WEBVTT - Gag Orders

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, keeps, and welcome to wok F Daily with

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>me your girl Daniel Moody Recording from the Home Bunker. Folks,

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited to welcome back to okay F Daily

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>our friend Glenn Kirshner. Glenn and I pre tape this

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>ahead of today's court appearance by Donald Trump and Jack

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Smith before Judge chunkin to discuss a gag order. And

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in this conversation with Glenn, we go and we talk

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>about all of Trump's legal woes, but in particular between

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>what is happening in down in Georgia this month, as

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>well as what will be happening as you're listening to

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this in Washington, d C. You know, and here's what

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>I will say, folks, as you've been, you know, listening

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>to the show. There are so many more important things

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that are happening in the world and in this country,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>but it is still really important to keep an eye

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on the person that ushered in this political healthscape that

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we are currently living with, where you know, lawlessness reigns supreme.

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, again, while I recognize and you know,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>through the conversations that I have on this show and

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>have stated, particularly over last week, that we know that

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>there are more important things and more important places to

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>be putting our energy. But it is important also to

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on and a foothold in what is

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>transpiring inside of our judicial system. For right now, it

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>continues to hold and I'm just looking friends, you know,

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>at the the Federal Circuit. I'm not even going to

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>touch what is happening at the Supreme Court and what

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>continues to happen there in that grifting, you know place.

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>But how these judges move with regard to recognizing the

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>threat and the danger to our country that Donald Trump

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>continues to impose is going to be important because what

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they are doing is setting the stage for how we

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>will measure things moving forward. And what we know is

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump has continued to break the rules, move

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the gold posts, understanding that the rules don't apply to him.

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you can look no further than George

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Santos right in Congress. You can look at Bob Menendez

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate. You can look at these people who

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have broken our norms right and broken the law and

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>are currently indicted. But why did these people think that

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>they could get away with certain behaviors and certain actions.

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Well because what's good for the goose is good for

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the gander, And so it's really important for us to

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on what is happening and how our

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>judiciary shakes out, because this is our last hold, you know,

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>between this andful fledged authoritarianism. So what happens over the

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>next several months and the course of twenty twenty four

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to have deep implications as to where this

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>country ends up come, you know, a year from now, which, frankly,

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I do wish I had a crystal ball, But

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>then sometimes I'm really glad that I don't, because a

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>part of me doesn't want to know, but then a

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>part of me wants to know. So I can tell

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>us all how to prepare for what is coming next.

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But coming up next with this conversation is our friend

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Kirshner. Folks, it has been a while since we've

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>had our friend MSNBC legal analyst and the host of

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Justice Matters, Glenn Kirshner on Woke a f Daily to

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>give us a primer into where we are in the

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>legal dull drums of Donald Trump. Glenn, let's start out

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>with Georgia and what is transpired there, because Jim Jordan,

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>who just well, as of this recording, has lost his

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>bid to be the news speaker for the Republican Party,

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>has been weaponizing his position as the chair of the

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>House Judiciary Committee in many ways. But I would love

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>for you to give us a primer into what he's

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>been trying to do and what Fannie Willis has called

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>him out on.

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, Danielle, I think we need to go

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 2>back to Jim Jordan criminally defying a congressional subpoena himself.

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it is mind boggling to think that a

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 2>member of Congress was subpoenaed to testify about incriminating information

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 2>evidence about a president of the United States trying to

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 2>overturn the results of a presidential election. Instead of providing

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 2>that evidence to a Congressional committee and by extension, to

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the American people, he criminally defied the subpoena, thereby hiding

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 2>from all of us the evidence of Donald Trump's January

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 2>sixth crimes. That is something for which he has never

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 2>been made to account. I hope the hell he is someday.

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 2>But against that backdrop, he then tried to interfere, misuse

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>his office and his power as chairman of the House

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Judiciary Committee to try to interfere in Alvin Bragg's prosecution

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 2>up in New York. He didn't make a lot of

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 2>headway there. Now he's trying to interfere in Fonnie Willis's

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 2>RICO prosecution of Trump and others down in Georgia by

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 2>basically demanding that she'd turn over all of the information

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 2>and the documents and answer all kinds of questions about

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 2>why she is choosing to prosecute somebody who violated the

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 2>laws of the State of Georgia. He is abusing his position,

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 2>his power, his authority. He, in my opinion, is very

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 2>likely committing any number of crimes, including being an accessory

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 2>after the fact to Donald Trump's crimes, because he's trying

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 2>to help Donald Trump avoid and evade accountability prosecution. He's

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 2>trying to cover up the evidence of Donald Trump's crimes.

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 2>And it is mind boggling to me that the Department

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 2>of Justice thus far has let him do it with impunity.

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 2>So Fawnie Willis pushed back hard, sent the letter, i

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 2>think her second letter just yesterday or in recent days,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 2>saying you either don't know, oh that the Constitution actually

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>separates the powers of the federal government from the States,

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and you, mister fed have no right interfering in the

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 2>state court prosecution of a criminal former president of the

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 2>United States or anybody else. Either you don't understand the

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 2>way the constitution works, or you're just affirmatively trying to

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 2>obstruct justice and try to help Trump avoid accountability. Which

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 2>is it? So she's not giving an inch, and now

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 2>we have to see what the next move might be.

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's pretend for a moment that Jim Jordan isn't

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>moving from a place of obstruction and malice and an

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>accomplice after the fact, what authority and what position would

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>he be coming from in order to demand information from

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the Fulton County DA on information on a case that

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is in Georgia. I just want folks to understand again,

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>these are state crimes. Right that she has indicted Donald

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump and the other seventeen co conspirators on are state crimes.

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Jim Jordan is the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So tell me how this would make sense if, in fact,

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Jim Jordan wasn't just trying to obstruct the law, or

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is there an avenue for that to make sense?

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think I'm creative enough to come up

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 2>with a legitimate argument as to why this makes sense.

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Here is the best Jim Jordan has. He can say,

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, the prosecutor's office in Georgia receives some federal funds,

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 2>some federal grants, some federal money, and in our oversight capacity,

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 2>we want to question members or representatives of the Fulton

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 2>County District Attorney's office just to make sure that these

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 2>federal funds are being spent appropriately and aren't being you know,

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 2>misallocated to bring an inappropriate prosecution against the former federal official.

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 2>As those words come out of my mouth, I don't

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 2>believe them because it's bs. But that really is the

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 2>only sort of legitimate potential hook Jim Jordan can hang

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 2>his hat on demanding information from Fawnie Willis.

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Now, because Jim Jordan has the ability to just ignore

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 1>subpoenas apparently with and face no criminal responsibility or contempt

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that, tell us where what position Fannie

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Willis finds herself in. As she is putting out now

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 1>her second letter essentially stating that you are acting in

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the way of obstruction to my case, what could possibly

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>happen with her Yeah.

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 2>So if I were Fannie Willis, I would be doing

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 2>precisely what she's doing. I would be standing on the

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Constitution's separation separation of powers. Right. The Tenth Amendment says,

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 2>the powers enumerated to the federal government are few, they

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 2>are limited, and all of the other powers are reserved

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 2>for the states or the people. And I would stand

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 2>on that separation of powers. So here is the next

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 2>play for Jordan. He can try to subpoena her, and

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 2>if she refuses to comply, I don't know if he's

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 2>technically issued a subpoena or they've just been sending letters

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 2>back and forth at this point. And then if she

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 2>refuses to apply and stands on the separation of powers

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 2>as provided by the Constitution, he can then move it

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 2>into court to try to have the court enforce the subpoena,

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 2>which he did up in New York when Alvin Bragg

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 2>told him to, you know, stick your subpoena, you know awhere,

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 2>And then there was some negotiating and Alvin Bragg ended

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 2>up presenting some information to Jordan and to his committee.

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 2>So I assume this will probably move into the courts,

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll have to have a court decide if

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 2>this is a righteous subpoena or if it's a violation

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 2>of the separation of powers and the subpoena is being

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 2>used nefariously by Jim Jordan to try to obstruct a

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>state court prosecution.

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And what court would that go through? Would that be Georgia,

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.319
<v Speaker 1>would it be Washington d C. Where Jim Jordan supposedly

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is right as the chairman, Like, what circuit would that

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>be moving through if he chooses to make that move.

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a great question. I think technically you might be

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 2>able to bring it in both DC and in Georgia.

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 2>But if we look at New York as a guide,

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 2>I believe Jordan and the committee filed in New York

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 2>because I know it was a New York State New

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 2>York federal judge that took up the question of the

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 2>enforceability of Jordan's subpoena when he was subpoenaing stuff from

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Alvin Bragg trying to interfere in the New York prosecution.

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 2>So it may very well be a Georgia federal court

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 2>will take this up if it if it gets that far.

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but you know, here's here's what I have

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>seen at least outside of of the Cannon Court, is

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it is clear that these judges, regardless

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of who they've been appointed by, are really not interested

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>in frivolousness, right, Like, so what what even if you know,

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>let's let's shake the crystal ball for a minute, even

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>if it were to go up through the courts, is

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>there a strong enough case or does this look kind

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of like all of Donald Trump's attorney's attempts to slow

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>things down or to obstruct where it's a waste of

0:12:58.000 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 1>the court's time.

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a great question. I do think the courts

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 2>have held strong on for example, all of the election challenges.

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>They held strong when Judge Aleen Cannon literally abused her

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 2>judicial authority. Not my opinion, that's what the Eleventh Circuit

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Court of Appeals ruled. She abused her judicial authority and

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 2>did an enormous favor for Donald Trump that the law

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 2>did not allow. By and large, the federal courts have

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 2>held fairly strong. I have a feeling though this is

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 2>probably slightly different than Trump and his lawyers filing frivolous

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>federal suits or cases. And here's what I predict will happen.

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Sort of much of what we saw in New York

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 2>when okay, there was a little bit of negotiating, and

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 2>ultimately Alvin Bragg provided some information, you know, probably that

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 2>had something to do with federal money, federal grants, federal

0:13:56.320 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>funds that were being used by the New York District

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Attorney's office, because that's actually a legitimate area for oversight.

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 2>But we all know that's not what Jim Jordan is doing.

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Has Jim Jordan subpoena district attorneys from the other forty

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>nine states to find out how federal funds and grant

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 2>money are being used, of course not because they're not

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>prosecuting his political benefactor, Donald Trump. So this is as

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>transparent as it gets.

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, let's shift gears now and move over to

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Jack Smith. Now, what we have seen of Jack Smith

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and his cases is that most recently, he is trying

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to present to Judge chuck In, who is overseeing the

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>January sixth case, a potential gag order for Donald Trump,

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>who let me just remark and say that if Donald

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Trum for anybody else other than a person with the

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>name Donald Trump, Donald Trump would be in jail. He

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>has threatened judges, he has threatened law clerks, he has

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>threatened jurors, he has weaponized his social media platforms and

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>put people in harm's way. There is no way that

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>if he was not the former twice impeached president of

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States, that he would be out right now.

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So now here comes Jack Smith working to try and

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>get a gag order. Talk to us about this, because

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen is these limited gag orders. Judge anger On,

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm maybe butchering his name put one

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in place, not for himself, but after Donald Trump posted

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the picture of his law clerk with Chuck Schumer. So

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of this?

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's about time somebody imposed a gag order

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 2>on Donald Trump. And as much as I think in

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the moment, we were all celebrating the fact that some

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>judge stepped up and tried to protect somebody from Donald

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Trump's dangerous, indeed often deadly rhetoric by imposing a gag order,

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 2>there was a momentary celebration there. But Danielle, it highlights

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the extreme injustice and the unequal application of the rule

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 2>of law. And here's how Donald Trump, as you just cataloged,

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 2>has been endangering witnesses, grand jurors, prosecutors, judges, and all

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 2>of their respective family members. And he's been doing it

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 2>with impunity. But what happens when somebody close to a judge,

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 2>somebody that a judge obviously feels very protective about his

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 2>law clerk, gets put in harm's way by a Donald

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Trump instant gag order. Well, isn't it not? See I'm

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 2>not laying into Judge Ngeron here because he did the

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 2>right thing. But it highlights that if you're close to

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 2>a judge, if a judge feels protective about you, in

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 2>particular instant gag order, no motions and replies and oppositions

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 2>and oral arguments and decisions, and written a snap gag

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 2>order to protect somebody that the judge feels protective about.

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 2>How about we feel protective regarding the witnesses Donald Trump

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 2>is endangering every day and the jurors and the prosecutors

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 2>and their family, just the way Judge Ngern felt protective

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 2>of his law clerk. And how about we use the

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 2>rule of law as it was intended to be used,

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 2>and we gag Donald Trump from endangering all those other

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 2>people who maybe aren't so close to the judge. You know,

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 2>you can see that there's more injustice than there is

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 2>justice right in this snap gag order that was issued

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 2>by Judge Ngeround. But the silver lining, which I'm always

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 2>looking for, and sometimes it's peeking out behind the big

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 2>dark cloud that is Donald Trump, the silver lining is

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I think this will make it even easier for Judge

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Chuckkin on Monday. I'll be in the courtroom when this

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 2>argument is held to impose a far more sweeping gag order.

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Because even after Jack Smith filed the motion with Judge

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Chuckin seeking a broader gag order, what did Donald Trump

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 2>do said that one of the really compelling witnesses against him,

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 2>General Mark Milly, should be executed Danielle. If a defendant

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 2>on release in four felony cases ever threatened to witness,

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 2>that person would be in pre trial detention so fast

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 2>it would make their head spin. And this is the

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 2>continued failure of our institutions of government to take responsibility

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 2>for a president, former president, who continues to try to

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 2>kill our democracy. And I wish I had an explanation

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 2>for why we are allowing it to go.

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>On, because, honestly, Glenn, I mean, I just want to

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>remind folks, because you've talked about this for so many

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>years on this show. But like you have prosecuted, you know,

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>mob bosses, drug lords, you know, murderers. If any of

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>those people involved in rico cases that you've tried over

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty years need any of the things that

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has done, stated said at rallies on social media,

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>what would happen to that person?

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.959
<v Speaker 2>They would be in pre trial detention instantly. Because the

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 2>standard to detain somebody pending trial if they're on release

0:19:55.840 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 2>in a federal felony case is is there clear and

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 2>convincing evidence that the person poses a danger to any

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 2>person or to the community. The answer to that is

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 2>a resounding yes. Donald Trump poses a danger to witnesses

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 2>and judges and prosecutors and their family members and jurors

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 2>and you name it. And so you know, anybody else,

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 2>anybody else would be instantly pending trial. Not only that,

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 2>he's also on pre trial release presently, and he has

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 2>been violating the terms of his release with impunity. That's

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 2>a reason to revoke his pre trial release. Separate and

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 2>apart from whether he's a danger to the community and

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 2>a flight risk, he is either unable or unwilling to

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 2>abide by conditions of release. There are so many reasons

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.479
<v Speaker 2>to detain impending trial, not the least of which is

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 2>it will end up taking away his megaphone. It will

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 2>bring the temperature of the country down, It will give

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 2>it will give the people some hope of a fair

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 2>and impartial jury being impaneled to try the case against him.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, and our system of government, our institutions, refuse

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 2>to take responsibility and do what the law really demands.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 2>They're just ignoring it.

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Glenn, is it the belief then that the

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>risk of putting Donald Trump in pre trial tension is

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>greater than letting him be free? Do you know what

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying?

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't yet, But it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 2>what the risk is because here and I agree with you,

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 2>that there are people who are taking extraneous factors, factors

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 2>that have nothing to do with the law and the facts.

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Extraneous factors. I often call it politics, but it's not

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 2>really politics. It is perhaps, you know, national security, Like,

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 2>won't people you know, flood the won't his supporters flood

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the streets and start shooting? Okay, here's the thing that

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 2>would be horrific, And I don't ever want to see

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 2>that happen in America. But it doesn't matter because you

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 2>do not make prosecutorial decisions based on extraneous factors, because

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 2>once you do, the rule of law means nothing because

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 2>you're no longer applying it as it was intended to

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 2>be applied. I'm not going to say I don't care

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 2>if his supporters take up arms. I don't think they

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 2>will because they are by and large weaken, cowardly people. Yes,

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 2>some of them are well armed, but I don't think

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 2>they're going to put them in themselves in harm's way

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 2>if Donald Trump is detained pending trial. But we are

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 2>putting the nation in harm's way if we don't apply

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 2>the law as it was intended to be applied and

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 2>detain Donald Trump pending trial.

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>With a couple of minutes that we have left, you're

0:22:56.400 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be in court come come Monday, where Judge

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Chunkin will rule. Right, I'm assuming on whether or not

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to impose a larger, more encompassing gag order.

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 2>And she may not rule instantly, Okay, listen to the arguments.

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 2>She may take a couple of days, but she'll rule

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty promptly.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So what would that can can you just walk us

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>through what would be included in that gag order and

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>then if broken, what would be what would be the penalty?

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I suspect I obviously don't know how Judge chuck

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 2>In will fashion any restriction on Donald Trump's speech and posts,

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 2>but I suspect it will be you may not speak

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 2>publicly or post publicly about witnesses, prosecutors, court or court

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 2>staff family members in a way that good could be

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 2>perceived as threatening, intimidating, harassing. And then she's going to

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 2>have to fashion a number of restrictions to prevent him

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 2>from infecting the jury pool, from continuing to flood the

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, the airwaves and continue to spew into the

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.479
<v Speaker 2>public square disinformation that you know, the people who are

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 2>going to be jurors, they're absorbing it, they're hearing it,

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 2>you know. And so she's going to have to find

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 2>some creative way to limit Donald Trump's ability to poison

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 2>the jury pool. And the other thing that was just

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 2>taken up in a recent motion filed by Jack Smith

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 2>is with respect to once the jurors come into the courtroom,

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the hundreds of them who are summoned into you know,

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 2>for jury selection, what Donald Trump may not do. For example,

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 2>this is what Jack Smith just filed emotion regarding they said. Look,

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 2>you can look at social media and look at any

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 2>publicly available information. For example, if jurors are posting publicly

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 2>things about themselves, but you can't contact them, you can't

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 2>communicate with them, you can't friend them trying to draw

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 2>more information out of them. And you can't have your

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 2>cruddy associates like Roger Stone and Steve Bannon and these

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 2>other knuckleheads. You can't have them friend them or communicate

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 2>them with them as your surrogates, et cetera, et cetera.

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 2>These are perilous times for jurors as much as anybody else.

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 2>So Judge Chuckin, who is up to the task. I

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 2>used to try murder cases against her back in the day,

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 2>and I've been in her court more recently as she's

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.959
<v Speaker 2>presided over Jay six cases. She's up to the task.

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>But it's going to be challenging to fashion the kind

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 2>of you know, narrowly tailored restrictions on his speech and

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 2>his posts that will accomplish all of this, but that

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 2>won't run a foul of the First Amendment.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>If this happens, Glenn, he violates it.

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:08.880
<v Speaker 2>He will violate then what well, Judge chuck In, don't

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:13.479
<v Speaker 2>play she will probably. Now let me tell you, in

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 2>my experience, I have had lots of people violate conditions

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 2>that were set by the court, both pre trial and

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 2>like post trial when they were in a probationary status.

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Judges ordinarily like to give a defendant one stern warning,

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 2>a good finger wag, and then says, if you do

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 2>it again, here are the consequences up to an including

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 2>you will be revoked on release and you will be

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 2>detained pending trial. And it's in that way they basically

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 2>put the keys to the jail cell in the defendant's hand,

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 2>and they warn them, if you violate the condition one

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.959
<v Speaker 2>more time, I will lock you up. Your freedom is

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 2>in your hands, not mine. I would suspect now there

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 2>may be an intram money fine, which doesn't matter because

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 2>he'll just grift more money from his base pay the fine.

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 2>But I suspect that is the direction in which we're heading,

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 2>and it's only a question of how quickly we get there.

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I do think, I do think there's a very real

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 2>possibility that Donald Trump will end up in a jail cell,

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 2>not just after he is convicted and sentenced, but while

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 2>he is pending trial.

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And last question for you, last last question, the ordering

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 1>of this actual trial happening. What are we looking at? It?

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Is it March? I forget?

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 2>What is the March fourth? Yeah, March fourth, jury selection

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 2>begins in DC. As of right now, May twentieth is

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 2>the trial date for the document's trial down in Florida.

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 2>But Trump's lawyers have been yelling and screaming and whining

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 2>about wanting to continue that. We will see if Trump

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 2>appoint e Judge Aleen Cannon caters and cowtows to Donald

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Trump and moves that trial date or holds fast with

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 2>that May trial date. I don't think Judge Chutkin will

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 2>move the March trial date. It might slip a couple

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 2>of weeks if there are some exigent circumstances. But I

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 2>think we're going to see a trial this winter into

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 2>early spring, and that will result in Donald Trump's first

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 2>criminal conviction.

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>And we have Cheeseboro and Powell, and that is still

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>slated for the end of this.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Month, October twenty third, they begin jury' selection unless one

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 2>or both of them plead guilty, and then the question

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 2>is how many other defendants in that what started out

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 2>as a nineteen code offend in case one pledged guilty recently,

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 2>and he will undoubtedly testify against Sidney Powell because they

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 2>were charged with some crimes in common. The question is

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 2>how many more of these plea offers that we know

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Fannie Willis has extended to other defendants are accepted? Did

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 2>how many defendants drop out, plead guilty, flip and cooperate,

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 2>and how many are left to go to trial?

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, Glenn, we will leave it there today

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully get back to you soon to get a

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>better sense. As the month goes on. In these the

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>jury selection begins and chunk and rules to see where

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>we land, and I hope it will land Donald Trump

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in prison. Let me just say that, but we appreciate

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you as always.

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Danielle.

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>That is it for me today. Dear friends on woke

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a f as always, Power to the people and to

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>all the people. Power, get woke and stay woke as fuck.