WEBVTT - Baker Mayfield Is Not Boring

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from my Heart Radio,

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice.

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Now along with the fanball dot com the host for

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly, it is time for America's longest running

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>fantasy show, Fantasy Football Weekly. I am your host, Paul

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Charging from fanball dot Com. My co host today are

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison and Scott Fish. Hello, guys, Hey, it's got

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a little like our new theme music. Over the course

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of today, we're going to tell you the one thing

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you need to know from each team's preseason well zip

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>through all thirty two teams, report back in all the

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>training camp battles that we identified back in our first

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>show of the preseason, we told you we were watching

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of these. Will tell you who won every

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>one of those, and sometimes they don't even care, but

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll even tell you about those. We'll answer three tough questions.

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>You get to play along, try to go three and

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.639
<v Speaker 1>oh with our panel of experts will present the outcome

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>of our drafts when we use different drafting personas or

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>strategies and um and I'm looking forward to that, like

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>if you want, I'm not quite not like Uncle Rico

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or it's more like, if you want to have a

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterback heavy idea, if you want to have a receiver

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>heavy idea, if you want to go high risk, if

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to go low risk. I was planning on

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.559
<v Speaker 1>doing the whole segment as Mr Mee seeks, but that'd

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>be tough. We'll reveal our latest round of sleepers towards

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of the show, and we'll break down the

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Thursday Night game. Yep, we're already breaking down regular season

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>games fantasy style because we've we've got one less than

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a week away. We've got the Thursday Night game. Uh,

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and then of course next weekend we'll do the full

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>slate of all of the games when we get to

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>next weekend's show. So, guys, let's start here the one

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>thing you need to know about each team's preseason. I

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>want the most important thing for each one of these teams, Matt.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna begin with you and the Panthers. Cam Newton

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>sprained his left foot in the preseason game versus New England,

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and everybody got a little scared. And we're gonna talk

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about this later in the show. Ron

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Rivera says he's going to be totally ready to go. Yeah,

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>we'll just dive in deeper to Cam Newton a little

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>bit later. Yeah. I mean he's picking it. He's picking

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>up the the tag of being I think a little

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>injury prone now, yea, bron Yes, Scott, give me the Raiders.

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>Nothing really going on with the Raiders this office, no

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>no storylines whatever, don't have anything to talk about their

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh Antonio Brown back at practice, off practice, not wearing

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>his helmet, wearing his helmet, I think the main regular

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>feet frozen feet. Yeah, he's probably gonna be good to go,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>but if, if you know, maybe it's too sunny in

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>his uniform, his black uniform gets too hot. Maybe he'll

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>leave again. Maybe maybe he'll get a blade of grass

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>stuck in his new face mask. I don't know, So

0:02:55.560 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>go get Tyrrell Williams just in case it's a handcuff situation. Now,

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Can I just not have the Antonio Brown part of

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that handcuff? Can I just not have Raiders on my team? Um,

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll only have this. I think the real loss here

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is that he moves to a new system, totally new offense,

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>new quarterback, new scheme, and has had very little time

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to work with those guys, and it might be a

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver issue, but Derek Carr through career lows on deep passes.

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Last year passing, I know, I was like completion percentage.

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not good. Packers Green based starting wide receivers are

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Marquees Valdez Scantling usually playing on the outside. He's the

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>speed guy, and Geronimo Allison usually in the slot. MBS

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>has got the speed that Aaron Rodgers hasn't had since

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Jordy Nelson for sure, and I mean like you know

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>pre Niece, you know, pre a c L Jordy Nelson,

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even before that, because Jordy was more like

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>speed after the catch guy. This is more like just

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>straight line vertical speed for the big arm with Aaron

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers from Mardez um um, sorry, Marquez Valdez scan you

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>could just call him m VS. Yes, let's go to

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins. Matt case Keenum has been named the starter,

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't even really matter that much because the

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>biggest story there is Trent Williams. They're all pro left tackle.

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>He just might not show up for Washington all season,

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's just a bad sign for the whole Washington offense.

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>In general. I know Brian Johnson has said it a

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>few times on this show. If there's one team you

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>can just eliminate from your fantasy depth chart this year,

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it might be Washington. You might just want to get

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>rid of all of them. Yeah, I think I got

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a contender for that. And that's the next team, The

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills. The Buffalo Bills. The four running backs split

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>all their carries evenly. Every one of them tend to

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>twelve carries during the preseason. Singletary and Yelleding got most

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of the past game works, so maybe there's something there.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Gore was the most effective. Just avoid all of that.

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And Robert Foster dressed the fourth preseason game playing second team.

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>He's no longer even talk about Stay Jones playing with

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>playing in the fourth. You guys are stepping out all

0:04:53.760 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of my my training camp matchups. Later, Texans Lamar Ler

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>went on I r S. Most listeners know Duke Johnson

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is your news starting running back. The good news is

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Duke Johnson has never missed a game in his entire career.

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>That's good. The bad news is he has averaged eight

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>touches per game throughout his career. We have no reason

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to believe he can be a workhorse back or will

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>even be asked to be will. I believe he's the

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.799
<v Speaker 1>all time rushing leader in the history of the University

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of Miami. That's that's a good sign. I think. I

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>think there is a misconception that Duke Johnson is a

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>tiny scat back. Let me remind use two hundred ten pounds.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 1>He's not a tiny guy. You know, he may be

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>able to be an inside and runner. He might be

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>able to withhold eighteen touches a game. He's never been

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>asked to do. It doesn't mean he can't do it.

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>But that's what you need to know. Rand Let's go

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to the We need a listener, by the way to

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>make the I'm the Scatman song into I'm a scat

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>back and send that into us so we can have

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that on the button bar. Well, we'll wait on that. Yeah,

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the bucket my breath. Matt Jamis Winston looked pretty good

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>in the Bruce Arians offense had good command of the offense.

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Problem is the offensive line might be the biggest concern.

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>In the third preseason game, the most important preseason game,

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Winston was sacked five times against the Browns. That's not good.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>That's like an average of nine times per game. It's

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>not It's not an average of nine times. We're just

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it is. Okay, it's in the ballpark of that.

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I suppose we're This is the one thing you need

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to know about every team's preseason. We are now on

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns. Yes, so they shipped off Duke Johnson,

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned. So it's all it's all Nick Chubb

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Doncha. Hilliard has looked really good as

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the backup, over a hundred thirty yards on twenty six

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>touches in the preseason. He's been my last pick of

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>the draft. Guy. Man, he should be, and he should

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>be despite the loss of Zeitler to New York in

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that trade. Uh, the offensive lines look good, so Indianapolis Colts.

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Obviously Jacoby Bursets the new starting quarterback. Don't assume he'll

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>hold back the offense like he did back then. He

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>was very young, just a set in your player playing

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>behind a horrible offensive line that ultimately would go on

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to just pound nails into Andrew Lux's career. Coffin. Well,

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>not only that he got there like a week and

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a day before his first startart right entactly, um sets

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>look good in the preseason both last year and this

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>year's preseason. He's surrounded by talent. I think he's good

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>enough to keep. T Y Hilton is a reliable starter.

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And potentially Paris Campbell who's going undrafted many in many

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>leagues because he didn't have a preseason and ultimately he

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>might be okay too, and Ericy Brown as well. Let's

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>go to the Lions. What's the one thing we need

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to know? Um? Surprisingly, t J. Hockenson looked like the

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>most impressive Lions offensive player coming out of camp average

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>nine point eight yards after the catch during the preseason.

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh struggled a bit in the run blocking game. That's

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that might hold him back from snaps

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this season. But uh, there's a lot of positivity around

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a rookie tight end, which is pretty rare in the NFL.

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to the Jets. So the Jets,

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about this on previous shows. I think

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be much more fast paced team, much

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>more up tempo. When the starters are in. They've been

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>using a lot of no huddle, a lot of quick plays.

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I think Gaye's uh lack of plays. His His low

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>amount of plays per game in Miami was just effect.

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>He had bad players and he was trying to slow

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>down the game. I think it's gonna be a fast

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>paced team. I think it's gonna have some bad players. Well,

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that is true. Um Jets have the hardest first half

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>schedule against the past, and so as as optimistic as

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I am that that offense is going to be better,

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm investing in the second half of the season. The

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>one thing you need to know about the Chiefs is

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a possible timeshare brewing in the backfield between incumbent

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>starter Damian Williams and sixth round rookie Darwin Thompson, who's

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>looked terrific and his shot all the way up to

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>number two on the depth chart changed the tenor of

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the conversation there from really being all about Damian Williams

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to now potentially being a true time share. Williams is

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>expected to be the starter, but we may see more

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>time from Darwin Thompson. Then we thought Carlos Hyde, by

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the way um on the bubble and by the time

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you hear the show, depending on when you listen over

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, might already be cut. That's my my prediction

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>for a notable name that could go down in flames.

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our next team, and that is the

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks Matt uh Injuries. Injuries have plagued the Seahawks preseason.

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>David Moore, who had high hopes as a wide receiver

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>too as a shoulder injury, DK Metcalf and knee guard

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Iupati as a foot injury. And there's a whole

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>bunch of defensive players that are also injured, including Ezekiel Ansa,

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Sachem Griffin, and l J. Collier. It's it's gonna be

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a tough road to hoe for the Seahawks to start

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the year. Yeah, that's they didn't get the preseason they

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>needed on a DK Metcalf. No, definitely not. Let's go

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Broncos. The one thing we need to know there,

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Ummanuel Sanders looks like he has some Adrian Peterson recovery

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>ability even after thirty. For some reason, he flashed plays

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in game and not just not just video as of practice.

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>In game, he actually looked good. I'm no longer concerned

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>about drafting him. I've got him up at numbers twenty

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>nine at the wide receiver position. That might be a

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>little optimistic given the all the young talent they've got

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>a receiver and that too, that's that's a bit of

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>an issue. Maybe I'm a little optimistic on him. Let's

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>go to the Rams. Cooper Cup looks fully respeaking of recover.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>He's Cooper Cup fully recovered from his a c L

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>injury of last November. You know, to me, it seems

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>unlikely that that couple will immediately return to a full workload.

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think he's I think he's right in the mix,

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>and you're in week one. I just don't think it

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>should be like in every single play. Guy. They said

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his measurables are better than when he

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>came into the league right now. Reminder, he was averaging

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown per game last year before his injury. Cooper Cup,

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Eagles. What's the one thing we

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>need to know, Matt. I mean, the biggest news out

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of Eagles camp might be the troll job of the

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>zeke who billboards that they put up around town. But seriously,

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just a really crowded offense for the receiving targets.

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>There's Art's el Sean d Jack's Agilard, j Jaw Goddard,

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Darren Sprowles, Corey Clement, Miles Sanders all have the ability

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to catch passes. It makes me kind of want Carson

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Wentz as the only option on that offense. Well, I

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know about only, but I've got him up to

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>number six among quarterbacks. I think Carson Wentz is going

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>off the board is roughly quarterback like sixteen, But I

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's exactly it. There's so many good targets for

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz. I don't have to guess who. I don't

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>have to guess which receiver is gonna have the hot game.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll just take the quarterback. Yeah, that's exactly what. Um.

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Let's see the Dolphins. What's the one

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>thing we need to know there? Scott, You're you're beautiful, lovely.

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Stu Beard may have gotten the start for Week one.

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>He may start the season, but he is Stu Beard

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and Rosen out played him this preseason. They invested a

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>second round picking him. Stu Bird is gonna start the season,

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>but eventually it'll be Rosen and I'm not sure that's good.

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I know the exact week it's going to be, and

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you in a later segment alright, good, the

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Vikings Dalvin Cook is sitting out of potential, potentially giant season.

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The offensive line is upgraded. The new zone stretch blocking

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>scheme is a perfect fit for Dalvin Cook's running style.

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>How so he only played in college in high skame.

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, right exactly, he looks as explosive as ever.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 1>You saw his eighty five yard touchdown sprint a little

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>over a week ago. He's got a lead upside. If

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings offensive line improves and he handles the bulk

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of the work, he could easily be one of the

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>top three or four or five running backs for fantasy play.

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 1>He is my number four running back at the moment.

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our next team, that is the Dallas Cowboys.

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>The one thing we need to know there, man, I mean,

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the biggest troll job of the season was Jerry Jones

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>saying Zeke his own team. UM. Zeke's holdout is obviously

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the main storyline, but an interesting stat I saw online today.

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh DA's passerrating in games with Ezekiel Elliott point nine,

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Deck's passerrating in games without Zeke eighty point eight so

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it moves down a little bit. I know Brian loves

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard, but I'm a little bit nervous about the

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys as a whole, and this Zeke called out looks

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>like it might last into mid October or later. Let's

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>go to the Patriots. A lot of moving parts for

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots right now, Scott. What's the one thing though

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>people need to know? If it's just one thing, it's

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 1>that Josh Gordon is now eligible to play Week one,

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and Tom Brady's yardage attempt is targeting any receiver Josh

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Gordon number one in his entire career including career Wow,

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>no way, so downfield passing Josh Gordon. I love it.

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Saints. Jared Cook looks like a

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>potential steel at his current average draft position of the

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>seventh round. Beat writers are describing Jared Cook as the

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>go to receiver for Breeze and have noted his multiple

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>big plays throughout camp. If you like that Jared Cook

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>as a Raider catching one hop wobblers from Derek Carr,

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not a catch. You're gonna love him as a

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Saint catching spirals from Drew Brees. Let's go to the Giants.

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>What's the one thing we need to know so we

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>know it's not if it's when Daniel Jones takes over

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>for Eli. Joe Ones went twenty nine for thirty four

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that's completions four hundred, sixteen yards and two touchdowns in

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the preseason. Now, the schedule is really tough through the

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>first six weeks, including Week five against the Vikings. In

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Week six against New England, that's Eli's last start. That's

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>against New England. He's gonna try to get one final

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>troll job on the Patriots. And then week seven they

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>play the Cardinals at home. That's a nice game. Then

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>they get Detroit Dallas and an away game at home

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets. Those are four really nice games for

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones to get eased into. Then they got a

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>bye week. They'll be able to adjust. That's when Daniel

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Jones will take over his week seven calling your shot,

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I like it. That's the one thing we need to

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>know about the Titans. This one is tough. There's not

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>really anything it's but the revamp line with the addition

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of Roger Staffold. I know Taylor of the one is

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be suspended a little bit here, but once

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>he's back. That line has made Jeremy Mcnifmuckle's a former

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>fifth round pick, couldn't even make the fifty three man

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>roster for the Bucks his first year and it's been

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>on five teams. Sense they made him look like a

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>legitimate NFL running back in the preseason. So I like

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that for Derrick Henry and Dan Lewis, who's going so

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>late he's now a value. Yeah, Dan Lewis is going

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>on draft basically, and and he's yeah, he's still about

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>he's a great value. Uh. For the Steelers, no real

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>clarity on the job to backfill Antonio Brown's production. James

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Washington provided a few big plays this preseason, but almost

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>entirely with backups. Dante Moncrief got the starting work, but

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and he looks like the starter, but he didn't even

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't show anything for that matter in his career, Doncte

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Moncrief hasn't shown anything. So I think it's still a

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>murky situation for the Steelers and we don't have a

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of clarity there. Let's go to the Falcons and

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the one thing people need to know the young offensive

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>line there, will it hold up first round pick Caleb

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>McGarry had a cardiac ablation procedure and only played in

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>one preseason game. Chris lind Stern was also a first rounder.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Starting at right guard. Center Alex has been dinged up

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Let's see if this line holds up against

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings in Week one. Yeah, that's a that's a

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>stout challenge right off the bat for them. All right,

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Bengals, Scott. Everyone knows A J.

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Green went down, so I'm not gonna go with that.

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>The running game has looked actually really good, but Rodney

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Anderson just toys a C L again to row now,

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's all mixing and g O. There are really

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>no backups, so you can draft them with confidence. Now.

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I see the offensive line really really worries me. They

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>lost first round pick. It's it's it's as this preseason,

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but I would yeah, I'm, I'm you're more might be

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>tanking for tou Fort and they might be. Yeah, things

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>go badly. Forty nine ys have utter confusion at the

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver position. I wish I could tell you now

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>there's all this clarity through training camp, but it's the

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>opposite of that. Dante Pettis was great at the end

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of last year, but he's been the subject of Kyle

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan's ire, including making Pettis play the third with the

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>third and fourth stringers. Last week, rookies Jalen Hurd and

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel looked promising and stretches. Now Hurt has got

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>an injury. Right now from this Week one, Trent Taylor

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>was going to be the starting slow receiver, but he's

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>got a foot injury. He probably won't play in a

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Week one either. Marquis Goodwin remains, but they were trying

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to cycle him out of the starting rotation, but I

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>think they got to put him in. It's still very,

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>very muddy with the wide receiver well, and there's always

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle. All right, let's go to the Cardinals. Matt

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray didn't throw a touchdown pass all preseason and

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be under pressure a lot. His escapability will

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>totally be in play a ton this season, as it

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like he'll be taking a majority of snaps from

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the shotgun, and maybe most of his snaps while trailing

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>in a game and running for his absolute life. All right,

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Jaguars. The big news is Leonard

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Fournette is getting every single starter snap in in the

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 1>preseason games, every third down, he's gained all the passing

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>game work. If healthy, there is no limit to help

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>productive he can be for fantasy this year healthy. I

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>didn't pay attention to what actually happened on Thursday night,

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>but the Jaguars were on pace to be the lowest

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>score preseason offense in NFL history. I don't remember what

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>they did on Thursday night, but they may have actually

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>set that record. Uh. Let's go to the Ravens. Justice Hill,

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>rookie running back, looks like the second best back on

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the roster and will likely get into the mix. Is

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:15.959
<v Speaker 1>a change of pace for mark Ingram. Mark Ingram has

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>never been a guy who's been a workhorse throughout his career,

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>so I think Justice Hill is going to get in

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the mix pretty regularly here um and his big play

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>potential makes him dangerous. He's not he's not a big guy.

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>He's not a big physical back, but he's got big playability,

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>so he can turn even a handful of carries potentially

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>into a solid fantasy day. Justice Hill for the Ravens.

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Bears. What's the one thing people

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>need to know. David Montgomery has looked like the best

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>rookie running back in this year's crop. He has the

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>ability to catch passes, something Jordan Howard really did not have,

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.239
<v Speaker 1>which makes the Bears less predictable. Fit. Frankly, when uh,

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>because it was Howard on the field and it was

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>a run play, and it was Treat Cohen on the

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>field and it was a pass play. Now David Montgomery

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of flips that. So I think Montgomer ends up

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>as a bell cow and Treat Cohen's just a change

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of pace guy this year. Totally agree. I got my

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>coming up to number nine a running back position. I'm

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm all in. And our last team, Scott the Chargers.

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>It's just more on Melvin Gordon. It's a it's a

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>hunch now it's it's been reported that he may be

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>back by week one, but it's going back and forth

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>every day. There's nothing concrete, so I say you still

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>got to use it decently. High pick on Austin Neckla.

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Well done, guys. That was all thirty two teams. We

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>get to take a breath for a moment. Everything chart

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is available at fanball dot com. I going to fanmball

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash charts. You get instant access to my

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>cheat sheet, my free five thousand dollar week one contest

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>our podcasts, and it's your portal to guillotine leagues again.

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Famball dot Com slash chart Coming up next, the preseason

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 1>is over, the training camps are over. We'll look at

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>every meaningful training camp battle and tell you who won

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and how important they are or aren't to your fantasy team.

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>You're sitting to Fantasy Football Weekly Fantasy Football Weekly returns.

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I am Paul Charchion. My co host are Scott Fish

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Harrison. You can find me on Twitter at

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchi and Scott Fishes at Scott Fish twenty four

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>because apparently there were twenty three other Scott Fishes that

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>came for you. Those ones are way better that we

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>prefer the other three, all of them. That's how they about.

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait till you make it and Matt Harrison

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>is at Explosive Output. And the very first show of

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this season, almost a month ago, we identified every training

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>camp battle worth tracking. Now, with the preseason behind us,

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>let's identify the winner of every battle and the fantasy

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>ramifications that come with it will begin with Scott and

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins quarterback situation. It was case Keenum versus Dwayne Haskins.

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Well case Keenum one that he's the name the starter

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for the for week one, which I love. For Trey Quinn,

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>who is a slock ey uh you know how Keenum

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>targeted targeted the slot over half the time over half

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>his past attempts in Denver and in Minnesota where Yeah,

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean he did have Adam Thielen and he did

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>have Emmanuel Sanders. He should be the best Hamilton's came

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in still, so I like that for Quinn. Great. Quinn

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>is a is a nifty last pick of your drafteper

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in PPR leagues. I could see him doing on this

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 1>show a few weeks ago. He was six catches sixty

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 1>yards kind of guy just your bye week. Can easily

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>lead that team in receptions. I think he might be

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the favorite to lead the team in receptions. Chompson Tray Quinn.

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't that be something? If it's Chris Thompson back from

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the dead, that would be great. The lowest drafted wide

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>receiver one in league. Yeah, Tray quinnan if he is

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in fact one, there um Matt Let's go to the

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Ravens wide receiver position. It was Miles Boykin versus Marquise

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Brown versus Willie Snead. Gross Is it possible that there

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>are no winners here? Because the official Ravens depth chart

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>has Snead and Seth Roberts as the starters, with uh

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Marquise Brown, Michael Floyd, Chris Moore, and Boykin as the backups.

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Brown muff two punts in the final preseason game on

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Thursday and was not targeted at all and has been

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>dealing with foot injuries all offseason. So I'm I'm cutting

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>him out. He's not on my list anymore. Boykin looked

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like the best player maybe, but I still think it's

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 1>probably a pretty good split between three or four receivers.

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess Boykin's the guy most interested in, followed by

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Snead and then maybe Michael Floyd. I feel like that

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>depth chart was in order of NFL seniority, Like, yeah,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I know that's that is not a true depth chart

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>right there, and I'm not sure it's gonna make the

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>team anyway. We'll find out Eagles running back situation. They

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>drafted Miles Sam There's Day two pick then they also

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>acquired Jordan Howard in the off season. How's the Sanders

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>versus Howard split look there? And who do you think one?

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>It is still split in fact that Darren Sprawls is

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>coming into it. It's good. It's just gonna be a

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>split Miles Sanders. I I will say, maybe it's just bias.

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought has looked the best. Uh No, that's not bias,

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that's just fact. Okay, he's looked the best. And I'm

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a noted Jordan Howard Hayter, so that doesn't help the situation.

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think by the end of the season, creamal

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>rise at the top and he'll be a fifteen touch guy.

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Is Darren Sprawls the running back you want the most?

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Out of the Philly running backs? You probably can't write.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, just PPR like, I love Darren Sprawls.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm the guy who thinks you should go to the

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame. So I mean, there's no bigger Darren Sprawls. Uh.

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know aficionado than me. But you're a sproseologist.

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I like it, um, But I don't think you're going

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>to be drafting Darren Sprowls. And you know, I love

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>what he does, and in fact that even brought him

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>back is amazing after how little he's been able to

0:23:58.240 --> 0:23:59.959
<v Speaker 1>produce the last couple of years. Let's go to Buffalo

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the running back situation. There, we were monitoring McCoy versus Gore,

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>versus yelled and versus the rookie Singletarry. Is it possible

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that there are no winners here too? Uh? Somebody starting? Well?

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Are they in the third preseason game? Wait? Are they

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>starting like Adrian Peterson started for the Saints that one

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>year for two plays? And then so in the third

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>preseason game, Shady McCoy and Gore completely split the load

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>right down the middle. Uh, they alternated series. Uh both

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>looked fine. I guess as rushers t J. Yeldon at

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>three catches for fifty one yards in the third preseason game,

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>he looked fine. Singletary looks like the future, but as

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>a log jam in front of him. Uh, I was.

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at Bill's Twitter, and it's possible that

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Yelleden gets cut on Saturday just because they're looking at

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the last running back spot and Sonora's Perry is a

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>really good special teams guy and yelled In doesn't play

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>special teams. So unless they're going to keep a sixth

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>running back in that backfield, including their fullback that they

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>have yelled in, might be the guy getting cut, But

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that somebody else might get cut. Maybe McCoy

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>gets cut. Maybe the guy who gets cut off this

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:14.479
<v Speaker 1>roster ends up in Houston. And yeah, that's right. Uh,

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>if there was one Bills running back who, if everything

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>goes just right, is the best guy to have, right

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>his season goes just just right, I think it's probably

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>still McCoy's. Probably still McCoy, isn't it. It's good because

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>he's healthy, right, so he's been dinged up for two

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>straight years. He if he comes back healthy and you

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>can get some semblance of what Lashawn McCoy was, I

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>think he would be the best out of this. But

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>everything has to go just right, including Frank Gore suddenly retiring.

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I don't know. My kid will be watching Frank

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Gore in ten years, and that's not he'll be He'll

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>be bouncing his kid on his knee, still watching Frank Gore.

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks running back situation Chris Carson versus Rashad Penny. This

0:25:56.400 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>one wasn't even close, is that even a battle. No,

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in the minds of many, I heard, I heared a

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>notable fantasy animals to him. Not gonna out on this show,

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>many say on the radio, still using this. Well, the

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks used their draft equity on Rashad Penny, so they

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>have to use them as a as a time share. No, no, no, Uh.

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson easily won that hands down. And remember the

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks ran the ball fifty five percent of the

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>time last year. In today's NFL, it was definitely a

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>league high. Carson should easily return value at that fourth

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>round ADP. Chris Carson is my number six running back,

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>so fourth round ADP is absurd. Let's go to the

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bill's wide receivers. We just Matt We just shackling

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>running games, thank you. And how about John Brown versus

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>A Jones versus Robert Foster, None of the above. It's

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Cole Beasley. He's the winner. He's the best wide receiver

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>that you want on the Bills. And uh, Cole Beasley

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is upset to he's playing with a chip on a

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>shoulder because he's furious over his Madden writing. God, but

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>he developed maybe the best chemistry with Josh Allen and

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Camp in preseason seven catches for seventy one yards in

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>three games. Uh, Foster is the guy who flashed at

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, but he's buried on that

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that depth chart. Maybe he's the fifth wide receiver. Yeah,

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's probably cold Beasley Redskins running back to Darius

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Guys versus Adrian Peterson just soon took an interesting turn

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>at the end. It really did with with putting Geiss

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in for eleven touches his first game back. It was

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a very risky move by Washington. I feel like Washington

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>generally pays it's safe with their athletes. I mean, it's

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>not like they've had multiple staff infections, bad surgeries that

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 1>a current lawsuit. Rudge rush JRG three back too quickly,

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, but this one, it really does feel

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 1>like a split. They paid Peterson a lot of money.

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna want to keep guys somewhat healthy. I think

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a legitimate sp Alright, let's go

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to the charges running back situation. There, we were looking

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:59.479
<v Speaker 1>at Melvin Gordon's contract against Austin Ekeler and Justin Jackson.

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>No new clarity there. Yeah, after Thursday's preseason game, GM

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Tom Talsco said that he prides himself on having solutions

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to problems, but he doesn't have a solution to the

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon problem. So it's still Austin Ekeler as the

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>winner right now. All right, let's go to the Bucks

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Peyton Barber versus Ronald Jones. A lot of

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones apologists out there. No, no, No, one point

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>six yards per carry Ronald Jones from last year. No thanks,

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it's Peyton Barber. He won this. But look out for

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Darya gun bow Wally uh. He he might steal some

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>third down work. And there's beat reporters they're even talking

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 1>about he might take some first and second down work.

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>He's he's coming up out of nowhere. That's hope the best. Yeah,

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that good one. Dolphins running back situation, Kenyan Drake versus

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Calin Balage. Well, Drake missed two weeks of practice with

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a foot injury, but when he came back on Monday,

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he looked explosive and sharp in practice, and klin Blage

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>had twelve carries for seventeen yards as a starter to

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>catch us for negative two yards. He lost the job. Yeah,

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he did to Ken is a plotting, shiftless, boring,

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>uncreative runner who will only give what his offensive line

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>can give him. How do you really feel? And his

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>offensive line won't get him in running the forty Niners

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>running back situation, it was Coleman versus Breeda versus McKinnon. Well,

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>McKinnon has a better chance of being on I R

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>than starting they put him on IR Yep. Just Thursday.

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he's on i R. Okay Friday, Uh, Tevin

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Coleman and Matt Breda have been splitting. Breda has looked

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>much better in the preseason. Breda will not go away.

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is a pretty decent split between

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>these two. This year, Breed is more explosive and I

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>like him better. Uh. Ryan Fitzpatrick versus Josh Rosen. As

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>we're going back through a training camp battles from our

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>first show of the of the year and now giving

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you the answers to all the battles that we were watching.

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Were now in Miami for the quarterback situation. Fitzpatrick v

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Rosen stupid does the winner and he gets to face

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>four playoff teams in a row. Baltimore, New England Dallas

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Chargers. Then a bye week. Boy, then Josh

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Rosen starts in week six. That sounds like it, all right,

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Packers. Markis Velde's scantling versus Geronimo Allison. Uh,

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>this one, I think that MVS has probably won it,

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but they both kind of win because the Packers use

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 1>three wide receiver sets sixty five percent of the time,

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and if you only count passing plays, it's like top

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>five in the league. So they're both gonna be on

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the field. Geronimo Elson is going to be your safe,

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>big slot guy, and at this point of his career,

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not explosive anymore, so that's why he's being moved inside. Uh,

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>MVS can play inside and outside. He's the explosive guy.

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>He's the big play guy. Uh, he's the speed guy.

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call him the winner, although they both kind

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of win because they're gonna both give me on the field. Alright,

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Final one Patriots second receiver spot. It was originally nikkil

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Harry versus Mary Thomas versus Philip Dorsett is Maurice Harris

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and the winner is Josh Yes, Josh Gordon. We didn't

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>see that one coming. Maybe the runner up is Jacoby Myers,

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, who had twenty catches, two and fifty

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>three yards and two touchdowns in the preseason. Now five

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>deep at wide receiver. How about that? That is? That

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>is very very deep. Uh, You've probably are just talking about.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine League's the hottest new format in fantasy sports. Seventeen

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>teams and each week the low scoring team gets cut

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>from the league and their entire roster goes to the

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire. It makes for absolutely insane waiver wire runs.

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>You can learn more and even join the Guillotine League

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>by going to Guillotine League dot com powered by fanball

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. Coming up next, it's Three Tough Questions. I

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>will pepper our panel with three tough questions. You play

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>along at home, see if you can go three and Oh,

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you are listening to Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul Charchi,

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Ma Coast Are, Scott Fish and Matt Harrison from fanball

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. You can hear us over the year on

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>many stations around the country, and this show is also

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a podcast available every Friday and all the major podcasting platforms,

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>including the number one destination for podcasts, The I Heart

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>radio app boys, it is time to get into the

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>grinder with three tough questions. Listeners you can play along

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>see if you can go three and oh. Tough question

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>number one, how much does the retirement of Andrew Luck

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>hurt the value of the rest of the notable Colts players,

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly Marlon mack, t Y Hilton, Eric Ebron a lot,

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a little or not at all, Scott a little but

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>not much. Uh. This is a different coaching staff from

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>when U Brissette last played in two thousand seventeen. I

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>trust Frank right. I actually kind of love Frank Reich honestly.

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I like the way it calls. Uh, it's a way

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>better old line. There were a bottom ten old line,

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>then their top five oh line. Now. Uh, Andrew Luck

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>almost never got hit last last year, so we can

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>expect Jacob be Prissette to have some time back there. Uh.

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>They're just a better team and they have a lot

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>more wet weapons. That line is gonna be still gonna

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>be great, so Max should be okay. He may not

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>get quite as many scoring opportunities. Brissette in college targeted

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>tight ends twice over twice as much as the national average,

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and during the preseason over twice as much as the

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>NFL average in the preseason, so he seems to like

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends. That might be good for the tight

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>ends currently in Indie. Um losing a Hall of Hall

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of Famer caliber quarterback like Luck him, it's gonna be

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a downgrade. So it's got you gotta say a little.

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Brissett's not gonna throw thirty nine touchdown passes

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>like Andrew Luck did. But it's just a little. I

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>think I think all those players are gonna do just fine.

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt Um, I think Scott's nailed it. It's

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a little and Um. I I have some tight

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>end love that I want to give here too, but

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to save it for a guy I have

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>later in the show. You're marked as a sleeper, So

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with a little and and say, did

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>out of fish? You know what I should add? Frank

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Raik used the fed the tight ends a lot stop stop,

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:21.240
<v Speaker 1>so I said I had stuff for later. You keep talking.

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>The The correct answer is, in fact a little. I

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>tipped my hand on this earlier, and for many of

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the reasons Scott already raised. You're finding right now that

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>all of these players have dropped roughly around or half

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>around down in value. I think that's that's you know,

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm still interested in those guys can find value here,

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you can, Yeah, you can find some value here. Marlon

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Mack still with somebody was very excited about before, Still

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>am I don't. I don't think he gets affected by

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this as much as everybody else either, So there's still

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot to like. And remember this is an elite,

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 1>an elite offensive line that's gonna especially I think for

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Mack, just continue to open up polls like the

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would have. Anybody can do the handoff. Let's go

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>to tough question number two. Cam Newton's foot injury has

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.760
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of fantasy owners rattled. Are you buying

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>low or are you just glad you didn't draft him?

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Charge This was a tough one. How tough, Matt Well,

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>My hypothalamus has been uh severely damaged. Yeah. I have

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>lost uh my my sleep and wake cycle, the control

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of my appetite, my regulating of body temperature, and controlling

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>how I produce and release hormones. It's a lot of

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>explains why you're not wearing pants. You could be the

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>hormones or the temperature one of the two. I'll let

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you decide. A lack of mobility sounds like it hurts Cam,

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's actually made the Panthers throw more. When Cam

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>was dinged up in his first game back, he threw

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>forty seven passes in that game. They kept him in

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the pocket, and they kept him throwing. Last year, when

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>he injured his shoulder, he threw over forty pass attempts

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in weeks thirteen and fourteen after he injured the shoulder.

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:06.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a little reckless, actually, it's weird. It's worth noting

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that all of his productive stats last year happened in

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the season. When he was healthy.

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>He had eleven straight games of two or more passing touchdowns.

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Then he got hurt. But I'm not that worried. I

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>think I think that means more dump offs and more

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 1>short passes for Cam. So I'm on by low mode. Alright,

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you're buying Scott. Yeah, I just don't see that his

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>prices dropped that much. His ADP really hasn't come off

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the ninth round. Maybe some owners of him and trades

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>make are a little worried, but I would buy low

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. I'm not worried about it. He's already shed

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the walking boot. I know he hasn't practiced yet, but

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 1>he's a gamer. He'll be He'll be ready to go

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 1>for a week one. I do have concerns that maybe

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the rushing numbers won't be there early in the season,

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>but I think they think later in the season he'll

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 1>be fine. That offensive line is a big, big X

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>factor that worries me. I think Cam's gonna that's a

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 1>big lot of and that part concerns me a great deal.

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Cams not somebody who's got that innate clock in his

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>head about when to get rid of the ball. I

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's savvy that way, and I think he's

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna absorb a lot of hits in this Still, his

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>value so low in the ninth round, and I do

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>like the emerging receivers that he's got, so I am

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>buying low on him. But as most is playing one

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback leagues, unfortunately we like QB flex. I'm backing him up.

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:22.879
<v Speaker 1>He might even be my backup in the ninth round,

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'm backing him up with with another viable quarterbacks.

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I do worry about that offensive line. Still correct answer,

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>buying low tough question. Number three. By the way, if

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you're playing in one QB leagues, moved to super flax

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, or vote in your league to do it

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>next year. But get that and get that going, get

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it going. It's you know, the premise is just really

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the simple there's about twenty good fantasy quarterbacks out there, twenty,

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so the position just has no value when you're starting

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>ten and ten of them are starting, there's just no value.

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't in a one quarterback league. You can't trade

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan or Baker Mayfield or Aaron Rodgers for any

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>thing of value. You go into a super flex league,

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the only one you could trade is Mahomes. That's the

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>only one where people think that there's a level up

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:11.879
<v Speaker 1>in value. That's the only guy you could trade. That's lame.

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Four years in a row. Out of the four years,

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>three years I didn't draft quarterback. I won the league

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:20.360
<v Speaker 1>twice in that In my homeland. Also, when Andrew Luck retired,

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>people in one quarterback leagues just shrugged. Didn't really hurt

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:27.399
<v Speaker 1>whatever super flex leagues that hurt him. It's it's almost panic.

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>You lose a Hall of Fame calibert quarterback that's throws

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:32.720
<v Speaker 1>three nine touchdowns in a one QB league. You're like, Okay,

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>I lost Andrew Luck in the Scott Fish Bowl and

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm panicking. Yeah, Yeah, that's super flex right there. Tough

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>question number three this week on National Radio, Lamar Jackson

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:46.720
<v Speaker 1>said that he won't run is often and he plans

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to throw thirty passes a game. Does your outlook for

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Jackson go up down or stay the same? Scott? It

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>stays the same for me. I mean, we're talking about

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy who broke the NFL record keep you rush

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>attempts in just seven games last year. Of course, he

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to lower that number. He wasn't gonna run

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>quite as much per game at that pace. By the way,

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>he would have on a sixteen page, he would have

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>been the number three ye rusher in the NFL with

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 1>how much he was running. He averaged twenty four past

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>steps per game. So this is really only six more

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.839
<v Speaker 1>attempts per game if he's running a little less. I'm

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>not worried because the Ravens, they they led the league

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in plays per game at seventy one plays per game.

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>They have a lot of plays out there. He's still

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna runs. He's easily in my top ten and check

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this stat out for for Mr Lamar Jackson here charge Uh,

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>nine running backs since nineteen seventy two have rushed for

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>over seven hundred yards. Now, Lamar Jackson was just a

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>few yards shy of that last year. I think that's

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>forty three yards of game. Forty four yards game. You

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 1>think he gets that, right? I can't answer them. I

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>can't give you the answer. But yeah, okay, maybe nine

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks have rushed for seven hundred plus yards in the season.

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Seven finished in the top five, eight finished in the

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>top seven, and vic finished in two. It's basically a

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed top twelve finish if he gets seven rushing yards

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>forty four game, it's happening. Matt ditto. Okay, he had

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>so so many of my stats there, it's great. I

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>will add that he averaged fourteen rushing attempts in his

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>last seven games of the year last year. Uh, that

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 1>number does have to go down. He he can't simply

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 1>run that much. So if you're putting the ball in

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 1>his hands to throw more, that's good for Lamar Jackson

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 1>because he's looked good in the preseason with the dink

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 1>and dunk stuff. I don't think that they really wanted

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to open it up and show anything. And John Harbaugh

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>says that this offense is about to revolutionize the NFL.

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>That might be coach speak, but let's let's let's give

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it a ride and see what happens. You can say

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>that you're gonna throw thirty passes a game in August. Yeah,

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>when push comes to shove and you need first down

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and you need your quarterback to do what he does

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 1>what he does, they're going to run the ball. That's

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 1>all planning stuff. Greg Romans the offensive coordinator, running genius,

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's the most run oriented coordinator there probably is.

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So I don't believe that there they actually will throw

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty times per game. That sounds nice, but in reality

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it won't happen. My outlook for Jackson basically can't go

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>up any higher. He's been in my top seven base

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>all preseason. He's my number seven quarterback now the nine

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>top seven yep. Uh So the correct answer your outlook

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 1>for Jackson stays the same. By the way, my first

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>line on here that I didn't say, I'll believe it

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>when I see it. Yeah, exactly, that's that's exactly. That

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>is exactly right. Guys, we got a couple of minutes

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>left in in this segment. Let's talk about this. Give me.

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>We've a couple of weeks ago, we did a segment

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we call the reach around, where it's one player you

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 1>would reach around early to go get. I want the

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 1>opposite of that. I want you to give me a

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>player in the first few rounds that will do round

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:59.439
<v Speaker 1>one first that you would not take until at least

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>around eight or beyond. So a player who's going at

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 1>least one round two early. We'll call it the push around,

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna sing Matchbox twenty while we do it.

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Are we starting in round one? We're starting in round one.

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I want the round one player, Matt, you can go first.

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:16.439
<v Speaker 1>I want the round one player you would not take

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>in round one and wouldn't consider until round two. I'm

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>simply not taking Ezekiel Elliott in drafts right now because

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think I'm gonna get him for six weeks. Okay, yeah,

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna buy the Yeah, man, I have some stats

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>on that, but I can't remember right now. So yeah,

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it's Elliott with me too. I'd rather have him in

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 1>round two like all the first rounders that's Elliott. I'm

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>going James Conner was going at the end of the

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:40.399
<v Speaker 1>first round. You never liked him, No, I liked him

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>five verse half of last year, and now I think

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it's way more of a time share than people realize.

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:46.400
<v Speaker 1>And even though Connor look good in the preseason, I

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna see a lot of Jalen Samuel's round.

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 1>To give me a player who's going in the second

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>round who you wouldn't touch until round three or beyond Matt,

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say Joe Mixon, who's going in the middle

0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of that round. I've got him later in a lot

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of a so far this year. But I just fear

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:05.319
<v Speaker 1>that that offense is just going to be so bad

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>with a j Green hurt. Andy Dalton is not a

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:09.439
<v Speaker 1>very good quarterback. That line is kind of a mess.

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>They're going to hand them the ball a lot, but

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to be very successful. So

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna push him down to at least the third

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or fourth before I take him. Scott, it's Antonio Brown

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:20.919
<v Speaker 1>for me. That's just too early. I like every wide

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver in that round better. I like some of the

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in the next round better. I even like

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:28.399
<v Speaker 1>a fourth round wide receiver two better than Antonio Brown,

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>So it's easily him. Yeah, you took my one A

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 1>and my one bin and Antonio Brown two guys. I'm

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 1>nervous about, very nervous about, very quickly round three. Give

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>me a player in round three that you're not going

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to take in round three you would not take in

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>round three and one consider until round number four. I

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:47.320
<v Speaker 1>think that would have to be Josh Jacobs. I just

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in what the Raiders are doing as an offense.

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to be a disaster. To offensive

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>line is terrible. Yeah, good point. Yeah, I think that's

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 1>where i'd go to Josh Jacobs. Marii Cooper, former Raider.

0:43:57.760 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't like a comedy add feet and wide receiver.

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>No bueno. I'm I'm showing caution there. Give me Michael

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Gallop seven rounds later instead. That's my That is my

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>angle coming up next. Let's answer uh oh, we just

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 1>did that. Let's go through a draft using three different

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 1>types of strategies, a safe draft, a bounce back draft,

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and a high risk draft. The one you prefer will

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>tell you a lot about the strategy. You should employ

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 1>for your own draft. Will go through the safe, bounce

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>back and high risk, high reward drafts. After this, it's

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm Paul Georgian, co owner of fanball

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>dot Com My Sidekicks Today, Matt Harrison, Scott Fish. Guys,

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk for a moment about a drafting

0:44:56.280 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 1>persona or a drafting archetype, or a drafting philosophy, and

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:04.839
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna break down six of them in total, three now,

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 1>beginning with a predominantly safe draft, boring draft. A boring draft.

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Safe safe sound a lot better, doesn't safe sound a

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 1>lot People like, Yeah, let's get boring in here. And

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:20.800
<v Speaker 1>then we'll flip it over and do the risky draft,

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 1>high risk, high reward draft, which I think tends to

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 1>sound a lot sex here. Assume it's all gonna go well,

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't always. And then we'll do a bounce

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>back draft filled with players that are coming off of

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 1>disappointing seasons or injury seasons or something whatever went wrong

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 1>last year and now the opportunity to come back and

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 1>be meaningful players. So then, as listeners, I think you

0:45:43.080 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 1>want to listen just at the end of the day,

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>listen to the lineup that was created taking one player

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>from every round, and do you like this starting lineup?

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I've confined it to the starting lineups? Do you like

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this starting lineup? This appeals to you, then you should

0:45:56.800 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>employ a safe draft, for example. So let's begin there,

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the safe draft, and that is Matt. No, it's Scott, Sorry, Scott,

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:07.879
<v Speaker 1>he's doing safety. The safety I did safe so many

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:09.719
<v Speaker 1>years in a row. I'm sick of it. I want

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to get risky. Do you want me a list of

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 1>my seven starters? First? Do you just want me to

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 1>go down the line cube, give me the quarterback. I

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 1>don't need to get the rounds. Just give me the

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 1>starting lineup. And how that sounds? You can? You can?

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:22.320
<v Speaker 1>You can tell us why you made each pick briefly,

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:25.359
<v Speaker 1>all right, my quarterback. I want to tell the rounds too,

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:28.959
<v Speaker 1>because it's important my quarterback. We did the first seven

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>rounds of a DP. So my quarterback I drafted in

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>round seven because that is the latest I was allowed

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to draft a quarterback in this scenario. And it took

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. Once that's not boring, Well, was awfully excited.

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>That's who I took in the risky draft. Okay, what's

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>boring about him? Okay, here are the options. Deshaun Watson

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth, Baker Mayfield in the seventh. About Patrick

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes in the second, that Matt Ryan in the seventh?

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 1>What about Matt Ryan? As about it just safe? I

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>mean that right down the middle, the fairways safe. I

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>think Baker's a little more safe. But we're talking about

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 1>guys with that are known commodities. Baker has been in

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the in the league one year. We know what Matt

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Ryan's all about. It's safe production alright, Alright, Matt Ryan, job,

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>he forced me to. We're talking about a guy who

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:26.280
<v Speaker 1>has four thousand plus yards every year since two thousand eleven.

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the last time he missed a game, Avatar

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>was in the theater. Wow. Seriously, yep, So Matt Ryan,

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan, he just always plays fished that movie a

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>pile of steaming dawnels. Oh god, so bad. I never

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:45.960
<v Speaker 1>saw it be glad. Okay, all right, so your quarterback

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is Matt Ryan. Yep, alright, my running back is going

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to stay on the same team. Apparently. Devata Freeman super boring.

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:57.319
<v Speaker 1>But even though he only played two games last year

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 1>and missed most of the season. Before that, he'd only

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 1>missed three total games in his first In the first

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>four seasons, he had even more total yards and eight

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 1>or more total touchdowns in each of those three years.

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:10.720
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the two before he missed were plus touchdowns

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and thirteen plus touchdowns plus yards and plus yards, sorry,

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and thirteen plus touchdowns in those two You are doing safe,

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 1>boring draft strategy, all right, So that's one of your

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:28.279
<v Speaker 1>starting running backs. Yeah, so my other starting running back

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>really my only choices in the round. I was going

0:48:30.880 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 1>our Duke Johnson and James White. You want to tell

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:36.719
<v Speaker 1>me which one is more boring? There? Um, James, you

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 1>know what you're getting with James White for sure, right right? James.

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>James White was a top twelve running back in PPR

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>last year. The New England team passes to the running

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 1>back more than just about any team in the NFL.

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh safe pick there. Round one. I took Michael Thomas

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 1>from my starting wide receiver. Super safe. Can't get more safe.

0:48:57.320 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 1>At least four receptions in every game last year, thirteen

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 1>games of six or more targets, double digit fantasy points

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in fourteen games, seventy five yards and or a touchdown

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in ten games. He's just safe. He's consuper Julian Edelman

0:49:10.160 --> 0:49:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Round four, my otherwide receiver, super safe, super boring. I

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 1>just could never pull the trigger on him, but I

0:49:16.160 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 1>should because he's averaged over six receptions per game for

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:23.440
<v Speaker 1>five consecutive years he played. He played because you know,

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I don't think he's a risk. He had

0:49:27.560 --> 0:49:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a torn a c L he miss here, so he's

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:33.399
<v Speaker 1>even the suspension year. He averaged six receptions per game

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:35.959
<v Speaker 1>that year, catches a lot of balls at least fifty

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 1>yards are touchdown in eleven of the twelve games he

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>played last year. Super consistent guy. Round two. I took

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey because when you're thinking, he's not a boring pick,

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but he's as safe and super possibly calm at that

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:53.440
<v Speaker 1>end position. And then from my flex position, I actually

0:49:53.520 --> 0:49:56.800
<v Speaker 1>think Robby Anderson is really really silly and I you

0:49:56.880 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>don't agree, Well, I just a historic he has not

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>been safe. You're projecting safeness on to him. Last year

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>he had at least five targets in all but two games,

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 1>fourteen games of at least five targets. The targets catches

0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that they have that would be the better question. I

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:16.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I worry. I worry. Five targets tarted into

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:19.719
<v Speaker 1>two catches. He scored three times in the final four

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:22.200
<v Speaker 1>games last year, average eighty four yards per game that stretch.

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:24.319
<v Speaker 1>He had at least seven targets in seven to last

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:27.359
<v Speaker 1>eight games last year. All right, well just that, all right,

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:29.719
<v Speaker 1>So there's your gift. Just zip through the whole the

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>whole thing one more time, super fast. The safe draft

0:50:32.560 --> 0:50:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan, DeVonta Freeman, James White, Michael Thomas, Julian Edelman,

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey, Robby Anderson. All right, if you like that,

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that is that you. If you like that roster, you

0:50:42.800 --> 0:50:46.759
<v Speaker 1>can emulate a safe down the middle approach. Now, let's

0:50:46.760 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 1>flip it over to Matt for the opposite side of this,

0:50:49.480 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>The risky, high risk, high reward draft. These are all

0:50:53.160 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>players with a lot of upside, potentially a lot of downside. Matt,

0:50:56.920 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 1>who you? Who do? I want to go in order

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of how I drafted him, and then I'll summarize it

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>at the end because I think it's gonna work really well.

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:09.399
<v Speaker 1>First round Ezekiel Elliott. Yeah, obviously that's high risk as yeah,

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:11.840
<v Speaker 1>might not play this season, might be the top running

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:14.719
<v Speaker 1>back on the board, and uh, we will probably find

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 1>out whether or not he's playing, you know, in a

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 1>few days. Uh. Second round Antonio Brown wide receiver, downgrade

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to Oakland. However, he could get a hundred and eighty

0:51:25.719 --> 0:51:28.840
<v Speaker 1>targets from Derrek Carr this year. It's possible that they

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:31.319
<v Speaker 1>just target him over and over and over. Also, he's

0:51:31.360 --> 0:51:35.800
<v Speaker 1>really good. He has really good um. Third round Leonard

0:51:35.840 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>four Net, great player when not injured and missing team photos.

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But the risk here is he's maybe the only good

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 1>offensive weapon on the Jaguars, and they could just load

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the boxes with nine guys and try to stop him. Uh.

0:51:50.360 --> 0:51:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Fourth round running back Melvin Gordon also might not play

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>this year, but he was a top eight a DP

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>player just a few months ago, So there's the huge

0:51:59.200 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 1>upside there. Uh. In the fifth round, tight end O J.

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Howard the Bruce Arians offense, Cameron Brad is kind of

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a tight end touchdown vulture for O. J. Howard. However,

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 1>sky is the limit for this offense. This offense might

0:52:13.360 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 1>be just trending hugely upward. In the sixth round, Josh

0:52:17.600 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Gordon at a wide receiver. He'll be my flex. He

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 1>could be the top wide receiver in the Tom Brady offense.

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:24.840
<v Speaker 1>But he could smoke up one time and leave the

0:52:24.960 --> 0:52:28.320
<v Speaker 1>NFL forever. He could be done. And as I mentioned before,

0:52:28.520 --> 0:52:30.799
<v Speaker 1>my high risk quarterback is in the seventh round. That's

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. The upside is the top overall quarterback is.

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>The downside is that offensive line took a couple of

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 1>steps backwards of this offseason and there could be a

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sophomore slump. We might have just seen the heat from

0:52:43.520 --> 0:52:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Freddie Kitchens last year. It just could go backwards. So

0:52:48.280 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 1>my lineup is quarterback Baker Mayfield, running backs Zeke Leonard,

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:57.840
<v Speaker 1>four Nett, Melvin Gordon, uh Antonio Brown, and wide receiver

0:52:58.120 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Josh Gordon. Those are my two wide out and then

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:03.160
<v Speaker 1>O J. Howard as a tight end. You get the feeling,

0:53:03.200 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you know everything clicked with that team. Oh man, you'd

0:53:05.719 --> 0:53:09.400
<v Speaker 1>absolutely crush you demolish every one of those guys you

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:12.359
<v Speaker 1>hit the side. But that is a lot to ask.

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's remember, by the way, with Zeke and Melvin Gordon,

0:53:15.040 --> 0:53:17.840
<v Speaker 1>your real worst case scenario isn't missing a whole season.

0:53:18.400 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 1>They will come back in Week ten because they have

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to get their year of service so they get so

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:26.239
<v Speaker 1>they can do another year towards free agency, so you're

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, there really isn't a scenario where they do

0:53:28.320 --> 0:53:30.840
<v Speaker 1>not come back when they miss the whole season. That

0:53:31.000 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 1>last less year that was a different said he wasn't

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:37.360
<v Speaker 1>under contract, so he didn't have that, he didn't have

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to do that. There are going to be some Zeke

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Gordon Elliott teams out there. I think they probably will,

0:53:41.800 --> 0:53:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's it's not it's not impossible strategy,

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just very, very risky. Now I could have taken

0:53:49.000 --> 0:53:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to Gurley in the second round too. I've got the

0:53:56.080 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 1>bounce back draft. So my drafting persona here is somebody

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that wants to cash in on a player who had

0:54:01.920 --> 0:54:05.040
<v Speaker 1>an unusually bad year last year and it's got a

0:54:05.080 --> 0:54:07.960
<v Speaker 1>lot more upside this year, whether it's a production or

0:54:08.040 --> 0:54:11.320
<v Speaker 1>injury related or in things like that. Correct. Now, most

0:54:11.400 --> 0:54:14.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy players succumb to this this thing where they just

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 1>can't stop replaying last year and really have a hard

0:54:18.560 --> 0:54:23.480
<v Speaker 1>time visualizing a materially different season this year. So part

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:25.279
<v Speaker 1>of our exercise here is to sort of break you

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:27.120
<v Speaker 1>out of that mold and looking for ways in which

0:54:27.200 --> 0:54:29.799
<v Speaker 1>these guys could be better this season. In the first

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:33.240
<v Speaker 1>round of my bounce back draft. I took David Johnson,

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:35.399
<v Speaker 1>coming off a disappointing season which he was the top

0:54:35.480 --> 0:54:38.360
<v Speaker 1>three or four running back last year. It was disappointing.

0:54:39.320 --> 0:54:41.080
<v Speaker 1>He was still and he wasn't top ten running back,

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:43.320
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't the season everybody expected by by a

0:54:43.400 --> 0:54:47.080
<v Speaker 1>long shot. The vast misuse by Mike McCoy who who

0:54:47.440 --> 0:54:49.319
<v Speaker 1>just ran them up the middle over and over again,

0:54:49.360 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and he just you know, in you so so poorly.

0:54:52.600 --> 0:54:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Now a totally different offense that seems dedicated with getting

0:54:56.560 --> 0:54:58.480
<v Speaker 1>him the ball more often. I think there's gonna be

0:54:58.480 --> 0:55:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of plays where Kyler Murray Murray behind a

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:04.359
<v Speaker 1>bad offensive line, play breaks down, he's running for his life,

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and here's David Johnson in the flat, easy six yard past.

0:55:09.160 --> 0:55:11.839
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson turns up field and goes like ninety two

0:55:11.880 --> 0:55:16.240
<v Speaker 1>yards for touchdown. Yeah, easy problem. Yes, Round one David Johnson.

0:55:16.440 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Round two, Dalvin Cook on a bounce back here right

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:23.320
<v Speaker 1>one of my he's my currently my number four ranked

0:55:23.440 --> 0:55:26.840
<v Speaker 1>running back. Vikings offense is being sculpted to him his image.

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:28.840
<v Speaker 1>So the only problem here is is he would have

0:55:28.920 --> 0:55:31.279
<v Speaker 1>taken him over David Johnson. I would have taken over

0:55:31.440 --> 0:55:33.600
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson, but the ADP says, I gotta go David

0:55:33.680 --> 0:55:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Johnson first. I would have I like him better than

0:55:36.000 --> 0:55:39.480
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. Uh Dalvin Cook. He's the history of injury

0:55:39.560 --> 0:55:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is well known here. But when healthy, absolutely explosive, he

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:46.359
<v Speaker 1>will not give up goal line carries anybody. This year,

0:55:46.400 --> 0:55:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe that will be his job as well. Round

0:55:49.280 --> 0:55:52.640
<v Speaker 1>three of my bounce back draft is also a running back,

0:55:53.160 --> 0:55:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and it is Leonard Fournette. Matt took most of the

0:55:55.520 --> 0:55:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Leonard Fournette steam for me. You know the soft tissue

0:55:58.160 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 1>injuries you lived at last year, that's the downside. Matt

0:56:00.760 --> 0:56:03.440
<v Speaker 1>identified the upside. He bounce back and risky kind of

0:56:03.480 --> 0:56:05.960
<v Speaker 1>go hand in hand a little bit. Round number four

0:56:06.120 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladay for moreen Kenny Golladay, Let's go to the

0:56:09.200 --> 0:56:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish baby tron desk. What do you think? I

0:56:12.080 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 1>think he's awesome. The bounce back is because last year

0:56:17.719 --> 0:56:20.160
<v Speaker 1>was a down season in which that offense was really

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:24.120
<v Speaker 1>struggling and injured. Matthew Stafford. The running game wasn't clicking.

0:56:24.160 --> 0:56:27.600
<v Speaker 1>The passing game he was hurt by the trade. No

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Golden Date, they had no Marvin Jones. And so defenses

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:34.040
<v Speaker 1>were just planning to stop stop Kenny Golladay, still Scott's

0:56:34.120 --> 0:56:37.320
<v Speaker 1>youngest son's middle name is Golladay. It's really weird. His

0:56:37.360 --> 0:56:42.160
<v Speaker 1>first name is Baby. In the fifth round, I took

0:56:42.200 --> 0:56:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup coming off in my bounce back draft, coming

0:56:45.960 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 1>off of the a c L injury suffered last November.

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:50.919
<v Speaker 1>He looked spry. I think he's ready to come back

0:56:51.000 --> 0:56:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to the type of season that he was having, hopefully

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:56.640
<v Speaker 1>where he was on pace for one touchdown per game

0:56:56.760 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 1>last year. Then in the sixth round, Hunter Henry. We

0:56:59.600 --> 0:57:01.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen him in a year, so obviously prime for

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a bounce back at the tight end position, averaging happy

0:57:05.080 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game like Hunter Henry, a former first round pick.

0:57:08.920 --> 0:57:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Plenty of upside in a bounce back season for Hunter Henry.

0:57:12.040 --> 0:57:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And then in the seventh round, as alluded to earlier,

0:57:14.480 --> 0:57:18.360
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite quarterbacks, Carson Wentz other injury plague season.

0:57:18.400 --> 0:57:20.640
<v Speaker 1>After an injury plague season, a lot of people are

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 1>too gun shy to pull the trigger on him. I'm not.

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I love him this season and think he set on

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a potentially m VP caliber season for Carson Wentz and

0:57:29.640 --> 0:57:31.960
<v Speaker 1>he's my bounce back quarterback. So the lineup looks like

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz into David Johnson and Dalvin Cook and Leonard

0:57:35.640 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Fournett are running back. I think we're in a good spot.

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:40.919
<v Speaker 1>So my wide receivers are Kenny Golladay and Cooper Cup

0:57:41.520 --> 0:57:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and my tight end is Hunter Henry. What do you

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think I'd like a little more depth at the wide

0:57:46.080 --> 0:57:49.720
<v Speaker 1>receiver position. There, it's a it's a very draft. It

0:57:49.840 --> 0:57:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is at you like that draft, alright? That's the bounce

0:57:54.920 --> 0:57:57.400
<v Speaker 1>back draft, and that's as straight. If you like the listeners,

0:57:57.440 --> 0:57:59.320
<v Speaker 1>if you like the sound of that, you can go

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:04.320
<v Speaker 1>employ the bounce back strategy with your draft and that

0:58:04.360 --> 0:58:07.000
<v Speaker 1>would certainly be something that I ended up liking this.

0:58:07.160 --> 0:58:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I like the sound of this team. But there's risks,

0:58:09.440 --> 0:58:11.480
<v Speaker 1>by the way, with all these picks. Cooper Cup top

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 1>five and red zone targets each of the last two

0:58:13.360 --> 0:58:16.440
<v Speaker 1>years when and that's not changing because he converted him.

0:58:16.920 --> 0:58:20.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it wasn't just targets, it was touchdowns. There's

0:58:20.960 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 1>three there, you go, three different draft day personas. But

0:58:23.600 --> 0:58:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we're not done. We've got three more for you. We'll

0:58:26.120 --> 0:58:29.000
<v Speaker 1>take a look at a quarterback heavy draft orientation. Maybe

0:58:29.000 --> 0:58:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you're in a super flexily or whatever. I'll show you

0:58:31.240 --> 0:58:34.360
<v Speaker 1>what a do the opposite draft looks like, and Matt

0:58:34.360 --> 0:58:36.480
<v Speaker 1>will show you what happens when you stack players from

0:58:36.520 --> 0:58:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the NFL's hottest offenses. And as a reminder, go to

0:58:39.640 --> 0:58:42.440
<v Speaker 1>fanball dot com slash charge for my free cheat sheet

0:58:42.760 --> 0:58:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and my free Week one contest with a five thousand

0:58:46.240 --> 0:58:49.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar prize pool. It is free to enter for week

0:58:49.320 --> 0:58:52.280
<v Speaker 1>number one fanball dot Com slash chart. We are back

0:58:52.360 --> 0:59:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in moments. It is a pre season additional fantasy football weekly.

0:59:16.280 --> 0:59:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Paul charge in. We've got three more draft day

0:59:19.840 --> 0:59:24.720
<v Speaker 1>personas to run by you, beginning with a quarterback heavy approach,

0:59:25.160 --> 0:59:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish. Let's see how these rosters end up looking

0:59:28.960 --> 0:59:33.200
<v Speaker 1>when you prioritize quarterbacks in your draft and my prioritizing

0:59:33.320 --> 0:59:36.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks like a super flex league. Yes, ideally it is

0:59:36.480 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 1>super flex league because that's the way people should play.

0:59:38.920 --> 0:59:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Is super flex I like to put out there. I mean,

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:43.720
<v Speaker 1>lots of lots of articles have been written on this,

0:59:43.840 --> 0:59:46.880
<v Speaker 1>but six point to four point passing touchdowns don't change

0:59:46.880 --> 0:59:49.640
<v Speaker 1>your draft strategy. So drill down on that for a second,

0:59:49.680 --> 0:59:52.040
<v Speaker 1>because most people do believe that if I'm in a

0:59:52.160 --> 0:59:56.160
<v Speaker 1>six point passing league, I need to go a couple

0:59:56.200 --> 0:59:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of rounds earlier on my draft, so or in my auctions,

0:59:58.240 --> 0:59:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I gotta spend a few extra bucks on these guy

1:00:00.560 --> 1:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>so help people understand why they shouldn't change their strategy.

1:00:04.080 --> 1:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a buck or two extra on the heavy touchdown scores,

1:00:06.920 --> 1:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but generally you use it. You use that difference, that

1:00:09.760 --> 1:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>four to six difference in valuing one player towards another

1:00:13.920 --> 1:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>for a trade. For like if if two players are

1:00:17.280 --> 1:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty evenly priced, sure look, or especially in start six

1:00:20.600 --> 1:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>situations in a six verses four use the player that

1:00:23.720 --> 1:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you think might score more touchdowns. But the top twelve,

1:00:27.000 --> 1:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>if you take out my homes, because that was just

1:00:28.640 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>such an anomaly year uh two through twelve last year

1:00:33.120 --> 1:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>had an average point per game difference of under one.

1:00:36.560 --> 1:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>The standard deviation is under one point point. Yeah, undervariously

1:00:40.600 --> 1:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>standard deviat that's nothing. I would not have guessed that. Yeah,

1:00:44.040 --> 1:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean some of them are like one point six five,

1:00:46.520 --> 1:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>one point seven five, But the standard deviation, like a

1:00:49.720 --> 1:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>average model out is under a point difference that can

1:00:52.400 --> 1:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>be made up by streaming. That can be made up.

1:00:54.920 --> 1:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, it's a one quarterback league. You don't

1:00:56.800 --> 1:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to draft the stud of studs you can.

1:01:00.280 --> 1:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>You can match up play it. So don't don't adjust

1:01:03.520 --> 1:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>your draft strategy too much at all for QB heaving

1:01:06.240 --> 1:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>for a six four point Alright, that's great data. Yeah,

1:01:10.600 --> 1:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really a minimal difference. But when comparing two players,

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, for trading for if they're evenly priced in

1:01:17.480 --> 1:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a draft, start said, then you can look at it

1:01:20.200 --> 1:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a little harder. But just draft strategy in general, no, don't. Alright,

1:01:24.320 --> 1:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going to go super flex. And I grabbed

1:01:26.040 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>some super flex ADP for this which is off this sheet,

1:01:29.520 --> 1:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>so a different sheet. Um, I'll do what Matt did.

1:01:33.440 --> 1:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I like, I like that round one DeAndre Hopkins because

1:01:38.360 --> 1:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I will take him in round one. Still don't need

1:01:40.520 --> 1:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to take a quarterback, and I really like the round three,

1:01:44.920 --> 1:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>four five running backs this year, so like, I just

1:01:47.600 --> 1:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like I need to. But in round two

1:01:51.320 --> 1:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I had to take Dalvin Cook for so many of

1:01:53.680 --> 1:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the things that charge that I also have him in

1:01:55.680 --> 1:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>my top five. I believe I have him four as well.

1:01:58.120 --> 1:02:01.479
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah I do have before uh so Dalvin Cook

1:02:01.560 --> 1:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>as well, DeAndre Hopkins. Dalvin Cook, DeAndre Hopkins obviously double

1:02:05.080 --> 1:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>digit touchdowns like three to the last four years. It's

1:02:07.000 --> 1:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>he's DeAndre Hopkins Dalvin Cook. Around two, round three, I

1:02:12.480 --> 1:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>had the choice between for NET and carry on. I

1:02:14.600 --> 1:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>believe that's where I'd go there because I like a

1:02:16.280 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of wide receivers later, so I went for NET.

1:02:18.600 --> 1:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe that if things break right, he could be

1:02:21.600 --> 1:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>RB one, two, three. He has funny four NET and

1:02:23.840 --> 1:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>ended up on three of our different rosters. Yeah, okay,

1:02:27.160 --> 1:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we kind of like him there. Around four, had to

1:02:31.080 --> 1:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>jump at Cam Newton. Alright, that's where now we're getting

1:02:34.160 --> 1:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>our quarterback in this quarterback heavy draft strategy. Yeah, I

1:02:39.400 --> 1:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>still like to preach weight on quarterback. But Cam Newton

1:02:42.880 --> 1:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>was sitting there, and I just we have seven right

1:02:45.480 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>enough in a super flex right in this in this

1:02:47.760 --> 1:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>one I did. I. I really wanted Cam Newton. I

1:02:50.040 --> 1:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>really like him this year. I believe I am like

1:02:52.120 --> 1:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>six or something like that, sixth or seventh, seventh maybe. Yeah.

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I had him outside the top ten and I just

1:02:58.520 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>keep moving him up. I don't know why. All right, Uh,

1:03:02.080 --> 1:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>round five, I took let me see here, I have

1:03:08.040 --> 1:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to look at this for a second. D D. Westbrook, No,

1:03:15.120 --> 1:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>there it is round five. I did it again. I

1:03:17.720 --> 1:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>took Lamar Jackson, alright, quarterback quarterback, alright, I went quarterback quarterback.

1:03:22.880 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You got a rushing quarterback in a rushing quarterback, which

1:03:25.040 --> 1:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is we talked about this last week. This is one

1:03:27.000 --> 1:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite strategies and super Flex because odds are

1:03:30.760 --> 1:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the two of them is going to rush

1:03:32.280 --> 1:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you to a good game. Yeah. I love the super

1:03:34.520 --> 1:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Flex running back running back strategy, running quarterback quarterbacks. Thank

1:03:38.680 --> 1:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you so to recap right now, I have Lamar Jackson

1:03:41.200 --> 1:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and Cam Newton as my starting quarterbacks in the super

1:03:43.560 --> 1:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Flex League. Then I have Hopkins and Dalvin Cook and

1:03:46.600 --> 1:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>four net alright, round six and seven. Round six, I

1:03:49.400 --> 1:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>went with Tyler Lockett, who I have is a round

1:03:51.640 --> 1:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>six a steel Yeah. In super Flex, I mean there's

1:03:55.360 --> 1:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>enough quarterbacks going down a little other options go down

1:03:59.400 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>DK back, I've already hurt. I have Tyler. He was

1:04:01.760 --> 1:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>so efficient last year, so many touchdowns. I think he's

1:04:05.080 --> 1:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson is great. I have Tyler locked in my

1:04:07.600 --> 1:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>top twenty and then Hunter Henry and round seven. All right,

1:04:10.640 --> 1:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's good. That's it is great value. We

1:04:12.680 --> 1:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>might we touched on Henry earlier. Um, all right, so

1:04:15.760 --> 1:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that's here. If you like the sound of that quarterback

1:04:18.240 --> 1:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>heavy uh super flex roster. There's your there's one strategy

1:04:23.320 --> 1:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>for it, right there, Matt. Yes, I've asked you, challenge

1:04:26.840 --> 1:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you to stack together hot offenses. These are multiple players

1:04:31.280 --> 1:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>from one team that's on on a good offense. Yeah. Um,

1:04:34.920 --> 1:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>tell us how this worked out and and explain why

1:04:37.120 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't just stack chiefs. So I went seven rounds

1:04:39.760 --> 1:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>deep and I was looking at first off I was

1:04:41.920 --> 1:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what are the offenses that I

1:04:43.960 --> 1:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>want to get, and I tried wanted to try to

1:04:45.800 --> 1:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>get a stack of three and another stack of three

1:04:49.520 --> 1:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>into these teams together. So if these two offenses go

1:04:52.280 --> 1:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>off together, oh, I'm just in the money. Uh. You

1:04:55.440 --> 1:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>can't get the Chiefs in though, because Mahomes, Hill Kelsey,

1:04:59.240 --> 1:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and Damian Willie all have round two ADP Right, you're

1:05:02.360 --> 1:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get You can't stack cheap. So the best

1:05:04.440 --> 1:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>thing you could do is take one of them early

1:05:06.800 --> 1:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in round one and then take a second one in

1:05:09.000 --> 1:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>round two and hope that one falls to round three.

1:05:12.840 --> 1:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think it's gonna happen. Damian Williams might

1:05:15.760 --> 1:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>fall if you want to stack any Chiefs. The other

1:05:20.080 --> 1:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>team you can't really stack effectively. I mean you could,

1:05:23.600 --> 1:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>but you can't is the Saints because Kamara and Thomas

1:05:26.480 --> 1:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>are both going on top eight in ADP. You could

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>get Breeze, Jared Cook and Latavious later, but it's not

1:05:32.120 --> 1:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>quite the same. So um, I actually have two options

1:05:36.880 --> 1:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for you guys, and I'm gonna see which team that

1:05:38.760 --> 1:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys like better. Option number one is a stack

1:05:42.840 --> 1:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of three Falcons, three Browns and one ram Odell Beckham

1:05:48.200 --> 1:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in the first, Nick Chubb his teammate in the second,

1:05:52.920 --> 1:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Davante Freeman in the third, Brandon Cooks the lone Ram

1:05:57.200 --> 1:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and the fourth Calvin Ridley in the fifth round. Second Falcon, Yeah,

1:06:02.600 --> 1:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry, another Brown in the sixth, and then Matt

1:06:06.240 --> 1:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Ryan in the seventh. Or you could take Baker Mayfield

1:06:08.560 --> 1:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and go four Browns. Yeah you could. They have the

1:06:11.120 --> 1:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>same round there, the same round ap Okay, So you

1:06:14.040 --> 1:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>can't your tight end, That's what I got to know.

1:06:17.400 --> 1:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't need one. We'll take We'll take Austin Hooper later, sure,

1:06:23.320 --> 1:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>like Austin Hooper or David and Joku way later. I'm

1:06:26.760 --> 1:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>not on the Joco bed. But okay, so you either

1:06:30.040 --> 1:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>have Matt Ryan or Baker Mayfield as your quarterback. You're

1:06:32.440 --> 1:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>running backs are Nick Chubb and Davante Freeman, and you've

1:06:35.160 --> 1:06:39.840
<v Speaker 1>got wide receivers of Odell Brandon Cooks, Calvin Ridley, Jarvis Landry. Okay,

1:06:39.920 --> 1:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of a fun team, right, It is a

1:06:41.360 --> 1:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>good team, all right. I would not mind coming out

1:06:44.280 --> 1:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of a draft with that team, all right. I mean,

1:06:46.280 --> 1:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's some downside if the Falcons have a fourteen

1:06:48.800 --> 1:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>point game, which they might in Week one against the

1:06:50.560 --> 1:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Vikings and so to by the way, um you're in trouble,

1:06:54.400 --> 1:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but predominantly that's not going to happen. So let me

1:06:57.720 --> 1:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>let me see if you like option two any better.

1:06:59.720 --> 1:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>This one on is three Packers, three Rams, and one Saint.

1:07:03.800 --> 1:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>And I did get a tight end in this one,

1:07:05.600 --> 1:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you. All right. In the first round, I took

1:07:08.040 --> 1:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams, nice safe, awesome player. In the second round,

1:07:11.240 --> 1:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we're getting risky. We're going Todd Gurley and hope that

1:07:14.320 --> 1:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>he stays healthy all year. Third round, Back to the Packers,

1:07:18.000 --> 1:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones on my team. Fourth round, back to the Rams,

1:07:23.280 --> 1:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods. Fifth round, let's go another Ram Cooper Cup

1:07:28.880 --> 1:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>on that team six and offensive can support both the

1:07:32.280 --> 1:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. Sixth round, I got Adams, I got Jones.

1:07:35.880 --> 1:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Why not get Aaron Rodgers in the sixth round. Let's

1:07:38.440 --> 1:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>go pick him up in the seventh round. My one

1:07:40.560 --> 1:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Saints Jared Cook at tight end. So Aaron Rodgers is

1:07:44.440 --> 1:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>my quarterback. Running backs of Gurley and Jones, wide receivers

1:07:48.440 --> 1:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of Adams, Woods and Cup and Jared Cook at tight end.

1:07:52.040 --> 1:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>That I vote for. I vote for your this, this packer,

1:07:55.560 --> 1:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Ram Combo, and they all wear yellow. So as I'm

1:07:58.840 --> 1:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>watching all the games, yellow answer, just watch for yellow

1:08:01.560 --> 1:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>guys in the end zone exactly. I like, so you

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>can you can build a couple of offensive stacks, and

1:08:07.560 --> 1:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you can really shoot for the moon with these kind

1:08:09.440 --> 1:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of things, and and you never know how it's gonna

1:08:11.800 --> 1:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>end up, but it's it's kind of a fun way

1:08:14.040 --> 1:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to play. It is a fun way to play all right,

1:08:16.400 --> 1:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>less games to pay attention to, um, My drafting persona

1:08:22.160 --> 1:08:26.519
<v Speaker 1>was that of somebody who's do the opposite. Have you

1:08:26.640 --> 1:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>ever done this before? Only only for like twelve years? Uh,

1:08:31.200 --> 1:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>except for the draft list that you and I did

1:08:33.520 --> 1:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>last weekend. Running back right, which I didn't intend to do,

1:08:38.000 --> 1:08:39.519
<v Speaker 1>but that's just the way it worked out. You have

1:08:39.640 --> 1:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to be flexible in this world. Do the opposite drafting

1:08:43.360 --> 1:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is effectively a shoeing running backs early because they are

1:08:46.360 --> 1:08:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the highest risk players and these are the most valuable

1:08:49.760 --> 1:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>picks that you have. So you want to flip the

1:08:51.960 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>risk scale pyramid upside down. You want to have the

1:08:55.720 --> 1:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>most risk at the bottom of your draft and the

1:08:57.439 --> 1:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>safest players at the top. All right, so we want

1:08:59.360 --> 1:09:01.639
<v Speaker 1>proven perform members at the top. And that's not running backs.

1:09:01.640 --> 1:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Because running backs get hurt all the time. They're subject

1:09:04.200 --> 1:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to problems. If the defense is bad, they get hurt.

1:09:06.120 --> 1:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>The quarterback is bad, they get hurt. There's so many

1:09:08.400 --> 1:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>things that can go wrong. One year you're great running back.

1:09:11.160 --> 1:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>The next year you just fall off the cliff and

1:09:12.760 --> 1:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>you're a good anymore. There's just so many things that

1:09:14.520 --> 1:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>go wrong. I feel like I already know what this

1:09:17.080 --> 1:09:19.519
<v Speaker 1>team is going to look like. It's it's gonna be

1:09:21.400 --> 1:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's my kind of team. But team round one, you've

1:09:25.920 --> 1:09:27.479
<v Speaker 1>got you have a choice of a lot of guys.

1:09:27.520 --> 1:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>How about Michael Thomas as Are says as are do

1:09:30.439 --> 1:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the opposite style wide receiver in the first round. Second

1:09:34.000 --> 1:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>round Travis Kelsey. We want to have the best tight

1:09:37.080 --> 1:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>end in the game. We'll take Travis Kelsey. Third round

1:09:40.160 --> 1:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans and what should be a much improved offense.

1:09:43.040 --> 1:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans has been very good every year of his career.

1:09:45.680 --> 1:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Fourth round, we start to first for the first time,

1:09:48.280 --> 1:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>turn our attention to the running back position. And part

1:09:50.920 --> 1:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of the way to do the opposite works is after

1:09:52.800 --> 1:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you've after you've locked in your players in the first

1:09:54.760 --> 1:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>three or four rounds that aren't running back. So we

1:09:56.400 --> 1:09:58.759
<v Speaker 1>do a bunch of running backs in the middle rounds.

1:09:59.360 --> 1:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris car Person criminally going in the fourth round when

1:10:02.880 --> 1:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you should be going out. How did I know Chris

1:10:04.439 --> 1:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Carson was going to show up by your D T

1:10:06.439 --> 1:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>O team, Philip Lindsay in the fifth round. One of

1:10:09.800 --> 1:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>my favorite fifth round values that you can get Royce

1:10:14.160 --> 1:10:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Freeman to me not not a material factor. Miles Sanders

1:10:17.960 --> 1:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in the sixth round, figuring he's gonna get ten to

1:10:19.960 --> 1:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve touches a game that will be enough for me

1:10:21.840 --> 1:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to flex him into a flex spot here as my

1:10:24.160 --> 1:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>third running back in the seventh round of my last pick,

1:10:27.120 --> 1:10:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. There's my do the opposite strategy, which gives

1:10:31.840 --> 1:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>me Michael Thomas and Mike Evans at receiver, Travis Kelsey

1:10:35.200 --> 1:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>at tight end, Chris Carson, Philip Lindsay, Miles Sanders at

1:10:39.280 --> 1:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>running back, and Baker Mayfield is a quarterback kind of

1:10:43.960 --> 1:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>like my stack team better than the D T O

1:10:46.120 --> 1:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>team you can get Mike. To be honest, if you're

1:10:48.360 --> 1:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>an a draft in Mike Evans hits your third round,

1:10:50.720 --> 1:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>just auto pick that and don't don't have to think

1:10:53.360 --> 1:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>twice about that pick. I suppose h Yeah, So that's there,

1:10:56.600 --> 1:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you go. Let's go to uh. I think it's time

1:10:59.760 --> 1:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>guys that we start thinking about the Thursday Night game already.

1:11:03.800 --> 1:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I know, isn't that hard to believe? Our final topics

1:11:06.439 --> 1:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>are had. We're gonna break down the Thursday Night game

1:11:08.360 --> 1:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasy style, which is a preview of what you're gonna

1:11:11.040 --> 1:11:13.639
<v Speaker 1>get of every single game once we get into regular

1:11:13.720 --> 1:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>season mode and next week and our final Sleepers of

1:11:18.840 --> 1:11:22.519
<v Speaker 1>the year. Related note, by the way, starting next Wednesday,

1:11:22.520 --> 1:11:24.759
<v Speaker 1>you'll be able to get my Week one player rankings

1:11:24.840 --> 1:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>for free at fanball dot com if you want not

1:11:26.840 --> 1:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the preseason drafting player rankings. If you want ranking specifically

1:11:30.479 --> 1:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>for Week one coming Wednesday. Fanball dot com. It is

1:11:35.400 --> 1:11:59.599
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly with Paul Giarchia. It is Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:11:59.720 --> 1:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>We are going to break down the Thursday night game

1:12:02.160 --> 1:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy style. If you haven't heard the show before, you're

1:12:04.720 --> 1:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear letter grades on every meaningful player and why

1:12:07.120 --> 1:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>we believe that letter grade to be correct. But first

1:12:10.520 --> 1:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we do this. In the final segment of every show

1:12:12.439 --> 1:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason, our hosts release our favorite sleepers. That's

1:12:16.960 --> 1:12:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison, Scott Fish. Let's let's get to these this

1:12:20.600 --> 1:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>week's three players. Matt, who do you have? I alluded

1:12:24.840 --> 1:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to it a little bit before. My sleeper is Jack Doyle.

1:12:28.760 --> 1:12:32.519
<v Speaker 1>Jack Doyle, who's kind of going criminally underdrafted considering he

1:12:32.640 --> 1:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>was just gone last year. Um So. Jacoby Brissette started

1:12:37.120 --> 1:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen games. He played fourteen games with Jack Doyle. In

1:12:41.680 --> 1:12:44.919
<v Speaker 1>those fourteen games, Doyle averaged seven and a half targets,

1:12:45.200 --> 1:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and Jacoby Brissette targeted the tight end more than anybody

1:12:48.120 --> 1:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in the league Seen. He caught almost six passes per game.

1:12:52.600 --> 1:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>He had the second most receptions among tight ends in SEEN.

1:12:56.680 --> 1:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>With Jacoby Brissett. You put all that together, six catches

1:13:00.880 --> 1:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a game is good enough for ninety six passes a year,

1:13:03.760 --> 1:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>sixteen game season. Yeah, that would have been third last year,

1:13:08.080 --> 1:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in the year where two guys broke the all time

1:13:11.280 --> 1:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>record for tight end receptions in the league. Now keep

1:13:15.040 --> 1:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in mind you didn't have Eric Ebron there. That's a

1:13:18.360 --> 1:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>big difference. Now. Eric Ebron is kind of the the

1:13:21.400 --> 1:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>goal line vulture, if there's such a thing at the

1:13:23.960 --> 1:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>tight end position. Jack Doyle only had four touchdowns with

1:13:27.479 --> 1:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Brissett, he might that's a fantasy vulture. Stared me

1:13:35.320 --> 1:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Vultures are freaky. Yeah. Um, so I

1:13:39.040 --> 1:13:41.519
<v Speaker 1>like Doyle to be a big part of the possession

1:13:41.600 --> 1:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>game for the Colts this year, and I think he's

1:13:43.400 --> 1:13:46.639
<v Speaker 1>being underdrafted. All right, Scott, who is your final sleeper

1:13:46.640 --> 1:13:50.799
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I'm going with Justice Hill. He's moving

1:13:51.000 --> 1:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>up the ranks though right now. Yeah, people are on

1:13:53.479 --> 1:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>him now, yeah, yeah, Now he's going in the tenth

1:13:58.320 --> 1:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>and eleventh round. But the Ravens running X last year

1:14:00.600 --> 1:14:05.519
<v Speaker 1>average thirty touches per game. Once Lamar Lamar Jackson, Lamar Miller,

1:14:06.000 --> 1:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson took over. I mentioned earlier, the Ravens average

1:14:09.040 --> 1:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy one place per game, which is the most in

1:14:11.400 --> 1:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the NFL last year. That's enough to support two backs

1:14:15.400 --> 1:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and even Lamar Jackson. Uh. They have said that he

1:14:19.040 --> 1:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>could be an every down guy if anything happened. I

1:14:21.280 --> 1:14:23.479
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's got the size to be in every download.

1:14:23.479 --> 1:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of small running backs that have been

1:14:26.120 --> 1:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the guy. Uh. He's easily the best pass catcher on

1:14:29.680 --> 1:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the team. He'll have a role. There's potential for him

1:14:32.120 --> 1:14:35.479
<v Speaker 1>to be a super poor man's Kamara to Ingram once again,

1:14:36.200 --> 1:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Now there could happen you Ingram's there? Justice Hill? All right,

1:14:40.439 --> 1:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>My final sleeper and the final one we will offer

1:14:42.439 --> 1:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>this preseason. Michael Gallop a player I have targeted in

1:14:45.880 --> 1:14:50.639
<v Speaker 1>many leagues. They're countless examples of elite receivers who hit

1:14:50.680 --> 1:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>their stride in year two. Half of today's great receivers

1:14:54.479 --> 1:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>went from good too great in their sophomore year. Michael Thomas,

1:14:59.000 --> 1:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill, do you do? Smith Schuster, Brandon Cooks, just

1:15:01.439 --> 1:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to name a few. Last year, Michael Gallup's usage ramped

1:15:05.040 --> 1:15:09.519
<v Speaker 1>up dramatically as the season went along. From Week seven forward,

1:15:09.960 --> 1:15:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Gallup had five meaningful Fantasy games with at least fifty

1:15:13.760 --> 1:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>yards and or a score. The rest of the way

1:15:16.240 --> 1:15:19.479
<v Speaker 1>and then in the playoff games. The two Dallas playoff games,

1:15:19.880 --> 1:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>he scored a touchdown in one and put up a

1:15:22.200 --> 1:15:25.759
<v Speaker 1>hundred nineteen yards in the other. Michael Gallup, the Cowboys

1:15:25.840 --> 1:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>lost one hundred fifty four targets from last year one

1:15:30.960 --> 1:15:33.439
<v Speaker 1>four and Jason went and Randall Cobb are not going

1:15:33.479 --> 1:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to make up the difference of one. You know where

1:15:36.120 --> 1:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>they're going to Michael Gallop. Marie Cooper already nursing a

1:15:40.720 --> 1:15:43.559
<v Speaker 1>foot injury. Well, it doesn't even count the Ezekiel Elliott

1:15:43.640 --> 1:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>targets that might not be there. Oh yeah, good point, right,

1:15:46.640 --> 1:15:50.439
<v Speaker 1>although I think Tony Pollard can catch. Okay. Lastly, Gallop

1:15:50.520 --> 1:15:52.759
<v Speaker 1>in fact, played a lot of wide receiver to in college.

1:15:52.920 --> 1:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Gallup has looked great this preseason. I mean, he looks

1:15:56.200 --> 1:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like he's made the year to jump at the eye test,

1:15:59.000 --> 1:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>he passes the test based on what we've seen this preseason.

1:16:02.280 --> 1:16:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Roll it all together, Michael Gallup one of my favorite

1:16:04.840 --> 1:16:08.439
<v Speaker 1>sleepers of the year. We've got a Thursday night game.

1:16:08.439 --> 1:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>You guys, what's already Thursday night game? It's gonna be

1:16:12.760 --> 1:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl. Wait, no, not the champs this year.

1:16:16.320 --> 1:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the old hundred Years the NFL have the with

1:16:21.240 --> 1:16:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the oldest rival rivalry in the NFL, Bay and Chicago.

1:16:25.200 --> 1:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's break down the Packers side first, if you will,

1:16:28.040 --> 1:16:30.599
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna start with the with the running game

1:16:30.680 --> 1:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>here with Aaron Jones. Chicago was the NFL's best run

1:16:34.840 --> 1:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>defense last year, no matter how you look at it,

1:16:37.280 --> 1:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's no reason to think they're not going to

1:16:38.760 --> 1:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>be great again this year. They ranked number one against

1:16:40.840 --> 1:16:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the run. They were number one at home in yards

1:16:43.479 --> 1:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>allowed by a mile, giving up sixty four rushing guards

1:16:47.439 --> 1:16:51.759
<v Speaker 1>per game at home. That's it. Jones had a career

1:16:52.439 --> 1:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>has a career average of just three point four yards

1:16:55.160 --> 1:16:58.479
<v Speaker 1>per carry against Chicago. He has never caught a pass

1:16:58.560 --> 1:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Bears. Ever, there's not much to like at

1:17:02.640 --> 1:17:05.599
<v Speaker 1>all about Aaron Jones. I give him a wobbly C grade.

1:17:06.320 --> 1:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't bench him because he's a good talent and

1:17:08.400 --> 1:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a good offense. But it's a myrtle match. No, no,

1:17:11.640 --> 1:17:13.799
<v Speaker 1>there's no plus or minus is in our grading system.

1:17:14.240 --> 1:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>He is a firm scene for Aaron Jones. Let's go

1:17:17.960 --> 1:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to the passing game Aaron Rodgers, who gets a B grade.

1:17:21.439 --> 1:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>It is the first time in his career that Aaron

1:17:23.520 --> 1:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers is going to try to implement a new offense.

1:17:26.160 --> 1:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Think about that. As many years he's been in he's

1:17:28.360 --> 1:17:30.519
<v Speaker 1>never had to learn a new offense. And here it

1:17:30.600 --> 1:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>comes in Week one against the best defense in the NFL.

1:17:34.120 --> 1:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>A tough time to try to do that. Chicago finished

1:17:37.720 --> 1:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>last year ranked number one, and points allowed seventh, and

1:17:40.520 --> 1:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>passing yards allowed ninth and passing touchdowns allowed. Rogers last

1:17:44.680 --> 1:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>two games in Chicago zero touchdowns, none, passing, none, rushing.

1:17:51.240 --> 1:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Chicago did change out Adrian Amos for how Clinton Dix,

1:17:55.080 --> 1:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think that materially changes this defense. One

1:17:58.120 --> 1:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>angle I do like for Aaron Rodgers, though, is Geronimo

1:18:01.880 --> 1:18:05.519
<v Speaker 1>Allison as the slot receiver. Allison gets the only really

1:18:05.760 --> 1:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>strongly positive matchup on the table. Here. It's against journeyman

1:18:11.000 --> 1:18:16.519
<v Speaker 1>slock corner buster screen, the busted screen door. He's been, uh,

1:18:16.640 --> 1:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>he's been a career long liability, and he's coming off

1:18:19.360 --> 1:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>his worst ever season resulting in his in his ejection

1:18:23.360 --> 1:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>from the Jets roster. And so now he's in Chicago

1:18:28.120 --> 1:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna be manning the manning the slot. So

1:18:30.680 --> 1:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I like Geronimo Allison is a sneaky sleeper and I've

1:18:33.240 --> 1:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>given him a B grade. Davante Adams also with a

1:18:36.439 --> 1:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>B grade. He's the only packer with some history against

1:18:39.320 --> 1:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bears in which you can feel good about. Adams

1:18:42.200 --> 1:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>has scored three in three of the past four games

1:18:44.800 --> 1:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>against the Bears. He's topped eighty eight yards in three

1:18:47.840 --> 1:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>straight games against the Bears. He's got a very intriguing matchup.

1:18:50.920 --> 1:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna go up against his former teammate ha Ha

1:18:52.960 --> 1:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Clinton Dix. Those guys ran against each other all the

1:18:55.840 --> 1:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>time in practice. I don't know who really gets the

1:18:59.720 --> 1:19:02.479
<v Speaker 1>antich here, if it's Adams, if the familiarity is better

1:19:02.560 --> 1:19:05.519
<v Speaker 1>for Adams, or it's better for Hacklington Dicks. But it

1:19:05.640 --> 1:19:08.759
<v Speaker 1>is a fascinating matchup. Nonetheless, Davante Adams an elite receiver.

1:19:08.880 --> 1:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>He maintains a B grade. And lastly, Marquees Valdez scantlingk

1:19:14.400 --> 1:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. A handful of speed receivers were able

1:19:18.040 --> 1:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>to beat the Bears last year, Albert Wilson, Tyler Lockett,

1:19:21.760 --> 1:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>DeShawn Jackson, Aldrick Robinson, but that was about it. Generally,

1:19:25.400 --> 1:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>speed guys didn't fare terribly well, but there were a

1:19:27.800 --> 1:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>few flashes where they were okay. That was one of them,

1:19:30.960 --> 1:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>he gets a C grade. Jimmy Graham firmly on the bench.

1:19:34.600 --> 1:19:38.479
<v Speaker 1>No grade. Bench grade for Jimmy Graham combined for only

1:19:38.520 --> 1:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>forty yards in the two games last year, and the

1:19:40.479 --> 1:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Bears didn't allow a single tight end touchdown in the

1:19:43.040 --> 1:19:45.479
<v Speaker 1>second half of last year. So would you call that

1:19:45.600 --> 1:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>an F minus. No, because there's no minus is so

1:19:48.479 --> 1:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't have an F minus. But he can be

1:19:50.040 --> 1:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>firmly on the bench. Let's go to the Chicago side

1:19:52.400 --> 1:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of this. A grade for David Montgomery, I don't need

1:19:58.320 --> 1:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to I don't need to see it first. I don't

1:20:00.320 --> 1:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>need to gott you have to prove anything to me.

1:20:02.439 --> 1:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>A grade for David Montgomery, don't need to prove it.

1:20:06.720 --> 1:20:08.599
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be a lot of fantasy. And I was like, well,

1:20:08.600 --> 1:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I gotta see it first. You don't have to see

1:20:10.320 --> 1:20:14.559
<v Speaker 1>this first. Start David Montgomery. In the two games last

1:20:14.680 --> 1:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>year between these teams, Jordan Howard touched the ball twenty times,

1:20:19.200 --> 1:20:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and twenty times, I'll take twenty touches for David Montgomery.

1:20:23.920 --> 1:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>He's better than Howard by a lot. And if I

1:20:26.400 --> 1:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>get those same twenty touches touches, he's gonna be sitting

1:20:29.160 --> 1:20:32.519
<v Speaker 1>on a fantastic game. The Packers improve their defense a

1:20:32.560 --> 1:20:36.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways, but mostly with pass rushers. The Smiths.

1:20:36.520 --> 1:20:38.559
<v Speaker 1>The two Smiths that they brought in Rashawn Gary who

1:20:38.600 --> 1:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they drafted, all gall guys that are designed to be

1:20:42.400 --> 1:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>pass rushers. The Packers ranked twenty three against the run

1:20:45.560 --> 1:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>last year. That feels about where they're kind of come

1:20:47.880 --> 1:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in this year as well. I love David Montgomery while

1:20:51.000 --> 1:20:52.799
<v Speaker 1>we stay with the running back, so let's talk Tariko

1:20:52.920 --> 1:20:54.559
<v Speaker 1>in here. He had a nice game in the Week

1:20:54.680 --> 1:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen meeting between these two teams. But I'm a little

1:20:57.400 --> 1:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>nervous here. The Packers upgraded their outside linebackers this miss

1:21:00.240 --> 1:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that I just mentioned, and those guys have the speed

1:21:02.320 --> 1:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to hang with Tarik Cohen and montgomery soft hands are

1:21:05.960 --> 1:21:08.519
<v Speaker 1>a real threat to Cohen. I mean, Cohen didn't have

1:21:08.680 --> 1:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>to sweat any catches from Jordan Howard. Now he does.

1:21:12.840 --> 1:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>That worries me a little bit. And Plus, for all

1:21:14.880 --> 1:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the problems the Packers had last year, they allowed the

1:21:17.800 --> 1:21:22.799
<v Speaker 1>fifth fewest running back receptions last season. That all affects

1:21:22.840 --> 1:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Tree Cohen, who I give a C grade to. Now

1:21:25.000 --> 1:21:28.519
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the passing game. Mitch Drabinsky gets a

1:21:28.560 --> 1:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>C grade. Is that a sad trombone ski or a

1:21:32.360 --> 1:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>happy trombone? What do you think? There are a lot

1:21:36.160 --> 1:21:39.599
<v Speaker 1>of small things that work in Drabinsky's favor. A second

1:21:39.720 --> 1:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>year in Matt Naggi's offense, which I like. There's that,

1:21:42.000 --> 1:21:45.719
<v Speaker 1>There's Alan Robinson's fully healthy. I like that, Anthony Miller

1:21:45.800 --> 1:21:49.439
<v Speaker 1>fully healthy. I like that David Montgomery's receiving skills I mentioned.

1:21:49.560 --> 1:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I like all those things. The Packers, though, should get

1:21:52.960 --> 1:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>much better pass rush this year, and the addition of

1:21:55.840 --> 1:21:59.479
<v Speaker 1>safety Adrian Amos helps solidify highly inconsistent secondary that allowed

1:21:59.479 --> 1:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the six most touchdown passes last year. I'm moving Mitch

1:22:02.439 --> 1:22:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Drobiski up to a B. I had him as a scene.

1:22:06.640 --> 1:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It's happy trombone skiing. It's happy trombone ski for Mitch.

1:22:10.439 --> 1:22:12.559
<v Speaker 1>He's gave. I moved him up to a B just now.

1:22:13.360 --> 1:22:15.559
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Miller gets a C grade. He played hurt most

1:22:15.600 --> 1:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of last year um and actually he's been nursing an

1:22:17.880 --> 1:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>injury in this preseason as well, but should be able

1:22:19.760 --> 1:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to go here. I think he does have a chance

1:22:21.880 --> 1:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to make a jump and working from the slot, he

1:22:24.040 --> 1:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>goes up against the Packers worst cornerback Traymont Williams. The

1:22:26.920 --> 1:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>path of least resistance to the passing game really does

1:22:29.080 --> 1:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>actually go through Anthony Miller. Not somebody can start every week,

1:22:31.800 --> 1:22:34.519
<v Speaker 1>you can start him this week. I mentioned Allen Robinson

1:22:34.600 --> 1:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>back healthy. He had two quiet games against the Packers

1:22:38.080 --> 1:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>last year. Starting cornerback Kevin King is unlikely to play

1:22:41.920 --> 1:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in this game because he's got a severe hamstring injury

1:22:44.200 --> 1:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that's knocked him out of the whole preseason. I don't

1:22:46.240 --> 1:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>think he goes here. That means Robinson's going to see

1:22:48.800 --> 1:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of King's backup Tony Brown, who was

1:22:52.000 --> 1:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>bad last year as a rookie. I like Allen Robinson,

1:22:55.080 --> 1:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he's got a solid B grade. And the last Bears

1:22:58.040 --> 1:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>player that I need to check in on, Trey Burton.

1:23:02.280 --> 1:23:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Scored in the Week fifteen matchup, but other than that,

1:23:05.880 --> 1:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Scory did very little in that game. And I think,

1:23:08.040 --> 1:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>like Cohen, you know, the Packers too improved outside linebackers.

1:23:11.120 --> 1:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>They've got the speed to hang with a tight end

1:23:12.880 --> 1:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm worried they're gonna pick them up some. So

1:23:14.920 --> 1:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>really just a C grade on on Trey Burton in

1:23:18.360 --> 1:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>this matchup. So there you go. Letter grades for every

1:23:21.520 --> 1:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>meaningful packer and and bear. If you like that, you're

1:23:24.439 --> 1:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna love regular season addition, Fantasy Football Weekly because it's

1:23:28.800 --> 1:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>two hours of that basically us break it. There is

1:23:33.280 --> 1:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>more stuff too. We keep the three tough questions we

1:23:35.960 --> 1:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>take take a chance on me coming back. We've got

1:23:39.840 --> 1:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>premature speculation next week as well as a regular season

1:23:43.800 --> 1:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>bit boy for us. Additionally, Hey, we mentioned some of

1:23:47.160 --> 1:23:49.519
<v Speaker 1>our favorite sleepers for this week, but a lot of

1:23:49.560 --> 1:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>people haven't been able. Didn't weren't listening to every one

1:23:52.000 --> 1:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>of our other shows. Well, you should probably go back

1:23:54.520 --> 1:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>on the heart podcast app and listen to all of

1:23:57.120 --> 1:24:00.559
<v Speaker 1>our previous shows. I think that's a brilliant isn't on here?

1:24:00.560 --> 1:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>He must have been the live show here? It's the

1:24:02.320 --> 1:24:05.479
<v Speaker 1>best app for podcasting. It's an excellent app for podcasting.

1:24:05.800 --> 1:24:07.599
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio App. We encourage you to download it today.

1:24:07.640 --> 1:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go back through the sleepers we have given

1:24:10.120 --> 1:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>out over the last month and tell me if you

1:24:12.720 --> 1:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>still think they're viable sleeper candidates two ways. One are

1:24:16.680 --> 1:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>they still good? And then two has their draft position

1:24:20.320 --> 1:24:22.479
<v Speaker 1>moves so much that you don't you worry now that

1:24:22.720 --> 1:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>they're not sleepers anymore? Okay that now these guys, are

1:24:25.439 --> 1:24:28.360
<v Speaker 1>we still in there? Are we out on these guys?

1:24:28.439 --> 1:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right? In or out? Jalen Samuel's was one of

1:24:32.080 --> 1:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the first ones we gave, and that sounds like a

1:24:34.000 --> 1:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>charged sleep that it was a charge sleeper. Are you

1:24:36.560 --> 1:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>guys in or out on Jalen Samuel's as as a

1:24:39.479 --> 1:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>as still a sleeper. His price has even gone down

1:24:42.080 --> 1:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>since that has gone so I think he's still worth it.

1:24:44.880 --> 1:24:47.519
<v Speaker 1>His price has gone down because James Connor is going

1:24:47.600 --> 1:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to be the bell cow. You're not seeing it correctly.

1:24:50.000 --> 1:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Charged Connor is going to be the guy there, all right,

1:24:52.000 --> 1:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>so you're out. I'm with matt On Connor being the guy.

1:24:54.800 --> 1:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just Samuel's value is depressed at the point where

1:24:57.200 --> 1:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>even I would take a shot. Speaking of Samuel's, let's

1:24:59.640 --> 1:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>go to the singular Samuel, Curtis Samuel. I don't in

1:25:04.160 --> 1:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>or out on Curtis Samuel as a sleeper. When I

1:25:06.640 --> 1:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>saw this one done, I didn't agree with this even

1:25:08.960 --> 1:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>being allowed to be in this side because it was

1:25:11.960 --> 1:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>too good when yeah, when it was done, and and

1:25:14.280 --> 1:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>now even more so, he's not. He's like a sixth

1:25:17.240 --> 1:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>round pick now, So you're deeply on Curtis Samuel very much.

1:25:20.680 --> 1:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he did go up quite a bit in

1:25:22.920 --> 1:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a DP. He rocket it up where d J. Moore

1:25:25.280 --> 1:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of stayed the same and was really looked at

1:25:27.760 --> 1:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>as the wide receiver one in that offense. I think

1:25:29.800 --> 1:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it's closer to even right now. So ye, Samuel Park Yeah, okay? Uh.

1:25:35.200 --> 1:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Dante Moncreef was given earlier as a sleeper. Are you

1:25:40.840 --> 1:25:43.519
<v Speaker 1>in or out on that sleeper choice? From earlier earlier

1:25:43.560 --> 1:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Fantasy Football Weekly? I think I'm out just

1:25:48.760 --> 1:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not making that draft pick. I think he's

1:25:50.760 --> 1:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a decent red zone like like he used

1:25:54.000 --> 1:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to roll. Yeah, but I'm probably out. I guess I

1:25:57.720 --> 1:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>think he's mundane. Yeah, I think the draft just there's

1:26:00.320 --> 1:26:03.479
<v Speaker 1>opportunity though for sure. The opportunity is that it's there's

1:26:03.520 --> 1:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>so many targets there, and I think that they're going

1:26:05.840 --> 1:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>to treat him just as well as they're gonna treat

1:26:07.720 --> 1:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>James Washington in that offense. I think Dante Moncrief sitting

1:26:10.760 --> 1:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in a good year. I'm still in another chart special

1:26:13.320 --> 1:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>C J. Anderson. Are you in or out? On c J. Anderson?

1:26:17.200 --> 1:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Let me make my case again, because he's so far

1:26:19.200 --> 1:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>off radars right now, offensive coordinator Darryl Bevel averaging thirty

1:26:24.120 --> 1:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>carries per game across his career. They're not all going

1:26:27.080 --> 1:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to carry On Johnson. They're going to C J. Anderson,

1:26:29.160 --> 1:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the cut Zac center. He's not a factor anymore. It's

1:26:31.240 --> 1:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>still surprises me that you like c. J. Anderson so much,

1:26:35.000 --> 1:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>being as you're the highest on carry On Johnson of

1:26:37.760 --> 1:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>anybody I've seen. I know I like him both, so

1:26:39.840 --> 1:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they both get fed. Man. I think I

1:26:42.240 --> 1:26:44.120
<v Speaker 1>think if c J. Anderson is really in play, I

1:26:44.200 --> 1:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>think it does bite into carry On quite a bit. So, um,

1:26:47.680 --> 1:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess I like c J. Anderson because I'm not

1:26:49.880 --> 1:26:51.559
<v Speaker 1>as much of a believer and carry on. All right,

1:26:51.600 --> 1:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So you're in, yeah, and you're I'm out. I'll try

1:26:54.160 --> 1:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to get him on waivers later. I just I'm not

1:26:56.000 --> 1:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna waste that roster spot. And yet, all right, when

1:26:58.320 --> 1:27:00.439
<v Speaker 1>any scores a week, one that'll be from for time.

1:27:00.960 --> 1:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller was given in an earlier show that's a

1:27:03.840 --> 1:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Brian special. I think I think everybody's in on Darren Waller.

1:27:07.120 --> 1:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Brian was first to that one before Hard Knocks,

1:27:09.880 --> 1:27:14.400
<v Speaker 1>before before everybody and was first on that one. Okay, now, no, no,

1:27:14.560 --> 1:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we're giving it to Brian. We're giving it to Brian Johnson.

1:27:17.240 --> 1:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Are in? Wait, yeah, we're in. You're in the cut

1:27:21.000 --> 1:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Wilson today too. So it's Darren Waller and rookie Foster

1:27:25.040 --> 1:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Morrow or whatever. Littavius Murray was given as a sleeper

1:27:28.720 --> 1:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>earlier show episodes, remain in. Oh, I'm very in. You're

1:27:33.479 --> 1:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in as well. I was never in on Murray because

1:27:35.840 --> 1:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I just think he is a one dimensional, straight ahead

1:27:38.479 --> 1:27:40.360
<v Speaker 1>runner who's not going to be able to replicate most

1:27:40.400 --> 1:27:42.959
<v Speaker 1>of what mark Ingram did. I think he will replicate

1:27:43.080 --> 1:27:47.519
<v Speaker 1>most of what mark Ingram did. And Peyton Barber given

1:27:47.560 --> 1:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in an earlier Show by Me Church special on Daria

1:27:51.120 --> 1:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>gun Bow Wally, well you get him in the last

1:27:54.560 --> 1:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>round round? No. I I like the I like the

1:27:57.479 --> 1:28:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Barber call. Most people again, replay last season, not edged

1:28:01.439 --> 1:28:03.599
<v Speaker 1>in Barber's it wasn't a factor last season. Well, he's

1:28:03.600 --> 1:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be like the lowest top running back drafted,

1:28:07.120 --> 1:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>right starting running back. He's probably going to be the

1:28:09.400 --> 1:28:11.559
<v Speaker 1>last one draft now Lashawn McCoy might be the last

1:28:11.600 --> 1:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>one drafting. Whoever is Something's something in that ballpark Anyway,

1:28:15.760 --> 1:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>if you love this show, go to famble dot com

1:28:17.840 --> 1:28:20.880
<v Speaker 1>slash charge for my free cheat sheet, my free five

1:28:21.000 --> 1:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar week one contest, Guillotine league's podcasts, and a

1:28:25.720 --> 1:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>lot more fun at fanball dot com slash charge. Thanks

1:28:29.000 --> 1:28:31.360
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Fantasy Football Weekly. We are here every weekend,

1:28:31.439 --> 1:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>both on the air and via the podcast. We especially

1:28:34.240 --> 1:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>recommend you listen by the I Heart Radio app. It

1:28:37.080 --> 1:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is number one for podcasts for a very good reason.

1:28:39.640 --> 1:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And many thanks everyone who take the time to rank

1:28:42.080 --> 1:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and review this show on your preferred podcasting platform. We

1:28:46.160 --> 1:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that that helps other people, not your league mates,

1:28:48.840 --> 1:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>but other people do it. Yeah, if you haven't done

1:28:51.760 --> 1:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that yet, please go do it. Talk you next week

1:28:53.800 --> 1:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>for more Fantasy Football Weekly, But bye everybody. Do new