WEBVTT - Jennison Bets On 'Booming' Digital Payments Sector

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg PENL podcast on Paul Swing You,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits. Each day,

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Steve Manuchin currently making comments saying

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump and Jijan Ping of China are likely

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to see each other at the end of June. He's

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>also saying that he is happy to talk to player's

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer on China trade policy. UH. He made

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>some comments about a potential US defaults as well, saying

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that that could happen in late summer if there is

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>no debt ceiling rays. He is testifying UH in front

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of Congress today and is going to be a commenty

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>will bring you headlines as they appear. Meanwhile, the concept

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of the ongoing trade skirmish between the U S and

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>China certainly has impacted UH text shares, which have taken

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a beating and been more volatile. Our next guest still

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>likes a bunch of those text socks and perhaps is

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>going to go shopping market Baraboo. He is head of

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Global Equity at Jennison Jennison Associates, the fundamental equity and

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>fixed income business of p JIM overseeing about a hundred

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and sixty billion dollars from Boston, Mark, thank you so

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>much for being here. So at this point, given how

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>much we're seeing tech shares lag behind in light of

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the trade tensions, are you seeing opportunities? Yeah,

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we definitely see opportunities. Um. You know, our focus, of

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>course is on really strong secular growth stories in the

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>market and in technology. There are many uh oftentimes they're

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>not in in the crosshairs of the trade war, so

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it's not in semi conductors, it's not

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in devices, the areas we really like our cloud based architectures,

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>software as a service companies, UH. Digital payments globally everywhere

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world, including in China. It's booming as everybody

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>moves to more cashless systems. So there's lots of opportunities

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>out there, but you really want to stick with the

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the secular growers, not not try to outsmart the markets

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>on this trade war. In the cyclical part of the market.

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So Mark, you mentioned kind of secular growth stories. One

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, really interesting secular growth stories that

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>has been developing within the tech space. It's just kind

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese technology companies that have American investors have

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>been able to invest in recently, Ali Baba, tense Cent

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Bai Do. What is your sense of those names given

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>what appears to be rising trade tensions. Yeah, with well,

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>let's look at Ali Baba as an example, uh, because

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty clean, uh in terms of the trade impact,

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't really have any direct trade war impact.

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 1>It's really just a domestically focused company solving for convenience

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for Chinese consumers, uh and feeding that sort of emerging

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>middle class boom that you're seeing in China. So you know,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>for example, in the first quarter they just boarded revenue growth,

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>so no problems there, but there are multiples come down

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>now because of these trade tensions. So you could say

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.839
<v Speaker 1>that's could be a really good opportunity because it's very

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>inexpensive relative to its growth rate uh, and of course

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a very very profitable company because of their business models.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So that would be a good one to focus on

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>going forward. Um. The only direct impact they would have

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is more indirect than that would be. A macroeconomic slowdown

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in China obviously makes that more challenging for everybody. Uh.

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what the markets pricing in, but

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it may be too pessimistic. When we think about tech shares,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we often think about the Fangs, and that's really sort

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of been the dominant player uh in this space. What

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>about them? I mean, are you right now interested in Apple?

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you interested in Facebook? Are you interested in some

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of the big winners over the past a couple of months. Well,

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, looking at Fang and brought more

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>broadly to find it, you know, the market is charing

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>for some of those companies. So the smartphone market is

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>matured globally. Um Uh. Search market is still growing nicely,

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's obviously slowing down on a structural basis,

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>just because it's so big. Um And so when you

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>look at Fang today, I mean, the two that are

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we're most excited about would be like a Netflix or Amazon,

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>where the growth rates are still quite healthy and there's

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of market penetration left for both companies, so

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>their addressable market keeps expanding. UM. And that's what you'd

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>want to look for. So I think even within FANG

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the list gets narrower. So, Mark, we would be remissed

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>today if we didn't ask you your thoughts on Qualcom

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>big news this morning with the UH their regulatory issue

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>stock down. Give us your sense of Qualcom. Yeah, I

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>think the I think the market obviously thinks that recent

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>deals that Qualcom is negotiated with Apple and Samsung, for example,

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>can somehow be broken UM. And you know we're we're

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>not legal experts, and we don't know all the details

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of their agreements, UM, but it's our understanding that that's

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>highly unlikely. And if that's the case, then qualcoms being

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>oversold on this FTC decision because they've already privately negotiated

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>agreements with their big customers, or most of them. So

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering what your highest conviction bet is right

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>now going forward over the next six or twelve months. Well,

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 1>we think it's in the area of digital payments because

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>all over the world UM and developed markets. Of course,

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>we have good financial infrastructure, but we're still seeing consumers

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.679
<v Speaker 1>move and move away from cash UM, which is still

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>amazingly a large percentage of transactions even here and in

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, they're actually leap frogging to internet based technologies

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that enable payments to occur very quickly, with less fraud

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and very cheaply, and providing financial services to underbanked populations.

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>So that's an area we think is just looks terrific.

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And are you talking specifically about Pal about Square? I mean,

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>are those the names you're talking Yes, there's a whole list.

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>In the US, it would be of course, a company

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>like MasterCard, which is benefiting from from that digital trans transition.

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>It would be PayPal, digital wallet, it would be Square

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>with serving small businesses. But then when you move outside

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States, it's interesting companies like Mercato Libra in

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Latin America, which has a good chance of becoming a

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>dominant digital payments provider in that region. It's already an

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>e commerce winner there. Um and and in and of

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>course other companies that are just targeting payments like Audience

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Netherlands who have a blue chip customer list

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>including Netflix, Uber, Airbnb, UM. So it's very good. It's

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>like it sounds like a hot sector. Mark Barrebo, head

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of Global Equity for Jennison associates, the fundamental equity and

0:06:48.480 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>fixed income business of p G. I am. Let's talk housing,

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>because there have been signs that the slowing housing market

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is starting to turn around, at least in certain parts.

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>The big question, though, is, especially here now that we've

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>had the tax season, are we still seeing persistent weakness

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in some of the high tax states, particularly in the

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>coastal areas. It's one area I'd like to focus on

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>with Best Friedman, chief executive officer of Brown Harris Stevens,

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>who joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios. Bess,

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being here. So we look

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>at the New York City market, or the San Francisco market,

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>or some of these high end coastal high tax areas.

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Are we seeing a substantial hit at an ongoing level

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>from the removal of salt deductions or have capping them anyway?

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's I don't know. It's hard to say yet,

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't. We were just talking earlier about, you know,

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the new mansion tax which bent has been enacted, and

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that uh, come July that goes into effect

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and we won't know what the effect of that is

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be until we see the transactions for from

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a year from now, So it's hard to say at

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>this point. But so I guess what I'm hearing in

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the New York market is that the higher end is

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>weaker than say the mid end of the market. Is

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that true and kind of what's driving that? If you think,

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the high end market has slowed down a bit,

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Definitely the co op market. I mean that used to

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>be booming and we've definitely seen a slowdown. I think

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the prices were so uber high, you know, and you

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>hear all these like big deals that got done and

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>those days are kind of they've they've slowed down incredibly.

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>So now people the two bedroom, the three bedroom market,

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that market is very fluid, but the super high end

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>market co op market has slowed down because people are

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>looking for values and condominiums. They want to move downtown. Um,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.599
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing a shift where people want to live with

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:49.599
<v Speaker 1>their kids. Now not everybody wants to be on the

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 1>Upper east Side. They want to go downtown. And now

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Hudson Yards, which is very new, super exciting. Um. Somebody

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>referred to it as Dubai on the Hudson because it

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>looks similar or to some of the stores and some

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.959
<v Speaker 1>of the shopping centers in Dubai, right. I mean, it's exciting,

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and we won't know what's going to happen with the

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>condos there for a while. It's gonna take some time.

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>One big question I have, and we just keep talking

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>at nauseum about the trade tensions in the ongoing skirmish

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>between US and China and elsewhere, and I wonder about

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>foreign investments. Are you still seeing that Chinese buyer, that

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>European buyer to come to the US. That that buyer

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is gone. We haven't seen that buyer in a long time.

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>How long um? I would say it's been three plus

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>years since we've seen that buyer. I mean typically in

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>New York City, it's you know, it's New Yorkers. It's

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>very domestic. It's very light on you know, international people

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>coming to buy. It say it's probably people think there's

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>so many people that come here to buy, but really

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of New Yorkers and a lot of

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>domestic you know, Texas, all over California. People buy here

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>from within the United States. So that internationally, yeah, and

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>no longer Chinese buyers are gone because you see some

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of these crazy ta easy buildings here in Midtown just

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>right by our office here on fifty seven Street, and

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>then on the west, the western side. It's really interesting.

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering. You say there has been a softening, uh

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in particularly in New York City, and I'm wondering how

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>big has the softening been and how big could it be?

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's hard to say. I mean, we've seen

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>probably a bit. It's probably down about ten percent if

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I had to estimate, And I don't know. It's you know,

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty is not good. All the stuff that's going on,

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>like the trade wars, that kind of stuff is not good. Um.

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>It creates sort of instability in the market. But you know,

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty optimistic about it. I see, you know, rates

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>are good. Um, people are still buying, so I think that, Um,

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the market is going to be steady. It

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>has been steady, and I think it will continue to

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>be so. So best your CEO of Brown Hire, stevens Um,

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>what is your strategic focus for your firm this year?

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Giving given what you're telling us about the real estate

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>market and some of the key markets like the Hampton's

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Well, we have kind of been focusing

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on hiring the right people. We just hired a new

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>chief marketing officer, so we're really focusing on UM, tightening

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>up our markets and getting more strategic UM. We're focusing

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>heavily on social media. That's obviously, as everybody knows, is

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like a new channel on the television. Everybody is on

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Instagram or LinkedIn or Facebook, and so we're spending a

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of time on digital. I think today print is

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of old school and people are not looking at

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it as much. In real estate used always be like

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the glossy magazine and all the properties, but you get

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so many more readers or interests with content and social

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and digital. So we're focusing heavily on that. And Brown

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Hair Stevens, being a legacy firm, has typically been in

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>print and so now we're trying to flip it a

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit and do more digital. I wonder if there

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>are other benefits to from going digital where you can

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>actually measure who's viewing what and then use that to

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to better market and understand what people are

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>looking for. You hit the nail right on the head.

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean with print, you put stuff out there, nobody

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 1>knows if anybod even looks at it, orf it goes

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Speaker 1>in the garbage. But we can totally measure what people

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>are opening up and then we can get a little

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>bit more info on that. So what are you learning?

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>We're learning like what what type of a person will

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like our information? What who's interested in? What where do

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>they live, what's their background? All that stuff is helpful

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to us so we can cater to our audience. UM.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're getting laser focused on digital. That's really important

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for us, and it seems important given that the millennials

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>are coming into their real estate buying part of their lives.

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>What are you sensing any trends here, like in the

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>New York Hampton's Florida market about millennials and their purchasing intent.

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we see a lot of millennials purchasing in Brooklyn.

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's very popular, you know, in downtown and

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>typically areas um that are not popular yet. You know,

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>they want to be in places where people are not

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>there yet, so they want to be or that's where

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>they can afford places. That's I think you said it

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better. I'm not I'm being very diplomatic,

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>well said, but yes, I think that's a big part

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of it. So interesting. Best ream and thank you so

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Best As the CEO Brown Howard

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Stevens talking to us about the real estate market in

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>New York, paul I felt a certain magic as our

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>next guest walked into our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studios. He

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is the longest serving malt master in the Scotch whiskey industry.

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>He is David Stewart of the Balveny. He is based

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>normally in Scotland the Boviny excuse me, uh, He's normally

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>based in Scotland, but he joins U here in New York. David,

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>let's just talk about what it means to be a

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>malt master. Yeah, it is a very unique job in

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the Scotch whisk industry, the scott swisk and it's employs

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people and and really there's probably only fifteen

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of us doing this same jobs out the whole industry.

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So we are actually involved in the quality of the

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>whiskey that's actually in the bottle, selecting the cast that

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>will create any one of a different expressions, making sure

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>if we taste consistently and the quality is correct, and

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>also innovating as well looking forward of what we're going

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to release in a few years time. So we're always

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>innovating and experimenting in our warehouses and putting a whisky

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>into different cast types and maybe changing the distillation process

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>slightly to maybe give us something in the future. So

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a very proud to have worked in the Scotch

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>whiskey and just for so long and and with this

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>great family company. So talk to us about the Scotch

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>whiskey business. Is it is it growing? Where is it growing?

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Where people drinking more and less? It is growing at

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the moment, and it has been for the last time

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen years. A number of the distilleries are actually

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>increasing production. We need to we need to look so

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>far out to mean, our youngest whiskey is twelve years.

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>We've got to forecast what we're going to sell in

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve years time. So we've got to increase production at

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>our distillery now. So we're pretty quisky into casks that

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>will age on for the next twelve years. So we're

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>increasing production or distilleries and that's happening throughout the industry.

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of small craft the stiller is being

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>opened up in Scotland, probably another ten or fifteen that

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>will be opened up in the next five or ten years.

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So and Asia probably is is a big growing emerging

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>market for the Scottish whisky industry. You were talking about

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>how long you've been doing this. You started in nineteen

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>sixty two at the age of seventeen. You've been doing

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>this a long time. What's been the biggest change in

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Yeah, Well, when I started was all but

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>blended whiskey. We single malts weren't around at that time.

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But our company, the family company of William Grant Lawrence

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>glen Fidder back in nineteen sixty three, just a year

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>after I started, were and we probably had about ten

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>years really without any competition. And then the rest of

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the industry soh A, well Glen Fidder was doing as

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a single malt how profitable single maults can be. And

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>then and then the rest of the industry came into

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>two join us and launch their single malts. So I say,

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>blender whiskey is Blender whiskey is still the biggest category

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>if as sales are concerned, But single malts I've got

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>such a variety, as I've mentioned as a hundred and

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty distilleris in Scotland, all producing these different styles of whiskey,

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>different flavors. So and it's yeah, it's growing to be

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>fair the last ten twenty years, it's as boom time

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Scotch whisky industry and long may that continue.

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>The company you're launching, I guess a new product, three

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>bottle set of whiskeys. Tell us about that. Yeah, well

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this is the above any stories, which is all about

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the how we created the whiskey were calling stories, because

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stories to tell about how the whiskies

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>were created and the people behind the behind the creation

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of these whiskey. So that the first one is a

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve year old whiskey which is they called the sweet

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Taste of American Oak. And this is as we normally

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we're used the American child bottles after bourbon, but in

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>this sensance we've actually used virgin oak instead of chatting

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>they we've only toasted them at a Cooper's into Kentucky

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and we've got these bottles sent over to Scotland. We

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>gave them another toasting in Scotland and then we put

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>our twelve year old Blevinian into these casts for a

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>short finishing period, so it sided more okayness and honey

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and citrus and vanilla notes to the whiskey. Okay, So

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I should ask you about the increase in people investing

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in in scotch and sort of high end bottles and

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>all of that. But I want to know more logistics

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.959
<v Speaker 1>about your tasting of this. Do you spit out the

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>scotch when you taste it, when you swish it around

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>in your mouth, or do you drink it? Or like

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the wine industry, we were trained nose us, so I'm

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>nosing Christy all the time. We've got tulip shaped nose

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and glasses that got a small opening at the top

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that we stick our nose into and so I actually

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>taste it. We don't taste that very rarely do we

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>taste that. We may need to do with twenty or

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty samples in a day from all different sides of

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the process, and you split it. Aging whiskey finishes single battles,

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>but no, when noising the whiskey, that's what that's what

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>takes a long training period. David Stewart, thank you so

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>much for being with a Smaalt Master of the Balvany

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>from Scotland. Here we're we are looking at Boeing shares

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>down more than one percent, but some people are expecting

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>that they are getting ready to unroll the newest seven

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven, getting it back into service seven threies seven MAX.

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>This of course was the one that came under a

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of scrutiny after being involved in two different crashes.

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Joining us to give us a sense of what the

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>latest here is is George Ferguson, Senior Aerospace, Defense and

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Airlines analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. So, first of all, why

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is it important for Boeing to put Max back in service? Well,

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think simply because there's they have no

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>other product to offer to airlines and the narrow body

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>airplane is is the most prevalently flown airplane around the world.

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>That's the biggest people mover. It's not to say that

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the seven thirty seven has has problems and it shouldn't

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>be offered. I think the airplane is fine, um, but

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't go to another You couldn't decide we're going

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to redesign the seven thirty seven now because of these

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>recent problems and and have a product to offer people.

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, for another five years. So, George, I know

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>next month is the Paris Air Show and among all

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>the champagne and rose that I'm sure you'll be drinking.

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>What is can Boeing actually sell airplanes? Can they sell

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>seven thirty seven max Is next month in Paris? The

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>funny thing is we've seen them actually sell a couple

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>uh in the last and last few months, even while

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the airplane has been grounded. So can they sell them? Yeah?

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Bits and pieces, But there won't be any significant sales

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>without getting this airplane back in the air and in

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>revenue flight. So it does look like they are going

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to get it back in air, but it's gonna look

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a little different, right, Yes, I mean we'll have some

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:19.719
<v Speaker 1>modifications to it, uh for sure. And I think that's

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's what's what's gonna get hammered out here.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>What we have a global regulators meeting coming tomorrow where

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the f A is inviting into bunch of regulators around

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the world, and and my senses the f A is

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>going to show them what they think the right fixes.

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And it seems to seems to us at the fixes

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that the semcast system that pushes the nose over in

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the event of the airplanes at risk of stalling. Um

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>that this system will be less aggressive, because it really

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the MCAST system in both crosses really aggressively pushed the

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>airplane's nose down because it was getting erroneous sensor input,

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>but the pilots couldn't counteract it purely by pulling back

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>on the on the yoke of the airplane, of the

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>control wheel the airplane. And it seems to me that

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of the fix will be not to let MCAST

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>get that aggressive so the poots can can counteract it.

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>There are other procedures for the pilots to to fix

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>what they call runaway stabilizer problem, but I think that

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>will be that will be core of the fix. I

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>think the other challenge Boeing has here is they want

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the MAX to look like and and and take the

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>same training as the seven thirty seven n G it's predecessor.

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>They sold it to airlines with the view that there

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be much training required to transition from the old

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>seven seven to the new MAX. And so I think

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>what we'll watch very closely as we go into this

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>regulator negotiations, will regulators want more training, especially if they

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>want simulator training or actual flight chaining. I don't think

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>flight training is on the table, but you never know.

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Um that cost airlines money and they won't like that

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>if they need that kind of training to transition pilots.

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Low cost airlines hate hate additional costs, and so that

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 1>will be the key to watch as we get into

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>this regulator round. So, George, I know we're we're still

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the midst of this, or Boeing still

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of this. Is there a sense of

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>what the total cost or liability to Boeing will be here? Yees?

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>So we uh, we've been plugging some numbers together over

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days, and you know, our view

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is that at the by the end of three Q

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 1>the airplane we're back in the air um and we

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>think that by the end of if they get into

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the air by the end of September, we think there's

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>one point four one point five billion dollars worth of

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>what lost profit to the airlines that had deliveries before

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it was grounded or would have gotten deliveries over the

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>last number of months. That number wouldn't sort of stop

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>increasing because airlines would have until they got the deliveries

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>they were expecting UH to continue to claim losses. We

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>based that on Southwest, which is a very profitable airline,

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>so we're trying to be a little bit high with

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that number. But we kind of see one point four

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 1>one point five billions through the end of September, and

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>we see about a billion dollar cost of both both

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of the crashes got a very good at one point

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars. George Ferguson, senior aerospace analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from Princeton, New Jersey. George,

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for your comments on Boeing. It seems

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>like to the extent that Boeing maybe past the worst

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of this, and as George suggested, if they can get

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the plane back in the air UH in the third quarter,

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>they can put some kind of cap on the liability

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and and move forward. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>abram Woyit's I'm on Twitter at Lisa Bramwoits one before

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.