WEBVTT - Bonus: Is Elon Serious About Colonizing Mars?

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody. Max Chafkin here. The other day, Dana and I,

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>along with our colleague Ashley Vance, were guests on Bloomberg's

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Odd Lots podcast for a special episode. It was all

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>about Elon Musk. We had a great chat with Joe

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and Tracy, the host of Odd Lots, and we wanted

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to share it with you right here. Enjoy it, and

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>after you do, you should check out the Odd Loots

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>podcast in general. It's a great, idiosyncratic, nerdy, weird, offbeat

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and incredibly smart take on finance and markets and economics.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And as for Elon Inc. We will be back on Tuesday,

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>just like we are every week. The vote is happening

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. It looks like Elon Musk is going to

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>come out ahead, but we'll have the full report on Tuesday.

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you all about what it means for Musk's

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>empire and where we go from here. And until then,

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you and see us soon.

0:00:55.360 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. We're very excited

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 3>about this recording. It's a crossover episode with Bloomberg's weekly

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Elon Inc. Podcast. So we're all about Elon today. And

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 3>to get into that, Tracy, do you remember our interview

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:30.639
<v Speaker 3>with the Ukraine post CEO.

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I do, Igor Smolensky. That was a really interesting

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 4>episode for a variety of reasons. One because I just

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 4>really enjoy talking about logistics. But secondly, one of the

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 4>things that stood out to both of us, I think

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 4>from that conversation was when he was talking about how

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 4>they're using Starlink in Ukraine and also the idea that

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, if they were ever to redesign the postal

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 4>service from scratch, they would avoid traditional internet and just

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 4>use all starlink.

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 3>No, that was like a very eye opening moment for me,

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 3>and I feel like when it comes to Elon Musk,

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 3>obviously it feels like, I don't know, forty percent of

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 3>the attention on him is related to Tesla, another forty

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 3>percent is Twitter or x, and then we're aware that

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 3>there's like a bunch of all these other companies like

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:24.399
<v Speaker 3>Neuralink and Grock and SpaceX, but SpaceX and Starlink. That's

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 3>a huge deal because my understanding or my sense is

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 3>that like he is just dominating the skies.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and that's kind of the cool business as well. Right,

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 4>it's really cool business, like rockets that can be reused.

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 4>If you ever see the satellites launching into the sky,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 4>the Starlink ones, they're really beautiful. Satellite internet is really

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 4>interesting to me, partly because of when I was in

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 4>Hong Kong. Yeah, and you know, they had the really

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 4>strict COVID rules and they would basically send you to

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 4>a government facility that was extremely limited. If you came

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 4>down with COVID, you had to have satellite Internet in

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.679
<v Speaker 4>there because there was no government internet. So you had

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 4>to get a little box and bring it with you

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 4>if you were spending like three or four.

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 3>You get it.

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Wait, you didn't.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 3>You never had to go.

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't.

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 4>I know a lot of people who did.

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 3>And they had to bring their own box.

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, because otherwise there was either no internet or it

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 4>was so poor. The effectively there was no internet.

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 3>I had not realized that element. But it is pretty wild. Like, Okay,

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 3>here's one company and it just totally dominates satellite communication.

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 3>I know, it dominates rocket launches. And historically space was

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 3>the domain of governments, right, space was the domain of

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 3>the military of any government and or NASA or the

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 3>NASA equivalent, And now we're in this world where there's

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 3>one individual and basically one company that is just completely

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 3>dominating space. And like I said, you know, I think

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 3>people talk about Tesla and they talk about Twitter, but

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 3>I feel like SpaceX deserves more attention, and I want

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 3>to learn more about SpaceX.

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, this is something I hadn't really I guess, internalized

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 4>until recently. But the degree to which NASA basically opened

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 4>up space to private companies is kind of remarkable compared

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 4>to the way it was in the past. So absolutely,

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 4>I think this is something we should talk about.

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, we've wanted to do a space slash SpaceX

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 3>slash Starlink episode for a while to like really understand

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 3>this company and how it fits into the broader Elon

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 3>Musk Empire. So I'm very excited to say today we

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 3>have a bunch of perfect guests. They are all our

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 3>colleagues at Bloomberg. But first up, we're going to be

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 3>speaking with Ashley Vance, who reports on all kinds of

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 3>cool tech stuff for us here at Bloomberg, sort of

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.799
<v Speaker 3>like the future cutting edge pieces. Every time Ashley writes

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 3>an article it's just about some crazy, mad scientist, usually

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 3>out in the Bay Area doing anything wild. He's written

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 3>a biography of Elon Musk, and his more recent book

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 3>is called When the Heavens Went on Sale. The Misfits

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 3>and Geniuses racing to put space within reach. So the

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 3>perfect guest to talk space. So Ashley Vance, thank you

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 3>so much for coming on.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 5>Oud, locks, thank you for having me.

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm aware that SpaceX exists, that it's in the business

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 3>of private rockets and satellites and all that stuff, But like,

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 3>how big is SpaceX or maybe how far ahead is

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX versus the competition?

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, yeah, quite far, you know. I always think of

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 5>this as one of the most unlikely business stories there is.

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX started roughly twenty years ago. Nobody, you know, had

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 5>really proven anything out as far as being a commercial

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 5>rocket company or satellite company in a meaningful way. Before

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 5>it was all governments, that a handful of governments that

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 5>dominated this business. And if you fast forward now twenty

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 5>years later, SpaceX last year, for example, they put up

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:45.559
<v Speaker 5>about fifty percent of the world's rockets and probably close

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 5>to around eighty percent of the world satellites. So that's

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX versus the entire world. That's SpaceX versus China, Russia, India,

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 5>et cetera. And if you look at this year so far,

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 5>they've put up about ninety percent of the out of

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 5>stuff that's gone into space this year has been put

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 5>up by SpaceX. So they basically revived the United States

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 5>space program. We'd fallen behind a number of countries that

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 5>looked like China was going to take this thing over,

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 5>and now SpaceX is the clear winner of the space

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 5>economy so far.

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 4>I have a embarrassing question, but what's the difference between

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 4>SpaceX and Starlink.

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, well, okay, so there's different pieces here. Traditionally,

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 5>most companies you've sort of divided either you were a

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 5>rocket company or you were a satellite company. SpaceX has

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 5>become the dominant player in both and Starlink fits into

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 5>that picture. So Starlink is a satellite communications service. SpaceX

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 5>puts up thousands of satellites around the Earth. They're always

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 5>surrounding the Earth. They're beaming down high speed internet and

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 5>so it's really designed for places where like half the

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 5>world today cannot be reached by fiber optic cables because

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 5>it's it's too hard or expensive to put them in

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 5>the ground. That's a lot of people. That's four billion

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 5>people that cannot get high speed internet today. And if

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 5>you buy a SpaceX antenna, it's like a little basketball

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 5>sized thing and you stick it at your house. You

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 5>then pull down this high speed Internet delivered from space.

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 5>And so SpaceX is dominant in rockets that it is

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 5>really dominant in satellites. If I could give you one

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 5>more data point just to like put this in perspective.

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 5>So from like nineteen fifty until about twenty twenty, all

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 5>of the world we had two thousand, five hundred satellites

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 5>surrounding the Earth. That's what we've done in all those decades,

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 5>from twenty twenty to today, that we've gone from two thousand,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 5>five hundred satellites to about twelve thousand surrounding the Earth,

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 5>and the vast majority of those now are SpaceX satellites.

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 5>That's why there's that huge jump.

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Wow. I feel like it dominates the night sky amateur

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 4>like photography community as well. Do you ever see that

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 4>online people talking about like, what's this light in this sky?

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 4>I can't figure it out? And the answer is always starlink.

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 4>It's always starlink. Launching new things.

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean it's funny. So you know, when they

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 5>do a Starlink launch, each rocket is filled with dozens

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 5>and dozens of satellites, and yeah, it's just cool phenomenon.

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, when they first come out of the rocket,

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 5>they're all kind of clumped together, and then over the

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 5>course of weeks they sort of slowly spread out, and

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 5>so now you can see that in the night sky.

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 5>It used to be a pretty rare thing, but over

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 5>the last two three years, people see this now all

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 5>the time.

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 3>So I used to do a little bit of on

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 3>air reporting for Bloomberg Rocketry, like when they would fire

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 3>up some of those SpaceX trials and then the rocket

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 3>would go up and then come down, and like, I'm

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 3>still pretty blown away when I see those relandings, Like

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 3>it still doesn't seem like that should be physically possible.

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I know there are other competitors. You wrote a whole

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 3>book about them. Jeff Bezos has one. Some of the

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 3>people who used to work for SpaceX have launched their

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.599
<v Speaker 3>own Sitting aside the new miracle gap, what is this

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 3>sort of technological gap right now between SpaceX and how

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 3>good it is with its reusable rockets and so forth,

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 3>and where the competition is technologically.

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean that's pretty dramatic too. So there used

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 5>to be there was a handful of government programs that

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 5>dominated space since the space race began. And none of

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 5>the government players do reusable rockets at all. So nothing

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 5>from Europe, nothing from Russia, India, Japan, any of that,

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 5>and so you have to kind of turn to the

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 5>commercial players that have popped up over the last ten

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 5>fifteen years and so so SpaceX has this dialed in

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 5>as we all know. You know, they've reused one rocket

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 5>I think as many as twenty times. And I wrote

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 5>a biography on Elon you know that came out a

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 5>few years ago. When I was researching that book, all

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 5>the traditional players said this was going to be impossible

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 5>and it was wasted time and the math would never

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 5>pencil out. But clearly it has. After SpaceX, the second

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 5>most successful rocket company is rocket Lab. It was started

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 5>in New Zealand. It's headquartered now in the United States.

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 5>So AX has flown hundreds and hundreds of rockets. Rocket

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 5>Labs flown about fifty and they have a much smaller,

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 5>cheaper rocket and they have started to move towards parts

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 5>of reasonable rocket, and they are building now a larger,

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 5>fully reusable rocket that they're hoping to fly next year.

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 5>So they really are the only current real rocket competitor

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 5>to SpaceX, and they're doing very well. They're starting to

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 5>launch once every couple of weeks. You know. The next

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 5>step is the sort of last great hope to really

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 5>challenge SpaceX is Blue Origin, which has been sort of

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 5>like a sad tale for it was started almost the

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 5>same year as SpaceX and really hasn't done that much.

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 5>They do have a reasonable rocket for the tourism flights

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 5>where you go to space for about six minutes. Blue

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 5>Origin has never sent a satellite up. It's just not

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 5>been involved in sort of the commercial end of the business.

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 5>This year they think will be the first time they

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 5>send up their much larger rocket that can take satellites.

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 5>And Blue Origin is also focused on reusable rockets.

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 4>Wait, I have another basic question, which is how do

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 4>reusable rockets actually work? And why did SpaceX decide to

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 4>go down that route, because, as you said, a lot

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 4>of people thought it was mathematically or physically impossible.

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean there's this thought that there was sort

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 5>of a waste of time because the rockets they go

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 5>through so much damage and pressure and violence during a

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 5>rocket launch that the idea of bringing this huge tube

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 5>back and it's still being usable again, that seemed a

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 5>bit far fetched. And you have to deal with the

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 5>whole process of actually getting that toobe back instead of

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 5>falling into the ocean or burning up in the atmosphere.

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 5>And so SpaceX, you know, they developed this technique where

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 5>they have these landing legs actually on the big base

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 5>part of the rocket, and it comes back towards Earth

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 5>and it's sort of free falling, and then all of

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 5>a sudden, the engines kick back on again and they

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 5>slow it down and just lands right back on the

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 5>pad where it took off from. There's a big trade

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 5>off in this, so the physics nobody has a great

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 5>advantage on the physics of rockets, and the physics of

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 5>rockets aren't that great. When you have this giant tube

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 5>full of fuel, you know, it's a few percent of

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 5>the total weight of that rocket is the stuff that

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 5>you actually get to take to space. The vast majority

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 5>of it is fuel, and you have to use some

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 5>of your fuel to land the rocket. And so people

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 5>also thought that was a bad trade off to make

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 5>it's better just to take more stuff.

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 3>Didn't. At one point, some people thought that rockets themselves

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 3>would be inherently impossible for that exact reason that just

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 3>like so much of the weight would be the fuel.

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 3>And so some people just theorized that the idea of

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 3>rocket true would be inherently impossible.

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, going way back, you know, the first rocket pioneers

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 5>were sort of like in the nineteen tens and twenties.

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 5>This guy, Robert Goddard was the American pioneer in this field,

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 5>and he there's a pretty famous moment where he writes

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 5>a op ed for the New York Times talking about

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 5>flying a rocket to the moon, and he was just

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 5>pilloried as this wacko, you know, and that none of

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 5>this whatever happened, and the physics don't make sense at all,

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 5>and so it took a while to sort of get

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 5>people to believe that these days. The way the basically

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 5>works is like the bigger you can make a rocket,

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 5>you start to get these advantages, and so that's kind

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 5>of what you want to do. But the bigger you

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 5>make a rocket, the more complicated it is, the more

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 5>engines it needs, it gets harder and harder, and SpaceX

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 5>is really the only one that has dialed all this in,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 5>has the manufacturing processes to make all this this math work.

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 5>If you look at the government programs, they don't really

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 5>have an answer to what SpaceX is doing. And these

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 5>things take ten twenty thirty years to figure out.

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 4>How did we end up with a system where we

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 4>have you know, the government has a space program, NASA exists,

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 4>and then we have these private companies who are doing

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 4>or providing very important services for entities like NASA. It

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 4>seems like a weird kind of pseudo government private commercial

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 4>system that we ended up in.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, if I could riff for a second,

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 5>I've thought about this a lot. You know, there's an

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 5>economist named Alex McDonald. He works for NASA. He wrote

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 5>a really interesting book kind of on this topic. You know,

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 5>we were talking about these rocket pioneers in the nineteen

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 5>tens and twenties. The US had Robert Goddard. There was

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 5>a similar figure in Germany and Russia, and they were

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 5>all pursuing these kind of liquid fueled rockets very similar

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 5>to what we use today. They were essentially startups. These

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 5>were researchers who got private money. Back in the day,

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 5>if you were really rich, the cool thing to do

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 5>was to build a giant telescope. That that's what like

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 5>rich guys used to used to put their money towards philanthropically,

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 5>and they started to do that to rockets. It was

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 5>kind of like everyone was interested in space and wanted

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 5>to prove this out, and so it looked like we

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 5>were kind of heading on this commercial path. I think

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 5>World War Two spilling into the Cold War, where space

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 5>turned into this national sort of achievement, this point of pride,

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 5>this way to show your scientific prowess, you know, it

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 5>turned into a government effort. And the result of that

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 5>was that the rockets could not fail. We got on

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 5>this race obviously to send humans into space, and so

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 5>you have to build very expensive, infallible rockets, and this

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 5>is it was sort of like history that pushed us there.

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 5>But then we got stuck. You know. Literally, rockets really

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 5>did not change from the nineteen sixties until SpaceX came along,

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 5>and so everybody got fixated that these rockets had to

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 5>be huge, costly expensive. They couldn't fail. It was embarrassing

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 5>if they did, and that was the ethos, and so

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX came along, they were able to take more risk

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 5>to make the rockets cheaper, to use modern technology, modern software,

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 5>and so they changed that equation. And it's only now

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 5>that we're in this weird world between government and commercial space.

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 5>I think, you know, we are leaving that era of

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 5>government space. I wrote my hope, my new book was

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 5>called When the Heavens Went on Sale because I think

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 5>this is completely becoming a commercial enterprise now.

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 3>It's so fascinating, this sort of like path dependency and

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 3>right like it's the sort of military over engineered. It's

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 3>about carrying people. It's about that triumphalism and then the

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 3>idea that okay, that's what people think a rocket is.

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 3>And then SpaceX comes along and just rethinks it from

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 3>the ground up and sounds like I'm curious about the business. So,

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, Tracy and I had a conversation on on

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Lots several months ago, and we were actually talking to

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 3>the guy who runs the Ukrainian postal service and he

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 3>was talking about how, you know, thanks to Starlink, specifically,

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 3>if Ukraine were able to retake a village, they wouldn't

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 3>rebuild the old internet infrastructure. They could get internet going

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 3>in a day with satellite, And it's sort of like

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 3>very jarring because you realize, you know, just what an

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 3>incredible asset Elon is building up. And so between SpaceX

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 3>and starlink, I you know, I know that like SpaceX

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 3>will charge you or an individual if you want to

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 3>like get some space on one of his rockets to

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 3>fire up your own satellite. Obviously Starlink subscribers pay I

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 3>guess presumably some monthly fee. But you know, where's this

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 3>going in terms of the monetization and business to have

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 3>both the launching infrastructure and the satellite infrastructure together, and

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 3>what can be done with so much physical material out

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 3>in space owned by one company?

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Well, look, I mean this has been SpaceX's huge advantage.

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 5>It has rivals trying to build this space internet. There's

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 5>one web which which started as a sort of quasi

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 5>US and European venture. It's gone through bankruptcy in many

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 5>twists and turns. But it has tons of satellites, but

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 5>it lacks rockets, and it was actually hoping to fly

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 5>on a ton of Russian rockets. And when the Ukrainian

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 5>War broke out, they don't have access to these Russian

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 5>rockets anymore, and so they got sort of stock in

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX was able to race ahead. Amazon is looking to

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 5>build a giant constellation. Jeff clearly has a rocket company,

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 5>but he doesn't have the rockets right now that can

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 5>can send all these satellites up. And so SpaceX is

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 5>in this unique position. There's trade offs, right. You can

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 5>think of starlink. I think of it as a it's

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 5>really like the first global internet slash communications provider. As

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 5>we all know, telecoms tends to be a sort of

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 5>nationalized thing. If you're in the US, you're on whatever

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 5>at and T or Verizon. When you go to Europe

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 5>you have to switch to something else. You know. Being

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 5>in space you get past all of that, and so

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 5>you become this global force. And that is how they

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 5>make their money is on these monthly subscriptions. I have

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 5>Starlink at a house in Mexico. I think it's about

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 5>sixty or seventy dollars a month to get the service.

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 5>And so you've got consumers paying for that, You've got

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 5>some businesses paying for that, and yeah, so there's this

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 5>idea maybe you could avoid building a lot of infrastructure

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 5>on the ground. There is a trade off, Like space

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 5>Internet is almost definitely never going to be as fast

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 5>as fiber. And so if you're you know, if you're

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 5>in a country like the United States, where we have

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 5>this huge land mass and we have the money to

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.719
<v Speaker 5>lay all this fiber, you know that is still going

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 5>to be in the backbone that most people use. But

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 5>in all these other circumstances, planes, cars, boats also like

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 5>this idea. This is what I think about the most,

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 5>is this unified fabric of the Internet blanketing the earth,

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 5>so that no matter where you are, there's Internet service.

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 5>All of our modern devices are working, things like autonomous

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 5>cars and drones and all this stuff that need to

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 5>be connected all the time. You know, I think I

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 5>think SpaceX right now is in the pole position to

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 5>be that sort of future backbone of all that.

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 4>You said something interesting earlier, you said our last hope

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 4>for competition to SpaceX was Blue Origin, And that.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 5>Might have been dramatic, but they are the biggest of

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 5>just because Jeff has so much money to.

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Actually right, well point taken. But I do get the

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 4>sense that there is a desire to have more than

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 4>one company that's doing this, And I guess my question

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 4>is why is that important? Because when I think of

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 4>natural monopolies, Like, it's usually something pretty important like infrastructure

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 4>or rockets. In this case, couldn't we have a world

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 4>where one company is very very good at building these

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 4>and dominates Like, what's the trade off here?

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, we do have a world like that at the moment,

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 5>and you know we've already seen subtradeouts. I think there's

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 5>a bunch of reasons you would want multiple rocket companies,

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 5>particularly if you're the United States or Russia. Clearly for political, military,

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 5>strategic reasons. You don't want to be dependent on one

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 5>company for all kinds of reasons. Something could go wrong,

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 5>their rocket could stop working, they could go out of business.

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, you want these other paths to space. We've

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 5>talked about how many satellites are going up. I mean

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 5>this is the next I think of it as the

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, we spent the last thirty years building out

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 5>this internet infrastructure on Earth. We are now doing the

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 5>exact same thing in space. It is going to be

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 5>the next spot where we build out our computing infrastructure,

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 5>and you want lots of access to that and ways

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 5>to put these satellites up, replace them. And look, if

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 5>we look at Ukraine, there's a pretty good case you

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 5>could make that Ukraine would have fallen to Russia quite

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 5>quickly without SpaceX. In the early days of the war,

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 5>all of these satellites were providing tons of imagery that

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 5>aided the Ukrainian military. After that, SpaceX Starlink became this

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 5>central part of the Ukrainian military's infrastructure. It really undermined

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 5>Russia's plans for attack. But you know, we saw these

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 5>situations where Elon can turn Starlink on and off at

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 5>his whims and so, you know, do you want one

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 5>person with the power of a nation state when things

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 5>like this happen, And do you want that one person

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 5>to be someone as material as Elon? Probably not. You

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 5>probably want a couple options in this race. And definitely

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 5>nations like China, Europe, Russia going to want their own space,

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 5>internet and rockets.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I imagine that pricing is pretty low down on

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 4>the priority list when it comes to rockets. But Joe,

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 4>weren't you looking at the cross for some of.

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 3>These Yeah, it was fun. I looked and see what

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 3>the cost of putting a satellite into space, and I

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 3>was pretty annoyed because I thought I could get a

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 3>fifty kilogram satellite into space for six hundred and ninety

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars. But then I clicked to the next page

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 3>and there were all there's like fuel surcharge and all

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 3>this stuff junk went up to like one point five million.

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 3>So I was like, I was not happy. I felt

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 3>like an Airbnb person.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 5>That's still pretty good, though. You know, if you go back,

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 5>if you go back a few if you go back

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 5>a few years, you're you basically have to pay three

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 5>hundred million dollars and buy an entire rocket.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 3>And okay, right, I'll book the one point five million. Wait.

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 4>So prices happened coming down like dramatically.

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 5>So there's there's a couple of ways prices have gone down.

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 5>So SpaceX's major competitor in the United States is this

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 5>company called United Launch Alliance. It's a combination of Boeing

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 5>and Lockeed, and they're going rate for rocket launch is

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 5>usually about three hundred million dollars. That's for the entire rocket.

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX charges about sixty million dollars for the equivalent rocket.

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 5>So already SpaceX pulled the price down, and then there's

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 5>a new model that's emerged where you don't have to

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 5>buy the entire rockets because the satellites used to all

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 5>be the size of a school bus and cost billions

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 5>of dollars, and you wanted your own rocket. Now there's

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 5>tiny satellites like the size of a shoe box, and

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 5>so you buy space on a SpaceX.

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what I was looking at. I was

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 3>looking at that. They called it like the ride share program, right, yeah,

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 3>the SpaceX riodehair Well.

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 5>Just one last thing on the price, and then you

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 5>know there are tons now of these small rocket companies

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 5>that have merged. So like with rocket Lab, you don't

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 5>get the giant rocket of SpaceX, but you can get

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 5>an entire rocket for about eight million dollars whatever you

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 5>like to space. So it's it's part. This is what

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 5>has opened up the opportunity for all these satellite startups.

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 3>We gotta check the CPI index for satellite rocket and

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 3>see the disinflation happening there. I just have one last question,

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 3>and you already did sort of hit on it, but

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 3>the national security element, and I'm curious about it, both

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 3>in the US and maybe China and Europe, like it

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 3>is pretty wild that you know, in a war, a

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:51.479
<v Speaker 3>lot may depend on the whims of one individual. Elon

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Musk and whether you know, it's his company, he can

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 3>do whatever he wants, and theory, et cetera. But like,

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 3>how are governments around the world thinking about the key

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 3>man risk of the geopolitical risk and this is it

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 3>is an American company, and et cetera, and the sort

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 3>of you know, the potential for yeah, the fact that

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 3>if he wants to turn it off for one country

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 3>and not for another country, he can really impair change

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 3>the course of a war. Like, how are they thinking

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 3>about this risk?

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, in the United States, I mean, we do have

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 5>backup plans. You know, there is United Launch Alliance is

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 5>always there with a rocket. They just they haven't been

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 5>able to do things like send humans to space. SpaceX

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 5>has been the only one that could send humans to

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 5>space since the Shuttle stopped. But the US has been

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 5>funding all these startups. Rocket Lab got some military funding.

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 5>There's tons of these small rocket companies that have received

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 5>funding from DARPA, et cetera. And so so they're trying

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 5>to put all these backup plans in place. China has

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 5>a weird mix of government backed and private rocket companies.

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 5>If you look elsewhere, the list gets much smaller. It's

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 5>usually one government program and maybe a rocket startup. And

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 5>so this is like a very expensive, hard to do thing.

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 5>The US was in a pretty bad spot twenty years ago.

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 5>The government programs had slowed down. The US is an

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 5>amazing spot now. We have more rocket startups and satellite

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 5>startups than anywhere on Earth by many, many times. Russia's

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.719
<v Speaker 5>space program is cratering. I think people should pay attention

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 5>to this. SpaceX had already undermined their entire business. The

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 5>war in Ukraine has cut off a lot of customers.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 5>They are the wild card in all this space is

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 5>a point of national pride going back many decades. Corruption

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 5>plus their declining business has eroded their space program. They've

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 5>already done things like sent a missile up from the

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 5>Earth to destroy one of their own satellites, just to

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 5>remind everybody that they have this capability. And so you know,

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 5>you'll also notice that the Space Force formed over the

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 5>last few years, and so so this is how people

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 5>are thinking about this space is going to be an

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 5>area of military combat almost definitely.

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Ashley Vance, that was so fantastic, So great to have

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 3>you on onlines like I know a little bit more.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 5>Now, Thanks thanks for having.

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 3>That was our conversation with Ashley Vance. And now we're

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 3>going to turn to two other of our Bloomberg colleagues,

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 3>two of the hosts of the excellent Elon Inc. Podcast,

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 3>which covers the sort of weekly or daily goings on

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 3>of Elon Musk and his universe. They're going to help

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 3>us understand how SpaceX and Starlink fit more directly into

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 3>the broader Elon Musk empire. We're going to be speaking

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 3>with Dana Hall and Max Chafkins. So, Dana and Max,

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much for coming on Odd Lots. So, Dana,

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 3>I'll start with you, like, how would you describe that

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 3>specific role in the various assets that Elon has? What

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 3>is SpaceX and I guess Starlink, Like, what does it

0:27:58.119 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 3>serve together?

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, I guess I would say first and foremost that

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 6>SpaceX is Elon's first love. I mean, this is the

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 6>company that Elon founded after he made his millions from PayPal,

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 6>and it's really the company that he began first and

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 6>foremost before anything else. I mean, I feel like in

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 6>the public perception he's known as the CEO of Tesla

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 6>because Tesla is publicly traded and it makes a consumer

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 6>facing product. But Tesla's the company that Musk invested in

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 6>early on and then took over. But SpaceX is really

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 6>the company that he founded, and it's really his first love.

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean, this guy's whole thing is about going to Mars,

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 6>and all the other aspects of his company are really

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 6>sort of building towards that, like a penultimate goal that

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 6>has been his goal for like decades now.

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Just from a like logistics standpoint. Also picking up what

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Dana saying, like Elon Musk has long lived very close

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to SpaceX, like it's been where he sort of located

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>his person and then he's flown, you know, a couple

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of days out of the week to Tesla and sort

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of manage that as like a side gig. And the

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>other thing that Dana didn't mention this pretty important is

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not just his first love. It's also kind of

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>key to his brand. And like the way that he's

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>managed to sort of create a lot of momentum in

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>other businesses I think draws at least to some extent

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>from the success he's had at SpaceX.

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 4>Yes, everyone knows that Tesla's are in fact just earth rockets.

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 4>That was terrible, Max. I was gonna ask you you

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 4>mentioned you mentioned time management there. This was going to

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 4>be my next question, But when I think about Elon's empire,

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 4>I can't even remember everything he has now. But obviously

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 4>there's Tesla, there's SpaceX, there's the boring company?

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that it?

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 4>And like Neuralinkrock Grock x X AI. Yeah, Twitter, Where

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 4>where does he find time to tweet? That's the important thing.

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think if you talk to shareholders Tesla

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and even in some of Elon Musk's friends, I think

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>would say, you know, he's spending too much time tweeting.

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that one of the things that's

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>been so difficult about this X acquisition, the acquisition of

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter renaming it ex, and then Elon Musk's like increased

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>engagement on X has been that it has like taken

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>him away from these companies that are potentially more lucrative,

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>more valuable, and also like more ultimately probably more important

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in sort of achieving the goals as Elon Musk has

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>laid them out.

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 6>Dan, Yeah, I was gonna say, I think he tweets

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 6>a lot when he is on a plane or on

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 6>the toilet. Frankly, I mean I think he's even said

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 6>as much and he tweets a lot, and he doesn't

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.239
<v Speaker 6>sleep very much, so you know he's when he's in

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 6>between meetings or even if he's in a meeting. I

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 6>think he's just sort of glued to that phone NonStop.

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 3>I can't relate. Like Tracy immediately turns her head to

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 3>me when you said that, but I can't relate to that.

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 5>So keep going.

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 4>You and Evon would have a lot to talk about,

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 4>I feel like.

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Or it would just be distracted the entire time and

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 3>not have it a lot to talk about.

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, right, here's the serious question. Are there synergies between

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 4>a company like space X and say a Tesla or

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 4>a boring company or neuralink or something like that.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean Elon Musk would say yeah, absolutely. I mean,

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>first of all, like the general thing that he did

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>with SpaceX, like if you go back to the beginning,

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is sort of take essentially like pre existing technology that

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>was more or less already out there, and find ways

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to make it more efficient, cheaper, and to sell it

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in a super effective way. Originally to the government of course,

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>now to private enterprises. And I think in certain ways

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>he's followed that playbook with almost every company except maybe

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>arguably actually more than maybe with X.

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and I think that like all of his companies

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 6>still serve this larger purpose. So for example, the Boring Company,

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 6>which we think of as this like weird tunneling startup,

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 6>that's like building tunnels under Las Vegas. Like if he

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 6>does like colonize Mars, you're going to need to build

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 6>tunnels on Mars because there's not an atmosphere on Mars,

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 6>so you have to like tear a form the planet first.

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 6>So like all of his companies have a role in

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 6>like the bigger project, which is the Mars colony, and

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 6>in the way that you know he's using X to

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 6>train the X dot AI and just the fact that

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 6>so many investors and executives and people are all related

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 6>to each other. It's like it's one big, kind of

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 6>massive elon universe. And I can't think of any other

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 6>executive who has run so many companies simultaneously, and he

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 6>just keeps expanding. I mean, that's what's so, that's what's

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 6>so wild, Like you would think that SpaceX and Tesla

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 6>would be enough, and now he's got six companies.

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 3>So Dan, it just to be clear on this when

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 3>you talk about Mars and the vision is to get

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 3>to Mond Like should we take that literally? Like, oh,

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 3>should we take it literally or seriously? Like is really

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 3>like the way to understand the constellation of companies as

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 3>a combined project. That's a Mars project and we should

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 3>take it literally. That that's what the project is.

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean, that's how I take it. Yeah, because I

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 6>think that, like, you know, okay, is does Tesla have

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 6>a relationship to Mars? Not really, but like Musk's wealth

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 6>is key. Like if you think about Musk needing wealth

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 6>and the amount of money that will be needed to

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 6>go to Mars, Tesla plays a role on that. You're

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 6>gonna need internet service on Mars. You're gonna need like

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 6>if human beings are living on Mars, they are gonna

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 6>need to communicate somehow. So yeah, I think of Mars

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 6>as being the guiding principle behind a lot of what

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 6>this guy does. And it does seem like fanciful and

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 6>pie in the sky, But then you think about how

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 6>many decisions he's made. It's all kind of with Mars

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 6>still at the apex of like what is driving him?

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can see though, some of that starting

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to stretch, right, I mean, like you don't need electric

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>cars on Mars. I mean you might need good batteries.

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess I think he. I think it's like seriously

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not literally, like Elon Musk believes that it would be

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>great if we had a Mars colony, and I think

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>he does actually, like with his own being, want to

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>visit Mars, and he's been able to use that as

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a sort of animating force behind this business that in

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways has like nothing to do with

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, SpaceX has something to do with going in

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to Mars in the sense that like, oh well, eventually

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the rockets will get big enough and so on. But

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>for many years, right it had nothing to do with

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.479
<v Speaker 1>going to Mars. It was sending stuff to lower Urbit.

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>But he's been able to use that belief as like

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the kind of guiding light for SpaceX and amazingly for

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>all of these other companies. Like he's people think of

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>him as this amazing engineer, but he's also an amazing marketer,

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's really good at sort of turning something that

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>can feel pretty pedestrian, like, hey, right now, the boring

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>company is digging a tunnel between like you know, one

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>end of the Las Vegas convention Center and the Virgin Hotel,

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:36.800
<v Speaker 1>which is like very close if you've been to Vegas

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and coming up with a story that somehow spins that

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>as like this is all about our plan to colonize Mars. Right.

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like a Steve Jobs level exaggeration slash marketing.

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>It's what makes him really successful. But it's also what

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, brings on critics and short sellers and so on.

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 4>Why hasn't he started an agriculture technology business Because I

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 4>feel like you're gonna have to grow potatoes on Mars.

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 4>That's one thing I've learned from Hollywood, and that could

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:04.319
<v Speaker 4>solve an Earth problem too. Right.

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, Kimball, his brother, Kimball, kind of does that, right.

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean, Kimball is like the chef who's got this

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 6>kitchen communities and he's growing organic food and teaching kids

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 6>how to be like cook and he's got restaurants. I

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 6>sort of feel like Kimball plays that role.

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean the most extreme version of this kind of

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like weird flight of fancy thing that is the woke

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>mind virus, right where when he took over Twitter. From

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the outside, you're looking at this, You're like, Okay, this

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is the guy who really likes this social media app.

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>He really likes posting on it. He also has amazing

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>access to great investors. He's got some ideas, and after

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:40.720
<v Speaker 1>buying it, you know, or I guess in the process

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of buying it, he sort of concocted this idea that

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter would be the key to saving civilization from collapse. Like,

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>because if the woke mind virus is Elon Musk describes it,

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 1>were to take over, then our Martian colity would be

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant because we'd all society would collapse. So I don't know,

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like he's he's got an endless capacity to like

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>ditched these new companies into that pre existing narrative.

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.279
<v Speaker 3>Wait, Max, you said something I want to follow up on.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 3>People think of Elon as a great engineer. Is he

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:11.800
<v Speaker 3>a great engineer or is he a great product manager,

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 3>product dev who has done an objectively phenomenal job of

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 3>bringing engineers together. I mean, there's no question he's built

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.240
<v Speaker 3>what he's built, and SpaceX is SpaceX, and et cetera.

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Is he himself considered to have great engineering jobs or

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 3>is he just like a great like sort of manager type?

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>He ask Elon, Right, he's gonna he will insist he's

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a great engineer. In fact, he's like put it in

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>his titles. You know, his like official title at SpaceX

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>has long been like chief rocket Designer. He like really

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>embraces the idea that he is involved in the engineering

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>for better or worse, you know, the cyber truck, as

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>recounted in the Walter Asacson book, Like the cyber truck

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways seems like a miss. And

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.879
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons is that Elon insisted on all

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>these things. Now, is that engineering? Is that product management? Like,

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know, I'm I don't He's not.

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's as hands on as as many

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>people work for him, although I will say he's definitely

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:03.760
<v Speaker 1>like a more hands on than your average Silicon Valley CEO,

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and he prides himself on that, and you know, for

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>better or worse, that's that's who he is.

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 4>So going back to SpaceX for a second, where does

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 4>the money actually come from? Because this must be massively expensive.

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 4>We got the sense from Ashley that you know, clearly

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 4>the business is exploding, but even with that revenue coming in,

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 4>you're still talking about billions and billions of dollars of

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:29.720
<v Speaker 4>upfront investment for something like rocket technology. Who's funding that, well, NASA.

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 6>I mean the company has sort of developed hand in

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 6>glove with NASA, which very early on, you know, after

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 6>the Space Shuttle program ended, NASA wanted commercial companies to

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 6>kind of take the mantle and basically lead to charge

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 6>in terms of privatizing space, and NASA sort of put

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 6>out bids for private companies to kind of bid on

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 6>the right to ferry not just cargo but humans to

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:56.280
<v Speaker 6>the International Space Station. Two companies one SpaceX and Boeing.

0:37:56.719 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 6>SpaceX beat Boeing by years. I mean SpaceX has been

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 6>bringing astronauts to and from the Space station now for

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 6>a while Boig has yet to fly. Like, so NASA

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 6>was a huge and very early kind of supporter of SpaceX.

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 6>And then beyond NASA, Like if you think of the

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 6>launch market as like a three legged stool, there's NASA,

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 6>there's the US military, and then there's like other satellite companies.

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 6>So I mean the military is also huge. Like, if

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:25.399
<v Speaker 6>you've got an NRO satellite going up there, you want

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 6>it to go up on an American rocket. So Elon

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 6>has a lot of defense contracts as well.

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny because you often hear stories that are

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>like Elon Musk beat NASA, right, as if they're in competition,

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And in certain ways, I suppose that's true, because SpaceX

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 1>is a privately held company and it develops things in

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat different way than NASA has in the past.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>But you could tell a story about SpaceX where the

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>hero is not Elon Musk, it's some like George W. Bush,

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>era administrator, who had the sort of brilliant idea to

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>give contracts to these private companies for what had become

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 1>essentially a routine mission, Like we don't need to spend

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>all this money on the shuttle, we should let the

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>likes of Elon Musk do it. And it's to NASA's

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 1>credit that they went for that, but also, of course,

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 1>to Elon Musk credit that he, you know, followed through

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>on it and achieved it.

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh, just on that note, do you get the sense

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 4>that SpaceX is particularly adept at bidding for government contracts?

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Is it that they're like especially efficient at providing the

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 4>best cost benefit, or is it that they're the only

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.360
<v Speaker 4>ones that have this technology or the only ones able

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 4>to do this at a certain scale?

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's an amazing he's amazing at it, Dan,

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 1>go ahead.

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, no, I mean that's the other thing that's sort

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 6>of a wild part of the backstory is SpaceX actually

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:38.759
<v Speaker 6>sued the Air Force for the right to compete on

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 6>these national security missions. And everyone thought at the time, like,

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 6>why would you sue the Air Force if you're trying

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 6>to bid on these contracts. But they sued and they won,

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 6>and then they started bidding and they absolutely win a

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 6>lot of the bidz because they are more cost effective.

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 6>It's not a cost plus contract, it's just like it's cheaper.

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 6>And like the Air Force and the Pentagon love Elon Musk.

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean, whenever he speaks at any of their like

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 6>military installations, he's like wildly applauded by all of the

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 6>folks there. And then in turn, like SpaceX has been

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 6>very shrewd about hiring former military people to come work

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 6>at SpaceX, so the whole revolving door thing. They have

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 6>an incredible lobbying team in Washington, d C. And so

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 6>when SpaceX started, it was on the outside of the

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 6>military industrial complex, and he very shrewdly kind of wormed

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 6>his way into it. And now he is very much

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 6>a part of it and like a big, big benefactor

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 6>of it.

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>We shall also say, like one thing that makes SpaceX

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of unique in Elon world is this woman Gwen Shotwell,

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 1>who is the COO and who has been the person

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>who has sort of led this push to like sell

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>these rockets to the military, as Dan and I talk

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:46.439
<v Speaker 1>about all the time on the podcast, and we've spent

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 1>time with Gwen as well, Like they have a unique relationship.

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>She is like uniquely able to manage Elon musk to

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 1>get kind of does.

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 3>That not exist at the other seven or eight companies,

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.040
<v Speaker 3>that sort of person who can manage him the same way? No,

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:00.840
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't.

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it exists at any of them.

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, because she's like the longest tenured person and she's

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 6>the only person who's like the clear number two, Like

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:12.399
<v Speaker 6>Tesla doesn't have a clear number two whatever. There's been

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 6>someone who seemed like the number two. They either get

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 6>fired or they quit. So she's got staying power and

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.919
<v Speaker 6>like this level of eq that is sort of unparalleled

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 6>at any of his other companies.

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Is SpaceX profitable? Could we get a scent? What are

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 3>some of the numbers that we know about it revenue profitabilities.

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Are we going to see an IPO? What are the

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 3>years are we talking about? Give us a talk talk

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 3>business for a second.

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So probably not, but I don't think we totally know.

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And Elon Musk has sort of indicated in all sorts

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of ways that he's not going to take SpaceX public.

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 1>What's sort of come out via reporting and like little

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>dribs and drabs of what he said is that he'd

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.919
<v Speaker 1>very much like to take starlink public, but that would

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>leave SpaceX, the defense contractor, to continue to be his domain.

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>That kind of makes sense because in theory, again the

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>real challenges with starlink business that I'm not sure everyone

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>totally appreciates, but in theory that could be a very

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>profitable business, lots of customers, it's like easy to model

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:11.280
<v Speaker 1>out and so on, and in theory could be separate

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>from SpaceX. The other thing is Starlink would create lots

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and lots of demand for SpaceX launches, because like if

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you're launching all these little satellites in the space and

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to do it continuously because they follow the sky, eventually,

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that's going to create lots of demand that SpaceX could use,

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>like long run to keep the rocket program developing and

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, eventually get to Mars. Yeah.

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 6>I also think that Elon doesn't really like being a

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 6>public company CEO. I mean, he tried to take Tesla

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 6>private in twenty eighteen, was forced to basically, you know,

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 6>go back on that idea and keep it public. But

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 6>he kind of hates it. Like he hates the disclosures,

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 6>he hates the rigamarole of earnings calls, he hates Delaware law.

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 6>You know, like there's a lot more scrutiny on you

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 6>when you are a publicly traded company. And so I

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:55.720
<v Speaker 6>kind of think going public is like a last resort

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 6>for him. I mean, you go public when you are

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:00.479
<v Speaker 6>trying to raise money, but if you can raise money

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 6>without it, I think he would prefer to stay private

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 6>for as long as possible.

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's also like a tension here because he

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to go public. He hates the idea of

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>giving up control is terrible. On the other hand, he's

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:14.720
<v Speaker 1>so good at dealing with Wall Street and like really,

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and I guess that's the line he's trying to walk

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>with Starlink. You know, you're able to like break off

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this piece of the business that maybe he doesn't care

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that much about, which allows him to tap capital markets

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>get his investors some kind of return while also keeping

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>his first love his own.

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 3>Danna and Max, thank you so much for coming on

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 3>odd lots, really appreciate it.

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Great to be here.

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 6>Thanks so much for having us.

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Tracy, I'm really glad we had those conversations because well,

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:51.880
<v Speaker 3>I just want to understand more. But now I like

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 3>more even fully appreciate what an extraordinary sort of I

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 3>guess moment it is that one private individual has such

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 3>a stranglehold I guess so to speak on space right now.

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:04.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm kind of reusable rocket pills.

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh, very exactly.

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, No, that was fascinating. There was so much to

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 4>pick out of that conversation. One thing I thought was

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 4>really interesting was when Ashley was talking about NASA and

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 4>the sort of headline risk it felt around rockets and

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:22.720
<v Speaker 4>various space launches that ended up being a limiting factor

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 4>in developing the technology. And we kind of see that

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 4>time and time again with government projects, right.

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 4>So, on the one hand, the government can be incredibly

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:33.400
<v Speaker 4>influential when it comes to, you know, promoting or designing

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 4>new technology. But on the other hand, it can end

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 4>up being very, very conservative because if something fails, it's

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 4>a waste of tax payer money, and you got all

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:42.760
<v Speaker 4>these negative headlines.

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Totally. I had not thought about that at all, but

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 3>it makes so much sense that, like we just come

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 3>to think about, like we know what a rocket is, right,

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 3>It's this extremely expensive, one time thing. It has to

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 3>be so reliable that we could put human life in it,

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 3>and you know, that was a whole purpose, and you know,

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Ashley talked about this sort of the rocket is the

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of representation of a nation scientific achievements, particularly during

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:12.319
<v Speaker 3>the Cold War, but that doesn't necessarily lend itself to

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 3>great commercial operations because it's so expensive. And then you

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 3>can sort of understand how a company can say, like, wait,

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:19.319
<v Speaker 3>maybe we can rethink this.

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:19.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 4>The other thing I would say is it feels like

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of this kind of happened in the background,

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 4>like the slow growth of SpaceX and Elon's Empire and

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:34.320
<v Speaker 4>the dominance of things like Starlink. But now with Ukraine

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 4>and Russia and various other things, it's kind of bursting

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 4>into the public consciousness. And I wonder if there's going

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:43.840
<v Speaker 4>to be more awareness, let's say, of that dominance.

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I just don't see how any government anywhere

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 3>could not be incredibly anxious about that. I mean, it

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 3>seems to be the advantage of the US government that

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 3>it is an American company that is so dominant, et cetera.

0:45:57.400 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 3>But obviously Elon is ELI and so I don't know

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 3>how much like any government wants to like sort of

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:05.759
<v Speaker 3>depend on that. And then for if you're China or

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 3>if you're Japan, or if you're Europe, SpaceX is not

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 3>one of your companies. And I know it feels like

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the sort of national security implications everywhere. I just imagine

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:18.800
<v Speaker 3>militaries and space agencies around the world must be like

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:21.280
<v Speaker 3>sitting off all kinds of alarm buddles, the alarm bells.

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 4>What did Danna say? It's Elon's universe.

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:28.320
<v Speaker 3>It literally is also like the idea like it really

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 3>is about Mars is like I find to be like

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 3>a really like fascinating idea that like you put all

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 3>these things together, boring tunnels, batteries, space, internet, satellite like

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 3>the unifying idea here.

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Where does the flamethrower fit in?

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 3>You got any how are you going to fight the martians?

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, isn't that obvious, like the Martians aren't going

0:46:50.000 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 3>to fight themselves, You're gonna have to Like.

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 4>The Martians aren't going to fight themselves.

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 3>You got to bring the flame throwers.

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 4>No, that was kind of an eye opening way, I

0:46:58.239 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 4>guess of making sense of what it first seems like

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 4>a very disparate universe of companies. So yeah, I thought

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:07.359
<v Speaker 4>that was incredibly interesting and definitely going to be watching

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 4>what SpaceX does next.

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Likewise, shall we leave it there? Let's leave it there,

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 3>and a big thank you to Ashley, Max and Dana,

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 3>and make sure you check out the Elon Inc. Podcast.

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 3>You can find and subscribe to that in all the

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:20.280
<v Speaker 3>regular places.

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 4>This has been another episode of the Odd Thoughts Podcast.

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:28.880
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at The Stalwart.

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.319
<v Speaker 3>Follow Ashley Vance He's at Ashley Vance. Follow Dana Hall,

0:47:32.440 --> 0:47:36.360
<v Speaker 3>She's at Dana Hall. And follow Max Chafkin He's at Chafkin,

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 3>and follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman Arman Dash,

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Ob Bennett at Dashbot and Cal Brooks at cal Brooks.

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 3>And thank you to our special producer Elon Inc. Producer

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:52.279
<v Speaker 3>Magnus Hendrickson, who used to be years ago the Reunited

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 3>with Magnus. Thank you to our producer Moses on them

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 3>from our odd Laws content, go to Bloomberg dot com

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 3>slash odd Lots, where you have transcripts, a blog, and

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 3>a newsletter and you can chat about all of these

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:05.879
<v Speaker 3>topics twenty four to seven in the discord discord dot

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 3>gg slash odd Lots.

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:09.520
<v Speaker 4>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 4>when we talk about reusable rockets and satellites falling out

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.720
<v Speaker 4>of the air, then please leave us a positive review

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 4>on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 4>a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of our

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 4>episodes absolutely ad free. All you need to do is

0:48:24.080 --> 0:48:27.799
<v Speaker 4>connect your Bloomberg account with Apple Podcasts. In order to

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 4>do that, just find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts.

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:31.880
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening.