WEBVTT - Nicole Webb on the Markets (Radio)

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to our guest who joins us here in

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>New York, Nicole Webb, Senior VP and financial advisor at

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Enhancement Group. Thanks for joining us. A pleasure to

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>see you in person after what we've been through over

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it feels like the last two and a half plus

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>going on three years, right, Yeah, it's it's absolutely fun

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to be here with And is that what we're seeing

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in the market kind of a resumption of normalcy. We're

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of the air come out of those

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>high flying tech stocks that everyone was pounding the table

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>out during the pandemic. Yes, I absolutely think that right

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>now a lot of these trades are all about the

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>American psyche. It's no surprise to me that we're seeing

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>resilience McDonald, Chippotle. Why people are driving their kids to

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>school again, kids are doing sports Boeing, there's a demand

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>for more airplanes. This isn't shocking visa. People want to

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>spend and the consumer still looks pretty strong. The economy

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>as a whole hasn't weakened yet. And right now as

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing some of these cyclical trades where mega tech

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is pulling back, but there's these under lying blue chip

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>companies that are doing so well that bodes well for

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the FED and what the FED may do next. We

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>want strength and resilience, that's broad, but we also need

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a pullback here that that makes people a little less wealthy,

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and that cap waiting of mega technology may do that

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>without systemically breaking That's an interesting point, Nicole. I mean,

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. But having said that, the as you just

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>alluded to as well, the FED needs the economy too weaken.

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>It needs those that's spending to be less strong if

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>they are going to reign in price hikes. Absolutely, but

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this is where I think we should focus a little

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more on the cap waiting of mega technology and

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the wealth destruction in the pullback in those in those companies.

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And when we talk about, even though it's been thrown

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to the wayside, this notion of a soft landing, it

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't destruction of everything that the soft landing was this

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>idea that perhaps we can create a pullback, which we

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>saw initially simply in the duration sensitivity of these technology companies. Um,

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>but there's still going to be pockets of strength. I

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.839
<v Speaker 1>don't think we want the the American consumer. I don't

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think we want massive layoffs or this deep profits recession um.

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So I do think a lot of what's happening right

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>now this week could bode well for the next FED

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>meeting in the American public. So we have the GDP

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>report for Q three to six. That's not bad after

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of negativity in the first half of the year, right.

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>And then on top of that, if you look at

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the GDP price index four point one percent, which is

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>less than half what we saw in Q two. So

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it may be that we've seen the peak in inflation.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Things are softening just a bit, prices are coming down,

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we can have a serious conversation about the

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>FED pivoted FED pivot or I think more about a

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>FED stall out, the notion of a pivot to an

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>ease the moving of levers um. We don't want that,

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and I can't foresee it because again, duration sensitivity would

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>shoot the market value of some of these more sensitive

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>stocks back up, and they don't want that either. That's

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>part of financial tightening, right. They want the equity market

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to settle down, they really do, and so that sensitivity

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>will remain. Will see some of that probably more stagnant

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>interest rate environment, That holding pattern will be difficult, especially

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for technology companies. But what we still want or hope

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>for is some strength and resilience in the broader market

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>sectors where Americans are still living a fairly normal life.

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And and that's some of those trades that I was

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioning earlier. So what's the bond market telling in, Nico

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>m h. The bond market is very interesting, uh, in

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that I believe that it has come to close to

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a bottom. And because of that, you know, it's probably

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in my twenty years doing this the time that clients

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't objecting to the same notion of why am I

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>investing in bonds? They don't do anything for me, Nicole,

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>given what's been going on market, WI is it going

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to change the name of your company to the Wealth

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Protection Group? I actually really like that one. Uh. You know.

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I will say, you know,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>before we move on from fixed income is twofold. When

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>we look at the equity markets right now, it's pretty

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>clear that this isn't cash moving in from the sideline.

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So when we're looking at daily volumes, what we're seeing

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>is these trades out of technology, cyclical trades into the

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>industrials um and on the fixed income side. The reason

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>why because you can pick up the two year treasury

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>hovering around four to four and a half percent on

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>any given day, and and that that works well for

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>people in this environment. UM, when it comes to reaching

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the bond market forward looking, we think

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we're either in a holding pattern. We might even see

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>an equity market rally if we only see fifty base

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this points in December. UM, just simply on this notion

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of a pivot. And so for all of those reasons,

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.559
<v Speaker 1>a great time to be buying in the fixed income market.

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>So Rischus in Hong Kong, he's going to ask you

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>about opportunities where he happens to be. But I want

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to get to a lot of the volatility that we

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>have seen and how that impacts investor psychology. You and

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>I were talking during the break about the fact that

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>so many people who are now participants in the market

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>are unaccustomed, not really thinking about how to deal with

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>this enormous volatility. We have seen huge price wings there

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in for the long term, and yet that creates that

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>volatility creates an emotional response, and sometimes they become reactive.

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Right Absolutely. I think when I think about the world,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we live in today, which has been intensified by COVID.

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So many things move at a robotic tempo, not necessarily

0:05:55.480 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a human tempo, and and so unjust lee retail investors

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to do the right thing participate in

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets are being hurt by not fully being

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>able to digest what all of this volatility means, but

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>feeling like they're doing the wrong thing when they're not participating.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a tough moment in time for them. And UM,

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I actually have some empathy in that regard. Um, I'm

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>not gonna ask you about what's going on in this

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.119
<v Speaker 1>part of one. If you look at the Hong Kong market,

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Hank saying, is it levels not seen since two thousand

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and nine, would you believe? And on top of that,

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>we've got pe ratios of about five and a half

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to six six or thereabouts. Tell me something. I mean

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>that would normally be a screaming by, but it isn't

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>for many. Yeah, it is a screaming by. Uh. You know,

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>if we track back the US markets versus non and

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you can go developed Europe Asia. Um, you know, these

0:06:55.320 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 1>waves about performance are somewhat cyclical. I was saying that

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the broad markets were a buy when they were trading

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>at a thirty percent discount to the US markets. Looking

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>at them today, they look like an absolute by when

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we think about the heads of the economic table um,

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly no reason to be so US centric or dominant.

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>It really though, comes down to anticipation of are you

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>managing a p n L for day to day returns?

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you a long term investor? Someone like myself certainly

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>has an overwaiting right now to the international landscape for

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>money that I'm not going to touch for a long time.

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So generally speaking, if we were to tease out some

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>themes here, are you avoiding technology? Are you looking at

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>more economically sensitive areas of the market, industrials, materials, that

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. I like to think about diversification across

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>styles of investing. So when it comes to passive investing,

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the SNP gives you that predominant waiting towards technology. When

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes to your active and tactical compos own and

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where you get mindful about where am

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I making my purchases to round out that construction and

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>so taking a value cyclical industrial tilt. As we anticipate

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a slower growth environment that's paid to wait. Idea around

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>dividend paying stocks, picking them up at attractive prices is great.

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And then when you think about that, that that tactical

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:26.679
<v Speaker 1>component of where are we in a global market cycle? Again,

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>there's so much opportunity outside and while we might not

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>give back purchasing power the US dollar may say strong

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>for a bit um, on the far side of that,

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there is this resurgence of growth abroad. Nicole,

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today. Just Nicole Webscinia,

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>vice president and Financial Advice and Wealth Enhancement Group Enhancement Group,

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 1>giving her take on I was getting on the market wise.

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>They've got a lot more, including a data check coming up.

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>This is bloom Bag