WEBVTT - Revolutionizing Energy with Bitcoin Mining: A Deep Dive with Stephen Barbour

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Mark Mass Show.

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 2>We're always talking about the way the world is changing,

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 2>of course as we look at it through the lens

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 2>of politics, finance, and technology, and of course that technology

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 2>is bitcoin that is changing the world through the decentralized technology.

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to bring to you some late breaking news

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 2>so you can see how the world is changing. And

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 2>of course of interesting guests. You don't have to just

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 2>listen to me all the time. And today I have

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 2>Steven Barber coming onto the show. Always a wealth of

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 2>information and fun guy to talk to you. I'm looking

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 2>forward to this. He is the owner of Upstream.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Data, Inc.

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Which is sort of turning trash into treasure, maybe even

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 2>better than turning track. It's like it's like almost like

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 2>the ultimate form of recycling waste into treasure.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe would you say that, Stephen.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 3>It's not a bad analogy. Yeah, we specialize in turning

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 3>waste gas, wasted methane into bitcoin.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 2>But it's not just that, right, So it's like I

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>revised it from turning trash into treasure, but it's actually

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>it's actually better than that, because like trash would just

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 2>whatever sit there in a landfill, but this methane is

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 2>just leaking in right right now. The options are we

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 2>either flare it or vent it into the ecosystem. And

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 2>so you're taking that and instead of just letting it

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 2>seep into the ecosystem or burn it off, you're actually

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 2>using it and turn it into something valuable.

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, like pretty much every oil gas well or

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 3>oil well in the world when it's like cracking a

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 3>can of coke, Like as soon as you release the

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 3>pressure on that thing, there's like there's gas that comes

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 3>out of solution. So every oil well out there, pretty

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 3>much conventional at least, has that gas that comes with it.

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 3>And so yeah, the problem of course being if you're

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 3>stranded energy, you know, like remote oil wells out in

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 3>the middle of nowhere, and you don't have pipeline infrastructure

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 3>to sell the gas, then you have to do something

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 3>with it. So in a lot of cases, that's too

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>much gas to do anything with, and so we build

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>products that people can buy and it turns that gas

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 3>into bitcoin. It's basically it's natural gas engines fully like

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>a fully kitted out skid where the fuel gas plumbs

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 3>in through the engine, generates power, sends electricity to the

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 3>mining side, which is what we call the load center,

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 3>and that turns it into hashes, and of course those

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 3>hashes reward you in bitcoin.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 2>Now, I know in Canada and the United States, there's

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of regulations around, you know, for these energy

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 2>companies of how much gas they can in some instances

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 2>even how much gas they can flare or event into

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>the ecosystem.

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's sort of.

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Like what you're talking about, where they're forced to do

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 2>something with it. And if they're stranded, if they're so

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 2>far from a pipeline, then they don't really have a

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 2>good option, right they could either shutter it in or

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 2>use an option like this. I mean, is that sort

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 2>of how the regulations work.

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Basically, you're there's a couple of ways you can

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 3>control your gas flow, so you can rate limit you're well,

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 3>So like most most people when they drill a well,

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 3>they want to produce it at max potential rates because

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 3>that's what they're that's where they're making money. It's selling

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 3>it well. But the more you produce, like the more

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 3>you pump the oil to surface, the more gas that

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 3>comes with it. So a lot of the regulations will

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 3>force the oil company, you know, they might be allowed

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 3>to vent or flare up to a certain limit, but

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 3>to stay within that limit, they might have to throttle

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 3>their downhole pumps and throttle a well, depending what what

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 3>the completion looks like in some jurisdictions, like I think

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 3>New Mexico right now, I'm not sure so sure about California,

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 3>for example, where where you're sitting. But certain states have

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 3>different rags and some of the REGs are no flaring whatsoever,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 3>so you're not you're basically not going to get a permit,

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 3>or if you do get a permit for routine flaring,

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>it only be temporary. So that's where they're forced to

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 3>well either not develop the property or if they do

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>develop the property, they have to you know, pay a

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 3>lot of money out to get pipelines, in which case

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 3>might be very far from the market, so you spend

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot of money at pipelines.

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask another question that I think it

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 2>can be more fun and interesting for the listeners. So

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's a lot of attacks on bitcoin, fudd

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>if we will you know, if you're uncertainty to out

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of attacks on bitcoin, specifically around the amount

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 2>of energy it uses. A lot of the counter to this,

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, from bitcoin minors, let's say, but also some

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 2>political organizations around bitcoin mining as well push back and

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 2>they try to say how clean bitcoin is and how

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 2>much renewable energy it uses, and how it's helping to

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 2>actually cut down on CO two and things like that.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I've considered, I've been asked to join some of these

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 2>political organizations, and I'm like, the problem I have is

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 2>I sort of reject that entire premise, right, I sort

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 2>of reject that entire premise. I don't think we need

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 2>to be arguing that bitcoin isn't a waste of energy.

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we need to be arguing that it

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 2>cuts down CO two missions because I don't even think

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 2>that's the problem in the first place. And I'm curious

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>your take on that.

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's been over the years since I got

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 3>into the space in like twenty sixteen, that's been one

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 3>of the most common FUD vectors. You know, the most

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 3>common social attacks on bitcoin is that it's is it

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 3>a good use of energy? Just because obviously the trend

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 3>and hash rate and the underlying power usage that goes

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>under that hash rate is up and up and up

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 3>like exponentially, and of course one day it'll plateau somewhere,

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 3>but it is going to very high places, like it's

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 3>going to be a lot of load on energy systems

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 3>across the globe. I've always just started with when people

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 3>have brought that up to me, well, bitcoin's a waste

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 3>of energy for that person, it might be a waste

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 3>of energy. Like if they don't use bitcoin, then sure,

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 3>like you don't, you'd have no you'd take no value

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>from it. Sure, that's your That is the root of

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 3>what value is. It's always a subjective thing. I always

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 3>just use the same example, like I don't personally like

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 3>certain vegetables like cauliflower, but I don't go around saying

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 3>saying that it's a waste of energy just because I

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 3>don't eat it. I don't eat it. There's a whole

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 3>industry around growing cauliflower. I'm sure it's quite a lot

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 3>of energy actually that goes into it, right, So you

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>know that to me is fundamentally where the argument ends.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 3>Is for a lot of people, bitcoin can be a

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 3>waste of energy in their subjective view, and that's just fine.

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 3>But there's a lot of people paying for it, including

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 3>both of us and many of your listeners. And to

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 3>us bitcoin is useful and therefore it has value. That's

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 3>just really where it ends. But if you want to

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 3>like dig in further, I mean, if you look at

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:43.679
<v Speaker 3>where bitcoin mining is applied, it's often applied at sources

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 3>of energy that can't find a market anyway. I mean

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 3>that's because that's the way it's trending. That's you know

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 3>why I call my company upstream Data. We're going upstream

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 3>in the energy system, and that's more or less where

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 3>you get the cheapest energy because it's the most wasted energy.

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 3>We specialize in that in the natural gass side, but

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 3>our customers use our packages.

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Everywhere.

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 3>We have people on solar wind where they curtail it.

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 2>So if you think about waste the way I've thought

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 2>about it is like to your point, like you don't

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 2>like cauliflower, what a waste to make cauliflower?

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.559
<v Speaker 2>I see some guy meditating for you know, thirty minutes

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 2>a day. What a waste of your time to sit

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 2>there and just stare into space. But for him that

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 2>holds his whole routine together, for example, Right, So it's like,

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 2>who's to say what's a waste?

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>But what would be a waste.

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 2>I think is sort of maybe we could agree on

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 2>is like if I had a bunch of steak that

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 2>I just cooked up and then nobody ate it and

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I had to throw it away, Well maybe I kind

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 2>of wasted that steak, if you will, right. So from

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 2>that perspective, then when they say that like bitcoin is

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 2>a waste of energy, well that's actually not true because

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 2>mostly what I think you're framing up and what I

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 2>see is that bitcoin is actually using wasted energy.

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>In a sense, we've already created the energy.

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 2>The energy is already there, and if we don't use it,

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the energy goes away. That's the steak. We might as

0:07:58.200 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 2>well just eat the steak, right, We might as well

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>just use the energy is there. So it's not really

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 2>waste energy. It's actually using wasted energy.

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it it enhances the efficiency the power

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 3>generation system. So if it's wind power, most people don't

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 3>argue that wind power is bad for the environment. You know,

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 3>there's definitely a nuance to that topic, but most people

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 3>agree that it's it's a good thing. And so bitcoin

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 3>mining going upstream to wind firms and taking all the

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 3>surplus power that the wind firm cannot ship because the

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 3>demand isn't there when it's being generated, which of course

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 3>is the main problem with sources of energy like wind.

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 3>That's great, I mean otherwise it's just getting curtailed like

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 3>it's not being generated. They you know, the blades get

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 3>in set, so they don't, they don't. There's no load

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 3>on the system, and so bitcoin generates a load on

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 3>on these. You could basically pick any source of power whatsoever,

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 3>whether it's a thermal power plant being like coal, natural gas, nuclear,

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 3>for example. Bitcoin makes them all more efficient. They makes

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 3>them all more energy efficient because it's effectively just a

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 3>buyer blast resort. And every single kind of power plant

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 3>will have periods where it needs this buyer blast resort

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 3>because even like a coal plant.

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna I got to cut you off before you

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:23.719
<v Speaker 2>give me that example, because I got to run into

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 2>a break. If you're just tuning into the Markmas Show,

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 2>sitting down, Stephen Barber from Upsteam Data Inc. We'll be

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 2>back with more in a minute. I got to take

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 2>a very quick break. Don't go away your back all right,

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 2>welcome back. If you're just tuning in you're listening to

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 2>the Mark Mos Show, Sitting down. Stephen Barber from Upstream Data, Inc.

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>And we're talking about upstream data. We're talking about using

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 2>wasted energy and how we can turn that.

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I cut you off before the break.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 2>If you want to go ahead and just kind of

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 2>finish what you're saying, you're gonna be an example.

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just an example of like even like a thermal

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 3>power plant, like they operate at most most peak efficiency,

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 3>like the best heat rates when they're at you know,

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 3>nominal load. And one problem you see today is when

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 3>you have all this other load or or this other

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 3>generation come out on the grid, like wind and solar

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 3>that can offset what's coming from these reliable base loads.

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 3>And so if they operate at a lower lower than

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 3>nominal capacity than they're designed for, they actually burn energy

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 3>less efficiently, especially coal plants for example, Like they'll burn

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 3>coal at a worse heat rate than they would otherwise.

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 3>So having just always having things at nominal optimal generation

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 3>is a net benefit. And it just goes back to

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 3>the point you said earlier, like any the stakes are

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 3>getting thrown out, we need to stop throwing out the

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 3>stakes and start frying them up. And that's what bigcoined

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 3>out exactly.

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Now, once you mine it, let's let's let's kind of

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 2>move up this a little bit. So once you mine it,

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>most of these miners now mine inside of a pool,

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>so they pool their resources together to try to earn

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 2>more rewards that way. I know you've been throwing out

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 2>some tweets lately kind of talking about some of these

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>pools and being are they custodial pools?

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Are they non custodial pools?

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Mean?

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Do they hold your bitcoin? Do they ky see you?

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Do? They have to know your customers, They have to

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 2>collect all the data on you before they'll pay you

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 2>out to the bitcoin.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious your take on that.

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 2>And then we can talk about a new mining pool

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 2>potentially that was trying to fix that and it's sort

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 2>of gone.

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Off the rails a little bit.

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 2>But what's your take sort of on the way this

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 2>this mining mining pools potentially, like I said it, with

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 2>some censorship ky C in there, how that's starting to develop?

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean the general trend over the last number

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 3>of years is mining pools have and they will continue

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 3>to be get under more scrutiny from different regulators. I

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 3>guess it's hard to pin them down on what they're

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, they're not so much like a financial services

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 3>in a way, they're more of a server providing you know,

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 3>a place to pool compuation. So it's but they also

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 3>end up pools generally custody bitcoin, So that's one one

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 3>thing that's that's a concern, Like most pools do, and

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 3>the reason they do it is because there's an it

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 3>allows for much more efficient payouts. Like to put it

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 3>in a nutshell, you think, pay more people out in

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 3>a more efficient manner, unlike an exchange which might be

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 3>acting as a custodian for other reasons. That's one thing pools. Uh,

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 3>there's there's been pressure, like some pools are preemptively gone

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 3>forward with oh fact compliance right for example, so basically

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 3>just blacklisting or providing not including certain utxos and transactions

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 3>in their blocks and effectively censoring bitcoin because of pressure

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.079
<v Speaker 3>from regulators. So like most of the pools that I've

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 3>done this, like Marathon, Marathon's pooled this for a period

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 3>f two pool reason most recently. And the funny thing

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 3>is they did it preemptively because they they're sort of

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 3>almost what I say is like they they're they're positioning

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 3>for regulatory capture, which is probably inevitable. I think it

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 3>is inevitable that pools, mining pools at least like within

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 3>the threshold will be licensed. That's like likely they're going

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 3>to be the trend. It's just why you in.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Like the developed world, like in the US or Europe

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 2>for example, then you're saying to start a mining pool,

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 2>then you would need some You're you're thinking your your

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 2>prediction would be that they would be required to have

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 2>some sort of a license by the government of a pool.

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 3>I expect eventually that's likely what's going to happen. Yeah,

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean it it just generally, I mean that kind

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 3>of thing, and it might be very it might be

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 3>sort of like tiered where if you're just like small

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 3>or something, you know, you might not have to it

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 3>might be a very lightweight thing, but you might have

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 3>to register. There's all kinds of things, I mean, just

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 3>because of the nature when you like sort of zoom

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 3>out the nature what bitcoin is. It's a competitor to FIAT,

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 3>it's a competitor to central banking really in my view,

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 3>so I think it's pretty much inevitable that they're going

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 3>to push it's the easiest way to call it socially,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 3>attack bitcoin or attack bitcoin if you want to put

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 3>it in that kind of you know, frame of view

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 3>is to put in do it through regulation, licensing, permitting, yeah, axing.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 2>And obviously they could set up these pools from anywhere though,

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 2>right So, I mean they can easily set up because

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 2>it's just a place where it concentrates these computers, this

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 2>computer power, this hash.

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Power, if you will.

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean there's no reason why they couldn't just

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 2>go set up the pool in El Salvador or Argentina

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 2>now or something.

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh of course, yeah, you can set the pool up

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 3>in a jurisdiction. Of course, the regulators might just say, well,

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 3>you're serving an American client, right, so that's a problem,

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 3>and that's what they do in America. If you serve ers,

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 3>and even if you're abroad, that can be a problem.

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that was like you know, bitmax had to

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 3>deal with that. But the thing about pools, you remember,

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 3>and it's the beautiful thing about bitcoin, right, like a

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 3>public pool where you're opened into everyone. That's pretty much.

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 3>I find it hard hard to believe that they're going

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 3>to be able to find a way to be publicly

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 3>available and somehow circumvent any regulation that might come because

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 3>by nature being publicly available, and the tools they have

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 3>at their disposal to identify the operators. You're likely just

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 3>going to have to comply with whatever regulations come. And

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 3>it's not that that in itself is a negative. It's

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 3>more so just you know, the regulators are going to

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of create a white market for bitcoin mining pools.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 3>But you can also run pools like bear in Mind

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 3>mining solo. You can still run a private pool. And

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 3>that's one prediction I've made is I think we're going

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 3>to see more were like you.

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 2>And I, Hey, Steven, Like, let's just set up a

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 2>little pool between ourselves kind of thing. Yeah.

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Like I actually one day part of my part of

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 3>my software which I won't bore you guys with today,

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 3>but like part of my development plan with my business

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 3>is it's leading to a point where I could offer

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 3>a private pool because I build infrastructure for people. The

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 3>thing about and this is probably too deep for this

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 3>podcast right now, there is a lot of problems with

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 3>opening a pool up to the public because you can

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 3>get it's called block withheld, you can be attacked by

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 3>your own customers, and also like you can actually pay

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 3>them to attack you if you're not And there's really

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>no way around preventing that from happening outside of having

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 3>software having full control of the mining stack that's on

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 3>your pool. So I think as bitcoin develops towards more

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 3>adversarial conditions, it becomes bigger globally, it's more competition, and

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 3>you might have even like state attacks against it, or

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 3>if that doesn't happen and you have like just just

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 3>aggressive pools against each other, I think we're going to

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 3>see development towards private pools. So that's like I'm running

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 3>a pool, but I'm not letting you in without me

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 3>like having some kind of contract access to your front.

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you think those those smaller mining pools, though, can

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 2>be competitive and still provide economic you know, advantage, or

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 2>at least be competitive in that sense.

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I do think pools can be competitive. It is

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 3>a tough business, like if you're purely a pool and

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 3>you're not doing if you look at most pools today,

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 3>like I'll just use brains Pool, slush pool, it's the

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 3>oldest pool, you know. They they offer not just mining

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 3>pool as a service, they offer like firmware, and they

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 3>drive their pool through firmware sales, effectively like installing their

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 3>firmware drives into their pool. So like pools have generated.

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's hold that difficult to take a very quick break.

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 2>If you're just tuning in listening to the Mark Mass

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Show sitting down with Stephen Barber, we're talking about sort

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 2>of the intricacies of bitcoin and bitcoin mining. It's important

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 2>stuff we're gonna dig into a little bit more a minute.

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I gonna take a very quick break, though, don't go away.

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bear back, all right, welcome back.

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 2>If you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Mass Show sitting down with Stephen Barber. We're talking about

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin using wasted energy, the attack vectors on bitcoin, and

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about specifically the mining pools and some of

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the attack vectors there. So you're gonna say that maybe

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 2>some of these attack vectors could be solved by setting

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 2>up like private mining pools, where a group of people

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 2>known people to each other could set up their own pool.

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 2>And I think you were going to say, could it

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 2>be economically competitive with larger public pools.

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, the cheapest way of mind is actually solo mining.

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 3>It's cheap in the sense you don't pay any fees,

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 3>You just pay the cost to run a note and stuff.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Why it's expensive is because you don't get your payments regularly,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 3>so the cost of capital is quite expensive. You might

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 3>mine for months if you're small and not get your paid.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Cost on your money is quite significant, and so like

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 3>there's almost a trade off. Like solo mining, it is

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 3>actually long term cheapest. It's just most people can't afford

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 3>to wait for the block. And I'm not so much

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 3>saying that, I think that I think we're going to

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 3>see it a bigger trend towards private pools, mainly because

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 3>I think as a network gets bigger, a private pool

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 3>can operate cheaper than a public pool because it doesn't

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 3>have to worry about the risk of block withholding attacks.

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 3>That's or it doesn't have to price in the risk

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 3>of block withholding attacks because presumably a private pool has

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 3>control or somewhat control over the mining hardware that's connected

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 3>to it, and that's like maybe a deep to get

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 3>into technically. But that's one reason why I think we

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 3>will see more private pools.

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, the reason why, I mean it is pretty deep

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 2>and probably more technical than I want to get into

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 2>for most people listening, but I'm just the reason why

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested in it is because what we're seeing right

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 2>now is sort of it depends on where you're at

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 2>in the world, but even in the United States, the

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Land of the Free, we're having a very very adversarial

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 2>take starting to happen in the United States with Elizabeth

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Warren sort of running this war path on, you know,

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 2>basically creating rules around bitcoin and cryptocurrency that could effectively

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 2>make it almost impossible to run, you know, putting keyc

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 2>rules into all these different places that it just doesn't work.

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 2>And so on one hand you have that, on the

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 2>other hand, you sort of have all these ETFs that

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 2>are about to pop up, so you know, could happen

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 2>any day, could happen before this is even aired. At

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 2>this point, it looks like it's happening that quickly. We've

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 2>seen the SEC has shifted and made all of these

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 2>funds now go from physically settled to now cash settled.

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 2>So now the funds aren't even buying and selling bitcoin,

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 2>they're just doing all the cash. So we're basically just

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 2>betting on the price of bitcoin, we're not even buying

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 2>and selling it. And then we have Elizabeth Warren over

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 2>here saying like all self custody and transactions on your

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.959
<v Speaker 2>own could be deemed illegal. And if you put those

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 2>two together, then it sort of looks like when they're

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 2>starting to like, well you can own it, but only

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 2>you can own it through a fund which doesn't actually

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 2>own it, but you can't own it on your own.

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It looks like there's.

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Like this attack vector that's just like pushing us into

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 2>this path. Then you add on what you're talking about

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 2>as far as then the mining pools are even regulated,

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 2>so you can't even mining get it that way. So

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 2>now you can't get it through mining, you can't custy

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 2>it yourself, and you can only own it through an

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 2>ETF that doesn't even actually own it. It looks like

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 2>that's sort of where we're going. Would you say those

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 2>are attack vectors that you're looking.

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 3>At, Yeah, I would, I would. I would say that

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 3>the who I call the evil fiat maximilists or that

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 3>is exactly what they want. That's what they're trying to do.

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 3>It just remains to be seen if there's enough of

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 3>a private interest. You know, the US is the one

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 3>place that I would hope would push back on regulation,

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 3>and luckily we do have several you know, good lobby

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 3>groups helping push back and then there's good states where

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 3>they've really ablished like they're open for business and bitcoin mining,

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 3>obviously a few of them being like Wyoming and Texas

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 3>and the like. But yeah, I think I think that

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 3>is actually the biggest risk to what we're going to see,

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 3>just like as people in the bitcomining ecosystem is, is

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 3>them coming harder towards pools. The way it's trending is

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 3>more regulation. But I think it should be expected because

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 3>the government, whether you're federal or state level, they tend to,

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, at some point when when there's new businesses,

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 3>new ventures, new innovation being happening and developing, it's only

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 3>usually a matter of time before they get involved with

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 3>regulation on that, with permitting on that, and you know,

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 3>they that's what they're in business for. They need to

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 3>get their cut. So it's it's not surprising to me,

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 3>but I do like what I see, even with the

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 3>some new initiatives in the in the like the pool,

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 3>the pool ecosystem has been pready dead for several years.

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 3>So like a few new pools came up, like Ocean

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Demand Pool, and I think they're trying to solve a

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 3>very real problem, and so it's good to see more

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:16.479
<v Speaker 3>options out there, but I would expect regulation is just

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 3>something we're all going to have to you know, expect

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 3>and work through. The really thing that bugs me is

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 3>that the big pools, and it's not I'm not really

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 3>here to name names, but the big ones, like the

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 3>two biggest ones, are foundering in a pool. It's in

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 3>their best interest, just like just like it is for

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 3>coinbase to build for regulations to come in, because they're

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 3>they're the most well equipped to navigate regulation. It's just

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 3>the nature of big business versus small business, and big

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 3>businesses generally want regulation because they build regulatory motes. They

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 3>might say they don't, but that's the fact, like they want.

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 3>You generally see big businesses lobby for specific regulations that

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 3>they can navigate. They can keep the massive amount of

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 3>overhead on staff to keep on you know, in line,

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 3>whereas like the newcomers, especially as that regulation gets set

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 3>up and those moats are built. And that's usually what

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm whining about on Twitter is like, you know, generally speaking,

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 3>is these people have like it's almost like a incentive

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 3>to usher in the REGs because they can keep their

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 3>competition at bay because they're going to be the best

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 3>equipped and.

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Sure, yeah, we see that all the time.

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 2>And that's the corporatism, if you will, corporatocracy of the

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 2>world right where these big businesses use use the regulatory

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 2>system to build these moats. I mean we've seen it

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 2>time and time again. I mean, Amazon's a perfect example

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 2>of how they've done this. I remember why, I used

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 2>to sell internet products a long time ago, and they

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 2>pioneered a bill because at the time, in the United States,

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 2>you could buy stuff on the Internet and not pay

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 2>sales tax. And Amazon pushed a bill that would require

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 2>all these internet sellers to actually have to collect sales tax.

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 2>And of course, you know you had to dig to

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 2>find out Amazon who was pushing this?

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>But why would they do that?

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, to your point, for Amazon, how big they are

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 2>and how much staff they have, they could figure out.

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 2>And in the United States, tax selles tax collected on

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 2>a county by county basis not even a state by state,

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:10.959
<v Speaker 2>So it's like, how many thousands of counties? How am

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 2>I supposed to keep track of that? I can't, But

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 2>they have the bureaucracy, they have the manpower to do that,

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 2>and so since I can't do it, they can. Well,

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll just have Amazon sell my products for me. I'll

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 2>just list everything onto Amazon, let them take a cut

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:24.919
<v Speaker 2>of everything I do, and then they'll take care of

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 2>the sales tax for me.

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's great business, Like sell the solution to the problem.

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 3>You you help me.

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly right.

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 2>So you know, and what we just saw, I don't

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 2>know if you saw it. Well, I'm sure you've been

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 2>seeing what Meal is doing down in Argentina. I mean

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 2>he just went and cut like three hundred and eighty

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 2>regulations and yeah, and I watched his talk this morning.

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 2>It was in Spanish, but I read the transcription and

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 2>he called this out exactly. He said, you know, like

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>in Argentina, we're not even free. We have to be

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 2>given permission for everything. And so he's just like that out,

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 2>which you know, I guess we'll see in real time,

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I believe, I'm sure you would agree. Well, hopefully unleash

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, this economy, this h this creativity.

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe it'll be a big miracle.

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's the nature he's doing. What you know, I

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.719
<v Speaker 3>hope to see broadly, I mean the nature of bureaucracy

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 3>just gets worse and worse and more entangled over time,

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 3>and usually people have no incentive to come in and

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:31.959
<v Speaker 3>remove the bureaucracy, to remove the rags. So you need

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 3>people like him to sort of, I guess, rise up

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 3>popularly with the hatchet and chopp things down. Chop down

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 3>the yeah, chop down the forest and allow people that.

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean he literally ran on his campaign.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 2>He was running around with a chainsaw and like, hey,

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm taking a chainsaw and he did.

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean so far.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump ran on a campaign of I believe he

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 2>promised to get rid of I think or three regulations

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 2>for every new one he put in place, and I

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 2>think it ended up being more than that, like five

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 2>regulations for every new one.

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good.

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he at least made a dent. Mealey is

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 2>like holding my beer. Here's three hundred and eighty, like

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 2>just gone right, Like it'd be pretty interesting if you're

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 2>just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show.

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm sitting down with Stephen Barber from Upstream Data, Inc.

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 2>It's helping people turn trash into treasure with bitcoin mining.

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back. I want to ask you.

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 2>About ordinals and inscriptions and things like that, but you're

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.239
<v Speaker 2>gonna take a very quick break. If you're just tuning in,

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to miss this. This is probably the

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 2>most debated topic maybe in the space.

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back with more in that in a minute.

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't go away, all right, welcome back.

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 2>If you're just tune in, you're listening to the Mark

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Moss Show, sitting down with Stephen Barber from Upstream Data Inc.

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, Stephen, we're.

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Talking a lot about the mining and we talked about

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the pools. I want to talk about this next piece,

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 2>and this is the ordinals and inscriptions. Just like anything,

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 2>there's pros and cons to everything, So I guess it

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 2>depends on which side and pros and cons that you're on.

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 2>On the pro side, it's generated a lot more fees

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 2>for the miners, so I'm guessing the miners are probably

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 2>liking that. The con side, people aren't happy that it's

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 2>increased their transaction costs, even though considered, you know, comparatively,

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 2>it's still pretty reasonable. And then so there's that, there's

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 2>the pros and cons there. Then you have sort of

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 2>some of these bitcoin maximalists who think it's a misuse,

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 2>it's a waste, if we want to frame it that way.

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 2>It's a waste of the network using it this way.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Where do you how do you view this?

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 2>How are you sort of breaking down dissecting this topic.

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'd like to I'd like to think I would

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 3>balance you because I've always liked the framing that you know,

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Bitcoin you sort of have like on one hand, like

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 3>merchants like people, me and you, all of us transacting

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 3>with each other using the network. You also have miners,

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 3>which are basically providing the underlying service, and there's overlap,

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 3>but like when you think about them in two discrete

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 3>like buckets of network participants, Well, miners like the people

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 3>I sell to, they love ordinals. They don't know or

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 3>care whether it is or they might know, but they

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 3>in the end, if we don't care, it's more fees,

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 3>it's more revenue, So of course we love it. So

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm sympathetic to that because it's it's increasing our sales,

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 3>it's increasing our revenue. But I'm also a user, so

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 3>like I don't like paying high fees. And my personal opinion,

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 3>like on NFTs and inscribing JPEG's in the blockchain, is

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't really see the market for it other than

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 3>people speculating and gambling. So in one hand, you can

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 3>lump me in the Bitcoin maxi group. That's really you

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 3>could say against them. But meanwhile, I was one of

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the first people inscribing on ordinals. I have an ordinal

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 3>like from way back because the way I my my

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 3>take on it is if you're node, if you're running

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin core, which is the reference protocol, and it accepts

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 3>a transaction, and that transaction is valid, and I really

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 3>don't care what you use it for. It's not my business.

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't care if somebody were transaction fee, right, I mean,

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>who's to say what a waste is?

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? If and and honestly, if you're interested in just

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 3>putting you know, the cliche monkeys on the blockchain all

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 3>day and you're paying for that, like I don't really care.

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's we already have a spam throttle with

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 3>block size. Uh, that's why there is a block size,

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 3>and so people can't just spam infinite JPEGs. There's a

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 3>limitation on it. And as long as I really like

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 3>my no doesn't know what these things are. You have

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 3>to interpret the transaction data just to know that it's JPEGs.

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Of course, like there's there's signals and flags.

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>But don't you think though that maybe one?

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 2>So I mean to your point, like, if who's to

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 2>say I'm wasting energy, who's to say I'm wasting block size?

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Like who's to say what a waste is to me?

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>But don't you think? I mean? And certainly we saw

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>when these first started.

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 2>That it was a bunch of really really horrible JPEGs

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 2>if you will, the monkey.

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>JPEGs they were.

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 2>They were the worst jpeg not even the good ones

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 2>that we saw, like of the whatever they were, I

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 2>forget the big ones, the apes or whatever from a

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 2>couple of years ago. These were like the peppies, these

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 2>were like really bad ones. But I feel like from

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 2>an economic standpoint, incentive standpoint, like from a you know,

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 2>from a competitive standpoint, like it seemed like that was

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 2>just kind of being done to sort of prove the case.

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I think if you think about this two years.

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Five years, ten years out from now, like they're probably

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 2>not using that. If we think about inscribing stuff on

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the blockchain, you know, seeing the Wikipedia being put on

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 2>the blockchain, seeing the Bible being put in the blockchain,

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 2>or three D gun schematics like that seems like a

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty cool use case. I suppose of stuff that you know,

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 2>we want to preserve for all time, and I think

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 2>so one, I guess, do you think the monkey jpeg

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 2>is like a little introductory use case that probably goes

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 2>away because it's why would you spend that much money

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 2>to send it?

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you see a higher use case of it? I

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>guess I'll just throw that out there.

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 3>I think I think it's you know, it's just data, right,

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.719
<v Speaker 3>so whatever data is valid, and if it's pure, if

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 3>it's just the pure transaction and it's just for me

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 3>to get my bitcoin to you at the lowest bites

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 3>right in the lowest fee, that's the best use case

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 3>in my opinion, because it is a cash network, it's

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 3>a payments network, it's a monetary system, and that's I think.

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 3>The only thing I.

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Would say to this case is like in the eighties,

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 2>we considered information like my morning newspaper, my nightly news.

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Today it's like a.

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Kid on Instagram in South Pacific posted a picture and.

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I see what the waves look like.

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 2>The information has changed, and I think what we consider

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 2>money or even value communication is going to be different

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 2>in the future.

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 3>I really just try to be agnostic, Like I just think,

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 3>whatever the node allows as long as I'm running and

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 3>then that node software because I presumably agree with the

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 3>rule set. What an argument do I have, like against

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 3>how anyone else wants to use it? I just think

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 3>it's fine use it.

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Also, like, high prices create innovation, right, So if oil

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 2>prices go really high, you start figuring out how to

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 2>get cheaper oil or maybe an EV or new technologies, right,

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 2>and so like maybe higher fees will start to push

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 2>new technologies on layer twos and layer threes and things

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 2>like that.

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 3>They will absolutely will. I think the lightning people. I

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 3>say the lightning people just because I haven't been participating

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 3>in the lightning economy too much, but the people that

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 3>are really building their businesses around lightning and like, and

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 3>also their intellectual capacity around developing it, which is definitely

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 3>going to be a massive, like way a scaling solution

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 3>for bitcoin an important one. This is good for them.

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Costier base layer stuff does unfortunately price out some of

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 3>the market. That market is therefore forced to use some

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of substitute, whether it's a layered substitute like through

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 3>a custodian or non custodian, or in some cases they

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 3>don't use it at all. They use something else entirely.

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 3>They might even use gold coins for something like I

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 3>don't know, maybe that gets re monetized at some point.

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 3>But these are good things. I agree completely. It prices

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 3>in the necessity to drive more resources to towards new tech.

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 2>So that's the other thing I was talking about. So

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I was talking about this the other day. You know,

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 2>if you look at the monkey jpeg, the NFT things,

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 2>so to speak, right, like, the people that are buying

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 2>monkey JPEGs or NFTs whatever, they're not buying into the

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 2>ethos or I should say, more specifically, the real value

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 2>of bitcoin being censorship resistant, immutable, decentralized, they're just buying.

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>They're gambling too. I mean that you made that point.

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 2>We saw what happened in Ethereum back you know, a

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 2>couple years ago, when the JPEGs were really going hot.

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 2>The transaction fees got so high that all the NFTs

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 2>jumped to Salana where they were much cheaper. So the

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 2>people that want the monkey JPEGs, they're gonna they don't

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 2>want to pay high fees, They're going to go to

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 2>where the fees are lower. So when you start thinking

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 2>about this from a competitive landscape like the financial transactions

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 2>will always win out. Like the financial the JPEGs don't care,

0:34:58.280 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 2>they don't want to pay high fee, They'll just go

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 2>to Salon, and so Salon is always going to be

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 2>there for them. So I think a lot of that

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 2>just sort of takes care of itself.

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So one, I'm curious.

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 2>Your point on that. And then the next question I

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 2>want to add on top of that is your take

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:10.720
<v Speaker 2>on that we have about a minute a half.

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Two.

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that when we make these changes like

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 2>tap route, we get unintended consequences like this? And do

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 2>you think it'd be a danger to go back and

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 2>rechange it now to try to fix this? And who

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 2>knows what unintended consequences we get from that.

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And that's why I've been I stir a lot

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:32.280
<v Speaker 3>up on social media when I criticize the development process

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:37.840
<v Speaker 3>at bitcoin core, because I think there's been cases, especially

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 3>when they're trying to rush upgrades, you know through the system,

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 3>like through minor activation, like softworks like early signaling, and

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 3>they're literally out like people are literally out campaigning to

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 3>mining pools to like, hey, please activate this and please

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 3>signal this. It's just a terrible way to go about

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 3>it in my view, And the fact is, like no

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 3>one's perfect. Huoing the Bitcoin cored development process, it's not perfect.

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 3>And I think because me, you and I think most

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 3>of the listeners here were really big into bitcoin. We

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 3>think it's the future of money. I think it's critical

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 3>that we don't rush things. I see this as a

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 3>system that's going to last a thousand years. People might

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 3>laugh at that, but I really do think it has

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 3>the fundamentals to last one thousand years. And so you know,

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't see a rush like I just think. I'm

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 3>like an ocifist, like I want I want the code

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 3>to stop developing, or at least develop at the correct pace.

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 3>And let's not I shouldn't say stop developing. I just

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 3>want things to be you know, we need a solid

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 3>foundation for everyone to build on and shifting it, you know,

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 3>we should be very careful about. But that's the nice

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 3>thing is the users can choose what software to run.

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 3>And that's why I have an upgrade in my node.

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Personally that the node I do use at home in

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 3>a long time and I don't plan on it.

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, we got to wrap it up with that.

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:11.439
<v Speaker 2>If you're just tune in you're listening to the Mark

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 2>ma Show. We've been talking with Steven Barbara from Upstream Data, Inc.

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 2>You should definitely check out what he's doing. We'll make

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>sure we linked all that in the show notes down below,

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 2>and with that we got to sign it off.

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much, Thanks Mark,