1 00:00:00,680 --> 00:00:04,200 Speaker 1: Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics, 2 00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:07,160 Speaker 1: where we discussed the top political headlines with some of 3 00:00:07,200 --> 00:00:11,639 Speaker 1: today's best minds. And Donald Trump says, as he said 4 00:00:11,760 --> 00:00:15,000 Speaker 1: many times before, that he will close the Department of Education. 5 00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:18,200 Speaker 1: We have such a great show for you today. CNN 6 00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:22,720 Speaker 1: political analyst Ron Brownstein tells us what he sees when 7 00:00:22,720 --> 00:00:25,840 Speaker 1: he crunches these numbers from the twenty twenty four election. 8 00:00:26,160 --> 00:00:30,080 Speaker 1: Then we'll talk to investigative reporter Miranda Green about pink 9 00:00:30,120 --> 00:00:34,040 Speaker 1: slime newspapers that were mailed to voters in swing districts. 10 00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:37,800 Speaker 1: These newspapers might have swayed the election. But first the. 11 00:00:37,720 --> 00:00:43,560 Speaker 2: News Somali, we are hearing the first rounds of Trump appointments. 12 00:00:43,880 --> 00:00:46,879 Speaker 2: Let us hear the murderer's row of stupid and what 13 00:00:46,920 --> 00:00:47,680 Speaker 2: you're seeing here. 14 00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:52,640 Speaker 1: So again what you see from these appointments, and the 15 00:00:52,680 --> 00:00:55,880 Speaker 1: first two I think are very instructive. Well, the first 16 00:00:55,880 --> 00:00:58,800 Speaker 1: one was Susie Wiles. She will be the first ever 17 00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:03,520 Speaker 1: female chief of staff. So that's a girl boss, if 18 00:01:03,560 --> 00:01:07,000 Speaker 1: you can use the term ironically. But the two biggest 19 00:01:07,040 --> 00:01:12,720 Speaker 1: appointments so far are Tom Holman, the borderss are and 20 00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:17,000 Speaker 1: Steven Miller, and both Tom Holman and Steven Miller. Tom 21 00:01:17,040 --> 00:01:20,720 Speaker 1: Holman used to head ICE, has been involved in deportation stuff, 22 00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:24,280 Speaker 1: and he is most famous for musing before the election 23 00:01:24,600 --> 00:01:28,240 Speaker 1: to sixty Minutes that you don't have to do family separation, 24 00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:31,960 Speaker 1: you can just deport the entire family. And I think 25 00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:35,559 Speaker 1: it's important to realize that these two nominations show pretty 26 00:01:35,560 --> 00:01:38,800 Speaker 1: clearly where Trump World is going, and it's the thing 27 00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:44,800 Speaker 1: that Republicans held signs up about during the Republican National Convention, 28 00:01:44,920 --> 00:01:48,680 Speaker 1: which is mass deportation. Look, there are other picks that 29 00:01:48,880 --> 00:01:52,080 Speaker 1: Trump has made that will get past Senate confirmation, people 30 00:01:52,160 --> 00:01:55,880 Speaker 1: like Marco Rubio to be Secretary of State. Another pick 31 00:01:55,960 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 1: will be Lee Zelden for EPA. He is a climate denier. 32 00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:03,840 Speaker 1: But I want to talk about Holman and Miller because 33 00:02:04,280 --> 00:02:06,640 Speaker 1: this is a real clear sign of what they're going 34 00:02:06,720 --> 00:02:08,640 Speaker 1: to do when they first come into office. And it's 35 00:02:08,720 --> 00:02:11,959 Speaker 1: going to be deportation, it's going to be workplace right, 36 00:02:12,280 --> 00:02:14,960 Speaker 1: it's going to be camps. It certainly I hope that 37 00:02:15,080 --> 00:02:17,600 Speaker 1: it won't be any of those things, but this seems 38 00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:21,400 Speaker 1: like a pretty clear sign that that's where we're going. 39 00:02:21,480 --> 00:02:23,320 Speaker 1: And I just want to pause for a second and 40 00:02:23,360 --> 00:02:28,160 Speaker 1: realize that they were a huge swing of Latino voters 41 00:02:28,240 --> 00:02:31,280 Speaker 1: who voted for Trump. Tom Holman, you know, he is 42 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:34,680 Speaker 1: coming for these Latinos, and you're going to have to 43 00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:36,480 Speaker 1: just we're going to all have to hope that he's 44 00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:41,960 Speaker 1: checking people's you know, legal illegal border status, because these 45 00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:46,040 Speaker 1: people are not known for their specificity or their care 46 00:02:46,400 --> 00:02:49,840 Speaker 1: in the assignment, and it seems highly likely that a 47 00:02:49,880 --> 00:02:52,240 Speaker 1: lot of people are going to get swept up in 48 00:02:52,280 --> 00:02:54,880 Speaker 1: these sweepes. It's quite scary. Also, it's just going to 49 00:02:54,960 --> 00:02:59,840 Speaker 1: be very logistically difficult to do and of course morally horrifying. 50 00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:03,440 Speaker 1: So stay tuned for this and we'll definitely see more 51 00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:03,799 Speaker 1: on this. 52 00:03:04,280 --> 00:03:07,519 Speaker 2: So Mai Lee Zilden, who we remember as running against 53 00:03:07,639 --> 00:03:12,960 Speaker 2: Kathy Hokel on Crime, Crime Crime, is also really really 54 00:03:13,000 --> 00:03:16,560 Speaker 2: psychotically obsessed with climate change not being real. What are 55 00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:17,079 Speaker 2: you seeing here? 56 00:03:17,360 --> 00:03:21,160 Speaker 1: So I think an interesting pick. You'll remember Scott Pruitt 57 00:03:21,280 --> 00:03:24,760 Speaker 1: had it in twenty sixteen. He resigned after being the 58 00:03:24,800 --> 00:03:29,919 Speaker 1: subject of seventeen federal investigations. It's a non agency for Trump. 59 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:33,000 Speaker 1: He oversaw the rollback of more than one hundred environmental 60 00:03:33,080 --> 00:03:38,160 Speaker 1: rules when he was last president. So again, Zelden is 61 00:03:38,200 --> 00:03:41,480 Speaker 1: here just because it's approach for him and he doesn't 62 00:03:41,520 --> 00:03:45,080 Speaker 1: believe the climate change is real. This will be another 63 00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 1: place where the federal government will either just not do anything, or, 64 00:03:49,760 --> 00:03:53,720 Speaker 1: more likely in this case, try to make it easier 65 00:03:53,760 --> 00:03:58,640 Speaker 1: for polluters. We have oil and gas companies asking Trump 66 00:03:58,840 --> 00:04:02,560 Speaker 1: not to leave the Paris Climate Accord. This is where 67 00:04:02,560 --> 00:04:05,920 Speaker 1: we are at this moment. We have ex on Mobile 68 00:04:06,440 --> 00:04:11,320 Speaker 1: warning Donald Trump not to pull out of the Paris Agreement. 69 00:04:11,640 --> 00:04:14,600 Speaker 1: I have a hard time imagining x on Mobile gives 70 00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:19,440 Speaker 1: a fuck about anything, but I just want to point 71 00:04:19,480 --> 00:04:22,080 Speaker 1: out this is how far down the rabbit hole we are. 72 00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:25,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, not good, So byan scratch my head, at least 73 00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:29,080 Speaker 2: maybe you can make sense this. I can actually Okay, 74 00:04:29,080 --> 00:04:32,880 Speaker 2: good Mike Hookaby for Arkansas governor who once wrote a 75 00:04:32,880 --> 00:04:36,360 Speaker 2: book about killing yourself with a fork and knife about 76 00:04:36,360 --> 00:04:39,240 Speaker 2: our nutrition system and then said fuck that I'm gonna 77 00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:41,719 Speaker 2: get fat again, and this was a bullshit book. He's 78 00:04:41,720 --> 00:04:44,520 Speaker 2: going to be a besser to Israel. Make it makes sense. 79 00:04:45,120 --> 00:04:48,919 Speaker 1: Yes, I could actually make this make sense because this 80 00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:53,080 Speaker 1: is like the fascinating grift of Trump World. Mike Huckabee 81 00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:56,080 Speaker 1: has been leading tours to Israel for years. 82 00:04:56,360 --> 00:04:58,359 Speaker 2: All that I need you to make something makes sense 83 00:04:58,360 --> 00:05:01,040 Speaker 2: for me, you being the wish What are the two 84 00:05:01,120 --> 00:05:05,120 Speaker 2: of us? Yes, Huckabee, does it sound Hebrew to be No. 85 00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:09,320 Speaker 1: He's not a Jew, but you'll remember that religious people, 86 00:05:10,040 --> 00:05:14,679 Speaker 1: very religious, you know, Zealid love Israel. So in fact, 87 00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:18,200 Speaker 1: I'm going to read a testimonial from Blue Diamond Travel 88 00:05:18,240 --> 00:05:21,880 Speaker 1: Experiences our prayer as many many more Christians can travel 89 00:05:21,880 --> 00:05:24,680 Speaker 1: with Mike and Janet Huckabee and feel the presence of 90 00:05:24,720 --> 00:05:27,440 Speaker 1: our Great King in just the same way we did. 91 00:05:27,720 --> 00:05:31,719 Speaker 1: I assume that this will be very good for his 92 00:05:32,000 --> 00:05:38,000 Speaker 1: tour guide business. Being the ambassador, Trump has really leveraged 93 00:05:38,200 --> 00:05:45,120 Speaker 1: the Christians obsession with Israel into his own weird using 94 00:05:45,360 --> 00:05:51,599 Speaker 1: Israel to whatever. And now Mike Huckabee will figure into 95 00:05:51,640 --> 00:05:54,760 Speaker 1: this hole. While this, by the way, his twenty twenty 96 00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:59,400 Speaker 1: four Israel tour is called Unveil the Spiritual Wonders. 97 00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:02,120 Speaker 2: Oh, I had that on my to do list for 98 00:06:02,560 --> 00:06:03,479 Speaker 2: next year. That's good. 99 00:06:03,960 --> 00:06:08,080 Speaker 1: An unforgettable journey through Israel, blending faith, culture, and history 100 00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:15,960 Speaker 1: into a unique tapestry. There you go. Ron Brownstein is 101 00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:19,760 Speaker 1: a senior political analyst for CNN and a senior editor 102 00:06:19,760 --> 00:06:24,920 Speaker 1: at the Atlantic. Welcome to Fast politics. Ron Brownstein, he 103 00:06:25,279 --> 00:06:29,440 Speaker 1: molly anything new goal nothing. Absolutely. After this election, I 104 00:06:29,480 --> 00:06:31,480 Speaker 1: was like, I have to talk to Ron. Ron has 105 00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:33,520 Speaker 1: to explain to me what happened. I just wrote a 106 00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:35,719 Speaker 1: piece about all this stuff I got wrong for very 107 00:06:35,760 --> 00:06:38,599 Speaker 1: fair about this election. I did not get this right. 108 00:06:38,720 --> 00:06:41,720 Speaker 1: But you are much more harder than I am, So 109 00:06:41,960 --> 00:06:43,920 Speaker 1: explain to us what happened. 110 00:06:44,440 --> 00:06:45,280 Speaker 3: You know, I'm not sure. 111 00:06:45,320 --> 00:06:48,480 Speaker 4: I was much smarter, and I got one big thing wrong, 112 00:06:48,520 --> 00:06:50,920 Speaker 4: which we will talk about in a minute. But I mean, 113 00:06:51,080 --> 00:06:54,120 Speaker 4: the most abnormal thing about this election, the most shocking 114 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:57,120 Speaker 4: thing about this election was how normal it was. I mean, 115 00:06:57,200 --> 00:07:01,840 Speaker 4: Donald Trump obviously is not a normal candidate, but to 116 00:07:01,960 --> 00:07:06,320 Speaker 4: a large extent, the electorate treated him that way. And 117 00:07:06,560 --> 00:07:11,480 Speaker 4: you had the normal hydraulics in place, which is in 118 00:07:11,520 --> 00:07:14,840 Speaker 4: a two party system, when the view of one party 119 00:07:14,880 --> 00:07:18,320 Speaker 4: goes down, the other party rises, and you know, there 120 00:07:18,320 --> 00:07:20,240 Speaker 4: are always a lot of things going on, and we 121 00:07:20,320 --> 00:07:23,160 Speaker 4: have to unpack and understand what happened with young men 122 00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:27,960 Speaker 4: and Latino men in particular. But Harris underperformed across the 123 00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:32,200 Speaker 4: board demographically and geographically. She did not have the gaens 124 00:07:32,360 --> 00:07:35,600 Speaker 4: among college white women that you would have expected. She 125 00:07:35,640 --> 00:07:39,160 Speaker 4: did not have the gains among young women that you 126 00:07:39,200 --> 00:07:41,720 Speaker 4: would have expected. She did not have the gains in 127 00:07:41,720 --> 00:07:45,720 Speaker 4: suburbia that seem very much possible after the twenty twenty 128 00:07:45,760 --> 00:07:50,640 Speaker 4: two election. And what you saw was a very normal 129 00:07:50,880 --> 00:07:54,680 Speaker 4: pattern when you have an outgoing president who is unpopular, 130 00:07:54,880 --> 00:07:57,600 Speaker 4: who is either running for reelection or stepping aside. In 131 00:07:57,720 --> 00:08:00,880 Speaker 4: either case, the vast majority of pepeople who are unhappy 132 00:08:00,920 --> 00:08:03,360 Speaker 4: with that president's performance vote for the other side. So 133 00:08:03,640 --> 00:08:06,600 Speaker 4: what did that mean. Well, sixty percent of voters in 134 00:08:06,680 --> 00:08:10,200 Speaker 4: the exepole said they disapproved of Biden's performance. It was 135 00:08:10,280 --> 00:08:13,320 Speaker 4: even worse than the number in twenty twenty two, and 136 00:08:13,440 --> 00:08:14,760 Speaker 4: eighty two percent. 137 00:08:14,480 --> 00:08:16,680 Speaker 3: Of those disapprovers voted for Trump. 138 00:08:17,120 --> 00:08:21,320 Speaker 4: Seventy percent of voters said that the economy was in 139 00:08:21,360 --> 00:08:23,800 Speaker 4: bad shape, it was only in fair or poor condition. 140 00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:27,640 Speaker 4: Seventy percent of those people voted for Trump. That's his vote, 141 00:08:27,680 --> 00:08:31,160 Speaker 4: that's his forty nine point something that'll probably end up 142 00:08:31,160 --> 00:08:33,680 Speaker 4: getting when this is all counted. He's just over fifty. 143 00:08:33,720 --> 00:08:36,840 Speaker 4: Now he possibly, maybe more likely than not, is going 144 00:08:36,880 --> 00:08:39,679 Speaker 4: to fall just under fifty. But if you look and 145 00:08:39,720 --> 00:08:43,840 Speaker 4: compare to twenty twenty two, Molly, the share of people 146 00:08:43,920 --> 00:08:47,360 Speaker 4: who said the economy was in bad shape but voted 147 00:08:47,520 --> 00:08:52,520 Speaker 4: for Whitmer or Shapiro or Mark Kelly or Rafael Warnock 148 00:08:52,840 --> 00:08:56,600 Speaker 4: in twenty two was much higher than the share of 149 00:08:56,640 --> 00:08:58,920 Speaker 4: people who said the economy was in bad shape and 150 00:08:59,000 --> 00:09:02,559 Speaker 4: voted for Harris in those same states. And what that 151 00:09:02,720 --> 00:09:08,080 Speaker 4: says to me was that people associate and attribute the 152 00:09:08,120 --> 00:09:12,840 Speaker 4: president control over national economic policy, and it simply was 153 00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:15,599 Speaker 4: less possible for her to run away from the discontent 154 00:09:15,679 --> 00:09:18,920 Speaker 4: over that. Primarily, other things mattered in you know, the 155 00:09:18,960 --> 00:09:23,320 Speaker 4: border mattered, Prime mattered, But primarily it was harder for 156 00:09:23,360 --> 00:09:27,720 Speaker 4: her to escape the undertow of discontent about the economy 157 00:09:27,720 --> 00:09:30,319 Speaker 4: in Biden's performance than it was for Democratic candidates in 158 00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:33,400 Speaker 4: twenty two, and for that matter, even to some extent 159 00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:36,520 Speaker 4: in twenty twenty four. You know, people like splocking. 160 00:09:37,080 --> 00:09:39,439 Speaker 1: Yes, I want you to talk us through this, because 161 00:09:39,440 --> 00:09:42,080 Speaker 1: I looked at those numbers and you had people I 162 00:09:42,120 --> 00:09:46,240 Speaker 1: feel like, the best example here is the example of 163 00:09:46,440 --> 00:09:50,720 Speaker 1: Carrie Lake in Arizona. You had people vote for Trump 164 00:09:51,080 --> 00:09:55,880 Speaker 1: and then not bother to fill in the bubbles for 165 00:09:56,000 --> 00:09:58,520 Speaker 1: carry Lake, who ran as a mini Trump. 166 00:09:58,559 --> 00:10:02,160 Speaker 4: So explain that to me my basic feeling about this. 167 00:10:02,679 --> 00:10:04,760 Speaker 4: You know, there are people who point to Trump having 168 00:10:04,840 --> 00:10:08,160 Speaker 4: this unique connection with his voters. And I am sure 169 00:10:08,200 --> 00:10:11,560 Speaker 4: that is true, and that was not able to be replicated. 170 00:10:11,559 --> 00:10:14,600 Speaker 4: And in many cases the Democrats in the Senate raises 171 00:10:14,679 --> 00:10:18,440 Speaker 4: did not get appreciably more votes than Harris did, but 172 00:10:18,480 --> 00:10:21,880 Speaker 4: the Republican got appreciably less than Trump did. Certainly, I 173 00:10:21,920 --> 00:10:24,200 Speaker 4: think that was the case in Wisconsin. 174 00:10:24,040 --> 00:10:27,480 Speaker 1: And Michigan and Arizona and Nevada. 175 00:10:27,520 --> 00:10:30,079 Speaker 4: So I actually look at it a little differently. I mean, 176 00:10:30,120 --> 00:10:31,840 Speaker 4: I go back to the point I made a minute ago, 177 00:10:31,960 --> 00:10:34,360 Speaker 4: which is that, for example, if you look in twenty 178 00:10:34,400 --> 00:10:37,600 Speaker 4: twenty two, people who had a negative view of the economy, 179 00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:40,960 Speaker 4: John Fetterman in twenty twenty two lost them in Pennsylvania, right, 180 00:10:41,000 --> 00:10:43,120 Speaker 4: he lost them, but he lost them by eighteen points. 181 00:10:43,320 --> 00:10:45,360 Speaker 4: People who had a negative view of the economy. This 182 00:10:45,440 --> 00:10:47,959 Speaker 4: time in Pennsylvania, Kamala Harris lost them by. 183 00:10:47,920 --> 00:10:50,640 Speaker 3: Thirty seven points. Okay, in Nevada. 184 00:10:50,760 --> 00:10:52,400 Speaker 4: Last time, people who are in a negative view of 185 00:10:52,440 --> 00:10:54,920 Speaker 4: the economy, Catherine court has Master lost them by twenty 186 00:10:54,920 --> 00:10:58,680 Speaker 4: six points. This time Harris lost them by forty one points. 187 00:10:58,720 --> 00:11:01,760 Speaker 4: And then you kind of look at it horizontally. In 188 00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:04,839 Speaker 4: this election, Rosen didn't lose people who are negative on 189 00:11:04,880 --> 00:11:07,000 Speaker 4: the economy by quite as much as Harris did. And 190 00:11:07,040 --> 00:11:10,560 Speaker 4: to me, that's the difference is that as the presidential candidate, 191 00:11:11,240 --> 00:11:15,720 Speaker 4: you are held accountable greater than anybody else. 192 00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:19,360 Speaker 1: And this is really we're only here for my own edification. 193 00:11:19,679 --> 00:11:22,480 Speaker 1: I understand this is a podcast, but this is a 194 00:11:22,559 --> 00:11:29,199 Speaker 1: question I want answered. Doesn't it seem like Harris is overperforming? 195 00:11:29,520 --> 00:11:33,839 Speaker 1: For example, so originally you had this Biden map before 196 00:11:33,840 --> 00:11:36,400 Speaker 1: he dropped out, which showed him losing. This is the 197 00:11:36,480 --> 00:11:38,920 Speaker 1: famous pod Bros. Where they had a map that showed 198 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:43,240 Speaker 1: him losing four hundred electoral votes, right, which I didn't 199 00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:46,040 Speaker 1: even know was possible, but it is, turns out and 200 00:11:46,080 --> 00:11:49,440 Speaker 1: then Harris jumps in and she reversed the tide, right, 201 00:11:49,520 --> 00:11:53,440 Speaker 1: So you see the down ballot candidates actually do better, 202 00:11:53,720 --> 00:11:56,559 Speaker 1: and they do better in swing states where the campaign 203 00:11:56,640 --> 00:11:59,760 Speaker 1: has taken over the airwaves. So that makes the case 204 00:11:59,800 --> 00:12:02,840 Speaker 1: that a Harris did actually help and b that the 205 00:12:02,920 --> 00:12:06,120 Speaker 1: campaign did actually help, Which gets me to my next thought, 206 00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:08,840 Speaker 1: which is, does this mean that Donald Trump is just 207 00:12:08,960 --> 00:12:13,360 Speaker 1: singularly powerful and that it's not so much about the 208 00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:17,760 Speaker 1: Republican brand or the Democratic brand, but merely about the incredible, 209 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:19,840 Speaker 1: unheard of power of Trump. 210 00:12:20,120 --> 00:12:23,880 Speaker 4: So to your first point, I think it is unequivocal 211 00:12:24,000 --> 00:12:26,319 Speaker 4: that Harris did better than Biden would have done. I 212 00:12:26,360 --> 00:12:29,280 Speaker 4: mean I talked to one political scientist who said that 213 00:12:29,360 --> 00:12:33,199 Speaker 4: based on Biden's approval, the right track, wrong track, and 214 00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:37,640 Speaker 4: the perceptions of the economy, that his model would have 215 00:12:37,720 --> 00:12:38,520 Speaker 4: had a six. 216 00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:40,600 Speaker 3: Point popular vote loss for the incumbent. 217 00:12:40,960 --> 00:12:42,959 Speaker 4: Harris is going to end up losing by somewhere between 218 00:12:42,960 --> 00:12:46,560 Speaker 4: one point five and two points. What I think I 219 00:12:46,679 --> 00:12:49,520 Speaker 4: got wrong the most, and a lot of people got 220 00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:53,160 Speaker 4: wrong the most, was that the twenty twenty two model 221 00:12:53,400 --> 00:12:57,120 Speaker 4: turned out to be not quite as replicable. 222 00:12:56,600 --> 00:12:58,079 Speaker 3: In twenty four as of the period. 223 00:12:58,080 --> 00:12:59,480 Speaker 4: And what I mean by that if you look at 224 00:12:59,520 --> 00:13:03,520 Speaker 4: twenty twenty in the states where both sides weren't spending money, 225 00:13:03,600 --> 00:13:06,440 Speaker 4: whether they were red states like Texas and Florida or 226 00:13:06,480 --> 00:13:09,040 Speaker 4: blue states like California and New York. In twenty two, 227 00:13:09,360 --> 00:13:12,800 Speaker 4: Republicans improved in those states, which is what you would 228 00:13:12,800 --> 00:13:15,920 Speaker 4: expect when sixty five percent of the country thinks we're 229 00:13:15,960 --> 00:13:18,760 Speaker 4: on the wrong track and the president's approval rating is low. 230 00:13:19,000 --> 00:13:21,200 Speaker 4: But what Democrats were able to do in twenty two 231 00:13:21,800 --> 00:13:25,520 Speaker 4: was basically quarantine the swing state and in the states 232 00:13:25,559 --> 00:13:30,640 Speaker 4: where they ran a full scale campaign Wittmer, Shapiro, Evers, 233 00:13:30,760 --> 00:13:35,560 Speaker 4: Mark Kelly, Katie Hobbs, John Fetterman, Raphael Warnock. They ran 234 00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:39,679 Speaker 4: vastly better than Democrats did in the non competitive state. Okay, 235 00:13:39,720 --> 00:13:42,559 Speaker 4: fast forward to twenty four. Right, fast forward to twenty four, 236 00:13:42,720 --> 00:13:46,120 Speaker 4: The same thing happens in the non competitive states. New 237 00:13:46,200 --> 00:13:50,280 Speaker 4: Jersey gets worse, Arizona gets worse, Florida gets worse, Texas 238 00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:52,599 Speaker 4: gets worse. You know, whether it's a blue state or 239 00:13:52,640 --> 00:13:55,840 Speaker 4: a red state, when you're dealing with a forty percent 240 00:13:55,880 --> 00:13:59,120 Speaker 4: approval rating for the outgoing president, they all get worse. Now, 241 00:13:59,160 --> 00:14:01,600 Speaker 4: what do we look in side the quarantine line in 242 00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:05,480 Speaker 4: the swing states? It works to some extent. Harris doesn't 243 00:14:05,520 --> 00:14:08,920 Speaker 4: deteriorate in them as much as she does outside of 244 00:14:08,920 --> 00:14:11,840 Speaker 4: the swing states, but she doesn't run nearly as well. 245 00:14:11,840 --> 00:14:15,080 Speaker 4: The differential isn't nearly as big as it was in 246 00:14:15,120 --> 00:14:17,880 Speaker 4: twenty two for Whitmer and Shapiro and Ebrs and Warnock 247 00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:22,080 Speaker 4: and Kelly, and the undertow kind of seeps in. 248 00:14:22,280 --> 00:14:24,880 Speaker 3: You know, the quarantine. The moat doesn't work. 249 00:14:24,920 --> 00:14:28,560 Speaker 4: The quarantine doesn't work, As I said, even in those states. 250 00:14:28,880 --> 00:14:31,440 Speaker 4: To me, like, out of all the numbers I've looked at, 251 00:14:31,480 --> 00:14:34,000 Speaker 4: the one that really jumps out at me is that 252 00:14:34,040 --> 00:14:40,240 Speaker 4: in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, significantly more of the 253 00:14:40,320 --> 00:14:44,120 Speaker 4: voters who are negative on the economy voted against Harris 254 00:14:44,520 --> 00:14:47,120 Speaker 4: than voted against the Democratic candidates in twenty two. We 255 00:14:47,160 --> 00:14:49,200 Speaker 4: can argue about why that is. You know, a lot 256 00:14:49,200 --> 00:14:53,280 Speaker 4: of factors probably went into that, including Trump's improving image, which. 257 00:14:53,080 --> 00:14:54,080 Speaker 3: We should talk about. 258 00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:56,320 Speaker 4: But a big part of it, I think is that 259 00:14:56,680 --> 00:15:01,160 Speaker 4: you just can't escape that verdict as the president. And 260 00:15:01,200 --> 00:15:03,880 Speaker 4: the fact that she declined everywhere, the fact that the 261 00:15:04,000 --> 00:15:07,520 Speaker 4: urban centers decline, the inner suburbs decline, the outer suburbs decline, 262 00:15:07,560 --> 00:15:10,000 Speaker 4: the rural places decline. They all declined by about the 263 00:15:10,000 --> 00:15:12,320 Speaker 4: same amount. I wrote this the Center for Rural Studies, 264 00:15:12,480 --> 00:15:15,240 Speaker 4: which is a think tank. They have a classification system 265 00:15:15,240 --> 00:15:18,480 Speaker 4: that categorizes all counties in six groupings, from the most 266 00:15:18,600 --> 00:15:21,880 Speaker 4: urban to the most rural. They all declined by about 267 00:15:21,920 --> 00:15:24,920 Speaker 4: the same amount. That is not something that is about 268 00:15:25,240 --> 00:15:29,520 Speaker 4: messaging or positioning. That is about a common national experience, 269 00:15:29,600 --> 00:15:33,680 Speaker 4: a shared national verdict, which is inflati, which is inflation 270 00:15:33,840 --> 00:15:35,920 Speaker 4: above all, and maybe a little bit of the border 271 00:15:35,960 --> 00:15:37,000 Speaker 4: and crime, but of inflation. 272 00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:41,520 Speaker 1: I mean it seems like that's an anxiety about implanturing, right, yes. 273 00:15:41,400 --> 00:15:43,840 Speaker 3: More than anything else. Absolutely, I think what was it? 274 00:15:43,880 --> 00:15:45,680 Speaker 4: Forty six percent of people in the exitpos said they 275 00:15:45,720 --> 00:15:47,200 Speaker 4: were worse off than they were four years ago, and 276 00:15:47,240 --> 00:15:48,960 Speaker 4: over eighty percent of them voted for Trump. I mean, 277 00:15:49,080 --> 00:15:51,160 Speaker 4: that's kind of the heart of the election right there. 278 00:15:51,280 --> 00:15:54,600 Speaker 1: Doesn't that mean that Trump has more power as a candidate? 279 00:15:54,640 --> 00:15:56,880 Speaker 1: I mean, isn't that what that is? His ability to 280 00:15:57,000 --> 00:15:59,400 Speaker 1: appeal to a broad swath. 281 00:16:00,120 --> 00:16:03,400 Speaker 4: I would say his ability to turn out people inclined 282 00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:07,400 Speaker 4: to support him is his superpower. But I think equally 283 00:16:07,480 --> 00:16:12,360 Speaker 4: critical was that the cross pressure of the economy caused 284 00:16:12,400 --> 00:16:13,640 Speaker 4: a lot of voters who. 285 00:16:13,520 --> 00:16:15,640 Speaker 3: Remain hasard Trump to vote for him. 286 00:16:15,680 --> 00:16:18,240 Speaker 4: Anyway, It's worth noting a couple of these between the 287 00:16:18,240 --> 00:16:21,120 Speaker 4: exit polls and votecasts, which are two major sources right 288 00:16:21,160 --> 00:16:23,560 Speaker 4: of people's attitudes as they were voting, fifty five percent 289 00:16:23,600 --> 00:16:26,000 Speaker 4: said he was too extreme, fifty five percent said they 290 00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:28,400 Speaker 4: were he would lead the country in an authoritarian direction. 291 00:16:28,560 --> 00:16:31,200 Speaker 4: Two thirds almost said they wanted the abortion to remain 292 00:16:31,280 --> 00:16:34,480 Speaker 4: legal in all most circumstances. Fifty five fifty six percent 293 00:16:34,480 --> 00:16:37,720 Speaker 4: majority said they opposed mass deportation, and roughly that many 294 00:16:37,800 --> 00:16:40,520 Speaker 4: said they want the government to do more to provide 295 00:16:40,560 --> 00:16:43,160 Speaker 4: access to healthcare, all of which they're not going to 296 00:16:43,200 --> 00:16:46,200 Speaker 4: get with Trump. And the reason he won is because 297 00:16:46,240 --> 00:16:49,480 Speaker 4: there was a substantial slice of voters in each of 298 00:16:49,520 --> 00:16:53,280 Speaker 4: those questions who express negative views about Trump who voted 299 00:16:53,320 --> 00:16:55,520 Speaker 4: for him. Anyway, Here, I'm going to give you the 300 00:16:55,560 --> 00:16:58,320 Speaker 4: world premiere of something that will be in my Atlantic 301 00:16:58,360 --> 00:17:02,200 Speaker 4: column later this week. Voters who said abortion should be 302 00:17:02,280 --> 00:17:06,160 Speaker 4: legal in all or most circumstances. Okay, pro choice voters 303 00:17:06,280 --> 00:17:09,399 Speaker 4: but were negative on the economy said the economy was 304 00:17:09,440 --> 00:17:10,399 Speaker 4: only fair or poor. 305 00:17:10,680 --> 00:17:13,800 Speaker 3: How do you think they voted? Trump won? And this 306 00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:16,480 Speaker 3: was a big group. This is over one. 307 00:17:16,400 --> 00:17:19,879 Speaker 4: Third of the electorate said they were pro choice but 308 00:17:19,960 --> 00:17:21,399 Speaker 4: the economy was fair poor. 309 00:17:21,440 --> 00:17:22,440 Speaker 3: Trump won them. 310 00:17:22,480 --> 00:17:26,280 Speaker 1: Wow? Is that because he just was able to neutralize 311 00:17:26,280 --> 00:17:29,720 Speaker 1: the issue by saying that he wanted to throw it 312 00:17:29,720 --> 00:17:32,320 Speaker 1: back to the States and then just shutting it down. 313 00:17:32,560 --> 00:17:35,159 Speaker 3: Some of that and some of that. 314 00:17:35,320 --> 00:17:38,280 Speaker 4: The economy mattered more to them the way I phrased it. 315 00:17:38,359 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 4: And this is not the first time this has happened. 316 00:17:40,760 --> 00:17:43,280 Speaker 4: This was what happened to Carter with Reagae, It's what 317 00:17:43,320 --> 00:17:46,080 Speaker 4: happened to George H. W. Bush with Clinton. If people 318 00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:50,400 Speaker 4: are dissatisfied with the status quo, stability is the risk 319 00:17:50,640 --> 00:17:55,399 Speaker 4: people view continuing along the track of an unacceptable present 320 00:17:55,560 --> 00:17:59,160 Speaker 4: to be a greater risk than leaping into an unpredictable future. 321 00:17:59,280 --> 00:18:03,920 Speaker 4: And Trump, again, this is a well trod dynamic. The 322 00:18:04,359 --> 00:18:07,359 Speaker 4: shocking part is that it applied to Trump. You know, 323 00:18:07,480 --> 00:18:11,000 Speaker 4: I mean that Trump got all of the traditional benefits. 324 00:18:11,119 --> 00:18:13,880 Speaker 4: He recumbent, and he's someone to try to overthrow the government, 325 00:18:13,920 --> 00:18:17,240 Speaker 4: and he has ninety four felony indictments and convictions. 326 00:18:16,880 --> 00:18:19,159 Speaker 3: And adjudicated sexual assault and all of that. 327 00:18:19,359 --> 00:18:21,560 Speaker 4: And yet if you kind of look at the numbers 328 00:18:21,560 --> 00:18:24,119 Speaker 4: and didn't have his name on it, it would be like, humph, 329 00:18:24,160 --> 00:18:26,320 Speaker 4: this is what the out party gets. 330 00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:27,879 Speaker 3: And you know, maybe part of that. 331 00:18:28,240 --> 00:18:29,879 Speaker 4: And this is where I think there's going to be 332 00:18:29,920 --> 00:18:33,000 Speaker 4: a lot of second guessing about some of the Democratic 333 00:18:33,080 --> 00:18:36,760 Speaker 4: strategy in twenty three and twenty four. His favorability was 334 00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:39,320 Speaker 4: much higher in the electorate in twenty four than it 335 00:18:39,320 --> 00:18:43,880 Speaker 4: wasn't twenty two. His retrospective job approval was over fifty percent. 336 00:18:44,280 --> 00:18:45,080 Speaker 1: That's insane. 337 00:18:45,560 --> 00:18:49,840 Speaker 4: And that is pretty striking given everything else. A big 338 00:18:49,920 --> 00:18:53,119 Speaker 4: part of that is that voters, as we've talked about before, 339 00:18:53,600 --> 00:18:55,640 Speaker 4: you could see this happening all the way through twenty 340 00:18:55,680 --> 00:18:59,119 Speaker 4: three and twenty four. Voters were judging Trump retrospectively through 341 00:18:59,240 --> 00:19:02,000 Speaker 4: the lens of what they didn't like currently about Biden, 342 00:19:02,359 --> 00:19:05,640 Speaker 4: primarily inflating and maybe the border. But it also meant 343 00:19:05,640 --> 00:19:07,960 Speaker 4: that all of the other things they didn't like about Trump, 344 00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:10,480 Speaker 4: they kept his approval rating from ever hitting fifty while 345 00:19:10,480 --> 00:19:13,280 Speaker 4: he was president, were kind of fading in their memory, 346 00:19:13,359 --> 00:19:16,359 Speaker 4: and Democrats didn't really do a great job of reminding 347 00:19:16,400 --> 00:19:18,320 Speaker 4: them of that until the end. I mean, let's just 348 00:19:18,359 --> 00:19:21,520 Speaker 4: consider here, this was the only president ever who's approval 349 00:19:21,600 --> 00:19:24,760 Speaker 4: rating never reached fifty percent while he was in office 350 00:19:24,760 --> 00:19:28,960 Speaker 4: in Gallup, and his retrospective job approprating in Vodecast was 351 00:19:29,240 --> 00:19:33,280 Speaker 4: fifty or fifty one percent. Like that is something, and 352 00:19:33,320 --> 00:19:36,600 Speaker 4: that is partially a reflection of I said, the hydraulics, 353 00:19:36,880 --> 00:19:39,760 Speaker 4: you know, Biden goes down, Republicans go up. But it's 354 00:19:39,800 --> 00:19:43,800 Speaker 4: also the extent to which everything else about his presidency, 355 00:19:43,960 --> 00:19:45,639 Speaker 4: which by the way, people are going to get exposed 356 00:19:45,680 --> 00:19:48,280 Speaker 4: to again that they didn't like kind of faded next 357 00:19:48,320 --> 00:19:49,720 Speaker 4: to the fact that people felt they had more money 358 00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:50,960 Speaker 4: in their pocket at the end of the week. 359 00:19:51,160 --> 00:19:55,160 Speaker 1: That is wild, wild, wild wild. 360 00:19:55,440 --> 00:19:57,320 Speaker 3: And by the way, like, here's one thing that goes 361 00:19:57,320 --> 00:19:57,600 Speaker 3: with that. 362 00:19:57,840 --> 00:20:00,320 Speaker 4: Biden won the popular vote by four and a half point, right, 363 00:20:00,520 --> 00:20:02,399 Speaker 4: So we're gonna have to wait and see when we 364 00:20:02,440 --> 00:20:04,600 Speaker 4: get the actual analysis it's done with the data files, 365 00:20:04,600 --> 00:20:08,760 Speaker 4: which is both Catalyst and Pew. But right now, Biden 366 00:20:08,800 --> 00:20:10,720 Speaker 4: won by four and a half points. But when among 367 00:20:10,760 --> 00:20:13,359 Speaker 4: the people who voted in twenty twenty in both the 368 00:20:13,359 --> 00:20:17,359 Speaker 4: exipol and votecast, they were even in how they voted 369 00:20:17,480 --> 00:20:20,760 Speaker 4: in twenty twenty plus one for Biden or zero difference. 370 00:20:20,920 --> 00:20:23,600 Speaker 4: So that means that a lot of people who voted 371 00:20:23,640 --> 00:20:25,920 Speaker 4: for Biden in twenty twenty did not come back. Did 372 00:20:25,920 --> 00:20:28,720 Speaker 4: they not come back because they didn't fear Trump enough? 373 00:20:28,840 --> 00:20:30,600 Speaker 4: Did they not come back because they didn't like the 374 00:20:30,640 --> 00:20:33,600 Speaker 4: results they got from Biden? Was it both? But there 375 00:20:33,720 --> 00:20:36,800 Speaker 4: was a big fall off in the kind of surge 376 00:20:36,840 --> 00:20:39,080 Speaker 4: anti Maga voter. It came out in eighteen twenty two. 377 00:20:39,480 --> 00:20:43,200 Speaker 1: I wondered if that was the Democratic base staying home. Well, 378 00:20:43,240 --> 00:20:46,040 Speaker 1: it was something she lost young people. 379 00:20:46,440 --> 00:20:48,879 Speaker 4: Well, she won young people, but retreated from Biden in 380 00:20:48,920 --> 00:20:53,359 Speaker 4: twenty I actually think that was probably the surge. Again, 381 00:20:53,400 --> 00:20:57,280 Speaker 4: when Catalyst and Pugh does this and they match their 382 00:20:57,640 --> 00:21:00,480 Speaker 4: analysis to the actual voter file, will have a better idea. 383 00:21:00,520 --> 00:21:03,720 Speaker 4: But if I had a guest today, the irregularly voting 384 00:21:03,960 --> 00:21:07,880 Speaker 4: Democratic leaning constituencies, they came out to vote against Trump 385 00:21:07,880 --> 00:21:10,639 Speaker 4: in eighteen twenty and twenty twenty two, a lot of 386 00:21:10,640 --> 00:21:13,639 Speaker 4: them stayed home, whereas Trump continued to turn out his 387 00:21:13,880 --> 00:21:17,680 Speaker 4: irregularly voting, his low propensity voters, particularly younger men. 388 00:21:17,840 --> 00:21:18,840 Speaker 3: Again, we'll look. 389 00:21:18,680 --> 00:21:21,120 Speaker 4: At later when we get these other sources, but right now, 390 00:21:21,160 --> 00:21:23,400 Speaker 4: what we have, the exits of the votecast told us 391 00:21:23,560 --> 00:21:28,479 Speaker 4: that Republicans outnumbered Democrats among voters to the biggest degree 392 00:21:28,560 --> 00:21:31,040 Speaker 4: I think ever in the exipolse. I mean the exipolse, 393 00:21:31,280 --> 00:21:33,760 Speaker 4: you know, the exipole was Republicans were four points more 394 00:21:33,760 --> 00:21:35,800 Speaker 4: of the electorate than Democrats, and I think votecast was 395 00:21:35,840 --> 00:21:36,200 Speaker 4: the same. 396 00:21:36,680 --> 00:21:39,480 Speaker 3: There's never been a gap like that, never, never. 397 00:21:40,040 --> 00:21:42,960 Speaker 1: But that's because he got those low propensity ones and 398 00:21:43,080 --> 00:21:44,520 Speaker 1: twos out right. 399 00:21:44,359 --> 00:21:48,360 Speaker 4: And then the low propensity Democrats would be my supposition 400 00:21:48,520 --> 00:21:51,480 Speaker 4: did not come back. Now, why you know, one view 401 00:21:51,600 --> 00:21:54,600 Speaker 4: is they did not have the sufficient sense of alarm 402 00:21:54,760 --> 00:21:57,879 Speaker 4: about MAGA, despite Trump being more radical than he was 403 00:21:57,920 --> 00:22:01,240 Speaker 4: in twenty or sixteen. The other are though, is that 404 00:22:01,320 --> 00:22:04,359 Speaker 4: they came out, they voted for Biden, and their lives 405 00:22:04,359 --> 00:22:06,439 Speaker 4: didn't get better in the way that they hoped, and 406 00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:09,400 Speaker 4: interest rates and inflation were weighing on them, and they 407 00:22:09,440 --> 00:22:10,800 Speaker 4: were just like, screw. 408 00:22:10,560 --> 00:22:16,280 Speaker 1: It, unbelievable. Ron Brownstein, appreciate you so much, and also 409 00:22:17,000 --> 00:22:20,600 Speaker 1: so Deprodson. We're all gonna die, but thank you for 410 00:22:20,680 --> 00:22:21,000 Speaker 1: coming on. 411 00:22:21,200 --> 00:22:22,640 Speaker 3: Can I just say one last thing real quick? 412 00:22:22,840 --> 00:22:26,320 Speaker 4: Yeah, you don't get movement of this magnitude on an 413 00:22:26,400 --> 00:22:30,159 Speaker 4: ideological shift. I don't think the consistency of this across 414 00:22:30,200 --> 00:22:33,639 Speaker 4: every kind of county says to me that this was 415 00:22:33,680 --> 00:22:37,040 Speaker 4: more about performance than anything else. It was a common 416 00:22:37,119 --> 00:22:40,720 Speaker 4: national verdict. Biden's administration did not deliver what people hope, 417 00:22:40,880 --> 00:22:43,480 Speaker 4: even though they had a lot of positive achievement. 418 00:22:43,600 --> 00:22:47,160 Speaker 1: Should that make me feel better, Yes, yes, okay, it should. 419 00:22:47,000 --> 00:22:49,080 Speaker 4: Make you feel better, only in the sense that if 420 00:22:49,080 --> 00:22:53,280 Speaker 4: Trump doesn't deliver. People hired Trump to solve some specific problems, 421 00:22:53,440 --> 00:22:56,919 Speaker 4: particularly they're squeeze in the cost of living. They remain 422 00:22:57,119 --> 00:22:59,280 Speaker 4: hesitant about a lot of the things that he wants 423 00:22:59,320 --> 00:23:03,440 Speaker 4: to do back the APA, undermining vaccines. 424 00:23:02,880 --> 00:23:03,720 Speaker 3: Mass deportation. 425 00:23:04,000 --> 00:23:06,800 Speaker 4: If he gives them a lot of that and doesn't 426 00:23:06,840 --> 00:23:09,520 Speaker 4: deal with doesn't solve the problem that they hired him 427 00:23:09,560 --> 00:23:11,800 Speaker 4: to do. You could see the same kind of uniform 428 00:23:11,800 --> 00:23:13,960 Speaker 4: movement in the other direction in the elections of the 429 00:23:14,000 --> 00:23:15,040 Speaker 4: near future, and. 430 00:23:15,000 --> 00:23:18,640 Speaker 1: It is, I might add, a very hard problem to solve, right, 431 00:23:18,720 --> 00:23:21,879 Speaker 1: I mean, there's no quick fix for making things less expensive. 432 00:23:21,960 --> 00:23:24,600 Speaker 1: Thank you, thank you, thank you. Ron Brownstein. Will you 433 00:23:24,680 --> 00:23:25,439 Speaker 1: please come. 434 00:23:25,320 --> 00:23:27,800 Speaker 3: Back, thank you, thank you. You know where to find me. 435 00:23:29,600 --> 00:23:34,600 Speaker 1: Miranda Green is an independent investigative reporter. I'm Miranda. Welcome 436 00:23:34,640 --> 00:23:39,119 Speaker 1: to Bath Politics Biggs. Talk to us about what you 437 00:23:39,680 --> 00:23:44,560 Speaker 1: discovered and how the right and mago world more specifically 438 00:23:44,640 --> 00:23:45,600 Speaker 1: gets its news. 439 00:23:45,920 --> 00:23:49,199 Speaker 5: Yeah, you know, I think post this most recent election, 440 00:23:49,520 --> 00:23:51,520 Speaker 5: a lot of the rhetoric and a lot of the 441 00:23:51,720 --> 00:23:56,560 Speaker 5: kind of internal dialogue has been about what the media missed, right, 442 00:23:56,680 --> 00:23:59,959 Speaker 5: A lot of kind of self lagulation about what we 443 00:24:00,080 --> 00:24:03,080 Speaker 5: could have done more, or how we didn't see that 444 00:24:03,119 --> 00:24:07,159 Speaker 5: Trump would win with such overwhelming numbers. And as people 445 00:24:07,160 --> 00:24:10,359 Speaker 5: were having that dialogue, it made me think about the 446 00:24:10,400 --> 00:24:13,760 Speaker 5: reporting that I've been doing these past two years, which 447 00:24:13,800 --> 00:24:16,320 Speaker 5: is not just about kind of where people are getting 448 00:24:16,320 --> 00:24:19,879 Speaker 5: the news, but also how the right has really created 449 00:24:20,359 --> 00:24:24,639 Speaker 5: this ground game of taking advantage of the depletion of 450 00:24:24,720 --> 00:24:28,159 Speaker 5: local news across the country and how they're leveraging that 451 00:24:28,359 --> 00:24:33,720 Speaker 5: to get out their message in oftentimes very secretive, non 452 00:24:33,760 --> 00:24:37,480 Speaker 5: transparent ways. And the reporting that I've been doing these 453 00:24:37,520 --> 00:24:40,320 Speaker 5: past couple of years has been looking into this kind 454 00:24:40,400 --> 00:24:45,240 Speaker 5: of playbook that a lot of these organizations, largely backed 455 00:24:45,240 --> 00:24:48,920 Speaker 5: by the oil and gas industry, are using to take 456 00:24:48,960 --> 00:24:52,639 Speaker 5: advantage of this kind of dual lack of trust in 457 00:24:52,720 --> 00:24:58,680 Speaker 5: mainstream media and also lack of opportunity of taking advantage 458 00:24:58,680 --> 00:25:01,199 Speaker 5: of a local news that no longer exists across the 459 00:25:01,240 --> 00:25:05,040 Speaker 5: majority most of the country, you know, newspapers around seventy 460 00:25:05,040 --> 00:25:09,200 Speaker 5: five percent since two thousand and five across the country. 461 00:25:09,520 --> 00:25:12,400 Speaker 5: More than half of the counties across the United States 462 00:25:13,320 --> 00:25:17,520 Speaker 5: only have one or no local news sources. And this 463 00:25:17,720 --> 00:25:20,760 Speaker 5: is something that players in the oil and gas industry 464 00:25:20,800 --> 00:25:23,199 Speaker 5: and on the right are taking advantage of. And so 465 00:25:23,280 --> 00:25:25,040 Speaker 5: that was something that I really wanted to highlight. 466 00:25:25,320 --> 00:25:27,400 Speaker 1: So make that make sense when it comes to oil 467 00:25:27,440 --> 00:25:29,920 Speaker 1: and gas and local news and what that means. 468 00:25:30,240 --> 00:25:33,000 Speaker 5: Sure, you know, the oil and gas industry has been 469 00:25:33,080 --> 00:25:36,760 Speaker 5: feeling the pressure for at least five years now. You know, 470 00:25:37,160 --> 00:25:40,960 Speaker 5: it started under the Obama administration, It was lacks or 471 00:25:41,040 --> 00:25:44,080 Speaker 5: under the first Trump administration, and it became much stronger 472 00:25:44,160 --> 00:25:47,720 Speaker 5: under the Biden administration. This idea that we as a 473 00:25:47,840 --> 00:25:51,520 Speaker 5: globe are seeing the impacts of climate change, that climate 474 00:25:51,600 --> 00:25:56,760 Speaker 5: change scientists and science show is because of human impact, 475 00:25:56,920 --> 00:25:59,960 Speaker 5: because of the emissions of the Oil and Gas Sact, 476 00:26:01,359 --> 00:26:04,760 Speaker 5: and that in order to change that, we need to 477 00:26:05,040 --> 00:26:08,919 Speaker 5: dramatically curb those emissions. And so, you know, the businesses 478 00:26:08,960 --> 00:26:12,360 Speaker 5: that make their money off of these admissions, they're struggling 479 00:26:12,440 --> 00:26:15,040 Speaker 5: to figure out how to continue to make money, how 480 00:26:15,080 --> 00:26:18,600 Speaker 5: to continue to benefit their shareholders, and to stay afloat. 481 00:26:18,680 --> 00:26:20,840 Speaker 5: You know, their business is like anything else, and so 482 00:26:21,240 --> 00:26:23,320 Speaker 5: one of the ways that they can do that is 483 00:26:23,400 --> 00:26:28,160 Speaker 5: by you know, helping to change public perception over their industry. 484 00:26:28,280 --> 00:26:31,200 Speaker 5: A lot of this is happening because people, the kind 485 00:26:31,240 --> 00:26:35,199 Speaker 5: of public consciousness has changed to understand that, you know, 486 00:26:35,280 --> 00:26:38,280 Speaker 5: climate change is largely asked that, you know, because of 487 00:26:38,320 --> 00:26:41,520 Speaker 5: these companies, because of what they're doing. What is happening 488 00:26:41,560 --> 00:26:44,520 Speaker 5: is that you know, as mainstream media, as reporters have 489 00:26:44,720 --> 00:26:48,280 Speaker 5: changed from you know, myself included from having to write 490 00:26:48,320 --> 00:26:51,080 Speaker 5: stories that said, on one side, climate change is real. 491 00:26:51,160 --> 00:26:53,879 Speaker 5: On the other side, let's quote a climate denier. And 492 00:26:54,040 --> 00:26:56,960 Speaker 5: now we are finally in this you know, this place 493 00:26:57,000 --> 00:26:59,440 Speaker 5: where we don't have to do that anymore. The science 494 00:26:59,480 --> 00:27:02,119 Speaker 5: shows that climate change is at the hands of you know, 495 00:27:02,280 --> 00:27:06,400 Speaker 5: of humans, that it is coming from fossil fuels by 496 00:27:06,440 --> 00:27:08,440 Speaker 5: and large, and so we don't need to do that. 497 00:27:08,480 --> 00:27:12,720 Speaker 5: But the media is turning against these industries, and so 498 00:27:13,240 --> 00:27:15,120 Speaker 5: you know, what they're doing, by and large is trying 499 00:27:15,160 --> 00:27:17,320 Speaker 5: to find, well, how are alternative ways of getting our 500 00:27:17,320 --> 00:27:19,280 Speaker 5: messaging out there if we can no longer rely on 501 00:27:19,320 --> 00:27:23,080 Speaker 5: reporters to kind of carry this one sided messaging because 502 00:27:23,119 --> 00:27:25,199 Speaker 5: they're going to poke holes in it. And so what 503 00:27:25,320 --> 00:27:28,520 Speaker 5: they have done and I found in my reporting largely 504 00:27:28,560 --> 00:27:31,919 Speaker 5: across the southeast and areas where you know it is 505 00:27:32,000 --> 00:27:34,840 Speaker 5: Republican and areas where oil and gas still has a 506 00:27:34,880 --> 00:27:38,560 Speaker 5: stronghold because it's largely produced in those areas, they are 507 00:27:38,760 --> 00:27:43,679 Speaker 5: buying up local newspapers, creating newspapers online and paying for 508 00:27:43,840 --> 00:27:47,280 Speaker 5: content in kind of you know, papers that are willing 509 00:27:47,359 --> 00:27:50,120 Speaker 5: to take that kind of news to take those kind 510 00:27:50,119 --> 00:27:53,240 Speaker 5: of pay to play stories to push this messaging that 511 00:27:53,320 --> 00:27:57,560 Speaker 5: shows that they are still they are great community supporters, 512 00:27:57,600 --> 00:28:00,200 Speaker 5: that they are there for jobs, that you know, they 513 00:28:00,200 --> 00:28:03,520 Speaker 5: have the best interests of Americans at heart, and that 514 00:28:04,000 --> 00:28:06,000 Speaker 5: what they're doing is not that bad. In a lot 515 00:28:06,040 --> 00:28:08,439 Speaker 5: of the reporting I found in these papers where they 516 00:28:08,480 --> 00:28:11,400 Speaker 5: are kind of buying this influence or creating this influence, 517 00:28:11,520 --> 00:28:15,240 Speaker 5: It's not so much that they were pushing anti climate 518 00:28:15,320 --> 00:28:18,280 Speaker 5: change initiatives or that they were saying how great oil 519 00:28:18,280 --> 00:28:20,960 Speaker 5: and gas was. They were just not reporting on the 520 00:28:21,000 --> 00:28:24,800 Speaker 5: negative aspects of their companies at all. 521 00:28:24,240 --> 00:28:28,600 Speaker 1: Right, So they were sort of just selectively covering what 522 00:28:28,640 --> 00:28:32,600 Speaker 1: they felt like covering that worked for their narrative exactly. 523 00:28:32,680 --> 00:28:34,119 Speaker 5: And you know, you have to keep in mind in 524 00:28:34,200 --> 00:28:37,480 Speaker 5: these communities. You know, I'm talking about rural Alabama, I'm 525 00:28:37,480 --> 00:28:40,800 Speaker 5: talking about communities in the Gulf Coast of Florida. I'm 526 00:28:40,840 --> 00:28:44,160 Speaker 5: even talking about community in Richmond's, California, just outside of 527 00:28:44,200 --> 00:28:47,800 Speaker 5: San Francisco. I mean, in these communities, they have very 528 00:28:47,880 --> 00:28:51,560 Speaker 5: few other options for local news. So when these newspapers 529 00:28:51,600 --> 00:28:54,440 Speaker 5: come online and then residents are thinking, Okay, this is 530 00:28:54,480 --> 00:28:57,320 Speaker 5: a place where I can read community profiles, this is 531 00:28:57,360 --> 00:28:59,479 Speaker 5: a place where I can understand the businesses that are 532 00:28:59,480 --> 00:29:02,720 Speaker 5: opening around me. They're not aware of what they're not 533 00:29:03,160 --> 00:29:07,440 Speaker 5: seeing in those papers because they have so few other alternatives. 534 00:29:07,600 --> 00:29:11,080 Speaker 5: So by being able to control this narrative in this way, 535 00:29:11,640 --> 00:29:14,880 Speaker 5: that is a when for these companies, and it's something 536 00:29:14,880 --> 00:29:18,400 Speaker 5: that they openly talk about. Actually they and they learn 537 00:29:18,520 --> 00:29:22,080 Speaker 5: from one another. And the reporting that I did for 538 00:29:22,160 --> 00:29:24,880 Speaker 5: a story I worked on with The Guardian about Alabama 539 00:29:25,000 --> 00:29:28,160 Speaker 5: Power and it's control of these two newspapers in Alabama, 540 00:29:28,760 --> 00:29:32,320 Speaker 5: one of their PR specialists, who ironically was a former reporter, 541 00:29:32,840 --> 00:29:36,240 Speaker 5: actually went on too a PR podcast and they asked him, 542 00:29:36,480 --> 00:29:38,040 Speaker 5: you know, where did you come up with this idea 543 00:29:38,080 --> 00:29:40,680 Speaker 5: of launching this Alabama News Center, which is one of 544 00:29:40,720 --> 00:29:43,480 Speaker 5: these organizations that they launched in I think it was 545 00:29:43,520 --> 00:29:47,239 Speaker 5: twenty sixteen, And he said, we were thinking that we 546 00:29:47,240 --> 00:29:50,520 Speaker 5: were pitching our stories to reporters. Reporters were no longer 547 00:29:50,600 --> 00:29:52,720 Speaker 5: writing the stories that we wanted them to write, so 548 00:29:52,760 --> 00:29:54,920 Speaker 5: we're thinking, how else do we get these stories out there? 549 00:29:55,160 --> 00:29:57,880 Speaker 5: We're going to launch our own newsroom. And they actually 550 00:29:57,960 --> 00:30:01,840 Speaker 5: said we got this idea from chev because the year earlier, 551 00:30:01,840 --> 00:30:06,560 Speaker 5: in twenty fifteen, Chevron had launched the Richmond Standard in California, 552 00:30:07,120 --> 00:30:11,400 Speaker 5: which was a newspaper that had not exist prior in 553 00:30:11,440 --> 00:30:13,760 Speaker 5: that area, and it was a huge community that was 554 00:30:13,840 --> 00:30:17,000 Speaker 5: lacking local news. And it's doing something very similar where 555 00:30:17,000 --> 00:30:19,440 Speaker 5: it was covering local news. It was covering what was 556 00:30:19,480 --> 00:30:22,800 Speaker 5: happening in the community, but it was not covering itself critically, 557 00:30:22,880 --> 00:30:25,320 Speaker 5: even though it was the largest employer in the area. 558 00:30:25,880 --> 00:30:29,600 Speaker 1: Wow, how does this relate besides climate change? 559 00:30:29,760 --> 00:30:32,800 Speaker 5: Yeah, you know, I spoke to Anne Nelson. He is 560 00:30:33,280 --> 00:30:35,560 Speaker 5: a prolific writer. She wrote a book about kind of 561 00:30:35,600 --> 00:30:38,280 Speaker 5: the oil and gas influence and the kind of dark 562 00:30:38,400 --> 00:30:43,800 Speaker 5: money behind manipulation and in the media. And one of 563 00:30:43,800 --> 00:30:45,600 Speaker 5: the things that she said to me, which I thought 564 00:30:45,640 --> 00:30:48,600 Speaker 5: was really interesting, is that, you know a lot of 565 00:30:48,640 --> 00:30:54,600 Speaker 5: the donors that donate to conservative interests and the Trump campaign, 566 00:30:55,040 --> 00:30:57,480 Speaker 5: you know, they make their money in oil and gas. 567 00:30:57,560 --> 00:31:00,560 Speaker 5: You know, some of the largest donors out there, Harold 568 00:31:00,600 --> 00:31:04,360 Speaker 5: Ham out of Oklahoma, Timothy Dunn out of Texas. That 569 00:31:04,520 --> 00:31:06,120 Speaker 5: is where they made their bread and butter. And they 570 00:31:06,200 --> 00:31:08,720 Speaker 5: care about the future of the industry that they've made 571 00:31:08,720 --> 00:31:11,320 Speaker 5: this money up, and they care about conservative ideology, and 572 00:31:11,400 --> 00:31:14,920 Speaker 5: so they're not necessarily just focused on oil and gas 573 00:31:14,920 --> 00:31:16,920 Speaker 5: and climate initiatives, but that is kind of where a 574 00:31:16,960 --> 00:31:19,560 Speaker 5: lot of some of this money stems from. And so 575 00:31:19,760 --> 00:31:22,720 Speaker 5: you start seeing the echo chamber of this and other 576 00:31:23,160 --> 00:31:27,040 Speaker 5: news organizations and other kind of pink slime journalism, which 577 00:31:27,080 --> 00:31:30,400 Speaker 5: is another aspects that I've covered, where it's these news 578 00:31:30,640 --> 00:31:35,480 Speaker 5: seeming websites that exist online that are perpetuating this kind 579 00:31:35,520 --> 00:31:40,760 Speaker 5: of not journalistic news articles that people are picking up 580 00:31:40,760 --> 00:31:43,120 Speaker 5: and reading and thinking that they are vetted in the 581 00:31:43,160 --> 00:31:46,160 Speaker 5: same way. And that is kind of, you know, I 582 00:31:46,160 --> 00:31:48,680 Speaker 5: think the heart of so much of what people are 583 00:31:48,680 --> 00:31:51,160 Speaker 5: trying to grapple with here, which is again, where are 584 00:31:51,200 --> 00:31:54,240 Speaker 5: Trump voters getting their messaging? Where is the other side 585 00:31:54,280 --> 00:31:58,360 Speaker 5: getting their messaging? Where's Middle America reading? And these are 586 00:31:58,400 --> 00:32:00,840 Speaker 5: some of the places where you know, Middle America is 587 00:32:00,880 --> 00:32:04,440 Speaker 5: getting their news, not exclusively, but it is definitely a 588 00:32:04,520 --> 00:32:08,200 Speaker 5: part of the puzzle here. These organizations like Metric Media, 589 00:32:08,240 --> 00:32:11,240 Speaker 5: which is part of a larger network which has more 590 00:32:11,280 --> 00:32:14,840 Speaker 5: than eleven hundred online news sites that span the country. 591 00:32:15,160 --> 00:32:17,760 Speaker 5: I mean, they found an opportunity here to really get 592 00:32:17,760 --> 00:32:20,280 Speaker 5: their messaging out and they are known pay to play players. 593 00:32:20,320 --> 00:32:21,960 Speaker 5: New York Times to the story on them back in 594 00:32:22,000 --> 00:32:25,920 Speaker 5: twenty twenty about how they take money for specific stories 595 00:32:25,920 --> 00:32:28,840 Speaker 5: that they write, and they kind of put them together 596 00:32:29,120 --> 00:32:33,480 Speaker 5: into these packages of these websites that look mostly real. 597 00:32:33,560 --> 00:32:35,640 Speaker 5: They're a little odd, they're a little funky. But if 598 00:32:35,680 --> 00:32:38,600 Speaker 5: you're a normal reader and you're kind of pushed to 599 00:32:38,640 --> 00:32:43,040 Speaker 5: these websites, you don't know, right, you know, journalists like us, 600 00:32:43,040 --> 00:32:46,600 Speaker 5: we have a trained eye. Where like most stories have bylines, 601 00:32:46,640 --> 00:32:49,760 Speaker 5: it's kind of weird if they don't articles. What makes 602 00:32:49,840 --> 00:32:54,040 Speaker 5: articles distinct is that they have both sides of the story, 603 00:32:54,080 --> 00:32:57,600 Speaker 5: and they both perspectives, right Like, any time I write 604 00:32:57,600 --> 00:33:00,560 Speaker 5: a story about anyone, you know, say I write a 605 00:33:00,560 --> 00:33:03,080 Speaker 5: story about Exxon, I reach out to Exxon, and I 606 00:33:03,120 --> 00:33:05,080 Speaker 5: give them a chance to comments, and I make sure 607 00:33:05,080 --> 00:33:07,320 Speaker 5: that I have try to represent their point of view 608 00:33:07,320 --> 00:33:09,360 Speaker 5: in the story, even if they don't want to talk 609 00:33:09,400 --> 00:33:12,320 Speaker 5: to me. These stories don't do that. And what they're 610 00:33:12,360 --> 00:33:15,280 Speaker 5: doing furthermore, in what they were specifically doing in the 611 00:33:15,320 --> 00:33:17,600 Speaker 5: lead up to this election that I noticed is that 612 00:33:18,080 --> 00:33:20,680 Speaker 5: in addition to these websites that kind of exist online 613 00:33:20,720 --> 00:33:23,720 Speaker 5: and sometimes there really have a ton of content, sometimes 614 00:33:23,840 --> 00:33:26,680 Speaker 5: kind of seem a bit like sleeper cells, they were 615 00:33:26,960 --> 00:33:31,520 Speaker 5: publishing print versions of some of these key websites ing 616 00:33:31,720 --> 00:33:36,360 Speaker 5: key counties and then sending them to people's mailboxes directly 617 00:33:36,400 --> 00:33:38,560 Speaker 5: who obviously had not paid for them, had no idea 618 00:33:38,560 --> 00:33:40,880 Speaker 5: what they were, but they were showing up and kind 619 00:33:40,920 --> 00:33:44,280 Speaker 5: of pushing specific key issues related to that election. 620 00:33:45,080 --> 00:33:47,640 Speaker 1: That makes a lot of sense. I know what red 621 00:33:47,800 --> 00:33:50,520 Speaker 1: sludges explain to us what pink sludges. 622 00:33:51,160 --> 00:33:54,760 Speaker 5: Yeah, So pink slime is a terminology that kind of 623 00:33:54,960 --> 00:33:58,400 Speaker 5: it's kind of this gross terminology. Honestly, it comes from 624 00:33:58,720 --> 00:34:02,640 Speaker 5: this idea the term that people have used to describe 625 00:34:02,680 --> 00:34:05,800 Speaker 5: the additive filler and meat in food, So you know, 626 00:34:05,920 --> 00:34:09,040 Speaker 5: additives in something like hamburgers or chicken nuggets, say something, 627 00:34:09,080 --> 00:34:11,840 Speaker 5: it's called pink slime. And so it's been kind of 628 00:34:12,080 --> 00:34:15,640 Speaker 5: reutilized as this idea that there is these fake news 629 00:34:15,680 --> 00:34:18,360 Speaker 5: sites that just have this fake content that's like fluff 630 00:34:18,480 --> 00:34:21,359 Speaker 5: and filler contents in these these websites that look real 631 00:34:22,040 --> 00:34:25,920 Speaker 5: but really have bias and have a partisan kind of 632 00:34:26,040 --> 00:34:28,360 Speaker 5: you know, spin on them. And so that's why I 633 00:34:28,880 --> 00:34:30,640 Speaker 5: tend to try to like to use the word news 634 00:34:30,840 --> 00:34:34,359 Speaker 5: seeming or news appearing, because it looks real, but if 635 00:34:34,400 --> 00:34:37,000 Speaker 5: you look close, it's it's not what it seems it 636 00:34:37,160 --> 00:34:41,680 Speaker 5: is something that has been utilized by organizations for years now, 637 00:34:42,200 --> 00:34:44,920 Speaker 5: but really seems to kind of pick up and take off, 638 00:34:45,080 --> 00:34:48,720 Speaker 5: especially around elections or key culture war issues. 639 00:34:49,920 --> 00:34:50,480 Speaker 1: Interesting. 640 00:34:51,040 --> 00:34:54,040 Speaker 5: So, one of the papers that I actually highlighted that 641 00:34:54,200 --> 00:34:57,920 Speaker 5: came out was shipped to people's doorsteps in North Dakota 642 00:34:58,440 --> 00:35:02,880 Speaker 5: October fifteenth. Was a very interesting kind of odd oddity 643 00:35:03,120 --> 00:35:05,320 Speaker 5: because this this paper showed up with people's stores is 644 00:35:05,320 --> 00:35:08,919 Speaker 5: called the Central Lord Dakota News, and it's ten pages long, 645 00:35:09,160 --> 00:35:12,360 Speaker 5: and it's very clearly right leaning. But North Dakota is 646 00:35:12,480 --> 00:35:15,440 Speaker 5: right leading, so, you know, not the kind of place 647 00:35:15,520 --> 00:35:18,520 Speaker 5: that you know, maybe people would automatically. 648 00:35:18,000 --> 00:35:18,600 Speaker 1: Fill this away. 649 00:35:19,000 --> 00:35:21,800 Speaker 5: And it talks about key issues that I'm sure voters 650 00:35:21,800 --> 00:35:26,640 Speaker 5: and that state care about, inflation, security issues, immigration. But 651 00:35:26,760 --> 00:35:29,439 Speaker 5: if you dig deeper into the story, you realize there's 652 00:35:29,480 --> 00:35:32,160 Speaker 5: kind of an odd angle to some of these articles. 653 00:35:32,400 --> 00:35:34,919 Speaker 5: It talks a lot about protests. It talks a lot 654 00:35:35,000 --> 00:35:40,400 Speaker 5: about the Dakota access protests that happened back in twenty sixteen. 655 00:35:40,920 --> 00:35:44,080 Speaker 5: So this is eight years ago, right, twenty sixteen. This 656 00:35:44,480 --> 00:35:46,960 Speaker 5: nowhere close to, you know, what we're currently dealing with. 657 00:35:47,680 --> 00:35:50,160 Speaker 5: Why would they be have an entire section in this 658 00:35:50,239 --> 00:35:53,280 Speaker 5: paper that says, you know, on this day in twenty 659 00:35:53,400 --> 00:35:56,520 Speaker 5: sixty and that talks about all these disruptive protests. Well, 660 00:35:57,120 --> 00:36:01,440 Speaker 5: turns out that the Key pipeline company but that owns 661 00:36:01,480 --> 00:36:05,160 Speaker 5: the Dakota Access pipeline, has a lawsuit against Greenpeace, which 662 00:36:05,239 --> 00:36:08,239 Speaker 5: is a major organization that have protesters protesting against the 663 00:36:08,239 --> 00:36:11,400 Speaker 5: pipeline that is coming up in North Dakota in February. 664 00:36:11,920 --> 00:36:14,520 Speaker 5: And this lawsuit is considered one of the biggest lawsuits 665 00:36:14,560 --> 00:36:16,800 Speaker 5: it's probably going to happen in the state in its history. 666 00:36:17,239 --> 00:36:19,839 Speaker 5: And this is you know, most likely part of their 667 00:36:19,880 --> 00:36:23,160 Speaker 5: ground game to try to get public perception to benefit 668 00:36:23,239 --> 00:36:27,279 Speaker 5: them and turn against remind locals how frustrating that situation was. 669 00:36:27,680 --> 00:36:30,480 Speaker 5: And so again it's all wrapped up in other stories 670 00:36:30,600 --> 00:36:32,480 Speaker 5: that seem just like, Okay, this is part of the 671 00:36:32,600 --> 00:36:34,800 Speaker 5: news cycle. This is not the out of the ordinary, 672 00:36:35,280 --> 00:36:38,480 Speaker 5: but it's putting that back into people's mind. You know, 673 00:36:38,560 --> 00:36:40,920 Speaker 5: do you remember eight years ago about all these protests. 674 00:36:40,920 --> 00:36:42,400 Speaker 5: Do you remember that the roads are blocked. Do you 675 00:36:42,440 --> 00:36:44,680 Speaker 5: remember that the police had to deal with this? You 676 00:36:44,719 --> 00:36:47,160 Speaker 5: remember it was expensive for the state to try to 677 00:36:47,680 --> 00:36:50,240 Speaker 5: remind people before in the lead up to this lawsuit. 678 00:36:50,280 --> 00:36:51,680 Speaker 5: In this court case, is about to happen. 679 00:36:52,200 --> 00:36:56,680 Speaker 1: Wow, how widespread is this news? Like? What percentage of 680 00:36:56,760 --> 00:36:59,800 Speaker 1: Americans do you think get these mailers or read this 681 00:37:00,040 --> 00:37:00,720 Speaker 1: news online? 682 00:37:01,040 --> 00:37:04,719 Speaker 5: Yeah, it's really hard to tell how widespread this practice is. 683 00:37:05,160 --> 00:37:07,280 Speaker 5: We know that there are at least eleven hundred websites 684 00:37:07,320 --> 00:37:10,680 Speaker 5: that exists across every single state and many communities to 685 00:37:10,680 --> 00:37:13,520 Speaker 5: target at them. It's really hard to tell how many 686 00:37:13,560 --> 00:37:15,960 Speaker 5: people are actually getting the sense to them, you know, 687 00:37:16,280 --> 00:37:18,400 Speaker 5: besides people who are tweeting them out or sending them 688 00:37:18,440 --> 00:37:19,960 Speaker 5: to me. That's kind of how I get an inkling 689 00:37:20,040 --> 00:37:23,520 Speaker 5: of what's happening. We do know it's overwhelmingly on the right. 690 00:37:23,920 --> 00:37:25,680 Speaker 5: You know, they arought eleven hundred sites on the right. 691 00:37:25,719 --> 00:37:28,800 Speaker 5: There are about seventy sites on the left that do this. 692 00:37:29,000 --> 00:37:32,680 Speaker 5: So it's not entirely done by conservatives, but it is 693 00:37:33,120 --> 00:37:36,680 Speaker 5: largely done by conservatives. And what's really interesting too, is 694 00:37:36,719 --> 00:37:40,600 Speaker 5: that the conservatives that are doing this, their funding is 695 00:37:40,719 --> 00:37:44,040 Speaker 5: tied to the Koche Brothers. Their funding is tied to 696 00:37:44,120 --> 00:37:47,600 Speaker 5: this kind of conservative apparatus that is taking advantage of 697 00:37:47,920 --> 00:37:52,120 Speaker 5: alternative news. We see organizations like Center Square, we see 698 00:37:52,239 --> 00:37:55,280 Speaker 5: organizations like The Daily Signal from the End, the Daily Caller, 699 00:37:55,719 --> 00:37:59,120 Speaker 5: News Foundation. You know, those are all right leaning state 700 00:37:59,200 --> 00:38:03,759 Speaker 5: policy network backed Coke money taking organizations. They're all kind 701 00:38:03,800 --> 00:38:07,520 Speaker 5: of part of this network. And what I am noticing 702 00:38:07,719 --> 00:38:10,759 Speaker 5: as a reporter is that this is bigger than just 703 00:38:10,920 --> 00:38:15,760 Speaker 5: the election. This is about how do we rework trust 704 00:38:15,880 --> 00:38:19,279 Speaker 5: in news to be trust in us. People don't trust 705 00:38:19,320 --> 00:38:22,120 Speaker 5: the mainstream media. There are a lot of conservatives aren't 706 00:38:22,120 --> 00:38:25,280 Speaker 5: reading the New York Times, They're not going on NBC 707 00:38:25,600 --> 00:38:29,120 Speaker 5: or ABC. They are looking for partisan news, and so 708 00:38:29,719 --> 00:38:33,719 Speaker 5: partisan think tanks, partisan entities are thinking, well, how do 709 00:38:33,840 --> 00:38:36,399 Speaker 5: we capitalize off of this and how do we then 710 00:38:37,360 --> 00:38:44,040 Speaker 5: utilize those eyeballs to push our best interests. It's very strategic. 711 00:38:44,520 --> 00:38:47,560 Speaker 5: They are echo chambers of one another. You know, these 712 00:38:47,640 --> 00:38:53,120 Speaker 5: metric media sites have shared Daily Caller articles, they do 713 00:38:53,360 --> 00:38:57,400 Speaker 5: share Center Square articles. I mean, they are creating this 714 00:38:57,760 --> 00:39:04,520 Speaker 5: robust conservative news movement. And the thing that I find 715 00:39:04,719 --> 00:39:08,120 Speaker 5: the most concerning as a reporter is that there's so 716 00:39:08,440 --> 00:39:13,800 Speaker 5: little transparency there. You know, if people choose to read 717 00:39:14,280 --> 00:39:18,480 Speaker 5: write leaning or left leaning news, that's their prerogative. If 718 00:39:18,520 --> 00:39:22,320 Speaker 5: they want to listen to Joe Rogan because they like 719 00:39:22,480 --> 00:39:25,160 Speaker 5: him and they like his perspective and they kind of 720 00:39:25,280 --> 00:39:29,000 Speaker 5: know where it's coming from. That's their prerogative. But if 721 00:39:29,040 --> 00:39:31,960 Speaker 5: you go on Metric Media's website and you look at 722 00:39:32,000 --> 00:39:35,480 Speaker 5: their about as section, there's nothing there. If you try 723 00:39:35,560 --> 00:39:39,000 Speaker 5: to contact anyone, it is just a form you fill out. 724 00:39:39,560 --> 00:39:42,520 Speaker 1: We really appreciate you taking the time. 725 00:39:43,080 --> 00:39:45,160 Speaker 5: I would just say from a you know, I think 726 00:39:45,200 --> 00:39:47,600 Speaker 5: that the lack of transparency in these pink s Lin 727 00:39:47,640 --> 00:39:50,239 Speaker 5: sites is really the most concerning here. That you know, 728 00:39:50,480 --> 00:39:52,920 Speaker 5: listeners and readers should be able to choose where they 729 00:39:53,000 --> 00:39:55,960 Speaker 5: get their news from, but they should know who is 730 00:39:56,080 --> 00:39:58,560 Speaker 5: behind that news. They should know where the money from, 731 00:39:58,719 --> 00:40:02,319 Speaker 5: they should know the motivation behind those individuals who are 732 00:40:02,840 --> 00:40:06,320 Speaker 5: pushing those narratives. And as long as they do, you know, 733 00:40:06,440 --> 00:40:08,479 Speaker 5: that's up to them. I think that you know, more 734 00:40:09,080 --> 00:40:12,560 Speaker 5: opportunity and more you know, venue to find news is 735 00:40:12,680 --> 00:40:15,400 Speaker 5: never bad, but it's the facts. I want to make 736 00:40:15,440 --> 00:40:17,560 Speaker 5: sure that the facts are accurate, that people are really 737 00:40:18,440 --> 00:40:22,120 Speaker 5: understanding what they're reading and understanding, you know, what the 738 00:40:22,200 --> 00:40:24,319 Speaker 5: motivations are for those who are you know, putting out 739 00:40:24,360 --> 00:40:27,480 Speaker 5: those those papers that they're picking up. Thank you so much, 740 00:40:27,960 --> 00:40:33,880 Speaker 5: thank you, Mollie, pect. 741 00:40:35,239 --> 00:40:37,959 Speaker 1: Jesse Cannon, so my young fast. 742 00:40:38,280 --> 00:40:42,160 Speaker 2: Unfortunately, the Republicans seem to have quenched having the majority 743 00:40:42,200 --> 00:40:45,880 Speaker 2: in the House. But there's an interesting asterix that you 744 00:40:45,960 --> 00:40:48,080 Speaker 2: and I were just discussing. What are you seeing here? 745 00:40:48,400 --> 00:40:53,640 Speaker 1: Trump is nominating people who feel more establishment because he 746 00:40:53,760 --> 00:40:55,839 Speaker 1: thinks it will be easier to get Some of these 747 00:40:55,880 --> 00:40:58,360 Speaker 1: people a need to send a confirmation and some of 748 00:40:58,440 --> 00:41:01,399 Speaker 1: them don't. But he's trying to pick from a sort 749 00:41:01,440 --> 00:41:04,360 Speaker 1: of group that's more quote unquote establishment, and this is 750 00:41:04,480 --> 00:41:08,080 Speaker 1: leading him to take Republicans from the House of Representatives. 751 00:41:08,320 --> 00:41:11,520 Speaker 1: Now the House of Representatives has not yet been called, 752 00:41:11,719 --> 00:41:14,719 Speaker 1: though Republicans are going to win the House of Representatives. 753 00:41:14,920 --> 00:41:18,160 Speaker 1: They're going to win it by four five seats about 754 00:41:18,480 --> 00:41:21,680 Speaker 1: what they had in the previous Congress, or is we 755 00:41:21,880 --> 00:41:24,520 Speaker 1: like to think of it here at fast politics in 756 00:41:24,920 --> 00:41:30,880 Speaker 1: unngovernable majority, right, we saw Mike Johnson really had a 757 00:41:30,920 --> 00:41:33,640 Speaker 1: lot of trouble getting stuff passed, almost always had to 758 00:41:33,680 --> 00:41:38,640 Speaker 1: caucus with the Democrats. Now he has this situation where 759 00:41:38,719 --> 00:41:42,960 Speaker 1: Donald Trump has literally already is talking about taking five 760 00:41:43,440 --> 00:41:46,360 Speaker 1: Republican members of Congress and putting them either in his 761 00:41:46,560 --> 00:41:51,399 Speaker 1: cabinet or in his administration. That will mean that while 762 00:41:51,920 --> 00:41:55,000 Speaker 1: those I mean, we'll see what happens how he'll take 763 00:41:55,080 --> 00:41:58,000 Speaker 1: them out or when they have specials. Each state has 764 00:41:58,120 --> 00:42:00,600 Speaker 1: different calculus for special et cetera. 765 00:42:00,840 --> 00:42:02,719 Speaker 2: We know how this shakes out of New York State 766 00:42:02,800 --> 00:42:05,239 Speaker 2: and if he's taking a least Stephonic out. We saw 767 00:42:05,320 --> 00:42:06,680 Speaker 2: this with George Santos already. 768 00:42:06,880 --> 00:42:08,600 Speaker 1: The only thing I would say with that is that 769 00:42:09,200 --> 00:42:13,480 Speaker 1: Stephonic has a safe red seat, So George Santos didn't. 770 00:42:13,920 --> 00:42:16,120 Speaker 2: Yes, but it's still time where that seat will be 771 00:42:16,400 --> 00:42:19,200 Speaker 2: blank and the majority will be slimmer right, and. 772 00:42:19,400 --> 00:42:22,040 Speaker 1: That'll be a real problem for Mike Johnson. 773 00:42:21,960 --> 00:42:26,399 Speaker 2: And potentially our democratic name only Governor Kathy Hochold might 774 00:42:26,719 --> 00:42:27,239 Speaker 2: slow walk. 775 00:42:27,320 --> 00:42:31,240 Speaker 1: That one hard to imagine, but it's possible that, my friends, 776 00:42:31,680 --> 00:42:37,279 Speaker 1: Mike Johnson with his ungovernable Republican majority is our moment 777 00:42:37,360 --> 00:42:42,000 Speaker 1: of fuck Gray. That's it for this episode of Fast Politics. 778 00:42:42,520 --> 00:42:48,200 Speaker 1: Tune in every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday to hear 779 00:42:48,520 --> 00:42:52,680 Speaker 1: the best minds and politics makes sense of all this chaos. 780 00:42:53,160 --> 00:42:55,960 Speaker 1: If you enjoy this podcast, please send it to a 781 00:42:56,080 --> 00:43:00,080 Speaker 1: friend and keep the conversation going. Thanks for listening and