WEBVTT - Meet The Godfather Of Cryptocurrency

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. So, Tracy, Bitcoin

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>has been surging again lately. Yeah, I think as we

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>record this, it's currently above eight thousand, right. Yeah, it's

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>been fluctuating a little bit, but obviously one of the

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>things that happens that every time Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>start to spike, interests follows soon thereafter. It's one of

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>these things where when it's down suddenly people go quiet

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>and stop talking about it and pretend they were never involved,

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and then when it's surging, everyone's like, oh, yeah, I'm

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in that stuff at a very much a

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>great example of narrative following price. Yes, indeed, I actually

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>joked on Twitter earlier today that now we're going to

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>see all the people that scrubbed blockchain from their Twitter

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>bios and LinkedIn profiles, they're all going to start adding

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>it back in. But I think when it comes to

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin price, you know, I know a lot of

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>people watch it sort of purely out of entertainment value.

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>But we've talked before on the show about the importance

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of the network effect and the idea that if you're

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>actually going to get people using bitcoin, you need to

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>generate a buzz, right, absolutely, so obviously the buzz is

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 1>picking up. Bitcoin itself has been around, uh for about

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a decade now, basically exactly ten years more or less.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>But what I think a lot of people don't know

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>or they've never really thought about, is for for so long,

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>many years prior to bitcoin, decades really, people had been

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to work on the problem of digital money and

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>somewhere or other, whether it's anonymous payments online or payments

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that didn't have some sort of centralized clearinghouse to facilitate them.

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin isn't just a new thing. It's kind of the uh,

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the solution to a problem that people had been focused

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on for a while. Right. So, I think the notion

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>or the exploration of digital currencies kind of started growing

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in tandem with the Internet, right, and it was sort

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of a solution to a problem that the Internet and um,

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>new technology suddenly threw up. Didn't you read a book

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>on this, by the way, weren't you really excited about something? Yeah,

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a great book coming out this summer by Finn

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Brunton all about this, But yeah, exactly right. I mean, obviously,

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in the real world and the physical world, I can

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>pay you in cash and no third party no uh,

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, legal authority has to know about it. But

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>very early on people sort of intuitive that as our

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>economy became more digital, that that would be a problem

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>that would need to be solved. So today I'm very

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>excited because we are going to be talking to a

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>guest who was at the forefront of this search for

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a solution to this album. Truly, I think everyone in

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the space would agree. One of the godfathers of digital currency,

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a true pioneer, an inventor of digital currency long before

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin ever came around, who could tell us all about

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>this prehistory of cryptocurrency and where he sees the space now.

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So that further Ado, I want to bring in David Chaum.

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>He is the CEO and founder of Elixir, but very

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>early on for decades. Like I said, one of the

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>godfathers of the space. Really appreciate you joining us. It's

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>so great to be here with you both. Let's start. David,

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>just tell us how did you when did you get

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>interested for the first time in solving this problem and

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing that as the world got more digital there would

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>need to be away for transactions to be at least

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in some sense anonymous. Well, actually eighty two I published

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a paper about blind signatures, which was the e cash

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>technology that I later deployed in in the mid nineties.

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So e cash it was not a cryptocurrency as we

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>know it. Now, why don't you explain what was the cash? Well, actually,

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the cash is slightly different and in some sense slightly

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>better than perhaps cryptocurrencies, in that current cryptocurrencies are generally

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>think of the more like digital checks. They move money

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>from one wallet I d one account, your account to

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>someone else's accounts, whereas with e cash, it was a

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the first digital bearer instrument. It was a number that

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>was worth money. And one of the additional features of

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the cash was because it was a digital bearer instrument,

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in the first such thing, it could have this special

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>blind signature property, which meant that when you withdrew one

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of the is from your bank account, and you know

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>your bank account was reduced in value, and they gave

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you this signature publicly digital signature, the cryptographic operation they

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>performed on a number that you sent them, that that

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>signature was worth let's say one dollar, that came out

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of your account. Well, you were able to transform that

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>signature into a different and unrelated form that was still

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>clearly signed worth one dollar, but absolutely uncorrelatable to the

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>number that you sent to your bank, So that meant

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that you had the money. There was no way that

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>they could stop you from spending it or even noo

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>where you would spend it or if you had spent it.

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is an actual improvement over these check based

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>systems where much can be traced. So I have two

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>questions based on that. But one was e cash dependent

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>on the banking system? Could it own work if you

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>had a bank accountant? It was sort of deriving the

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>number from that transaction, And be what was the problem exactly?

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>We alluded to this in the intro, But what was

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the problem that you were trying to solve with this invention. Well,

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to answer the part A, we issued what we're called

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>cyber bucks. This is what today is called an air

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>drop in effect. So what I said was we're only

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>going to issue a million of these, and anyone who

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to put up a digital shop, we will give

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>them a hundred. And there were like over a hundred

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>shops set up and if you go to my website,

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you can still see their logos and click on them

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and see kind of what their homepages looked like. In

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>many cases in those days, this was way before really

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the web or an electronic commerce was very early days.

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So I invented de cash more truth be told to

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>demonstrate that it was possible to do all the things

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that you need to do in the digital world as

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a consumer while still maintaining your privacy yourself. Is it

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>like a today called digital sovereignty, keeping your own keys

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>so that you didn't have to rely on others to

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>safe you know, do not look at your personal data

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>or stored safely. Just before we move off the specifically,

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure people understand exactly how the

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>mechanism works. So the idea was, I mean, we don't

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>have to get too technical, but the idea was essentially,

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>if this had spread and if this had become well adopted,

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea was one could take money out of their

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>bank and have it would be on a card, or

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.679
<v Speaker 1>they'd have some sort of card that would represent this.

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>This was a purely digital process, so your computer would

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>create a random number at itself, which no one else

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>could predict. Or imagine right, and then it would we

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>say blinded. It would hide it in a second in

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a key, and then it would send that hidden random number,

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>which is like this would be the serial number of

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>your digital one dollar bank note. Later it would hide

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the digital serial number by encrypting it with another random key,

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>send that hidden serial number in the bank would use

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the secret key that only it has, which it gives

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it the exclusive ability to validate these digital bank notes.

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It would then return that signed hidden number to you.

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And then because of the magic of commutativity, and like

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, three times four is equal to four times three,

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you could divide out the hiding layer and now you

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>would have the signature, the actual bank's validating signature on

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>your seal number, without any residue from the hiding And

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>then the recipient of this money, so you get the

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>money out of your bank. The recipient then has something

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that they can deposit in their bank account. Absolutely. And

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>but then there was the old little double spending problems,

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's the bank would that have to send it

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>into the bank to make sure that you hadn't spent

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it elsewhere. But there was a more sophisticated version that

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>we developed that was enjoyed work with money or and

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>names fiat that if you did double spend it, you

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>would in effect be digitally signing a confession to this effect,

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>whereas if you spend each one only once, you would

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>never reveal enough information to allow your identity to be linked.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's because when you spent those those special types

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of coins, you would have to answer a random query.

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And if you'd answer two questions, it's kind of like

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>when the police interrogate you. You know, if you answer

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>two questions, they don't fit together and then they realize, oh,

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's you. So I'm guessing you know we're talking about um,

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 1>I guess the early nineties. When when you did this?

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The early eighties, right, Well, I wrote a technical paper

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>on e cash in two, which was the same year

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that I or canize the International Association for Cryptologic Research

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and held the first really scientifically sponsored conference on cryptography

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to counter the National Security agency directors threatening to scientific

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>organizations draconian legal measures if they were to even have

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>sessions little own conferences on cryptography, so I organized a

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 1>conference without using any electronic communication that created in effect

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in international scientific association. And then when the people all

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>appeared there. I said, okay, now you're all members by

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>virtue of having paid your registration fee, and we'll have

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>our next events in Italy in the spring. And here's

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the you know. And so I did all that without

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>ever using the phone. So the guys in the front

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>row were all from the n s A. And they

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>all turned green. So you're developing this in the eighties,

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and then in the nineties, I guess, well, the idea

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>was published in the eighties, and then in the nineties

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Dutch government because I was based in Amsterdam at

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the Center for Mathematic Computer Science and whole leading group

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of crhotography of search there, and the Dutch government came

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to us said we want to do a road toll

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>pricing like sort of like I think it's often called

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>easy paths these days on the highway speed on without

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>lane constraints, and uh, we don't want the drivers to

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>have to reveal their identity or they're there, who they

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>are to these to these radio frequency transceivers that they

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>passed under. And can you do this? And I said yes,

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I've just happen to have the answerd blind signatures this decash.

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So they said, great proof to us that it can work.

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I recruited like a dozen college students, said you guys,

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>build this in ten days. I'll send you and your

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>girlfriends to Disney World for for two weeks. And they

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>turned their like student housing into a lab or twenty

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>four hours a day and they did it. We started

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Dutch government and they were like, wow, that's cool. One

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in one yard of road travel at two a like

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>at a hundred kilometers an hour could make this privacy

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>protected payment. And so I just took the contract they

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>gave us to the bank and said, hey, we got

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>this contract from the government to make this and they said, oh, great,

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you can borrow against that, no problem. And that was

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>digit cash. So what I was going to ask is,

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you know it's now and clearly we're not using digit cash.

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>We're arguably not even really using a lot of other

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies for for payments. So so what happened, like what

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>went wrong? Why wasn't there more adoption? The real question

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that I was fighting for it at that point was

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the web over the like what I used to call

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the five channel guys that the set top boxes. I

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you recall, but it wasn't a done deal.

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>That we'd all be using the Internet and the web right.

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>It was more like you have this closed box and

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it would deliver video but also like the web interface,

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>but it would be a closed system and that would

0:12:57.679 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you know you have an account with it, and that

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>there would be no real need for payments. And it

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>all seemed quite plausible and there were a lot of

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>big actors supporting that, and it was kind of a

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>uh an insurgency that was pushing for an open web.

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the Scientific American article that I

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>published in the mid eighties would show that you could

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>do all these interactions online protecting your own privacy and

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>your own information, using your own keys, was instrumental in

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>getting people to realize that the web was could work

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>for everything that would be needed in future, and was

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a much better option than this kind of closed set

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>up box option. Do you think the the closed set

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>top box people are kind of winning again, because I

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's a big people look at the web and

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel as open, and it feels dominated by

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>a handful of companies, and people don't use much uh

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>technologies that could obfuscate their privacy. Is this is this

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 1>is part of the reason that we see this revival

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of interest in cryptocurrencies in blockchain as a response to

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the open web is losing. Well, that's

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a that's a really interesting way to look at it,

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think the open web has one because my

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>definition of winning is deployment wins. So we have now

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>used this approach to get a very powerful and very

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>easy to use computer in the hands of everyone half

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the people on the planet, and that that's a huge win.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>And what that has done to answer come back to

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>your your point is the transparency and the east access

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to information like what your show provides it. It is

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>revealing that the web isn't kind of what it could

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>be and what end that all these strange things are

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>happening behind the scenes, and people are have become very

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>upset about it. I thought's the sense of the public

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that I get. They really are starting to recognize that

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not just you know, strong end end encryption. It's

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>needed is the protection of the metadata, the whole social graph,

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>who you talk to and when, where you are, how

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you interact with things, all that inciliary information which you

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>know they've been distracted from being concerned about now is

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>something the public is aware of and so I think

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we're it's it's all tied up to the just the

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>perfect point where the Maslowian level is about to do

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a phase change. So now we have smartphones that are

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>so handy and cheap and work great and can do everything,

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and now people are saying, Okay, it works. Now what

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I what I really need is privacy. Something that's striking

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to me listening to this is you two, Like very

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>few people were thinking about any of these problems, even

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>just this idea that there would be something called an Internet,

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>or that there were different versions of how it could

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>have gone, the more closed version, and anticipating that privacy,

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>which is incredibly salient topic in twenty and nineteen, would

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>ever be have to be a thing that we have

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to worry about. Setting aside digital money for a second,

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>just tell us about, like, how this became something that

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you anticipated in the group of people who were thinking

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>about this. How did it tell us about that scene

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and anticipating all this stuff. I'm not sure there was

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>much of a scene. It was me and I wrote

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>about this very extensively, at so much so that my

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>work was invited to the best journals and republished in

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of languages, and then I laid out two scenarios.

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Basically is what's played out right, that that privacy technology

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>could protect people, allow them digital sovereignty, if you will,

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in tony sterm alogy, or it could go the other way,

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and that is that all this information could be used

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to control society under the pretense of, you know, preventing

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>criminal use of of systems, and that this would lead

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to a kind of battle between these two approaches. The

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>winner would determine whether we'd have like a free, democratic

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>society or we'd have a kind of totalitarian society that's

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>orchestrated by let's say, AI helping evil actors control everything.

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that choice is now, finally, after

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>all these years, become quite a parent to people. And

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>also it's much more imminent than people realize because all

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the AI and and and and message data and all

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that stuff is going way ahead behind the scenes. And

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I think people are starting to get a sense of that,

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're saying, hey, wait a minute, this is this

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty dangerous situation. Democracy is a key aspect

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of all this too, And not to be left out

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>and done a lot of work, I'm voting and I

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>think that all this digital privacy is a critical and

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>necessary ingredient for democracy. And and that's kind of to me,

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the meta issue that the public gets

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to decide what kind of world they want, and the

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>only real way to do that is if they have, uh,

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the ability to see whatever they want, to communicate with

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>people and to pay for be paid for information or

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>supplying if its subscribed to your your show, whatever, if

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>they had to pay for it without anyone being able

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to notice that or stop them. So, David, I have, um,

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>what might be a stupid question, but when it when

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes to that metadata issue, when it comes to

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the problems of sovereignty, it seems like we expend collectively

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>so much energy, or at least the cryptographic community expends

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>so much energy trying to solve this problem, you know,

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>creating anonymous payments and similar things. Would it not just

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>be easier for the government or the regulators to limit, um,

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the use corporation's use of information of metadata or is

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the issue that you don't trust the government at all

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to do that in a fair and um unbiased way.

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I came back, so to speak, into this space truth

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>be told. When the snow and revelations were made public,

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and I went to my cryptography conference that I had founded,

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>so that we have one every year, and there's two

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>others that were sponsored by organization publics and journalist one.

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>It was a big deal. Now we have like a

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>half a dozen workshops around the world and there so

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the seven hundred league cryptographers in the world are there,

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and I know a lot of them, all the ones anyways,

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and just but I realized we didn't even establish that's

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>your background, right, Yes, I'm generally thought of as like

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I published a bunch of articles on cryptography and for

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>a long time, more than anyone else in the world,

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>even five years after I stopped publishing. That's what the

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>publisher told me. I don't really know, but I'm not

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>academic really anymore. But I was at at this conference

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and no one seemed very concerned about the Stone revelations.

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>But to me, it was really shocking because I never

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>really believed or was certain that the government was spying

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>on everything. I remained open to that. Yeah, would I

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like to believe there was a benevolent information security aspect

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to government spots. When it was revealed that they were

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>really doing the worst possible things we could imagine, and

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and the people in the field were hardly shocked by

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:58.959
<v Speaker 1>it because they make a living kind of you know,

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>being a part of the what do you call it,

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like the crypto industrial complex, you know, education that I

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>just had to find a way to speed up all

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>my old work, which I did, so I've made a

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand times faster we don't want have done in thirty

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>five years. The mixing, and that was the missing ingredient

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in the e cap so that to hide where you're

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>sending the money from. Let's talk about the sort of

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>closer prehistory to bitcoin. So we as we established Bitcoin

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>came out in two thousand nine, I think, or into

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight, people had been working very towards this

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>goal for a while. The cash was one of them.

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>There was a famous mailing list called the cipher Punk

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>mailing list. You I believe you participated in that mailing list, right.

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>The cipher punks all maintained that that my work inspired,

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>so your name is is mentioned all over those archives.

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>It was the technology that I developed which enabled their position.

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So at that point, how much were you talking to

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the people working on this problem, thinking about the solutions

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that you would come up with talk about the opportunity

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>is like, how much were you sort of uh in

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>communication with the people who ultimately we're getting closer to

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>solving bitcoin. Basically, I filed my dissertation at Berkeley into

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the library and two without releasing the copyright to dissertation abstracts.

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So the three copies in the library and the archive

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>there were the only copies that were let's say, publicly

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>available in principle. Now it turns out that there were

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>some times that they were checked out, and it's very

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting to go look at those little slips of paper

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and see the dates and so on. But that dissertation

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>laid out in code how to build a blockchain, and

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and recently there's a referee article that appeared in the

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Tripoli Security and Privacy is a pretty good journal, established

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that that dissertation included all the aspects of modern blockchain's

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>permission I'm in un permission sort of corporate in the

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:04.479
<v Speaker 1>open ones except for the proof of work, which was

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>presented like ten years later at the cryptocomis that I mentioned,

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and I was there in the audience thinking that's where

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>they want to use this to protect against spam. Maybe

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>you could use it for other things, but I'm not

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>going to think about it because they both were working

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>at IBM and it's probably bad that completely and they

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>already thought about it, so I didn't think, oh, maybe

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we could use this to solve, uh, you, improve electronic money.

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>So in October two thousand eight, the you know, the

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>famous Bitcoin Satoshi Knockamoto white paper comes out. What did

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you think when you write it or when did it

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>first come to your attention and what was your reaction?

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Did you go like, oh, this sounds a lot like

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>my dissertation. Well, it's kind of a blend of of

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>my dissertation and the kinds of electronic money systems that

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we worked on back in the day. But honestly, what

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was, Gee, this is a potentially very

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>powerful mechanism. Could possibly be used by government for various purposes.

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>It might have bad implications for voting that's not done

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.239
<v Speaker 1>in a polling place in terms of vote buying. It

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>might be able to be used to pay people to

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>do things that are an athetical to democracy, or maybe

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 1>that are supportive of democracy in emerging countries. It's like

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a very powerful extra uh state kind of mechanism,

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and that was to me the dramatic thing about it.

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's one thing to say that two cryptographers

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>can do send messages back and forth all day long,

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>but government can just like turn off their phones or

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, see that they're doing that. You can't be anonymous.

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.959
<v Speaker 1>You're not really protected unless you're in a large group.

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>And what what Bitcoin did was it said, Hey, we're

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have so many people participating in this from

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>so many different jurisdictions, that this is going to be

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>outside of the control of government. And I think to me,

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the key thing, that's the real distinguishing factor. The

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the technologies arguably a bit crude and primitive, but it

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>apparently gets a job done. And you're definitely not Setoshi, right,

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't into that. Okay, he tried, Joe. The state

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of things now, obviously Bitcoin is massively bigger than almost

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>anyone could have guessed. We have thousands of other different coins,

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>blockchain projects, spinoff ideas. What are you working on and

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>what do you see as the opportunities today? Well, there's

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount going on in the blockchain space. Sort

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of it's kind of a little bit

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes, and this is amazing how many big

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>actors are kind of working on blockchain projects. So it's

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's extraordinarily exciting. And there are sort of scenarios

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>where these kind of mechanisms really helped maintain our kinds

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of civilization if the government really starts to weaken more.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of people are worried about

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that to some extent because of the transparency of the web.

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>But the real killer app, so we also used to

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>call it that in the modern world, is clearly messaging

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>integrated with payments, with popular applications in the same name space.

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>This is what we chat has in China, and it's

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially what Facebook is turning into if you believe what

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they say that all the new users are basically just

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>chat users, and so it's we chat with blockchain inside.

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So that means we don't keep the metadata. In fact,

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>we have a way to destroy it using a mixing

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>technology which I also published in the eighties, uh and

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>found this way to speed up after the revelations. So

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a payment system based once again on digital bear

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>instruments denominated digital coins, and a solution to the who's

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>talking to whom the mixing the uh metadata problem integrated,

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>and we have a way to allow the depths to

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>run securely off chain so that it doesn't depend on

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the chain like the current major chain. So it's I

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>think the killer app that will displace current dominant you know,

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>just like so many times we've seen it seems like

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the major social network systems are undisplaceable and the next

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>thing you know, everyone's moving over to the next new

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>thing because because they get better privacy. That happened with

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like Telegram, right, So this is metadata protection a whole

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>other level beyond what people are trying to recognize is

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the real issue, not the end and encryption that like

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Telegram provides. So I think we'll see people move over

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to our platform and they'll then their social graph, who

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>they communicate with, and when they'll have integrated payments. As

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned for this is really essential for democracy, and

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>we've got it all working on a blockcheam. We've got

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 1>tremendous support from the community. We've got almost nine nodes

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that have volunteered to operate our system without making any

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>money off it. So an anonymous payment system with an

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>anonymous messaging platform attached, so that the entire sort of

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>transaction becomes anonymous. Well, I would to me it's not

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>so much the anonymity because you are able to establish

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>who you are, and you do have the benefit of

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>knowing who you're communicating with and so on, and you

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>can always reveal this. This blockchain based you know, chat

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>today doesn't really give you the ability to prove that

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you send a certain message, so it can be used

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>as a replacement for email, which is an important thing

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>for developing country. So and it's also censorship resistant, you know,

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to kind of stop people from be able

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to because they can access it through any one of

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>our uh node. So it's a it's a pseudonymous self

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>sovereign identity based messaging integrated with payments. But then it's

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>also an open, two sided business model platform for debts. Okay,

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>with that caveat This is something I often wonder about cryptocurrencies.

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But again, it feels like developers spend a lot of

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>time working on the underlying technology of crypto, trying to

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>make the blockchain or whatever more efficient. How much does

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>technology actually matter when it comes to cryptocurrencies? Are people

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>basing their use case or they're buying and selling of

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, something like bitcoin on the underlying technology or

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is it just first mover or advantage. How much does

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it matter? I believe that being able to do untraceable

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>messaging to solve the metadata problem at the speed needed

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>for consumer transactions, which is like ten second latency from

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>initiation and sending a message, receiving it or banking payment

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and having to be final, is they key enabler for

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>taking the blockchain out of its current kind of huddles

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>investment kind of mode and making it a mass consumer product.

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that phase change is what the

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>technology breakthrough that I've established, like a thousand x speed

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>up in this in the in the messaging privacy allows,

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So in that sense, I think technology plays a very

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>key role there. And I think that there's also a

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>second and part of the question is you know about

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>good money. It's all about good money. And if if

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that a bitcoin or an etherorum or whatever

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>popular crypto you think of could be displaced by one

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that is arguably stronger, and even though there's a lot

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of momentum, brand and and value and so on, because

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it's all about good money. And I think one of

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the things that our elicks are. Technology has going for

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it in that regard is that it is based on

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>quantum resistant cryptography so called random functions. No one else is,

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and that makes it something that nation states can trust.

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And so that's a kind of cryptography. It's the only

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>kind that they used to protect their national security information

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and commanding control systems and so on, and so it's

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it's actually very important for developing countries or even countries

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>like Japan. We are worried that you know, China is

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>coming in and dominating with with Alipai, that they if

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a kind of digital imperialism. What you want is

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a level playing field between countries so that the small

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>countries can also introduce innovative products and safely allow sophisticated

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>financial services to come in from abroad to create economic growth.

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>We have to wrap up. But one less GUESSI do

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you ever worry about all this technology in the hands

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of people. I mean, obviously you look at something like

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the Snowden revelations or various other things, even financial collapse,

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and that gives rise to a lot of well deserved

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>skepticism about centralized authorities, whether they be governments or banks.

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>But do you ever worry about the sort of complete

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>flip side and what happens when institutions that have essentially

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>provided some sort of order to society for centuries or

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>decades suddenly get deeply undercut and their ability to maintain

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>control of communication and transactions. Yes, I think that it's

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously a vulnerability to stability if these major institutions were

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to be really disrupted, and I think they recognize that,

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and they are acting behind the scenes. I'm getting on

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a plane a couple of days to go visit one

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of the major central banks of the world. Invited me there.

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>The people, you know, and I've been involved with these

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.959
<v Speaker 1>sort of folks for quite a while. They're all working

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>desperately behind the scenes to try to find a way

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that they can issue a digital currency that's uh really

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, worthy of of their backing and and so

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they'll just as as this technology

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 1>goes mainstream, the regulatory you know, people recognize that it's

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>really important for privacy and security and democracy, the regulatory

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>impediments will will fall away and be you know, for good.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's just like all financial services innovation,

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, when the eventually when it becomes mainstream. It's

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>all happily accepted, and I think then the these mainstream

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>organizations and major actors will continue to be a significant

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>players and this will create a stable, gradual transition to

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a much better world. David Chum, thank you so much

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for coming out. Fascinating conversation. Thank you. It was really

0:33:49.760 --> 0:34:02.719
<v Speaker 1>a blaste here. Thanks David. That was great, Tracy, I

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>really loved that conversation. Yeah, that was really fascinating. And

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, Um, you hit upon something in one of

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>your questions to David, which was just how early he

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>was when it comes to talking about a lot of

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the problems that we are talking about today's such as

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>privacy concerns, such as the idea that you know, our

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>private data is going to be used by nefarious corporations

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>or governments. He was just so early to all of that.

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's kind of unreal like it was sort of

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>at a time when a lot of that was in

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the realms of science fiction. Yeah, something that I thought

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of that I hadn't really thought of before is like, obviously,

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, among mainstream pundits and the tech press and

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>uh analysts, privacy is a huge deal and people are

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>really concerned about how much data companies like Facebook and

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and all these and Google and all these entities

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>have on us. And yet in the conversation, and again

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it's sort of like mainstream, mainstream tech journalism,

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 1>there's still quite a bit of dismissiveness, I would say,

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>about the sort of crypto world, of the blockchain world.

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>They think a lot of it is a snake oil

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:13.959
<v Speaker 1>or just weirdos and cranks who live in Silicon Valley

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>or off the grid somewhere. But when you figure or

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>when you sort of think of the big picture of that,

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>actually it's a lot of the crypto blockchain people that

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:26.959
<v Speaker 1>have been warning about privacy concerns long before most tech

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>journalists had even it occurred to them. It seems like

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it should be more a part of that conversation. Well,

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about that before, the notion that there are

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>so many sort of value systems attached to cryptocurrencies, but

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>there's also I don't know, just based on the conversation

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>we had with David, it feels like there's something deeper here,

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he mentioned digital imperialism. It feels like the

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 1>world right now is sort of having to choose between

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>which technological and which government system it wants. And I

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>say that someone who's you know, technically in China at

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the moment, and it's sort of watching this unfold in

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>various ways, but it does feel like we're at that

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>moment of time where people are going to have to

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>start making these decisions right and there. It almost doesn't

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's a big distinction between a government system

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and a Facebook coin, like whatever it is, it's some

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>gigantic entity upon which the individual has no control one

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>minor thing. Uh, and maybe it's a subject of a

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>future conversation. Uh. David pointing out that the first time

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:35.320
<v Speaker 1>he came across proof of work, which is integral to UH, bitcoin,

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>was it was presented as a spam fighting technology. I'm

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 1>not sure how many people know that bitcoin kind of

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>came out of work to to fight against spam. So

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it might be worth unpacking that one at a later day. Yeah,

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin of fighting the good fight against junk email and

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>privacy concerns. That's that's something, all right. This has been

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 1>another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway, and

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You could follow me on Twitter at

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:11.879
<v Speaker 1>the Stalwart, and you could follow David on Twitter at

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Chalm dot com, and be sure to follow our producers

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter tofur Foreheads. He's at four Heast, as well

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>as Laura Carlson at Laura M. Carlson and be sure

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>to follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesco Levy at

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Francesca Today. Thanks for listening.