WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Tough Game to Pick

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>The following. Here's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Lets go. Are you

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>ready for a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>It's time for the Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>It is Friday, October twenty third, twenty twenty, season sixteen,

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>episode number fifty. Welcome to another edition of The Break.

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>We're life in the s WBC Mortgage studios. At the start,

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a freaky Friday, so we're gonna figure out what's

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna go on This Sunday. Cowboys will face the Washington

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>football team in Washington at noon. Uh, Nick, you are

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>making that trip to Washington. Um, luck with that and

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll get back here. I know it's gonna be fun. Well, bet,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the ones I'm not really like.

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I really wish I was going because going

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to that stadium, it's just get yeah, and we're getting great.

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>We're getting in really late. Uh. You know, normally you

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>get in about five o'clock five thirty, regardless of what

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>time it is five to thirty. It's getting in a

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>lot later than that, like seven thirty. You just got

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>turned around, and well, I think like you're going out. No,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you're like you got to be in your room and

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.839
<v Speaker 1>get some food and call it a night. Right. Almost

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>named the hotel we're going to, But that's probably good.

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the food. It's the only place, you know, who

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>knows what the food's gonna be. But the press box

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is the only place where I've seen media go. I'm

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>just going downstairs to get food. Like literally, media will

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>go and buy food at the concession stand rather than

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>eat what they have in the press box for free.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>That tells you a lot about the food that's offered

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in the press box for free. I mean, Dave, worst

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>stadium in the league, Dave, you know what. I don't

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>hear him right now, but I bet he's gonna be like, yes,

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>by far, we lost, Dave. Um, Well it's a good start.

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But I will answer the question, yes, best worst stadium

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in the league by far, not even for lots of reasons,

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>for lots of reasons, not not even closer. Who knows.

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't even I don't I don't know where I'll

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>be who knows what it should It should be interesting.

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is gonna You know, the Cowboys play

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>well here. I mean nine out of the last twelve

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they've won, but with probably a lot more to do

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>with the team than the they're facing than the stadium. Yeah,

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>but what I'm saying is is that they play well there.

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and it doesn't not always with the team.

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean this, We've seen bad football teams go in

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>here with Matt Castle as a starter and they turn

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it around and they win. So you know, it's always

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>been a game where the records don't matter as much.

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And this time, you know, both teams are struggling, if

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you will, struggling. All right, let's go ahead and jump in.

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about this roster. I have

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a few different topics we need to hit there. Let's

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>get some injury updates. Let's start first with Zach Martin.

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>What are we hearing about Zach Martin. I guess it's

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be me here since Dave's out. I think

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Zach Martin has is gonna be a game time decision.

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't look like it's it's It looks like

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a better chance that he doesn't play in this game.

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't practiced so far this week. They don't do

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot today. They'll do some stuff tomorrow. I think

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>he goes on the trip to Washington, but I don't

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 1>if I had to guess right now, I don't think

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 1>he will play in this game. What about Alden Smith?

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>He had an injury last weekend, has been practicing limited

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>on a limited basis this week. What are we thinking

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>about him for this weekend? I think he's got a

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>much better chance to play. It seems like he will be. Uh.

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>He's not only going on the trip, but it looks

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>like he is going to play in the game. Mike

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy said said as much that he thinks he expects

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>him to be out there. Talking about Sean Lee and

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Cheetobe Owoogier, both guys are guys that have been on IR.

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>They're eligible to return at whatever point the team games

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in ready, they've started that process. Where are they right

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>now in their recovery and return they I don't see

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>him there for this game. Dave and Naber might have

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>different thoughts there, but I mean, I think and I am.

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I can you hear me now? Yes, yes, we can

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>hear you, Sean Lee Cheeto, Hey, Sean Lee Cheeto. No,

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not that's not happening. Um, they are practicing. It's

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>good to see him out there. Don't look for them

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. UM, don't look for Zach Martin on Sunday.

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you already said that, UM, and Randy Gregory

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is worthy of being on the forty eight. That's a

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>direct quote from Mike McCarthy. So, and what do you

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>expect Randy Gregory's role to be this weekend? What do

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you expecting to see from him? Well, I would assume

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of similar to what we've seen from him

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in past years, where they don't necessarily put him out

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there the whole time. They're just kind of easy him in,

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>give him some reps game Dave reps. So I wouldn't

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be expecting too much, but but at least seeing him

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>on the feeling getting him back onto that because we

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>know how different and real game is compared to practice.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So I would expect them to just kind of easy

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>him in it. But I'm super I'm really excited to

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. I know that we all none of

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>us expected Adam Smith to do what he has been

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>capable of doing. And I know we've seen this from

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Randy Gregory in the past, but I am excited to

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>see if he can bring something similar, something fresh, some

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>extra energy to the defensive line. So we'll see what

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>all he does. Dave, I want you to take me back.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I want you to take the fans they're listening right now,

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>take them back to the time when Randy Gregory was

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>playing for this team and give me a scouting report

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>on the type of player that he was good and bad.

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think, I think, fortunately, it'll probably be

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty similar, just because he was in a similar situation

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen. He was coming off a lengthy absence

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>because of suspension, and they used him as a situational guy,

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, an obvious passing down guy. I think he

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>finished he finished that season with only like twenty five

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>tackles because he was you know, they played him on

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a pitch count basically, But he had six sacks and

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty five pressures. So when you put him in a

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>situation where he can go get the passer, he's pretty

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>damn good at it for a guy that hasn't gotten

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to play a lot of football. And then obviously. You know.

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>The downside is I guess you would call him a

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>very undisciplined player because he was good for an offside

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>flag or two seemingly every single week. But man, he's

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he's fun to watch. Like I think about that. I

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>think it was against Tampa in twenty eighteen, he stripped

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston in the pocket and Jalen Smith recovered it

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and returned it for a touchdown, and it was kind

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of like this moment where you were like, Wow, maybe

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys were right about these guys. And two years

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>later now you're questioning it again. But it was a

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>really it was a really fun moment at the time.

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>That's probably that's the biggest Randy Gregory memory that I have.

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, for a guy, like I said, you know,

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>for as little football as he has actually played, he

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>has shown some real potential if he can play a

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit more disciplined. And Nick, I heard you this

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>morning on a one h five dot three the Fan.

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>You were doing a hit there and talked about Randy

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Gregory and some of your recollections of him and what

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of player he is. What are your thoughts with

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>him coming back? What are you expecting to see from him,

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and where do you think he'll be as far as

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the kind of play you can can get

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>out of him at this point his career, you know,

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's hard to say. And of course I

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned there on that show that I temper all the

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>raving about what he looks like in practice because they

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>still go up against the Cowboys offensive line. So how

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>do we judge anything right now with that? But if

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, if he looks quick and he's put on

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>some weight and you know, and it's been good weight,

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>looks like it, you know he needed to bulk up

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>some and so you know, if he can be a

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>player that can kind of help with the run game

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>at times but also get around that edge, just be

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>better than what they have and that shouldn't be that hard.

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if he can just provide a little bit

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of a spark, I think that that'll be something that

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>this team has been missing for sure. Questions do you

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>think he can do that with such a long layoff? Yes,

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I can't say no. With watching Alden Smith.

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I just I know they're different people, different players,

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff, but you can't I think Bucky said

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it too. I mean, when you see Alden Smith, you

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>can't say no, it's not possible. And I think they're

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to give him a huge role. I mean,

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>he can't have a big role going there on pass

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>rushing downs. Try to be disruptive. He can probably do that.

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And I did not remember that he was the one

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 1>that made that tackle against Jameis Winston. I mean, I

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>remember Jalen Smith, but I didn't think I thought it

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>was d Law. I didn't think it was Gregory that

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>made that. So Stephen Parker safety was moved to the

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>active roster. He's a guy that they've been kind of

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>popping up on game days, but now he's on the

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>active roster. Was this a move because they expect him

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to play more at safety or is he a special

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>teams guy? Or is this a situation where they just

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>added a little more depth to their secondary. What do

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you think, Dave? I mean, he's been in there playing

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>safety the last couple of weeks, so I would imagine

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it almost you know, it seems like they're doing this

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>thing by committee because they don't have somebody that's good

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>enough to just nail down the role like Xavier Woods

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is out there, and then depending on the snap, it

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like sometimes it's darry and Thompson, sometimes it's Donovan Wilson.

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think they'll probably throw Stephen Parker in the

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>mix as well. I know they've been really impressed with

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>what they've seen from him in practice. I can't say

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that it like he's jumped off the tape to me

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>watching the games. But again, it's like safety by committee,

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Like if you don't have one guy that can do it,

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>you might as well just throw numbers at it, right right,

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're gonna do this. We're gonna check our

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>first break a little bit early. We're gonna come back,

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna dive into the Washington football team versus

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas cowb Boys. Ask some questions for you guys

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>about both the offense and the defense and how we

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna perform this week. We'll do that. We'll

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>actually have some talk in the third segment about the

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>NFC East. An interesting game last night between the Eagles

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Giants. We'll talk about that a little bit,

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get our predictions for the week. We'll do

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that all when we come right back. This is Dallas

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot com Radio. We're back in a tasty treat

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's new Doctor Pepper

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and cream Soda. Let's take a listen, Doctor cream Soda.

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Is he a new combone. Let's music to my ears? Okay,

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>doctor music to my ears and mouth new Doctor pepper

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and cream Soda. Delas. Just want to use what the

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>pros use? How about the official men's skincare brand of

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black. Right now, you can get

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the Jack Black Starter, a curated collection of Cowboys locker

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>room favorites, for just ten bucks with free shipping. The

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>starter includes four Jack Black skincare favorites plus a full

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>sized and tense therapy whip bomb. Go to get Jack

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Black dot com slash Cowboys and use the code word

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Team JB. That's get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys.

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>The Jack Blackstarter ten bucks, free shipping since eighteen sixty five.

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Stetson Hats are American maid with Pride right here in Texas,

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and Stetson is proud to be on the field with

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>America's team. Want to show your Texas and Team Pride two?

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You can by purchasing your own stetson, you can look

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>just like how the flag guys do on field at

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>every home game. Stetson hats the official crown of all

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>self respecting Cowboys and your favorite football team. Get yours

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 1>today at shop dot Dallas Cowboys dot com or at

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Stetson dot com. It's funny as we travel places, often

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we find the places we want to travel aren't really

0:11:55.440 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>places at all. They're people. They're grandparents, them all old

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>friends and new nephews. That's why at American Airlines we've

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>been using enhanced cleaning measures so you can feel confident

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>every step until you get to them. So, as always,

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 1>our people can't wait to take you to yours American Airlines.

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>You are why we fly back to the break. Are

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you craving at and T Stadium's famous Cowboys cheese, steak,

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>nachos or Cowboy rita? Yeah? Okay, well, Derek, when you're

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>watching the Cowboys at home or at the office, bring

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>your favorite stadium fair to you. Price your online order

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>for pickup or local delivery every week this season. Check

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>out the menu at at and T stadium dot com.

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Slash at home Interest. You're all going to do that

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this week, Maritas, something we ought to consider. Now. I

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 1>don't know about the Cowboy readers. You know, Amber gets

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a little while when she starts drinking, So I don't

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>know about that. We got work to do. What about

0:12:56.520 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>nachos cho, I could go for some nacho? What'd you

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>say nacho? Because I'm Hispanic? Nick, Wow, that was not

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>what you was saying. I don't think, I hope not.

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even say anything. That's the problem. She can't hear.

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>You're the one that said that. Clarify yourself. Now, I'll

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Cowboy reader. Was that what she was

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>getting it? I guess no. I just heard Nick say

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Nacho's Oh okay, See that's what I thought. It's part

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of the read All right, let's jump back in. Let's

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>get back on track. We're live from the SWUNBC Mortgage

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Studios at the Stars. The second segment of the break,

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the Washington football team versus the Dallas Cowboys.

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>That happens is Sunday at noon in Washington. My first

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>question for you guys Washington. Washington has the third worst

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>scoring offense. Dallas has the worst scoring defense. Which one

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>will be better this weekend? Washington's offense or Dallas's defense.

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with you, Amber. I would like to think

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that the defense he's able to start doing something better

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>than the previous games. But based on just everything that

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>has happened this season, I mean, there's no way that

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I can sit here and say, oh, yeah, they're gonna

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>stop Washington regardless of them not having a great offense

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>like we've seen it happen. I mean, they have not

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>really been able to stop anyone. I really thought that

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be the case with the Giants, and the

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Giants ended up scoring over what was the thirty points.

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember the exact amount of numbers, but I

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>just I it's gonna be a tough game. But the

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Dallas defense, it's gonna end up allowing points, just like

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>they've been allowing points all throughout the season. Nick, you know,

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that Layton vander Esh's return and being back

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>for this game, I think this is a type of

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>game where you'll see him really be a part of

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the defense. I think with a wide open threat with Arizona,

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>with Kyler Murley running, I think it's kind of tough

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to you know, he's not He's not that quick of

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a linebacker. He's aware. But but I mean I think

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in a game like this, I think you'll see him

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>out there more and I think that he'll, you know,

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that will help this defense. I think Randy Gregory will

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>help some there off the edge, so they're getting some

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>players back and then they're just not going to be

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>facing guys that that should, you know, hurt them that bad.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think the defense has a better

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>chance of step it up. I think I think Washington's

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>offense is what it is, Dave. I don't trust this

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>defense at all to do anything different than they have done.

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I agree with everything that they've said, but

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean you still got Terry McLaurin and he can

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>run really fast in a straight line, which is all

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that anybody has needed to do over the last month

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>or so. Um. But I will say the one thing

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that gives me confidence is Kyle Allen is awful in

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of like pocket presence and taking well. I mean

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not very good anyway, but like he's off in

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the pocket. I saw a staff this morning. He's got

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the second worst EPA when it comes to strip sacks,

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>only behind Daniel Jones, who you will remember the Cowboys

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>got a strip sack return, you know, and return it

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown against him. So if they can get

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to Kyle Allen, then they should be able to you know,

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>make make some hey there. Obviously they've got to do that.

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>They haven't been consistent, but I would like to think

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that they can turn his bad pocket presence into a

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>short field or two, which would go a long way

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to help in this offense. Yeah, I agree with everything

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys are saying. And I thought it was interesting

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that up until Dave, nobody mentioned Kyle Allen, because that,

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to me is the interesting part. Like, you look at

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>all these teams of Cowboys have played, he is by far,

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, the worst quarterback that they've paid played

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to this point. Now I know that's also that that's

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the death nail for the Cowboys deep. It's like as

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>soon as we start throwing out those kinds of edicts,

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that's when they just get completely roasted. And everybody's like,

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen's ready for the Pro Bowl. But my point is,

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the this will be the quarterback

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that is probably least proficient of all the guys they've

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>played so far, and I think because of that, I

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of faith in the defense right now,

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys defense. What I do have some faith and

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>is in the fact that Kyle Allen hasn't played very well,

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and because he hasn't played l well, I don't think

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>he gets going this week. I agree with you, Dave

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>on McLaren. I think McClaren is the one guy you

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>got to be really concerned about, and so I think

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll get some plays. He'll get some plays out of

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>this defense. I just don't think it'll be enough. I

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>think when you look at the two, I think the

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys defense will be better. All right, let's me want

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to the second question Nick, you mentioned a little while ago.

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>One thing we know is that the Cowboys defense they

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>can make someone bad look good. So there's that. I mean,

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it's to the point where it doesn't even necessarily matter

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>who the opponent is. It's now up to it's just

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>all on the Cowboys at this point. It's it's all

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>up to them, like it's up to them to be

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>able to start changing this whole narrative because right now,

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>like I can care less who the opponent is, It

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter if they're at the bottom of the list.

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys still will make mistakes and end up making

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>them look good. I agree with all of that. What

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, though, is when you look at this Washington offense,

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>this there is not really a good comparison of a

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>team that they played. I know, we think that the

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Giants are bad. To me, the Giants are light years

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>ahead offensively than what Washington is. If you watch offense,

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>their offense, they just are not I mean, they're really

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>really bad. So you're right there, there's bad versus bad.

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>My question then becomes which one is worse? And I

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>think in this instance, this may be the one offense

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in the league that the Dallas defense may be better than.

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 1>But we'll all see, And you're right, Amber, I do

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>think what we've known and what we've seen over time

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is that sometimes you get you look at these kind

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of matchups and you're like, well, certainly Cowboys get it

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>going here, and for whatever reason, it doesn't get going.

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's a real possibility that happens. Let's move on

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to that second question, Nick, you mentioned about Layton vander

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>esh playing last week. I want to take you guys

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 1>back to last week, and I'd like you guys to

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>tell me how you thought he played and how much

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of a difference do you think he made in this defense,

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>particularly last week against the Arizona Cardinals. Nick Le'll start

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>with you. You know, I was just looking at his

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>snaps right now. He played fifty percent of the snaps

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty one percent, so that you know, there wasn't a lot,

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and that might be by design. I would think, you know,

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>they want to see how he comes out of this game.

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought he played. Okay, I didn't. I didn't notice

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>him a lot. Obviously he's only a play out there

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>half the time. But I do think again, I think

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a game like this he will play more. It'll be

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, they'll run the ball more. It'll be kind

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of in the trenches a little bit. And I think

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>this game suits him better. And I think you'll you'll see, oh, Layton,

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Layton's back for this game, Dave, Yeah, I agree. I mean,

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say I didn't really notice him. He played

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent in the snaps. I think he had three tackles.

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>That's to be expected. I mean, not only has he

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>been off for a month, but again no offseason. He

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was out for most of last year. I would it's

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna take him some time. We talked about the play

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that Darius Butler broke down the pop pass to who

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>was a Kirk or whatever one that Anthony Brown. Yeah,

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>if you go back and if you go back and

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>watch that, Yeah, if you go back and watch that play,

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Brown, Why are you still in the end zone?

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Smith? What are you looking at? Leyton vander Esh

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>diagnoses the play beautifully. He just happens to be on

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the wrong side of the formation. So that was really

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>encouraging to think that, you know, his instincts are still

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with him, And yeah, I would imagine he'll continue to

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>improve as he goes along, and playing a bad offense

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>should only help with that hamper. You know, one thing

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>that I did notice is his energy. I mean he

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>out of the whole defense. I mean, he was a

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>player that he was noticeably more energized than everyone else

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on defense. And I'm sure that's a product of a

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>competitor sitting watching the game from afar, seeing the way

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that his defense is playing and him not being able

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to help out. So I'm sure that that has something

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to do with Okay, now he's ready to go in

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>there on the field and do something. So the one

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>positive thing, and I'm sure he's going to get better

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, but that's something that was good to see,

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>just a player in there with some energy, bringing some

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>extra little spark into that very dull defense. One of

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the things I noticed, it's funny, one of the things

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>I noticed about him was there are a few plays

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that he came very close to making that he didn't

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>end up making it. Obviously, that's not good enough for

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy like him, we expect better. But like you said, Dave,

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing about that is in most of

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>those instances, the reason why he was even close is

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>because you could see he recognized what was going on early.

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>He just didn't have the whatever it was to get

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>there to make the play. Part of that, it's specifically

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>on places where he was trying to chase down Kyler Murray.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Is Kyler Murray like. He's a different level of speed

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and quickness that sometimes can make even the best defensive

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>players look foolish. But that all being said, I actually

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that he did look like he recognized

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>what was going on. It's one of my biggest critiques

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of Jalen Smith over the first six weeks of this

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>season is that he doesn't always seem to recognize what's

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>happening quick enough and then be able to react quick enough.

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we were seeing those things from Layton. Now

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>he's got to get hisself back into the right kind

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of shape and I think he'll make place for this defense.

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on to the next question. Last week,

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Justin Hamilton and Neville Gallimore played more against Arizona. How

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 1>did they play? And are you ready to play them

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>more than Don Terry Poe at this point? At this point,

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>who I think we all agree has been a disappointment.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's start first with you, Dave. Yes, absolutely, I mean yeah,

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, Justin Hamilton is kinda he was

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a Twitter star. I guess if

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>you're like looking for a positive, that came out of

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that game and just looked like he was active. It

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>looked like he wasn't getting blown off the line of scrimmage.

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's not Aaron Donald or even half of that,

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>or you know Snacks Harrison at his peak, like's not

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>he's not at all pro nose tackle. But it just

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>seemed like you were getting better push and you know

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I hate, I mean, better, better pursuit all of that stuff,

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 1>better athleticism, I mean, we we all agree Poe has

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>been a liability for this defense. I don't know how

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>hard it is to upgrade what you've gotten out of

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that over the last four or five weeks. Amber, I'll

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be honest, It's not like I sit there and absolutely

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>like focus on the the tackle position during the whole game.

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So I did have to pull out the stats for

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>this one. And I know we all know that Dantari

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Po has not nearly been doing and been doing enough

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>at all. But based on the stats, in six games,

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Dontari Po has been able to accumulate a total of

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>seven tackles. And then you look at Justin Hamilton in

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>just this one game he got a combine of three tackles,

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>so nearly on stats, I'm gonna go with absolutely, get

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Dontary Post out of there, put Justin Hamilton, let him

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>do some more things. I mean, look, he's almost caught

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 1>up to Dontarry Post stats in just one game versus

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>six games that he has played, So yes, put him

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>in there. They do need a change because he hasn't

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>been working all fair, Yeah, I mean, typically stats for

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>your defensive tackles shouldn't They don't matter as much typically

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>because you want them to just be there clog up

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the middle. Other guys make plays. But over the course of,

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like she said, six games, I mean you can you

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>would imagine you get a few, you get in there,

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's the thing. He's not clogging up the middle

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>po I mean, he's never gonna win any foot race

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. We understand that, but that's not

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>his job. His job is to be in there, take

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>these double team blocks and let other guys free them up.

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And that certainly isn't happening. So if what's the benefit there,

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean that there hasn't been any benefit for him.

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, I mean, anybody, he's got to be better.

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton's hungry, ready to go. He looked active. I think

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>he'll be better in this game as well. Yeah, I'll

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you the stat that matters for defensive tackles rush

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>yards against. And we've seen this rush defense be horrible

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of that, A ton of that has

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to do with the fact that up the middle he

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.719
<v Speaker 1>gets washed out and moved out of the way, and

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>on the outside he is not doing anything to help

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>his linebackers out. They are regularly getting an offensive linement

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.239
<v Speaker 1>on them before they even get into the play and

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they aren't able to get off those blocks a lot

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of times. So I think both ways, you have to

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the defensive tackle and say, especially at one technique,

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>can say you're not doing your job if you're getting

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>just run on like that. Right, are you laughing about?

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Just an inside joke, I'll tell you at the break.

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.959
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, I got a good staff play. All right,

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>wait for that. All right, let's go to the next question.

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Next question, Dallas or Ken Dallas slow down Washington's pass rush?

0:25:55.480 --> 0:26:00.719
<v Speaker 1>And if so, how Let's start with you Nick man Um.

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you gotta get the ball out quick. He

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>would love for the Cowboys to be a good screen team.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, they're not terrible. They're not terrible

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>at it, but they're they're not like they're not great

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>at it. But this is the type of game where

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you would you would want them to be to be great.

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is is the the Red team doesn't

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>blitz as much like like the Cardinals. Did you know

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the real Red team like they blitz all the time,

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, it's this team just rushes with four,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>so their linebackers are in position for screens and stuff

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>like that. You gotta get the ball out to your receivers, slants,

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>bubble screens. They're gonna have to go and make plays

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and make make you know, get the ball in their hands,

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>break tackles. That's one way to do it. The running

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>backs out of the backfield, and I think this has

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>got to be a huge game for Dalton Schultz. He's

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to work those linebackers work the middle of

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the field and you know, just you gotta get the

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>ball out quick. But those those guys have to be

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>ready to catch the ball. Dave, I've already made it

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>very clear how scared I am of this pass rush.

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>But if you're looking for optimism, don't forget. They really

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>padded their stats against Philly in that season opener. They

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>sacked Carson Wentz eight times that day, so they have

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>half of their total from one game. The last three

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>weeks they got they got to Daniel Jones once, they

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 1>got to Jared Goff once, they got to Lamar Jackson once.

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So yes, they're very good. Clearly, you can mitigate that

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>if you're about your business now. I mean, Baltimore has

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>an amazing offensive line that's really not fair. But the Giants.

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>The Giants don't. And we know firsthand from watching the

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Rams that they're just great at getting the ball out

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of Jared Goff's hands, Like that's one of the keys

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to their success. So it can be done. I don't

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>know how much I trust the Cowboys to do it

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>because they are not as creative. You know, they'll they'll

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>run running back screens, but like you don't see the

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>tunnel screens and the jet motion the stuff that the

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Rams do with Robert Woods. We haven't seen that from them. Um,

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe they dusted off this week. I kind

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of doubt it. So it's on. It's on the offensive

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>line to play really well. But I mean, at the

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>very least they need to design, you know, short drops

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and quick throws for Andy Dalton. Um. I think it's possible,

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>but I don't trust them to be as successful as

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>some other more creative offenses. Yeah, I was just gonna

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.199
<v Speaker 1>say about that, Um that you know, Dave, You're right,

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't. They're not creative like that except for two

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>point conversions. It seems like in the two point conversions.

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>We see some like cool plays with the market Cooper

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>flipping around. Yeah, maybe do that. I mean there's a

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of second and five. Yeah, there's a lot of

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>third and two, third and three situations. So you know,

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to be right down there to do

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>some you know, let's have some fun. Yeah. The other

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>thing I'll throw out two. Dave and you mentioned this

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>about the about what you see from the rams. It

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>was I think against the Giants where you saw the

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys running a lot of boots. They were just doing

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>some different things that were kind of these misdirections. I

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>combined what Dave said and what Nick said. Nick, you

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Dalton Schultz in that game. One of

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the things they were doing, they were going on those

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>boots and they'd have either a tight end or they'd

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have another receiver coming from the opposite side of field

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>going on a drag across the field, and it would

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>create these interesting little plays for you because the defense

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>starts flowing one way because the handoff looks like it's

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>going one way, and then the quarterback boots around and

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>he's got room, he's got time, he can make a throw.

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>So I want to see some of that. That's what

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the kind of stuff you see from the Rams

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>all the time, that that misdirection. They show you one thing,

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>they get you flowing one way, and then they go

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>back the opposite way. I think the Cowboys can do it.

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.239
<v Speaker 1>We saw it in the Giants game. Question is can

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>they do it with Andy Dalton and can they be

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>consistent with it enough to where they keep this defense

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>off balance. If you can get this defense off balance,

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>then I think that front four has to pause just

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit. You slow down just enough that helps your

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>offensive line and maybe that means the Cowboys can have

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance of being able to complete some pass. All right,

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>here's my final question on Washington versus Dallas. Can I

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:08.239
<v Speaker 1>can I ask a question? Sure? Absolutely? Going back to that,

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's say let's say they do go into the game,

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>start off the game with like creative plays like that. Offensively,

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Kellen Moore has this nice little plan game plan, but

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>then we see that's not necessarily working, it's just not falling.

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean at that point in the game, let's say,

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>what second quarter, are you wanting the Cowboys to kind

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of keep pushing that or do you at that point decide. Okay,

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>let's just take it back. Let's just try to play

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>more conservative because I mean, one of the things that

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we heard, I mean last week going into the previous

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>game with Andy Dalton, would the Cowboys be playing some

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>more conservative football based on the fact that they have

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton a quarterback and not that Prescott. Well, let's

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:56.719
<v Speaker 1>be click, we'll see good, Dave. I mean, I'm not

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>asking them to be like crazy aggressive, like if you go,

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>if you go watch some of the stuff that the

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Rams did to the Cowboys, like it's it's really simple stuff,

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>just you know, boot bootlegs that get goff moving out

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of the pocket or get you know, I don't understand

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>why the Cowboys don't like jet motion, like just I

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>mean that what Christian Kirk did the other night, like

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>give the ball to the wide receiver moving across the formation. Um,

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>these are these are basic things that most football teams do.

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm not asking them to pull out Nick's flee

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>flicker in this game. I think that would be a

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>terrible idea. So I don't want them to be because

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Dalton don't get murdered. Maybe I don't, I don't, but

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone's trying to get Zeke get everyone's and he's going

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to pitch it back. But when you're running without anybody

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>getting in your way, then you can kind of get

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>both of them, right. I just that's that. I don't

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>like that either, Dave. I'm with you. Go ahead. I

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.719
<v Speaker 1>don't want them to get crazy aggressive. I just want

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>them to be more creative and how they get the

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>ball out of Andy's hands. Yeah, I totally agree. This

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>was not about getting crazy. This is about just misdirection,

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.239
<v Speaker 1>show things a lot of play action. And by the way,

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in order to get play action to work well, you

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>gotta run the ball well. So I think they have

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to give a healthy dose of running the ball and

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>show that they're committed to running the ball, even if

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work as well early on. You gotta show

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that you're committed to running the ball. And that means

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that if you go three and out because you're running

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more, that's okay, you gotta punt it.

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But I just think in a game like this, you

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>got to show them that you're committed to the run.

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>That'll help you create those play action opportunities and maybe

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>help your boots and that kind of thing. Because teams

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have to start really really paying attention to the run.

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm really interested to see if they get in third

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and short, even down on the goal line. I think

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you've got to go back to the Antoine Woods package.

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And we didn't see it last week or even the

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks, but I think it's it's important

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>because that offensive line is night. When you go big

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>on big, you're gonna lose. You're gonna lose. And hopefully

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're not stubborn enough to think just run them

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>over because they won't think. You gotta get some big,

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger guys in there. And I think, you know, Antoine

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>can certainly help with that poem. I'm gonna take our

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>final break. When we come back, let's talk a little

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>bit about the NFC East. Where the Cowboys stand right

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>now in the NFC East, and where those other teams stand,

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and what we think is going to happen, and the

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>big question, who do we think is the team to

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>beat in the NFC East. So that when we come

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>right back, this is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio since

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty five. Stetson hats are American maid with pride

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>right here in Texas and Stetson is proud to be

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>on the field with America's team. Want to show your

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Texas and team pride too? You can by purchasing your

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>own Stetson. You can look just like how the flag

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>guys do on field at every home game. Stetson hats

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys and your

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite football team. Get yours today at shop dot Dallas

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com. I'm Jay Novachek,

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>former tight end for the Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day,

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I was the guy who always got the tough yards

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I run with John Deer today. In fact,

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a John Deer three zero twenty five E

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>tractor that can handle any yardwork I need to do,

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>even the tough yards way out back. So if you

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>have one acre or a thousand, John Deer has the

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>equipment that's just right for you. Visit a John Deer

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.760
<v Speaker 1>dealer today and run with us. We are the official

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys. Want to use what

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the pros use? How about the official men's skincare brand

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black. Right now, you can

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>get the Jack Black Starter, a curated collection of Cowboys

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>locker room favorites for just ten bucks with free shipping.

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>The Starter includes four Jack Black skincare favorites, plus a

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>full size and tense therapy lip bomb. Go to Get

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and use the code

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>word Team JB. That's Get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 1>The Jack Black Starter ten bucks free shipping. We're back

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in a tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds.

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.879
<v Speaker 1>It's new Doctor pepper and cream Soda. Let's take a listen,

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Paba cream Soda. Is he a new comboe? That's

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>music to my ears? Okay, Doctor time, music to my

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>ears and mouth New Doctor pepper and cream Soda. Delas,

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>just do bad? Back to the break all right. Monster

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Jam returns to AT and T Stadium October twenty fourth

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and twenty fifth. These adjournal and charge family entertainment features

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the most famous trucks in the world, with

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>world class drivers who push these perfectly engineered vehicles to

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>their limits in a freestyle, two will skills and racing competitions.

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Get your tickets now at SeatGeek dot com. Monster Jam.

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Monster Jam Monster Jazz. All right, welcome back to the

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 1>final segment of the break Leaf nest WBC Mortgage Studios

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Are and I want to take a little

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:03.879
<v Speaker 1>time here in the final segment to talk a little

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:07.919
<v Speaker 1>bit about the NFC East. This division is not very good.

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>They have one win against a team that has oh no,

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. They don't have a win against a team

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>that has a winning record. The closest is San Francisco,

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 1>who is now three and three, so they're five hundred.

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 1>At least they did get a I think it was

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the was it the Eagles that beat the forty nine

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 1>ors three? So there's one win against the team that's

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>five hundred. All the rest of the wins have come

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>against teams with losing records. Majority of the wins have

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>come against each other basically. So this is a team

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that is not This is a division it's not doing

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>very well against the rest of the NFL. But they

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>got to send somebody to the playoffs. And so the

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>question for you guys is, based on what you've seen

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>through six weeks, who is the favorite in this division

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to go to the playoffs. Let's start first with you Am,

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>where you have that look like you have something burning

0:36:53.200 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to say, because I will never, ever, ever pit the

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Eagles for anything at all. I cannot stand the Eagles,

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>but I gotta be fair and say that I do

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>think that looking at all the games so far, the

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are starting to turn it around a little bit.

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they have had some competitive games. So it's

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a tough one. It's a tough one, and the worst

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>part is that it's all so situational football, like so

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:32.280
<v Speaker 1>situational moments, where if they couldn't clean up if everyone

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in the NFS well, between the Eagles and the Cowboys,

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>if they can start cleaning up their game a little

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>bit more and stop making so many little mistakes, I mean,

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they can start really turning this whole season around and

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>making the nfcas look a little bit better than what

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they've been looking like so far. But it's it's pretty

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>close between the Eagles and the Cowboys right now. I

0:37:54.960 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>have seen more competitiveness from the Eagles, though, Dave. I mean,

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the Eagles absolutely. That's not to say

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys don't have a chance, but I'm just tired

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 1>of not I'm tired of not seeing this team make

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>any progress like Mike McCarthy said earlier this week, like,

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we're not a better team in week six than we

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>were in Week one. I mean, and it's been six weeks,

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it's been almost half the season. We have not seen

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 1>them fix any of the things that are contribute to

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:28.919
<v Speaker 1>their losing ways. Then you look at the Eagles, which

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know they've they've been much more competitive.

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, they haven't beaten anybody impressive, but neither have

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys and their injuries. They have a lot of

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 1>them as well, but their injuries seem like they're like,

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:43.399
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get some of these guys back. They're gonna

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>get Miles Sanders back, They're gonna get Zach Ertz back.

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Raager will be back eventually, Lane Johnson hopefully they'll

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>give him a chance to get healthy. Most of the

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys key injuries aren't coming back, Like you're not getting

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Tiring and Lyle, you're not getting Dak Prescott back. So

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the Eagles have a much better chance to

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>round into form over the next five to six weeks

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>than the Cowboys do. And until I see some notable

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:15.439
<v Speaker 1>progress from the Cowboys and just playing cleaner football, it's

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>hard for me to think that they're just going to

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 1>magically turn it on, especially knowing that so many of

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>their best players are done for the year. I mean,

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>first of all, let me apologize to Carson Wentz because

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I said Andy Dalton might be the best quarterback in

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the division. He's not. Carson Wentz is a much better quarterback.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Just kill my next question. I'm sorry, I'm sorry, but

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:40.479
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that your next question might be who's

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the best quarterback in the division whatever. I'm just saying,

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz is better than Andy Dalton quarterback one of

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the other's great throw to win the game needingtime you're

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>throwing to a five five running back, you have to

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 1>drop it in there. He did a nice job with that,

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>but Evan Ingram catches the ball and they lose. And

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 1>then I don't think everything Dave just said. I don't

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:05.879
<v Speaker 1>think he even says all of that if they lose

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that game to the Giants, because this shows just how

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>bad they really are. Now they are going to get healthier.

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that, and I think the Eagles are

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>the team to beat over there because they seem to

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. They have a better quarterback, and they're

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 1>going to get healthier than the Cowboys. I do agree

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 1>with that. But they're they are not good. They're not

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:26.479
<v Speaker 1>good at all. Anybody can beat them. Oh, don't don't

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>get me wrong. I don't think they're good. Yeah, but

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to be good to win. Ye, you're right,

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>this whole like they have, nobody's beating the team doesn't matter,

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care. Yeah, but yeah, the way they played Baltimore,

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, they went up there and fought with them

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 1>and probably you know, could have tied the game and

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. You don't really I don't know you

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 1>say that about the Cowboys, but I mean they okay,

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.399
<v Speaker 1>well they compete with Seattle too, so I mean, but

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just that you can't judge anything except for last

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>week because nothing this is all you know, that was

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>all before Dak got hurt. Now it's just what is

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>this team? We still don't know what this team is. Well,

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the point I would make. Is I think

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago, we thought, or at least I thought,

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>this was a good to above average offense and a

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>bad defense, which made the team an average team the NFL.

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I figured they'd be a seven and nine, eight and eight,

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>nine and seven type team. Since then, we've had one

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:27.439
<v Speaker 1>game to see Andy Dalton as a starter. And again

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not placing all the blame on Andy for what

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we saw last week, but what I know is in

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the one game I saw him as the starter. This

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:37.360
<v Speaker 1>offense is a bad offense. This defense is a bad defense,

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>which makes us a bad team. This is why right now,

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any scenario where the Cowboys will be

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>better than the Eagles by the end of the season

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:48.800
<v Speaker 1>unless somehow they can turn around what they're doing on offense.

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And maybe there is a possibility that Andy Dalton, you know,

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:54.359
<v Speaker 1>he's just starting to kind of getting some reps, he'll

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>be better. He'll get this offense able to manage or

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 1>able to be able to move the ball, even with

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this offensive line, because you gotta work around this offensive line.

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:06.399
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna get healthier there. But maybe he gets

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to the point where he can move this offense in

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the same way that Dak was with the offensive line

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 1>he has. But as of right now, I don't see

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 1>any any reason to believe that the Eagles are not

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the team to beat based on what I've seen so far,

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and that the Cowboys have two teams on their schedule

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're like that they're not gonna win, probably Eagles,

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sorry, not everyone else, I mean, no one

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>else on their schedules, Like there's no way I could win.

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 1>The problem is Philly's already played both of them. Yeah,

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't beat him, played him, okay, but it didn't beat him.

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, and the Eagles will probably play all

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of those teams the Cowboys have as well. So the

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>schedule of the injuries, all that, the quarterback, all that

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>seems to point towards Philly. All right, real quick, I

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.360
<v Speaker 1>want to get your your opinions on the best quarterback

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.279
<v Speaker 1>in the division. Nick, you've already said you think Andy Dalt,

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sorry, you think Carson Wentz is the

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback in the division. I assume, yeahs you're not

0:42:55.960 --> 0:42:57.399
<v Speaker 1>putting one of those other two guys ahead of him.

0:42:57.480 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's go to Amber and Dave. Let's start with you, Amber,

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>who do you think is the best quarterback in the division.

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>I have to judge based on just the games that

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been able to see, and it's not much and

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>probably not fair because Carson Wentz has had far more

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>games than what we've seen from Andy Dalton this season.

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But in regardless of certain people making comments and saying, okay, well,

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton actually played an okay game, it wasn't that bad.

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:27.839
<v Speaker 1>I saw it pretty bad. I did not like when

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 1>I see what I saw Maryland, and maybe because my

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>expectations were a lot higher coming from a veteran guy,

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but the way that I saw him play it just

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 1>did not inspire me anything. It just looked like a

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:45.359
<v Speaker 1>guy with no experience, like I expected him to be

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>more polished. But again, gotta be fair and say, okay, well,

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't had the first team reps as he would

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>when he wasn't a starter, you know, so at this

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 1>point I would agree with Nick. I would go with

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Carson Dave. I don't want to pat myself on the back,

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>but like you can go find audio of me before

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals game saying everybody, let's calm down. I know

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz has had a rough month, but he's still

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty darn good player. And he is, I mean,

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>he's He's had a lot of problems. Obviously, the injuries

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>are insane. It seems like he's lost some confidence but

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 1>he is still a quarterback that's capable of willing his

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>team to victory, which he did last night and he

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>almost did against Baltimore. And I just don't think Andy

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Dalton's ever been that quarterback. I mean, what was what

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 1>was the line on Dalton when he stepped into the

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:40.240
<v Speaker 1>starting lineup, It was like, well, with this supporting cast,

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 1>he could be pretty good. Carson Wentz hasn't had a

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>supporting cast since twenty seventeen. Like he's it's a mass

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:48.800
<v Speaker 1>unit up there, and he still finds ways to piece

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, competent effort together. So it's it's Carson in

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 1>three years, though, who do you think it'll be? You mean,

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>when Dak's back, Dak Prescott? I mean, it's Dak right

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>now if he's healthy. Yeah, I agree. I mean, here's

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 1>three years, though, I still think it's Dak Prescott. You're

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:08.439
<v Speaker 1>assuming Dak won't be here? Is that? I mean, he'll

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 1>probably be here, But I mean, do you think Daniel

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Jones will be up there? Honestly, I think Daniel Jones.

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 1>I think Daniel Jones a really good quarterback and the

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.879
<v Speaker 1>only reason, the only reason I'm not putting him ahead

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of Carson Wentz right now is because of the factor

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that Dave threw in, which is he's not able to

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>will his team to win like Carson Wentz is. But

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this, if you watch that game last night,

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>there was some absolutely dumb throws that Carson Wentz made.

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:34.439
<v Speaker 1>There was one that was the interception where I don't

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>know who exactly he was throwing it too and why

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he thought that was gonna be a completion. And then

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the other one where he's scrambling out of pocket he

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>goes back probably twenty thirty yards and then runs forward

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and throws opposite field. Should have been intercepted. I mean,

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:49.200
<v Speaker 1>he does that kind of stuff where you're like, what

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is this guy seeing? What is he thinking? So I

0:45:51.600 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think Carson Wentz is a right now. He's not

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>playing like a good quarterback to me. He's playing like

0:45:56.600 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>an extremely average quarterback in at moments on the side

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of of of being a bad quarterback. But that's what

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:05.839
<v Speaker 1>you got in this division right now. Nobody's better than

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>him right now, I guess is the problem if if

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>if Jones takes it to the house and doesn't get

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 1>tripped over the eighteen yard line or whatever, I think

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:15.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a different opinion about him all the way because

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like, man, that guy just took an eighty eight

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 1>yards and now instead it's like, nah, he's not he's

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>not athletic. He trips and fall. I don't think anything

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:28.879
<v Speaker 1>like that. Before they still score on that drive. You're right, Nick,

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 1>If if Evan Ingram just catches, I mean that was

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a beautifully thrown gay. Yeah. If Evan Ingram just catches quarterback,

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:39.399
<v Speaker 1>but he ain't bad, I don't know. I just said

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that about Daniel Jones. He's going to be pretty good.

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And Markley and those guys get there, you know, with

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:46.239
<v Speaker 1>their offensive coordinator. I mean, they're gonna be good. But

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that Dak. I mean, I still think Dak

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 1>is the best quarterback he will be, but he can't

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>sleep on him. I mean, I think Daniel Jones is

0:46:54.239 --> 0:46:56.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be good. I think it's a real possibility in

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:58.719
<v Speaker 1>three years, like you say that Carson Wentz will be

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the third best quarterback in the NFC. So I totally

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's a possibility. I'll move on before that. About that,

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:07.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's get our predictions real quick before we

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>end the show. Let's start first with Dave. Dave, give

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 1>me your prediction for this weekend. I don't remember the

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>last time I hated picking a game this much. I really,

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I know, I'm so serious. I hate it. I don't

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:23.839
<v Speaker 1>trust the Cowboys. I don't want to pick them to win.

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 1>They don't deserve to be picked to win. But I still, like,

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you look at it on paper and you say, like,

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I still think the Cowboys are a better team except

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the one big caveat that the thing that the that

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Washington does the best is rush the passer, and that's

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 1>get's gonna be a huge problem for this offensive line.

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:48.160
<v Speaker 1>And I just think I think it's gonna be a sucky,

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>ugly game. I think the score is gonna be something

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:54.799
<v Speaker 1>awful like eighteen to sixteen, like a whole bunch of

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:57.839
<v Speaker 1>field goals, maybe a miss two point conversion somewhere in there.

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'll just I'll take the Cowboys very reluctantly, but

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna be surprised if I regret that on Sunday.

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Amber, I know I've said this before, but

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean it this time. I'm serious. If the Cowboys

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 1>loose to Washington, that is it. Next week, I'm picking

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles, and then I'm picking Pittsburgh. I'm picking at

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the opponent for the rest of the year. I'm serious.

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll just know going in who Amber's picking, like, right, yeah,

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>don't even asking me. Okay, okay, I won't take it

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>as far as the whole season, but at least next

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>week I'm definitely peaking the Eagles if the Cowboys lose

0:48:44.239 --> 0:48:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. Now, I just to say something I'm gonna

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>say twenty seventeen, I, like Dave said, I absolutely don't

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>trust the Cowboys whatsoever. But because it is against Washington,

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna go ahead and say Cowboys win. All right, Yeah,

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, neither team deserves to be picked. I mean,

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but what I keep thinking is, is Washington break over there.

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:10.959
<v Speaker 1>You know that they do every every day for forty

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>five minutes. There's no way you can pick their team

0:49:13.560 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to win. There's no way you can be like, whether

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna win, they're gonna you just they don't deserve

0:49:17.840 --> 0:49:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to be picked. Neither do the Cowboys. I agree with

0:49:21.360 --> 0:49:23.399
<v Speaker 1>both of them. I think it's gonna be an ugly game.

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be I picked that earlier to

0:49:26.440 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty to nineteen is my pick. I think. I think

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the oddsmakers have it as a one point favorite free Cowboys,

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>and that's all they get. For me. I'm gonna say

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:38.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen because because Washington missed an extra point or

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 1>something like that. I mean, I know the Voto confidence

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:43.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't good, but you shouldn't because that really, this team's

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:46.239
<v Speaker 1>only played one game and they got beat thirty eight

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to tend to the Cardinals. That's that's why we're all

0:49:49.680 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 1>so reluctant. None of this that we've seen before even matters.

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>It's one game that they put on tape, and the

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>tape should be burned. And that's the point. Right now.

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to see how Andy and this offense response,

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 1>because if I see what I saw last week, then

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 1>my expectation for the rest of the season is that

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be just a as Amber called yesterday's show,

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this is not gonna be great, right, So I do

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 1>think I do think though that I want to give

0:50:18.239 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a little more deference to the Cowboys just because I

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 1>think Washington's offense is worse than Dallas's defense. That says

0:50:25.719 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but I really do believe that, and so

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I think at the end of the day. That's the difference.

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the Cowboys get a win sixteen thirteen. I

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's gonna be a lot of scoring. Everybody

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 1>makes sure you got lots of food and drink because

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna need to entertain yourself at moments during this game.

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:41.840
<v Speaker 1>But I do think the Cowboys get a win sixteen thirteen.

0:50:42.040 --> 0:50:44.200
<v Speaker 1>And we'll be back here on Monday to tell you

0:50:44.239 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>if we were right or wrong and what happened and

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:47.920
<v Speaker 1>what went right and what went wrong for the Dallas

0:50:47.920 --> 0:50:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys till then, for Nick Even, Dave Hellman, Amber Garcia,

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Derek Eagleton. This has been the Break live on

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a pretty

0:51:00.360 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.