WEBVTT - Joseph Baratta on the Future of Private Equity

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Very Red Holds on

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. This week on the podcast, I have an

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>extra special guest. Joe Barada is the global head of

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Private Equity at PE Giant Blackstone, where he has worked

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen ninety eight. I found this to be a

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>fascinating conversation because Joe's career has very much paralleled the

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>growth of private equity. When he began, PE was a

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a niche boutique sort of investment, and

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>over the ensuing twenty five years it has grown to

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>be really a major asset class with giant opportunities that

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>have been expressed by then small now very large companies,

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>of which Blackstone is one of the largest. He is

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>very familiar with everything from M and A to credit,

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:01.279
<v Speaker 1>to real estate, on and on, and has had experiences

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>both in the US and overseas, really a global perspective

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>on what took place in private equity in the past

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>and what the future looks like. I thought the conversation

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was quite fascinating, and I think you will as well

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>with no further ado, my discussion of private equity with Blackstones.

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Joe Barratta. Joe Barratta, Welcome to Bloomberg. Thank you, happy

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>to be here, Happy to have you. Let's start out

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>with just a little background on your career. You began

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>more or less in the M and A space at

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley, Is that right? Yeah? Right after I graduated college,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I went to Georgetown in nineteen ninety three, I got

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>an analyst job at Morgan Stanley in the M and

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>A group and that's a kind of two year training program.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And I did that and I was painful. You can imagine.

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a good background for someone who eventually

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>ends up buying companies. Yeah, I'm I knew nothing about finance.

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in Sacramento, California. My dad was a

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>bodybuilder and owned three gems in Sacramento. Really yeah, and

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.839
<v Speaker 1>so I didn't know, you know, what finance was all about.

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I had never been to New York City until I

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>was I think twenty years old, and I had some

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>roommates who grew up in New York City who had

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 1>gone to Dalton High School here, so completely different world. Yeah.

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>When I came to the city, I was like, Wow,

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>this place is amazing. And you know, I needed to

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>earn some money and I was adept in finance. I'd

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>studied finance, it was my major at Georgetown, and I

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>was hoping to get a job somewhere, and I got

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a job at Morgan Stanley, which way exceeded my dreams

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>at that point. Huh. So, eventually you leave Morgan Stanley,

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you end up at Tentacom Incorporated and McCallen Dulu and Company.

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming these are both related, m M and A

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>type firms or probate. Yeah, the first job from Morgan

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Stanley was McCallen delou and So in the early nineties,

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>analysts at these big investment banks Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>had sort of two or three options. You could stay

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>there and become an investment banker and do that for

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a career. You could go into the emerging fields of

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>investing in private equity or in hedge funds, or you

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>go to business school or maybe go to business school later.

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I really wanted to learn how to invest money, not

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>just be an advisor. And I thought private equity was

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>cool because you weren't at the whim of the market.

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the market's like if you start at

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the wrong time, if you're wrong for a few quarters

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like boom, like the career is abbreviated. And I thought

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>private equity was interesting because you could live with those

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>investments for a longer period of time. You had a

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>longer period of time to figure out if you were

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>right or not. And I think fundamentals mattered more in

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>private equity than they did in public market investing. So

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get a job at a private equity firm.

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do fundamentals matter more? Or is it

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>really just a question of how far away from fundamentals

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>can public equities get, either to the upside or the

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>downside where it creates some form of opportunity, which kind

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of raises the question how closely do private market fundamentals

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>track what's going on in the public markets. Yeah, in

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the long run they do. In the short run, there

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>can be distortions in public market valuations as we saw

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and one, and we saw prior to

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that in two thousand and seven, and prior to that

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and ninety nine. So yes, you're right, Like,

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in the long run, fundamentals drive determine share prices in

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 1>private equity. You know, we're owning things for five, six, ten, years,

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>and we're not subject to like the vicissitudes of the

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>market in the short run. We never have to sell,

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>only only when we want to because we control We

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>control the companies, and to me, that was a more

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>comfortable form of investing in it and where I wanted

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to bet my career. So you end up at Blackstone

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety eight at a time when public equity

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>prices became a little unmoored and were on the way

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>up to a real bubble. What was it like on

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the private side at the end of the nineties. Yeah,

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I started at Blackstone in July of ninety eight, and

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess what was going on that year? You had um,

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you had like a Southeast Asian currency crisis. He had

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on in Latin America, had the Russia crisis.

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>He had Lehman almost go bust. I think around that

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>time for maybe at the first or second time, and

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, there was a lot of volatility. Private equity

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>was still, i'd say, in the in the first phase

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of its ofs of its existence, and Blackstone was one

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of them. That's why I joined Blackstone. It was one

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of the leading firms in that moment. It had a

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of momentum. I think they were. They were operating

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>at the really top of the industry, really smart people,

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>good track record, and I wanted to attach myself at

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that point in my career, I was twenty I think

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven years old. I wanted to attach myself to

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>affirm that I thought really had a lot of growth

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>potential where I could learn from the best people in

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the industry. That certainly was what I found there. And

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>today private equity has become immense compared to twenty twenty

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. We'll talk a little bit about your

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 1>time in London later, but I love the announcement when

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you were promoted to a global head of pe from Blackstone.

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>They said, the seventy three investments and pending deals you're

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>involved in combined for one hundred and seventeen billion dollars

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in revenue, the equivalent of the thirteenth largest company by

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>revenue on the Fortune five hundred lists, Meaning your team,

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>your group would be a Fortune top twenty company. Yeah,

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>tell us what that growth has been like over the

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>past five years. It seems a house of fire. Yeah.

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>When I started at Blackstone, we were I think we

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>just started investing our third private equity fund, it was

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>about three billion dollars in total size. We had our

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>second real estate fund, which was I think about a

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>billion two or three size. I think we just raised

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a small credit fund which is nine hundred million, and

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>then we had an m and a advisory business, and

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole firm was maybe maybe two hundred total employees,

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>not just investment people, total staff. And today we're knocking

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>on the door of five thousand. I think we're forty

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>five hundred something like that. And the size of our

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>private equity business is you know, we're now on our

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>ninth fund. We have associated funds in Asia, and an

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>energy transition and a long dated vehicle that allows us

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to hold things for fifteen plus years. And I think

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>if you add it all up, we have about forty

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of funds that we're currently investing in their period.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And the total aum of our private equity business a

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>UM assets under management is roughly eighty ninety billion. So

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're materially bigger than we were twenty five

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Even when you read that announcement from two

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that was twenty twelve, we're probably three times this size

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is we were in twenty twelve, both in terms of

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the aggregate revenue of our companies, size of our portfolio.

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>We're probably now something like one hundred and fifty total investments,

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>many hundreds of billions of revenue, hundreds of thousands of

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>employees if you add up all of the companies in

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>which we're invested. So it's been really significant growth. And

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you know why is that? I think because the private

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>equity investing model has been really good for our clients,

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>which our state pension plan, sovereign wealth funds, you know,

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>ensuring the retirement safety of many tens of millions of people.

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So you're you're anticipating one of the questions I'm going

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to ask you, which might as well bring it up

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>now over that twenty five year period or even the

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>past decade where you've tripled in size, it's more than

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>just quantitative. It seems like private equity is qualitatively different

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>than it was back in the early days. Is this

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>simply becoming institutionalized or has the asset class been validated

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>and now people are treating it differently than they did

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties where it was kind of a small

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 1>niche backwater. I'm exaggerating that at all, whereas no, No,

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it was more of a cottage industry. There were a

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>few firms, a couple of big leaders like KKR. Blackstone

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>was what was right on their heels back then. But

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing like it is today. It is that it

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is an institutionalized asset class. There's definitely been proof of

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>concept for large scale institutional investors and even retail investors

0:09:54.440 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>that we can produce sustainable, predictable above public market returns.

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>And we've become better at what we do in buying

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>control of companies, engaging with them, making them better, helping

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>them grow, and so and so. Yeah, and we've had

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>limited partners in our funds who've been with us since

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the early nineties now and keep reupping because we deliver

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>a good return for their beneficiaries. So let's talk about

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>some of those different types of funds. You mentioned private credit,

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned real estate, private equity, M and A what

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is energy transition? That sounds quite fascinating. Yeah. Energy has

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>been a major investment theme across many of our businesses

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and credit and in corporate private equity, and we have

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>for the last six or seven years. The way we've

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>been expressing investing in energy is an energy transition, So

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in companies that are helping accelerate the transition from burning

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 1>hydrocarbons to produce electricity and energy to renewable sources, and

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>so in private renewable meaning wind solar, nuclear or whatever,

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>wind solar, electrifying the economy, getting off of oil and gas,

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>and it's all kinds of companies engage. It's not just

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>power generation from those sources, but it's companies that are

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>involved in in consulting and utility services, in companies that

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>make components that are helping electrify the economy, and electric

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>vehicles or in HVAC systems. So it's a whole broad

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>spectrum of investing in the energy complex focused on the

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>transition from hydrocarbons to renewable. So we take for granted

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>totally that you're out in a car, you could pull

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>over anywhere and tank up with gas. It feels like

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we're very early stages of transitioning to being able to

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>pull up somewhere and spend ten minutes charging the car

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to get you another hundred miles or so. Is that

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the sort of infrastructure we're talking about, in addition to

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>all the obvious ones we've yeah, that's part of it.

0:11:54.120 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're not specifically investing in charging stations, we

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>actually have assets where those are going in, or we're

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>investing in components that are part of manufacturing those those facilities.

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>But yes, that's the kind of thing we're talking about

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>that is part of the energy transition. And you had

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioned private credit before. That seems to have been a

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 1>giant growth area, especially when rates were at zero, when

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>people weren't seeing a whole lot of returns from fixed income. Well, yeah,

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the private credit market I think is really attractive and

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it's actually been around a long time. I mean there

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have been leverage loans and high yield bonds since the

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties, and as an asset class, they've performed extremely

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>well with low incidents of loss, good returns. You get

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>paid for the incremental risk that you're taking in a

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>more leveraged capital structure. So it's been a great asset class.

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It's attracted a lot of capital, and the way buyouts

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>are being financed is evolving away from syndicated, big syndicated

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>capital structures to buy banks to now the people who

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>are actually going to hold the risk, firms like Ours

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and Apollo and areas and others who are actually lending

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>money directly to the people who are borrowing instead of

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>going through the banking intermediaries. So how much of this

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is a function of trend we sort of began in

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen nineties. As companies got larger and larger, it

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>seemed like banks went upscale with them and left sort

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of a gaping void in the middle where, you know,

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>mid market companies didn't have a merchant bank that that

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>could facilitate UM loans, credit, anything along those lines. I

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>think private credit has filled the hole for these smaller businesses.

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But but really, um, not on the full banking suite.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of great smaller banks, uh whose whose business

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>strategy it is to serve smaller and medium sized businesses.

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But in financing acquisitions and capital needs of these middle

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>market companies, a private credit market has played an important

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>role in that. Yeah, really quite interesting. Let's talk a

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit about your career at Blackstone. You've been there

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>for twenty five years. That's a pretty good run. What

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>attracted you to them in nineteen ninety eight when they

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>were still kind of a modest, small firm. Yeah, I

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>mean I was in my mid twenties and you know,

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>looking to build a career in private equity. I liked it.

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought I could, I could build a successful career.

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>It was I recognize that it was still pretty early

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in the development and there should be a lot of

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>growth in these firms. And I wanted to work at

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a place that was operating at the highest level with

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the smartest people, where I could learn the most and

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>see if I could hang, you know, so to speak

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>with keep up with the big dogs. Yeah, and I

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>think I had very modest expectations, like, jeezus, I can

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>last two or three years. At least I will have

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>done it. I will learn something and I'll have something

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>else to do on the other side of it. So

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you lasted two or three years and then you get

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>tapped to go to London in two thousand and one.

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>That had to be a giant challenge, especially given what

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>was taking place that dot COM's had just imploded. It

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't very long after the handover of Hong Kong China,

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of things were changing in both the

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>UK and Europe. What was that like going over to

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the EU in England during that period, Yeah, I mean

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it was it certainly not expected. I'd never lived abroad.

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think i'd been to London. I'm not even sure

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>i'd been to London. I'd been to like Paris and

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Venice or something. And the guy who was going over

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>truly lead at David Blitzer, who was was was a

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>good friend in colleague, and he sort of said, geez,

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>why don't you come and do this with me? He

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>was a senior, the senior guy at the time, and

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, geez, okay, well you're like late twenties

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>at this. Yeah, I'm I'm twenty nine when I'm asked,

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm thirty when I move, you know. And yeah, because

0:15:58.400 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it was two thousand and one, and you know, it

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>was just after September eleventh. I'd agreed to go before

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Strumber eleventh happened. I was supposed to go over, you know,

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in November. I ended up doing that. I remember a

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>completely empty plane flying over to London with my with

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>my then girlfriend. Moving to London. I had no language skills.

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>The firm had had need language skills in England, not

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in England. But but you're still dealing with a lot

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of Europe And yeah, I'm not being sarcastic, You're still

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>dealing with people in Brussels and people in Paris and

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>people in Milan. It has to be useful skills. No,

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, I mean France, Germany, Italy, Spain, you know,

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the whole Nordic region, Sweden, to say nothing of two

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>people separated by a common language, right exactly. Now, In

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that moment, Americans were sort of viewed as positively and

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>as neutral, so you know, you could go to France.

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they didn't love, you know, any Germans as much,

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>but they sort of Americans were tolerated, you know, and

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we were kind of oddities at the time, particularly in

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>private equity, which was still in its infancy in November

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and one. When I moved over, the

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>industry wasn't called private equity. It was called venture capital,

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was in real technology. Venture capital was the

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>nomenclature for everything that was basically a private investment. But

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>you're not dealing with startups, you're dealing with correct seven

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>more mature companies. Yes, but you know, when I moved,

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have the single currency in circulation until January

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>vote two, so there was still French francs and you know,

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Lira and German deutsch Marks, and so that didn't happen

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>until two thousand and two, and it took the year

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>for all of those local currencies to literally paper and

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>coin currencies to come out of circulation and have so

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Europe really a period of transition, and and you're stepping

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>right into the thick of it, right into the thick

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of it, trying to figure out what are too young?

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>My colleague David Blitzer, I think he was maybe thirty one.

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I was twenty nine, and there we were two young Americans,

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>no language skills, like, what are we supposed to do now?

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>The firm had had assets in the UK. We owned

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the Savoy group of hotels, which is the Connaught and

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Carriages and Savoy Nice saw his property nice yeah, which

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is a good asset, a nice calling card. We had

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>actually two investments in Germany in telecom infrastructure that in

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that moment we're doing that great um and so we did,

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>but we were kind of trying to do deals by

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>airplane from New York and that's not functional. So Steve said,

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>we got to have a real presence. We have some assets.

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>We had some real estate guys there, my friend and

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>former Morgan san Lano's colleague Chad Pike ran our our

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>European real estate stuff, and David and I moved over

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 1>to do the private act. And when you say Steve,

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>for those people who may tell us, tell us about

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Blackstone's boss, Steve, Steve Schwarzman our our co founder and

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>CEO and chairman, and you know, amazing mentor and great

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we were supposed to have on the show,

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and a little thing called COVID came along and interrupted

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>us or like literally that end of March, beginning of

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>April when his book came out. Yeah, and well you

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>have to get him back. He's way more interesting than me. Well,

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>so far you're pretty interesting. So you're you're raising the bar.

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So so you moved to the UK, Yeah, you're you're

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>an hour or two hop from all the key places

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. How did the build out go for a

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of young Americans saying, Hey, we want to play

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>with this private equity thing in the EU. Yea, So

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>our our strategy was and it sort of David had

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>conceptualized like we're going to be the neutral Americans who

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>can work with the locally European firms to help him

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 1>get deals done. So we kind of went on, did

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>some missionary work, meeting the local private equity firms in

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>France and of course in the UK and Germany, up

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Nordic region in Italy, and we just met

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>all the other players. It was this small industry. There

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>weren't that many people. There weren't that many firms, and

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>we were like, look, we'd we'd be great partners as

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at ass The first deal we looked at

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>was in France. We were looking at taking remember Vivendi

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time, the media conglomerate. They had bought a

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>bunch of educational publishing assets, including US textbook company Hote

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and Mifflin. Back when there were actually textbooks in schools

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's still textbooks in school You could just access

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>everything online as well if you want fewer of them. Yeah,

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>but and so we partnered with a few local firms

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and actually one of our US competitors to look at

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this big asset because it was quite big, and in

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the end we ended up just buying the US textbook business,

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Hote and Mifflin. That was our first deal in Europe,

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>which was actually a US deal, but we probably wouldn't

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>have done it had we not been there looking at

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the divestiture from Vivendi, and so you know, that was

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of the the strategy day one, and then it evolved.

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, I sort of looked at, well, the industry

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in Europe is a good decade or two behind the US.

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So I said, well, what kind of deals were worked

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in the US in the early nineties in my experience,

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know what I sort of decided as well,

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>fragmented industries where you could drive consolidation that had happened

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>already in the US, things like um, you know, in

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the UK pubs there was a big consolidation and lots

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>of divestitures of pubs that were owned by brewers in

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the time, and there were rules came down that brewers

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>can't own distributors similar to US any trust rules exactly

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>diversify and or I'm sorry, they made them divest those

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>vertically integrated holdings exactly. So the second deal we did

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>was we worked with another firm, a local UK firm

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>called CVC and also TPG to buy Scottish and Newcastle's

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>pub divestiture. Scottish and Newcastle was a big brewer up

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>up in Scotland at the time, and so we bought

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the pub business, we combined it with another one, we

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>bought some more and that was a pretty successful investment.

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Then we did other similar investments, particularly with real estate intent.

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>The pubs all own their real estate, so we were

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>working with our real estate guys in healthcare facilities and

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 1>visitor attractions and theme parks. So we did a lot

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>of these sort of consolidation place a broad spectrum of

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>different holdings. One of the things that I have to

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>follow up with is how important was it partnering with

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>local other investors and other vcs or ps. I don't

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>know what they called themselves back then, and vcs at

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the time, but they were private equity. How important was

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it finding a local partner to you know, hook up

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>with and be able to participate in deals with. I

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>think early on it was important until we established ourselves,

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and then we did less of that. We started doing

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>deals on our own. Probably somewhere around two thousand and

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>four or five, we started doing things by ourselves. We

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>were much more networked, you know, people knew who we were.

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Blackstone as a brand name was becoming more known just everywhere,

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>but in particular in Europe. Because we weren't particularly well

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>known at that time, and so yeah, it was helped

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of helped us get off the ground, so to speak.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And so you guys are expanding in the two thousands

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. When did Blackstone start to look at Asia?

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>When did that? Beckon? I think it was two thousand

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and five when we started to look at in China

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>and in India in particular, and also Japan. And it

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>really most of our expansion started with our real estate business,

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>because that's a it's a little bit easier to expand

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>globally in real estate because it's more asset based rather

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>than like you know, company based, and so we sort

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of followed our real estate colleagues where they win, established

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a tohold, became successful. So really in private equity, our

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>first adventure outside of Western Europe was in India and China,

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and that was somewhere around two thousand and five. Really

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting. I have to point out out that your

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>life history is a series of ever worsening weather. You

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>start out in California, you go to DC, you go

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to New York, you end up in London. So so

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>warm sunshine, no interest, I don't know, no, I mean,

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>I I go back to California all the time. I

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of good friends from high school, and

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I grew up into at the foothills of

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the Sierra Nevada Mountains and I love to go there.

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But I can't explain it. You just like life gets

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in the way. And I had it, you know, a

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.239
<v Speaker 1>cool career going, and I just and I stuck with it.

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I've lived in great places. I've been

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>super lucky to have these fun adventures, whether or notwithstanding.

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about some of those places.

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Your base of operations when you're in the UK is London,

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>but you're back and forth to multiple countries. What's it

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>like trying to manage a rapidly growing private business with

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Eventually the current he's became more or less uniform, but

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>different languages, different customs, different culture, different ways of doing business.

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>All the places you've mentioned, like Germany is very different

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>than the Switzerland, Switzerland, which is very different than the

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Nordic countries. How do how do you keep all that straight? No,

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard. And what what we began to do

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>is hire local people. So one of our first hires

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>now that the man who runs our business in Europe.

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 1>We hired this guy, Leon Alison, who's French, and we

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>hired Germans. We for for a brief while we had

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>an office in Hamburg. We hired an Italian silt the firm,

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Andrea Vlarry. Uh. And so we began to hire local

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>people who were young in their careers. These are people

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>who were, you know, in their late twenties, early thirties,

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>oldest maybe mid thirties. Uh. And they and they kind

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of grew up with the firm and they were able

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to be the translator, so to speak, both both physically

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and culturally. Uh. In these some of these other countries,

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>any memorable snaffoos either culturally or language wise when you're up,

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you're bouncing from you know, you go

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>to Frankfort to Denmark, two totally different worlds. Now, the

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>funniest story I can remember is in these early days

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>when we were out trying to introduce ourselves to the

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>local private equity firms. UM I went to Paris and

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>went to Lazard Frere, which was you know that is

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the bastion of like French establishment business. And they had

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>like bottles of Bordeaux on the conference room table. I

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>mean that's you know, this is this is probably two

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand and two. And they introduced me to and I

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>won't I won't name names. He's a wonderful guy, but

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>in the moment it was less wonderful. They introduced me

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:48.479
<v Speaker 1>to the head of a of a significant private equity

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>firm in Europe, and I was doing my pitch. So

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>here I am thirty years old, he's probably forty two

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>or three. I'm doing my pitch on Black Center. We're

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>good friends, and we don't have an ego, and you know,

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>we could help facilitate transactions whatever US perspective and global perspective.

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And the guy looks at me like I had, you know,

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>two horns coming out of my like who's this young American?

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Why am I? Why am I talking to him? I

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>mean his family dates back to like Louis Katurs. I mean,

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>this is this is the ultimate French establishment. And here's

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 1>this like schmuck from Sacramento, like, you know, thirty years old,

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>like pitching him on why he should why we'd be

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a good partner for him, and he was in that

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>moment completely dismissive. About ten or fifteen years later, we

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>actually did work together and he acknowledged that moment and said, God,

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I just thought you guys were just such jokes, but

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it had ended up being you know, that was like

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>an example of like I just think we were discounted,

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>but it was. It was really early in the development

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of private equity, so even like undergone us could be

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>could be successful. And I was waiting for you to say.

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>And it was ten am and they broke open the

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>bottles aboard. They definitely did that, and everybody started drinking

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 1>and we looked at each other. Can we have a

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>drink that morning? That is very Yeah. And you couldn't

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>wear brown shoes. You can only wear black shoes. You

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>weren't taken seriously is that true? You know, the whole

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>dressing custom what you know, we're both sitting here in

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>blazers without ties. Yeah, who cares about brown shoes? What

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is that was? It's a real thing. And you're I mean,

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>at least it was back then. Yes, brown shoes are

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>for like, you know, shooting or something. Oh really, yeah,

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I never would have guessed that really quite quite interesting. Yeah,

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, there are a lot of different names

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>for Blackstone. It's I've heard people say Blackstone, Blackstone Group,

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>black Stone Partners. I know there are lots of different funds.

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming that all these different names will come from

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>different work products, different strategies, different funds, or is just

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody getting this wrong? Yeah? No, no, that's right. I

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>mean the firm's called Blackstone period Um, and within black

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Zone in our private equity funds are called Blackstone Capital Partners. Uh.

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>In our real estate it's black Zone real Estate Partners.

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And then there are variants on that theme. But you're

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>not wrong. I mean there's different names within the individual businesses,

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but we all work at Blackstone. It's one firm. Makes

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense. So let's talk a little bit

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>about the state of pe investing today. We're coming off

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a period of low inflation, low rates, and suddenly we

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>have higher inflation and rising rates. What sort of a

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>challenge does that present for private markets? Yeah? Well, if

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you do this, if you've been doing this long enough,

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>which fortunately I have since really nineteen ninety five, you know,

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you see different cycles, and you see what happens when

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>capital becomes cheap and money becomes easy, and interest rates

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>or lower or not really a factor, valuations go up.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And you saw it, of course in the late nineties

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and the tech sector. You saw it into financial services

0:29:55.480 --> 0:30:01.719
<v Speaker 1>sector in two thousand six seven eight ual crisis. And

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>so as we were watching the fed's reaction to the

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, pushing rates down and keeping them down, we

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>were like, geez, this probably is not gonna last for ever,

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and that that doesn't seem to be the natural state

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of affairs. A growing economy, zero cost to capital, markets

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:26.479
<v Speaker 1>compounding at fifteen sixteen secs like that probably isn't going

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to happen forever. And so, you know, my base case

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>was that it wouldn't and you'd have I called it

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>wonkily like mean reversion and global cost to capital, which

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>means rates would go up, market risk premiums would go up,

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, pe multiples would calm down, credit spreads would

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>probably gap out. Not to say like we executed on

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.959
<v Speaker 1>that vision perfectly, I mean, we will have made some mistakes,

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>but we definitely became much more cautious when the bull

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>market really ramped up, in particular post COVID, when not

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>only did you have the low rates which the FED

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>double down on, you had this huge transfer payment from

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the federal government into people's pocketbooks, which which massively accelerated

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy and rates sayed low. And then we started

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing significant signs in inflation, particularly in our real estate business,

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>with rents going up significantly, wages going up, across our

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>private equity portfolio, beginning to see pricing power for many

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of our companies that they hadn't had in a long time.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And we're like, whoa, this is the sign, Like this

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is the canary in the coal mine. There's real inflation.

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>The FED was saying, no, it's transitory or whatever adjective

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>they used, and we did. We became more cautious, and

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>so I'm proud of how we navigated that cycle. And

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in a more normal world. To me,

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this world is normal, not abnormal, with you know, real

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>positive real interest rates. I mean, inflation is higher than

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>than normal, but that's going to come down. But I

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're going to go back to the days

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of twenty nineteen to twenty twenty one. So here's the

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>really interesting observation that that you're making Blackstone has boots

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>on the ground and all these different sectors. You see

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>these things before they start to show up in the

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>economic data. You see it in real time across real estate,

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>across labor, across all these different inputs. How do you

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>use all of this data that's generated by all of

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio companies to navigate the world at large. Well,

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>one thing that that John and Steve have done is

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to make sure the firm is really joined up across

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>our investment businesses. So we share themes, and we share

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>these economic signals and so. And at the top of

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the firm, Steve, John, a few others of us who

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>are on the management committee are really able to push

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>down into the organization like what we're seeing to change

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>investment behaviors. And so that's what we were able to

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>do to a large degree, is to is to become

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>more conservative, to to become more cautious on valuations, you know,

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as we started seeing evidence of inflation and thinking that

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>rates were probably going to go up at some point. Again,

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not perfect. I'm not saying we're clairvoyant and we

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>handled everything perfectly, but in general we became much more

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>risk averse risk off in that you know, mid twenty

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty one period. So it's it's not like the public

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>markets where you could say sell here by there because

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you have such an obvious prints in prices, but you're

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at valuations and what sort of multiples you want

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to pay. Yes, you're looking at the cost of capital

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and how much margin or leverage you want to assume.

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So when you're adjusting your investment posture, you're basically saying

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take more risk or less risk based

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>on what's going on. So clearly that was a great

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>time to pull back in mid twenty twenty and we

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>sold what we could right as much as we could,

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, to your point, like it's hard to turn

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>on a diamond, say it's all the whole portfolio. We

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>can't do that, but we can things that are mature,

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>things where we've realized value. Sometimes we've taken companies public

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and we can sell stock. We we leaned in to

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.280
<v Speaker 1>exiting what we could in that in that period. So

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>so here we are, end of the first quarter twenty

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. What's the environment look like relative to mid

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:39.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one. Obviously rates are higher, but prices seem

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to have come down a bit. How are you looking

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>at the investment environment today? I think starting with the fundamentals,

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the economies quite sound. We're seeing in

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>our businesses real stability across most sectors. So let me

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>interrupt you right there. I've been hearing recession chatter. It

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 1>seems like for six months at least, sounds like you

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>guys aren't aggressively in the wearing a recession or about

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to have a recession. Six months. It's been almost a year.

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>People were declaring last summer we're already in a recession.

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming you guys, we're not seeing evidence of it

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in the portfolio. I mean there's some degree of like

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 1>heightened caution concern because when you do take rates up

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and really tighten financial conditions, there are consequences in the

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:31.359
<v Speaker 1>economy at some point, but we're not seeing it. We're

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing maybe wage increases beginning to decline, so the rate

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>of increases is declining. We're seeing some companies have less

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>pricing power maybe than they had a year ago. But

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing solid demand. We're seeing full employment. We still

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>continue in many of our companies to struggle to fill

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>open rolls. So overall, the picture we see is of

0:35:56.920 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a of a reasonable economy with some risks to the future.

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>But I don't whatever recession we may have, I don't

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>think it is going to be you know, really significant.

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.839
<v Speaker 1>And you guys, your your bread and butter is not

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>forecasting the econom I don't want to I don't want

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that that's what we hear. But it is

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at what's more attractive and what's less attractive. So

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about geographies, and let's talk about sectors, what's appealing. Well,

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we're spending all in our private equity business, We're spending

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>all of our time looking at things that touch the

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>public markets, because that is where the valuation correction, you know,

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really happened, where where you can transact at prices

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>lower today than they were two years ago. And so

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>corporate carve outs public to privates. You know, the last

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>few deals we've done a bit a large corporate carve

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>out from a from a large important American corporate, Emerson.

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>We bought their climate technologies business called Copeland. We recently

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>announced to take private of a of a of a

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>technology company called c Event, which is publicly traded. And

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:03.439
<v Speaker 1>so as in terms of where our teams are spending time,

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it's in and around sort of public markets. That's very

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:10.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting because we typically think of private equity as looking

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>at these mature, non public companies I guess you kind

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>of forget hey, when stock prices come down enough at

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a certain point that valuation becomes really attractive if the

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>assets themselves are productive enough. Yeah, I think a big

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>chuck of what we do over our history has been

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>taking companies private and doing corporate carve outs from public companies,

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:37.280
<v Speaker 1>so non core assets that are large company's, divesting family

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.760
<v Speaker 1>owned businesses. Sometimes we buy things from our competitors, particularly

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 1>if we think we can make them a lot bigger

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>through acquisition or other things. But that's not uncommon to

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>see private equity firms taking companies private and transacting with

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:58.359
<v Speaker 1>public companies. In terms of sectors, I think the real

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>value dislocations have happened the technology industry. So certain elements

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of technology, particularly in software, we think are much more

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>attractive than they were a couple of years ago. Not

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to say they look overwhelmingly cheap, but certainly more attractive

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>than they were. I think that also there's a bunch

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of businesses that are manufacturing things that must exist in

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the physical world, you know, to to cool or heat

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the environment, food, the distribution of essential medical products, you know,

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole energy transition. These are these are physical assets

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and we want to invest not just in digital virtual assets,

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>but also in physical assets. So I think that's and

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the market hasn't loved owning manufacturing, industrial type businesses. Those

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>do seem to be valued relatively more attractively. Well the

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>past decade, the intangibles have been super attractive. Anything with

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the patents of copyright an algorithm underneath it, because you

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>don't have the obviously, and I'm not going to teach

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>you about the private equity business, but for listeners, you know,

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the same capital cost you don't have

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the same labor costs. There's a scalability there that you

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>don't get in the real world, which probably is why

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of real world assets eventually become attractively priced.

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Does that a fair fair way? And businesses that just

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>have to exist? What about geographies? Where are you looking

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>around the world? What's an attractive place that people probably overlook?

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I think people are very negative on the UK and

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:35.720
<v Speaker 1>post brexit. Is that the driver not only post Brexit,

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:38.359
<v Speaker 1>but but now you know in the in this kind

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of world of inflation and in dislocation, and you know,

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 1>conflict near the continent, like all of that is conspiring.

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I think to make markets look relatively attractive, in particular

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, where we own a lot of assets

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and will continue to buy businesses. India is very attractive.

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>It is a rapidly growing economy with a highly educated

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 1>workforce that with supply chain chain dynamics now moving toward

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asia and India. We've had a big business there

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. And let see, let me ask you,

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you about India, because it feels like,

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>at least in the public markets, India is always on

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>like a year or two away from being the next

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>big thing, and it just hasn't seemed to happen. What

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>are the challenges of investing in a place like India.

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:35.879
<v Speaker 1>What we've found is that control is important in India.

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, you want to be able to control the exit.

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>You want to be able to ensure that you're bringing

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in best in class management that's really perfectly aligned with you,

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, economically, that's a big thing. In sin of

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 1>alignment in India has been a harder thing, and I

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 1>think largely you want to avoid highly regulated industries where

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 1>you're relying on the government to do something. There's a

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:02.359
<v Speaker 1>little more friction in the types of industries, and so

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>we've pursued in the last decade of control strategy and

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>largely where we are an outsourcing partner providing a critical

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>component or service to Western companies. So taking advantage of

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the currency declining a lower cost base in India, but

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>revenues denominated in dollars or euros really interesting. The war

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine surprisingly hasn't had a negative impact or at

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>least not as much as I expected in the public markets.

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>How are you looking at a geopolitical event like that

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 1>affecting you know, what's taking place on the continent. Yeah,

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't spend too much time thinking about like the

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 1>when that might end in the ramifications of it, we

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>do think at some level it does affect the cost structures.

0:41:56.600 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, energy prices are higher, inflation is significant, uh,

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know cost structures are are a little less

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>efficient there maybe than in the US now. So we're

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 1>very much open for business in Europe in the UK,

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you know this. The conflict has definitely been a drag

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 1>to some degree in the economy and introduces some uncertainty.

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But if we can find a great business at a

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 1>reasonable price in Europe, you know we're going to buy it, huh,

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. We talked earlier about inflation and rising rates.

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Private credit deals tend to be so for plus. So

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 1>when I look at the world of higher rates, is

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it have a big impact on how you structure deals

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 1>or is it just a factor that's going to move

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 1>up and down and everybody just changes their spreadsheets and

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the numbers will just move higher. I mean, there's no

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:58.720
<v Speaker 1>question that financing costs are higher, both debt and equity,

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 1>which is a healthy thing because I think the cost

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of global cost capital was too low, induced by super

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 1>low rates and capital allocation to riskier assets, institutional investor's

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>chasing return. You see that on the private market. It's

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 1>obvious in the public markets things get frothy people, you know,

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 1>when there is no alternative, people just pile into equity,

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and for a while it looked like the lower quality

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the stock was, the better it did. Do you have

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the same phenomenon in the private market. I think private

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:34.839
<v Speaker 1>market valuations are driven to a large degree by what's

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>going on in the public markets. So if your alternative

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 1>as a company is to go public at a given price,

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not going to sell it to a private

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>equity firm at a much lower price. So yes, private

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>equity valuations are influenced very significantly by what's going on

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 1>in the public markets. That's why as an investor I'm

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>much happier today because we're able to buy things more cheaply.

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that financing costs are higher kind of

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't either here nor there, because our returns are not

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>predicated really on the cost of financing. They're predicated on

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 1>buying a good business, doing something to make it grow

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 1>more quickly, and having an attractive exit when we come

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to sell it, which means it has to be a

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 1>good business, it has to be growing, and the financing,

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the cost of financing in the quantum isn't the biggest

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:25.240
<v Speaker 1>driver of our returns. Really interesting, So, given the change

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in size of private equity over the past twenty five years,

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is there a sweet spot? I mean, some of your

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:36.840
<v Speaker 1>holdings like Hilton obviously, Giant, I know the Savoy is

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in the UK and in Europe. You guys seem to

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:45.839
<v Speaker 1>play across a lot of different sizes. Where is the

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 1>most fertile ground for growth size wise? Well, I think

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the evolution of the size of

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>private equity transactions over the last decade, they're actually they

0:44:57.960 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't grown very much, notwithstanding the fact that the equity

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 1>capital market caps like three or four times bigger than

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it was in two thousand and seven. You know, we

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 1>bought Hilton in June of two thousand and seven, and

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the size. It was thirty two three

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>four five billion dollars, like the last thirty billion dollars

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>deal we did. I mean that we bought Medline in

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:21.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, in two thousand twenty one, in twenty twenty one.

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So I actually think at the large end the private

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 1>equity market, we're undercapitalized. It's very hard for us to

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:31.839
<v Speaker 1>assemble much more than a five billion dollar equity check.

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And there are thousands of companies in the US that

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>are ten to fifteen billion dollars plus enterprise value company.

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So we have to work with our investors, our limited partners,

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 1>other private equity firms to assemble a deal that gets

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:48.799
<v Speaker 1>much more than ten billion of enterprise value. And there

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>are many more ten billion dollar companies today than there

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was fifteen, twelve or fifteen years ago. So I think

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the large end of the market, we think is the

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>most attractive. It's where we play it's where we have

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 1>competitive differentiation, and it's where you find better quality businesses.

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:07.320
<v Speaker 1>At what point does size become the enemy? It sounds

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like you can scale up by partnering with lots of

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:14.839
<v Speaker 1>other PE firms. Is there a ceiling or at what

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 1>point do you look at something and say, hey, that's

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:19.759
<v Speaker 1>just too big to try and take a boy? I mean,

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest deal that's been done in the

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>last you know, ten years is around thirty billion dollars

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, Yeah, to get that done, we

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>had to work with um two of our competitors, which

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is fine, but we'd prefer to buy things on our own,

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:37.400
<v Speaker 1>just Black Sun, with our with our limited partners. You

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:40.799
<v Speaker 1>want the control and be able to to set how

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 1>you're going to exit or how the farm's going to

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>be run. Well, it's not necessarily a problem to do

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that with some of our friendly competitors, but like, really

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:51.759
<v Speaker 1>our preference is to do it just on our just

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 1>by ourselves. Um so, uh, you know the answers, We

0:46:56.640 --> 0:47:00.399
<v Speaker 1>can't really get deals much bigger than you know, ten

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen billion dollars done on our own, and I

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's right now a little bit. Plus the financing

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:09.839
<v Speaker 1>markets are less liquid and there's less quantum available. So

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of the realm we're in. And

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:14.719
<v Speaker 1>like I said, those companies aren't too big to make

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 1>good returns with. I mean, you have a bunch of

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 1>companies that have trillion dollars plus market caps, That's right,

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 1>So what is ten billion dollars? If Apple decides it

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:25.760
<v Speaker 1>wants to buy something for you know, ten, twenty, thirty, forty,

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't blink in. There are a lot of companies

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. Huh, really really quite fascinating. So you do

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:37.359
<v Speaker 1>some really interesting work at Blackstone, including serving on a

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of portfolio companies boards first EGIL Investment Management. You

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Menline earlier, Ancestry dot com is probably things people

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 1>are are familiar with. Tell us about those experiences. What

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is it like being on these boards and what sort

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:56.719
<v Speaker 1>of input do you give to management? Though? Well, what

0:47:56.880 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 1>brings me energy and joy in my job is investing

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>capital and working with companies. So the way I do

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you know this job in addition to you know, managing

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of our people and you know, engaging and

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 1>other stuff at the firm, is I want to keep

0:48:12.440 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a hand in Uh, the investing and and and engaging

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 1>with our companies. So yeah, there's a few companies where

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 1>where I'm closely involved and I sit on the board

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and I help their management teams, um, you know, plot

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 1>strategy and deal with you know, important strategic issues. Our

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:34.240
<v Speaker 1>model is not to run the companies. We find great

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>management teams, we back them with capital and support, and

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>we let them run the run the businesses. So we

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 1>operate from a board level and really focused on key

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 1>strategic and risk management variables. Really quite interesting, what what

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of new markets are you guys considering? What are

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 1>you looking at that might not have been on the

0:48:56.800 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 1>table a decade ago. Um, you know, the whole notion

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:04.719
<v Speaker 1>of energy transition is a market that you know, a

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>decade ago, energy investors were investing in upstream oil and

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>gas or in midstream companies, and today the clear direction

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to travel is toward weaning ourselves at these big economies

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 1>off of hydrocarbon's for power. So that is that is

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>one sector that that we're investing in that a decade

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 1>ago we wouldn't. And also, um, there's new business models,

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:30.879
<v Speaker 1>new media models. You know, we we spent a lot

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of time looking at traditional media businesses that UM linear TV,

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>satellite broadcast, regional sports networks, all those thingsagies that that

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the direction of travels, those aren't really investable. The streaming

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:46.800
<v Speaker 1>services direct a consumer. Uh, And so instead of investing

0:49:46.800 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 1>in those, we decided to back Kevin Mayer and Tom

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Staggs to x Disney, guys really well regarded guys in

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the business, guys in the entertainment industry, to build an

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:59.920
<v Speaker 1>independent content creation business, which we've done both in children's

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:04.719
<v Speaker 1>content with Moonbug and in live action entertainment with Hello Sunshine,

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>which was the business at Reese Withers been started. So

0:50:06.960 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the type of thing that a decade ago we

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:13.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have invested in. You know, big bigger technology company

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>software businesses that have proven they've got really durable, sticky

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 1>revenue models. Maybe they're not run that efficiently you can

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:24.760
<v Speaker 1>take margins up. That's another in market that we're investing

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:27.359
<v Speaker 1>in today that maybe a decade ago we wouldn't have been. Huh.

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting. How often does a new business model

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:36.360
<v Speaker 1>come along that's really notably different from what proceeded it?

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Is this just part of the life cycle of business?

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Or do you go through these periodic spasms where everything changes. Well,

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say in my twenty five year history of Blackstone,

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:51.719
<v Speaker 1>there were certain industries that were growth industries that we

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 1>were investing in in the mid nineties and late nineties

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and early two thousands that now are no longer investable.

0:50:57.120 --> 0:50:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So as an investor, you have to be nimble. You

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:03.320
<v Speaker 1>have to have like an open mind and realize that

0:51:03.400 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>things are changing. Industry structures are changing, business models are changing,

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and now the rate of change is much more quick.

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Um with with with the advent of technology, ubiquitous broadband,

0:51:18.360 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 1>which really enabled the internet, changed the way we watch media,

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 1>changed the way we shopped, changed the way we we

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we found information. Um uh, it changed the way we

0:51:29.680 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>communicated with each other. Um and and now I think,

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, AI could be it probably is one of

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 1>those other major c changes where business models turning on

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.680
<v Speaker 1>human beings doing wrote tasks you know, probably is not

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the future. And and a lot of businesses are going

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to be dislocated. So a big part of what we

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:50.359
<v Speaker 1>do is trying to figure out where we don't want

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to invest and what's going to be dislocated by ubiquitous broadband.

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Back in two thousand and five, six seven, and now

0:51:58.280 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 1>AI with the rate of sophistication of that technology, so

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we see a lot of hype business come along. Clearly,

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:10.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a ton of hype in crypto, and then

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse you know, kind of came, almost came and

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:17.279
<v Speaker 1>went already a lot of hype there. My sense is

0:52:17.320 --> 0:52:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that AI and cha chat bots and the recent you know,

0:52:23.000 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 1>multibillion dollar acquisitions that have been done by firms like

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft and Google, this doesn't seem to be that sort

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of ephemeral hype story. This seems to really be a

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:39.880
<v Speaker 1>potential sea change. I agree with you. I mean, like

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, there's a few fundamental enabling technologies that happen.

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Ubiquitous broadband internet to your house, to your mobile device,

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:52.840
<v Speaker 1>which really enabled a change in retail and media models,

0:52:52.920 --> 0:52:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in communication models, and now this, you know, the blockchain.

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:59.360
<v Speaker 1>When it came, people like Hm, I always went like,

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the use case? Right, It's a solution of a

0:53:02.560 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 1>problem exactly, and it's cool, and you know, bitcoin or whatever.

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:09.839
<v Speaker 1>They're probably a real store of value, but that's not

0:53:10.040 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 1>really investable for us. It is AI investable because it

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:17.920
<v Speaker 1>looks like a couple of big companies, UH push their

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 1>way in there are a couple of transactions, or is

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:23.920
<v Speaker 1>this gonna, you know, be the fertilizer that launches a

0:53:24.960 --> 0:53:27.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand blooms or whatever the express it may be invested.

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:31.839
<v Speaker 1>It's it's certainly investable for venture investors and smaller guys

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.080
<v Speaker 1>who are willing to sort of dig holes in the

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 1>ground and hope something comes out. I mean for us

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in corporate private equity. No, but what it what it

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 1>is is we have to figure out what businesses are

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:45.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be disrupted and avoid those and figure out

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:49.600
<v Speaker 1>what what mature businesses will be enabled by this and

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:53.240
<v Speaker 1>invest Like look at Disney. You know, Disney, in large

0:53:53.239 --> 0:53:56.759
<v Speaker 1>part was was hugely enabled by streaming services because of

0:53:57.040 --> 0:53:59.919
<v Speaker 1>the amazing content it owned, So it was a bit

0:54:00.120 --> 0:54:04.400
<v Speaker 1>ficiary of the technology change. But cable television models or

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:07.960
<v Speaker 1>satellite TV like those, those those suffered. And so we're

0:54:07.960 --> 0:54:10.319
<v Speaker 1>trying to find the businesses that are going to be

0:54:10.480 --> 0:54:14.319
<v Speaker 1>enabled and benefited by AI and avoid the things that

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 1>are going to be dislocated. That's quite quite interesting. So

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I read a quote of yours that cracked me up.

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask you about you said, if you

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:27.880
<v Speaker 1>weren't working in private equity, the next best job would

0:54:27.880 --> 0:54:31.080
<v Speaker 1>be general manager of the Dallas Cowboys. I mean, with

0:54:31.239 --> 0:54:33.640
<v Speaker 1>all respect to the Joneses who run that team, you know,

0:54:33.640 --> 0:54:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and have to particularly this off season, They've done a

0:54:35.880 --> 0:54:39.279
<v Speaker 1>nice job. I've been a Dallas Cowboys fan since I'm

0:54:39.280 --> 0:54:40.920
<v Speaker 1>seven years old. And you say we'll get a kid

0:54:40.920 --> 0:54:44.640
<v Speaker 1>from Sacramento, a Dallas Cowboys fan and an America's team.

0:54:44.680 --> 0:54:46.799
<v Speaker 1>I was watching the ten am game back talk about

0:54:46.840 --> 0:54:49.040
<v Speaker 1>linear TV. There were two games, one at ten, one

0:54:49.040 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>at one, and the Cowboys playing in the NFC East

0:54:51.680 --> 0:54:54.040
<v Speaker 1>were always on the ten am game and it was

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:57.440
<v Speaker 1>America's team. So I'm watching the Cowboys like every Sunday.

0:54:57.520 --> 0:54:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And then when the Niners got good, I became a

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:02.560
<v Speaker 1>cherry and said, no, I'm a root for the Cowboys really,

0:55:02.600 --> 0:55:06.799
<v Speaker 1>even though they lost so similar Jerry Rice didn't no bid,

0:55:07.160 --> 0:55:10.960
<v Speaker 1>no bid really that Rogers sawback, Tony Dorset, Tony Hill

0:55:10.960 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 1>those and then of course and now look they're fun

0:55:14.680 --> 0:55:17.799
<v Speaker 1>to watch. I love football. I don't miss a game.

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:20.799
<v Speaker 1>And yes, if Jerry needs some help, you know, he

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:23.640
<v Speaker 1>knows you knows, you know, he reach out to Steve.

0:55:23.680 --> 0:55:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Steve will put you in touch. And then we talked

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:29.880
<v Speaker 1>about the companies that you're on the boards of, but

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you're also a trustee of the Tate Foundation, which I

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 1>assume is related to the giant Tape Museum in London.

0:55:38.680 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about the work you do

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:44.400
<v Speaker 1>with them. That sounds like a fascinating organization. Yeah, the

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Tate is is such a significant cultural institution in the UK.

0:55:48.280 --> 0:55:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It's it's funded largely by the by the state um.

0:55:52.160 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 1>The Tate Foundation is the private philanthropic arm of the

0:55:55.560 --> 0:55:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Tate that helps fund special projects, whether it's exhibitions or

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:03.000
<v Speaker 1>building buildings. You know, the big Tate Modern Gallery was

0:56:03.040 --> 0:56:06.719
<v Speaker 1>in large part funded by private donations. And you know,

0:56:06.800 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 1>philanthropy in the UK is at a different scale than

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the US. So for not a lot of money,

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I could like get engaged in the arts

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in a really important cultural institution, where in the UK

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it's less sort of focused on the elite and more

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:25.840
<v Speaker 1>focused on like the democratization of art and culture for

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:28.839
<v Speaker 1>the people of the UK. And I really identified with that.

0:56:29.239 --> 0:56:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize philanthropy was that different overseas than is here. Yeah,

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:36.799
<v Speaker 1>first of all, how did you first get involved with them?

0:56:36.800 --> 0:56:39.279
<v Speaker 1>By the way, my wife loves the Tate Modern one

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of our favorite. It's a great building and a beautiful collection. Yeah,

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:45.359
<v Speaker 1>how did you first get get involved with them? You know?

0:56:45.400 --> 0:56:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I just I had I had young kids. From two

0:56:49.320 --> 0:56:52.319
<v Speaker 1>thousand and four until two thousand and ten, we were

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:54.719
<v Speaker 1>having babies and one of the places we'd always go

0:56:54.800 --> 0:56:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is either Tape Written or Tape Modern. You could consume

0:56:58.160 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 1>saturdays with kids running around, and like I said, they're

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>very accessible, there's nothing intimidating about those institutions. And then

0:57:05.200 --> 0:57:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I knew some people who are involved, and I met

0:57:08.440 --> 0:57:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the director one day and um, you know, they asked

0:57:11.800 --> 0:57:13.400
<v Speaker 1>me to, you know, get involved. And so for the

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:15.799
<v Speaker 1>last maybe I don't know, twelve or so years, I've

0:57:15.840 --> 0:57:18.080
<v Speaker 1>been involved with the Tape Foundation. It's a great, great

0:57:18.080 --> 0:57:23.480
<v Speaker 1>group of people, great organization. So yeah, that's been a fun.

0:57:23.280 --> 0:57:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Sound it sounds like a lot of fun. So so

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 1>before we let you go, we're going to jump to

0:57:27.480 --> 0:57:30.560
<v Speaker 1>our favorite questions that we ask all of our guests.

0:57:31.040 --> 0:57:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Starting with you mentioned streaming. Tell us what you've been watching.

0:57:35.040 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 1>What keeps the family entertained? I just got done with

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Daisy Jones in the six I'm halfway through it, really

0:57:41.640 --> 0:57:45.480
<v Speaker 1>loving it. Which where the music is amazing. The whole

0:57:45.600 --> 0:57:48.480
<v Speaker 1>aesthetic of it is amazing, the acting is amazing, the

0:57:48.600 --> 0:57:51.600
<v Speaker 1>music is great. And it also happens to be a

0:57:51.600 --> 0:57:55.240
<v Speaker 1>production of one of our portfolio companies, Hello Sunshine, and

0:57:55.280 --> 0:57:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it is the perfect example of what we thought Hello

0:57:58.840 --> 0:58:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Sunshine could do. Then leaning power to as symbol that

0:58:01.760 --> 0:58:07.960
<v Speaker 1>amazing ensemble, cast amazing music creators and create something that

0:58:07.960 --> 0:58:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that UM is really is really important to to. In

0:58:11.600 --> 0:58:14.800
<v Speaker 1>this case, Amazon Prime to be an important counterparty of

0:58:14.800 --> 0:58:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the streamer. So I'm really proud of what they did there.

0:58:17.400 --> 0:58:20.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's a great show. Yeah, supposed to be sort

0:58:20.160 --> 0:58:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of loosely fashioned after the Fleetwood Mac story with all

0:58:25.080 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the christ and I think they nailed it. I really think.

0:58:27.800 --> 0:58:30.000
<v Speaker 1>The other one I love is White Lotus, which is fantastic,

0:58:30.000 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 1>not a not a Black sunrelated thing, also awesome. So

0:58:33.360 --> 0:58:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I really like the first season. I haven't gotten into

0:58:36.400 --> 0:58:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the second season yet, um and people said it's even better.

0:58:40.360 --> 0:58:43.440
<v Speaker 1>It's wilder and crazier, yeah than the first one. So

0:58:43.440 --> 0:58:46.880
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about your mentors, who who helped shape

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 1>your career. I've I've been really fortunate in my life

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:54.440
<v Speaker 1>where I've had, you know, along the way in the journey,

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley at mccundeloo, at Tinnacum, which is the Ruttenberg family,

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:02.439
<v Speaker 1>where in each of those places I've had somebody who

0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:04.840
<v Speaker 1>really helped me in my career and with whom I'm

0:59:04.960 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 1>very close even today. And then at Blackstone, you know,

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Steve Schwarzman changed my life and Tony James who started

0:59:14.160 --> 0:59:17.120
<v Speaker 1>when I was about four years into Blackstone and really

0:59:17.320 --> 0:59:19.720
<v Speaker 1>helped transform the firm and make it what it is today.

0:59:19.760 --> 0:59:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Those two men really were extremely important in my professional development,

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:29.360
<v Speaker 1>my personal development. Great amazing mentors. Let's talk about books.

0:59:29.400 --> 0:59:31.160
<v Speaker 1>What are some of your favorites? What are you reading

0:59:31.240 --> 0:59:35.160
<v Speaker 1>right now? You know the book I most recently finished

0:59:35.840 --> 0:59:39.240
<v Speaker 1>by Arthur Brooks, a book on happiness. Yeah, I've been

0:59:39.280 --> 0:59:42.280
<v Speaker 1>following that series in the Atlantic. It's really quite fascinating. Yeah,

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:44.720
<v Speaker 1>he's He's amazing And in fact I invited him to

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:46.840
<v Speaker 1>come talk to our partner group. We had a global

0:59:46.920 --> 0:59:50.400
<v Speaker 1>partner off site in Private Equity in London in September.

0:59:50.440 --> 0:59:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I had him come to talk about like what it

0:59:53.280 --> 0:59:56.040
<v Speaker 1>means to be where from where you should be deriving

0:59:56.040 --> 0:59:59.919
<v Speaker 1>your happiness. It's not just like the next the next deal,

1:00:00.040 --> 1:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the next promotion, the name in the paper or whatever,

1:00:02.880 --> 1:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you got to get it elsewhere. And I think it's

1:00:04.720 --> 1:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>really important for people who are workaholics, who are high

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>achievers to put, you know, everything that we're doing every

1:00:11.960 --> 1:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>day into context and to find happiness kind of outside

1:00:14.840 --> 1:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that box. So that's been a really important book I've

1:00:19.520 --> 1:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>read recently, and I think he's great, really interesting. We're

1:00:23.640 --> 1:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>down to our last two questions. What sort of advice

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>would you give to a recent college grad who was

1:00:29.600 --> 1:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>interested in a career in private equity Patience. I think

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the one thing I've seen in this generation of people

1:00:37.240 --> 1:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like me and you is we all were impatient. We

1:00:41.720 --> 1:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>all wanted to get there fast. But I think it's

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>entered a new level because people start so early. You

1:00:47.120 --> 1:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>have to do so much to get in college. We're

1:00:49.680 --> 1:00:52.919
<v Speaker 1>hiring summer interns now who are nineteen and twenty years old.

1:00:53.560 --> 1:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>You know that did not happen when we were kids. Uh,

1:00:56.560 --> 1:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And they and they sort of by the time they're thirty.

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>They want to have had like declare vic jury on

1:01:00.400 --> 1:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the career that doesn't happen, and enjoy the journey that

1:01:03.480 --> 1:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it takes a long time to figure out, like how

1:01:06.960 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you how you get good at something and in the

1:01:09.400 --> 1:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>particular way you want to do it, and you have

1:01:11.720 --> 1:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy that process and enjoy like the time it takes.

1:01:17.040 --> 1:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And then by the time you're in your forties you

1:01:19.120 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>can actually be good at this job. And by the

1:01:20.840 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>time you're in your fifties, with some wisdom, you can

1:01:23.160 --> 1:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be really good at the job. But it doesn't just

1:01:25.200 --> 1:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>happen like that, And I think people just need to relax,

1:01:28.640 --> 1:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>take a deep breath in the early days, do what's

1:01:31.400 --> 1:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>asked of them, do it as well as they can,

1:01:33.480 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and move on to the next step. Really really interesting

1:01:36.800 --> 1:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>answer our final question, what do you know about the

1:01:39.720 --> 1:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>world of investing today you wish you knew back in

1:01:43.240 --> 1:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the nineties when you were first getting started. I think

1:01:47.040 --> 1:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that it changes so much and fundamentally that you can't

1:01:52.400 --> 1:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>hold on to like, um, you know, absolutes. There's really

1:01:58.720 --> 1:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>no absolutes. There's some like risk management things that you

1:02:02.520 --> 1:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that you always need to be mindful of. But I

1:02:05.120 --> 1:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>could have evolved more quickly as an investor, you know, overtime,

1:02:09.320 --> 1:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and I continue to learn that lesson really intriguing. Thank

1:02:13.640 --> 1:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you Joe for being so generous with your time. We

1:02:16.000 --> 1:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have been speaking with Joe Barratta. He is Global head

1:02:18.880 --> 1:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of Private Equity at Blackstone. If you enjoy this conversation,

1:02:23.760 --> 1:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>well he sure and check out any of the previous

1:02:26.600 --> 1:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>five hundred or so we've done over the past eight years.

1:02:30.560 --> 1:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>You can find those at YouTube, iTunes, Spotify, wherever you

1:02:35.280 --> 1:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>find your favorite podcasts. Feel free to sign up for

1:02:38.680 --> 1:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>my daily reading list at Ridholtz dot com. Follow me

1:02:41.920 --> 1:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Ridholtz. Follow all of the fine family

1:02:45.880 --> 1:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Podcasts on Twitter at podcast I would be

1:02:50.400 --> 1:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>remiss if I did not thank the fine team who

1:02:53.360 --> 1:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>helped put this conversation together each week. Sebastian Escobar is

1:02:58.200 --> 1:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>my audio engineer. Ris Wold is my producer. Fatica Valbron

1:03:03.160 --> 1:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is our project manager. Sean Russo is my researcher. I'm

1:03:07.760 --> 1:03:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Barry Ridholds. You've been listening to Master's Business on Bloomberg Radio.