WEBVTT - NAFTA Trade Issues Baked Into TPP Are Now Gone, Froman Says

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast on iTunes,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. I am thrilled to

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>welcome Ambassador Michael Frohman to the show. He is a

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Distinguished Fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations and he

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>was President Obama's principal advisor, negotiator, and spokesperson on international

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>trade investment issues. He led the negotiations of the Trans

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Pacific Partnership and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership UH.

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador Frohman thrilled to have you. Right now, we're hearing

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot about how broken a lot of these trade

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>agreements are. Is there one aspect of NAFTA and some

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of the other trade agreements that could be tweaked to

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of ameliorate some of the anger? And where do

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you think it's the anchor is really coming from? Well? Absolutely,

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I think NAFTA is now twenty three years old, and

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>under President Obama, we sought to renegotiate NAFTA through the

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Trans Pacific Partnership. Canada and Mexico were members of TPP.

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Mexico agreed in the context of TPP to have binding

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and enforceable labor and environmental provisions, which they did not

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>have in in NAFTA. They agreed to open up their

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 1>energy sector to US participation. They agreed to put disciplines

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on their state owned companies, They agreed to a whole

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>series of obligations around the digital economy. And similarly Canada.

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Canada had refused to open up its dairy and poultry

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>markets to US exports in NAFTA, and through t PP,

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we were able to open up those markets. So there

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly is improvement to be to be had in in

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>in NAFTA. We did that in t p P, and

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the question now is what does the Trump

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>administration seek to do beyond what we did in t

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>p P to to address this. I've heard Secretary Ross

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>has mentioned he wants to talk about the digital economy,

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>about raising UH living standards in Mexico. That's exactly what

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>our labor chapter and our Digital Economy chapter did in TPP,

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're all waiting to see what else

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he wants to do and the administration wants to do

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that goes beyond that ambassador from and can you give

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>us some details of the nitty gritty of where, when,

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and how these negotiations take place, and how are they

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>prepared for some of the technical background information that would

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>come with the bureaucracy and the new administration. So Congress

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>passed a law in June of fifteen called Trade Promotion Authority,

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>which lays out a whole series of processes that the

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>administration has to go through before negotiating any trade agreement.

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And that involves deep consultations with Congress, I think for

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>at least ninety days. It involves reaching out to stakeholders

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and having public hearings and getting input. And this is

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the normal process you go through when you negotiate in

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:12.119
<v Speaker 1>a trade agreement. So the Trumble administration seems to be

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>beginning that process now, and I think UH Secretary Ross

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>indicated earlier this week on an interview here on Bloomberg

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that it was going to take some number of months

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>before they would get started actually in renegotiating NAFTA, primarily

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>for that reason, and and that's uh, that's the first

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>step that needs to be done. I think once you

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>get beyond that, and you have a clear sense of

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>what it is you want to put on the table,

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>what the parameters of the negotiation will be. It that

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>involves consultations with with our partners Canada and Mexico to

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>determine whether they are willing to engage on that basis.

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And of course, as we reopen NAFTA, they may well

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>have their own issues that they want to put on

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the table. Well, I want to pick up on that point.

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>In particular, there was a story today about how Mexico's

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>sugar industry, which is upset about the idea of possibly

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>being blocked or tariffed taxed by importing sugar into the US,

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>might block imports of American high fructose corn syrupe in retaliation.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>How concerned are you that relations between Mexico and the

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>US will deteriorate before negotiations even begin and derail any

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>potential to really come up with a beneficial plan. Well,

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>these are there are some longstanding outstanding issues. Sugar with

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Mexico is one of them. The U s sugar industry

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>brought some actions under our trade remedy laws UH that

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that kept Mexican sugar out of our market. We negotiate

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>an agreement to settle that. That agreement has been uh

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>fraying at the edges or there's been a lot of

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:49.239
<v Speaker 1>pressure on that agreement. And the comments you mentioned reflect

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the concerns the Mexican sugar producers have, and they've always

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>threatened that if we keep sugar out of our mark

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>their sugar out of our market, they'll keep our fructos

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>out of out of their markets. And so they are

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>a substitute for each other to a certain degree. All

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that puts a premium on making sure that you're using

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 1>all the good will that you have with your neighbors,

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that you're making sure that you're addressing their concerns and

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't deteriorate into a trade war, because any of

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>these issues can lead to sanctions and counter sanctions and

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not good for for for any of us. And so,

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's trigger with Mexico or dairy issues with with Canada,

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we have outstanding trade issues that need to get addressed.

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Many of them were addressed in the context of of

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>TPP and going forward, since the administration is determined that

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't want to move forward in it with its

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>own participation in TVP. It's going to find it's going

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to need to find other ways of addressing these outstanding issues.

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that there's any political connection between TPP

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>trade and the rhetoric on trade and the desire for

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>UH commerce Secretary Ross talked about those negotiations. Is there

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>any connection between that and the border wall proposal? Well, look,

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there will be lots of uh PhD dissertations

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>written on this last election and what was what went

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>into the well, just give them your headline, give you

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>about the fifteen seconds. So like, I think that notwithstanding

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the rather remarkable economic recovery of the last seven years,

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people who are angry and resentful,

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>and they're seeing the impact on wages and jobs much now.

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Economists will tell us much of that impact, the vast

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>majority of the impact comes from technology. Some of it

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>comes from globalization. But you don't get to vote on technology,

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't get to vote on globalization. You get to

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>vote on trade agreements, and you get to vote on immigration,

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and so UH taking action against whether it's foreign governments

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>or foreign immigrants is a bit of a scapegoat for

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>people's understandable economic and securities. They may be the wrong target,

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 1>they may not be the cause of the problems, but

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they are a reflection of how angry and anxious people

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>are about their economic well being in the country. Well,

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say that is a very diplomatic answer, and

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I wanted you're a diplomat. Ambassador Michael Frohman, Thank you

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>very much, former US Trade Representative, currently a Distinguished Fellow

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Council on Foreign Relations. We've got the Axel Murk.

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>He is the president and chief investment officer of Murk

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Investments and Axel. Maybe you could respond to this information

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and maybe explain how this fits into the context of

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what the e CBS attempting to do. Well, Yes, him

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>highly Well. I think Mr drag is known to pivot um.

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Every six months he comes up with a completely new

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>story and and every time he holds the meeting, he

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>gives some positive negatives, and then half a year later

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>he says, see, I told you. I was like, I

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned all the policies, so I mentioned all the negatives,

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and so this time around the glass was harful. He

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>said everything is working. Our apolicies are fantastic. And by

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, yep, we are attentive but not anxious about

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>anything that's coming up. Meaning if if things do go

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>bad with the upcoming elections, I'll bail you guys out.

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And so what I have been arguing, including on your program,

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is that we've reached the bottom of the interest rate

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>title in Europe and that is not priced in. And

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it in the euro, especially last today, how

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it's been moving higher. And that's exactly that that they

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>are looking at the way how they can get out

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of this this massive cit they're doing. And and sure

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>enough everything is always too what's been priced in, and

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the Euro has been moving higher, and even on the

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>back of a good job report. But all I've been

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>weakening today Axcel To that point, what would the market

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>effect be should the ECB start raising rates sooner than

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is currently being priced in. Well, that that's bound to

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>happen because everything is pricing in that that look, and

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna win. That the Dutch is gonna be pulling,

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be out of the U or whatever

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it might be, and there's so much negative news price

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>then there is a price then that that the rates

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>are going to go forever lower, and and there's that

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>they have been an effective not going to go lower.

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And so what's going to happen in my view is

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that that the euro is going to strengthen over time.

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Um and because we we've praked been all these wonderful

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>rate heps in the US. But I think in the

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>US we are far more behind the curvesin in Europe.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>So but hold on a second, because which assets specifically

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>will sell off the most should the ECB say raise

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>benchmark rates. I don't know before the end of this year,

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>which assets. It's a good question. I mean, in the

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>last two days the German bones have been significantly underperforming.

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>If you're kind of on the micro level, yel freas

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>have been narrowing partially on the backle of drug is

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>saying everything is fine. But in the in the medium term,

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, the problem is that over years there are

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>all all the single banks have been doing. If they've

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>compressed with premium, that means all risk assets are EXPENSI

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and that means all risk asses may come down. And

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that is everything from from stocks to to jump bonds

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and then yes, even on the on the stafer bond set.

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So I I've been quoted by you guys and saying

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that I'm negative on both bonds and equities, and that's

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. I just don't see unless we have this

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>gigantic economic growth that we're going to get and get

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to a normalization without a very serious correction in the

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>nasset prices. And and stocks might be more vulnerable um

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>than than than some other securities are. But but I

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.439
<v Speaker 1>do think, yes, that both stocks and bondable up. So

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>do you think we're in a credit bubble? Um bubble

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is a loaded term, but but by all means we

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>have we have been. What what's difference on the credit

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>bubble in two thousand seven is that if it if

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>it were to burst, I don't see necessarily a disorderly

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>collapse as there was a risk in two thousand seven.

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean we're not in the bubble. It

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean we cannot have a your correction, and so

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>basically we cannot afford to have high rates. I once

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>talked to a FET official. He has just retired from

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a regional fete, and I asked him kind of why

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>why is the FET so scared of hiking rates um

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of of of kind of pushing out surprises down, stock

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>market down, and so well they the FETE is never

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>concerned about it unless they caused the bubble. And then

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>then he paused, meaning that one of the reasons we

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>can't high grade this because we've built this recovery and

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>anceprise inflation. And so if we were to try to

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>get ahead of the curve, we would not just tumble

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 1>the stock market, but we could cause your economic calm.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's the other problem we have. We we we

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we we. The set has become a slave of the market,

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's showing the market knows that. And this is

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>taking the set for a right, so to speak. So

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Accel's move from Europe and moved to the U S

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>where we just got this job's report. Uh, they gave

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the market exactly what it what it wanted. And you're

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing traders piled back into risk your assets from stocks

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to high and some of the assets that you were

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>saying in Europe are inflated by low rate policies. Do

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you think that this sort of knee jerk Pavlovian response

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to this goldilocks environment is just simply setting up the

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>market for a bigger fall. When the Fed eventually does

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>start hiking rates faster, Well, it does every time, right,

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean the last time we have the goldilocks economy

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>was in the mid two thousand's, right, that didn't end

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>too well. Now again, I'm not suggesting we're gonna have

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>a two thousand eight sort of collapse again. But but yes,

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>when everything's got great, you should start planning for for

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the period thereafter, and and and and so that means

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you pick chips off the table, you're bound to portfolio

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and then tried to take food and steps, but Alex

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just to accel, just to sort of take the other

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>side of that. I mean, everyone who has tried to

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>take chips off the table has suffered, right, I Mean

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's been and that's why, and that's all the more

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>reasons to do it, right. I Mean, when the I'm

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the few folks who's who's cautioning, and and

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>when when I shut up and stop being cautious about

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the markets, yes, then definitely sell your portfolio, right, I

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 1>mean it's the anybody who has been cautious has on

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>the perform You're, as they say, you're the last man

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in when you go in that's that. Then then we're done.

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>For here. I just wanted when you stop calling me

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>your stocks. There you go, but no here I want

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to before you go, I want you to

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>tell us what do you think about the forget what

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you want, what we want, anybody wants. Tell me what

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you believe interest rates will be at the end of

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen, and go ahead. I'll give you a wild

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>guest for the for any point in two thousand eighteen. Yeah, well,

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you the same answer I've given you before

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>when you asked me this question. As whoever will be

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>will be behind the curve. It doesn't matter when normal

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>rightside matters where they are relative to inflation, and the

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>set is should be two should be around two point

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>one percent right now? Possibly possibly possibly that's what tis

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in but it is depending on the market. If the

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>market is doing great, we'll get higher rates. If the

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>market balls the fit, we're not going to get it.

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So the market isn't charged yet. If we're gonna have

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>continued rallies in the stock market of bombs are going

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to behave will continue hiking rates. But if we see

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>trouble because of anything U then you can blame the Chinese,

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you can blame the frenchise who or Trump whoever it

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>might be. Um, then UM, then the DST expectations will

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>come down. And so I know then exposession is going

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to come. I know the next PR market is going

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to come. The time is of course not known. But

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>what we do know is that they said the reason

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they're there so so so extremely slow and raising rates

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it because they just don't want to unravel anything. And

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the problem is, of course in doing so, they're creating

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>more bubbles, and at some point it's going to unravel.

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And we find that I tell you exactly when that

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>will have happened, Well, we're gonna call you when it happens.

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Axel Merk, President, chief investment Officer Merk Investments, based in

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, munis in focus with Joe my sec editor

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Brief Markets. You know, I gotta ask you, Joe.

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that we're always talking about is

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rico. But I was noticing that there are a

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>lot more problems in the MUNI market than just Puerto Rico.

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us sort of the bird's eye view

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on in Illinois and whether this demonstrates

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>something larger than just finance's Illinois absolutely like, I'm not

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>ever going to recover from this. No, Illinois could solve

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>all its problems tomorrow if they had the political will

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to do it, which is exactly one of the one

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of the rating agencies brought up last week. They say, Wow,

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a state that goes three years without a budget, which

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>is what we're heading into, Uh, is demonstrating lack of

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>political will. But they could do it tomorrow. Or very

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>wealthy state they're you know, the capital of the Midwest, right,

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone goes to Illinois. Everyone goes to Chicago. Just to

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>put this into perspective, Uh, Joe mysa. Illinois revenue so

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a steep year over year drop last month, the commission said, Uh,

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>this is I mean, according to a monthly report issued

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday by the PIE part partisan Commission on Government Forecasting

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and Accountability, UH significant downward adjustment to its estimates coming

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in March. Had overall base revenues that had to a shortfall,

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>gross personal income tax everything is down, down, down, down down.

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So this is more than just simply coming up with

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a budget. I mean, they face pension issues, they pay,

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>they face Uh, you know, revenue, tax revenue issues. It's

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>really that easy. A lot of the a lot of

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that fall in revenue was because an income tax increased

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>lapsed and uh you know that. So there's that um

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But of course there's also some people moving out of state. Yes,

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>you're right there. Uh you know, Illinois is is a

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>pin you brought up before, the sort of big picture.

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Illinois is sort of an outlier. It's the exception that

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>proves the rule. Uh, the rule being, you know, municipalities

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>take care of themselves. They're well run, they don't default

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>on their debt. In Illinois, what you have is the

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>lawmakers sort of driving the bus off the cliff. Remember

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the old headlines in the New York Times bus plunge kills.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>This is what it's like. Bus plunge in Illinois. Happy Friday. Uh,

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to I want to ask though,

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>about the bonds of Illinois. There was a great chart

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on the terminal this week by Martin Braun looking at

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>how foreign money is flooding into municipal bonds in the

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>United States, and I found this fascinating. I'm wondering, are

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>they going to places like Illinois. Oh, of course they are,

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>especially because uh, you know, by driving the bus off

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the cliff. For the last you know, two and a

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>half three years, we've seen spreads over the benchmark municipal

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh it's almost children fifties sometimes of three basis points

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>over what triple A municipalities borrow four. So you're getting

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a big yield premium. But of course for foreign investors

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>who are getting sometimes zero percent, uh, US munies look terrific.

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>They just have to kind of there is a learning

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>curve to them. Just to put this into more into

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>sharper focus. Uh. This was in January, right, the Attorney

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>General of Illinois asked a judge to lift an order

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that required state workers to be paid during the state's

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>record nineteen month as you said, the budget impass in

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>hopes and so on, and they filed a motion in

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the Saint Clair County to dissolve the order that would

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>have authorized the state controller to actually pay out the wages,

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>so they don't have to pay out the wages. At

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>what point does this just not come workable? Uh? Probably

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>June one, Okay, that's when they really should have their

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>next budget all set and ready to go. And you

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>know what chances are they will because I really don't

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>know municipalities except the ones that are in extremists that

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>drive the bus off the cliff. So you think that

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody who goes into into Illinois bonds that are yielding

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>three or four percentage points above where other where triple

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.239
<v Speaker 1>A meetings are yielding, that they're going to get their

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>money back. That's money good. Sure, Illinois can't afford not

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to pay its debts, so they're not going. They're not going.

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, first of all, bankruptcy is in an option

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>for states. But yeah, they're you know, Illinois going to

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>be okay. Well, one area that might not be okay.

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>We need to talk about putter Eco because this week

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>there were some developments. The Fiscal Control Board rejected the

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:09.239
<v Speaker 1>governor's plan for financial plan going forward. Can you give

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>us some color around this, what this means for bond

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>holders and what this means in general for the for

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the island's financial health. Wow. We had a terrific piece

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg View today by Antonio Weiss, the ex Treasury

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>official who helped out with the UH setting up the

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>oversight board, and he said he advocates bankruptcy because he

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't think the new governor is going far enough in

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>adjusting the debt, so he is really advocating haircuts for all.

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, you still have some hedge funders out there

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>who bought Puerto Rico geos or bought Puerto Rico sales

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>tax geos are general obligation bonds. Go ahead, right Who

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>who believe that it's geos at par I? Remember that

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>was a rallying cry. Guess what, no g knows it

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>par for you? It looks like hair cuts for all.

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And with this wife piece today, that was sort of

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>really putting it on the table, telling the governor, who,

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is advocating cuts for everyone, but this

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>wife's pieces, No, no, you're not going far enough. You've

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>got to really reduced that no par for you. Will

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>keep that in mind as we head towards lunchtime. Joe Mesa,

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. As always, Joe Mesk,

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>editor for Bloomberg Grief on municipal markets and expert on

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>all things related to Muni's. Now we want to hear

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>from Ian wish Art. He is a Bloomberg News reporter

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>in Brussels, and he wrote a story today that I

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:57.479
<v Speaker 1>found fascinating about Theresa May who is the head of

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Britain and sort of the internal discussions that she's having

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>with parliament in that country about what she may have

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to face as she engages in the Brexit process. Ian,

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Can you give

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit of color around some of the

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>pessimistic paintbrush that the parliament parliamentary members are trying to

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>give to Theresa May, to give her sort of a

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>dose of reality. That's right, Hello from Brussels, where the

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>summit has been going on between EU leaders and basically

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you're right. There's a lot of people in a lot

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of members of the Parliament of the UK who who

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.479
<v Speaker 1>aren't happy with the way that the Prime Minister Theresa

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>May has gone about this. Some on one hand, want

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 1>her to trigger what they call Article fifty, which is

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>part of the e use Constitution which allows a country

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to leave the EU. They wanted to do that as

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>soon as possible. Others want her to wait a lot

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>longer to make sure she knows exactly what she wants,

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and she's trying to balance, really balance those two extremes

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of opinion um to please everybody at the same time

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in London. Before she comes back here to Brussels to

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the European Union to officially start the negotiations with the

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>EU about Brexit. I'm wondering you if you could maybe

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>just add to this some context regarding Northern Ireland and

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Scotland and what this kind of means not only for

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>what becomes of Britain after the exit, but also what

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>this means for the European Union itself. Yeah, there's a

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of confusion and a lot of complexity. Let's start

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>with Scotland, where Scotland obviously part of the United Kingdom,

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>so Scotland has to live with any decision that the

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>rest of the UK that England makes Scotland. Actually, the

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>people of Scotland actually didn't support Brexit, but the the

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>UK as a whole did, So they're talking about holding

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a referendum of their own again in Scotland to break

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>away from England, to break away from the UK because

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't like what from a Prime minister to reason

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>May is doing in pulling out of the EU. So

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that's one story that might develop over the next year

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>or so. Then you've got Northern Ireland, which again is

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the UK, but the Republic of Ireland isn't

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the Republic of Ireland in a separate country that belongs

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to the EU and will stay in the EU. So

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you've got a border between the Republic of Ireland and

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Northern Ireland. UM, and that's been subject to of violence

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and war over the sort of the last thirty forty years. UM.

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>There was peace in the last ten years. But they're

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>really worried that if that border becomes a border not

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>just between Ireland and Britain, but between the whole of

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the European Union and Britain, then those troubles might come

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>back again. So that's obviously on the minds of negotiators,

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>both in London and in Dublin, and they want to

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>avoid that in whatever deal they come up with. And

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>you're right, there's also talk about the future of the

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>EU and what that will look like after the UK leaves.

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And you said a while back that Parliament members were

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>not happy with the approach that Theresa May has taken

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>with respect to Brexit. What could she change that would

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>bring them into the fold and make them more supportive

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of her plans? Um. It depends which ones you ask,

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>but most of them will say we want some reassurances

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to protect our interests, that you're going

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to protect British interest that we're not going to be

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>worse off after we leave the European unions, so um

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>nationals are protected in where they can travel, where they

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>can go and work in Europe. That the the UK

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>is not paying into the European Union budget anymore. There's

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>some speculation that it may have to pay sixty billion

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>euros when it leaves of financial contributions, and they don't

0:25:57.640 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>want that either because they say, why are we leaving

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the EU We still have to pay So all these

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>reassurances need to be made. The trouble for the reason

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>may if she can't really make those reassurances, because it's

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>all depends on what sort of deal she gets with

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the EU over the next eight months or so. I

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>want to thank you very much for joining us. Ian

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>wish ARTI is our European government reporter. He is reporting

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>from Brussels. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>out there on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio