Speaker 1: All right, thank you, Scott Shannon, and thanks to all
Speaker 1: of you for being with us. Write down our toll
Speaker 1: free telephone number this Friday. It's eight hundred and ninety
Speaker 1: four one sewn if you'd like to join us. Sort
Speaker 1: of any climatic the quote sentencing non sentence of Donald
Speaker 1: Trump in this ridiculous case in New York that I
Speaker 1: mean it will be overturned. I'm ninety nine point ercent
Speaker 1: certain that that's going to be the case, regardless of
Speaker 1: what the appellate court said about sentencing or the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court said about sentencing. There are just too many issues
Speaker 1: in play here where corruption existed, and it's frustrating. I
Speaker 1: think the bigger argument, the better argument before the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court was Levin's argument, which was they should use the
Speaker 1: supremacy clause and how there wasn't any jurisdiction for Alvin
Speaker 1: Bragg to come up with his novel legal theory to
Speaker 1: bypass a statute of limitation that had come and gone.
Speaker 1: And even on the federal side of this, I mean,
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice has weaponized, as it is, had
Speaker 1: passed on this very issue. And you know the fact
Speaker 1: that they were stacking these charges one on top of
Speaker 1: the other, added to the fact that the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: decision I believe it was July one, on immunity, and meanwhile,
Speaker 1: there were tons of evidence brought into play that of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's time as president that would literally render the verdict,
Speaker 1: you know, meaningless. It should have been thrown out for
Speaker 1: one hundred different reasons. It never should have been brought
Speaker 1: to begin with, and it's sort of anti climatic. There
Speaker 1: might be a silver lining in all of this, that
Speaker 1: civil lighting being that Donald Trump can now get now
Speaker 1: that he's out of Juan Mershawan's courtroom, that would now
Speaker 1: give him the ability to go to another court and
Speaker 1: get this thing overturned for a whole host of reasons,
Speaker 1: the least of which is they had no standing. The
Speaker 1: first thing is Supreme Court, if you listen to oral arguments,
Speaker 1: will have why are you here? Why are you before us?
Speaker 1: Why is this a federal issue? And in this particular case,
Speaker 1: this was a New York issue a legal nda, and
Speaker 1: Donald Trump made that point earlier today and getting indicted
Speaker 1: for calling a legal expense a legal expense, which is
Speaker 1: pretty much what it was, a legal nda put together
Speaker 1: by a lawyer and identified as a legal expense that's
Speaker 1: from and again the statute of limitations had run out.
Speaker 1: How does this become what they turned it into, this
Speaker 1: whole novel legal theory. As Johnathan Turley said, there was
Speaker 1: no underlying crime in this case, but they managed to
Speaker 1: conjure it all up. They get a corrupt, frankly abusively
Speaker 1: biased judge in a very liberal jurisdiction. You know a
Speaker 1: group of people that just don't like Donald Trump, and
Speaker 1: he didn't have a chance in hell in this particular case.
Speaker 1: But he will win on appeal, which I've been saying
Speaker 1: all throughout this, I mean even fake news CNN, I
Speaker 1: it may even be worth playing that. With everything that
Speaker 1: they've thrown at Donald Trump, legally, he has won every
Speaker 1: single thing and he has not lost. And he's not
Speaker 1: going to lose on this one. Listen, big picture.
Speaker 2: Six months ago, he faced four criminal cases. He had
Speaker 2: been convicted in the New York Hushmany case, which was
Speaker 2: considered the least serious of the four. And now even
Speaker 2: though he has been convicted, he has received really no
Speaker 2: punishment there. The two federal cases against them have been dismissed,
Speaker 2: and the Georgia case, the prosecutor has been disqualified. That
Speaker 2: case is not completely dead, but it's basically on life support.
Speaker 2: I mean, if we look at his legal defense team,
Speaker 2: this is an extraordinary victory. Now, they got a couple
Speaker 2: of big assists from the Supreme Court over the course
Speaker 2: of the last two years, but the fact that they
Speaker 2: have been able to keep their client from really facing
Speaker 2: any consequences across four criminal cases is truly straordinary and
Speaker 2: today is really the symbol of their successful defense of
Speaker 2: their client.
Speaker 1: Well, in many ways, there are so many attorneys involved
Speaker 1: in in this whole process, too many to properly count
Speaker 1: on many different levels. I did notice when I was
Speaker 1: on vacation that one of Joe Biden's biggest regrets is
Speaker 1: that he picked Merrick Garland to be the the Age,
Speaker 1: which is stunning to me considering how much the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice became weaponized under Garland. I mean, this this
Speaker 1: whole special prosecutor issue, you know, both the one for
Speaker 1: Hunter and the one designed that was going to give
Speaker 1: Hunter the sweetheart deal. I mean that that was all
Speaker 1: done with the with the wink and the nod of
Speaker 1: the Justice Department this case in New York. Remember, you
Speaker 1: had the third highest ranking Department of Justice official that
Speaker 1: left his position to go to New York to help
Speaker 1: help Alvin Bragg try this case. That's how badly they
Speaker 1: wanted to Donald Trump. None of this came into play
Speaker 1: until Donald Trump announced that he was going to run
Speaker 1: for president again. And never mind the lack of equal
Speaker 1: justice or equal application of our laws. But certainly in
Speaker 1: this case I would have appealed that the Supreme Court sooner.
Speaker 1: I would have said the supremacy clause would have been
Speaker 1: the Levin argument was the better argument. Election and appearance
Speaker 1: would have been a good argument, and that they have
Speaker 1: no standing would have been a good argument. And again,
Speaker 1: all of this will come out, the immunity ruling will
Speaker 1: come into play in the appeals process. But again it's
Speaker 1: sort of anti climatic, it's meaningless. This whole, this whole
Speaker 1: exercise was all designed to prevent him from running and winning.
Speaker 1: That's what it was all designed the American people. To
Speaker 1: your credit, otherwise, what you're seeing unfolding California would be
Speaker 1: your reality right now, because this is the California represents
Speaker 1: that intersection of radical environment menalism. You know that that
Speaker 1: sort of melds itself into what is radical socialism. Marxism, statism,
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call it, because that's what's going
Speaker 1: on out there, and radical environmentalism. I mean, you go
Speaker 1: through the list of failures and it's just they're too
Speaker 1: numerous to mention, and it's like you can't even believe it.
Speaker 1: It's like it's a bad movie that's been unfolding before
Speaker 1: your eyes. It really is. And it's sad because California
Speaker 1: is one of the you know, most beautiful states you've
Speaker 1: ever been to. I did live out there in the
Speaker 1: eighties for five years. That's where I got my radio start.
Speaker 1: And you could even go I think it's UC Davis.
Speaker 1: You can go to many top universities. I've mentioned many
Speaker 1: of them, Auburn University, University of Georgia, University of Florida.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's so many universities where you can get
Speaker 1: a degree in the science of forestry. And yet you
Speaker 1: know here the simple things like well, why weren't the
Speaker 1: the fire hydrants working well? They Gavin Newsom, I'm not
Speaker 1: sure what he's thinking, And when he answered, Anderson Cooper,
Speaker 1: I guess asked them the question, well, they weren't designed
Speaker 1: to deal with these types of fires. We'll slow down
Speaker 1: a second here, because California is known to have wildfires,
Speaker 1: Santa Anna winds, and I lived out there, so I
Speaker 1: know for a fact they are predictable. They're going to happen,
Speaker 1: so you've got to prepare for the worst case scenario.
Speaker 1: You know, they had a referendum on this very issue
Speaker 1: in building water reservoirs out there from twenty fourteen, that's
Speaker 1: eleven years ago. Not a single one of them were built.
Speaker 1: It's like they can't even build that. The train that
Speaker 1: they want to build from Bakersfield to God knows where,
Speaker 1: and it's already billions of dollars above budget. They have
Speaker 1: plans for wind turbines that will cost billions. They allocated
Speaker 1: six hundred and fifty state federal dollars for a project
Speaker 1: to make the LA Ports green. I mean, how does
Speaker 1: that make any sense? Why do they have eight hundred
Speaker 1: thousand dollars green street sweepers in Los Angeles? Why did
Speaker 1: they cut the LA Fire Department budget by seventeen point
Speaker 1: six million just a number of months ago. Why did
Speaker 1: they want to even cut more money from this knowing
Speaker 1: that they're not prepared. Why did I have to travel
Speaker 1: to California and Devin Nuna's district to cover the issue
Speaker 1: of farms not getting water. I did it on behalf
Speaker 1: of the farmers because I love farmers. I just do.
Speaker 1: I mean, I just have a very keen understanding. And
Speaker 1: maybe I don't think we appreciate farmers and ranchers as
Speaker 1: much as we should, or truckers that deliver all these
Speaker 1: goods to us at every store that we go to,
Speaker 1: but they're all part of the supply Chaine and farmers
Speaker 1: couldn't farm out there, and the reason was that the
Speaker 1: state put the lives of the delta the smelt above,
Speaker 1: giving the which is a meno fish, an irrelevant mineral
Speaker 1: fish in my mind, over the right of farmers to
Speaker 1: grow crops to feed people. I mean, that's how bizarre
Speaker 1: this all is. But you know, they gave up on
Speaker 1: clearing the brush and these controlled burns and the science
Speaker 1: behind it. They didn't build the reservoirs. They didn't you know,
Speaker 1: we now know, we learned today that the reservoir in
Speaker 1: the Pacific Palisades was empty. How is that possible? How
Speaker 1: do you deny farmers thousands and thousands and thousands of
Speaker 1: acres of farmland water, you know, to protect a little
Speaker 1: minto fish called the Delta smelt. How do you cut
Speaker 1: the LAFD fire budget by millions of dollars and yet
Speaker 1: you allocate six hundred and fifty million for the LA
Speaker 1: port to go green and spend eight hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 1: per green street sweeper in LA. This is insane. It's
Speaker 1: the highest time state in the country. There's plenty of
Speaker 1: money allocated for illegal immigrants in the sanctuary state of California,
Speaker 1: in the sanctuary city of Los Angeles, and I know
Speaker 1: the people out there, and then you have a mayor
Speaker 1: that comes back from Ghana when the fire started and
Speaker 1: then is asked by a reporter and can't even get
Speaker 1: the words out. My thoughts are with the people of
Speaker 1: Los Angeles. We're doing everything we can do to remedy
Speaker 1: the issues involving fire, hydrants that don't have water, and
Speaker 1: getting the resources available to people, to protect as many
Speaker 1: homes and property, as much property as possible, and to
Speaker 1: save lives. Ten people at least that we know of,
Speaker 1: are dead. You know, you have over ten thousand structures
Speaker 1: that have now been destroyed, homes and businesses, and if
Speaker 1: you look at you know, the disqualifying conduct of this
Speaker 1: mayor and the idiocy, and she goes, oh, let me
Speaker 1: give you here's the website to go to the here's
Speaker 1: the url. She doesn't even know what the website is.
Speaker 1: This is the second time she spoke. The first time
Speaker 1: she wouldn't answer a reporter's question. The LA Fire Department
Speaker 1: deputy chief said, if she has to carry a man
Speaker 1: out of a burning building, he's in the wrong place.
Speaker 1: What hang on a second. I don't care if you're
Speaker 1: a man or a woman in the fire department at all,
Speaker 1: doesn't matter to me. But you got to be strong
Speaker 1: enough to do the job. It's that simple, it is.
Speaker 1: You know, by the way, some of the money that
Speaker 1: was spent in La gay choirs, trans cafes, the social
Speaker 1: justice art. You know, the fire chief warning the Democratic
Speaker 1: mayor these budget cuts would severely limit fire response. She
Speaker 1: didn't pay attention to it. These hundreds of hydrants were
Speaker 1: stolen for scrap before the fires in La. Now everybody's
Speaker 1: worried about the amount of looting that that they anticipate
Speaker 1: is going to happen. LA Water Power officials rake in
Speaker 1: fat salaries, some people being paid hundreds and hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of dollars being paid more than Donald Trump, who
Speaker 1: gives all of his salary to charity. You know, we'll
Speaker 1: play it later in the program. This mother confronting Gavin
Speaker 1: Newsom on the horrific response and the lack of water,
Speaker 1: and I mean his answer was all I'm calling I'm
Speaker 1: on with Joe Biden. Well, I'm trying to call Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: It just is one thing after another. Then we have
Speaker 1: an insurance crisis that we've warned about. The insurance was
Speaker 1: the canary in the coal mine when the insurance companies
Speaker 1: pulled out. They pulled out for a reason. They pulled
Speaker 1: out because they knew that this was likely to occur.
Speaker 1: They took an objective view of what the policies in
Speaker 1: the state were and they said, we can't ensure this.
Speaker 1: The risk is too great, the payout will be too
Speaker 1: great and will be bankrupt. So they pulled out. California
Speaker 1: Democrats and the sad reality is too is I still
Speaker 1: don't have any hope that the people of California would
Speaker 1: wake up realize that the promises of government that they overpromise,
Speaker 1: they under deliver, that they mismanage, and this is the fake.
Speaker 1: This is the promise of socialism. They'll promise you the moon.
Speaker 1: You're going to guarantee your cradle to your grave, from
Speaker 1: the womb to the two. Everything's going to be taken
Speaker 1: care of. And yet we have Social Security and Medicare
Speaker 1: on the verge of insolvency. We have some of the
Speaker 1: worst schools in the industrialized world, even though we pay
Speaker 1: them war per capita for student we have. They can't
Speaker 1: keep basic law in order because they believe in defund dismantled,
Speaker 1: no bail laws. They can't control the border. We let
Speaker 1: in terrorists and murderers and rapists and cartel members and
Speaker 1: gang members, and then they don't want to expel them.
Speaker 1: They want to give them pre sex change operations, housing, food, healthcare,
Speaker 1: and education. Explain that in insanity to me. But all
Speaker 1: the promises of Obamacare, none of them are fulfilled, none
Speaker 1: of them. They squandered the money with Social seecurity, there
Speaker 1: was no lock box, the school systems, the disaster. They
Speaker 1: don't keep law in order, and people still want to
Speaker 1: put their faith, their hope, their trust in government. I
Speaker 1: urge all of you to never do that, to assume
Speaker 1: the worst, to assume they're never going to be there. Look,
Speaker 1: President Trump and This really did define his first term,
Speaker 1: and I think it will define his second term. And
Speaker 1: that is the things that he said on the campaign
Speaker 1: trail are not just slogans, They're not just words. I
Speaker 1: think this is his agenda. It's not going to be
Speaker 1: earth shattering to people. The left will do their predictable
Speaker 1: They hate Donald Trump. They hate Donald Trump, they hate
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. I mean, that's what's so anti climatic about
Speaker 1: the sentencing today. And I wonder when this case finally
Speaker 1: gets overturned, and it will, I wonder what kind of
Speaker 1: news coverage that'll get, especially compared to all of the
Speaker 1: coverage of all of the cases that have all fallen apart,
Speaker 1: because it was all designed by a weaponized Department of Justice, unfortunately,
Speaker 1: a politicized, weaponized FBI, and a politicized and weaponized intelligence community,
Speaker 1: you know, which they have been working, you know, to
Speaker 1: get Donald Trump since the day came down the escalator
Speaker 1: and you know, for three years nothing but a Russia
Speaker 1: hoax and live pedal to the country. He literally was
Speaker 1: in the Ritz Carlton in Moscow with hookers urinating on
Speaker 1: it and they were urinating on him. I'm like, huh, Okay, first,
Speaker 1: he's the biggest GERM fobe in the world. It never happened.
Speaker 1: He wasn't there. It didn't matter, The truth never mattered.
Speaker 1: PAISA warrants where they used his opponents dirty bought and
Speaker 1: paid for Russian disinformation. Dossier would made up lies as
Speaker 1: the basis of getting a PISA warrant, not one, but
Speaker 1: for them. They ruined the life of Carter Page. Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: They spied on him as a candidate, as a president.
Speaker 1: This went on for a full year. Nobody's ever been
Speaker 1: held accountable. The double standard. You don't have equal justice
Speaker 1: under the law. You know, Joe Biden, he wasn't covered
Speaker 1: by the Presidential Records Act. Donald Trump was. Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: wasn't covered by the Presidential Records Act. Donald Trump was.
Speaker 1: They raided mar A Lago. They shuffled through all of
Speaker 1: Llania's clothes, all of Baron's close And meanwhile, they had
Speaker 1: been there, not that not that long before, and the
Speaker 1: FBI had full and complete access to all of mar
Speaker 1: A Lago. We know that now to be a fact.
Speaker 1: We know that the FBI even called there was one
Speaker 1: particular room where they saw things. I don't know why
Speaker 1: they if they saw something that shouldn't have been there.
Speaker 1: Why didn't they take it with him? Then? Why didn't
Speaker 1: they asked to take it with them? Then? Why did
Speaker 1: they call back and say would you mind putting another
Speaker 1: lock on that door? Which they complied with? I mean,
Speaker 1: why didn't they come back? They've nobody denied the access.
Speaker 1: The first time Joe Biden at top secret classified information
Speaker 1: in four different locations, they didn't raid any one of
Speaker 1: those locations. They didn't rate his home with his beautiful corvette,
Speaker 1: and they didn't raid any of the They didn't raid
Speaker 1: his home on the beach in Delaware. Interesting how he's
Speaker 1: able tome in Delaware? Isn't it on a senator's salary?
Speaker 1: You don't exactly get rich serving in Congress, But that
Speaker 1: isn't aside for another day. Same with Hillary Clinton thirty
Speaker 1: three thousand deleted subpoenaed emails. You know, no reasonable prosecutor
Speaker 1: would prosecute devices destroyed with hammers and sim cards removed
Speaker 1: a bleach bit something nobody had ever heard of, being
Speaker 1: used to wipe clean the hard drives and the servers
Speaker 1: of Hillary Clinton. You know she had top secret classified
Speaker 1: information more than they found at mar A Lago with
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, didn't they raid her house, her office. Why
Speaker 1: wasn't she put under the same type of scrutiny. Why
Speaker 1: wasn't there a special prosecutor. I didn't finish the thought earlier,
Speaker 1: But you know, the idea that Joe Biden is angry
Speaker 1: at Merrick Garland as one of his worst appointments is laughable,
Speaker 1: considering Merrick Garland did everything he could do to weaponize
Speaker 1: that Department of Justice and the FBI in the process.
Speaker 1: James Comy was the one that famously said no reasonable
Speaker 1: prosecutor would prosecute before the twenty sixteen election. The only
Speaker 1: reason that he came out with this information was because
Speaker 1: there were other law enforcement officials that were aware of
Speaker 1: Anthony Wiener's laptop and the top secret classified information Visa
Speaker 1: v I guess Uma Abadeen, who's worked for Hillary at
Speaker 1: the time, but Hillary's emails, not hers and anyway, and
Speaker 1: that it was going to come out and he had
Speaker 1: to get ahead of it. But they were trying to
Speaker 1: protect him, just like the Department of Justice tried to
Speaker 1: protect Hunter. And this guy investigated doing nothing for four
Speaker 1: years and then all of a sudden comes up with
Speaker 1: a sweetheart deal. They thought that the judge would sign
Speaker 1: off on it, not read it. The judge actually did
Speaker 1: her job, read read the plead deal and turns to
Speaker 1: the prosecution and the defense and says, I've never seen
Speaker 1: a deal like this my entire career. Have any of
Speaker 1: you ever seen it? And the defense had to even
Speaker 1: acknowledge No, they'd never had. So the plan was to
Speaker 1: give Hunter a sweetheart deal where he wouldn't be held
Speaker 1: accountable for anything. The judge, unfortunately didn't go along with
Speaker 1: their scheme. Unfortunately. For if you believe in the truth
Speaker 1: in the case of Donald Trump, no he look at
Speaker 1: what they have put this guy through for the last
Speaker 1: nine years. And this is the amazing part of the election.
Speaker 1: I keep focusing on him because it's so amazing is
Speaker 1: that the American people heard this every single minute, every
Speaker 1: hour of every twenty four hour day, every seven day week.
Speaker 1: This is all they focus on. And if you watch
Speaker 1: the mob, the state run media mob, they're doing it again.
Speaker 1: You know, some people are saying, well, the media's gone
Speaker 1: quite quiet and they're more compliant. It's all going to change.
Speaker 1: Let me once these hearings begin for the nominations, you know,
Speaker 1: when they bring up Pete Hegseth and Pam Bondy and
Speaker 1: Cash Battel and RFK Junior and Tulci Gabbard that they're
Speaker 1: going to go back to doing what they do best.
Speaker 1: The Democrats. You think Adam Shift's character has changed, You
Speaker 1: think Chuck Schumer's character has changed. Now there's smear merchants.
Speaker 1: They will smear, slander, besmirched to try and destroy every
Speaker 1: single person that Donald Trump wants in his cabinet. And
Speaker 1: they're going to pick and choose who to go harder
Speaker 1: at because and and they're going to try and do
Speaker 1: what they did to Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas and
Speaker 1: Justice Kevanaugh. They're going to try and do that a
Speaker 1: lot of the Trump nominees. They will be true to form.
Speaker 1: It's predictable as the day is long. And the hope
Speaker 1: is is that Republicans will give Donald Trump the cabinet
Speaker 1: that he wants so that he can fulfill his promises
Speaker 1: as your president. That's why when you look at what
Speaker 1: he has planned on day one, and this was kind
Speaker 1: of revealed when he had a closed door meeting with
Speaker 1: Republican senators, is apparently a list of about one hundred
Speaker 1: executive orders for prioritizing border security, domestic energy production, and
Speaker 1: he was in the meeting. Apparently Homeland Security advisor Steven
Speaker 1: Miller was there. I talked to a number of Senators
Speaker 1: in the room. They said it was extraordinarily productive, that
Speaker 1: the President was dialed in, funny not along with everybody.
Speaker 1: Listen to them. The only question that came up was
Speaker 1: whether there should be one bill or two bills. There's
Speaker 1: two schools a thought on it. I'll let them work
Speaker 1: out the details, but I kind of think Newt had
Speaker 1: the right idea, one big, beautiful bill, get it all
Speaker 1: done now, and get it done so the economy can
Speaker 1: start revving up as quickly as possible. Trump said he'd
Speaker 1: also sign at least twenty five executive voters on the
Speaker 1: first day of his second term, and based on those
Speaker 1: statements and the statements on the campaign trail, he ran
Speaker 1: heavily on these focused promises that he wanted to secure
Speaker 1: the border on day one and dedicated to carrying out
Speaker 1: the largest deportation operation in US history, reversing the Harris
Speaker 1: Biden open borders policy, which has created the biggest national
Speaker 1: security crisis in our lifetime. So he's going to stop
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants and the flights from the southern border to
Speaker 1: other parts of the US. He's going to shut down
Speaker 1: the acceptance of asylum applications. He's going to bar US
Speaker 1: born children of illegal immigrants from automatically receiving American citizenship,
Speaker 1: which he should do. Used to be a term probably
Speaker 1: politically incorrect. Now I don't know. I mean, I can't
Speaker 1: keep up with what you can and cannot say. But
Speaker 1: you know, an anchor baby, somebody would come from another
Speaker 1: country into this country, they'd give birth, and that child
Speaker 1: automatically being born birthright citizenship. I under those circumstances, I
Speaker 1: think it's done, you know, outside of the spirit of
Speaker 1: what was intended. And yeah, he's going to pardon. There
Speaker 1: were a lot of people that were persecuted about January sixth.
Speaker 1: There were some bad people there that day. They did
Speaker 1: horrible things and they should be held accountable, and they
Speaker 1: were held accountable. But then there were people that never
Speaker 1: even entered the capital that were tried and convicted. Those
Speaker 1: people never should have been convicted. I mean, you've got
Speaker 1: a guy in New York eighty seven prior arrests outstabbing
Speaker 1: people on the subway last weekend. You got this guy
Speaker 1: in the Daniel Penny case Neely, you know, forty two
Speaker 1: previous encounters with law enforcement, and yet he's on the
Speaker 1: train threatening to kill people, and they wanted to put
Speaker 1: Penny in jail. The President is also going to end
Speaker 1: this last minute attempt of sabotage by Joe Biden on
Speaker 1: his energy agenda. This to me is one of the
Speaker 1: most important parts of his agenda. If we're going to
Speaker 1: get this economy running again and we're going to deport
Speaker 1: people and we have to find them to deport them,
Speaker 1: that's going to be very expensive. We're going to need
Speaker 1: a lot of manpower. If the President is going to
Speaker 1: restore or refund the police and restore law and order
Speaker 1: in the country. If the President is going to prop
Speaker 1: up social security and Medicare, which is headed towards insolvency.
Speaker 1: If the President is going to create the next generation
Speaker 1: of warfare again, Russia and China have hypersonic missile technology,
Speaker 1: why don't we We are falling behind. It's a gap
Speaker 1: of vulnerability. If he's going to really build a iron dome,
Speaker 1: all of this research is going to cost a fortune.
Speaker 1: We're going to have to invest that money, because if
Speaker 1: we don't have a secure country. We don't will never have,
Speaker 1: will never have freedom, and we'll always have a vulnerability
Speaker 1: that we ought we ought never have. And both Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris and Joe Biden they have neglected on military, so
Speaker 1: we're going to have to spend money there. And then
Speaker 1: the President has promised no tax on tips, no tax
Speaker 1: on social security, no tax on overtime. He will fulfill
Speaker 1: those promises, but that also in the beginning especially, it
Speaker 1: will stimulate economic growth over time, which will result in
Speaker 1: more revenues, not less revenues. But in and he's got
Speaker 1: to extend the Trump tax cuts. I would advise that
Speaker 1: he make them permanent. But if he's going to do
Speaker 1: all of these things, they all cost money. Now, the
Speaker 1: biggest revenue source we have well, you know you hear
Speaker 1: about you know, these oil rich nations, these energy rich countries.
Speaker 1: The beauty is, we have more energy resources in the
Speaker 1: United States of America than all of these countries pretty
Speaker 1: much combined. We have Western Europe that has allowed itself
Speaker 1: to become reliant on natural gas from Russia. In light
Speaker 1: of what Russia did with Ukraine, I don't think it's
Speaker 1: a reliable partner. So there's an opportunity for America to
Speaker 1: produce all of the energy needs of all of Western Europe,
Speaker 1: and we have the benefit of earning a lot of
Speaker 1: money financially. We become a rich country. One of the
Speaker 1: things Alaska does that I always loved about Alaska is
Speaker 1: as they produce energy, as they produce minerals, and they
Speaker 1: mine the earth and whatever they're producing, their natural gas,
Speaker 1: whatever it happens to be. The people, the citizens of Alaska,
Speaker 1: they don't pay a state income tax. They get a
Speaker 1: check from the state every year, a percentage of what
Speaker 1: the profit that they may from the resources that they
Speaker 1: share as members of that state. I mean, we have
Speaker 1: thirty seven trillion dollars in debt. We've got to pay down.
Speaker 1: These are enormous problems we have. So this is the
Speaker 1: single best way to pay down our debt, salvage social
Speaker 1: security of medicare, deport these people that shouldn't be here,
Speaker 1: refund the police, you know, end this military gap of vulnerability,
Speaker 1: prepare for the next generation of warfare, which will be
Speaker 1: fought in air conditioned offices, not on battlefields. And the
Speaker 1: single best thing we can do is to produce energy,
Speaker 1: you know, to the extent we're capable now There's going
Speaker 1: to be a lot of reluctance and resistance among energy
Speaker 1: companies to do it because Donald Trump only has a
Speaker 1: four year term, and I think the best way around
Speaker 1: that is to give them an unbreakable, you know, fifty
Speaker 1: hundred year lease on certain areas of the country that
Speaker 1: the government cannot go back on, and that has to
Speaker 1: be binding. They have to make it binding, and if
Speaker 1: that takes Congressional action, then so be it. Now there's
Speaker 1: a lot of things Trump can do on his own.
Speaker 1: But then there's gonna be times when we come on
Speaker 1: this program and we give out the phone number in
Speaker 1: Congress and the Senate, and you're gonna have to you
Speaker 1: just can't vote for Trump and say good luck, I
Speaker 1: did my part. I'm done because we don't have big
Speaker 1: enough margins in the House and Senate. And some of
Speaker 1: these people are not exactly you know, fearless leaders. Some
Speaker 1: of them have very weak spines, and some of them
Speaker 1: are scared to death, and some of them only care
Speaker 1: about their reelection. And we may have to help them
Speaker 1: stiffen their spine. You know, God forbid if a moment
Speaker 1: ever comes and somebody breaks into your house, your home,
Speaker 1: your business, and you have to protect your life, your
Speaker 1: family's life, your employees life. You know what. That's a
Speaker 1: tough situation to be and I hope nobody ever has
Speaker 1: to live through that. But the reality is we do
Speaker 1: live through moments like that, and defending your actions in
Speaker 1: today's justice system, that's where your nightmare can start. We
Speaker 1: live in a time where government overreaches all too real. Prosecutors, politicians,
Speaker 1: they want nothing more than to make an example out
Speaker 1: of law abiding gun owners like you and me. I've
Speaker 1: been a proud member of the us CCA for over
Speaker 1: nine years and I know with the us CCA, if
Speaker 1: God forbid, that moment ever comes, that they'll be standing
Speaker 1: there with me. And I want to encourage you to
Speaker 1: protect your family, your freedoms. Join the over eight hundred
Speaker 1: thousand responsible safe gun owners like me who trust the
Speaker 1: us CCA to have their back. They have training, resources, help, defense,
Speaker 1: liability insurance. Just text my last name, Hannity to the
Speaker 1: number eight seven to two two. Learn about how membership
Speaker 1: with the us c C can safeguard your family, protect
Speaker 1: your rights. That's Hannity to eight seven to two two,
Speaker 1: and you'll be glad you did. More. Hannity, Big Government,
Speaker 1: He's your watchdog on Washington. Kennedy is on, all right
Speaker 1: when we come back. We got a lot of ground
Speaker 1: to cover today. Adam Carolla, we thought his house burned
Speaker 1: on the ground, A lot of helms around him. Did
Speaker 1: He will join us. That's coming up at the top
Speaker 1: of the hour. We'll get into Juan Mershan's decision with
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett and David Show, and later on Sarah Carter
Speaker 1: she used to live in California, And here Davis will
Speaker 1: join us about why this was so preventable. Straight ahead,