WEBVTT - Beam Dream Dead, Lakers vs Warriors Preview, & The Deciding Factor

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 2>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>by checking all State first. Like you know, to check

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 2>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 2>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 2>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>You're in good hands with All States savings. Very terms apply.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 2>All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Welcome in episode one, What's Right with Nick Wright? Huge

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>show today. You know, the other day I said we

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 3>were gonna try to have a quick show. I don't

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 3>know that I can promise you that today because we

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 3>have so much to do. We have an NFL Draft recap.

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Round one of the NBA playoffs are over. Round two

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 3>has already begun. Steph Lebron Part five starts tonight. So

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 3>much to get to right now, however, we must get

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 3>to what. And by the way, my lovely daughter newly

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 3>eighteen year old daughter, Diora Diora, don't leave me hanging.

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 3>She's here hosting with me. Appreciate it. She's on the show.

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 3>She just had a birthday this weekend. It was wonderful.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 3>It was lovely. Here's what did not make the cut

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:01.279
<v Speaker 3>for today's show. Not on today's show, and Hopkins saying,

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 3>who said I want to go? Yeah he did? Uh, DeAndre,

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I thought the Chiefs might trade for you. I thought

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 3>someone might trade for you. You definitely thought someone's gonna

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 3>trade for you. That's why there were trade rumors. Aaron

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Rodgers a Little Madison Square Garden double dip Ranger game,

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 3>then a Knicks game, and then Lebron gives some bad

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 3>wildlife advice, talking about if you see me fighting a

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 3>grizzly bear, help the bear. That is actually a verse

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 3>from a mystical freestyle. I preferred the tweet that he sent,

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 3>which was a verse from Kingdom come back in six

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 3>from jay Z. But regardless, we'll get to Lebron in

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 3>a bit, But first to you or oh, that's a

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 3>look at the sea. That's an unnecessary photoshop with me

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 3>helping Lebron with a grizzly bear, give me a break.

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 3>That is no way to start the show. We have

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 3>too much to do to be distracted by this nonsense. Also,

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 3>by the way, speaking of birthdays, as we mentioned yours

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 3>eighteenth birthday was this weekend. Our executive producer Matt Ford's

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 3>birthday is today, so happy birthday to Matt. Do your

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 3>what are we starting with?

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 4>So today we're going to start with the Warriors pulled

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 4>off the series comeback against the Kings. Curry had fifty

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 4>in game seven. Yeh, if only someone, someone on this

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 4>show said that you'd regret picking the Kings. It must

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 4>be hard for you as a Warriors hater and a

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 4>sax Stan. Steph is entering Top ten conversations. But you

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 4>still doubt the Warriors. You gave your flowers to Curry

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 4>and also said the Warriors would have won if Fox

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 4>stayed healthy.

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 3>No, the Kings would have won.

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 4>The Kings would have won if Fox stayed healthy. So

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 4>which is it? Are the Warriors lucky? Or is it

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 4>time for you to admit that you were wrong about

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 4>them again?

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Can it be a little of boat?

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 4>No, it's a yes or no question.

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 3>It's actually not a yes or no question. Is an

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 3>either or question. It was it? Was it this? Or

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 3>was it that? That is not a yes or no question, ma'am.

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 3>It's also a little of both. The Warriors did get lucky.

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Darren Fox was thirty two, seven and six on good

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 3>efficiency and was taking care of the ball. He then

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 3>broke his finger and averaged instead of thirty two a game,

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty four a game. The efficiency fell off the map

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 3>and the turnovers double. That was a huge factor in

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 3>this series, right, So that's where they got lucky. Where

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 3>I was wrong is underestimating Steph's ability by himself, with

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 3>some help from Kevon Looney, to just carry this team.

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>And this is where so listen and we'll get to

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Lakers Warriors. In a bit, I'm sad for the Kings,

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.239
<v Speaker 3>for the King's part of it. Sabonis needed to be better.

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I didn't love some of their Game seven rotational decisions,

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 3>felt like way too much. Terrence Davis. I felt like

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Game six they went small and may and I understand

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 3>Terrence Davis was part of that Game seven. It's hard

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 3>to kill them too much because they're up at half,

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 3>but obviously that third quarter killed them. They couldn't make

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 3>a basket, they couldn't get a rebound, and Steph went incandescent.

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Steph Curry Game seven, Yeah, incandescent Steph Curry Game seven.

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Most points in NBA history in a Game seven with fifty. Furthermore,

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 3>in the last sixty years, there has been one person

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 3>to score forty five in a game seven win, and

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 3>that was Lebron in twenty eighteen in Round one against

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 3>the Pacers. One guy's done it in sixty years. Durant

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 3>scored forty eight in the game seve they lost. Dominique

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 3>scored forty seven in a Game seven they lost. Lebron

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 3>and o Eight scored forty five in a Game seven

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 3>they lost, So only two even forty five point game

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 3>sevens and wins. Step just had one of them. So

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 3>that then brings up the top ten stuff. And that's

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 3>where it gets tricky because it does feel like there

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 3>are twelve guys for ten spots. So my top ten

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 3>of the last fifty years, which you can check out

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 3>on our YouTube channel, we have individual videos for every

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 3>single player. It is absolutely worth your time. It should

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 3>have gotten me an NBA Awards vote, but I'm not

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 3>bitter about it.

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 4>He's a little bit of My top.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Ten of the last fifty years goes like this. Lebron Kareem, Jordan, Magic, Duncan, Kobe, Bird,

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 3>a Cheme, Shack, Steph. That's how it That's how it

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 3>was as of the end of last season. That's ten names.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 3>You then add Wilt and Russell. That's where you get

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 3>your twelve. So where does Steph slot in? There? Has

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Steph now jumped above Shack and a Keem. I've gotta

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 3>it's really hard because Shaq's the most dominant player I've

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 3>ever seen at his peak. The Keem's the greatest defensive

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 3>player since Russell. So the Steph versus Shaq and a

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Keem stuff is tough. But ahead of Shaq and a

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 3>keem Are, Bird, Kobe, and Duncan. And this is where

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 3>it gets really interesting for Steph because he's won on

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the same level of those guys. Duncan five titles, six

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 3>finals appearances, Kobe five titles, seven finals appearances, Bird, three titles,

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 3>five finals appearances, Steph four titles, six finals appearances. He

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 3>is the greatest teammate in modern NBA history, with the

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 3>only close competitor being Duncan. He is not the defender

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Kobe or Duncan was, but he is arguably the most

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 3>potent offensive weapon in the history of the sport. So

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 3>how do you measure that out? The issue for Steph

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to jumping those guys is a body

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 3>of work problem. And by that I mean, and I'll

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 3>be quick on this, but it is worth noting how

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 3>many truly great seasons do each of them have, so

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Steph Curry And again, you can check this out in

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 3>the video series. And keep in mind the video series

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 3>was done before he won last year's title, or it

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 3>might have been done right when he won last year's title.

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember, but it doesn't matter. It was being

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 3>done while he was in route to winning the title.

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Great seasons Steph has four first Team All NBAS, two MVPs,

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 3>four total top five MVP finishes. So as far as

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 3>this guy might be the best player in the league,

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 3>he's unquestionably one of the five best players in the league.

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 3>He has four years like that, four first team All NBAS,

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 3>four top five MVP finishes. That's where it gets really

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 3>hard for him against Bird, Kobe and Duncan. Bird nine

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 3>first team All MVP, nine top five MVP finishes and

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 3>three overall MVPs, Kobe eleven first team all in All NBAS,

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 3>eleven top five MVP finishes, one overall MVP, Duncan ten

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 3>first team All NBAS, nine top five MVP finishes with

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 3>two wins. And it's also I know people were doing

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the is he better than Magic argument? I'm not ready

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 3>for that. I don't think that's right. Magic had twelve

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 3>seasons pre HIV twelve seasons. In those twelve seasons, nine

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 3>of them he was first Team All NBA. Nine of

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 3>them he was Top three MVP. Nine of them he

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 3>went to the NBA Finals and won five titles. So

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 3>we can't leaping him over Magic. Now. If he wins

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 3>the title this year, it's different. Go ahead to your

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 3>nothing you wanted to say something, I'm.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Just gonna say, like, how do we get here?

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Like because the question was about him being top ten

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 3>all time? And so we Here's the problem with people.

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 3>When people do top tens, they include fifteen people in it.

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 3>If you're gonna accurately and adequately do a top ten,

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 3>you've got to say who's in and who's out. Now,

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 3>if you want to say Steph has now done enough

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 3>to jump above Shack and a keem, I'll listen to it.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Has he done enough yet to jump ahead of Bird

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 3>who would be next in line? I'm not quite there

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 3>yet because he doesn't have the full body of work,

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 3>but I think he will get there, and him versus

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Kobe and versus Duncan will be very interesting. Him versus

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Wilt is always gonna be tough because Wilt did not

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 3>have the winning Wilt was not a great teammate, but

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:15.239
<v Speaker 3>Wilt was as individually dominant as any player in league history. Obviously,

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, what's the follow up here to you?

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 4>How bright do you think the Kings feature is?

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it's really good, really bright, But I'm not

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 3>ready to say this definitively alright in pencil not pen

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 3>They might have a what are you laughing about that,

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm a wordsmith that I'm painting a picture of my

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 3>words writing in pencil not pain Yeah, there you go exactly.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if that would quite be a metaphor.

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 4>No, it's definitely a meph.

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure about that. Here's the thing for the Kings,

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 3>and this is what I'll write in pencil, not pin

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 3>So Bonus might not be a playoff player and that

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 3>would be a killer for him. Fox is monk is.

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 3>I thought Keegan Murray acquitted himself very well after the

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 3>beginning of that series. But I'm not sure that sis

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 3>could be a it's two, it's just seven games, but

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Sabonis was a problem for them all.

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 4>Right, next, now we are set up for an all

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 4>for an all time round two series Lakers Warriors Lebron

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 4>the Steph Steph is fifteen and seven and Lebron is in.

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 3>The playoffs versus Lebron in the playoffs.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 4>Versus Lebron in the playoffs. Y yikes, but.

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Saying yikes about that stat or yikes about you messing

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 3>up the read I'm not sure. Go ahead, sorry, go ahead,

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 3>go ahead? Sorry? As you were if I.

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 4>See where I am. Okay, sorry sorry, If Lebron loses

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 4>to Steph again, how can you say that this guy

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 4>is the goat and he's not even the greatest of

0:13:56.320 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 4>his era. How badly does Lebron need this win for

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 4>his legacy?

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Lebron does not need this at all. And this is

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 3>where and I just gave a love letter to Steph,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 3>but this is where I will not engage. I will

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 3>not engage in a is Steph greater than Lebron argument?

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 3>There is no basis for it, just none. Forget the

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 3>body of work stuff that I just laid out. Where again,

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 3>where I said Steph had four top five MVP finishes

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 3>and four first team All NBAS and Lebron just for

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the record, where he's at on there he has thirteen

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 3>first team All NBAS and fourteen top five MVP finishes. Okay,

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 3>so forget that part of it. And as far as

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 3>oh what if Steph has a winning record against him

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs, Check Michael Jordan's record in the playoffs

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 3>against Larry Bird spoiler alert, it's oh to six. Check

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 3>his record against Isaiah Thomas in the playoffs. Check shacks

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 3>record against Carl alone in the playoffs, it's one to eight.

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Here is what actually is on the line in this

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 3>series now, if either one of them win a championship,

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 3>it has massive legacy implications for them both. Lebron wins

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 3>a championship in year twenty, and it is no longer

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 3>debatable who the greatest player of all time is. Steph

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 3>wins a championship in year twenty, and I do think

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 3>he probably he's not in your twenty Pardon me, but

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 3>at age thirty five, that ends the Steph versus Larry

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Bird discussion and makes the step versus Kobe and discussions

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 3>really really interesting versus Kobe and Duncan discussions. Pardon me,

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 3>but here's what Steph has an opportunity to do that

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 3>he's never done, and he should do it because of

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 3>where they both are in their career. And I understand

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Lebron's thirty eight steps thirty five, so it doesn't say

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 3>that different. But here's the reality of Lebron has played

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 3>playoffs in regular season combined sixty five thousand minutes. Only

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Kareem has played more. For some context on that, Steph

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 3>has played thirty five thousand minutes. Damian Lillard has played

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 3>thirty thousand minutes, so all of the minutes on the

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 3>court in Dame's career playoffs in regular season. Add that

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 3>to Steph's career playoffs and regular season, and you have

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Lebron's career. So here is the opportunity that Steph has

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 3>this series, win or lose. And this is why I

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 3>don't care that much about the overall record. He has

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 3>played Lebron in the playoff series four times and a

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 3>play in once. He has never once outplayed never once.

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 3>The twenty fifteen finals, Lebron was thirty six thirteen and nine,

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 3>Steph was twenty six five and six, and Lebron was

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 3>so dominant in that thirty six thirteen and nine they

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 3>gave Finals MVP to a guy who evered sixteen points

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 3>because he held Lebron to thirty six, thirteen and nine.

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 3>The twenty sixteen finals, Lebron was thirty eleven and nine

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 3>and Steph was twenty two, five and four. The twenty

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 3>seventeen finals, Lebron was thirty four twelve and ten and

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Steph was twenty seven eight and nine. And the twenty

0:17:55.359 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 3>eighteen finals, Lebron was thirty four nine ten and Steph

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 3>was twenty eight, six, and seven. There has never been

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 3>a single finals that Steph out played Lebron, not one.

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 3>So I understand he has the winning record because for

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 3>he's fifteen and seven for eight of those wins, and

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 3>only one of those losses he had Durant with him

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 3>in twenty fifteen. It was Lebron, Moscow and Della Vedova.

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 3>They had healthy, evenly matched teams once in twenty sixteen

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 3>and that led to one of the greatest finals ever

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 3>and Lebron having the greatest three game shut in the

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 3>history of the sport. So it will be good talk

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 3>show fodder. It is also utter nonsense if we had

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 3>and again that is not disrespectful to Steph. It is

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 3>just an accurate reading of the situation.

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Next, okay, so you know look away demons.

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 3>But you think Demanse by the way, is watching no

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 3>chance watch. I disagree with you. I think he's watching it.

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he's watching it live. Oh he's there, Demo.

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Look at this. Whoa wow, he's in studio.

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 5>Oh I am indeed watching bro the throw shade there

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm watching.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 4>Is this your first time, screw you?

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 5>But yes, this is my first time being in the office.

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 5>It's not my first time watching it live, though.

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 3>It's not.

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 5>I also also sent you a little bit of money

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:47.719
<v Speaker 5>for your birthday yesterday.

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Did you get it?

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 4>I did get it, all right.

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 5>I just wanted to make sure that I didn't get

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 5>a message or anything.

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, But I love you. Guys.

0:19:57.920 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 4>Supposed to play Fortnite last night.

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 5>This didn't text me for that either.

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, hold on sibling rivalry notwithstanding diora if

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 3>you could read this question, because then I do actually

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 3>want to talk to Demand for a moment about this series,

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 3>just because this is his team. But go ahead.

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay. So the seventy six Ers won Game one last

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 4>night and the Celtics behind James Harden's forty five. The

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 4>scariest part is Embiid didn't even play. What does Demonse

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 4>have to say about it?

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, we can ask him directly, but I also think

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 3>we have a tweet of his that we can show

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Demanse we not worried about it, is all I'm gonna say,

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 3>laughing emoji, laughing to hide his tears and fear emoji.

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 3>So what's the question here, Scoot?

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Everyone is going to overreact to this Celtics loss.

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Are you all right, So before I answer, because and

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 3>you guys can then cut my mic for a moment,

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 3>because I know there's to be some audio weirdness with

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 3>demanse answering. Demonse are resident Celtics fan, give us your

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 3>take on this game and that series in the series.

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 5>Hey man, I just don't think that what the Sixers

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 5>did and what James Harden did yesterday is sustainable. The

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 5>Celtics is gonna pick it back up. You know, we

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 5>always tend to get sloppy. I'm not worried about it

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 5>one hundred percent. Think that you should fear what's going

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 5>to happen next to the Lakers a lot more than me.

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm feeling good about it. I'm not worried about it

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 5>at all.

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, here's why I do think, And let's turn off

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 3>Demonse's mic for a moment just so the audio works better.

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 3>I do think there is reason for concern for Boston

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 3>in this regard. Boston has not looked like the championship

0:21:55.080 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 3>favorite that they allegedly are since the first game of

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 3>the postseason. The first game of the playoffs they blew

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 3>out Atlanta. It looked like that series was going to

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 3>be a laugher. The second game of the playoffs, they

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 3>beat Atlanta. It was maybe a little closer than you'd wanted,

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 3>but it was fine. It looked like the series is

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 3>gonna be a laugher. They then lose to Atlanta in

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 3>Game three, lose to Atlanta at home in Game five,

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 3>and then need a furious fourth quarter comeback to beat

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta in Game six. You then play Philly with no

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 3>embeid Harden, fresh off of Vegas trip. He drops forty

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 3>five on you, and some really an odd game from

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Brown and some odd postgame comments from Jalen Brown.

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Brown was six of seven in the first quarter

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 3>of that game, finished the game eight of ten, so

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 3>after the first quarter he took three shots the rest

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 3>of the game. He's asked about the end of the

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 3>game when he was trying to push in transition and

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 3>then didn't and he when they ended up getting a

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 3>shot like violation on the play, and he says, uh, yeah,

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:26.959
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to run, but no one was running

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 3>with me. He also has this very odd hand cut

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 3>on his hand that he said he got from picking

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 3>up a vase. Okay, his like the Jalen Brown thing.

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Is something to monitor and be at least semi concerned about. Furthermore,

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 3>there's another one to your further the Celtics lost a

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 3>game where they scored thirty eight points on eighty five

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 3>percent shooting in the first quarter. I've never seen a

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 3>team shoot eighty five percent in a quarter ever. I'm

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 3>sure it's been done. I don't remember ever seeing it.

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 3>And this is why not taking care of business and

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 3>playing with your food, or as Doc Rivers unfortunately called it,

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 3>not taking care of business and playing with your meat,

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 3>can come back to bite you. The Celtics, had they

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 3>won Game five against Atlanta, this series against Philly would

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 3>have started on Saturday. EMBIID would have missed that game.

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Clearly was not going to be ready for Game two,

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 3>which was going to be today yesterday, and maybe miss

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 3>game three. Now you go longer with Atlanta, you lose

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 3>game one. Now EMBIID doesn't even have to come back

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 3>for Game two, and Philly has already stolen home court.

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 3>So I'd love to get more from Demons on this,

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 3>but it does seem like it's The audio is not

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 3>great when we go back and forth with him using

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 3>the producer mic Hey. But I will say this. The

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 3>other thing, someone should tell Demonse's guy, Robert Williams time

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 3>Lord that the playoffs are here, because he's supposed to

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 3>be their X factor and the guy's getting twenty minutes

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 3>a game and is yet to have I think he's

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 3>had one super high impact game, so I think there

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 3>are a lot of warning signs for Boston. Conversely, Philly

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 3>at some point has to get some respect considering they're

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 3>undefeated in the postseason despite Embiid only playing two games

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 3>fully healthy and three games at all, and they're five

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 3>and zero, and right now, if you remember, you know

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 3>my pick was Lakers Sixers. The two teams with the

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 3>best record since the All Star Break across the entire

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 3>NBA are the Lakers and the Sixers. And shout out

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 3>to Harden. Playoffs have been a bugaboo for him his

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:31.719
<v Speaker 3>entire career, and not only forty five, but a step back,

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 3>go ahead three in the final twenty seconds. There's this

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 3>big time in the final thirty seconds that was as

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 3>big time as it gets. Now, do I think Philly's

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 3>a lock for the series. I don't because I don't

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 3>know the health of him Bid, But the idea Philly

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 3>was a ten point dog yesterday Boston losing that game.

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 3>It really is a disaster for him. All right, last

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 3>one of the first segment, you are.

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Despite poor shooting all around, Denver took a two to

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 4>zero lead on the Suns. Yep, Jokics, Sorry, yeah, you

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 4>got it. Jokics looked like the best player in the world,

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 4>while Katie couldn't even buy a three. Yeah, you picked

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 4>the Nuggets in this series. Are you worried at all

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 4>that this is King's Warriors two point zero?

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 3>No? I I think Phoenix is in real trouble. I've

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 3>been saying that. I said it when they were beating

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 3>the Clippers. They do not have a bench, and yesterday

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Manti Williams actually tried to He played eleven guys. I'm

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 3>gonna do this math quickly. Twenty six plus sixteen is

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 3>forty two plus eleven is fifty three plus nine is

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 3>sixty two plus five is sixty seven plus. He played

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 3>his bench seventy minutes, So there's only two hundred and

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 3>forty minutes in zwo of playing Diamond a game forty

0:27:59.880 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 3>eight minute game, five guys on the court, two hundred

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 3>and forty minutes. He played his bench for seventy of

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 3>those two hundred and forty minutes. So what is that like?

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Right around twenty eight to twenty nine percent something like

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 3>that of the game was given to the bench. How

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>many points do you do you or I know you

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 3>didn't watch the game it was on late. How many

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 3>points do you think those that bench seventy twenty nine percent? God,

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 3>that's satisfying. Let's do seventy over to forty quickly.

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 4>I like that.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 3>How many how many points do you think those bench

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 3>players combined for in their seventy minutes of action? Give

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 3>me a range. Well, the least they could score a zero. Well,

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 3>the team scored as a total eighty seven points. The

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 3>bench played about a quarter or twenty percent of the game.

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 3>How much do you think the bench scored? Hold on,

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll help you out. I'll give you this. The Nuggets bench,

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 3>which played fifty four minutes, had thirteen points, So not

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 3>that much. I'm gonna say twenty four. The bench scored

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 3>four points. The bench was two of sixteen from the

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 3>field gave you nothing once again, Damian Lee gave you

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty six unproductive minutes. Josha Koge, who was a bench

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 3>player but started for you, was one of three from

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 3>the field for two points. So your non big four

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 3>guys were a combined three of nineteen for six points.

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:46.719
<v Speaker 3>Not gonna work. You then add to it that Chris

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Paul tweaked his groin shocker the sunder in dire straits,

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 3>and then you have the odd Kevin Durant part of it,

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 3>which is duract. Listen, Durant was not good in this game.

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 3>In these playoffs as a whole, he's been good. It's

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 3>been twenty eight a game, twenty eight nine and five

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 3>on fifty percent from the field. He's been good, but

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 3>not as dominant as I think people expected him to

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 3>be good enough. Say it again, Yeah, it seems unfair,

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 3>but that's what it feels like. He hasn't had a

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 3>single I'm Kevin Durant, I'm gonna, you know, destroy your

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 3>world game yet this postseason. He's been very consistent. Yesterday

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 3>was his first bad game from a field goal percentage standpoint,

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 3>but twenty seven, twenty five, twenty eight, thirty one, thirty one,

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine, twenty four. But they need more. And and

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 3>I said this, and Brew and I don't know wild

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 3>degreed or disagreed, but the minutes were going to catch

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 3>up to him. Minutes played in these playoffs are in

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 3>forty four, forty four, forty one, forty four, forty four,

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 3>thirty six because they got blown out forty four. Booker's

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 3>been excellent, not enough. I think the Suns are in

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 3>real trouble. And all the Jokic stuff, I know people

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 3>are going to recreate my history on Nikoli. Jokic never

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 3>said the guy's a bad player. I simply said I

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 3>did not think he deserved his two previous MVPs. I

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 3>also said this year I would have been fine with

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 3>him winning MVP if he hadn't won the previous two,

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 3>because this year he fit the bill of an actual MVP,

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 3>had unbelievable stats, the team was the one seed. They're

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 3>a real contender. But I wasn't gonna let I wasn't

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 3>okay with Yokic winning three in a row. With all

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 3>that said, he was extraordinary yesterday and he's been awesome

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 3>this postseason. And Lakers Nuggets in the Conference finals, which

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 3>we saw in the bubble, is gonna be great and

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna get it again because the Lakers are beating

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 3>the Warriors. I didn't actually give that just real quick here,

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 3>I think Lakers Warriors is going to follow the exact

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 3>same beats as Lakers Grizzlies, where the Lakers win Game one,

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 3>lose Game two, win Game three and four, lose Game five,

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:36.959
<v Speaker 3>win game six. I think that is gonna be the

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 3>beats of this series. And I think the Lakers out

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 3>in order to hurt my ankle. In order to win

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 3>a championship, the Lakers are gonna have to probably go

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 3>something close to undefeated at home in the postseason. They're

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 3>a quarter of the way they are at three and

0:32:56.480 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Zo Deora excellent first segment, Demonse, that was delightful seeing you.

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 3>It's also don't care Season five, Demonse wrote on wrote

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 3>on a piece of paper, what'd you say to yours

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 3>so they can see him? I think, yeah, well, well,

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 3>here's the thing to you ere, this is an audio

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 3>and a video enterprise. So some people just listen to

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 3>your podcast, so they can't see all our cool graphics,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 3>are cool studio, your lovely outfit today. They can't see

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 3>any of that. They just they are just you know, listening.

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 3>So I have to, you know, walk, I have to

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 3>read for them. Demonzi says, season five, that's not happening.

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Pal season five is not happening. This Celtics could win

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 3>the series. But Celtics and five is not happening. And

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 3>the Suns and that Chris Paul injury. If he's out, man,

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 3>it's not that he's been great, but they don't have

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 3>the depth. And that was the concern with putting all

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 3>your eggs in a basket with a thirty seven, thirty

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 3>eight year old point guard thirty how old's drink thirty four.

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 3>There's some real, real risk there, and I think they're

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 3>seeing it now. Quick break, sixty second, break right back,

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 3>talk a little NFL draft, and play a cool game.

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 3>That's all next.

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 6>Well's right, We're so done with New Year, New you.

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 6>This year, it's more you on bumble, more of you

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 6>shamelessly sending playlists, especially that one filled with show tunes.

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 6>More of you finding geminis because you know you always

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 6>like them. More of you dating with intention because you

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 6>know what you want and you know what we love

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 6>that for you. Someone else will too be more you

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 6>this year and find them on bumble.

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, Welcome back, do that every time, Welcome back

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 3>in Let me have it, okay, just remind me and

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 3>I'll let you have it, but it sounds bad and

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 3>we both do it. I'll just let you have it.

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 3>Your brother is in La watching from the studio. I

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 3>never let him do that, but he also didn't have

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 3>the audacity to even try to do that. Demonse understood

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 3>his role as the co host, like we are both well,

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 3>don't have to have the same argument. Next you're gonna

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 3>try to argue with me a barbecue or something. We

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 3>don't need to be in reruns already you're wrong. That's fine,

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 3>don't worry about it. But welcome back in and you

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:24.879
<v Speaker 3>can do that in the future. What are we doing

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 3>with before we get to our game?

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 4>So we're gonna talk about the NFL draft has come

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 4>and gone. Yep, And there's lots of talk about qbs

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 4>and oh my gosh, qbs and the Lions taking.

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 3>And taking a running back, taking a running back.

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 4>But most importantly, do you think people already throwing the

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Eagle Super Bowl parade is a bit much?

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, listen, I do like what the Eagles did. Jalen

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Carter could have been the number one player in the draft.

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Massive off field concerns, but the talent is undeniable. They

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 3>think they have the culture to deal with it. At

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 3>number nine, they traded up from ten to nine. I

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 3>get it. The player they took at thirty Nolan Smith

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 3>is the guy I wanted the Chiefs to draft at

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 3>thirty one. So I'm not gonna act like I don't

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 3>understand why people are loving days after the draft what

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles did. It should be noted on Nolan Smith

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 3>that despite his insane combine measurables athletic freak tests that

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 3>he had that he just ace, he was not wildly

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 3>productive at Georgia last year. He only played eight games

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 3>and sacks can be a misleading number. Where he only

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 3>had three. The guy only had eighteen total tackles. So

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 3>the upside is there situational pass rusher down to down.

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 3>I say again, I wanted him on my team. But

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the other thing that I think Howary Roseman is really good,

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 3>I also think there is some confirmation bias thus far

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 3>in how we evaluate him. Okay, so let's just go

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 3>through his first round picks over the last few years.

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Because he's been great at trading, great at being aggressive,

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 3>fight drafting, Jalen Hurts in the second round. Believing in him.

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 3>All that stuff is a triple plus the draft. However,

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 3>last year they took Jordan Davis at number thirteen. The

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 3>jury is out on him. I think he's good. I

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:54.399
<v Speaker 3>think he'll be good. Nobody can act like what they

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 3>saw from him his rookie season, which was marred at

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the end by a high ankle sprain enough to definitively say,

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 3>oh yeah, no doubt that was the right pick. The

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 3>year before, they took Devonte Smith at number ten. I

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 3>like that pick a lot. I think that was the

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:16.319
<v Speaker 3>right pick. Now, it's not fair to be like, would

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 3>you have rather had Micah Parsons at twelve? Of course

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 3>you would have, But the question is him versus the

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:25.959
<v Speaker 3>receivers that came after him. He's been better than Kadarius Tony,

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 3>obviously better than Rashad Bateman. So you like that pick.

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 3>The year before that, in the first round, they took

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Rager over Justin Jefferson. That is a massive miss.

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 3>The year before that, in the first round, they took

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 3>Andre Dillard, and that was a massive miss. They they

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 3>took Derek Barnett. I don't know how he was there

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 3>when they took Derek Barnett. They took Derek Barnett in

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 3>the first round. He's fine, I don't. I don't think

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 3>many Eagles fans would say, oh yeah, he's he lived

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 3>up to that first round pick. And obviously the Wins

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 3>extension was a disaster. So I do think there was

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 3>a little too much of media group think and just

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:14.280
<v Speaker 3>drafting all Georgia guys. I think could have some downside

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 3>to it, but I like their players. I like the

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 3>guys they got, and if my team were drafting in

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 3>those spots of two, I would have wanted.

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 4>Them to take How do you think the Chiefs did?

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 3>So they addressed their three biggest positions of need. They

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 3>didn't move up to get Nolan Smith. They stayed where

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 3>they were, and they took the Kansas City kid from

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 3>k State Azuma to be a defensive end. That's back

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 3>to back first round picks they've used on defensive end.

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Last year they obviously had two thanks to the Tyreek

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Hill trade. I liked Carl Loftus last year. We'll see

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:51.360
<v Speaker 3>what Ozuoma does in the second round. They they, according

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 3>to the consensus boards, reached massively on Rareshi Rice, the

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver from SMU Now. He was wildly productive in

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 3>college and they obviously liked him. I I'm not gonna

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:11.240
<v Speaker 3>act like I scouted Rashi Rice. I'm not a draft guy, wils.

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 3>I wanted them to go defensive end, wide receiver or

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:17.359
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver defensive end in that order they did. They

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 3>just got to be right on the player. And then

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 3>they took an upside tackle in Juanya Morris. And again

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 3>they traded up in the second and third round to

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 3>target both of those guys. So those were clearly players

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 3>they really wanted. And so then you just gotta see

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:35.359
<v Speaker 3>if they end up being you know, last year they

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 3>crushed the draft. Only Seattle had a better draft than

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 3>him last year, So you gotta wait and see. They

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 3>did address their biggest positions of need. Now I do

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 3>want to spend a couple of minutes here talking about

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 3>the other big stories of the draft. Okay, I cannot

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:59.280
<v Speaker 3>overstate what a long term disaster I think the Texans

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 3>draft is going to prove to be. Everyone loved. I

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't say everyone. A lot of people loved it because

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 3>they end up with their quarterback CJ. Stroud and the

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 3>best defensive player, Will Anderson. The price they paid to

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 3>go get Will Anderson in trading the twelfth pick, the

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 3>thirty third pick, and this is the most important part.

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Next year's number one pick is bananas. It's in. The

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Texans could be the worst team in the league next year.

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 3>They they traded away the number one pick of the draft,

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:44.399
<v Speaker 3>or maybe the number one pick of the draft, their

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 3>number one pick. If the Texans loved will Anderson that much,

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 3>you could just stay it too, draft him at two

0:41:57.040 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 3>and then at twelve take another blue chip player like

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Christian Gonzales, or trade out of that pick, which you

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 3>obviously could have, so you can draft Caleb Williams, who

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 3>is a generational prospect next year, or Bryce may or

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 3>even if you just love CJ. Stroud CJ. Stroud on

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 3>this team, They're not going to be good next year.

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe the Cardinals. The Cardinals very likely. I

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't say likely. It is absolutely on the board that

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the Cardinals go into next year's draft with the first

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 3>and second pick of the draft. They could be the

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:44.839
<v Speaker 3>worst team. The Texans could be the second worst team.

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 3>So I thought the Cardinals crushed. I thought what the

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:54.799
<v Speaker 3>Texans did was back crazy, And now I want to

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 3>defend the Lions for a moment, all of my smart

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 3>media friends. They are in agreement on one thing. The

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Lions draft was stupid. They drafted these non premium positions

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 3>and they didn't get the value they needed all of it.

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 3>Here is my tepid defense of the Lions. I don't

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 3>think drafting the second best running back in the draft

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 3>at twelve is good strategy. I don't think drafting an

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 3>inside backer at eighteen is good strategy. I understand that.

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the Lions looked at it like this. They

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 3>must have believed that Jamiir Gibbs it's good enough in

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:49.319
<v Speaker 3>a normal draft to be far and away the best

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:54.240
<v Speaker 3>running back in a non Vjon Robinson draft. Everyone agrees

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 3>that Jack Campbell is the best inside linebacker. Everyone agrees

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 3>that Brian Branch, the safety that they gotten around two,

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 3>is the best safety. And they must have fallen in

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:10.800
<v Speaker 3>love with Sam Laporta, a player I liked, but everyone

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 3>was shocked that he went before Michael Meyer. But they

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 3>had the opportunity, so I think they looked at this

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:22.359
<v Speaker 3>draft and said, with our first four picks, we can

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 3>get the best or the second best player in the

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:32.840
<v Speaker 3>entire draft at four positions and instantly have for the

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 3>next five years, a top level starting safety, a top

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:41.760
<v Speaker 3>level starting tight end, a top level starting inside backer,

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 3>and our top level running back. I understand the positional

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 3>value part of it. I understand why analytically speaking, it

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 3>was not sound. But I also understand the lion's perspective

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 3>of Okay, we're sitting there at where was there forty five?

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 3>We could get the seventh best receiver or the best safety.

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 3>We're sitting there at eighteen. We could get the fifth

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 3>best pass rusher or the best inside backer. We're sitting

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 3>there at twelve we could get the fourth best offensive

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 3>lineman or a running back we love. I don't necessarily

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 3>agree with it, but I don't think it's as quite

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 3>as insane as what seemingly everyone else in the analytical

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 3>community thinks it is. So those were my big draft takeaways,

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 3>and now we can move on to the game.

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, Okay. In this game, we are going to

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 4>run through each of the remaining playoff teams, and you

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 4>will give us a reason why you think they should

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 4>they can win the finals, or reason why you think

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 4>they can't win the five, and what each team's X

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 4>factor will be. Yep, we've heard you talk enough about

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:07.759
<v Speaker 4>the Warriors and Lakers, though, So we're gonna stick to

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 4>the teams who can actually win.

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well that's that's a cheap shot at both the Warriors.

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 4>And anyways, first off, the Celtics.

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, why can they win the finals? Embiid not

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 3>fully healthy, home court throughout, Tatum plays out of his mind.

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:30.479
<v Speaker 3>That's why they can win. That's their path. Why they

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't win is a really weird Jalen Brown situation. I

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 3>just I haven't loved his quotes. I haven't loved. I

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 3>thought yesterday was bizarre taking three shots in the final

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 3>three quarters. I think that could play a huge role.

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 3>And the X factors their rookie head coach Joe Missoula,

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 3>and the Joe Missoula has not exactly bathed himself in

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:13.719
<v Speaker 3>glory thus far this postseason. And even if they get

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 3>out of Round two Spolstra, what they have waiting for them,

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 3>and that the best coach in basketball, that could be

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 3>a hell of a challenge in round three. So to me,

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:29.719
<v Speaker 3>the are X factor is Joe Missoula, without question. All right,

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:34.800
<v Speaker 3>next seventy six ers? All right, so why very simple?

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Outrageous depth and the MVP. That's why why not would

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:49.360
<v Speaker 3>be playoff Harden? If playoff Harden who yesterday was not

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 3>playoff Harden. And that's a great thing. And the X

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 3>factor is Tobias Harris. I feel like we know what

0:47:56.280 --> 0:47:59.400
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna get from MAXI. We know if and be healthy,

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 3>what we're gonna get from embiid. If Tobias Harris can

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 3>consistently just give you what he gave you last night,

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:11.440
<v Speaker 3>which is not a ton but right or what let

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:12.960
<v Speaker 3>me see what he finished with last night? I think

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:16.320
<v Speaker 3>it was right around twenty. Tobias last night had eighteen

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 3>points on sixteen shots, made two threes. That's all you

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 3>need from it. It's very simple for them.

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Next, okay, next is the Knicks.

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, the Knicks can't win the title. I'm sorry Knicks fans,

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 3>and you're mad at me.

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Say why they could?

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:35.759
<v Speaker 5>Though?

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:39.240
<v Speaker 4>And why not? You'd think there's nothing they could.

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the other teams canceled their flights. The Knicks

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 3>can't win the title. They can't gonna walk out.

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:52.479
<v Speaker 4>Of here and there's gonna be a listen.

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 3>And then the Knicks have been better than I expected.

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I was wrong about them to a degree, but they

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 3>don't have enough top level talent. They just don't. They

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 3>can't win the title. Why not? They don't have enough

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 3>talent the X factor, call it the MSG crowd. That'll

0:49:08.120 --> 0:49:10.840
<v Speaker 3>be great, but sorry, we just let's just move on.

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:15.719
<v Speaker 3>Next the Heat. Why can Why can the Heat win

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:16.280
<v Speaker 3>the title?

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy freaking Butler and Eric Spolstrom, the best coach in

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 3>the league and a dominant playoff player. That's that's why

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:30.240
<v Speaker 3>they can win the title. It's very simple. Jimmy Butler

0:49:30.840 --> 0:49:33.360
<v Speaker 3>and now he turned his ankle and we got to

0:49:33.360 --> 0:49:36.360
<v Speaker 3>see how healthy is. I bet he plays tonight. But

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:39.439
<v Speaker 3>they have the best coach and they have a guy

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 3>who has been playing at the highest level of anyone

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 3>this postseason. That's why they can't. Why they can't is

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 3>the overall talent's not enough. They're leaning a lot on

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Lowry and then you get to Struce and Vincent

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 3>and Caleb Martin and a Zeller brother wearing a mask.

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 3>The X factor is Kyle Lowry. Does Kyle Lowry have

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 3>one more great playoff run in him? If he does,

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:16.240
<v Speaker 3>man that's a backpad is a tough ass back court

0:50:16.320 --> 0:50:20.520
<v Speaker 3>man in Butler and Lowry. All right, Next, the Suns

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:29.240
<v Speaker 3>why could they? Booker and Durant have the highest scoring

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:33.319
<v Speaker 3>run of any champion duo ever. That's their only way.

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 3>The highest scoring duo of any champion ever is Shaq

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 3>and Kobe and one at fifty nine a game. They're

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 3>gonna need Booker and Durant to be sixty five a

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:47.600
<v Speaker 3>game for them to win the title. Wow, okay, why not? Depth?

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:51.439
<v Speaker 3>They have no bench, they barely have a starting five.

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 3>It's very simple. Why not? And the X factor is

0:50:55.680 --> 0:50:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Chris Paul's health. If Chris Paul's growing, like even if

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:01.879
<v Speaker 3>he's health I don't like him in this series. If

0:51:01.880 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 3>he's not healthy, they're cooked. And the maybe there's news

0:51:06.920 --> 0:51:09.479
<v Speaker 3>on that since we've been on the air, I haven't

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:12.720
<v Speaker 3>seen it. But the soft tissue injury for Chris Paul,

0:51:13.960 --> 0:51:16.479
<v Speaker 3>you could see that coming a mile away. They're playing

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:19.400
<v Speaker 3>him forty minutes a night. In Round one. I kept

0:51:19.440 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 3>saying this was a bad idea, and it had it

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 3>already came to fruition.

0:51:23.719 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 4>Next the Warriors.

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:30.720
<v Speaker 3>The Warriors is not next. The Nuggets are next.

0:51:30.960 --> 0:51:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh yah, we said.

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:35.799
<v Speaker 3>We're not doing the Warriors of the Lakers. That was

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:39.839
<v Speaker 3>your own words. Why can the Nuggets? I'm just telling

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:50.880
<v Speaker 3>you why can the Nuggets Jokic continuing to play at

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:59.040
<v Speaker 3>an insane level, plus their overall continuity and depth of roster.

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:03.800
<v Speaker 3>It's not that they're crazy deep, like they go ten guys,

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 3>but you don't need to go ten guys. But what

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 3>they have right now is they have seven guys they

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:16.320
<v Speaker 3>deeply trust with a sneaky eighth man in Christian Brown,

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:25.120
<v Speaker 3>but Jokic, Murray, Gordon Porter, KCP Uncle Jeff Green, and

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Bruce Brown. You trust them all in the playoff in

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:33.399
<v Speaker 3>these moments, and Christian Brown's been good, why wouldn't they

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:39.319
<v Speaker 3>win the title? Michael Porter Junior, they need him to

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:46.719
<v Speaker 3>be a consistent threat from the outside. And he's a

0:52:46.760 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 3>weird guy in that he doesn't have many B games.

0:52:51.719 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 3>He has an A game and then some C and

0:52:54.160 --> 0:52:59.319
<v Speaker 3>D games. And the X factor is the altitude. The

0:52:59.480 --> 0:53:03.319
<v Speaker 3>X factor for them is a home court advantage when

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:06.680
<v Speaker 3>you are playing every other day, that is like any

0:53:06.719 --> 0:53:11.680
<v Speaker 3>other team in the sport, because guys get there and

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:14.879
<v Speaker 3>they don't have the stamina for it. Like if they

0:53:14.960 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 3>were to be in the conference finals, they will play

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 3>either the Lakers or the Warriors. Lebron is old. Can

0:53:24.640 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 3>he handle that altitude. Staff runs more than any player

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:32.279
<v Speaker 3>in league history when he doesn't have the ball. Can

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:35.799
<v Speaker 3>he handle the altitude with them having home court advantage.

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:39.120
<v Speaker 3>It's a legitimate question, and that is the X factor.

0:53:39.440 --> 0:53:43.279
<v Speaker 3>How well trained their opposition is to deal with that altitude.

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, that was a really good game. Answer your

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 3>questions in the C block questions and comments. That's next

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:58.920
<v Speaker 3>What's Right? All right? Welcome back in What's Right with

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:01.279
<v Speaker 3>Think Right? Episode one forty seven. You're supposed to do

0:54:01.320 --> 0:54:02.600
<v Speaker 3>the welcome back in Scoot, No.

0:54:02.560 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 4>Wen, I do it for the other one that you

0:54:04.360 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 4>already took for me.

0:54:05.360 --> 0:54:08.319
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, all right, we'll start that next week. All right,

0:54:08.320 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 3>what are the questions that we're gonna read?

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 4>And so first question, Yeah, Gabrielle, I think it's Gabriel.

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:19.800
<v Speaker 3>It might be Gabrielle. My guess is a demand. So Gabriel,

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:22.200
<v Speaker 3>what is that? Because I think I've seen the metrics

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:25.440
<v Speaker 3>on our show. We're about eighty six percent male, fourteen

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:26.400
<v Speaker 3>percent female.

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:29.839
<v Speaker 4>All right, Well, he says he's going to Kansas City

0:54:29.880 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 4>in a few months, and what are the top three

0:54:31.800 --> 0:54:34.800
<v Speaker 4>barbecue spots? There are also Happy Birthday?

0:54:34.960 --> 0:54:39.879
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Arthur Bryant's Jack Stack and Joe's Kansas City. Those

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 3>are the top three.

0:54:40.760 --> 0:54:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Next, Arthur King said, do the Chiefs trade for d Hot.

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 3>No that now that they use the second round pick

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:50.360
<v Speaker 3>on a wide receiver. I don't know that they and

0:54:50.400 --> 0:54:52.360
<v Speaker 3>they don't want to spend the money on it. I

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 3>don't know, other than Tony, if they have a top

0:54:56.600 --> 0:55:01.880
<v Speaker 3>flight talent in the receiver room. But they certainly have

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:05.479
<v Speaker 3>enough bodies. So right now, the Chiefs wide receiver depth

0:55:05.560 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 3>chart is Kadarius Tony, who was a number one pick

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:13.400
<v Speaker 3>three years ago for the Giants, sky Moore or I

0:55:13.440 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 3>guess Cadarius number one pick two years ago, depends on

0:55:15.640 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 3>how you look at it. Sky Moore was a second

0:55:19.760 --> 0:55:22.520
<v Speaker 3>round pick for the Chiefs last year, Rashie Rice, who

0:55:22.560 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 3>was second round pick for the Chiefs this year. MBS.

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 3>There's four. They signed Richie James, they like Justin Watson

0:55:30.080 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 3>who was on the team, and they have a flyer

0:55:32.640 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 3>on Justin Ross. So that and so, no, I don't

0:55:37.640 --> 0:55:40.880
<v Speaker 3>think they're adding any more receivers. I kind of wanted

0:55:40.880 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 3>them to spend an asset in the draft on a

0:55:44.600 --> 0:55:47.120
<v Speaker 3>tight end because I wanted them to be able to

0:55:47.200 --> 0:55:50.960
<v Speaker 3>learn from Kelsey. But they didn't prioritize that, all right, Next.

0:55:50.840 --> 0:55:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so coach Mysstik asked, if there's truly twelve guys

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 4>for ten spots, which he agrees on, why don't we

0:55:59.800 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 4>just make top twelve the measuring stick from here on out?

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Listen. I'm fine with that Club Superstar, which we do

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:08.840
<v Speaker 3>every year on the show in which is being debuted

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 3>next week on First Things First, Club Superstar is a

0:56:12.320 --> 0:56:15.800
<v Speaker 3>very strict twelve person rule, one in, one out A.

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:18.359
<v Speaker 3>People can't throw around the superstar wards. Sorry for hitting

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:23.080
<v Speaker 3>your shoes, baby. The superstar word to you know, liberally,

0:56:24.040 --> 0:56:27.800
<v Speaker 3>and it's twelve men and NBA teams are twelve men essentially,

0:56:28.040 --> 0:56:31.400
<v Speaker 3>So I'm good with that. But other people aren't. People

0:56:31.480 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 3>like top tens. They like big, easy round numbers, and

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:40.480
<v Speaker 3>because of that, I listen. The top twelve is inarguable

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:45.440
<v Speaker 3>the twelve greatest players in league history are, and we

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:49.240
<v Speaker 3>could argue about the order, but they are lebron Kareem

0:56:49.760 --> 0:56:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Michael Magic, Russell, Wilt Duncan, Kobe Bird, steph Akeem Shack.

0:56:58.440 --> 0:57:04.320
<v Speaker 3>That's twelve. After that, you then get into another section.

0:57:04.960 --> 0:57:09.560
<v Speaker 3>The old timers in that section are West Oscar, doctor

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:14.319
<v Speaker 3>j Moses, the kind of bridge. The gap guy in

0:57:14.400 --> 0:57:18.080
<v Speaker 3>the section is Isaiah Thomas, and the contemporaries in that

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 3>section are Jannis and Durant. That's seven. They're their own

0:57:23.840 --> 0:57:29.600
<v Speaker 3>bucket of guys. And then that next group, one of

0:57:29.640 --> 0:57:32.760
<v Speaker 3>which is a top twenty player. The others are not

0:57:33.480 --> 0:57:44.440
<v Speaker 3>are Waged, Dirk, Garnet, Mailman, Mike, and if we want

0:57:44.440 --> 0:57:51.360
<v Speaker 3>to go way back, pettit Coozy that that group of guys,

0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:54.440
<v Speaker 3>and it gets complicated from there. Again. I'm sure I

0:57:54.520 --> 0:57:58.080
<v Speaker 3>left someone else someone out when I was talking about

0:57:58.320 --> 0:58:02.040
<v Speaker 3>that next bucket of people, but I think for the

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:06.480
<v Speaker 3>most part we got it. Is there anybody I said Derk?

0:58:06.960 --> 0:58:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I think I said Chrome alone. Barkley's in there. The

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:16.160
<v Speaker 3>CP three's probably in that next little group. It gets complicated,

0:58:16.280 --> 0:58:21.960
<v Speaker 3>gets hard a lot of NBA history. What about Luca, Well, Luca,

0:58:22.120 --> 0:58:24.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, obviously will be there. And Luca, you know,

0:58:24.880 --> 0:58:27.280
<v Speaker 3>I had twentieth on the fifty graders of the last

0:58:27.280 --> 0:58:29.920
<v Speaker 3>fifty years. This year kind of hurt that and he

0:58:29.960 --> 0:58:31.360
<v Speaker 3>needs to put a few more pelts on the wall.

0:58:31.400 --> 0:58:33.640
<v Speaker 3>But Luke obviously is gonna be there. Let's just keep moving,

0:58:33.680 --> 0:58:34.800
<v Speaker 3>go ahead, all right.

0:58:34.800 --> 0:58:39.360
<v Speaker 4>Adam asked well, the Warriors shooting and pace where down?

0:58:40.240 --> 0:58:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Where down? Lebron more than Memphis? Who and the Lakers

0:58:43.160 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 4>can guard Curry?

0:58:44.440 --> 0:58:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, listen all in short and versa order. First of all,

0:58:48.360 --> 0:58:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Vanderbilt will start on Curry, but they're gonna be switching

0:58:52.440 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 3>everything and the nobody really can guard Curry. The point

0:58:59.360 --> 0:59:03.560
<v Speaker 3>is can you can you affect him enough? Can you

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 3>take away the other things? Can Anthony Davis make sure

0:59:06.120 --> 0:59:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Looney doesn't kill you on the offensive? Class the Warriors shooting?

0:59:10.040 --> 0:59:12.920
<v Speaker 3>So this is so interesting for both the Warriors and

0:59:12.960 --> 0:59:17.680
<v Speaker 3>the Lakers because it's going to be a culture shock

0:59:17.840 --> 0:59:21.240
<v Speaker 3>for both teams. So the Warriors go from playing a

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:25.560
<v Speaker 3>team and that's all offense, no defense, to the best

0:59:25.560 --> 0:59:30.480
<v Speaker 3>defense in basketball that is going an incredibly long, incredibly strong,

0:59:30.920 --> 0:59:35.360
<v Speaker 3>incredibly physical. Are the Lakers. The Kings are all finesse,

0:59:36.280 --> 0:59:38.720
<v Speaker 3>so that's gonna be a tough adjustment for them. The Lakers,

0:59:38.760 --> 0:59:41.880
<v Speaker 3>on the flips, I'd go from playing the worst shooting

0:59:41.920 --> 0:59:45.240
<v Speaker 3>team in the playoffs Memphis, to the best shooting team

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs and the Warriors. That's gonna be a

0:59:48.720 --> 0:59:53.280
<v Speaker 3>culture shot. Who adjusts most to that is key. I

0:59:53.360 --> 0:59:56.880
<v Speaker 3>also do think while Lebron typically treats game ones as

0:59:56.880 --> 1:00:00.480
<v Speaker 3>feel out games that tonight's game is a sneak. Gotta

1:00:00.480 --> 1:00:04.040
<v Speaker 3>have a game for the Lakers because after tonight, it's

1:00:04.160 --> 1:00:07.360
<v Speaker 3>every other night for the entirety of the series. And

1:00:07.440 --> 1:00:11.880
<v Speaker 3>tonight the Lakers they're coming off some rest. The Warriors

1:00:11.880 --> 1:00:14.880
<v Speaker 3>are coming off of seven game war. So I think

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:17.520
<v Speaker 3>the Lakers need this win.

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:25.040
<v Speaker 7>Next Fozy a Gene a Gene said, Nick, you said

1:00:25.040 --> 1:00:27.960
<v Speaker 7>that Giannis losing in the first round can affect him

1:00:28.000 --> 1:00:28.960
<v Speaker 7>being the best player.

1:00:29.400 --> 1:00:32.920
<v Speaker 4>So does Luca not making it into the playoffs affects

1:00:32.960 --> 1:00:37.880
<v Speaker 4>his high rating? He also lost in the first round twice.

1:00:38.120 --> 1:00:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Luca losing in the first round to the

1:00:40.640 --> 1:00:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Clippers two years in a row, a few years ago,

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:47.520
<v Speaker 3>when Luca was absolutely sensational in those series and the

1:00:47.520 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Clippers had Kauie and Paul George for the entirety of

1:00:50.280 --> 1:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>about those series, that didn't negatively affect him. This year

1:00:54.760 --> 1:00:57.280
<v Speaker 3>and being the lower rated seed losing of the Clippers,

1:00:57.320 --> 1:00:59.400
<v Speaker 3>it's very different than being a one person eight but

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 3>this Yeah, of course, I went into the year saying

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:03.320
<v Speaker 3>lucas the second best player in the sport. I no

1:01:03.400 --> 1:01:06.880
<v Speaker 3>longer say that can't say anymore. Can't miss the play

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:10.960
<v Speaker 3>in and be healthy most of the year, just can't.

1:01:12.000 --> 1:01:15.480
<v Speaker 3>That's so yeah, he's it did affect his rating absolutely,

1:01:15.960 --> 1:01:19.120
<v Speaker 3>so there's no question about it. So yeah, I love Luca,

1:01:19.800 --> 1:01:25.480
<v Speaker 3>but he did not the team. The MAVs were a

1:01:25.560 --> 1:01:29.000
<v Speaker 3>failure and all effects. So is Lucas still a superstar? Yes?

1:01:29.680 --> 1:01:31.000
<v Speaker 3>But can I call him one of the two best

1:01:31.000 --> 1:01:34.520
<v Speaker 3>players in the sport anymore? I cannot doora you were

1:01:34.520 --> 1:01:39.200
<v Speaker 3>excellent today? Oh you don't want a rating? No, I

1:01:39.240 --> 1:01:42.880
<v Speaker 3>don't nine point zero your best one yet, Demonse.

1:01:43.160 --> 1:01:44.919
<v Speaker 4>Usually last one was a nine point two.

1:01:45.200 --> 1:01:46.720
<v Speaker 3>No it was I thought it was an eight point nine.

1:01:46.760 --> 1:01:48.880
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna have to check the tape on that. Uh.

1:01:48.920 --> 1:01:51.320
<v Speaker 3>If it was, then I'll readjust because this was your

1:01:51.320 --> 1:01:54.320
<v Speaker 3>best performance yet, Demonse. It was great to see you,

1:01:54.400 --> 1:01:57.000
<v Speaker 3>my son. You're doing great in Los Angeles. We love you,

1:01:57.120 --> 1:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>we miss you. Uh. Sorry that you know your Celtics

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:02.160
<v Speaker 3>are going to lose the Sixers is gonna be tough

1:02:02.160 --> 1:02:04.560
<v Speaker 3>for you to deal with, but you know, such as life.

1:02:04.960 --> 1:02:07.680
<v Speaker 3>If they'll Demanse, I will tell you this, if we

1:02:07.760 --> 1:02:12.880
<v Speaker 3>get a Lakers Celtics finals and they're in LA, I

1:02:12.960 --> 1:02:14.440
<v Speaker 3>will buy you tickets.

1:02:14.840 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 4>I want everyone to know how loud he is.

1:02:16.840 --> 1:02:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Right now, okay, well do you where interrupted me? If

1:02:20.040 --> 1:02:24.560
<v Speaker 3>we get Lakers Celtics Finals, that would mean the Lakers

1:02:24.560 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 3>have are at home for games three, four, and six.

1:02:27.280 --> 1:02:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I will buy you tickets Tomanse to a great bar

1:02:32.160 --> 1:02:34.200
<v Speaker 3>in Santa Monica to watch the game. I hope you

1:02:34.280 --> 1:02:36.880
<v Speaker 3>enjoy that. Talk to you guys Thursday for the show

1:02:36.920 --> 1:02:40.280
<v Speaker 3>What's right? Man? Hey, it's Nick right. Thank you so

1:02:40.440 --> 1:02:43.680
<v Speaker 3>much for watching. Please do us a favor click subscribe.

1:02:43.720 --> 1:02:47.360
<v Speaker 3>It helps my ego and Demanse's got a financial bonus

1:02:47.400 --> 1:02:50.240
<v Speaker 3>writing on a number of YouTube subscribers, so help him out.

1:02:50.440 --> 1:02:52.240
<v Speaker 3>And also click the bell. I don't know what the

1:02:52.240 --> 1:02:53.800
<v Speaker 3>bell does, but they tell me to tell you to

1:02:53.800 --> 1:02:57.960
<v Speaker 3>click the bell. And audio listeners. People that have commute drives,

1:02:58.040 --> 1:03:00.840
<v Speaker 3>whatever it is, subscribe to the pot podcast as well

1:03:00.880 --> 1:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>wherever you get the podcast. Same shows, just you know,

1:03:03.960 --> 1:03:06.000
<v Speaker 3>just in your ears instead of through your eyes. All

1:03:06.040 --> 1:03:07.320
<v Speaker 3>that check it out, Appreciate show.