WEBVTT - Building and Scaling Niche with Morning Brew

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm off my game today. No, you're not. People are

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>going to have to start making better content. I think

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking about this for a long time.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.239
<v Speaker 1>When you program for everyone, you program for no one.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's at were purpose driven platform. Like we're

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to substance? How was that? Are you

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>happy with that? This is marketing therapy right now? It

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>really is? Well? What's up? I'm Laura Currentti and I'm

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Alexa Kristen. Welcome back at Landia. So Alexa, I am

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>out in Hollywood, Los Angeles, which is so pertinent for

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>our conversation. To open up today's show talking about the

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Emmys and our favorite show, ted Lasso ted Lasso Big

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Wins at the Emmy's. I love this show. It brings

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>so much joy and laughter. And as we were getting

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>ready for this record, talking a bit about how a

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>series on Apple TV plus, I think it's interesting to

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>think about how ted Lasso becomes brand and the ability

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to permeate the world of business management. You have some

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:09.559
<v Speaker 1>thoughts around this uh commerce fandom in a different way.

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So knowing we're going to talk to our friends at

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the Morning Brew about niche community building through media, I

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>thought this would be a fun place to start. I

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great place to start. I love ted

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Lasso as well. Then when I see on Twitter on

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>LinkedIn people talking about the business and management like leadership

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>lessons of ted Lasso, quoting the show and Laura, when

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you and I were talking about this, I said, there's

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>an extension here, like an obvious extension of ted Lasso

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>NBA Crash Course or ted Lasso Leadership Course. There's so

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>much opportunity to start thinking about that content as a

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>jumping off point for additional products. And I think that

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>if Hollywood looked at product and product market fit and

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing that there is a huge product market fit around

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a business community that's dying for leadership lessons, that actually

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>makes you think a little bit differently, And isn't this

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of heavy slog of learning? And I think that

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that note that kind of heavy I'll call it my

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>This is such an Alexis m right, the heavy schlog

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of learning. But I think the point is is that

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>there's so many places in spaces where content can show

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>up and have a different um meaning or feed a

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>different audience that maybe it originally didn't seek out to do,

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>but they're finding that they have major footholds or fandom

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>by creating these types of extensions or new products, and

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's exactly what morning Brew has done. Alex

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and Austin on the show they talk about in this

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 1>episode of how they thought about building niche communities, and

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>from a marketer perspective, I'm still kind of amazed that

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of marketers get caught in the kind of

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>mass media game versus building for niche audiences over and

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>over and over in mass and finding these areas and

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>building products to create fandom, to create what I call participation,

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So then you start to think about your metrics. Someone

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>asked me about, um, you know, how we were measuring

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>things at GE last week, and I said, well, we

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>went from the typical shares and likes and those types

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of things into participation. And for my perspective, I was

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about the podcast. I was talking about the message

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and how fans were popping up fan fiction and how

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>they were doing cosplay. That is huge for a brand,

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think that morning Brew understands this concept kind

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of fundamentally. I think Alex really started to see this

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>when he started really started to see that pull of

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the of the market demand. Even at you know, University

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of Michigan where they started this. The kind of focal

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>point of the conversation that we have with them is

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>around really starting to think about content and building content

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as products products for niche audiences and serving those audiences

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>UM in a way where they can't get um, what

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you're giving somewhere else, and then allowing and this is huge,

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>allowing those audiences to create in and around your I P.

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Because we are getting to the place where participation and

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>ownership is king. These are the conversations around all the

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>n f T s, around crypto and content and so

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>as marketers start to think about, how do I allow

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>my audience to start to participate and have maybe a

0:04:56.080 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>piece of ownership, even if it's informal, Um, how do

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>we ignite imagination or creativity with our audiences? That starts

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to become a very different model of media. UM. Then

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>I think we've seen before. Yeah, there's certainly the product

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>roadmap that this requires, right, and moving from foreign factors

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to franchises and thinking about, you know, how you build

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>for communities, engage with communities, And then there's a conversation

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for the c R oh, right, and the sales teams

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and how they're packaging this. So many times over the

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>last few years on this show we've talked about, you know,

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>sitting down with publishers talking about their pitch, and nine

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>times out of ten those pitch decks have started with

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>how many peoples reach right? If it starts with we

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>have an audience of X, it's a wildly different entry

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>point when you're talking about participation and how you price

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that accordingly. And with that, we'll be right back with

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>Alex and Austin, co founders of Morning Brew. Alright, ed Landia,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we are back with our partners that yield Mo. If

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you remember, we spent our first mini series talking about

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>how yield Mo works with brands to make audience attention actionable,

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and in this mini series we take on how contextual

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>targeting is being reimagined as brands make every interaction with

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>their consumer meaningful. Welcome Lisa Bradner, GM of Data and

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Analytics from yield Mo. Thank you so much, great to

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>be back. Always great to talk to you guys. So Lisa,

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about what is yield Mo, What do

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you do at yield Mo, and how are you working

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>with your clients sure, Yelm is a smart exchange. We

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>are focused on increasing the value of advertising inventory for

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>buyers and sellers. We do that through data and my

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>job is to help bring the right data to bear

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>so that we can help brands find the best impressions

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>for their goals and do so in a privacy safe

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>way that is right for consumers. So Lisa and helping

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>brands find the right data. How much does context factor

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>into that? And how is yield MO framing context as

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you bring data forward to your clients At the highest level,

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>context is everything right? It's how do we show up

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>as brands in an appropriate way when we're wanted, when

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we're helpful and deliver a service so that we are

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>just accepted as being in the right place at the

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>right time. Super easy to say, super hard to do. Right.

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of the marketing holy grail. But what we

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>look at is the data. Everything that's happening in the

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>moment and AD is served, and we look at all

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of that data to understand what's going on, what's surrounding

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that ad, where is that AD showing up, what devices

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it on, is the person viewing that ad paying attention

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to that add and spending time with it. We look

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>at everything that has happening in that instant and helps

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>clients figure out when they're advertising is landing and when

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe it isn't landing as well as it could. So

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>why do you think that contextual targeting is gaining increasing

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>importance in today's marketplace? So I think when you say

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>contextual targeting, that means different things to different people. But

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>at the highest level, we are on a half of

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>having less data available about the people were serving ads to. Right,

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So Google is sunsetting third party cookies. Apple is already

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>blocking on Safari third party cookies. It is harder and

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>harder for marketers to connect the data about an individual

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and how they move across the web. So without that

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>data that marketers have become really reliant on, it's contextual

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is the alternative of how do I show up in

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the right way without leaning too hard on individuals private data.

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But what Yale MO is looking at is you know, contextual.

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>One Datto was, hey, here's an article about travel, let's

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>serve a travel ad um. We're not going that literal.

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>We're looking to understand from the data. Let the let

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the ad experience tell us what ads are working with

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>what content and what context and what time and what

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>device and what place so that the data that comes

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>back can be modeled by machines and tell advertisers where

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and when and how to place their ads. Contextual advertising,

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>right and you talk about kind of at its highest level,

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>has lots of different kind of meanings and machinations. But

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>contextual advertising has become very in vogue in light of

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the cookie conversation. So cookies going away, which we know

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>got pushed back right in terms, go push the time back. However,

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a really interesting time for marketers to be thinking

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>differently about contextual advertising. Why and why has it come

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.359
<v Speaker 1>back into such kind of a focus for for marketers.

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question because I think there was a

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>portion of the marketing world that when Google delayed the

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>cookie deprecation, when people I don't have to think about

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that right now, right right, but the smart money is

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>saying this is real. I'm already actually losing a lot

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of iOS users, and most marketers if they went in

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and really studied their programmatic campaigns, I think they would

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>be surprised to see that often their campaigns are going

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to Android users. That's not because the android users are

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily their best customers. It's because the Android users are

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the ones that they can match to their audience. So

0:10:55.559 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they're already missing a whole lot of iOS customers and

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>they may not even be realized realizing that yet. But

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the smart marketers are seeing that, are realizing that their

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>audience is going to get harder and harder to find.

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So on the one hand, they're upping their loyalty strategy

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to get a lot of first party data, but on

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, they're starting to test and learn new

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>ways of expanding reach, new ways of finding efficiency, new

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>ways of communicating and reaching out to their audience without

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>relying on first, second, or third party data. Lisa, this

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is a great start to the conversation and we look

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>forward to having you back for part two. And we

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>are back on the mic with our friends from Morning

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Brew at Landia. Let's give a big welcome co founders,

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reef and Alex Lieberman. Welcome to Atlantia. Welcome, thanks

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>so much, thank you. Yeah, we were just saying as

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>we were getting ready to come into the episode, this

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is like total fans of m all things in the

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter feed, so we're excited to have you and bring

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>this conversation I r L kind of kind of it's

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it's better than on Twitter, but not as good as

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in person. You both are very vocal founders and business

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>leaders who are constantly sharing the journey that you both

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>have been on in building your business. One of the

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>things that struck Alex and I as marketers is something

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that you posted Alex talking about the most underrated entrepreneurial

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>skill is storytelling. UM and as this is a podcast

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that is largely dedicated to the power of it, would

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>love to hear you know what that means to you.

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And as you started, as you said, with the product

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in a vision, it was really storytelling that catapulted Morning Brow.

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Can you take us into that. Yeah, you know, my

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>thought around this is Austin and I both went to

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>an undergrad business program at Michigan, and I would say

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>most people in the underground business program we're we're fighting

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>for kind of the same three categories really two categories

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of jobs investment, banking, UH and management consulting. And I

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>think as a function of that, most people focused on

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>attaining the skills that made the most sense for those jobs,

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So things like you know, financial analysis, accounting, operations UM

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 1>and you know, don't get me wrong, those are really

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>important things. Those are skills that you know, any business

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>professional should have proficiency in. But what was always interesting

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to me is that the skill, whether you want to

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>call it sales or communication or storytelling, it wasn't talked

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>about a lot. There was one class that everyone took

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that was a joke for most people in business communications.

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the reason I tweeted about that was

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>just in reflecting on kind of what are the biggest

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>things that I think most founders are entrepreneurs leverage in

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>order to propel their business forward. I think storytelling has

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to be in kind of the top three of not

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the number one. Yet it's not people aren't incentivized to

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>really get great at storytelling, uh in college. And when

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I posted about that, I was kind of just referring

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to verbal storytelling, but I think it actually is more

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>broad than that. It's verbal storytelling, it's written storytelling, and

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's visual storytelling. And I think we've seen examples of

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>great creators or experts in those different areas build massive

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>audiences on the Internet because people are realizing on the

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Internet and not necessarily in school, how important those things are.

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I look at the number of newsletter lad businesses that

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>have emerged over the last blood's even call it twelve

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen months. There are a number of choices when

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the plot of your story on paper, it

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>could look similar to a lot of other value props

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that are out there. What would you say was the

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>plot twist of Morning Brew that could take it from

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the product you rolled out with two really where you

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>hope to see this business grow? I think the plot

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>twist was, Well, there's a few. The first one was

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>when we identified very early on that the content was

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>not just for college students, but it was for everyone.

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>At first was Alex who was really doing for his

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>friends and they were doing for other colleagues or just

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>people in the business school. But when we went to

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>our internships or our jobs and we realized that this

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just for college students, those for professionals as well.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That was a big moment where the market went from

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>college kids, which is a nice market, but not that

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>big and not that valuable, to be totally honest to everyone,

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and we had CEOs of big companies reading, and we

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>had investment banking analysts, and so that was the first thing,

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>who was the first big CEO that you saw subscribe?

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>There was the year of Time Warner Cable, who ended

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>up investing in Morning Brew. Early on, he was I'd say,

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the first big person who we didn't know signed up,

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and then we found out signed up. We used to

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>every night go through the list and see who was

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>signed up. I think the second thing was Alex and

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I both knew the tone and voice we wanted to

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>hit on in every single newsletter. We know we couldn't

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>do that. We know that we knew that we had

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the vision, but we couldn't execute it on every single day,

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>every single sentence of every single news letter. We could

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>do it for small chunks a sentence, a paragraph, maybe

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>even a single newsletter, but not six five days a year.

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And when we found writers who could write in the

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>tone we wanted it written in, that was the second

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>inflection point, aha moment whatever, which was okay, now we

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>can focus on the business really early on me growth, Alex,

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>sales even because we had some content people. That was

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the second really big moment where we knew the audience

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and then we do the content and get hit. And

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the third was sales. It was can we get brands

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to advertising Morning Brew, and can we continue to champion

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>this idea of creating native advertising? Right, we knew banners

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>weren't gonna we were going to build a big business

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>off of the backs of banner ads in the newsletters.

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So once those three hit the audience, the content and sales,

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>we knew we had a business. Who is your first

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>paid partner? It was Emlahart, a college memorabilia business that

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>did like branded college rings and other you know, college apparel.

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>It was an eight hundred dollar ad. They bought three

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of them total, and the only reason we got it

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>was because one of our original investors in The Brew,

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>he had a relationship with them and he said he

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>was helping us earn some beer money. So that was

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that was the first advertisement partner. The first one we'd

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>like earned for ourselves was the University of Jena. And

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the first big partner was discover Card. What was the

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>time frame from Memorabilia to discover Card. We'll Discover Card

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we started speaking to when I was in Michigan, because

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll never forget they came to us and they said

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to send you an RFP, and I immediately

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>said that sounds Great and Google. When RFE was I

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>had I had no idea, not a clue, I mean

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>just I couldn't even begin to guess what it was.

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>But so I just remember pacing in the auditorium at

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Michigan just talking on this call with senior marketers at

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>one of the agencies. I can't remember which one. It

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>was about Discover. So that was the beginning of seventeen

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>and they were tossing around numbers, like I remember, they

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>said they were gonna r FPS for a hundred thousand,

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty thousand, and five hundred thousand, and

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 1>basically what I had to tell them was for five

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand, they could own the company five times over.

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And we had liked subscribers. Maybe he's not he's not joking.

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>It was like sending like Alex and my mom like that.

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>That was the list. The CMO of Discover card her daughter,

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>I believe, introduced her to Morning Brew and so she

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>reached out to the agency saying, Hey, what they're doing

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>is really cool. I would love to partner with them.

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>So the agency thought, oh, Morning threw, they're butted up

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>all of this stuff, and it was just Alex nine

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and we had no idea what we're doing, so it

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even there's not you couldn't fake it till you

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>make it right. At some point, it's just so ridiculous,

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>and so we had to come clean like, yeah, this

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>is ridiculous, you know we we can't do it there

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>with a half million dollars. But the big thing we

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>did is we said, but how many subscribers do we

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>need to have for you to actually care about us?

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Because at the time we didn't know, we weren't sure

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>it was a ten thousand, fifty hundred thousand, a million.

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>We had this idea that we could get to a

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>place where big brands would care about us, but we

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>did know what that point was, and they started throwing

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>out numbers like a hundred thousand subscribers, and so that

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>for a while is our north star. And I think

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>around end of seventeen, that's when we started to work

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>with them, was when we actually had thousand subscribers. So

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to how I built this with Gyraz

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>and I think Austin, you were talking about the future

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of media is definitely niche and distributed. What does that

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>mean in your business today? And how do you think

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>about niche and scale. I think oftentimes people confuse the

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>word niche and small. Niche doesn't mean small. What we're

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>learning is that the Internet is a very large place.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of people in the world, and these

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:53.479
<v Speaker 1>niches can have tons and tons and tons of followers.

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And so at first we call ourselves this niche publication,

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and to some extent we still are people who want

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to consume. Whom to want to opt in, to consume

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>business news in a newsletter in a conversational tone every

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>single day is fairly niche. It's not huge. But now

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>we start thinking about, Okay, we have this audience of

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>three million plus, and of course you want to scale

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that and get that bigger. But that's not the only

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>way we view growth anymore. We have a goal at

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Morning Brew do two things. One make people better at

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>their job, and we do that through our B two

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>B publications as we call them. So we have retail Brew,

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.479
<v Speaker 1>we have marketing Brew, we have Emerging Tech Brew. So

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to use one of those as an example, we for

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>retail Brew, we try to think about how many different

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>ways can we serve a retail professional events, podcasts, you

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>know what it, whatever may be within that vertical. And

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so right now we have newsletters, web content, and events,

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're contan think about what else is next, could

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.880
<v Speaker 1>be job boards or whatever else. But on the other

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>side of things that's not job specific or industry specific,

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we think about up how can we make well rounded

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>business minds. And there's four categories were really interested there, business, money, career,

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and lifestyle. And so as you break those down, like so,

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>taking for example, money, we're going to think about how

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>can we create content in the money vertical. It's mostly

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>personal finance and investing. So you could argue investing is niche,

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>but the number of people who would like to consume

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>investing content in some way, whether it's a Twitter video

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>or Instagram post or a podcast, is really really large.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>So we're just starting to break down the content we

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>create and target these niches that our audience cares about.

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>But my belief is these niches of productivity or investing

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>are really really big. Alexa and I used to meet

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>with media, you know, sales teams all the time. We

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>were coming in from you know, big legacy networks and

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>publications to niche startups and the common denominator slide Slide

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>number one was how many people you reach? Right, Like

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Austin you said the first question he has, well, how

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>many how many subscribers do we have to get to

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to actually validate the cost you're willing to pay. But

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>what if at the time those twenty thousand readers we're

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>spending on average, you know, an hour plus with Morning

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Brew content in the community, we're deeply engaged were advocates

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>for the brands who were a part of the Morning

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Brew community, would that be worth five thousand dollars. It's

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting question. Yeah, I mean, I would just

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 1>say that it all comes down to incentives. Right when

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you think what you guys are talking about, how it's

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>like crazy thinking about audience in mass scale and not

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>having focus and monetizing that. But I think when you

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>think about incentives drive people, it starts making sense why

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>brands m why publishers have valued the wrong things in

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the past. The incentive for the marketer at the brand

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in the past was to make their boss happy. What

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>their boss valued was getting in front of exactly one

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 1>ship ton of people. And so if you could get

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>in front of that many people and make your boss happy,

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you were happy because your boss was happy with you

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>on the publisher side, if you had a business model

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.719
<v Speaker 1>that forced you to get in front of tons of

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs because your costs were high, you needed to be

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a big scale to create any sort of margin for

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>your business. Again, your incentive is to get a lot

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of people reading to make the economics of your business work.

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.959
<v Speaker 1>I think in order to think in this what feels

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 1>like a common sense way, your incentives need to be

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>aligned with thinking through common sense. So common sense KPI

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>s look like I mean, I would just basically say

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the reason we've been able to think about things in

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>this way is it all started with I would say,

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>at the core, the value of curation. The value of

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>curation is what allowed us with one newsletter to have

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the same number of writers when we had ten thousand,

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.959
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand and three million readers. And when you

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>have the same cost basis and you continue to grow

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.959
<v Speaker 1>your audience, your margin grows, and so you don't have

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to worry about like, obviously we want to scale Morning

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Brus audience, but we're just as interested in getting people

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>into our ecosystem through things that aren't just our daily newsletter,

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 1>and also retaining and engaging our daily newsletter readers with

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>other things that we create. We don't have the incentive

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to have to get from three million to ten million

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>just for the sake of having enough margin as a

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>business to have a business that makes sense. Yeah, and

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>most businesses, especially legacy I guess now their legacy. I

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>don't mean The Times or the Journal, but some of

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>these publishers who are popular on the Internet for fifty years,

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>they monetize their content with ads or round their content

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:05.479
<v Speaker 1>banner ads, programmatic pre roll. We're not going to compete

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>with BuzzFeed and Vice on SEO in search terms. We're

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>just not going to do it. That they've be on

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the Internet for two decades or however long they've been around.

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So we have to compete by building brands that people

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>are passionate about, that they care about, and partner with

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>brands in really clever ways to generate higher CPM ADS.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>But the CPM the higher CPM ADS makes sense because

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not this banner that's chasing around the Internet, but

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it's actually an integration into our podcast, into our social

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>To Austin's point, this whole thing is like, if we

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>can create great niche content, what you're effectively doing is

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>targeting a specific psychographic, a specific problem that's being solved

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or passion that's being filled for our audience. And so

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>by doing that, you have the ability to not just

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>create content in one place, but create content around like

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>an actual franchise in a brand. And what that allows

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you to do is that when you go to market

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and partner with a brand, you know, they're not just

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>getting native ads in Morning Brew. They're not just getting

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>placement in a social post. They're not just getting a

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>host reading a podcast. They're getting all of the things

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to exist everywhere and aligned fully with the franchise that

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is focused on a specific niche you know. So for

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Heineken Um, we're working with them on their zero point

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>zero or zero zero product, which is their non alcoholic beer,

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and they get to align with Business Casual, which is

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the more key podcast product at Morning Brew, but we

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>don't even refer to it as a podcast anymore. It

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is a franchise that has podcast, that has newsletter that

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>has social content that also gets extended into our daily newsletter,

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and Heineken zero zero get those touch points in all

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>four places that I just mentioned, so that one stands

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>out to me. The other one that stands out to

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>me was the work that we did with Fidelity with

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Fresh Invest, where we created a custom, uh interview style

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast with them. It was a limited series where basically

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I was the host. I would introduce Fresh Invest, I

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>would talk through the biggest things happening in the markets

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in the last few days, and then I would interview

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>a Fidelity employee who was an expert in one of

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the topics of the financial markets news that I was

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>covering in that episode. And we did that as a

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>limited series. It ended up getting you know, two x

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the downloads that we were expecting on the show. Um,

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're we're talking about another season for that

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>coming up. But that was a really good experience of

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at the ratings for the podcast,

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>if you look at people's experience, people felt like it

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>was a genuine content franchise where they learned about the

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>financial markets from experts, and it just so happened to

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>be created in partnership with Fidelity. That's awesome. I love,

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>love love that you guys are talking about ecosystems and

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>franchises actually like ecosystems because when you start to think

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>about who's created I P and content ecosystems. You start

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking about Disney, Marvel, blah blah blah blah ba. There

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't been a lot of publishers who have created these

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>types of They've tried, Laura and I have like sat

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>with some of them. They've tried, but unsuccessfully. I think

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in the past um who have really created these sustainable

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>ecosystems all based on specific audiences. As you guys started

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this, was this an intentional build There's a

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.959
<v Speaker 1>little rhetorical question, but like it was this an intentional

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>build into ecosystems and franchises? Was it? Were you looking

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at the entertainment world and starting to see what was

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>happening in the last you know, seven eight years in

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of like really building out that i P. What

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>led you to the infrastructure here and the kind of

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>framework that you're going after. I think there are a

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>few great examples of the people are companies that are

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>doing this that really inspired us. And so to your point, yeah,

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean the scale players aren't doing this. They don't

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>need to. And in fact, it's probably to be honest,

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>those scale players that's probably disrupting themselves. They probably can't

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>do it. Just it's not in their DNA to build this.

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>But you look at if you're familiar with the Churning

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>group in their portfolio, whether it's Food fifty two or

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Meat Eater or bar Stool or Crunchy Role, any of

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>these franchise, they've taken these niche audiences. Now they're doing

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it with Golden Auctions, which is an auctioneer house there

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that that's actually more commerce, and now they're going to

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>build out content. I assume they've done a really interesting

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>job there. Same with if you look at the Ringer,

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.719
<v Speaker 1>they've done a really interesting job with some of this

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and e sports teams you look at hundred Thieves or

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>these other sports teams, they've done a better job than

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>most media companies of building franchises and building passion audiences

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and selling them commerce and selling them tickets to gain

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to you in person, the sports competitions and events. Those

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>are some of the people we looked at. His inspiration

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for what we're doing. Was it premeditated? Though? Like that

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to get because what I love when you

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>were talking about in the how I built this, and

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it was really honest And I have to

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>commend you guys on your um on your kind of

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>level of transparency UM, building in public and and doing

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it what feels really earnestly UM, which is super refreshing

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and absolutely a part of your brand, which you've already

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of talked about. I started listening in the Founders

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Journal and one of the things that you said was

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.959
<v Speaker 1>we really kind of didn't know we used our naiveness

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>about the media business to actually succeed here when you're

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about franchising this stuff out in these ecosystems is

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>actually a pretty big deal in terms of a business

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure and thinking through this. So was that premeditated? What

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say is to the point of us building

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in a in a naive fashion, I would say for

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the life of the business, that is

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>how things went down. And um. You know, Paul Graham

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>has a great essay about independent thinking and one of

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the you know, when when he tries to to guide

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:22.959
<v Speaker 1>people through how can you be a more independent thinker,

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the things he always refers to is having

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a beginner's mindset. What is one of the best ways

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to have the beginner's mindset is literally to have a

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>beginner's mind is like not even know this. The way

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that things have been done. That is how we started

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>building our business because we had no exposure to media.

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And when you asked about how have we gone into ecosystems,

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it was more just like us thinking linearly

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>about serving our audience and also what brands were asking for.

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's like we started with newsletters and then we said, well, one,

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to diversify away from just creating newsletter content,

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and our audience doesn't just read newsletters when they read

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>about business. That's what guided us to podcasting because we said,

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>what Morning Brows built is a really intimate relationship with

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a really obsessive audience. There's nothing more intimate than hearing

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:15.959
<v Speaker 1>a personality or a brand speaking to in your ears.

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And then as we've gone into other things, whether it

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>be social content, going more into video content, going into events,

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that has been furthering that narrative of what are all

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the ways that we can serve the modern business leader

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in the two big needs that Austin talked about, um,

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>how can we do all of those things? And at

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the same time, we've heard from brands how what they

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>hope to do is get in front of our audience

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in a way where they are hitting multiple touchpoints of

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that ecosystem where truly feels like in an ecosystem and

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>not just a single product placement here, in a single

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>product placement there. I would say, Now, you know, especially

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>with Austin at the HELM, we are way more meditated

0:33:57.360 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in how we are building out these ecosystems. But I

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>say for the vast majority of the business, it was

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>really linearly thinking about what does our audience want and

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>also what are brands asking for? Well, I think it's

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>a difference between franchises versus form factors when you think

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>about what leads right, especially from a consumer standpoint, to

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>stop leading with the form factor first, but is the

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>perspective and community that we are building as creators that

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we should be putting the premium against. It's funny you

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>bring this up. We've been talking about this a lot

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 1>of the Brew. We spoke the last year about this

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>transition from newsletter company the media company, and all that

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>means is we transition from a medium which is newsletter

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to multi platform and we now lead with whatever platform

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>best serves the audience in that niche, with the talent, personalities,

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever we have, and so as we go into personal planants,

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 1>if it makes sense to be newsletter heavy, well be

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>news letter heavy. If makes sense to be video heavy,

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 1>will be video heavy. And so initially we people did

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>call us a newsletter, and most people still think of

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>us as a newsletter of business. I did to think

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 1>a while. I think my goal is where a lot

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.399
<v Speaker 1>of people actually discover us, not through Morning Crew, right,

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>they listen to Business Casual and they're like, oh, I

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't either one what is Morning Brew? Or I didn't

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Morning Brew has this podcast? That'd be awesome. And if

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we can do that in all these verticals. And this

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is not a one or three even three or five

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>year vision, this is this takes years. You look at

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>the companies have successfully done this. Food fifty two is

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a great example. It's taken a long time. A really

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 1>meat Eaters another one. If you're not famili to media,

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.439
<v Speaker 1>they're a really interesting brand and no one really talks

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>about it's at least not in the New York City

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>media circuit because they cover hunting and fishing. But that

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 1>company has scale tremendously and now they have all their

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.240
<v Speaker 1>oy have a ton of brands, they bought a commerce brands.

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 1>They're selling hunting gear and you can only sell product

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>product to your audience, they actually care a value. You

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>can't sell things to your audience and they don't care

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a value, And so that that's the goal. Are there

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>other bets as you think about this modern business leader

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you're serving that push media beyond form fact there, but

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 1>push media as we know it into new territories that

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>perhaps some of the legacy competitors in your category aren't

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking about. But you know that the customer is interested in.

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>So we have a ways to go till we're really there.

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Right So right now we're testing out this this cohort

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>based course called MBA, which our first test into non

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>ad based revenue, and it's really exciting. But I see

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a world in which we're not just the media brammit.

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:53.720
<v Speaker 1>We're a consumer brand where people don't. Yes, we create content,

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>but just like every commerce brand out there trying to

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>create content, I think we can beat all of them

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to create commerce. And so that core based course is

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 1>one thing we're doing. But I see a world in

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>which we have content and investing in content and business

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:11.720
<v Speaker 1>news and content and productivity and maybe in the productivity vertical.

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>We have a morning Row journal that helps you journal

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 1>every day, and that's a I don't know, you buy

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that every three months or so, and that's a product

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that franchise sells. And maybe we have financial products in

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the investing vertical, and maybe in the news vertical we

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have a community that talks about certain types of news.

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>And in retail, which is the B two B side

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of things, we have a once a year annual event. So,

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>just like the other companies I mentioned, have evolved over

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>time and started to build out different types of content,

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>blur the lines between what's a content company what's just

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a consumer brand. That is where we're in up play.

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>But we have a lot of work to be done

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:57.919
<v Speaker 1>in terms of just we just started to build on

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>social and build video and the five we have one

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>we have two two podcasts Always Only and then one

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast Alex mentioned we did as a one off, and

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 1>so we just scratched the surface in terms of what

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>we're capable of doing. And so we have a lot

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of runway in terms of what we can get done

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're really excited about being able to do all

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of that. This takes really specific talent. How are you

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 1>guys thinking about creative talent and hiring creative talent? Is

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 1>there a different kind of requirement or person you're looking for.

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>We have been incredibly talented team we have. It's you know,

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not specific, Alex. It's more creative than I am,

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>so she can talk more about the people we have

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:45.919
<v Speaker 1>on the team. But we just hire really talented creative people. Yeah,

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would just say that people always ask

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 1>us how is our writing so good? And there really

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is no secret we hire incredible writers. We like to

0:38:56.360 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 1>say we go unicorn hunting every time we hire eiter,

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 1>because you need to find someone who is obsessed with

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the news, someone who is really well informed, someone who

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 1>has great writing chops who writes with flow, who just

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 1>like writes extremely well, and someone who's funny but isn't

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to write laugh out loud jokes, is able to

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>intertwine humor with um and punch nous with the stuff

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're writing. I think talent will work the same way,

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>just in in a different type of context, with social

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 1>or with multimedia. I mean, we're already seeing this right

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>with Morning Bruce TikTok, which has gone from zero to

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty almost seven thou followers in a few months. Daniel

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Toomey who's been our talent on there um he was

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>an inbound person who applied to the business. We're just

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to change the lens through which we assess

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>social audio or video talent, but we're gonna look for

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the same mix, which is who who are the p

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>bold that are able to marry entertainment and information in

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a way that creates the morning grout voice that has become,

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a special part of our I P. I

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>want to go to like a quick speed round of questions.

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>What is a topic that you think in the business

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>world that gets you so excited that you want to

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>go deep on and no one's really covered it the

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>right way or the way you want to cover it.

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say DEFY and recently reading up on DEFY,

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>what is defy decentralized finance? And I'm sure people have

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>covered the right way. It's one of those things where

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like such an outsider even trying to consume

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the content where I'll read a tweetstorm on

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>DEFY and I'll see a term or a phrase or

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>something that is a matter of fact in that conversation

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, and I'll look that up and I'll

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what that means. And then I'll read

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that and you have to keep on pulling back layers

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the onion and then they just a really complex topic. Yeah, well,

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe a listener on the podcast can sponsor it, and

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>then we'll do it. Alex, what about you topic? You know?

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Normally I say the creator economy, but I'm going to

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 1>switch it up this time, and what I'm gonna say

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is studying totally different businesses in other countries. That's a

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>relevant thing for me just because, like recently, companies that

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been looking at are China based or India based,

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and you find entirely different models that haven't been tested

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>or haven't reached um mass market in the US, and

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's such an amazing arbitrage in general, like

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they're different, arbitrage is for business opportunities. One is creating

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>a business for a younger generation. That's been done for

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 1>an older generation, but it hasn't been done for a

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>younger generation. That's quite literally morning brew. I think another

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 1>example of that arbitrage is studying businesses in other countries

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and then bringing them stateside. I think you're even starting

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.839
<v Speaker 1>to see that, like with the recent news around podcasts

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>um and like Apple, Spotify, MPR introducing obviously paid podcasts

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>like that that has existed in China for many years. Okay,

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>dream brand partner? Who is it? Lulu Lemon? Oh, tell

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>me you wear men's Lulu Lemon. Yeah I'm wearing I'm

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>wearing a lu Lemon right now. Yeah, I'm big, big

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Lulu guy. And now they own Mirror. You can really

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:18.919
<v Speaker 1>get a cool campaign with Mirror and Lulu Lemon. Morning Brew,

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Alex Lieberman, Model executive chairman, bring it all together? Well, Alex,

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>who's your dream partner? So I'm gonna say this, because

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Austin did a realistic one, I'm gonna do an unrealistic one.

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 1>But it ever happened. I just go into retirement right then.

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And there is uh Tesla, not only because they don't

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>spend on marketing, but I just envision a world in which,

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>when it's fully autonomous, you have a whole campaign around

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what work looks like in an autonomous vehicle, and I

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 1>think it would be sick. What is your legacy headline

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 1>if you look back, when all is said and done,

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>what would you like to sum up in a headline

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:58.879
<v Speaker 1>about Morning Brew? That's a question you should have asked

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 1>us to prepare for That's that's a that's a big one. Ah,

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>this is cliche or it's a bad answer, But I

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>want I mean we and we said this from day one.

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>This was this analogy. We use the way that our

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>parents generation, the way boomers look at the Wall Street Journal,

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>especially the most passionate boomers, where they read it every day,

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 1>but also they get the Wall Street Journal Wines magazine

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and they go to the wine tastings and all of

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:34.479
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, that type interaction and that type of uh

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>daily you know, thinking about that brand. Yeah, I want

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that to be the way people think about Morning Brew.

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>But compelling that with the fact that we now the

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Internet and we have digital and does not a once

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>You don't consue a paper once day, but you consume

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>digital products all day long. And so that's the analogy

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I want people to make. Is Morning Brew did for

0:43:57.239 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>for millennials or gen Z or whatever the Ultra Journal

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:04.919
<v Speaker 1>did for boomers? What about you, Alex, Yeah, I would

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 1>say it's uh just a different angle on the same

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>type of take. Right, we're talking basically at the end

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of the day, our goal is ubiquity for our generation.

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:18.359
<v Speaker 1>UM I want rap songs to be written about us.

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I want people to reference the Brew on big TV

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 1>shows that come out on Netflix, because when things like

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:30.800
<v Speaker 1>happened happen like that, you reach a level of cultural

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:34.800
<v Speaker 1>ubiquity that only happens when you've truly served an obsessive

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>audience for a long period of time. Before we go,

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we play a game with all of our guests. Bye

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 1>bye bye. What would you get rid of? What would

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you buy or acquire? And what would you do yourself?

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I would buy on behalf of Morning grew a financial

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>service company. I don't know what, but I do think

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:57.760
<v Speaker 1>eventually Morning Bruising get into financial products. So that's again,

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the ten year vision. I think I would create

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a tequila brand. Oh, now we're talking. Now we're talking

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a partnership. Yeah, that's collaboration all the way. Spicy Margarita's

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>or the official drink of Atlantia Tequila shots for the

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 1>official drink of Austin Reefs. So, and what are what

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>are you getting rid of? I would get rid of

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment that AD based businesses are bad. I think

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it is ludicrous and I think bad at they add

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:30.880
<v Speaker 1>based businesses are bad. So I think all bad businesses

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 1>are bad, But I don't think all AD based business

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>are bad just because a few people ran or poorly

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:41.880
<v Speaker 1>ran AD based businesses. So you just landed yourself a

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:46.400
<v Speaker 1>keynote at the next I A B conference. What about you, Alex?

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 1>This is a tough one. Um okay, So let's just

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>start uh bye? What what would I bye? Well? I

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:58.720
<v Speaker 1>was going to say a find financial services company, because

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's just a lot of technology we wouldn't

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>want to figure out and we want from a partner.

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 1>But Austin said that, so I'm gonna go with I

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:13.280
<v Speaker 1>would buy a failed uh direct a consumer apparel brand,

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>something like a Combatant Gentleman, a brand that did not

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>work out well but is for the modern business leader

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and is what we think of quality products. But the

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 1>economics and the business they just didn't run it prudently.

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I would buy that business. Who would I say by two?

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Or what would I say? By two? Um? I I

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 1>would say by that I'm now I'm just cheating because

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I said this on Twitter. I would say bye to

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the word orthogonal. I think it's such a usually start

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>up word. It's a good word, but I just there

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>has to be a better way to say what orthogonal means.

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 1>And the only person who I give permission to use

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>it as Ben Thompson because he uses it a lot,

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:01.879
<v Speaker 1>but he's also leagues UH smarter than all of us,

0:47:02.000 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>so he can use it. And then by b y

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>um a journal brand like I just think, especially the

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:13.839
<v Speaker 1>Founders journals, the audience UH continues to grow. Literally can

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:16.440
<v Speaker 1>have a journal called Founders Journal or journal brand by

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Founders Journal that gets featured in all social content, with

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>all recordings of episodes. And I think given we're we

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 1>could actually literally create niche journal brands for decision journaling,

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 1>for different job functions, for UH, for mental wellness, for

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:34.520
<v Speaker 1>professionals focused on like specific prompts for your mental health.

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:36.799
<v Speaker 1>And the best thing about a journal business is not

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:39.719
<v Speaker 1>only the margin um, but also you can make it

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>into almost a recurring revenue product where people use up

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>all their pages and then they need to get the

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>next journal. So, Alex Austin, if people want to get

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in touch with you to journal, make tequila or do

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:54.759
<v Speaker 1>business with the Brew, how can they get in touch

0:47:54.800 --> 0:47:57.440
<v Speaker 1>with you? You can sign up for Morning Brew newsletters

0:47:57.520 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 1>at morning brew dot com and you can follow me

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:04.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Austin underscore reef r E. First you'll

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>go and sign up for all the Bruise products where

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Austin just said morning brew dot com. Then you'll listen

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 1>one of those products is Founders Journal. Would love for

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you to listen. And then on Twitter on business Barista. Awesome,

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys, Thank you so much, Thank you so much,

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and please come back and visit. We will. Thank you.

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for having us guys. Thank you again

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to Alex and Austin for coming by. Great conversation. Going

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 1>back to what we were talking about at the kind

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of beginning of the show, it really codified my thinking

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and some of the things that we used to do

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 1>together where we would have conversations with c r o

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 1>s at big media companies, but we would be asking

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and pushing on what I P do you have? This

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:54.840
<v Speaker 1>was what what's your I P? What's your most valuable

0:48:54.840 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I P? Talent, etcetera, technology, etcetera. And what happened because

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we were asking those questions, we stopped having conversations just

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>with the sales teams. We started having conversations with the founders,

0:49:10.160 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 1>CEOs and the chief product officers and maybe more importantly,

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the chief product officers, so really the people who were

0:49:18.160 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 1>driving the technology, thinking about audiences and developing products in

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:28.920
<v Speaker 1>media for audiences. And that completely changes the conversation that

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you have on the brand partner side if you're actually

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:37.799
<v Speaker 1>starting to develop with developed products, think about audiences with

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a chief product officer at a media company. And I

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:44.360
<v Speaker 1>think that there are actually still few chief product officers

0:49:44.400 --> 0:49:48.239
<v Speaker 1>titled kind of quote unquote properly, but I believe we're

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:50.760
<v Speaker 1>going to see a lot more, a lot more chief

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 1>product officers entering entering into the world of media. You know,

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:57.279
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting if you go back in the episode the

0:49:57.360 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 1>transition from newsletter to podcast, because there was an intimate

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 1>relationship that existed with an obsessive audience. That pairing of

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the commercial side coupled with the content side when you're

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 1>picking up the signals, insights, inputs from audience pits on

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 1>um what what you're noting around bringing product officers forward

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>with revenue officers and having those conversations with marketers. How

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:26.799
<v Speaker 1>can advertisers be a part of it and build not

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>just media product, but add product around it and and

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:35.959
<v Speaker 1>in that intimate relationship with obsessive audience. Note it does

0:50:36.040 --> 0:50:41.680
<v Speaker 1>not look like impressions. It does not look like clicks.

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:45.719
<v Speaker 1>It looks like conversations. It looks like how many sweatshirts

0:50:45.760 --> 0:50:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I sold last quarter to people who are engaged with

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:52.200
<v Speaker 1>my community? And so could you imagine lex and we've

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:55.160
<v Speaker 1>sat down in many of these conversations with publishers, c

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>ros and sales teams. If that pitch deck started with

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 1>X media company we sold ex sweatshirts with our logo

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:09.319
<v Speaker 1>on it last quarter, versus we reached X audience, could

0:51:09.320 --> 0:51:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you imagine the conversation that that would have started for us?

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>And just what's happening there? Tell us about that? Yeah?

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it just signals something different, which is the

0:51:19.719 --> 0:51:26.320
<v Speaker 1>participation factor. And in that participation factor, new ad products

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and monetization models should emerge. Two things. They're one, I

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:39.200
<v Speaker 1>think that we too easily equate scale with volume like that,

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so on the nose direct impressions, giant audiences, you can scale,

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, brands are doing it all the time,

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:54.799
<v Speaker 1>scaling with niche audiences and Austin. Austin talked about that.

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:56.719
<v Speaker 1>He was like, and I kind of pushed him, so

0:51:56.760 --> 0:52:01.439
<v Speaker 1>he hit home the point that niche and scale are

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:05.759
<v Speaker 1>not mutually exclusive in fact they work together. And so

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>when you start to think about that, are we even

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 1>defining scale the right way? Do we have the right

0:52:12.080 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>tools to really think about and design for scale visa

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:22.200
<v Speaker 1>V niche? And then too that participation factor, how do

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 1>we allow and invite the audience to own part of

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:33.319
<v Speaker 1>the experience because that is where the fire happens. That

0:52:33.400 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 1>point is really interesting when you think about how much time, attention, engagement,

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:45.000
<v Speaker 1>money is left on the table when you go vertical

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:49.600
<v Speaker 1>versus building horizontally, and so you can scale that niche

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 1>by moving into and diversifying your product portfolio, as we

0:52:54.440 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>heard the Brew intends to do. I think it's a

0:52:57.040 --> 0:53:00.760
<v Speaker 1>really interesting inflection point for media company. He's in thinking

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:05.759
<v Speaker 1>about ted Lasso included how I moved from form and

0:53:05.800 --> 0:53:10.319
<v Speaker 1>function to franchise and thinking about the newsletter or a

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:13.680
<v Speaker 1>streaming show which now has the ability to move into

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and engage with community in new ways that widely opens

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>up the aperture for business totally. And with that, Atlantia,

0:53:23.320 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back in two weeks. Laura hit it with

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:28.319
<v Speaker 1>a list of all of our friends and family at

0:53:28.320 --> 0:53:30.359
<v Speaker 1>my Heart who have been so good to us and

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>helped us get back on air. Big thank you to

0:53:33.120 --> 0:53:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Bob Connal, Carter, Andy, Eric Gayle Val, Michael jen We

0:53:37.560 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you. Thank you so much for this opportunity. We'll

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:47.480
<v Speaker 1>see you in two weeks. So, Ryan, what Ted Lasso

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>character are you? I really wish I was Roy Kent,

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:54.919
<v Speaker 1>but I am, in fact a Nate through and through,

0:53:55.320 --> 0:54:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and I hope that is uh his oar goes where

0:54:00.600 --> 0:54:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going, where he'll have a bit of

0:54:03.000 --> 0:54:05.160
<v Speaker 1>redemption from being a little bit of a jerk this

0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 1>season totally. But he's not a jerk, and you're not

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a jerk. He's like a secret killer. He's a secret killer. Yeah,

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:13.879
<v Speaker 1>you don't see you don't see him coming, and then

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 1>he'll just drop some some knowledge bombs. Ryan, if you

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:21.759
<v Speaker 1>have to cast Alexa and I, who oh my gosh, Well,

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:24.439
<v Speaker 1>well Laura has to be. It's it's a tough toss

0:54:24.480 --> 0:54:26.400
<v Speaker 1>up because I know you probably both want to be

0:54:26.440 --> 0:54:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the key Ley. But I feel like I feel like

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Laura's kind of the KEI ly in in this vibe

0:54:31.600 --> 0:54:34.440
<v Speaker 1>as an occasional mix of Roy, a little bit of Roy.

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:38.919
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a little Roy Kent, a little Roy Kent. Yeah,

0:54:39.040 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Laura will be are Roy. That's a good call,

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:43.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, Ryan, who am I? Who am I? I

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>have to go with with the boss lady, with the

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:52.520
<v Speaker 1>team owner. I feel like just honest and like doing

0:54:52.600 --> 0:55:00.399
<v Speaker 1>weird investigative. I think that you're you're definitely the leader

0:55:00.520 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that surprises, that's very much in touch with the team

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh and knows the way to go. Nate, you

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 1>just got promoted. Nate, you just got promoted assistant coach.

0:55:12.719 --> 0:55:14.600
<v Speaker 1>You definitely our assistant coach.