WEBVTT - N.K. Will Want Security Assurances, Hormats Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jaylie.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg. The

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>main event the President of the United States about to

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>see whether his bet on North Korea will pay off

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Kim John Gunn's desire to end his country's economic stagnation, well,

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>will it prevail over the the dictator's fear of relinquishing

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>his nuclear threat. Joining US now from Singapore is to

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Lou Honor nipa Bloomberg Washington correspondent to Lou, walk me

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>through the main event and what is about to happen

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>over the next twenty four hours. Yeah, you're you're You're

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned it. We're less than twenty four hours out

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>from the biggest meeting of President Trump's life, also the

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>biggest meeting so far of Kim Jong UN's life. They're

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be meeting for the first time, the first

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>meeting between the US president and North Korean leader, and

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the goal from the U s side is to get

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Kim Jong un to commit to giving up his nuclear

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>weapons program. Now, there has not been a public statement

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>from Kim Jong un that he is willing to give

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>up this program that his family has developed over several decades,

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>so there will be We'll be watching very closely to

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>see whether or not there is any type of indication

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that Kim Jong un has actually turned the corner and

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>decided that he no longer needs this nuclear program and

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>he's willing to engage with the US, come out of

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the isolation that the US has placed North Korea in

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>into with various sanctions, and give up his nuclear program.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>The President Trump will try to get that commitment from him.

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>We're told that they're going to have his handshake starting

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>at nine a m Here Singapore time, followed by a

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>bilateral meeting, follow bilateral just one on one, just the

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>two of them with translated translators, followed by a larger

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>meeting with their staff as well. You need to have

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>an agreement on what the terms actually means. You need

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to define the terms. And both sides use this term

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the nuclearization of the peninsula. What does that mean to

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the president and what does that mean to the North

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Korean leader? And are they the same things. They are

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely not the same things. They are talking past each other,

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and there have been a lot of low level meetings

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to get those definitions closer to together. From the

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>U S side, the nuclearization means getting rid of the

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>entire nuclear program UH, declaring the entire nuclear program, having

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>inspectors verify that that program is being dismantled, and having

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>North Korea get rid of every bit of their nuclear

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>weapons program. Now the North Koreans have a different idea.

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>They believe that it means that the U S should

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>reduce its own presence in the region, maybe getting rid

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>of its troops on the South, in South Korea, on

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the Korean Peninsula, getting rid of the nuclear umbrella, the

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>protection that the US provides to South Korea and Japan

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>by having a presence in the region. And it also

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>means getting rid of the hostile nature of U S

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>functions UH and and and US diplomatic isolation of North Korea.

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>So they see the nuclearization the much different lights than

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the US, and they have not yet been able to

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>bring those two definitions in line just yet. So, given

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>how the G seven went, the sub debate over whether

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the pressure is increased on the President of the United

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>States or decreased on the President of the United States

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>as he goes to Singapore. Does the President go to

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Singapore stronger or weaker after that G seven, Well, he

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely does not have as much of the support of

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>our allies that he would have had if he had

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>had a productive G seven and been able to use

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that as a launching pad for this meeting in Singapore.

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Now he's still fighting and still having to answer questions

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and still tweeting about what happened in Canada and about

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the G seven. So there is a certain level of distraction,

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's this idea that the President has trouble getting

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>along with allies, he has trouble sticking to a deal,

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and whether or not that is something that's weighing on

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the mind of Kim Jong n after our President Trump

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>pulled out of the communicate is something that remains to

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>be seen. But obviously the President hasn't shown a strong

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>knack for staying in deals, has been much better at

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>breaking deals than putting deals together, and that's going to

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>make it much harder for him to to reach a

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>deal here in Singapore. All for joining us from Singapore,

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for your time, so joining us

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>around the table in New York, Tom King popping into

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the studio, Tom good morning, Good morning. Then for weekend. Yeah,

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to say the least, Charles Cancer come again as well,

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Seenior portfolio manager, Charles. I always ask myself on Monday mornings,

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>what's new? What's changed? Has anything truly changed after that

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>weekend other than you're a little bit more restive? Probably

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not you think I'm rested, Charles. That's nice of you.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting, though, isn't it for the market, just zero reaction.

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>The media and all the experts going crazy on relations

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they should be. But for the market and

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>investors it's same out. We've seen this before. I think

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the markets fighting this debate around fundamentals and the influence

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>that that higher interest rates will have on valuation and

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>and and that's going to be a tug of war

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that's going to last well beyond the global events of

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>this week, next week and and the rest of the year.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>And I'd say, as it relates to earnings and evaluations, um,

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you should anticipate less multiple expansion. But but but equity

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>return should follow earnings growth, which which I think will

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>be in in in the middle high single digits. Do

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 1>you think any of what we've seen over the last

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>weekend or so damages CEO confidence business confidence? No, not yet.

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think you always have to pay attention

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to to the institutes of the global economy because most

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>businesses today drive a lot of their growth from from

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>from outside the US, and and any confident shock will

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>be a negative to investment and consumer spending. But if anything,

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the debate that's going to take place in Singapore should

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>be a positive for confidence because it may imply a

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>safer global economy and world. What are you doing with

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>cash now? I mean it's in the change interest rate

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>environment all of a sudden. Cash is a different thing,

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Well, you've got to be careful about cash,

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and it depends on with whom you refer to. I

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>think at the individual level, I think the individuals always

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>miss price the optionality that comes with cash. Cash gives

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you the opportunity to invest when others can't, and it

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>gives you the opportunity to sleep well at night. As

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it relates to to the corporate side, the key question

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>is as as as surplus as cash flows have expanded

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in in magnitudes that they couldn't imagine after much lower

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>corporate taxes. The question there is will the corporate t

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>o be a productive allocator of their cash um and

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>were encouraging our company to to to to to term

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>out their debt. I moved from variable structures to fixed structures,

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and we encourage them to to to take risk and

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to to be innovators and to invest at rachel return

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that are you know, candidly nine basis points higher than

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the cost of cash um um. And if they can

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>do that well Shell, the value creation will continue. Is

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that in mid cap I mean, you made a lot

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of headlines with the Amazon offers, but forget about the

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>glory stuff. Were you really making it mid cap? Small cap? Look?

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I think for us our bread and brother Bread and Batteries,

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the medium sized companies that that that that face u

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>enormate opportunities to to continue to grow and and and

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't faced the headwinds of of the law of large numbers.

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>UM And when we were just in Denver meeting two

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of our medium sized companies UM and I was very

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>encouraged by by what they've seen from in terms of endermon.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>The one was an industrial company, the other was a

0:07:56.200 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>was a database measurement company that provides data into the

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>financial services. The consumer is really strong right now and

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is spending and and on the industrial side, of course,

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it depends on what your Protestant services are. But demands

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>really strong right now, and inventory is on a very

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>good position. Are you following a World Cup team? I

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>mean it's this week, It is this week. I would

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>typically follow in no particular order, South Africa in the US. Um. Good.

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're discussing Italy earlier, so we were, so it'll

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more challenging this year. But but

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>but no doubt I'll have at least one eye on

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 1>on on the event, says as they as they get

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Team Chiles. Well, if you forced me into a box,

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it'll it'll likely end up being England. Um, you know

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we all go back to the Commonwealth in one way

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>or now that excuse me. I read the New York

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Times insert thing this weekend covered John Ferrill. Would you

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>explain why Torres and pan On are going to the

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>World Cup? Yeah, in Italy is not Well, it's the

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>way they're separated into the different sort of grouping. So

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you have your wafer, which is where the bulk of

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the European precisely, and then you qualify a certain number

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 1>of teams from individual regions. The real question is why

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is Panama going and not the United States? How did

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 1>the United States not qualify for this World Cup because

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they have the easiest route to get into the World Cup?

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I am so too this week it's going to be great.

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>The good news for us to it. I think in

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the next round of the World Cup they're more teams,

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.199
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully cancer greater. Catch out with you for our

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>listeners worldwide, you're listening to Bloomberg Surveillance. We are thrilled

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to do what we do on surveillance, to go and

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>find the best voices we can find on a topic.

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And you do that with Charles Armstrong to say he

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is professor of history at Columbia. Barely describes his contribution

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to Pacific rim thinking and particularly the Peninsula of Korea,

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and he comes out of the Jonathan Spence Combine at

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Yale University LS. His doctorate is out of Chicago. Professor Armstrong,

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>we are thrilled to have you with us today. What

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>would Jonathan Spence say about the making of modern Korea?

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Synthesize your lifelong work to this historic moment for the

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Peninsula of Korea. Well, Korea has always been a place

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that has scarcely dependent it's independence. UH. It lived in

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the shadow of China for a thousands of years but

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>was never absorbed in the Chinese Empire. It wasn't a

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>colony of Japan for thirty five years. UH. And it

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is now divided into two in the North and South.

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So this is a long history of unity and independence

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>UH in Korea. And I think a lot of Koreans,

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>including in the South, are really looking forward to the

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>summit meeting between Trump and Kim Jo Muan, not because

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>they like Kim Joman necessarily, but because they see this

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as a historic turning point leading towards UH evenge the

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>reunification of their country. Secretary of Pompeo I thought was

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>organized and forceful in his brief this morning to the

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>media five thousand media and Singapore. If you were to

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, if you were to advise the Secretary of

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>State and the unpredictability or the nuances of the Supreme Leader,

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>how would you advise Secretary of State Pompeo. What Pompeo

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday in Singapore is a little bit different from

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:49.599
<v Speaker 1>what Trump has been saying. It does seem to be

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>quite different from what Kim Joman has been indicating he

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>expects it out of the summit. So I would say

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to keep an open mind, stick to principles, keep the

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>American goals in mind. But but the b nuanced about

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>how you get there. So what I what I mean

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>by that is Pompeo said US tensions will remain in

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>place until it's a complete and verifiable, irreversible denuclearization of

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the creating peninsula. But that's going to be a tough

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>sell to the North Koreans, and Trump himself has said

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that at the beginning of a process, not in in itself.

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 1>So you know, there's no no North kids are tough negotiators,

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to go in UM understanding your goals

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>but being able to work towards them in a creative way.

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>What is the minimum condition for success at this meeting?

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that what the minimum is a declaration of

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>principles both sides can agree that we want complete denucralization

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and outlining a process how to get there. Opening up

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>North too, inspections um, the starting uh process of leading

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>towards the release of sanctions. But I don't think we

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>can expect a huge UH and and a clear commitment

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>or a clear achievement. I think this has to be

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with Trump on this the beginning of

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the process. Professor Armstrong. How does South Korea fit into

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>these meetings? I mean, it's Trump and Kim, I get that,

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>but South Korea has a unique place at the table.

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not there at the table, what is it.

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>They have been very important, particularly the President of South

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Korea bunjay and really getting this this UH process going.

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>They've facilitated between North Korea and the US. They've reached

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>out to North Korea to start a dialogue going back

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to the the Winter Olympics in South Korea, and they

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>have a huge amount of state. Obviously, they don't want

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a war on their peninsula. I think that's the first

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>condition for them. They want to lead us back from

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the edge of war that we seem to be in

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>just six months ago. UH. And they want to move

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the Korean peninsula to a situation of stable peace UH.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And they want to improvement in the North. You know,

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>they have to live with with North Korea right on

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>their doorstep, and they want the regime to be less

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>hostile and also forced people to be better off. So

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I think economic interaction with North is also very important.

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But then this is President g the New York Times

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>making a strong point this morning, the Chinese will not

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>be there. I don't buy it for a minute. The

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Chinese must be there in representation in North Korea. How

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>does that relationship fit in the next twenty four hours.

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>China has made it clear to Kim Joland, meeting him twice.

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>She had two meetings with Kim in less than a

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>month after refusing to meet him for for six years

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>since he came to power. So clearly China wants its

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>position represented, even if it's not physically there at the meeting.

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>China is both bars most important economic partner, takes about

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it foreign trade, supplies it with oil and food, and

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in exchange. They want secure border. They don't want the

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>US right on their doorstep. They want a reliable buffer

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>on their northeastern boundary, which is very sensitive, and they

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>also want to uh North Korea that is less unpredictable

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and more affluent. They really want North Korea to go

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>down their path of economic form and they see that

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that can happen until US an improve relations with the

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>United States and we see some relief from sanctions. Professor Armstrong,

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Greatly appreciate the time today, professor

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of history at Columbia and truly one of the nation's

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>experts on Korea, greatly greatly appreciate that where this down, Uh,

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a woman who survived the winters of Bates College, that

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>itself is a triumph Flora and joins us with FS investments.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>As we looked to the feed, as we looked to

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>where Laura, I want you to explain an absolutely killer

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>chart you have going back twenty five years, which is

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the tenure yield up and then rolling over, and then

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the ten year yield up and rolling over, and sort

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of in two thousand five six into the crisis up

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and rolling over, and then you've got a question mark

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and then things change. Where are we with a tenure

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>yield right now versus other FED cycles? So um, yeah,

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>First off, we have I had my twenty five year

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>college reunion since weekend, so apologize my voice is so

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we're covering from all the fun. You were down with

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the Washington you were down with the Washington capitals, doing

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the bend or that they were, Well, that's good. Bates

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>College is a good place to have anniversary. It's still going,

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>um thanks to highlighting that chart. Because one of the

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>to mean, one of the most important um pieces of

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>misinformation I hear from, especially fixed income investors, is that

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>as the FED races rates, as short term rates renormalized,

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that the the FED funds rate hikes cycle is going

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to be somehow this rising tide the lists all ships

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and long term rates are going to go up too.

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And I could not disagree more. Um. I look at

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the history of said cycles and what you traditionally see

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>is longer term rates rising somewhat at a at a

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>slower pace in the beginning of the cycle, and then

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that usually does not last. It typically plateaus and even

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that try and even reverses. And so we're long term

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>rates have gone up a little bit because we started

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>raising rates. We've had volatility in the long end recently.

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, to me, the sell off we got

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>verse three oh eight and the tenure the rally to

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>bright yields back down to two eighties, that made all

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the sense in the world, because we are in an

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>environment when the federations raised, where we just should not

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>expect the long end to also be on autopilot and

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 1>rise as well. So, Laura, the intuitive way that the

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>curve behaves at this point of the tightening cycle is

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that we get some flatness, that you get a bare flantner,

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>which means the sell off of course comes at the

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>front end more predominantly. The argument against this, Laura, and

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes from JP Morgan Asset Management and Bob Michael,

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is that this time is a little bit different because

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>you're also getting balance sheet unwind and you get in

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the reverse sort of Q eight and the reverse effects

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>will be the return of term premier and ultimately what

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>that could mean is a shift to a steeper curve.

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.959
<v Speaker 1>What do you say back to that, Laura, So you know,

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest certainty about that comes to me

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>from the European Central Bag and the announced that they're

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>possibly going to make this week. All of the de

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>leveraging that we're seeing in the FED balance sheet to

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>me has already been priced in, that spaked in the

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>cake already. So I don't see that in and of

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>itself pushing long term rates uh significantly really at all,

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>unless they was for some reason accelerate and nobody really

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>expects that. The ECB is a much bigger question mark.

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, at some point they are going to

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>hit an inflection where they're no longer adding to their

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. You know, I think the first rate move

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the first start of this's not

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the balance sheet side that they

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>begin tightening policy. But um, you know, their timing, the

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>fact that they have only a single mandate and inflation

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>data aren't exactly being cooperative in the in the EU. Uh.

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>To me, that is one of the biggest question marks

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for the bomb market is here, I mean within that

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is is the marker and we were talking with Drew

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Matis earlier with an optimistic tone that leads to higher

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>rates in his single point marker. I guess it is

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>three and a quarter percent. Give us some precision here, Laura. Uh,

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, do we get to do we

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>go through the three oh eight level you're talking about earlier? Yeah,

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that's entirely possible because this Federate ex cycle

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>is so different. If you think about to me, the

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know, we can see rates creep higher

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>for the first half of the cycle and you look

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>out even at the fed dum protections, this cycle still

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>has a long way to go. So you could absolutely

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>see uh on the tenure, you can even see a

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, but compared to where we have been historically,

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it's still so low. And you know from where the

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>chair that I sit in, the people I seek to,

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>they're always looking for yield, They're looking for investments and um,

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that's a message that I just carry through

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>because people forget me, don't understand, they don't get that dynamic. Well, Laura,

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, Lauring, thank you so much. With

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>FS investments, so really a smart conversation. They're folks on rate.

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And again, you know, if you read your Fabosi, there's

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to call it four factors that go into

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>what the curve does, what the dynamics are and CEFA

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:20.479
<v Speaker 1>exams are passed and failed on that idea. We've been

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to advance the conversation over the last number of

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>weeks on our international relations. Did that earlier with the

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Korean expert from Columbia University and now joining US forever

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>associated with a Fletcher School Toughts and with Princeton Robert Hormetts.

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>He is a former Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth,

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Energy in the Environment, working with President Obama. Boba Hormetts

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of course for years a good supporter of what we've

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>done here at Bloomberg on the economy and Bloomberg Surveillance. Ambassador,

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we are thrilled to have you with us for this

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>half hour. You know Graham Allison at Harvard who speaks

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of the tension between China in the United States. Where

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>will that tension be if Mr Trump has a successful

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Korean summit? Well, I think a successful Korean summit probably

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>will be a relief in terms of the relationship between

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the two countries, because the US has been pushing China

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 1>to be more helpful to the cause of getting the

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>North Koreans to do de nuclear rise in the Chinese

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>have been upping their sanctions under US pressure. But also

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese do not want instability in Northeast Asia, and

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>if the summit were to fail, the chances of instability

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>would probably increase, or at least the perception would increase

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that the United States and North We're going to get

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>back into the sort of shouting match that they had

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>just before the current flaw began to emerge. The way

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this works, Bob, is somebody gives up something, and usually

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the greater power unloads money, aid whatever you want to

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>call it at a country. And clearly we and others

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>can unload AID on and impoverished North Korea. But what

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>will they give up? Well, that's of course the big question, Tom,

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and that is the Administration has made it very clear,

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and indeed members of the Congress from both parties have

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 1>made it clear that the goal of the United States

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>should be complete denuclearization with a very very robust surveillance

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>through various quarters to make sure that they have not

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>only rid themselves of nuclear material, but also the capability

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of creating new nuclear material and the ability to deliver

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>uh the sorts of weapons, which is essentially not just

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I C B M s but more limited shorter range

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 1>ballistic missiles that could deliver nuclear weapons. So the Administration

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Congress seemed to be united on something very

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>strong and and very permanent, with a lot of inspections

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that that is occurring. In return, of course,

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the North is going to want security assurances. They're going

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to want a substantial amount of assistance, as you say,

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>because the economy is in very bad shape, and they're

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>going to want an end to the to the Korean War,

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and most likely some kind of American pullback of its

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>true presence um in in the South and and and

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>in the region. You know, one thing that I'm struck

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>with is there seems to be so much at stake

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 1>from a diplomatic standpoint, and we hear, we see all

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>these headlines that are really significant. Uh. And you're uniquely

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>positioned to answer a question of why markets don't seem

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>to care. You are formerly the vice chair of Goldman Sachs.

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>You know the relationship between these sort of big, high

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>level negotiations and underlying business. What will it take for investors,

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:19.959
<v Speaker 1>for corporations to care. Well, that's a great question. And

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I have been surprised all along that with respect to

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>North Korea, indeed events surrounding Iran, that there is not

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>more attention or concern in the markets Iran because of

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>course it's near a very rich oil producing area and

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>also does have a lot of conventional weapons to be

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>just very very disruptive if it wanted to be. Um

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and to some extent it already is in certain parts

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>of the region. But in North Korea, I think the

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>feeling is the markets really are focusing on a lot

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of other things for the moments in North Korea doesn't

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>occupy a great part of their attention. But the other

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is they really don't know how things are going to go,

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and they perhaps have not fully digested the seriousness of

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>these two countries. If things really went sour getting into

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>some kind of confrontation, perhaps they don't believe it will

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 1>ever happen, and therefore they're discounting it. And even if

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>this thing normalizes and there's a better set of relations

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in Northeast Asia, they probably don't see this as very

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>advantageous economically, So on the margin, while they're focused on it,

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't think a the worst calamity will occur, so

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't think that will happen. And even if a

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>really good outcome occurs, it probably, at least in the

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>near term, won't have much of an economic impact. So,

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>given your experience as an executive at the top of

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a major bank, I'm wondering, do you think that the

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty that some of these high level discussions have injected

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>into the global economy has already been priced into some degree?

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>In other words, do you think that companies have actually ratched,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>did back their expansion plans, or not invested in their

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>plans as a result of this with respect to Korea,

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you mean with respect to Korea and also just sort

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of the volatile backdrop of international relations. Well, I do

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>think the one thing that is going to trouble companies

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>going forward is what happened in Quebec over the weekend,

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and that is the companies had been hoping, at least

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and and perhaps some degree feeling, that there would not

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>there would not be a trade war. Um, what happened

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>in Quebec has made a lot of people very concerned

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that the US and its major Western trading partners and

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>major Western allies are really on the verge of something

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that could be far more disruptive to international trade, international finance,

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and international markets. I think that is a big concern.

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>If it can't be pulled back, that's an issue because

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the G seven was designed to to reduce tensions on

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the ECONO. I'm excited and solved problems among the major

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>economies and to underpin our security and political relations if

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>this institution goes sour. These are the countries that agree

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>with the United States most on most issues. If their

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 1>tensions across the Atlantic and Pacific of a deep trade

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>nature on our investment as well. I think markets are

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>going to see, well, maybe this trade war that we

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>thought could be averted by meeting such as those in

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Quebec could now be unleashed in an even more toxic way.

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>What a joy to have with us. Robert Hormat's ambassador. Hormats,

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of course the former under Secretary of State for President Obama,

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but far more an author thinking about the linkage of

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>our foreign policy into our fiscal economics is important book

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>The Price of Liberty of a few years ago, and

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in it Bob maybe getting us to Quebec hard and

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>ineescapable facts. The hard and inexcapable facts is the American

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>diplomacy industry has to move on from Quebec. What will

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State Pompeo do after what we saw this weekend. Well,

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>he's got a big job ahead of him. I was,

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>as you know, the sherp or the planner, and participated

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in the first uh several summits. I've been to twelve

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and over the course of my career in government, and

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>at Rambo in nineteen the first of these was designed

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>during a period of great economic difficulty for the West,

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>after the major oil crisis of nineteen seventy three, Inflation

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>was rampant. There was a lot of division, and the

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>idea was you pull these countries together, the major countries

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Western world, and you give them a sense

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of a common purpose, which is to work together to

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>overcome economic problems those were, as I mentioned, very difficult

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and also as a way of underpinning

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>politic coal and security ties. What happened that Quebec was

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that this was the most divisive summit that in all

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the time I've been working on these, the most divisive

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>summit I have seen by far. It's unprecedented that one

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>country would refuse to sign the Communic a that has

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>never happened to my knowledge. But also the tone was

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>so divisive. So what was meant to be uh coordinating

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>common solutions and economic problems and underpinning political security relations

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is now an acrimonious turned into an acrimonious forum in Quebec.

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Now the question is going down the road, how do

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you pull this together? You need strong alliances with the

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>US is a great power, not to because it's great internally,

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but because it had powerful friends and allies. You need

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that and to have exert influence in the world today.

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:56.479
<v Speaker 1>So Secretary Pompeio has got to begin to rebuild trust

0:30:56.720 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in these alliances for both economic and political security reason.

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>But Ambassador Harmat's your charm over the years has been

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>your uncanny ability to take the want um of foreign

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>policy and link it to our domestic realities. The President,

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact is, has a residence with a large body

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of Americans who support him. Does he have the backing

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of a fair amount of Americans when he is this

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>brusque with our allies? Do you get the sense that

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>he has touched a residence with some part of the

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>American people? Unfortunately, I think there are a number of

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>people who are of the view that globalization has disrupted

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>their lives and their communities and threatens their jobs. And

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>if the President takes these very tough lines and is

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>very pugnacious about pressing other countries to do what he

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>wants or making statements like he won't trade with them

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>if they don't, which is what he tweeted today. Um,

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that to me is something that while Americans may like

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the rhetoric and find the toughness quite appealing, and certainly

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>there is ninophobia and there's an any foreign feeling in

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>certain quarters in this country. Over a period of time,

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>when people come to realize that that has a very

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:22.959
<v Speaker 1>direct effect on their pocketbooks, on their four O one case, UM,

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they will probably take a somewhere different view.

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Although admittedly, UM, there is a strong political view that

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump's toughness is a good thing, and I think not

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the majority of Americans feel that way, but a certain

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>portion doing a certain strong portion of his base. The

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>big question that you've touched on, I think is is

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this just a temporary phenomenon, a Trump phenomenon, or does

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this what happened to Quebec signal a sustained weakening of

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>cooperation among the Western community on a wide range of issues,

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>going even beyond Trump. Is it is it possible to

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 1>pull that back to what we tried to do in

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the seventies and eighties and nineties seven American presidents have

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>regarded these summits as a good thing to reduce tensions.

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Now we have those tensions, and it's going to be

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot harder to pull them back, and Pompey was

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to do this because he needs these allies

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and we need strong trading partners. We got into a

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>trade war. A lot of American companies, a lot of

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>American jobs that depend on exports, and a lot of

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>American consumers that depend on import goods are going to

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>be very adversely affected, so that what's good headlines today

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>may not be good and certainly won't be good for

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>America tomorrow. I come in Bob in the morning and

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I write the opening script for television, and on the

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>back end of it today, you know, playing off of

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Navarro's comments, I said, there is a special place in

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>hell for the Montreal Canadians. Check that for Prime Minister Trudeau.

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>The kind of rhetoric that we heard from the professor

0:33:55.600 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of economics from ukl irv Irvine, or the rhetoric we

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>hear from my good friend Lawrence Cudlow. I know that's

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>not within the Hormat's dialogue or discourse. Is that a

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 1>permanent damage to this president and is it a permanent

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>damage to this nation? Well, I don't know how permanent

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it is, but I I think that it does. As

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I was mentioning a moment ago, there are a certain

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>number of people who feel that it is time the

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>United States took a stronger position, and they think somehow

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they're quite tough rhetoric um an acrimonious rhetoric and somewhat

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>bullying rhetoric with a strong position. And I just want

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to repeat what what some Americans think is good for

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>this country today and what some Americans think is appealing rhetorically.

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>What some Americans think is a way of America standing

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:51.240
<v Speaker 1>up to the rest of the world. Maybe that sounds

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>good to some Americans today, but there is a strong

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>reason why these institutions and patterns of cooperation were built.

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 1>It was it was in part, in large part because

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>deserved America's interests on trade, on investment, and on growth.

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that the the appeal of language

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>today to some people may turn out to be very

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>unappealing when they realize how bad it is for the

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>American economy, how bad it is for jobs, and how

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 1>bad it is for their for their for there for

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>one case, you know, not that you know, I'm trying

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what percentage of the audience will know

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 1>who Dean Atchison is or you know, others. We can

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about impress everyone, but it's almost like we've lost

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:38.280
<v Speaker 1>our sense of history. You specialized in honoring our history.

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:40.919
<v Speaker 1>We have a president who is clearly a historical there's

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>no question whenever anybody's politics, and in believing that, are

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>we basically losing our understanding of our diplomatic history. Whether

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>it's we are Tom exactly put your finger on it.

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Most people don't remember the history, and and and and

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and there's some that would just assume not pay much

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>attention to do it anyway, and by so doing, they're

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>missing the whole point as to why these institutions and

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>why these alliances and why these patterns of economic cooperation

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>were created in the first place after World War Two,

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and in the case of the G seven in nineteen

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 1>they were created because presidents of Republican and Democratic presidents.

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is created under Republican president I remind you

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of Gerald Ford and supported by President Reagan and many

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>other conservative Republicans as well as Democrats. They all understood

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>that this was important to the American national interest and

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to make America great. After World War Two, people realized

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>we need to have strong alliances and strong economic partnerships.

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>If those deteriorate over time, weakens America's influence in the

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>world and will weaken our economy because we need the

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>trade and we need the investment. And it's particularly relevant

0:36:56.040 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>today as the President goes into these meetings with the

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the Party Secretary of North Korea um on on a

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>major issue. All American presidents in the past have concluded

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that when you go into a meeting with your adversary,

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to have a strong alliance behind you. You

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>want to have solidarity among the Western countries to back

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 1>you up, to be there for you. And this was

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>very badly shattered at least for the moment in Quebec.

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Now the President and you went back to Pompeio. Now

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>we have to make especially sure that when he goes

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 1>into that somebody has a very close relationship and is

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>in line with the thinking of Japan and South Korea

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 1>are two allies in the region and they're in line

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>with him. So at least we now for the next

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>immediate steps. If we can't pull the overall relationship together

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>among the G seven, he's got to be especially strong

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in making sure that the alliances with with Japan and

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>South Korea are very strong in this. In this moment,

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:00.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to leave it dear Robert Hermans, generous of you,

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be with us for this thirty minutes. Thank you

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.479
<v Speaker 1>so much. Robert Hormetts with Kissinger Associates and of course

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the former own Secretary of State for Economic Growth. Thanks

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast.

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio