WEBVTT - Apple Should Partner With Tesla On EVs: Wedbush's Ives

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Apple is up two points

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>x percent today for the year, though year over year,

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>I should say from this day last year, Apple is

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>up eight So this two and a half percent increase

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>probably not the biggest of its year. Nevertheless, it's up

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>on an electric vehicle report. It's going to make one.

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>We knew it was going to, but now we have

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more detail. So let's bring in somebody

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>who knows a lot about what Apple is doing and

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>how it can be successful done Eyes of web Bush

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Securities joins so down. We knew that at some point

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we would probably get an electric vehicle from Apple. What

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>do we know now that we didn't know in the

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>last few days. Well, I think it's really around the

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>battery technology and some of the innovations going on within Cupertino.

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at the e V and

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the autonomous visioned Apple. There's been a lot of starts

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>and stops, but clearly they're going to dive into the

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>deep end of the pool. I believe it's going to

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>be through more of a strategic partnership where clearly it's

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>going to send a ripple effect across e VY and

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>from a stock perspective, it's just another arrow in the

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 1>quiver when you look at the overall ecosystem going forward,

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Where does the confidence come from that Apple will be successful?

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's great at other things, but I

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 1>mean vehicles are a whole different kettle fish. As they say, yeah,

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.559
<v Speaker 1>no doubt, And that's why I don't believe that they

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately start manufacturing their own cars. I believe they're going

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to leave that to a partner, potentially a Tesso or

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>v W because you know, I think that's the thing

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>investors want to see them, from a software perspective, vertically

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>integrate their software into vehicles. And I think if you

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>go out into the next few years, EVE, it's a

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>golden age and I think it's even similar what we're

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing in China and Bay Do that they potentially you're

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>going to get into evs because we're talking about a

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar mark at the next decade, and the Apple

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>recognizes where they sit. Autonomous is key, and I think

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>this is just going to be another way for them

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to monetize that you know, brand, which is unparalleled. Um,

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>this same argument is partially what's behind Tesla is nearly

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>seven h again this year, right while we're at three

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>percent or so ev take up right now, there will

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>be a point at which that becomes, you know, exponentially larger.

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>What about the idea of Apple teaming up with a Tesla,

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is that something that would ever happened, Well, I think

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 1>they could potentially Apple and Tesla, and I think that's

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a partnership that potentially could happen in terms of how

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it fits strategically. So I think that could be somewhere

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon two thousand one Musk and Cook on EVS.

0:02:57.840 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>That would be something that could have a ripple. In fact,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that's why I believe a test or VW is ultimately

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>who Apple partners with, right and essentially Apple needs to

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>find a partner. So what would be the best partner.

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm the bed the best partners in stree mode in Tesla,

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one that would make the most sense

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>strategically in terms of going after that market, especially where

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>e V is right now. I mean right now, in

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>terms of the e V market, it's Testa's world and

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone else is paying rent. And that's something I can

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>see Apple further and further penetrating through a partnership. Down

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about the rest of Apple's future. What's

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>your price target on Apple right now and what do

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you see coming in the nearer future. Yeah, right now

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we're a hundred sixty dollar price target two hundred bult case.

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I continue to you as a supercycle iPhone twelve. I

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's really just playing out in terms of China.

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>This is a key market, and to me, Apple is

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a stock that I think invest is just further and

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>further appreciating in terms of what I'd view as an

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>unparalleled upgrade opportunity. That's why the super cycle pieces is

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>taken hold amazing. Then I also want to ask you

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>about the performance of Tesla on its first day in

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five hundred and whether it adds to volatility.

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So obviously we saw you know, run up and then

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a set off. What happens you know,

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>does it settle into regular SMP action. Yeah, I think

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that was a bit of a sell in the news.

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously parabolic move into SMP five hundred inclusions.

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It's really all about demand here. Demand looks very strong

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>in terms of December, especially in China. That's really the

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>winchman to move the stock higher. And that's why, you know,

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>we have a thousand hour bulk case on Tessa, and

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it just comes down to execution in this

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>market you're seeing in China too, where it's only three

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>percent of all overall autos today, we think going to

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>ten percent untill two thousand twenty five. That's why right now,

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>e Z is you know, I think one of the

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>more transformational market opportunities we've seen in our last twenty years. Yeah. Well,

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>for sure of you watching that. I mean a lot

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of people that that's that's all that coming are benefiting, right.

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>So I want to ask you as well about the

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>solar winds and the hat I mean the cybersecurity industry,

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>will is ultimately benefit it or hurt it. Well, for cybersecurity,

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it could have three to five dips of

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>growth in the near term. I mean, this is what

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>likely looks like probably the biggest cyber security attack potentially

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>in the history and and and it's it's a black

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>eye for the overall for the industry, but the beneficiaries

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to be massive. Because government agency is an enterprise,

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna need to spend on companies like z Scale

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>or Tenable power Out, stail Point, among others. And that's

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>why you've seen these stocks continue move higher in terms

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of where cybersecuit is going, especially in the shift to

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>claud Out. And this is you know, obviously this attack

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>just speaks of sophistication and threat, but that's a silver

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>lining in this very unfortunate incident. It's bullish for cybersecurity

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>stocks and investors are continuing to move those higher. What

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>are your topics in the space right now? Down the

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>topics and cybersecurity are Tenable, sail Point, z Scaler as

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>well as pal Out, So those are kind of names

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>front and center that I think benefit here. And we

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>believe cybersecurity stocked overall could be up more than between

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>now and the two thousand one. To me intact, taking

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a step back, it's cloud cyber security and overall than

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>games led by Apple. That's the way to play this market. Amazing, Dum,

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for all of that, all of

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>your intelligence. Down Lives, Managing Director of Equity Research at

0:06:55.160 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>web Bush Securities. Well, it's pretty wild year for equity markets.

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>We're u S five hundred, but we really, I mean

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>we dropped into you bear market territory more than that.

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we were down about thirty something percent at

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one point in March. It's been even wilder year for treasuries.

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>We went from you know, one point nine something percent

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>right down to fifty basis points and we've retraced a

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit of that now. So let's bring in somebody

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to advise clients through this whole volatility. Lisa

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Charlotte is the chief investment officer for wealth management at

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley about two and a half trillion dollars in

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>client assets. Lisa, how are you feeling as we approach

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty twenty So, um, look, we're feeling

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>um bullish. Uh, clearly, you know we believe that that um,

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we're in a v shaped recovery. Although it's unfortunate that

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're currently experiencing this this latest surge in

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the virus um, we are constructive that potential it will

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>be the last such surge. Um. You know, as we

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>get through the months of the tough months of January

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and February and and get larger portions of the population vaccinated.

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But the momentum, the underlying momentum in the economy continues

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to be very solid. I think, you know, some of

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the backward looking data that we've gotten over the last

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks, you know, showed that there was slowing in

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>November and December. We could as you noted, that the

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>consumer confidence numbers fell more than expected. But uh, you know,

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the past is the Finally, the passage of this fiscal

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>stimulus spell should put a floor underneath confidence. And that

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>combined with with um, you know, the vaccine should should

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to to bridge us to to uh a

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>full recovery by the middle of next year. And and

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we think markets can kind of get uh

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>huh so more to go. Obviously, you're you said your bullish.

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you had stayed in the market, if

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you had kept your nerves this whole time, you'd be

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>quite happy. But now I wonder what's priced in lison,

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>what's left to price and surely some of that good

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>news is already priced. Yeah. Look, I think that the

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>reason markets have stalled out here at the end of

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the year is in part, uh, not just about you know,

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>sentiment about the virus itself, but it's about the fact

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have a lot of more positive catalysts

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to go. This is a market that has priced an

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary amount of what has proven to be upside surprises, right,

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>whether we're talking about the speed of recovery, whether we're

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about the fact that retail sales have held up,

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>whether we're talking about the fact that consumer balance sheets

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 1>have not deteriorated, credit card chart drops or not skyrocketing,

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcies are not sky rocketing. The stimulus measures, uh, you

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>know thus far appear to have worked. Um. And you know,

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 1>we are looking at uh consensus forecast for corporate profits

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>next year to actually be up year over year about

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>pent So, uh, that's a lot of good news. And

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly what you know, a price earning ordered price

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>earnings ratio of of twenty two times tells you I

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and so this is a market that's going to have

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to digest and and let a little bit of main

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>street and reality and the numbers catch up to the anticipation.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we think that next year, UM, you know,

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>stocks uh, at least as measured by the index, you know,

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>can be up another you know, five seven percent for

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>those deliance however that need you know something more than

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that that are looking for ten percent or fifteen. What

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we've said is you've got to look at individual stocks.

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>You've got to look outside the US. You've got to

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>look in small and mid caps, uh, because the index

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>itself is really pretty rich. What about stocks that had

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>been overlooked, such as financials where we saw a massive

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>rally yesterday a Goldman, Zachs, Take Morgan and so on

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>after the buybacks and dividends news. They're you know, undervalued

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>according to some value investors right now. So our surgeon,

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>areas of healthcare, anything in those areas attract to you, Lisa,

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>absolutely so. Our our number one idea for is financials. Uh.

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, we published our report this week, you know,

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about the fact that, um, not only do we

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>think that the yield curve does steepen next year, which

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>will help with net interest income, but we do think

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that the charge offs this cycle loan losses are going

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to be significantly less than historical and therefore a lot

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 1>of the reserves that were taken by the banks will

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>be released back into currenting. Obviously. Uh, you know, we've

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>gotten a little bit of regulatory forbearance here and and

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you know we saw that as he said, with the

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>FED allowing the resumption of of of share buy backs.

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>That's going to help the factor. And look, last, last,

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>but not least, is there are lasting behavioral changes that

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that occurred during this pandemic that we believe create huge

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>profit opportunities and efficiencies for the bank. Well, Lisa, we

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to get into those behavioral changes

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>another time, but we really really appreciated looking forward to

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that particular conversation and happy holidays to you. Much appreciate.

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>That's Lisa Shallows of Morgan Standie Wealth Management. Let's bring

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>in something else now. David Garrity is with us, his

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>chief market strategists for laid Law and Company also partner

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.719
<v Speaker 1>at bt Block, a cybersecurity and blockchain firm. And we've

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 1>got the laid Law five forecasts for one, so David

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>gets straight into it. What's your five forecast for next year? Yeah,

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the five forecasts are starting off bunny, looking at the

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that the market is still very much dependent upon

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>government fiscal stimulus, whether it's here in the US or

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it's coming from overseas um. You know, from that standpoint,

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we think that the markets will start the year off choppy,

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>with games going more towards the back half of the year.

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Talking about markets, we have an objective for the S

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundreds of four thousand for two thou one,

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>about eight percent upside, and we think that against this backdrop,

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have interest rates rise on the ten

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>ure to about one and a half percent. Obviously, we

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>think inflation is gonna run hot, break evens going from

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>one to two point three. And then against that backdrop,

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have the dollar weekend against foreign currencies

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>by ten, you know, off the strength of better economic

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>growth forecasts outside the US then the US. We're calling

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for international stocks non US to appperform over the course

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.359
<v Speaker 1>of one and we think that here within the US,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>with an economic reopening value sectors are actually going to

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>perform tech in the year ahead, although tech will continue

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to have growth from disrupting as it does. Yeah, fascinating.

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's a really complex look at the markets. Is

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that one forecast. I just want to make sure David

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or all five. Um, that's all five sort of wrapped

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>into one statement. Well, talk to us that about the

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'll get to that at the end. Talk to

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>us about the value plays. Because we were speaking earlier

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to somebody who thought that financial stocks and some areas

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of healthcare might be the places to look for free,

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>fresh value. Where are you seeing that? Yeah, and I

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly would agree. Relative to financials and the fact that

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, central banks are allowing the financials to go

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>engage in buy backs, namely the federal reserves, and now

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been in the impact that will have in the

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>lights of the JP Morgan as well as Goldman, Sacks

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and others certainly favors the financials. Clearly, it's the steepening

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>yield curve which is a thing that really will serve

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to drive the financials. We think also at the same

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>time that a recovering oil price going from forty dollars

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a barrel now backed up towards sixty over the course

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of one will certainly prove to support what has been

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the weakest sectors this year, which has been energy.

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, down about or so in under formed the

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>s and p f UM. You know, so we think

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that energy really is going to be probably the leading

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>recovery trade. But along with that, we'd also would throw

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in with the financials with energy also looking at industrial

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>stocks industrials. Interesting, what area of industrialism would that be

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>dedicated on some kind of an infrastructure package. It may

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>be very much driven by an infrastructure package. Certainly have

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>seen positive performance coming out of the likes of Caterpillar

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>UM so far here in the fourth quarter of We

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>think that there's further upside relative to that. We certainly

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, the ground is that uh in

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the US to see a good infrastructure program being put

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in place. Hopefully Congress cooperates, but that's what's going to

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>give people, we think in the markets preps someone on

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>hold until we get a better idea as to whether

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we're really going to become bipartisan in one and not

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily as partisan as we've been. David, I want to

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>ask you a little bit about cybersecurity as well. Bt

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>block is a place where your partner and it's a

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity intelligence and a blockchain firm. I'm not sure how

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>related the two are, but certainly we've had this massive,

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>massive cybersecurity breach. It's very very serious and it goes

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>back as far as six months maybe more, to places

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like Treasury and other agencies. How do you see this

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>playing out or are we in endanger that right now

0:16:56.040 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>without even realizing it, into the extent of foll have

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>gone more and more online over the course of has

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>worked from home became the new normal and is likely

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to extend into uh, you know, the fact that people

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>having information observed or leaked certainly grows. And from the standpoint,

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>what we've been doing within DT block have been you know,

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>developing improved ways of managing passwords. One of the things

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that was the major weakness within Solar Winds was that

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>they really hadn't practiced anything near decent password management discipline,

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's what created the the open window, if you will,

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that others were we're able to come in from, especially

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>from Russia, will be able to find a fix or

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>a patch or whatever you do find for this. I mean,

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like it's gone so viral that we're talking

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>about you know, x number of Fortune copies, X number

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of US agencies and governmental departments and so on, how

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>do you patch that up? Yeah, I mean the issue

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that you had with solar winds, the hack was that

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>there was essentially code that was put into software updates

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>if they were sending out to all their installed clients,

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>both government agencies as well as also private sector entities,

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>and you know, that's how the backdoor basically got populated

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>across the user base. Now, the problem you're going to

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>have here and trying to remedy this problem is that

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the backdoor that was put in wasn't necessarily the only one.

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Um you know, there are also other additional means of

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>establishing backdoors in the various systems that have been populated

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>as a result of this act. So trying to find

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a way to actually go through and clean it up

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to take some extended period of time. Relative

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to government policy, you know, there clearly is an opportunity

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and in need here on the policy front to basically

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>become or unified as regards cybersecurity how it's practiced, not

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>just within the government but across the US as a whole. David,

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>if there are some stocks in that area that you

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>would recommend, would be very grateful not just to cybersecurity,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>but also blockchain. Um. You know, in terms of looking

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 1>at blockchain, there have been a number of vehicles we

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, our Investment Management has had a

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>blockchain ETF that's out there that's very good in terms

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of highlighting some of the stronger names. Our Investment Management

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.959
<v Speaker 1>through their disruption UH or innovation ETF you know, had

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a bannery year of a hundred and fifty two m.

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Granted it might have been more due to Tesla in

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of their vehicles, but you know, I think over

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the course of emerging there will be more names that

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>will be looking at and be happy to highlight at

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that time. Great well, David, thanks so much for joining

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>us today, and have a wonderful rest of your year.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>David Garity is chief market strologist at laid Law and Company,

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>also partner at bat Block of Cybersecurity, Intelligence and blockchain firm.

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>On there to talk about is laid Law five. Those

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>forecasts for one hospitals are deluged in the United States

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and places such as California. I see you capacity is

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>down to less than two and a half percent right now,

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and of course fatalities are climbing. Let's bring in some Fazali,

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Senior farm analyst and head of e m A Research

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Intelligence. To talk about this obviously, as well

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>as the vaccines and this variant that we're seeing in

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom that may already be in Germany and

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>France some how important is a distress that this is

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a variant and not a new strain. Oh, hi, Vannie,

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, look, it's it's nomenclature, scientific nomenclature. I

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>mean a strain Star two is a new strain of

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus versus Stars kobe us. So it's just it's

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>just to be to be pedantic. It's the right it's

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the right way to put it. This is a variant

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's the same family. Still, does it mean that

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the current vaccines will also work against it? Or do

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>we know that yet? So we don't know for sure.

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of reasons to remain optimistic the vaccines

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>will be Apparently, at least the fires A BioNTech one.

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>The immune response they've seen to it does not seem

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>to correlate with the areas where the mutations are, but

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>mutations can also change the shape of this. The confirmation,

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>if you like, of the spike protein which is being

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 1>targeted by the vaccines, so it might diminish the efficacy,

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>but luckily we're starting at efficacy, so it's going to

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be quite good to see what that might be. Even

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>if it's is still a pretty pretty serious help in

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>managing the pandemic. Now, this particular variant, we know that

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's more contagious. Do we know how people are reacting

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>when they get it? Is it the same type of reactions?

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Are they as sick? You know, our ventilator is something

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that did come up. It's too early to tell, you know,

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the the the the only way we know is in

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks time as hospitalizations mortality data come through

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you can see what what what variant of

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the virus was was causing those issues. You need the

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>data to be able to tell, and just by looking

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>at the numbers it's impossible to be able to tell because,

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>as you rightly said, if the ice use are jam packed,

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 1>then people's mortality is likely to go up because they

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>can't deal with them better. So that's that's Those are

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>key elements that that some serious science needs to be

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>done to figure it out. The measure is being taken,

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>so lockdown and various countries restricting travel into their countries

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 1>from the United Kingdom for various amounts of time, and

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>those may get extended. Is that the right thing to do?

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>They It's possible that it's that it's a bit late

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of shutting the stable doors after the horse

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>has already bolted, And it's possible that they already that

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they that the virus has evolved the same mutations in

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've seniored already in South Africa, very similar

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>mutation is not identical, but to very similar mutations in

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>other countries. And I would be amazed if it's not

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>already in the United States. So that's the key thing here.

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to repeat that Sam Fazali, who is head

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of our pharma analytics and really has been on top

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of everything coronavirus related, understands it all, says that he

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>would be amazed if this new variant is not already

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, a variant that is more contagious some.

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>The longer that this you know, COVID nineteen plus its

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>variants get to linger in a country and in the world,

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the more mutations will have. Right, How isn't it getting

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>more and more serious and more and more urgent that

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we impose draconian measures to try and stop

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>this thing. Well, I kind of wrote that back in

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>if you remember Vannie back here a couple of months ago,

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>as the US cases were starting to rise. The issue

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is that the more the virus, as you rightly say,

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the more the virus mutass, the more people have got

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>this virus, the more opportunity gets to me to sorry,

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>the more opportunity gets to mutate, and that obviously eventually

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>it finds ways around our immune system. So the key

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>thing is to really try and bring it down to

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>levels that a lot of Europe. You know, in France,

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the case numbers, they've managed to

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>bring it down quite meaningfully, although they've just relaxed a

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit their rules. And I'm worried that cases will

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>start rising again. So that that's the element. And Drew

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Conian or not, I mean, you've seen the effect you

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>can have on a country if they don't if they

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>don't make the right decisions. But what's going on in

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the UK. Yeah, so some we are seeing vaccines rollout today.

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Fauci and friends got the MODERNA vaccine. We had already

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>seen other officials get the Visor vaccine. I guess you know,

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>when we eventually are able to get a vaccine, doesn't

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>matter which one we receive. Oh, they are very lucky people, actually,

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't care which one I get. If

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>if whatever one's available between Maderna and finds my on take,

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I would happily take it. It's um, they're pretty similar.

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>One's got maybe a little bit less a little a

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit more troublesome than the other, but frankly it's

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>neither here nor there. So I'm just jealous of them

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>getting it. So do you have any concerns at all

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>about the idea that there may have been extra doses

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that Fiser wasn't willing to sort of allow. It was

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>putting a little extra into vials just to allow for

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe a little bit of spillage or what

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>have you. But hospitals are now seeing that, you know,

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>they can be made into extra doses and maybe even

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a dozen and a half. Does that concern you at all?

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Should these administrators be confined to just five doses per vile? No,

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. It doesn't concern me at all. I mean,

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you know this, you're activating the immune system here. Even

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>if you get twenty five micrograms or thirty five micrograms,

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>and please, I am hyph pothesizing here, right, it probably

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make that much difference um in terms of the

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of immune reaction that it causes. So the important

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>thing is that, you know, the more doses we have,

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the better. I am, however, not a fan of what

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people seem to be talking about, which is,

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>let's just do one does because it showed some efficacy

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>after one does, and then we can extend this out.

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>We have no idea what it does after one dose.

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 1>It was just part of a trial where the endpoint

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of the trial was a two dose trial. You can't

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>make these decisions based on what anecdotal evidence one trial

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>shows you what So that that that's a big concern

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>for me. These interviews are always full of public health announcements,

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and there is another one. Don't just take one does

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're lucky enough to be in the system, go

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>back for your second dos because you don't know what

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>you're in for if you just take the one. But

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you do know how lucky you are if you happen

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to get to some how long will it be before

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we know if there are any adverse effects and the

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>population in general that are vaccinated. We so I just

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>put a update ut today on our BI platform looking

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 1>at the data that we've seen already. If the numbers

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>are right, CDC has reported six allergic reactions by Friday night,

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and I estimate about five hundred thousand people have been

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated in the US. So that's a case rate of

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>not point not not one to percent. I mean, it's

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>let's put it this way, it's a very small percentage

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of people. Of course, if one person getting a side

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>effect is not a good thing. But this seems to

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>be manageable. And we'll have to wait till January February

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to hear about Bell's palsy because that takes a little

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>while longer at least in the trials to surface. So

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>let's see how that shows up. Some thank you so much,

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for all of your hard work all

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.239
<v Speaker 1>year keeping an eye and everything coronavirus related for us

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>being much much appreciated. That is some for sale who

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 1>has head of E M. E. A Research as Bloomberg

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence but also senior pharmer analyst. Thanks for listening to

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts or whatever a podcast platform you prefer.

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn. And

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Radio