WEBVTT - From the Vault: Bird Intelligence

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And it's Saturday.

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>The vault creeks open slowly. Will you walk in with us?

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You should walk in because this time the vault contains

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>super intelligent birds. Funny thing about super intelligent birds is

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>they're not the result of some kind of Dr Moreau,

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>like a mad science experiment. They already exist in the

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 1>natural world. Birds are scary smart and that's what our

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>episode is about today. This originally aired on March thirty one,

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand sixteen, and it was called The Unsettling Depths

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of Bird Intelligence. All right, let us enter in. Welcome

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff Works

0:00:51.120 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, welcome to stuff all your mind. My

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And Robert

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you to go with them on

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a mental journey through the past. Let's do it, okay.

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So I want to ask you to think about the

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>evolution of technological civilization in terms of the human hand. Okay, Well,

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>that is the not the only model we have for

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of technologically advanced civilizations. Yeah, so I'm totally

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>down with it. Think about tool using intelligence, right, Yeah,

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>So the earliest tools used by primates are primate ancestors

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.559
<v Speaker 1>that the apes we call our cousins. They're all things

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that can be manipulated by the fingers. You had the

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>hand axes. I'm sure you've seen these things there, these

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>carved down stones, and there are different theories about what

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly they were used for. Where they for processing carcasses,

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>where they for throwing it prey or some combination, you know,

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>where they just merely useless status items. But they were

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>these chipped stone tools used in the hand. And then

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of course we had handheld and thrown weapons, handheld tools

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>for processing the car rcases of prey like a stone cleavers,

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and then later on you had tools for cooking and

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>tools for farming and all just kind of a spiral

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>staircase of technology revolving around the solid core of the

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>shape of the human hand. Everything was based on the

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>assumption of thumbs, palms, fingers. Even if you look at

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the beginnings of human culture, like if we go to

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 1>the oldest examples of art, we know cave paintings show

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the use of handprints, pigments, applied to cave walls by hand.

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>And then I don't know if you've ever seen this,

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but finger fluting, where it's not painting, but where Stone

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Age artists would make patterns and cave walls and what

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>used to be soft cave walls by dragging their fingers

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>through the soft surfaces which later hardened. And then, of course,

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the oldest known musical instruments appear to be

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Paleolithic flutes made out of the bones of bears or vultures.

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So you get a bare bone, you bore some holes

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in it, and you could make a flute. And of

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>course what do you do with those holes You cover

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>them with a fingertip to change the pitch of the

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>note you're producing with the flute. So when you consider

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>all this, and then of course coming all all the

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>way up to our our steering wheels and our gaming

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>console controllers and every other thing you hold in your

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>fingertips today, it's almost impossible to imagine the evolution of

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:24.119
<v Speaker 1>a technological civilization and advanced intelligent culture without hands. Uh.

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think some would say that it was

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>our primate hands that made this trajectory possible for our species,

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like it was only the fact that humans went bipedal

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and started having free hands to work with that encouraged

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the development in the brain the powerhouses for tool use

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and innovation that made us who we are today. But

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to think about what if evolution had gone

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a different way? Ah, So what you have another form

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of life on the planet. Uh was managed to ascend

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that staircase we mentioned earlier? What kind of tools would

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they have used? How would they have used them? Yeah,

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and that stairing, so their spiral staircase might not have

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>had hands. What if there was an advanced technological species

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>on Earth, but not one that evolved from primates, and

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>not even one that evolved from mammals. Is it possible

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to imagine a technological civilization built by the cousins of

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.799
<v Speaker 1>birds in the same way we have one now built

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>by the cousins of apes. Um like where you've got

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>highly intelligent cousins of pigeons conducting science and business and

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>art and education in these huge technological monstrosities of cities,

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>while you've got monkeys scampering around in flocks throughout the

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>city surfaces, pecking around for crumbs, and every now and

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>then you'd have a highly intelligent bird creature go out

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>on its lunch break and feed the monkeys some some

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>bread crumbs, or feed on the monkeys. Could be because yeah,

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>because this gets especially interesting when you when you when

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>you when you look back, say about fifty million years

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>uh to the to the earth really u c. N Epoch,

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and you'll find that this is the only time in

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>history when birds ruled the world. They permeated most of

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the key positions on the food chain, with a large

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>flightless terror birds stalking the land terror birds, terribs, massive, yeah,

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>top predator, just terrifying land birds. But I can imagine

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>something like what if something like that had been the

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>species that really took off, and maybe that was what

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>would live in these cities and eat the monkeys. But

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>but as for just birds in general, you know, why

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>not why not the birds? Because birds are builders. Yeah,

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they build nests, they put them together, their tool users.

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>As we'll discuss, they exhibit social behavior, trickery in some

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>cases startlingly complex social behavior. So you know, I can

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>imagine on that end of things, I can imagine the

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>bird brain being completely capable of ascending uh. In terms

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.679
<v Speaker 1>of manipulating objects. Will certainly get more to the details

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in a bit. But I instantly think of some of

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the controls that we see, uh for disabled individuals who

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>do not have the use of their hands, where they

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>use like a straw to to control the movements of

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>say a wheelchair. Yeah. I can imagine technology like that

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>being utilized by some sort of highly evolved bird creature,

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and with the kind of intelligence that a highly advanced

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>technological civilization would have. I wouldn't say that something like

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that is necessarily impossible. Uh. In fact, today I think

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we want to make the case for why it's not

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>completely insane to imagine a technological culture in a hypothetical

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>alternate universe built around the core of wings, beaks, and

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>claws instead of fingers and thumbs and palms. Yeah, I

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's even a little bit insane. That's what

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it is. However, is it's a little more alien than

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>even most of our science fiction dreamers want to want

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to want to play with. You know, we tend we're

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>talking about this later. Even when you think of of

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>alien species and science fiction that are avian, they're almost

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>always the same sort of bird human hybrids that we've

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>been dreaming about since they know since you know Babylonian days. Yeah.

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh so I should say at the beginning that this

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>episode was inspired when I saw a recently published paper,

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and this paper was called Cognition Without Cortex, and it

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>was a review of recent findings on avian cognition and

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>euro anatomy, sort of collecting all of the literature of

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>recent decades, looking into how smart exactly are birds, what

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of cognitive traits and thinking to the exhibit and

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>what are we learning, uh, what are we learning about

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>how a bird's brain works and how that compares to

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the mammalian brain. And so this paper was written by

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Owner Gunter Kune and Thomas bugny Are and it was

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in Trends and Cognitive Sciences, published on March one. Well

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you know this, Uh this raises the question, Joe, what

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>is your attitude towards birds? What is your experience with

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the perception of bird intelligence? Well, I know exactly what

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it is, because I've always thought that birds looked kind

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of dumb. You have, and I have to admit it.

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry now, I'm sorry now that I've read all

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>this research, but I always looked at them and said,

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>oh man, there's something just kind of like an ancient

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>emptiness in the eyes of a bird. And I was

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>not alone in this because you may have heard this before,

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>but I want to share it with you. A quote

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>from the famous film director of Werner Hertzog speaking about chickens. Yes,

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>can you please do it in his voice? No, I

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>can't do the accent, but I'm going to read his quote.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Hertzog says about chickens, the enormity if they're flat brain,

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the enormity of their stupidity is just overwhelming. You have

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to do yourself a favor. When you're out in the

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>countryside and you see chickens, try to look at chicken

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>in the eye with great intensity, and the intensity of

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>stupidity that is looking at you is just amazing. By

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's very easy to hypnotize the chicken. They're

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>very prone to hypnosis. And in one or two films

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I've actually shown that. Okay, so he's talking about chickens here,

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and I have heard from people who have raised chickens before.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I think my my grandmother was very much in this

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>boat that the chickens are are stupid and in a

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>pain to keep. And but chickens are just one of many,

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 1>many species. Yes, that's that's true. There are there are

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>one subspecies there also, we should point out domesticated and

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>there is often something that we see in biology that

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>happens to domesticated animals. Animals that have kind of a

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>cushy life where they're fed every day tend to not

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>be quite so quick in the in the thinking department

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>as their wild cousins. But I don't know if that

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>explains how people feel about chickens. Maybe chickens are a

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>lot smarter than we give them credit for. But anyway,

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the conventional wisdom for a long time has been in

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in sort of crude terms, birds are dumb. Birds are

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>stupid because they do not have the right kind of brain. Yeah,

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of this boils down to

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>just basic perception. Like my wife has often been kind

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of like freaked out by birds. And the way she

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>describes it is that she grew up around dogs. She

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>grew up around horses, and she says that those animals

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are easier to read. You can you can you can

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 1>get a better idea about what a dog is going

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>to do. You can tell if a dog is aggravated, excited,

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>what have you? A horse? The same way they are

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>all these different cues that we can pick up on

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and really communicate facially with them. It's more difficult to

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>do with a bird, and certainly the bird I can

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>just seem like a glassy um, you know, a cavern

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of nothingness. I think of what Quint says in Jaws,

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the shark size it's like a doll's eye. Yeah, yeah,

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>very much. So you get that kind of glassy doll's eye,

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>uh impression from them. But you know, I go to

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the zoo a lot with my my son and there

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of birds there, some of them in particular,

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>like the ground hornbill that they have there. I'm just

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>always startled by how intelligent they seem to be, and

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that I am. I'm observing them, but they seem to

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>be observing me almost on equal footing. So in in

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that area, I have to disagree with the perceived stupidity

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>of the bird. Just talking about perceptions here at this point,

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think I would have to say that that

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>your wife's intuition about the sort of disconnectedness of the

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>bird the space between you does make sense from a

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>biological perspective, because there is a biological gap between humans

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and birds much larger than our gap, the gap between

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>humans and other mammals. So the gap between humans and

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>dogs is you're still both mammals. You have a much

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>more recent common ancestor. The gap between primates like us

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and birds is ancient. There are last common ancestor with

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>birds is believed to exist. It to have existed about

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred million years ago. We have not been related to

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>birds since before the dinosaurs, way before the dinosaurs. It

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>goes back way back. These are these are just extremely

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>different branches of the tree of life on Earth, and

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>so I think it makes sense to look on a

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>vian creatures with the with the kind of hesitance. So

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>there there there's an alien quality to it that's much

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like the quality of a reptile or a fish. They're

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>just not much like us. Yeah, there's a definite alien

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>quality to them. But I mentioned the conventional wisdom was

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that when people used to think all birds were really stupid,

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>they thought that they were stupid because of how their

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>brains were built. So what where does human intelligence come from? What?

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Why are mammals smart? Typically people look at the cortex.

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>The mammalian prefrontal cortex appears to be the seat of

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 1>executive functions. So all the thinking you do that involves

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>conscious control of thought, using working memory and constituting the

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>planning and execution of actions. That that that's cortex stuff.

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>And so the old line of the of the neuroscientist

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>or the neuro anatomist was sort of that I can

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>look at your brain, and by looking at your brain,

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you how you're thinking works, how your

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>cognition works. And if you don't have a cortex, you

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.599
<v Speaker 1>just don't have much cognition going on. I watched a

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>presentation by Owner Gundercun and he called attention to the

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>work of the German neuro anatomist Ludwig Eddinger, who lived

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>eighteen fifty five to nineteen eighteen, and he said that

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Eddinger was the leading comparative neuro anatomist of his time.

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh and the his project was sort of to understand

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of the brain invertebrates. Vertebrates all creatures that

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>have a backbone. Um, so birds and mammals both vertebrates.

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Where where do the differences in brain evolution come along?

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And Eddinger's theory was, first you got fish, and fish

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>basically just have a spinal cord with a little you've

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>got some brain stem on the end. Their fish don't

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have much going on brain wise. And then after that

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you had amphibians and and so they've got a part

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of the basil ganglia that's sort of a little bit

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>extending what the brains are capable of. And then you've

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>got reptiles, and this adds more to the basal ganglia

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>second component of it, and you've you've got slightly upgraded

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>cognitive skills. And then after reptiles, you've got the fourth thing,

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>which is birds. And then birds have uh, they sort

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of developed the basil ganglia improve the skills more. And

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>then finally with mammals you get the cerebral cortex, which

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>gives them this unprecedented thinking power, intelligence, cognition, flexibility, the

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>ability to use their brains to adapt intelligence to all

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>kinds of different scenarios. And so, according to Eddinger, you

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>should look at a monkey and you should see cognition.

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>It's behaviors that come out of thinking. It's not all

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>just instinct. It's weakly determined by the genes. But meanwhile,

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you should look at a bird, like a pigeon that

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a cortex, and it should have a little

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of intelligence, but it's going to be a just instinct,

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, gene determined behaviors. Is that true? Well, on

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>one hand, this gets into the whole idea of the

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of the ice cream scoop model of of neurophysiology, right,

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that humans have the most scoops of brain ice cream

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and therefore have the most powerful brains. But then also

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>our our understanding of how these brains are working has

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>evolved somewhat over the years too, and we've been forced

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to sort of think think outside of the of our

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>own uh uh, you know, anthropomorphic bias in terms of

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>what constitutes intelligence. And of course we've conducted plenty of

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>experiments on top of that to really get down for

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to take apart intelligence, even human intelligence for divided into

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>components that can then be tested for in other species. Yeah,

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think what we're learning in recent years over

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>many experiments is not just like one experiment has changed,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is the way we're thinking about this There there are

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>so many more experiments than we could even talk about

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in this episode, and the jury is out on many

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of these areas, right, But there's so much new research

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>showing that bird intelligence, bird cognition seems to go far

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>beyond what was previously assumed that this old theory of

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the determination of cognition by the by the structure of

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the brain does seem to be flawed. It seems to

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>be that this is not correct anymore because it was

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>based on a false premise. Birds are much smarter than

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we thought, and some cultural traditions seem to have actually

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>long associated birds, like like corvids, which include crows with

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>higher brain function. I know we came across this, uh

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>this great North Smith right. Oh, yeah, Hoogan and Moon

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in those are Odin's ravens. Yeah, companions. He also had

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>some some lupine companions, Gary and freki Um. But the

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing about to sound like fraggle names. They do

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of in our sything about Whogan and Moon and

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I also think of and maybe they were, but Whogan

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and Moon and also sounded like they should be, uh

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>like the the host characters in like an old horror comic,

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they should be chatting with each other. Maybe

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm directly maybe they were. I don't know. Someone will

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>have to fill me in on that. But they not

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>only are they Odin's companions, they are a part of him.

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>They are his thoughts and memories, respectively. And so some

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>argue that Moonen is actually desire rather than memory. But

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially the idea here said Hohogan, um who can represents

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the thoughts of Odin Moon and represents the memories. That's

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>too cool, because they're they're embodied cognition, right, yeah. Yeah,

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 1>And uh, here's a little a little bit of Old Norse,

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>uh that has been translated that tells you a little

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>bit about Whogan and Moon. And this is apparent. This

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to be from Odin himself, who can and

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>moon and fly every day over the world. I worry

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>for Whogan that he might not return, but I worry

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>more from moon In. Oh well that if you interpret

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>moon into mean memory, and it's uh, that's kind of

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a bittersweet fact about the loss of memories into time. Yeah,

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that these are just they're they're birds that are out

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>there in the world, and hey, one day one or

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>both of them may not come back. And and it's

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting too. I don't want to go to too far

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>down the rabbit hole. But you apparently don't see animals

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>playing a huge role in Old English Norse heroic literature.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Except in the case of certain carrion animals, the beasts

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of battle, like the wolf which we mentioned earlier, Gary Frekie,

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the eagle, the raven. Uh. So it's interesting to think

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>about these are the animals that fed on the battlefield

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>dead and therefore they have some sort of privileged status. Symbolically,

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that's weird. One might think that that would make them

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>taboo or something like that, but instead that elevates them

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to the being uh, the stuff of myth. Yeah, I

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>mean it. You certainly we see we see some of

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that in other cultures, but yeah, I haven't looked into

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it as much in terms in terms of Western culture because,

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>for instance, the vultures have elevated status uh in Tibetan

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>mythology because they're closer to the sky and they are

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>involved in the rights of death. But the Siberials, right, well,

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's time to actually look at some of

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>these studies of of avian cognition of exactly what bird

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>brains are capable of in practice and the to summarize

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>recent discoveries. Will get into the details in a moment,

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>but basically, what we have found, what scientists have found

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is that some birds, like parrots and that that would

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>mean birds of the order Satasa forms that include true parrots, cockatoos,

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and New Zealand parrots. And then also corvids which are

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>birds of the family corvid A, and that would include crows, ravens, rooks, magpies, chuffs, jay's,

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:51.959
<v Speaker 1>and nutcrackers. These bird groups display cognition on par with primates,

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>which means primates of course being the order containing monkeys

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and apes like us, so on par with pri mates. Seriously,

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and just just allow us to demonstrate with a selection

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of findings. What we are talking about is mental time travel, yes,

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 1>also known as chronosthesia if you want to be fancy

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>about it. Now that this is sort of it's something

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>that you take for granted. Is it comes very easy

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>to advance primates like humans. But it's just being able

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to travel back and forth along a mental timeline. Yeah,

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the ability to entertain alternate future scenarios. You know,

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you tell a creature ways option A versus option B.

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>It's how you're able to remember past events and anticipate

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and plan for future events. And that ability is core

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to so much of human experience. You know, our ability

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to or or our flaw and being able to just

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>regret the past, worry over the future, the entire wheel

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of suffering. It's a very human thing, it's yeah, And

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it seems very easy to assume that because you look

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>at the behavior of most animals and they really do

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>seem to live in the present moment, that they don't

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>seem to be able to consider a hypothetical unless we're

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>projecting it on them. Okay, so, especially in the case

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of our pets. Um but yeah, so is it president animals.

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>It kind of depends on who you ask. Some say no,

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>not at all, mean, even some scientists. It's not just

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>like a popular no no. If you just ask people,

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling they're going to Yeah, they're gonna

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>be You're gonna get into projection concerning the animals that

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>we think we we understand the most and then we

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>can read more easily. But with with scientists, yeah, it depends.

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>A December two paper published in Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 1>titled mental time travel an exclusively human capacity lets you

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>know where they stand? Yeah, it argues exactly that that

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>that quote. Some animals indeed appear to possess episodic memory.

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>There is, however, no evidence that they are able to construct, reflect,

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 1>and compare different future scenarios like humans are okay, so

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:00.120
<v Speaker 1>episodic memory that just means having sort of not ingrained

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>how it always was or learned behaviors from the past,

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>but being able to recall a specific instance, like if

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you can remember what you had for lunch yesterday, that's

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>an episodic memory. And some evidence shows that some animals

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>have this, But they're saying that they can't. They can't

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>project thoughts into the future, right, Like, it's one thing

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to remember what's happened, but then can you anticipate future

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>events and plan around them? But not all scientists agree

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>with this conclusion, is right? Um So, Back in two

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>thousands seven or so, Nicola Clayton of the University of

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge argued that scrub jays, which is a spacies of

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>large brain crow, exhibit mental time travel. And then in

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven there's an interesting study uh from Karina

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Logan of the University of Cambridge and Sean O'Donnell of

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>the University of Washington, and they argued that this mental

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>time travel is demonstrated in certain tropical birds who engage

0:22:55.280 --> 0:23:00.479
<v Speaker 1>in bivouac that's temporary anton nest sites checking, bivouac checking.

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So basically the idea here is that the ants, the

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>ant colonies are moving around. They have like a cyclical

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>raid cycle that they go through. They have patterns of

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>activity exactly, and so the animals hunting them in this

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>case the birds, they have to figure out how to

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>anticipate those movements. The birds keep track of where the

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>ants are, they remember their past movements, and according to

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the use of these researchers, they're actually using that data

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to anticipate future movements of the ants so they'll know

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 1>where to go to score their meal. Okay, so mental

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>time travel and birds, Uh, that seems to be a

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>toss up some some scientists say yes, some say no,

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but either way it's an interesting lead for for continuing research.

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's one area where we can see birds excelling

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in higher cognitive function where there is no doubt whatsoever,

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's in tool use. The birds are freakishly handy,

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that's right. There are a number of examples of tool

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>use and birds, some more complex than others. Uh. For instance,

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Egyptian vultures use the stones as tools to to bust

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>open ostrojaggs. Yeah, there are also that you have, like

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>the brush turkey builds. This is rather simple, builds a

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>gigantic mound of soil and decaying vegetation to lay their

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>eggs in. But then they'll kick the garbage at enemies

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to drive them away. Yeah. Wait, what are their enemies?

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Things like monitor lizards? Uh? Yeah what Yeah, so they're

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they're kicking garbage at monitor lizards. Yeah. It's like, like

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I say, this is very basic tool, you like, but yeah,

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>kicking rubbish, you're still making a tool out of something

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in your environment trash soccer. Yeah. Now, one of the

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>more elaborate examples here you have the woodpecker finch, which

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is one of Darwin's finches from the Colapicus Islands. Tool

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>It uses cactus spines or wooden splinters to dig grubs

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>or other insects out of holes and wood so, in

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>other words, it obtains its food in the same manner

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>as a woodpecker, but it hasn't evolved the necessary long

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>tongue to scoop them out out, so it goes it

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>breaks off something sharp to get in there, and it

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>may even trim the twig. And this is key because

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>There are other examples of animals that say, like use

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a muscle shell fragment to hammer open another muscle, or

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>use a piece of bark to pry another piece of

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>bark off we've all engaged when we we haven't all.

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>But if you've ever used part of a crab claw

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to dig out crab meat, you've engaged in like this

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 1>level of simple tool use, which shouldn't be discounted. I mean,

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>even that's impressive, that is still impressive tool you. But

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>it goes beyond that, right, because they are actually trimming

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the twig trying these finches, these finches, they're trimming the twig,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>They're they're manufacturing a tool. So they're they're going from

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>what's called a nature fact to an artifact. And nature

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>fact is finding something in the world and using it

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>as is okay, But the artifact, you're transforming it into

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a tool. Yeah, So that's sort of the difference between

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a rock and a hand axe. So if you've got

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>an ancient, ancient primate who has managed to hunt down

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.199
<v Speaker 1>and kill a piece of prey, a large animal, and

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it wants to process the carcass to get some meat

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>off of it, it could just pick up a kind

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of flat rock and use that for help. That would

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>be a nature of fact. Or it could chip down

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a rock until it's got a sharper edge. That's an

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>artifact exactly. And just to put this, you know, and

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>then a framework of human tool use their four levels

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of artifact fact tool used. There's reduction that's where you

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>reduce the massive functional of the functional form. So you're

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>chewing the stick down stuff in the bark, et cetera.

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>That's what we just talked. Yeah, that's what we definitely

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>see in birds. Uh. Then there's level two conjunction that's

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>combining two or more units to make a tool. This

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>is like a flint headed spear or a have to axe. Uh.

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Number three is replication that's conjunction, but with two or

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>more from similar units required, so a double pronged fishing

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>spear or a trident. Yeah. And number four is linkage

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that's physically distinct objects in combination, like a bow and arrow.

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we're not going to see a bow and arrow

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>with birds here today. Now what a sling count is linkage? Yes,

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it would. Yeah, you have two distinct objects

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that are coming together to make something. Uh, even even

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>more powerful, you know. Yeah, but some some of the

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>tool use you see in birds is really the word

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I would use is disturbing. I don't mean to give

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it a negative quality, but it's kind it's unsettling when

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you see it. Yeah, I mean, if you're talking disturbing,

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the shrikes have always inspired a certain amount of terror.

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>These are the these little birds impale the bodies of

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>insects and small vertebrates on thorns. It partially for storage,

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>but also just so they can better strip them apart

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>as they you know, decided to eat them. Oh so

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like a leather face putting somebody on a hook. Yeah, exactly,

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's like sometimes they're called butcher birds for

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.239
<v Speaker 1>this very reason, because it's like putting them on a

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>butcher's foot. That's messed up. Now, crows and ravens, I'm sorry.

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Let let me let me take the judgment off of that.

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a nature. Yes, that's a nature. Um and and yes,

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>so there's nothing wrong with letther face crows and ravens. Uh.

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>This is where we see some some wonderful tool uses

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>where well, crows have administrated tool use and even the

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 1>creation of artifacts. They've been deserved to fashion tools from

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>twigs to fish, beetle, larva out of logs, and in

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>lab environments they've been observed to use one tool to

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>make another tool. Now this is weird, Okay, this is

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>not just using a tool to get the thing they want,

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>but crafting tools, like using one tool to craft a

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>second tool, which is like a whole other layer of

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>abstract thought. Yeah. Indeed, uh, specifically the crowing question and

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>this one study bent the end of a wire using

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>the edge of a glass, then used the hooked wire

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to retrieve another stick which was long enough to read

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>some food that it wanted. So those different steps there

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in tool use in cognition, that's pretty advanced. It seems

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.719
<v Speaker 1>like something some people wouldn't be able to figure out

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>how to do. Yeah. I kind of imagine myself in

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the lab trying to do some problem solving puzzle and

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>just failing. Yeah. I mean, it's the kind kind of

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>steps that you can imagine just an individual on the

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>street going through if they wrop their keys down a

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>sewer grade and I see them and they're like, how

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>am I gonna get that back? All right? Well, what's

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>around me? Is there a coat hanger? Can get a

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>hold of. Is there some other you know, when we

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>begin to go through these these sort of basic tool

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you steps to do something we we normally don't have

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to engage in. But some of these steps really do

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>involve very strange ideas of of the abstract conditionals of

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>how to manipulate your environment. Like one of the examples

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>would be displacement of water. This is something that's been

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>observed in those New Caledonian crows. New Caledonian crows have

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>been documented to h So you've got a tube and

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it's got some water in it, and floating on the

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>top of the water is a yummy piece of food

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that the crow wants, but it's down in the tube

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and it can't reach it. So the crows figure out

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to drop rocks or heavy objects into the water to

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>raise the water level to fish out the piece of food.

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>It that that's again something that I wonder if I

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>would think to do well. I mean, it reminds me,

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of course of Aesop's fable of the crow in the picture,

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Like that just goes right back to some of our

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>oldest tails in which the crow is thirsty and has

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to drop pebbles into the picture. To raise the water

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>level enough to drink from it. So we've been observing

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this for for ages, I imagined, and in fact, I

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>think there was a study we came across just this

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>month that was looking at the evolution of the beak

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of the New Caledonian crow, essentially saying that it evolved

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for tool use. Right, Yeah, I should mention that they

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we've also observed the New Caledonia crows forming beetle hooks

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>from the barbed edges of wide leaves, and in fact,

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>uh these Cornell researchers in this recent study they used

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>shape analysis and uh CT scanning to compare the shape

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and structure of the New Caledonia crow's bill, and they

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>found the unique bill contributes to the bird's ability to

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>use and probably make tools specialized for tool manipulation. Okay,

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's not just the brain, but the crow is

0:30:55.680 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>so specialized for being a technological creature that it has

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>evolved other body parts to aid in the creation of technology.

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And this is where it gets interesting because it brings

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>us back to our original uh ponderings about the possibility

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of avian evolution to a you know, technological state. Yeah,

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it makes me think about if we were to really

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>commit to this speculation about if birds became the ascendant

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>intelligent species on a planet, what would their technology look like?

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if instead of every object being shaped

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>around the human hand, if you'd have all these objects

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>shaped around these specialized types of beaks, what would that

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>look like? How would be how would they control their technology,

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>how would they hold things? How would they control all

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of the aspects of their environment with a beak? Yeah,

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>because you would sort of be talking about the like

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the the end result of of you know, just just

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>ages and ages of stick manipulation by beak, Like what

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is the like what's the optimal form of that? It's

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.719
<v Speaker 1>so different than what we have to work with in

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of thinking about the human hand and tool used

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>as humans appreciate it. There's another thing that some studies

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>have found birds can do that even some humans struggle with,

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's delay of gratification. And so I'm sure you've

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>seen these studies before. Like a kid is given the

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to have they put a marshmallow front of marshmallow

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>test and say, if you can resist eating this marshmallow

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>for five minutes, you'll get two marshmallows. You know, so

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll get more, you'll get a better reward if you

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>can just wait a little bit. Animals are not good

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>at this task. Animals are not good at practicing restraint.

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>They can't delay gratification. If you put food in front

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of them, typically they're just gonna eat it um. But some,

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in some cases, animals can be trained not to do this,

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>especially some higher functional, higher cognitive functioning animals like primates

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases like birds. So there was one

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>paper I came across that talked about how often cockatoos

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>were They were essentially able to wait up to about

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty seconds for food of a preferred quality, but less

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>time for a higher quantity. And this was something that

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>was also found in a study I read about Corvid's

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>waiting for food. They can delay gratification for longer, or

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in some cases they can only delay gratification at all

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.719
<v Speaker 1>if they're anticipating getting a better piece of food, but

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>not if they're anticipating getting more food, which is interesting

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to me, Like they'll they'll pay up in waiting time

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>for quality, but not for quantity. Okay, it's it's weird

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>anytime I think about this scenario or any of these

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>scenarios involving crows eating, I just think of them like

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:47.479
<v Speaker 1>picking at corpses. Uh, like a medieval setting. Yeah, yeah, well,

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean it makes you think, like, so, what's the

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>equivalent in the of the quality versus quantity fact in

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>like the marsh marshmallow experiments, So it would be like

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the kid has given a marshmallow, and then it's instead

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of you'll get two more shmallows, you'll get I don't

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>know what's better than a marshmallow, human eyeball. Human eyeballs.

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I just assume that is the ultimate treat to chocolate

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>covered eyeball, No huge, a piece of chocolate cake or

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>something like a much improved object overall. And so crows

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>no quality when they see it, and so do cockatoos.

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>It's time to hold the mirror up to Avian cognition,

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>because we're gonna talk a little bit about mirror self

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>recognition tests or m s R. This is one of

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting of these examples to me because it

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>deals with not just thinking about how to solve a task,

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but something that's a kind of a different issue, which

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 1>is self awareness. Yeah and uh, and this is something

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.359
<v Speaker 1>we could easily do an entire episode on the mirror tests.

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty interesting. It's it's one thing we should Yeah,

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the more common consciousness tests that we

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 1>roll out with other species. And there's certainly some species

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that it it works better with. There are other things

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>like the octopus where uh, they're often difficulties in trying

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>to make this test applicable to uh, to those two

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>members of that species. But essentially, when presented with a

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>mirrors reflection of themselves, how is the creature going to respond?

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to respond as if there's nothing there

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>at all? Is Are they gonna respond as if, oh,

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 1>there's another there's another dog, there's another fish right there

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at me, I better react accordingly. Or are they

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>going to recognize that that is themselves? Are they gonna

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>look in the mirror and see themselves and know it

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to be themselves? Which is sort of a holy grail

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of self recognition intelligence? Like, what a what a strange

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thing to be encouraged by nature? Why would nature select

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for the ability to be able to recognize yourself in

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a reflective surface. I mean, it just does seem like

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a very an inherently, very complex thing for a brain

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to do. Yeah, I mean it ties into your ability

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 1>to to recognize your own place within a scenario, within

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:04.879
<v Speaker 1>a social structure, and then it also bleeds over into

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>some other cognitive abilities we're going to discuss in a

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>bit concerning not only how we perceive ourselves, but how

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we perceive others. Now, for those creatures that do react

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.720
<v Speaker 1>with hostility when they see their own reflection in a mirror,

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>they may actually be onto something. Oh yeah, you know,

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 1>in fact, you're Heluis Borges rainbow fish story is true. Uh,

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're not familiar with this one, um, it has

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to do with the fact that that everything you see

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in the mirror, that the mirror people, the mirror creatures

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 1>are merely repeating our actions, and they look like they

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>look like us, and they go through this silly mimicry

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>because they lost a war ages ago, and part of

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the truth is that they have to just mime everything

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we do, but that but one day they will rebel

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>against us, and the first thing we'll see in the

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>mirror is the brilliant rainbow fish with you know, colors

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that we've never seen in this world. That'll be the

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>sign that opes it's about it's about to go that's

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>here in the mirror world is about to invade ours.

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So maybe the creatures that that that how and bark

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 1>at the mirror, maybe they just know what's up. Well,

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to that day of reckoning. Now, what

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>animals that we know of other than humans can actually

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>pass the mirror tests? Which which ones can look in

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a mirror and say, hey, that's me all right? Well?

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:27.280
<v Speaker 1>As of aside from humans, you have a certain great apes.

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>You have apparently a single Asian elephant, their dolphins, orcas, uh,

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:39.959
<v Speaker 1>the Eurasian magpie, um, a few species of ants interestingly enough. Yeah,

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's something we'll have to explore that in a

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in a later episode. But there there's an argument that

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>ants can pass the mirror tests. I have some questions

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>about that. Yeah, uh, as well as maccaques have also

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>passed Yeah, um yeah. And so one example I've seen

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it you might be wondering, well, how can you test

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to see if an animal recognizes itself in the mirror.

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>One example that I saw that was actually presented by

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Professor Gunterkune was an example where they have a magpie

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>looking in a mirror and there is a sort of

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>dot of colored dye on the magpies feathers underneath the

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 1>head where it wouldn't be able to see on itself,

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>but it could see in a mirror. And they try

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>it with a couple of colors of dies. One is

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>a black colored dye that just matches the color of

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the feathers, so it shouldn't be able to see it

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>in the mirror. And sure enough, they put a magpie

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in a room with a black colored dye under its chin,

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't seem to do anything unusual. But they

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>do the same thing with a yellow colored dye and

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the magpie starts scratching it itself. It looks in the mirror,

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>sees that it has a yellow patch underneath its neck,

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>and it starts scratching at the patch, trying to get

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it off. Now, they used the black colored dyes a

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, control to show that okay, it's not just

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>feeling something on itself, it's reacting to what it sees

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and it sees it in the mirror and says, I

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>need to get that off me. Yes and forms of

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>this this uh this inc method are are utilized with

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a number of MSR tests, particularly those aimed at at

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:10.879
<v Speaker 1>land based animals and When it comes to other birds,

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a handful species show self contingent behaviors in front of mirrors.

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Magpies and jack DAWs they show self contingent behaviors. Two

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>out of five magpies past the mirror tests. New Caledonian crows,

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>gray parrots, and keys engage in social behavior and mirror

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>directed uh exploratory behavior, but they lack self directed behavior

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>in front of mirrors, and New Caledonian crows and gray

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>parents all parrots also use a mirror UH instrumentally to

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 1>localized food, so they can in these tests, they will

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>They'll put them in a position where they can use

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the mirror to better find the food, and then they

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>will utilize the mirror to do so. Interesting. Okay, so

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I got another one for you. How about some bird math.

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, it's not going to be very complex math,

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's math that's that impressive for a non human animal.

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So lots of animals can do some basic form of

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>counting objects, and I want to emphasize basic, but far

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.800
<v Speaker 1>fewer animals can do more abstract operations with number concepts

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>like comparing numbers and stuff like that. But back in

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the scientists were able to successfully train recis monkeys to

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>do this test where they look at a group of

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 1>objects on a computer screen, and then they'd rank the

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:30.800
<v Speaker 1>groups according to how many objects were on the screen,

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and so a group of three objects is greater than

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a group of of two. And then after this training,

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the monkeys learned how to do this task even when

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they were presented with unfamiliar large numbers. So let's say

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 1>they've been trained to point out that three is more

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>than two and two is more than one. You can

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>suddenly show them new numbers they've never seen before, like

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>eight and six, and they'll do the test correctly. They'll

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>point out that eight is more than six. So basically

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>checking for algory of nick thinking on the part of

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the animal, like I sort of deal with with quantities

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:07.240
<v Speaker 1>visual quantities in the difference and and tell yeah, exactly.

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And so there was a study in two thousand eleven

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>published in Science by Damian Scarff, Harlan Hayne, and Michael

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Colombo that essentially found that pigeons, pigeons, now that the

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>classic dummies of our our jokes about bird intelligence did

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>just as good as reesus monkeys on this test. Uh

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that birds do the the operation of magnitude comparison just

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>as well as primates. And the setup goes like this.

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>You get the birds and you train them over time

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to peck at screens bearing numbers of objects in increasing

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>order of magnitude. So, for the pigeon sees three screens,

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 1>one has one object, one has two objects, one has

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>three objects, and you train the bird with reinforcement to

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>peck them at going one to three. Then you introduce

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>new numbers, just like you did for the Reese's monkeys,

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and they can do the same thing. They can look

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 1>at six and nine and compare and can pack them

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in ascending order. They can extend their math skills to

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 1>unfamiliar numbers, and so this leads to two possible conclusions.

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 1>The researchers pointed out, I read this in UH they

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>were speaking to the New York Times. They said, the

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>birds and the mammals here. Obviously they've both got these

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 1>number skills. The monkeys have them, the pigeons have them.

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And they either separately evolved the basic number skills, meaning

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the convergent evolution two different evolutionary solutions to reach the

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>same goal in different creatures. Because ultimately both creatures live

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in the same world, a world of fixed and movable

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>objects of varying quantities, and obviously that plays into the

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>survival advantage to be able to uh, to determine these differences. Yeah,

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Or if that's not the case, if it's not convergent evolutions,

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:49.279
<v Speaker 1>separate solutions leading to the same conclusion. They must have

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten these number skills from their last common ancestor. As

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned earlier, that last common ancestor between mammals and

0:42:56.280 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>birds lived three hundred million years ago. So are the

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>terrible before the dinosaurs? Yeah, three million years ago with

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>number skills, I mean, before the age of the dinosaurs.

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>That's very creepy. But I think we've got one that's

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>even creepier, And that's theory of mind. Yes, And this

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is where I definitely think back to standing on one

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 1>side of the glass and watching the ground hornbills and

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and looking into the eye of the ground hornbills as

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they walk up and and we'll often show off like

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a dead mouse. They'll have it in their beak and

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:31.759
<v Speaker 1>they'll want to show it to me, or if they

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have really they seem to be showing it off. Yeah,

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they want to show that that dead mouse to me,

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And if there's not a mouse, they'll have a wood

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:40.879
<v Speaker 1>chip and they'll pick that up and want to show

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it to me. Um, But but to what extent is

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that hornbill? Actually? Could it possibly be perceiving me as

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 1>an entity that is perceiving it. This is where we

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>get into theory of mind, and it's a pretty big

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:57.280
<v Speaker 1>deal in human cognition and the human experience overall. Theory

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of mind allows us to see the world or too

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>often quite poorly, through another person's eyes. It allows us

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to attribute a mental state to our not only to ourselves,

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 1>but to other entities. Yeah, and this is considered a

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>crucial part of sort of human development, Like when children

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 1>at what age to children gain a theory of mind?

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>When are they not just reacting to stimuli, When are

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they not reacting to uh, to a lighting up toy

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and a human as if they're the same type of thing,

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but recognizing that a human has intentions and starting to

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:36.800
<v Speaker 1>imagine what the other humans intentions are. Yeah, this is

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>something we easily take for granted. I think it's important

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to note that when we say theory of mind it

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>itself is not a theory. It is saying that our

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>perceptions of other mind states. All we have is a

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:51.919
<v Speaker 1>theory of that individual's mind Everyone in your life, from

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a stranger on the street to you know, a loved

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>when you see every day, the best you have is

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a theory of what their mind state consists off. And uh,

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot. There's some interesting studies out

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>there that show that that even people we've we've known

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, our vision of their mind state

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't is far from perfect. It's just a version of

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 1>who they are, and we use those in our our

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>our calculations as we navigate our world. Yeah, and that

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of strange. I mean, you think you live in

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a world of other people, but really you live in

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a world of what you imagine other people are. Like, Yeah,

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you kind of live in your own little, you know,

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>matrix simulation of the world. But uh, but how about animals? Right?

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Can animals do this? That's been one of the big questions.

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:38.760
<v Speaker 1>To the degree to which non human animals can possess

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:42.280
<v Speaker 1>theory of mind remains an open question, but some studies

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 1>suggest that ravens might have the gift. Yeah. Most recently,

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a two thousand sixteen study and this the year published

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in Nature Communications, suggests that ravens possess a basic theory

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of mind. How on earth would they test for this?

0:45:56.120 --> 0:45:59.720
<v Speaker 1>And how can you figure out if a raven knows

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the something else has intentions? Well, it comes down to this.

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 1>You often hear this phrase thrown around, Right, It's particularly

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in uh in you know dramas where there's a lot

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of deception. Right, does does he know that? I know

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that he knows? You know? It all comes down to

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a a complex game of hide and seek among the

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>ravens where they where they're they're they're trying to hide

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and acquire pilferd bits of carrying. Yeah, so they've gorged

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>themselves on I don't know, like the eyeballs and whatever

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:33.799
<v Speaker 1>they can get from these dead animals. All the best bits,

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>all the best bits, but there's still some nice nuggets

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 1>there that they want to come back with later. So

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:40.800
<v Speaker 1>they tuck these into the throat pouches and they hide

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 1>them away. Now, subordinate ravens hold on just just to clarify,

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't hide them in their throat pouches. They take

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 1>them in their throat pouch to hide them somewhere. They

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 1>just stick them in the throat, their throat pouch and

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>then they're gonna want to hide them in some external

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:57.839
<v Speaker 1>place later on, like a dog burying a bone exactly. Yeah,

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they want to create a you know, just to high.

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 1>They want to find a hiding place for the good

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>so they can come back. They want to bury that

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>treasure now. Subordinate Ravens will spy on their superiors to

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 1>see where they're hiding. The choice spoils sniveling little because

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the Boss Raven got the best parts. But here's the thing.

0:47:15.920 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 1>The Boss Raven didn't become Boss Raven by being a dummy.

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 1>The Boss Raven knows that she's being watched, and she'll

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:27.720
<v Speaker 1>often employ various strategies and deceptions in order to throw

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>off the others. So she she practices deceit and trickery. Right,

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:35.360
<v Speaker 1>So she's doing things like doing a quick burial, like

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I gotta bury this fast before anybody notices where I'm

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 1>putting the goods, makes sense, or digging behind a visual

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:45.359
<v Speaker 1>barrier so I can't quite see what she's doing, avoiding

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the hiding place after burial to avoid drawing attention to it.

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I'm gonna bury it over here, But

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stand over here because I don't want you

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to think that I'm guarding something precious. And then finally,

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>this one is really key. She'll pretend to dig a hole,

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 1>but keep the loop in her throat pouch until a

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>better opportunity to hide it presents itself. So I'm digging

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:08.239
<v Speaker 1>a hole, just pretending to bury it, so you'll think

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I've buried it here, I'm going to do a little

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 1>slide of beak and actually bury it over on this side.

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Now this is interesting because you could look at all

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this and say, well, I don't know, maybe is I mean,

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of these tests, you could say, is

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 1>this just some kind of instinctual behavior manifesting itself in

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a very complex way, And so you'd almost have to

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>introduce unnatural scenarios to testincy is this really? Is this

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:37.839
<v Speaker 1>bird thinking flexibly or is it just carrying out some instincts? Right? Yeah?

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Is it just responding to visual stimuli or is this

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>theory of mind? Well that's what the researchers in this

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:47.920
<v Speaker 1>study set out to discover. So this study involved two

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:51.920
<v Speaker 1>experimental areas, one wall between them with a peopole for

0:48:52.000 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 1>viewing the human researchers who brought them food, and a

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 1>small window which could be shut or open to make

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the other raven in the experiment visible. So this was

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to test how they behaved when they could see their

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 1>competitor and when they couldn't, and also how they factored

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 1>in this peep hole through which somebody else human might

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>be viewing them as well. So they taught the birds

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:18.799
<v Speaker 1>to look through the peep hole and spy on the

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 1>humans as well. Afterwards, they that the birds indeed hid

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 1>their food and acted suspicious even when they had they

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:30.320
<v Speaker 1>had only the peephole to contend with with the window

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:32.759
<v Speaker 1>to the other raven shut off. Wait a minute, so

0:49:32.920 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't see the raven. They just knew that it

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:38.399
<v Speaker 1>was possible for something to look in at them, right,

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, So basically they're testing, you know, through three

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 1>different things. How are they behaving when they know there's

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a raven there that could see what they're doing, how

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 1>do they behave when there's nothing there that they're aware of,

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And how do they behave when there's no visible raven

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's the possibility that something else, perhaps this human,

0:49:55.320 --> 0:49:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is viewing them as well, And they seem to infer

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:01.839
<v Speaker 1>that some one could be watching and acted as if

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the possible watching entity might behave like another crow. So

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:09.800
<v Speaker 1>they attributed theory of bird mind to the unseen human.

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>They thought that human might be coming to steal their

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 1>carry in exactly. Yeah, yeah, so they were. They were,

0:50:15.600 --> 0:50:17.719
<v Speaker 1>according to the researchers. Here. The argument here is that

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 1>they are attributing theory of mind to the human. Right.

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I just want to issue a disclaimer to any Corvid's listening.

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to steal your delicious eyeballs. Those eyeball treats.

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 1>You earned them, they're all for you. Prove me wrong,

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it's probably what they they would say back. Okay, well

0:50:34.760 --> 0:50:38.239
<v Speaker 1>that's fascinating. And and if those the interpretation of those

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>results are indeed correct, that's uh. I don't know that.

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 1>That's something else. Yeah, I mean, of course it makes

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:48.640
<v Speaker 1>sense because they ravens from a very early age. They

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have to engage in a uh, you know, a fairly

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>complex um um hierarchical group of friends and frenemies and

0:50:56.719 --> 0:50:59.800
<v Speaker 1>different factions. So they're like social birds. Yeah, they're instantly

0:50:59.800 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 1>throw ust into like a mini Game of Thrones scenario,

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and they have to be able to survive in that environment. Okay,

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:08.839
<v Speaker 1>well there's another perhaps lighter example, we could throw too,

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 1>But that is also still pretty interesting, which is the

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:13.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that it might not be impossible to have a

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:16.719
<v Speaker 1>bird DJ your wedding. Yeah, you could book a DJ

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 1>bird brain, or perhaps DJ budgery gar budgery garza, or

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the basically the common pet parakeet, a vocal mimicking parrot species,

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the one you teach to say bad words. Yeah, yeah,

0:51:28.800 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of course uh. In a two thousand eleven study published

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in Scientific Reports, a team of researchers trained eight budgery

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:39.839
<v Speaker 1>guards to perform isochronus that means occurring at the same

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 1>time tapping tasks in which they pecked a key to

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the rhythm of audio visual metronome style stimuli, so keeping

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:51.959
<v Speaker 1>keeping time, keeping beat exactly and now. This has also

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:57.240
<v Speaker 1>been observed in sea lions, Reese's monkeys, chimpanzees, and Binobo's uh.

0:51:57.280 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 1>In this case, though, the budgery guard as they seemed

0:52:00.640 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>inherently inclined to tap it fast tempos which have a

0:52:04.040 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>similar time scale to the rhythm of their own natural vocalizations,

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and the researchers suggest that the vocal learning might have

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:14.719
<v Speaker 1>contributed to their performance, which resembles that of a human Now.

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:18.279
<v Speaker 1>That makes me think about theories about the emergence of

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:22.400
<v Speaker 1>musical ability and humans and if our musical ability is

0:52:22.440 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>inherently tied to language. Yeah. Yeah, There's been all sorts

0:52:25.520 --> 0:52:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of interesting studies. I'm particularly thinking about those involving in

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Neanderthals and the idea that they might have like sung

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:36.759
<v Speaker 1>instead of spoke. Yeah. Yeah, it's a fascinating material. Have

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you ever done an episode on the origins of music before?

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I know I have explored it some in past episodes,

0:52:45.280 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's one of those where there's always new research

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:49.280
<v Speaker 1>coming out. I would I would love to re explore

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it at some point. Yeah, I'd like to do that. Well, anyway,

0:52:52.880 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not the end we we should probably pretty much

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 1>leave it off there. But that's not the end of

0:52:57.920 --> 0:53:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the research into bird cognition. We just have to stop

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 1>because there's so much. But there's also been research about

0:53:04.520 --> 0:53:09.399
<v Speaker 1>birds observing object permanence, Like to what extent birds can

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:12.400
<v Speaker 1>still remember an object is present even if they can't

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 1>see it. You know, for lots of animals, it seems

0:53:14.600 --> 0:53:16.839
<v Speaker 1>like all that exists is what's in front of them

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:20.200
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. But can birds remember something's there even

0:53:20.239 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 1>if it's removed from view. Looks like in some cases

0:53:23.080 --> 0:53:25.759
<v Speaker 1>they probably can, though I think not all scientists agree

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:29.920
<v Speaker 1>on that. One. Another interesting social result we've come across

0:53:29.960 --> 0:53:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is that crows and ravens seem to be able to

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:35.799
<v Speaker 1>recognize when they're being treated unfairly. They can respond to

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:39.839
<v Speaker 1>inequity and the reward of treats and stuff like that. Uh.

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And then there there's also been some research into the

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 1>metacognition of corvids. Right, Yeah, this is a betacognitions essentially

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:51.720
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about thoughts, thoughts about the limits of thought. Um

0:53:51.840 --> 0:53:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and large build crows succeed in retrospective but fail in

0:53:57.000 --> 0:54:02.719
<v Speaker 1>perspective meta memory task. They haven't according to some of

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the studies we're looking at here. They haven't quite pulled

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 1>off like full scale meta cognition, but they have limited

0:54:10.880 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>abilities there. Um. And to put this in perspective of

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 1>other animals, I've I've read studies where um, where rodents

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:29.799
<v Speaker 1>have have demonstrated possible meta cognition. Okay, well, I think

0:54:29.840 --> 0:54:32.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the takeaways from everything we've just been talking

0:54:32.080 --> 0:54:35.120
<v Speaker 1>about is that there is just so much research on

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the sophisticated cognition of birds that even if some of

0:54:38.760 --> 0:54:42.840
<v Speaker 1>this research turns out to be misinterpreted or or refuted

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:45.319
<v Speaker 1>by future studies, there's so much of it that there's

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously some real phenomenon here. Yeah, so many of these

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:51.279
<v Speaker 1>are things that you see coming online with a young

0:54:51.360 --> 0:54:55.839
<v Speaker 1>human child as there, you know, as their brain powers up.

0:54:56.160 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And then you see those same power ups taking place

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:01.719
<v Speaker 1>with the bird brain. And so we should look at

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the brain itself, I guess, because this comes back to

0:55:04.080 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the concept of cognition without a cortex. As we mentioned before,

0:55:08.560 --> 0:55:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, neuroscientists thought that sophisticated cognitive powers

0:55:12.880 --> 0:55:16.080
<v Speaker 1>only came from a neo cortex, also known as the

0:55:16.080 --> 0:55:19.400
<v Speaker 1>neo pallium, which is the most recent addition to the

0:55:19.440 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>mammalian brain, the powerhouse of higher human thought. It's, you know,

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the part of the mammal brain that gives us our

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:29.800
<v Speaker 1>real intelligent flexibility and ability to adapt to all kinds

0:55:29.800 --> 0:55:34.919
<v Speaker 1>of environments and scenarios the topmost ice cream scoop exactly now.

0:55:35.200 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 1>The cerebrum takes up most of the volume of the

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:41.239
<v Speaker 1>brain in both mammals and birds, and in the cerebrum

0:55:41.320 --> 0:55:45.239
<v Speaker 1>in both classes mammals and birds can be divided into

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:48.080
<v Speaker 1>two regions. You've got the paliole region up on top

0:55:48.320 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and the sub paliol region and the sub palliole region

0:55:51.680 --> 0:55:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that's ancient, that's extremely similar in mammals and birds can

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:59.000
<v Speaker 1>probably be traced back to a common ancestor more than

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:02.439
<v Speaker 1>five million years ago, like five thirty five million years ago.

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:06.200
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty similar between animals as different as and this

0:56:06.280 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is the example Gunter Cune and Bugny argue animals as

0:56:10.120 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>different as humans and lamprey's so so this is clearly

0:56:14.040 --> 0:56:16.839
<v Speaker 1>this is what some people might call lizard brain kind

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. It's it's deep deep in there. It's one

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of the older parts of how you're nervous system works.

0:56:23.360 --> 0:56:25.719
<v Speaker 1>But then you've also got the pallium, the upper part

0:56:25.719 --> 0:56:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of the brain, and that's the upper surface of the cerebrum.

0:56:29.239 --> 0:56:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's got the cortex or things that are like

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the cortex, the hippocampus, the paliola migdala, the class drum,

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and the old factory bulb and in the uh the

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:43.520
<v Speaker 1>paliole brain is where the major differences between mammals and

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 1>birds show up. So in mammals, this region is dominated

0:56:47.640 --> 0:56:50.120
<v Speaker 1>by what's usually called the neo cortex. So I've read

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:52.960
<v Speaker 1>apparently some the neo nous of the neo cortex has

0:56:52.960 --> 0:56:55.800
<v Speaker 1>actually been called into question in recent years. So maybe

0:56:55.800 --> 0:56:58.160
<v Speaker 1>instead we should just call it something like the cortex

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:02.160
<v Speaker 1>or the six layered cortex um. But the bird's palio

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:05.960
<v Speaker 1>brain doesn't have this cortex. Instead, it's got these little

0:57:06.000 --> 0:57:09.640
<v Speaker 1>groups of things that have been called nuclear aggregations, which

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is a good name. And the question is do birds

0:57:12.400 --> 0:57:15.319
<v Speaker 1>have the equivalent to a cortex? Do they? Do they

0:57:15.360 --> 0:57:20.560
<v Speaker 1>have something that works like a cortex does. And what Gunter,

0:57:20.680 --> 0:57:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Cune and Buggy are conclude by looking at all of

0:57:23.880 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 1>this recent research is that it seems to be, Yeah,

0:57:26.680 --> 0:57:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the cognitive power of the bird seems to be located

0:57:29.640 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in the A, V and pallium, which does a lot

0:57:32.320 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of the same work as the mammal cortex. And these

0:57:36.280 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 1>are these are similar brain structures, but the big question

0:57:39.640 --> 0:57:43.160
<v Speaker 1>is why are they doing similar work? Are they an

0:57:43.200 --> 0:57:47.360
<v Speaker 1>example of convergent evolution, like we've talked about where convergent

0:57:47.400 --> 0:57:49.880
<v Speaker 1>evolution would be something you know, one example would be

0:57:49.920 --> 0:57:52.840
<v Speaker 1>like wings. You've got wings on bees, wings on bats,

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 1>wings on birds. They obviously did not get these wings

0:57:56.160 --> 0:57:59.840
<v Speaker 1>from a common ancestor that they shared, they separately evolved

0:58:00.040 --> 0:58:03.760
<v Speaker 1>similar solutions to hey, I need to fly. Recent findings

0:58:03.760 --> 0:58:07.520
<v Speaker 1>say that we probably get some basic homologous structures from

0:58:07.520 --> 0:58:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the common ancestor between mammals and birds, but these structures

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 1>continued to evolve in parallel, eventually converging on the mind

0:58:17.240 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>structures that we see today cognition, intelligence, complex thought, problem solving,

0:58:22.320 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 1>executive function. And uh, one thing that seemed very interesting

0:58:27.120 --> 0:58:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to me about this is, to whatever extent this is

0:58:30.800 --> 0:58:34.840
<v Speaker 1>an example of convergent evolution, it seems to apply to

0:58:34.920 --> 0:58:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the study of machine cognition because when you look about

0:58:38.640 --> 0:58:42.240
<v Speaker 1>at like computers and you ask the question can computers

0:58:42.240 --> 0:58:45.200
<v Speaker 1>really think? Can a machine really think? Could an artificial

0:58:45.240 --> 0:58:49.360
<v Speaker 1>intelligence program really be thinking if it doesn't have a

0:58:49.440 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 1>brain like us? Well, if birds can think without having

0:58:54.240 --> 0:58:57.560
<v Speaker 1>brains like us, why not other physical structures that give

0:58:57.680 --> 0:59:00.520
<v Speaker 1>rise to information processing. Yeah, It's just gets into the

0:59:00.600 --> 0:59:05.840
<v Speaker 1>idea that perhaps consciousness just simply something that emerges from

0:59:05.880 --> 0:59:10.720
<v Speaker 1>any significantly significantly complex system of information, right, Yeah, Yeah,

0:59:10.760 --> 0:59:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So you kind of can't say that there's a unique

0:59:15.080 --> 0:59:19.520
<v Speaker 1>magical architecture in the mammalian brain that creates the phenomenon

0:59:19.760 --> 0:59:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of thinking if it looks for all, we can tell

0:59:22.880 --> 0:59:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like birds can actually do a lot of the same

0:59:25.200 --> 0:59:27.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we would think of as thinking, and maybe

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:31.960
<v Speaker 1>given different evolutionary circumstances, they might have been as intelligent

0:59:32.080 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or more intelligent than us. And so if there's nothing

0:59:35.240 --> 0:59:38.440
<v Speaker 1>unique about the mammal brain that gives rise to thinking,

0:59:39.040 --> 0:59:42.320
<v Speaker 1>why couldn't you know dick Hart's internal protagonist, the one

0:59:42.360 --> 0:59:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that says, I think, therefore, I am be any type

0:59:46.520 --> 0:59:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of physical architecture that gives rise to information processing, maybe

0:59:51.560 --> 0:59:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a swarm intelligence and a swarm of ant like aliens

0:59:55.240 --> 0:59:58.840
<v Speaker 1>or or a computer. It it really leads one to

0:59:59.120 --> 1:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>some strange inclusions about what intelligence is and where it

1:00:03.240 --> 1:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>emerges from physical reality. Indeed, indeed, it really it really

1:00:07.320 --> 1:00:10.040
<v Speaker 1>forces you to to rethink what we think we know

1:00:10.720 --> 1:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>about about intelligence and thought, Okay, well, I think we

1:00:14.600 --> 1:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>should come back and finish with that question we started

1:00:17.280 --> 1:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>with about the technological civilizations in that alternative reality where

1:00:23.080 --> 1:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the ascendant intelligent life form on Earth is avian rather

1:00:26.680 --> 1:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>than mammalian. If it's not primates, but it's birds that

1:00:29.960 --> 1:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>are the smartest creatures and create the machines and the

1:00:34.520 --> 1:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>buildings and the cities and the social structures and everything

1:00:37.600 --> 1:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we think of as intelligent civilization. What would that look like?

1:00:41.240 --> 1:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>How would it be different? Well, I instantly when I

1:00:44.160 --> 1:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>when I think of sci fi visions, like existing sci

1:00:47.520 --> 1:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>fi visions of of intelligent avian species. Uh, you know,

1:00:51.600 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I instantly think to flash Gordon the Hawkman, particularly Prince

1:00:56.120 --> 1:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>uh Prince Volton played by Brian Blessed in one of

1:00:59.680 --> 1:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>his uh most uh spectacular, one of his loudest roles,

1:01:03.640 --> 1:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>one of many loud roles over the years. You know,

1:01:06.360 --> 1:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they're still basically they're just humans, right, They've got arms. Yeah,

1:01:10.040 --> 1:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean it gets down to the the age old

1:01:13.440 --> 1:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>reality that humans have looked at birds and we've we've

1:01:16.720 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>envied them, but only for one thing. We just want

1:01:19.280 --> 1:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the wings. We don't want the talons, we don't want

1:01:21.800 --> 1:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the cloaca, we don't want any of the other stuff.

1:01:24.600 --> 1:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>We just want to fly. And so when we think

1:01:27.200 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of avian creatures and avian intelligent avian species, we tend

1:01:31.760 --> 1:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to think of just people with wings, and we want

1:01:34.080 --> 1:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to have our cake and eat it too. We want wings,

1:01:35.960 --> 1:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but we don't want to give up the arms. Yeah,

1:01:37.720 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we've got to choose. Yeah, that's one of the things

1:01:40.080 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that I've looked in the pasta with some of these

1:01:41.880 --> 1:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>hype of one plastic surgeon in particular, doctor rosen Um

1:01:47.000 --> 1:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>has argued that there's a way that you could turn

1:01:48.800 --> 1:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the human arm into into a wing. But most people,

1:01:52.520 --> 1:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>really they don't want that. If they want to become

1:01:54.240 --> 1:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a bird, they want to still have arms. Yeah, they

1:01:56.400 --> 1:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>want to be an angel, not a bird exactly. Yeah,

1:01:59.000 --> 1:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>And most angels are with with arms um in terms

1:02:02.840 --> 1:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of like actual intelligent um, you know, in more considerate

1:02:07.160 --> 1:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas about what a an avian alien species might consist

1:02:11.520 --> 1:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of or what they might think like um. The best

1:02:14.720 --> 1:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>example I've run across is in the second book of

1:02:17.880 --> 1:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Richard K. Morrigan's Takeishi Kovacs novels, the most stuff famous

1:02:21.600 --> 1:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of which is is Altered Carbon, which I understand is

1:02:24.200 --> 1:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>getting picked up by Netflix. The second book, Broken Angels,

1:02:27.960 --> 1:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it introduces a long extinct or at least absent, elder

1:02:32.360 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>race referred to as the Martians. But they're only referred

1:02:35.000 --> 1:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to as the Martians by humans because that's where we

1:02:37.160 --> 1:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>first encounter their ruins on Mars. On Mars. So the species,

1:02:43.040 --> 1:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>in particular their avian they're winged um. They disappeared from

1:02:47.880 --> 1:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>our galaxy at some point in the long past. They

1:02:49.720 --> 1:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>left behind all these advanced artifacts and a few functional items.

1:02:53.040 --> 1:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But Morgan plays with the idea of a technological civilization

1:02:56.480 --> 1:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that evolved from solitary predatory predatory avian creatures. So in

1:03:02.280 --> 1:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>their maps, the local settlement is always positioned at the

1:03:05.720 --> 1:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>center of the universe. Uh. So they seem to have

1:03:08.960 --> 1:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>existed in their most evolved state in a form of

1:03:13.080 --> 1:03:17.439
<v Speaker 1>highly advanced and automated fiefdoms controlled by and consisting of

1:03:17.480 --> 1:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a lone individual. Uh, which is all kind of slightly,

1:03:21.400 --> 1:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>slightly hard to fathom. It's so different from how we

1:03:24.440 --> 1:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>think of civilization and technologically advanced civilizations working. But indeed,

1:03:29.440 --> 1:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>what how would the model differ if the species was

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>inherently solitary instead of social, I mean, would it even

1:03:35.760 --> 1:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>be possible? Uh, it's it runs contrary to our to

1:03:39.840 --> 1:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>our only example of evolved uh technological civilization. Yeah, it's

1:03:45.560 --> 1:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>just another way of highlighting exactly how deep our mammalian

1:03:49.600 --> 1:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>influences run. The fact that we things we think of

1:03:53.040 --> 1:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>as inherent to intelligence or inherent to civilization are really

1:03:57.160 --> 1:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>facts about mammals. And you know, you want or how

1:04:00.360 --> 1:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>different things would be if it weren't mammals. Yea, though,

1:04:03.800 --> 1:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the whole idea about the creature positioning itself

1:04:06.360 --> 1:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>at the center of the universe, I mean we all

1:04:08.000 --> 1:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>do that. It comes back to the whole theory of

1:04:09.480 --> 1:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>mind and how we're just all we all were doing

1:04:12.600 --> 1:04:16.479
<v Speaker 1>is engaging with this sort of mental simulation of who

1:04:16.520 --> 1:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we are, this idea of ourselves that may itself be flawed,

1:04:20.520 --> 1:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and then all these various flawed ideas of what these

1:04:22.800 --> 1:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>other mammals in our lives are thinking. It's a very

1:04:25.520 --> 1:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>sense of imagination from which we conjure up things like

1:04:28.880 --> 1:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>how are the duck? Oh, yes, another great space faring

1:04:32.000 --> 1:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>avian species, now, but how are the duck? He just

1:04:34.320 --> 1:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>had hands, didn't he did he? Yeah? I guess he

1:04:36.480 --> 1:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>was kind of like a cartoon failure of imagination. How

1:04:39.440 --> 1:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>are the duck? Why didn't he have wings instead of

1:04:41.680 --> 1:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>arms with fingers? Yeah? You know, they weren't quite it was.

1:04:45.880 --> 1:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>This is not really science fiction, but the Skexies in

1:04:49.000 --> 1:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the Dark Crystal, I think they had hands too, didn't

1:04:51.600 --> 1:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>they theyd swords at each other? Yeah, they did, but

1:04:54.480 --> 1:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>they were they behaved. I like the way that they

1:04:57.920 --> 1:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>behaved like bickering, you know, vulture creatures. They their their

1:05:02.240 --> 1:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>attitude was seemed very avian. Yeah, they were essentially well,

1:05:05.880 --> 1:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they are a there. Their culture embodies the scavenging impulse. Yeah,

1:05:11.720 --> 1:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>like they're all squabbling over scraps. Yeah. Yeah, and their

1:05:14.960 --> 1:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>their their outfits and their environments are all just kind

1:05:17.640 --> 1:05:20.439
<v Speaker 1>of a big piles of junk. Really. I do love

1:05:20.440 --> 1:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>The Dark Crystal. It's it's such a magically non human story.

1:05:26.360 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>It is, Yeah, just the the entire thing, like all

1:05:29.480 --> 1:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the creatures, all the plants, it's just a completely alien environment.

1:05:33.160 --> 1:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And it was made at just the right time. If

1:05:35.120 --> 1:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you've made it a little earlier, the practical effects wouldn't

1:05:39.160 --> 1:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>have been there to make it look as good as

1:05:40.840 --> 1:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it as it does. And if you made before c G. Yeah,

1:05:43.640 --> 1:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>if you came a little later, they would have c G.

1:05:45.240 --> 1:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I the heck out of it. So it was it's

1:05:47.080 --> 1:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a movie, perfect movie that came out around it just

1:05:50.560 --> 1:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the right time. So I actually got in touch with

1:05:53.240 --> 1:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>owner Gintercune, one of the authors of the Cognition Without

1:05:56.040 --> 1:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Cortex paper, over email, and we had a brief exchange

1:06:00.400 --> 1:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and he answered some questions very generously for us, So

1:06:03.640 --> 1:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>This whole interview will be posted on stuff to Blow

1:06:06.080 --> 1:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com, but we just wanted to talk

1:06:08.360 --> 1:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>about a couple of his answers here because I thought

1:06:10.320 --> 1:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting. One of the things we asked him

1:06:12.440 --> 1:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>about was the difference between different species of birds in

1:06:16.360 --> 1:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of cognition. Specifically, I said, uh, we're now learning

1:06:20.120 --> 1:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>how intelligent corvids and parrots are, but are the chicken

1:06:23.720 --> 1:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and the pigeon probably a lot smarter than we thought

1:06:26.320 --> 1:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>as well? I'm just gonna read his answer here. On

1:06:29.040 --> 1:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this particular question, he says, it doesn't make much sense

1:06:32.360 --> 1:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to talk about birds and mammals in general. It is

1:06:34.280 --> 1:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>much more useful to compare some groups of birds with

1:06:37.360 --> 1:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>some groups of mammals. There's practically no important difference in

1:06:40.440 --> 1:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>any cognitive repertoire between corvids and parrots on one side

1:06:44.720 --> 1:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and primates on the other side. But obviously it would

1:06:47.240 --> 1:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>be a bit unfair to compare a chicken and a

1:06:49.440 --> 1:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>pigeon with an eight. But this is also true for

1:06:52.960 --> 1:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>mice and rats, So, to put it in a bit

1:06:54.880 --> 1:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>unscientific way, chicken and pigeons are possibly comparable in many

1:06:59.240 --> 1:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>aspects with rats. When it comes to cognition. That said,

1:07:02.240 --> 1:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it is important to state that the cognitive differences between

1:07:05.080 --> 1:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>rats and monkeys on the on the one side, and

1:07:07.880 --> 1:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>pigeons and corvitts on the other side are often overestimated.

1:07:11.720 --> 1:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Careful observations show that also chicken and chickens and pigeons,

1:07:16.080 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>as also rats, achieve much higher levels of cognitive operations

1:07:19.880 --> 1:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>than often assumed. I thought that was interesting because it

1:07:22.640 --> 1:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>highlights that there might be just sort of like a

1:07:24.760 --> 1:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>general lack of awareness we have about how smart all

1:07:30.160 --> 1:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of species are, not just birds, but that

1:07:32.720 --> 1:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we we under or overestimate the intelligence of animals across

1:07:37.800 --> 1:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the board. Yeah, we we. It's very difficult, even in

1:07:40.840 --> 1:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>scientific settings to set aside um, you know, our our

1:07:44.120 --> 1:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>human bias on these things. Another one of the questions

1:07:47.720 --> 1:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>he answered was that I specifically asked what he thought

1:07:51.320 --> 1:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the most impressive display of sophisticated cognition he'd seen in

1:07:55.760 --> 1:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>birds was. And so he says, imagine you're sitting in

1:07:59.200 --> 1:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>front of a table full of tasty food, and you're

1:08:01.480 --> 1:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>asked which of the many items on the table is

1:08:03.560 --> 1:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the most delicious one. That's my situation now, Uh, just

1:08:08.560 --> 1:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a feast of bird intelligence but he says, if you

1:08:12.320 --> 1:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>force him to give an answer, he says, I'd like

1:08:14.080 --> 1:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to mention two points. The first is self recognition in

1:08:17.080 --> 1:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the mirror, as shown by magpies. Now, that was one

1:08:19.400 --> 1:08:21.599
<v Speaker 1>of the ones we talked about and we found pretty interesting.

1:08:21.920 --> 1:08:25.519
<v Speaker 1>But he says this finding possibly implies that magpies know

1:08:25.760 --> 1:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>about themselves, and they shared this kind of knowledge with

1:08:29.479 --> 1:08:33.719
<v Speaker 1>chimpanzees and a few other ape species. The second aspect

1:08:33.800 --> 1:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that I find fascinating is social cognition. We also talked

1:08:36.920 --> 1:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>about this one. He says. Corvids seem to know in

1:08:40.200 --> 1:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of detail what other animals can know and

1:08:44.160 --> 1:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>what they can't know. So this is the theory of

1:08:46.360 --> 1:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>mind we discussed. Uh. He says, they also seem to

1:08:50.040 --> 1:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have a certain understanding of the intentions of other corvids,

1:08:53.120 --> 1:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and they possibly are able to at least anticipate how

1:08:56.280 --> 1:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>another bird is feeling in a certain situation. Just a

1:09:00.280 --> 1:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>few years ago, nobody would have thought that this was

1:09:02.880 --> 1:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>within the reach of a bird. Now, I want to

1:09:05.280 --> 1:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>stress that we asked a number of other key questions

1:09:08.120 --> 1:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>related to the research. Here. Some of the question we

1:09:09.960 --> 1:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>asked him about some of the questions that arose in

1:09:12.240 --> 1:09:15.519
<v Speaker 1>our coverage of the topic. But I do want to

1:09:15.560 --> 1:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>just touch on very briefly the more science fiction oriented

1:09:19.040 --> 1:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>question that we asked him. Um. We asked him about

1:09:22.479 --> 1:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, he said, evolution had got a different way.

1:09:25.080 --> 1:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Could avians rather than primates have become the dominant intelligence

1:09:28.360 --> 1:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on planet Earth, even developing a technological civilization? What might

1:09:32.200 --> 1:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that look like? And and I have to give him

1:09:34.320 --> 1:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>credit for taking our bait, you know, they're not not

1:09:37.080 --> 1:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>every scientist out there is willing to play the what

1:09:39.439 --> 1:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>if game um with interviewers. But uh, I thought he

1:09:42.800 --> 1:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>was game. I thought he had a very practical answer though.

1:09:45.160 --> 1:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So he says, in principle, yeah, he thinks in principle

1:09:48.120 --> 1:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you could. But he says, however, birds have a problem

1:09:51.280 --> 1:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that all reptiles have. They are unable to construct big brains. Uh.

1:09:56.120 --> 1:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>This could be related to the fact that in reptile brains,

1:09:58.960 --> 1:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>and so also in bird brains, the four brain is

1:10:01.479 --> 1:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>not divided into gray matter and white matter. In mammals,

1:10:05.200 --> 1:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this division is very important, and the mammalian cortex can

1:10:08.280 --> 1:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>grow like a folded carpet theoretically endlessly. In the reptile

1:10:12.920 --> 1:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>slash bird brain, the upper limit seems to be reached

1:10:16.000 --> 1:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>by a little more than a hundred grams. We haven't

1:10:19.040 --> 1:10:21.639
<v Speaker 1>understood this point completely yet, but to be as smart

1:10:21.680 --> 1:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>as we humans are, birds possibly would need a couple

1:10:24.280 --> 1:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of hundred grams. And as long as they're unable to

1:10:27.200 --> 1:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>come up with that, we ruled this planet. So it's

1:10:29.320 --> 1:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>just mass. It's yeah, you know, that's all they lack.

1:10:32.800 --> 1:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>But we can still lord it over them. Indeed. So hey,

1:10:36.240 --> 1:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>if you want to check out the rest of this interview,

1:10:38.120 --> 1:10:39.519
<v Speaker 1>you can head on over to stuff to Blow your

1:10:39.520 --> 1:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Mind dot com. Uh that's where we will have the interview.

1:10:41.960 --> 1:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>If you're checking this out within a week or two

1:10:44.400 --> 1:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of this episode's publication, it's probably gonna be on the

1:10:46.640 --> 1:10:49.639
<v Speaker 1>front page somewhere. But we also really want to thank

1:10:49.760 --> 1:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Dr Gunjakun for getting back to us. His answers were

1:10:52.800 --> 1:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>very interesting and it was very generous of him to

1:10:54.720 --> 1:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>share his time and his thoughts. That's right, And we'll

1:10:56.880 --> 1:10:58.719
<v Speaker 1>also include a link to this on the landing page

1:10:58.720 --> 1:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>for this episode. All right, so there you have it,

1:11:01.439 --> 1:11:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Avian Intelligence. We would love to hear from our listeners

1:11:04.920 --> 1:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>about this topic. Um, how do you feel about the

1:11:08.240 --> 1:11:10.599
<v Speaker 1>mind of a bird? Do you have birds in your life,

1:11:10.960 --> 1:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and if so, how do you objectively and subjectively um

1:11:15.320 --> 1:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>view their intelligence? And if you're a science fiction fan

1:11:18.320 --> 1:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>or a fantasy fan, you have you come across any

1:11:21.200 --> 1:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>models of of of fictional Avian intelligence, particularly Avian intelligence,

1:11:26.479 --> 1:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>uh Ben, you know involves the use of technology is

1:11:29.400 --> 1:11:31.639
<v Speaker 1>so share those with us. We would love to hear

1:11:31.640 --> 1:11:33.479
<v Speaker 1>about them. And if you want to get in touch

1:11:33.520 --> 1:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>with us with feedback about this episode or any other

1:11:35.880 --> 1:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>recent episodes, you can always email us that blow the

1:11:38.400 --> 1:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>mind at how stuff works dot com. Well more on

1:11:50.760 --> 1:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics because it how stuff

1:11:53.240 --> 1:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>works dot Com. The list four foot