WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: How Revisionist History Works

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, and welcome to this weekend's edition of S

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Y s K Selects. Uh. This is Chuck here. I

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:12.159
<v Speaker 1>picked out Revisionist History. Uh, basically because it was just

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a pretty darn good episode from my recollection. Um, but

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of course you didn't go back and listen to it,

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>because why would I do that to myself? But I'd

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>love for you to welcome to stuff you should know

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>from house Stuff Works dot com. Hey, and welcome to

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, and there's Charles W. Chuck

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Bryant with his uh Nazi soda? What your orange Phantom?

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>That's not exactly true. No, okay, well let's talk about

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this because it's a pretty good podcast. Their episode to

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>discuss this. If you asked me, oh yeah, revisionist history,

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Yeah. We're talking revisionist history, and for the

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>time being, we're talking about the origin of orange phanto

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>because there is a him were out there, Yeah that

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>orange Fanta is a Nazi soda, that it was created

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>by the Nazis. Yeah, that isn't quite true. Uh, like

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>there were Nazi products like Hugo Boss, that's Wwagen, Siemens, IBM, Mercedes.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this one to No Mercedes wasn't well Volkswagen, definitely.

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>The beatle was created to look like the SS helmet

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand. Yeah, but Fanta Orange was created

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>by a coke employee in Nazi Germany, Coca Cola Germany UM,

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>which was supposedly well then that was the name of it,

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was supposedly cut off from its parent company

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>during the war. Yeah, so they didn't have the supplies

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>they needed to make h coke. So this guy was

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of mixed together a potion and created Fanta Orange. Um.

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>He went out back and dug up a bunch of

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>roots and squeezed the red headed kid. But it wasn't

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>like he wasn't a member of the Nazi party, and

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't created four Nazis, but it was enjoyed by Nazis. Okay.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's where I think you can reasonably call it

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>a Nazi drink. It was. It was born out of

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the the Nazi regime in Germany as a result of

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>directly because Coca Cola drives because of the embargo on

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>the Nazi regime. Get Hitler love coke too, by the way,

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>did he? Yeah? Um, but I wouldn't put it in

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the category of like Nazi products like Volkswagen and Hugo

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Boston and so Coca Cola the way it has has

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it spelled out, and I mean it depends like this

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>story is about as good as Coca Cola can come

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>off looking while still admitting that Fanta is a Coke

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>product that was created in Nazi Germany. But basically their

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>their spiel is that, you know, Coke was cut off.

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Their spiegel was that UM Coke was cut off. Coke

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Germany was cut off from the parent company because Coke

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't doing business, and then UM, as a result of

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the war ending Coke was like, wow, this did really well,

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>come back into the folds, and we'll just keep selling

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Fanta and and way to go for you know, keeping

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the company alive in the face of these Nazi war pigs.

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>UM that's apparently like the company line. I don't know,

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it could be revisionist history. There are some American companies

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that definitely did business illegally in Germany, most prominent among

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>them as IBM, who literally created not only the machines

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>but also the programs to tally the people in concentration camps.

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>That is not revisionist history. No, that's absolutely true. But

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't I didn't even know when I brought

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>this drink in here that would be such a great

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>setup of the show. I just enjoyed men Orange. It

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>turned out pretty well. Yeah, so chucky. There's this really

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>great article that Conger wrote called how Revisionist History Works.

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Email today tell her how good it was. I mean,

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it is good, and she ignored me. It's the top

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>notch article. And she starts out with a pretty great

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>intro that I don't feel can be much improved on

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>because it demonstrates this whole thing pretty well. Conger talks

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>about George Washington, how as a little boy, Uh, he

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>was maybe a little aggressive, and he got ahold of

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>an axe and uh his father's ax, I believe, and

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>he gave a cherry tree forty wax. Then when he

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>saw what he had done, he gave it another forty

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>one and ended up chopping down the cherry tree. I

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:33.239
<v Speaker 1>may have mixed legends here. Uh. And when his father

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>came out and saw that he had just chopped down

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>a cherry tree, a perfectly good money producing cherry tree,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>because those things were like gold back then, he said Georgie,

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>what did you do? Did you cut this down? And

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>George Washington looked at the axe, looked at the tree,

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>looked at his father, looked at his feet, thought about

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe a sandwich later, gonna be present one day? Shut up? Yeah,

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And he said, I so I should probably be like

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>every other president and not tell a lie. Instead tell

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the truth, because that's what our presidents do. And he said, father,

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I cannot tell a lie. I did chop down this

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>cherry tree. What are you gonna do about it? I

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>never understood the point of that story. Was it that

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>he was honest, honest, forthright, upstanding, was willing to accept

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the heat for what he'd done. He was accountable. There's

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff wrapped up in just that one

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>little fable good with an X, exactly handy. His dad

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>had cherry tree, so he, you know, came from a

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>wealthy background. But the problem is is all of it's

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>made up. And we've talked about this before. I don't

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>remember what what I think it was, maybe the how

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>much money is there in the world. We talked about

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>how Washington's biographer made up a bunch of stuff. Um

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>remember in throwing a silver dollar all the way across

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the Potomac. And when I'm saying, like, the problem is

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>there weren't silver dollars back when Washington was younger, and

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the Potomac, that's impossible. Yeah, right, exactly. But

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the point in is Mason Weems, h Mason Lockweens, who

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>was Washington's early biographer, just made up a bunch of stuff.

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>And what is kind of a black eye or egg

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>on the face of historians for a century or so

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.799
<v Speaker 1>that followed. They just kind of bought these things hooklient

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and sinker and it actually, the cherry tree story was

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:24.799
<v Speaker 1>in our textbooks, this total fable, completely made up fable,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>was told the school children as the truth. I bet

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it still is in some classrooms and maybe in the ozarks,

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, but typically outside it has been revised because

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they found out, i think a two thousand and eight that, um,

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>there were no cherry trees on Washington's family childhood home,

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>so cut him all down right exactly, But there was

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>not even evidence of cut down cherry trees. So they

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 1>had to go back and say, hey, we need to

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>take this out of the textbooks. They did, and nobody

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>really was bothered by it. It's pretty minor, it is.

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not like saying Christopher Columbus discovered America and

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>proved the world wasn't round and didn't commit match genocide

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and tortured and rape people, right that, Yeah, that he

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and his men didn't sharpen their knives on the skulls

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of live Indians they encounter. Yeah, it's amazing to me

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's we still have Columbus Day. Did you you

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>know the deal? Now? No one mentioned it. Well, I

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>think people are starting to pull their heads from their butts. Yeah,

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this year marked the the true beginning

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of the end for Columbus Day. I do not think

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be around much longer. Shouldn't be. It's just

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>two history is that man is too complicated, and he

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>did too many horrific things, even culturally relativistically. Yeah, he

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>did horrible things, and I feel like he's not going

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to be honored too too far from now. Yeah, my

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>friend Jerry in Portland as a school teacher, and uh,

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a thing going around Facebook about Columbus and I

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>shared it, of course, and Jerry said, you know, I've

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the past three years, I've been able to teach this version.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So there's at least like a hundred and eighty kids

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in Portland that are now like scarred for life with

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the truth. And I was like, man, that's great. It's

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>about how sad is that you even have to say

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>this version instead of real history, right you know? Right? Well,

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's part of the problem. Is history as

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>they figured out and maybe the I think late nineteenth

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>ordly twentieth century, it's objective or subjective. It's not objective,

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and people thought that it was and that it just

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of history happened, you talked about it, and that

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>was that like you there were it was just history.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't continuous and like when something happened, it happened,

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and then once it was written down, that's how it was.

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It was. It's a subjective, ever evolving thing. And we

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>figured it out, and we'll talk about when we figured

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.719
<v Speaker 1>it out. But first, um, I mean we're what we're

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about overall, this idea that history is meant to

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>be modified as new facts come to light, as attitudes change. Um.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>It is called revisionism. And it's not necessarily a dirty word. Yeah,

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into that. It definitely has a negative connotation

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>when you say, well, that's revisionist history exactly. Uh. And

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that's one lens to to look at revisionist history through. Yeah,

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the three um major parts of revisionist history.

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, this is the three ways you can

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>look at revisionist history. Yeah. One is a theoretical perspective.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Basically we'll say, looking at it through the lens of

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>African Americans instead of old white men or women or

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, any other like minority. That's one example. That's

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>like you know when people say like get on the

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>right side of history. Yeah, that's basically somebody being aware

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that there is a cultural social lens of revisionism. Sure

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know what's going on is going to change

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the attitude towards something that's going to change, and you're

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna look like a pretty horrible person when there's a

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>picture of you fifty years from now holding a sign

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that's Columbus right right exactly. Uh. The other is one

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of the others is fact checking. Um, that's basically just

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to get it right lens. Yeah, like new facts come

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to life, you change the history books. And finally, the

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>negative perspective um that uh sees revisionism as an effort

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to falsify or skew things for you know, usually political motives.

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, let's talk about one of those. Congord gives

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>another good example of like all three of these wrapped

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>up in one guy. One Thomas Jefferson. Yeah. So factually,

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Jefferson was the third President of the United States.

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>He wrote the Constitution, wrote the Declaration of Independence, like

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 1>from word a disease. Yes, yes, you're right, might have

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>had some help. I don't know, I think other people

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>history exactly, but I mean, yes, he he was a

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>founding father. There's a lot of stuff that we know

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for a fact Jefferson did right, But there's also other stuff. Um,

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in particular that he had a slave with who who

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>was also his mistress. In her name was Sally Hemmings,

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and he had children with her. And for many, many

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>years this was viewed by negative revisionists as just a

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>dirty rumor, yeah, which is incredibly insulting, it is to say,

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>because they were in love. Ye, well yeah, Nick Nolty,

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it wasn't like, oh he just you know,

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>had his way with his slaves, like he was in

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>love with Sally Hemmings and it's very insulting to say

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that that's a blight on America that our president with

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 1>stoop so low, is to be in love with a

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>black woman, you know. Exactly. So the people who looked

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>at this through the negative view of revisionism, that it

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>was meant to sully we're on the wrong side of

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>history agreed. So in the late nineteen nineties, I think

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:43.599
<v Speaker 1>maybe nine seven, I don't remember. Um, incontrovertible d n

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>E DNA evidence showed that Sally Hemmings and Thomas Jefferson

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>had children together. They did it more than one, yes,

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>which does imply that they did it. They did it

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a bunch um yeah, because the first time, I mean,

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>come on. Uh. So with that, we have these three

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>different lenses coming to play. You have the social theoretical lens,

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>which is okay, well, now we can go back and

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>look at history and say, um, maybe Jefferson wasn't the

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>only one to have a slave mistress, right, Maybe there

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of this stuff going on, and maybe

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>black folks and white folks were co mingling more than

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we thought, right exactly. Maybe at some point along that's

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the way we um we meaning like the midnight mid

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty century people of America put our own racist hang

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>ups on the people before and before during this era,

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and we changed history unwittingly, it changed it back with

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this fact that came to life. Then there was the

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>fact version yeah, which is like, maybe this is something

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we should put in textbooks, right, you know, or more

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to the point, now we can't not put this in

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>textbooks or the very least biographies, but textbooks do come on. Um.

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a third one, the negative revisionism, which

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of was um dispelled when this incontrovertible DNA evidence

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>came to light. Yeah, because up to that point you

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>could be like no, no, no, and then once the

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>DNA came out, it was like yes, yes, yes. Yeah.

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>So historians they have connor comparison to journalists, which is

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I think pretty spot on. There's a responsibility there to

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>get it right and to not use your own skewed perspective,

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, take the Civil War. If you still today,

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>if you go out in the sticks of Georgia and

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>ask someone about the Civil War, they're probably gonna have

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>some opinion. Yeah that may not be quite right. I

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>don't think. I don't know if people at North even

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>care about that stuff anymore. I think the South has

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>all the hang ups, sure, because we lost. They were

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the ones, Yeah, the losers and the ones who wanted

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to succeed. Yeah, up North, it's just like what happened.

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>But it's amazing that like this, many years later, there's

0:13:56.280 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>still that skewed political perspective because of your personal beliefs

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in history, maybe family history, you know. Uh So let's

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about modern revisionism, which pretty much started after World

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>War One, when the onus was put on historians to

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>suss it out and say, like, all right, world War

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>One happened, So that happened. Uh, we now have an

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>obligation to record this and teach the world about it.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>But there were a lot of different opinions about it, right,

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>which makes it tough. And the term revisionist history was

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>actually coined a couple of decades before World War One

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>by Marxists who were grappling with um whether or not

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the revolution was inevitable and how to put that down

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in the history books, and revisionism was coined around this

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>this time by those people, but it really didn't come

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>into play worldwide until after World War One, and at

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>this time scholars started to realize that this is when

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>people figured out history is objective, Like seriously, up to

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this point subjective you mean, yes, thank you. I don't

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>know why I can't get this straight today. But up

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to this point, historians, mainstream historians overall typically believed that, like,

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>history was objective. Yeah. And now something like World War

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>One happened with all the world involved, everyone at a

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>stake in it. Because what is history besides um, looking

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>good you know, no one wants to look bad in

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the history books or making someone look bad on purpose. Um,

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and historians started to realize, like, whoa, whoa, whoa, Like

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of up to us what goes in the

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>history books. And this is such a complicated, complex event

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that maybe history isn't objective. Yeah. In thee A, the

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>speech was given at the American Historical Association by President

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Carl Becca, and he was kind of the first guy

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to really come out in public and say, you know what,

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a living, evolving thing. It is very much subjective,

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's uh subjective because it's humans memory basically the

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>story definitely fallible or their perspective as individuals. Uh. And

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>like I said, politics is usually one of the big

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>reasons how it gets skewed, but not just politics nationalism.

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Everybody wants their country to be the winner or look

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like the good guy or what have you. Um. But yeah,

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Becker was the first to say it's subjective and therefore

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it's subject to revision. And World War One was the

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that kicked it off. Like we said, the Treaty

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of Versailles really really strongly punished Germany, redrew its boundaries

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and basically said, Germany, you're responsible for World War One.

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.239
<v Speaker 1>You guys were the aggressor, and everybody else was reacting.

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And then as time wore on, um new documents were

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>at least that showed that, no, it wasn't just Germany.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of other factors involved, including among

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the Allies that contributed directly to the beginning of World

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>War One, and Germany was kind of punished unfairly, so

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in the League of Nations basically said hey, we need

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>some sort of guidelines for writing historical textbooks, and they

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 1>came up with that, and from that point on revisionism

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>was born. And then y one, Carl Becker said, yeah,

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>here in America, we agree history is subjective and it

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>can be revised. Yeah, and declassification of documents is a

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>big way that things can be revised, because you know,

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have it's not just someone's opinion. If

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have actual documentation and like peer reviewed stuff,

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>then you can't revise history, you know what I'm saying. Uh.

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>So that brings us to World War Two, when what

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>is called the age of historical consensus officially began. Um,

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and I get the idea that that was just when

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>people sort of historians a banded together a little bit

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>more than ever before. Yeah, get that feeling. They Yeah,

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of patriotism, nationalism, and basically everybody said,

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>if there's anything that happened in World War Two, is

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that the US emerged victorious and saved the world. Jingoism perhaps, Yeah,

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>very much. So this is among historians. And you know,

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>if all historians basically are on the same page that

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>America is awesome and kicks ass, then that's what the

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>history books are going to reflect. Yeah, and that held

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong until the nineteen sixties, which, as anyone who

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>knows anything about American history knows, it was a pretty

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>tumultuous time. Uh. Quite a few things to Vietnam War,

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>civil rights movement, feminist movement, globalization, the Cold War, they

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>all combine to basically quell that nationalism a little bit. Maybe, yeah,

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I mean all of the the u s

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>went from this sunny, happy, suburban, white picket fence Nazi

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>butt kicking country to one that was coming apart at

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the seems internally. And the historians of the time of

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the sixties said, like, wait a minute, if history is

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>this ever evolving, UM dialogue, that's table will be revised,

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>how are we going to document this? And what they

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>figured out, very wisely, was well, we need to tell

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody's story four lenses. Yeah, well, at least I think

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:27.959
<v Speaker 1>six maybe emerged from the sixties that basically history became

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>more inclusive. It wasn't just about the leaders anymore. It

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just about how great America was. It was the

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>whole picture. That's what historians strove to to get to

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>write the four major lenses from the sixties on or political, economic, racial,

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 1>and sexual. That's four, it's not six. You should make

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>two more up. We could probably come up with a

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>couple that aren't like fully covered here. On political lends,

0:19:55.000 --> 0:20:00.120
<v Speaker 1>though UM obviously has to do with foreign policy. Nationalism. Um,

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen sixties, I believe you already mentioned the

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Marxist revisionism outlined more of a struggle between the classes,

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe he took an approach that wasn't like, gave

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the lower classes a little bit more there do, Right,

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just like, um, just because somebody was a

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>prominent leader doesn't mean they were a great person necessarily. Uh.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, that was a huge radical change, especially compared

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to that age of consensus among historians. The economic lens

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Charles A. Bird, a historian, had a pretty radical idea that, hey,

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the Founding fathers were writing the Constitution this sort of

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>look out for wealthy white dudes. And I think he's

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>probably right. Yeah, there was a he wrote that in

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>I think nineteen thirteen, and it took until the TUMULTI

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of the sixties before anybody ever really like kind of

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>championed itmult. I think that's right. Really, if I am

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a descriptivist at the at the moment, not just tumult Yeah,

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but doesn't TUMULTI run roll off the tongue a little more, well,

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>tumulty would be the adjective like that was a very

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>TUMULTI no, that'd be tumultuous. I know, that's one point.

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, Beard's idea was that the framers of the

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Constitution said, hey, let's protect ourselves, and the landowners who

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>owed money to the framers basically led a revolution in

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundred that was led by the election of Thomas Jefferson.

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's where we are we live in today. But

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>we may have had much more of an elite society,

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>or basically we have an elite society now, we just

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>would have had had one for longer. So the racial lends, obviously,

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>uh strove to cast a light on minorities a little

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>more that were largely ignored thanks to the civil rights

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>movement um against some momentum. I remember being in school

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and not learning about Malcolm X or Hue P. Newton. Who. Yeah,

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't taught those things classes in high school. I

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 1>had to read about them on my own afterwards. College

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.959
<v Speaker 1>does a much much better job, for sure, But even

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and this was, I mean, this is a

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>while ago for me. This was in the eighties. Do

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you remember, but like you think, it's gotten a little better.

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember when you learned hopefully at least in

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>high school. Um about the Native Americans supplied of Native

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Americans in the US. I don't remember, man. I remember

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.479
<v Speaker 1>ninth grade finally taking a history class where they like

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>spoke frankly about it, like you're like your friend in Portland,

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and I don't remember my mind just being blown because

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, wait a minute, what about everything

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I learned the last eight years, Like all that's just

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 1>total bs, like completely is contradicted by what you're saying.

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Not only was this stuff like left out, I learned

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the opposite, you know that they basically just went away

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on their own because the white man came and they

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>were like, oh, this place is yours. And I remember

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>were being in ninth grade just learning this like wow,

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that was a big eye opener for me. I think

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 1>that's probably why I got into history, because I was like,

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty interesting stuff, Like there's more out there,

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 1>sure I want to know, like, yeah, the whole the

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>whole thing under the Rachel lens. Also, now you could

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>learn about dudes like the Tuskegee Airmen or Japanese in

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>tournament camps, which I never heard of until we did

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that episode on me. Until three years ago. But um

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that raises another good point, Chuck Uh. With the Japanese

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in tournament camps. It wasn't in the history books before,

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and then it comes out maybe in the nineties. I think,

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>um or it's put into the history books in the nineties,

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of reflects why people struggle against revisionism,

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>or some people do, because history is ultimately zero sum,

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>right if you put that in the history book, the

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Japanese plight, American Japanese Americans who were putting new in

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>terms at camps, their plight is honored just through recognition,

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>like this happened to you people, and now everybody knows

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>about it. But at the same time, the US government

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.479
<v Speaker 1>looks bad. Yeah, and reparations are like all of a

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>sudden on the table and they don't want that. So

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible to shine a light on something and it

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>not have Almost always, I can't think of one instance

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a also a negative impact on something else, because what

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is history again, if it's not somebody's screwing somebody else over?

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Is that all it is? I mean, at least world history,

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>political history. Uh. And the final lens, of course, is

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 1>the sexual lens, which shone a light on women and said, hey,

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>history is not just about old white men. Yeah, there

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of ladies like Elizabeth Katie Stanton and

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.959
<v Speaker 1>so journal truth. And I think the only, like, the

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>only black woman I ever remember reading about, of course,

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>was Harriet Tubman. It's like one person, are you really

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the only that's the only African American female in

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>history that made any difference was Harriet Tubman, Right, And

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 1>think about it, Like the most recent one that's mentioned

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 1>here is Elizabeth Katie Stanton. So apparently we ran out

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of producing great women in the early twentieth century. Where

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is the rest of them? So apparently we're still struggling

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>with that sexual lens of revisionist history. I think I

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>think women are definitely still fighting that fight. Included a

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>cool thing the other day on I think it went

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of viral where this woman had her daughter, Um,

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like little girls play dress up and stuff

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>little boys to too. But um, instead of dressing the

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>daughter up like you know, I'm a Disney princess, um,

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>she dressed her up like famous women in history and

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>took pictures and just had a blast. And uh, it's

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>really neats, like a little photo series of this girl

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>dressed up as all these like great women in history,

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it's very cool, very cool thing to do.

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I saw that. Yeah, it was just

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago. So you probably did good

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>for her, is what I say. Yeah, good for her. Um,

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>I guess now maybe it's a good time to do

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a message break. Yeah, and after we're going to get

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>into correcting the facts, which is my favorite part, so Chuckers, Yeah, um,

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about revisionism as a means of correcting the facts. Yeah,

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>like the game of telephone, the old adage, and that's

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>basically what history was. You start with a story and

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>it gets passed down orally or maybe even it was

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>written down, and it's just like a game of telephone,

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>things get mixed up and in the end you end

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.719
<v Speaker 1>up with what is probably not the way it really happened, right,

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Purple Monkey Dishwasher like like Pocahonas is her example about

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>she had this. It was a great love story between

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Captain John Smith and Pocahonas and Jamestown and Disney made

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a movie about it. It It seems like I'm picking up

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Disney a lot, and it's well, it's the same thing

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>like that. Disney took this, this idea and ran with

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it and created like a new well not a new character,

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but he created a character who fell in love with

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>John Smith and they had a wacky courtship and overcame

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>all the odds and Jamestown was saying, I think he

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>falls down at some point maybe and there's maybe a

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>talking animal. Yeah. There was one problem with this though,

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is Pocahonas was eleven years old and James Smith was

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>not a um perst. Well, pederste is exclusively with boys,

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is it. I don't think I knew that. Yeah, so

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess you'd be a pedophile. Yeah, let's let's just

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>generally say a pedophile. Uh yeah. And even though things,

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, people courted younger back then, eleven was not

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>his game. So it's not true. Pocahona Is actually um

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>married a widower named John Rolfe. She died when she's

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>about twenty one. She did help, she did introduce the

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the colonists to her tribe. The thing is and and

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>like do she did play a role in saving Jamestown. Um,

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, she didn't fall in love with Captain John Smith. No.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And thanks to modern times, we have things like anthropology

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and forensic science and archaeology, and uh, people coming out

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>like the deep throat Mark felt finally revealing I was

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>deep throat. I don't think he revealed himself though, did he? No,

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he was uncovered. I believe documents becoming declassified, like as

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>time marches on and we get a little bit more modern,

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we we get the facts more correct again with declassified information. Um,

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know something is a secret, it can't be part

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of history. But then once it's declassified, these things definitely

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>have an effect on history and impact on history. CIA

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>did give LSD too, unwaiting Americans. Um, the Star Wars

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>program did very much help usher in the end of

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War. All these come from declassified documents that

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>show yeah, this, this actually happened this way go back

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and they really had an alien autop season area, right,

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that's all on TV. Did you hear them Molder and

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Scully or down for making another movie? They don't know

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>if it will happen, but I mean, if they're both game,

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>why not, especially her? And we're about do for the

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>nineties to come back in vogue. So you just look

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a good bit things not working or does it have

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a clock on there. No, it just shows I don't

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>have four thousand steps yet today, but you just happed it,

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>so it thinks you're walking. I'm just shaking my much

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>tv uh, because there's nothing like cheating yourself out of it,

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>just out of health. UM. So, like we said, updating

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>biographies and more importantly, uh for me, textbooks is a

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>big part of this. UM. But it's not so easy.

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not like, hey, let's just throw in a new

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>chapter on Jefferson. Um. You have to actually go through

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>quite a process. Scholars and researchers. Uh. You know, the

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>first they developed these theories and thesis, they published them,

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they're reviewed by academics and teachers. Uh, textbook authors meet

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>at conferences and see the new recommendations. It's kind of

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a long involved process too to make a substantial change

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in a textbook. Uh. And there's an actual Institute for

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>International Textbook Research that analyzes all this stuff and make

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>sure that textbooks are diversified. And uh, don't just tell

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the history of you know, wealthy white dudes, right exactly.

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>This is ideal, This is the ideal process. Yeah. There's

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>another really big factor in this that we've talked about before,

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>where the biggest states are the states with the most

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>students and therefore by the most textbooks are the ones

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>who ultimately get to write the textbooks, which is why

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Texas has such an outsize influence on what the rest

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the country learns, because they write the textbooks and

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the publishers aren't going to make different textbooks for each state.

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna make them for the biggest state and then

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>go sell them to the rest of the state. So

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>there are flaws in this process. And including that, there's

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>also you know, it's it doesn't keep up in real

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>time very well. Now you can't just economically, you can't

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>publish a new textbook every year. I think they try

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to have about a tenure life on a textbook, but

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't they just email history teachers and be like, hey,

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>on page forty two, it says that Jefferson did not

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>have kids with Sally Hemmings. Don't teach that part. Teach

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. Yeah, And I wonder. I'm sure it varies

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>from county to county. I wonder how much freedom teachers

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>have to develop their own curriculum and other standards. But

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how they can do their own I wonder

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the impression there isn't teaching any longer, like oh, this

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is a moot point when we're talking about textbooks. That's

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>not true. Uh sorry, sorry, teachers, I just realized something

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of you. Have you listen to this, No, and you

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>weren't saying that in spiteful way. You're saying that like

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's sad that. Yes, exactly, teaching is, you know, stuff

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to get teachers these days, thank you, just like a

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>public service, you know what teaching these days? Yeah? Yeah,

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think it always has been you think, Yeah,

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that the constraints put on teachers has really

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>tied their hands to the point where they aren't able

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to teach like they should or like they want to. Yeah,

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think it remains a public service. I just

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.479
<v Speaker 1>think our education systems that need is some real reform.

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Well it is. And it's sad that I think a

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of teachers these days to treat it like a

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>public service. And and it's not bad, but I'm saying

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes teachers these days will be like, yeah, I'm gonna

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>go teach for four or five years because people are

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in need of teachers. Not necessarily I want to be

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a teacher for my entire career, and what they're finding

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>out is this generation is going to be short on

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>teachers because people are teaching for a shorter amount of time,

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what. I'm interested in this, and we to

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>do an episode on that. But in the meantime, we're

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna do a pre listener mail call out and ask

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>for any teachers out there who are in there on

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the front lines, email us and tell us what can

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>be done to solve the problems with the public school system,

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's easy, complex, whatever. I'm very curious and totally

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:25.719
<v Speaker 1>down to help anyway we can, you know, Um, alright,

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>so where were we textbooks? Sometimes you will publish um.

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they'll publish supplemental material that's like not every ten years,

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>just to get things right. Um. Yeah, because ten years

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>is a long time to go between discovering acceptance of

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a new historical fact and teaching it to to kids.

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>That's too long. But people got up in arms. The

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>American Historical Association UM submitted as it's or updated it's

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>national history standards in textbooks, and they got negative feedback

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>because they were like, well, where's Daniel Boone and who's

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this Harriet Tubman, why's she getting so much attention a

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>black woman, unbelievable. Yeah. So even when they get it right,

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>they still get go It's a it's a really good point.

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a good segue to the negativism. Um, even when

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it's true, it's still going to encounter resistance. Part of

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it is that people hang on to their national pride,

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 1>their national story, stuff they learned as a kid. People

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>are fearful of new things change. Um, but what does

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that mean about me? You know exactly? Like I dressed

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.720
<v Speaker 1>like Daniel Boone and go out in public. So what

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>what happens if everybody doesn't know who Daniel Boone is

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and I just look like a weirdo. Um. But another

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>part of it is because of the bad name that

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>revisionism has has been given by hacks and crackpots over

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the years. Yeah, that's true. Yeah. I remember in two

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand three, President Bush used the turn revisionist history historians

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about the media their coverage of the war in Iraq,

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>basically saying that, you know, some reporters are questioning the

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>reasons that we invaded Iraq and had sway over the

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 1>public's opinion about this, and a lot of historians for

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the media to have, and a lot of historians weren't

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>too keen on that. You're like, hey, you shouldn't really

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>say that, because that's kind of knocking studying history, the

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>academic field of history, or the fact that history is

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>able to be revised. He was, he was making it

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>a negative thing. Same with um Florida. Apparently in two

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six they outlawed the teaching of any postmodernist

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:41.439
<v Speaker 1>or revisionist history and kids were only allowed to learn

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the facts, which is number one impossible yea, and number

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:52.720
<v Speaker 1>two um it says implicitly that revisionist history is not facts.

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And what's the opposite of facts? Will lies? Man, that's

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>sad it is because it's basically saying we were used

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>to progress. Yeah, I will not progress, not only in

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>bad stuff, but in good stuff too. Yeah. No, we

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>are quite happy with that whole post war agent consensus thing.

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna stay right there. So the rest of the country,

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:18.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world, you go progress without us. Well,

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>that's that's crazy. You just can't do that. You can't

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>dig in your heels in in thwart history. It just

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>won't happen. Yeah, you look like you're on the wrong

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.359
<v Speaker 1>side of history. That's gonna be one of our new

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>t shirts with you like pointing. Uh. One reason though,

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>revisionist history has negative connotations because people wrongly tie it

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to things like Holocaust deniers. That is not revisionist history.

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>That is called negationism, and it's not the same thing.

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you know someone who says the Holocaust didn't happen,

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not revising history. There crackpots. Yeah, and probably a

0:36:57.040 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>troll too, yeah. Um yeah, So you can just kind

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of remove the whole Holocaust and now from revisionist history.

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>The poem is in the public image. Those two things

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>go very much hand in hand, same with conspiracy theories.

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>But Conger kind of gives this little thumbnail handy dandy

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 1>guide to separating the wheat from the chaff as far

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as revisionist history goes. So if you're encountering something like

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 1>a moon landing conspiracy or Kennedy assassination and conspiracy, you

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 1>have to ask yourself. Number one, is this a professional

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>historian or an amateur historian on the blog? Yeah, that's

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 1>a good one. Is this historian um out for the

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 1>truth or fame and money? So is it just sensationalized um?

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:45.919
<v Speaker 1>And we ran into something like we almost did the

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 1>article about did the Chinese beat Columbus. That's a good

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>example of somebody who is a historian. I don't I

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think his name is Gavin Menzies. There's just a theory. Yeah,

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's like all this really tiny crumbs of circumstance

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>util evidence here there that um, the Chinese did beat

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Columbus to the New World. The problem is, at this

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.720
<v Speaker 1>moment it is just a crackpot theory. He has almost

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing to back it up, as he looking just to

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>sell books. He sold a bunch of books. Well, that's

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty red pretty big red flag it is. It

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is interesting, and you can't say that somewhere down the

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>road that we won't find that the Chinese did visit

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the New World before Columbus. But as it stands like

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>that is so far outside of the mainstream. It's just

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a crack pot idea. At this point, you know that

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>some guy wove into a pretty interesting book. Yeah. And

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 1>she also points out, which is totally true, that we

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>tend to be more skeptical of revisionist history. That's we

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>have a feel like we have a stake in right

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or are very familiar with like, maybe I'm resistant to

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that because I was raised the idea that Columbus discovered

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the New World, Whereas if I it was from Ghana,

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd be like, yeah, maybe the Chinese did do it.

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Who cares exactly? You know, I couldn't said it better.

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, Basically, a very small number of revisionist histories

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>are factual or not factual but accepted as fact in

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the end. It's just tough to pull off, like Kevin

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Menzies is another good example of that. But here's the thing,

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>revisionist history, it has a um, unearned bad name, right

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an actual worried Well, we're not We're not saying

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a fringe idea that's been brought into the mainstream.

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a mainstream, um part of the study of history, right, Um,

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that some fringe dwellers have adopted like here or there.

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, like like, revisionist history is

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a real part of the discipline of history, and it's

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a good part of it in my opinion, because, like

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Congred points out, it levels the playing field. It's inclusive.

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Like when revisionist history became a thing, history became more

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.760
<v Speaker 1>inclusive of and it started to tell everybody's story. Yeah.

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to hear from historians. They're gonna be like,

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>oh dude, thank you yeah, or boy, did you guys

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>screw this up? Microvisionist history is nothing but crack pots,

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Like where did you get the idea of what? No?

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Um so you got anymore? I got nothing else? Thank

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you for let me stay all pepped up about this one.

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, how was a history major and like this

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>is like great stuff. I know. I usually just throw

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the wet blanket on you. Uh that is not true. Uh,

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 1>since we said wet blank get or chuck did that

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>triggers me to say, if you want to learn more

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about revisionist history, go to the website, type that in

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the handy search bar. And then, since I said handy

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>search bar, we've got kind of a Rube Goldberg thing

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>going here that triggers uh listener mail. That's right. I'm

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna call this, uh handwriting analysis from a handwriting analysts.

0:40:56.840 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 1>And this is my favorite thing is when I hear

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>from the actual people and they either say, hey, you

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:04.320
<v Speaker 1>did a good job or you didn't do such a

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>good job. I don't mind this. I was surprised to

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>hear we did so good about the Maori. That was great. Yeah. Boy,

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>those Kiwi's love a little light shine in their way.

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Hey, guys, just finished episode on handwriting

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysis as I arrived to work as a handwriting analysts,

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>or as we call ourselves, forensic document examiners. When I

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>got into my car at home and saw the title

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of the episode, I had already begun a mental checklist

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>about the misconceptions you might pass on about the field.

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Um oh, that's negative. I have to deal with them

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>all the time. However, I'm delighted to say you guys

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely nailed it. Exclamation point. I don't have a single

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 1>criticism or correction in this case. Each lab has its

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 1>own specialty, but at the Homeland Security Investigations Forensic Laboratory

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>where I work, we specialize in travel and identity documents.

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Most of my work is determining if certain passport screen cards,

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>driver's licenses, and visas our counterfeit or altered. What I'm

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>trained to do handwriting examinations as well. I spent months

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of my training and handwriting and it is not for everyone.

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Let me say it is a difficult task. It takes

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of natural ability to accomplish. The first thing

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we did in training was to take a form blindness

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>test to make sure we had that natural ability before

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I started the job I have now though. I actually

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 1>worked for the Secret Service on the Phish database that

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned. Uh. Fish is a lot like a f

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I S for handwriting. The Secret Service processed a lot

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>of anonymous threat letters and I would put them into

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>the database to see if I could come up with

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>any matches. You could probably imagine how fun it was

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to find a hit. Uh. There were a few times

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 1>this happened for me during the year I worked there,

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and Uh, it always amazed me how well the system worked. Right.

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>And that is from Jordan's the handwriting animals. That's pretty awesome.

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I like hearing from the actual people too. It's great,

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Jordan, Yeah, thanks a lot. Jordan's. Um, Well, let's see,

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we already asked for it, but I think compars asking

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for again. If you are a teacher and you have

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 1>some ideas about how to fix the cracks and flaws

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of the public education system or education system in general,

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 1>we want to hear about it. You can tweet to

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 1>us at s Y s K podcast. You can join

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>us on Facebook dot com slash Stuff you Should Know.

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>You can send us an email to Stuff Podcasts at

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Discovery dot com, and you can join us at our

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 1>home on the web stuff you Should Know dot com.

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:34.280
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and thousands of other topics, visit

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:42.439
<v Speaker 1>how stuff Works dot com.