WEBVTT - Country Garden on the Brink

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence, the podcast

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that pulls back the curtain non global business so you

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>can invest better across the Pacific realm. I'm Tom Corbett

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 2>And I'm John Lee. Another domino is falling in China's

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 2>troubled housing market. Country Garden, once considered a gem among

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Chinese property builders, is on the knife's edge of default

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 2>after missing a critical debt payment, stirring a new crisis

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>of confidence in the country's housing market and raising broader

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 2>questions about its economy.

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Country Gardens tumble into distress closely resembles earlier Carnage, a rival,

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>ever Grand, which defaulted on its own debt in twenty

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, leaving some asking if other developers are far behind.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 2>What does this latest fiasco say about China's housing market?

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Why is it happening, what's at stake, who's getting hurt?

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 2>And how is it going to end.

0:00:56.240 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in Christy Hangs, senior equity analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I think Country Gardens event tells us that most of

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 3>China's private developers could be wiped out.

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 2>From the market, and Daniel Fann, senior credit analyst.

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 4>If Country Garden defaults, it will be probably marked kind

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 4>of the end of China property era since two thousand

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 4>and eight.

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Both joining us here in Hong Kong, Christy Dan, welcome.

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having us going to be here.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 2>Christy. We've had a number of Chinese developers, including Evergrand,

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 2>collapse over the last two years. But why is the

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 2>potential default of Country Garden different?

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 3>So, first of all, Country Garden has over three thousand projects,

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, and that's already four times Every Grand's number

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 3>of projects. So if there are issues with unfinished homes,

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 3>it's just a bigger headache for local governments to deal

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 3>with because there are just many more projects. And secondly,

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the nature of the two events are very different.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 3>When Evergrand went, but the Central Bank can still call

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 3>it an isolated event is because of its own poor

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 3>management and ratless expand. But for Country Garden, it's designated

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 3>as a high quality developer still by the government in

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 3>the late twenty twenty two, and you know, it's granted

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 3>as us to onshore born sales and bank credit lines,

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 3>yet nine months later is failing to repay a coupont

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 3>payment and for that to happen to a Country Garden

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 3>is more detrimental to sentiment, I would say, because it

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 3>tells you that something's fundamentally wrong in China's housing market,

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 3>and that's pushing even formally healthy developers to the brank

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 3>of default.

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 4>From a fixing come perspective, I think Country Garden is

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 4>important in the sense that it used to be a

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 4>core holding for many many fund managers. I think that

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 4>a pornly was rated investment grade as well. I think

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 4>it may last year, So that makes it very detrimental

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 4>if Country Garden goes wrong. That's more from a trading

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 4>or positioning perspective.

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 2>So this used to be rated investment grade. You're saying

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 2>yes and low investment grad I hate to be one

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 2>of those analyst right now.

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>But when you consider how quickly Country Garden went into

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>distress Christy Dan, what does that tell you about the

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>nature of their financial situation and China's broader housing market.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 3>The Country guardency event postes questions about the fundamental health

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 3>of China's housing market. And we have always acknowledged that

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 3>housing market in China are property developers, they are over leverage,

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 3>and there's an oversupply in the housing market in China,

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot of access in the system, but

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 3>that has gone unnoticed when there are a lot of

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 3>investment demand scooping or absorbing those oversupply of properties. But

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 3>when the parties stopped in twenty twenty one and the

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 3>pricing come down, and when people stop investing, we realize

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 3>that there is a big problem there. And it is

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 3>not a cyclical problem that you can wait out for

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 3>a few years for things to get better. But we

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 3>realize that China is facing our structural problems and housing

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 3>market is going to change in the way that it

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 3>operates for many years to come, and it's going to

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 3>be a painful process of adjustments.

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Then you'll fan, did it surprise you how quickly Country

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Garden fell into distrust? Is that something you could have

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>seen coming?

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 4>I think yes and no. Yes in the sense that

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 4>once they are not able to do the sare placement

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 4>at the end of July, which was a very strong

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 4>signal about their ability to get refinancing or willingness.

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>That was the early signal that maybe something wasn't quite right.

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 4>That was a confirment signal kind of. I think Christie

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 4>has made some earlier call about the negativity on the setter.

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 4>So for Country Garden, because they did a roll over

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 4>on their syndicated long in July. So given hope that

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 4>they're able to roll over and then hopefully followed by

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 4>a Sair placement, then I think they're able to kind

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 4>of like muddle through for a couple of a few

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 4>more months before they made the call to delay their

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 4>cup point payment.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and for our side, I think that canary in

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 3>the coal mine is in early July when we know

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 3>that contractor sales for Country out And was down fifty

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 3>four percent year over year in June. And I think

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 3>some of the media has liken China developers to that

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 3>business model to a Ponzi scheme, which is, you know,

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 3>because often developers need to bring in fresh new cells

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 3>to generate cash in order to surface the construction cost

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 3>of projects that were sold one to two years ago.

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 3>And Country Oda had said before in need twenty eight

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 3>to thirty billion yar a month to ensure it has

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 3>enough cash to complete presole properties. Yet we keep on

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 3>seeing cells falling, you know, sixteen billion, twelve billion, and

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 3>that's when we started making calls on you know, we

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 3>need to worry about its liquidity. But I think everything

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 3>is unfolding so quickly and suddenly. Timing wise, our best

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 3>guests was something that might happen late this year or

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 3>early next year when it's convertible born or dollar born

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 3>come due.

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 2>So Christy, you med an interesting observation. Are you suggesting

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>that they need new sales to fund existing projects?

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because I think it's the business model of Chinese developers.

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, they are looking at high turnover of their assets,

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 3>so they will try to make money from contract to sales,

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 3>and with that money they would invest in new land

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 3>puzzles to just keep on boosting their land bank and

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 3>their top line growth. But suddenly, when sell slum, which

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 3>is the case when everywhere went bus and the whole

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 3>industry we had saw thirty percent slum in sALS in

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty two, the problem starts unfolding and we can

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 3>see that, you know, they're running out of liquidity. A

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of their money is locked on a project level.

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 3>And then we see, you know, developers failing to repay debt,

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 3>and it's just keep on spreading to more and more developers.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And that wasn't just for Country Garden, was it. Christie

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Hung that's true for most China property developers. This idea

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that as long as they have access to financing, whether

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.559
<v Speaker 1>it's debt or equity or for sales, they can keep

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>kicking the ball down. They can keep perpetuating their business

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>model once something goes wrong.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's very true. And I think, just to be clear,

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 3>you know, since Everygrand's debacle, there are over sixty other

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 3>developers that have extended or defaulted on their debts. So

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 3>there are many privately owned developers that is still soften,

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 3>and Country Garden is one of the biggest survivor until

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 3>it's failing to repay is coupon payments.

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 2>So back during the global financial crisis, the US and

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 2>European government saved a lot of banks and companies dean

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 2>too big to fail? Do you think Country Garden is

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 2>too big to fail? And will the Chinese authorities come

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 2>to the rescue with a bailout plan?

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 3>So to me, it's too big to fail, and because

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I've talked about how it's the largest developer by itself

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 3>in the past six years and a dead crisis is

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 3>going to put completions of its three thousand projects at risk.

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 3>But that being said, we don't think Country Garden can

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 3>count on about by the government because since mid twenty

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty one, since Everygrand's debarcle, the government has stopped sort

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 3>of rescuing the liquidity of individual developers, and Country Garden

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 3>could be no exception. You know, the government's priority is

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 3>to complete the priestole homes to ensure the livelihood of people,

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 3>but not to prevent corporate effaults.

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 2>And is there an underlying raison for that. Is the

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 2>government just running out of finances or is it more

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>that the worried about moral hazard risk.

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I think both of your reasoning makes sense, and at

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 3>the end, I think it does make sense if the

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 3>government doesn't offer a bet or because if you look

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 3>at the land bank of Country Garden, eighty percent of

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 3>it is focused on China smaller low tier cities where

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, housing is now very hard to sell and

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 3>that's very weak demand in those markets. So even if

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 3>there is hand out from the government, it is going

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 3>to only offer temporary liquidity reprieve, but it's not going

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 3>to change the longer term fate that you know, Country

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Garden's business model isn't working, and it's due to aufflaor

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 3>strategic focus on log cities, and I think to the

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 3>government's point, it might not make sense to throw good

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 3>money off to pat.

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence. By the way,

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>if you like what you hear, and we hope you do,

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>please rate us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>wherever you may be listening to us. Of course, more

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>stars are better. Your feedback matters, and we love hearing

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>from our listeners. You know, a lot of the damage

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>may not come from the crisis itself at Country Garden,

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>but in Chinese consumer's reaction to it, because it may

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>fan the flames of doubt among home buyers. Many you're

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.239
<v Speaker 1>going to be reluctant to purchase because they lack confidence

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that Country Garden can deliver. Are we at risk of

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a feedback loop here? Now that this has happened to

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a second major developer, Daniel Fan any take on that?

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's just Tom Westpinal just add to

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 4>what Christy mentioned. I think we financing is one thing

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 4>causing the trouble. It's a double mmy weaker sales plus

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 4>a let lot with financing market. If you're homeowner, first

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 4>of all, you worry about delivery, and then second of all,

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 4>you worry about mortgage, so definitely it will burn into consumption.

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.359
<v Speaker 4>I think an other impact would be like engineering companies.

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 4>Construction companies that deal directly with developers may also take.

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 3>The heat, right and I think that's you know, with

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 3>the stumming home selves. Adding to what Dan just mentioned,

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 3>there's also downstream industries that is going to be impacted.

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, look at renovation companies, white goods, furniture, and

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 3>if there's falling home prices, you can expect there would

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 3>be wealth effect on consumption. Consumers are now feeling poorer

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 3>because home prices are declining and they are less likely

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 3>to spend, especially on say discretionary items, and that in

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 3>turns squeeze retail sales, herd corporate earnings, and corporates might consider,

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, it has to cut headcounts, and then that's

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>built over into you know, there's a weaker and player,

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm an outlook in the market, and people are not

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 3>feeling safe about the income and about their job, so

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 3>then they might not be able to commit to buying

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>a property right now. So it's a negative loop, as Tom.

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned, and Chinese consumers are already feeling strapped, and

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>this is coming against a backdrop of almost a cascade

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of problems. You've got inflation, you've got youth unemployment. So

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about how the impact and the

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>housing market is dovetailing into all those other factors.

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 3>China property is say twenty twenty five percent of China's GDP.

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 3>It's a pillar industry. So if it has a big

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 3>problem like country guidence event that we're looking at right now,

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 3>it's going to weigh on sentiment on the Ovoy economy.

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 2>So what can the authorities do? The Chinese government has

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 2>always been able to pull some leavers to restart the economy,

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 2>to fan the animal spirits. What can they do to

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 2>save the housing industry?

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 3>I think for now we are seeing the government is

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 3>focused on demand syde policies like easing home purchase restrictions

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 3>in larger cities, lowering down payment ratios, and cutting mortgage rays.

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 3>But I think the reality is, you know, people are

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>not buying property because mortgage rate is cheap. They were

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 3>buying property because they expect home price to appreciate. That's

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 3>until the party is over in twenty twenty one. You know,

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 3>the household mindset about investing in property has changed already,

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 3>and the government's mentor of housing is for living in,

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 3>not for expectation, is becoming more and more ingrained in

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 3>people's mindset, and I think what policy didn't do this

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 3>round is to address the liquidity problem of any developer.

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 3>So when buyers continue to see more developers are defaulting,

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 3>that's a big damage to confidence. I think it's just

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 3>very hard to just go with demand side policies to

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 3>just revive demand and not fix the corporate debt problems

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 3>that's facing Chinese developers, because the two go hand in

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 3>hand together to bring up the health of the China's

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 3>housing mine.

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Trying to just lower it's interest rate by fifteen basis

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 2>points to two point five percent. Look, I think this

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 2>was the steepest cutting three years. Do you think this

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 2>is going to have any impact at all?

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 3>I think, as I said, I don't think it's going

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 3>to move the needle in terms of housing market sentiment

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 3>because people are not buying because mortgage rate is cheap.

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 3>They are buying property because they expected home price to appreciate,

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 3>and that was the case in twenty sixteen to twenty twenty,

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 3>when prices were up for to eleven percent per year,

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 3>and you know, home price appreciation is just almost like

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 3>a certainty to people. That's why there's so much investment

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 3>going into property. And there's obviously overbuilding of housing in China,

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 3>and when we see that they're downside to home prices

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 3>since twenty twenty one, people stop investing those overbuilding of

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, infantry. There's no its demand coming in to

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 3>absorb them, and that becomes a big problem.

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Christy Hang, Daniel Fan. We've seen Chinese regulators step in.

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>There was somewhat of a rescue package in November, and

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>yet still you have a second major developer that's fallen

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>into the stress. How did we get here?

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 4>I think on the financing side, the government tried to help,

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 4>but the structure itself has some issue. I think they

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 4>did some like three arrows program. The second one is

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 4>to guarantee onso borns issue by developers. But the problem

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 4>is developers need to pull up collaterals. As you know,

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot of these developers they are over leveraged already.

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 4>They don't have a lot of unpledged asset to post

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 4>a collateral purpose. So that's the reason why the supportive

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 4>program did not work out that well.

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, to back up dance point, say, for example, a

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Country Garden, it was able to issue state guarantee bond

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 3>for about three point five billion in twenty twenty two,

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 3>and that compared to itself, Slum is down two hundred

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 3>billion on. So you see the extreme comparison of how

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 3>littwo bond is able to raise and how sales has

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 3>been in a steep decline. That just shows you even

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 3>though the government filed to support high quality developers like

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Country Garden back in November during the Rescue Plan, policy

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 3>support up to this point seems still far from sufficient.

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Daniel.

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 2>If we can take a step back, country Gardens is

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 2>still not in technical default. What are the next steps?

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Can they pull a rabbit out of the hat?

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 4>I think yeah, they still have like thirty day great spirit.

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 4>They're supposed to pay the cubebone on August six, so

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 4>meaning that like around September six, if they are able

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 4>to come up with their money, then they are able

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 4>to resolve this technical default. I'm still a little bit

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 4>hopeful that they are able to come up with money,

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 4>or at least come up with some swittener like to

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 4>ask one extension of the cube on payment, So I

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 4>think that we will buy them some time to deal

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 4>with a bigger problem. And Country gardens demise has had

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 4>a big impact on equity markets, but arguably it's had

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 4>an even bigger impact on credit markets. How important is

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 4>Country Garden to China's credit markets and what's the lasting

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 4>impact if it were to devote? I think the impact

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 4>is in that addition to the fact that it's a

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 4>core holding for many fire managers. Is market share in

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 4>the ind that is still not small if I remember correctly.

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 4>It had a point eight billion of US dollars bond

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 4>in the China Real Estate Index, which is around like

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 4>thirty something billion if I remember correctly, So the proportion

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 4>is not small. And I think more importantly is we

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 4>don't have other big developers left after Country Garden. We

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 4>have a bunch of like niche developers, and then we

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 4>have some soees and a couple of investment grade developers.

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 4>So if Country Garden defaults, it will be probably marked

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 4>kind of the end of China property era since like

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and eight something like that.

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's a pretty stark or rather bold take, I

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>would say.

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So if you imagine, like if Country Garden defaults,

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 4>we are going back to pre Country Garden era. Country

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Garden was listed in two thousand and seven, so then

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 4>if they default, basically we are back to two thousand

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 4>and six. At that time there were like a handful

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 4>of developers in the board market.

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 3>I think maybe I would like to ask then a

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 3>question about the slow process of restructuring of bonds for

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 3>the developers. I say, Everygren's debacle started in mid twenty

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty one, but now were still nowhere in the process

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 3>of concluding our restructuring, and what is your take on that.

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 4>I think there are a few reasons for that. One

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 4>is to crystallize the total death. I think, for example,

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Evergrand they announced their twenty twenty two results not that

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 4>long ago, so you need to have some kind of

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 4>numbers to form at least the framework of the that

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 4>restruction plan. I mean, ideally you're able to do some

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 4>kind of careful projection to see how much sales you're

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 4>able to generate, although that's a big academic If you

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 4>talk about Evergrant's extension plan, the longest one is twelve years,

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 4>So you're going to do a projection for twelve years,

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 4>and I don't think it's practical at the current environment.

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 4>And the other thing is, given what you have mentioned

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 4>the outlook of the SETA and we are in a

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 4>down cycle, some developer may just take the advantage of

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 4>observing what's happening what others are going to do. At

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 4>the same time, they are kind of in the place

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 4>it standstill or some kind of like foremost stand still,

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 4>meaning that they don't need to pay coupon and the

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 4>one is going to sue them. There's some cases that

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 4>develop us are being sue, but in most cases they

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 4>are able to get away. So that's another reason for

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 4>a practical purpose. So all added together, we sees no

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 4>move in that restructuring.

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Christy Dan, what do you both see as far as

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>contagion risk? It could ripple in any number of directions.

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>You've got to exposed bondholders. HSBC and Blackrock are both

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>major bondholders. There's of course other developers, banks, other lenders, creditors,

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>asset managers, property buyers and owners. What do we know

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>about contagion risk? How bad could it be? Who's most

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>at risk? Tell us what you're thinking.

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 3>I think within the developers space after country garden biers

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 3>are going to question you know, can I trust in

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 3>any private developers in China and the pres projects And therefore,

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, for the small amount of developers that are

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 3>still left standing, the cells are going to suffer and

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 3>so as the liquidity and we do expect a second

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 3>wave of liquidity crisis, and that could wipe out most

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 3>major players in the private sector in a China property space.

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It becomes a toxic feedback loop, doesn't it.

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And if you look at developers like Agile Season,

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 3>they have even weaker cash coverage of short term debt

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 3>than Country Garden as of end twenty twenty two, and

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 3>they're similarly focused on China's low tier city so their

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 3>liquidity would be something that we'll be watching in the

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 3>next six months.

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I was going to mention Warren Buffett is famous for

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>saying there's never just one cockroach in the kitchen. We've

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 1>already seen many developers, not just Country Gardener ever Grant

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>tumble into distress. But it's not a stretch. I think

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>others are at risk, as you just mentioned.

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 4>I think, yeah, being this way for a second or

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 4>the impact depends on the situation to the banking sector

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 4>in an other ways, given the bank's exposure to developers

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 4>and also like potential delay in mortgage installments on.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, Daniel, that's an interesting point. Over the weekend

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 2>there was news that a major Chinese trust company missed

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 2>a payment, sparking concerns posed by wealth products issued by

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 2>I guess the shadow banking sector if you'd like to

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 2>call it. Is there any relationship between these wealth products

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 2>and developers.

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 3>So, property developers have been big issuers of truts loans

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 3>and that is one of the major funding channels too,

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 3>in addition to on shore offshop bonds as well as

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 3>bank lending. So, as Dan mentioned, you know a big

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 3>chunk of private developer issuers. They have either extended or

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 3>defaulted on the debts. The issues with the delinquency of

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 3>these truts products are going to continue to emerge, and

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 3>my continuity to see more headlines hitting the market.

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Christy, Dan paint the picture for us. How do you

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>both see this drama unraveling? It's not going to stop

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>with Country Garden. Christy, you just suggested, do regulators intervene?

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Do bankers intervene? What's the endgame? What do you see

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.239
<v Speaker 1>three six months down the road? Right?

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I think country Guidance event tells us that most of

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 3>China's private developers could be wiped out from the market.

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 3>And the scary thing is private developers in China account

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 3>for about sixty five percent of home sales in twenty

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 3>twenty one, and if most of them cannot survive, you

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 3>can expect the supply pipeline that is going to come

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 3>for China. And I think in the near to medium

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 3>term you will see a property sector that's predominated by

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 3>just most these state owned developers, and for perfect developers,

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 3>that market presence will continue to languish. And I think

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 3>for housing as a commodity is going to become more

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 3>and more boring. You know, housing in China that have

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 3>generated so much investment appeal during twenty one six to

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty. And for the trends in terms of new

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 3>home cells, you can see from the example that the

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 3>US took around seventeen years to make it back to

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 3>pre crisis level in twenty oh five, and it was

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 3>like a V shape recovery that happened over seventeen years.

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 3>But for China, we think that new home cells likely

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 3>would never make it back to pre crisis Level's going

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 3>to be an L shaped and the size of new

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 3>home cells already shrunk thirty percent in twenty twenty two,

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 3>and I think I'll just continue to see protracted contraction

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 3>from here.

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty downbeat assessment. Daniel Fan, is there any

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>upside for.

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 4>Fixing her market? I think it's a little bit difficult

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 4>to see upside because of the shinking of their market,

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 4>especially in the higher area. So fund managers basically they

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 4>may head for two directions. One is fight for quality,

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 4>so meaning that they will do more investment grapeon, and

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 4>also they will diversify away from China.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.479
<v Speaker 2>I guess so if properly markets are doing poorly, equity

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 2>markets are not doing much better, and same with credit markets,

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>then where do investors put their money in China?

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a little bit difficult to justify the

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 4>core on China. There are already some fund managers looking

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 4>at Japan and Australia, so make Asia like a bigger Asia.

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 4>Usually in the past we talk about Asia, it's always

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Asia is Japan and we don't usually include Australia into

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 4>the picture. But now it seems the situation is changing.

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 4>We have a bigger Asia.

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think Shani Wong our analysts covering brokerages

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 3>and Stephen covering insurance. They have been happening on how

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 3>we have been seeing more self bound Thlough going into

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 3>insurance products in Hong Kong because it offers higher you know,

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 3>related to the US in the US, and we're also

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 3>seeing more investments into mutual fund products in China.

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Christy Daniel, Let's say I'm sitting in the US, I'm

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to this podcast and I'm thinking, well, this is interesting,

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but this crisis is happening in China. It's far away,

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but it goes beyond that, doesn't it. The impact is

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>real and the impact goes beyond China's borders. Talk a

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit about that.

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 4>I think for US investors, the impact is there, especially

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 4>for Country Garden because at one point it was investment grade.

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 4>So there's some US investors they use Country Garden as

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 4>a protzy to invest in China. So in this scenario,

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 4>they may need to rethink what they need to do

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 4>in Asia, including China. China is a bit portant, especially

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.360
<v Speaker 4>in the physical market for Asia.

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and a lot of institutional investors are evaluating the

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 3>case of investing in China. We've been hearing how foreign

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 3>investors are talking about Chinese these physical properties as something

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 3>that they wouldn't touch because of just the diet our

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 3>look in the market, and how it's very hard to

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 3>liquidate those assets.

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And both of you have spent countless hours following this

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>drama researching the financial distress among the developers as it unfolds.

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Are there any lessons looking back that have come across

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>your mind that we can draw from China's housing crisis.

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 3>I was just having a conversation with Dan the other

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 3>day and we mentioned how we have been reflecting on

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 3>the policy actions in China in the past eight to

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 3>ten years. And remember how China opened up on shop

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 3>on issuance to develop her in twenty fifteen, and that

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 3>is followed by five years of housing boom. And because

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 3>developers they have such ease in raising funding, whether it's

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 3>from the on chopbon market or from the off shop

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 3>on market. Because then was talking about how you was

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 3>close to zero for safe or risk free securities, whereas

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 3>for Country Garden or other developers, the US are just

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 3>so appealing, and that attracted a lot of offshore funding

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 3>for developers too, and with those money, developers they went

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 3>on shore to buy a lot of land, they speculated

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 3>on land, land prices jump and therefore home prices jumped,

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 3>and when investors saw the home presses jumped more appiling

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 3>in to invest in property, and that caused the housing

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 3>brewmen the past five years. And then there came the

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 3>three Red lines through in two tho nineteen that basically

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 3>popped the bubble for Evergrand and most of the other

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 3>private developers that followed. And I think the course of

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 3>events that is unvoting before us, I would still say

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 3>that majority of it could be a result of policy actions.

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 3>So we need to reflect on how policies could come

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 3>sometimes too late, to bring back the balance in the market.

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we should end this podcast on a

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 2>positive note. Is there any super lining to this story anyone?

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 4>I think if we take policy aside, we locate it

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 4>as a kind of like cythnical down tern Purely from

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 4>the financial market perspective, it's not that unpredictable because if

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 4>you look at the funding situation, the bond issues appeared

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 4>in twenty nineteen, so in how you market the maturities

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 4>three to five years, so it's pointing to probably twenty

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 4>twenty two and twenty twenty four kind of range for maturities,

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 4>so that is written down like a few years ago.

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 4>And the other thing is, as Christie mentioned, the fundamentals

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:53.959
<v Speaker 4>over supply versus demand. I think ever since twenty seventeen

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 4>when also Born market open, a lot of developers they're

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 4>talking about their the glow that top live three times,

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 4>so meaning that supplies coming, but at the same time,

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 4>demand on the hard side is like on the slow side,

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 4>given if you look at the TTV growth in China,

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 4>so that's kind of a mismatched. So now we can

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.239
<v Speaker 4>draw some kind of conclusion we are very close to

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 4>a bottom from a cythnical perspective, if there's like eternal

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 4>run in the macroeconomy, hopeful that we could see a

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 4>bull market lightly in twenty twenty six to twenty twenty seven.

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of a weight, but our fingers are crossed.

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think in the longer term, we are

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 3>still positive about housing market in tier one cities or

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 3>stronger tier two cities like shan Jan Hanjo, and we

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 3>have been visiting projects. We've been seeing correction in prices

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 3>in even those largest cities. So I think if you

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 3>are an investor in the physical market. It's not a

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 3>bad entry point to consider in the coming one to

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 3>two years as prices spots home.

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking China's property crisis with Christy Hog and

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Fan, both senior analysts with Bloomberg Intelligence. Christy Daniel

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>has been a compelling story and your expertise and your

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>insights have really got a long way toward helping us

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>unschool this and better understand it. And we look forward

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to following your research and to hearing more from you

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>as it unfolds.

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Tom, great pleasure to be here.

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom mccorbett in Hong Kong, and I'm John Lee.

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 2>This podcast was edited by Clara Chen and you've been

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 2>listening to the Asia Centric podcast