WEBVTT - Teva CEO on Staying Competitive in Generic Drug Market

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Jason

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Kelly on Bloomberg Radio. Of course, CEO of Teva Pharmaceutical

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>truly a global executive in many ways, and this has

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>been quite an assignment for you over the last couple

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of years, really coming to the end of a two

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>year pretty intense restructuring. Uh, tell me what has been

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>going on? Tell me what you essentially inherited two years ago. Yeah. So,

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>so it has been a very big restructuring, probably one

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest in the pharmaceul industry. And the situation

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>when I joined to it was really that the company

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>had a very tough situation. It had done an acquisition

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>here in the US of a comedy called Activists, which

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>was another leading engineering company, and had taken on it

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>to the tune of more than thirty four billion dollars.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And then it had run into a price spiraled down

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>on the whole U s Generic Managa, and at the

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>same time it's big blockbuster, Kopacon, went off patent, so

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of phacing a loss of revenue to

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the tune of potentially five billion dollars, and its earnings

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>were around five billions, which would wipe out the earnings basically,

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.919
<v Speaker 1>and then it's not good to have thirty four billion

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>dollars of debt if you don't make any money. So

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>so that was a situation when I started talking to

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the board about taking the position as CEO, and the

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>simple math was that this could only be handled if

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we could reduce the cost dramatically, because we couldn't do

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>anything about kopecs and going off pattern, and we couldn't

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>really change the US generic situation short term. So we

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>started the restructuring plan which has been now executed over

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the full year of eighteen and nineteen, where we reduced

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the number of manufacturing sites by more than twenty from

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>eighty to below sixty, the workforce by more than thirteen thousand,

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and closed a lot of officers, laboratories and so on.

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>All in all, we're using the total spend based by

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>three billion US dollars, which basically leads you to that

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the revenue dropped five billion, their earnings went away. We

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>saved three billions, so now we still make three billions,

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>which is enough to really serve the debt, which we've

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>also managed in the meantime to bring down from thirty

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>four billion to now just below twenty five billions. So

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the math is relatively simple, and yet this is a

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>complicated process. At what point did you feel like, along

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the way along this sort of two year journey, Okay,

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>now we are sort of on the right track, was

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>there a key decision, either a key closure or a

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>key investment that you felt like was an inflection point.

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not saying this to be bragging, but I

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>felt from the beginning that the analysis I did show

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that this could be done, and I immediately created my

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>new management team when I started. Within ten days, I

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>had a point of the new management team. And when

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I've done that and I knew that they were on board,

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I was pretty convinced that we would do it. Interesting,

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we had a little bit of political challenge in Israel

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Israeli government with Nitzan Yao, but we all

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>came that and stood our ground, and we have basically

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>executed the whole plan the way we re laid it

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>out in the beginning. Actually now in the next phase,

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>which links to our long term financial targets that we

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>put out two years ago, because now we're getting to

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the phase where we can grow modestly but we can

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>grow again on the top line and grow the bottom line,

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>grow the earnings, and we can also start optimizing on

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a more granular level the whole global value chain. Right,

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And so as you think about the pipeline as it were,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we've only got about a minute left in this segment,

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.119
<v Speaker 1>what are you singularly most excited about? So, what I'm

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>excited about that we have created a very focused pipeline

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>focused on biopharmaceuticals, both innovative biologics and biosimilars, and we

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>have a I think of a great pipeline now twenty

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>five projects, some of them very very innovolved, innovative, some

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>with partners like we have a protocol in Facino map

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>with Regeneral on new pay communication by Logic, which will

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>be fantastic if it passes through the phase three. And

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we have launched some exciting new by Logics such as

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a Jovi which is a treatment for chronic migraine, which

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>is fantastic as well. So I'm very excited both about

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the pipeline and about the fact that we've stabilized our

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>generic business. All Right, you're listening to Bloomberg, but sweet

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>chasing Kelly here in New York City alongside Core. Shelt

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:36.239
<v Speaker 1>He is the CEO of tele Phormaceutical based in Tel Aviv.

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>Here in New York City today, So tell me about

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Core the outlook for as you look ahead. You're through

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>this restructuring, So what does the rest of the year

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>look like? So this year looks a lot more stable

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.799
<v Speaker 1>than we've seen the past. We have very big dynamics

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>with loss of revenue on kapas and with big changes

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>than the generic revenue. For this year, we expect a

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 1>more calm development. Will still lose a little bit of

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>revenue on on Capaccent, but then we will have growth

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in both our anti migrain drug a Jovi and the

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>movement disordered drop called Ostato for hundredsons deceas ands out

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of this Kenesia. They will both be growing, so we'll

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.559
<v Speaker 1>get a nice marginal growth on revenue. The generic business

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>worldwide we expect to be roughly stable, so we're expecting

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 1>a modest growth in revenues and a modest growth also

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in earnings and and a good strong cash flow. So

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>this might not seem terribly exciting, but it's a major

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>change from the last three years where we've had you know,

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>significant reduced revenues, significant reduced earnings. So we're sort of

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>turning the corner slowly here. And I've been saying before

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen will be the trough here to the bottom

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of the trough. But now we sort of getting to

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>where the trough starts. Slowly, slow, slow awards but not dramatic. Well,

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and in some ways I would imagine maybe a little

0:05:57.960 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>bit boring is a little bit good at this point

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>after a couple of years of drama, I can tell

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you boring is definitely good and hitting the guidance is

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely good. So so I like boring. Yeah, of course

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it's still with me. He is the CEO of Teva

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Pharmaceutical based in Tel Aviv, here in New York City today,

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>thank you for hanging with me. Let's talk about the

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>world of generics because here in the United States, I

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like, especially it's so important given the cost of drugs,

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the cost of healthcare. Help me understand the economics of it,

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>both for you and and candidly for our listeners and

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>viewers out there as they think about their own health. Yeah,

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 1>let me try and give you a little bit of

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the big picture. The way drug discovery has been organized

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>in you say, the Western world for a long time

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>since the Second World War, is really that components have

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>been incentivized to innovate and find new drugs. But because

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it's so risky, ninety nine out of a hundred projects

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that you initiate fail, there's been sort of an extra

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>premium given, which is basically the patent legislation. Now, this

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is worked really well and has made that investors are

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>willing to take the risk and invest in drug development,

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen a phenomenal development over the last fifty

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.559
<v Speaker 1>years of many new drugs coming to the market. Now,

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the way it then works as you get pattern exclusivity

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>for a period, let's say ten years, and then when

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the pattern expires, generic manufacturers will take over and will

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>manufacture the drug and it will become much much cheaper,

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and it will be widely way little bile worldwide, so

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>not just in the US, but worldwide. Now, this in

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>principle is a very good model because secures long term,

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>very cheap supplies of all kind of drugs, and it

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>also secures that there's investments in new products. So what's

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>happened over time is, of course more and more products

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>go of patent so today way more than all pharmaceuticals

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>used in the United States is generic products. Now we're

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the leaders in that. So we produced you know, more

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>than one out of ten pills, tablets, medications, injections that

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>are taking every year, every single day in in the US.

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>They come from US, come from Teva, and worldwide, were

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the leaders with the biggest manufacturer worldwide, with you know,

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>many manufactories around the world, and we do a lot

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of different products. So what's been happening then and hurting

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit financially and we now adjusted to

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it was really that we have been accumulating many different

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>companies twenty mergers over twenty years, and then all of

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, the FDA started approving a lot of Chinese

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and engine manufacturers, and prices on US generics went even lower.

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Some of it even went so low that we couldn't

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>compete because the manufacturing costs in India China is significantly

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>lower for a lot of reasons, the cost of labor,

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>environmental laws, and so on. So we had to say

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 1>to our customers, well, we can't go to the price

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>level and me sustainable. Now we provide a high quality product,

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>we secure deliveries, secure supplies, and we had a good

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation with the big customers, which are from the free

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>big buying groups, three big groups that also include pharmacists

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and so on, and I think we reach a good

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>compromise where we still supply very very cheap medication, but

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>at a level where it's sustainable. And and this is

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>very important because if you have a product like um

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you and I just talked about EpiPen. We have a

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>product where there's only one supplier and the pattern that expired,

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and that manufacturer gets some quality issues and manufacturing issue,

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>then it's a real issue for society that there's not

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the backup suppliers. So ideally, when a product that has

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>gone off pattern, you would like to see at least

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.599
<v Speaker 1>two or three companies get approval, and you'd like to

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>see a much cheaper price, but a sustainable price where

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you have safety of supply, because for the public, it's

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>important that prices come down, but it's also important that

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>the quality is always perfect, and it's important you can

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>always get the drug when you go to the pharmacy.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's really you know, what what I want to

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in sure is that the product we do with TV,

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they're always the right quality and you can always depend

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on that you can get the product. And I'm very

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>happy that without generic Eppin, we've been able to say

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that anybody in the US, if they go to the

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>pharmacy and they don't have the original product, they can

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>always within twenty four hours scated from US. Interesting, and

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we shave it within twenty four hours to any pharmacy.

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So in the explanation you just gave, one of the

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>things that becomes clear is drugs. Drug pricing setting aside,

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>even R and D and development is complicated. And yet,

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>as you are very much aware, we are in a

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>political presidential presidential election you're here in the United States,

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>drug pricing will continue to be a key issue. It

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is often fair to say oversimplified by politicians and consumers.

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>What do you expect will happen this year? What can

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you do to sort of help inform the debate so

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that it proceeds in in in a rational way. Yes,

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we've just released actually a report, an independent economic report

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on our worldwide activities. And in this report you will

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>see that generics in general, of course lower healthcare costs,

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and the generics that we from server supplies to the

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>American market actually in two thousand and eighteen lower the

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>cost compared to the originator prices by forty one point

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>nine billion US dollars, a huge amount, and part of

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that was actually the patient out of pocket cost. So

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 1>the patients in the US saved six billion dollars are

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>not having to pay the high copace that goes with

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>with patented products. So are generics the answer, I mean,

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>our generics the answer to sort of the drug pricing

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>conundru No, it's not the whole answer, but it's a

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>big part of the answer, which is why more than

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>nine of all drugs consumed in the US are generics. Amazing,

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and generics are cheap. I mean the U s generic

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>pricing has come down dramatically. It's now at a level

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>where it's at the same level or below Europe. So

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>so you don't have this disparity that you're discussing. Then

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on specialty products, it's a very complicated situation. As you said,

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of payers, there's a lot of buyers,

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of intermediates, so it makes it very

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>very common. There's no simple solution. I've been supporting very much.

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>What also farmers bringing forward that for sure, transparency is

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>good because if you get more transparency on pricing on rebates,

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that can only help making the system of efficient. I'm

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>not saying it's the solution to everything, but I think

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>at least it's something that could be done without any

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>major harm to anybody. And why would you not want transparency?

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>You could see right? All right? I want to wrap up.

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Only got about a minute left. But you know, having

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>gone through this pretty dramatic restructuring, you're an experienced executive.

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>What was the thing you learned the most from sort

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>of going through this process? From taking the job, as

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you say, ten days in, you sort of had a

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>good sense that it was going to work. But I

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>have to think you learned something along the way. I

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>think I was confirmed in my sort of gradual stronger

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and stronger believing that when you know something has to

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>be done, you might as well do it as fast

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>as possible because it will actually work better if you

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>do it faster. And what work do you have left

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to do? What's the big project you have left to

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>do to really be able to look back and say,

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, success. So I got two really big challenges left.

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>One is to optimize our whole manufacturing really optimize it.

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>We've of course done a lot, but there's still a

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>long way to go before we can say we have

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>perfect logistics, we have perfect value chain optimization, we have

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>perfect optimization of all the technologies we're using. So that's

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the one thing I really want to achieve. And the

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>other thing I want to achieve is to see some

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>major new launches coming out of our pipeline and see

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the great products we have in our stato and enjoy

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we really grow to a global strength and giving the

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>benefits to patients worldwide from these new innovations. Right Courseial,

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Really a pleasure to spend some

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 1>time with you, CEO of Teva Pharmaceutical based in Tel Aviv,

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>here with me in New York City.