WEBVTT - Ray Dalio

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>More than fifty years ago, a young Harvard physical graduate,

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Ray Dalio started a hedge fund, Bridgewater. That fund became

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the largest hedge fund in the world and one of

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the most successful in the world. Over this period of time,

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>he's writing a number of books, and his most recent

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>book talks about his concern about debt in the United

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>States and around the world. I had a chance to

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>sit down with the Ray Dalio to talk about his

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>views about investing in recent months. One of the most

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>common things talked about is something called tariffs. What is

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>your view on tariffs? Is it good? Economically bad? Economic?

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Is going to solve our budget problem because I think

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>in the big Beautiful Bill, a lot of money that's

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>coming in comes in from tariffs, and that helps reduce

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the deficit a bit. TFS.

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Tariffs are not bad.

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Throughout history, tariffs were the main source of government revenue

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 3>and so on, And any form of taxes has its cost,

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 3>so capital gains taxes are bad, and so on. Different

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 3>things have their I think the question is how well executed,

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 3>how big are they, how disruptive of they in terms

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 3>of the process they can bring a significant There's something

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 3>to be said for them in that they bring in

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 3>a significant amount of revenue. That means that there's less

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 3>that's needed elsewhere. And we're now in a different world.

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>We're in a world where the world is almost at

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 3>war self sufficiency. We have to build self sufficiency. We

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 3>cannot continue to borrow or depend on imports for that.

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 3>And so there's a manufacturing how do you create manufacturing

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.279
<v Speaker 3>in the United States and so on. There's some merit

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 3>to all of those arguments. The question is whether that

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 3>is done really well and so on for the whole world. Tariffs,

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 3>of course, are not the ideal you would like to have.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 3>If you're deally what's best for the whole world. You

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 3>would like to have the least efficient inefficiency. You'd say

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 3>wherever they produce it the best, and we have it

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 3>go around. But we're in a world now that we

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 3>have to be realistic in terms of we cannot be

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 3>dependent on importing a lot of things, and nor can

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 3>the world be dependent on the value of the bonds

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.679
<v Speaker 3>and the debt that we're acquiring in order to pay

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 3>for those things.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, the big beautiful bill that's now being talked about,

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>will that solve our problem or mitigated or what it? Will?

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>It do.

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not going to solve our problem.

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So if that's not going to solve our problem,

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>how are we going to solve this problem.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 3>We're going to do it the way that we always

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 3>do it, and it's always done when countries essentially go broke,

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 3>what they do is they, through a combination of devaluing

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 3>the currency, printing of money there's an imbalance, print money

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 3>to value the currency, and create an artificially low interest

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 3>rate so that the person who's holding the bonds is

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 3>receiving of artificially low in interest rate. That's the way

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Japan has done it with their local and that's the

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 3>way we will do it.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So, in other words, my grandchildren and great grandchildren not

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>yet born are going to be paying off this debt

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in devalue dollars. More like going to happen faster than that.

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Faster than that, Oh okay, I.

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Think they'll probably be beyond that.

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>What about cutting interest rates? Why doesn't the chairman of

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fed say, well, cutting interest rates will save us money.

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>We're spending at trillion dollars now on interest for our

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>own debt. Why don't we just lower the interest rate?

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we just do that?

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 3>There is the real interest rate and one man's debts

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 3>or another man's assets. And so if I lower the

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 3>interest rate, I will reduce my desire to hold that bond.

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 3>And in my opinion, when if you do that too much,

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:55.119
<v Speaker 3>you will lose the demand for those bonds you Unlike

0:03:56.000 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 3>if you do create something closer to the four per

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 3>cut in the expenditures, four percent increase in the tax revenue,

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 3>improve the balance, then you'll have a benefit. If you

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 3>try to force interest rates down, you were hurting those

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 3>who were holding the bonds, and you will lose the

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 3>demand for the bonds and you can create that spiral.

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>Before we finish this discussion, I want you to just

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>inter erupt it of for a moment and say, look,

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you've scared me a bit, but I need to make money.

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm an investor. What should I do to take advantage

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>of what you just described and scared me. Should I

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>go buy gold? Should I go buy dollars? Buy euros?

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>What should I do?

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Look at the value of your portfolio in inflation adjusted terms,

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 3>not in nominal terms. Okay, And the safest investment that

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 3>you can get right now is an inflation index bond.

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Because what you'll get is it'll be indexed and you'll

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 3>get a bit over two percent real return above inflation

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 3>and whatever happen. So you start with what is a

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 3>safe investment. The next thing I think you have to

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 3>do is diversify your portfolio. We've talked about the powers

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 3>of diversification. So I don't want to get anybody into

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 3>one bet because I'm going to be wrong. But do

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 3>consider that gold is a form of money and gold

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 3>is that central banks are acquiring gold now as a diversifier,

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 3>and so in your it also is negatively correlated with

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 3>most of the things that you have. In a time

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 3>of great stress, what you'll find is that the gold

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 3>will do well and when the assets don't. The world

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 3>used to have gold as money. That was the way,

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 3>and so the world would look at things differently. They

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 3>would look at the prices of things in gold terms. Now,

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 3>because we have fiat money and we've become used to it,

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 3>we look at the prices of things in money terms,

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>and we look at gold that way. I think if

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 3>you started to say it's money, it's a source of money,

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 3>and you have that that's part of the diversify. So

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 3>it would diversify your portfolio. It's a prudent thing to

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 3>have somewhere between ten or fifteen percent of your portfolio

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 3>and gold.

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>For thousands of years, people have liked gold, and people

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>still seem to like gold. Price of gold are going up.

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>Why are people so interested in owning gold in a

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>time like this?

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Since seventeen fifty eighty percent of the world's moneies have

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 3>disappeared and all of those that existed have been greatly devalued.

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 3>That's one of the reasons that gold is a storehold

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 3>of wealth and has been for a long time. And

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 3>there's a saying that gold is the only asset that

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>you can have that's not somebody else's liability, And what

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 3>they mean by that is that you don't have to

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 3>receive money from somebody else. In the world that we're

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 3>now in and we're seeing it internationally, worry about sanctions,

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 3>there's a worry about taking gold. Those holders central banks

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 3>around the world are concerned about the possibility that let's say,

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 3>what happened to Russia could happen to them, and so on.

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 3>So there's a diversification of that, and it creates a

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 3>dynamic in and of itself because what happens is if

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 3>they are switching, and they are switching to gold away

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 3>from bonds and so on, then that has the effect

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 3>of not only making our supply demand balance that we're

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 3>talking about about the new deficit, it means that you

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 3>can have the selling of gold, which makes that supply

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 3>demand balance worse.

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>It used to be the case that the US dollar

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>was backed by gold, and the US government said, if

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't like these pieces of paper, we'll give you gold,

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately we ended that we're never going to go

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>back to that.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Presumably right, probably, presumably that's right, but not if you

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 3>watch these gold site these cycles, because you have the

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 3>deval euasion, then people feel don't have confidence in the

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 3>fiat system. Over a period of time and through history,

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 3>they've at that point. The way that works is you

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 3>print all this money, then you pray the debt with

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 3>the cheap money, but nobody wants to hold it, so

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 3>then they go back and link it again. It is

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 3>conceivable that you can see a relinking of gold to money,

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 3>but that's way in the future.

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Since the beginning of this year, the dollar against the

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>basket of currencies is down about ten percent. Many people

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>are worried that they might continue that way devalued. Some

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>people say it's not a bad thing because we can

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>sell things more cheaply overseas and increase our exports. But

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>if people are worried about the dollar going down in value,

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>what would you suggest they do buy other currencies or

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>go buy things that are not dollar denominated.

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I think their concern would be some version very similar

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 3>to the seventies you just talked about. I remember I

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 3>was clerking on the floor of the New York Stock

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Exchange John August fifteenth, nineteen seventy one, and that is

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 3>when Richard Nixon got on the television and he said,

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 3>in his polite way, this was a wonderful move. But

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 3>the money that you thought you had, the gold was money,

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 3>and what at the time people thought were real, the

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 3>money that we're used to, they would say, or like

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 3>checks in the checkbook. They said, you're not going to

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 3>get your money, you can keep the checks. At that point,

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 3>then we began the seventies, and the seventies was a

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 3>period in which there was both stagflation. The thing that

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 3>we have to worry about is a stagflationary environment because

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 3>all the currencies went down. So when you were looking

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 3>at diversification. The problems that we're talking about are not

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 3>just American problems. We have a significant problem. But if

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 3>they're European problems, they're Japanese problems. There's Chinese problems. No,

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 3>we've lived on promises to be able to take that

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 3>dead asset and converted into money, and now there's not

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 3>enough money to go around. So I would say that

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 3>when you ask the question, would I value in relationship

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 3>to other currencies? Probably, but the other currencies won't want

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 3>much of an appreciation, and so that's why I'm saying

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 3>that something like gold will be the better performing currency.

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Some people worry about this and can tell us whether

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>this is realistic or not. In nineteen eighty five, there

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>was something called Applause Accords where the United States government

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>agreed with other governments that we were going to devalue

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the dollar illegally officially, and it was done in secret.

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Nobody knew it was coming. Is that possibly that the

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>government of the United States could again agree with other

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>governments we're going to devalue the dollar further. You think

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that's unlikely these days?

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I think it's a possibility. Yes.

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 3>It's so interesting in history when you look at what

0:10:54.800 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 3>happens when governments are in certain positions through history, they

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 3>do the same things, okay, And that means that a

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 3>move like that, or even there could be foreign exchange controls,

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 3>there can be different ways.

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 2>That that that happens.

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Now, my perception is that people in Washington always say, well,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>if a situation was that bad, the bond market would collapse.

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And then the bond market people say, well, the situation

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that bad, Congress wouldn't do this, and they both kind

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>of blame each other for not doing anything. Why hasn't

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the bond market collapsed? Ever, the fact that we have

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>all this debt over all these years.

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 3>You don't like to say I've experienced this many times.

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 3>I did this analysis in two thousand and seven and eight,

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 3>I went to Congress and everybody said they asked me

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 3>the same question, but we had the problem. Same thing

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 3>happened in Europe. So there's a supply demand, there's a saying.

0:11:54.960 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 3>You know that everything goes slowly until it happens all

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 3>at once when the problem happens. You know, these things

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 3>happen like that.

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>How long did it take you to write this book?

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>This is how many books have you now written? For four, Okay,

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>And how long did it take to write a book

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>like this?

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 3>This is research that I've done over a long period

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 3>of time, So putting it together and getting it out,

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, I would say at part time basis, maybe

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 3>over a year.

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Hey, so you built the biggest hedge fund in the world.

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>What's the relative pleasure of building the biggest hedge fund

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in the world versus writing a book that's a bestseller?

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 3>As you would know, probably it's a stage in life thing.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's a stage in life where you know,

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 3>you compete and you build something, and then there's a

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 3>stage in life where you're passing things along.

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 3>So at this stage in life, you and your way,

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 3>me and my way. It's a great, great joy to

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 3>be able to pass along what I've learned. So I'm

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 3>loving it.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>This book is designed to make people feel good or

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to scare.

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 2>People, neither.

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to convey the mechanics the cause effect relationships

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 3>so that people can understand what's going on and then

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 3>navigating it. I think it's a book that will make

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 3>people worry. But I have a principle which is, if

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 3>you worry, you don't have to worry. And if you

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 3>don't worry. You need to worry, because if you worry

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 3>about something, then maybe you'll prevent what you're worrying about.

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>When did you decide to become a writer as opposed

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to just an investor? I mean a lot of great

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>hedge funt investors just keep sitting in front of screens

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. When did you say I want to

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>do more than sitting in front of screens. Was that

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:47.359
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years before you decided to exit Bridgewater?

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 3>No, it was maybe thirty five forty years ago. What

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 3>I learned was that if I was whenever I was

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 3>making decisions, if I would pause and reflect and write

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 3>down the cry that I would use to make that decision,

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 3>it would make me think more deeply about it. And

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 3>then I learned that I could put those into code

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 3>and then back test them so I would know how

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 3>my decision making would work. And so right from then

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 3>thirty five years ago, that's how really I built Bridgewater

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 3>was what are the criteria? Test the criteria over a

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 3>period of time, and then form a game plan. So

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 3>I'd say, thirty five years ago, I've written down I

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 3>call these things principles.

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I've written down. Probably you know, I don't know a

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 2>thousand of them or something.

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>For those who haven't followed the hedge fund world. You're

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>from Long Island, you went to Long Island University. You

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>would say you were not a superstar in high school.

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>On the contrary, but you did very well at Long

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Island University, and eventually you got in the Harvard Business

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Goal and you started your career, and your career almost

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>went south when you punched your boss in the mouth, right, No,

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that was.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 3>My opportunities began, and I got fired when I got fired,

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 3>then I got fired.

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You started your own firm, and you borrowed some money

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>at some point from your father because the firm hadn't

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>done that well. And what did you ever think that

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe you weren't going to make it? And at the

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>point did you were?

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, let me tell you about that incident because

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 3>it was one of the worst cases and one of

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 3>the best cases for me. So this is nineteen eighty

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 3>eighty one, and I had calculated that the United States

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 3>lent more money to countries than they're going to be

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 3>able to pay back, and that there would be a

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 3>big debt crisis, and then in that happened Volker type money.

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Nineteen eighty two, Mexico defaults on its dead and I

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 3>got a lot of attention because I anticipated this and

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 3>I thought I was right and I couldn't have been

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 3>more wrong.

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 2>I thought we were going to have a.

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Big economic crisis because of this, and what happened in

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 3>stead was the stock market went up, they eased monetary policy,

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 3>and I have a terrible.

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Mistake and it cost me money.

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 3>I was so broke that I had to borrow four

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars from my dad in order to pay for

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 3>family bills. And this was painful, and that changed my

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 3>approach to everything two ways.

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Two ways.

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 3>First, it made me think, how do I know I'm right?

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 3>It gave me the humility I needed to balance with

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 3>my audacity, and it let me understand how do I

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 3>play this game going forward? And I understood the power

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 3>of diversification and how diversification could reduce risk by up

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 3>to eighty percent without reducing returns. And that was then

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 3>the bottom of Bridgewater, and then from then on it

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 3>was straight because of the lesson I learned. Writing down

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 3>these things and these experiencing and making the most out

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 3>of mistakes as learning experiences has been sir an investor.

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You always have ups and downs. Nobody does everything perfectly,

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>not even buffet right.

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 3>But you know what changed that from that point the

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 3>returns were in my thirty some one years since of

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 3>doing that, since that point, it was I think about

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 3>eleven point eight percent return with no year down significantly

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 3>other than two thousand, twenty twenty during COVID and that

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 3>was down thirteen percent, but the other years were down

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 3>like two percent. Because I learned the power of diversification.

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, one of the things about diversification is that

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 3>you can reduce the returns the risks without reducing the

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 3>turn My mantra is fifteen good uncorrelated return streams because

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 3>if you if they engineered to have about the same

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 3>expect the return and you have that kind of diversification,

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 3>you will lower the risk by about eighty percent, which

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 3>raises the return to risk ratio by a factor of five.

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 2>So that's the power of the game plan. That's what

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 2>helped me.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>You want to get the deficit down the three percent

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of GDP? Yeah, you want to do it three ways.

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Cut the interest rates, cut spending, and increase.

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Taxes each bi mondus amounts right, and do it.

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Over three years, yes, three, three to three. Okay, what's

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the chance of that happening?

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay, five percent?

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, you've been in Washington.

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 2>I was in Washington the other day.

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and members of Congress tell you this is a

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>brilliant idea. We wish we had thought of it, and

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do this.

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you what members of Congress tell me, which

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 3>is very interesting both sides. Nobody agree. Nobody disagrees with

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 3>what I just said. It's very interesting. They all agree

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 3>that has to go to three percent. They all agree

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 3>it has to come from those three things and so on.

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 3>And then they say, but I can't say that because

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 3>we're now in an absolutist political environment in which if

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 3>I say they want the public, my electorate wants me

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 3>to say, I will take a pledge of no new taxes.

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 3>So because of that absolute if you don't take a pledge,

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 3>then it's like this with the constituents. The constituents say

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 3>something like, are you telling me that you're going to

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 3>compromise with those people and you're going to raise my taxes? Okay,

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 3>no way, I don't want you in government. And so

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 3>they won't convey what they truly believe.

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>What about yourself? Why don't you go into government? Why

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have you thought about you're being secretary Treasury, chairman of

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve, run for the Senate or something, and

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 1>solve those problems while you're in government. Have you ever

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>thought of that scares.

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 2>The Daylight's Adam.

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Let me say, I have the greatest appreciation and respect

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 3>for those who go into public service and serve in

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 3>this kind of an environment. And I think there's a

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 3>question of whether with the population. It's not just a

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 3>leadership question, it's a can you lead question? You can

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 3>bring capable people into that job. But we're in a

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 3>situation where everybody's fighting over every decision all the time

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and will tear everybody down if they're so it's a

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 3>very difficult situation.

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Now somebody is watching, they say, I want to be

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the next Ray Dalio who builds a gigantic hedge fund,

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>does well financially, well respected by people, writes best selling books.

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>What's the secret to that? What do you do?

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 3>Make your work and your passion the same thing, and

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 3>don't forget about the money part. In other words, I

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 3>didn't work for money, but I had a passion. I

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 3>fell in love with the game of investing, and I

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 3>think you have to make your work and your passion

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 3>the same thing. But you do have to pay attention

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 3>to the money part, because if you're not earning an

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 3>adequate amount of money, then that's a problem. So and

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the best life is for them those

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 3>who will make the most amount of money. There's a

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 3>very low correlation between the level of happiness or well

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 3>being past the basic level of income.

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>The highest Really, you're just telling me that, now, wow, well.

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 3>We know that which has the highest level of happiness

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 3>and well being generally is a sense of community. Do

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 3>you have a sense of community your friends in that community.

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, I would say, don't over exaggerate the power

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 3>of money. You need to have enough and you have

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 3>to pursue your passion. And you know, have enough money

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 3>and if if it's if it's it's never work. If

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 3>you're pursuing your passion.

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is the best investment vehicle for

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a middle class American? That is risk adverse and inflation

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>index bond, which is index fund tips.

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Treasury inflation protected securities, because it will guarantee you a

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 3>real return. And I don't think that you should be

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 3>speculating in the markets because there's a zero sum game

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 3>and you'll probably be the loser.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>So, as we get ready to celebrate next year the

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of this country, are you

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>optimistic about our future or is the debt problem so

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 1>concerning to you? You're not optimistic about our future.

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a time horizon we're going to go.

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 3>I think we can deal with this. I think it

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 3>comes down to how we are with each other. But

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 3>we will go through this and we will get to

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the other side.

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And when you go meet with members of Congress or

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>other people in government and you talk about these serious

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>issues of debt and depicts and so forth, do they

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>listen and then they say, by the way, what should

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I do with my own money? They ever ask you

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>how they should invest their money, or they never ask

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you for investment tips, not typically. Now, what about when

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.239
<v Speaker 1>you go to a cocktail party, people ask you for

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>investment ideas all the time.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Here and there. I guess, let me reverse the question,

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 2>what do they do with you?

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm not as good an investor as you are.

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 2>So well it worked out pretty good.

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>They mostly say to me, do you know Ray Dalio. So, Ray, look,

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to congratulate you on your incredible success. You

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>came from very modest means, worked your way up fifty

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>years as an investor, built the biggest hedge fund in

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the world, and you've contributed a lot to endowments and

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.719
<v Speaker 1>others who've been your investors. So you should be very

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>proud of what you've achieved. And now I hope you

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>can make some progress in Washington. I've been living there

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for a while. It's not that easy to make progress,

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>as you know, but hopefully you'll continue and maybe some

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>people will say they don't want to get reelected, they

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>just want to do the right thing. Hopefully you'll commit them.

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much, Thank you. Thanks for listening to hear

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>more of my interviews. You can subscribe and download my

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast on Spotify, Apple, or wherever you listen.