WEBVTT - #918 Packers Unscripted: The comeback continues

0:00:06.750 --> 0:00:11.390
<v Speaker 1>Hi everybody, welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted from Packers.com.

0:00:11.550 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford, joined by the one and only

0:00:13.790 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Wes Hodkowitz. We're coming to you here from the Pottawatomie

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Sportsbook studio inside the walls of Lambeau Field. And next

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>up for the Packers, Wes, is the New England Patriots.

0:00:23.340 --> 0:00:27.690
<v Speaker 1>It will be a road game in Foxborough, Massachusetts. 325

0:00:27.690 --> 0:00:33.100
<v Speaker 1>Central Time kickoff on Fox, former Patriots team. Great and

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.460
<v Speaker 1>future Hall of Fame quarterback Tom Brady will be in

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.330
<v Speaker 1>the booth for Fox to call the game. But before

0:00:39.370 --> 0:00:42.110
<v Speaker 1>we get to the Patriots, there's a bit of news

0:00:42.190 --> 0:00:45.030
<v Speaker 1>on the practice field Wednesday for the Green Bay Packers

0:00:45.090 --> 0:00:49.660
<v Speaker 1>because none other than numero uno Micah Parsons was back

0:00:49.850 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on the practice field. His first practice since before he

0:00:55.200 --> 0:01:00.030
<v Speaker 1>injured his knee in mid-December of last year. And Parsons

0:01:00.050 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is just doing individual drills right now. He's going to

0:01:02.550 --> 0:01:05.140
<v Speaker 1>ramp up to maybe get into more of the meat

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.700
<v Speaker 1>of practice next week and whatnot. And he's sort of

0:01:08.940 --> 0:01:12.459
<v Speaker 1>eyeing that Thanksgiving Eve game against the Rams, which is

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>be right at the end of that three-week window in

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:21.310
<v Speaker 1>terms of activating into the active roster. But there's... there's

0:01:21.330 --> 0:01:23.930
<v Speaker 1>just that little bit of extra energy, I think, within

0:01:23.970 --> 0:01:27.210
<v Speaker 1>this team now that they know Micah Parsons is truly

0:01:27.290 --> 0:01:27.910
<v Speaker 1>on his way back.

0:01:28.030 --> 0:01:30.810
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Mike, I said it in an insider inbox this morning.

0:01:30.830 --> 0:01:34.610
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a boost and a vibrancy throughout the

0:01:34.630 --> 0:01:37.450
<v Speaker 2>entire building that you have Micah Parsons back. I mean,

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.259
<v Speaker 2>Matt LaFleur said it. I appreciate his comments on this

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.940
<v Speaker 2>because there's so much that we fixate on as it

0:01:42.980 --> 0:01:45.900
<v Speaker 2>relates to Parsons in terms of just the pure pass rusher.

0:01:45.940 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, again, generational talent, but It's all the little

0:01:49.020 --> 0:01:51.370
<v Speaker 2>things that came along with them acquiring him that I

0:01:51.410 --> 0:01:56.170
<v Speaker 2>think have separated that acquisition, right? First and foremost, I mean,

0:01:56.250 --> 0:01:58.870
<v Speaker 2>he's a very well-rounded football player. He did a tremendous

0:01:58.910 --> 0:02:00.770
<v Speaker 2>job against the run last year, too, probably one of

0:02:00.790 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the more underrated parts of his game. that I think

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.420
<v Speaker 2>the league is appreciating that maybe the common viewer doesn't.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.060
<v Speaker 2>But beyond that is the leader that he's become in

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.340
<v Speaker 2>the locker room and the relationship that he's built with

0:02:11.370 --> 0:02:14.510
<v Speaker 2>these players in the span of just over 12 months.

0:02:14.590 --> 0:02:17.690
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, as Jordan Love talked about, a number of guys,

0:02:17.710 --> 0:02:20.150
<v Speaker 2>Christian Watson mentioned it, Xavier McKinney in the locker room.

0:02:20.970 --> 0:02:23.609
<v Speaker 2>Having Micah Parsons back on the practice field is a

0:02:23.669 --> 0:02:27.169
<v Speaker 2>big deal. And as you talked about on three things,

0:02:27.210 --> 0:02:30.580
<v Speaker 2>the fact that Yeah, three things. Sorry, too many videos.

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 2>The fact that it does line up 21 days between

0:02:33.620 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 2>now and that Thanksgiving Eve game against the Los Angeles Rams,

0:02:39.500 --> 0:02:42.850
<v Speaker 2>it's there. The window is there now. And as Parsons

0:02:42.910 --> 0:02:46.210
<v Speaker 2>explained after practice, I thought he was really good and

0:02:46.250 --> 0:02:49.730
<v Speaker 2>explanatory in terms of what this journey's been like and

0:02:49.750 --> 0:02:52.209
<v Speaker 2>the various hurdles that have been along the way to

0:02:52.230 --> 0:02:53.550
<v Speaker 2>finally leading to his return.

0:02:54.230 --> 0:02:58.810
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the video of Parsons' media session after Wednesday's practice

0:02:58.870 --> 0:03:01.690
<v Speaker 1>is available on Packers.com. I also wrote a story kind

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of highlighting some of his comments and trying to condense

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.820
<v Speaker 1>everything in terms of what he's talking about, what he's

0:03:08.860 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>been through, where he is mentally right now, and how

0:03:11.980 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>he feels about things moving forward. So be sure to

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:19.260
<v Speaker 1>check out that story as well. But Parsons will not

0:03:19.300 --> 0:03:23.650
<v Speaker 1>be on the field in New England on Sunday. One

0:03:23.669 --> 0:03:26.700
<v Speaker 1>guy who might be, I guess, Chris Brooks also returned

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to practice. Running back, he's coming back from the ankle injury.

0:03:30.260 --> 0:03:33.380
<v Speaker 1>His window to be activated off of injured reserve is

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.410
<v Speaker 1>now open. I'm not sure what sort of a ramp-up

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.310
<v Speaker 1>period they're looking at for Brooks, and we'll see if

0:03:38.330 --> 0:03:41.690
<v Speaker 1>he does get activated, what that means for Josh Jacobs,

0:03:41.730 --> 0:03:44.970
<v Speaker 1>Marshawn Lloyd, Pierre Strong, and the reps in the backfield.

0:03:45.870 --> 0:03:51.140
<v Speaker 1>But this Patriots team, Wes, it's interesting. Their season has,

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways, paralleled the Green.

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Bay Packers season.

0:03:54.940 --> 0:03:58.260
<v Speaker 1>Both the Packers and the Patriots started out 1-2, all

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.060
<v Speaker 1>sorts of questions, everybody wondering what was going on with

0:04:01.100 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>these two teams that made the playoffs last year. The Patriots,

0:04:04.020 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, going all the way to the Super Bowl

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.860
<v Speaker 1>in the AFC. But since those 1-2 starts, both of

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.860
<v Speaker 1>these teams are 4-1. Both of them, the only loss

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.460
<v Speaker 1>in that time was actually to an NFC North opponent.

0:04:16.540 --> 0:04:19.580
<v Speaker 1>The Patriots lost to the Bears, the Packers lost to

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:26.229
<v Speaker 1>the lions. Um, and we're seeing much as we're seeing

0:04:26.410 --> 0:04:30.980
<v Speaker 1>in year two, three, three, four, five, six, four of

0:04:31.060 --> 0:04:35.300
<v Speaker 1>Jordan love as the Packers starting quarterback year three for

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:41.300
<v Speaker 1>Drake may, he's got a triple digit passer rating right now. Um, this, uh,

0:04:42.300 --> 0:04:44.659
<v Speaker 1>He's got some good players around him, obviously, but this

0:04:44.740 --> 0:04:47.849
<v Speaker 1>is definitely an offense that goes through the quarterback.

0:04:47.990 --> 0:04:50.190
<v Speaker 2>It is, and I think you saw it both when

0:04:50.230 --> 0:04:52.870
<v Speaker 2>they were going through their struggles earlier this season and

0:04:52.910 --> 0:04:54.750
<v Speaker 2>then when they've turned it around over the last four

0:04:54.770 --> 0:04:58.370
<v Speaker 2>or five games. There's a difference when Drake May is

0:04:58.430 --> 0:05:01.730
<v Speaker 2>moving the ball, when he's comfortable, and when he's producing. Honestly,

0:05:01.770 --> 0:05:03.830
<v Speaker 2>I think sometimes it just comes back to just remembering

0:05:03.890 --> 0:05:07.020
<v Speaker 2>who you are. these guys, man, you saw it with Jordan.

0:05:07.060 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, even though Jordan was a little bit farther

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 2>along in terms of the age and the time spent

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.339
<v Speaker 2>in the National Football League, just when you do something

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.010
<v Speaker 2>well right off the bat, you need to reinvent, you

0:05:17.050 --> 0:05:20.969
<v Speaker 2>need to reassess, you need to grow. And I think May,

0:05:21.190 --> 0:05:23.570
<v Speaker 2>so much success came to him right away in year

0:05:23.650 --> 0:05:26.830
<v Speaker 2>two that the first month of the season, those first

0:05:26.850 --> 0:05:28.770
<v Speaker 2>three games, a lot of people were wondering, okay, where

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 2>is he at? Was that in a illusion last year

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.510
<v Speaker 2>what the Patriots accomplished. They didn't really beat a lot

0:05:34.529 --> 0:05:36.910
<v Speaker 2>of winning teams. They got to the Super Bowl but

0:05:36.930 --> 0:05:40.430
<v Speaker 2>didn't do particularly well once they were there. But I

0:05:40.470 --> 0:05:42.310
<v Speaker 2>think what this has shown you is this is a

0:05:42.330 --> 0:05:45.130
<v Speaker 2>quarterback-driven league and there's only so many guys like Drake May.

0:05:45.150 --> 0:05:48.150
<v Speaker 2>There's only so many guys like Jordan Love available. And

0:05:48.690 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 2>where the Packers have struggled to get the run game

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 2>going and are still trying to figure out that piece

0:05:53.779 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 2>of the puzzle, I think you look at the Patriots

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 2>where they were trying to figure out the passing game

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 2>early on. And now it feels like they're starting to

0:06:00.300 --> 0:06:01.580
<v Speaker 2>build some momentum in that area.

0:06:01.700 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they went into the season kind of revamping

0:06:04.580 --> 0:06:07.940
<v Speaker 1>the receiver position as far as the weapons around Drake May.

0:06:08.260 --> 0:06:11.909
<v Speaker 1>But since then, A.J. Brown, Romeo Dobbs have both gone

0:06:11.950 --> 0:06:15.330
<v Speaker 1>down with injuries. So the receivers that May is working

0:06:15.370 --> 0:06:18.370
<v Speaker 1>with are not necessarily household names. Hunter Henry at tight

0:06:18.470 --> 0:06:21.530
<v Speaker 1>end is becoming a very reliable target for him. But

0:06:21.589 --> 0:06:24.510
<v Speaker 1>now he's cropped up on the injury report again. So

0:06:24.620 --> 0:06:27.300
<v Speaker 1>his status for Sunday will be up in the air.

0:06:28.420 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>The biggest difference when you look at the Packers and

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.330
<v Speaker 1>Patriots here, the biggest difference as far as how their

0:06:33.370 --> 0:06:38.630
<v Speaker 1>seasons have gone has been in the turnover category because

0:06:38.910 --> 0:06:43.270
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, Green Bay's defense already has more takeaways than

0:06:43.310 --> 0:06:46.340
<v Speaker 1>it had all of last season. And the Packers are

0:06:46.380 --> 0:06:49.900
<v Speaker 1>plus four right now as far as the turnover margin.

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>The Patriots are at minus seven. They are down amongst

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.450
<v Speaker 1>the bottom teams in the league in that category and

0:06:57.170 --> 0:06:59.350
<v Speaker 1>Which speaks to, I mean, to still be five and

0:06:59.410 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>three when you're minus seven in the turnover margin is

0:07:04.260 --> 0:07:06.980
<v Speaker 1>saying something about the type of roster and the type

0:07:07.020 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of team that you have. But Drake May, he's thrown

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.060
<v Speaker 1>eight interceptions. This team has lost five or sorry, lost

0:07:14.150 --> 0:07:17.650
<v Speaker 1>seven fumbles over the course of the first eight games

0:07:17.690 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Kind of seems that, you know, This

0:07:20.780 --> 0:07:23.180
<v Speaker 1>Packers defense that's done a really good job taking the

0:07:23.220 --> 0:07:25.130
<v Speaker 1>ball away, they need to do that once or twice

0:07:25.210 --> 0:07:25.690
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday.

0:07:25.810 --> 0:07:28.250
<v Speaker 2>They do, and they've got to get Drake May uncomfortable.

0:07:28.690 --> 0:07:31.390
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the fact that he has those eight interceptions. Well,

0:07:31.430 --> 0:07:33.650
<v Speaker 2>seven of them came in those first four games. He

0:07:33.690 --> 0:07:35.510
<v Speaker 2>only has one in the game that he did have

0:07:35.550 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>it in was against the Bears, and spoiler alert, they lost.

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 2>When he's clicking, when he's humming, and he's been able

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.220
<v Speaker 2>to find the Hunter Henrys of the world and he's

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.780
<v Speaker 2>able to get the running backs going in the passing game,

0:07:46.340 --> 0:07:48.500
<v Speaker 2>that's been their path to victory so far this season.

0:07:48.910 --> 0:07:51.590
<v Speaker 2>This is not a group of household names at receiver.

0:07:51.610 --> 0:07:53.930
<v Speaker 2>I think Matt Collins is maybe for a lot of

0:07:53.950 --> 0:07:56.110
<v Speaker 2>stuff that doesn't really have to do with what happens

0:07:56.190 --> 0:07:59.730
<v Speaker 2>on the field in terms of just his boisterousness and

0:07:59.870 --> 0:08:03.830
<v Speaker 2>kind of the entertainment factor of it. But the realistic

0:08:03.850 --> 0:08:05.910
<v Speaker 2>thing is they've found a way. I mean, when you

0:08:05.930 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 2>look at Douglas and some of the receivers that they have,

0:08:08.740 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 2>these are day three picks. These are guys that they've

0:08:10.860 --> 0:08:13.060
<v Speaker 2>been developing. These are guys that have sort of emerged

0:08:13.100 --> 0:08:16.060
<v Speaker 2>on the scene. But again, the fact that May is

0:08:16.140 --> 0:08:18.630
<v Speaker 2>making it work kind of like Jordan Love with this

0:08:18.670 --> 0:08:20.530
<v Speaker 2>Packers offense, even though I think the weapons are a

0:08:20.530 --> 0:08:22.570
<v Speaker 2>little bit more dangerous in terms of Green Bay's deep

0:08:22.610 --> 0:08:26.070
<v Speaker 2>passing game, it comes back to the quarterback. And when

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:27.810
<v Speaker 2>the chips are down and when you need to find

0:08:27.860 --> 0:08:31.060
<v Speaker 2>a victory, it's about relying on that guy under center

0:08:31.380 --> 0:08:33.180
<v Speaker 2>to lead you forward. And I think that's why when

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.059
<v Speaker 2>you look at all the statistics and all the superlatives

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>and go through NFL.com and some of the stat sheets

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 2>and the research notes that they have, these two guys

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.380
<v Speaker 2>are right up there at the top of the league

0:08:41.420 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 2>right now. And it's the reason why I think quietly

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 2>there's MVP campaigns being put together by both men because

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 2>of how their football team has had to rely on

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.740
<v Speaker 2>them to push forward. To bring back the other side

0:08:54.780 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 2>of that takeaway argument, defensively it's been a grind for

0:08:57.940 --> 0:09:00.260
<v Speaker 2>New England trying to generate those opportunities too. I want

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.090
<v Speaker 2>to say they're 30th or 31st in the league in

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.830
<v Speaker 2>takeaways so far this season. Packers need to be able

0:09:06.870 --> 0:09:09.090
<v Speaker 2>to pluck the ball away and also on Jordan Love's behalf,

0:09:09.330 --> 0:09:10.429
<v Speaker 2>protect it.

0:09:11.030 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>One thing that Drake May does have that the Packers

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:18.350
<v Speaker 1>have not developed yet is a reliable running game. Ramondre Stevenson,

0:09:19.290 --> 0:09:22.170
<v Speaker 1>not the flashiest running back in the world, but a

0:09:22.250 --> 0:09:25.130
<v Speaker 1>power back who is tough to bring down will grind

0:09:25.190 --> 0:09:28.930
<v Speaker 1>out the tough yards. And there's nothing flashy about this

0:09:29.030 --> 0:09:32.550
<v Speaker 1>new England running game, but lo and behold, you look

0:09:32.610 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>up and they're averaging like 120 rushing yards a game,

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.420
<v Speaker 1>which is exactly what a quarterback like Drake may needs to,

0:09:39.660 --> 0:09:42.970
<v Speaker 1>to keep defenses honest. And then, and then, May is

0:09:43.010 --> 0:09:44.900
<v Speaker 1>also a guy who will run around and scramble. I

0:09:44.929 --> 0:09:47.339
<v Speaker 1>think he's up over 200 rushing yards on the year.

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.260
<v Speaker 1>Now there are occasionally there's a designed run for him

0:09:50.260 --> 0:09:52.699
<v Speaker 1>or a zone read type of thing, but he's gotten

0:09:52.700 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those rushing yards off of off of scrambles, um,

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.710
<v Speaker 1>see in the field. And, and, uh, you know, if, uh,

0:09:59.860 --> 0:10:01.599
<v Speaker 1>if you're in man coverage and he gets out of

0:10:01.620 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the pocket and you're just trailing receivers and stuff, he's

0:10:04.260 --> 0:10:06.540
<v Speaker 1>going to take off and go move the chains and

0:10:06.580 --> 0:10:09.809
<v Speaker 1>get the first down there. So, um, there's a lot, um,

0:10:10.590 --> 0:10:13.370
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot to pay attention to. And when you

0:10:13.410 --> 0:10:18.390
<v Speaker 1>talk about not being flashy, I mean, that really kind

0:10:18.429 --> 0:10:21.740
<v Speaker 1>of I guess, encapsulates what this New England defense is

0:10:21.770 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>all about. This is an absolutely classic Mike Vrabel defense

0:10:25.140 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>where you look at it and you go, yes, you've

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>got Christian Gonzalez, who is that star cornerback and high

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.239
<v Speaker 1>paid guy and all that kind of stuff. But you're

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:39.689
<v Speaker 1>not looking at a defense that has a whole bunch

0:10:39.730 --> 0:10:43.690
<v Speaker 1>of big names and some lineup that supposedly scares you.

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but then try to find a weakness in a Mike

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.740
<v Speaker 1>Vrabel defense, right? I mean, they don't do anything necessarily

0:10:49.780 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>spectacularly well, and you said they're not taking the ball

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.740
<v Speaker 1>away a bunch or anything like that. They're doing okay

0:10:54.780 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>with their sack numbers, not great, but not bad. But

0:11:00.220 --> 0:11:02.860
<v Speaker 1>they're just a typical Mike Vrabel defense in that they

0:11:02.900 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>are solid. They are going to make you earn everything

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.020
<v Speaker 1>that you get. And I would say probably the strength

0:11:08.059 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of the defense, because of Gonzalez being on the one corner,

0:11:11.110 --> 0:11:13.790
<v Speaker 1>Carlton Davis at the other corner, is what they have

0:11:13.830 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on the outside, which allows them schematically to say, okay,

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:22.860
<v Speaker 1>we'll leave those guys one-on-one and we can concentrate players

0:11:22.900 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the field to try to take

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:24.940
<v Speaker 1>away those seams.

0:11:25.020 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, marrying that coverage and the pass rush is obviously

0:11:27.780 --> 0:11:30.450
<v Speaker 2>something we always hear. Going back to Jeff Halfley talked

0:11:30.500 --> 0:11:32.590
<v Speaker 2>about it, and certainly Jonathan Gannon has brought it up

0:11:32.630 --> 0:11:34.550
<v Speaker 2>a lot. I think it's one thing that Vrabel and

0:11:34.590 --> 0:11:37.829
<v Speaker 2>this defense do really well. They know where their bread

0:11:37.890 --> 0:11:40.309
<v Speaker 2>is buttered. They understand what they have on the perimeter

0:11:40.330 --> 0:11:42.939
<v Speaker 2>and they play to it. The one thing I will say, though,

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.220
<v Speaker 2>what I've really appreciated about New England here in this

0:11:45.300 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 2>post-Belichick era, and honestly, this probably goes back to Elliot Wolfe,

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:55.469
<v Speaker 2>former Packers royalty, personnel man, son of Ron Wolfe, but

0:11:55.530 --> 0:11:57.489
<v Speaker 2>has been kind of in charge of personnel there the

0:11:57.530 --> 0:12:00.210
<v Speaker 2>last few years in New England. They've found some diamonds

0:12:00.250 --> 0:12:03.270
<v Speaker 2>in the rough. Elijah Ponder's one of them. This dude

0:12:03.330 --> 0:12:05.929
<v Speaker 2>comes in as an undrafted rookie last year, hits the

0:12:05.970 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 2>ground running. Now he's their leading sacker. And he seems

0:12:08.940 --> 0:12:11.020
<v Speaker 2>like a sack specialist. I think he has seven quarterback

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.890
<v Speaker 2>hits this year and six of them are sacks. Christian

0:12:13.929 --> 0:12:17.170
<v Speaker 2>Barmore is honestly, he is one of my favorite players

0:12:17.210 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. Not nearly enough is said about him.

0:12:20.179 --> 0:12:23.599
<v Speaker 2>Not nearly enough ink is spilt on him. He reminds

0:12:23.660 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 2>me of kind of that Geno Adkins thing. Um, type

0:12:26.700 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 2>where it's just these, these steady, reliable defensive linemen that

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.870
<v Speaker 2>aren't going to draw headlines. But my goodness, when you're

0:12:33.890 --> 0:12:36.330
<v Speaker 2>talking about preparation for a football game, these are the

0:12:36.370 --> 0:12:38.030
<v Speaker 2>guys you're looking at. These are the guys you have

0:12:38.050 --> 0:12:40.709
<v Speaker 2>to contain. And then when you have someone like Gonzalez

0:12:40.770 --> 0:12:43.250
<v Speaker 2>on the perimeter, who is, and that now they've certainly

0:12:43.309 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 2>paid him. like a number one premier all-pro cornerback, there's

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 2>so many different ways they can beat you, right? Because

0:12:51.260 --> 0:12:52.890
<v Speaker 2>as much as they want to get the takeaways, it

0:12:53.010 --> 0:12:55.610
<v Speaker 2>isn't always predicated on that. Sometimes it is just about

0:12:55.630 --> 0:12:57.450
<v Speaker 2>the difficulty that it is trying to move the ball

0:12:57.490 --> 0:13:01.390
<v Speaker 2>against them. So seeing Green Bay's explosive passing game matching

0:13:01.470 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 2>up with the way that I imagine Frabel is going

0:13:04.059 --> 0:13:07.300
<v Speaker 2>to look to defend Green Bay, which is you wonder,

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 2>are they going to stack the box? Do you play

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.100
<v Speaker 2>to cover two? Do you challenge Josh Jacobs in this

0:13:13.179 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 2>rushing offense and this offensive line to be able to

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 2>move the football against the lighter box and play your

0:13:17.740 --> 0:13:20.090
<v Speaker 2>coverage concepts? All things that we're going to have to

0:13:20.110 --> 0:13:23.130
<v Speaker 2>see unfold at Foxborough on Sunday. But a lot of

0:13:23.150 --> 0:13:25.089
<v Speaker 2>different ways this can go. And then also throw in

0:13:25.110 --> 0:13:29.090
<v Speaker 2>the fact that this is Mike Vrabel, former Tennessee... Titans

0:13:29.130 --> 0:13:32.540
<v Speaker 2>head coach against Matt LaFleur, former Tennessee Titans offensive play

0:13:32.580 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 2>caller and coordinator.

0:13:33.500 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they worked together for the one year, yeah, that

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:37.420
<v Speaker 1>one year before LaFleur came to Green Bay.

0:13:37.620 --> 0:13:39.339
<v Speaker 2>And then if I can just quickly correct myself, because

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.940
<v Speaker 2>they did not rank 30th, 31st in takeaways, they have

0:13:42.020 --> 0:13:44.090
<v Speaker 2>eight on the season, they're right in that lower middle

0:13:44.110 --> 0:13:46.990
<v Speaker 2>of the pack, but I think that what you said

0:13:47.030 --> 0:13:51.350
<v Speaker 2>originally plays true, they are 30th, 31st in that turnover differential,

0:13:51.390 --> 0:13:53.190
<v Speaker 2>and it's because of how many times they turned the

0:13:53.550 --> 0:13:55.189
<v Speaker 2>ball over there in the first month of the season.

0:13:55.250 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, We've already touched on a couple things in

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of, uh, keys to victory here. Um, I do

0:14:01.540 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think the turnover part of it plays a big factor

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.020
<v Speaker 1>here just because of what Green Bay's defense has been

0:14:07.059 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>able to do so much better than the Packers defense

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.540
<v Speaker 1>did last year. And the fact that, you know, it's,

0:14:13.780 --> 0:14:16.069
<v Speaker 1>it's all right out there when, when the Patriots turn

0:14:16.090 --> 0:14:17.750
<v Speaker 1>the ball over, they have a hard time winning when

0:14:17.770 --> 0:14:19.730
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots are able to protect the ball, they're very

0:14:19.770 --> 0:14:23.380
<v Speaker 1>difficult to beat. So, um, So I think that rises

0:14:23.420 --> 0:14:25.980
<v Speaker 1>to the top of the list for me. Anything else

0:14:26.330 --> 0:14:28.390
<v Speaker 1>for you as far as a key to victory for

0:14:28.410 --> 0:14:29.210
<v Speaker 1>the Packers here?

0:14:29.350 --> 0:14:32.850
<v Speaker 2>There is a lot more notoriety with this New England

0:14:32.890 --> 0:14:37.170
<v Speaker 2>Patriots secondary, specifically those cornerbacks, than what Green Bay has.

0:14:37.250 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 2>But I talked about this in Insider Inbox, and I

0:14:40.380 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 2>think it's something that needs to probably be discussed more.

0:14:43.500 --> 0:14:46.620
<v Speaker 2>Is there a position on this roster right now that

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.570
<v Speaker 2>came under as much scrutiny, as much criticism? in as

0:14:50.610 --> 0:14:55.550
<v Speaker 2>many lingering questions as the cornerback room that for the

0:14:55.610 --> 0:14:58.150
<v Speaker 2>first two months of the season has not really been

0:14:58.170 --> 0:15:02.260
<v Speaker 2>a question. I mean, the fact that Green Bay, you know,

0:15:02.300 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 2>you look at how people approach this thing going into

0:15:04.660 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the season and all this stuff. I think Keyshawn Nixon

0:15:07.140 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 2>is playing some really good football right now. He's physical,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.300
<v Speaker 2>he's fast. It just seems like his ideology for how

0:15:13.340 --> 0:15:15.450
<v Speaker 2>he wants to play the game lines up perfectly with

0:15:15.490 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Gannon. And Brandon Cisse, man, This guy's 21 years old.

0:15:21.500 --> 0:15:24.690
<v Speaker 2>And I think about the job that he did, you know,

0:15:24.710 --> 0:15:27.170
<v Speaker 2>whether it was Coker, whether it was McMillan, I mean,

0:15:27.550 --> 0:15:31.690
<v Speaker 2>those weapons for the most part were neutralized against the Panthers. And,

0:15:31.710 --> 0:15:33.830
<v Speaker 2>you know, I was saying this to a couple of people,

0:15:34.830 --> 0:15:38.070
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't have known that Carolina was as explosive as

0:15:38.130 --> 0:15:41.630
<v Speaker 2>it was. going into that game by how Green Bay

0:15:41.650 --> 0:15:44.450
<v Speaker 2>was able to defend it. So having the safety room

0:15:44.750 --> 0:15:47.070
<v Speaker 2>in these cornerbacks that Green Bay has, and luckily, knock

0:15:47.110 --> 0:15:49.070
<v Speaker 2>on wood, they've been healthy at all those positions for

0:15:49.090 --> 0:15:52.750
<v Speaker 2>the most part, that is the difference here. So yeah,

0:15:52.790 --> 0:15:54.250
<v Speaker 2>I think the Packers are going to do what they do.

0:15:54.270 --> 0:15:55.930
<v Speaker 2>They're going to try to generate pressure. They're going to

0:15:55.990 --> 0:15:58.490
<v Speaker 2>try to confuse Drake May. But when the ball is

0:15:58.530 --> 0:15:59.730
<v Speaker 2>in the air, the Packers are going to have to

0:15:59.770 --> 0:16:01.470
<v Speaker 2>make a play. So when you ask me how the

0:16:01.510 --> 0:16:03.430
<v Speaker 2>Packers win this game, I think it is making the

0:16:03.470 --> 0:16:05.350
<v Speaker 2>bigger play on defense. I think it is getting a

0:16:05.390 --> 0:16:08.820
<v Speaker 2>takeaway or two. And it's allowing Jordan Love and that

0:16:08.940 --> 0:16:11.300
<v Speaker 2>offense to get comfortable in a tough road environment.

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.300
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think I like what you said about

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:17.370
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay's secondary, particularly the cornerback position, because really, I

0:16:18.590 --> 0:16:20.570
<v Speaker 1>would say for the first time this year, what we

0:16:20.650 --> 0:16:23.790
<v Speaker 1>saw in the Carolina game last Thursday night was a

0:16:24.670 --> 0:16:28.970
<v Speaker 1>Carolina offense that was frustrated that one of its best weapons,

0:16:29.070 --> 0:16:33.020
<v Speaker 1>Tet McMillan, couldn't get the ball. So... they began to

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:37.460
<v Speaker 1>essentially force-feed him with wide receiver screens, with the RPO slants.

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It was like, this is how we're going to get

0:16:38.900 --> 0:16:42.850
<v Speaker 1>the ball. We are going to force-feed one of our playmakers.

0:16:43.620 --> 0:16:46.810
<v Speaker 1>And defensively, I mean, yeah, okay, so if that's how

0:16:46.850 --> 0:16:48.690
<v Speaker 1>they're going to get the ball to their guy, there's

0:16:48.750 --> 0:16:51.290
<v Speaker 1>not a whole lot you can do about that. But defensively,

0:16:51.330 --> 0:16:53.370
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly where you want to have the other team.

0:16:53.390 --> 0:16:55.210
<v Speaker 1>You want to have them trying to force it to

0:16:55.250 --> 0:16:58.609
<v Speaker 1>a certain guy because just within the natural flow of

0:16:58.650 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>their offense— it wasn't going to one of their playmakers

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.699
<v Speaker 1>and the Packers were able to take that away. If

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay can do that, and I don't know in

0:17:07.109 --> 0:17:09.830
<v Speaker 1>this type of matchup, you know, okay, does the focus

0:17:09.869 --> 0:17:12.550
<v Speaker 1>become Hunter Henry or one of these other guys that's

0:17:12.590 --> 0:17:16.290
<v Speaker 1>filling in for A.J. Brown or Romeo Dobbs? I'm not

0:17:16.369 --> 0:17:19.700
<v Speaker 1>sure necessarily how the Packers will go about that. But,

0:17:20.180 --> 0:17:25.310
<v Speaker 1>you know, you mentioned the the amount of off-season scrutiny

0:17:25.369 --> 0:17:27.630
<v Speaker 1>there was at the cornerback position and what is Green

0:17:27.650 --> 0:17:29.629
<v Speaker 1>Bay going to do, et cetera, et cetera. And it's

0:17:29.690 --> 0:17:31.710
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that now, now that we look

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.479
<v Speaker 1>back on it, it's like, okay, Green Bay didn't have

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.940
<v Speaker 1>a first round draft pick, but if it did have

0:17:36.980 --> 0:17:38.939
<v Speaker 1>a first round draft pick, and if the Packers had

0:17:38.980 --> 0:17:42.260
<v Speaker 1>drafted Brandon Cisse in the first round, everybody would have

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>been like, okay, everything's fine at cornerback. They got a

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>first round pick. Well, they basically did get a first

0:17:47.740 --> 0:17:49.780
<v Speaker 1>round pick because he's come in and played like one.

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.710
<v Speaker 1>It just so happened that Fortunately for the Packers, he

0:17:52.730 --> 0:17:54.369
<v Speaker 1>was there in the middle of the second round. They

0:17:54.390 --> 0:17:58.649
<v Speaker 1>were able to grab him and, and he, his insertion

0:17:58.690 --> 0:18:01.929
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup. And as you said, the ongoing health of,

0:18:02.230 --> 0:18:06.620
<v Speaker 1>of really the entire group it's it's elevated everything that's

0:18:06.630 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>going on combined with that trio of safeties with Gannon scheme,

0:18:10.980 --> 0:18:14.340
<v Speaker 1>everybody fitting into it, you know just right. And yeah,

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of, we sort of feel silly now for

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>all the talk about the cornerback position, but of course,

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Nobody knew that Brandon Cisse as a 21-year-old rookie would

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:23.740
<v Speaker 1>come in and do this.

0:18:23.859 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 2>And it was fine to have those questions. There should

0:18:25.660 --> 0:18:27.950
<v Speaker 2>be questions. That was a big changeup the Packers made

0:18:27.990 --> 0:18:30.530
<v Speaker 2>at cornerback. Nate Hobbs came in, didn't work out. They

0:18:30.609 --> 0:18:32.950
<v Speaker 2>cut him after once a year on a four-year contract.

0:18:32.970 --> 0:18:35.389
<v Speaker 2>They moved forward. But the problem for me where I

0:18:35.430 --> 0:18:37.290
<v Speaker 2>got a little bit punchy about this is there was

0:18:37.390 --> 0:18:39.850
<v Speaker 2>so much criticism. It's fine to have questions. It's fine

0:18:39.869 --> 0:18:41.740
<v Speaker 2>for people to wonder, okay, I feel a little bit

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 2>nervous about this. I'm not sure how this is going

0:18:43.340 --> 0:18:45.870
<v Speaker 2>to work out. It's just it's that type of thing

0:18:45.910 --> 0:18:48.930
<v Speaker 2>where it's these guys are here for a reason. Keyshawn

0:18:48.990 --> 0:18:51.090
<v Speaker 2>Nixon is in that secondary for a reason. And I

0:18:51.130 --> 0:18:52.670
<v Speaker 2>think one of the things I've kind of take personal

0:18:53.369 --> 0:18:55.460
<v Speaker 2>is the fact that and I wrote this earlier this week.

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Keyshawn Nixon should be one of the best free agent

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 2>stories in the 21st century, whether it was Ted Thompson,

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Brian Goodkins. This guy came here. after not getting tendered

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.690
<v Speaker 2>a restricted contract from the Vegas, uh, Raiders, it wasn't

0:19:09.710 --> 0:19:11.090
<v Speaker 2>a question of whether or not he was an unrestricted,

0:19:11.430 --> 0:19:13.710
<v Speaker 2>the Packers had to give up nothing for him. And

0:19:13.750 --> 0:19:15.810
<v Speaker 2>he has literally climbed his way up that depth chart

0:19:15.830 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 2>the last five years and has put in some really

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.860
<v Speaker 2>good work for them. Does not miss football games, does

0:19:19.900 --> 0:19:23.260
<v Speaker 2>not miss snaps, plays physical, plays hard, has the right mentality.

0:19:23.300 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 2>The questions came up in training camp. He answered every

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.810
<v Speaker 2>single one of them. I just think something needs to

0:19:27.850 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>be said for that. Um, But again, this is about

0:19:30.340 --> 0:19:32.340
<v Speaker 2>the Packers. This is about being at five and three.

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:33.659
<v Speaker 2>And on Sunday, they got to find a way to

0:19:33.700 --> 0:19:34.659
<v Speaker 2>get to that six victory.

0:19:34.940 --> 0:19:38.550
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely. Well, we do need to pay a few bills.

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.550
<v Speaker 1>So let's hear a quick word from our sponsors. Sirius

0:19:42.690 --> 0:19:47.270
<v Speaker 1>XM NFL Radio delivers hard-hitting analysis and up-to-the-minute NFL news

0:19:47.310 --> 0:19:53.430
<v Speaker 1>that true football fanatics need 24-7. 365. Hey Packers fans,

0:19:53.710 --> 0:19:56.950
<v Speaker 1>looking to score a few more Wisconsin memories? From Devil's

0:19:56.990 --> 0:20:00.340
<v Speaker 1>Lake State Park to the Milwaukee Art Museum, discover all

0:20:00.380 --> 0:20:05.660
<v Speaker 1>the wonders of Wisconsin at TravelWisconsin.com slash wonders. Welcome back

0:20:05.700 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to Packers Unscripted. One other key to victory I want

0:20:09.100 --> 0:20:12.020
<v Speaker 1>to mention before we move on to kind of what's

0:20:12.060 --> 0:20:15.389
<v Speaker 1>going on elsewhere in the NFC North. This is one

0:20:15.410 --> 0:20:18.150
<v Speaker 1>of those games, and the Packers haven't had a game

0:20:18.790 --> 0:20:20.930
<v Speaker 1>in a while here where we've been talking about this,

0:20:20.990 --> 0:20:24.050
<v Speaker 1>but I think this is one where we've seen what

0:20:24.090 --> 0:20:26.570
<v Speaker 1>the Packers' pass rush can do. We're talking about what

0:20:26.630 --> 0:20:30.379
<v Speaker 1>the Packers are doing coverage-wise and everything like that. Drake

0:20:30.420 --> 0:20:32.290
<v Speaker 1>May is a guy who can blow all that up.

0:20:32.330 --> 0:20:33.930
<v Speaker 1>If you let him get out of the pocket, you

0:20:33.970 --> 0:20:36.090
<v Speaker 1>have to contain him in the pocket. And that's, and

0:20:36.130 --> 0:20:38.210
<v Speaker 1>that's not to say that he can't beat you from there,

0:20:39.010 --> 0:20:41.390
<v Speaker 1>but that's where the Packers have to make him try

0:20:41.430 --> 0:20:44.090
<v Speaker 1>to beat them. Because if May gets out of the

0:20:44.130 --> 0:20:46.430
<v Speaker 1>pocket and, you know, and then he's able to scan

0:20:46.470 --> 0:20:48.750
<v Speaker 1>the whole field and make an explosive play or take

0:20:48.820 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>off and run and move the chains with his legs,

0:20:51.260 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of those backbreaking, like third and seven,

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>10 yard scrambles or whatever, where you think you're off

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>the field because everything looks like it's all there, and

0:20:59.180 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>then boom, he scrambles and gets the first down. Those

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.980
<v Speaker 1>are the kinds of plays that the Packers defensively just

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>can't let happen. And I think if they keep Drake

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.810
<v Speaker 1>May in the pocket, I think the Packers' offense on

0:21:12.850 --> 0:21:14.370
<v Speaker 1>the other side is going to be able to score

0:21:14.410 --> 0:21:15.510
<v Speaker 1>enough points to win this game.

0:21:15.590 --> 0:21:17.710
<v Speaker 2>I agree, Mike. And for the Packers, you look at

0:21:17.750 --> 0:21:22.030
<v Speaker 2>this season, speaking starting with the Patriots, there's a reason

0:21:22.070 --> 0:21:24.150
<v Speaker 2>why they're almost at 1,000 rushing yards on the year,

0:21:24.190 --> 0:21:26.470
<v Speaker 2>and it's not because they've had this super potent running game.

0:21:26.490 --> 0:21:28.980
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Henderson's had a rough year. There's been some

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 2>production questions there. I think he has an illness right now,

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.540
<v Speaker 2>but even before that, you know, he wasn't really clicking

0:21:34.900 --> 0:21:37.370
<v Speaker 2>the way they wanted him to be clicking. Stevenson has

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.690
<v Speaker 2>been solid, but just, you know, hasn't been that home

0:21:39.750 --> 0:21:42.790
<v Speaker 2>run threat. It has been the Drake May element that

0:21:42.810 --> 0:21:45.629
<v Speaker 2>has added to that run game and on pace for

0:21:45.670 --> 0:21:47.689
<v Speaker 2>over 500 rushing yards this year. So you certainly have

0:21:47.710 --> 0:21:50.990
<v Speaker 2>to consider that. For Green Bay, you know, I look

0:21:51.109 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 2>at Being able to contain Stevenson is probably the biggest,

0:21:54.660 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 2>and they have Kiner there now too, but that's going

0:21:57.340 --> 0:22:00.980
<v Speaker 2>to be where everything starts. Not only as the passing attack,

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 2>but that's what allows you then to key in a

0:22:02.580 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 2>little bit more on May, the scrambler. You want to

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 2>put this thing in his hands, but maybe not too

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 2>much is probably the way I want to say that.

0:22:11.070 --> 0:22:13.010
<v Speaker 2>But trying to make them one-dimensional is going to be key.

0:22:13.050 --> 0:22:14.649
<v Speaker 2>It was what they struggled with the first month of

0:22:14.690 --> 0:22:16.930
<v Speaker 2>the season. They couldn't get the run game going. May

0:22:16.950 --> 0:22:18.330
<v Speaker 2>had too much on his shoulders and he kind of

0:22:18.350 --> 0:22:21.980
<v Speaker 2>fell apart. That's going to be critical. And then conversely

0:22:22.020 --> 0:22:25.060
<v Speaker 2>for Green Bay, we know the numbers. We know the stats.

0:22:25.060 --> 0:22:26.940
<v Speaker 2>60 rushing yards per game right now as a team.

0:22:28.010 --> 0:22:30.990
<v Speaker 2>One of the worst starts for any ground attack going

0:22:31.030 --> 0:22:34.010
<v Speaker 2>back in the Super Bowl era. The Packers have to

0:22:34.090 --> 0:22:35.770
<v Speaker 2>find some wiggle room here, and it's not going to

0:22:35.810 --> 0:22:39.250
<v Speaker 2>be easy. Carolina was the last ranked running defense. This

0:22:39.310 --> 0:22:41.300
<v Speaker 2>is one of the top 10 ranked running defenses. They

0:22:41.340 --> 0:22:44.260
<v Speaker 2>are disciplined. They are fundamental. What Green Bay is going

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.220
<v Speaker 2>to be hanging its hat on here is, okay, a

0:22:46.300 --> 0:22:49.660
<v Speaker 2>little bit of reprieve with the offensive line. Maybe we'll

0:22:49.700 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 2>see the same starting five again. Maybe they're going to

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 2>see things sort of settle in now that Aaron Banks

0:22:53.460 --> 0:22:56.070
<v Speaker 2>is back in the lineup. And then also Josh Jacobs

0:22:56.109 --> 0:22:58.689
<v Speaker 2>now having two games underneath him. You asked the question

0:22:58.710 --> 0:23:01.990
<v Speaker 2>this week, I mean, did Jacobs look better in game

0:23:02.130 --> 0:23:03.850
<v Speaker 2>one or game two than game one? And I think

0:23:03.869 --> 0:23:05.930
<v Speaker 2>there were some things, especially in short yardage, where I

0:23:05.990 --> 0:23:09.030
<v Speaker 2>saw some life. But can you get the explosive plays

0:23:09.070 --> 0:23:11.090
<v Speaker 2>out of that? And I'm not talking about 60-yard rushing touchdowns.

0:23:11.109 --> 0:23:13.090
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about a 12-yard carry now and then. Yeah.

0:23:13.470 --> 0:23:15.629
<v Speaker 2>Can you find that and be able to keep New

0:23:15.670 --> 0:23:18.450
<v Speaker 2>England honest? Because otherwise, Frabel's going to go to work.

0:23:18.590 --> 0:23:20.869
<v Speaker 1>And then can you get that 8 or 10 or

0:23:20.890 --> 0:23:24.260
<v Speaker 1>12-yard run and then build off it, do something to

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.940
<v Speaker 1>build off it from there? Well, as we talked about

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.380
<v Speaker 1>on our last show, this NFC North is a gauntlet.

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.300
<v Speaker 1>And looking around the division, this is how it lines

0:23:33.420 --> 0:23:36.340
<v Speaker 1>up this week. Detroit is on the road at Miami.

0:23:36.380 --> 0:23:39.189
<v Speaker 1>It'd be tremendous if old friend Jeff Halfley could do

0:23:39.210 --> 0:23:42.850
<v Speaker 1>the Packers thing. favor there, but that'll definitely be a

0:23:42.869 --> 0:23:45.490
<v Speaker 1>tough one for the Dolphins the way the Lions have

0:23:45.510 --> 0:23:49.350
<v Speaker 1>been playing. Tampa Bay is at Chicago on Sunday night football,

0:23:49.410 --> 0:23:51.650
<v Speaker 1>so the Bears and all the talk about them coming

0:23:51.710 --> 0:23:54.050
<v Speaker 1>off of the big Monday night road win at Seattle.

0:23:54.570 --> 0:23:58.629
<v Speaker 1>They're in a national primetime game once again. And then

0:23:58.670 --> 0:24:01.429
<v Speaker 1>the Monday night game this week is Buffalo at Minnesota.

0:24:02.380 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of eyeballs will be on that one for sure. And,

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:09.350
<v Speaker 1>you know, what is exactly going on at quarterback with Minnesota?

0:24:09.410 --> 0:24:11.429
<v Speaker 1>Is Kyler Murray going to play? Is he hurt? Are

0:24:11.450 --> 0:24:14.790
<v Speaker 1>they going to just make the move to Carson Wentz? Regardless,

0:24:16.030 --> 0:24:21.050
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. The interesting thing is that, okay, we don't

0:24:21.090 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>know how these games are going to turn out, but

0:24:23.060 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>if the Lions and the Bears both win and the

0:24:25.700 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Vikings lose, all three of those teams would have two

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:33.380
<v Speaker 1>losses on the season. And if the Packers beat the Patriots,

0:24:33.980 --> 0:24:36.570
<v Speaker 1>the Packers would be 6-3 and still sitting in last

0:24:36.650 --> 0:24:40.630
<v Speaker 1>place in the North at 6-3. Now, I'd take that.

0:24:40.790 --> 0:24:43.210
<v Speaker 1>If the Packers get to 6-3, wherever they're sitting in

0:24:43.230 --> 0:24:46.100
<v Speaker 1>the NFC North, 6-3 with a home game coming up

0:24:46.190 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>against Minnesota next week, that's a good spot to be in.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.060
<v Speaker 1>So that's all the Packers can control. That's all you

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>can worry about. But this could be a very, very

0:24:55.580 --> 0:25:00.510
<v Speaker 1>interesting week with these two primetime games. the Buccaneers at

0:25:00.550 --> 0:25:03.870
<v Speaker 1>Chicago and Buffalo at Minnesota, as far as the division goes.

0:25:04.010 --> 0:25:06.030
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's so many things in play here because as

0:25:06.090 --> 0:25:08.169
<v Speaker 2>much as you and I have spent time talking about

0:25:08.210 --> 0:25:10.670
<v Speaker 2>the NFC North picture and how wins, you know, don't

0:25:10.710 --> 0:25:12.629
<v Speaker 2>necessarily get you out of the cellar of the division

0:25:12.670 --> 0:25:15.550
<v Speaker 2>right now or in the North, the NFC is in

0:25:15.609 --> 0:25:18.970
<v Speaker 2>general is starting to lose pace with the NFC North.

0:25:19.060 --> 0:25:21.990
<v Speaker 2>When you look at the problems and the tribulations here

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 2>that the Rams and Seahawks have been working through early

0:25:24.340 --> 0:25:29.990
<v Speaker 2>in the season, Based on injuries alone, it would appear that, again,

0:25:30.030 --> 0:25:31.250
<v Speaker 2>we have a half a season to play at, but

0:25:31.310 --> 0:25:33.550
<v Speaker 2>it would appear like the NFC East, the NFC South

0:25:33.570 --> 0:25:36.130
<v Speaker 2>will again be one bid divisions.

0:25:36.330 --> 0:25:38.169
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the division champ is going to get in and

0:25:38.210 --> 0:25:40.330
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be awfully hard for anybody else in

0:25:40.369 --> 0:25:42.570
<v Speaker 1>those two divisions to be competing for a wild card.

0:25:42.609 --> 0:25:45.570
<v Speaker 2>And that's why, yeah, as much as the Packers can't,

0:25:45.910 --> 0:25:48.429
<v Speaker 2>the Packers can only worry about the NFC North when

0:25:48.470 --> 0:25:49.620
<v Speaker 2>they play the NFC North.

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Because what was the difference? You go back two years

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:54.700
<v Speaker 2>ago for the Green Bay making the playoffs as an

0:25:54.700 --> 0:25:58.490
<v Speaker 2>11 team win. 11-win team. It was the fact that

0:25:58.510 --> 0:26:00.510
<v Speaker 2>they swept the AFC South that year. It was the

0:26:00.530 --> 0:26:02.830
<v Speaker 2>fact that they took care of business outside of the division.

0:26:03.530 --> 0:26:05.170
<v Speaker 2>The Packers are going to have to do that again here.

0:26:05.190 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 2>It continues against the Patriots because I don't know about you,

0:26:08.580 --> 0:26:10.980
<v Speaker 2>I'm not counting on the Miami Dolphins to come through

0:26:11.020 --> 0:26:13.500
<v Speaker 2>there against Detroit, even though that's a home game. I

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 2>think the Buffalo game is very interesting because if I was,

0:26:17.180 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>assuming everything is on the up and up with Murray

0:26:19.260 --> 0:26:21.180
<v Speaker 2>and there's no hamstring or whatever else they were talking

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 2>about with him, I think this is the litmus test.

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 2>The litmus test. I think this is the, the high

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.420
<v Speaker 2>watermark game to be like, okay, can you beat a

0:26:28.460 --> 0:26:31.590
<v Speaker 2>team like Buffalo? Can you lead us? Because it's great.

0:26:31.690 --> 0:26:33.850
<v Speaker 2>If you win games, it's great. If you make the playoffs, but,

0:26:34.030 --> 0:26:36.350
<v Speaker 2>but Kevin O'Connell has been in this position where you

0:26:36.369 --> 0:26:38.070
<v Speaker 2>have a 13 win team or whatever it was. And

0:26:38.090 --> 0:26:39.409
<v Speaker 2>then you get to the playoffs and they just kind

0:26:39.430 --> 0:26:40.869
<v Speaker 2>of feel like a lame duck right away.

0:26:40.890 --> 0:26:41.110
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:41.590 --> 0:26:43.689
<v Speaker 2>They got to find a way to be better than

0:26:43.710 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 2>they were the week before and the week before that. Um,

0:26:47.270 --> 0:26:49.409
<v Speaker 2>And as I talked about on Tuesday's show, there's a

0:26:49.430 --> 0:26:51.010
<v Speaker 2>part of me that just wonders. I'm not saying he's

0:26:51.050 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 2>any better as a quarterback, but I just wonder if

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Carson Wentz fits the vision of what the Kevin O'Connell

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 2>offense is going to be better than Kyler Murray.

0:26:58.140 --> 0:27:00.700
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and when you talk about trying to feed your

0:27:00.740 --> 0:27:04.369
<v Speaker 1>best weapon, I mean, every week there's a story out

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.929
<v Speaker 1>of Minnesota. Well, how does Justin Jefferson feel about how

0:27:06.990 --> 0:27:09.090
<v Speaker 1>things are going and his statistics and all that? And

0:27:09.150 --> 0:27:12.669
<v Speaker 1>it's a weekly story. It's an ongoing story because you

0:27:12.690 --> 0:27:15.230
<v Speaker 1>have one of the best playmakers in all of the

0:27:15.300 --> 0:27:18.770
<v Speaker 1>NFL in and he's not getting the football enough. So

0:27:18.830 --> 0:27:22.030
<v Speaker 1>how are Kevin O'Connell and the Vikings going to go

0:27:22.070 --> 0:27:25.510
<v Speaker 1>about getting Justin Jefferson the football? And that's what everybody's

0:27:25.570 --> 0:27:27.470
<v Speaker 1>waiting to see through the second half of the season.

0:27:27.510 --> 0:27:29.860
<v Speaker 2>And some of these targets, man, that Jefferson has made

0:27:29.940 --> 0:27:32.500
<v Speaker 2>plays off of, it's just remarkable. I mean, that touchdown

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 2>last week is as beautiful as you're going to see.

0:27:34.660 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 2>That was not a gimme play at all. I mean,

0:27:36.540 --> 0:27:40.510
<v Speaker 2>that is Justin Jefferson, all pro, potential Hall of Fame

0:27:40.570 --> 0:27:44.570
<v Speaker 2>talent just making a play for his football team. So yeah,

0:27:44.890 --> 0:27:48.010
<v Speaker 2>it's just, it's interesting because as I talked about on Tuesday,

0:27:48.130 --> 0:27:50.129
<v Speaker 2>all four of these teams in this division have questions

0:27:50.170 --> 0:27:52.250
<v Speaker 2>to answer and some bigger than others. Yeah.

0:27:52.270 --> 0:27:55.150
<v Speaker 1>And I think with the Vikings coming to Lambeau Field

0:27:55.210 --> 0:27:58.630
<v Speaker 1>next week, obviously all focus right now is on the Patriots,

0:27:58.670 --> 0:28:00.790
<v Speaker 1>but with the Vikings coming in next week and coming

0:28:00.869 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>off of this game against Buffalo, If the Vikings win it,

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:05.980
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be like, oh, the Vikings are for real.

0:28:06.020 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Here they come. And if the Vikings lose to the

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Bills and it's two straight losses and they're six and

0:28:10.500 --> 0:28:13.230
<v Speaker 1>two and the questions remain at quarterback, it's going to be, oh,

0:28:13.260 --> 0:28:15.660
<v Speaker 1>are the Vikings just a big fraud? I mean, it's going,

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.020
<v Speaker 1>you know, the narrative is going to be either at

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.669
<v Speaker 1>one extreme or the other as they come into Lambeau

0:28:20.710 --> 0:28:23.150
<v Speaker 1>Field next week. And we'll just have to see what

0:28:23.190 --> 0:28:23.530
<v Speaker 1>it is.

0:28:23.550 --> 0:28:25.449
<v Speaker 2>Sean Hockley is not going to be able to save you.

0:28:27.430 --> 0:28:30.369
<v Speaker 1>With that. We'll call it a wrap on this edition

0:28:30.410 --> 0:28:32.730
<v Speaker 1>of Packers Unscripted. Be sure to follow all of our

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.420
<v Speaker 1>coverage of the team on Packers.com. For Wes, I'm Mike.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.060
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for tuning in, everybody. We will see you

0:28:39.100 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>next time.