WEBVTT - The Possibility of a Digital Commons Ft. Andrew

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, and welcome to another episode of It could

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>happen here once again. Who's still around myself Andrew and

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>also joined with Garrison is here as well, and me mea,

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm also here. And of the things that I've been

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking about lately, because I've been reading a lot more fiction, UM,

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things and these sorts of sci fi's

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>fair particularly UM some Activia, but the UM, some orcum,

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>some Margaret Atwood, I recently read Orks and Creek. UM.

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I've just been thinking about a lot of these concepts

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that are presented in stories um in sci fi UM.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>And what is more sci fi than the idea of

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>computers that sort of digital space, and what has become

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of the digital would um as of late as you know,

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and really since its inception, as capitalism has sort of

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>chopped it up and privatized it and sequested it and

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>monopolized it. As I think that it really um goes

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>against what the principles of the Internet should be m

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how it is run, how it is structured,

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>how it is organized. Because the Internet as a concept

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>really brings together, um a variety of people, variety of

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>spaces and backgrounds and intersections and I believe it would

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>be a place of sharing, a place of collaboration, particularly

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>since the sort of resources that might be um limited

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in the physical world, ah far more abundant in the

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>digital world. Um. I'm thinking too, of like educational resources

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and otherwise, of course they are you know, infrastructural limitations.

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>But on the cloud, you know, um, in cyberspace. And

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I cringe saying that because it makes me feel like

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a boomer. Um. You know, they have the ability to

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>freely and easily copy and share and paste wherever and whenever,

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>basically without many limitations. Um. And instead of really seizing

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that for what it could be, you know, we've we've

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>turned it into this sort of um corporate feudalism. Um.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>We're all these uh digital margritcoporations, these social media giants

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>basically have carved of the Internet into their own little

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, fiefdoms and dominated um the discourse, you know,

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>dominated how we communicate with each other, how we tend

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to communicate each other bast in the main stream side

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of the internet. What has become to mein stream things

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>what most people think of when they think of the Internet. Um,

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not a big fan of that. Idea of

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, that perception, that conception of the Internet in

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>fact um as something that I have been thinking about

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and developing and discussing for the past couple of months

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and researching for the past couple of months. I really

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>think that among all the other things that I've discussed

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>unnecessary components in developing the commons, in creating and re

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>establishing the commons, I think digital commons will be just

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>as important because the commons, uh, the rather, the inclusion

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of the commons is what really kicked off the establishment

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of capitalism. I believe the re establishments of the commons

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>will be required in that transition away from capitalism towards

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a more collective, more communal, um, more sustainable way of life.

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>For those who um, I guess just tuning in this

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:28.239
<v Speaker 1>perhaps your first episode with me at least, or perhaps

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you've never seen any of the figures of my channel, UM,

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll take a moment to, you know, explain what exactly

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the commons are. The commons referred to the resources accessible

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to all members of a society, the totality of the

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>material riches of that part of the world, of that world,

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:53.239
<v Speaker 1>regarded as the inheritance of humanity as a whole, something

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to be shared together the commons, or something that are

0:04:56.320 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>based on common pool resources or cprs, which is any

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>natural or man made system that is organized to benefit

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>a group of people, but would provide diminished benefits to

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone if each person pursued their own self interest. And

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of course these resource systems, like I said, it could

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>be natural or man made, so they could be forests,

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, traditionally there are things like forests and irrigation

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>canals and fisheries and pastures and drown water basins. Um.

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's it can be expanded even food.

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean things like energy infrastructure like windmills, winterwo banes

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 1>or as. Um. Going to describe different portions of the Internet,

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>different resource systems within the interntion of course the Internet

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>as a who well, I believe all of those things

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>can um can be brought under the commons um And

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of course the commons. The theory of commons, history of

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the Commons is it's all uh lengthy discussion. Of course,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you could read about it and Governing the Commons by

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 1>eleanor Ostrom. You could listen to a sort of a

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>condensed version of that. In my video on my channel

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on the commons as an institution, but when it comes

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to you know, information and communication technologies, when it comes

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to I c t S and sort of applying that

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>commons idea to I C T S, I'd like to

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>think about it in terms of these sort of digital

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>communities bringing together people who share, you know, common goals

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to collaboratively build and share those resources through technology. So

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say that digital commons are or can be,

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and can be because I think some of them already

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>exist in some form. But they are basically these online

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>creation communities where you know, there's a free flu um

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and free access to and free collaboration, um. You know,

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>the sharing of this non exclusive digital information and the

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>collective creation of like knowledge resources. These resources of course

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>being owned and used freely between or among the community

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and also available for use by three parties. So and

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>instead of being exchanged as commodities, you know, these resources

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are used and reused and reused without artificial restrictions to

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of enforce an artificial scarcity. UM. I just actually

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>thought of a really funny example that I hadn't initially

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>conceived of in a sort of guideline for this episode,

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. If you're a lot of familiar with

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Martin Scorsese, is gonetro of no? Okay? So in three

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Martin Scorsese developed this film called Gone. It's a historical

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>epic um, a sort of a post war era mafia movie.

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And it was directed by scotts Czy and it started

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Robert de Niro and Alpuccino and Gene Hackman. It had

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a sort of deep hume eroticism blended with a sort

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of exploration of of medial aggression. It's a sort of

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a look at the relationship between Gon Shrev, who is

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a Russian mafia boss, and his partners slash rival, slash

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>old friend Andrew, who I believe is supposed to be

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>an Italian mafia boss. But the thing about Gone Sharov

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, you can find posters about it, you

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>can find fan art of which you can find many, many,

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>many fan fictions about it. Um, But Gonsuv is not

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a real movie. V. It does not exist. Everything I

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>described it's entirely fake. The litany of colorful side characters

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that you know, people have developed for this movie, the

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of fan fictions, the dozens of methanalyses and pieces

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of fun arts people have, you know, generated for this movie.

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>The movie itself does not exist. The movie only exists

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in the collective um co creation of it that took

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>place over a Tumbler of all places. Essentially, a couple

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of Tumbling users basically came up with this idea of

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>this lost Martin Scorsese film that everybody has seemingly forgotten,

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and they would rave about it, and they would come

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 1>up with fake plot points and fake characters, and before

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you know it, you know, it's sort of like this

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 1>massive Internet phenomenon, sort of inside joke Internet, inside juke UM.

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>One of people started building on top of it and

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>respecting what came before um, and that sort of spirit

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of co creation is what it ended up creating. This

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>gone this teal of gone throw, this gone through of fandom,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>this whol development of Gone Through as a character of

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the side characters as you know, fully developed characters. And

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it all started because you know, one user said to

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>another like, oh, don't you know the movie Gone Shurov's

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>only the greatest Mafia movie ever made. On that tagline,

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the greatest Matthia movie ever made would be built upon

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with further photoshops and embellishments and developments, and there's now

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like a really comprehensive document of gone shureoff law. Um.

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>Things are added and just things added in complete seriousness.

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.959
<v Speaker 1>But it's just a thing that exists. It's a thing

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that I believe. UM. It's just one manifestation of many

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of what the Internet has the capacity to produce. When

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>online creation communities are allowed to operate freely UM and develop,

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't sort of common creative UM resources. I think

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>other examples of I guess the seeds of what I'm

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about can be seen in UM. I guess like

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>rule play UM servers and role play communities, role play

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>message boards. I think some fandoms also have some of

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the seeds of what I'm talking about. Of course, the

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Minecraft community with everything they've created, modern communities across different games.

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>They all sort of manifestations of, you know, human desire

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to create and human desire to share without you know,

0:11:54.160 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the artificial restrictions and boundaries of of mainstream couples imagination.

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I think another manifestation of the digital commons in a

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>sense could be found in resources like z library, UM

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and a few others that I'm afraid of naming in

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>case you don't think get taken down as well. And

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's really the sad part of ours. The

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>library is lost. I mean I haven't really been feeling

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that loss because I am aware of the alternatives. Um,

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's lost on the last because of the way

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the library is formatted, it was a bit more accessible.

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of people and people aware of it

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. UM, but Z library, and I'm glad that

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it's called a library. It's called Z library. It's just

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, one manifestation of the UM the routes of

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the library as a concept and how it can manifest

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>UM in the digital speece, how the commons through the

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess the conception of the library can manifest in

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a in a digital space. I mean even you know,

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>mainstream ones we have like we have, we have stuff

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>like archive dot org and I know archive dot org

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is trying to launch something to host a whole bunch

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of scientific journals and other articles that are harder to

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>access as well, but I mean they already host you know,

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>quite impressive plethora of copyrighted books. UM. Me and Robert

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>have gotten into arguments on Twitter dot com with many

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>an author who is mad about their book being on

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>archive dot archived dot org. And so that is you know,

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>there is, there is, There is many resources if you

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>know where to look. But sadly some are some someone

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>are no longer with us and people have been have

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>been u punished by the state for trying to provide

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>open access to information. Yeah, I mean who controls information? Right? Well, however,

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the same goes I think another as you mentioned, kind

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>another example of that sort of collaborative information sharing can

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>be seen and of course Wikipedia, you know, yeah, as

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>personal computers and the intents became more more accessible, the

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>lower barriers of expression and stuff. Um, this Internet culture

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as and it was initially born, it was one with

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the aim of, you know, collaboratively creating cultural content. Is

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that developing and generating you know, univer we sell access

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to knowledge, you know, Wikipedia just one example. Of course,

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>different wikis blural but of course longer called wickies. I

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's called fandom that all or something now. Yes, Unfortunately,

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>fandom bought a whole bunch of uh different wiki sites

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that were independently operated over the course of the past

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, and then they kind of consolidated under the

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>big fandom company. Yeah, now like half of them are

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>unusable because of ads and stuff. Yeah, it is, it is.

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it's pretty rough to scroll a fandom site. It's

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>not the easiest thing. But I will see, as a

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>youth with a few regulations and my access to the Internet,

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it was actually quite nice to be able to go

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>onto fandom and just like well I was, you know,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>around when it was still Wicky. Um, but you know,

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>going like Marvel Wicky or going TC Wicky and read

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>up on all the different characters I was into at

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the time. Oh yeah, absolutely. You know I used to

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>go on like power listing Wicky and like come up

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>with characters, you know, piece on certain superpowers. Um. And

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I also created my own Wicky for my own like

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>meat up, uh sort of world building project. Um. And

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>just the fact that resource was available, you know, that

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the tools were easy, were free to access, um, and

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that easy to understand as well. UM. And of course

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>they were always tutorials and stuff available if you don't

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>know how to function and what to do certain things.

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Just that that that accessibility, UM and freedom is something

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that I think is still exists, you know, in some sense,

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>despite you know, this company buying out everything, and I

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the fact that you know, unlike you know that

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>company Wikipedias and me and e og. Wikipedia continues to

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>maintain their steadfast anti ad um you know, standing um

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and continues to you know, um run on I guess

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>crowdsourced donations just just today as of the day that

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>we're recording. Uh. People whole a whole bunch of the

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>right wingers that have coalesced around Musk after his purchase

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter have gotten mad at Wikipedia for not for

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they've They've gotten mad that Wikipedia wasn't was wasn't re

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>posting their fake Twitter files drama thing um as glowingly

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>as some of them might like. And they're complaining about

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia's left wing bias. And a whole bunch of these

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Musk fan boys are talking about being like, hey, Elon

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Musk should buy Wikipedia and fix Wikipedia's left wing bias.

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And this there's this one, this this one guy who

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>was like, um, I wonder how much Wikipedia would cost

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to buy at Elon Musk and then the the uh,

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Wikipedia's like, absolutely not, this is not

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for sale. We are not letting Elon muskmpie Wikipedia. Yeah,

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean if if conservatives really want um a platform

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that badly, there's always conservative Pedia or whatever it's called. Um,

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>there's always Encyclopedia if they want to get really wacky. UM.

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, Wikipedia is going to continue being Wikipedia, thankfully. UM.

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the rabbit holes it has let me through.

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the Wikipedia games that I've been able to play.

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, like you have to go from one page

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to another. Uh, you know that kind of degrees of

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>pages how you link two different completely different topics. But yeah,

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>zero advertising, accessible to all many different languages. Of course,

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know it's not completely flawless. They're sitting um, very

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>contentious articles of course, UM. They always be attempts to

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>hijack that those peaches for the post of propaganda. Of course,

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>every article has its bias. But By and Lodge, because

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of the collaborative nature of the project, they have been

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>ways to mitigate bad actors and respond to um those

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>sorts of attempts at corruption and cooptation. So you know,

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it goes to show that you know, even something as

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say, the centrally organized as Wikipedia, um, is

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>still able to regulate itself collaboratively. Yeah. I think around

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>this time last year here on the show, we interviewed

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody from Wikimedia UM specifically talking about how the talking

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>about the the regional differences of the wikipedias that are

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in different countries and in different regions, how that impacts

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>access access information, and how people in their own communities

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:57.959
<v Speaker 1>can work towards providing a fuller better picture of the

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>types of information that people are getting. UM. And the

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>great part about it is that it really does put

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the power into anyone's hands. It's not it's it's not

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>gate kept the same way a lot of other information is. Yeah. Yeah,

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>that's the beauty of it. Really, I think another prominent

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>case of information sharing rather file sharing and just sort

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that that payer to pay architecture we found in really UM,

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the pirating community could and could you know, there's facilities,

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>access and the exchange of cultural products there might otherwise

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>be lost, you know, as we're seeing with a lot

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of these shows being axed, and you know, people's hard

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>earned UM, you know hard people who you know, really

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>worked hard on sitting projects and stuff. These companies with

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>their you know, tax dodging schemes and whatever, you're able

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to basically sweep all out a side UM and so

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that um, we are able to preserve and

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of course in films and view and TV shows being

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>taken down by sit in streaming services and not eve

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>being able to be found easily physically. UM. You know,

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>having these files and stuff just accessible online UM shared

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>between payers is it's really great to see, UM, and

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it really allows for the preservation of things right otherwise

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>be lost. And of course there's also as another example

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of a sort of digital comments UM, the idea of

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>open source, or really the free software movement, which is

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a social movement aimed at attaining and guaranteeing certain freedoms

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>for software users, you know, to run the software, to

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>study software, to modify the software, and to share copies

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of that software, whether the modified or not. UM. The

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>philosophy of this free software movement is really this idea

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>that computer you should not lead to people being prevented

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>from corporating with other In fact, it should be the opposite,

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>should be allowing people to cooperate with each other. So

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>things like you rejecting restrictions on software, promoting free software,

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and liberating people who use technology, use computers. It's really

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>what you know, the free software movement is trying to

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>do um. One of the founders of the movement again

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>name is Stilman. He has said that the idea of

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the free software movement is that, you know, by allowing

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>free access to software, it allows it promotes, rather than

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>hinders the progression of technology, because it means that much

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of the wasteful duplication of system programming effort can be avoided,

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you know that EFFLCA instead of going into advancing different projects.

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>So you open source and you know, free software movement

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>what you want to call it, it's although I know

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>there's some people make a distinction, um it is I

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>would believe, I would think a manifestation of digital comments

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>people are able to self organize through the associate and

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>really just allowing people to you know, get their hands

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>on some software, to create, to run, to redistribute, to

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>change their software, to look to pick apart and learn

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>from certain code. Um, I really just allow people to

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to create and share. And the sort of culture

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that open source and free software creates is one of

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, courtesy, is one of collaborations of helping one

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>another to contribute to a greater whole, um, to sort

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of regulate each other's monitor activity that might jeopardize the project,

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and we see the benefits of that. You know, out

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of the most recognizable, high traffic open software projects, uh stable,

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're secure and they're very thoroughly understood by

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the people who collaborate to create them, compared to a

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of the more clues and proprietary projects that are

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>not as accessible, not as open to scrutiny and study.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>So it is, I think, in a sense, a phone

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of of anarchy and um of people governing themselves and

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>cooperating to create a whole greater than any individual could

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>create a loan um. And speaking of you know people

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess coming together and communicating and collaborating. Um. It's

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.719
<v Speaker 1>this sense that I guess people have been discussing a

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>lot lately of the digital public square, and Twitter teams

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is usually at the center of that conversation, This idea

0:24:56.160 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that we have this space that you know, that shouldn't

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>be privatized, shouldn't that should be freely accessed and everyone

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>could communicate without restriction. And when you have the free

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>speech people within that honestly question the value of Twitter

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every day. Uh you know, obviously some good

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>let's come out of it and the really other sort

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of quote and quote digital public squares like any sort

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of me and extreame social media. Some good you know,

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>comes out to them. You know, you meet people, you

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>are able to work in projects, able to meat like

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>minded folks. All that is is good. But also a

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of you know, terrible, terrible things have come out

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>to these platforms and continue to every single day. UM,

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's a mixed bag. But I think any

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.479
<v Speaker 1>sort of digital commons project will need a space, um

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and how that space is conceived what of course need

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>to be unmoored from you know, havelessmashination, um that the

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>act whole um, you know, potential economy, reach economy that

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>aims to keep us divided and button heads. But I

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>do think they will need to be they will need

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a space for communication across boundaries, across regions

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>around the world easily. Last thing I really wanted to

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:29.239
<v Speaker 1>touch on on this topic. It's really the sort of

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the overlap between the idea of digital commons and t growth,

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>so you know both sort of question that sort of

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>means an idea of consumption. Um, digital commons, you know,

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they promote this this idea of someone who both consumes

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and produces, consumes value and digital space, but also adds

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to that value. That doesn't could modify UM the resources

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 1>available in the digital space, but rather, you know, makes

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>it accessible and adds to it, contributes to it. And

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>that's at the idea of open access really something to

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the growth also tries to emphasize, you know, even though

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to scale within planetary limits, we still want,

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, a good life for all. We still want

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>people to to collaborate and create UM and fract beople

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>more free to do so without limitations that the growth

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>oriented capitas economy imposes on us. The idea, of course

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>digital commons also brings the means of production in the

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>digitals fare under the control of the communities who use it.

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>We use that resource, who use that service, in complete

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>contrast the capitalist them of keeping them perfectly health and

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>aiming to serve profit. Digital commons and deep growth both

0:27:54.800 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 1>emphasize access UM it's information to knowed three resources as

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>part of our human heritage, as part of our human rights.

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>The commons should be something that is openly available rather

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>than restricted, commodified, privatized. Of course, unlike traditional commands, UM

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, digital commons are not easily exhaustible, not really exhaustible. UM.

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>They're not subject to many of the limitations that physical

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 1>commons would have. But at the same time, you know,

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>they depend on a certain infrastructure, and infrastructure that relies

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>on you know, energy, and that energy has to come

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>from somewhere. Being able to access the internet requires UM

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>certain tools, certain technologies, computers, phones, whatever, UM, and the

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>resources required to create those technologies has to come from somewhere. UM.

0:28:56.480 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>The cables and the oceans, the satellites and space. You know,

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the electricity for the computers, the materials for the phones

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:09.239
<v Speaker 1>and the computers. All of those things UM consume and

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>contribute the exhaustion of environmental resources. And so balancing that

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and being COmON sense of environmental impact, we still have

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to be essential component and you know, any development of

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the digital comments. At the end of the day, I

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>believe that humans are sort of pre program to create

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and to collaborate with each other UM, and I think

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>digital comments are one way in which we can do that.

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciated, UM the way that different writers and

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>thinkers on the subjects have UM sort of explore those ideas.

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I drew a bit from one particular author,

0:29:55.840 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Mayo Foster moral um and the exploration of the idea,

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot available if you're interested in covering

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>topic and what happlin. Of course, the same goes for

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the communs in general. There are a lot of different

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>resources out there. Um eleanor Ostrom's work is a great

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>place to start, and I really think it's important that

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>we do um get these conversations rolling in the mainstream,

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in the background, in every corner and every space, because

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>we stand to benefit a lot from it, and we

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>honestly really need it in a time like this. That's

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it from me for this episode. You can follow me

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube at androids um, on Twitter at and disclosing true,

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and on patreonic and support me if you'd like at

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>patre dot com slash saying true yeah, and you can

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>find it could happen here on Twitter and Instagram. Apparently

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>we have the cool zone as a TikTok a thing

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that we learned. Do we officially have one? I thought we?

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I I okay, well that we did.

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Who knows? We may or may not have a TikTok.

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>You'll never know. By earlier January. We definitely will because

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we have something special planned. Um but yes, Twitter, at

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>least Twitter and Instagram at at happened here. Pondon, cools

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and media still on where despite despite the digital town

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>square collapsing, we are holding out in the in the

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>dystopian ruins of Twitter. Um so yeah, anyway, it could

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>zone media dot com, or check us out on the

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:54.239
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts. You can find sources for It could Happen here,

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>updated monthly at cool zone Media dot com slash sources.

0:31:57.960 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening,