WEBVTT - 5/29, Part 1 Correa to IL, Dietrich hitting the long ball, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy best

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever, Do Do Do? Do? Do? Do Do Yeah,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>as as the Fantasy best Friends Forever Here on the

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports or Radio an hour alongside for Franky Stample,

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Susman. Happy hump Day, which feels weird

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's only the second day of the week. Some

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>would say it's the final day of the week. Ah well,

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll save that for later on the show. I guess

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>what doing? Alright? Greg? How are you doing? I had

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to sleep last night, so it was weird nights man

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>um because I knew I could give a little bit later.

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Actually know NBA record this morning and I was ahead

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of my game. I record them Yestery will courts them

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>after this, I was ahead of the game, but for

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, I was up a lot last great and

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>then I woke up like a half hour before, and

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I really plan the waking up. I had a couple

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of urgent text messages, and then I was up when

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>they showered, and I was like, this is gonna be

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a great morning. And then it wasn't terrible morning for Greggy.

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Lots of work. The moment you woke up today, huh,

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I did I did you know. Let's just say it's

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>off the air, off the Yeah, things are going right.

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we're not on YouTube. We're on YouTube at the moment.

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Even though the description does not say BFF shore titles

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and say BFFs. We are working through those problems and

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we hope to have a solution too. That is correct.

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>That is correct. We're We're trying great, We're trying out here.

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But regardless, the show goes on and there's a lot

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about from last night, a lot of fantasy

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>baseball action and implications from last night. It was an

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting night in baseball over all. The Yankees come back

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>fell just short, but overall, um, it was an interesting night.

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It was It was a good night of baseball. Great, Yes,

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot happened. A lot did happen. We're gonna break

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.119
<v Speaker 1>it all down over the next two hours for you,

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>uh tomorrow on the program All Head dr A. We'll

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>hit up Brad Ziegler as well for Thursday and actually

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 1>have breaking news. Let's start off right now. Alright, we'll

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>start off with breaking news. Let's go. This is per

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Mark Berman, not Mark Berman, who covers The New York

0:02:54.919 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Next Burman sports director at Fox twenty six. He's in Houston,

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>says this Carlos Korea is out three to four weeks

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>with a correct rib. That seems like a good place

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to start. Frank, indeed, yes, it is Carlos cream missing

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the next month or so with a craft rib. With

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a cracked rib. You'll get him back a little before

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the All Star break. I would think that sucks at

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that point. They probably no, But you're talking three or

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>four weeks. You're talking three to four weeks, and there's

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>like two more weeks of action before the All start.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess. I guess it also probably depends like where

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Astros that are at. If they're dominating like

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>they are right now, do they really need him? We'll

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. Yeah, I mean at least the next

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>three or four weeks. We're looking at the late June

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>early July maybe for Carlos Korea and I had issues

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>with Korea Greg coming into the season. Um, you know,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>because he's been injury prow in the past couple of years. Obviously,

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can't really predict a cracked rib. Not

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll be interested to ask if we have dr or

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Virginia okay, soever we have from inside injuries, I'll be

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>interested to ask if there's any possible way that this

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>correcked rib is something that had to do with like

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>all of his oblique injuries and years past or back injuries.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Because we always talk about like these compensatory injuries. I

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>wonder if this cracked rib will have anything to do

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>with injuries that Carl's corea has suffered in the past.

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately I wasn't on Carl's corea heading into the

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>year just because he's missed so much time to pass

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>leep the years really really affected his performance, specifically last

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>year the year before that it affected him as well. Um.

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>To be to be fair, though he was performing quite

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>well this year while he was healthy, but it seems

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>like he's going to be out out at least the

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>next three to four weeks. So big blow for the

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Houston Astros. The Astros getting a taste of what the

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Yankees have gone through all season now losing George Springer

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>was out too of a dealing with a setback now

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, and Carl's corea out for the next month.

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it's all hands on deck. It's uh,

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get a lot of Alex Bregman still, obviously,

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>Michael Brantley, those guys have carried the load all season.

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Greg Hen this effect Kyle Tucker at all? So that's

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the obvious question, right, like, how could this possibly affect

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker? Or you're on Alvarez and I think I

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>may have found out how how was that? I want

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk you through this. The last time Carlos Correa

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>missed a significant period of time, who played shortstop? Alex

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Bregman correct, So Alex Bregman could total speculation on my part. Obviously,

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Alex Bregman moved from the third to short given that

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Alevis Diaz is banged off and he's played we've been

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>playing second himself. He could also play short when Alva

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>comes back, although we'll see what else he does make

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it back, but Alex Bregman moves to short, got it good? Yeah,

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Julie gary L goes from first to third third base

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>every day, so I'll play a third base on Sunday.

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>He was correct, correct, but he can't play third. He

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>can play third. Everyone could at tempt to play third

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>every day opening up first base, you're on Albarews play

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>first base. Well that's the hope, right, that's the hope.

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, we're gonna get these questions, and

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>rightfully so. And I see your logic, Greig. I think

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that can actually make some sense here. But for whatever reason,

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the Astros have been headed in too. You know, call

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>either of those guys up, whether it's Kyle Tucker, whether

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it's you're on alvarezs. Kyle Tucker more of an outfielder,

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe they could use him as designated hit or something

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, but they have been using you're on Alvarez

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Moore at first base. Last night, Tyler White played first

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>base for the Houston Astros. Julie Guriel did play third base,

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>so you got that part right. And then they had

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Jack Mayfield when they short stop, and I don't know

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>what Jack Mayfield. I was looking into the minor league

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>numbers just now I want to see all right, so

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you're on. Alvarets has played nine games at first based

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>so far this year in the minors, and obviously you

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>know what he's done, and then they able to do

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 1>overall speaks for itself. I mean not just uh, I

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>mean twenty home runs, three sixty three batting average p s.

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You're don Alvarest is the hottest hitting player in the

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues right now, and we're all clamoring for him

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to come, but they've been hesitant for whatever reason. I

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>think if they if they wanted to make this happen,

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>this might be the final straw that they needed Greg

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>because now they're without al Twove, now they're without Springer,

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>now that without Korea. That's three players that are mainstays

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in their line up there, the core of the Houston Astros.

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it'll take them losing a couple of games for

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>them to really realize, Okay, we we need we need

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a shot in the arm here. We need something maybe

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that leads to it. But I would imagine with all

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>these injuries in the near future, we should get one of,

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>if not both, Kyle Tucker and you're Don Alvarez. At

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>least that's what I'm hoping for, Greg, and I'm sure

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other people are as well. Yeah, I

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think so too, And I'm hoping, uh hoping that we

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>get both Alvas both Tucker in the lineup soon for

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Houston as we get towards the omer and fantasy owners

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>get towards that playoff push. Good start there, Frank with

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the news on Carlo's corral. Yeah, I'm I'm looking to

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>see if Jack Mayfield actually ranked as a prospect for

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the Astros. He doesn't rank in their top thirty on

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>MLB dot Com, and he's actually he's been around a while.

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>He's a twenty eight year old, so he's bounced around

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in the minor leagues, and it seems

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>like he's a quad a ish player, probably someone that

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Nando di Fino loves deep down. But at two seventy

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>career hitter in the minors for Jack Mayfield, he does

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have a season of twenty home runs under his belt

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>with ten stile and basses as well that came back

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen, so seems like a solid player. He's probably

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>just like a you know, plug the hole for now,

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but doesn't really offer much upside playing deeper leagues for

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the short term. It seems like he's gonna play shortstop

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>until they make a corresponding move, whether it's Kyle Tucker,

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>your Don Alvarez, or or whatever it might be, whoever

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it might corresponding move. And so Ryan mc taggard actually

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>reported that he's gonna be out four to six weeks.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>So that'll take us to the All Star. That was

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Miles Straw and called up from Triple A. Straw, Yes

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is her prospect, Yes he is. He is their fourteenth

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>ranked prospect in the orgmentation. So let's call up everyone

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>except Kyle Tucker or you're Don Alvaage. Well, i'll tell

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you what he been up to al right. So in

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Triple A so far this year, in forty six games,

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 1>he's benning two eighty nine with the three sixty nine

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>o b P seven p s. Does not hit for

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>any power whatsoever. One home run, five doubles, sixteen stolen bases,

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>So if he plays every day, he might have some

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>sneaky stolen base upside. Greg and looks like he has

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>some batting average, he has a hit tool. He has

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a seventy grade on his speed according to MLB dot Com.

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>So this is ranked out of eighty guys. Pretty damn fast.

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>That's basically what they're saying here. So he's got sixteen

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases in forty six games. So I just mentioned

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Jack Mayfield. If that's not the answer that they're looking for,

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.959
<v Speaker 1>if we get more consistent playing time out of Miles

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Straw and that is someone who can offer us some

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>stolen base upside, Greg Okay, So Miles Straw potentially giving

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>us that stolen base upside with whose it with Carlos

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Cray excuse me out for the next four to six

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>weeks with a fractured rib. No bueno for Carlos correct

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>stole seventy basses last year in the month league, seventy basses,

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the year before that thirty eight. So he's got thirty eight,

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy and so far sixteen under his belt. He has

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>one sixty seven stolen bases in the minor leagues and

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>has been caught stealing forty one. This guy is he's

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>known for his hit school, he's known for a speed.

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>He's a three oh one career hitter in the minors.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So no, I just spoke up Jack Mayfield. But this

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>guy obviously has a much higher upside for batting everything

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and and some speed here Greg, some stolen basis absolutely okay.

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So last night Houston was able to get a victory

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>over the Cubs. Uh not thanks for their pitching which

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>was quite bad, but they're hitting which was quite good Hereston.

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>In this game nine to six, Corbyn Martin started for Houston.

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>He got rocked over his three two thirds innings of work.

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh James also got rocked into two and the third innings,

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>each allowing three runs each, striking out for each, allowing

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>uh several home runs. On the other side for the Cubs,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>John Lester, despite getting a big lead, he could not

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>keep that lead. He was up three one, then three two,

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and then blew it open in the fourth, allowing four

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>more runs. His line was five and two thirds, seven

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>runs alloud eight his three walks, strike, striking out three.

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>It was all about the hitters on display here for

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>both sides for Houston and Chicago. Will go over to

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Houston as Alex Bregman hit two home runs, his sixteenth

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and seventeenth of the year for the Astros. For the Coves,

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of players went deep and cleanly. One I

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about Frank Jason. Heymy, where did his

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>eighth home run? Cow? Sure it is night and I'm

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>actually right there with you. David Bodie hit to his

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 1>fifth and sixth of the year. But the player that

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I think does bear mentioned he played short stop yesterday

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>with Javier Baiez dh ing and that is Addison Russell.

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I know Addison Russell not a good guy. Get it.

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Started off the year suspended due to the domestic violence incident,

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but he is back now and I think it bears

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>looking into Addison Russell as a potential fantasy commodity. Again,

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 1>I completely recognize you don't like it, you don't want

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to do it given his background, But from a fantasy

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 1>perspective only, that's all I'm doing here. On the season.

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Thus far, Russell's batting with four home runs, seven runs scored,

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>six ubies over eighteen games and fifty three plate appearances.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>His HERD hit rate is close to forty, which I

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think is very good. Um his k K rate is

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>down to nineteen ish percent. Bavitt doesn't look to be

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 1>crazy nothing really. My estimation, Frank really seems out of

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the line. What do you think of Addison Russell? Should

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owners in all leagues consider him? Well? For us?

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And foremost, I just want to piggyback off of what

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you said, and that's why I wanted to bring this up,

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>because he has been playing well and and it's worth mentioning.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>But I understand that you know this has happened in

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the past in all different sports. If you have an

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>ethical issue with Addison Russell and anything that he's done,

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>completely understand not wanting to get involved with it. Greg, Like,

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna judge you, obviously, and we're not asking

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>you to judge us either for talking about him. But

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:25.599
<v Speaker 1>we are here to talk about fantasy baseball and he

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>is relevant right now what he's doing offensively, so it's

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 1>worth mentioning. Look, if you don't like the guy, I

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>get it. But a lot of the points that Greg

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>hit on are valid. A hard hit rate so far

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>for Addison Russell this year, He's got four home runs

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and only eighteen games. This is a player that has

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a season of twenty one homers and nine five ribbies

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>under his belt as a middle infield player. Never a

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:48.599
<v Speaker 1>guy that's going to hit for good batting average. So

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.079
<v Speaker 1>I think the is a little bit flukey right now, Greg,

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>but the strikeout rate has improved, he's lowered it so far, um,

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's worth mentioning, especially right after the

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that we we just went over Carlos Korea's injury.

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Right If you're looking for a middle infielder that can

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>give you a little bit of pop and and kind

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of replace something of what Carlos Correa was doing. I

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>mean you're talking about like sixty Carlos Correa here, and

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 1>that's what Addison Russell is providing right now. Then I

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>do think that it is worth mentioning and and what

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>he's doing right now, I think he's better for probably

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>better for roto leagues, although the plate discipline isn't terrible. Look,

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>if you need a middle infielder, this is what it

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>comes down to. He's in a really good lineup with

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Cubs. He's playing more recently, and I do

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>think that he should be on your radar as someone

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to add. Over the last ten days, Addison Russell, Uh,

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they played every day the Cubs every day over the

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>last ten days, They've played Addison Russell has started six

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of those ten games. In the four games that he

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>did not start, he received at least two at bats

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in every single one of them. Now, he got zero

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>hits in those eight bats, but he did receive two

0:14:58.400 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>at bats. So he came in early enough in the

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and receive two at bats for Chicago. Now he does

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that seventh or eight in this lineup, depending I guess

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>right to your left and how the lineup does shake out.

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>He's homeward in three of his last four games. I

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think Frank's right. I think if you need a middle infielder,

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Addison Russell is fine. There is no speed here.

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at a guy that has the ability to

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>get on base, does have a little bit of power

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>from the middle infield spot. If you aren't looking, if

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you did lose a Carlos Correa, Frank and for whatever reason,

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't like the numbers, you don't like Addison Russell,

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to go in a different direction. Who are

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>some other names that fantasy owners can try to grab? Yes,

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>how's just talk about the middle infielders in general. And no,

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're gonna talk about Derek Dietrich obviously, and

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing right now. And I got a question

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>before the show, Derrek Dietrich or Tommy Lostella. No, I

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>think those both are fine options. They're more you know,

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>second baseman, middle infielders. But if we're just talking about

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>shortstops and players who are out there, David Fletcher, I mean,

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>we've spoke about this guy for how long now he's

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>still only owned four homers, four stow and bases. Good

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>batting average doesn't give you a ton of counting stats,

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>but he does give you good batting average. Lord as

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Gurriel someone that we mentioned yesterday with Modica. If he's

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>out there still only thirty four percent owned on Yahoo.

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Another player that can provide some pop and I think

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>better batting average, and Addison Russell as well. You know,

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I had some people asking me over the weekend, Greg,

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>why do you like Lord As Guriel. I don't really,

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't really get it. You look at what he

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>did last year. The guy hit two eighty with eleven

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>home runs in only sixty five games. It's pretty impressive.

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's a guy that can hit, you know,

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>close to close its twenty home runs the rest of

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, assuming that he sticks in the lineup. You're

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to wait a little bit. Did Gregorious or

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>uh you spoke about him as well yesterday? Uh, and

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>then Jose Glesias. I mean, this is just like deeper

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>leagues if you just need someone to fill in until

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you get like a d D. Gregorious back well was

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a Glazie has actually played well. Greg three thirteen batting average,

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>four home runs as well. So those are a few

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>middle infields that you can look at. Put there are

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>many only other middle infielder's a plenty. The only other

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>name we wanted to mention you adventure been on him.

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>That's or Lando or Cia. You mentioned him a lot

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this week, so I want to throw him out there

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. Okay, touch a little bit more on Corbyn, Martin,

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>dont lesson. When we get back, we'll do that. Well,

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk more into the astros and the coast. We'll

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>go all around the majors here over the next two hours.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It's Frank and greg gets your fantasy best friends forever

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 1>here on f t S Y Daily roado dot Com.

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Learned from the games best DFS players. We don't just

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>give you advice. We play every day, all major sports,

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>all year round. We never stop industry leading DFS tools

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and custom projections, and now the Daily Roado dot Com Optimizer.

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>In minutes, build an optimized line up for cash games

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and tourneys learned from the game's best DFS players. Joy

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Daily rohado dot com. The following ad contains shocking material.

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Listener discretion is advised. Is some someone in your family

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>playing a dangerous game of Russian Roulette? Over forty three

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>thousand people die a year from drug overdose. A hundred

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and twenty people a day, five people every hour, one

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>person every twelve minutes. Eight thousand people die every year

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>from alcohol abuse. Over two hundred and forty people a day,

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>ten an hour, one person every six minutes. Somebody you know,

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe next learn how to help someone you love get

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>away from the drugs, alcohol and bad influences with the

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>f m l A. People who can take a leave

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>of absence from their job and still keep it a

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>call now and learn how we can help you. Eight

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six two one eight

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six to one. That's

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>eight six six for four. Do you want to risk

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>free wagers up to one thousand dollars if so go

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to points bet dot com forward slash grid, open yourself

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>up a points pet sports with majoring account, Enter the

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>promo code grid and you'll get to risk free bets

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of up to one thousand dollars. In addition to traditional betting,

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>points bets also offers its own betting concept where customers

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>they're rewarded by how much they win their pett that's

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>points pet dot Com forward slash Grid. Enter the promo

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>code grid and get your two risk free bets of

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>up to one thousand dollars today. Back with you on

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the bff's Fantasy Sports Radio Network, Frankie Stamford, Gregg soustermore

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>over Carlos craz injury and potentially replacing him with Addison

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Russell and Frankie, you wanted to get more into John

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Lester uh and Corby Martin two starters from yesterday. Yeah,

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>because like a full a month ago, I apologize to

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>John Lester and now look at what he's doing. Five

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and two thirds eight hits, seven earned runs, three walks,

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>three strikeouts. Greggy, he has allowed nineteen earned runs over

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>his last three starts. That's fourteen innings pitched. That's a

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>twelve point to one E r A. So I'm here

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to say this, Greg, john Lester owes me an apology. Yeah, yeah,

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>if you're listening out there, John Lester, I apologize because

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I talked badly about you during draft season. I didn't

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>think he had anything left in the tank. First five

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>six starts you look pretty good. Next three sucked. You

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Owe me an apology. So John Lester, done with you.

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 1>This kid, you probably wouldn't drop him, but he had

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>some really tough matchups. But overall, I think this is

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.239
<v Speaker 1>part of what you're gonna get from John Lester. You're

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna get some inconsistency. I think you can use them

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in the right matchups. This was not one of the

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>right matchups. Corbyn Martin. On the other hand, Greg, he

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been great. He hasn't great. We had high expectations

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for this guy. He was one of the top prospects

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Houston Astros, not the top pitching prospect because

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they have this guy named uh Forest Whitley in the organization.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Forest Whitley, by the way, has been terrible in the

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>minors this year, and I don't know when we're gonna

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>get him. Yeah, that could be much longer time. You

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>know we're not in the same discussion as Kyle Tucker

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.479
<v Speaker 1>and you're on Avarez when it comes to Forest Whitley.

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 1>But Corporn Martin, Greg He's allowed six home runs over

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>his first four starts. He's allowed at least one homer

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in each of his starts. He hasn't gone more than

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>five and a third endings pitched in any of those starts.

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, he hasn't gone more than four endings pitched

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in each of his past three starts. I'll throw this

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>your way, Greggy. You got the quick trigger finger. Are

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you dropping either one of Corbyn Martin or John Lester? So?

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I am as I am a John Lester Howler. I

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>did bention him last night. I took the shot with

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Leto last week with Houston. Didn't do it last

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>night with Lester getting in a moment must start. We'll

0:21:56.400 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>get a Julio in a moment? Um, Am I dropping Lester? Um?

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not against dropping Lester obviously, you know a quick

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>triggering hear me. I'm not against dropping him. I'm not

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>actively looking to draw him like I am Aaron Sanchez

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>at this point on that same team. Um, But I'm

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly not holding on off the right players out there.

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>The question obviously becomes who do you pick up for him? Right? Like,

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>if you give me a name, I can tell you

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>if I dropped a Lester for him. I'm looking at

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the most added pictures right now. I can always go

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>back to Tyler Molly if you want. Yeah, Yahoo is

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>just it's tough to gauge most added in Yahoo because

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it's always just pictures who are pitching that day? Yes?

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather own Wade Miley over John Lester? Is

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that a fair question? I don't know if he said

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that like rudely or not. I don't know either, trying

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to figure it out like a fair question. He's got

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a three point three to ear a one point one

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>six whip forty five trackouts in sixty two and the

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>third endings. Bitch, uh, it seems like there might be

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>some regression coming for Wade Miley. Greg, but lads on

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Man's when four or five starts, Well, yeah, he got

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Astro's offense behind. It helps a broken offense now,

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Greg, it is broken, but it helps.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a free to e r a. His X fit

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is four point four zero. His Sierra is four point five.

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Not as bad as I thought that was going to be.

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I felt like it was gonna sure, but I thought

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>like that was gonna be significantly worse. Yeah, his hard

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>hit rate is thirty eight and a half percent. I

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>think Wade Miley for Lester is like fair. I mean,

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess they're like similar pictures at this point. John

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Lester does get more strikeouts, but his underlying numbers are similar.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I just looked him up, so pick your points. I

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>probably just but yeah, they're they're similar. Um, Pabo Lopez,

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>he was only picked up because he's facing the Giants today. Uh. Really,

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Griffin Canning one of the most added players, which rather

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>own Griffin Canning over John Lester, Gregg, let's see why

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>he would be out there. I don't leave be out there,

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>but sure would you drop John Lester if there's like

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a two start pitcher available that you want for next

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>week or something like that. Ideally not. I think he's

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>better than just that guy, to be honest with you,

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't just young for a random two starter.

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So his next start comes on for Zach Davies, who

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>has like a two point one A Greg Now I agree,

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with you. My next start, his next start rather comes

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, and that's the make a brake start for him.

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Was his last three stars for Lester all of an

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 1>awful beyond three losses in a row, right, Washington, Philly

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and Houston. Ye all really next, He's not tough matchup

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>or it's not an easy matchup, but it's it's Anaheim. Yeah,

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim might trout by the way,

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Greg banged up. He's always banged up. He is where

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>he plays. The Angels are not great against left handed pitching.

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's the bigger break start. That's the make

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a break start for John Lester. But if he's scheduled

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to pitch on to start pitcher, it might be Yeah,

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>he's probably a two starter, so you're gonna want to

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.360
<v Speaker 1>keep him around at least for that, yes, and see

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens. But overall, I guess what we're getting at here,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>or at least what I'm gathering Greg, is that there's

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>not there's not a ton of great starting pictures available

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>right now in free agency. Like we've really passed that

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>point where you know you had all the all the

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>pitching prospects come up, and you know we had um,

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you know all these like Frankie Mantas earlier on the season.

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>We haven't had another wave of starting pictures like that

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that need to be like must add type pictures. How

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>about Nick, Greg? That your way? What it wasn't terrible?

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't terrible. Greg was good, he settled down quite well.

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Well not style. Come on, how about this one, Greg,

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>mitch Keller, that might be the one. Wait, I see

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>news here he's headed to triple A. I'm eighteen hours ago.

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Keller, It it's a triple A. Well, I thought

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>there was a chance he might stick around because now

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>they have an injury to Jordan Wiles. Correct so many

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>he'll come back up? Would you do that? We dropped

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>h On Lester for Mitch Keller. No, man, I get

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>the next start, maybe the miners. Nick Pavetta last night,

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I will go there next my man Lucas. But that's fine.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Pavetta five innings, three history runs, two walk struck out

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>six allow those two first inning home runs one of

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Paul gold Street, one of Marcela Uzuna, and that was it.

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>No more runs came across the board. So he did

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>settle down. Yeah, he settled down. What what does the

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Pavetta start? It was obviously a mixed bag. It was.

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is Nick Pavetta style right here. I mean,

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly who he is. He gets you worried

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>earlier on in the start, he gives you two home run,

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>gives up two home runs, and you're thinking to yourself, well,

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>here you go. Nick Pavetta is at it again, but

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>settles down averages over a strike up for any in

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the start, doesn't give you length. That seems to be,

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a defining characteristic of Nick Pavetta nowadays. But

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>he goes five and Jack pay his whip one of

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the dot five. You know, three hits, two walks. So

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>let's you know, five hits and walks combined over five innings.

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Pitched three earned runs, the two on runs, he gave

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>up but six strikeouts, and he settled down nicely. You know,

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>his final his final four endings of work, we're scoreless,

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and he was getting a lot of strikeouts as well.

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm cautiously optimistic. I thought it was a step

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction. Again, I wouldn't have started him

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>last night. I wouldn't have started for this two start week.

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 1>But if he comes out of his next start, which

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is against the Dodgers again, allowing like three earned runs

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>or less, and I would say Nick Pavetta is probably

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>back on our radar. That's someone that you can pitch

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in the right matchup. So that's how I bet right now.

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>And I thought it. I thought it was a solid

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>step in the right direction. Group. I don't want to

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>overplay it too much, but I mean he did some

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>he did some good things here. Greg not all bad, No,

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>not all bad. It's fine. On the other side, four

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>St Louis way now stuck out ten guys over the

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>six and things of working, like four runs eight hits,

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>uh too, were in bombing the fourth. Riss Harper hit

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>a big time double in the third. Those are all

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the runs that scored in the game. Yeah, nothing crazy

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>going on in this game outside of that. I mean,

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Wright not really much to talk about. Ten strike

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>out shirt impressive, but he still has a four point

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>nine four e r A. Marcelo Zuna hit another home run,

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>his fifteenth of the season. He has forty seven r

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 1>b I s. He is batting two thirty one, however,

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 1>so that seems weird for him, because this is a

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>guy who typically has always hit for a solid batting average,

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, to seventy two eight plus, So I would

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>imagine some positive regression to come there for his batting average.

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And I know we've been getting a lot of questions

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>about Paul gold Schmidt, but he is getting up there

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in age. He's one year older. We saw this last

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>year where he got up to the slow start and

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>then just took off. I still think that he has

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the ability to just take off out of nowhere. I'm

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not ultimately all that's scared about a guy like Paul Goldschmidt,

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but he hits his his eleventh home run in this

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>one Grede twenty six Ribbies gonna need you mean more

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>than that, But I like that. Yeah, yeah, you'd like

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 1>more than that. But it's still really good Cardinals lineup.

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I think as the as the weather starts to heat

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit more, we'll get even more out

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of Paul goldchmigrade all right, So Paul Goldchard, hopefully we'll

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>heat up for fantasy owners in the coming days as

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the weather gets warmer. You mentioned Casa Hernandez. You should

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>feel good about that before it is sixth homer of

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the year. Hernandez batted seventh last night. I leave for

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia and uh, Caesar is not homeward in two of

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>his last three games. He's batting over three ov P

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>around three sixty, not really running as much as he

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>did last year, which is three steals. What do you

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>think of performance as a late He's just rock solid

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and he's you know, really good in points leads two

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>because he doesn't strike strike out all that much. He

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>has good plate discipline. The walk grade is actually down

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>last year thirteen point four percent, this year seven point nine.

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like he's taking a little bit more

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of an aggressive approach. Last year he would a leadoff

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>man for the Phillies, so maybe that was something he

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>was consciously doing. All right, let me get on base more,

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>let me walk more, let me have the guys behind me. Uh,

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, do all the damage, drive me in. But

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe this year he's taking a little bit more of

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>an aggressive approach. It certainly seems like that's what he's doing.

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But he's lowered his strikeout rate eight percent last year

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>this year thirteen point nine, which in turn has raised

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the batting average up to three oh three, and that's

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>more of the player that we're expecting. She's our Hernandez

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to be six homers, twenty five runs, twenty five ribbies.

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see him run more. You know, if

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he could turn out to be a fifteen fifteen player

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with good Counties has in a good batting average, I

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>think everybody would sign up for that. And you know,

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>he's just he's a quality player. Greg and I think

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>last year you saw that in that second half he

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was he was hampered with an injury. I think it

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was something to do with his foot or like a

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>lower leg injury. I think that really slowed him down.

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>You see that in the batting average last year. But

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>now he's bouncing back to the to the player we

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>know he could be. So I like these arn Is.

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a fine middle infielder. The Lucas Gilio Show ruled

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on last night and we mentioned how on Nick Pavetta

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>really jounced back after a tough first inning. Well, the

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>same can be said even more so my man Lucas Gilto,

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>who over the first four hitters allowed a three run

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>bomb who went maryfield. After that, Nada Gelto allowed I

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>think one more hit the rest of the way. He

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>struck out ten guys walked, one of that came the

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>first inning and allowed of the three run ball. He

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>went eight innings once again, lower's e r A to

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>two point eight five and improved through seven and one

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>on the season, circle of trust welcome. It has been

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>an awesome, awesome season for Lucas Gilto And like I

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>said last week, I'm actively rooting for this kid because

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>so many people were writing him off, and you know,

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it takes years for these prospects to figure it out,

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, there was a lot of expects he

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>for him. He was, you know, part of a huge

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>trade and you know he was really asked to be

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the leader, the anchor of this pitching staff for the

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Chicago White Sox frankly before he was ready. I mean,

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>this was a really young kid. But he's he's starting

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.959
<v Speaker 1>to put it together. Greg fastball changeup combination has been

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>lights out for him. He also mixes in a quality slider,

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's really been the improvements on that changeup and

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>his fastball. His fastball command has been better. He averaged

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>ninety five point two miles per hour last night with

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>his fastball his change up by the way eighty two

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>point six, So we see a twelve thirteen mile per

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>hour discrepancy between his changeup and his fastball, which obviously

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>is keeping hitters off balance tremendously. He had twenties six

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>swinging strice yesterday against the Kansas City Royals career high

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>ten strikeouts. He retired after that home run. He retired

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty two of the next twenty four batters he faced.

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>He's allowed only five walks over his last four starts.

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's tremendous for him as well as a

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>guy who you know routinely has been over three walks

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>per nine in his career. And he's also struck out

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>seven or more in five of his last six. So

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>these strikeouts are there, the walks are down, the swinging

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>strikes are there, fastball change of combination, is there, mixes

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in the slider. I mean, he's got absolutely everything working

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. Greg, I'm buying in. I'm I'm buying in.

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And I put out a poll before the show started.

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I asked which one of these breakout starting pitchers you

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>trust most the rest of the way. Geelito, Matthew Boyd,

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Smith, and Brandon Woodroffe Brendon Woodrof not getting as

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>much love as he should. He's not Lucas Glo leading

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>with thirty of the vote. Sure there's a little bit

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of reason there, but hey, Matthew Boyd pitch last night.

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>He also pitch pretty damn wells fantasy best for however

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>from Frankie stand for one of more two last night.

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>The one hit, the other one not so much, not

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>so much. Yeah, and my under for the for the

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Nationals and the Braves Greg eight and a half final

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>score five four. Huh. These guys just know and girls

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.239
<v Speaker 1>if if there are are female odds makers out there,

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to limit it to these guys. But man,

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>looks Gelito, Greg, you said, circle of trust. He's earned

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 1>He's earned it, man, he's earned it. The next start

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>for Giolito, the second of the week, comes against who Reggie,

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I got it here, hang on Cleveland, Cleveland beautiful. Yeah, well,

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:26.399
<v Speaker 1>I believe he's already dominated like twice. On May seven,

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>he was in Cleveland. He went seven and a third

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 1>shut out in a struck out eight. It's pretty good.

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And the Cleveland Indians have not been so great against

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>right hand pitching so far this year. So anything any

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 1>benching this far this year, Well, if you follow Michael

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Florio's Twitter feed, ramires two hits and two stolen bases.

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's hope this is part of the break out. How

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>many times have we said that this year for for

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Rosie rameiroors way way too many. But that's why I said,

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>you can't bench him in rhoto leagues because he just

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>has that ability to exactly you of anywhere from three

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to five bases in a single week. So I wouldn't

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>have been him there, but I understood. Look, if you're

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>getting frustrated with him in the head to head league.

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>We had a long discussion about Josier Mirrors. You go

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>back and listen to it yesterday on demand. You can

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>watch it on demand. Well, yeah, we had a very

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>spirited discussion about Jose and Mirrez and what to do

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>with him right now. It's a it's quite the conundrum.

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:21.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it's been one of the biggest issues of fantasy

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>baseball so far this season. The other story last night,

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>one of our fantasy best bets forever that didn't go

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>our way was between Cincinnati and the Pirates. So we

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>have really just one day to thank for that. It

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>was Derrick Ddrich d squad. Uh. Two weeks ago, we

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>went to our lane up for g s T. I said,

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we only have one player that tennell runs. It was

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a player that we just picked up. It was Derrek Didrich.

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Since then, we we've dropped Derrek Didrich. Oh, Greg, why

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>are we so dumb? And he hit three home runs

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>last night. He now has seven teen home runs on

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the season. Diedrich led the Reds to an eleven and

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.040
<v Speaker 1>six victory. Jordan Lyles gets hurt in this one. He

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>went four nuts, let three hits, three runs, walked too,

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>struck out three, allowed one of the Dietrich's home runs,

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>while Lucas Sims made his debut seven or third. Is

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of exciting about this kid on Twitter during

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the night seven of the third, six hits, four runs,

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:17.320
<v Speaker 1>nine strike as. The only runs until allowed was a

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>grand slam by the idiot Kevin Newman. You're still holding oude.

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Never forget. Never forget. The reason, Greg says idiot Kevin

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Newman is because we had Jamison Tyone both starting together.

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Actually uh, and this guy Kevin Newman made like three

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>errors in one ending and basically just completely messed up

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 1>any opportunity for Jamison Tyne to get anything done earlier

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 1>on in the season. So stupid idiot, that's why. But yeah,

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Sims, a lot of people were talking about him

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter last night and like that, ignore the Derrik

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Techricht Park. You worry I'm gonna get to Derrik Dietricht.

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, this guy was basically fastball curball. There was

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>curball thirties seven times last night. Also makes in a

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>change up nineteen swinging strikes on a hundred pitches. So

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I do have Do I have a little bit of

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.360
<v Speaker 1>interest a guy like Lucas Sims. I'm gonna pay attention

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to him, and only I might take a stab there already,

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>but I fifteen teamers, but I'm on the radar. See

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 1>what happens with Lucas Simms. There's some interesting minor league

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:20.399
<v Speaker 1>numbers as well. We get back tell you more about

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the teaching. We'll take a break here, we'll come back

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:35.839
<v Speaker 1>more on is next. The Fantasy Sports Network is ready

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to take you out to the ball game. Our experts

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>and analysts are following the Boys of Summer through all one,

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 1>d and sixty two games of the two thousand nineteen

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>MLB season with the best fantasy baseball analysis in the industry.

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Catch the latest news and notes every day to help

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you win your fantasy leagues and your d A best tournaments.

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Will always want you back listening and watching the Fantasy

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network on the f f N T s Y

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Radio app and the f N T s Y YouTube channel.

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Sports Network where we're root Root rooting for

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy baseball team. Morie Salad two thousand and fifteen,

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion, two

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen, World Number one Me personally, I keep my

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>game face on me all the time, especially coming out

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>with the bucker, leaving the range or even leaving the ports.

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? Go to game based grooming dot com

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing. Kneed rain,

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Make it rain. St Louis Listen. Worst team in the

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>NHL as of January two, somehow managed to come back

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and make their way to the finals. It's an amazing story.

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>But every time I look at these two teams play,

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I just keep going Boston's the better hockey team. I

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people were picking St. Louis to

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>win this in six, but I think a lot of

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that had to do with ruined Haytes. St. Louis Better story,

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Boston the better hockey team, weekday six to nine am

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on your popular podcast

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:07.280
<v Speaker 1>providers can't get enough Fantasy Football. Rhoto Experts has launched

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>their NFL three Fantasy Football package, which includes the best

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 1>math based seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere on the Internet.

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Davis Madig and the Ruto Experts are providing dynasty, season

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>long betting, best ball and NFL Draft content every day

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of the year to give you an edge regardless of

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>what type of fantasy football you play. Say Tember cent

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>at Rugo Experts dot com with the promo code V

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and t s Y, it's the NFL three Fantasy Football

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>package only at Rhoto Experts dot com. Okay bao on

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasys Friends Forever, It's Frank, It's Greg, it's your

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:53.879
<v Speaker 1>BFFs or for the next hour and twenty or show.

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to risk free waters with throw

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. They headed over the points bet dot Com

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>slash grid open up points Bet Sports wagering account and

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Thrillo code grid and you'll get too risk free bets

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:06.959
<v Speaker 1>up two a thousand dollars in addition to traditional betting points,

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>but also offers its own many concept where customers are

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>rewarded by how much they win their bet. For example,

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:13.919
<v Speaker 1>if you bet the Patriots minus three and that covered

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the spread by seven points, you'll see seven times a stake.

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 1>That's points. Bet dot com slash grid and too promo

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>code grid and get your two risk free bets up

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to a thousand dollars today. Once again, the promo code

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:29.879
<v Speaker 1>is bet dot com slash good. What I'm doing there? Yes? Greg?

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 1>How many times can you say grid and good? How

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 1>many times can you say grid in one hour? If

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you guys are at home and board and you feel

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like drinking, um, let me take a drink every time

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Greg says good and there you go, There you go.

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>That's all I got was It was like drop drop,

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, that's what it was? Are talking about,

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Little John Dropp? That's what I'm doing? Good? All right?

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you not hear it? A little bit? All right?

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Kind of um? Little greggy that's what they call you,

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Little greggy, Little Greggy, little Dickie. I was playing making

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a play on little John Gregg and now you're a

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:14.839
<v Speaker 1>little Greggy, the white guy or little Dickie. Interesting guy,

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Little Dickie, by the what an interesting guy. When it

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to Derek Dietrich, also quite interesting guy. Right now, Greg,

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>this guy has seventeen home runs and that is a

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:30.240
<v Speaker 1>career high for him in fifty two games. His previous

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>career high was sixteen home runs. That was last year

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in a hundred games. Now, everything that we did for

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Christian yellowsh J t ro Muto, we looked at their

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:43.720
<v Speaker 1>career numbers in terms of splits on the road versus

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>playing in Marlins Park. And if you did that before

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the season, you would have saw that Derrick Dietrich had

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>much better career numbers on the road than he did

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in Marlins Park. And rightfully so, it's obviously a man

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>at play ballpark that he was hitting in. But he

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.320
<v Speaker 1>gets away from Miami and I saw people talk about

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this on Twitter last night. Well, how could the Miami

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Marlins give up on Derrek Dtrich? Oh my god, Well

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>they designated him for assignment last year and twenty nine

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>other teams passed on him too, there's a lot. I

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>thought the Yankees actually could be interesting in Dtrich never

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>made a move them. Yeah, and that might have made

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of sense here to uh, given the

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 1>way that he is uh pulling the ball, hitting the

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>ball in the air, and what he's doing in a

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 1>good hitter's ball park right now and Cincinnati would have

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>made some sense. But overall, he's interesting. Fly ball rate

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>right now that is a career highest. Previous career high was,

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So he's putting the ball in the air, he's hitting

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball hard. You watch those three homers yesterday, just

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 1>barreling it up, making solid contact. You can look at

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball as long as you want. Now, Derrick Dtrick,

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess you've earned that right. But he has uh

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>seventeen home runs. Great. His home run the five ball

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 1>ratio is thirties six point two per cent. That's like

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Christian Yellow second half of the season last year type numbers.

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know that he's gonna keep that up,

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't really matter. I mean, you look at

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the fan grass projections the rest of the way, they

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>have him for between fifteen and eighteen home runs for

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the season. He's already got seventeen. I

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 1>would put him for over thirty home runs as a

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>middle infielder. So if he's still out there, I guess

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:16.799
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance. Look, the reason why we dropped him

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>was if you look at his game log from from

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>May seventeen to one, there was a four game stretch

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>where he sat out three games and he's probably still

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 1>going to sit against left handed pitching. Does that mean

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that he's not valuable for fantasy No, obviously, because he's

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 1>hitting for immense power right now. But he's I would

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>say he's better for Rhodo because you don't need him

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:40.239
<v Speaker 1>to play every day. It's just a matter of what

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 1>he does when he actually does play, which has has

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>been tremendous. He's still he's only owned in Yahoo, so

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 1>he might be lurking out there in a little in

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, smaller leagues all teamers, maybe some ten teamers,

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 1>but first, second, and outfield eligibility on Yahoo makes him

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>even more enticing. He's he's made changes this year, Greg

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it seems pretty legit. Derry Dietrich getting the

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 1>job done. The question becomes when Scoot Jenette comes back,

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>what happens Derrick Ddrick yeah. I mean that's just that's

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:16.360
<v Speaker 1>another wrinkle question here in the equation that is Derek

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Dietrich and Cincinnati Reds. I almost wonder do they they

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:24.360
<v Speaker 1>try and make a move? Do they try and do

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that move would be because they

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 1>have a Hendyo Suarez at third base, He's not going anywhere.

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Nick Senzel is in the outfield. I mean the outfield

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 1>seems pretty pretty set too. So yeah, what happens, uh,

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens with Scooter Jenette comes back? Can he play shortstop?

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Can Derrek Dietrich play shortstop? That might be something that

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to start asking ourselves because I don't think

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that Derrick Dietrich is gonna go away. Why should he? Yeah,

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>he's doing tremendous things right now, So you know, they

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>do have the option. I don't think they would want

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to mess with this though, Greg They can move Nick

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Senzel back into the middle endfield and then put Dietrich

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in the outfield. I don't think that makes a lot

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 1>of sense. It's a possible Scooters doesn't get a job

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Wally Pip Pip right here for Scooters. But Scooter has

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>been so good to the past couple of years. Great.

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Did he played short stop? I don't. I don't think

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>that he's ever played shorts. Scooter. Maybe maybe he has,

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe he can. I'm gonna look into it. I'm gonna

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>look into see if if he's ever played any short stop.

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he has to be honest with you. He

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 1>has played mm hmm thirteen games in single a ball

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:43.319
<v Speaker 1>at short stop. Nothing in the majors. Really, he does

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have experience in the outfield as well, the corner outfield positions,

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:53.359
<v Speaker 1>not centerfield. Last year he played hundred and forty two

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 1>games at second. Yeah, I'm looking at Scooter net has

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>played six hundred and thirty four games as a second baseman.

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>The most he has any other position is as a

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 1>third baseman with nine Joey Bottom, does he just go away?

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, Frank. Look, if the Cincinnati read

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:14.279
<v Speaker 1>so I want to take a page out of the

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee Brewers book and they only want to care about

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>offense and the way that their home ballpark is built,

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:23.760
<v Speaker 1>they probably should take that approach. Just care more about offense.

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to put your best team on

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the field, your best hitting the lineup on the field,

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:32.239
<v Speaker 1>then that probably includes either Scooter Jeannette at shortstop or

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Dietrich at shortstop. I don't think those things work.

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And you Hanio Squarres playing shorts stop way back in

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the day, but he's kind of filled out a little

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 1>bit more. It seems like pretty cemented in at third

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 1>base right now. Yes, maybe they can move Nick Senzels

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 1>back to the infield. I don't think that's gonna happen though,

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 1>so I think, yeah, it's probably gonna be one of

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the one of Dietrich or Scooter Gennette playing shortstop. Jose

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Gleasius is regarded as a really good to fensive shortstop

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:02.959
<v Speaker 1>and he's over hitting over three only four home runs,

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:05.399
<v Speaker 1>but he hasn't really done anything to lose his job.

0:47:06.000 --> 0:47:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You know what they say, Greg, the Reds have a

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:11.320
<v Speaker 1>good problem on their hands here. But regardless, Derrick Teachrich

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>needs to be owned because I think, if anything, the

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:14.719
<v Speaker 1>one person that they're going to figure out how to

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>get in there against right handed pitching is going to

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>be Derrick teacher and the choice at this point, No,

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 1>they do not. Shame on us, Shane, shame, shame, shame

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>there you go, Shame on us from his Derrick teacher thing.

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Lyles he droppable, Yeah, yeah, Like I would say

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>he's more droppable than John Lester. Yeah no, I mean

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.320
<v Speaker 1>he's dealing with an injury and he actually threw to that.

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:49.240
<v Speaker 1>He puts, he put together, you know, some some solid

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 1>starts in a row, Greg. But yeah, I think he's

0:47:53.200 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I think he's more droppable than than John lest He

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 1>does have three point zero nine e r A. So

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are pretty good. Numbers are pretty good here, um.

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I would actually, I would probably try and hold him

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>if I'm deciding between Jordan Lyles and John Lester, like

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably gonna drop Jordan first, Craig, but I would

0:48:12.080 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 1>look somewhere else, try and find someone else to drop

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:16.640
<v Speaker 1>before I would drop Jordan Lyles because the numbers overall

0:48:16.640 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been it's been pretty good. Actually, just I don't

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 1>own him anywhere, so I didn't I didn't know how

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 1>well he was playing. But he is three point zero nine.

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:27.359
<v Speaker 1>You're right, the underlying numbers is not terrible either. There

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:29.399
<v Speaker 1>you go, Jordan Lyles a strike up or any nine

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:36.399
<v Speaker 1>case per nine Lester Lyles, I would I would hold

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on to Lester all right. There you go um, well,

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 1>let's go into your uh So. That was the one

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 1>of our fantasy best bets for every Yesterday we got

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it dead wrong. Let's specifically venture and I my second

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:50.800
<v Speaker 1>one in Frank's first one was mad Boy taking on

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the Orioles and dealing Monday. Strangely, the Tigers were a

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 1>small underdog in this one. Would made no sense at all,

0:48:57.360 --> 0:48:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and Boyd does what BOYD does. Man six innings of

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:03.399
<v Speaker 1>shout out Baseball, walk eight ks and proved through five

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and four On the year. Del Bundy, on the other side,

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 1>a should pitch well seven innings, quality start, three runs,

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed seven hits, eight strikeouts, didn't walk anybody yesterday. Frank,

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, before you before you going say this,

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 1>just one note, take quit what you will. It's just nothing.

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I recognized that it is not one of these weird

0:49:23.880 --> 0:49:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Greg things. The month of May, Dylan Bundy did not

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 1>allow more than three runs in any game that he

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 1>pitched them first, saying I'm about to throw you through

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the studio, right, I'm gonna throw you through this window.

0:49:37.800 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm just noting that you sit here and you crush

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:46.759
<v Speaker 1>me for liking He's crappy, middling, veterans. What would what

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:51.240
<v Speaker 1>phrase would you use to describe Dylan Bundy failed top prospect?

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Failed top prospect. I'm sure Andrew Cashner was a prospect

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 1>at some point he was. I can't believe you just

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>said that to me. I was on was noted man,

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it's all like that. Dylan Bundy has a two point

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:06.000
<v Speaker 1>six four ARRA in the month of magg I know,

0:50:06.400 --> 0:50:08.239
<v Speaker 1>I was just explaining that, say, do you think you're

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 1>onto something here? Um about to say he's one of

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 1>these guys that gets a ton of swinging strikes, but

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean anything because results haven't been there. But

0:50:19.800 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm just saying, I just wanted to note

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't mean anything swinging strikes. Last night on

0:50:26.320 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>he's got a thirteen point three percent swinging strike rep.

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:35.279
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good. I know that. I'm just noting that

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>is all right. I mean, I think it's actually it

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:41.719
<v Speaker 1>was worth noting. I think it's relevant. I think it's

0:50:42.960 --> 0:50:45.840
<v Speaker 1>only fifteen team mix. All right. We got him, we

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>got him. He was shocked when he just look at

0:50:47.560 --> 0:50:49.319
<v Speaker 1>these numbers. But don't kill me when I bring up

0:50:49.320 --> 0:50:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Casher thing. I just gotta look at Andrew Cash's

0:50:52.000 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers two. I know I've seen him after him up,

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:56.879
<v Speaker 1>you can get into Mattie Boyd. Now all right, well,

0:50:56.960 --> 0:51:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Matt Boyd, he's been awesome. Look six shut out as.

0:51:00.400 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>He's been one of the best breakout starting pitchers this year.

0:51:03.920 --> 0:51:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned the poll from before the show. I included

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:10.760
<v Speaker 1>matt Boyd, Lucascilito, Caleb Smith, another one of them, Brandon

0:51:10.760 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Woodroff has been awesome, Matthew Boyd, Greg a few more

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:16.720
<v Speaker 1>votes for Matthew Boyd. He now leads the poll thirty

0:51:17.040 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 1>per cent. Which starting pitcher do you trust the most?

0:51:19.719 --> 0:51:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Moving forward? So people like Matthew Boyd, and rightfully so

0:51:22.960 --> 0:51:24.920
<v Speaker 1>what he's done this year, he's been awesome. Six shoutout

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 1>as yesterday eight strikeouts. He had fourteen swinging strikes. He's uh,

0:51:30.360 --> 0:51:32.800
<v Speaker 1>he's gone down the Patrick Corbin route, Greg, where he

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>has up to his slider usage tremendously and that has

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 1>helped his hey per nine. Um, it helps his walks

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 1>per nine. You know two point five y r A

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:46.240
<v Speaker 1>three point four nine x fIF three point to eight Sierra.

0:51:46.600 --> 0:51:50.320
<v Speaker 1>He's legitimately one of the top twenty five starting pitchers

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:54.319
<v Speaker 1>in Fantasy baseball right now. His his slider usage Greg

0:51:54.560 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>up to thirty five percent this year, and and a

0:51:57.160 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 1>slight increase in his in his fastball velocity too. So

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:03.480
<v Speaker 1>everything Matthew Boyd is doing it seems pretty legit. I

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>want to look more into the Steal and Bundy thing.

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now, you can talk about whatever else happened is Yeah,

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>no worries. Matt Boyd has been really really good all

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:14.400
<v Speaker 1>season long, and good for everybody that was still on

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 1>him after it last year and the year before. But

0:52:18.080 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt Boyd finally coming together. Obviously the match it was

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:23.799
<v Speaker 1>good against Baltimore. Maddie Boyd, man, I get the job done.

0:52:23.800 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>That's five. R Eco goodrim In his fourth homer of

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:30.839
<v Speaker 1>the year for Detroit, well Christian Stewart still his first

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 1>base of the season for Baltimore. It seems like we're

0:52:34.160 --> 0:52:36.719
<v Speaker 1>getting suckered in here, Greg, not Christian Stewart. Excuse me,

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Dwight DJ Stewart by Dylan Bunny. I do want to

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:41.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about Stewart not getting sucked in. I was just

0:52:41.960 --> 0:52:46.239
<v Speaker 1>noting in the month of May one eight percent hard

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 1>hit rate against forty three point seven percent groundball rate

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>compared to a twenty nine percent groundball rate in March

0:52:53.280 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and April. So that's why we were streaming all our

0:52:55.760 --> 0:52:58.399
<v Speaker 1>hitters are DFS hitters against Dylan Bundy in the month

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:02.279
<v Speaker 1>of March and April is because get all rate. The

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:04.640
<v Speaker 1>guy pitches in hand in yards. That's why that's why

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you see the Baltimorials give up as many home runs

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 1>as they did. But yeah, two point six four e

0:53:10.920 --> 0:53:14.160
<v Speaker 1>r a in May, but a four point to nine

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:19.000
<v Speaker 1>except Greg all right Ale only fifteen team makes He's

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:21.359
<v Speaker 1>on the radar, not adding him in twelve team leagues.

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:25.399
<v Speaker 1>But we you know, we've gone through stretches where Dylan

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Bundy is somewhat relevant for fantasy, so that is worth mentioning.

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And then DJ Stewart Craig I wanted to talk a

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit about d J Stewart. He's a prospect for

0:53:34.200 --> 0:53:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the Orioles. Not it's like a top ish prospect. He

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is a a top fifteen prospect in the organization, A

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:47.320
<v Speaker 1>little a little plump outfield prospect here Greg who sneakily

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:50.320
<v Speaker 1>has some speed, so no tweeting about this yesterday. So

0:53:50.440 --> 0:53:54.360
<v Speaker 1>he's six pounds, he's a he's a bigger he's a

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>bigger boy. Sixty five career stolen bases in the minor leagues.

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:02.200
<v Speaker 1>He has a twenty season under his belt. In the miners.

0:54:02.920 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 1>He had three hits yesterday, a pace yesterday in the majors.

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:09.560
<v Speaker 1>In the minors this year he was hitting three sixteen

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:14.240
<v Speaker 1>with eight homers, four steels and ops. Over a thousand

0:54:16.800 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Orioles are looking for some kind of young talent to

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:22.279
<v Speaker 1>help them out, good ballpark to hit in. I have

0:54:22.520 --> 0:54:25.120
<v Speaker 1>some interest in DJ Stewart. Again, he's in the uh,

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the Dylan Bundy realm right now. Well, we'll say fifteen

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>team mixed, because you know, five five outfielders. Anyone is relevant.

0:54:32.560 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 1>As as long as you're playing the outfield and you're breathing,

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:38.839
<v Speaker 1>you're relevant. Obviously A only not doing it in twelve

0:54:38.880 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>teamers yet. But I'm paying attention. I'm paying attention, Greg.

0:54:41.520 --> 0:54:43.680
<v Speaker 1>This is UH. There's a guy who was hitting very

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:45.719
<v Speaker 1>well in the miners, has a little bit of pop

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit of speed. So DJ Stewart someone

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that you should be interested in. Mabe Demetrius Jerome Stewart

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:58.359
<v Speaker 1>would not have guessed that from me, neither. Our third

0:54:58.800 --> 0:55:03.800
<v Speaker 1>fantasy that's forever Yesterday was the under this one was

0:55:03.840 --> 0:55:09.880
<v Speaker 1>your specifically, uh, Mike Sarroca not pitching. The start was

0:55:09.920 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Stephen it was Max Freed wrong young bet Pray set

0:55:13.160 --> 0:55:18.280
<v Speaker 1>hang on Max Freed taking on Steven Strasburg and combined

0:55:18.320 --> 0:55:20.399
<v Speaker 1>they only allowed six runs, which would have been fine.

0:55:21.040 --> 0:55:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Barrackla didn't suck. Yeah, Kyle Barklaw messed this up. Man, Ah,

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that's one. Five to four. Sean doo Little picked up

0:55:28.600 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>his tenth save of the season. Steven Strasburg seven intings,

0:55:31.560 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>five hits, two runs, walked, two struck out eleven or

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Max Freed was great five and two thirds, nine hits,

0:55:37.760 --> 0:55:41.360
<v Speaker 1>four runs, walk three, struck out of five. Annoyingly, you

0:55:41.520 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 1>had three of the runs for Washington all three. Three

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of the four runs four Washington came in that six

0:55:50.680 --> 0:55:53.840
<v Speaker 1>inning cost fantasy owners equality start from Max Freed there,

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:55.920
<v Speaker 1>which is always the worst. Yeah, Greg, and I think

0:55:55.960 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it's worth mentioning for Max Freed as great as he

0:55:58.040 --> 0:56:00.280
<v Speaker 1>was in April, and I don't want to take anything

0:56:00.280 --> 0:56:02.720
<v Speaker 1>away from it. I still think that he is pretty

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>good picture. He's a fun picture to watch. You know,

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:06.799
<v Speaker 1>he's got a mid nineties fastball, he's got that big

0:56:06.920 --> 0:56:10.319
<v Speaker 1>hook as well. But Greg in April a two point

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:12.560
<v Speaker 1>four three e r A over five starts, in May

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a four point one one ear A over six starts

0:56:16.200 --> 0:56:19.000
<v Speaker 1>or Max Freed still thirty strikeouts and thirty and two

0:56:19.120 --> 0:56:22.400
<v Speaker 1>thirds and he's pitched. But you knew some re question

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>was gonna hit at some point for Max Freed, and

0:56:24.320 --> 0:56:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we're currently in the midst of that happening. Treggy, there

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are a few things that you need to pray to

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy gods for throughout the course of the season

0:56:31.840 --> 0:56:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and even before the season. If you get any shares

0:56:34.080 --> 0:56:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of Steven Strasburg, just stay healthy. Please just stay healthy,

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Steven Stratsberg, because what you're doing right now is phenomenal. Greg.

0:56:44.200 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 1>The way that he's pitching is like the picture. We

0:56:46.840 --> 0:56:49.560
<v Speaker 1>know he can be a top ten, top twelve ish

0:56:49.880 --> 0:56:53.640
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher for Fantasy over eleven case per nine two

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:56.440
<v Speaker 1>point to eight walks per nine, three point one e

0:56:56.680 --> 0:56:59.239
<v Speaker 1>r A A two point an x fit A three

0:56:59.280 --> 0:57:02.520
<v Speaker 1>point one seven in Sierra fourteen and a half percent

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 1>swinging shrike rate. He's changed up the arsenal dis he

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:09.680
<v Speaker 1>sear Greg, he's completely ditched his slider. He's using his

0:57:09.760 --> 0:57:12.799
<v Speaker 1>curveball more, which is a wipe out curveball. He's learning

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:16.040
<v Speaker 1>how to pitch more this season with less, and he's

0:57:16.080 --> 0:57:20.000
<v Speaker 1>getting better results. One hour down, one hour ago. We

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:20.880
<v Speaker 1>wrap up next