1
00:00:00,840 --> 00:00:03,000
Speaker 1: What's the friends, and welcome into Fantasy Pros. This is

2
00:00:03,040 --> 00:00:06,200
Speaker 1: the Fantasy Football Podcast. I am Chris Welsh, and I've

3
00:00:06,200 --> 00:00:10,680
Speaker 1: got two of the brightest and best minds at Fantasy Pros.

4
00:00:10,680 --> 00:00:11,799
Speaker 1: And what are we here to talk about?

5
00:00:12,039 --> 00:00:12,600
Speaker 2: Wait? Wait? Where?

6
00:00:12,760 --> 00:00:14,640
Speaker 1: Oh wait? No, I've got patent Debro. Sorry, I've got

7
00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:18,240
Speaker 1: patent Debro. Still pretty great. You guys sync that up fantastically,

8
00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:19,880
Speaker 1: by the way, hat tip to both of you. We've

9
00:00:19,880 --> 00:00:22,000
Speaker 1: got Pat fitz Morris and Derek Brown, the King of

10
00:00:22,000 --> 00:00:24,079
Speaker 1: Bros Debros, in the house where we're gonna be talking

11
00:00:24,079 --> 00:00:26,720
Speaker 1: about some running backs. We're not gonna go insane with

12
00:00:26,880 --> 00:00:29,280
Speaker 1: tons and tons of ranks, but we're gonna get hyper focused.

13
00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:32,000
Speaker 1: We're gonna talk about four running backs that these fine

14
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:36,320
Speaker 1: gentlemen cannot stop drafting because there's floor, there's upside. They've

15
00:00:36,400 --> 00:00:38,760
Speaker 1: just got to have them. And guess what their ECRs

16
00:00:39,040 --> 00:00:40,960
Speaker 1: might be kind of juicy because they are players that

17
00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:43,400
Speaker 1: are very obtainable. So we've got four of them to

18
00:00:43,479 --> 00:00:46,159
Speaker 1: be tackling today. Debro, what's up, brother? You ready to

19
00:00:46,159 --> 00:00:47,040
Speaker 1: talk some running backs?

20
00:00:47,159 --> 00:00:51,360
Speaker 2: Hell? Yeah, Welsh, I mean, this is the sex Appeal show, right,

21
00:00:51,520 --> 00:00:53,760
Speaker 2: like it's all in vogue. The year of the running

22
00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:57,080
Speaker 2: back is back run the dang ball, I mean, passing

23
00:00:57,160 --> 00:00:59,680
Speaker 2: is out the window in the NFL. So this is

24
00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:02,279
Speaker 2: oh right, like we're stylish here, correct.

25
00:01:02,160 --> 00:01:05,720
Speaker 1: Okay, very interesting take. Pat, I would say, does this

26
00:01:05,840 --> 00:01:09,080
Speaker 1: show and this conversation make the case why you can

27
00:01:09,080 --> 00:01:11,800
Speaker 1: get back into all your early wide receivers and not

28
00:01:11,959 --> 00:01:15,319
Speaker 1: have to play the early running backs. This might be

29
00:01:15,400 --> 00:01:18,520
Speaker 1: the case. It's not like a no running back situation

30
00:01:18,640 --> 00:01:20,920
Speaker 1: or anything like that, but these are maybe some of

31
00:01:20,920 --> 00:01:22,280
Speaker 1: the players are going to make it a little bit

32
00:01:22,280 --> 00:01:25,520
Speaker 1: easier for you to tap, you know, wide receiver, tight

33
00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:28,200
Speaker 1: end for you, Pat, or wide receiver, wide receiver. What

34
00:01:28,200 --> 00:01:28,840
Speaker 1: do you say about that?

35
00:01:29,400 --> 00:01:32,800
Speaker 3: Yes, value running backs. Here are the guys we're going

36
00:01:32,840 --> 00:01:35,040
Speaker 3: to talk about. Walsh, and I believe everyone we're going

37
00:01:35,080 --> 00:01:39,640
Speaker 3: to discuss today has an ECR of RB twenty or later.

38
00:01:40,319 --> 00:01:42,880
Speaker 1: Okay, so there you have it. You want to get

39
00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:45,000
Speaker 1: a little bit heavier in the wide receiver streets, Maybe

40
00:01:45,000 --> 00:01:46,880
Speaker 1: you want to make sure you're getting yourself a Rock

41
00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:49,600
Speaker 1: Bauers or something like that. These are some running backs

42
00:01:49,640 --> 00:01:52,880
Speaker 1: that might be speaking to you. If you guys want

43
00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:54,720
Speaker 1: to join in the conversation, you can go to Fantasy

44
00:01:54,720 --> 00:01:57,520
Speaker 1: bros dot Com slash NFL slash rankings. You can check

45
00:01:57,520 --> 00:01:59,560
Speaker 1: out all the rankings we've got going on. You can

46
00:01:59,600 --> 00:02:02,920
Speaker 1: look away. These fine gentlemen have everybody the expert consensus ranks.

47
00:02:02,960 --> 00:02:05,560
Speaker 1: I believe we're up over fifty plus rankers that are

48
00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:07,520
Speaker 1: on there right now. That's only going to continue growing.

49
00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:09,400
Speaker 1: And there's lots of other plays you can check out

50
00:02:09,400 --> 00:02:11,640
Speaker 1: the ADP to compare against lots of good fun stuff.

51
00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:13,280
Speaker 1: So go and check that out. If you want to

52
00:02:13,280 --> 00:02:16,320
Speaker 1: follow along, let's jump into it. We've got four running backs,

53
00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:18,760
Speaker 1: deebro We are going to start with you, your first

54
00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:21,560
Speaker 1: running back. He's a guy you can't stop drafting. He's

55
00:02:21,600 --> 00:02:24,560
Speaker 1: of value. We're looking Best Ball versus ECR. We got

56
00:02:24,560 --> 00:02:27,239
Speaker 1: the whole thing under the sun. Which running back do

57
00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:28,240
Speaker 1: people need to know about?

58
00:02:28,240 --> 00:02:28,320
Speaker 2: That?

59
00:02:28,360 --> 00:02:30,120
Speaker 1: You are going to be targeting every.

60
00:02:29,960 --> 00:02:32,040
Speaker 2: Single time I log into draft a Best Ball team

61
00:02:32,160 --> 00:02:35,040
Speaker 2: or I'm looking at early ADP. David Montgomery stands out

62
00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:38,120
Speaker 2: to me as a massive value. He's RB twenty in

63
00:02:38,160 --> 00:02:41,760
Speaker 2: Best Ball, RB twenty four in ECR, and I just

64
00:02:41,760 --> 00:02:43,960
Speaker 2: think people are forgotten what Joe Mixon did in this

65
00:02:44,080 --> 00:02:46,960
Speaker 2: exact offense a few years ago in twenty twenty four,

66
00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:50,679
Speaker 2: Mixon was fifth and opportunity share top fifteen and snapshare

67
00:02:51,160 --> 00:02:54,239
Speaker 2: thirteenth and freaking carries. He finished with two hundred and

68
00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:57,000
Speaker 2: eighty one touches in that offense, and there's nothing stopping

69
00:02:57,040 --> 00:03:00,000
Speaker 2: Montgomery from flirting with that number or three hundred touches

70
00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:02,120
Speaker 2: this year. And he's not washed. Guys. That's the other

71
00:03:02,120 --> 00:03:04,400
Speaker 2: part about this. They look at the age of Montgomery

72
00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:07,239
Speaker 2: and they say, can he still be in every down

73
00:03:07,240 --> 00:03:09,360
Speaker 2: back what we saw in Chicago? I think he can.

74
00:03:09,520 --> 00:03:11,639
Speaker 2: Like last year on a per touch basis, he was

75
00:03:11,680 --> 00:03:15,480
Speaker 2: still awesome in Detroit twelfth in yards are to contact

76
00:03:15,480 --> 00:03:17,480
Speaker 2: pert tentp. We want to talk about three down skill

77
00:03:17,520 --> 00:03:21,400
Speaker 2: set and him shoving Woody Marks into a clear, just

78
00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:24,440
Speaker 2: change of pace role, which I think is going to happen.

79
00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:26,959
Speaker 2: He was also twenty second in yards per route run

80
00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:30,880
Speaker 2: twelfth and first downs per route run. Montgomery beat Woody

81
00:03:30,960 --> 00:03:35,200
Speaker 2: Marx on every single per touch efficiency metric last year

82
00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:38,920
Speaker 2: and as well as a pass protector. Regardless of whatever

83
00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:41,560
Speaker 2: you look at, Montgomery is a better running back. I

84
00:03:41,600 --> 00:03:44,920
Speaker 2: think they're going to ride him into the ground this year,

85
00:03:45,120 --> 00:03:48,480
Speaker 2: very much similar to Joe Mixon, and he's a top

86
00:03:48,480 --> 00:03:50,880
Speaker 2: fifteen back For me, I think he's got RB one

87
00:03:50,960 --> 00:03:52,480
Speaker 2: upside if all the things hit.

88
00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:54,960
Speaker 1: What do you think, just real quick before we get

89
00:03:54,960 --> 00:03:57,600
Speaker 1: Pats take on this, what do you think the biggest

90
00:03:57,600 --> 00:04:00,320
Speaker 1: factor between the best ball and the ECR ranks is?

91
00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:03,440
Speaker 1: Why is best ball? Again, it's not like a tier difference,

92
00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:05,080
Speaker 1: but it's you know, it's closing in on like mid

93
00:04:05,200 --> 00:04:07,160
Speaker 1: RB two versus the back end of RB two. Why

94
00:04:07,200 --> 00:04:09,960
Speaker 1: do you think the best ball ranking differs from his ECR.

95
00:04:10,160 --> 00:04:12,000
Speaker 2: I think his people and best Ball will push him

96
00:04:12,080 --> 00:04:13,920
Speaker 2: up a little bit more. Maybe they're more in line

97
00:04:13,960 --> 00:04:16,320
Speaker 2: with my thinking and saying he's probably one of the

98
00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:18,560
Speaker 2: best volume bets that you can make at that part

99
00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:21,119
Speaker 2: of a draft, So that pushes him up the board

100
00:04:21,240 --> 00:04:24,480
Speaker 2: just a little bit versus like ECR and people ranking,

101
00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:26,760
Speaker 2: Like you got a lot of other running backs, Like,

102
00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:29,039
Speaker 2: however you want to devise this up, like do you

103
00:04:29,040 --> 00:04:30,880
Speaker 2: want to go for upside? Do you going to go

104
00:04:30,960 --> 00:04:33,599
Speaker 2: for the safe veteran in the volume play and stuff?

105
00:04:33,640 --> 00:04:36,720
Speaker 2: So I think some people could be gravitating to younger

106
00:04:36,920 --> 00:04:40,000
Speaker 2: or potentially sexier names at the low end RB two

107
00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:42,120
Speaker 2: territory and it kind of pushes Montgomery down the board.

108
00:04:42,120 --> 00:04:42,520
Speaker 2: A little bit.

109
00:04:42,600 --> 00:04:44,920
Speaker 1: I think volume is a really interesting thing there too,

110
00:04:45,120 --> 00:04:47,640
Speaker 1: best Ball. Maybe you know, if it's not their first

111
00:04:47,720 --> 00:04:50,400
Speaker 1: running back, or if it is their first, you know,

112
00:04:50,440 --> 00:04:53,400
Speaker 1: maybe the volume plays into wanting to take some shots later.

113
00:04:53,920 --> 00:04:55,680
Speaker 1: Or if it is their second running back, maybe they

114
00:04:55,680 --> 00:04:58,000
Speaker 1: took a shot a little bit earlier. So volume seems

115
00:04:58,000 --> 00:05:00,359
Speaker 1: like it's in play there. Pat, what's your take on

116
00:05:00,440 --> 00:05:04,640
Speaker 1: David Montgomery here? Obviously ECR versus Beastball is kind of interesting,

117
00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:06,240
Speaker 1: but where do you think he is on the reign

118
00:05:06,279 --> 00:05:08,520
Speaker 1: of like, you know, value betting a guy that you

119
00:05:08,600 --> 00:05:10,160
Speaker 1: want to take and you think experts are going to

120
00:05:10,200 --> 00:05:10,599
Speaker 1: be taking.

121
00:05:11,120 --> 00:05:13,479
Speaker 3: Yeah, if you can wait and get Montgomery, if you

122
00:05:13,520 --> 00:05:15,560
Speaker 3: do go with a wide receiver heavy approach in the

123
00:05:15,560 --> 00:05:19,200
Speaker 3: early rounds, Montgomery is a really nice target in the

124
00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:22,360
Speaker 3: fifth round or so because there is built in volume firm.

125
00:05:22,480 --> 00:05:24,280
Speaker 3: I don't see who's going to challenge him for early

126
00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:29,640
Speaker 3: down carries in Houston, and Houston has that great defense

127
00:05:29,680 --> 00:05:32,640
Speaker 3: should provide plenty of for unfriendly game scripts. And I

128
00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:35,920
Speaker 3: think he returns value if he just gets five, six,

129
00:05:36,040 --> 00:05:38,680
Speaker 3: seven touchdowns this year. The nice thing is there's a

130
00:05:38,680 --> 00:05:42,840
Speaker 3: path to ten eleven, maybe even more touchdowns than that

131
00:05:43,000 --> 00:05:44,560
Speaker 3: because he's going to be the goal one guy.

132
00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:47,920
Speaker 1: Yeah, touchdown equity seems like it's I've stared at him

133
00:05:47,920 --> 00:05:50,680
Speaker 1: in his ranking and like you look at potential upside

134
00:05:50,720 --> 00:05:52,800
Speaker 1: even though he doesn't feel like a quintessential upside play,

135
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:55,680
Speaker 1: It's like touchdown equity seems like it's like a much

136
00:05:55,720 --> 00:05:58,400
Speaker 1: more of a premium or in the positive side for him.

137
00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:02,760
Speaker 1: He was Bestball RB twenty, ECR thirty four. Pat super fascinating.

138
00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:06,640
Speaker 1: Your player is the opposite Best Ball twenty four RB

139
00:06:06,880 --> 00:06:09,680
Speaker 1: and then ECR twenty. I know this has been one

140
00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:11,560
Speaker 1: of the guys you've been talking about, but you're talking

141
00:06:11,640 --> 00:06:14,960
Speaker 1: about players that not just experts are drafting, but Pat Fitzmors,

142
00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:17,080
Speaker 1: the expert is drafting and wanting to have on a

143
00:06:17,080 --> 00:06:19,280
Speaker 1: lot of teams. That player is who.

144
00:06:19,720 --> 00:06:22,600
Speaker 3: It's Bucky Irving, And I don't know if the experts

145
00:06:22,640 --> 00:06:26,799
Speaker 3: are really drafting him. Every expert I'm seeing on Twitter

146
00:06:26,960 --> 00:06:31,080
Speaker 3: is fading Bucky Irving. My affinity for Bucky is somewhat personal.

147
00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:34,280
Speaker 3: I was very out on him in going into his

148
00:06:34,400 --> 00:06:37,200
Speaker 3: rookie year after he ran a four or five five

149
00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:39,400
Speaker 3: at the combine at one hundred and ninety two pounds,

150
00:06:39,560 --> 00:06:41,520
Speaker 3: even though he had two really good seasons to wrap

151
00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:44,760
Speaker 3: up his college career at Oregon, even though a lot

152
00:06:44,800 --> 00:06:48,320
Speaker 3: of the talent evaluators were raving about him. Started his

153
00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:50,680
Speaker 3: rookie year as for Shad White's backup, but he was

154
00:06:50,680 --> 00:06:52,880
Speaker 3: getting about a thirty of the offensive snaps, maybe like

155
00:06:52,960 --> 00:06:55,039
Speaker 3: nine carries a game. I wound up picking him up

156
00:06:55,080 --> 00:06:57,800
Speaker 3: in one of my leagues just before the midpoint of

157
00:06:57,839 --> 00:07:00,720
Speaker 3: the regular season, and just before the Bucking reduced for

158
00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:03,919
Speaker 3: Shad White's role and made Bucky their lead back. I

159
00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:06,120
Speaker 3: already had a pretty good team, and adding Bucky to

160
00:07:06,200 --> 00:07:09,960
Speaker 3: the mix just gave my team a nitro boost. From

161
00:07:09,960 --> 00:07:12,600
Speaker 3: Week ten on, Bucky averaged one hundred and fifteen yards

162
00:07:12,600 --> 00:07:16,080
Speaker 3: from scrimmage per game, scored five touchdowns. He was RB

163
00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:18,600
Speaker 3: seven and a half point PPR scoring over that stretch

164
00:07:18,880 --> 00:07:23,120
Speaker 3: right between Chase Brown and Derrick Henry. Now Bucky's ECR

165
00:07:23,240 --> 00:07:26,640
Speaker 3: sitting at RB twenty and I think like fifty fourth overall,

166
00:07:26,800 --> 00:07:29,560
Speaker 3: that's middle of the fifth round. And I get that

167
00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:31,880
Speaker 3: Bucky is coming off kind of a rough season. He

168
00:07:31,920 --> 00:07:34,920
Speaker 3: had foot and shoulder problems last year, only played ten games.

169
00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:37,000
Speaker 3: He went from five point four yards per carry at

170
00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:39,880
Speaker 3: three point four. I really believe the drop off was

171
00:07:40,160 --> 00:07:44,680
Speaker 3: more about the Buccaneers offensive line than Bucky himself. Tampa

172
00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:49,120
Speaker 3: Bay's offensive line just injury ravaged last season. Tristan wurfsmissed

173
00:07:49,120 --> 00:07:53,360
Speaker 3: five games, Cody Mack missed fifteen games. Luke Getticky missed

174
00:07:53,400 --> 00:07:56,560
Speaker 3: six games. Buccaneers o line had ranked second in the

175
00:07:56,640 --> 00:07:59,680
Speaker 3: league in adjusted lineyards in twenty twenty four. That's a

176
00:07:59,760 --> 00:08:03,600
Speaker 3: run locking metric for those not initiated with that stat.

177
00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:06,360
Speaker 3: In twenty twenty five, they dropped to twenty second in

178
00:08:06,440 --> 00:08:11,280
Speaker 3: adjusted lineyards. So I acknowledged that the Buccaneers might continue

179
00:08:11,320 --> 00:08:15,360
Speaker 3: to give Sean Tucker the goal line work. But Bucky

180
00:08:15,520 --> 00:08:18,360
Speaker 3: is still Tampa Bay's lead back, and I don't want

181
00:08:18,400 --> 00:08:21,960
Speaker 3: to hear that Kenneth Gainwell is taking over. Gainwell averaged

182
00:08:22,000 --> 00:08:24,320
Speaker 3: six point seven carries a game for Pittsburgh last year,

183
00:08:24,320 --> 00:08:27,400
Speaker 3: and that was a career high. And Bucky Irving is

184
00:08:27,440 --> 00:08:30,600
Speaker 3: a better pass catcher than Kenneth Gainwell. Bucky has averaged

185
00:08:30,640 --> 00:08:33,200
Speaker 3: one point five to six yards per route run for

186
00:08:33,280 --> 00:08:38,079
Speaker 3: his career, Gainwell one point one nine. Bucky in twenty

187
00:08:38,120 --> 00:08:41,240
Speaker 3: twenty four led all qualifying backs in yards per carry

188
00:08:41,360 --> 00:08:45,640
Speaker 3: after contact yards after contact per kerry excuse me, three

189
00:08:45,679 --> 00:08:48,959
Speaker 3: point nine to three had a breakaway run right run

190
00:08:49,120 --> 00:08:52,520
Speaker 3: rate of thirty four point nine percent ranks sixth in

191
00:08:52,559 --> 00:08:55,520
Speaker 3: the league in rushing yards over expected per attempt, just

192
00:08:55,559 --> 00:08:58,160
Speaker 3: ahead of Jamior Gibbs and James Cook. Bucky is a

193
00:08:58,200 --> 00:09:00,720
Speaker 3: great player. I can't wait to see what he's gonna

194
00:09:00,720 --> 00:09:03,640
Speaker 3: do with a healthier offensive line. That's a very good

195
00:09:03,640 --> 00:09:07,319
Speaker 3: offensive line when it's intact. Even in a bad year.

196
00:09:07,440 --> 00:09:10,559
Speaker 3: Last year, Bucky average twenty point three carries per game.

197
00:09:10,880 --> 00:09:14,760
Speaker 3: He is not a committee back. Don't believe that. Yeah,

198
00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:16,800
Speaker 3: I just I think he's a really good value, right.

199
00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:19,480
Speaker 1: And also, like you use an word healthy is really

200
00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:21,240
Speaker 1: interesting because I think there was just a lot of

201
00:09:21,240 --> 00:09:24,240
Speaker 1: health questions that were just following him and the valuation

202
00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:26,160
Speaker 1: of what people wanted to put on him. But like

203
00:09:26,679 --> 00:09:29,360
Speaker 1: he's already running practices, you know, like he's out, like

204
00:09:29,400 --> 00:09:31,040
Speaker 1: he like that. That I think is one of the

205
00:09:31,040 --> 00:09:33,280
Speaker 1: biggest things to be an eye opener, because I think

206
00:09:34,240 --> 00:09:36,439
Speaker 1: you would almost have the conversation of, like, you know,

207
00:09:36,600 --> 00:09:38,760
Speaker 1: do you really want to focus more on the injury

208
00:09:38,800 --> 00:09:40,240
Speaker 1: or do you want to focus more on the other

209
00:09:41,080 --> 00:09:42,679
Speaker 1: the other running backs that are there? What is going

210
00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:44,800
Speaker 1: to take away. I'm just not sure a healthy Bucky

211
00:09:44,800 --> 00:09:47,120
Speaker 1: Irving can be taken off the field at a dramatic degree

212
00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:49,320
Speaker 1: that drops his value. So he does seem like a

213
00:09:49,360 --> 00:09:52,280
Speaker 1: really good value. But Debro, you've been checking your head.

214
00:09:52,360 --> 00:09:55,480
Speaker 1: You're not in full agreement. Obviously there's roles. Kenny Gainwell

215
00:09:55,520 --> 00:09:58,480
Speaker 1: could play a passing role. John Tucker can play a

216
00:09:58,480 --> 00:10:02,400
Speaker 1: goal line role. But does that not make Bucky Irving

217
00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:04,360
Speaker 1: still a top twenty running back? Does it take him

218
00:10:04,360 --> 00:10:07,439
Speaker 1: out of being a top twenty running back? Which you I.

219
00:10:07,400 --> 00:10:10,200
Speaker 2: Think the I really love Pat's point about the offensive

220
00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:13,080
Speaker 2: line last year because it was decimated. They couldn't block anybody,

221
00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:16,000
Speaker 2: they couldn't keep Baker Mayfield upright. I think this offense

222
00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:19,440
Speaker 2: could definitely bounce back this year. My biggest concern about

223
00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:23,240
Speaker 2: Bucky Irving, like I and to Pat's point, yes, Bucky

224
00:10:23,320 --> 00:10:26,559
Speaker 2: has been the superior receiver to Gainwell over his career.

225
00:10:26,600 --> 00:10:28,760
Speaker 2: Gainwell kind of closed the gap with the usage and

226
00:10:28,760 --> 00:10:31,040
Speaker 2: stuff last year one point four to four yards per

227
00:10:31,120 --> 00:10:34,640
Speaker 2: route run them bringing him in off the street. And

228
00:10:35,080 --> 00:10:39,079
Speaker 2: we've seen Rashad White factory into this backfield in both seasons.

229
00:10:39,600 --> 00:10:43,800
Speaker 2: My worry for Bucky is if Gainwell can just be

230
00:10:43,960 --> 00:10:47,000
Speaker 2: Rashod White, but actually be better than Rashad White, which

231
00:10:47,040 --> 00:10:48,920
Speaker 2: is kind of a low bar to clear because Rashad

232
00:10:48,960 --> 00:10:52,120
Speaker 2: White's never been efficient in his entire NFL career, even

233
00:10:52,200 --> 00:10:54,320
Speaker 2: his massive like RB one season that has him in

234
00:10:54,360 --> 00:10:57,520
Speaker 2: the case, then I worry about Gainwell carving more of

235
00:10:57,559 --> 00:11:00,400
Speaker 2: a role than what we saw previously before we'reshot White,

236
00:11:01,000 --> 00:11:03,400
Speaker 2: but I do think Bucky will still retain the lead

237
00:11:03,440 --> 00:11:07,640
Speaker 2: back role. My bigger worry for Bucky Irving is the injuries,

238
00:11:07,720 --> 00:11:10,880
Speaker 2: like and it's it's I don't want to ding him,

239
00:11:10,920 --> 00:11:12,800
Speaker 2: and I didn't ding him coming out because we're living

240
00:11:12,840 --> 00:11:15,240
Speaker 2: in a new era of the NFL where if you're

241
00:11:15,280 --> 00:11:18,080
Speaker 2: sub two hundred pounds, it used to be like a

242
00:11:18,120 --> 00:11:20,440
Speaker 2: really big knock on you as a prospect and looking

243
00:11:20,520 --> 00:11:24,240
Speaker 2: at your you know your projecting your volume forward. But

244
00:11:24,280 --> 00:11:26,920
Speaker 2: then we had Jamier Gibbs, Austin Eckler says, high devon

245
00:11:27,000 --> 00:11:29,720
Speaker 2: a chan other players of that size to where they've

246
00:11:29,760 --> 00:11:32,680
Speaker 2: been given runs of backfield. But those guys have held

247
00:11:32,720 --> 00:11:35,360
Speaker 2: up to the volume. And Bucky, I mean even looking

248
00:11:35,400 --> 00:11:36,920
Speaker 2: at last year, he had a foot sprain and a

249
00:11:36,920 --> 00:11:39,920
Speaker 2: shoulder ac joint sprain. You rewind to twenty twenty four

250
00:11:40,360 --> 00:11:43,880
Speaker 2: hip back, toe, and hamstring issues, and the thing that

251
00:11:43,960 --> 00:11:45,560
Speaker 2: kind of got buried in all of that was the

252
00:11:45,559 --> 00:11:48,400
Speaker 2: toe issues seemed like it wasn't a short term thing.

253
00:11:48,440 --> 00:11:51,000
Speaker 2: It's something he's dealt with since college and might deal

254
00:11:51,040 --> 00:11:54,400
Speaker 2: with on and off his entire NFL career. So the

255
00:11:54,480 --> 00:11:56,840
Speaker 2: size kind of is showing up for Bucky Irving. Can

256
00:11:56,960 --> 00:12:00,400
Speaker 2: he stay healthy and those health concerns are whipped pushes

257
00:12:00,440 --> 00:12:03,520
Speaker 2: me with Bucky Irving down the trough just a little

258
00:12:03,559 --> 00:12:06,880
Speaker 2: bit versus other running backs in that range. But depending

259
00:12:06,920 --> 00:12:09,160
Speaker 2: on how my team makeup and stuff like that, am

260
00:12:09,160 --> 00:12:12,000
Speaker 2: I willing to draft Bucky Irving at some spots because

261
00:12:12,400 --> 00:12:15,840
Speaker 2: he could be a massive value if he can stay healthy. Yeah,

262
00:12:15,840 --> 00:12:16,520
Speaker 2: it's possible.

263
00:12:17,520 --> 00:12:19,880
Speaker 1: Conversation is gonna be very interesting over the next month

264
00:12:19,960 --> 00:12:22,880
Speaker 1: how this starts to transpire around Bucky Irving. But just

265
00:12:22,920 --> 00:12:26,000
Speaker 1: remember Pat was there first. We got two more running

266
00:12:26,040 --> 00:12:28,840
Speaker 1: backs coming up. But the running backs we're talking about

267
00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:32,319
Speaker 1: today are values because you know they're simply too cheap,

268
00:12:32,679 --> 00:12:35,600
Speaker 1: But that only matters if you know when to take them.

269
00:12:35,880 --> 00:12:38,760
Speaker 1: With draft intel, you can see how your league mates

270
00:12:38,800 --> 00:12:41,400
Speaker 1: have drafted in the past. Spot who tends to push

271
00:12:41,480 --> 00:12:44,080
Speaker 1: running backs up the board and build a plan around

272
00:12:44,120 --> 00:12:45,360
Speaker 1: your actual draft room.

273
00:12:45,679 --> 00:12:46,319
Speaker 2: So before you.

274
00:12:46,280 --> 00:12:47,959
Speaker 1: Assume one of these running back values is going to

275
00:12:48,000 --> 00:12:50,720
Speaker 1: fall back to you and follow our ECR, make sure

276
00:12:50,720 --> 00:12:53,640
Speaker 1: you go to Fantasypros dot com slash intel. That's Fantasypros

277
00:12:53,640 --> 00:12:56,839
Speaker 1: dot com slash Intel, use draft Intel and know when

278
00:12:56,920 --> 00:12:59,920
Speaker 1: you need to make your move. Debro, we're jumping back

279
00:13:00,200 --> 00:13:03,199
Speaker 1: you for your second running back value that you're drafting

280
00:13:03,240 --> 00:13:05,240
Speaker 1: all over the place. And this is the lowest of

281
00:13:05,559 --> 00:13:07,720
Speaker 1: whether it's Best Ball or ECR, this is the lowest

282
00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:09,800
Speaker 1: of any of the running backs values that we have

283
00:13:09,920 --> 00:13:13,360
Speaker 1: on the board. And you, my friend, want to give

284
00:13:13,440 --> 00:13:15,800
Speaker 1: us a little Tony Pollard, So why don't you drop

285
00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:18,160
Speaker 1: it for us? Why Tony Pollard is a RB value

286
00:13:18,160 --> 00:13:19,320
Speaker 1: that you're drafting this season.

287
00:13:19,800 --> 00:13:23,000
Speaker 2: He is an RB three across Best Ball and ECR

288
00:13:23,160 --> 00:13:25,960
Speaker 2: RB thirty one on both of those different iterations of

289
00:13:26,040 --> 00:13:28,959
Speaker 2: rankings and ADP and stuff. And I don't understand why,

290
00:13:29,120 --> 00:13:32,680
Speaker 2: Like I'm not worried about Tajy Spears. Taj Spears, we

291
00:13:32,800 --> 00:13:35,800
Speaker 2: haven't seen him be ultra efficient. We haven't seen him

292
00:13:36,160 --> 00:13:38,880
Speaker 2: be able to stay on an NFL field. And you

293
00:13:38,960 --> 00:13:40,960
Speaker 2: look at what Brian Dave, All, the new OC for

294
00:13:40,960 --> 00:13:43,320
Speaker 2: the Titans, has done in his entire career as an

295
00:13:43,320 --> 00:13:47,520
Speaker 2: offensive coordinator or a head coach. He rides one running

296
00:13:47,559 --> 00:13:50,120
Speaker 2: back religiously. You can go all the way back to

297
00:13:50,160 --> 00:13:53,520
Speaker 2: Devin Singletary even before that, Peyton Hillis. We can talk

298
00:13:53,559 --> 00:13:57,320
Speaker 2: about Saquan We could talk about win cam Scataboo before

299
00:13:57,360 --> 00:13:59,480
Speaker 2: the injury. You can talk about Tyrone Tracy before that,

300
00:13:59,559 --> 00:14:02,760
Speaker 2: and Devin's Singletary before Tyrone Tracy took his job. It

301
00:14:02,800 --> 00:14:05,160
Speaker 2: has been one running back and it's going to be

302
00:14:05,280 --> 00:14:07,760
Speaker 2: one running back in Tennessee this year, and that guy

303
00:14:07,840 --> 00:14:10,640
Speaker 2: is going to be Tony Pollard. So I don't understand

304
00:14:10,679 --> 00:14:14,160
Speaker 2: why he's not an RB two in rankings. I get

305
00:14:14,200 --> 00:14:17,000
Speaker 2: that he had a disappointing season, but again, we all

306
00:14:17,040 --> 00:14:19,600
Speaker 2: think that Tennessee is going to improve this year. The

307
00:14:19,720 --> 00:14:23,200
Speaker 2: question is how much we're discussing an offense that crushed

308
00:14:23,240 --> 00:14:25,840
Speaker 2: Pollard because he couldn't score any freaking touchdowns. He was

309
00:14:25,920 --> 00:14:29,160
Speaker 2: forty ninth in red zone touches. This offense was bottom

310
00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:31,840
Speaker 2: three in points per game and red zone scoring attempts

311
00:14:31,880 --> 00:14:35,920
Speaker 2: per game. Those numbers are going up with better play

312
00:14:35,960 --> 00:14:38,720
Speaker 2: from cam Ward. The addition to Cardinell Tate, the addition

313
00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:42,960
Speaker 2: to Wandel Robinson, Calvin really hope hopefully being healthy and

314
00:14:43,000 --> 00:14:45,720
Speaker 2: if he can't do it, then Ella Ao Manor or

315
00:14:45,760 --> 00:14:49,520
Speaker 2: Shamiri DK can hopefully step up there and an improved defense.

316
00:14:49,840 --> 00:14:52,040
Speaker 2: And quietly, I don't think that people understand that this

317
00:14:52,160 --> 00:14:55,400
Speaker 2: offensive line, well, I'm not telling you this offensive line

318
00:14:55,480 --> 00:14:57,000
Speaker 2: is going to be a top twelve unit this year.

319
00:14:57,320 --> 00:14:59,520
Speaker 2: They were close to that last year. And run blocking

320
00:14:59,800 --> 00:15:02,600
Speaker 2: this this offensive line at the thirteenth best yards before

321
00:15:02,600 --> 00:15:05,560
Speaker 2: contact per a tenth last year. And that is also

322
00:15:05,760 --> 00:15:09,560
Speaker 2: without like fielding a competent passing attack. If they do

323
00:15:09,600 --> 00:15:12,200
Speaker 2: that this year, they could be top ten in that metric.

324
00:15:12,520 --> 00:15:15,600
Speaker 2: And then we're discussing they're opening up consistent holes for

325
00:15:15,640 --> 00:15:19,040
Speaker 2: Tony Pollard in an improved offense. He owns the backfield.

326
00:15:19,320 --> 00:15:22,960
Speaker 2: He wasn't washed. Last year amongst forty nine qualifying backs,

327
00:15:23,120 --> 00:15:25,360
Speaker 2: he was twenty second in yards up to contact per attempt.

328
00:15:25,440 --> 00:15:28,640
Speaker 2: So I keep drafting Tony Pollard, and at this price point,

329
00:15:28,680 --> 00:15:30,680
Speaker 2: I will continue to draft Tony Pollard because he's an

330
00:15:30,760 --> 00:15:34,360
Speaker 2: RB three who is really an RB two, although nobody

331
00:15:34,360 --> 00:15:35,800
Speaker 2: seems to put respect on his name.

332
00:15:36,520 --> 00:15:39,320
Speaker 1: Pat Is this though. I mean, Deebro's making a great

333
00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:41,320
Speaker 1: case here. But the thing that maybe still floats out

334
00:15:41,320 --> 00:15:43,680
Speaker 1: there is like, is Tony Pollard going to be the

335
00:15:43,680 --> 00:15:47,120
Speaker 1: guy unquestioned player? Because if you do believe that, I

336
00:15:47,160 --> 00:15:49,840
Speaker 1: think it is hard to not look at like him

337
00:15:49,880 --> 00:15:52,000
Speaker 1: outside the top thirty as being a great value. If

338
00:15:52,040 --> 00:15:54,640
Speaker 1: he's going to be untouched in that offense. Is that

339
00:15:54,680 --> 00:15:56,280
Speaker 1: what you believe or do you think there's bigger questions

340
00:15:56,320 --> 00:15:59,280
Speaker 1: around Tony Pollard and him usage as an RB one

341
00:15:59,640 --> 00:16:00,000
Speaker 1: in his.

342
00:16:00,880 --> 00:16:03,560
Speaker 3: I think he's the guy, and we saw how well

343
00:16:03,600 --> 00:16:06,280
Speaker 3: he played down the stretch last year when the Tennessee

344
00:16:06,360 --> 00:16:08,840
Speaker 3: passing game finally got going, that was the key. They

345
00:16:08,920 --> 00:16:11,560
Speaker 3: just debro said it. They couldn't get anything going early

346
00:16:11,680 --> 00:16:14,760
Speaker 3: in the year. So even though Pollard at the backfield

347
00:16:14,800 --> 00:16:17,880
Speaker 3: to himself with tij Spears on IR it was a

348
00:16:17,960 --> 00:16:20,440
Speaker 3: rough start, but then gets it going late in the

349
00:16:20,480 --> 00:16:23,040
Speaker 3: season once cam Ward starts cooking a little bit, rattles

350
00:16:23,040 --> 00:16:25,720
Speaker 3: off three straight one hundred yard rushing games late in

351
00:16:25,720 --> 00:16:28,720
Speaker 3: the season. Also, the schedule was kind of sneaky tough

352
00:16:28,800 --> 00:16:32,480
Speaker 3: last year. During that slow start, he had the Texans twice,

353
00:16:32,560 --> 00:16:38,800
Speaker 3: the Rams, the Jaguars. Some really good run defenses, and yeah,

354
00:16:38,280 --> 00:16:41,440
Speaker 3: I think things set up pretty nicely for Pollard this year.

355
00:16:41,440 --> 00:16:42,640
Speaker 3: He's in a better spot.

356
00:16:42,840 --> 00:16:45,000
Speaker 1: All right, final running back, we're going to be talking

357
00:16:45,040 --> 00:16:48,520
Speaker 1: about ECR just as an RV to both the same

358
00:16:49,360 --> 00:16:52,320
Speaker 1: overall fense FORSE expert consensus rank and best ball rank.

359
00:16:52,640 --> 00:16:55,200
Speaker 1: DeAndre Swift interesting, they might wasn't sure that we were

360
00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:57,080
Speaker 1: going to get in here and Pat, that is your guy.

361
00:16:57,200 --> 00:16:59,480
Speaker 1: So the RB two of values. You went from Bucky

362
00:16:59,480 --> 00:17:02,280
Speaker 1: Irving to DeAndre Swift. Talked to us about why you're

363
00:17:02,280 --> 00:17:03,800
Speaker 1: going to be drafting him a whole bunch and why

364
00:17:03,840 --> 00:17:05,920
Speaker 1: he is such a great rby value.

365
00:17:06,040 --> 00:17:08,760
Speaker 3: Because Welsh, I think it's rarely a bad idea to

366
00:17:08,880 --> 00:17:13,240
Speaker 3: attach yourself to the NFL's best play callers, and Bears

367
00:17:13,280 --> 00:17:15,920
Speaker 3: head coach Ben Johnson might be the best running game

368
00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:19,760
Speaker 3: designer in the league. Bears were third in rushing yardage

369
00:17:19,840 --> 00:17:22,359
Speaker 3: last year. They averaged four point nine yards per carry

370
00:17:22,359 --> 00:17:24,639
Speaker 3: as a team, which also ranked third. They were third

371
00:17:24,680 --> 00:17:27,800
Speaker 3: in rushing DVA, only behind the Rams and the Bills.

372
00:17:28,160 --> 00:17:30,919
Speaker 3: Ben Johnson also had the running game humming when he

373
00:17:30,960 --> 00:17:34,000
Speaker 3: was in Detroit as their offensive coordinator for three years.

374
00:17:34,280 --> 00:17:37,880
Speaker 3: The Lions ranked twelfth fourth and second in rushing DVA

375
00:17:38,800 --> 00:17:42,639
Speaker 3: during Johnson's tenures the OC and Ben Johnson likes to

376
00:17:42,680 --> 00:17:46,000
Speaker 3: run the ball. The Bears were eleventh in terms of

377
00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:50,679
Speaker 3: highest percentage of running game running plays. Last season. Swift

378
00:17:50,680 --> 00:17:53,000
Speaker 3: had thirteen hundred and eighty six yards from scrimmage in

379
00:17:53,040 --> 00:17:56,480
Speaker 3: ten touchdowns. He was RB fifteen in half point PPR

380
00:17:56,520 --> 00:18:00,720
Speaker 3: scoring he catches passes. The Bears have a good offensive line,

381
00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:04,439
Speaker 3: they have Ben Johnson as that run game mastermind. Swift

382
00:18:04,480 --> 00:18:08,320
Speaker 3: is RB twenty three in ECR fifty seven overall, And look,

383
00:18:08,359 --> 00:18:10,359
Speaker 3: I'm a kyalaman on Guy fan. I think he's good,

384
00:18:10,880 --> 00:18:13,399
Speaker 3: but he's not going to displace DeAndre Swift. It's going

385
00:18:13,440 --> 00:18:15,760
Speaker 3: to be a two way backfield in Chicago. But the

386
00:18:15,760 --> 00:18:18,600
Speaker 3: Bears are going to be among the league leaders in

387
00:18:18,880 --> 00:18:22,400
Speaker 3: total running back output because of Ben Johnson.

388
00:18:22,760 --> 00:18:24,240
Speaker 1: So that's where I was going to go with you.

389
00:18:24,280 --> 00:18:26,920
Speaker 1: Debro was like, are we forgetting what about kalaman On Guy?

390
00:18:26,960 --> 00:18:29,560
Speaker 1: Were forgetting about him? He has an ECR of thirty three.

391
00:18:29,960 --> 00:18:32,600
Speaker 1: But the ending there is where Pat, you know, kind

392
00:18:32,600 --> 00:18:35,159
Speaker 1: of put the icing on the cake. If yes, it

393
00:18:35,160 --> 00:18:37,560
Speaker 1: can be tough sometimes maybe just on the surface level.

394
00:18:37,560 --> 00:18:38,879
Speaker 1: Looking at the Bears and you like, can both of

395
00:18:38,920 --> 00:18:40,640
Speaker 1: these guys eat? I was going to say, are one

396
00:18:40,680 --> 00:18:43,000
Speaker 1: of these two players DeAndre Swift at twenty eighty three

397
00:18:43,359 --> 00:18:45,639
Speaker 1: or kaman On Guy at thirty three too overly ranked?

398
00:18:46,080 --> 00:18:48,119
Speaker 1: But if you believe this is going to be a

399
00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:50,720
Speaker 1: very run heavy offense, both of these guys are going

400
00:18:50,760 --> 00:18:52,560
Speaker 1: to be able to eat and be serviceable as either

401
00:18:52,560 --> 00:18:55,119
Speaker 1: an RB two or flex. So talk to us about

402
00:18:55,440 --> 00:18:57,800
Speaker 1: kalaman On Guy is well attached to DeAndre Swift here

403
00:18:57,840 --> 00:18:59,800
Speaker 1: this offense and can they both thrive?

404
00:19:00,080 --> 00:19:01,679
Speaker 2: I think they could both thrive if they stay as

405
00:19:01,720 --> 00:19:03,440
Speaker 2: run heavy as they are, which I think with Ben

406
00:19:03,480 --> 00:19:06,040
Speaker 2: Johnson it's going to be at least illegue average with

407
00:19:06,359 --> 00:19:09,080
Speaker 2: passing rate, so I think you're still going to get

408
00:19:09,080 --> 00:19:13,000
Speaker 2: plenty of rushing volume here. I think Manonguy is appropably priced,

409
00:19:13,040 --> 00:19:17,000
Speaker 2: maybe a tad bit overpriced. I think Swift is criminally underpriced,

410
00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:19,800
Speaker 2: Like he was RB sixteen and PPR points per game

411
00:19:20,640 --> 00:19:23,480
Speaker 2: even after monog Guy's emergence after week nine, he was

412
00:19:23,520 --> 00:19:26,439
Speaker 2: still RB twenty in Fantasy points per game, and so

413
00:19:26,720 --> 00:19:29,240
Speaker 2: if we see and he was he best in Manonguy

414
00:19:29,280 --> 00:19:32,320
Speaker 2: in every single per touch efficiency metric out there mistackle rate,

415
00:19:32,359 --> 00:19:35,840
Speaker 2: explosive run rate, rushing success rate, everything. So I don't

416
00:19:35,840 --> 00:19:37,800
Speaker 2: think Swift is going away, and I think at this

417
00:19:37,920 --> 00:19:40,960
Speaker 2: low end RB two RB twenty three price tag, he's

418
00:19:41,040 --> 00:19:42,920
Speaker 2: underpriced and I'm going to be drafting him too. I

419
00:19:43,000 --> 00:19:43,600
Speaker 2: agree with Patty.

420
00:19:43,640 --> 00:19:48,399
Speaker 1: Here beautiful from DeAndre Swift, Pollard, Dave Montgomery, and Bucky

421
00:19:48,400 --> 00:19:51,160
Speaker 1: Irving laid the groundwork for four R and B values,

422
00:19:51,160 --> 00:19:53,040
Speaker 1: four ORB values that you don't have to put a

423
00:19:53,080 --> 00:19:55,920
Speaker 1: top twenty tag on you can get later in drafts.

424
00:19:56,280 --> 00:19:58,800
Speaker 1: Build your team up, build your wide receivers, build your

425
00:19:58,800 --> 00:20:00,960
Speaker 1: tight ends. Make one one of these guys in RB

426
00:20:01,000 --> 00:20:03,159
Speaker 1: two and in some cases some great RB three's. What

427
00:20:03,200 --> 00:20:05,240
Speaker 1: do you guys think though? Do you think these are

428
00:20:05,320 --> 00:20:08,280
Speaker 1: great values? And if not, what values are you guys

429
00:20:08,280 --> 00:20:09,960
Speaker 1: looking at? Put in the comments below. We'd love to

430
00:20:10,000 --> 00:20:11,520
Speaker 1: hear from you. You guys want to check out all

431
00:20:11,560 --> 00:20:14,040
Speaker 1: the rest, go to fantasypros dot com slash NFL slash

432
00:20:14,080 --> 00:20:16,399
Speaker 1: rankings to check out what all the rankings look like

433
00:20:16,760 --> 00:20:19,320
Speaker 1: as they change throughout the season, and check out all

434
00:20:19,359 --> 00:20:21,199
Speaker 1: the great stuff that Pat and Debro have going on

435
00:20:21,240 --> 00:20:23,080
Speaker 1: here at Fantasy Pros. Thanks so much for hanging out.

436
00:20:23,119 --> 00:20:25,200
Speaker 1: I'm Chris Welsh. We will talk to you next time

437
00:20:25,480 --> 00:20:27,080
Speaker 1: right here on Fantasy Pros.

438
00:20:27,359 --> 00:20:30,440
Speaker 3: Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Football podcast.

439
00:20:30,640 --> 00:20:33,160
Speaker 2: If you love the show, the best freeway to support

440
00:20:33,240 --> 00:20:36,320
Speaker 2: us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

441
00:20:36,400 --> 00:20:40,320
Speaker 2: at Fantasypros dot com slash review, or on Spotify. Follow

442
00:20:40,400 --> 00:20:43,800
Speaker 2: us on x, Instagram and TikTok at Fantasy Pros, and

443
00:20:43,880 --> 00:20:46,600
Speaker 2: subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash

444
00:20:46,640 --> 00:21:07,000
Speaker 2: Fantasy proSP