WEBVTT - Fantasy Baseball 2020: Closer Rankings! 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening. This

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>is the Fantasy Football Best Friends Forever Show. Start listening

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to us or suffer the consequences. See yeah right now.

0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>As welcome by your host fie By from Fine Did

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>from St. Francis Prannice. Stand all, ladies and gentlemen, your

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>p with that we won't give you Inside up Studio

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty four. This is the b f F. S is

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stample. I am Greg Sauceman. What's happen about? Great

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>happy Monday to you. I hope you had a great weekend.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Did we had a Tyson Fury fight? Good times? We

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>got some peace, Paul. It's a great weekend, Greg. Nice

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>weather too, really nice weather this weekend and your weekend go.

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I just sleep, man, I slept pretty well, have very funny.

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I was excited to tell you about hit me very excited.

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh So on Saturday night, Frank I woke up and

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I found out overnight in my dreams that we uh

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we fired Craig Mish. Oh, I'm not laughing at you, Craig,

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm laughing with you. So we fired Craig Mish, but

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you still host the fs T. Do you want to

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>know who you hosted it with? Um? I do want

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to know. So I guess it was FST with Frank

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Staffle and my dad Rob. Susan's right, it was you

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and Rob hosted f S Day whenever the Fantasy League

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 1>gets a fresh pair of socks, sir. So that was

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>We worked on some wedding album stuff. Very it was fun.

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>We were all the same side, which was nice. It's hard, man,

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard. Wedding album. Oh you're creating your Yeah,

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you gotta pick out pictures before you like, Yeah, officially done.

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you about it during the update and somebody

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>else cares um. But we got that. We got Relief

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Picture rankings, our debut. With the rankings, we're going backwards.

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Everybody else that starts to catcher, we don't. We started

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the Relief Picture akings. We had some NBA to talk

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>about as well before we do any of that. Shan

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Glassmachia your sports trading us up. I'm John Glossomakia with

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.839
<v Speaker 1>your sports trade news update. All right. Kobe Bryant remembered

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 1>right now going on at the Staples Center in Los Angeles.

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>His widow, Vanessa Bryant calls Kobe m v P of

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>girls Dad's and she went on to say, God knew

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that Gianna and Kobe couldn't be together on the start

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>without each other. He had to bring them home. And

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you have them together, babe, you take care of our

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>g end. Quote. So a lot of emotions raging right

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>now at the Staples Center as they remember Kobe and

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Gianna Bryant. Let's go over to the NHL and they

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline. One of the more key names on the

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire or the trade rumor mill was Chris Criter.

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>He was, of of course, the New York Rangers forward.

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>He's no longer on the trade rumor mill. He is

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>locked up for seven years. Of twenty eight year old

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>signed a six point five annual average value deal with

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the New York Rangers. He has four goals and one

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>assists in sixty games this season. Set to break a

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>career high in both categories. He is now a New

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>York ranger for the next seven years. We think he

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is locked up, so he is no longer on the

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>trade rumor Mill All right, let's go over to the

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Rodal world and MLB hands a road lest the Angels closer.

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what Joe Madden, the manager said today. He's pretty

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>safe bet to begin the season as the team's closer.

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Last year he saved twenty three games with a two

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>point four three e R, a seventy five K, sixteen

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>walks in seventy two and two thirds innings. Last seasons

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>hands a road least now the closer, according to Joe

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>Mann and the Angels owner. So that's some BFFs news

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>right there. And friend Mill Rays, the Cleveland Indians outfielder

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>has dropped eighteen pounds in the off season. He hit

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>over thirty home runs for the Padres last year or so.

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.679
<v Speaker 1>He isn't known to be a defensive liability. Losing eighteen

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>pounds might help in your fantasy traps there. If you

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>are a big Friend Mobrays fan, that is your BFF

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>sports grid news update for this hour. Now back to

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Greg and Frank take it away all right, Thanks so much, Sean.

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And we mentioned at the top of the show we're

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about closers and relief pitchers here in

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of fantasy baseball. But before we do all that,

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we did want to jump a little bit into the

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>NBA here. Earlier today, our own Greg Sussman spoke with

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rhodo's Ricky Sanders about tonight's NBA DFS slate. Here's

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 1>who you should be building your lineups around tonight. Let's

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>complete the Philly triffect to hear with you. Well embed

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>at center, Dude Emvite Janice Dodges. How are you pulling

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this off? Well, we didn't mention Kendrick not a point

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>guard who's under five k, which is just a crazy

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.679
<v Speaker 1>price tag for him. So again, if you're playing Richardson

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're playing him all of a sudden, you can

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>pull it off with relative ease. But look, I mean

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Joel embiid against this Atlanta Hawks team that again allows

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton of stocks. It's just a great setup in itself.

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>And then you have Ben Simmons out of rotation, and

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>without Ben Simmons, Joel embiad isp posted to like a

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty five percent usage rate, a rebound rate that's gone up.

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>We haven't had a twenty five percent rebound rate baseline

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>on Daily Rhodo. Obviously, Ben Simmons a good rebounder, and

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you know as a point guard, and you look at

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>this matchup, I mean, it's just great. This Hawks team

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 1>has not covered center as well all year long. You know,

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Joel Embiid could get you those blocks, and that's beyond

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we haven't projected with a high usage rate,

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>high assist rate, a high rebound rates rate. In fact,

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>with Ben Simmons out, So Joel Embiid just does everything.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a great spot for him. It's a great matchup,

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and it he really doesn't matter. With Tobias Harris, I

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna be the focal point of his offense. Hey,

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you haven't. I got an opportunity to talk to Ricky

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier today you will be the sixers. That's where we're looking.

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>No Ben Simmons tonight, Harris's questionable. So before you check

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to finalize your line ups, I don't know what to

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Daily Order dot Com to set them. Yeah, it's a

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>great point. Look, whenever Ben Simmons is out, Greg you're

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>looking to build your teams around some of those seventies

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>sixers players, and it makes a lot of sense. You

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>heard it from Ricky Sanders. Joel embiid usage rate up

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>over thirty five per cent when Ben Simmons is not

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>on the floor. So you're looking to fill out your

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>DFS lineups tonight trying to figure out who to build

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>around Greg, I think Joel and beat the process makes

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the most sense, of course. Not trust it, man, you

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>gott trust the process. There you go Daily Order dot Com.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you check that out. But be four lineups

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>lock tonight, righty? Should we start our relief as your rankings? Yeah? Yeah,

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>let's do it all right? So I have I have rankings.

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg has rankings, Frank rankings. No, No, what are you

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about? Right? What is this right here that I'm

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at? That's Fantasy Pros rankings. Rank No, those are

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>my rankings, which go on Fantasy Pross whatever. Five most

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>accurate rank about nine. I haven't released the yet. I

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>believe I saw they did. Well, then I'm not on it.

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I did. I'm not even kidding. I did see it.

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Did I don't know? I did see they did? Then

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>ruses on it. I did not rank very highly and

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>rhonases on it. Now you piqued my interest. All right, anyway,

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>if you look over here on my computer, look at

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>this color CODEDE sheet. I got my color codes ready

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to rock with the relief pitchers, considering this is the

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>only show draft accuracy out yet. I saw draft projections.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Then I saw raft projection injections. I saw I'm I'm

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>not even making it up. I don't even know what

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that means. Then I will find it during the break

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for you. All right, Well, they haven't released the twenty

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen draft accuracy rankings from last year. We're still waiting

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>on those. All right, I'm sure I finished, like number one,

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris MENI got something, that's how I know. And I

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 1>saw this a color coded movie. You want? This is

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what I'm gonna do is better room may that's Venmo,

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Greg solid. I don't know what do you charge for

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that nowadays? You know cool? A couple of suckles were good,

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>A couple of cecles. You rather have w W E

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>network or the Greg network. So I was was trying

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>to make these rankings, uh previously five minutes ago, and um,

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I have a really hard time this year. And this

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm hoping to use the show for trying

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to figure out like where the first here ends and

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the next year begins, and then that's here after that.

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm all about tears, you know that about me,

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's really hard for me to kind of figure

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>out who's elite and who's not because I really think

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that truly, every closer on the board I think hasn't

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>been wrong with them as like a welt, And because

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>of that, I don't my tears are like much larger.

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>They're literally impacts of ten. Franc I literally have two

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>packs of ten for the first nineteen or you know,

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially pac ten the first nineteen relief pictures off my board. Yeah,

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, the closer position is always a tough

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>one to figure out for fantasy purposes. And obviously if

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>you play in Rhodo or head to Add Categories, saves

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>count for a lot more. Honestly, if you play in

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>head to Add Categories, I would probably just punt some

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on bases and punt saves. But that's just me. I

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>know that there's a lot of strategy built around, you know,

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>getting those elite relievers in that type of format if

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to and head to head points leagues, they're

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as valuable. But yeah, Greg, look, I think

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the position now is harder to figure out than ever

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>before because as we go through today and try and

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>figure out, you know, every team's closing situation, you're gonna

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>see that there's at least five, six, seven teams that

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to have multiple closers or don't have a

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>set closer right now. Gabe Kapler's out in San Francisco.

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>If you watch the BFFs the past couple of years,

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I hate Gabe Kapitler because he can never

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>figure out who his closure is gonna be. You know,

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>he changes it up every single day based on match.

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So it was based on this, based on that, you know,

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>analytics for his closers. Uh, And now, well, I guess

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>he's got a fun job to figure out who's gonna

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>use out there in San Francisco because A they're not

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna win a lot of games, Greg, and B I

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think they really have that many great relievers in general.

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So like most years, I would say this year is uh,

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting situation trying to figure out all these

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>closing situations. There's a lot of question marks. This year,

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna break down, starting at the top. When we

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>come back the BFS roll on here on Monday. After this,

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot Com

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and the

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts,

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support, and much more. Save ten

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>on winning NBADFS advice with promo code Dunk. Visit daily

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>dot Com backslash to learn more. Alright, back here, BFFs,

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>it's our closer Rankings programmed. Where do you rankings? All

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>all week long? Oh? Next week, we're that's that time

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of year. We're getting the mark. Next week's March. We

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>basically have to do two weeks worth of ranking shows.

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Grego's next. We're gonna have to spend like two days

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>on out fielders, two days I'm starting pitchers. That's the

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>next two weeks, right, and then next week what's up

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the draft? Next week? No, right, it's not what draft auction? Draft? No, no, no,

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the auction is after it's like Thursday. I got on

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>my calendar here March March twelfth. Next week's the fifth

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>ready that I wasn't so crazy to ask. You're not

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>far off. You didn't realize that was close? Yeah, you're

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>You're not wrong. There's two weeks from this. Thursday is

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>our first draft of the year. I mean, good times.

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm already nervous. Why we're gonna crush you? We already?

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>You already have a list? Do I do the list?

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Hashtag list um. Who was listening to the show Dane

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Dane Martears listen to the show last week and he

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>heard of our strategy a little bit about how I

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>want to piss everybody off. He enjoyed the show, he

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>says me. He says, let's succeed every year. He's not wrong.

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>All I do is have fun. Let's go greatly jumping right.

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump right in here today and let's get into

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the closers. As I mentioned my top tier and asked

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Frank right before the show starting, where is the top

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>tier end? And he's like, there's four guys and then

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>there's everybody else. But I was looking at the four

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>guys and I'm like, I think there's issues. So for me,

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I got like nine guys. I feel very comfortable draking

0:13:57.920 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>any of these guys. I don't want to spend on

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>any of the top four because I like the other

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>six more just as much. And to be fair, I've

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>done two drafts already, Greg, and I have not wound

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>up with either of the top four closures that I

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>have in that top tier um anyway, So I mean

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that's not how That's usually what I do when it

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>comes to relief pictures in rhoto leagues and head to

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>end categories leagues. I am going to more often than

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>not to wait for those top five or six to go.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll wind up with one of my top ten closers Greg,

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>then I'll probably jump in the eleven to fifteen range,

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe just add a few more speculative guys

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>swords the back end of the draft. But more often

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>than not, I don't wind up with one of the

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>top five closures, Greg, because the value is just too high.

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing. I got nineteen guys. As I

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that I like nineteen of them, I want two

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteen. That's fair. I think that makes a

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense. Yeah, And I'm not gonna spend up

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for the number one closer, who is Josh Hayter this

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>year coming off the board. And I'm not gonna spend

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>up for Curbs, who's traditionally number two, And there might

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>number one and two also, I just don't see myself

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>spending up. I'm gonna wait and wait and wait and

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>take two of my top nine team. So let's go

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>through some of the top guys. I want to tell

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you why I'm like pausing rather than drafting these players,

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>because like I think they have welts and number one,

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>we have Josh Hayden, number two, Curvy eighth, number three

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>or all this, Chapman, number four, Roberto oh soona and

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that's like the consensus top four, right, That's what you

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>told me, that top serious, correct, That's what it is

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for me. Okay, So those are the top four. Now

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the reason I don't want to spend up for them,

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I will go with the ones that are clearer to me.

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Rollis Chapman a lot of miles on that arm. We've

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>seen him be pulled in the closer roll before, we've

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>seen him go on the I l a couple of

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>times elbow injuries, shoulder injuries. You wonder if all of

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>these pitches, all of these years, and that knee issue

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that always recurs, you wonder if it catches up to

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>him at some point. Again, not I I don't like.

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Are all the Chapman's right. Number three closer issues are

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>about Herby Yates led the MLB and saves last year

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>with forty one saves. We were just talking about it

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>during the break, Frank forty one saves he had. But

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's a free agent to be or is

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this just the year left? The Padres thought about trading

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>him last year at the deadline. They didn't this year.

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>If they fall out of it, they're going to just

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like they did Brad Hand before him. And if Kurby

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Yates goes, somebody else will stop up. Amilio Pagan. I

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just traded for very good, very good reliever, Herby Yates,

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the number two. Costing what he costs, it doesn't seem

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>worth it to me. And then you have Josh Hayder,

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>who is amazing the best reliever in baseball. Oh right,

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>he has all these multi inning appearances. They deploy him

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>whenever they want to. This is the issue we said

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>with him coming in the last season, and they had

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of relievers in Milwaukee that could wind up

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>getting this job at some point or stealing saves. Hayter's

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the guy, He's the number one guy. He's the best

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>out of these players. What if you're just specifically looking

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>for saves at you have questions when it comes to

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Josh had Finally, Ronny at the top four is a Rhodo,

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>So he's a cheater. Well they got that's all you got. Well,

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>it's worth mentioning that our own Craig miss who was

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>still on Fantasy Sports today by the way, him Greg's

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>dad did not replace Craig Mish spoke with Alex Bregman

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend. We're at I don't know where, somewhere

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at spring training wherever they are, somewhere in Florida, and uh,

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>he said that Roberto Soona is going to lead all

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 1>of baseball and saves and subcaraus I can see that.

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Like to me, it's not crazy, you know, cost the least,

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it may lead them and saves like the most. He's

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>probably the one that I'm most likely to draft, just

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>based on So you look at the adp over at

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy pros right now, we're gonna put him in

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>white on the on the rankings, and Josh Hayder is

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>going off the board at fifty seven overall. So I mean, look,

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a steep price that you're talking about. In a

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve team league, you have to use a fifth round

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>pick on a closer. Mind you, you're gonna get the

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>best closer in the game. You're gonna get a ton

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of strikeouts, great ratios from Josh Hayter as well, But

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a big price tag to pay up. You're

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>passing up on, you know, legit top twenty starting pitchers,

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you're passing up on stolen bases, which are scarce category

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. Curby Yates, I'm with you, Greg, I think

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>he's awesome. The sub too e er. Last year he's

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous and we were all over him. I actually wound

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>up with a few shares of Curby rates last season. Uh.

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Phenomenal splitter, no doubt about it. We think you raise

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a great point that they already have traded away Brad

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Hand in the past, they were thinking about trading away

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Kirby Yates. Last year they just traded four and they

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>gave up some assets together anymore. Amilio Pagan who is

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal look in his own right, and they also

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>have another name in Andres Munios who came up last year.

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>It was like a hundred five miles per hour. They

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>actually are projected to have one of, if not the

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>best bullpens in the Nationals. There's well, it's on one

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and two for you continue and I'm with you on Osuda.

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm most likely to drop chairman oh on a roller.

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Chapman look, he has missed time and the strikeouts were

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 1>down last year, the swinging strike rate was down, the

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>velocity was pretty much on par. I mean, doesn't throw

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>as hard as he used to, but but you still

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about the knees in the back of

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>your mind a little bit. He has thrown a lot,

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>uh look playing for one of the best teams in

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>baseball and the Yankees, they have the highest projected over

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>under for any team in baseball this upcoming season. They're

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>going to win a lot of games, and you know,

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.719
<v Speaker 1>he easily could save forty plus games this upcoming season.

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But I'm with you, Greg, I think based on the

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>price tag you have to pay for all this, Chapman

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 1>he's I think like some of the names that are

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>going behind him are really not that dissimilar, and you

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>might be able to get them a few rounds later.

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>So I don't really have a problem waiting on him.

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>If you want to grab Chapman, I'm fine with it.

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>But you still do have to pay a big price

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>tag he's going off the board. I pick seventy one

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>right now, Greg, So back into the sixth round in

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a twelve team league. Again, that's that's a big price

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to pay for for your first closer. There you go.

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>We're all we're on the same page here when it

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>comes to Reberto. Assume you be in our favorite of

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>this tier. Let's move on. Let's move on. You think

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that tears over here right like, that's where you're stopping.

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>You're cutting it off, making a new color. Yeah. I

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have a problem with you kind of just keeping

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>one big tier for like your top ten. That's fine

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to me. I think that these four are you know,

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:14.919
<v Speaker 1>if they remain the closest for their respective teams the

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>entirety of the season would not surprise me. If they

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>all have sub two point five oh e r A

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>s really good strikeout numbers, and forty plus saves. I

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>would just put those these this group before I have

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.719
<v Speaker 1>less doubt about than the other group of players were

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>about to talk about next gree al right, so let's

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>get let's get to those next guys. It would just

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>keep diving in Frank, because for me, I look at

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>these guys that are in the next crew and I'll

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>just kind of rattle them off and you could order

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>them how you pre For Frank, you got Liam Hendrix

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in here. We talked about him briefly last week. You

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>got Kenley Jansen in here. We talked about him briefly

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>last week in the same conversation. Guys, we think that

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>could be this year's late China. We got Greig Kimberle.

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe in this mix. We have Taylor Rogers. I

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>believe in this mix. And finally, for me, where my

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>top nine ends, I got Edwin Diaz here as well.

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Is there anybody I'm leaving out or anybody that wouldn't

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>be in that top nine? So I have the top

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>four as the first year, and then I have five

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.239
<v Speaker 1>through eleven for me that are kind of in this

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>They could still be really really good, but again they

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>have more Awartz than the than the first four that

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we already spoke about. And for me, that group is

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Brad Hand, Taylor Rogers, Ken Giles, Edwin Diaz, Liam Hendrix,

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Kenley Jansen, and Craig Kimberl rounding out the top. So

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it basically it's Brad Hand and Ken Giles that I

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 1>probably just move up to a bigger tier. But look,

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's concerns over both of those guys as well.

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Like Brad Hand was not nearly as elite last year

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>as he was. He can there's a chance he could

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>be traded as well, and they have And I think

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>with Ken Giles was he was trading the Yankees acquired him,

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>but they look at this his medicals like, yeah, we're good.

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna take this guy. You're out on Ken Giles.

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>If the Yankees are out, Greg's out. I hear what

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. But Greg, he was phenomenal last year, just

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>into the highest strikeout rate of his career, elite numbers.

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>It's just a matter of you know, Ken, can he

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>stay healthy? Can you remain healthy? And a lot of

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>people expect the Toronto Blue Jays to be more competitive

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 1>this upcoming season. Again, what he did last year a

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>sub two e r A, a whip of one point

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>zero zero twenty three saves, just one blown, save eighty

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>three strikeouts in fifty three and two thirds endings pitched. Greg,

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I understand the injury concerns you might have over Ken Giles,

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think you could say that about a lot

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of the guys that we're talking about here. Kenley Jansen

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>has not, you know, been the model of health you

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>worry about, you know, the heart condition that he has,

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>plus his um his performance has you know, taken a

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>step back. Craig Kimberly, you have some of those same

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>concerns about Liam Hendricks you just dubbed last week as

0:22:57.760 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>this year's blake, trying to tell me they all have war.

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Give me the person who has the best skills of

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this group, and I think Ken Giles is up there

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as one of them. And I think you can argue

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the same thing for Edwin dis Edwin is exactly the

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>guys I think Edwin Diaz and Ken Giles, to me, Greg,

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>are always married together. Even a couple of years ago,

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>there were two guys that I was completely awful because

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it seems like they could just implode at any time.

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And last year we saw that implosion from Edwin Diaz

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and we saw Ken Giles go the other way, actually

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>took a huge step forward. It's just a matter now

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of him staying healthy. And if he does that, I

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're looking at thirty five plus saves. You can't

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>just look at teams and say, oh, the Blue Jays

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>are not gonna be great, because look at the padres

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.959
<v Speaker 1>one less than eighty games, team win close. Kirby Yates

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>led the league in with forty one safe, So you

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>can't really look at teams and I just think that

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the Blue Jays are gonna be better. And I really

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>like the skills out of Ken Giles as well. I

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>think Edwin Diaz here, let's talk a little bit more

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>about Tylor Rodgers when we come back. I also wonder

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>about the fatigue, or at least our fatigue with guys

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like Craig Kimberroll and Kenley Jansen. I think we could

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>at least mentioned here. On the other side, we're also

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>getting to the next year of guys. Guys I really like,

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to live in this next year because what

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>I do put its here of guys that I'm pretty

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>positive at the closers and that's what I'm looking for.

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll break that down for you. Proto next, want to

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>swap support, and much more. Save ten percent on winning

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk. Visit Daily Rodal

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com backslash dunk to learn more. Back year in

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the VFF spotted some of your tweets and darks Edward

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 1>days and I just wotted to Joe saying, hey, I

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>have no problem with the d r RP. One I

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>really don't have no problem is be my first closer

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>off the board. If that's what the value is, he's

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>my highest closure left, so also in that range, and

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 1>imagine it going to break for guys like Kenley Jansen

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and Crank Kimbell. And I asked you Frank or post

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the question. These are just some fatigue with these guys

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>because they've been around so long. Craik Kimbell signed in

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>June of last year and it was very, very uncomfortable.

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>And you talked last week a little bit about Kelly

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Jansen stuff not being what it once was, and Blake

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>trying and possibly you serveyan Kenley Jannson at some point.

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>The first question is who would you rather have between

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Kimberroll and Jansen. The second question is do you want either?

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't really want either. And I actually had this

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>exact decision to make in one of my NFBC Draft

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Champions League so far, Greg and I wound up going

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>with Kenley Jansen. But I think no matter who you

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>go with there, you're not going to feel great about it. Obviously,

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers, like the Yankees, expected to be one of

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the best teams this year, probably going to win a hundred,

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe more than a hundred games, but there is serious

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>concern over Kenley Jansen. The e r A was, you know,

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the highest that that it's space it's ever been for

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Kenley Jansen. Last year. The velocity has been down in

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the second half. He allowed more line drives last year.

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>The whip was the highest that has been for Kenley Jansen.

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Like we have legitimate concerns. There are a bunch of

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, warning signs when it comes to him. But again,

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I still think that he is the closer for his

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>team right now, and obviously Dave Roberts has a ton

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of faith and trust in Kenley Jansen. But frankly, I

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>do worry about the skills starting to erode a little

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>bit here, Greg, But the fact that he plays for

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>a really good team and you know he's gonna get

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of the doubt. I think the least is

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be pretty long. He's probably going to be safe

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>for at least another thirty to thirty five saves, assuming

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>he's healthy. He also has a heart condition. But I

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>also think that, like I think Kimberall's job is even

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>safer with the Chicago Cubs, like Kelly Johnson. We just

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about like training last week, right who's up next

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>for the Cubs. Who's another guy that's going to be

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the guy? Steve c Scheck. Is that what we're talking about.

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>D c Scheck is now with the White Sox, Pat

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 1>Stroke is on the Cincinnati Reds. Jeremy je Ris Austin

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>round but last year had an ear a over five right,

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So you want to know that the actual answer is

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>that the one that people have been drafting is this

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>gentleman named Rowan Wick is a two point four one

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>point one four with thirty five strikeouts in thirty three

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>innings pitched. He's the name. So that's the name that

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>people are hand. I think Craig kimber full off season

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and give it a year younger than Kenley Jansen, but

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a brutal season as well, or second half

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of the second half was good, but the overall season

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>was fine. Thirteen eight six or nine walked up ton

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of people. Ere was good. Extra was fine. I thought

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it was okay. I'm not having dove in this obviously.

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Freik Kimberll in the second half of eighteen had a

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>four point five seven e r A for what that's worth.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Greig thirty four strikeouts its whey one in two thirds

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 1>an ex pitch. But I almost give him the benefit

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of the doubts. I'm with you because last year he

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>joins the Cubs late, he doesn't pitch until June. Because

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>of all the draft compensation that was attached to Craig Kimbrill,

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>and some people thought that he was overvaluing himself. He

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get paid some kind of monster contracts, similar

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to what role this Chapman got a couple of years

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>ago from the Yankees. That was never going to happen

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>for Craig Kimberle. But do you agree that both of

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>these guys are adequately ranked like where they're going, So

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't be valued the same way that they have

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>been in years past my rankings. So who do you

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>have just behind them? Liam? Here's Brad Hand and Ken Giles.

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>You really don't like Ken Jiles? Huh, I guess we're

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get Ken Jiles. Basically he's the number one

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>closer of number one closer target of mine. Really well,

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>let's make it Robards number one. That's fine because I

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>just mean based on you know, price versus upside and

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>skill level. And I think, let me tell you the

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>guy I have them of things there first day the

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>guy had directly above them, and that's Taylor Rodgers, right,

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>pitching for a really good Twins team. Really good stuff

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>ran away with this closer's job last year. I understand

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that kind of came from nowhere, and he wasn't the

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>guy we expected to be the closer for the Minnesota Twins.

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>But if you trust the Taylor Rodgers can keep this

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>job all season long. Rodgers is no grander pick here

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>inside the top ten. Yeah, and that's if you trust it, right.

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>And he was phenomenal last year, There's no doubt about that.

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean to six one e r A with a

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>one zero zero whip, he's actually done a two years

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in row. Greg, He's had a sub too six five

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>e r A two years in a row. He's he

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>had a zero point nine five whip in eighteen, a

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>whip of right around one in twenty nineteen. And the

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts actually went up last year right around twelve case

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for nine. The command got better, the walks went down. Uh. Yeah,

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot to like. Obviously, the Twins

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>are expected to win a ton of games this upcoming season,

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and looking into Taylor Rodgers, I wanted to see, well,

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>what are the splits because obviously he's a lefty and

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to see, no, is there any opportunity that

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>he's just really good against lefties and kind of got

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>hip hard by right He's Nope, there is no worry

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>about that whatsoever. In fact, lefties were actually better against

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Rodgers than righties. He did a great job of

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>neutralizing both two O eight batting average with a six

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>eleven o p s against right handed batters last year.

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Greg he can handle both sides of the play. And

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of these guys were naming. There's

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>all these managerial changes, right, and team philosophy changes. It's

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>not the case in Minnesota. It's the same exact management

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>team that's been there. Sure, bench coach has gone and

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>pitch coach has gone. In a bunch of play, those

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of these guys have gone, but same general manager, same

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>president baseball operations, and Rockabadelli is still the manager for

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the Minnesota Twins. He named Taylor Rodgers the closer. He

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>watched Taylor Rodgers get thirty saves for him last year.

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:43.719
<v Speaker 1>And yes, Trevor May is still there, and yes, ty

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Duffy is still there, and Sergio Romo is still there,

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and Tyler Clipper You're still there. It's a lot of

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Romo five years old, right, There's a lot of names.

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Five Taylor Rodgers proved himself for this crew last year.

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's why for me um he is number six

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and leam of him. Number six. As well, So I'm

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I like him. Why do we both like him over

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Leon Hendricks though, that's my question, Like I have it, well,

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'll tell you exactly why. Taylor Rodgers has

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>now been an elite reliever for two years in a row,

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and Liam Hendricks has shown flashes. But what he did

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>last year was something he had never done before and

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it was due to a velocity spike. And I don't

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>want to downplay that, Like, if Liam Hendricks continues to

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>have that velocity spike that he had last year and

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>continues to get as many swinging strikes and strikeouts, then

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>he is not going to be this year's Blake Trinan.

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want people to think that, oh, we're

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>just making a lazy comparison, because it's the Oakland A's

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>closers and they're both they were both being drafted, as

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, top five or even top ten options from

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>one year to the next. But Liam Hendricks did things

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>last year that he never did before. So I think

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you're okay to be skeptical of that performance and whether

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>or not it's going to carry over from year to year,

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>And if it does, then yeah, he's easily going to

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>wind up being a top five closer because the a's

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to be gray. It's a good ballpark to

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>pitching as well. Uh. And he showed us some of

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that upside last year, but again, you don't know if

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that velocity necessarily is going to carry over. And it

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>was by far the best year of his career. He

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>come through with him as your first closer, comfortable, ish,

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I have him at nine, just ahead of Kenley Jansen

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and Craig Kimbero. Ideally, I would want one of my

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>top eight guys. That's the difference again between us Brad Hanna,

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>ken Giles. But to me, again, I have a top eleven,

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't really matter to me. I just want one, really,

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys. Ideally, let's move on to the

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>next ten or so, into the next tier, and mine's

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the Fantasy pros the average Jeff rankings, because

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>as I said, Frank, I want guys that I know

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be the closer, and that's what make

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>up my next year. So I'll read in these names

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and you let me know your thoughts, right Nector Nurses

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in here, because I, as you know, I don't trust

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Hector Narius or the Phillies. Okay, well maybe Joe Giardi

0:32:55.680 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>does Greg even probably not Brandon Workman, Alex klam A,

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Hans Robless. As we heard today and in Shawn's update,

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>ricel Iglesias, Archie Bradley Way like a lot, who was

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a La clerk, Kiona Kela and Will Smith make up

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>my next tier. I noticed that there's no Mr Anderson,

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>there is there is no Nick Anderson. Well, we talked

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to it, Tam. We talked to the announcer, oh the

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay race stats, and he's just like, I don't

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>know Jose Alvarado and he's much closer to the the team

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>than I am and you are. And this industry is

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we have no idea who the closing was. The closers

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>are the race non zero. I'm not I'm not paying

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>this price tag on a Nick Anderson, as good as

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>this stuff can be, when the really the nine names

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that I just named, the eight names, they're all the closers.

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>They've all been announced as the closers. Now, this is

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>just betting on on the cream rising to the top, Craig,

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>That's all it is. Would hear if you're drafting Nick

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Anderson because The reason you would do that is because

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>he has. If you just look at his skills in

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of strikeout rate and everything that he posted last year,

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>he was a top five, top ten reliever in baseball

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>all around. Agree that he is going to be the

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>best reliever in that pen and that they're going to

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>value him as such in Tampa Bay this year. Then

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you could potentially have the top closer this season. He

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>could be this year's Kirby Yates. He could be a

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>year ago. At this time, we're talking about who's Alvarado

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a similar spot? Right? And look, I'm just playing Devil's

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>still there. I'm just playing Devil's advocate because I'm probably

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>not drafting Nick Anderson if he continued. Would be surprised

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to you, Frank, if game five of the regular season

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Nick Anderson starts for the rais why, probably be a

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>little surprised. He didn't start any games last year, did he? No,

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>he did not. They didn't use him as an opener

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>last A full season with him change. I'm just not

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>investing a high pick in a rate. I agree. I

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I'm just playing Devil's ade. Skills are

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:58.919
<v Speaker 1>amazing when it comes to Nick and that's what people

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>are looking at. It's worth men name. I am defending

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 1>where I have it ranked. I brought this up to you.

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt Modica in the tout Wars draft and whole draft,

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 1>took Nick Anderson in the ninth round, one closer after

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Edwin Diaz, two picks after Taylor Rodgers, and he took

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Nick Anderson ahead of Kenley Jansen. He took him a

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>head of Brad Hand. He took him a head of

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Ken Giles. I will say everybody else, I will say

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>that towt Wars, the NFBC, those are different. What you're

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to achieve is a little bit different. You're trying

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to win overall in the NFBC. Well, in tow Wars,

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 1>it's just a team league. And you know, I mean

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no there's no overall components. So he's not like

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>swinging for the fences. He literally just taught. He just

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>took the best closer he thought was available, and that

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.839
<v Speaker 1>was Nick Anderson. I don't agree with Matt in that regard. Look,

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he has all the talent in the world,

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>and there's a chance, you know, the guy has nine

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>plus strikeouts this year, But how many says, what are

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you setting over under for saves that with him fifteen

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half exactly, and that's the problem. And then

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people get Frank's take on all these

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>guys and what he's kind of next true looks like

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>when we come back here. I love be fs. Want

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>with Daily rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:27.919
<v Speaker 1>projections in NBA DFS, plus lineup alerts, breaking news, lake

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 1>swap support, and much more safe ten percent on winning

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:34.479
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily Rodo

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com backslash dunk to learn more. All right, before

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we continue the program, Yeah, you know, shout out right

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>do this? What is that? This is a Ryan guys,

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>since Sonati made I p a the truth? The truth

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>where you just sent to us, Frank, I sent to

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you sent to us? Yes, you actually know who it is.

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just playing dumb our man. Derek Davis, Oh, Derek's

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>right friend of the show. Read it? What do you go.

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Here's your beer as promised, and I PA for Greggy

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that's me and Lagger for Frank. That's me. Go Bengals. Also,

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll bet the over this year as well. We'll be

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 1>for us. Yes, hey, come on with Joe Burrow come

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to town. He doesn't want to be there. Yes, time

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>to Shine with Sarah is my wife's business. So a

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:43.720
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Time to Shine with Sarah. So Frank

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Derrick Davis long been a fan of

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the show, faithful listener, faithful viewer of the program. Thank you,

0:37:55.760 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 1>sir again. This is fifty West, fifty W. I'm American,

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:07.399
<v Speaker 1>longer from Cincinnati's own good stuff. Here's buddy. Shout out

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to Derrick Davis. Appreciate it. Yeah, this edition of the

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Inside lines with the best, our best, yet we might

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>not make it there. That's tasty. That's stuff, good stuff,

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>durg it on a Monday. Are you are we allow

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:25.959
<v Speaker 1>to do this? Creek? I think I make the rules.

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I was about saying, there you go. All right? Um,

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I need a bunch of guys that are in my

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>next year. Random Workman, Alex Coleman, Hans Rob Lass, Rice

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>ell Iglesias, Archie Riley, jose La Clerk, Kella uh and

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Will Smith. I think I did these move Kiana Killa down. Um,

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>there's my initial reaction here, but these are the guys

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that I feel really good about being being the closer

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for the respective teams not having a nice season. My

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 1>next year includes Givanna Gagos, who we're speculating give me

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the closer, but Andrew Miller Ko wind up being there?

0:38:57.840 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I was rightis wind up with the closer, Carls Maartinez

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>peop in the little pen. I think there's a lot

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:04.240
<v Speaker 1>more questions with the gayegos. Velocity down for Carlos Martinez

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend as well. Surprised he will not have

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 1>on any of my teams. Hector Nerris, Joe Himenez, who stinks,

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>uh Ian Kennedy. You know, I think you should rethink

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe him Man, E Kennedy, Wade Davis, my Man, Brandon Kinseler.

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, I like Brandon Kindler. Like Brandon Kinseler as

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>well as a third option, not not a second closure neither.

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Washington guys like everybody loves Sean Doolittle, like Danny Hudson

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:26.919
<v Speaker 1>very well, maybe the closer there. I don't get the day,

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the little thing Tony Watson, maybe the cape caplosn't screw

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it up. And then of course the raised guys is

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the sky Blue Greg. Of course Gabe Kapler is gonna

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 1>mess it up. And then whoever the closers in Seattle,

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 1>which I asked you about. I was like, yeah, Matt

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>McGill versus Yoshi Harano versus you know who else? They

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>fine before opening day. So that's that's why, that's what

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>my deal is. Yeah, that's Look, that's basically everybody, right,

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll try try everybody. I'll say this, Greig, I think

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you should rethink Joe him is and I think you

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>should look into him. The reason being he had a

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>four three seven e r A last year. He had

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a four one nine x fit. His skill interactive e

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>r A was three point four one, and his underlying

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 1>metrics were phenomenal percent swinging strike creed, thirty five percent

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>chase rate. His sixty seven percent first strike percentage was

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>also in the elite category. He throws hard, he has

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a fastball, he uses a slider, mixes in a change

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>just barely, but over twelve case per nine. Greg, he's

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:23.359
<v Speaker 1>got to work on the walks a little bit here,

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think Joe Jimenez as a third closer. I

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want him as my second closer, but you know,

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:31.919
<v Speaker 1>in a similar range as a brand kinseler, I think

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>someone I could get you more strikeouts. Both teams are

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be great. But when you introduced Jo him

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and as you said, he stinks, all right, so listen,

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 1>I'll take that far back, but I feel good at that.

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't got Kiota Keller to the other crew. And

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:47.839
<v Speaker 1>then Brandon Workman really high, you're not worried about what

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>anything going on with the Boston Red Sox because they

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>were hesitant to give him that role basically all of

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>last year, even with him being the best reliever on

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the staff than they did. And then Ron Rednecky said

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>he's the closer. He has said that ready. I just

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's far from a short thing. He also walks

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a ton of batters too. Isn't his walk right like

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>over five per nine enough? I've all just he does

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>get He does get a lot of strikeouts. Right to

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:15.800
<v Speaker 1>last year, phase for nine Greg five point six five

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>walks for nine for Brandon Workman one A right looks

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 1>great thirty eight percent hard contact rate, the x fit

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>over three Swingen strike right. Not nearly as good as

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe Himenes, Greg Chase right, not nearly as good as

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe him Is this I'm not gonna be in on

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Workman. I was just off the list. I was

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna move Will Smith up. Is he definitely the closer there?

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Will Smith is not the closer. Molansen has already been

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>named the clothes. But it's one of those weird situations

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>where Will Smith is the best reliever on in that

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 1>bullpit down So it's it's like Josh Hayter from a

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, where he wasn't the closer, but

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you knew he was the best reliever there, and he

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was always just kind of lingering. That's why you can't

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>really draft Mark moll Anson with much confidence, because again,

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>there's someone behind him who is better than him, who

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>can get more strikeouts than him, doesn't walk as many

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>batters as Mark Molanson does, and Mark Mollanson it seems

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>like he's basically the closer just because he's making a

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. Greg so is Will Smith. So yeah,

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think that they signed Will Smith thinking that

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he was going to be there fireman putting out the fires,

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, seventh eighth inning whenever there's you know,

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the best hitters coming to a to the plate, or

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, a big jam to get out of.

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I think Will Smith is probably going to be used

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:37.319
<v Speaker 1>in that role because he is the best reliever in

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that pulpan. Right. So, then of the next tier of

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>guys land and I named, who's your number one guy

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna you trust the most? Is Archie Bradley. I

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>want to say Archie Bradley, but just because I don't

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 1>think that there's anyone else there in Arizona that you

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:55.879
<v Speaker 1>know like you on Lopez. We knew about from last

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>year with Brad Ziegler, right because Brad Ziegler put us

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>put us on him. But last year, yeah, I mean

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Joan Lopez was fine. He just doesn't get a lot

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 1>of strikeouts. Forty two strikeouts and sixty one and a

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>third endings pitch that's not gonna get it done. Hector

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Ron Done was fine last year. He has some closing experience.

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Junior Gara has you know, been around. He was with

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the Milwaukee Brewers, former starter with the team, And so

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I think Archie Bradley is actually pretty safe here, Greg,

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>but the whip one point four four for Archie Bradley

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 1>last year and he struggles big time with walks. This

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is why, this is why all these guys are this

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>next year. Right, That's that's obviously why um Hans Robles

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>had a great year last year. Already named the closer

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 1>by Joe Madden. You heard that from Seawoman earlier. Richell Glaciers,

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone was off last year. Maybe he should be the topic.

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I seear Archie Bradley four point five walks for nine,

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>his highest since two thousand and fifteen. So really struggled

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:47.839
<v Speaker 1>with the command last year and he's swinging strike Greg,

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 1>greg nine point six. That's below league average. Right, I

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:55.359
<v Speaker 1>want to like Archie Bradley. He's he's probably the name

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that I trust most at his next up on this

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>list right to the Glaciers He's he's there as well.

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he's like just outside the top twelve. And

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there are a few other names, uh there. In Cincinnati

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to they signed Pedro Strop, who you

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.399
<v Speaker 1>know filled in at times with the with the Chicago Cubs.

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Mere Garret's a great reliever. He just hasn't been used

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>as as the closer before. Michael Lorenzen is kind of

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like that two way player. I don't think he's actually

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>like a threat to the closer's role. What about Alex

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Columnett thirty four saves for Rice Ley Glaciers last year.

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I probably feel better about Rice Ley Glaciers than I

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 1>do callum Me. The underlying numbers for Columny were not good.

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 1>You look at you know, all the skill indicators, and

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the x fit was not great, much higher than the

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>e r A four Alex column A last year. And

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they just signed Aaron Bummer to an extension, five year extension,

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 1>and I think that there is a chance that, like

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 1>if column A struggles, I don't think that he's going

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to have that that long lash because that's a team

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:00.919
<v Speaker 1>is trying to compete and they want to now. And

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Bummer last year was ridiculous two point one three

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>e r A zero point nine nine whip um he

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 1>was great. He was actually better than Alex Collinmate. So

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 1>column is someone who worries me. Doesn't get a ton

0:45:11.560 --> 0:45:13.439
<v Speaker 1>of strikeouts either. Two more names are in this crew

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for me, hans A Robless and jose La clerk. Now

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we've mentioned Robles a few times on the show. The

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 1>clerk was a top pick last year as the reliever,

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:25.319
<v Speaker 1>um and really let you down right. He lost his

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 1>job in April, did Jose La Clerk, And he was

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:32.840
<v Speaker 1>my once three. He's my tenth or leven the closer

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 1>off the board last year, right behind Curby Yates and

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I got lucky and I draft the Curby rates in

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>most spots. Um, but whose the clerk was really liked

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:41.839
<v Speaker 1>last year? Lost his job very early right after signed

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that contract extension, struggle out of the year, eventually got

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>his job back. It's already been announced he is the

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>closer once again for Texas. It makes sense they just

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:50.879
<v Speaker 1>paid him, so he kind of has to be. Are

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 1>you following the money here with Josi La Clerk? Yeah,

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's a he's a risky one as well.

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 1>You want to like him because he has phenomenal strikeouts stuff,

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 1>but struggles big time time with command as well. What

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I will say about Jose La Clark is that there's

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 1>not much competition there. Like the setup man is Rafael Montero. Yes,

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that Rafael Montero, Greg the New York Mets. Rafael Montero.

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think that there is a good amount of

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 1>job security here for the clerk still only twenty six

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>years old. The strikeouts were great last year of over

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:24.280
<v Speaker 1>thirteen case per nine walks for nine five point one one. Greg.

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:27.799
<v Speaker 1>He's he's not gonna be a target of mine, Jose

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:29.839
<v Speaker 1>La Clark, He's not I thought he would be. He's

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be a target. There's a name that I

0:46:32.520 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 1>found when Craig and I were doing like outside one

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand a DP in the UH in the NFBC. I

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:41.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's DeMarcus Evans. Look into this kid, Greg, because

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Marcus he's on the Texas Rangers. He's in there, he's

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in their farm system. Twenty three years old. He had

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve saves last year in the minor leagues between High

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 1>A ball and Double A, and the strikeout numbers are

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:56.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ridiculous. So that's like my dark horse, just shot

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in the dark throwing a name out there. Uh, DeMarcus

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Evans of the Texas Rangers. Pay attention to that name

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for the Rangers this year, La Clerk, He's going to

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 1>be given the first opportunity. Greg, There's no doubt about that.

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But I I worry about the command just he hasn't

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:16.320
<v Speaker 1>really shown the ability to uh to really harness that

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in and build off of that. I worry. I worry

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>about the command and the walks when it comes to

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 1>uh clerk, Is there is there anybody else that we

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't named that you want to get into? You know,

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:32.719
<v Speaker 1>you like Diegos? Is there anybody else? We have two

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 1>minutes to go. You haven't got a chance to mention? Yeah,

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>diagos Um. It's interesting just because he was a nasty

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 1>reliever last year and we're trying to figure out what's

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>going to happen with the Cardinals this year. Everyone's drafting

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Diegos like he is going to be the closer, but

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:48.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously Andrew Miller is still there. You mentioned that Greg

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Koni Kelly you mentioned is someone that I'm interested in,

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but could be traded halfway through the season. The Pirates

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 1>are not going to be are not expected to be

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:59.839
<v Speaker 1>competitive this upcoming season. Kyle Crik is the next name up.

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Find Koni Killer to pay attention to their I've been

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:05.799
<v Speaker 1>drafting a lot of the raise guys, just like in

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>some of these deeper drafts not named Nick Anderson. But

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 1>what about what about taking Alvarado, I mean twelve team draft,

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:14.919
<v Speaker 1>you want that third closer Randy Kinseler. Randy Kinsler see,

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean we can put him on the list. He's

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be the closers for the Marlins. They don't

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of money. They sign him to a

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 1>one year, four million dollar contract. Randy Kinseler is going

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to be the closest bbff IS draft and Randi Kinsler

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:28.919
<v Speaker 1>say that much. Roll COEs Coches next rolls back here

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey. Enjoy that for Shans Malakia, Alex Passano,

0:48:32.320 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stanfel and Greg Sousman will do it all again tomorrow.

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 1>We hope I want to be the next Daily Fantasy millionaire.

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 1>com and dominate on fandel and draft kings this season.

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Compete with the pros with Daily rodal dot Com optimizer

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line

0:48:56.719 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and much more.

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Say ten on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk.

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily Rodo dot com backslash dunk to learn more.

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 1>H