WEBVTT - 03/11/21 DPS Hour 1 Chris Mannix

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio. It's a Thursday, Our one Dan and The

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Dan et Stan Patrick Show. Could we limit the number

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of three point attempts in an NBA game? Too much

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>of a good thing? Chris Mannox will join us on

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>loan from Sports Illustrated coming up. I'm looking at the numbers.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>The NBA is on pace to make twenty seven thousand,

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred thirty one three pointers this season. That would

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>be just two hundred and twenty four shy of the record,

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>which was set in twenty eighteen. Keep in mind, we're

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna have ten games less for each team this season.

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Team's averaging almost thirteen made three pointers per game. The

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>league is on pace to break that record for a

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>ninth consecutive season, also averaging thirty five attempts from three

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>point range per game. That'll be a record for the

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>tenth consecutive season. But I'll talk to Mannix about it.

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Saw an article on ESPN that said, may maybe you

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>limit the number three point attempts or made. Let's say

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>you have twenty that you can do each half, and

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>then after that at three point shot counts is two points.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I think if you brought a little bit more physicality

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to the NBA where you could hand check somebody that

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>might help out a little bit. Right now, it's basically

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>free flowing where you can just stand on the perimeter

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and everybody can take a shot. Ball movement pretty good

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>on the perimeter. Kids love it as well. I mean

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you're able to imitate your best player, your favorite player.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, imagine that you get on the court, you

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>want to be Steph Curry. How often do you get

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to do that? But I don't know if people are

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>bothered by it. Maybe it's just a purist that there's

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>too much of a good thing here. This is what

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>basketball is. It's about dunking, it's about layups, and it's

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>about three point attempts. Okay, So we're going to take

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>away something that the players have improved upon, because for

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a while, there are a lot of players who weren't

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>great shooters. They made themselves great shooters. I think what

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the NBA may look at is, are we creating great

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>basketball players? Are they one dimensional? Just stand on the

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 1>perimeter and you can stay in the league for next

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>or five years because you can shoot. Or we've seen

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>marquee players like Jason Kidd or Vince Carter, they become

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>three point specialist. I'm okay with it. I don't want

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to be I don't want to add gimmicks. Hey, how

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>many three pointers have we attempted? Nineteen? So you get

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>one more this half or in the final six minutes

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been proposed. Now this is just you know, I

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>think power brokers behind the scenes talking about this in

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the final six minutes. Then the limitations are off. You

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>can shoot as many threes as you want to. I

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>don't need gimmicks. This is basketball. You said this is

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>what you need to do, and players have improved their games.

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>Now I go, oh, wait a minute, you guys got

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>too good? Got too good here? Yeah, Paul, you sound

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>like a guy who doesn't need a gimmick, but you'd

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of like something to cool off the threes. I

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>would like. Okay, First of all, you watch games now

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>where nobody's called for palming, like you can get your shot,

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>there's no traveling, and I can't put my hand on you.

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>These guys are so elite in what they do and

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't slow them down. This is when you go

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>back and you watch a game that Jordan played in,

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>or Bird or magic. I can physic, I can be

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>physical with you. I could put my hand on you now,

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it was still entertaining. I just I don't know how

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it's so hard to play defense now because I can't

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>put my hand on you at all, and there's no

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>nobody calls carry anymore. John Stockton and Allen Iverson used

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to have a little bit more of a handle and

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden, Why I was watching a

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>game last night college, I'm going nobody's calling this North

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Carolina notre name. And you could see how it's such

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>an advantage. I can take that ball and I I mean,

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I can have you off balance in a second, and

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't put your hand on anybody. There's the physicality

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of just being able to man up is gone from

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the NBA. But you know, maybe it is too much

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of a good thing. But I don't think we're going

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to be doing anything anytime soon. I don't want a

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.679
<v Speaker 1>gimmick in there where we're counting the number of threes. Yes, McLevin. Also,

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the fouls on James Harden and Dan check are they're unwatchable,

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Like why do they call those little things where Pardon

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just throws his body into you. Yeah, And Trey Young

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>has mastered this where he's running down the floor and

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>then he's shooting back up into you. And Steve Kerr said,

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can't do that. You can't allow that.

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Reggie Miller, I think invented that, by the way, Yeah, McLeman.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>But the NSAY tournament is going to be decided by

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>one play and one play only landing in the three

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>point That was the only thing that That's why UVA

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 1>won a title. They won like four games off that

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>one call. Yeah, I hate that rule. Yeah. Did they

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>do that when you were a jumpshooter back in the day,

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you did get a space, did you? No, they would

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>put their foot underneath you that they wanted you When

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you would go up, they put their foot underneath so

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you were thinking about coming down and avoiding their foot.

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Believe it or not. But I'll talk to Mannix about this.

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's anything that can be done

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>should be done, but you know, you're seeing the proliferation

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of the three point shot college in high school, even

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>grade school as well. Eight seven seven three DP show

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>email address DP at dan Patrick dot com, Twitter handle

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a dp show I did to find this story amusing

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>this morning because it feels like the Boston Celtics are

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in on every possible free agent, all the big names.

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Danny Ainge, Oh, we just missed out on Chris Paul,

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Love, Jimmy Butler, Kwi Letter and Anthony Davis, Paul George.

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Then a story comes out that they just missed on

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>James Harden. Here it feels like Danny Ainge wants everybody

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>know that Danny Ainge is doing his job as a GM,

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that we're trying. We almost got him, Like they almost

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>get these great players, you know who they've gotten exactly

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>none of these players. Hey, we got Kemba Walker, Okay,

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Chris Paul, Kevin Love, Jimmy Butler, KWHI, Leonard,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis, Poulter. We oh, we almost got him. Hey,

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>were you guys sitting on the James Harden sweet Yeah,

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>we almost got him, almost got him. Yeah, we almost

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>got Will Chamberlain. Now got we almost got cream Allen. Wait, Danny,

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you weren't there, then you almost got Tim Duncan. Oh,

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>don't bring that if you want the lottery that still

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>bothers people. I'm fired up today. This program brought to

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you by Mercedes Benz Vans. They go far beyond from

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>their customization options, cutting edge tech, five star sales service,

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>financial support crew. Mercedes Benz Vans built equipped end engineer

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to get ready for anything. So go the extra mile

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>taking the all important first step into an authorized dealership today.

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And don't get me wrong, I love watching the three.

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's exciting. I think it's more exciting than

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the dunk. And the strategies that go into this I

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>think are really important. But I will say this, James

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Harden is getting credit for changing his game. James Harden

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is getting a lot of credit for an MVP candidate.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Why he changed his game and you know why because

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>he had to because if you look back on his

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>game in Houston, it didn't succeed. He needed to change. Now,

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is there a middle ground here? Because I'm looking at

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers. Lakers aren't a great shooting three pointing team,

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a great three point shooting team. They don't shoot volume.

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>The seventy six ers, I think at bottom of the

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>list there Utah Jazzer first and shooting threes. What is

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>sustainable because there is sustainability in the regular season, and

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't always translate into the postseason. Postseason comes down

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to half court basketball, in my opinion, always has always will.

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 1>We're playing the same opponent, there's no tricks. It's not, hey,

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we got to deal with this guy one night, now

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>we move on to another guy. It's every night we're

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be facing you, and here's our game plan.

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And then you see what teams are really all about,

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that philosophy, that game plan, does it work, and it's

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be the same this year. You taught jazz

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>they fire threes? Okay? Is it sustainable in May or June?

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what I want to know. The Nets? The Nets

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>have mid range jumpers. I got Joe Harris and James Harden,

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>but Kyrie kd mid range jumpers here? Is that sustainable?

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you have to play great, great defense this year? Right?

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>You got to play great defense always? I always think

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to. Maybe the Nets they break that mold

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this year. You don't have to play great defense. Just

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>play or at least give the impression you're playing some defense. Here.

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>All I gotta do is outscore you. It's rare, but

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what the philosophy is right now. But I just

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>saw the article and I started thinking about the three pointer.

0:09:55.240 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And I don't mind watching good three point shoo. It's

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>when you watch bad three point shooters that's when it

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>drives me crazy. Yes, McLevin. Is that why the Warriors

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>had to add Durant for like the slower pace of

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs like a mid range guy. Well, I mean

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the great scores of all time. Durant

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>can shoot three, can get to the hoop. I mean,

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he's he's a walking basket. But that three point style

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>worked for them for a while, just nothing but threes.

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But then they didn't really I don't know if that

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>could have won them four to three titles. Um yeah,

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean if Durant doesn't get hurt, I mean you

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>can go down, you know, look back on that hit

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the wayback machine. And because they all they did was

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>hoist threes and it worked for them to a large extent.

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>But I have two of the greatest shooters in NBA,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>three of the greatest shooters in NBA history. So it's

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>not like it's a plucky team like the Utah Jazz

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and you go look at them, they won the title.

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I got Steph Clay and Kevin Durant. Those are three

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest shooters in the history of the game.

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>And I could put Clay and Staff up there as

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>just shooters. Durant's one of the great scores in the

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>history of the game. That's a pretty good advantage against

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>any team there. Yeah, pulling. I don't know if this

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>has been asked, Someone's had to ask us, would you

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>rather have in their prime to start your super team Steph,

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Clay and Durant, Harden, Kyrie and Durant? Is that an

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>easy one? Our hard one? Assume everyone's in their prime.

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So the Golden State Warriors three years ago to three

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago, Durant, Steph Curry, Clay Thompson or the current

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>NETS three, and I assume everybody's healthy. Yeah, I just

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know about Kyrie that I just I'm not honor

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>off the court well just Kyrie. Yeah, I'm just not sure.

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 1>It feels like Clay and Staff, there's no drama whatsoever.

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>There was drama with Draymond and Durant because Draymond knew

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that KD was just stopping through to pick up a

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>title and then he was leaving, and I think Draymond

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>had a real problem with that. But when they were

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>on the same page that was beautiful as beautiful basketball

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to watch. So I would take those three because it

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>feels like I have two of the greatest deep shooters

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of all time and I have one of the top

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>five scorers of all time. Add that, you know, put

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that together. If one guy's off two guys, you know,

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>what are the odds that two guys would be off

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and one guy would be on. Or you had two

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>guys who were who were on and one guy was

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>off and you and you got a coach who was

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a shooter, Steve Kerr. That's all he did was shoot.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>But I would I would take that group Harden. We've

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>seen in the playoffs. It's not good. He doesn't come

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>up big in the playoffs. Yes, mc glove permission to

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>completely annoy you with a system. Take No, it's too

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>late now you open the door. Do you really want

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that to me, Paul, He says, I shouldn't

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>do it. Go ahead, our Stephen Clay, Stephen Clay if

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they didn't play in that Warrior system. And my proof

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>being Steph was not Steph with Bark Jackson as a coach.

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if you can judge them independently

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of each other in a way. Well, Steph had the

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>ankle injury first couple of years. True, all right, Clay

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>grew up right before our very eyes. Is a great shooter.

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>If I put Clay in today's NBA, Clay Thompson could

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>be even better if he was out of Golden State.

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>From the standpoint of he wouldn't share the bat he

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>would get. He would he would be averaging, you know,

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight points a game. But what if the Timberwolves

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>had listened to you and taken Steph instead of Johnny

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Flint or whatever it was. And it's a chance Steph

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>might not have developed the same way. That is fair.

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But do I think he would still be great and

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>All Star? Yes? I do. I mean a lot of

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>down through history, look at the players. You know, Let's

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>say Bill Russell didn't end up in Boston. If Bill

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Russell ended up with the Cincinnati Royals, Hey not Bill Russell?

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Or is he that's why when you saw him play?

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Like was he that? But he's known as a winner?

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>That he was not? He would he was had eight

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Famers in the lineup. If the Bears drafted

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady, like you have a perfect situation for greatness

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>down through history. I mean, look at it. Kurt Warner

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get the chance to play. When Trent Green goes down,

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he gets the chance to play. And then we saw

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that there was something. So what if Trent Green doesn't

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>get hurt? What if Drew Bledsoe does not get hit?

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Like all of these what ifs and careers that hinged

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>upon that. What if Belichick's days with the Jets? What

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>if Belichick and Sabans stay with the Browns? Like it's

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>just crazy that, you know, when you start to think

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>about it, there is a lot of luck that goes

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>into these these great careers, whether it's coaching. What if

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>what if Nick Saban stayed with the Dolphins? What if

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Alabama wasn't open? Like, it's just it's littered with all

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of this. It's crazy. Yeah, mclovin, I guess my Yeah.

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>My point is that Hardened, Kyrie and Kevin Durant might

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>be more individually talented, but when the three of those

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>guys were humming in Golden State, it was like a

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>greater triumvirate. If it does that make sense? Yeah, But

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>imagine like the Lakers won the coin toss with magic Johnson.

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>What are we talking about if the Celtics had gotten

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Tim Duggett, Yeah, yeah, but Magic was going to go

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Bulls. So it's a coin toss like that.

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>That's how crazy all of this is. But then once

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you got him, what you did with him, then you

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>got showtime. What if Portland had taken Jordan? Would that?

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I see? That's that's why it's just history is littered

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>with that. That's why when you always say, well, it's

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>system quarterback, there's a lot that goes into that. And

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Peyton Manning could have gone to the Chargers if the

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Colts took Ryan Leaf, right, and Ryan Leaf no, I

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Hey, until it would have been successful. Probably

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>he would have been successful. But they always say that

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Chargers the organization was a mess. Yes it was, Yes

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>it was. But the NBA starts in second half in

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>earnest tonight. I don't know what that means. Mclovin in

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>earnest I always hear that, No, how about the NBA

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>just started second half tonight? Yes, time? And is it

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>insulting to like those couple of games that were played

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>last night? You know in earnest it means the majority

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of the schedule. But if I'm the Grizzlies of Spurs

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, hey, we're important too. We just

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>happened to be one of two games from West night

0:16:55.400 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in Earnest. Where is Ernest? By the way that guy

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Ernest goes to Cambra? Is there is there a town

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>called Ernest? Remember when they changed Montana Joe Montana? That

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that city they named it Joe Montana. Where's is there

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>an Earnest? By way? I heard it? Yes, Sorry, some

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 1>NFL free agent was tendered again that I had laughed at,

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Like what other sport do we use the word tender?

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>He was tendered? I mean it sounds so nice. By

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the way, I gotta play some of Jerry Jones's comments

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>from the press conference yesterday. Oh it was priceless. Yes, boy,

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>there was an Ernest Pennsylvania and Ernest Georgia. That's the

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>only ones in America. Imagine if Elway had gone to

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the Colts or Elway had gone played for the Yankees. Right,

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>history is you know, rewritten with all of these moments.

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>That'd be a good podcast, like imagining all those differences

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in there. I've brought that up before. I wanted somebody

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to do the heavy lifting, so I could just take

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the cliff notes of what they came up with. But

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>what if, like you just did a what if podcast

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>or column kind of like a sliding door. Has you

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>ever seen that movie the rom com with Gwyneth Paltrow?

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Did I just lose our man card for the day?

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Sliding Doors? Like, if she went this way, her life

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>went that's way. If she went that way, her life

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>went out. It's a great rom com. Well, I did

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>wonder that. You know, when you take a job or

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you help somebody get a job. I have broadcasting students

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and you help them get a job someplace, and then

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>they might meet somebody in that job that turns out

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>to be their wife or their husband. Like what school

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you go to and you meet somebody there and because

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you went there, or you took a job and you

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't think you were going to get that job, or

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you missed out on a job like just it's so

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it's weird. I believe in fate, but there's a lot

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of luck that goes into this. Yes, Polly, I was

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>bartending in New York, spinning my wheels doing nothing in

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the mid nineties, and I worked late because some other

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>guy wanted to leave early bartending, and I met a

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>dude who worked at three in the morning for CBS

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Sports and we started talking and he goes, yeah, we

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>have an opening for like a researcher on the NFL

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Today shows, like oh, I would love to be part

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of that, and they end up bringing me in. I

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>always think to myself, if I didn't work late that night,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>do I meet that dude? Do I get a job

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>at CBS Sports? Yeah, it's wild if I didn't miss

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>out on the job in Dayton, Ohio. And then I

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>want to feel sorry for myself. And I went to

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>see an ext girlfriend in Atlanta and the last day

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm there, I took a tape into CNN and then

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>got hired that day at CNN. If I don't if

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>she says, hey, just they're hiring at CNN. I go

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to Atlanta last day and I have my audition tape

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going I'm not I can't get a job

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>at CNN, And I went in got a job. A

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>week later, I'm doing headline sports at CNA. Yes, do

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>you remember there was another guy who is going to

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>do what I did for SI Right before we were starting,

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Mark Bechtel. I'll say the nays, but he got some

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>book project with the Daytona five. They're like, all right, well,

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>parlof you're up. Otherwise this whole thing, for me, we

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>never would have happened. It was just like a stroke

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of luck. Damn, I gotta blame sorry about that. I

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>can remember the day we met mcloven at Sports Illustrated.

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We were there and mcloven, you were goofy. You were

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of like jittery and and talking really fast and

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>your arms are flailing in the air when you were talking.

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 1>And Dan didn't remember your name. When you walked out

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of the room, he goes, he know that one guy.

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>He's he's got something. And that was the entire discussion,

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and then it kind of morphed into something that's not

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>what happened. That is partially what happened. I was suave

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and cool. No, you were not. You were not. You

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>were whacky. Get out of here. You were. You don't

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>remember that day up, I'm not making it up. I

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>can remember its specifically. It was the same day because

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>while we're waiting for you to be in the room,

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Rick Riley called in to quit Sports Illustrated and we

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>were in the room of the Heads Illustrated while Rick

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Riley's calling in the quit. Dan and I are sitting

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>there in the room listening to the phone call. That

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is true. They put they put Rick Riley's call on speed,

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm listening to Rick Riley saying he's quitting Sports

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Illustrator to go to the mothership. And then and then

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I met you right after that talk about sliding doors.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>By way, Rick Riley goes to ESPN and you go

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to Sports Illustrator. Look, everything happened. There wasn't exactly a

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>trade because that ESPN didn't do well in that trade,

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>but it was presented that way. Oh, Riley for Patrick

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and I went, Nah, that ain't true. That was like

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe Barry Carroll for Kevin Mcalan Robert Parris. Wow. I

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>did help Riley with that trend. You know, he wanted

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 1>to know about ESPN and I did help him with that.

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's I did warn him, you know, and I said,

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>know what you're going into. And you know Riles wanted

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to be a TV guy and he was tired of

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>writing column Sports Illustrator. Wow, how did we get here?

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>We got we got a little deep there all right,

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a break. Chris Mannox will join us. We'll

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about too much of a good thing with the

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 1>three point proliferation, as they like to say, a few

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>other things with Mannix coming up. Doug Gottlie will stop

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>by if if Duke looks like they're on the doorstep.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>If Duke beats Florida State next game, Duke's in the tournament,

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, and Mark Few, the Gonzaga head coach, will

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>join us a little bit later on just getting started

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>running late here back after this and the Dan Patrick Show.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Discover the Discover card and then thank me later, Discover

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>matches all the cash bank you earn on your credit

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>card at the end of your first year. Automatically, there's

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>no limit on how much you can earn. And that's

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing right. In fact, it's even more amazing because

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of all the places where Discover is accepted. Ninety nine

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>percent of all the places in the United States that

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>take credit cards take the Discover credit cards. So when

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Discover, get used to hearing the word

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>yes more often, learn more Discover dot com slash yes

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty one Kneelson Report limitations apply. Thanks for listening to

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the Dan Patrick's show podcast. Be sure to catch us

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday morning nine until noon eastern six to

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio, and you can find

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>us on the iHeartRadio app at FSR or stream us

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>live on the Peacock app. Today, this is Jason McIntyre.

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Join me every weekday morning on my podcast, Straight Fire

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>with Jason McIntyre. This isn't your typical sports pod pushing

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the same tired narratives down your throat every day. Straight

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Fire gives you honest opinions on all the biggest sports headlines,

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>accurate stats to help you win big at the sports book,

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>and all the best guests. Do yourself a favor and

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>listen to Straight Fire with Jason McIntyre on the iHeartRadio app,

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Players Championship

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 1>getting underway today TPC Sawgrass Golf Channel continuing coverage over

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the weekend on NBC. Got a pole question before we

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>get to Chris Mannox. Okay, so we're battling around what's

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the good three point whole question? Polly has his idea

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that what if you make it worth two and a

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 1>half points? Oh no, no problem solved. No, problem solved

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>analytic beginning of the problem. No, No, the two and

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a half point shot would take over the NBA. It

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>would devalue that shot enough, but it'd still make people

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>shoot it. And then twos would be more in play,

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>but not. It wouldn't be like a you know, a

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>street fight down for twos, but you could win like

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>one thirty two and a half to one twenty nine.

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 1>This is fantastic for Vegas. Vegas with the hook, yeah,

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>with the hook, yes, time and the the over under would

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>half fractures like one quarter and three eighth that have

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to play with the fractus like crazy. With half point yeah,

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he commended, hardened from two and a half. Couldn't well,

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>not in the playoffs. It wouldn't be um, that's cold.

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris Mannox he's a senior writer covering the NBA for

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Sports Illustrated, joining us on the program NBA shut down

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a year ago on this day. What do you remember

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>about that? I remember being relieved from minute because I

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>had been scheduled to do back to back Celtics games

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>for local TV there. I just finished writing a story.

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I was exhausted, and I remember thinking like, great, you

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>know this would be like a week, a couple of

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>days off, I can get back into the flow after

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of a mini vacation. Didn't turn out that way. Yeah,

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>when it first happened, and I remember Paul text me,

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>he said, turn on ESPN, And I turned on ESPN

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't like eleven o'clock at night to watch

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Sports Center. It was eight o'clock and you're going, wait

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a minute, what's going on on ESPN? Oh, they got

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a basketball game. No, they're supposed to have a basketball game.

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And then all of a sudden, it was basically Oklahoma

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>City drive home safely. And then you realized, Okay, what's

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>this mean? And who would have thought? You know that

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Sacramento later on they had to tell that. You know,

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>it's like, hey, there's contact tracing with these officials, and

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's pretty incredible what happened, what happened quickly

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>with the NBA, and then everybody else sort of followed suit. Yeah,

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it was when you look back on it now, it

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 1>was remarkable. I remember I think it was the Hawks

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 1>game that turned out to be Vince Carter's last game

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of his career there, and I remember kind of wondering, like,

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what are you guys doing Why are you

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>even finishing this game? I mean, like you know, the

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>whole referee thing you were talking about, you just wondered

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>why everybody didn't just stop short right there and ended.

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think that goes to show that back then,

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>nobody believed that this was going to have the kind

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>of impact on the season that it had. I remember,

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for talking to coaches executives in the days that followed,

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>all of them had said, look, it's probably gonna be

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>about a week for this thing to settle down. Then

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll come back in empty arenas. There was an acceptance

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that they'd be back in limited to no capacity at arenas,

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but no comprehension that this could wind up shutting the

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 1>league down until they could go into a bus. And

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 1>remember Lebron said that he's not playing if there's no

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>fans in the stands, and that was I was in

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>LA for that, and somebody asked that he was kind

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of walked into that a little bit, where, yeah, he was,

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>he didn't know about all the things that were going

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>on in that moment. When the NBA said that he's

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course he responds, you know, I'm not

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>playing without fans. I play for the fans. Well, that

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>obviously changed very quickly as as the reality of the

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>situation kind of set in. You know, you look back

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on the bubble and we didn't know it was going

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to work, and you know, you had some players who

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>were adversely affected by it. But I still maintain what

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Lebron and the Lakers pulled off is as memorable and

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>as difficult as any team has gone through with no

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>home court advantage, there a sterile environment. Have we given

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers enough credit for what they pulled off in

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>winning that championship? I think we have. I'm kind of

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a tough person to talk to about the challenges of

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the bubble den because sitting in a hotel room eating

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo wings is not all that abnormal for my day

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to day life. So it's it really is, like I

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of say that, I mean, I sympathize with people

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>that have families and are away from them. That's just

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>not me. And so if you like tell me that

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I can get wings twenty four hours a day like

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm and there's a never ending supply of pandy in

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the mess hall, like I don't. I don't really do

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>all that, But you could see it. I mean, when

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you're in that bubble, and I was in it for

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>two plus months, you can see the mental wear and

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>tear it takes on players in real time. From the

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>first week where everybody's kind of like, all right, we

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>can do this, we can hang by the pool, no

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>big deal to like the second month, when you see

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>these guys walking to the dining hall, just trudging heads down,

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of conversation amongst each other, sitting down,

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>getting through a meal, and then going back to the room.

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>It obviously had an enormous mental toll taken on these guys.

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know where you rank it among the

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>most difficult things the NBA team has done to win

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a championship. But it's up there to be able to

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>go three plus months and win a title. Chris Mannox,

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the Sports Illustrated senior NBA rider joining US, I saw

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>an article a column, and it had to do with

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>ESPN speaking to some several prominent figures around the NBA,

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and that there was a radical proposal that maybe you

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>could limit the number of threes you attempt in a game.

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's say it was first half, you got to attempt

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty second half twenty and then after that everything counts

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>as two until the final six minutes of the game.

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Are we getting to the point is it too much

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of a good thing that what the three pointer means

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to the NBA? Right now, we're not getting to that point.

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>You can't put the genie back in the bottle. And

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>this is what the NBA wanted twenty plus years ago,

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>when the ratings were starting to dip the physicality of

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the game was causing too many low scoring games. You

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>remember that time, Dan, you know, David Stern and NBA brass.

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they wanted what we're seeing right now, a

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>free flowing game, a lot of three point shots. Maybe

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want it at the level that we're seeing

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>where teams are just reflexively shooting thirty five forty three

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>points per games, sometimes more. But this is the tradeoff.

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>This is what you get. The idea that they're going

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to limit three pointers in a game is just it's

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>as likely as them ultimately instituting the four point shot,

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>which was kind of a running joke, you know, ten

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen years ago. You're you're gonna have to deal

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>with the fall up because this has helped grow the game.

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think about the most popular players in the game,

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the most emulated players in the game. It begins with

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Steph Curry and it goes down to all these three

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>point shooters that have helped make the game as popular

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>as it is today. It just is what it is. Dan,

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to be able to change what the

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>NBA has become. But is there a really good team

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't rely on the three pointer as much as

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody else does? I mean, there are teams that do

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it at a supersized level. I don't have the numbers

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in front of me on which team ranks towards the bottom,

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but every team is gonna jack them up at a

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>high level, especially in the fourth quarter. I mean, look, Dan,

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>coaches in the NBA, every coach, this is what they teach.

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>The best shots are layups, dunks, and three pointers. The

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>way that Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant played the game,

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>every coach would try to dissuade them of that. Nowadays,

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't want mid range jumpers, they don't want turnaround

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>post shots because they have been deemed inefficient. Layups, free throws, threes.

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>That is all every coach wants from their team. You know,

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you might see some numbers dip here and there from

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>one team to another, but by and large that's the philosophy. Well,

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I got Utah's the number one three point shooting team

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in the NBA. The Sixers are the lowest. The Lakers

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>are in the bottom five as well. Now, I don't

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>know if that changes when we get to the postseason

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>or later in the season. But you know, do you

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>have to be jacking them up? And are you all

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in on Utah being a team to beat or you know,

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the teams to beat. I don't think you

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have to be jacking them up to be a championship team,

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>especially when you're talking about the Lakers and Sixers, who

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>are both at least can be elite defensive teams with

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the personnel that they have. So if you can be

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>great on that end, you're fine. I am buying the

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Jazz as a serious threat twitter championship because I was

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>going through this over the All Star break. There's really

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>nothing the Jazz do that you look at and say

0:32:55.880 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not sustainable. You've got Mitchell playing at a high level,

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>which is a natural progression of his game. Mike Conley

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>was not great last year. But this is the Mike

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Conley Dan that we've seen for most of his career,

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the guy that we saw playing so well in Memphis.

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Gobert to me is a sneaky MVP candidate. I mean

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>he has become such a presence offensively with his screen

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>setting that he's a real impact player on that end

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of the floor without shooting the three. They've been an

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>elite defensive team during Quinn Snyder's time there. Certainly when

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you get into the playoffs, I want to see if

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell can make plays, if Conley can make plays end

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of game situations. But right now, like the only question

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you have is can like Jordan Clarkson continue to be

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the sixth Man of the Year type of player or

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>does he revert to being an inconsistent gunner. Other than that,

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sold on what the Jazz are. Yeah, but

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't give Rudy Gobert or MVP credit if he

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>sets nice screens. Chris, of course you can. No, I can't.

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Why can you imagine that? Where you're going? What did

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>he do so well? Man? Can he? Okay? Okay, now

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>now you're now you're twisting words here, like it's not

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not he's just this great screen center. He's also

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the most intimiding defensive presence the league has. Seems it's

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a tumbo, so like that's a big factor in all this.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>But offensively, you ask those Jazz players and I've done this,

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 1>like you know, what's what's Gobert's influence And he just

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sets some bone crushing screens that freeze up these guys

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>as an impact. Okay, Like he's never gonna be a

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>three point shooter Dan, that's obvious, but if he can

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>be a massive screen center, that'll impact the offense. The

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Lakers can't win a title without Ad. Can the Nets

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>win a title without KD No, neither. I don't think

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers, frankly can win a title without Dennis Shrewder

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>for that matter. But that's a conversation for another time.

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>And he's been that impactful for them. Um, Look, the

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Nets are going to test the theory if that that

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you need to be a top tennis defensive team to

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>win a championship. They're not going to be that type

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:05.399
<v Speaker 1>of team no matter how many guys they sign off

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the street in the next couple of weeks. But because

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>they're so dynamic, offensively at full strength. Because they've got

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 1>three guys, which is almost unpressed in three guys that

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>can take over a game in the fourth quarter. They

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 1>can get away with being a middle of the pack

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 1>or worse defensive team. But without Durance, without him being

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>completely healthy, there's too many good teams in the Eastern Conference.

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that can knock them off. Great to talk

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 1>to you again, Chris. I hope you're well. I thought

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you'd appreciate screen set like you know, kind of a

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 1>grinder in your day, I know, but I just I mean,

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>it's it's nice. I mean I didn't set screens. I

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.959
<v Speaker 1>was a shooter, so right, but you went around them, right,

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so you knew the value of a screen. Yeah, But

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you know it wasn't you know, one of those things

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>where I said, gosh, you know that guy, he's more

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>valuable than I am. It didn't matter if they were

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>setting screens are not for me. I mean, okay, next

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>time you have Reggie miller on, ask him that question.

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>He didn't need screens. He just ran all day. Well,

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't just run without getting a screen set for you.

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy. The reasons and you're running is you're kind

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 1>of trying to rub guys off screens and Reggie had,

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>by the way, two of the better ones in the

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Davis twins Antonio and Dale, who just set rocking screens.

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>They weren't twins. I know it's they were called that though.

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>With that's I know there weren't twins. I just think

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you hate the French. I don't. I don't hate the French.

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I love Tony Parker, just him, Yes, just Rudy and

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the Gobears. I love. I love Rudy. Got it. I'm

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>going to tune into the next Jazz game just to

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>watch him said screens. God, I'm telling you must see TV.

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know. Thank you, Chris, you got a

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>div Chris Mannox Sports Illustrated senior basketball writer and a

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>man who loves a good screen. Take a break. Play

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the day next here on The Dan Patrick Show. Thanks

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 1>for listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to catch us live every weekday morning nine until noon

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>eastern six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio, and

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you can find us on the iHeartRadio app at FSR

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>or stream us live on the Peacock app. Oh my God,

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the play of the day play. This is the play

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>on the day. Check this out. Rant drives, Baseline loses

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:39.479
<v Speaker 1>the handle, goes right to Valence, shone Us, who floats

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it up and Andy gets fouled again. Jonas Valence soon

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>us single handedly trying to take this one over. He's

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>got twenty four and fourteen, ended up with twenty nine

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and twenty Courtesy the Grizzlies Radio Network. Play of the

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Day brought to you by M Drive. Powerful Ingredients back

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>my signs. Help me get energiant, stronger, leaner the supplement

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I take every day. M drive Dan dot com. Don't

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>let age beat you. rEFInd your prime with M drive.

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 1>We've been wondering about fate and luck and how that

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 1>could have changed sports history. When you think about it,

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if Drew Bledsoe does not get hit in

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Jets, when does Tom Brady get

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.760
<v Speaker 1>his chance? What if the Saints had drafted Patrick Mahomes

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and he had to sit behind Drew Brees for a

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. All these what ifs. The Tampa Bay

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers held the number one overall pick I believe this

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 1>is nineteen to eighty six or eighty seven. Paulie can

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>help me out on that. They decided to take Bo Jackson. Okay, well,

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:45.399
<v Speaker 1>there was a slight problem. He told that Buccaneers don't

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>draft me. He refused to play for Tampa because he

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>visited the team facilities and that was in the spring.

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>They said it was approved by the NCAA and it wasn't,

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>so he was not allowed to play his final college

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>baseball seat at Auburn. He believed that Tampa owner Hugh

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>culver House had done this on purpose so they could

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>convince Bo to just play football for the Buccaneers. He

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously never played for the Buccaneers. Selected by the Kansas

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 1>City Royals in the first round of the baseball draft

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 1>and then he was selected or then his rights were

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>traded to the Raiders, I believe after that, I think

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>at eighty seven draft, the Raiders took him late in

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the draft and worked out some type of deal where

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>they took over his rights from Tampa. Yeah, the Atlanta

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Falcons had the second pick of that draft. Imagine if

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons, a Southern team, acquired Bo Jackson in

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty six. Now, I mean he was a household name,

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:51.280
<v Speaker 1>yeah at nineteen, and he you know, playing both sports

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>there and he was great at both, but he would

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>have been a Hall of Famer in either one, I

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>think had he decided to just concentrate on that sport.

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Bono's Sports one of the great ad

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>campaigns in history. Mclub And what's the poll question today? Well,

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we started out with are there too many three pointers

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in the NBA? And sixty four percent said yes. So

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 1>that means we have to address us. We have to

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. I don't know if we do. I

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the ratings are or what attendance will

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>be once we're allowed to have fans that come back.

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Is it bad basketball? Is it entertaining basketball? You know,

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 1>scoring is up? We love scoring. This is what the NBA.

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 1>This is what every league is trying to do. Have

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>more scoring, more offense. It's like the home run. Is

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the three pointer? Like the home run in baseball that

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you have guys with launch angle, they go up there.

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>This is all they're trying to do in the NBA.

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>You've got guys they want to shoot. Everybody want to

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:57.879
<v Speaker 1>shoot the three. What are you tired of? More home

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:02.359
<v Speaker 1>runs or three pointers? Because home runs go up every year,

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>they break the single season record every year. Now three

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 1>pointers every year break the record. Yeah, MC club passing

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>yards and touchdowns too. Yeah. Same in NFL. It feels

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>like we're okay with that. It still feels like that's

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 1>difficult to do and you don't have ordinary people doing

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary things. It's the elite, you know, are able to

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>do this, whereas in baseball you go, lady, that guy's

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>got how many home runs? Or that guy is a

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>great three point shooter. It feels like it's a little

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>more random when it comes to baseball and even shooting

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>three pointers than it is. You know, that guy has

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen touchdown receptions or that guy's thrown for forty two touchdowns.

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll get phone calls coming up next hour.

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>We will check him with Doug Gottlieb. Is there a

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>chance that Duke is going to get into the tournament

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.720
<v Speaker 1>with a win against Florida State? Feels like that feels

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>like that. But if you're Kentucky, would you go to

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the n I t Like? These are pressing questions that

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I have. Yes, mclovett, I was gonna ask a pole question,

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>do you want Duke to be in a tournament? Yeah?

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know some people hate Duke. I'm kind of

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like a bit of a historical ducat. Yeah. I mean,

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>if you hate him, you want him in so you

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>see them lose. Make him a sixteen seed. That's what

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think would be really spicy. Also, we'll hear from

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Jones coming up next down. Jerry did not disappoint

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>because I thought, hey, if you did such a great

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>job with Dak, you got to be taking a victory lap.

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Need not taking a victory lap, or at least a

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>victory lap that you thought he would be taken. But

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll hear from Dak Prescott and Jerry Jones after that

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 1>contract was Sun anything else that I need to mention here?

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people like your shirt. It's kind of

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a spring flannel. Yeah, yeah, I was getting a good reaction,

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>like a bluish spring flannel, right. I like to call

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it a sprantel spring and flannel. Here you go. Yeah,

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Or it could be a fling. It could be a

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:11.839
<v Speaker 1>flannel in spring. Whoa one hour in the books, two

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:14.319
<v Speaker 1>more to go on this Thursday. And in case you're

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 1>wondering scoring at home, it's Fritzie mclovin, Paulie Seton and

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:19.959
<v Speaker 1>yours truly here on the day and Patrick show close

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 1>out first hour. With zip recruiter, I often give a

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>stat of the day. In fact, I gave one earlier

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in the hour. Four out of five employers who post

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:30.280
<v Speaker 1>on zip recruiter get a quality candidate through the site

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>within the first day. How about that for a stat

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of the day. Let me tell you about zip recruiter.

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking to hire somebody, zip recruiter can help

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:39.719
<v Speaker 1>you find the right candidate for your team fast from

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>healthcare to manufacturing, to business services and now. Try zip

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:46.360
<v Speaker 1>recruiter for freeze zip recruiter dot com slash patrick. You

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>post a job on zip recruiter, it gets sent out

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:51.879
<v Speaker 1>to over one hundred top job sites. With one click,

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 1>zip recruiters matching technology scans thousands of resumes and profiles

0:43:57.040 --> 0:44:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to send you the most qualified people for your job.

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:02.839
<v Speaker 1>If you're really interested in the candidate and you can

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:05.959
<v Speaker 1>invite them to apply for your job one click, zip

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>recruiter sends them an email from you and you'll stand

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 1>out for the competition. Try it for free. My listeners

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:15.239
<v Speaker 1>can go to ZipRecruiter dot com, slashpatrick, zip recruiter dot

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>com slashpatrick and remember, zip recruiter is the smartest way

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to hire