WEBVTT - Corporate Personhood? What About Ecosystem Personhood

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>In our last narrative season, La Luja Longla, about the

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>decades long fight over oil pollution in the Ecuadorian Amazon,

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned something unique about Ecuador's constitution. It includes a

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>provision for the rights of nature. Ecuador rewrote its constitution

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight to include a chapter called

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Rights for Nature. Other countries have toyed with this idea

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>since then, and it freaks a lot of people out,

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>especially people running large multinational corporations, mainly because it challenges

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the core tenets of capitalism, private property. Rather

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>than treating nature as property under the law, writes for

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>nature articles acknowledge that nature, in all of its life forms,

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>has the right to exist, persist, maintain, and regenerate, and

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that we the people have the legal authority to enforce

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>those rights on behalf of ecosystems. Here's Natalie Green with

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the Global Alliance for Rights of Nature explaining how the

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>concept works in Ecuador.

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Ecuador in two thousand and eight rewrote its constitution and

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 3>it was passed by the majority of Equilorians. And what

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 3>we decided is that we don't want to follow a

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 3>model development, like a socialism model or a capitalist model,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 3>because all those model were proven to be wrong, and

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 3>we decided to recognize something that is that we are

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.279
<v Speaker 3>going to fight for, and we're going to be working

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 3>for a model basic will being. What's what's establishing the

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>constitution is a model basic will bean And what will

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 3>being or sumacausai or wembibat in Spanish, will being is

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>this notion of believing in harmony with nature.

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And here is a handy explainer from the Community Environmental

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Legal Defense Fund, which has been leading a lot of

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the fights for rights of nature in the US.

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 4>Under the current system of law, nature is considered to

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 4>be property. When something is considered property, that often gives

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 4>the property owner the right to damage it. Therefore, those

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 4>who own these natural communities are largely allowed to use

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 4>them however they wish, even if that includes destroying it.

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Rights of nature is honoring and recognizing that nature has

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 4>the right to exist, flourish, and thrive. Laws recognizing the

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 4>rights of nature change the status of these ecosystems to

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 4>being recognized as rights bearing entities.

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>In late twenty twenty, the Ecuadorian Constitutional Court heard a

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>rights of nature case for the first time. It's called

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the Lessdros case and here's what it's about in broad strokes.

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>With the country's oil revenue on the decline, in twenty seventeen,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the Ecuadorian government opened up public lands for mining concessions,

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>some six million acres, including at least sixty eight percent

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of Los Ceedros, a protected cloud forest. The idea was

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that those mining profits would make up for lost oil

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>revenue the long shadow of oil colonialism. But because there

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>was that rights of nature provision in the constitution, citizen

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>groups were able to sue the government for this move.

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>They called it unconstitutional, and a couple of the justices

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>on that court wrote about it ahead of time, seeing

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>how important the forest was to protect and how eager

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>they were to think through the application of rights of nature.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Their decision hasn't come down yet, but when it does,

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it's going to have a major impact all over the world. Meanwhile,

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>communities in the US have started to embrace this idea too,

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and no surprise, their biggest opponents are oil and gas companies.

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a concerted effort underfoots supported by the American Petroleum Institute,

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to pass laws that would preempt rights of nature laws

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>from ever being passed. I'm joined today by Joshua Boaz

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Probannik and Melissa Troutman. They're the co founders of the

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:18.679
<v Speaker 1>great independent journalism outlet, Public Herald. They've done a lot

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>of the work on fracking and the impacts of that

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:26.239
<v Speaker 1>industry on Pennsylvania and Ohio and on water in general.

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>They made a documentary about rights of nature called Invisible Hand.

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>It takes a look at the push for rights of

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>nature laws in the US, particularly in two spots in

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Ohio and Pennsylvania. The film came out in twenty twenty.

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's a little sampling of it.

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 5>What do you say to your critics that say this

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 5>is absolutely bad ship and crazy absurd?

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 6>Cai goa.

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 7>We recognize a right that this watershed has had that's

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 7>long been ignored, its right to thrive.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 1>To flourish, an injection will problem.

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 7>We have a democracy problem.

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>We have shifted our government to one that's now become

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>totally corporate control.

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 7>If a corporation has the same constitutional rights as an individual,

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 7>why couldn't an ecosystem.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Melissa and josh talked about how they came to follow

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the rights of nature, how they've seen it play out

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>on the ground in Pennsylvania and Ohio and why the

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>idea has an unlikely opponent big environmental groups. That conversation

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>coming up right after this quick break. I'm Amy Westervelt

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>and this is drilled.

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 7>I get Google alerts for rights of nature in my

0:05:54.200 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 7>inbox every day, and it's there's constantly new news about

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 7>rights of nature all over the globe, particularly in the

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 7>United States. What's happening right now is there's a growing

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 7>movement to establish rights of nature in Florida to protect

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 7>the fragile ecosystems down there, particularly from the effects of

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 7>climate change. Interesting, and there's also some news just that

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 7>I just read today that there's a Convention on Biological

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 7>Diversity and that's an international environmental treaty and they just

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 7>convened in Colorado a couple of days ago and signed

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 7>the first international environmental Treaty to advance the rights of nature. Wow.

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 7>Is a milestone for the global environmental movement, and that

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 7>will be voted on at their next meeting in China.

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 7>So there's a lot more happening worldwide. The big case,

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 7>you know, the big spotlight that everybody in the movements

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 7>watching right now is Ecuador, right because in Ecuador was

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 7>the first country to establish rights of nature in its

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 7>national constitution back in two thousand and eight, and for

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 7>about ten years after that, there were a couple of

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 7>cases that went before the Constitutional Court in Ecuador, but

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 7>those the judges at the time didn't seem to prioritize

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 7>rights of nature, so it didn't really nothing much happened there.

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 7>But as of twenty nineteen, there's a new panel of

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 7>judges on the Constitutional Court in Ecuador, and this particular

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 7>court has prioritized rights of major specifically, and they have

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 7>selected a few cases to concentrate on so that the

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 7>parameters of rights of nature, how it is applied in

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 7>practical ways, the scope of the law is worked out.

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 7>And one of those cases before the Constitutional Constitutional Court

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 7>of Ecuador is a case to protect Los Adro's Forest

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 7>Reserve from mining. It's a very, very ecologically diverse forest

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 7>that will be gone if concessions for mining put forth

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 7>by the Ecuadorian government will go through.

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think we should speak, you know, to some

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 6>of the updates in the film too. You have the

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 6>Lake Erie Bill of Rights, which is one of the

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 6>stories that's covered in the film. That's an international waters case.

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 6>So you do have these conflicting Lake Erie resolutions about

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, how much water is going to be taken

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 6>out of the lake for instance. Yeah, so, I mean

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 6>you're dealing with, you know, basically treaty type situations where

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 6>you're trying to come to an agreement between the two

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 6>the two you know, international borders. But those those confrontations

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 6>and and and that kind of court case in negotiation

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 6>seems to be something that's going to happen here in

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 6>the future. There's certainly a lot of discussion about you know,

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 6>toxic trespass, the idea of Canada or somebody else introducing

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 6>pollution from one country into another and holding them accountable.

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 6>But I think that you know, in the cases with

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 6>Lake Erie, you know, rather than the regulatory agency being

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 6>the people who take over that decision making process about

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 6>what's going on with the lake and its health, the

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 6>local community is able to gain the kind of power

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 6>and authority that they need through rights of nature, you know,

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 6>if Toledo is able to make that sacro saying in

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 6>the city. Yeah, so that that way they're dealing with

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, Canada or somebody else across the table when

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 6>it comes to negotiations about Lake Erie and they're doing

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 6>it on behalf of Lake Erie, Yeah, rather than behalf

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 6>of these regulations who you know, have basically polluted that

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 6>lake to the point where it's unswimmable, undrinkable, you know,

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 6>is killing a massive number of.

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 8>Species just due to the way.

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 6>Permits have been handed out on that west side of

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 6>the of the Lake Erie basin. And just recently, you know,

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 6>the city is negotiating whether or not to pay out

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 6>two hundred thousand dollars in attorney costs and basically for

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 6>this this you know bill that they passed that they

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 6>had to argue in front of the court and the

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, the prosecutions asking for payment of two hundred

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 6>thousand dollars. So they're negotiating whether or not to payments

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 6>pay that. So if you want to take action, you

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 6>can either help you know, Taledoans for Safe Water raise

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 6>funds to you know, contribute to that fight over there,

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 6>or you can contact Toledo directly and tell them not

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 6>to participate in this you know, egregious request to make

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 6>the city pay this two hundred thousand dollars for a

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 6>democratically elected bill.

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 9>I'm curious about sort of you know what your your

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 9>hopes are for this documentary in terms of raising awareness

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 9>or where it.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Might kind of.

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 9>I don't know, just help to take the story well.

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 7>Joshua and I since co found Public Herald in twenty eleven,

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 7>we've come into this work through water. Our initial projects

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 7>were investigations of water contamination, the cover up of water

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 7>contamination related to fracking development in protected watersheds in Pennsylvania.

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 7>And it was over the past ten years that we've discovered,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it didn't take ten years, but that we've

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 7>discovered that the system of law that is in place

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 7>of environmental law, that is supposed to protect things like

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 7>our water, which is essential for life, of course, are

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 7>not are They fail And an examination of why they

0:12:54.400 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 7>fail brought us to create this documentary Invisible Hand, And

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 7>with this film, I see it as just the beginning

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 7>of continued coverage of how people confront the systemic fundamental

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 7>flaws in our legal system and in our society which

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 7>is built on you know, these same legal foundations, but

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 7>also our value system. You know, as we struggle with

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 7>climate change, with racism, with ecoside, I mean, all of

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 7>these problems stem from the same fundamental flaw for me,

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 7>which is a disconnection from the laws of nature, which

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 7>govern the universe and keep everything in balance. I think

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 7>that the film is just the beginning of covering this,

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 7>and it really it's the film is about the movement

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 7>that itself is in its infancy in terms of the

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 7>way that movements go. So my hope is that this

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 7>film introduces the concept to a level of detail to

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 7>people who may have never heard of it or who

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 7>just heard it in passing, and shows how communities actually

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 7>implement this and how brave and resilient they are in

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 7>this fight, because it's a really really hard one. I mean,

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 7>we're talking about shifting a paradigm which is not just

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 7>our legal system but also also our civilization and the.

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Way we live.

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 7>That is a huge, huge deal. But as for as

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 7>big is that as the struggle is, it's also very

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 7>very simple. Yeah, because the laws of nature are simple.

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 9>I'm glad that you used all the clips of like

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 9>the people's saying this is so silly, This is ridiculous,

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 9>in contrast with like the woman explaining what it actually does.

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 9>Because people do they talk about it as like, oh,

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 9>what do you want a treat to be? In negotiating

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:14.479
<v Speaker 9>these treaties you know, and no, we're talking about community

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 9>control over the resources that the community depends on, which

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 9>they don't have otherwise.

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 6>Truly, truly they don't have. And Grant is a perfect,

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 6>you know example of that, and so is Toledo and

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 6>then some of the other people that we, yeah, included

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 6>in the film, And yeah, you're right, I mean, it

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 6>was really nice to hear from these these antagonists and

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 6>what they have to say about it, because you know,

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 6>when you listen to those arguments about basically why life

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 6>shouldn't have rights, they sound pretty obscene and they get

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 6>to kind of the core of the problems with capitalism

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 6>and with you know, libertarianism or other things like that,

0:15:54.440 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 6>which have created this enormously selfish situation that relies on

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 6>a completely utopian fantasy that we will have unlimited resources

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 6>provided by the earth forever.

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if there are thoughts that you have on

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 2>the media side of this coin and sort of how

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 2>these stories do or don't get amplified in the in

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the broader media sphere. And oh and like, yeah, I'm

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 2>sure you have many thoughts on that.

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, documentary on that it was because it was so

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 6>it was so bad, It was so bad. We were

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 6>all right, Melissa and I have nothing, you know, but

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 6>the best intentions when it comes to sharing a story.

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 6>You know, Public Carol is not some kind of profit

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 6>machine wherever.

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 8>We're worried about our bottom line.

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 6>Our goal is to you know, to tell the story

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 6>the way it is, rather than allow these propaganda machines

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 6>to keep operating and basically either diffuse stories or just

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 6>either lie and tell fall story. So we I remember

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 6>we were talking about this and we had a documentary

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 6>that we thought of called Journation, which was the mix

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 6>between journalism and public relations, because we have so much

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 6>of the journalism that we expected to work with across

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 6>the state had been infiltrated by this public relations fallacy

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 6>of balanced journalism that they were just they were shooting

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 6>themselves in the foot every time they try to publish

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 6>a story. You know, we would have we would send

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 6>them a story like say, for instance, we sent a

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 6>newspaper story that was that first complaint story that we

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 6>did in twenty fourteen, which was on the Daily Show.

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 8>And it's this like really grainy.

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 6>You know, look at how a complaint happens from day

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 6>one to like day forty five, when the investigation is

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, concluded, and you're reading the story and it's

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 6>happening in real time. You know, as you're reading it,

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 6>you know, you're on day thirty one and with the

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 6>complaint and the readers on day thirty one, you're reading

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 6>it like as it's happening. So we're including all the

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 6>sources and everything, and we give this to another newspaper

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 6>to publish a print version of it locally, and they

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 6>weren't able to do it because they weren't able to

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 6>balance the story by calling the state and the industry

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 6>pr groups to provide a positive spin on all of

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 6>this negative shit that was.

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 7>Happening on people being without water for months of the time. Yeah,

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 7>I was like, right, because there's something positive in there

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 7>about that.

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 6>You are they're saying, you know, I'm like, you guys

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 6>are editorializing these stories.

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 8>You understand that, right.

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 6>You think you're creating a balance, but you're not actually

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 6>including what's happening with just the primary sources and just

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 6>the people involved. You're trying to paint this reality with

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 6>these outsiders and bringing their voices in to shroud the

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 6>seriousness of what these people are facing and the fact

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 6>that the state doesn't want to comment, Like, that's what

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 6>the state doesn't want to do. So that's what you publish,

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 6>you don't you know that you can't publish the story

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 6>until you get a comment. You've got all the state's

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 6>emails and everything else. So this happened everywhere. This happened

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 6>with our relationships with NPR. You know, we tried to

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 6>do some stories with NPR and and that just went

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 6>totally south and and they got stuff way wrong. Yeahs,

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 6>and we we we published this giant report about state

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 6>misconduct with layers of evidence just thrown throughout the whole

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 6>thing about specific cases where the this.

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 7>Is very well placed.

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 6>Looking atamination and uh so we're like, you know, hey,

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 6>you guys, we we just worked on this for three years.

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 6>We really want you to cover this story about the

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 6>state misconduct and the attorney gen generals investigating it. Like,

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 6>we've talked to the attorney general. They're out in the field,

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 6>they're talking to people. They're like, well, we can't write

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 6>a story until the attorney general tells us that they're

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 6>investigating it.

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 8>I'm like, it's the attorney general.

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 9>They're gonna yeah, they don't do that, guys.

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 8>They're investigating dipshits go up there published.

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 6>That's been like the constant wall of trying to to

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 6>take these stories that are so important and that our

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 6>people are suffering with and get them into the mainstream media.

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 6>And the mainstream media just has this amazing wall that

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 6>they don't let anything through, which it's it's it's not

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 6>such a big deal for us because we haven't a

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 6>huge readership, right so it's not like, you know, we

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 6>haven't fallen short on that side of it. We utilize

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 6>things like Google Ads, we utilize things like social media,

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, and all the different advertising platforms in public.

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 8>Film is really good distribution and in the film the.

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 7>Films themselves have really built our audience. But the issue

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 7>with not getting into mainstream is that we're not getting

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 7>to their audience. And these these are people who need

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 7>to be informed about what's actually going on. You know,

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 7>we have an election coming up and people are voting,

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 7>and and if you don't know the truth about everything,

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 7>if you have this picture in your mind of what's

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 7>happening with fracking, for instance, in Pennsylvania, which is the

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 7>second largest producer of natural gas in the country, if

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 7>you do if you have this picture of things as

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 7>if they're balanced, which is what the mainstream media tends

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 7>to report, including people like MPR. Then people think things

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 7>are okay, and that is very very much not the case.

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 5>We we covered this in a drilled season of like

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 5>exactly how the whole false equivalence thing was created mostly

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 5>by oil and gas companies. Like the woman who's in

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 5>charge of the Corporation for.

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 9>Public Broadcasting right now is you know, was one of

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 9>the like key architects of that and of climate denial,

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 9>and in fact like came up with the fucking term

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 9>clean coal.

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 10>So like, god, yeah, I'm not surprised that NPR does

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 10>a bad job.

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 9>Wow, I'm curious what you're actually seeing on the ground

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 9>with people in Pennsylvania and you know how you know,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 9>tracking regulation plays there.

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 8>I have a I have my own version of that

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 8>most of you.

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 7>I'll share, you share your share living on the front.

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 6>So I've been you know, I went to college and

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 6>studied comprehensive planning and zoning, and I saw a lot

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 6>of that work happening in Pennsylvania with regards to controlling

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 6>fracking and keeping it in.

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 8>Specific zones in the community.

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 6>And you know, working with food and water watch to

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 6>create a zoning plan that'll protect your community from oil

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 6>and gas and these kinds of things. And here you

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 6>have Grant right, and Grant is doing the exact opposite.

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 6>Grant is saying for you to tell me that I

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 6>have to zone things in my area and then make

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 6>sure that there is a place for waste in our community.

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 6>Make sure there's a zone for waste in our community.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 6>That's fucking unconstitutional, and we're not going to do that.

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 8>We're going to pass home rule. And this home rule

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 8>will have a bill.

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 6>Of rights, which says what our laws are and what

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 6>you must follow when you're in our community. It will

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 6>not be these unconstitutional mandates that we have to accept

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 6>waste or we have to accept fracking in our community.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 8>And that's something that Pennsylvania allows.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 6>Now, the problem is with banning fracking in pennsylvani And

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 6>why you don't see Grant in one hundred other communities

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 6>like you did in a place like New York.

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 8>Is the entire green movement in Pennsylvania.

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 6>Every single organization I've ever talked to about this, No

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 6>one is focusing on passing home rule bands inside of communities,

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 6>except for Cell Deaf Cell DEEV is the only one

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 6>I know who's like created a platform for communities that

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 6>actually ban fracking or ban infrastructure, or ban landfills or

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 6>ban anything, you know, through something like home rule, because

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 6>they've said, this is the this is the most powerful

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 6>part of the law, and this is where we're going

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 6>to help you pass if you want to pass. And

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 6>they're not going to push any of that out you.

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 6>They're just like suggesting, you know what it is that

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 6>they know. However, the environmental organizations have completely lost track

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 6>of how to deal with this with this problem, and

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 6>they are entirely invested in zoning, an ordnance plan plans,

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 6>entirely invested. So they're taking communities who are in dire

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 6>straight who want to ban fracking so it doesn't happen

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 6>next to the school, or they want to banfracking and

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 6>they don't want these wells, or they don't want injection

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 6>wells like plump Township, right, And they're taking these communities

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 6>and they're saying, well, we'll help you build these really

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 6>strong zoning and ordance laws and that'll make everything okay.

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 6>And I don't have an example of where that's okay.

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.439
<v Speaker 6>All I ever see with Melissa and I filming this stuff,

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 6>and we have been to I cannot tell you how

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 6>many of these boring ass zoning meetings.

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 8>It's a hearing and we're there for four hours. Yeah,

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 8>the whole damn thing, watching every attorney talk.

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 6>I mean so many times did we do this for

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 6>this film to try and find one positive piece to

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 6>stick in there about zoning and ordance.

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 8>We couldn't get a shred of it. It was just

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 8>a total total failure.

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 6>So on the banning side and that whole situation, there

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 6>is not good communication in Pennsylvania about your opportunities to

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 6>ban fracking locally with Homer, and that's something that as reporters,

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 6>I feel really important to share with communities because other

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 6>newspapers have said, like you, Grand Township will not win, right,

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.719
<v Speaker 6>Grand Township is a case of home rule, and they

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 6>won't win and this isn't gonna work. And then they win,

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 6>And I'm like, are you gonna go back and retract

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 6>your statement in your paper? Like do we need to

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 6>send you corrections for this? Because you just misled a

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 6>lot of readers about what they're supposed to do with

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 6>fracking and basically told them that what Grant's doing, which

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 6>is the exact same thing that somebody like Pittsburgh did,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 6>which has a band unfracking isn't going to hold up in.

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 8>Court when in fact it has.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 6>So Yeah, it's a really confusing situation on that front.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 8>Now, you know, Ohio was different.

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 6>Ohio lost that control their state Supreme Court stripped them

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 6>of local control. So they need to go at the

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 6>state level and kind of work their way down. But yeah,

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 6>it's it's a really dynamic story and I wish somebody

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 6>would write about it.

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 8>We just don't have the capacity right now.

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, I mean, the environmental groups in Pennsylvania have

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 7>there's no campaign to ban fracking in Pennsylvania, even though

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 7>as you're seeing in the polls, Amy that the majority

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 7>of people in Pennsylvania support a moratorium at the least.

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 7>And so it's a bit of a mystery to me

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 7>why that is. I don't know if it's because a

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 7>lot of the environmental organizations live are based in cities,

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 7>and there's no fracking in cities. So I work remotely

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 7>and I live my family with my family on the.

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 9>Front lines of fracking.

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>We live.

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 7>Very on a road that is essentially become the driveway

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 7>for a fracking wastewater facility. So there's active there's radioactive

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 7>fracking waste being driven over top of our water supply

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 7>all the time. Wow, and right. The environmental community does

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 7>not get behind the rights of nature community rights movement.

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 7>In fact, when I've brought it up with environmental groups,

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 7>their response is that, well, if we allow communities to

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 7>decide what's right for them, then some of them will

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 7>choose what's wrong. They'll choose to enact laws to promote

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 7>bad things like more fracking. Right, And I try to explain,

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, that's not exactly how it works. I mean,

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 7>you community rights work as an addition of increased protection.

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 7>It doesn't steal. You can't pass a local law that's

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 7>going to poison the next community over. That's that's not

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 7>that's not the purpose and the meaning of it all is.

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 7>So I think that fear is very unfounded.

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 9>But that's interesting.

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 10>Do you think that also that like with the larger

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 10>like with the national environmental orgs that they are, that

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 10>it's some kind of playing politics thing too, that they're

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 10>just like worried, But it's like they've bought into this

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 10>this story. A fracking ban is like untenable to voters

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 10>and whatever.

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 6>Food and Water Watch is a fracking ban organization, yeah,

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 6>but in Pennsylvania that push does not exist. It is

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 6>a zone, zoning, an ordnance organization. And I've confronted them

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 6>on this because we showed triple Divide it or invisible

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 6>hand early at one point and a community wanted to

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 6>use home rule, they wanted to ban fracking, and Food

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 6>and Water Watch wouldn't come to the show, They wouldn't

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 6>show up at the show, even though they have field

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 6>agents in that community because it wasn't a zoning an

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 6>ordinance situation.

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 8>It was a home rule band fracking situation.

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 6>And I kind of, uh, you know, I felt an

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 6>obligation there, as you know, as a journalist, to make

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 6>that clear. So I did publish my own editorial in

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 6>regards to the Mayor of Pittsburgh's statements about home rule

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 6>and why they felt that home rule was the only

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 6>thing that would stop fracking in Pittsburgh rather than zoning

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 6>and ordnance laws, which it has up to this point,

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 6>against what I was being told by the Food and

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 6>Water Watch organization in Pennsylvania, which was that, you know,

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 6>the route, the better route to take was to try

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 6>and push fracking to the edges of the community through zoning,

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 6>which if you've ever been involved in a case with

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 6>a corporation under zoning laws, they will find a way,

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 6>one way or another to change your zone so they

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 6>can put their well pad there. If they don't do

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 6>it this year, they'll do it four years down the road,

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 6>which is exactly what they did in this community who

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 6>wanted to have home rule and ban oil and gas

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 6>infrastructure because a natural gas power plant from in Energy

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 6>was proposed to be built there and it is, you know,

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 6>right now getting its air quality permits outside of the

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 6>Pittsburgh and Elizabeth township. Kay, and it will increase dramatically

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 6>all these different particulates in air pollution that's happening in

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 6>the Pittsburgh.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 8>Region, And that could have all been stopped had green.

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 6>Organizations created some kind of mobility and support for a

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 6>community who had you know, a dozen or more people

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 6>organized to go out collect signatures, get home roll passed,

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 6>and ban a power plant. But instead, you know, they

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 6>were left on their own. They were ostracized by bigger

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 6>green organizations for taking this position. I mean, it's an

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 6>astonishing treatment of the good intentions of a community to

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 6>protect themselves.

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 9>That's really interesting.

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 7>I mean, all of these environmental organizations are funded by

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 7>philothrapic foundations, right, and many of these foundations their priority

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 7>is to make the system that's in place work better.

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 7>What the fundamental piece that's missing is that the system

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 7>is working precisely as it's supposed to. And we can

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 7>dicker and play whack a mole to rearrange words on

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 7>pieces of paper that are always meant to treat nature

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 7>as property and always meant to prioritize commerce over basic life,

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 7>and the problem that remains the same. You know, it's

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 7>our laws are designed to serve an economic paradigm that

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 7>treats as property and as a commodity, and that paradigm,

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 7>it's it's our environmental laws come from that system, and

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 7>that's why they have failed, and they are going to

0:32:56.000 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 7>continue to fail until we see nature as something else,

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 7>until we see nature as what it really is. The

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 7>Rights of Nature movement that we've come to cover after

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 7>covering all of this environmental degradation and this infighting about

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 7>how to protect ourselves and you know, do we pass

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 7>home rule laws or do we zone it to the

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 7>outskirts of our community, which is incredibly unjust by the

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 7>way our way of life and our system of law

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 7>are constantly extracting far from from the outskirts of the

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 7>marginalized people in places and until and the environmental groups

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 7>are wrapped into that system. They're part of the capitalist system,

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 7>the colonial system that has created this problem and will

0:33:55.400 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 7>continue to until we manage to fundamentally shift the not

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:05.959
<v Speaker 7>our structure of law and our value system and the people.

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 7>You know, you mentioned the technologists that think that we

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 7>can we can techno fix our way out of this problem,

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 7>but that is absolutely absurd because technology, you don't just

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 7>wave a wand and create a piece of technology out

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 7>of thin air. It has to be extracted from somewhere,

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 7>and it's usually composed of pieces and parts and materials

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 7>that are extracted from those marginalized communities that have been

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 7>sacrificed for hundreds of years now through the through the

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:46.359
<v Speaker 7>industrial revolution. And so to techno fix our way out

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 7>is just to perpetuate more of the same harm. But

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 7>what we need to do, and I'm not saying that

0:34:55.280 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 7>technology isn't part of the our solutions moving forward, but

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.720
<v Speaker 7>we have to put at the center of our decision

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:11.879
<v Speaker 7>making processes nature and the laws of nature. We have

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 7>to start there. We have to design our future systems

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 7>and redesign our way of life and redesign our legal

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 7>system with the laws of nature at the center. We

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:32.800
<v Speaker 7>have to before we switch to one renewable energy, we.

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 10>Have to ask.

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 7>How and where. We need to ask ourselves how to

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 7>do that in alignment with the laws of nature. And

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 7>that's that's just how we have to do it moving forward.

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 7>It's not about you can never cut down a tree

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 7>or you can never drive a car. It's about how

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 7>we do that as can. Communities has interconnected communities of

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 7>people and living other non human relatives. You know, maybe

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 7>we don't each have maybe each you know, it's not

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 7>that we can't drive a car, it's that we have

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 7>to share cars. It's not that we can't cut down

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 7>agree it's that we have to acknowledge that we share forests.

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 7>And for one corporation to cut to to take a

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 7>forest like Los Adros, or a mining company to like

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 7>in Ecuador, to for them to get a concession to

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 7>decimate an entire forest, that kind of activity, that kind

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 7>of economic paradigm, that kind of social value system needs

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 7>to absolutely end, it's suicide if we don't. And instead,

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 7>the decisions that we make moving forward about whether it's

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 7>to mine lithium for electric car batteries or cut down

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:04.760
<v Speaker 7>trees for housing material, those communities need to those decisions

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 7>need to be made as communities, not as you know,

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 7>corporate entities that can that sit at the top of

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 7>the priority list for our legal system