WEBVTT - Climbing Up That Hill

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>advice League dot Com. Here's your host. Welcome to Fantasy

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. I'm Paul Charchy and my co host today

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 1>are Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. Hello, gentlemen, let's go

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>down charts treatings. We are near the playoffs, nearing the playoffs,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and that means that every game means that much more. Yes,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:41.599
<v Speaker 1>except for the people who are way out of playoff contention.

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>They're not listening now, they're out, they're not listening anyway,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>so we're not even talking to them. So just to

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys who are listening, our stuff means a lot,

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>that's right. You know, if you're a three win operation

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>at this stage, you're not listening to this podcast. Maybe maybe,

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean they should, And you know, really, that's one

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of the beauties of the Guillotine League. When you get chopped,

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to pretend you care, like you know,

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you got a three win team right now in December,

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't care, but you have to go through the

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>charade that you care. I should really make like a

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire move because I've moved two guys on I

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>try to put in a starting line up. Yeah, I

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>was in two this year. One I'm still in and

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the other one cut in week one. Wow. The truth is,

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>you cannot lose in the Gay Team League. I've talked

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about this for to three years? Are you kidding? You

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>cannot lose. You either win or you either win the

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>guille Team League or you win extra free times. It's

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a bonus win win. You can't lose. I love it.

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Of the course of the show, we're gonna break down

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>all the matchups fantasy style with letter grades and all

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the players that matter. Will take a chance on nine

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>different players. We'll answer three tough questions, and as we

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>usually do in December, we will retire premature speculation. But

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna fill that time by giving you some of

0:01:55.960 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>our favorite Dynasty Empire League stashes instead. There we go,

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>so we'll we'll you'll still get some good data out

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of that. In the final segment of the show, we

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>begin with the Cardinals taking on the Bears. Matt and

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray expected to be back at the Helm for

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>this one. Yeah, it's still a really weird gross game. Though.

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray and DeAndre Hopkins I kind of lump them together.

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Both have been limited in practice, Murray with the ankle,

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins with the hammy. Both are reported as moving around

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. Uh, Kyler, like you said, looks like he's

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>going to play. Easier for him to overcome an ankle

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>injury than a hamstring for DeAndre Hopkins. So I'll give

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Kyler a B grade. Here is Chicago's past defense has

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>actually been okay. If for some reason, Kyler does not go,

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we downgrade all of the receivers a full letter grade here. Conversely,

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if DeAndre Hopkins is active, I'm also going to downgrade

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>all the wide receivers a full letter grade. So like

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>if I gave Christian Kirk a B right now and

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>both are and Hopkins was active and Kyler was not,

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk would be on the bench. Here's how we

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>do it. Christian Kirk gets a sea after after all that,

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bears have bad corners, but the best dish has

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>been Xavier Crawford, who operates from the slot. That's where

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Kirk spends three quarters of his time. A J green,

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw a se on as well, he'll mostly line

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>up against Artie Burns, who covered for the injured Duke

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Shelley last week and allowed fifty five yards in a

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>score in his coverage. And I think they finally have

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>benched Kindle vildor. Yeah, he's a starter, which is too

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>bad because we love picking on him every show. I

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think we just love to say Kindle. Oh, yeah, he's

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>an open and shut book. And you know we've had

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>every every possible I think book reference. Yeah. Uh. A. J.

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Green has seen at least five targets and four of

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>his last five games as well. And ron Dale Moore

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>he saw eleven targets in Week eleven with Hopkins out,

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>but that was kind of the season outlier on him.

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw a C grade on him, seeing is how

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>we can downgrade it to bench if Hopkins place zach Ertz,

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him a C grade as well. In san

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>zach Ertz played against the Bears and had one hundred

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and three yards and a score. In twenty nineteen, Zackert's

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>played against the Bears and had one hundred and three

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>yards and a score. It is an odd number years,

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>so hundred and three yards of the score right here. Uh,

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>so the Bears have been They've been okay against the

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>tight end there, ranking in top ten interceptions, yards and

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns allowed to the tight end, so they've been pretty good. Uh. Finally,

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmunds still on i R with the ankle injury.

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>James Conner should see at least fifteen carries in this

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>game so we can safely put him on a touchdown to.

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Since Week five, the Bears have allowed to touch down

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to every running back who has had at least fifteen

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>carries in a game, except for Jamal Williams and Thanksgiving

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>last week, so Connor gets a B on the Bear side.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>It's really gross. Justin fields just downgraded to doubtful on Friday,

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>meaning that Andy Dalton is going to probably start in

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>this one. You should not start him against the Cardinals

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>who are only allowing two hundred one yards and one

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdown a game to opposing quarterbacks and almost all of

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>his wide receivers are hurt. Alan Robinson hasn't practiced this

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>week with a hamstrings. Marquis Goodwin didn't practice Wednesday with

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>rib and foot injuries. Cole Commett didn't go either with

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>a groin injury. Darnell Mooney is the only one you

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>can really play. He gets just a C grade. The

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Cards are allowing the fifth fewest receptions and yards to

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>opposing wide receivers though, so it's just a C grade

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for Mooney. And finally David Montgomery, he gets the Scott

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Fish volume C. Yeah, the only hope for the Bears

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is to hold the time of possession. The good news

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cards are allowing four point seven yards per carry

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>on the year. The bad news the Cards have only

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>allowed four touchdowns all season two runners, and the game

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>scripts have not favored runners all years. The Cards are

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>only seeing an average of seventeen rushing attempts per game.

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to the Giants taking on the Dolphins.

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>This is a brutal game with fel like I feel

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 1>like every one of my matchups, by the way, I'm like,

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>oh god started until you get the Giants. Dolphins, start

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins defense, Well, you actually do start defense. Giants

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be without their starting quarterbacks and two receivers

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in this game. And there's nobody in the passing game

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>to play here, absolutely none, absolutely none. If if you

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>are really in a penchion, need to take a dart,

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>throw it might be Tony because he got thirteen targets

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>from Glennon and the last one if he goes. If

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>he goes, he's it's not expected to play. So uh yeah,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and Shepherd's not expected to play. He had like Miami's terrible,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>gets a slot and he's not gonna go. Like there

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>were options, just it just didn't come together for the Giants.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Nothing in the passing game. Barkley, I am giving the

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>B grade too, though they they leaned on the run

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>heavily in that other Glennon game, giving over twenty I

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>think it was twenty four touches to the running backs.

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh and Glennon only passed it twenty five times in

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that in that first the first Glenning game. So I'm

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>giving Barkley a B grade here. He has ten catches

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in a two games back. Um, I saw this. I

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>saw the stat the other day. Barkley hasn't topped six

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>yards rushing since twenty nineteen, that by the way, and yes,

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>seven yards by the way. I tweeted it this week,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>so I thought he hasn't. It's been since Week four

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>since he scored a touchdown. It's been since since he's tapped.

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think with the volume plus the likelihood of four

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to five catches, I gotta be great on him, though.

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>That's you're way more optimistic than I am. I am. Actually,

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I OpEd it with I feel better about it with Glennon,

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and then I would have with Daniel Jones. Uh on

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the two on the Miami side. On the two A side,

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm given to a C grete. The Giants held out

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Hurts last week, but he was hurt a little. And uh,

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>they've they've been more than more like middle of the

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>road defense against quarterbacks over the last six two has

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>looked really solid. Uh. He's second in the NFL in

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a completion person manage over that span. UM. In those

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>six games, he has twelve touchdowns, so two per game,

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>averaging about two and fifty yards per game. Uh. If

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Gaskin would stop taking wildcat snaps at the goal line,

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe two, it would get a few more points. But

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I gotta c grade on him a grade for Jalen Waddle,

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it's hard not to give him his due at this point.

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>He's on pace to break An Kwon Bolden's rookie record

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>for receptions. He's averaging about nine targets, six catches, seventy

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>five yards per game. With Parker and Fuller unlikely to

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>play as well, he's still going to be just about

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the only guy in town. Uh So, I do have

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>an A grade on Waddle. I just think double digit targets.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Waddle is entering Rookie of the Year conversations right now,

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and Jamaar Chase is handing that five games have not

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>been spectacular for Chase. Uh Gasicky, I have a C

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>grade on him. He had a quiet day against Carolina

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>last week and what should have been a decent spot

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Becausecki basically plays jumper wide receiver a jumble wide receiver

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>role and had forty eight plus yard in the five

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>previous games to that, Giants just gave up really really

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>good days to Gronk and waller Um and they're they're

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>mostly average against the position. Obviously grade there. In the

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>running game, Philip Lindsay I actually kind of liked this

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>week until now he's turned up with an injury and

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:20.599
<v Speaker 1>he's doubtful to play, So it's gonna be all x.

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay had twelve carries last week. If he's not there,

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Gaskin is just gonna get more volume. What do you

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>think it says about Miles Gaskin on but you know,

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>on less than a week with the team, they gave

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay twelve touches. Yeah, the fact that they signed

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>him says something, and Lindsay responded with, Hey, I'm gonna

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have a good game on an on an

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>even numbered week this time, I'm gonna kick that. Uh.

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I have a B grade on Gaskin. The Giants d

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>checks in at fifth worst against fantasy running backs. They've

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed over a hundred fifty total yards per game. That's

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>good for fourth most, seventh most rushing yards, fourth most

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>passing yards. A lot of the position. As we know,

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>gasking can catch passes and those wildcat runs at the

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 1>goal line. He's getting a lot of goal line opportunity.

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a B grade on him, a much stronger

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>than be grade than I do on Barkley. Go good.

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm with you on that. The time has come.

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Javante Williams is going to be the starting running back

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 1>for the Broncos. Man. I'm glad that you brought this

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>up right after Myles Gaskin, because I got a choice

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>between those two in the league this week. Chart what

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Charter gonna do. What is the fantasy community gonna do?

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>If Mike Boon that's the is he might, it would

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>be very frustrating. Uh. Javonte Williams Melvin Gordon not expected

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to play in this game. He's officially doubtful. Let's you know,

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and the people who are doubtful do not play. So

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Javonte Williams as the starter. He's been really I Popping

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Lee good to this point. But Melvin Gordon has been

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>good enough to make sure that Williams isn't getting requisite

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>work to make can a safe start on a weekend

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>and week out basis. Until now, catch is this has

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>turned into a really good Chiefs run defense. They're allowing

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the sixth fewest rushing yards on the third fewest carries,

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and they haven't given up a touchdown by land Sea

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>or Air in seven games to a running back. How

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>did they get one by c touchdowns? You're gonna find

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>out a Monday night. With the Weather game coming on

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Monday night. I'm excited to talk to you about that

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>game when we get there later on. So I've got

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to be grade on Williams. In an easier matchup, I

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>would love to give him an A grade. What's gonna

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>be fun is think of all of next year's preseason

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>prediction articles that are going to talk about Javonte Williams.

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>They're all gonna reference this one game as a starter

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 1>that he had, you know, in the one game to six.

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right in that one when yards a year, right,

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>So be great on Javonte Williams. Hoping for greatness, but

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm subduing my expectations a little bit. The entire passing

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>games on the bench, Teddy Bridgewater is thrown zero or

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown in four straight games. The return of Jerry Judy,

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you would think that that would help the passing game,

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>but all that's done is take a meager number of

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>completions and divide them by another set. It's destroyed everybody,

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>including Tim Patrick, who had been as totally bankable, totally

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>dried up. Sutton's no good, Judy's killed us. So Judy

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't scored all year, and Grantity missed a bunch of

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the season, but still um Patrick's last two games fourteen

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and twenty six yards no offense has devolved into a

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>spot starter and this is not the spot Kansas City

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>secondaries red hot over the past six games, Kansas City

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is allowing just two three passing yards and one touchdown

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>per game. So that's it for the passing game on

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Let's go over to Kansas City. I am

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>excited for what I believe will be a very big

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>game from Clyde Edwards Hilaire. The Brocos are clearly feeling

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the absence of Von Miller and L and A. J. Johnson.

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>Over the past four games. They're allowing the most rushing

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>yards at a league high five point six yards per

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>carry to opposing backs. And it'll get even worse if

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Shelby Harris misses this game. He's Pro Football Focus his

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>seventh best run defending interior alignement, and he's questionable to

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>go in this one. And remember, in Clyde Edwards Hilayer's

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>last three full games, he's averaging one hundred total yards

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and he scored twice in those three games. A grade

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>for Clyde Edwards Hilaiyer. I just want to mention he's

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>he's had the flu this week. You do not expect

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that to be a problem by Sunday's expected to be

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>past that. Just for uh Patrick mahomes Man, I I

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>really struggled with the letter grade on Patrick Mahomes. Let's

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>talk it through together. Dud games and four of the

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>last five games for Mahomes. And when I say dud,

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean dud other than that Raiders game with four

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards and four touchdowns. Going back since Week six,

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>October sevente was a long time ago, he's had one

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>good game since them. In all the others, Patrick Mahomes

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>is averaging two twenty six yards and half of one

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game. God, that's I just traded Mahomes for

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a J. Brown in the league. Man it wow, that's amazing. Um.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>He threw just one touchdown in both of the Denver

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>meetings last year, and that was when Denver's defense was

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>reeling with injury. Defense is better. Denver hasn't surrendered more

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>than two touchdown passes to any quarterback this year. They

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>on the second best opponent completion percent. It's just C

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>grade on Patrick. Would anybody be surprised if he threw three? No? No,

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it's Patrick Mahomes. But we now have so much data

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>on this that you just can't feel like that's something

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that's bankable anymore. Let's talk about his receivers and I

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>want to begin with Travis Kelsey. This is a tricky

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>matchup Denvers allowing the fourth fewest Fantasy points to tight ends.

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>No opposing tight end is finished in the top twelve

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>in any game against Denver this year, and that includes

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller Mark Andrews. They did not crack the top twelve.

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And Travis Kelsey has dropped six passes in the past

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>four games. That is the most over the last four

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>games in the NFL. BE grade for Travis Kelsey. If

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you played a different position, it probably a C grade.

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm still maintaining an A grade on Tyreek Hill. In

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the last four meetings, He'll scored four times, which is

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty good considering Patrick Mahomes has only scored five touchdowns

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in those four games. He'll commanded a league high forty

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>eight targets over his last four games. Because that volume

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is there, I'm keeping the A grade on Tyreek Hill.

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You'll go up against rookie cornerback Patrick Certain for the

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>first time. Uh in Certain it's actually stam sur Tan's career.

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>But guarding Hill for the first time is a daunting task.

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm gonna go advantage Tyreek Hill and I'm

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep the A grade on him sitting on the bench,

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Darryl Williams, because once Clyde Edwards comes back, we're gonna

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>see Williams go right back to the low usage he

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>had before when Clyde Edwards a layer was healthy earlier

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>in the season. It's yet another bye week. You need

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>help with a couple of pivotal positions, maybe even the

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>tight end. We will tell you nine guides upon whom

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you can take a chance. Many of these players available

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>on the waiver wire, and at least one tight end

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to give you when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Take a chance on me nine players not normally a

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>new starting lineup. Any of these guys are available on

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire. We begin at the quarterback position and

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish. I'm going with Carson Wentz. He's had multiple

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in seven of his last nine. The two he

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>didn't were against the Bills Pasty and the recently really

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>really stout Jags past defense. Uh So, the Texans are

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>middle of the road against quarterbacks, but went went to

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty three and two last time, which kicked off a

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>stretch of qbs going for three or more multiple scores

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>uh like four times against the Texans after that, So

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Carson wentz al Right, I like it, Matt, you'll take

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a chance to be quarterback. My all might take a

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>chance of me. Players will be on the spelling test

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 1>this week. We start with Jimmy Garoppolo two two peas.

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised when I looked it up. He's only

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>thrown three career touchdown passes against the Seahawks in five games.

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Seattle's defense is looking absolutely brutal right now, and Deebo

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Samuel is out, So why Jimmy G here? Yes, I'm

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>curious about that. The Niners did figure out something in

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the first meeting. Is the combo platter of Jimmy G

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>and Trey Lance managed to throw for three, two and

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>three against Seattle earlier this year. Garoppolo was injured in

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 1>that game and missed the next two weeks. In the

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>six games since returning, Jimmy G has posted to yard

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>games and multiple touchdown passes and three of his last four.

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And with Deebo out, I think it forces the Niners

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>and to be more of a traditional offense. Run the

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>ball with Mitchell, passed the ball with Jimmy. I'm gonna

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>go with him this week, Tyrod Taylor d it depending

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>on who you ask. Taylor takes on the Colts and

0:18:57.800 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>while granted they haven't had there buy yet, but the

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Colts are surrendered the most passing touchdowns while allowing opposing

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks for multiple touchdowns in eight different games this year.

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So Taylor may help you through the air here, but

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>also on the ground. We've seen other comparable mobile quarterbacks

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>like Lamar Jackson, Ryan Tannehill, Josh Allen, Trevor Lawrence average

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>seven yards per carry against the Colts. If Taylor is

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna get seven yards per carry and he gets seven

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven carries, you know suddenly we're looking at a

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>easy fifty yard game for Taylor. I'm just on the ground.

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So combine that together, there's your starter. It's fun fact

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>on Taylor multiple touchdowns in every game he's played this

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>year between ground and air. I think not by sea.

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>You didn't put the scooping touchdowns. Speaking of touchdowns, let's

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>go to here take a chance, I mean running back

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Scott I'm going with Sony Michelle up against the Jaguars defense.

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not the best the matchups. It's the middle of

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the road matchup that's gotten better over over recent weeks.

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>But Darryl Henderson is dealing with a hip injury, and

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like there's a lot of concern he'll play,

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and if he does play, concern that a lot of

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>concern he won't play. But if he does go, he

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>might be on a little bit of a snap count.

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And the Jaguars are allowing nearly thirty touches per game

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to running backs. This is a game where the Rams

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>might get ahead to and run the ball with Sony

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Michelle to run out that clock. I see Sony with

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>ten plus touches. Whether whether Henderson goes or not, I

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>like see Gray there. Let's go to Matt and you're

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>take a chance of me running back. The second word

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 1>in the spelling test is use check, as in Kyle

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>use check. This is probably my boldest take a chance

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in me call of the year. If he scores once,

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm golden in this one. If he scores twice, I

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>get to go into the John t V. Take a

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>chance on me Hall of Fame. You I don't know,

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>yeah from file use check corse four times. You definitely

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>catch h Kyle J has caught a pass in every

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>game this year. Uh deebo. Samuel will miss this game.

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned that vacates about nine targets per game,

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>but in a sneaky way, it's also vacating rushing attempts

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>as he comes out of the backfield a ton, and

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Samuel's last three games he's ran the ball nineteen times.

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>They need to not only replace him as a wide

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>receiver but a weapon out of the backfield. So why not, Kyle?

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks are allowing the most receptions to running backs,

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the most receiving yards to running backs, and the most

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>total touches per game to the position. They can't give

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Elijah Mitchell thirty two carries again, Kyle use Check is

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna get some use in this game. Check that yep,

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders is back, but that doesn't mean Boston South

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 1>suddenly not gonna get carries. And they've give him plenty

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>of work even in Sanders games. And they're going up

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets. They ranked last in rush defense, last

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in rushing touchdowns allowed, twenty six yards per carry, and

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>no team is running the ball more than the Eagles

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 1>since Week seven. Granted a lot of that's Jalen Hurts

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>every time Boston Scott is mentioned on this show. I

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>want Scott to do a Boston accent from now on.

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you say Chowder? Okay, let's go. Let's let's go

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>over to the receivers that could be wide receivers and

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>or tight ends. Scott, who you got chowder? Russell Gauge

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, which was an

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>easier matchup earlier in the year, but they're still not

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>great against wide receivers. Over the less two weeks, Gage

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>has fifteen targets, leading the team the leading the team's

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in targets, catches, and yards. I say wide

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>receivers because Cordil Patterson I'm kind of running back for

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 1>this specific statistic. Um. He's had five to six cards,

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>catches and fifties and sixty plus yards in four of

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>his last five games with and he's scored in a

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of them. Still, uh, it's it's just good matchups

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>grade on him too. All right, Matt, you're a receiver. Well,

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>I happen to know it's a tight end. Well. The

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>final guy in the spelling test is c j Uzoma,

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and the US has popped off for a few big

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>days this year, they've all come against porous tight end defenses,

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Chargers fit that bill this week. Last week,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos tight end Eric Salbert scored Albert. The week

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>before Eric Ebron and Pat friar Muth each scored for

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, and the week before that, Tyler Conklin scored

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>twice for the Vikings. Against the Chargers. They're averaging almost

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>one tight end score per game and have allowed the

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>second most scores in the league to the position. Foster

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Moreau is probably the best backup tight end of the league.

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And you may recall in the preseason we said if

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>there's one tight end you're gonna hand come we've talked

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>about for a couple of years. We are. We're big

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Foster Moreau. Fans uh. That was your handcuff to have

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Moreau filled in for Darren Waller once earlier this year.

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>And here's what happened in that game. Moreau was on

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the field for every single snap. He ran routes on

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty two of thirty seven passing plays. They targeted him

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>six times. He caught all six passes for sixty yards

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown. And every tight end who's been targeted

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>five or more times against Washington has hit at least

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards and or scored a touchdown. Foster Moreau. Let's

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>go to another matchup, Chargers taking on the Bengals, Matt

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>this has been an inconsistent Chargers passing game. What do

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you think about Justin Herbert as he takes on a

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly good Cincinnati past. I have no idea who Justin

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Herbert is, but their quarterback Air Bear. He's not scared

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to go up against the Bengals, certainly not. Air Bear

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is thrown for multiple scores and four of his last

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>five and for over three hundred and three of his

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>last five. Both Mike White and Baker Mayfield through for

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>multiple scores against this defense in the last month, but

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>they did hold Derek Carr and Big Ben in check

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>in the last two weeks. Should we give him an

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>A grade for Air or a B grade for Bear?

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe we split the difference and give him something

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in between those two bad like an A B grade.

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll just give him a B and thank you. Mike

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Williams will face Eli Apple most often in this one.

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>He's the bengals worst cover corner according to Pro Football

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>folk US It's tough to feel a lot of faith

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in Williams right now, after hitting double digit PPR points

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>only once in his last six games, after accomplishing that

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>feat in four of his first five this year. Last

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>week in Denver, he didn't score, but did have eight targets,

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>his highest mark since Week five. So I'll take a

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>stand and I'm gonna throw a hopeful B grade on

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams this this week. It's that that is not

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>panned out more often than not. It's a hopeful B grade,

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>which is something like the grade alright, Keenan Allen gets

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a solid B grade. Uh, slot corner known as a

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>B grade. How's interrupting me? Chart? Geez? Uh slot corner.

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Mike Hilton has been very good this year, but Allen

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>has been to ten or more targets in five straight

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>games and double digit PPR points in every game this season,

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>which is crazy. Uh. Jared Cook and the rest of

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends are on the bench. Somehow, They're now

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 1>targeting four tight ends in this offense. And while Cook

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>leads the team and looks at four or five targets

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>per game, you need to score and Parum gets as

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>many red zone targets is just gross. Austin Ekeler. He

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>does get an A grade though. The Bengals have been

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>decent against the run game, but their bottom five in

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>receptions and receiving yards allowed to opposing running backs. That

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>an average of seven catches and fifty five yards per game.

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right Neckler's wheelhouse over to the other side. Chart.

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna need you get a button ready because Joe

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Mixon he gets this week's fantasy art Vark. Joe Mixon. Yeah,

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty one touches per game since the bye week, dang uh,

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Chargers have allowed the most rushing yards and

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.479
<v Speaker 1>the second most touchdowns to the running back position. It's

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a big Joe Mason. I think he's my

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>number one ranked running back this week. Well, that's that's

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>how you get an art Vark rading uh c j

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Uzoma was might take a chance on the receiver Joe Burrow.

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm only giving a C grade two. He hasn't topped

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>three hundred yards and four straight, has thrown two touchdown

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>passes in his last three games. And you don't pass

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Chargers, you run on the Chargers, which is

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>why the Chargers are top five and passing attempts, completions,

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and yards As a defense only allowing two eighteen yards

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>per game plus tackle. Riley Reef is not a percent

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and may not go with an ankle injury. Jamaar Chase

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and Tee Higgins gets c grades in this one. Chase

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>hasn't topped fifty yards in five weeks, Higgins has scored

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 1>more Fantasy points than three of their last four. Both

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.959
<v Speaker 1>get a little break though, as Chargers cornerback Asante Samuel Jr.

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Is looking like he's gonna miss this week with concussion. Still,

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael Davis and Tavon Campbell have been very capable this year,

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>and as I said, people just run on the Chargers,

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's pretty low volume here. By the way,

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boyd is on the bench, he draws Chris Harris

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>from the slot. That's a that's the worst matchup and

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 1>he's the worst of the three wide receivers. We're not

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>normally starting Tyler Boyd anyway, so that's okay. When we

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>come back, we will dive into more matchups, including Colts

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>versus Texans. Sure Jonathan Taylor is an obvious start here.

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>We know that Scott Fish likes Carson Wentz so hot.

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Which of the re sievers is gonna get beyond the

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>receiving end of all of those scores. I think you

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>promised four touchdowns for Carson Wentz a personal guarantee. We'll

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>tell you who they are when we come back. In

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>addition to breaking down the backup running backs between the

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Vikings and Lions, both of whom are in key roles

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this week, all of that and more Fantasy Football Weekly

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>returns in moments. This is the final segment of our

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>number one of our two hour journey into Fantasy football

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charge and Scott Fish and

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison with you if you want to follow Scott

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Fish on Twitter at Scott Fish twenty four. Matt Harrison

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is at explosive output and I am at Paul Charge.

0:28:56.200 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>In Boom Colts take on the Texans, Scott Jonathan Taylor

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>goes without saying he's an obvious start, and uh, there's

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>no scenario under which you would not start him. But

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>more about the passing game, sure, Uh, Carson Wentz obviously

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>was my take a chance on me quarterback. So in

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the passing game, you'd think I'd like a lot more

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>players than. Yes, I would, but I have a B

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>grade on Michael Pittman. He held was held down a

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit by the Bucks last week because the touchdowns

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>some for some reason went to Hilton, t Y Hilton,

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and Ashton Dolon. Uh a Dynasty Metrics favorite from a

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. Okay, yeah he was yeah writing that. Uh,

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he's still crushed in target share though he's getting over

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>eight per game. The top receiver usually goes for seventy

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>five plus on the Texans. Texans and usually scores. So

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I got that from Michael Pittman. As for the others,

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not trusting it. With Hilton, he scored, but

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't top thirty yards in his last four games.

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>All the rest are super inconsistent. It's gonna be Pittman,

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be Hinds getting some catches. It's gonna be

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Taylor getting some catches Whenzi'll get there. But we don't

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>know exactly where it's gonna go. You mentioned Taylor was

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the obvious a his last three lines against the Texans.

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I just want to put these out there, five and

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>one and one and two. Geez, those are honestly he's

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>better now than he was then. On the other side

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of the ball, Taylor was he was. So you think

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd like a lot of the wide receivers of it,

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>one of them because a lot of a lot of

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the reason I like Taylor was first rushing, Yes, exactly.

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>He gets you two to three points rushing every week.

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>No matter what, you'll get more than that. Yeah, I

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>do like do like Cooks. I got a C grade

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>on him. He scored last week to save his fantasy

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>day because his targets had dried up a little bit.

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>With Taylor only throwing at twenty four and twenty six

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>times in the last two weeks, which is gonna tank

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>tank them. But Cooks over the season and especially recently

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>end up until that two game stretch, had been getting

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>eight to ten targets. I figure him to come back

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a little more in that range. With them falling behind

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the Colts in this one. Uh see, great on Cook's

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I have a bench grade on Collins. He got the

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>first two targets and catches of the game last week

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and then the last target of the day and nothing

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to between. I can't trust that into the running game.

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I have them both on the bench. It becomes a

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>little more interesting. If David Johnson doesn't go bad become

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely plausible. Plug in. Yeah, the last two weeks, rex

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Burke had went eighteen carries for forty yards and twelve

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>for I believe twenty two yards or twelve or twenty eight.

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you want twenty carries for maybe fifty or

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards, Burke head bike and to see but two

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>yards per carries? What if Johnson doesn't go rex Burke

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>had doesn't even get my volume. See I'm that low

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>on Burke hand. Wow, Bikings take on the Lions. Alexander

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Madison will be your starting running back. He was a

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>top ten fantasy running back in the two full games

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>he's already played in place of Dalvin Cook, and he's

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>averaged in those two games. He averaged thirty two touches

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>per game, and one of them was against the Lions.

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Earlier the Lions, it was good for hundred fifty three yards.

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>In a grade on Alexander Madison in this one. Let's

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>go over to the passing game or justin Jefferson is

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>an obvious a over one hundred yards in his last

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>two match ups with Detroit, including one twenty four yards

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in the earlier meeting. He's become one of Fantasy Football's

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>safest wide receiver plays. A grade for Jefferson, B great

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>for Adam Theelan in a far trickier start than Jefferson's.

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Over his last four games against Detroit, Theland's averaging just

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>forty yards and only one score in those four games,

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>including the one earlier this year, which was just two

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>catches of for forty yards. That's not good. Uh fortunately,

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>does come into this game hot at least five catches

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and a seventy one yard average over his last three games.

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>He's also found the end zone in five of the

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>last six, which is great and touchdowns obviously always helped.

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But oddly enough, the Lions do a good job at

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>keeping receivers out of the end zone, allowing just one

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown to wide receivers in the last month Detroit. And

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that brings us to Kirk Cousins and you can probably

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>see this coming a little bit a B grade here.

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>The Lions are shockingly competent against the past. The last

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>four quarterbacks to face the Lions are averaging just two

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred twelve yards and zero point eight touchdowns. The Lions

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>granted Cousins is way better than any of the guys

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that they faced in that last month. But in the

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Week five matchup, Cousins was good for a very modest

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>two yards in one score. That was it. Still Jefferson

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and Theland dramatically better than anybody they'll face in the

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Lions secondary, and they should on paper do well here,

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>so I'm keeping a B grade on Kirk Cousins. Let's

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>go over to the Detroit side of this game. Another

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>backup running back, Jamal Williams, will get virtually all of

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the work here. You got almost every touch on Thanksgiving

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>after DeAndre Swift went down. The Vikings just got hammered

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>by Elijah Chill. They're giving up the most yards per

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>carry in the NFL, but they do get both of

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>their starting defensive tackles back, including key runs stuffer Michael Pierce,

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>who's missed two months of time. He'll he is expected

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to play in this game. Minnesota's allowed of rushing touchdown

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>in seven of the past eight games, and I think

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Williams does find the end zone here and a B

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>grade on him. The only part of the passing game

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that I'm giving a starting grade two is t J

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Hockenson and it's a bit's it's a seed that I

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 1>had as a bench for a long time. Only there

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>is something less than a sea. But there's not a

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>letter between C and bench. I mean it's there a

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Harpoons kind of a Vikings fantastic against tight ends, allowing

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown to the position all year. Nobody's top forty

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 1>four yards since Week three, and athletic linebacker Anthony Barr

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>likely plays in this game and he'll get a lot

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>of the Hockinson assignments. Hockinson only managed two catches for

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:58.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty two yards and no touchdown in the first match.

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I'm moving to the bench. That's it,

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and the whole arrest of the passing games on the bench,

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't even have to talk about golf and Cliff

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Raymond and I'm on ross A Brown and Josh Reynolds,

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>including Josh Reynolds. I know we had three catches for

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy yards. Last name, did you see the goff record

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>without Sean McVeigh. Uh? Is it like two wins or something?

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Two career wins zero sixteen and one? Oh man, when

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>did he have? What were the other So he's oh

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>ten and one now, right, So where were these other

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>six losses when Jeff Fisher was oh, back in the

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Fisher days, right right? Wow, That says plenty and

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe more about Sean McVeigh than anything else. Sean McVeigh

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>got Jared Goff to a super Bowl. It's amazing. That

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. Let's go to one more matchup in this segment,

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Eagles taking on the Jets. Matt I I talked a

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit about about Boston Scott, but let's talk about

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback position. Jalen Hurts may very well not go

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 1>in this one. He's got the bad foot, so even

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>if he does play, you might not get the rushing

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 1>out of him that you desperate need. Yeah, he was

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>practicing this week game time decision nursing an ankle injury.

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Probably not a good thing for running quarterback. Going against

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the defense that hasn't allowed anything to running quarterback, It's

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>really easy to run against the Jets as a running back.

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>In the game. Scripts haven't forced quarterbacks to run much

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this year. The Jets have only allowed one touchdown on

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the ground to a quarterback this year, in an average

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of eight rushing yards per game. Add add in Hurts injury,

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think they'll try to keep the alley's off Hurts.

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 1>They're probably gonna keep him in the pockets, So I'm

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him just a C grade. He's gonna have

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.399
<v Speaker 1>to throw. That's not his best trade. But the Jets

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>are allowing two seventy seven passing yards per game. UM

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>As far as other receivers, I'll give Davanta Smith a C.

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But the rest are on the bench. Everyone hates Jalen

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Reagor by the way, yeah they should after the two

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 1>drop passes at the end of that game. Really h

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Smith is only top seventy yards once in the last

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>seven weeks, but has scored thrice in the last four weeks,

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>so that's why he gets the sea. Dallas Goddart was obsent, absent,

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.479
<v Speaker 1>absent last week against the Giants, one catch for zero

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:07.879
<v Speaker 1>yards on three targets. But I'll give him a see though,

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as he was able to top sixty yards and three

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of the prior five games, and the Jets are allowing

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards per game two tight ends. That's the seventh most.

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 1>The running backs are just an absolute disaster. Miles Sanders

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't play the second half of last week's game, which

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>led to many believe that he wouldn't play this week

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>because he was injured. But no, he practiced in full

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday, so now it looks like he's going to

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 1>play now. But ankles are tricky. Just asks Scott fish Um.

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Lots of people pivoted to Boston. Scott and Charge talked

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 1>about him a little bit. He's missed every practice this

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>week with a non COVID illness. Jordan Howard also missed

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>practice with a knee injury. He looks more doubtful than questionable.

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And Nick Sirianni won't give Kenny Gainewell more than three

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>touches per game. They faced the worst run defense in

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the league their bottom seven and every statistical category against

0:37:56.360 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the run, including dead last and touchdowns, with twenty one

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>total to running backs almost two game. Sanders, I'm gonna

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>give a B. If Scott is active, he gets to

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:09.359
<v Speaker 1>see I don't think Howard goes, but if he does,

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>he gets yeah, okay, And and if Scott and Howard

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 1>are both inactive for this game, Miles Sanders vaults to A.

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Miles Sanders goes to an A. But then Kenny

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Gainwell gets a harpoon in this one. Oh, I like

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>the sound of that. On the other side, it's the

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Jets harpoon. You can't start a running back on the Jets.

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 1>We all thought Ty Johnson would get some usage with

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael Carter out, but he was third in the pecking

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>order last week, behind Tevin Coleman and Austin Walter. Austin

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Walter scored the short touchdown and Tevin, who is not good,

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>ended up with eighteen touches. If you have to start one,

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it's probably Coleman, who saw the most targets last week,

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>as the Eagles have allowed the third most receptions to

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>running back but are good everywhere else against the run,

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and you can't start anyone in the passing game either.

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Zach Wilson was able to beat the Texans last week

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.919
<v Speaker 1>on one d and forty five passing yards. He's only

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:05.399
<v Speaker 1>top the two hundred yard mark once in his last

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 1>five games. In seven total games, he's thrown four total

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes. That takes out all the wide receivers. If

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you do start one, it's Elijah Moore, who saw eight

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 1>targets last week from Wilson but could only manage four

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>forty six. But the deepest dart throw of them all

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is Jets tight end Ryan Griffin. Griffin leads the Jets

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and red zone targets with five on the season. Jets

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>tight end, the Jets tight ends right, thank you. The

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are dead last in the league against the tight end,

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the most receptions and yards and the second most touchdowns allowed. Griffin,

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that's like a sixteen team tight end premium level start

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:48.280
<v Speaker 1>right here for Ryan Griffin. If you absolutely Chris Chris

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>my Ark for the Giants tight end scored on the

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Eagles last week, if he could do it right, uh

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>An Tonio Brown's gonna miss three games. I've reason to

0:39:57.239 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>believe that brings him back Week sixteen. That is the

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 1>reason semi final week for most fantasy leagues. So he'd

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be there for two of your three, you know, two

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of potentially two of your three playoff games if you're

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>alive to that point. But do you burn a roster

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>spot in Antonio Brown and hold him all this time

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>waiting for him to come back? What do you guys

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>think I am in this situation in a couple of leagues,

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I was, as we remember from the preseason, I thought

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>he was going to be the best Bucks receiver and

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>through six weeks you were right there. So I'm in

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 1>this situation in quite a few leagues. Uh, those those games,

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe are the Panthers and Jets. I'm gonna look

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a real quick, Yes, I'm pretty sure it's Panthers and Jets.

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like that Jets matchup. Panthers matchup not

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>as great, but there's a lot of weapons for the Panthers,

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 1>but they're really decent on the back end. Um, he

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was wide receiver six in points per game Fantasy points

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>per games through six weeks. If he comes back at

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>full health, he was gonna miss a couple of games anyway,

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he's worth it on a championship Austar at

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the back of your batch. I'm going to hold him.

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm inclined to hold him as well, because I think

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 1>he is. He's just he was so good before and

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>he should be healthy at that point, and Antonio Brown

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 1>was so good. Yeah, I wouldn't hold him. The Panthers

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>are actually a very good the Jets, it's gonna be

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 1>a week seven team game. They'll have already locked up

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the NFC South. There's not going to be much of

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a reason to get Antonio Brown. They're not gonna be

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in week seventeen. But it's also a hey, run the ball.

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:33.359
<v Speaker 1>It's the Jets, you don't have to. That's that's Tom

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Ray always it's terrible. But by the way, the Bucks

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 1>they're there. Their pass rates, even when they're blowing teams out,

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is ridiculous. They just keep passing. So if Calvin Ridley

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 1>has been dropped, are you picking him up? You know

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley, I mean, it's he can come back any day.

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm that minute true. Now he could decide

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to be bad. Falcons are not out of

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the playoff race. It's not It doesn't look great, but

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not out of it. It really depends on your team.

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I have a team where he's on waivers and I

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:09.719
<v Speaker 1>have not picked him up, So I guess answer in

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that league, no, But there are other leagues where I

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely would, So I think it's a little roster dependent,

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, yeah, that's what do you think about

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>trading for him in a dynasty league? We're at the

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, this training deadline, a lot of weeks right here.

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about trading for Calvin Ridley for

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 1>next year? At what might possibly be the lowest. I

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>actually did trade for him last week in one of

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>my dynasty leagues where I'm not really competing this year.

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's kind of a savvy move. I believe

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>he is back with Atlanta next year, but beyond that

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>he's not, so I believe it. This is his last

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 1>year with the Falcons under contract, so makes it kind

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 1>of interesting. One second dynasty trade I saw this week

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in one of my league's Austin Nuckler for Derrick Henry

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and Christian McCaffrey. Damn, wow, it's come. It's come to

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 1>this for christ whim now for you know, two future assets,

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is that is a that's a win. That's

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 1>that's that is a win now trade, no doubt about it.

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the playoffs. As the playoffs are approaching for

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>those people that uh for league's average league has got

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:18.760
<v Speaker 1>six teams that go to the playoffs. Right of the six,

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe that that six teams should get in on

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:26.760
<v Speaker 1>points score. It should not go just by record, because

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:30.239
<v Speaker 1>so often times a very high scoring team has just

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>had some bad luck on who they've played. Are you

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>guys with me on this? Totally with you? This is

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>what I've done for twenty years. We have a team

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 1>in in my my home league that's four and eight

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 1>right now, but they're the third highest scoring team in

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the league and they deserve to be in. They deserve

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to be in. And the way you know, the way

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:48.879
<v Speaker 1>you know it's this is this is the right way

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to go. If you're that one seed, who would you

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 1>rather face the sixth best record or the highest scoring

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>remaining teams? Right, you'd always want to play the sixth

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>best record. That's the worst tad. By the way, you

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:03.879
<v Speaker 1>should let your teams with the higher seed to pick

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:06.320
<v Speaker 1>their pick their opponent on the playoffs, pick your poison.

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it. I don't know, but I love it.

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:11.760
<v Speaker 1>When we come back Fantasy Football Weekly, we will answer

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions. Play along, see if you can go

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:16.280
<v Speaker 1>three and note with our panel experts. When we return.

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is our number two Fantasy Football Weekly

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Paul charchy In, Scott Fish and Matt Harrison brought to

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you by Guillotine leagues dot com. All my player rankings

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>available for free Guillotine leagues dot com. This is a

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>segment we like to call three tough questions and we

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>traditionally start right here, tough question number one. We'll take

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>some Hill finishes a top ten quarterback eleven through fifteen

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 1>or sixteen or worse from this point forward, Scott, I'm

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>doing it man, top ten. I'm going top ten. The

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 1>top ten quarterbacks are avaging like nineteen or more fantasy

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>points per game. Taysom Hill just dropped, depending on your scoring,

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to twenty eight fantasy points in a game.

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 1>He looked terrible most of the game through four interceptions,

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:30.480
<v Speaker 1>including a pick six, but his rushing gets got him there. Honestly,

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you know me, Even if the rushing comes down, the

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:35.399
<v Speaker 1>interceptions are probably gonna come down as well. He's gonna

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of twenty point games. He did last time,

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't get a rushing touchdown this He had

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 1>like five rushing touchdowns in his four full starts last

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:46.439
<v Speaker 1>year or something four and four. Yeah, so I haven't

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 1>been in top ten, all right, Matt will Tastom Hill

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 1>finishes a top ten quarterback eleven through fifteen or sixteenth

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>or worse. So he did run for a hundred yards

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:57.839
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday night. There's only been two other quarterback one

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred yard rushing games this year LaMarche accident in week two,

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>justin fields in week eight, Nope, just once. Rushing scores

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 1>are even more important. By the way, Sam Donald is

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:13.280
<v Speaker 1>still quarterback twenty five based solely on his five rushing scores.

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill also has five. He's quarterback thirteen in total points.

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So even if Hill is a below average passer, if

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>he can keep up what he does on the ground

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and score a few along the way, he's going to

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>finish out the season in the eleven to fifteen range. Secretly,

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this question actually is will take him He'll keep the

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>starting job because if he does, he almost can't fall

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 1>out of the top ten. This is uh, this is

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>has spent especially thorny question that way because his passing

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 1>is bad enough to get him benched. He'll finish is

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a top ten quarterback in three of four games last year.

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna do it this week, making it four out

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of five. And you think you won't have another four

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:02.239
<v Speaker 1>interception game, which would help. But it's just so plausible

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>for him to get to a top ten ranking every week.

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:08.239
<v Speaker 1>The problem is is Trevor Simeon was already benched for

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>his passing. I know, but Here's the thing. Simeon is

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 1>not good, but he's a better pastor than Taysom Hill is.

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's what Taysom Hill has to average to get safely

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten every week. Just two d passing

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>yards which is nothing, one passing touchdown, fifty rushing yards

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>he averages in the five starts so far, he averages

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty three and half a rushing touchdown. He's going to

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 1>do that easily most weeks. The only question you really

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have to ask is will he keep the starting job?

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is yes. Tough question number two?

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Who will finish as the lead back for the Dallas Cowboys,

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Matt Now, does the lead back mean who's going to

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 1>have more touches this year? Yes? It does. Okay, I

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>don't care who gets the first touch of the game.

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 1>So just to clarify, I don't care about necessarily the start.

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Penny game in the first does not lead back. It's

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:09.359
<v Speaker 1>still Zeke. Then he had fifteen touches on Thursday Night

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to Pollard's nine. There's only been one game this year

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 1>where Pollard has had more. That was Thanksgiving where Zeke

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 1>bruised his knee, and in that game, Pollard only led

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to fourteen. Now we all see it. Pollard is

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a better back. He's a better back. The other thing

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 1>we all see is Jerry Jones paid Zeke a bazillion

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars and Mike McCarthy is an idiot who just keeps

0:48:30.200 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 1>feeding the ball to Zeke. So Zeke's gonna see more

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>touches down the stretch. He's still the lead back. No

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 1>matter how much we beg and play Scott. I have

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the same thing and virtually the same stuff, It's still

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:44.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be Zeke. For some reason. Jerry Jones runs

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>this team. He he is limping on the field, He

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:50.919
<v Speaker 1>is noticeably limping and and just lumbering on the field,

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and they just keep dead boys, gonna be dead boys,

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're just gonna keep riding Zeke for some reason. Yes,

0:48:57.920 --> 0:49:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I have almost all your talking points as well, but

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I'll mention this one of the other things that's gonna

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:04.919
<v Speaker 1>make it hard for Pollard, who's unquestionably the better back.

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Zeke's a far better past blocker. Pro Football Focus ranks

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard as the league's one hundred twelve best past

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 1>blocking rock back. I did not see that one coming.

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Bad stuff about Pollard yeah, so, I mean I think

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna factor into this as well. We want this

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:26.600
<v Speaker 1>change to come more than the team seems to want

0:49:26.640 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it to come. It ought to. If they want to

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:31.719
<v Speaker 1>give themselves the best chance to win, they should make

0:49:31.760 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>that change. But I don't trust three. What is the

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 1>appropriate level of concern for Jalen Hurts? Is it none?

0:49:41.400 --> 0:49:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Some or a bowl loosening level of existential dread? Scott.

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's hurt right now, which that that should

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>mean some, I guess, but I'm thinking long term for

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole rest of the season. Here. He gets the

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Jets twice, he gets Washington twice, he gets the Giants

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:02.439
<v Speaker 1>in the five fantasy relevant games he's about to play,

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:05.839
<v Speaker 1>those are all very positive matchups. He was progressing as

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a passer up until he got hurt. Um, I'm not

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be that concerned about the injury. I really

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like his rushing plus his passing progressing and those matchups,

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't have much concern. Okay, So none, Okay, all right, Matt.

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Is the appropriate level of concern for Jalen Hurts? None?

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Some or bload? Uh. He's at at least fifty rushing

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:31.760
<v Speaker 1>yards in five straight. In fact, during that Spanni's averaging

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:35.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty six point four just under a rushing score per game,

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:38.839
<v Speaker 1>you can basically bank on ten fantasy points per game

0:50:38.920 --> 0:50:41.440
<v Speaker 1>from just a rushing standpoint. But the passing is still

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 1>really bad. Under two hundred yards and seven of his

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>last eight prior to that in games where he was

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 1>forced to throw against Dallas in Kansas City, he was

0:50:49.480 --> 0:50:52.360
<v Speaker 1>able to eclipse the three yard mark in both. But

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 1>after the Jets this week, probably the best thing for

0:50:56.040 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>him is he gets a buy next week and he

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:00.840
<v Speaker 1>can heal up a little bit. Then he gets football

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:04.799
<v Speaker 1>team Giants and football team again in your fantasy playoffs,

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and football team has allowed the fifth most rushing yards

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:11.480
<v Speaker 1>per game to opposing quarterbacks. They're also bottom eight in

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:15.080
<v Speaker 1>passing yards and passing scores allowed. The Eagles are still

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in playoff contention in the NFC two. I don't think

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>they make a change. I have no concern about Jalen Hurts.

0:51:19.560 --> 0:51:21.880
<v Speaker 1>As you know, he's been salvaging his box scores with

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 1>his running, which has been consistently good all season long,

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:27.319
<v Speaker 1>although not as many touchdowns as you probably think. He's

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:30.759
<v Speaker 1>only scored rushing touchdowns in four games. Yeah, but but

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 1>he has eight in those games. But sooner or later,

0:51:35.680 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback has to be able to pass the ball.

0:51:39.719 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And he hasn't topped the meager threshold of one hundred

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:47.399
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight passing yards in five weeks, and going back

0:51:47.440 --> 0:51:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to week five, Hurts is averaging less than one less

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:54.400
<v Speaker 1>than one passing touchdown per game. You know what he needs,

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:57.239
<v Speaker 1>He needs to get right type of schedule with really

0:51:57.280 --> 0:52:01.279
<v Speaker 1>easy matchups to Well, here's the funny thing. His backup

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:06.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe getting the get right opponent this week, Gardner Minshew.

0:52:07.520 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>What if he starts this game and looks good against

0:52:10.640 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. He always looks right. Then the door opens,

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>so and then they're heading into the bye week. They

0:52:19.960 --> 0:52:22.919
<v Speaker 1>can prep up Minshew to be ready the week after that.

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a scenario here, a not impossible maybe it's implausible,

0:52:28.080 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 1>but not impossible scenario where Gardner Minshew challenges Hurts for

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the job as early as a few days from now.

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Final I'll pick up Minshew and the Eagles are right

0:52:37.920 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the playoff hunt, and they won't

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:42.719
<v Speaker 1>play Hurts just to get him reps. If he's not

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the best quarterback. They have to play the best quarterback,

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:47.879
<v Speaker 1>and your quarterbacks have to be able to pass at

0:52:47.880 --> 0:52:50.799
<v Speaker 1>some point, and Hurts his passing isn't there yet. The

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 1>appropriate level of concern for Jalen Hurts is some Our

0:52:57.320 --> 0:53:02.240
<v Speaker 1>next matchup is the Bucks taking on the Falcons Scott.

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:05.320
<v Speaker 1>But the Bucks Leonard Fournet with a big game last week,

0:53:05.400 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about He's I canna score four times?

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:10.239
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think about Leonard four Nett this

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:12.920
<v Speaker 1>week in this matchup with the Falcons. I have him

0:53:12.960 --> 0:53:17.359
<v Speaker 1>scoring five times. No, no, no, no no no. I am

0:53:17.400 --> 0:53:19.759
<v Speaker 1>a B grade on Leonard Fournett, mostly because he's a

0:53:19.760 --> 0:53:22.960
<v Speaker 1>lock for fifteen plus touches weekly. I know, I know

0:53:23.080 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones is getting in there. He's he's but he

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:29.160
<v Speaker 1>hasn't had more than ten touches in any game this year.

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:32.000
<v Speaker 1>He's just scored a couple of times. You can't trust that.

0:53:32.040 --> 0:53:33.959
<v Speaker 1>It's a little flukey. So I have Jones on the bench.

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But with four net he had seventy six yards in

0:53:36.560 --> 0:53:40.759
<v Speaker 1>the first meeting, a three score blowout, meaning he got

0:53:40.800 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 1>he got some work at the He got enough work

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in a three score blowout to get seventy six yards.

0:53:47.320 --> 0:53:50.440
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks keep passing when they are up. That's a

0:53:50.480 --> 0:53:53.280
<v Speaker 1>problem for him, but he still managed that in that game.

0:53:53.800 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 1>The but the uh, sorry, excuse me, the Falcons are

0:53:57.480 --> 0:54:00.160
<v Speaker 1>allowing the eighth most yards to running backs. So I

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:02.800
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna get enough to to lock in a

0:54:02.920 --> 0:54:06.280
<v Speaker 1>B grade here. Uh in the passing game, Tom Brady,

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I have an A grade on as a member of

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks. I've tweeted out some of these stats. These

0:54:10.360 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 1>are ridiculous. With Brady and Godwin against against the Atlanta Falcons.

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Three games Brady has played the Falcons as a member

0:54:17.719 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Bucks. Three yards, two touchdowns, three yards, four touchdowns,

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:27.799
<v Speaker 1>two seventy six yards, five touchdowns. It's he's just destroying

0:54:27.840 --> 0:54:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons. A grade there. Godwin also in A grade.

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:33.799
<v Speaker 1>He's played six games against the Bucks. He's topped a

0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:39.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards four of them, and he scored nine times

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:42.359
<v Speaker 1>nine times in those six games. Not just nine times,

0:54:42.360 --> 0:54:45.160
<v Speaker 1>he scored in every game. He scored twice in three

0:54:45.200 --> 0:54:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of them. It's yeah, I have a B grade on Evans.

0:54:49.960 --> 0:54:52.640
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't get the same volume as Godwin, but he

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>can explode on a dime and he scores a ton more.

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Evans buggaboo. Early in his career, doesn't score touchdowns. He

0:54:59.440 --> 0:55:02.040
<v Speaker 1>has twenty three touchdowns in two years with Tom Brady.

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Not bad. He's got ten this Year's become consistent with it.

0:55:06.239 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>B grade on Evans uh Gronk I got an A

0:55:10.120 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>grade on him. Thirteen catches for nearly two hundred yards

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:15.839
<v Speaker 1>since he's come back from injury. Uh. He was tight

0:55:15.960 --> 0:55:18.520
<v Speaker 1>end two before he got injured. He's tight end four

0:55:18.560 --> 0:55:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in the last two weeks. Right back to him, Right

0:55:21.200 --> 0:55:24.280
<v Speaker 1>back to him now that he's healthy. On the other side,

0:55:24.800 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan's on the bench. He's only finished as a

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:32.120
<v Speaker 1>top ten quarterback twice this year. He's barely startable. He

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>has one touchdown and five picks over the last three games.

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:40.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a good matchup, but he doesn't have really he's

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the offensive matchup. The Tampa Bay secondaries getting about Carl

0:55:45.560 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Davis coming back, and we talked about this earlier in

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the year that they were injured. That's why their secondary

0:55:51.000 --> 0:55:54.719
<v Speaker 1>was bad early and this is turning into a good

0:55:54.719 --> 0:55:57.440
<v Speaker 1>secondary again. Russell gauge I, I, he was gonna take

0:55:57.440 --> 0:56:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me player. Uh. Dyle pits Man, what

0:56:01.960 --> 0:56:04.160
<v Speaker 1>do you do with Kyle pits Like if he had

0:56:04.200 --> 0:56:06.239
<v Speaker 1>two more touchdowns, he would be tight end three on

0:56:06.280 --> 0:56:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the year. That's how ridiculous it is. He's got so many,

0:56:10.120 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 1>but he's not. And he's got scored in one game

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>this year, over over the last over the last month.

0:56:15.120 --> 0:56:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Guess how many red zone targets he has. I think

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to target him a bunch, just one zone target in

0:56:21.480 --> 0:56:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the last so he doesn't he doesn't get you scores.

0:56:24.960 --> 0:56:28.240
<v Speaker 1>You gotta hope for yards, which is what the Bucks

0:56:28.239 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 1>are giving up to tight ends. So I gotta c

0:56:30.800 --> 0:56:34.280
<v Speaker 1>grade on him because you're starting him. But it feels

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:39.919
<v Speaker 1>gross to start him sometimes. Uh. Cordarrel Patterson running back,

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Cordarrel Patterson A grade. Actually he's hybrid hybrid. My thing

0:56:45.520 --> 0:56:49.799
<v Speaker 1>with Cordarrel Patterson is he's completely game script immune. They

0:56:49.840 --> 0:56:52.760
<v Speaker 1>get behind, they pass it to him, they jump ahead,

0:56:53.040 --> 0:56:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they run it with him, and he gets both no

0:56:55.200 --> 0:56:58.320
<v Speaker 1>matter what. He gets at least fifteen touches in every

0:56:58.320 --> 0:57:00.760
<v Speaker 1>game he plays, at least nine. Then in the snaps

0:57:01.040 --> 0:57:04.799
<v Speaker 1>in his nine full games, he scored nine times. What

0:57:05.040 --> 0:57:10.320
<v Speaker 1>so he basically every generally general score three times against

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:13.839
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks generally. No, that was the he scored three

0:57:13.840 --> 0:57:16.960
<v Speaker 1>times in the overseas game against what was the Jags.

0:57:16.960 --> 0:57:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe, um uh, generally you don't play running backs

0:57:21.680 --> 0:57:24.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Bucks. So I'm gonna play Patterson the wide

0:57:24.240 --> 0:57:27.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver against the Bucks. I hear what you're saying. I

0:57:27.880 --> 0:57:31.160
<v Speaker 1>just I worry about the rushing yards simply not developing.

0:57:31.440 --> 0:57:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And he runs for like twenty three yards, okay, and

0:57:34.240 --> 0:57:37.040
<v Speaker 1>he gets sixty receiving and maybe a score. I mean,

0:57:37.080 --> 0:57:41.120
<v Speaker 1>then you're up to in the score. Alright, a few receptions.

0:57:42.400 --> 0:57:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to believe your reichs. I've got Patterson in

0:57:44.320 --> 0:57:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of leaks, and I've currently got him on

0:57:46.360 --> 0:57:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the bench in two guillotine leagues. So maybe I have

0:57:49.600 --> 0:57:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to rethink that a little bit. When we come back,

0:57:52.680 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Ravens take on the Steelers. We haven't had a good

0:57:56.640 --> 0:57:59.280
<v Speaker 1>game from Lamar Jackson in a long time. Is this

0:57:59.400 --> 0:58:01.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be the one? We'll tell you when we

0:58:01.680 --> 0:58:22.920
<v Speaker 1>return Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. We've

0:58:22.920 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>got a block of matchups for you. Letter grades on

0:58:25.960 --> 0:58:28.760
<v Speaker 1>all the salient players, beginning with the Ravens taking on

0:58:28.920 --> 0:58:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. Let's begin with a running game. A C

0:58:33.400 --> 0:58:36.320
<v Speaker 1>grade on DeVonta Freeman as mundane as he has been

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:39.960
<v Speaker 1>his volume and opportunity remains so high that he stays

0:58:40.000 --> 0:58:43.040
<v Speaker 1>startable here. He's averaging seventeen touches per game over the

0:58:43.120 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 1>last month for Baltimore, and it's seventeen touches pretty much

0:58:45.880 --> 0:58:48.880
<v Speaker 1>anybody is startable. That volume should be helpful against the

0:58:48.880 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Steelers defense allowing the most rushing yards and touchdowns over

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the last five weeks. Go figure DeVonta Freeman C grade.

0:58:57.960 --> 0:59:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Considered giving him a B grade here just because of

0:59:00.360 --> 0:59:02.440
<v Speaker 1>how much the Steel's defense has slumped. And t J.

0:59:02.480 --> 0:59:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Watt not expected to go here. And for all to

0:59:04.680 --> 0:59:08.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about t J Watt, his excellence is a pass rusher.

0:59:08.200 --> 0:59:10.320
<v Speaker 1>He's also a very good run stopper. They won't have

0:59:10.400 --> 0:59:12.560
<v Speaker 1>him there. Let's go to the passing game. I want

0:59:12.560 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to begin with the receivers and Marcus Brown, who gets

0:59:15.720 --> 0:59:19.480
<v Speaker 1>an A grade. Steelers pass defenses struggle lately, and cornerback

0:59:19.560 --> 0:59:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Hayden will miss this game and that will help Brown,

0:59:22.560 --> 0:59:26.200
<v Speaker 1>who scored a scored in both of last year's matchups

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:30.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Steelers. Steelers have allowed consecutive one hundred yard

0:59:30.720 --> 0:59:33.760
<v Speaker 1>receiving performances and if there's gonna be a third, Brown

0:59:33.840 --> 0:59:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is by far the most likely Ravens receiver to continue

0:59:37.000 --> 0:59:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that trend. Rashade Bateman, though, I'm putting on the bench soon.

0:59:42.440 --> 0:59:44.720
<v Speaker 1>We keep saying like this is the week that Rashod

0:59:44.800 --> 0:59:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Bateman is gonna break out, But for once, I don't

0:59:47.560 --> 0:59:49.840
<v Speaker 1>think this is the week he's gonna break out. It

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:53.960
<v Speaker 1>has materialized yet, despite plenty of targets positive matchups, and

0:59:53.960 --> 0:59:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this is just a neutral matchup. He's averaging just forty

0:59:56.760 --> 1:00:00.240
<v Speaker 1>eight scoreless yards per game over the last month. So

1:00:00.280 --> 1:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm keeping Bateman on the bench at this point. Be

1:00:02.800 --> 1:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>great on Mark Andrews, averaging a whopping nine targets per

1:00:07.160 --> 1:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>game since the bye week. He leads the team in

1:00:10.520 --> 1:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>red zone targets. The Steelers have allowed almost sixty yards

1:00:14.240 --> 1:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>per game to tight ends since Week eight, but none

1:00:16.960 --> 1:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of them have scored. And Andrews has never scored against

1:00:19.520 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, so this might be a yardage game and

1:00:21.520 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>not a touchdown game for Andrews. Roll all that together

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and we've got to be grade on Lamar Jackson. I

1:00:28.200 --> 1:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>think he's coming off a bad game. I think he

1:00:30.920 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>rebounds to a great degree here. Steelers are middle of

1:00:33.840 --> 1:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the road past defense. They're giving up two passing yards

1:00:36.480 --> 1:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and one and a half passing touchdowns per game. That said,

1:00:40.000 --> 1:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow just ran for a touchdown against them. Week

1:00:43.240 --> 1:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>before that, justin air there ran for nine yards on

1:00:48.760 --> 1:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. So back to back good rushing weeks by quarterbacks,

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and here comes Lamar Jackson, now at full health. I

1:00:56.200 --> 1:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>think he gets plenty done on the ground here. Again

1:00:58.520 --> 1:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>be grade for him. Let's over to the Steelers side.

1:01:02.720 --> 1:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll begin with the running game here and Naji Harris

1:01:05.560 --> 1:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>with just the C grade. The broader Steelers woes here

1:01:10.400 --> 1:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>are affecting Harris a great deal, coming off his worst

1:01:13.400 --> 1:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy game of the year after his team fell behind

1:01:16.120 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>very early last week, averaging a dismal three point three

1:01:21.360 --> 1:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry over the past six games. That's brutal

1:01:27.080 --> 1:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>for Naji Harris. Steeler's offensive line is major hindrance for him.

1:01:31.760 --> 1:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Only one back is crap Has has cracked sixty rushing

1:01:35.480 --> 1:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>yards against Baltimore and only three of topped one hundred

1:01:39.080 --> 1:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>total yards, so I don't think Harris is going to

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>get near that. Normally, Harris is receiving gives him a

1:01:45.080 --> 1:01:48.959
<v Speaker 1>safe floor, but the Bravens have been awesome against receiving backs.

1:01:49.000 --> 1:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>No backs top three catches or twenty seven yards since

1:01:52.360 --> 1:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>way back in Week six. So there's just nothing to

1:01:55.080 --> 1:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>like about Harris's game here other than volume and usage.

1:01:59.800 --> 1:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the receivers. Deonte Johnson gets a B grade,

1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know the deal on Johnson. Lots of targets,

1:02:05.960 --> 1:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>lots of catches, lots of yards, and no touchdowns. That

1:02:10.440 --> 1:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is the likely scenario this week as well. Ravens give

1:02:13.280 --> 1:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of receiving yards to whiteouts and very

1:02:15.240 --> 1:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>few touchdowns. Your glimmer of hope for the end zone

1:02:18.400 --> 1:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for Deonte Johnson is this. He will face Marlon Humphrey

1:02:22.520 --> 1:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>most often on the outside, and he's given up four

1:02:25.080 --> 1:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>scores on the season, which is as many as he

1:02:27.080 --> 1:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>gave up all of last year. So glimmer of hope

1:02:30.080 --> 1:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>for Johnson. But I don't think he scores here. And

1:02:31.840 --> 1:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it's another heavy volume and yardage game for a B grade.

1:02:35.120 --> 1:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, giving up that many touchdowns, we can call

1:02:37.240 --> 1:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Gettysburg four scores. I like that the Gettysburg

1:02:41.960 --> 1:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Chase Claypool has commanded at least eight targets in two

1:02:44.960 --> 1:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>straight games, volume he hadn't seen since in back to

1:02:47.840 --> 1:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>back weeks. Since Week two, and three, and we'll hope

1:02:50.640 --> 1:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it continues here because it led to eighty plus yards

1:02:53.520 --> 1:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in back to back games. Weirdly, for Claypool, who has

1:02:57.120 --> 1:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>built four touchdowns, he has not scored in five straight games,

1:03:01.440 --> 1:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and that is sadly. I'm probably going to continue because

1:03:06.360 --> 1:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>he will most often face Anthony Averett, who has given

1:03:09.080 --> 1:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>up just two touchdowns all season long. Pat Friarmouth has

1:03:13.080 --> 1:03:16.439
<v Speaker 1>been a great breakout story here and especially with Eric

1:03:16.480 --> 1:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Ebron on I r um. You know we're bemoaning the

1:03:19.680 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>lack of scoring for Johnson Claypole. We'll it's all going

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to Pat friar Muth for Pete's sake. Since his bye week,

1:03:26.640 --> 1:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Friarmouth leads the team in red zone targets and has

1:03:29.520 --> 1:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>scored five touchdowns. Meanwhile, the Ravens have allowed three scores

1:03:33.160 --> 1:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of tight ends in their last five games. They're also

1:03:35.120 --> 1:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>giving up sixty four yards per game to the position.

1:03:37.840 --> 1:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>That is a lot. So Friarmouth B grade. So if

1:03:41.280 --> 1:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I roll all of those receivers, if Johnson, Claypool and

1:03:44.120 --> 1:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Friarmouth all have a B grade, I guess I kind

1:03:47.000 --> 1:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of have to give Ben Roethlisberger a B grade right now.

1:03:50.600 --> 1:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him grade um. You know the drill here,

1:03:54.080 --> 1:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>lots of passing, low efficiency, not enough scoring. But Baltimore

1:03:58.320 --> 1:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>gives him a lot of upside. Among teams that have

1:04:00.480 --> 1:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>had their by Baltimore surrendered the most passing yards to

1:04:03.040 --> 1:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>opposing quarterbacks, and I think the yards are gonna come

1:04:05.600 --> 1:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>here even if I don't have an explosive game on

1:04:08.720 --> 1:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the docket for Ben Roethlisberger. Some of his ex teammates

1:04:13.000 --> 1:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>have come out and former players have come on, so

1:04:14.800 --> 1:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they should bench Ben Roethlisberger. But I don't think they

1:04:17.440 --> 1:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>know who's on the depth chart, apparently because there's nobody

1:04:20.400 --> 1:04:23.919
<v Speaker 1>to turn to here. Dwayne Haskins to Boskins, right, Matt

1:04:24.000 --> 1:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners taking on the Seahawks. Forty Niners. Elijah Mitchell

1:04:27.560 --> 1:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>coming off of back to back twenty seven carry games.

1:04:32.160 --> 1:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you like him this week against the Seahawks

1:04:34.240 --> 1:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty two total touches last week against the Vikings hundred

1:04:38.280 --> 1:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and six yards and a scoring that one he gets

1:04:40.320 --> 1:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>an A grade. He faces the awful Seahawks run d

1:04:43.680 --> 1:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>which already highlighted a bit and take a chance on me.

1:04:46.120 --> 1:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But I will add that they saw a similar bell

1:04:48.640 --> 1:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>cow workload from Antonio Gibson last week, who had thirty

1:04:52.360 --> 1:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>six touches and a hundred and forty six yards. I

1:04:55.400 --> 1:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>did use Jimmy Garoppolo and Kyle use check in to

1:04:58.480 --> 1:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me segment. Both of them get

1:05:00.360 --> 1:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. Deebo Samuel we mentioned will miss this

1:05:03.960 --> 1:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>week with a growing strain, So I'm gonna give Brandon

1:05:06.200 --> 1:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Auk a B grade here. Eighty five or more yards

1:05:09.240 --> 1:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in three of his last four, scored in two of

1:05:11.320 --> 1:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>those four. He's back in the good graces of Shanahan.

1:05:14.400 --> 1:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>But we're not going to go as far on the

1:05:16.080 --> 1:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers to reach for John Jennings or Trent Sherfield here.

1:05:21.560 --> 1:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle was a big disappointment last week after scoring

1:05:24.720 --> 1:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in the three previous games. I'm going right back to him,

1:05:27.640 --> 1:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>though he gets an A grade this week. The Seahawks

1:05:29.640 --> 1:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>have allowed the eighth most receptions to the tight end position,

1:05:32.520 --> 1:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and they allowed a huge day to Zechert two weeks

1:05:34.720 --> 1:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>ago where he had eight catches and scored twice. Plus

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the Niners targeted Kittle eleven times in the first meeting

1:05:41.400 --> 1:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>with Seattle this year on the Seahawks side, on on

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>our like internal slack. I jokingly asked if Russell Wilson

1:05:49.400 --> 1:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was take a chance on me worthy, it's if he's

1:05:52.360 --> 1:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>even on a roster at this stage. Roster still. He

1:05:57.080 --> 1:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>hasn't thrown for three yards since Week two. Uh, he

1:06:00.600 --> 1:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't run the ball that much anymore. He's only averaging

1:06:03.000 --> 1:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>fourteen rushing yards per game in his last six games.

1:06:06.200 --> 1:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>He's hit the two touchdown mark only twice. And his

1:06:09.840 --> 1:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>high water mark for yardage in twenty career games against

1:06:13.760 --> 1:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the fort Can you guess what it is? Apparently it's

1:06:16.960 --> 1:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>not that high the way you've set it up, So

1:06:18.200 --> 1:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna guess like two yards two hundred sixty one

1:06:21.120 --> 1:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>yard games. Plus, the Niners defense has been really good

1:06:27.600 --> 1:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the last month or so. No quarterback has topped two

1:06:30.640 --> 1:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>D fifty passing yards since Week three. Only three quarterbacks

1:06:34.280 --> 1:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>have hit the double digit or the double touchdown mark

1:06:36.680 --> 1:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in the last eight games, but one of them was

1:06:39.040 --> 1:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>russ So I'll give him a courtesy C grade here.

1:06:42.040 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But he's teetering near the sabotage drop cliff. The last

1:06:45.520 --> 1:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>week on the show, we said sabotage drop him. Well,

1:06:48.520 --> 1:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>then you already pushed him over u DK Metcalf and

1:06:51.560 --> 1:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Lockett they might be there too. Uh. They both

1:06:54.560 --> 1:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>get C grades in this one. DK has scored four

1:06:57.160 --> 1:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>times in his last four meetings with San Francisco, Lockett

1:06:59.840 --> 1:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>three three times in the same span, and actually DK

1:07:02.440 --> 1:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and Freddie Swain scored in the earlier meeting this year.

1:07:06.160 --> 1:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf didn't catch a ball last week until the final minute,

1:07:10.120 --> 1:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and Locket is so reliant on the big splash play

1:07:13.200 --> 1:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>but he only gets like three four catches a game.

1:07:16.080 --> 1:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>The Niners have only allowed two touchdown passes to a

1:07:18.560 --> 1:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in the last five weeks, and both went

1:07:21.600 --> 1:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to Adam Feeling last week. So if I had to

1:07:24.560 --> 1:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>bet on a touchdown for a wide receiver in this one,

1:07:27.760 --> 1:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd give it to lock It, who should face a

1:07:30.160 --> 1:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>healthy dose of Emmanuel Moseley, who gave up the scores

1:07:33.760 --> 1:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>last week. But it's gross Gerald Everett. He's on the bench,

1:07:37.160 --> 1:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way. And then the Seattle running game is

1:07:40.800 --> 1:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>on a rock. I got one running game that I

1:07:43.360 --> 1:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>think is worse in this league. That'll that that I'll

1:07:46.360 --> 1:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that I'll put out in the final. Alex Collins and

1:07:51.120 --> 1:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>DJ Dallas and maybe Adrian Peterson are all on the bench.

1:07:55.760 --> 1:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh Collins is still working through an abdomen injury and

1:07:58.360 --> 1:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>was limited in practiced this week. D Dallas is limited too.

1:08:02.240 --> 1:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>They don't trust him that much either, because they made

1:08:04.400 --> 1:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>him split the word workload with an injured Collins last week,

1:08:07.240 --> 1:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and they signed Peterson to the practice squad because Marshawn

1:08:10.160 --> 1:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Lynch was not available this weekend. There are media reports

1:08:12.720 --> 1:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>saying they're gonna elevate Peterson over the weekend. Didn't play

1:08:15.800 --> 1:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>him in this game now. And then there's the defense.

1:08:18.479 --> 1:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin and Madison combined for seventeen carries and only sixty

1:08:22.080 --> 1:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>yards on the ground last week. The Niners held James

1:08:24.800 --> 1:08:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Robinson twenty nine yards the week before and Darryl Henderson

1:08:27.720 --> 1:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was held to thirty one yards the week before. So

1:08:30.080 --> 1:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no way you can start anything that was that

1:08:32.920 --> 1:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>was a minute and a half on. Don't start any

1:08:34.960 --> 1:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of those, you know, you know what, don't don't have

1:08:37.080 --> 1:08:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Seattle backs on your Russell drop out Collins is. You

1:08:40.520 --> 1:08:42.519
<v Speaker 1>give him ten carries, he'll get you forty yards. You

1:08:42.520 --> 1:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>give him twenty carries, he'll get you forty yards. Like

1:08:44.760 --> 1:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the Leroy Horde of modern day. Speaking at James Robinson,

1:08:48.200 --> 1:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>he's the only Jaguar worth mentioning as we turn our

1:08:50.240 --> 1:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>attention to Jags taking on the Rams, Scott nobody no

1:08:53.680 --> 1:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>other part of the Jaguars offense. You don't think it's

1:08:57.040 --> 1:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna be big. He led the team in targets and

1:08:59.520 --> 1:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards last week did for our first rounder. Robinson's

1:09:03.400 --> 1:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>got the foot injury, and just when I watched him play,

1:09:06.280 --> 1:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he's just you can tell that's what is bothering him.

1:09:09.040 --> 1:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have the limited practice all When he's limited

1:09:12.040 --> 1:09:14.519
<v Speaker 1>all week and there's not a great matchup, I'm nervous

1:09:14.520 --> 1:09:16.519
<v Speaker 1>about James Robinson here. What do you think I still

1:09:16.560 --> 1:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>have a C grade on him? Because despite being limited

1:09:19.080 --> 1:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>all week, this is a guy who plays hurt. And

1:09:21.520 --> 1:09:23.479
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if for sure, I wonder if it's that's

1:09:23.640 --> 1:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>undrafted nature in him. He's like, I gotta stay on

1:09:26.200 --> 1:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this team. They drafted a first round running back. I

1:09:29.040 --> 1:09:32.639
<v Speaker 1>gotta prove my worth. Uh. The Rams have allowed only

1:09:32.720 --> 1:09:37.599
<v Speaker 1>allowed three backs over fifty yards this season. UH, and

1:09:37.720 --> 1:09:40.599
<v Speaker 1>only James Connor and DeAndre Swift logged RB one weeks.

1:09:40.600 --> 1:09:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Because Connor scored twice in DeAndre Swift caught like eight balls. Uh.

1:09:44.720 --> 1:09:48.799
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a volume C grade. He's scored in almost

1:09:49.160 --> 1:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>He scored in almost every full game he's played. He's

1:09:51.280 --> 1:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>played seven full games. He's scored in six of them.

1:09:53.840 --> 1:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So I like the chip. I like the odds that

1:09:55.640 --> 1:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>if they can get down there, they like him. At

1:09:57.400 --> 1:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the stripe, he might get a touchdown. He might get

1:09:59.800 --> 1:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you forty to fifty yards, maybe a little more. He

1:10:01.720 --> 1:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>does catch passes. I have a volume SEE on him

1:10:04.880 --> 1:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>or yeah. On the other side, Matthew Stafford B grade,

1:10:10.320 --> 1:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>once an obvious weekly A grade starts for the first

1:10:13.800 --> 1:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>few weeks of the season. Now I have a B

1:10:16.400 --> 1:10:19.479
<v Speaker 1>grade on him. With this offense floundering a bit over

1:10:19.520 --> 1:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks. However, his worst game on the

1:10:21.720 --> 1:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>year is two forty three yards in the score. It's

1:10:24.200 --> 1:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>like his floor is a C grade pretty much. Uh.

1:10:28.320 --> 1:10:30.519
<v Speaker 1>The Jags Basty, as we mentioned earlier in the show,

1:10:30.520 --> 1:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>has been sneaky good lately, holding four of the last

1:10:33.280 --> 1:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>five qbs under two hundred yards. Those five qbs totaled

1:10:37.000 --> 1:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns. But it's really just his floor is way

1:10:39.960 --> 1:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>too seefe safe. He's better than those five quarterbacks, and

1:10:43.640 --> 1:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>he's got better weapons than all those quarterbacks. I'm still

1:10:46.360 --> 1:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>giving him a B grade because even last week he

1:10:48.800 --> 1:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>had three hundred and a couple of scores and didn't

1:10:51.240 --> 1:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>honestly didn't even play all that well and be a

1:10:53.200 --> 1:10:56.479
<v Speaker 1>good matchup in a really good matchup. Tough matchup. Odell

1:10:56.520 --> 1:10:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Beckham expected to play in this game Cooper Cup. I

1:10:59.479 --> 1:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna start with Cooper Cup though just obvious a

1:11:02.160 --> 1:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>like his last week with O b J coming on,

1:11:04.680 --> 1:11:06.639
<v Speaker 1>he had his worst game of the year, seven catches

1:11:06.680 --> 1:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>for ninety six yards. O b J expected to play.

1:11:10.080 --> 1:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him and Van Jefferson C grades. I like

1:11:12.840 --> 1:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>O b J went healthy a little bit more based

1:11:15.320 --> 1:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>on last week. A lot of the early passes Stafford

1:11:18.280 --> 1:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>had O b J didn't connect, kept going to him

1:11:20.560 --> 1:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in the second half. I love seeing that Van Jefferson

1:11:23.280 --> 1:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>did exactly what he's done all season. A bunch of

1:11:26.560 --> 1:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>but like seven and six to nine targets. He only

1:11:29.479 --> 1:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>catches a few of them, but he usually catches a

1:11:31.560 --> 1:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>big one. He's done that four times, caught a big

1:11:33.840 --> 1:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>one that made his fantasy day. Otherwise he doesn't have

1:11:36.080 --> 1:11:38.519
<v Speaker 1>a great fantasy day. So I have C grades on

1:11:38.600 --> 1:11:40.479
<v Speaker 1>both of them. I trust O b J a little

1:11:40.479 --> 1:11:44.519
<v Speaker 1>bit more I have Tyler Higbee on the bench just way,

1:11:44.680 --> 1:11:48.599
<v Speaker 1>way too inconsistent, especially with O, B J and Jefferson

1:11:48.680 --> 1:11:53.679
<v Speaker 1>taking so much production last week. Darrel Henderson B C grade.

1:11:54.040 --> 1:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I would have had a B grade if he was healthy,

1:11:56.200 --> 1:11:58.639
<v Speaker 1>But now I'm giving him and Michelle C grades because

1:11:58.640 --> 1:12:01.919
<v Speaker 1>i think just with that, if he doesn't go, that's

1:12:01.920 --> 1:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>an obvious choice. But as we mentioned, to take a

1:12:04.120 --> 1:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>chance on me segment, I got Michelle with ten, ten, twelve,

1:12:06.880 --> 1:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>fourteen touches. I think Henderson does that. I think they

1:12:09.840 --> 1:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>split it up pretty well, and Henderson catches the ball

1:12:12.080 --> 1:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot more. If Henderson doesn't go, Where do you

1:12:14.120 --> 1:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>put Sony Michelle in A grade? I had a secret Yeah,

1:12:18.280 --> 1:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>but does that without without Henderson? Either way, Sony Michelle

1:12:22.320 --> 1:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is just so much less efficient because he's not very good.

1:12:28.000 --> 1:12:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Yes you, by the way, let's let's get that straight.

1:12:33.040 --> 1:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd hate to have the Sony Walkman nickname get just

1:12:36.080 --> 1:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>not get used and end up being forgotten out of

1:12:38.160 --> 1:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>the ether. That's no good when we come back. Some

1:12:40.720 --> 1:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty stashes you'll want to make at the end of

1:12:43.320 --> 1:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this year to set you up for next season, plus

1:12:46.080 --> 1:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>our final two matchups including Washington taking on the Raiders

1:12:49.840 --> 1:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>will tell you what to expect from a surging Antonio Gibson.

1:12:53.880 --> 1:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>When we returned Fantasy Football Weekly, final segment of our

1:13:15.320 --> 1:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>number two Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Charchy and Scott Fish

1:13:18.439 --> 1:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Harrison with you. Up to this point of

1:13:22.360 --> 1:13:25.599
<v Speaker 1>the season, we've been using premature speculation in this spot,

1:13:26.240 --> 1:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>but now that we're so late into the season, we

1:13:28.880 --> 1:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>usually retire it at some point. We're going to do

1:13:30.760 --> 1:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that now. This is kind of dynasty premature speculation because

1:13:34.439 --> 1:13:36.599
<v Speaker 1>this is the time in a lot of leagues ther

1:13:36.680 --> 1:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>roster lock is coming up for the playoffs, and so

1:13:39.920 --> 1:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a dynasty league and you're thinking about

1:13:42.400 --> 1:13:45.519
<v Speaker 1>stashes for next year, you need to make those moves

1:13:45.600 --> 1:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>sooner than later. So we're here to help you with

1:13:48.400 --> 1:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the players we think can be savvy dynasty

1:13:52.080 --> 1:13:56.599
<v Speaker 1>stashes that are available to pick up. That's not easy

1:13:56.640 --> 1:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to do, or just go try to Accordred. Okay, that

1:14:00.200 --> 1:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>works for me, Scott, Do you want to go first? Yeah?

1:14:03.120 --> 1:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The first guy I'm gonna start with. You got more

1:14:04.880 --> 1:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>than one awesome welcome back to you. Yeah, I got

1:14:07.080 --> 1:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>several several points we can go. The first guy I'm

1:14:10.160 --> 1:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>going to start with this guy who I think is

1:14:11.800 --> 1:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>going to get paid in this offseason, and that is

1:14:14.920 --> 1:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>that number three wide receiver whose contract is up for

1:14:17.479 --> 1:14:20.519
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys. Michael Gallup. Yeah, he looked just looked

1:14:20.560 --> 1:14:22.599
<v Speaker 1>really good the last two week. He has looked really

1:14:22.640 --> 1:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>good the last two years. Uh, it's it's likely he's

1:14:25.920 --> 1:14:29.519
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit free agency. It's likely he's going to one

1:14:29.720 --> 1:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Yeah, I mean his contracts up, he's gonna

1:14:32.280 --> 1:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're not signing can resign. He will be. He

1:14:34.680 --> 1:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>will be are one of the top wide receivers signed

1:14:37.000 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>out there. He's gonna make like number one, number two

1:14:39.960 --> 1:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver money for whatever team he goes to. I

1:14:43.120 --> 1:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know where he's going, but he could be really

1:14:44.800 --> 1:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>good next year. Matt, give me a dynasty stash. You know,

1:14:49.400 --> 1:14:52.519
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings are going there already ten million over the

1:14:52.560 --> 1:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>cap next year and they're going to have to cut

1:14:55.360 --> 1:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>money here and there. So I think they're gonna cut

1:14:57.320 --> 1:15:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Madison, who makes one point two mill but only

1:15:00.520 --> 1:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a two. It's not Dalvin Cook. I'm pretty sure it's

1:15:05.320 --> 1:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>not Dalvin Cook. So Cannogo is the guy that i'd

1:15:10.200 --> 1:15:12.519
<v Speaker 1>like to pick up. Dalvin Cook cannot stay healthy for

1:15:12.560 --> 1:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a full year, and the Vikings do love to run

1:15:14.840 --> 1:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the ball. I think Cannuang Goo fills that Alex Madison

1:15:19.160 --> 1:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>role next year. But you seem to think that Dalvin

1:15:21.920 --> 1:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Cook might be on the short. You gotta make up

1:15:25.160 --> 1:15:28.559
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of money. You never know. That's it's possible.

1:15:28.560 --> 1:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>That's all I'm saying. Um. By the way I learned today,

1:15:31.280 --> 1:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>can a Wong Woo? It's Wong wou wong wo. Okay,

1:15:36.120 --> 1:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't look at the letters because you'll never come

1:15:38.360 --> 1:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>up with that. He just take take the end of

1:15:40.520 --> 1:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>voice of the Vikings told me it's Wong woo, and

1:15:43.160 --> 1:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>he would know because he's got to call it correctly.

1:15:45.439 --> 1:15:48.559
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. Can a Wong Woo Minnesota Vikings

1:15:48.640 --> 1:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>running back. Here's my guy, my dynasty stash Chargers tight

1:15:54.000 --> 1:15:59.559
<v Speaker 1>end Donald on the list. Scratch that, Steven Anderson and

1:15:59.640 --> 1:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook our free agents. Parm is the only tight

1:16:03.240 --> 1:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>end under contract for the Chargers next year. And get this,

1:16:07.720 --> 1:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>justin Herbert is throwing thirty of his passes to the

1:16:11.960 --> 1:16:18.479
<v Speaker 1>tight end position and Parm is a freaking beast. He's

1:16:18.680 --> 1:16:23.639
<v Speaker 1>six foot eight, two hundred forty pounds. Dude is an

1:16:23.760 --> 1:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>NBA power forward with that size and if he, if

1:16:28.280 --> 1:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>he evolves his game a bit, Donald param could be

1:16:32.479 --> 1:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>scary good. It's uh, I like that param angle. Um,

1:16:36.880 --> 1:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll come back. We have time at the end of

1:16:38.280 --> 1:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the show and come back to some more of your

1:16:40.439 --> 1:16:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty stashes, Scott. But let's make sure we can get

1:16:43.439 --> 1:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in our two matchups. I don't think Scott wants to

1:16:45.640 --> 1:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>do him anymore. Maybe not. Let's Donald Palm off the table,

1:16:50.640 --> 1:16:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Superstar off the board. I've done Washington's taking on the Raiders. Uh,

1:16:57.520 --> 1:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with Antonio Gibson. In three games since Washington's

1:17:01.160 --> 1:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Week nine, by all wins, Gibson's average twenty four carries

1:17:07.240 --> 1:17:10.519
<v Speaker 1>for ninety yards and he has scored twice. Vegas is

1:17:10.720 --> 1:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>much easier to run upon than pass upon, so I

1:17:14.400 --> 1:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna get plenty of work here. Raiders are

1:17:16.720 --> 1:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine and touchdowns allowed to running backs with thirteen

1:17:20.040 --> 1:17:22.719
<v Speaker 1>of them, and they give up over one rushing yards

1:17:22.720 --> 1:17:25.759
<v Speaker 1>per game. Um, and we know that J. D. McKissick

1:17:25.760 --> 1:17:27.519
<v Speaker 1>has been ruled out of this game, So maybe a

1:17:27.600 --> 1:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of extra pass catches from Antonio Gibson when Dell

1:17:32.520 --> 1:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Smallwood will factor into the j D mckiss. Yes, great,

1:17:39.560 --> 1:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the passing game here. I've got a

1:17:41.200 --> 1:17:43.719
<v Speaker 1>bench grade on Taylor Heineke. As I mentioned just mentioned,

1:17:43.800 --> 1:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Raiders are hard to pass upon and just one touchdown

1:17:46.320 --> 1:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>pass in five of the past six games for Heineke

1:17:48.920 --> 1:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>um he doesn't provide much upside in any matchup, but

1:17:52.240 --> 1:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>especially not this one. Aside from elite passers Patrick Mahomes,

1:17:56.320 --> 1:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott and Justin air Bear, Las Vegas is only

1:17:59.880 --> 1:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a allowing two passing yards and one point two passing

1:18:04.120 --> 1:18:07.479
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game. So where does this leave us with

1:18:07.520 --> 1:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>his receivers. It's not great, but I do have a

1:18:09.680 --> 1:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>B grade on Logan Thomas in his first game back

1:18:13.360 --> 1:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>last week nearly scored. He was on the field for

1:18:17.000 --> 1:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps last week and that number probably vaults

1:18:20.160 --> 1:18:25.599
<v Speaker 1>to which. By the way, pre injury, Logan Thomas didn't

1:18:25.600 --> 1:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>miss a snap this year, on the field for every

1:18:28.360 --> 1:18:33.360
<v Speaker 1>single offensive play. Thomas has a plus matchup this week,

1:18:33.439 --> 1:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Raiders have allowed the fourth most fantasy points per game

1:18:35.880 --> 1:18:38.599
<v Speaker 1>two tight ends. What's more, over the last six games,

1:18:38.600 --> 1:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they've allowed five tight ends to finish inside the top

1:18:42.320 --> 1:18:45.519
<v Speaker 1>nine at the position, so be great on Logan Thomas

1:18:45.800 --> 1:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and Terry mclauren is one of the trickiest starts of

1:18:48.240 --> 1:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the week. Mclauden. He'll get shadow coverage from Casey Hayward

1:18:53.200 --> 1:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and elite cornerback allowing a passer rating of just fifty

1:18:57.200 --> 1:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>three in his coverage and zero touchdowns. A loud and

1:19:00.840 --> 1:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>for McLaurin, who in previous seasons had been pretty much

1:19:03.720 --> 1:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>matchup proof, he's been very boom er bust this year,

1:19:08.120 --> 1:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and this feels like a bust game. Only two teams

1:19:10.800 --> 1:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>have managed a one yard receiver against the Raiders. I

1:19:14.800 --> 1:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>don't like McLaurin here. It's a respect for his abilities.

1:19:18.040 --> 1:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>See grade for Terry McLaurin. Let's go over to the

1:19:20.880 --> 1:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Raiders side of this game. I want to start with

1:19:22.920 --> 1:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of caution on Josh Jacobs. He saw a

1:19:26.479 --> 1:19:28.640
<v Speaker 1>huge spike in usage last week, but that was an

1:19:28.680 --> 1:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>anomaly on the full season where he's been averaging a

1:19:31.080 --> 1:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>mundane eleven carries per game before last week. Washington much

1:19:35.800 --> 1:19:38.519
<v Speaker 1>tougher opponent to run upon than pass upon, and I

1:19:38.560 --> 1:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>don't see Jacob's getting a lot of volume here. Opponents

1:19:41.200 --> 1:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>averaging just thirteen running back rush attempts per game against

1:19:45.920 --> 1:19:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Washington over the last five weeks. That is the league's

1:19:48.760 --> 1:19:52.519
<v Speaker 1>lowest figure. So volume working heavily against Jacobs here. They're

1:19:52.560 --> 1:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>also going up the second fewest rushing yards and they've

1:19:55.320 --> 1:19:59.599
<v Speaker 1>only allowed one score to backs over the last five weeks.

1:19:59.800 --> 1:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>So I don't like Jacobs here much at all. And

1:20:01.880 --> 1:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>just to see great I oh, I nearly had him

1:20:04.320 --> 1:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. I keep him to see his his

1:20:07.640 --> 1:20:09.679
<v Speaker 1>passing volume. I think he has like six year seventeen

1:20:09.680 --> 1:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>targets in the last three games. It's gone. It's gone

1:20:11.720 --> 1:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>up a lot, and that does that could get you

1:20:14.680 --> 1:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the CE. I like the way you put that. Frank

1:20:16.800 --> 1:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Moreau's may take a chance on me tight end this week,

1:20:19.760 --> 1:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's got a B grade here, Hunter, Renfro, you

1:20:22.960 --> 1:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>call him Frank, I did call him. I think I

1:20:26.120 --> 1:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know who's Frank Moreau. I don't know. I don't either,

1:20:28.960 --> 1:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Foster Moreau. You did with Brian earlier this week too,

1:20:32.400 --> 1:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I did. On the top you called Brian Frank.

1:20:34.880 --> 1:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I did. Renfro has commanded at least nine targets in

1:20:39.160 --> 1:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>three of the last four games since Henry Rugg's arrest,

1:20:42.240 --> 1:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and with Darren Waller out. It's hard to believe he's

1:20:44.040 --> 1:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>not going to continue to get heavy, heavy volume here.

1:20:46.920 --> 1:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>He's tallied one yards and or a score in three

1:20:50.160 --> 1:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>games since the Rugs arrest football team. Secondary ranks third

1:20:55.080 --> 1:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>in yards per game allowed and fourth and touchdowns allowed

1:20:58.400 --> 1:21:02.439
<v Speaker 1>to opposing receivers. That is great. Washington is using a

1:21:02.479 --> 1:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>new guy in the slot, guy named Danny Johnson, generically

1:21:05.640 --> 1:21:09.360
<v Speaker 1>named Danny Johnson. Sure his name is not Frank, Sure,

1:21:09.439 --> 1:21:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Frank Johnson, But we don't have a lot of data

1:21:11.920 --> 1:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>on him because he's pretty much new and advantage Renfro

1:21:14.600 --> 1:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on that particular matchup, and um so for Derek Carr.

1:21:18.520 --> 1:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Coinciding with the loss of Henry Ruggs, Cars scored just

1:21:21.520 --> 1:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown in three of the last four games, which

1:21:24.240 --> 1:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is worrisome. But Washington is a bona fide slumpbuster. They've

1:21:27.840 --> 1:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed a the most passing touchdowns, be the most passing

1:21:31.320 --> 1:21:34.759
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in every game this year, and see multiple passing

1:21:34.760 --> 1:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in eight of the last nine. But I gotta

1:21:37.720 --> 1:21:39.519
<v Speaker 1>go only give a B grade to Derek Carr here

1:21:39.600 --> 1:21:43.360
<v Speaker 1>because of the dearth of receiving talent on this team.

1:21:43.439 --> 1:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you want to go to any of

1:21:44.960 --> 1:21:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the depth guys like Brian Edwards or z Jones or

1:21:48.760 --> 1:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Sean Jackson in this one final matchup Jackson's interesting church.

1:21:53.240 --> 1:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Could you queue this one up with a few sleigh

1:21:55.160 --> 1:21:59.519
<v Speaker 1>bells for us? Maybe I would be honored to like that. Yeah,

1:21:59.680 --> 1:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>just like that. I keep that going. It's sleigh bells

1:22:02.960 --> 1:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>because we've got a weather game coming on Monday night.

1:22:06.360 --> 1:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>If you believe the podcast, we are going to have

1:22:10.800 --> 1:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>what happened that's the rate. So that's the funny thing

1:22:14.400 --> 1:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>is it's going to be a combination of precipitation right

1:22:17.760 --> 1:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>at the freezing line. We could have rain, we could

1:22:21.760 --> 1:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>have snow, we could have sleet or even sneat on

1:22:28.160 --> 1:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Monday night. We get up Monday night sneak game, and

1:22:32.280 --> 1:22:36.719
<v Speaker 1>blustery conditions thirty mile in our winds expected in this game. Yeah.

1:22:36.800 --> 1:22:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So I did look at it right before the show.

1:22:39.479 --> 1:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>The precipitation models have eased up a little bit, which

1:22:42.200 --> 1:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bummed about because I want to see

1:22:44.439 --> 1:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the gross weather. Um. But the real story is the

1:22:48.120 --> 1:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>sustained wins with gusts into the mid thirties. Uh. That

1:22:53.880 --> 1:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>affects a game quite a bit more than the precipitation

1:22:56.680 --> 1:23:00.559
<v Speaker 1>more than the precipitation um. And this game features the

1:23:00.600 --> 1:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>defense that's allowed the fewest yards the Bills at two

1:23:03.160 --> 1:23:05.479
<v Speaker 1>d seventy five yards a game, and the fourth fewest

1:23:05.560 --> 1:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>yards the Patriots at three sixteen, and the top two

1:23:07.920 --> 1:23:11.519
<v Speaker 1>scoring defenses. The Pats have allowed fifteen point eight yards

1:23:11.520 --> 1:23:14.599
<v Speaker 1>per two points per game and the Bills have allowed

1:23:14.640 --> 1:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>sixteen point five points per game. So this is gonna

1:23:16.880 --> 1:23:19.759
<v Speaker 1>be a low scoring game here. Who can you start

1:23:19.800 --> 1:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in this one? Damien Harris? He gets a C grade

1:23:23.000 --> 1:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'll throw a harpoon at Ramandre Stevenson too. Harris

1:23:27.040 --> 1:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>did see a slightly higher snap count and touch total

1:23:29.840 --> 1:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>over the last two weeks, but it's almost split evenly

1:23:32.320 --> 1:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>now and it's a brutal matchup, as the Bills allow

1:23:35.240 --> 1:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>only twenty four touches per game and a total of

1:23:38.320 --> 1:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and ten total combo yards per game to

1:23:41.160 --> 1:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>opposing runners. Those are both top five marks. Although Harris

1:23:45.240 --> 1:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>was able to hit the hundred yard mark against the

1:23:47.600 --> 1:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Bills last year in his only meeting against them, that

1:23:50.479 --> 1:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>was last year. That was last year. They have not

1:23:52.800 --> 1:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>played yet this year. Mac Jones was able to hit

1:23:57.960 --> 1:24:00.479
<v Speaker 1>passing yards against the terrible Titans passive fence, but he

1:24:00.479 --> 1:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>gets Buffalo, the best past defense in the league and

1:24:02.880 --> 1:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>windy and wet conditions. For that reason, Mac in the

1:24:05.320 --> 1:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>entire receiving game, they're all on the bench. The Bills

1:24:08.240 --> 1:24:11.479
<v Speaker 1>allow the fewest receiving yards to wide receivers, the fifth

1:24:11.479 --> 1:24:14.599
<v Speaker 1>fewest to tight ends. They've only allowed eight total passing

1:24:14.640 --> 1:24:18.559
<v Speaker 1>scores on the year. So Hunter, Henry, Jacoby Myers, Kendrick Born,

1:24:18.640 --> 1:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and Mac Jones are all on your bench. Now you're

1:24:20.479 --> 1:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>not worried about the loss of trade devious White. That's

1:24:22.880 --> 1:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a massive loss to this secondary in my mind, and

1:24:25.760 --> 1:24:27.880
<v Speaker 1>he could open up somebody to have a big game,

1:24:27.960 --> 1:24:30.519
<v Speaker 1>not in the wet and blustery conditions of this one.

1:24:30.600 --> 1:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And Mac Jones is not a guy who just throws up.

1:24:33.040 --> 1:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't get a strong armor ball through the wind

1:24:35.840 --> 1:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's not his game. You know who does have

1:24:37.960 --> 1:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a strong arm who could throw it through the wind.

1:24:39.760 --> 1:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>That's Josh Hellen. I'm gonna give him a B grade.

1:24:43.400 --> 1:24:45.599
<v Speaker 1>He's ran for at least twenty five yards and four

1:24:45.600 --> 1:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of his five career meetings with the Patriots, and did

1:24:47.800 --> 1:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>crack the code against them last December. Ended up with

1:24:50.680 --> 1:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>three twenty yards and four passing scores in that one.

1:24:53.200 --> 1:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>But that Pat's defense was not as good as this one.

1:24:56.560 --> 1:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh they trail only the bills and passing scores allowed

1:24:59.160 --> 1:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>with only four on the year, and they've intercepted the

1:25:01.800 --> 1:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>most balls in the league. But I'm still giving Alan

1:25:05.439 --> 1:25:07.599
<v Speaker 1>the B. I'm gonna give Stephan Digs a B grade

1:25:07.640 --> 1:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. He should go up against Jalen Mills both

1:25:10.040 --> 1:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the most of the time. He's their weakest corner and

1:25:12.640 --> 1:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>has allowed a passer rating of one twelve in his

1:25:15.080 --> 1:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>coverage as well as five touchdowns scored against him so

1:25:18.360 --> 1:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>far this year, and Diggs was on the receiving end

1:25:20.640 --> 1:25:23.559
<v Speaker 1>of three of those four Josh Allen touchdowns last December.

1:25:24.040 --> 1:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>He's just downgraded a little bit because of the weather.

1:25:27.000 --> 1:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give Cole Beasley a C start. He'll be

1:25:29.400 --> 1:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>on the slot against Miles Bryant, who hasn't allowed a

1:25:31.920 --> 1:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>score this year, but seventy of the balls and his

1:25:35.000 --> 1:25:37.719
<v Speaker 1>coverage are caught, and with the windy conditions, you gotta

1:25:37.760 --> 1:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>think lower distance, high percentage throws are more likely. So

1:25:41.240 --> 1:25:44.839
<v Speaker 1>that brings Cole Beasley in. That doesn't put Emmanuel Sanders

1:25:44.880 --> 1:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's on the bench. The target load hasn't been there.

1:25:47.439 --> 1:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Dawson Knox will get a C grade for much of

1:25:49.320 --> 1:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the same reason Cole Beasley does. Short and intermediate passes

1:25:52.120 --> 1:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>will be key. Plus, Knox scored twice last week and

1:25:55.320 --> 1:25:59.759
<v Speaker 1>had a third touchdown wiped from the board by a penalty. Finally,

1:25:59.800 --> 1:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the best matchup in this game would be a pager

1:26:03.400 --> 1:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a Bill's runner, a Bill's runner going against the Patriots

1:26:07.160 --> 1:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>run defense, but there are none. Zack Moss was a

1:26:10.800 --> 1:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>healthy scratch last week. You can't start him right now.

1:26:13.120 --> 1:26:16.479
<v Speaker 1>He shouldn't roster him right now either. Devin Singletary managed

1:26:16.479 --> 1:26:19.559
<v Speaker 1>fifteen carries last week and had two point nine yards

1:26:19.560 --> 1:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>per carry. The same can be said about Matt Brita,

1:26:22.400 --> 1:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>who had nine carries and ended up with two point

1:26:24.520 --> 1:26:27.360
<v Speaker 1>nine yards per carry. Spackfield is probably the worst in

1:26:27.360 --> 1:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the league. It's tougher to forecast the Monday night weather

1:26:30.479 --> 1:26:33.479
<v Speaker 1>than to start the right Bills running back. The Pats

1:26:33.479 --> 1:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>have allowed four point six yards per carry on the season.

1:26:36.560 --> 1:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the fifth most in the league. They've allowed the

1:26:38.760 --> 1:26:42.640
<v Speaker 1>fourth most total rushing yards, but they've only given up

1:26:42.680 --> 1:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>four scores to the running back position all year. Kettysburg.

1:26:47.040 --> 1:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>That's best in the league. Do you think with the

1:26:49.479 --> 1:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>weather there's just gonna be a lot more running in

1:26:52.439 --> 1:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this game. I think Josh Allen just is going to

1:26:55.120 --> 1:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>have to keep doing it by himself because those runners

1:26:58.000 --> 1:27:00.479
<v Speaker 1>are so bad they can't get any thing done on

1:27:01.000 --> 1:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it's finding his way to the end zone whatever that's worth. Yeah,

1:27:04.160 --> 1:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>not against the Patriots. Not give up no touchdowns to

1:27:07.640 --> 1:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>running back. So they're all on your bench. I don't

1:27:09.800 --> 1:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>think any of them should be on your roster either.

1:27:11.400 --> 1:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>A right, let's go back to dynasty statues. You've got

1:27:13.800 --> 1:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple more for us in our final moments, sure

1:27:17.040 --> 1:27:20.679
<v Speaker 1>sure does. First off, maybe Broncos players, they might get

1:27:20.640 --> 1:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>an what I would do to that offense? Tim Patrick

1:27:27.200 --> 1:27:29.719
<v Speaker 1>even just try to He just resigned from about another

1:27:29.720 --> 1:27:34.400
<v Speaker 1>sneaky Aaron Rodgers team. The Steelers, Yeah, might be ready

1:27:34.439 --> 1:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to win too. I think they're gonna be in the

1:27:36.200 --> 1:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson sweep Steaks along with potentially Philadelphia and the

1:27:40.600 --> 1:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson sweep Steaks. But yes, that is another possible

1:27:43.520 --> 1:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>landing spot. Here's another one, maybe Josh Palmer. This actually

1:27:47.320 --> 1:27:49.479
<v Speaker 1>helps Palm to Mike Williams contract is up, but I

1:27:49.479 --> 1:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>don't see him resigning there. They have an out on

1:27:51.840 --> 1:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Keenan all and but I don't think they take that.

1:27:53.840 --> 1:27:57.559
<v Speaker 1>Nico Collins, how about the box. Chris Godwin was franchise tag.

1:27:57.600 --> 1:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>He'll be a free agent again. Antonio Brown be a

1:28:00.240 --> 1:28:03.719
<v Speaker 1>free agent. Maybe Tyler Johnson or jal They hate Tyler Johnson,

1:28:03.800 --> 1:28:06.439
<v Speaker 1>is what I've concluded over the past month. It's it's

1:28:06.439 --> 1:28:11.640
<v Speaker 1>ain't don't like him, but he's playing to him. If

1:28:11.640 --> 1:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you're on the field all the time, and Tom Brady,

1:28:13.520 --> 1:28:17.679
<v Speaker 1>what if Godwin's gone? Though? But Brown has been gone

1:28:17.680 --> 1:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's been running all these reps and it doesn't matter.

1:28:20.360 --> 1:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>It's Brown and God What do you think it? Deshaun Watson?

1:28:22.640 --> 1:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe okay Man playing for next year. Thanks for listening

1:28:27.120 --> 1:28:29.479
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Football Weekly. If you're listening over the air,

1:28:29.560 --> 1:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>know that we are a podcast. If you're podcasting, know

1:28:31.800 --> 1:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>that we are over the air as well, and many stations.

1:28:34.680 --> 1:28:37.559
<v Speaker 1>It goes both ways. We'll be back next week as

1:28:37.640 --> 1:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the final bye week next week, and the playoffs are looming.

1:28:41.600 --> 1:28:44.519
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate everybody listening to Fantasy Football Weekly. Best of luck

1:28:44.680 --> 1:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this week. Talk to you one week from today. Fantasy

1:28:52.439 --> 1:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly is a production of I heart Radio. For

1:28:55.400 --> 1:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>more podcast from my heart Radio, visit the i heart

1:28:57.840 --> 1:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple podcast or are you listen to your

1:29:00.840 --> 1:29:01.559
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows