WEBVTT - DOJ Opens Probe Into NFL’s Sports TV Deals 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting headline came across the tape just a couple

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>of minutes ago. According to a Wall Street Journal, the

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Department of Justice opens probe into the NFL on anti

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>competitive concerns.

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean, who wants to mess with the NFL? I

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 3>guess the federal government.

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 4>You can. But let's break it down a little bit

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 4>if we can.

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 2>Randa Williams, Bloomberg Business of Sports reporter, random, what's the

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 2>story here?

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 5>So basically Senator Mike Lee, he's from Utah. He sent

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 5>a letter about a month ago, maybe a little bit

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 5>longer than that, and he encouraged the Federal Trade Commission,

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 5>the SEC in the Department of Justice to review this

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 5>Sports Broadcasting Act because of the fact that it cost

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 5>over one thousand dollars to watch NFL games. Now, rising

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 5>costs over broadcasting gals is pretty normal. I mean we've

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 5>seen every single time a league goes to the negotiating table.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 5>Normally the costs are passed down to the consumer, but

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 5>also the games grow and so I think that it'll

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 5>be interesting to see how they approach this if anything changes.

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 5>But the NFL still has four years left on its

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 5>broadcasting rights agreement. There have been reports that they want

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 5>to opt out of that and negotiate early.

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Those talks are very very early, so we'll see.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 6>Could there be possible political motivations behind this.

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 5>I think with everything happening in the country right now,

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 5>you never know who is setting your sights on the NFL.

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 5>And I mean, you see what's happening with the Rooney Rule.

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 5>There is a Florida Attorney General who has turned his

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 5>sites towards the NFL and saying that the Rooney Rule

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 5>goes against federal law. We'll see how that plays out.

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 5>And I mean, there are no reports right now that

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 5>those two things are connected, but we've seen different areas

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 5>of this administration set the sites on sporting leagues and

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 5>other organizations out there, so it wouldn't surprise me, but

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 5>it hasn't been reported yet.

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 2>So Randa, this is focusing primarily on the media rights

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 2>deals for the NFL.

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Now most of those.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Even going back.

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 3>Thirty years, forty years, there's.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Been some paid component to it because even if I want

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 2>to watch my CBS game, I'm probably getting it through

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 2>my cable package as opposed to having my rabbit ears that.

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 2>So it's always been some consumers directly paying for sports.

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Is it different now that it's streaming?

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 4>There are more partners now.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 5>So Amazon has a Thursday night football game you can

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 5>stream on Peacock. Occasionally YouTube has streamed the game before.

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 5>The NFL has been selling rights to these streamers and

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 5>these broadcasting companies for many, many years, and as the

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 5>game has grown, as the business has grown, the costs

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 5>have grown as well. And I think in reference to

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 5>what it costs to watch all NFL games, yes, it

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 5>would be expensive because you would then be paying for

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.399
<v Speaker 5>NFL Sunday ticket, you could be paying for red Zone,

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 5>you could be paying for each individual subscription of you know,

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 5>some of these games. With that in mind, of course,

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 5>the costs have gone up because they've added partners, they've

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 5>added games, you know, all of those things.

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 4>But again, like we're talking about.

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 5>ABC, NBCCBS, i'm ESPN, all of these things are you

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 5>could walk into a bar or just subscribe to your

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 5>local cable and they would be right there. Now, you

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't be able to choose a game. And here in

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 5>New York you would probably be subject to the Jets

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 5>and Giants and other places. It would be the local

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 5>markets there. So it really depends on if the customer

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 5>wants to pay for all of these games that the

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 5>NFL broadcast.

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 6>In the letter here by Senator Mike Lee, he said

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 6>to watch every NFL game during the past season, football

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.839
<v Speaker 6>fans spent almost one thousand dollars on cable and streaming descriptions. Yeah,

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 6>I guess if you're a fan, Yeah.

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 3>It's with it.

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it depends.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 5>I would just say this that the last Super Bowl

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 5>was twelve to zero and then had one hundred and

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 5>twenty five million viewers, And it was twelve to zero

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 5>at one point heading I believe, heading into the fourth

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 5>or you know, fairly well into the game. And it

0:03:59.920 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 5>was the second most watched Super Bowl of all time.

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 5>And with that in mind, if you're the NFL, of

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 5>course you would like to go back to the negotiating

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 5>table to try to get more money. Now, if let's

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 5>just say that this investigation kicks things down the road.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 5>If your Super Bowl is twelve to zero and it's

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 5>the second most watched game ever four years down the

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 5>line might not be a bad thing. You just want

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 5>that money right now. So evidently I do think that

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 5>the NFL will get their money. It's just about when to.

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 3>Get even more money.

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 2>There's obviously very advanced talks to add an eighteenth game,

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 2>and that would be that would be it.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 4>And that would well, see, I mean that is I

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 4>would say it happen.

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 3>You have to open up the whole agreement with the players.

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 5>Of course, yeah, And the Players Association has been in

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 5>flux for over a year. They've had three executive directors

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 5>in under a year. And when you have three executive directors,

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 5>the NFL then has to go to the players Association,

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 5>rip up the collective bargaining agreements, and then they have

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 5>to come to terms on a deal. Those negotiations have

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 5>not started at all. So an eighteenth game, a six

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 5>sixteen international game package that the NFL could sell, those

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 5>negotiations haven't started at all. So I think that Roger,

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 5>I've heard Jerry Jones, I've heard Robert Kraft. And those

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 5>are the Patriots and the Cowboys owners all talk about

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 5>adding these things, and I do think that they want to,

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 5>but it's so so early, which is why, you know,

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 5>going back to this investigation, in a worst case scenario

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 5>for the NFL, if they had to wait four years,

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 5>it might work out in their favor because of the

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 5>fact that they haven't negotiated as CBA.

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 4>So you know, I think that we'll see how this

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 4>plays out.

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 5>But right now, I think that if I'm the NFL

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 5>watching this, it's like, Okay, we'll see.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, what could possibly be the endgame here?

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 4>I'm not exactly sure.

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 5>I think that it could be to congregate some of

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 5>these costs to make sure that the CBS and the

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 5>ABC that there are less streamers involved, that it is

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 5>not passed down to the customer as much. But again,

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 5>like you got to think, this was one of the

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 5>most watched NFL seasons of all time, So really, are

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 5>the streamers hurting and I mean, excuse me, are the

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 5>customer is hurting if they're continuing to tune in that

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 5>That is what I think the NFL's defense to this

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 5>would be is that people are watching regardless and they're paying.

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 2>One of the news that we covered earlier today, I

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 2>want to cover it from a different angles the NFL.

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 2>The DJ is investigating the NFL on anti competitive terrifs

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 2>and it relates to the media rights deals that they have,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 2>and the media rights deals are so important to these leagues.

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 4>It is a.

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Primary driver of value for the franchises across pretty much

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 2>all sports. And it's equally valuable to the broadcast networks

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 2>and to the cable networks and to the streamers that

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 2>put this stuff out there, because boy, advertisers love live programming.

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Ethan Ynek, and she's the expert here, she's a US

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 2>media analyst here. So Keitha just talk to us a

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit about this dooja investigation into the NFL. What

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 2>are the big media companies who are so vested into this,

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 2>What are they saying?

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 7>This is actually good news, Paul, for the media companies.

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 7>So remember we are right smack in the middle of

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 7>what is expected to become a very very contentious media

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 7>rights renegotiation process with the NFL. So the NFL is

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 7>seeking something like about a sixty percent increase in its

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 7>rights fees basically from companies like Fox, Paramount Skuidance from Comcasts,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 7>and be Seeing from Walt Disney. Those are the companies

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 7>that are the most exposed.

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 3>And with the.

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 7>DOJ going after the NFL on anti competitive practices, it

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 7>looks like what they're saying is that the NFL is

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 7>trying to harm consumers by basically making it more and

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 7>more difficult to access their programming. So we know that

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 7>the NFL in the past has tried to sell these

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 7>smaller packages to streamers, you know, whether it's Christmas Day

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 7>games to Netflix or the Thursday night football package to Amazon.

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 7>They try to carve out these smaller deals basically in

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 7>a move to kind of maximize you know, monetization. But

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 7>obviously that's not sitting well with the DOJ. But this

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 7>is good news for the broadcasters because I think, you know,

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 7>we think it gives them definitely better negotiating leverage when

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 7>they go back to renegotiate deals this year with the NFL.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 6>What about let's now head to Disney, they're reading to

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 6>cut a thousand jobs, largely in marketing. You've talked a

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 6>lot about efficiency, So where exactly are these job cuts

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 6>happening and how do you make sure that or as

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 6>an analyst, how do you make sure that these don't

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 6>hit the creative engines of Disney and really affect the

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 6>future of the company.

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so it looks like it's about these job cuts

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 7>are really happening in the marketing departments. So let's just

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 7>look at you know, if you kind of take a

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 7>step back and look at the whole Disney engine. I mean,

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 7>they have over two hundred and thirty thousand employees, so,

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 7>you know, cutting about one thousand jobs, it's less than

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 7>one percent. It's really just a drop in the bucket.

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 7>But you know, the layoffs are really part of this

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 7>whole cost cutting and as you just said, the efficiencies.

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 7>You know, Ever since Barb Byger returned to Disney as

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 7>the CEO in November of twenty twenty two, he embarked

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 7>on this whole efficiency cost cutting program. He eliminated about

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 7>eight thousand jobs, which resulted in about seven and a

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 7>half billion dollars of cost cuts. And really this latest

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 7>wave of another thousand layoffs is just part of that.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 7>So it is not in any of the creative parts

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 7>of the company. This is really more in the marketing department.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 7>So we already know that, you know, Disney has many

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 7>multiple operations, so they have like a whole team supporting

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 7>Disney Plus. They have a very similar team supporting Hulu,

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 7>which is basically, you know, a product that is very

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 7>soon going to be integrated. So Disney Plus and Hulu

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 7>are going to become one consolidated, integrated product, which means

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 7>there's really no need to have two separate treat teas teams,

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 7>and so this is just really a process of streamlining

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 7>and removing redundancies and increasing the efficiency in the business.

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 2>KEITHA, what's the latest on the Paramount Skydiance and Warner

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Brothers Discovery.

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 3>When is that deal going to close?

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.959
<v Speaker 2>And what's some of the feedback you're getting from investors

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 2>about this deal?

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 7>The deal Paul is expected to get regulatory approval and

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 7>to close by September thirtieth of this year, so we

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 7>have a few more months. It looks like some of

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 7>the biggest investors are recommending that Warner Brothers shareholders obviously

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 7>vote in favor of the deal. That vote is set

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 7>for April twenty third, So it definitely looks like they're

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 7>not going to head into any big regulatory problem, something

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 7>that we were kind of anticipating with Netflix. This path

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 7>seems a lot more cleaner, a lot more smoother, and

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 7>in good news for Paramount, what they've done is they've

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 7>kind of secured the Middle Eastern funding, so they've got

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 7>about twenty four billion dollars, you know, some sovereign wealth

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 7>management funds. This was kind of a little bit of

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 7>an investor concern just kind of given all of the

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 7>geopolitical tensions and the regional conflicts there. But with that

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 7>kind of locked and loaded, I think investors are definitely

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 7>kind of heaving a sigh of relief here, and it

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 7>looks like everything will go, you know, as per plan.

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 7>The question, really, Paul, is whether they're going to be

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 7>able to deliver after the deal closes. That's really what

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 7>investors are going to be looking for, especially with the

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 7>six billion dollars of synergies that they've outlined and.

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 2>A lot of debt on the boundaryt talked to us

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 2>just real quickly how the market's thinking about their leverage

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 2>profile because they're gonna be the most or one of

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the most levered media companies out.

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 7>There, absolutely right, Paul seven times leverage about eight billion

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 7>dollars in debt when the deal closes. So that is

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 7>really what you know, the market is worried about, as

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 7>you pointed pointed out, and you know, again we have

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 7>so many different parts here, but I think the biggest

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 7>worry is really the exposure to the linear TV ecosystem.

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 7>It's you know, at fifty five percent of revenue still

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 7>is going to come from, you know, the linear TV bundle,

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 7>and really it's about how well they can manage that.

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 7>So this is going to be a wait and wat story.

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 7>We've not seen very good results in the past, so

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 7>fingers crossed.

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, Listen on demand wherever

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, it seems like a lot of these big

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 2>tech companies are almost tripping over themselves to get press

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 2>releases out, saying how big their AI revenue is, how

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 2>fast it's growing, and.

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Amazon's no difference.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Amazon CEO Andy Jase, in a shareholder letter set aws's

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 2>AI revenue run rate is over twenty billion dollars, as

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Selections was just reporting. That's up from fifteen billion just

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>in first quarter. So that's pretty good. Stocks trading higher

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 2>on rog ranaj here technology channels for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 2>out there in Chicago anrah Amazon twenty billion.

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 3>It seems big to me, how about you?

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, no, it's a very big deal. In fact, this

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 8>is the first time they are actually putting a number

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 8>around it, because if you remember a couple of years ago,

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 8>Microsoft was throwing its number out and everybody else was

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 8>asking Amazon, where is your number? Where are you? But

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 8>you know, one of the things we talked about at

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 8>that point, Amazon's writing on the chat GPT wave where

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 8>Amazon's more enterprise focus, and now those enterprise workloads are

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 8>coming in and that's where we see the AI revenue

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 8>for Amazon.

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 6>How does this change the calculus for the outlook of

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 6>the company, like the are you more bullish than you

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 6>already are?

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 8>That's a very good question. In fact, we published a

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 8>note yesterday saying that we anticipate aw's growth to pick

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 8>up this year, in fact even in the first quarter,

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 8>because one of the things we saw just now it's

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 8>two days ago was Anthropics revenue went from I think

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:59.359
<v Speaker 8>nine billion to thirty billion within no time. And AWS

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 8>is one of the preferred partners. And if you remember

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 8>two years ago, it was all Opening II Microsoft. Now

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 8>we are seeing Anthropic doing really well and that helps

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 8>Amazon Web Services. So this year we think Amazon Web

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 8>Service is going to do better than what most people anticipate.

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 2>And rag updates on kind of the competitive landscape. Now

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 2>where is Amazon fit in these days?

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so you go back and look at it. Prior

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 8>to the AI era, Amazon Web Services was the largest.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 8>It's still the largest, but it was the largest by

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 8>a massive amount compared to Microsoft and Google. Since then,

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 8>after charge GPT, Microsoft really closed the gap with them

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 8>and became a much bigger cloud vendor, you know, compared

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 8>to Google, but not as big as Amazon. But all

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 8>three of them are doing phenomenally well. Because remember, this

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 8>is a business where you need to put in a

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 8>lot of CAPEX and data centers in order to gain

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 8>this revenue. This is not something you and I can

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 8>build in house using you know, either Claude or anything,

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 8>because you need physical infrastructure, data center chips. Amazon talked

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 8>about their chip business for example. So Amazon still is

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 8>in the driver's seat with the largest market share, but

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 8>both the others I would say Microsoft and Google are

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 8>catching up fairly faster at this point.

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 6>So speaking of this flu of deals, we also have Core.

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 6>We've expanding their metadal for AIA computing the twenty one

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars. At a headline level, what does the deal

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 6>tell you the size and duration was what is that

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 6>signal and does it tell you METASAI demand is stronger

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 6>than expected?

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 8>I think Beta is spending so much because they need

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 8>to be relevant. Also in the large language model space,

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 8>it seems to me that this particular deal is tied

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 8>more so for the training of the model rather than infancing.

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 8>Because one of the things what we are seeing is

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 8>when it comes to even hyperskid cloud providers, whether that's

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 8>Microsoft or Google, they're doing some of the work in

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 8>house with their own data centers, but as they can't

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 8>expand that rapidly, they're going out to these neoclouds, whether

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 8>it's Nebeis or code and renting out their capacity so

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 8>that they can parse out some of that work to

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 8>them as well. So this is just a continuation of that.

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 8>The bottom line is AI infrastructure demand is very strong

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 8>and it actually helps out everybody, not just the hyperscal

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 8>cloud providers, but also the neoclouds.

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 4>And you cover all the software providers.

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 2>They've had a tough go over it over the last

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 2>several months, four or five months as investors try to

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 2>sense which one of these software companies and sectors and

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 2>verticals could be at risk from AI.

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Where are we now? Where Where's what's the market selling

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 3>these days?

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 8>So you can see them. I mean the index is

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 8>down quite a bit even today. Every software company is down,

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 8>and yesterday we heard that, you know, there's going to

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 8>be some new model by Clouds. So every time there

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 8>is a brand new model from Anthropic or anybody else,

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 8>there is pressure on these names, and I don't think

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 8>that's going to change anytime soon. What these companies have

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 8>to do is show that they are not going to

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 8>get cannibalized by these large language models, but actually embed

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 8>them in their core product and can continue with that

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 8>profitabil growth that they have. But that's not an argument

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 8>that gets settled in the next twelve months. It's going

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 8>to take a few years to build that out. What

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 8>we want to see from companies like Salesforce is to

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 8>go out and buy back a lot of the shares,

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 8>which they did twenty five billion dollar buy back that

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 8>they have announced. If these guys are able to embed

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 8>some of these models in their own products and protect

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 8>what they have, I think this is going to be

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 8>a change around in sentiment. But again, that's not going

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 8>to happen anytime soon. It's going to be a few

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 8>years before that shows up.

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up there

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 3>for this.

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Coarclay, and Android

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Bernie's they're out there.

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Constellation Brands was last night after the close, stock straining

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 2>higher here. I thought some of the guidance was a

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 2>little soft, but I guess the street says, hey, it's

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 2>better than we thought it was to be able. Let's

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 2>break it down with the red Brown Bloomberg consumer reporter

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 2>read what do we hear from Constellation about their business.

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you're right, the guidance was a little soft last night,

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 9>but I think this morning on the call, the company

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 9>kind of made the case that March sales were quite strong.

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 9>They feel like that momentum in this early part of

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 9>the year is going to kind of carry on through

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 9>the summer, and with that, they're planning to kind of

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 9>support the early momentum with I think the word they

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 9>use was an aggressive marketing campaign. So if you think

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 9>about the big events we have in the summer, makes

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 9>a lot of sense. Of the World Cup, the company

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.719
<v Speaker 9>expects that to be kind of a growth driver, especially

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 9>for their bigger brands Modello Corona, you know, we associate

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 9>those with the summer as well, so makes a lot

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 9>of sense. So I think that's kind of explaining a

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 9>little bit of the share move that we're seeing. The

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 9>question now, I guess, becomes whether or not that this

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 9>is just a blip or they're still kind of subject

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 9>to the sort of secular decline we're seeing in the

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 9>other parts of the alcohol industry.

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 6>How much of this softer outlook is macro driven. We

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 6>know that it's not really a good economy consumers are

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 6>feeling pinch as opposed to with the products themselves.

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, no, the company is making the case with the

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 9>when they kind of justified their guidance and it is

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 9>the lack of economic visibility. They also withdrew their twenty

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 9>twenty eight guidance as well for the same reason. They say,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 9>we just can't see that far out in advance at

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 9>the moment. But again, it kind of comes back to

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 9>this question about whether or not it is an economic

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 9>situation that they're kind of dealing with right now or

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 9>it is just their subject to the kind of consistent

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 9>decline we see in the beer market. Analysts are kind

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 9>of split on what the real situation is.

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned some of their brands, Modello and Corona, brands

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 2>that identify with the Hispanic audience in this country.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 3>The companies in the past has.

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Caught out the change in immigration policy is impacting having

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 2>an impact what they have.

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 3>They updated their thoughts there.

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 9>So during the call they said they actually saw a

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 9>sequential improvement and those zip codes that have.

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 4>A higher Hispanic population.

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 9>So you know, I guess it doesn't tell us a

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 9>ton if it just a sequential improvement from sort of

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 9>a lower start.

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 9>They didn't give any sort of specific details on just

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 9>how much of an improvement it was, so I guess

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 9>it's something that we still need to kind of keep

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 9>an eye on.

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 6>What about I mean, the company in general has benefited

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 6>from premiumization. Are we seeing customers trade down and what

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 6>trends are they pointing to?

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, the company said that that trend is continuing, so

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 9>they're still seeing some strength within their premium brands. I

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 9>think what may be going on is that people are

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 9>drinking less, but when they do drink, you know, maybe

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 9>I'll reach for the nicer options. So we've seen that

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 9>in other parts of the alcohol industry as well, So,

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 9>like you know, Spirits tend To has been pushing premiumization

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 9>as well, so that that trend might you know, maybe

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 9>we don't think of beer as necessarily always like a

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 9>premium option, but there are sort of ways to trade

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 9>within the category.

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 3>All Right, you're of that demo, a younger demo, Thank you?

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Are you guys drinking beer?

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Drinking the Red White Claws and all that iced tea

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 2>stuff and all that.

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, No, it's I guess when you go. I mean,

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 9>obviously in New York's a specific you know beer, I

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 9>mean alcohol culture, bar culture. But I guess when you

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 9>do go out there, you do see more people kind

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 9>of holding cans. A lot of the times, it's less

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 9>a white claw, that's it's more less seltzers. These days,

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 9>it's more theas ready to drink. So think of like

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 9>a serf side, which is like a spiked lemonade, a

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 9>spiked ice tea. Those are really popular right now. And

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 9>it all kind of comes back to this idea that

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 9>people are just changing the way they drink. They're being

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 9>more conscientious with how they drink. You know, they still

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 9>want to be social, be out talking to people, you know,

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 9>like their inhibitions go, but they want to not deal

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 9>with all that all of the health consequences when it

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 9>comes to drinking. They don't want they want something that's

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 9>a lower calorie. They want something that's lighter, easier to drink.

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 9>So I guess you know, that's it's a debate that's

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 9>been going on for a long time of like our

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 9>younger people actually drinking less. It's it's really kind of

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 9>hard to like tease out in the data or they're

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 9>just like changing, like we're saying, they're just picking difference

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 9>in constellation.

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Are they happy with their portfolio of brands or they

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 2>think are they always buying and selling stuff?

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 3>But I think right now they should be happy.

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 9>They have some of the most popular brands like Modella

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 9>obviously unseated bud Light a few years ago as the

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 9>most popular beer brand in the country. Corona, I think

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 9>is fifth. They also have Pacifico is one of the

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 9>highest growing brands as well, So I think that they

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 9>should be pretty happy with that stable. But you know,

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 9>we've seen deals happening in obviously the sort of rumors

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 9>around Brown Foreman potentially merging in a couple of weeks ago,

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 9>so they're, you know, in this sort of shrinking market

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 9>to gain growth, there's going to be probably more of

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 9>these sort of swaps, you know, in portfolios.

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal