WEBVTT - What's on the 2022 political horizon, with special guest host Brian Goldsmith

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Hi everyone. You're listening to next Question with Katie Kuric.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And no, Katie does not have laryngitis and a kind

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of nasally sick sounding voice. No, Katie is taking one

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>more week off after her book tour, and I am

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>excited to step in. My name is Brian Goldsmith. I'm

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Katie's former producer and actually her one time podcast co host.

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi Brian, Hi Katie. Well, I'm very excited about our

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast today. Brian. How does this compare to other conventions

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>you've witnessed? This is much different. It costs more than

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>three hundred million dollars to build this little research beforehand.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is named after Gary Hart. No, Phil Hard,

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>long time senator from Michigan. So podcasting isn't really what

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I do anymore. I'm now a media and tech consultant,

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but still a political junkie as obsessed with elections today

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>as I was back in two thousand and eight when

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I was lucky enough to be part of the team

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>behind Katie's iconic interviews with Sarah Palin. Have you ever

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>finished off with any negotiations, for example, with the Russians?

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>We have trade missions back and forth. We we do

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It's very important when when you consider even national security

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>issues with Russia. As Putin rears his head and comes

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>into the airspace of the United States of America, where

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>do they go. It's Alaska, It's just right over the border.

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>So today Katie asked me to talk about what else

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>politics were about to head into a new year, an

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>election year, a very big one, and I thought it

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>would be helpful to look ahead at the political landscape

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.559
<v Speaker 1>in two Who were going to be the players shaping

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the mid terms, what are the big issues and forces,

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and what are the consequences of the elections next year.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>We're lucky to be joined today by two of the sharpest,

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>wittiest politicos I know, two of my favorite tech sting buddies.

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Republican strategist Mike Murphy, who is kind of

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a defraked Republican strategist these days because he's a Republican

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>against Donald Trump, but in the old days he worked

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>for John McCain, Met Romney, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and many others.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>And Democratic strategist Liz Smith, who has also been around

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the block politically, although not as many times as Mike,

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>whom I actually met when she was the senior communications

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>advisor to my pal Pete Boutigg when he was running

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>for president. So let's start by talking about the campaign

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>next year. What's at stake? Thirty four Senate seats, every

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>House seat, thirty six governors races. UM just very simply,

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>why did the midterms matter? And and Mike, let's start

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>with you. Well, they met her on sort of two dimensions. One,

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>they matter because particularly now we're we're an historically thin

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>margin even in the House, and of course we're hide

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate. So one party will gain a lot

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of power, my guests, as the Republicans will win the House,

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 1>which gives them the checkbook, which will take the Biden

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>agenda on domestic policy to a screaming halt on anything

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>big and budget driven. The other in the Senate, somebody's

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna win and somebody is likely to lose. It could

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>wind up fifty fifty, which is the facto democratic because

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the VP can cast a tie. But um, it could

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>deleverage the in my view, heroic moderates like Mansion and

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Cinema if the Dems can run up their number and

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>get tighter ideological control. Finally, I'd say the other dimension

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is the narrative is Biden going up or going down.

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, there's all this bullshit and politics. Everybody

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>has an opinion. You can find two different cable TV

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>channels or podcasts or whatever. But elections are like the

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street phrase mark to market. It's the one day

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>where the voters get to straighten out all the bs

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can see what's really going on out there.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And the midterms are the most important measure like that,

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>other than a presidential race. And Liz, do you agree

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>with Mike that if the Republicans win one or both houses,

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Biden's agenda comes to a screeching halt. Uh. It becomes

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot harder to implement. And I agree with him

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>about the narrative, right, it becomes a narrative problem for

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden. But I would point to the election right,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Democrats got our asses kicked. You know, I was in

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Ohio in two I worked for Ted Strickland. It was

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the few races that was actually very close.

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>It was like a two point oh margin or something

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 1>like that. UM. And the narrative coming out of was

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that Barack Obama was dead man walking UM. For of course,

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>he ended up winning fairly handily in UM. But part

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 1>of it was that it was a kick in the

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was I know, sorry, I'm not sure

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>what under neutral phrase, by the way, under the new

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>rules of the Democratic Party. So it was a pick

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in a dense area full of nerves and it grows

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>is great pain. Okay, let's see dot org. But but

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but but let me let me but let me just

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>say this was it was UM. It was a wake

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>up call for Democrats that we needed to go more

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>on the offensive, and we needed to make sure that

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>we were making clear the choice between Democrats and Republicans

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>and really going out and selling our agenda. And the

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>one frustration that UM I have at times right now

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Democratic Party is that we know, we hear

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>every day how popular billback better or Biff or whatever is,

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but we're not out there necessarily communicating as aggressively as

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>we could be about these things and about the choice

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that voters faced between Democrats and Republicans. Okay, and we're

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>going to come back to that, but I want to

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>zoom out for for one more minute, which is UM,

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a history of this president's parties almost always lose

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of seats in the mid terms and the

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>term exactly. Um. Since nix, the average midterm loss for

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.679
<v Speaker 1>president's party is twenty five seats and it's very closely

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>tied to the president's approval rating. That is the number

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>of people in a poll who say they approve of

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>the job that the president is doing. For presidents below approval,

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>which is basically where President Biden has been since the summer,

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the average loss is thirty seven House seats, and so

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, even half of that would wipe away the

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Democratic House majority. Um. Is there anything that the President,

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the White House, the Democratic Party can do, um in

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the face of these you know, really powerful historical headwinds,

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>or do they basically need to accept that the House

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>is lost? Well, they My advice to them would be

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to stop fucking up. Um. Sorry, good advice. No, No,

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it's okay, it's okay, we're gonna So here's the problem.

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>You're right, and that's the you know, I think, and

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Liz is right too. You can over interpret

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the mid terms. Um, it's loaded against the incumbent president,

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the first term. But that said, when you're polling,

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers are collapsing. When you ran as the alternative the

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>chaos to bring normalcy back, but instead you've got kind

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of an ideological chaos of your own going. Um, then

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>all those life asks of well this is their traditional

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>bump in the road, it doesn't tell the big picture. Well,

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the big picture is right now medium disaster politically for

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden, a huge exploding doubts and at least in

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the conventional wisdom beltway, which means maybe you've got to

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>discount them a little for Kamala Harris. And so when

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you add upon that the traditional trouble you've gotten the

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>mid terms, it becomes an amplifier of the narrative. So

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>what can of White House do? Um, they can use

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the political power of the presidency in a competent way

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to try to marginalized the losses and make it easier

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>for those losses to be defined as historical normal. Right now,

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be defined if nothing changes, as obvious

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>result of political disaster for the Democratic Party and the president,

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>both ideological in my view. And you know, the increasing

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>thing questions about Biden, you know, why why do they

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>keep stumbling blah blah blah, And there'll be there'll be

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a chorus of partisans who are going to say that

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>no matter what he does. But I think most honest

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>reporters right now think, well, his phone numbers are collapsing.

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't hit a home run. The best thing he had, infrastructure,

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 1>got lost in this house slappy fight between the progressives

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and the few remaining moderates. Joe Mansion is running the country,

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>not Joe Biden, and he's a he's a week bystander.

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>So you don't set up the mid terms to mean

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>more by the stumble bump stuff that they somehow become

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>caught in. Some of us their faults, some of it not. Well,

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>let me let me build off of that. Do you

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>think there's a stumble bum narrative that's developed around the president?

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Because I'll give you the alternative case, which is, you know,

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>he came in and very quickly passed the American Rescue Plan.

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>He passed it by part as an infrastructure plan that

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>most people doubt it could get done. Uh. The economy

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is roaring back much more quickly than was projected when

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>he took office. So why is his approval rating at

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>forty or fort Uh? Well, I think some of it

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is due to things out of his control. Um, there's

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fatigue with COVID, you know the fact

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's seemingly never going away, and a lot of

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that is out of his control. And you know, he

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>can go out there and point out, well, he accelerated

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>back getting vaccines to more people. Republicans fought them at

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>every um, fought them tooth and nail at every step.

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But as long as people you know, feel burdened by

0:09:56.520 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, continued mass mandates and UM lock downs, whatever

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it is, that, I think that that's going to hurt him. UM.

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think that some of the narrative around him

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is unfair given the things that he's been able to do,

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>which to me highlights why they've got to be aggressive

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in going out and selling their agenda and and selling

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the great things that they have done. And I know

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that the White House is planning on doing that, and

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the White House be more aggressive in recent

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks doing that. Um. But another thing is to Mike's

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>earlier point, I'm gonna censor myself for once, UM about

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to stop at history here. Mike is less profane than

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Liz Smith. That's shocking up right right. This is like

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Katie Kirk after dark here. So, UM, but is what

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>we saw in Virginia in New Jersey that was very

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>troubling to me is that Republicans were seen as more

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in touch with voters, as more in touch with their concerns. UM.

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Democrats allow themselves to get sort

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of thrown off what should have been the core message, UM,

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the message that really voters care about, which is we're

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>improving your live We're delivering economic results for you, We're

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to lower costs, we're trying to fight covid UM.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And instead, you know, they're going off on tangents about

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff like uh, critical race theory and and defending UM

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>school closures, which are you know about is you know,

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 1>popular as herpies at this point. So Democrats need to

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>get go more on the offensive about the very good

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>things that we've done, because again, we are the party

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 1>right now that is fighting to lower costs for people,

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>We're fighting UM to get people childcare, tax credits, all

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>these great economic things. Republicans are standing in the way

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of that, and instead we're going down these crazy rabbit

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>holes and culture wars that we don't need to be

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of. The other thing that Terry mccauloff,

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic candidate in Virginia, really tried to do was

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>link the Republican to Donald Trump, and that became a

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>core element of his message and didn't seem to work. Um,

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 1>do you think that that portends something for the elections

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>next year? It does, And I'd be interested to hear

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike's Mike's take on this, But I'll just say briefly,

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look at eighteen when Democrats took back the House,

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>even with all this gerrymandering and everything, we were able

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to take back the House. You look at the ads

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that Colin all Red ran, that Andy Kim ran, that

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Underwood ranchers Democrats who beat Republicans to take the

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>House that year. Right, thank you for clarifying that, Yes,

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>they were not ads about Donald Trump. They were not

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>hair on fire sort of Lincoln project ads. They were ads, um,

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that were focused on economic issues, on healthcare, which was

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the number one issue in eighteen. And I think it's

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>incumbent on Democrats to understand that, um, that while the

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>belt Waite conversation might revolve completely around Trump and most

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>people's lives, don't you know they just carefully can pay

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the rails. And the more that we're talking about those

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>things bread and butter issues and less we're talking about Trump,

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the better. And I would advise Democrats to go back

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to that playbook. And Mike, do Democrats um have the

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>capacity to argue that when they're in charge of the

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>country believes we're on the wrong track. Biden owns people's

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>perceptions of the economy, which are really bad right now,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>despite the stock market, but despite the headline unemployment numbers,

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>some combination of costs, inflation, maybe chaos in Washington is

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>leading people to decide that, you know, no matter what

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Biden says, they they disagree with it. Well, the premise

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of your question, yes, I mean Biden is the captain,

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's gonna be about him. And in the belt

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Way and the chattering class, it's always about Trump out

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in voter land if you're not operating within the Democrat

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, the Republican primary electorate. Trump is rear view

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>mirror yesterday's news. Why are you still talking about it?

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>The biggest problem we have now on the Republican side,

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>as we have this kind of cement head bund that

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is scary, terrible, anti patriotic and basically now running the

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>House of Representatives. Uh, and we'll run it farther if

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we get in the majority, which is likely, you have

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a larger faction. But their cowards, so cowards don't count

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in factional wark as they hide, they don't fight. But

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats in some ways have a bigger problem, which

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is because our very democracy. And I don't tend to

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>be hysterical about this like some people, but it is

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>under threat. Um the Democratic Party is now too important

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Democratic leadership class because they're helping cause Trump

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>point two point oh, because they want to fight on

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>identity and the Democrats are stumbling into culture wars and

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they're holding a weak hand. Morally, they might argue they're

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>holding a strong hand, but politically it is a weekend.

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>It is secular superiority, mocking institutions, all about identity grievance.

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>If you went to Joe Biden's website and by the way,

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I voted for Biden. That's so much I hated Trump.

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was shaking. I needed a drink. It

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>was a painful experience for me. I'm a I'm a

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>firm conservative, but I thought Trump should danger to the

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to the country, so I voted for Biden, and I

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>had hopes he'd stick with his kind of center of steal.

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>And So back to Biden's website, if you if you

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>went down on the landing page, there were like fifteen

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>little iconic cartoons of different groups. Every group's represented and

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party. And I'm channeling Mark Lilla here, who's

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a Columbia professor. Luckily for him tenured, he's a liberal.

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>He wrote a great short book. I highly recommend the

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Once in Future Liberal after Hillary lost. But they do

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a corporatist in the political science sense of the word,

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a democratic coalition of all these groups with grievances. I'm

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a left handed Native American for Biden, I'm of this.

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm of that confederation of groups. We do the one

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>big unifying idea Shining City on the Hill with Reagan,

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>make America great again with Trump. Uh. That tries to

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>unite everybody in that cause. So this group is um

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>tells working class white people, holy crap, we need to

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>get a group, and then the Trump's of the world

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>show up with their racism and their nativist arguments. So

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the problem that Democrats have is getting out of this group.

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Is um that drives in and getting back to a

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>unified message about how and middle class economics the Democratic

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Party will help you. And we're back into it now

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>because even Biden's build Back Better, which reminds me of

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the slogan of a chiropractic chain um, is perceived as

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>cost right now, not benefit when you test the elements

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of it. There's voter candy in there all the way,

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's not relevant to what people think about Biden

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>really quick. They also think Biden is weak. It's not

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>about his eight point policy. Planet's about he's the old

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>man watching the house blow up, and nobody will listen

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to him, and that's kryptonite for a president. Unfair, but

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the way politics works. We're going to take a

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>break right now to pay the bills and we'll be

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>right back. You're listening to next question. I'm Brian Goldsmith

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm talking with two of my favorite political strategists,

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Liz Smith and Mike Murphy about the upcoming mid terms.

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to it. It is striking to me

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the extent to which performance may not matter. Policy may

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>not matter as much anymore. I mean, Biden sign legislation

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that literally sent most Americans a direct deposit of fives

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>every month, and people don't know about it, or if

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>they know about it, they don't give Biden credit for it.

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>He passed this once in a generation, biggest investment in

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure since Eisenhower, and he got no credit, no lift

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in his numbers. As a result, has politics just become

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>us versus them, tribalism, entertainment, disconnected from what's going on

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in the country or what Biden is able to accomplish. Well,

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 1>I think a little bit it has become that. Um uh.

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>But again just I think the belt Way conversation was

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>very much focused on process. I do not think if

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you go around asked your neighbors, asked your friends, that

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>they that they really know a huge amount about the

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>back and forth between the squad and cinema and mansion,

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>all of that. Um. And it's always important, at least

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, to keep in mind that people, I guess

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>are very much in the bubble. Um. But we have

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>eleven months to sell this just because Biden didn't get

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's silly to think that he would

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>get some huge bomb overnight just because he passed his bill.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I know it's historic but it goes to what you

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>were saying, Brian, that there is a large amount of

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>tribalism these days and it is sort of hard to

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>break through that. However, over the next eleven months, it's

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>incumbent upon Democrats um at every level to sell the

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>hell out of his accomplishments and to point out the

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>checks that people are getting. And a few weeks ago

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I got dollar check and to anyone of any income,

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a big chunk of change. And if people know

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are doing this and the Republicans have tried

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>to stop this sort of stuff at every sup of

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, that is a winning message for Democrats. But

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>let me let me just quickly interject, because I agree

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>with all that, but I have a big caveat the

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>two things. One, if see Biden didn't get a lift

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>from infrastructure because nothing ultimately happened. It got passed in

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, but it didn't get passed past by getting

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>through the House quickly, so the White House communication machine

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>could have turned on and the thing is perfect for

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a three or four months. Wow, look what just got

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>done fast and possibly in d C. Thank your President Biden.

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's the oldest slogan in the world Governor

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Rhodes in Ohio, Roads and Progress, so he didn't get

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>any of that. Instead it became a confusing Washington slappy fight,

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>just like before, where the squad was like mad, there

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>weren't enough trillions in it, and some guy from West

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Virginia said, and boom, it's lost in that no opportunity

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to hey, I got elected. Trump's gone and I just

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>built a lot of new highways and your brother in

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>law can get a good union job. That was all

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>taken from him. Now. Maybe they have it now, but

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they could have run their messaging for six months on

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a big win. And to your point about issues not mattering,

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>they matter less now because the old intermediaries are gone

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>in the digital tribal age and the old days, Walter

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Kronk I would say, this is amazing, the biggest infrastructure

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 1>bill ever. Here's what it means to you. Now we've

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>got eight hundred channels. Half of them are just insanity

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>of one tribe or the other picking everything apart. So

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to get the rewards you used to

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>earn with real accomplishment out there. So you have to

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>be better at doing less doing big things. And hammering

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>them in. Finally, one big problem they've got with this

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>build back better thing. The elements may test so well,

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>but because the nature of the legislative process is to

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>shove so many elements in it, no one element gets

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>all the attention. If this were the child care bill period,

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it would translate a lot more and help them instead

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of the big bundle of a trillion dollars worth of

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>view spending bill, which is easier to call inflation. So

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>two more issues that may cut through the noise that

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you both are describing our COVID and abortion, and let's

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>let's do one at a time. With COVID, Biden came

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.959
<v Speaker 1>in with a big advantage in terms of Americans perception

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of his handling of that issue. Now people are are

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>evenly split, Liz, when you think about the unpredictable future variants,

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is omikrone going to be the new delta or is

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it just going to be a blip? Um our school

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>is going to stay open? How do you assess the

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>political impact, to put it in purely crass terms of

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this once in a lifetime hopefully pandemic um. Well, I

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>mean it's hard to assess because it's very unpredictable and

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>we don't know how it's going to progress. However, I

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>do think that he needs to learn from some of

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the mistakes of the past, the mistakes that we saw, um,

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, early on in the Trump administration, and not

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>repeat them, you know, not uh you know. And Democrats

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>yet and this isn't just Biden, this is Democrats at large.

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Is to not you know, rush to close schools. I

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>think that the school closures were disaster, the impacts of

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>which are going to be felt for years and years

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and years in terms of kids, mental health, UM, economic

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>impact on families, all of that. So to learn from

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the mistakes of the past. But to you know, one

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>thing that I was hardened by was when the news

0:22:55.320 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>of the mecrum UM variant came out. He responds it

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>right away, and he was on top of it and

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>showed that his administration was taking it very seriously. That's

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>not something that the Trump administration was doing, you know.

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>But he's still gonna get punished, um for these things

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that are average to control because there is a lot

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>of fatigue with with COVID and UM. That's gonna be

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 1>a challenge for him. But as long as he shows

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>decisive leadership and learns from the mistakes of the past.

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the best and most he can do. Well.

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>He does own COVID. It's unfortunate. COVID is not kind

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of politicians. When you're elected, hey, maybe something will be different.

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>When nothing is different, they get mad at you. And

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.479
<v Speaker 1>there's no winning COVID on a political level if you're

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>an incumbent because you're making people take castor oil. It

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go away overnight. COVID is not going to say Biden.

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Biden is going to endure COVID, but it's gonna create damage.

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So the question is how does he paint the forward

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>picture that's not about identity grievances, of what the Democratic

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Party is fighting for that will help your life other

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>than a laundry list of programs. Biden was good in

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the campaign at being a regular guy with regular values

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>who understood people who swing wrenches for a living, and

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that message has been lost about a month into his presidency.

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Um because of the big megaphone of the progressives in

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the House, because COVID is something that frankly, it requires

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>political pain to solve. UM if anything, and I've said

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>this a lot on hacks on tap. I want Biden

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to start being much tougher calling out the unvaccinated Americans

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>is unpatriotic, and beat the hell out of them. You know,

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the sixty forty advantage. Go on offense and at

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>least be a fighter. Right now, Biden is an observer,

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and observer presidents and times of crisis do not do well.

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So he's got nothing to lose. He's on a spiral now.

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>They are going to lose the House, They're highly likely

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to lose the Senate. So if I were Biden, I'd

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>fight like I have nothing to lose and be tough

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Delaware Joe for a while, because I think there's nowhere

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to go but up on this and quit releasing term

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>papers about we found a by the gradable way to

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>ship the COVID for less admissions. You know, that's the

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>democratic term paper approach. It's great in democratic primaries, it's

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>great in the two counties of vote America vote Democrat

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in America. But the other three thousand counties it's a

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>cultural thing, and they may respect his toughness if he

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>starts showing it. Is another issue where Democrats feel like

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they've got a sixty advantage of support for Roe v. Wade. UM,

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the decision that's coming from the Supreme Court, we think

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe in June of next year, smack in the middle

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of the mid terms, could overrule it. UM. Will that

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>energize the Democratic base? Will that save Democrats from a

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic midterm result? Is there stuff the party could be

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>doing between now and then? Um? Yes. So. My my

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>view on this for a very long time has always

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>been that, you know, worst case scenario for Republicans is

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>if they actually do get a Supreme Courts it that

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>overtterms Roby Wade because they just want to run on

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>this issue for decades, decades, decades and use it um

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you know, a mechanism for grievance within

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>their own party. This allows us to sort of flip

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the script and do what Republicans have been doing for

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>decades and use this issue to motivate our base. Um.

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>And there is even beyond the polling, I think that

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>there is a even larger silent majority UM that is

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>on the side of preserving Roby Wade, preserving abortion rights.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>If you look at um stays, for instance, states like

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>South Dakota as conservative, socially conservative as they come. About

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>a decade ago, they tried to do a ballot initiative

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to ban abortion, and everyone was like, well, of course

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna pass. They're going to ban abortion. This

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is South Dakota. I worked in South Dakota, and I

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>barely remember meeting any Democrats who at the doors would say, um,

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that I'm pro choice. And so I think that this

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>will motivate not only Democrats, but you know, Republicans, moderate Republicans,

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Independence who see this as you know, a fundamental overreach. Um.

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's republicans worst nightmare. Um if this happens, I think,

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and it it really takes an issue off the table

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>for them, and it gives us a huge, huge motivating issue. Mike,

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:26.719
<v Speaker 1>you agree with that, uh, partially. First of all, if

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>you have an angry letter based on what I'm about

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to say, send it to Brian Goldsmith Katie Curry podcast.

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 1>The minor tragedy in this is that nobody sees the

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court through the prism of constitutional law anymore. It's basically,

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>will they give me what I want and I believe

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it or not, which is not the purpose of the court.

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And Roe v. Wade is tricky Constitutional law. The Court

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>basically tortured itself to find a way to please the

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>majority of the country that was at least a reasonable

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>argument constitutionally to create Roe v. Wade out. Politically, people

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>don't want big changes in abortion law in most places.

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Remember the fight of Row is, should localities states make

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>their own abortion laws? There shouldn't be federalized. If it

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is overturned, it's it's going to be political rocket fuel

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Democrats in some places and in other places

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>it won't be the suburbs, which are the key back

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and forth the likery you know against Trump. The Dems

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>won them in two thousand and eighteen. In healthcare they won,

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and Trump on popularity in you know Biden, Trump was

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>rejected in Virginia. They went back Republican. Uh so it

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>can happen. You don't get it for free by saying

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump and in In that world is going to be

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a mighty struggle between ideological fear of the Democrats. Tax

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and spend liberals bring us inflation, which Democrats roll their

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>eyes on. But that is an old hit. The Republicans

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>know how to play it and it works. It's working

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>now or a college educated pro choice voters who are

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>attempted to vote against Biden and all those things, being

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>horrified enough by the idea of fundamental changes in abortion rights,

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, won't happen in most suburban states.

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's a little bit of an abstract issue, but

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's very powerful. And finally, you know, a hundred million

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars is going to show up from low dollar donors

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Democrats. There it'll be it'll be huge. The

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>problem is will be bigger than frustration with Biden in

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>most places. No, and a few of those suburbs it

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>could be we will see last point. The suburbs will

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on the House races, but it's really

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>these key Senate races where it could make the difference

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>where it could take the Democrats out of the holder

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Nevada, or Nevada. But anyway to

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>land the other debate role will be a net plus

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Dems. In the suburb it's overturned. But I'm

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>not sure it's the Pana sea. You know, both parties

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>have a problem. They now treat their base voters like

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>swing voters, which means they retune their messaging only to

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>appeal to voters they already have. Oh you gave me

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a perfect segue, Mike, by the way, speaking why I'm here,

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Speaking of Bass voters as swing voters. This

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a minor obsession of of Lizz's and mine. Um.

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Latinos Hispanic voters in the country, Um, which are a

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>critical part of the Democratic coalition. Barack Obama got about

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of them in Hillary performed magnificently among them.

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden saw a little bit of a dip among Latinos,

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly as we remember Mike in South Florida and in Texas,

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>but he still got six of the Latino vote. Um,

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a pull out this morning. We're recording this on Wednesday.

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>That is sending shock waves through a lot of the

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>political community. Yes, done by Biden's poster and Trump's polster

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>together that finds for the first time in a generation,

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and that Hispanic voters are evenly split between the two parties,

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>which could have profoundly negative Consequencescrats. Yeah. So, um, Liz,

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>why don't we Let's let's first start by talking about

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the term latin X, and then let's talk about the

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>broader problem. I'm so I am so sick of all

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the ink that has been spelled spilled over this This

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>goddamn word you know, UM and latin x is like

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the political equivalent of man splaining um. It is a

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>bunch of political operatives, people sort of in the nonprofit industry,

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>pushing this term that Latino people themselves don't use. And

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I remember being on a campaign I'm not gonna say

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>which campaign, and there was a contingent of staff who

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>are demanding that we use the term latin X are

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Latino Staffers were like, you cannot use this term because

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we ourselves do not use this term um. And to me,

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it is just indicative of um uh an issue with Democrats,

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>which is that we're seen as not caring about you know, people, UM,

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that we're not in touch with people. And this bizarre

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>obsession we have with this word when voters tell us

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over again not to use it,

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>speaks to this sometimes condescending image of Democrats that you know,

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we know better that you know, that we're morally superior

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to people. Um um. But more broadly, can I get

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>just more broadly about I think the issues with the

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Latino vote. I started to see UM to have real

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>concerns in TwixT when Hillary's message to the Latino community

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>was just immigration, immigration, immigration. Um, Donald Trump is a racist, Uh,

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>he wants to build a border ball And I've worked

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in Latino politics. I've worked with in Puerto Rican politics,

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>mantic in politics up here in New York. But the

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Latino community is not a monolith, right. You've got Dominicans,

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Ricans, Mexican Americans, Venezuelans, et cetera. And so we

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>cannot assume that every Latino voter cares about the same issues.

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>But immigration is not even in the top three issues

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>for uh, for Latino voters. Yet still Democrats put it

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost when in all of our communications to

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Latino voters. And we've got to understand, um that if

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we want to win back Latino voters, we need to

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to them about the economy, about small businesses. Um.

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Latino community is was hit very, very

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>hard by COVID, and I think we've got to speak

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to them more on those those issues. And one last point,

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>because I could go on about this forever, is um,

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to realize that while all liberals might be Democrats,

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>not all democrats are liberals. And Hispanic Latino voters are

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>tradition way more socially conservative, more and frankly more economically

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 1>conservative um than you know. And the people who work

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>on campaigns, people like me and uh, we need to

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:16.720
<v Speaker 1>understand that because issues like defund the police, um, issues

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>uh like the Green New Deal certainly did push away

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Latino voters UM in areas like the Rio Grand Valley,

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>which is very dependent, which is very dependent. UM. Law

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 1>enforcement provides a lot of jobs to oil and gas

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>industry provides a lot of jobs, so and grant there. Um.

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You know. I don't use the phrase latin X. I

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>agree with Liz about it. I prefer the phrase American

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.879
<v Speaker 1>because it's back to the Republican thing of unified identities. Uh,

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the American identity, that's the pre Trump. That's a bit

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of the pre Trump repelic car of course, but look

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>look what the I a rare but huge mistake. I

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>watched the Biden campaign make and Brian you know about this.

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I was very involved with Republican voters against Trump. We

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>were people talk about the Lincoln Project, we are the

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>grift free Yeah you you were involved, and we did

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work in Florida state I know very

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>well from multiple governor and other campaigns for Jeb and others.

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And when they sent Kamala Harris to Miami, I thought,

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.919
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, they totally don't get it. They're going

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>down there with a voter of color argument, when if

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you've worked Dade County politics like I have for twenty

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>five years, that is not the thing. Uh Hispanic huh

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of going to the oldies been voters down there, Americans

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 1>of Hispanic heritage, Uh don't see themselves that way. They're

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 1>more conservative, particularly as liszt as socially conservative. They're very aspirational.

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>The index high for two wonderful things, creating their own

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 1>small businesses and enlisting in the military. And they have

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>family experience, particularly in Miami, because the different Florida markets

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>are different with dictatorships both in Venezuelan of course in Cuba,

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and Biden had Cuba trouble from before being connected to Obama.

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>On that Biden was the one who needed to go.

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the Wall Street Journal poll multiple times,

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, not send Kamala, who is a problem

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to build that coalition because she tends to be a

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.479
<v Speaker 1>one note candidate. If you look at that Wall Street

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Journal poll. The real cut isn't Latino, Uh, non Latino,

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 1>it's gender. And that's the big cut through almost all

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>data now. And the other big cut is college educated.

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>So the Democrats have to stop looking. And I'm sorry

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a broken record on this, but it's back

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to my point about the Democratic Party is too important

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Democratic leadership. They need to talk to their

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:52.280
<v Speaker 1>own voters and understand that the sophisticates and the sociology

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>view of what makes a Democratic party is not the

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 1>political coalition that counts. And if they don't do that,

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the bad clash against all that stuff is not only

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>going to scare swing voters in the suburbs back away,

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna elect Trump again. Trump gets rocket fuel from

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>grievance to the Democratic identity grievances and and it's crazy,

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's frustrating because I think the internal Democratic party

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 1>politics are heavily weighted that way. And last thing, this

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is grumpy old campaign consultant hour here, and I'll shut

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>up after up. But okay, I'm a politician, so and

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>so a false promise. No if I read about another

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Democratic campaign for staff revolt, because the twenty four year

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>olds are unhappy that we're not using Latin X on

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the bumper stickers. No good high stakes campaign should spend

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time listening to twenty four year olds. Um,

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>wait till they're thirty and they have experienced and listen

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot, you know. Yeah, And I gotta tell you know, Mike,

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I was talking with someone about this earlier today. It

0:37:56.600 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is a problem, um that the Democratic campaigns are staffed

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>by people who aren't representative most voters, like I include myself,

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and that I'm sitting here in my you know, duplex

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in the West Village with my Dartmouth diploma probably somewhere

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.439
<v Speaker 1>in one of my closets. And I'm very well aware

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of that. And I think it's that's why it's important

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to um not to one have diversity of thought in

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:26.399
<v Speaker 1>these campaigns, but understand that we don't necessarily have all

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the answers. And I think the four year old stafford

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>problem is an issue and it is sort of, I

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:34.879
<v Speaker 1>think at times pathetic that you do have these high

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>profile campaigns sort of being held hostage by kids who

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>are just fresh out of Oberlin College. When we come

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:47.280
<v Speaker 1>back more political issues. And yes, unfortunately the Donald Trump

0:38:47.320 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>of it all. Let's close with everyone's favorite topic, the

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:05.479
<v Speaker 1>end of democracy and Donald Trump. UM. There's a study

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that got a lot of attention this week. UM that

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 1>was referenced in a column on the Washington Post by

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Dana Millbank and a data analytics company combed through more

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:19.880
<v Speaker 1>than two hundred thousand articles from sixty five different news

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 1>websites across the ideological spectrum UH to basically analyze whether

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>stories were good stories, bad stories, or something in between

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.240
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Biden and then compare it to the coverage

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump got UH last year in and what

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>had found, amazingly enough, was that Biden's coverage was as

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>bad as Trump's, and sometimes worse. And and Millbank described

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 1>it this way. He said in Trump presided over a

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>worst in world pandemic response that caused hundreds of thousands

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>of unnecessary deaths, held a super spreader event at the

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>White House and got COVID nineteen himself, praised Q and

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>ON adherents, and raised violent white supremacists, waged a racist

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 1>campaign against Black Lives Matter demonstrators, attempted to discredit mail

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and voting, refused to accept his defeat in a free

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and fair election, leading eventually to the violence of January

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:16.879
<v Speaker 1>six and causing tens of millions to accept the big lie,

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the worst of more than thirty thousand lies Donald Trump

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:24.879
<v Speaker 1>told an office. And yet Trump got press coverage as

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>favorable as or better then Joe Biden is getting today. Sure,

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Biden's had his troubles with the Delta Varian, Afghanistan and inflation,

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>but the economy is rebounding impressively. He's signed major legislation,

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>He's restored some measure of decency, calm, and respect for

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>democratic institutions end quote. So my question is what do

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we do about this? Is the press just not equipped

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to handle an anti democratic, anti little d democratic, proto

0:40:56.239 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian outlier like Donald Trump? And is that enabling his comeback? Liz,

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:06.720
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you. Well, first of all, I'm always

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:10.840
<v Speaker 1>skeptical of these stories that quote these like media analytic things.

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.280
<v Speaker 1>It seems like it's always a sort of an advertisement

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>for them, and I'm not sure how accurate that is. UM.

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to put too much credence in

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that I read the story, UM, but I think I

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>get the overall sentiment here, UM And I honestly I

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>have a really hard time believing that if you look

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>at all the TV coverage, all the cable coverage, that

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment was more negative for Biden than for Trump.

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Putting that aside, yeah, you know, I get data. Milbank's

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>point that, um, you know, uh, Joe Biden stumbling over

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a word at a press conference or Kamala Harris using

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>non bluetooth ear phones is not the same thing as

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, you know, whipping up his um supporters in

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a frenzy and getting them to believe to storm the

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 1>capitol or to not accept the election result. And we

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't equate those two things. Um uh. But you know,

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes with the territory. Joe Biden, any any president

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to get criticism in the press. Um. And

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>so I think that interesting comming on the Biden administration

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:23.879
<v Speaker 1>to deal with it, um, and the press probably could

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more responsible and how they handle it,

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 1>how they handle Kevin McCarthy, how they handle these guys

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 1>who go on the Sunday shows and still are unwilling to, um,

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, sack up and admit that Donald Trump lost

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the election. So the press could be a little tougher there.

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think getting criticized comes with the

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.959
<v Speaker 1>territory being president. And that's where I disagree a little

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.760
<v Speaker 1>bit with what Milbank had to say. Mike. The premise

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>here is that the countries in this existential struggle not

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 1>between two parties, but between sort of democratic self governance

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and an authoritarian alter native. Do you think that is correct?

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's oversimplified. I think that I'm with Lizza

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>mill big thing is a little specious. It's the term

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 1>paper thing again with the demigrants. Do oh, the media

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>gave Trump a B and we gotta be minus. So

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the media's corrupt. How do we fix the media? That

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 1>sounds pretty authoritarian to me right there? Um, And I

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know how they score this stuff. It is tricky.

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:27.880
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the Trump and fractions were worse on

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the existential scale, but they're also process. Liz is cats

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>disagree with you, Mike, by the way, vocal Yeah. The

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>cat's a big Elizabeth Warren supporter. And it sounds like

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>more trumpy and howling to me. I think set the

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>cat of blaze. Uh so you know it. And both

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 1>sides like to whine about their media coverage. The fact is,

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 1>here's what the press likes. It's the old Roger Ailes thing.

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:59.760
<v Speaker 1>If your candidate cures cancer in the morning and falls

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>into an orchestra pit in the afternoon, the story is

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be falling into the orchestra pit. And Biden

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>has had big, flashy breakthrough problems, the fleeing Calbool a

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>k A. Saigon and seventy five visual images, very big inflation,

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:19.359
<v Speaker 1>price of gas at the pump, These new stickers I'm

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing all over gas pumps. Joe Biden did this pointing

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 1>at the price. Um, those are meeting potato things. Well

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Trump generated and I was on board. I mean, I've

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 1>hated Trump since I don't know where all these Johnny

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>come ladies. Ron was doing the governor New Jersey's campaigns

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and he was a huge problem in Atlantic City. But anyway,

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>that Trump thing is one outrage after another to the

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of the intelligentsia. Now I'm an elitist, I care

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>about the intelligentsia, um, But but I can understand how

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the turbulence of Biden covid he caught the Delta variant,

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>which probably had equal media volume to the problems Trump had.

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 1>So I get the moral weighting that that Dana is

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 1>working on their that Trump is more systemically outrageous and

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>poisonous and toxic. But the fact that Biden is getting

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 1>crampy pressed to the press is in the crampy press business. Uh.

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we know from psychological studies that a

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>grievance story will get seven times the click of any

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>other story, and they count those because they monetize them,

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly the cable news business. Don't get me started. So

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 1>what what do we do about it? Well, that these

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>are the rules we have in the Democrats have to

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>learn how to play effectively on them and get out

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 1>of the narcissism of identity. That would be my first thing.

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>The second thing is do we have fundamental lose democracy problems?

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Here is the premise of your question indicated. And I

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:43.319
<v Speaker 1>think the country is far too ornery and far too

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 1>well armed to fall into dictatorship. But I do believe

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>we could be stuck in kind of a lost decade

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of woke stoppo intolerant stupidity on the left and thuggery

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and kind of a ashism light American style. USA Number one,

0:46:03.760 --> 0:46:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't take vaccines. We just beat up a college

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 1>professor in the parking lot for having fancy opinions about biology.

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:13.520
<v Speaker 1>We could fall into that, and we're we're tickling the

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>whiskers of that now. And Trump is a big part

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:20.719
<v Speaker 1>of it because he's got He's become the the the

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:23.879
<v Speaker 1>deity of this kind of church of stupidity. Now, I'm

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>betting on the actuarial charts and some bad meat loaf

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:29.359
<v Speaker 1>make cure the problem in the short term. And I'm

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>not sure there's anybody else who could fill that Trump void.

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, we could get to our own American style

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that is not a dictatorship, but our democracy will be

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 1>paralyzed by stupidity and wokeism versus thuggish authoritarian vibe stuff.

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But does that mean the Congress is under arrest and

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump sent a GENERALISSMO outfit or any of that. I

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 1>don't believe that. And also remember the power of the

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 1>state in the US UH to enforce anything is police

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:08.240
<v Speaker 1>organism the military, and our military is a citizens army,

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and they've taken off to the Constitution United States. I

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>have some faith in that institution. If things go too

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 1>far um to to UH to maintain UH constitutional order

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 1>in the US. I don't know that I'm quite as

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>optimistic as you are. Well, you're a democrat. It is

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a be on the term paper. You're going great or

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>there's an f uh for democracy right now. And I

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>agree it's troubling, but maybe I'm more of an optimist.

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:36.959
<v Speaker 1>It's a Republican thing. I hope you're right. I hope

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you're right. I just I worry that the lesson that

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump learned last time is you gotta surround yourself purely

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:45.839
<v Speaker 1>with thugs and loyalists. That he doesn't care at all

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 1>about the laws of the norms of the institutions. The

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:51.800
<v Speaker 1>presidents have enormous power, and that one thing we learned

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:54.760
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the Trump presidency is that, um,

0:47:54.800 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the limits are kind of tradition rather

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 1>than written into the law, and previous presidents wouldn't have

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>crossed certain lines that Trump has no problem crossing. And

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the takeaway for him was that he wasn't aggressive enough,

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that he didn't crush dissent within what he calls the

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:13.879
<v Speaker 1>deep state and among his opponents enough. And I think

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a a not insubstantial chance that he comes back.

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:20.879
<v Speaker 1>And and what happens if if God forbid, he well,

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:23.840
<v Speaker 1>he wins. No. Look, it is a fear in My

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 1>advice to the Democrats is not to wring hands about it,

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:29.720
<v Speaker 1>but go nominate to Steve Bullock, now to Stacy Abrams

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 1>for president. Why don't you beat him at the election

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with a strong candidate appeals to everybody, not just the

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Democratic base. And what I was just gonna say, I

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>had a little bit of pushback to you might on

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that is that when you're like, yes, does the squad

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:48.240
<v Speaker 1>get the lion's share of press attention? They do, because

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 1>we know, as you said, what the press looks for.

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't think the processories a left or

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:55.040
<v Speaker 1>right bias. They have a bias towards conflict, and the

0:48:55.040 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 1>squad gives them that. But you know, there, I think

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party has filled a lot more with and

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Mark Kelly's and UM the Center from Arizona, Colin Olvera,

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the Congressman from Dallas, UM and moderates and people who

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>are much more in tuned with with Democrats. We shouldn't

0:49:15.080 --> 0:49:16.839
<v Speaker 1>give people the impression that it's all just I mean,

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like Raphael Warnock and Georgia performed extraordinarily well, and I

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:24.800
<v Speaker 1>think so I think Mike maybe underestimating Stacy Abrams is

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>as a political figure. But anyway, I take your point

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>about what the press focuses on and who the actual

0:49:32.320 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>legislators are. Yeah, I think Trump starts out if he's

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 1>nominated again, and I'm not locked into this camp that

0:49:38.680 --> 0:49:41.319
<v Speaker 1>he's running and it's all over. But if he's nominated,

0:49:41.920 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the veritable that'll let Trump be defeated, as would be

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>natural or not, is going to be the Democratic nominee

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>who they choose, so the stakes couldn't be hired for

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the Dems. And I worry again, I think their rank

0:49:56.600 --> 0:49:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and file voters get it. I worry about the culture

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of the leadership in the Democratic Party. Yeah. I guess

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>my thing is I think that Trump is a fundamentally

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:12.800
<v Speaker 1>lazy guy. Um, he's grifting, like I saw some numbers

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:15.239
<v Speaker 1>on how much he was raising off of that fundraising list,

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:18.439
<v Speaker 1>And if I had to make a prediction, it would

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 1>be that he's just gonna try to bankrupt all of

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:26.280
<v Speaker 1>his supporters, run away with that money and not run again. Um,

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but and probably wait till the last minute. So I

0:50:29.440 --> 0:50:32.319
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily I could be very wrong, but I I

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>don't see him running again because again, I think he's

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a fundamentally lazy person who cares mostly about money, and

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>he's got a perfect set up firm self right now. Well,

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some truth to that, but he is

0:50:42.800 --> 0:50:46.840
<v Speaker 1>going to with the mind of a sixty five year old, cranky, racist,

0:50:47.400 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>high dollar private business donor. He's going to look at

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic opponent that will drive a lout of his calculus.

0:50:53.960 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So if it's somebody that looks like the Democratic base,

0:50:57.640 --> 0:51:00.280
<v Speaker 1>he'll be encouraged. If it's somebody who looks more like Aden,

0:51:00.400 --> 0:51:04.319
<v Speaker 1>he won't be That's my guess. A version of your take,

0:51:04.360 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 1>which I pretty much agree with. Well, as they say

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:11.479
<v Speaker 1>on cable news, to be continued and we will see

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you go. You put a button on it. I did.

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I did ever so slightly um awkward, but still very good. Yeah,

0:51:19.239 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. In trouble, she'd better come back

0:51:22.440 --> 0:51:25.640
<v Speaker 1>from St. Bard's whatever and reclaim the throne here. She's

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:30.400
<v Speaker 1>got competition, al right. Well, Murphy, Liz, thank you so

0:51:30.520 --> 0:51:34.359
<v Speaker 1>much for doing this and we'll talk soon. Thank you,

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so thanks again to my guests, Mike Murphy

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and Liz Smith. Mike has his own amazing political podcast

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>with David axel Rod and Robert Gibbs, which is called

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:49.399
<v Speaker 1>hacks on tap. You can find it on all your

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite podcast purveyors. You can also find him on Twitter

0:51:54.560 --> 0:51:59.400
<v Speaker 1>at Murphy Mike and find Liz on Twitter at Liz Smith.

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:02.279
<v Speaker 1>But here's the hatch. Liz is spelled l I S,

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:06.479
<v Speaker 1>not l I Z. I'm Brian Goldsmith. You can find

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:09.879
<v Speaker 1>me at goldsmith be on Twitter. Thank you so much

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:12.839
<v Speaker 1>for listening, and thank you Katie for having me on.

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure your listeners are going to be quite relieved

0:52:15.480 --> 0:52:18.279
<v Speaker 1>to hear that you were on your way back. Oh

0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, everyone, if you haven't, please register

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to vote. You can't really participate in our politics without voting.

0:52:25.520 --> 0:52:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Listening to the podcast isn't enough, so you can check

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:30.759
<v Speaker 1>with your state or you can go to vote dot gov.

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to both my guests, host Alison Roman and

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Brian Goldsmith for helping me out. But now it's time

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:41.719
<v Speaker 1>to pass the mic because I'm back, baby, and listeners,

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I have such a treat for you. I hope it's

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:45.879
<v Speaker 1>a treat. It was a treat for me to put

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 1>it together. Next week, I'm sharing an intimate look at

0:52:48.800 --> 0:52:52.239
<v Speaker 1>my book tour, the highlights, the low lights. Actually, there

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 1>weren't any special guests, and so much more that's next

0:52:56.080 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 1>week on Next Question. Next Question with Katie Kurik is

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeartMedia and Katie Couric Media. The executive

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>producers Army, Katie Couric, and Courtney Litz. The supervising producer

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is Lauren Hansen. Associate producers Derek Clements, Adrianna Fasio, and

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Emily Pinto. The show is edited and mixed by Derrek Clements.

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 1>For more information about today's episode, or to sign up

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 1>for my morning newsletter, wake Up Call, go to Katie

0:53:28.200 --> 0:53:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Currek dot com. You can also find me at Katie

0:53:30.920 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Curic on Instagram and all my social media channels. For

0:53:34.680 --> 0:53:37.839
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit the I Heart

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen to your

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:42.280
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows,