WEBVTT - From the Vault: The Moons of Uranus, Part 2

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey you, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. We

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>have another vault episode for you. This is going to

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>be The Moons of Uruana's Part two, which originally published

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>on five eleven, twenty twenty three. This is part two

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of three. Please enjoy. This is the uss Hamlet's Father's

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Ghost requesting entry into Uranian orbit and the Uranian satellite system.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>We have decelerated and seek clearance to Titanium.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Greetings, USS Hamlet's Father's Ghost. This is Mustard Seed. Can

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 2>you state the purpose of your visit?

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Roger that Mustard Seed. I have two hundred and fifty

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare enthusiast on board, just waking up for a tour

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Uranian Moons. Our visit to the Royal Automated

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Uranian Theater on Titanius should be registered in the log.

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 2>All right, Roger that USSHFG. I can confirm your reservation

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 2>now and docking credentials are good to go with your passengers,

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 2>a pleasant and safe visit to the Uranian satellite system.

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 2>The next Automated Thespianoid performance will be let's see Ooh

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Edward the third Well, better luck next time.

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. The production of iHeartRadio.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey you welcome to Stuff to blow your mind. My

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert.

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and we're back with part

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 2>two of our series on the planet Uranus and its moons. Now,

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.919
<v Speaker 2>in part one we focused mainly on the planet itself.

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>This time we're going to start getting more into the moons.

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we'll do all of the moons this time. I

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>think last time we promised it would happen. We'll see

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>whether we can fit it all into one episode. But

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I had a few more core planet digressions burning a

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 2>hole in my pocket that I wanted to mention before

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 2>we fly off to the satellites. Are you okay with that, rob.

0:01:57.800 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it.

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 2>So. First of all, I was wondering what's the density

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 2>of Uranus, And it turns out that Uranus is the

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:09.119
<v Speaker 2>second least dense planet in the Solar System at one

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 2>point twenty seven grams per cubic centimeter. The only planet

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>less dense is actually Saturn, the second largest planet in

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 2>the Solar System. You might wonder which planet is the densest, Baby,

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 2>that's Earth. That's Earth. We are at five point five

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 2>to one grams per cubic centimeter, so we are the

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>density king. But one of the real things I wanted

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 2>to return to was a question of materials, because in

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 2>the last episode we mentioned, just giving sort of an

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 2>overview of the basics of the planet, that most of

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 2>the mass of Uranus is thought to be a hot,

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>dense fluid of ices, probably surrounding a rocky core of

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 2>some sort. And though it might be kind of strange

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 2>to hear like hot dense fluid of ices, that almost

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of doesn't make sense based on our definition of ice.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 2>And it's true that a lot of this ice is

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 2>going to be different than the kind of ice we know.

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 2>So I was reading more about this in an article

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 2>by a planetary atmospheric scientist named Amy Simon, who is

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 2>a senior researcher at NASA Goddard, and this was written

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 2>for the magazine of the Planetary Society. The article is

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 2>called the Realm of the Ice Giants, and one of

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.839
<v Speaker 2>the questions Simon addresses in this article is why are

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the planets Uranus and Neptune called ice giants as opposed

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 2>to regular gas giants. It's because compared to regular gas

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 2>giants like Jupiter and Saturn, Uranus and neptune are composed

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 2>of a higher proportion of ice forming molecules like water

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 2>and methane, though much of that so called ice is

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 2>in a phase unfamiliar to us. On the surface of Earth,

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Simon writes, quote, ice giants are mostly water, probably in

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the form of a super critical fluid. The visible clouds

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 2>likely consist of ice crystals with different compositions. So regarding

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>supercritical fluid, a supercritical fluid doesn't behave exactly like a liquid,

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 2>gas or a solid. It's an emergent state of matter

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 2>occurring at temperatures and pressures beyond what is known as

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 2>the critical point for each substance. And Simon has a

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 2>very good paragraph clarifying the planetary science use of the

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 2>term ice, which could help clear up any confusion there.

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 2>She says that on Earth we usually use the term

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 2>ice to refer to just water H two O when

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>it is frozen solid, but planetary astronomers use the word

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 2>ice to refer to any condensable molecule in its solid form.

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 2>She writes, quote, These tend to be highly reflective form clouds,

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and unlike minerals, can readily change between liquid, solid and

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 2>gas states at relatively low temperatures, so we're mainly familiar

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 2>with water ice on the surf of Earth, but throughout

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 2>space there are lots of ices. There's methane, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide,

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>and phosphene pH three, and these are all condensable molecules

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 2>and could all freeze in the atmosphere of Uranus and

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 2>Neptune also for that matter, and Simon writes that most

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 2>of the clouds we see in the atmospheres of these

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 2>ice giants are clouds of methane ice crystals or hydrogen

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 2>sulfide ice, So there's probably weird supercritical fluids down below,

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 2>and then an atmosphere above. The atmosphere in its gas

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>contents is mostly hydrogen and helium, but that atmosphere is

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 2>probably full of traces of different kinds of ice, including

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 2>not just H two O, but things like ammonia and methane.

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 2>And speaking of methane, as we mentioned last time, the

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 2>blue color of both Neptune and Uranus appears to come

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 2>from the presence of methane in their atmospheres, which absorbs

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 2>the red wavelength of light from the sun and reflects

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 2>only the blue spectrum. But the question is why is

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Urinus a paler shade of blue than Neptune. If you

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 2>look at Neptune, it's often kind of a royal blue,

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 2>whereas in true color, Urinus appears kind of a gray

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 2>green blue. Simon writes that this is quote either because

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Urinus has more haze, so more kind of a cloudy

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 2>outer shell, but she goes on, or because Neptune's atmosphere

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 2>has another unidentified constituent that absorbs longer wavelength light even

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 2>more strongly, and of course longer wavelength light would be

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.119
<v Speaker 2>more red shifted toward the red end of the visible spectrum. Okay,

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.239
<v Speaker 2>so that's ice, the atmosphere, the makeup of the planet.

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 2>But there's one more thing you may have seen headlines

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 2>about regarding Urinus in Neptune that if you have seen

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 2>these headlines, I'm sure you're wondering about it, and that

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 2>is the claim that some experts have argued that it

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 2>likely rains diamonds on Urine Neptune, and from what I

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 2>can tell, this is true. Now, this is obviously something

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 2>we haven't been able to detect directly with probes or anything,

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>so nobody can sense this happening. Instead, it's based on

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>what we do know about the planets and argue and

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of extrapolating logically from those starting facts. So how

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 2>does the logic go? Well, I was reading about this

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 2>in an article for space dot com by the sunny

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Stonybrook astrophysicist Paul Im Sutter, and in this article, Sutter

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 2>explains that we know from mathematical models that the inner

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 2>mantles of ice giants probably have temperatures of about seven

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>thousand kelvins or over sixty seven hundred celsius and pressure

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>about six million times the atmospheric pressure on the surface

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 2>of Earth. Meanwhile, higher up in the mantle, things are

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 2>cooler about two thousand kelvins and only two hundred thousand

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 2>times Earth's atmospheric pressure. And we know that water, ammonia,

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 2>and methane are present within that mantle. So what happens

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>to those substances in those conditions. Well, these conditions of

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 2>temperature and pressure would tend to tear apart molecules of methane, methane,

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 2>is ch four carbon, and hydrogen. And when those molecules

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>get torn apart, we are left with free carbon. Free

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 2>carbon tends to link together with other free carbon to

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>form long chains of carbon what happens to long chains

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 2>of pure carbon under high pressure that gets pressed into

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 2>a diamond. These diamonds would tend to then drop down

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 2>to lower in the mantle where high temperatures vaporize them,

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>and then they float back up into the upper mantle,

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 2>and then the cycle repeats, so you're left with diamond rain.

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like the name of a great alternate universe collaborative

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 2>sci fi movie musical between Prince and David Bowie. Wish

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 2>I could have seen it, but it does to be

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 2>very likely a physical reality on Uranus and Neptune as well.

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying that all we have to do is

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>jet out to Uranus, dip down into the atmosphere of Uranus,

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>scoop up some diamonds, then get back to Earth and

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 1>we're set for life.

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I've always said when I look up at the stars

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 2>at night, what I see is profit. Okay, but one

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 2>more digression before we get to the moons. Since part one,

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 2>we actually got a really great bit of listener mail

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 2>from Joe, not me, but a different Joe who listens

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 2>to the show, who brought to our attention some really

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 2>awesome photos of Uranus recently captured by the James web

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Space Telescope. Joe writes, quote, I've long awaited with tremulous

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 2>anticipation the resumption of your ural journey to the heliopause,

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 2>and was thrilled to see the recumbent sky king Uranus

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 2>on my podcast feed. Your choice was timely, indeed, as

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the James Webb Space Telescope just last month least some

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 2>spectacular visuals of Uranus. These images boast greater clarity than

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 2>the Hubble's effort, especially of the planet's rings. I love

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 2>living under a sky that will never run out of

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 2>extraordinary things to look at and talk about, and I

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 2>appreciate when you cast your gaze upward from time to time. Joe, Well,

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 2>thank you, Joe. Because I had not seen these, I

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 2>looked them up and this is fantastic. So I saw

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 2>these within the context of a NASA press release from

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 2>April sixth, twenty twenty three that Joe shared with us

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Rob I pasted these two photos here in the outline.

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 2>One is just zoomed in on the planet from the

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>more zoomed out second one. I would say, from my perspective,

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>these images are gorgeous. They fill one with awe at

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 2>the picture of this frosty, dark recess where the blue

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 2>God lives. And this might sound a little bit weird,

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>but I actually mean this in the best possible way. Somehow,

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>in these images, Urinus looks more like an optical artifact

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 2>than a physical object, as if the planet were like

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 2>a glint or a lens flare. And to explain what

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so the planet is pictured on its side,

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>because of course that's how it is. We're not seeing

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the rings laterally from the side, crossing over and behind

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the planet, like we do in most photos of Saturn. Instead,

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing the rings encircling the planet in an egg

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 2>shape because we're looking roughly down toward the north pole,

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 2>which faces sideways. And in this particular photo, though this

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 2>is not exactly true color, the planet is pale blue

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 2>with a white cap, and the rings sort of fade

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 2>outward to inward, from a screaming fluorescent white to a

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 2>dim blue gray as they sink toward the planet's atmosphere.

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 2>And the sunlight seems blinding in these images because we

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 2>actually see it gleaming off the edge of the planet.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 2>Which is even weirder because, as I said, the disk

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 2>of Urinus facing us looks like a glint or a

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 2>gleam itself, and in the more zoomed out of these

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 2>two photos, we can see the blue dots of the

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 2>larger moons surrounding it, also sending out these sort of

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>shafts of reflected light in these hexagonal criss crosses out

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 2>into space.

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, these images are gorgeous. It makes it look like.

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Urinus is a planet designed by Japanese illustrator Hajimi Soriyama, whose,

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of course I think he worked on the design for

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the original Sony Aibo robot, but also mostly known for

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>robot pin up like really shiny, silvery robot pin up models.

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>This artist is on my mind because the movie we're

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>watching Friday in for Weird House Cinema, this artist is

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>credited like deep down in the credits because there's a

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>character in the movie that has some of this art

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>up on his workstation. But this kind of but there's

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a certain from the female robot bodies in his art.

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 1>There is this kind of like glimmering like silvery perfection

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to things, And that's what I kind of get from

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this image of Urinus. And if you're into planets, like

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, put it on a calendar. It looks, it

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:16.359
<v Speaker 1>looks nice.

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 2>It is beautiful, And I will say the blue in

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 2>this photo, as I alluded to, is not exactly true

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 2>color from the visible spectrum. I think it's approximate. So

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the image is from the webs near infrared camera, combining

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>data from two filters. According to the press release, it

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 2>was one point four and three point oh microns, and

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 2>then the article explains these are coded out to blue

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 2>and orange respectively. Now I mentioned the white cap that

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 2>we see on Urinus in this photo. The article explains

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 2>that this is known as the polar cap, and it

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>seems to manifest when the pole of the planet goes

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>into direct sunlight during its long polar summer, which again,

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 2>as we talked about last time, lasts many years at

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 2>a time, and then the cap seems to disappear in

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 2>the fall when it starts to turn away from the sun.

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 2>As far as I could find, we aren't sure exactly

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 2>what causes this, or maybe if somebody knows, I just

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't dig that up. But so regarding the beautiful rings

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 2>in the picture, Uranus has thirteen known rings, and you

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 2>can see eleven of them in this photo, though some

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 2>of them are so bright that they bleed together. In

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the image, there are nine major rings, and then there

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 2>are two kind of faint dusty rings that were discovered

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 2>during the approach and Voyager two in nineteen eighty six.

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 2>But speaking of those rings and moons, rings and moons

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>sometimes have an interesting origin story, So I was wondering

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 2>where do experts generally think they came from in the

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 2>case of Uranus. Going back to that Planetary Society article

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 2>by Amy Simon, Simon writes that the medium sized moons

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>of Uranus probably formed in place at the same time

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 2>or after whatever event it was that left Uranus tilted

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 2>on its side. And as we talked about last time,

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 2>it seems likely that Uranus was probably knocked on its

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 2>side and left colder than all the other planets because

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 2>of an impact with a large object, maybe like an

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Earth sized planet, billions of years ago. And so what

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 2>we're left with is that the moon's orbit Urinus on

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 2>its equatorial plane, So like the planet itself and like

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 2>its rings, the moons are tilted at a roughly ninety

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 2>degree angle to the rest of the Solar System. In general,

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 2>the moons of Urinus are made of ice and rock,

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 2>usually slightly more ice than rock, and they show some

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 2>interesting surface features, like patterns of darkening on their surfaces

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 2>that are caused by some unknown material. Spectral analysis reveals

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 2>the presence of frozen carbon dioxide on a lot of

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 2>the moons. Meanwhile, the origin of the rings, the consensus

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 2>seems to be that they are created by the shattering

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 2>into dust and fragments of formerly solid moons. And as

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 2>we've seen with other planets, the sudden or gradual smash

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 2>up of moons can happen a number of ways, by

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, lots of little collisions with meteoroids or other objects,

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 2>or by tidal breakup due to gravity, in any case,

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>turning former larger satellites into smaller satellites and rings of

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 2>little fragments.

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's fascinating. How from our human perspective we look

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>up at our moon, we consider the moons of other worlds,

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's a certain certain stability to them, you know.

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at any planets, moons or moon,

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>generally you're looking at a more violent relationship over the

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>vast history of a given planet. There's nothing peaceful about it.

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, let's begin, at least begin to dip

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>into the moons of Uranus. Like I said, we originally

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 1>set out to do them all. Maybe we won't do

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>them all. Maybe we'll get part way through the journey

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and we'll come back on Tuesday. Who knows, maybe we'll

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>just we'll just get into we'll finish them up, and

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>then we'll go right into Neptune. There are no rules.

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>We can do what we want. So let's start with

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the inner moons of Uranus. Thirteen total known. All right,

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>We're going to start with a pair of moons, Cordelia

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and Ophelia. These are named for the youngest daughter of

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>King Lear and of course Hamlet's tragic beloved, respectively. The

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>main significance of these moons is that both Cordelia and

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Ophelia are shepherd moons, as their gravity keeps Uranus's epsilon

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>ring from dispersing.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 2>Now I thought this was interesting, so I was looking

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 2>up how exactly it is that shepherd moons work. What

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 2>does the shepherd moon do? These little small moons, how

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 2>do they keep a ring? Essentially, they keep a ring

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 2>in tight formation around the planet and clear these gaps

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 2>between the rings. And it seems that essentially it works

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 2>like this. So you've got a small moon and it's

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 2>orbiting the planet, And imagine at first it's orbiting the

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 2>planet along with a bunch of other small particles sort

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 2>of within the lane of that small moon's orbit. Particles

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 2>that are ahead of the small moon will be attracted

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 2>by gravity to it, meaning if they're orbiting ahead of it,

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 2>they will naturally want to slow down in their orbit,

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 2>right because they're getting pulled toward this moon. But slowing

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 2>down in their orbit actually causes them to lose energy

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 2>and fall down closer to the planet that they're orbiting.

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 2>So these like dust and particles and things in the

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 2>ring actually end up sorting into lower orbit rings. And

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 2>then meanwhile, things that are orbiting along the same lane

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 2>as this moon that are behind it in its orbit

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 2>are attracted to it and thus sped up. And as

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 2>they get sped up during to chase after this moon

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 2>by the force of gravity, that acceleration actually causes them

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 2>to have greater energy and to ascend in their orbit

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>and end up going into outer rings beyond that little moon.

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So again we have the Shepherd moons here. They were

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 1>discovered by Voyager two in nineteen eighty six. Like the

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of Uranus's inner moons. They appear to be roughly

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>equal split of water, ice and rock. They're small. Of

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>note to Cordelia is the closest to the planet, and

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>I guess we should also point out or come back

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.719
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that, yes, these are both Shakespearean references.

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>There are going to be a lot of shakespeare references

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>as we go through the moons of Uranus and these

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>just the first two.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 2>It seems that a lot of the names of these satellites,

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>for some reason were chosen either from the works of

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Shakespeare or from the works of Alexander Pope.

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, predominantly Shakespearean, but definitely there's some key Alexander Pope

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>references as well. So as as we go through it,

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>we're we'll probably talk a little bit about some of

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the namesakes here.

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 2>Well, this was something I was wondering. I don't know

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 2>about the origin exactly, like what people had in mind

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 2>when they were naming these, but so I think, like,

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 2>is there some significance to the innermost minor moon here

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 2>being called Cordelia, Because Cordelia is a very poignant character.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Cordelia is the youngest daughter of King Lear in the

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 2>play King Lear. If you don't know the play or

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 2>need refreshing the very beginning of it. The first scene

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 2>is King Lear is this old king? He comes out.

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 2>He decides that he will divide up his kingdom between

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>his three daughters, Goneril, Reagan, and Cordelia, and he's gonna

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 2>give the largest portion to the daughter that loves him most.

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 2>So Goneril and Reagan give these speeches where they overwhelm

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 2>their father with absurd insincere flattery about how much they

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 2>love him. And then when it's Cordelia's time to speak,

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 2>she finds that she cannot put into words. She cannot

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 2>express her love for her father to herself. She says

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 2>that she knows her love is richer than her tongue.

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 2>And then when it's her time to speak, she says,

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 2>unhappy that I am. I cannot heave my heart into

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 2>my mouth. I love your majesty according to my bond,

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 2>no more nor less, and I think he gives her

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 2>a chance to amend her statement. She doesn't, really, and

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 2>the so Leir gets furious at this decides to disinherit her.

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 2>He gives nothing to Cordelia, splits his kingdom between the

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 2>other two daughters, Goneril and Reagan who secretly think he

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>is a fool, and they will go on to betray

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 2>him once they come to power, And of course it's

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 2>a tragedy, so things just get worse and worries. Basically

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 2>everybody ends up dead. But you know, it's a very

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 2>meaningful character and something I think, I don't know that

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>that moment in the first scene is something that always

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 2>got me, something I can really relate to, like the

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 2>feeling of worrying that you don't express positive feelings because

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 2>you're afraid that you can't phrase them in the sincerest way,

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 2>like you don't know how to put them to words.

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 2>So then you worry that like you're perceived as not

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 2>wanting to say a positive thing at all. I don't

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 2>know if that makes sense.

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no, I mean certainly with the example

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>here from the play, absolutely.

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 2>But she's the daughter that truly loved him. She just

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, didn't want to give a big, insincere speech. Anyway,

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 2>It's a very meaningful character. So I'm wondering, is there

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 2>some similarly at play here in the selection of the

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>name for this moon? Maybe not so, Like it's a

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 2>very small satellite, it's the closest to the planet of these.

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 2>It is one of the shepherd moons that sort of

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 2>guide guides the epsilon and keeps it tight in formation.

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 2>By the end, I mean, she does show great discipline

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 2>because she comes back with an army to try to

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 2>to fight on her father's side against her cruel, duplicitous sisters.

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, maybe not, I don't know if it fits,

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>but I was wondering.

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>No, I think it's natural to try and read some

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of sense into the naming. Though. Of course, as

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll discuss it, it's different people at different times coming

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>up with these names. You know, some are maybe probably

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a little more up on the works of William Shakespeare

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>than others. Sometimes there seems like something they could be getting,

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>at other times not. And also some of these kind

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of slip by on a technicality, so they're kind of

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. All right, let's let's go into

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the next one. There's a Bianca named after Kate's sister

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Taming of the Shrew. This one does nothing

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>really else that I think is significant about it, and

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it was also discovered by voyager two. All right, after that,

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>we have Cresida. This is the title character from Troylus

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and Cressida. Again, nothing other else. It's really significant about

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>this moon. It was also discovered by Voyger two. I

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>know some of you are probably wondering when's Voyager six

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to show up in all this, But I

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>guess Voyder six just shot right out there, right.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I was unsure. But what you're referring to vgre here?

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Right? Yes, yeah, Voyger six doesn't actually exist except in

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.679
<v Speaker 1>the world of Star Trek. Okay, specifically Star Trek the

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>motion picture, the most riveting of all of them, that

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>is pinned by Alan Dean Foster.

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh wait, was he the one who wrote the novelization

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 2>of Halloween three or something like that?

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>He wrote the novelization of most films? Yes, all right.

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>The next moon of note here is Desdemona. This one's

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>named after the wife of Othello, no other real significance,

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>once again discovered by Voyager two. All right, now we're

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>moving on to another one. This is Juliet or Juliet

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>right if you're depending on how you're what line from

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the play using sometimes you got to hit two syllables

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>instead of three on that. This is of course named

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>after the title character from Romeo and Juliet. Romeo, meanwhile,

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is nowhere to be found amid the moons of Uranus.

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>It is kind of interesting that there's a part in

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Romeo and Juliet where Romeo is swearing his love up

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and down the universe and Juliet specifically asked him not

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to swear by the moon. She says, quote, oh, swear

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>not by the moon, the inconstant moon that monthly changes

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in her circle orb less that thy love prove likewise.

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Variable changes in her circle orb What does that refer

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 2>to the waxing and waning of the moon or maybe

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure I know what that means.

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I take it to mean, Yeah, it's like

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>there are different faces of the moon, Like like if

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>your love is like the moon, Romeo, then I don't

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like what am I going to get today?

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean it seems like if it is like the moon,

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>she could charted out and then she'd have a really

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>good idea of what she's going to get, you know,

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>phase by phase. But yeah, she's like, I need consistency.

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, your love should not wax and Wayne, we shouldn't

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 2>have a new moon of your love. Yes, it's were

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Wolf night every night.

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, anyway, aside from these thoughts, Juliet, nothing else than

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>literally significant, once again discovered by Voyger two. Then we

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>have Portia. This one is named after the heroine from

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the Merchant of Venice. This one, I guess the main

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>significance is that it orbits urin us in less than

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>one earth day, and it was discovered by Voyger two.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>All right. Up, next we have Rosalind. Rosalind is one

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Duke's daughters in As You Like It. That's

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the namesake. Nothing else really significant to discuss here. This

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>one was also discovered by Voyager two. All right. The

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>next one is is Cupid. This one is a tough

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>one to fit in, but okay. Cupid is, of course

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the Roman god.

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Of love, famously invented by William Shakespeare.

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, he is technically a character in Shakespeare's Timon of Athens.

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm not familiar with this play. I don't know anything

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>about that one. This may be one of the more

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>obscure ones. I don't remember studying this one in school.

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But the discovery of it is kind of interesting because

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 1>it was discovered by m R Showalter in JJ Lisauer

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>using the Hubble space telescope in two thousand and three.

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>It was too small and too dark for Voyager two

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 1>to spot. And I was thinking about this. It's tempting

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>to try and spin this one out and think of like, Okay,

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>here we have Cupid as this dark, near invisible shadow

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>press presence, you know, reminding us of past discussions about

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>how Cupid was sometimes said to shoot lead and arrows.

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's you know, he's not only dealing out love

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>with his projectiles, but also some of the ramifications of

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>love and maybe even the tragic ramifications of love. But again,

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>this one, this one seems to sort of slip by

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>on a on a technicality in terms of its naming.

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>All Right, the next one is Belinda. And this is

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>one where we have to just have to ask Shakespeare

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to move over, because this one is named after the

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>character whose lock of hair is stolen in Alexander Pope's

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Rape of the Lock.

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 2>Now, this is an unfortunately titled poem because it doesn't

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 2>mean what it sounds like that the poem by Pope

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 2>is an older definition of the word rape, which is basically,

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 2>in this context it means like theft or snatching. So

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the poem is a mock heroic satire. It narrates like

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 2>a social scandal in which a lord of some sort.

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I did read this in school, and I forget a

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of the details. But he like steals a lock

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 2>of hair from a young woman. But it's written like

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 2>in the style of the Iliad to be mocking of

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 2>the like oh ho ho, this is actually insignificant. I

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 2>think Pope's point is best summarized in one of its lines,

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 2>where he says, what mighty contests rise from trivial things?

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Though I don't know thinking back on it now, there

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 2>are obviously much worse crimes, but stealing somebody's hair is

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 2>pretty weird.

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Plus hair has magical connotations. They could be stealing

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it to work some sort of magic. Maybe that's explored

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in the poem. I don't know. I have a degree

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in English, and I somehow managed to never read this poem.

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I remember that, you know the course, I'm familiar with

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the author's name and his popularity and importance in English literature.

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But I remember this title would come up and I

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>would think, Oh, that doesn't sound like something I want

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to read, not realizing that it's about hair theft.

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Alexander Pope everything I recall that he wrote is basically

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 2>satirical in nature. I'm sure he must have written serious poems.

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 2>But like, the other main thing I remember he wrote

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 2>is something called the Dunciad, which is a sort of

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 2>an epic poem about stupidity.

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Hmm.

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 2>He was like, it seems like he was just really

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 2>into not suffering fools. Though, I feel like, if that's

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 2>your main vibe, you really open yourself up to to scrutiny,

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 2>don't you.

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, well we'll come back to Pope's work

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in a bit, because there are more moons named after him.

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>The next one is Perdita, and this is the daughter

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of Leontes and Hermione in William Shakespeare's The Winter's Tail.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>This one's discovery is actually pretty interesting because Voyger two

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>is involved in its discovery, but it wasn't recognized till

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three. Basically, University of Arizona's Eric Karkoshka

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>discovered it by comparing Voyger two imagery with Hubble imagery

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and sort of working out its existence based on these

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>two different streams. All right, up next we have Puck is,

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, named after the sprite from a midsummer Night's Dream.

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Tucci played him in the nineteen ninety nine film adaptation,

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>which had a great cast. I do remember seeing this

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>film when it came out, and I imagine I've seen multiple.

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>It seems like Midsummer Night's Dream is just one of

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>those plays that you're just going to fall into seeing it,

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>even if you don't set out to watch Shakespeare in life.

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Puck's a great character, great mischief maker, the mischief maker

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 2>who brings wisdom, whether on purpose or not.

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, Tucci was perfect casting. Now significance Here is

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the smallest of the inner moons, with a diameter of

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>about one hundred and fifty kilometers or about ninety miles,

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And it was guess what discovered by voyager two? All right,

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>up next we have Mab. It's named after Queen Mab,

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>queen of the fair folk and English folklore. She's mentioned

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in Romeo and Juliet So and just mentioned. So it

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>just really really squeaks by on a tacticality. I mean,

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those situations where I feel like

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to shout a little bit and be like, look,

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of names that are mentioned in Shakespeare,

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and there are plenty of characters. I don't know why

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Queen Mab seems like the ideal choice here.

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Is there an inner moon named Julius Caesar?

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>No, but you know you could that would have been

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a good one. Caesar, right, But that's just off the

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>top of my head. I'm not sure if there's some

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>other well, you know, I should also point out when

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you start looking. And I didn't get into this in

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>any of my note taking, really, but there are individual

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>features on some moons that are likewise named after other things.

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So it could be a Caesar in there somewhere, you

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>know what.

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I want to be fair, Even a lot of

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the Shakespeare characters that we think of as more original

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 2>shakespeare characters are actually often from like adapted versions of

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 2>pre existing tales. Like a lot of Shakespeare's plays were

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 2>not wholly made up stories. They were based on something

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 2>from history or from an older story or another play,

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 2>or something right right, like who would have thought of it?

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 2>You know? Hamlet is the guy from the Northman.

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, if you were around today, he'd be uh,

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, he'd be in the MCU somewhere working on

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a project.

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Of it.

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, Mab is the moon here. This one was discovered

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and three by show Alter and Lessauer

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>using the Hubble space telescope.

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Interesting in fact, I came across while reading that article

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 2>by the NASA Goddard researcher Amy Simon. She writes that

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:37.239
<v Speaker 2>mab quote maybe generating a tenuous blue toned ring like

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Enceladus does for Saturn's e ring, though the source currently

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 2>remains a mystery.

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know that sounds kind of fitting for the

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Queen of the fairy Folk, So I do like that.

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm looking at the clock, and do you know

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 2>what the clock reads. It reads a promise broken because

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 2>we said we were going to do all of the

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 2>moons within part two, and I think we have failed

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.239
<v Speaker 2>because we're coming up against a time limit. We got

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 2>to cap it here and we've got all of the

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 2>major moons left to talk about. So I think that's

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 2>going to have to be part three of our series

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 2>on Urinus and its satellites.

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, hopefully we didn't mess anybody up there, but I

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>think the journey will be better for breaking into three

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>parts here, and there's going to be a lot of

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>fun stuff to talk about, especially with the major moons

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of Uranus, and then getting also into just some of

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the additional Shakespearean references in the naming of these moons.

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, if you would like to catch up

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on past episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, including

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>our past episodes dealing with the moons of Jupiter and

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Saturn and Mars and so forth, you'll find those in

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the Stuff to Blow your Mind podcast feed, which you'll

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>find wherever you get your podcasts. We have core episodes

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of Stuff to Blow Your Mind airing there on Tuesdays

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and Thursdays. On Mondays, we open up the mail bag

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on our listener mail episodes. That's primarily where we read

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>emails from people. Occasionally we'll read one in an episod,

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>so as in today's episode, you know if it relates

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to the subject matter, but generally it's going to be

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Monday episodes. On Wednesdays, we do a short

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>form artifact or monster fact episode. This week. Of course,

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it ties into our theme of Urinus, so go check

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that out if you haven't. And then on Fridays, we

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>set aside most serious concerns to just talk about a

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>weird film on Weird House Cinema. Our selection for this

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.280
<v Speaker 1>week does not have anything to do with the planet Uranus,

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but that it's still a.

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Lot of fun. Bye God. We'll find a way to

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 2>tie it in by the time Friday comes around anyway.

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Huge thanks as always to our audio producer JJ Posway.

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 2>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 2>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:48.720
<v Speaker 2>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 2>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:35:52.080 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 2>your Mind dot com.

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.