WEBVTT - Covid Triggering Incredible Opportunities In Fallen Angels: Mellon

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEO, market pros and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. All right, let's spend some

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>time chatting about the credit markets, and let's go out

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on the risk spectrum a little bit, talking high yield,

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>talking maybe even fallen angels. We can do that with Paul.

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Benson had a fixed income efficient BETA. The firm is Melon,

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a B and Y Melon Investment management firm. They have

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and fifty eight billion. That's with a B

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>under management located in San Francisco. Paul, thanks so much

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. You know, first of all, I

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about risk return. Talk to us a

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.919
<v Speaker 1>little bit about fallen angels. What is a fallen angel

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and what kind of activity are we seeing in that market? Yeah, no,

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a great topic for today. Fallen angels have

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>really come onto the marketplace here, uh in in size,

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in this aftermath of the COVID UH nineteen crisis. So

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>what a fallen angel is is it's just an investment

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>grade bond that has been downgraded. So remember the investment

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>grade sort of ends at the bottom tier at the

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>triple B rating level. Downgraded below triple B, so it's

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>now double B R lower that enters the high yield portion.

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.919
<v Speaker 1>So really it's just a high yield bond that once

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>was an investment grade bond. And what investors are seeing

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is that these bonds have really really attractive risk return

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>characteristics and making for a terrific investment in this kind

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of environment. So give us some examples of some fallen

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>angels that have you know, kind of come to the

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>fore here during the pandemic. So there are actually a ton.

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So what's exciting about this this pandemic? Uh, you know,

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>if anything can be exciting from an investor perspective, it

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is that it's an unprecedented delusion of activity and sort

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of ratings migration perspective, and the markets really are not

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>very efficient on the fixed income side at handling that

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>trans transmission from investment grade investors to high yield investors.

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, in typical year you might have twenty billion,

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion dollars of downgrades across a handful of bonds

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>or or maybe ten or fifteen bonds. In twenty so

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>far we've had we've had almost two hundred billion dollars

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of following angel downgrades. And this spans, you know, across

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>more than two hundred bonds, two hundred fifty bonds UH.

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just one sector, you know, like in

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in the energy crisis in two thousands sixty and it

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>was predominantly energy bonds. Now this is across everything. This

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is across consumer cyclicals, This is across banking, this is

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>across capital goods, basic industry. You know, you're basically seeing

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it all here. And that actually is a real boon

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for high yield investors because a diversified play is going

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to allow you a much greater chance of success of

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>harvesting that that patrol risk premium, that discount, rather than

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, some idiosyncratic UH investment. So, Paul, when a

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>bond gets downgraded from investment grade to UH non investment grade,

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>does that mean a lot of owners of that bond

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>have to sell by because of their charter they can't

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>own non investment grade debt? Is that kind of how

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the play starts exactly exactly. And if you look at

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the the sort of the the the last ten years,

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, within the i G space investment grade space,

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you'll see that there's been a very inexorable rise in

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>passive passive managers. So you know, think of not just

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>indexing traditional indexing, the growth of that uh as you

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>know fees have been pushed lower, but also areas like ets.

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these et s are very passive in nature.

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And so you've got two camps. You've got one camp

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>which is traditional for example, pension plans that have strict

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>guidelines and say, you know, thou shalt not invest in

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>junk bonds. And so you know, if if I'm managing

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and i G portfolio for a client like that, and

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a bond gets downgraded below investigrade, it becomes a fallen angel.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Even if I think it's a very very attractive investment

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>and it's the worst possible time to sell, I don't

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>have a choice. I have to sell it now. That

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>becomes a real benefit for the folks. On the other side,

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're a high yield investor, and especially if you're

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>investor focusing just on fallen angels, you can pick up

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>these bonds at an incredible discount. All right, So Paul,

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of just kind of the the

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>credit quality environment that we find ourselves in. I know,

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is we kind of entered this pandemic in March April.

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, from a credit perspective, there's really concerns that

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see it, just this huge wave of defaults,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the leverage loan business, the high yield market business.

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>How we in fact seen that, you know, that's been

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the story of the year. It's people tend to panic

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:05.239
<v Speaker 1>when when when things when volatility picks up, the first

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>instinct is to panic. And you know exactly what we

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>saw with all the news articles, all the prognostications, even

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>from the major houses, predicting you know, unprecedented uh delusion

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of defaults and that just has not materialized. And further,

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what really scares us a little bit is

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>when you look under the hood. And that's what we're

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>really good at as a quantity We're a quantitative investment manager,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>so we really dive into the details. And people are

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>misinterpreting default rates by and large, they're looking at broad

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Moodies SMP type speculative grade default rates, which

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have a completely different composition than what investors, institutional investors

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>are actually investing in. You know, these SMP and Moodies

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>default rates include these very small companies. They include floating

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>rate debt, all sorts of stuff. Whereas you know, se

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of the institutional investors are focused on big, big investible

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>benchmarks such as the Bloomberg Barkley's High Yield Corporate Index

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>or you know, the Bambo Master to Index. These benchmarks

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>have only seen about half of the default rates that

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that these sort of you know, worst case prognonctiications came

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>out at and so we're looking at numbers like like,

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, sub four percent year to date. You know,

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>this is not this is this is certainly higher than

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>last year, but it's not anything to be overly concerned

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>about as a high yeld investor. Very interesting, Paul, thanks

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Share. This is part of

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the market we don't probably don't spend enough time on,

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>but certainly some opportunities there, the fallen angels, the high

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>yield credit market, the leverage loan uh business. Paul Benson

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>head a fixed income efficient data at Melan, giving us

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts again on these fallen angels UH and some

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of the higher leverage loan sectors of the marketplace. Yes,

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>they've been impacted by the economic downturn resulting from the pandemic,

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but probably performing better than expected, so some opportunities there

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>more to come. This is Bloomberg Now in terms of

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a new Biden administrator, a lot of folks from wondering

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>what it means for their industries, what kind of policies

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>will the new administration come up with for for specific industries.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>One of those industries is technology. Uh, there's obviously a

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>big issue with China. There's a big issue with to

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>what extent does technology in the United States need to

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be regulated. Victoria Espinal, President, chief executive officer of BSA,

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the software alliance based on Washington, d C. She joins US. Now, so, Victoria,

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we think about technology in the United States. Historically,

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the US has taken a very light hand to regulating technology,

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and one could argue that's been maybe one of the

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>main catalysts for the growth and development of tech in

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the U S. Silicon Valley and all of that. How

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>do you expect President elect Joe Biden and his administration

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to UH to manage technology policy. Well, first of all,

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I would saying that I don't think it's about no

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>regulation or lots of regulation. I think it's about smart regulation,

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, where it's appropriate. UM. In terms of the

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration now, I'm expecting that we're going to see

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to see some increased scrutiny on the technology industry. UM.

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there are some legitimate issues that need to

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>be concerned, that that need to be addressed, and I

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>think the Biden administration will focus on that. You know,

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I will say, speaking for the enterprise software industry, which

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>is the essay, we're excited to work with the administration

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on those. We feel like there are a number of

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>places where laws and regulations could be updated and improved

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and modernized UM, and we are really looking for places

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>where we can find solutions. There are some thorny issues

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>out there, artificial intelligence, privacy, cybersecurity. So we UM you know,

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>as a as an organization, as an industry, we try

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>not to run from challenges but to try to address them.

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And we're really excited about working with the Biden administration

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and how to find some long term solutions to some

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of the real problems that are out there, so Victoria.

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>One of the problems that has really come to the

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>four of the last several years has been UH China

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and technology transfers between US and China, and there's some

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>concern that there might be a technology cold war developing

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>between let's call it China and just broadly define the West.

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you expect the Biden administration What would you

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>recommend to the Biden administration as it thinks about technology

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>policy visa each China. I think it's going to be

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a major issue going forward, you know, in terms of

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what I would expect to the Biden administration, I think

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a Biden administration is going to be tough on China.

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, look, there's a whole range of

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>issues beyond the technology issues and the economic issues with China,

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>right human rights, Taiwan, the situation in Hong Kong, um.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>There have been a number of approaches the Trump administration

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>has taken on the eco comics sides, tariffs and trade

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and got in the most attention, I would say, but

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, other approaches including export controls, investment restrictions. Of course,

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Biden administration goes in, they're going to do

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>their own assessment of what the issues are and what

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the approaches are. I think they're going to bring a

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of expertise to that assessment, but I would expect

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that coming out of that, we're going to see two

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>differences in terms of approach. Broadly speaking, one I think

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>is I think there will be a focus on a

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>broader range of issues, so again not just economic issues,

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but issues like human rights for example. I expect we'll

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>see more UM focus on that from them Biden administration,

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and even in the economic issues, I think we will

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>see a focus on trying to come up with long

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>term solutions to those issues. And again it's sort of

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a broader range of economic issues that we faced with China,

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>including UM in the technology space. The second difference I

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>expect that we will the is working with other countries

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and building alliances. You know, the United States is not

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the only country certainly that has concerns with China, and

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the US will address is concerned directly with China,

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>but also I expect um the Biden administration will be

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>looking to build alliances and be doing that in concert

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>with other countries that also share those concerns. UM. The

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>last thing I would say is, you know, the president

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 1>look by then the major commitment during the campaign in

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of R and D investment in technology, Um, the

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>United States, unlike China, a lot of our investment in

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the United States comes from the private sector, and I

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>think that's appropriate. But it's also great to see that

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this administration is going to be focused on putting public sector,

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>significant public sector of funding into basic R and D investment. UM.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the really important part of this interesting so, Victoria.

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess as it relates to China, one of the

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>more immediate things that the incoming Biden administration will need

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to address is to talk I'm not even sure where

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>we are on the TikTok issue. Can you bring us

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>up to date? Well? Um, you know, in terms of

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the administration, I think the lot of the administrations speak

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>for yourself, and I think what they've said is that

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it's too early for them to say what you know.

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I would say more generally is I

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think this is an administration where policy is going

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>to be determined by any one particular company. In general,

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be an administration that is,

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>as I said, looking to find ways to set global

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>standards and rain in bad actors of all different kinds.

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Um But I think it's going to be at my

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>anticipate it will be a policy approach that it's more

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>about finding that long term, sustainable, durable framework as opposed

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 1>to being driven by any one particular company or one

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>particular situation. So, Victoria, I guess the other thing is

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>just kind of you know, the big U s technology companies,

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>particularly this social platforms, do you expect them to face

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>continued scrutiny, increased Scrutinyou is this something that's just gonna

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>be a factive life for the facebooks of the world

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>and others. Um? So I'll say this, you know, as

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>my organization doesn't represent Facebook, you know where the enterprise

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 1>B two B side of the software industry. Um But

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's also fair to say that

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry, including the social media platforms, I think

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>will face increasing scrutiny. I think we're going to see

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that in competition. I think we're going to see that

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in accountability issues, platform accountability issues generally. I think that, um,

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, that has been true for a while, so

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that will not be new with a Biden administration, but

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it I anticipate that there will be increased

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny and a Biden administration. And again, as I was

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>saying at the beginning, and I think there are some

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>legitimate concerns that need to be addressed, and um, you know,

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that's something I think that the Biden administration will be

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>focused on as well. Hey, Victoria, thank you so much.

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate your thoughts and insight. Victoria Spinel, president

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and chief executive officer of b s A, the Software Alliance.

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>They're based in Washington, d C. Giving us some thoughts

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>about how the incoming Biden administration may think about policy

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to technology, particularly the software companies. And again,

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>probably issue number one on day one will be the

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>relationship of U with the U S and China as

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it relates to technology. We are waiting for a discussion

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Television between Bowing CEO Dave Calhoun and Rhiner

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>CEO Michael O'Leary. Uh. They announced the deal today for

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>some planes to be acquired by Ryan Air. Let's chat

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>with George Ferguson, Senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines analyst for

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence on what we might hear. So George talked

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit about this deal for Boeing,

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>uh with Ryan Air. It seems like really good news

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>for Boeing here. Yeah, thanks Paul. I think it's absolute

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>endorsement here for the Bowing Max and the sixes that

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>have taken place, and it's where, you know, where Ryan

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Air sees that whole process. They must feel pretty comfortable

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of the airplane's viability. We've been saying it's a viable

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think they feel pretty comfortable and they're and

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>they're coming in for a nice size order seventy five.

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I actually thought it might have been larger, and I

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's not larger. Maybe a testament to the fact

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that we heard the Bowing CEO Calhoun say they're not

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>going to buy themselves back into the market or something

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like that. Not an exact quote, but I think maybe

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a testament. You know, we knew Ryan Air was sort

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of sniffing around looking for order actually for I think

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it's been at least a year or so. They love

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to buy airplanes cheap. I guess is that maybe um oh,

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Larry didn't get quite the prices he wanted and sort

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of stepped in for seventy. But looks a good endorsement,

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>good endorsement to the airplane, good news for Bowling, and

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>tell me good news for Ryan Air too. Yeah, so

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>George talked us about this seventh three of Max. You know,

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I just speaking for myself, you know, if I were to,

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, actually take a flight, which is a huge

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>if here in this pandemic world, and I walked up

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to the gate and I looked out the window and

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I saw seven three seven Max parked at my gate,

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.479
<v Speaker 1>I'd have no problems getting on the plane, am I?

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Am I the exception or how do you think this

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>plane is going to be uh kind of embraced by

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the airlines as well as in the passengers. Yeah, you know,

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that, Um, I think that the public has

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of a short memory on some of these things,

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think there are some people that would be

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>concerned about flying the Max given the history. I think that,

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, really some of their concerns you put to

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>bed by the fact that the f a A and

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>European regulators have really poured over the airplane to make

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>sure it's safe. They really don't want egg in their

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>face with it with another problem with the airplane, and

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>we're now going to have simulator training for the pilots

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>transitioning from the seven three seven eight to the max

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>which I think should also give people comfort. I think

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you'll see advertising campaign around some of those you know,

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>some of that training. Um. And look again, I think

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that there there'll be a short memory and you know,

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of Brian Air buying here and have this airplane

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>feathered into their fleet out in one Americans starts to fly.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I think at the end of the year here, you know,

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>given the news around the pandemic, I think it'll get

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>lost and I think there won't be as much reticence

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to fly the airplane had there not been sort of

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the backdrop of a lot more bigger news stories right

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>right now. So, George, I think the last time we chatted,

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the discussion points was China. UM, it's really important,

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>uh that China certify the seven three seven max A.

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge market. B Uh, it's an economy that's

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>actually growing. They're they're out of their lockdown and there

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>people are beginning to travel. Any sense of when we'll

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 1>get the green light from China as relates to the

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>seven three seven Max. Yeah, I mean I'm hearing that

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the you know, potentially we could see something like that

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in the new year. I mean I think that Bill

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese will want to find a way to do

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 1>the write word is embrace the Biden administration as they

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>come in. They'd love to be, I think, in the

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>good graces of the Biden administrations to change a tone

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>hopefully from the Trump administration for the Chinese when it

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 1>comes to trade. And I think you'll see it closer

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to Joe Biden present elect Biden coming into power. But

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>so I would expect it sometime earlier next year. And

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it is a core market, super important for about

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>talk to us, George, you know about boweing here, maybe

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a post mortem here, we've got

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the a little bit of a hindsight here. It just

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it feels like they didn't manage the process. Well I'm

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>not sure you know what else they could have done,

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>but it just feels like they didn't manage the process. Well,

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what's the what's the feeling among you know, you aviation

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>geeks that you know look at the stuff all the time. Yes,

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>So I do think they I do think you know,

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.479
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a little bit of Hubris took over at Boeing,

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of marketing uh and managing financial statements

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>private was prioritized over engineering. And you know, I think

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Calhoun's job is really to make sure that he resets

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that um, you know, resets that uh. You know that

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>environment at Boeing where the focuses on solid engineering. You

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>try to keep the Hubris down UM. And so you know,

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 1>it feels like as they've moved the airplane through the

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>recertification process, it feels like they're getting that back in order.

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>You know. Look, I think it's a constant challenge. They

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>are one of the pre eminent airplane builders in the world,

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the two compared to air MUTH

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>and I think they really have to manage that that

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>culture going forward. So it feels like it's gotten better

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like they've really got a good job

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in re certification. I think Calhoun and his success are

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>really need to think about keeping that engineering culture forefront

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>at the company. And I think they got to start

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking about their next product, you know, and that's another

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>engineering challenge, so I know, and the other again aviation geek,

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys take your yearly pilgrimage to either you know,

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.719
<v Speaker 1>London or Paris for the annual air shows, which is,

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, just a scam in and of itself in

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, But you guys do it every year. What

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>happens at the next time, when post pandemic you guys

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>meet in Paris and or London. What's Boeing's position going

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to be in terms of, you know, selling the seven

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven Max. Are they going to be able to

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 1>successfully uh put some more these planes into the fleet? Well?

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think today was again, you know, a big

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>endorsement there for their delay to sell the airplane. Um,

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anything about a scam, but it's a

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>big cocktail party, is what I think. Look, there's still

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>there's still a heck of a lot of orders in

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the backlog, and I think really their job is to

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>go out and touch those customers and and get them

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>happy about the airplane and wanting to take those orders

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>in the backlog, because the beauty is they don't have

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to sell the plane. It's already sold. You've got a

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>good death back, all right, George, thanks so much. We

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. As always, I look forward to you making

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>your pilgrimage over to London and Paris. George Ferguson's senior Aerospace,

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Defense and Airlines Animals for Bloomberg Intelligence. It is time

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion. We're joined today by Near case Or,

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>founder of Unison Advisors and a Bloomberg Opinion columnists. Near

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. I know you and

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Tim O'Brien and Bloomberg Opinion out with a column today

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>where you're you're talking about what Congress should consider as

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it does move forward slowly on a fourth round of

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>physical stimulus. What are some of your key takeaways that

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you think Congress really needs to think about here? Well, um,

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>good morning, Paul, thanks for having me. Um. We're um.

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, we think that more stimulus is probably necessary.

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, the economy is improving, markets are up. It

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>looks like there's light at the end of the tunnel,

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, with a vaccine coming, but there's still

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of suffering and it's not clear what the

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>timing around that is going to be. So more similar,

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>more stimulus is probably appropriate and probably and around the

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>size that they're thinking about, but there's an it's another

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to sort of step back and ask what is

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the point of the stimulus? What are we trying to accomplish?

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, if if you just pull them back the

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>lens a bit, uh, you know, we will have spent

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>If if this package is roughly a trillion dollars, we

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>will have already spent uh, you know, roughly two point

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>seven trillion with the Cares Act for a total of

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>roughly four trillion dollars. And four trillion dollars could do

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things. I mean, you could build infrastructure,

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it could bolster education and public health, um, and and

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>we're suggesting that we just take a step back and

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe give some bigger thought to the impact that that

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of money could have on the entire economy, not

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>just certain segments of it. So it's interesting here, I

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>think you know, some of the issues here, the concerns

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.199
<v Speaker 1>here that discussion points here are how much should go

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>to individuals versus how much should go to maybe industries

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and companies to support employment and growth, how much should

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>go to states and municipalities. How do you think Congress

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is thinking about this? And where where where do you

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>think they will allocate some of uh this upcoming stimulus? Well,

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, based on what they've said, UM, it sounds

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>like this. UM. We'll see what the final details are,

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but it sounds like this latest round and relief is

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 1>going to be UM and gets going to go to

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>supplemental unemployment insurance for unemployed American It will go to

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>small business, state and local governments that are obviously badly hurting. UM.

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>And then and then some money sprinkled around for various

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>things including public health and some other and some other initiatives,

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>UM and UM, which is all fine, but it sort

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>of continues this UM, this sort of uh, you know,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>crisis relief approach that we've had really since the two

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight financial crisis, where we're just really sticking

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>fingers in a damn and just plugging whatever holes are there.

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>And while that is necessary to some extent, UM, it

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>does put us in a situation where we have various

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>groups with you know, within the economy that are fighting

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>over over money. You know, in two thousand and eight,

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it was mostly Wall Street and corporate America that got

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>the money, and you know, we're living with the ramifications

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of that to some extent today. UM. You know, today,

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>appropriately more of the money should go to individuals that

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>are suffering from this pandemic at small business that are

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>also suffering. But but what they really ought to think

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>about is is there a way to spend this money

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in a way that improves the entire economy as a whole.

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, some of the some of the

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>data that we cite in the piece is instructive. I

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>think if you, if you take a look at this

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>economy from a longer, longer term perspective, what you see

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is that for for decades we've had lower economic growth.

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>We have a situation where a half of households in

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>America don't make a living wage. We have, roughly, by

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>credible westments forty five million Americans that are food and secure,

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and that speaks not only to the problems with the pandemic,

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it speaks to a larger systematic problem of this functioning

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. And what we're saying is what we

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>need is robust investment in education and infrastructure and public health,

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of money we believe will will go

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to the benefit of everyone, both business, big and s

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>all an individual. So near it's you know, you talk

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>about the food and insecure I'm glad you brought that

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>up because you know, we still have you know, roughly

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>ten million workers that have yet to recover their jobs

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that were lost during the pandemic. We've got. We see

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>every night on the news these incredibly long lines of

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>cars going to food banks and so on. So it

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>seems like the near term immediate need is so pronounced

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that it might be tough to kind of think about

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>some of those longer term investment areas, whether it's education

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>or skills and things like that. How do you again,

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you try to How do you think Congress

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is thinking about that balance? Well, that's fair, and I

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>think the way that they are thinking about it again

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is just let's take care of the immediate problem. But

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 1>but I would suggest that it's helpful to try to

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>connect the dots. It's not clear to me, and I

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think we should take for granted that once this

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>pandemic passes that these problems that we're seeing, that all

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>these ten million jobs um will will be back, and

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that food and security will will will improve. It's possible

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that this pandemic has caused sort of longer lasting systemic

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.439
<v Speaker 1>problems to the economy, the roots of which were already

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in place before the pandemic came. The pandemic just just

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of brought them to the floor, right, And if

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, I don't think it's gonna be enough

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to spend a trillion dollars on supplemental un employment insurance

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and and help uh too, small business and the like.

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the question is going to be how do

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>we get more jobs? How do we get how do

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we improve training for workers, how do we um how

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>do we improve the wages of of of working American?

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And it seems to me that that's going to take

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a longer term vision and a longer

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>term investment in things like education, infrastructure. So near give

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of kind of how this timing might

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>play out. I know we're in this lame duck session here.

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Do we expect something to come out of this lame

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>duck Congress now? And then after President Elect Biden is

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>sworn in on January with a new Congress that there

0:26:55.440 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>may be something bigger, broader that maybe you're you're thinking about. Well,

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they understand that it's going to have to

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be soon. It's probably gonna have to be this year

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 1>if they want to have something passed um and if

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't get it done, then it's probably gonna get

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>kicked into the next administration. In terms of what can

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>happen and under a Biden administration, I think it really

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>depends on what happens in Georgia. Um. You know, if

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the Republican hold the Senate, then I think you're looking

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 1>at a stimulus package to the extent you ever get

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one um that looks roughly like the one we're talking

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>about today. On the other hand, if the Democrats take

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a Senate um and they you know, they hold the

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>White House and Congress, then I think it opens up.

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it opens it up to to a much

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>broader initiative to the except that they want to do

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it something that's more new deal left, you know. But

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it really depends on whether they'll have the votes exactly. So,

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, infrastructure, there seems to be something

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that is bipartisan that seems to be the party line

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>here that infrastructure is in fact bipartisan. Is that money

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>well spent? Do you think if we can move down

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that road and maybe get my you know, gateway project

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>done so I can take to train into the city

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and a with a safe tunnel that would be nice wood.

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And then yeah, I mean infrastructure I think is one

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 1>of those things that that everyone can benefit from. Obviously,

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>we need infrastructure and at various realms, um, you know,

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to to sort of lay the foundation for

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>business and for commerce and all for all that obviously,

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but also infrastructures jobs program as well. So I mean,

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you have ten million Americans right now that have lost

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>their jobs, are looking for work, and um. You know,

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in a big, ambitious infrastructure project from the federal government

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>is a high is hiring opportunity for millions of Americans UM.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And potentially to to to to provide them not only

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>with training, but good paying jobs, um. And and not

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to mention all the knock on effects from having improved

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure and transportation in WiFi, and you know, we can

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>think of many applications. So infrastructures is a great example

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of a program where the money that you spend is

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.239
<v Speaker 1>not so much relief as it is investment UM. And

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that investment, you know, we can we can look back

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to the nineties, thirties and nineteen forty for ambitious, big

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>government projects that paved the way for the prosperity UM.

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>That all Americans have joined the fifties sixties UM in

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen seventies, and we can have that again. Hey Near,

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We appreciate it as always.

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Neil Case, our founder of Unison Advisors. Any Bloomberg Opinion comms.

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>You can read all of Near's at work on Bloomberg

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com, slash Opinion or O P I N go

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>on the terminal. We'll have more coming up. This is

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm on

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio