WEBVTT - First Round Domination!

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>source for the nation's best fantasy.

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Speculation and advice.

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, along with the guys from guatin leagues dot com,

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>here's your host, Paul Chargian.

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to the first round of the playoffs. Yes, we're

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 3>finally here. You've been working for fourteen weeks and now

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 3>it's do or die. Every week counts. We're here to

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 3>help on Paul Charchi and Coast Today, Brian Johnson and

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 3>thor Nystrom. Hey, guys, what's up boys.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 4>I think everyone has worked very hard, the hardest everyone's

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 4>ever worked in they make the playoffs this year in

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 4>fantasy football, it deals like this year.

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 3>It's been a tough road. Yeah, it has been a

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 3>tough road. If you made it in congratulations. I'll say

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 3>this though. The big mistake that I think people make

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>is they get to the playoffs and they feel a

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 3>certain sense of like entitlement that because they they've gotten

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 3>their roster to the playoffs, that done, they don't need

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 3>to do anything anymore. They're gonna just start the guys

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 3>that got you there. You can't stop working now.

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 5>No, this is the wrong time. This is where the

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 5>work begins.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 3>That's right, So don't feel like you got to just

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 3>go with the guys that got you there. You know,

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 3>were you the one that pivoted to Zamir White you

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 3>know on Thursday night? Those are the kinds of moves

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 3>that are gonna give you playoff wins.

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 3>We're here to help. We're gonna break down all fifteen

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 3>of the remaining games, including the Saturday schedule. We will

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 3>give you the nine players upon whom you can take

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 3>a chance, and we'll answer three tough questions later in

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 3>this show, Brian, let's jump right into the matchups. Pittsburgh

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Steelers taking on the Colts. The one two punch of

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Nase Harris and Jalen Warden were pretty much stopped last week.

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 3>What do you think of the running backs in this

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 3>game against the Colts.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a better matchup this week for Warren and Harris.

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Both should get.

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Decent usage against the Colts, who have yielded the fourth

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 4>and most rush attempts by running backs, and they've allowed

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 4>sixteen total touchdowns to the position. That's the third most

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 4>starting with Warren. Among running backs with one hundred plus carries.

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 4>Warren ranks first in yards per carry, yards after contact

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 4>per carry and mistackles forced per carry, but he continues

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 4>to split time with Harris, who has been less efficient

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 4>but still not bad. No posting decent fantasy numbers. So

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 4>I got to see on both of them, but they're

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 4>gonna continue to eat each other's lunch. So just to

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 4>see for Warren and Harris, and a C for Deontay Johnson,

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 4>and I got George Pickens on the bench, So going

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 4>back to Johnson. Since his return in week seven, Pickens

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 4>has an eighteen percent target share, which is not a lot,

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 4>actually it's kind of bad. And Pickens hasn't scored since

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Week eight, and during that same span, Pickens has topped

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 4>sixty receiving yards just once. So I'm just starting Johnson

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 4>out of these two, who's scored in back to back games.

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 4>And it's a fairly neutral matchup. The Colts allowing nearly

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and fifty yards in a touch per game

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 4>to opposing wide receiver, so I think Johnson's a safer play,

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 4>So I'm off off off Pickins this week. I will

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 4>get Pat Fryer Muth to see the cold steps surrender

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 4>just two tight end touchdowns all season, but they are

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 4>allowing more than five and a half catches and fifty

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 4>five yards per game to the position. So Muth is

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 4>viable in the wasteland. Mitch Trubisky not viable.

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I don't have my true I don't have my

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 3>sad trombone Ski.

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 4>People, it's it's ingrained in their brains at this point.

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 4>They can hear it already.

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 3>It's sad Trump. We don't have time for it.

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 4>We're not we're not. We're beyond Trubisky. We'll talk about him,

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 4>I probably never again. Continue over to the Colt side,

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Zach Moss. He gets a be as expected. Moss has

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 4>been getting belcow usage with Jonathan Taylor out the last

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 4>two games. He's averaging nineteen touches. Moss is on nearly

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 4>ninety percent of the snaps, but he's only averaging fifty

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 4>seven combo yards with no touchdowns over the last two games.

0:03:57.760 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, tough opponents, though, tough opponents.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 4>A little better matchup here, But just based on volume alone,

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 4>you're gonna start Zach Moss against anyone at this point.

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna give him a bee.

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't think he has a upside this week, but

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 4>he should provide a safe B floor or at least

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 4>a C floor over to the wide receivers. Michael Pittman's

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 4>the only one that's getting a starting grade for me.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 3>For the Colts.

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 4>Pittman is averaging eleven and a half targets over his

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 4>last seven games. He's just been bawling out during that span.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 4>This is not the best matchup. Pittsburgh hasn't allowed a

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 4>wide receiver touchdown in fourth straight. But Juju Smith, Schuster

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 4>and Jamar Chase both had at least eighty yards against

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 4>the Steelers over the last two weeks, so that should

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 4>be a safe floor for Pittman. So I'm still going

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 4>to give him a bee here. But Josh Downs, he's

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 4>on the bench. His yardage totals over the last five

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 4>thirty two, fourteen, forty three, forty and ten with no touchdowns,

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 4>had a nice run. But he's just a dynasty stash

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 4>right now. All the tight ends are on the bench

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 4>because the Colts deploy four of them, none named Jolannie Woods.

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry it's only because of injury, though it's unfortunate.

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 3>And Gardner Minshew.

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 4>I was close to giving him a CE, but with

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 4>elite edge rushers, T J. Watt and Alex high Smith

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 4>expected to play. I just can't you know, I can't

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 4>tell you to sort of Gardner Minshew in the playoffs.

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I would do it either. That's it

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 3>for that one. Jets take on the Dolphins in what

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 3>could be a significant rain game. Thor are we chasing

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 3>the box score from AFC Offensive Player of the Week

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Zach Wilson. I can't believe that string of words just

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 3>came out of my mouth.

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I can't believe I heard it. We're not.

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 6>This is a tougher matchup for Zack Wilson for sure.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 6>You're alluding to a three hundred one passing yards and

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 6>two touchdowns.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 5>Against the Texas last week.

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 6>But boy did the Texas have a future a secondary

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 6>which we're gonna be talking about later on. I give

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 6>Wilson a see here because of the tougher match He

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 6>did show something last week. But Dolphins have allowed the

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 6>seventh fewest yards per attempts week ten, so a tougher matchup.

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.679
<v Speaker 6>Like I said, Garrett Wilson, I'm gonna give him a bee.

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 6>He was the biggest benefactor of Zach Wilson's resurgence last week.

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 6>Season high one hundred and eight receiving yards on fourteen targets.

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 6>This is a game script that is going to skew

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 6>very pass heavy. Obviously, the Jets are big underdogs in

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 6>this one, but you know, again tougher match up in

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 6>terms of the on field thing. Miami's allowed the sixth

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 6>most opponent of justin fantasy points to wide receivers this year,

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 6>and contextually very important here to note Jalen Ramsey's been

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 6>balling out since he came back. He's only allowed a

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 6>forty two percent catch rates. It's nothing nuts. Yeah, he's

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 6>not going to be shadowing Wilson here, but they're going

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 6>to be heads up on each other quite a bit

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 6>in this game. You have to dig Garrett Wilson a

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 6>little bit. I give him a bee. Also give a

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 6>B to Breese Hall. Breese Hall fantasy running back fifteen

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 6>so far, number five in yards after contact per attempt.

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 6>The Dolphins are top five though in suppressing explosive runs

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 6>and yards after for the contact since Week nine. So

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 6>we're gonna stick with a B on that one. Moving

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 6>to the Dolphins, I've give to a C in this one.

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 6>Last time he played the Jets, he threw two interceptions.

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 6>The Jets have allowed an NFL low yards per attempts

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 6>since Week eight, and also two has been trending down,

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 6>as you guys know, in terms of fantasy He's been

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 6>QB sixteen or worse in three of his last five games.

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 6>And the Tyreek Hill status, you know, is still up

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 6>in the air. I give Tyreek a beat if he plays,

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 6>but he missed significant time as you guys know, against

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 6>the Titans last week after he injured his ankle in

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 6>the first quarter. Only ended up playing forty six percent

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 6>of the snaps in that game. He said afterwards that

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 6>he wasn't able to cut and change directions like normal.

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 3>And that, by the way, that's his gate, that's his.

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 6>Entire game, and so you take away his yeah, that movement, Yeah,

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 6>that's right. Yeah, it severely hampers him. He has not

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 6>practiced this week. He's officially questionable. Mike McDaniel was talking

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 6>to the media like, don't read too much into him

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 6>not practicing. So you could see him out there, but

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 6>if he does play, you got to curb your enthusiasm

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 6>because it's a tougher matchup against his Jets defense, and

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 6>he's obviously not going to be one hundred percent, so

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 6>b if he plays, I'm giving Jayalen Wattle a bee

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 6>as well in this one. He's going to get pounded

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 6>with the targets if Cheetah is out, but they don't

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 6>ever look at him in the red zone even when

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 6>Cheata's not on the field, So that's cut down on

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 6>Wattle's fantasy value this year, only at eight red zone

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 6>targets all season. The last time against the Jets, though

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 6>he did go eight for eight on targets for one

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 6>hundred and fourteen receiving yards. Devin Auchay and I'm giving

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 6>him a seat if he plays. He's the other big

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 6>one who's up in the air right now with his

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 6>status questionable with a toe injury mispractice on Wednesday. He

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 6>did return Thursday and Friday, but was limited. Workload's going

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 6>to be slash if he does end up going in

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 6>this one. Playable if you're desperate, if you know that

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 6>he's going to be playing in this game, but monitor

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 6>that status. Rocky Moster, I'm going to give him a bee.

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 6>He played sixty four percent of the snaps with twenty

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 6>two touches and one hundred total yards last week, and

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 6>this is a game where there could be Grand Slam

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 6>potential for him if Auchen is out big, if there

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 6>Jets have a run funnel defense. Opponents average more rush

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 6>attempts per game against the Jets and anyone else in

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 6>the NFL, we're given moster to be.

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is up. This is gonna be a tricky matchup.

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 3>I get the feeling one or two Dolphins is going

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>to have a down game against a very good defense.

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.599
<v Speaker 3>And guys who Dolphins that carried you into the playoffs

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 3>going to let some people down this week. Agreed, Bret

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 3>Bears take on the Browns, and this is two really,

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 3>really good defenses. And if you think Chicago's not, you're wrong.

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Continue listening on. We'll start at the bare side of

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 3>the ball, though, justin fields better matchup than it appears

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 3>at first glance. Cleveland has a lot of consecutive three

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 3>touchdown passing games. After giving up none of those in

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 3>the first eleven games, the Browns have allowed five quarterback

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 3>rushing touchdowns that's third most in the league, and since

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 3>returning from injury, fields averaging eleven designed runs per game

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 3>seventy four rushing yards per game. We're getting our be

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 3>two rushing production out of justin field, so B grade

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 3>right there. Even though it's a it is generally a

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty tough passing matchup, made tougher by the ankle injury

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 3>to DJ Moore. You're gonna want to follow his status

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 3>as a game time decision, but it's a brutal matchup

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 3>against an elite secondary, especially if Denzel Ward, who's questionable,

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 3>can return from his shoulder injury. But even if he can't,

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 3>cornerbacks Martin Emerson and Greg Newsen have played great over

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the last five weeks. They're giving up a less than

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 3>sixty percent catch rate and a forty four passer rating.

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 3>That's it. They've combined to allow zero touchdowns and four

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 3>interceptions over the course of the season. Your glimmer of

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 3>hope here is that Cleveland plays almost exclusively man coverage,

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 3>and DJ Moore is the seventh highest graded wide receiver

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 3>versus man coverage by Pro Football Focus. We've got a

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 3>C grade on DJ Moore, assuming he's able to go.

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Cole Comet clocks in. Only two tight ends have posted

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 3>big games against the Browns. It Commet clocking with the

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 3>C Mark and Andrews and Evan Ingram last week had

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 3>big games against the Rounds. Everybody else has just been duds.

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 3>The other tight ends are averaging one and a half

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 3>catches for seventeen yards a game. I it's nothing.

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 4>Evan Ingram essentially octupled the per game averages. Yeah, catches, yards,

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 4>touchdowns last week unbelievable.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Comt has seen at least seven targets in five

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:24.719
<v Speaker 3>of the past six games, but half of those are

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 3>with Tyler Bagen, who has dumping the ball to him constantly.

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Fields has got a lot more up and down usage

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 3>with Kamet. I still think this is a a playable

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 3>entity here in Parks. They're not a lot of alternatives

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 3>have passed to see great on Comet. We'll talk about

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 3>don to Foreman next segment. Let's go over to the

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland side. Joe Flacco has been shockingly good. It's funny

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 3>how he walked into this offense and looked more comfortable

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 3>in the Browns offense than the quarterbacks who are there

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.719
<v Speaker 3>all year. For sure, he's thrown for five hundred and

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 3>sixty five yards and five touchdowns, but this is a

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 3>very tough matchup against a massively improved Bear secondary that's

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 3>held their last two quarterbacks they face to less than

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 3>two hundred passing yards and six combined interceptions. This is

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 3>a tricky matchup for Flacco, only a C grade for him.

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk to his receivers, who all get C grades

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 3>as well, including David and Joko, averaging nearly eight targets

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 3>per game in his last three games, including season highs.

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 3>So Joe Flacco. Since way back in Week seven, the

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Bears are much improved against tight ends, allowing just thirty

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 3>five yards to the position per game. They've given up

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 3>half a touchdown per game, which isn't bad, and that's

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 3>your best reason to start in Joko here and is

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>why he still gets a C grade as the prospect

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 3>of a touchdown. Amari Cooper is coming off a fourteen

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 3>target game, but he's going to get lighter usage here

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 3>for sure. He probably gets shadow coverage from emerging elite

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 3>cornerback Jayalen Johnson, who's just turned into a menace, just

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 3>one score all season allowed, and he's giving up a

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 3>forty eight percent catch rate opposing number one outside wideouts,

0:12:55.760 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 3>having topped fifty seven receiving yards against Chicago since Week two. Wow,

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 3>so fifty seven feels like your absolute max for Amari Cooper,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.839
<v Speaker 3>and it's why he's just a C grade. Elijah Moore

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 3>comes into the C grade slot receivers avoid Jalen Johnson,

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 3>they fare better than their outside counterparts, although I will

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 3>note I'm on ros Saint Brown just got held to

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 3>a season low last week, so even Elijah were not

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 3>a sure thing. Moore has top forty two yards in

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 3>five straight games, which I like, and he's had the

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 3>upticking usage and better passing frankly from Joe Flacco, but

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 3>he scored just once all season. C grade there, and

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 3>then the last guy I want to talk about, Jerome Ford.

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 3>The Bears have turned into just a fantastic run stuffing defense.

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 3>No back his top seventy six yards all year, although

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 3>both of the Detroit backs said sixty six yards last week.

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll mention that Chicago's only given up three rushing touchdowns

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 3>since back in Week three. Ford has cut eight of

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 3>nine targets from Joe Flacco, so I like that. And

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the Bears allow the most receiving yards to opposing running

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 3>backs fifty eight per game. So you start forward in

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 3>PPR formats with a C raid. When we come back,

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 3>take a chance on me nine players not normally in

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 3>your starting lineup. I already tipped my hand for one

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 3>of them. Find out who the other eight are when

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 3>we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Take a chance

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 3>on me. Nine players not normally in your starting lineup.

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Find out who they are right here, beginning at the

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 3>quarterback position, and Brian Johnson take a chance. Forget about it.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 3>I got Tommy DeVito at the Saints.

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Over here, opposing quarterbacks were averaging around two hundred passing

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 4>yards and one and a half passing touchdowns per against

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 4>the Saints. That's decent production. But the real angle here

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 4>is the rushing. New Orleans has allowed the second most

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 4>rushing yards to quarterbacks. Five of the last six they

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 4>faced have run for at least forty yards. And I'm

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 4>also gonna guess Tommy Dee remembers that the Saints decided

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 4>to pick Jake Hayner over him with the one and

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 4>twenty seventh overall pick in the fourth round. Spike game incoming,

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 4>and let me take this a little further, all right,

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 4>Spike game last week for de Vito against the Packers.

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 4>They took a quarterback, and thor will do all these quarterbacks.

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 4>Then it's the Saints. Yeah, and then Eagles. Everyone he

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 4>faces in the Rams, Eagles, Rams, Eagles, they all took

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 4>a quarterback in the fourth round or later over Tommy DeVito.

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 4>He's going to run the table on all these fools.

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, thor you're taking to some quarterback.

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 6>I'm going with Will Levis and this one another guy

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 6>was taking ahead of Tommy DeVito, and I can't believe

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 6>I'm stumping for him here. Levis and the Titans are

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 6>playing the Texans this week. Since Levis got into the

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 6>starting lineup, he's been a fantasy q you know, super

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:05.239
<v Speaker 6>flex league startable, okay, fringish, you know, twelve.

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 5>Team super flex QB two.

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 6>But there's a possibility that he could be at QB one,

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 6>I think in standard twelve team leagues this week against

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 6>a rans at Texans pass defense. And for anyone out

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 6>there right now who's thinking that is a crazy thing

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 6>to say. Zach Wilson through for three hundred plus yards

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 6>and two touchdowns against his tech Texans secondary last week.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 5>They're very, very bad.

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 6>The Texans have allowed the second highest yards per attempts

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 6>since Week nine. And the last thing the Titans are

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 6>gonna be wearing those Oilers uniforms.

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 3>You want a piece of that.

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 5>They're gonna looking flashy.

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 4>This week in Houston too. That's like a it's not

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 4>a revenge game. It's like a uniform, just like I

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 4>like that.

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't like it.

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 3>I love it, like it, I do it. I like it.

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Matthew Stafford is kind of an obvious pick. I went,

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 3>I went obvious choice here, so just beare me out.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Washington is the opponent. They're the league's worst pass defense,

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's not close. They've allowed the most passing touchdowns thirty.

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 3>With four weeks to go in the season, Washington has

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 3>already allowed more pass touchdowns than thirty one of thirty

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 3>two teams did all of last season. Nine of the

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 3>last ten quarterbacks to face Washington have thrown for multiple touchdowns,

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 3>and the only guy who didn't was Mac Jones, and

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 3>he does not count. After a very slow start, Stafford's

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 3>been red hot four touchdowns, three touchdowns, three touchdowns the

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 3>last three weeks. I think he's an obvious start. In fact,

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 3>I think he's my number five or six fantasy quarterback

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 3>This week. To go to the running back position, Brian.

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 4>I've got Atlanta's Tyler Algier at the Panthers. These teams

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 4>first met back in Week one, and Algier outproduced Bijon

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 4>Robinson Algier at ninety four combo yards and two touchdowns

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 4>on eighteen touches. Bijeon has been getting more of the

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.239
<v Speaker 4>work as of late, as we all know, but there

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 4>should be enough meat on the bone in this very

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 4>juicy matchup, which is going to be played in torrential rain.

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 4>They're saying like two to three inches, Yeah, twenty mile

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 4>prour wins and no one throws on the Panthers anyway,

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 4>who have allowed the most rushing yards and rushing touchdowns

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 4>at running backs. And that's pretty easy to do when

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 4>you've yielded the second most red zone touches to running

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 4>backs and the second most touches in gold to ghost scenarios.

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 3>So Tyler l jeer viable this week? All right, let's

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 3>go to Thori. You take a chance with me running back.

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's get another share of those oilers' uniforms. All right,

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 3>We're going with Taj Spears a frequent frequent appearances. I

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 3>think he's old, second only to Baker Mayfield. And take

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 3>a chance on the appearances.

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 6>Home run hitter thirteen touches for one hundred and eighteen

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 6>yards on sixty six percent of the snaps last week.

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 6>There's an opportunity for another good game here. The Texans

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 6>not only have the mediocre run defense, but they're bottom

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 6>ten in the league in receptions allowed and receiving receiving

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 6>yardage allowed. I'm sorry to opposing running backs. Taja has

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 6>been getting some of those receiving looks and he can

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 6>break off any touchdown he gets for a touchdown. The

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 6>game script is also going to be in his favor

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 6>here with the Texans starting Davis Mills and that injury

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 6>decimated wide receiving core.

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Houston's gonna get rolled exactly.

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and Spears is going to get the touches, and

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 6>he has been incredible on a per touch basis this year.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Doctor Foreman is the player who's alluding to last segment.

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Last week, he was the clearback for lead back for

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 3>Chicago fifty five percent snap rate and Rochdown Johnson and

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Khalil Herbert combined for four carries. Since returning from injury

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 3>in Week eleven, Foreman's gotten one hundred percent of the

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 3>team's carries from inside the five yard line and a

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 3>touchdown is a very real possibility here. Cleveland has allowed

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 3>six rushing touchdowns in the last five games. They've also

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 3>started giving up more yards ninety seven running back rushing

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 3>yards per game over the last five weeks. That's a

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 3>much more yielding Brown's run defense than we were used to.

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the receivers, Brian, who you got.

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 4>I'm pairing Wandale Robinson with Tommy DeVito at the Saints slot.

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Receivers have been showing up week over week against the Saints.

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Adam Thielen five catches seventy four yards, a Monro Saint

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Brown forty nine yards in a touchdown, Darnell Mooney five

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 4>catches for eighty two yards, Josh Downs seven catches for

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 4>seventy two yards, Christian Kirk six for ninety in a touchdown.

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 4>Robert Woods scored against the Saints. The list goes on

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 4>and on. So wandel Robinson, who's also balling out, Yeah,

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 4>and they're getting the ball in his hands, whether they're

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 4>throwing it to him, handing it off. So I like

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 4>the Vito in Robinson a lot, bearing them.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Up all right, thor you're taking a chance with me

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 3>wide out.

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 6>I'm going with Broncos wide receiver Jerry Judy and their

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 6>game against the Lions.

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 3>He definitely qualifies by the way he doesn't take it

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 3>down now.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.959
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, obviously he's been super disappointing, so people out there

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 6>who have him might be like, I'm not doing that.

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 5>All can see it.

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 6>He's wide receiver sixty one and fantasy points per game

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 6>and Jerry Judy is not top seven or sixty receiving

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 6>yards since Week seven. I think he gets there this week, though,

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 6>there's hope because of the matchup.

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 5>Jerry Judy leads the team.

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 6>Even though he's played poorly this year, he still leads

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 6>the Broncos in first read share against single high coverage.

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 6>The Lions play a ton of single high coverage and

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 6>the Lions pass defense has been bad. Also, Judy is

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 6>going to be lined up across from Lion's rookie slot

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Brian Branch, who is allowed pass the rating of over

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and one this year.

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Wow, yeah, all right, would you guys care to hazard

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 3>a guess Pro Football Focus is highest rated wide receiver

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 3>in the last month.

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 7>Not Jerry Judy, but I like the cal Thor I'm

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 7>not throw the bu Dell Beckham.

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 4>Hey, my peacock off is still alive. Top twenty four

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 4>wide receiver.

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 3>I called it. Yeah, well, I hope you're not close yet.

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Maybe this game will do it. Fourteen targets in two

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 3>games under Joe Flacco, his biggest two game target total

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 3>all season, and over the past five weeks, the Jaguars,

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 3>his opponent, are bottom five in receptions, yards, and touchdowns

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 3>allowed to wide receivers. Some recent blow up games for

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 3>outside wide receivers. Against Jacksonville last week, Amari Cooper fourteen targets,

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 3>seven catches. The previous week, Jamar Chase eleven catches, one

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 3>hundred and forty nine yards touchdown. Previous week Nicocollins one

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred four yards touchdown. Odell Beckham feels very safe here

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 3>as somebody would not normally start, but you could this week.

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's go back to the matchups. The Atlanta Falcons taking

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 3>on the Carolina Panthers. You told us that you like

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 3>Tyler lg Er already imagine Bjon Robinson. You'll like him

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 3>even better. Yeah, and for many of the same reasons.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 4>Many of the same reasons. Again, no one throws against Carolina.

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 4>They don't have to. They're so easy to run. Against

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 4>and the weather is going to be a factor. They

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 4>have a really good secondary. They do, yeah, they do.

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not gonna fall that if they've got quality

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 3>players in that secondary too. But back to Beijon, he

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 3>gets the A. I just said this.

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm not even going through the stacks all yes, A

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 4>for Bejon Algier was might take a chance on me

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 4>running back. Sadly, Drake London the only starting grade I'm

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 4>giving out in the passing game, so that means Kyle

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Pitts on the bench. Back to London, he looked amazing

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 4>last week, but this is a bad matchup on paper,

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 4>especially with these weather concerns. No one throws on the

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Panthers and they do have a good secondary. That's why

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 4>opposing White House or averaging less than eleven catches per

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 4>game against Carolin, So I can't fault you if you

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 4>have a better for sitting London, if you have a

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 4>better option. But again, not a great matchup, so just

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 4>the softest of seas for London. And obviously Desmond Ritter

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 4>on the bench as well, despite his blow up game

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 4>last week, but that was an anomaly. Over to the

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Carolina side, I just have one starting grade and it's

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 4>on Chuba Hubbard. Hubbard has forty eight carries over his

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 4>last two games for nearly two hundred yards and two touchdowns.

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Belcow usage, but this is a brutal matchup. The Falcons

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 4>still haven't surrendered a rushing touchdown way running back. The

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 4>Ravens have surrendered three, and that's the second fewests.

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Just incredible.

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 4>But Atlanta is middle of the road when it comes

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 4>to rushing and combo yards allowed, so Hubbard should be

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 4>viable if he touched the three yards and touch.

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's total.

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 4>He's not an RB one by any means, but he's

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 4>flexworthy this week. And then again, everyone else on the bench,

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 4>even Adam Feelen. That epic run from weeks two through

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 4>six was a long time ago. Week six was the

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 4>last time Feeling scored or topped one hundred yards, and

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 4>the Falcons are vicious against wide receivers, allowing the third

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 4>fewest receptions and yards to the position and Feeling only

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 4>at two catches for twelve scoreless yards in the first meeting.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 4>So he's on the bench unfortunately, all right with Mingo, Hurst,

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 4>Bryce Young, all those guys, the.

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Guys that you don't care about, thor Houston taking Tennessee.

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 3>You've already touched on this a number of times and

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 3>take a chance on me, but not the Houston side

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 3>With Davis Mills at the helm? Who am I? Is

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 3>there anybody to start here?

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 6>Noah Brown if you need it. If he plays, But

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 6>he's questionable as well with a knee injury. Limited in

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 6>practice this week, and he's been a ghost the past

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 6>two weeks, been a little bit dinged up. But he's

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 6>gonna get all the usage her wide receiver one if

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 6>he targets if he does play, because Nico Collins and

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 6>Tank Dell are both out. But of course he's gonna

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 6>be playing with Davis Mill, So how much will that matter?

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 6>I give So I'm gonna give him a see.

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 5>If he plays.

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 6>Dalton Schultz, I'm gonna give him a see as well.

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 6>We know he is returning to the field after missing

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 6>the last two weeks with a hamstring injury. Schultz was

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 6>taken off the injury reports sore here going to be playing.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 6>He was a red zone target hawk earlier this season.

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 6>But how many times are the Texans going to reach

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 6>the red zone in this game? But looking my question, Yeah,

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 6>the Titans also allowed the second fewest Fantasy points per

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 6>game to tight ends, so not the best matchup. Motor Singletary,

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to give him a see. Has supplanted our boy,

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 6>Damian Pierce's lead back. It hurts to say. Singletary had

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 6>sixty five total yards on fifty seven percent of the

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 6>snaps last week. The Titans run defense has been playing

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 6>better recently number two stuff rates since Week ten, so

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 6>it can only give Motor a c. On the Titan side,

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 6>Levis and Spears were might take a chance on me,

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 6>Guys DeAndre Hopkins, I give him an a. In seven

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 6>games with Will Levis, Hopkins is averaging seventy five yards

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 6>and a touchdown per game. He's also been targeted twenty

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 6>four times in the past two games. He's like the

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 6>baby's blanket for Will. Levis and the Texans of course

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.719
<v Speaker 6>have the atrocious pass which we talked about before, and

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 6>also a.

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Revenge game of course too.

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 4>For DeAndre Hopkins exactly, I guess his original team, that's.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 6>Right, chick at Congquo. We're going to give him a see.

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 6>He's been one of the winners of the Titans. Turning

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 6>to Levis, Chig has two point three yards per route run.

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 6>Since Week ten, the Texans allowed the third most fantasy

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 6>points per game to opposing tight ends to solid matchup

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 6>for Chig, the concern is zero touchdowns this year and

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 6>you're not really targeting him in the red zone, so

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:27.679
<v Speaker 6>you gotta dig him a little bit for that. And

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 6>then lastly, Derek Henry, I give him a b RB

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 6>twelve and fantasy points per game so far this year.

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 6>Another strong games coming here against the Texans run defense

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 6>that has struggled in recent games. Texans have missed the

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 6>six most tackles per attempts since Week ten, and.

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 4>His history against the Texans is absolutely insane.

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 3>He's scored at least once in like five straight Like no, no,

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 3>he's kind of like, like half of his last five

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 3>performances are two hundred yard rushing performances.

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, big game could be coming.

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's hope that now. The past is not always

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 3>indicative of the future. But I think he's got one

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 3>more in them, one more in him Garter. Yeah, come on, kay,

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 3>one more time. That'd be great when we come back.

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Vikings versus Panthers. Vikings have Nick Mullins under center. Does

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 3>that help their well breaking news? It helps compare to

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 3>what they've had the past several weeks. How much is

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 3>it enough to help some of the Vikings that you're

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 3>counting on in the playoffs? Find out when we come back.

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Chargie and Brian Johnson

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 3>thor Nystrom with you. It's the first playoff week. We're

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 3>here to try to help you make the best of it.

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Vikings take on the Bengals. Vikings is going to be

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 3>without excellent right tackle Brian O'Neill. You'll want to be

0:27:55.840 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 3>thoughtful about how that could impact this offense least a

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 3>little bit. I'm going to start with a player who

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 3>has the potential for an absolutely gigantic game. Can I

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 3>take a guess? Yeah? It is time. It's tie time, right, No,

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 3>you gotta start with Ty Chandler. Charge, fine, I'll start

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 3>with Ty Chandler. I love No, I don't want the

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 3>drug for Ty Midsummer. That's what I thought you would

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 3>have started. All Kevin O'Connell has done is find ways

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 3>to diminish his role, despite Alexander Madison being every bit

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 3>as mundane as I was feared. Madison ruled out Chandler

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 3>presumed starter, but they activated Miles Gaskin on Friday. Now,

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, I'm nervous. Cincinnati has got a bunch of

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 3>middle of the pack run defense metrics, but they also

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 3>are twenty sixth in run stuff win rate, which could

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 3>suggest that there's a little something to be done here.

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Vikings are not a great run blocking team, but Chandler's

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 3>got a little burst, a little wiggle. Maybe I'll be

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 3>able to get something done anyway. Bengals allow five rushing

0:28:57.680 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns in their last five games. I'd love to see

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 3>you getting the end zone here. Chandler is a better

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 3>receiver than Madison. He could chip in four or five

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 3>receptions without Madison on the field at all. So I've

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 3>got a C grade on Chandler. Mostly, I'm more worried

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 3>about Kevin O'Connell than I am about the Bengals. But

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe that's just totally ill founded, and we'll find out.

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 3>I hope Chandler touches the ball twenty times. I'd be

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 3>very happy about that. All right. Now, let's go to

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the player sitting out a potentially explosive game for the

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota Vikings.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 5>TJ.

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Hockinson. Get a load of this and credit Scott Fish

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 3>for the stat as a starter in San Francisco. Nick

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Mullins average game to George Kittle. He played sixteen games

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 3>in San Francisco. His average game to George Kittle seven catches,

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 3>one hundred yards. Oh baby, If any of that's coming

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 3>to TJ. Hockinson, I'm interested. But you might be saying, well,

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 3>but what about that Bengals defense? How about this Bengals

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 3>have allowed the most yards to opposing tight ends. And

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 3>get a load of the recent games by tight ends

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 3>against the Bengals last week, Moli Cox touchdown. Week before

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Evan Ingram nine catches eighty two yards, first touchdown of

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the year. Week before that, Pat Fryermouth season highs nine

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 3>catches one hundred and twenty yards. Week before that, Mark

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Anders got hurt. Week before that, Dalton Schultz seventy one yards.

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Week before that, Dalton Kincaid ten catches eighty one yards.

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Week before that, George Kittle won one hundred and fifty

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 3>yards against the Bengals.

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 5>TJ.

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Hockinson my highest rated tight end this week. What about

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.959
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the Vikings receivers? Justin Jefferson, He's going

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 3>to play through that chest injury sustained on Josh Dobbs's

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 3>murder pass. Feeling a bit gunshy after last week, but murdered. Yes,

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 3>it was a murder pass. Cincinnati is Pro Football Focus's

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 3>third lowest graded coverage unit, but they do have some talent,

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 3>including veteran cornerback Chidobe Auzier, who has been very good,

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 3>allowing just one touchdown since Week two an average of

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 3>just twenty five yards in his coverage. Nick Mullens comes in,

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 3>obviously that changes things, But get this, Nick Mullins highest

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 3>passer rating on deep balls of longer than twenty yards.

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 3>That makes me optimistic that we're going to get some

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 3>of the down field abilities from Justin Jefferson we haven't

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 3>seen since he and Kirk Cousins were playing together. B

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 3>great for Justin Jefferson, C grade for Jordan Adison. Now

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 3>with Jefferson back, Addison's going to see fewer targets, but

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 3>they'll be better targets because Jefferson's going to be commanding

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 3>a lot better coverage. So that makes Addison kind of

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 3>a do or die home run dart throw kind of

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 3>player against the defense, allowing the highest rate of explosive

0:31:55.800 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 3>plays over the past five weeks. Cornerback DJ Turner is

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 3>allowed the tenth most yards per game among all cornerbacks.

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Mullins can pass downfield. So Addison, who was giving you

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 3>some deep ball production in the early parts of the

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 3>season with Kirk Cousins, could snap back here with a

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 3>decent game and he's startable. With a C grade for

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Mullins himself, I've got a segrade on him. If I've

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 3>got an A on Hockinson, a B on Jefferson, a

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 3>SEA on Addison, i can't give a bench grade to

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Nick Mullins. I've got to presume he's going to be

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 3>okay here. Every Bengals opposing quarterback has either scored or

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 3>top three hundred passing yards or both, every one of

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 3>them when last starting, which was a while ago. For

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Nick Mullins, as I mentioned, the deep ball was his

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 3>best was his best asset, and I think he's gonna

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 3>get some deep connections here. So a C grade on

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Nick Mullins. Let's go over to the Bengals side. I'm

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 3>gonna start with the running game. Brutal matchup for Joe

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Mixon non DeAndre Swift runners averaging three point two yards

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 3>per carry against Minnesota. If that were apply to a

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 3>full season. If you know DeAndre Swift, that performance didn't exist,

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 3>the Vikings would be the best run defense in the league.

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 3>They also allow only zero point three touchdowns per game

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 3>ground and air to opposing running backs. Similar or even

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.719
<v Speaker 3>better runners than Joe Mixon have been just silenced by

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota recently, including Josh Jacobs, Javonte Williams, Alvin Kamara, Aaron

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Jones all dud games in recent weeks against the Vikings.

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 3>But Mixon can catch, and the Vikings are getting dinged

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 3>through the air. They've been giving up eight receptions per

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 3>game to opposing runners over the last three weeks. One

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 3>matchup to watch Brian Minnesota Vikings linebacker Ivan Pace. You're

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 3>reigning defensive player of the week. He's undrafted, right, undrafted, insane.

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 3>He has a homecoming game in Cincinnati on his birthday.

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 3>What do you think of that doubleheader defensive homecoming birthday? Yeah?

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 4>I wish I was a more id leagues right now?

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Joe Mix and c Grade. Let's go to the

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 3>passing game. Obviously, Jake Browning's been It's a fantastic story,

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 3>including a league high eighty eight percent adjusted completion percentage

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 3>over the last three weeks. But this is a tricky matchup.

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Vikings are ranked fourth in pass coverage by Pro Football Focus,

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 3>and they've surrendered multiple passing touchdowns in only two of

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 3>their last eight games. During that span, they've allowed just

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 3>six passing touchdowns to nine interceptions. Now, Browning's rushing might help.

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 3>He's a and that's something. He is a good scrambler

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 3>and he could help out a little bit that way.

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 3>But I can only get you to a B grade

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 3>on Browning. I consider to see here, but I think

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 3>there might be enough between rushing and passing to get

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 3>him up to a B grade. Speaking of B grades,

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Jamar Chase. Even with last week's doug he's still averaging

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 3>a solid eighty six yards under Browning. And despite the

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 3>Vikings d dominating week offenses the last three weeks, lee

0:34:55.920 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 3>wide receivers are still doing okay. Cam Sutton six yards

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 3>in a score, DJ Moore one hundred and fourteen yards

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 3>on eleven catches. Adams DeVante Adams fifty three yards on

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 3>seven catches seven catches. Good. So yeah, it feels like

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 3>a be great for Chase. He says he's the best

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 3>receiver in this game.

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he was asked, I'm gonna paraphrase a little, but

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 4>you know, you and former LSU teammate Justin Jefferson are

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 4>the two best receivers. What do you think about that?

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 4>And he's like, no, I'm the best, the best, I'm

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:25.280
<v Speaker 4>the best. Here you go, it's gonna be quite the showdown.

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm excited.

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a little bolt boarding material. Oh yeah for

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Justin Jefferson. T higgins last touchdown was.

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:38.879
<v Speaker 4>Anybody twenty twenty two, almost week two, week two, week two.

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 3>I got the two part right, Yeah, you're close. Browning

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 3>just doesn't seem to have that rapport for any of

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 3>his receivers outside of Jamar Chase. Higgins has just two

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and three catches in his two games with Browning. Outside

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 3>spots can pay dividends. Against Minnesota, he'd face up against

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:57.879
<v Speaker 3>the Caleb Evans and Byron Murphy, and you know those

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 3>are favorable matchups. Murphy's allowed the third most touchdowns of

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 3>all cornerbacks, so I've got to see great on Higgins.

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 3>But honestly, his past production would not suggest that that's

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:08.439
<v Speaker 3>even possible. Here.

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 5>All right, let's get into this IRV Smith revenge game.

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 3>We're not gonna do that I know. I mentioned Browning

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 3>does love his tight ends. Tanner Hudson is if you're

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:20.359
<v Speaker 3>in a real pinch, that is a possibility. He doesn't

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 3>love Smith, No, nobody loves Smith. Tyler Boyd's on the bench.

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 3>He's done nothing with Browning, and the Vikings are top

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 3>ten and stopping opposing slot receivers. Chase Brown I love

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 3>what we're seeing in splashes of use, but he's not

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 3>getting enough carries and the matchup's difficult. We're gonna talk

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 3>more about Chase Brown later in the show. Let's go

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 3>to the Giants taking on these Saints.

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Brian Yeah, well, dive right into the passing game real

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 4>quick again. Tommy Devitos might take a chance on me quarterback.

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 4>He's gonna be a spicy meet the ball in this one.

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 4>I like Windel Robinson. He's might take a chance on me.

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Wide receiver. Darren Waller expects to play. But you can't

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 4>trust Darren Waller to finish the game.

0:36:57.800 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 3>No, I need to see a full game.

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 4>So he is on the bench. But Sakwon Barkley is

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 4>not going to give Barkley an a. He's looking great

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 4>as of late, and the Saints run defense has not

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 4>looked great. Over their last three games, New Orleans has

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 4>surrendered five hundred and twenty three combo yards and three

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 4>total touchdowns to running backs. Again, that's over the last

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 4>three games. That's what one hundred and seventy combo yards

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 4>per game they're allowing.

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 3>That's their last three. That's shocking for the Saints that

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 3>normally have a pretty good Yeah, they've fallen off big time.

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 4>So I love Barkley this week with the A over

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 4>to the Saints side, I love their running back not

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.839
<v Speaker 4>quite as much as Barkley, So Alvin Kamara just to

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 4>be Since Week nine, New York has allowed the fifth

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:41.399
<v Speaker 4>most rushing yards per game, the third highest explosive run rate,

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 4>and the fourth highest yards after.

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Contact per attempt.

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 4>But you know, Barkley, I'm sorry, Yeah, Kamara, it's really

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 4>more about the the air production for him, and the

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Giants have only started one receiving touchdown to running backs.

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 4>But Kamara is not your stereotypical receiving back. His sixty

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 4>three catch are top fifteen among wide receivers, not running backs.

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 4>But I just don't see that the a ceiling for Kamara.

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 4>So I'm gonna give him a B in this matchup

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 4>over to the wide receivers. It gets a little dicey here.

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 4>Chris o'lave. He hasn't practiced all week. They're still calling

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 4>him time questionable.

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 3>If he plays, I will give him a C. If

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:23.240
<v Speaker 3>he's active.

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 4>The Giants are allowing nearly fifteen catches, one hundred and

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 4>eighty yards and a touchdown per game to opposing wide receivers.

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 4>Those are good numbers for the opposition. So that's why,

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 4>like Rashid Shaheed, either way he gets a CEE is

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 4>expected to make his return from injury. So see for Shaheed,

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 4>see for a Lave. If he plays, if a Lave

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 4>doesn't play, I'm so close to giving Lynn Bowden a C.

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 3>But he's more of your age at at what at Perry, No,

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 3>not at Perry.

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Lynn Bowden has been seeing running more routes, seeing more targets,

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 4>all of that, so but I'm still gonna keep him

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.720
<v Speaker 4>on the bench. But he's a He's a DFS start

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 4>for you out there, for you daily players. Lynn Bowden

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 4>probably in your bare minimum. I like him as a

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 4>cheap option. Taysom Hill expected to make his return to

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 4>but there's there's no analysis you can do on Taysom Hill.

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 4>It's just like you plug him in and pray. So

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a very religious guy, so he's on the

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 4>bench for me, as is deres Tark the end to

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 4>each of the room.

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Though, all right, Happy holidays, Denver. Bronco's taking on the

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 3>Detroit Lions. I like parts of this Broncos passing game.

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 3>Thor you already told us that Jerry Judy was you

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 3>to take a chance on me wide receiver. What do

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:40.879
<v Speaker 3>you think about Russell Wilson in this one? I like him.

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:42.919
<v Speaker 5>I did too. I'm gonna give him a bee.

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 6>I did flirt with an a on but I'm gonna

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 6>stick with the b So the last five games for

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 6>Russell Wilson, He's number two in the NFL and highly

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 6>accurate throw rate, but a part of that is because

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.240
<v Speaker 6>the offense is skewed super conservative to help out the defense.

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:59.879
<v Speaker 6>One of the reasons that the Broncos have been playing better.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.760
<v Speaker 6>The Broncos haven't thrown for two hundred yards in seven

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 6>of their last nine games because of that, and eight

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 6>of the last nine Bronco games have gone under the total.

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 6>In Vegas, so you don't get as much scoring, but

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 6>there is an opportunity for a huge game here for

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 6>dangerous script. The game script looks like it could be

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 6>a shootout, and Russell is going to have to throw

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:21.959
<v Speaker 6>certainly more than he has been. And I mentioned before

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 6>the Lions pass defense has been badly struggling since Week nine.

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 6>That pass defense sixth worst in the NFL and allowing

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:31.720
<v Speaker 6>passing touchdowns and they've given up the third highest passer

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 6>rating in the NFL. I give Javonte Williams a see

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:38.240
<v Speaker 6>in this one. He's the RB twenty nine and fantasy

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 6>points per game.

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Because he hasn't scored.

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:43.280
<v Speaker 6>Doesn't score, Yeah, he does get the solid workload, especially

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 6>last three weeks, been playing sixty to seventy percent of

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:48.439
<v Speaker 6>the snaps. Not as good of a matchup for him

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:50.800
<v Speaker 6>against what is a much tougher Lions run defense. On

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 6>their pass defense, Lions have a high tackling have high

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 6>tackling efficiency numbers. They're also number eight and stuff rate

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 6>since the midway point of this season, Cortland Sutton. I

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 6>give him an a Cortland Sutton against single high coverage

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 6>this year, his first redshare jumps all the way up

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 6>to twenty eight percent. Lions are number six in the

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 6>NFL in single I coverage. I was talking about that

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 6>with Judy since the midway point of the season. This

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 6>is also a great matchup for Sutton, same way that

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 6>it was for Judy. Sutton of course on the outside,

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 6>but the Lion's boundary cornerback stink.

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:20.720
<v Speaker 5>Cameron.

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:22.839
<v Speaker 6>Sutton has given up one hundred and three passer rating

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:25.439
<v Speaker 6>this year, Jerry Jacob's given up one hundred and eight

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 6>passer rating against on targets this year, and the Lions

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 6>of AE as a team have allowed the most PPR

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 6>points per target to perimeter wide receivers since week nine.

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 5>Love Courtland Sutton this week.

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 3>I do too. I'm with you. I, you and I

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 3>are in lockstep on every one of those players for

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos. Love it.

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 5>Jared Goff moving over to the lines. I give him

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:44.800
<v Speaker 5>a c.

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 6>His volume is dipped here in recent weeks as the

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 6>turnovers have gone up a bit. Goff only has an

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 6>average of thirty attempts to the last two games, and

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 6>this is not a great matchup for him. Since Week nine,

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 6>the Broncos have allowed the fourth lowest passer rating and

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:03.839
<v Speaker 6>giving up the second fewest passing touchdowns. I'm honorous saying

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 6>brown in part for this reason, I had to toggle

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 6>him down to a B this week. Wide receiver five

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 6>in Fantasy overall season long, but rough game last week,

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 6>as you guys know, only twenty one receiving yards. Another

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 6>down game is coming here. Broncos pass defense. They've allowed

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 6>the lowest PPR points per target to opposing slots, so

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 6>they're particularly good against opposing slots, but a good pass

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 6>defense in general. Sam Laporta Sammy ball game, my boy

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 6>a always tight end three and fantasy points per game

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 6>and an awesome matchup for him too. Broncos are dead

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 6>last in the NFL against tight ends. Sam Laporte is

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 6>going off this week. Denver, by the way, you know,

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 6>you were talking about the other defense as far as

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 6>those tight ends.

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Bengals, they've given up the most yards. I

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 3>believe Denver's giving up the most fantasy points exactly.

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 6>And Denver's allowed ten straight tight ends to go over

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 6>thirty receiving yards.

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:54.919
<v Speaker 5>So you also have the flores falls and ceiling there.

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 6>David Montgomery, I'm giving David Montgomery in a as well.

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:01.320
<v Speaker 6>Just like ballgame, Montgomery, you have scored a touchdown every

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 6>game he has finished healthy except for one. There's an opportunity,

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 6>of course, for him to score multiple touchdowns in this game.

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 3>There is.

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 5>This also feels like a twenty plus.

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 6>Carry game for Montgomery, and contextually Broncos ranked dead last

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 6>with twenty six Fantasy points per game allowed to opposing

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:20.719
<v Speaker 6>running backs. I give Jamer Gibbs a B. He's averaging

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:23.320
<v Speaker 6>eighty three total yards since week ten. The Lion staff

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 6>has figured out how to start using him, get him

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 6>out in space and everything like that, five plus targets

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:30.800
<v Speaker 6>in the receiving game in three of the last five games.

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 6>The explosive players are coming for Gibbs here. I think

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 6>Broncos are at bottom ten defense in allowing explosive runs.

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:37.280
<v Speaker 5>We'll give him a bee.

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that sounds about it sounds about right. I have

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 3>a's on both of those guys, just the way you

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 3>beat the Broncos on the ground all control. I can

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 3>see both of them having a big game. Jimior Gibbs

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 3>chips and some receptions. Montgomery scores some rushing touchdowns.

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:50.839
<v Speaker 2>Ah.

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I think they're both sitting on really nice games.

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 6>Here, and their offense have been skewing that way anyway,

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 6>So I totally agree.

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:58.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, absolutely. Hey, if you'm miasicitedly part of the show,

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 3>you can always get all my play rankings which are

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 3>updated every single day at Guillotine leagues dot com. It's

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 3>completely free. You now can't join at Guillotine League in

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 3>week fifteen, but you know, if you can go to

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:11.320
<v Speaker 3>the site, you can download the app, get all of

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:14.240
<v Speaker 3>the player rankings available for free. And maybe you're even

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:17.240
<v Speaker 3>alive in a Guillotine League, which would be an ideal scenario.

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 3>As well. Our number two of Fantasy Football Weekly and

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 3>three Tough Questions coming up next our number two Fantasy

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Football Weekly. Paul Charchie and Brian Johnson throw an eye

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 3>from with you. You can follow us on Twitter. I

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.959
<v Speaker 3>am at Well, the site formerly known as Twitter. I'm

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:51.399
<v Speaker 3>at Paul Charchi in Twitter forever. For me, it's Team

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Twitter forever. It's so dumb to change these names. And

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:55.920
<v Speaker 3>by the way, I've mentioned this on the show one

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:59.760
<v Speaker 3>other time, HBO, why would you change the name of HBO?

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 3>And then, oh, by the way, like cancel all the

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 3>shows everybody likes, produce no new good shows, so everybody

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 3>hates your new name and they all cancel their subscription.

0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 4>Two worst brandings in the history of rebranding, so dumb.

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, you can follow Brian at bt XJ and thorn

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:17.760
<v Speaker 3>eystrom Is at thor KU.

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 5>No, you got k at rock Chart.

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's get into the three tough questions we

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 3>encourage you to play along.

0:45:23.800 --> 0:45:25.879
<v Speaker 2>Tough question number one for.

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Dynasty leaguers, give me somebody available that I can stash

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 3>for next year.

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:34.839
<v Speaker 4>Brian, Yeah, there's obviously not a lot left out there

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:37.880
<v Speaker 4>in most leagues, so I'm gonna go I'm gonna speak

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:43.040
<v Speaker 4>to the super flex or mandatory two quarterback dynasty leaguers

0:45:43.080 --> 0:45:47.800
<v Speaker 4>out there, unless you're in a super deep one. Hendon

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 4>Hooker should be available. Rookie quarterback for the Lions out

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 4>of Tennessee, basically didn't play all year for because of

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:56.799
<v Speaker 4>a knee injury. I almost want to put Thor on

0:45:56.800 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 4>the spot because he knows a lot more about Hooker

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 4>than I do. But I'm not saying he's gonna take

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:03.719
<v Speaker 4>Jared Goff's job, or it's going to be a quarterback

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 4>competition going to the next season. But you never know

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 4>what could happen to Goff and Hooker. Would Hooker have

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:12.399
<v Speaker 4>been a first second round pick if not for the injury, Thor,

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:14.439
<v Speaker 4>I think it would have been a second. So why

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 4>not stash him and just see what happens in your

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:17.560
<v Speaker 4>two quarterback leagues.

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:19.759
<v Speaker 3>He should be available, all right, he is. I like

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 3>the availability part of that, all right, Thor, give me

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 3>a dynasty for dynasty leaguers. Give me somebody who's largely

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:28.319
<v Speaker 3>available that I can pick up and stash for next year.

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:30.279
<v Speaker 6>I'm also going to go with the guy who got

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:33.320
<v Speaker 6>drafted in April. I'm going with Jets running back Israel

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 6>Abana Conda for this one. I think he could be

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 6>the twenty twenty four Rico Daudo abound A Conda, a

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.399
<v Speaker 6>two hundred and sixteen pounder who had a nine point

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 6>six RATS in otherwids tested ninety six size adjusted percentile

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:49.480
<v Speaker 6>coming in. He's also a home run hitter. I mean,

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 6>like his calling card is speed. I comped him in

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:56.439
<v Speaker 6>the pre draft process that Tevin Coleman. Very similar game,

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 6>Like they both run upright, they get you know, once

0:46:58.680 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 6>they get into space, it's just they're looking for that

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 6>straight line to the goal line and then they just

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:06.240
<v Speaker 6>want to run as fast as they can. A Bona

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:08.799
<v Speaker 6>Konda is likely to be the one be back in

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 6>the Jets backfield next year because Dalvin Cook is a

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 6>free agent. Breece Hall will be RB one in that scenario.

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 6>Obviously Breeze went down then if he would be getting

0:47:17.400 --> 0:47:20.400
<v Speaker 6>the bell call role. But I would also say Nathaniel

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 6>Hackett historically has used two running backs. Yeah, good point,

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:25.799
<v Speaker 6>So a Bona Conna could factor in there. And by

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 6>the way, it's going to be a Jets offense that

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.399
<v Speaker 6>is way, way way better next year because mister Aaron

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 6>Rodgers is coming back and Zach Wilson's going to be

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 6>banished again. So I really like a Bona Coonda For

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 6>Dynasty guys.

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 3>That's an interesting angle. You're kind of selling you that

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 3>they cut Michael Carter, So you know that tells me.

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 3>That tells me that they like Izzy for sure. For

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 3>my answer and we'll call it the correct answer. Well, first,

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 3>Jill Any Woods, who I talk about all the time.

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:52.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's a tragically lost season for him with

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 3>a multiple re injuries to his hamstring, but ultimately Cincinnati

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 3>running back Chase Brown looks great. You know in college

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 3>we saw a compact runner with great balance footwork. He

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:07.240
<v Speaker 3>had a little bit of burst last year to Illinois,

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Brown ranked second in the country with forty eight explosive plays.

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 3>And we've learned about Brown thanks for his recent upchick

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 3>upticking usage in Cincinnati almost five yards per carry. Dude

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:21.760
<v Speaker 3>can catch, you know, he caught a bit at Illinois

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:24.279
<v Speaker 3>as well. He can catch, and you get him into

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:26.799
<v Speaker 3>space and you got a problem on your hands. Kind

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 3>of like Chase Brown here. If you believe like me,

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Joe Mixon is just like slowly faltering. We don't know.

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:34.719
<v Speaker 3>It's mix and status for next year, you might not

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 3>even be on this team. Chase Brown could be the

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 3>lead running back for the Bengals with a Joe Burrow

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:40.280
<v Speaker 3>led offense next season.

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 6>He's a home run hitter for sure. Nine point eight

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 6>ras for Chase Brown in the process this year.

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:47.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, like that, we'll call that correct.

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 2>An tough question Number two, what's.

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 3>The right tie breaker in the playoffs for two teams

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:55.240
<v Speaker 3>that tie?

0:48:55.840 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 6>We begin with thor so I go by standings this

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:03.400
<v Speaker 6>because I feel like regular season, Yeah, the regular season standings,

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 6>because I feel like the team that finished higher in

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 6>the standings you have the fact a home field advantage, ergo,

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 6>you would get the tiebreaker on this one, so by

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 6>record first them by point score.

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:15.399
<v Speaker 5>That's always my default tie breaker after record.

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 3>Brian, what's the right tiebreaker for the playoffs when two

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:19.600
<v Speaker 3>teams have the same score.

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:22.760
<v Speaker 4>I used to be a points guy because I always

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:25.839
<v Speaker 4>thought overall points was more indicative of how good your

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 4>team is as opposed to a regular season record where you.

0:49:28.560 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Can get lucky or unlucky.

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 4>But I'm going to go the route, and I'm not

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:34.239
<v Speaker 4>in any of these leagues I wish I was, at

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 4>least don't think I am. But with the highest scoring

0:49:37.400 --> 0:49:39.799
<v Speaker 4>bench player. If we were to tie in our week

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:43.880
<v Speaker 4>fifteen matchup, it's sort of like a hybrid best ball approach,

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:46.320
<v Speaker 4>So I would go by the highest scoring bench player.

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 4>I feel in the fair Unless you're playing in like

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 4>whole point leagues, it's still hard to tie, but it's

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:54.840
<v Speaker 4>in edge case scenario. But if it happens, I'm going

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 4>with the highest scoring bench player.

0:49:56.160 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 3>The most important thing is to have an established tie breaker.

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 3>You probably don't know what Most leagues now score to

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:04.200
<v Speaker 3>the hundreds place, so it's uncommon. It used to be

0:50:04.320 --> 0:50:08.360
<v Speaker 3>very common. But here's the thing. I've seen friendships end

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:12.319
<v Speaker 3>over tie breakers in the playoffs because your league didn't

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:15.399
<v Speaker 3>have a tie breakers set up, it's a bad deal.

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:19.720
<v Speaker 3>So establish your tiebreaker now if you haven't already now.

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't like any tiebreaker involves backups, because your backups

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 3>aren't necessarily there to score points for you. For example,

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:28.320
<v Speaker 3>if I've got mix in, I want to Chase Brown handcuff,

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:31.719
<v Speaker 3>and that's the reason Chase Brown's on my team. I

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 3>remember one year, years ago when I wasn't a whole

0:50:34.280 --> 0:50:38.239
<v Speaker 3>points scoring league that we used backups, and so in

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 3>the championship game, I dropped everybody and just had kickers.

0:50:41.080 --> 0:50:43.239
<v Speaker 3>I just had nothing but kickers as my backups to

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 3>get your points, you know, out of my backups. I mean,

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 3>it's just I and the backups. Again, don't like the

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 3>backups the regular season, so throwor to your point, the

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:55.480
<v Speaker 3>better team was established over the course of the season.

0:50:55.600 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 3>The regular season record the winning percentage of the overall points.

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 3>But that tells me who was better, not who is

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:06.759
<v Speaker 3>is better. So to me, it's all about the starters.

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:09.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't like the backups. I like the regular season.

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 3>I give you the starters in this game this week,

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 3>So how can I measure when we've already tied Thor

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 3>and I have already tied. How can we do it?

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 3>I use most yards of your starters. If you play

0:51:21.640 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 3>with the kicker and defense, just throw those out. Most

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:25.799
<v Speaker 3>leagues don't anymore. If you do, just throw those out

0:51:26.000 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 3>most yards between my starters. Because I'm trying to make

0:51:27.960 --> 0:51:29.839
<v Speaker 3>the best starting lineup, Thors, trying to make the best

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:32.800
<v Speaker 3>starting lineup. Whoever had the most yards, You've got the

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 3>best team this week?

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Got tough question number three.

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 4>That's too much math for me, it's too much math

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 4>for you.

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Wow, did you go to Arizona State? Is this an

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 3>English Major? Sky? You?

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 1>MA?

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Should should higher seeded playoff teams be allowed to pick

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:58.399
<v Speaker 3>their opponents? Back to Brian first for this one. No,

0:52:00.719 --> 0:52:03.040
<v Speaker 3>do you get to pick whoever you want to play? No,

0:52:03.200 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 3>this is weird to me.

0:52:06.200 --> 0:52:07.799
<v Speaker 4>Initi was like, I'm not in a league like this,

0:52:07.920 --> 0:52:09.920
<v Speaker 4>and then I realized, I am in a league like this,

0:52:10.440 --> 0:52:12.399
<v Speaker 4>and we're in the same league. It's a Best Ball

0:52:12.440 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Empire league, and I am buying for the number one seed,

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 4>So I guess I'll gladly pick my opponent.

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:21.799
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know. It's just it's a little too

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:25.319
<v Speaker 3>it's too far off the tracks. For me, whatever analogy,

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 3>metaphor you want to use.

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Just basically, no, I think it's kind of bizarre, but hey,

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:33.440
<v Speaker 4>I'll take advantage of it if it presented the opportunity.

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 3>But overall I'm against it. I remember when PPR was

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:38.879
<v Speaker 3>too far off the tracks for people. All right, thor

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:43.160
<v Speaker 3>should higher seeded playoff teams be allowed to pick their opponents?

0:52:43.840 --> 0:52:46.640
<v Speaker 6>So this is the first time I was ever confronted

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:48.760
<v Speaker 6>with this idea. I guess I play in two basic

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:52.440
<v Speaker 6>of leagues. This idea is incredible and it should be

0:52:52.520 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 6>implemented everywhere for numerous different reasons. First of all, the

0:52:56.200 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 6>shade potential is absolutely incredible. Number one, uh but but

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.480
<v Speaker 6>number two, I feel like the teams that finish at

0:53:04.520 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 6>the top, who would have the first picks in it?

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:06.880
<v Speaker 5>They've earned that.

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 6>Why wouldn't they get to pick their opponent? I I

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 6>love the idea all the way around. All right, I

0:53:11.480 --> 0:53:14.000
<v Speaker 6>have several thoughts. Your first, Okay, some people, the NFL

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 6>doesn't work that way. You don't get I don't care.

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:18.440
<v Speaker 6>The NFL has nothing to do with this conversation. Yeah, honestly,

0:53:18.520 --> 0:53:20.439
<v Speaker 6>this is you know, this is nothing. No two things alike.

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 6>Second thing, I'm the number one seed. A lot of

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 6>teams that A lot of times the team that you

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 6>know rolled in as the sixth seed or whatever. However,

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 6>man teams you got in, you know that team's hot

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:33.840
<v Speaker 6>right now. You know it's not like the sixth seed

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 6>right now. It could often because oftentimes still a very

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 6>very good team and not the team that I want

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:39.839
<v Speaker 6>to get matched up with.

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I love that it adds new strategy. Now I

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:46.160
<v Speaker 3>got to like go through all the lineups. I gotta

0:53:46.200 --> 0:53:49.120
<v Speaker 3>do like projected outcomes. I got to try to figure

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 3>out which which opponent is going to be worse and

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:57.759
<v Speaker 3>then if you still get it wrong. Oh that's why

0:53:57.920 --> 0:53:59.839
<v Speaker 3>it's a given for me. I know it's I will

0:54:00.200 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 3>picked the wrong team. So I don't want to pick

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 3>the league Brian and I were talking about right now.

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:07.000
<v Speaker 3>It's an Empire League where if you win back to

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 3>back years, you win this rolling pot and the whole

0:54:09.200 --> 0:54:13.399
<v Speaker 3>thing ends. Last year, I'm in the championship and I've

0:54:13.440 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 3>got I picked. I get to pick my opponent. It's

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 3>a week before the championship. I guess, so I get

0:54:16.440 --> 0:54:19.600
<v Speaker 3>to pick my opponent. I chose wrong, got the wrong team,

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:21.799
<v Speaker 3>knocked myself out or else I could, I would have

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:23.320
<v Speaker 3>won the I would have won the whole thing, and

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:25.799
<v Speaker 3>if nature just run its course, you would have been

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:29.120
<v Speaker 3>that champion. I don't know for sure, but probably I

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 3>had a really good team. So anyway, I think it's

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:34.120
<v Speaker 3>super fun. It adds cool new strategy. It doesn't have

0:54:34.200 --> 0:54:37.160
<v Speaker 3>to be like the NFL. Let's let those highest seated

0:54:37.160 --> 0:54:38.360
<v Speaker 3>team pick their opponents.

0:54:38.400 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 6>I have a clarification question, would they Would the second

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:43.960
<v Speaker 6>and third teams be guaranteed to pick or could the

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:46.560
<v Speaker 6>top team be Like I want the number two seed

0:54:46.920 --> 0:54:47.319
<v Speaker 6>right away?

0:54:47.400 --> 0:54:49.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? You could. Yeah, you could do that. Wow. Yeah,

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 3>you don't have to pick like the SEP bottom half.

0:54:51.560 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 3>You can pick anybody you want if you're a team won.

0:54:53.360 --> 0:54:55.480
<v Speaker 3>I love this idea. It's super fun, isn't it. I

0:54:55.560 --> 0:54:56.920
<v Speaker 3>love this. Yeah, it's a lot of fun. All right,

0:54:57.080 --> 0:55:00.399
<v Speaker 3>let's get back to the matchups. Hey, it's me Bay

0:55:00.600 --> 0:55:04.759
<v Speaker 3>taken on Green Bay. How about Shot White suddenly going

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:08.239
<v Speaker 3>bellcow on us? I did not see that coming. Over

0:55:08.280 --> 0:55:11.879
<v Speaker 3>the past three weeks, he's averaging twenty carries and he's

0:55:11.920 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 3>chipping in three receptions per game. He's scored in five

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:17.319
<v Speaker 3>of the six games. For a guy who was incapable

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:20.440
<v Speaker 3>of scoring last year and most of this year, Shot

0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:23.800
<v Speaker 3>White turning it around. Green Bay has allowed six rushing

0:55:23.840 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns to running backs in their last five games. White

0:55:26.520 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 3>will be aided by the loss of well potential loss

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:31.440
<v Speaker 3>of Packers linebacker Kay Walker if he can't go, We're

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:33.960
<v Speaker 3>going to monitor his status in this one. Packer's own

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:36.960
<v Speaker 3>of three teams to not allow a receiving touchdown to

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:40.080
<v Speaker 3>a running back this season, and their scoreless streak goes

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:42.480
<v Speaker 3>back nineteen games, so they've not given up a receiving

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:45.160
<v Speaker 3>touchdown for nineteen straight games. So White will not help

0:55:45.239 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 3>us that way, and that's part of the way. I've

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:48.840
<v Speaker 3>got a B grade on White instead of an A

0:55:49.000 --> 0:55:52.239
<v Speaker 3>grade on White. To the Packer game, Let's go start

0:55:52.239 --> 0:55:55.960
<v Speaker 3>with Baker Mayfield. Even with quarterbacks Eric Stokes and Jay

0:55:56.000 --> 0:55:58.720
<v Speaker 3>r Alexander injured and then green Bay traded away, Rasuell

0:55:58.719 --> 0:56:01.239
<v Speaker 3>Douglas has been great with the bill. The Packers have

0:56:01.320 --> 0:56:05.200
<v Speaker 3>held opposing passers in check almost every week. No passers

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:08.040
<v Speaker 3>top two scores all year. Only one is top two

0:56:08.160 --> 0:56:11.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred and sixty yards on the season. Green Bay allowing

0:56:11.680 --> 0:56:14.680
<v Speaker 3>the fourth lowest a dot average distance to throw at

0:56:14.719 --> 0:56:19.680
<v Speaker 3>just seven and see. I just think Baker Mayfield's overall

0:56:20.239 --> 0:56:25.600
<v Speaker 3>upside very limited against what's been a shockingly and shockingly

0:56:25.840 --> 0:56:29.960
<v Speaker 3>competent Packers secondary despite a dearth of talent. Let's go

0:56:30.000 --> 0:56:32.000
<v Speaker 3>to Mike Evans with a weird dud last week. That

0:56:32.000 --> 0:56:35.880
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make sense now unless Alexander Stokes come back. It

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:39.200
<v Speaker 3>leaves the combo of Valentine and Valentine as you're outside

0:56:39.239 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 3>cornerbacks once again, and they've been pretty bad over the

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:44.520
<v Speaker 3>last five weeks. They have bottom fifty PFF coverage grades,

0:56:44.800 --> 0:56:47.480
<v Speaker 3>but they've only given up two scores between them and Evans'

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 3>biggest values is a red zone target, where he's a

0:56:50.080 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 3>top ten wide receiver target. I can only get you

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:55.720
<v Speaker 3>to a B grade on Evans in a weirdly tough matchup.

0:56:56.320 --> 0:57:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Here's your sneaky play this week. Chris Godwin is a

0:57:00.560 --> 0:57:03.200
<v Speaker 3>game time decision. He's got a knee injury practiced on Friday,

0:57:03.239 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 3>but they have said there's still a decent chance he

0:57:05.200 --> 0:57:10.600
<v Speaker 3>won't go. Trey Palmer Burner. Trey, is he ever a Burner? Now?

0:57:10.640 --> 0:57:11.040
<v Speaker 5>He's been?

0:57:11.120 --> 0:57:13.720
<v Speaker 3>He runs, He dominates the slot usage. He runs almost

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:16.520
<v Speaker 3>two thirds of his plays from the slot. Double the

0:57:16.720 --> 0:57:20.840
<v Speaker 3>slot routes from Evans and Godwin. Packers are getting dominated

0:57:20.840 --> 0:57:24.480
<v Speaker 3>by slot receivers, including when Dale Robinson last week went

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:27.720
<v Speaker 3>berserk on him. I'm on Rap Saint Brown before that,

0:57:27.920 --> 0:57:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Keenan Allen before that. Slot receivers getting it out.

0:57:31.400 --> 0:57:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:57:31.520 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 3>All those guys are are a lot more polished and

0:57:33.640 --> 0:57:36.400
<v Speaker 3>experienced than Trey Palmer. But you could get a breakout

0:57:36.440 --> 0:57:38.479
<v Speaker 3>game from him. And if you need a dart throw

0:57:39.560 --> 0:57:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Trey Palmer, let's go to the Green Bay side. Jordan

0:57:42.440 --> 0:57:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Love coming off a bad Monday Night game, but his

0:57:44.560 --> 0:57:47.720
<v Speaker 3>prior three games are very good, and the Bucks secondary

0:57:47.800 --> 0:57:51.520
<v Speaker 3>is the ideal recipe for a quick turnaround. The Bucks

0:57:51.600 --> 0:57:54.960
<v Speaker 3>ranked thirty first and passing yards allowed twenty eighth and

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:58.720
<v Speaker 3>fantasy points allowed to quarterbacks. They ranked twenty seventh in

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:01.320
<v Speaker 3>covers by Pro Football Folk. They've given up a league

0:58:01.360 --> 0:58:06.440
<v Speaker 3>worst six quarterback rushing touchdowns, and Love's mobility could definitely

0:58:06.480 --> 0:58:09.360
<v Speaker 3>factor in here and augment this box score. Be great

0:58:09.360 --> 0:58:13.360
<v Speaker 3>for Jordan Love. I'm starting Jordan Love over Patrick Mahomes

0:58:13.640 --> 0:58:17.560
<v Speaker 3>in one of my guillotine leagues. Who that is gonna be?

0:58:17.640 --> 0:58:21.439
<v Speaker 3>That's Love it if I if the ship goes down

0:58:21.440 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 3>on that I'm gonna feel pretty bad. All right, Let's

0:58:23.560 --> 0:58:27.840
<v Speaker 3>go to Jayden Reid and Romeo Dobs, both cornerbacks for Tampa.

0:58:28.000 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Jamel Dean and Carlon Davis are questionable follow their status.

0:58:31.480 --> 0:58:34.680
<v Speaker 3>That leaves something called Zion McCollum as the only healthy

0:58:34.680 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 3>outside cornerback that plays meaningful snaps, and over the last

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 3>five weeks, he's Pro Football Focus is fifteenth lowest graded cornerback.

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:44.880
<v Speaker 3>So I love the matchups here, and Reid's getting carries

0:58:45.280 --> 0:58:48.360
<v Speaker 3>about one hundred yards of rushing work in the last month.

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Both Dobbs and Reads viable against a defense that ranks

0:58:52.040 --> 0:58:55.400
<v Speaker 3>thirty first in yards allowed to the position. Drake London

0:58:55.480 --> 0:58:58.720
<v Speaker 3>crushed Tampa last week. They've allowed five one one hundred

0:58:58.800 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 3>yard receiving performances in their last six games. Game on

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Jaden Reed and Romeo Dobbs with B grades in this one.

0:59:06.760 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Christian Watson is not expected to play. He is doubtful.

0:59:09.640 --> 0:59:12.360
<v Speaker 3>We don't think he's gonna go in this one. You

0:59:12.400 --> 0:59:18.480
<v Speaker 3>could dart throw at at Wisntavious Wicks, but he's also

0:59:18.520 --> 0:59:23.439
<v Speaker 3>not healthy. Malik Heath he scored last week. You want

0:59:23.440 --> 0:59:25.760
<v Speaker 3>to go that far? Be my gad I don't now

0:59:25.840 --> 0:59:27.520
<v Speaker 3>you know what you can't do very easily on Tampa's

0:59:27.560 --> 0:59:30.400
<v Speaker 3>run the ball, and AJ Dillon's got groin injury, thumb injury,

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Jones is trying to come back from knee injury.

0:59:32.720 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 3>It's all bad for me. Tampa's a good run defense,

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:37.439
<v Speaker 3>they're giving him just three point seven yards per carries

0:59:37.480 --> 0:59:41.240
<v Speaker 3>since Week six, and even heavy volume backs are not

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:44.960
<v Speaker 3>getting any headway. Even if so, even if Dylan or

0:59:45.080 --> 0:59:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Jones one or the other starts, it doesn't mean that

0:59:50.440 --> 0:59:53.280
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna have any kind of productivity here. Dylan has

0:59:53.400 --> 0:59:57.480
<v Speaker 3>zero top ten finishes this year in Fantasy, and he's

0:59:57.600 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 3>his average finish. Get this. J Dillon's average Fantasy finish

1:00:02.520 --> 1:00:06.320
<v Speaker 3>running back thirty one, and he's spend the lone starter.

1:00:06.400 --> 1:00:09.760
<v Speaker 3>With Aaron Jones missing most of the year. Jones has

1:00:09.800 --> 1:00:12.560
<v Speaker 3>only two games with more than eleven touches. And my

1:00:12.720 --> 1:00:14.960
<v Speaker 3>fear is every time they give Aaron Jones a bunch

1:00:15.000 --> 1:00:17.440
<v Speaker 3>of work, he gets hurt. So even if Dylan is out,

1:00:17.680 --> 1:00:19.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they're gonna give Jones requisite work here,

1:00:19.960 --> 1:00:20.880
<v Speaker 3>so he's on the bench too.

1:00:21.160 --> 1:00:24.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't believe, and producer Brett would know, but I

1:00:24.880 --> 1:00:27.400
<v Speaker 4>don't think the Packers have had all of their offensive

1:00:27.400 --> 1:00:30.919
<v Speaker 4>weapons healthy for no, because Christian Watson missed Week one,

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Aaron Jones got hurt in Week one, and then ever

1:00:34.040 --> 1:00:35.040
<v Speaker 4>since then it's been an.

1:00:35.080 --> 1:00:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Offensive line span. Yeah, Luke Musgrave, he gets hurt at

1:00:39.280 --> 1:00:41.680
<v Speaker 3>I have to scroll several times just to get through

1:00:41.720 --> 1:00:44.480
<v Speaker 3>our injury report that way. Yeah, it's it's bad news.

1:00:44.840 --> 1:00:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Next year, Packers are going to be a tough team.

1:00:49.520 --> 1:00:49.720
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:00:49.800 --> 1:00:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Love's gonna get better. All the young receivers get better,

1:00:52.040 --> 1:00:54.600
<v Speaker 3>they get into all the injuries of this year, it's

1:00:54.880 --> 1:00:56.840
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna be They're gonna be a handful next year.

1:00:57.040 --> 1:01:01.680
<v Speaker 3>When we come back San Francisco taking on the Arizona Cardinals.

1:01:01.720 --> 1:01:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Deebo Samuel the highest scoring Fantasy wide receiver in the

1:01:04.760 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 3>last month. Will it continue? He had a zero catch

1:01:07.880 --> 1:01:11.040
<v Speaker 3>game last time these teams met. Find out when we

1:01:11.080 --> 1:01:32.040
<v Speaker 3>come back. Welcome back Fantasy Football weekly playoff week. It's

1:01:32.040 --> 1:01:36.560
<v Speaker 3>also rain week. Lookout for weather a pre kickoff. Anything

1:01:36.600 --> 1:01:38.720
<v Speaker 3>on the East Coast is got weather. And then the

1:01:38.800 --> 1:01:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Monday night er is shaping up in Seattle. Shocking, Seattle

1:01:41.400 --> 1:01:44.400
<v Speaker 3>could have cold rain in December. It's even raining in Minnesota.

1:01:45.600 --> 1:01:46.320
<v Speaker 3>In December.

1:01:46.440 --> 1:01:49.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, you gotta look for the win to anything

1:01:49.360 --> 1:01:52.720
<v Speaker 6>over twelve miles per hour statistically, data wise, going back years,

1:01:52.760 --> 1:01:55.160
<v Speaker 6>it affects the passing game, and the higher you get up,

1:01:55.240 --> 1:01:57.480
<v Speaker 6>closer you get to twenty, it starts to really get wonky.

1:01:57.560 --> 1:02:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we haven't had a snow situation yet this year,

1:02:00.360 --> 1:02:02.560
<v Speaker 3>which is kind of a bomb. Marks that love snow games,

1:02:03.920 --> 1:02:05.360
<v Speaker 3>But you know, we talk about a lot. You know,

1:02:05.560 --> 1:02:07.800
<v Speaker 3>rain and wind are are bigger threats a lot of

1:02:07.800 --> 1:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>times than snow, so you know it. You know they're

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:13.920
<v Speaker 3>all different, but SnO help offenses. In some cases they can.

1:02:14.000 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there's a whole thing of the snow over, but

1:02:16.320 --> 1:02:18.360
<v Speaker 6>you know we're going over on that because it's really

1:02:18.400 --> 1:02:19.760
<v Speaker 6>hard for defenders to get their footing.

1:02:19.840 --> 1:02:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Oh Lashawn McCoy had one of the most epic snow

1:02:22.280 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 4>game performances of all time. I believe he's with Buffalo.

1:02:25.640 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 4>It might have been with Philly. I think he's with

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Philly in Buffalo. It's like three feet of snow. No

1:02:30.040 --> 1:02:31.320
<v Speaker 4>one's gonna do anything, but he went off.

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll never forget the Tom Brady like fifty two

1:02:34.800 --> 1:02:38.040
<v Speaker 3>pointer he put up on Tennessee in a deep deep

1:02:38.080 --> 1:02:40.040
<v Speaker 3>snow game where everybody was like, oh, I don't know

1:02:40.040 --> 1:02:41.960
<v Speaker 3>if I could if I dare start any Patriots, and

1:02:41.960 --> 1:02:44.240
<v Speaker 3>I just went berserk. And I think the Titans got

1:02:44.240 --> 1:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>shut out in that game. I would imagine Randy Moss

1:02:46.200 --> 1:02:47.919
<v Speaker 3>helped out with that, right, it might have been that era.

1:02:48.280 --> 1:02:52.080
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco takes on Arizona Brian and as I mentioned

1:02:52.120 --> 1:02:55.720
<v Speaker 3>going into the break, Deebo Samuel played eighty five percent

1:02:55.760 --> 1:02:58.000
<v Speaker 3>of the snaps and no catches in the first one.

1:02:58.200 --> 1:03:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Now he comes in as Fantasy Ball's hottest receiver. Yeah,

1:03:01.520 --> 1:03:02.240
<v Speaker 3>he's on fire.

1:03:02.320 --> 1:03:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Going back a little further against the Cardinals over his

1:03:06.040 --> 1:03:08.840
<v Speaker 4>last two games. So they did play once this year

1:03:08.880 --> 1:03:11.240
<v Speaker 4>in Week four, San Francisco won thirty five to sixteen.

1:03:11.560 --> 1:03:14.160
<v Speaker 4>That was the game Deebo had no catches, But across

1:03:14.200 --> 1:03:17.040
<v Speaker 4>his last two games against the Cardinals, he's total two

1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:20.440
<v Speaker 4>catches for twenty scoreless yards and four carries for ten

1:03:20.480 --> 1:03:23.680
<v Speaker 4>scoreless yards. So history is not on Deebo's side right now.

1:03:23.760 --> 1:03:26.840
<v Speaker 4>But you're not benching Deebo Samuel on the heater that

1:03:26.880 --> 1:03:28.439
<v Speaker 4>he is on. So I got a B on him

1:03:28.720 --> 1:03:31.040
<v Speaker 4>and a B on Brandon Ayukhu had six catches, one

1:03:31.160 --> 1:03:33.600
<v Speaker 4>hundred and forty eight yards in the first meeting, and

1:03:33.720 --> 1:03:38.400
<v Speaker 4>more recently, Ayuk has scored end or topped one hundred

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:41.480
<v Speaker 4>yards in six straight games. Wow, Ayuk is just an

1:03:41.600 --> 1:03:45.520
<v Speaker 4>absolute steal draft a steal back in August, probably one

1:03:45.520 --> 1:03:48.640
<v Speaker 4>of the top ones at wide receiver. Sticking with the

1:03:48.720 --> 1:03:52.840
<v Speaker 4>passing game over to George Kittle, I almost gave him

1:03:52.840 --> 1:03:54.280
<v Speaker 4>a seed, but I couldn't do it in the tight

1:03:54.360 --> 1:03:56.520
<v Speaker 4>end wastelein. I'm gonna give Kittle a b But Kittle

1:03:56.560 --> 1:03:59.640
<v Speaker 4>had just one catch for nine scoreless yards in the

1:03:59.640 --> 1:04:02.760
<v Speaker 4>first meeting, and the Cardinals have held tight ends under

1:04:02.880 --> 1:04:07.120
<v Speaker 4>forty yards and five straight games, but Arizona has surrendered

1:04:07.120 --> 1:04:10.320
<v Speaker 4>four tight end touchdowns during that same five game span.

1:04:10.440 --> 1:04:13.200
<v Speaker 4>So you're not gonna sit Kittle. You're definitely not sitting

1:04:13.280 --> 1:04:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Brock Purty gonna give him a bee. He attempted just

1:04:16.320 --> 1:04:19.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty one passes in the first meeting, but completed twenty

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:21.960
<v Speaker 4>of them for two hundred and eighty three yards and

1:04:22.000 --> 1:04:24.920
<v Speaker 4>a touchdown. He also added a short score on the ground.

1:04:25.520 --> 1:04:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Purty is my.

1:04:26.440 --> 1:04:27.960
<v Speaker 3>He's not my number one this week.

1:04:28.040 --> 1:04:32.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's not my real life MVP, but he's Fantasy's MVP.

1:04:32.600 --> 1:04:34.720
<v Speaker 4>To me right now, at least among quarterbacks based on

1:04:34.760 --> 1:04:37.520
<v Speaker 4>where he's drafted. He's he's having a season that Patrick

1:04:37.560 --> 1:04:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Mahomes should be should be having, Purty is, but.

1:04:40.280 --> 1:04:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes isn't having the season that Baker Mayfield's having,

1:04:43.240 --> 1:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>no or a lot of We won't get into Mahomes

1:04:46.760 --> 1:04:46.960
<v Speaker 3>right now.

1:04:46.960 --> 1:04:49.360
<v Speaker 4>We'll get into a little later, right but up, I

1:04:49.440 --> 1:04:52.360
<v Speaker 4>just had to be on Purty because Christian McCaffery gets

1:04:52.360 --> 1:04:53.360
<v Speaker 4>the fantasy.

1:04:52.920 --> 1:04:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Fonsie a one.

1:04:56.800 --> 1:05:00.240
<v Speaker 4>Seventy seven combo yards and four total touchdowns in the

1:05:00.280 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 4>first meeting, and we don't have to go into Christian

1:05:01.840 --> 1:05:05.480
<v Speaker 4>McCaffrey anymore. Over to the Cardinals side, starting with James Connor.

1:05:05.880 --> 1:05:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Gonna give him a c Connor has averaged seventeen touches

1:05:09.240 --> 1:05:12.200
<v Speaker 4>since his Week ten return and remains the volume base

1:05:12.320 --> 1:05:15.560
<v Speaker 4>play regardless of matchup. But this should be tough sledding

1:05:15.880 --> 1:05:18.880
<v Speaker 4>against the forty nine ers, who since Week ten have

1:05:19.000 --> 1:05:22.880
<v Speaker 4>the fourth lowest missed tackles per attempt, the second highest

1:05:22.880 --> 1:05:25.920
<v Speaker 4>stuff rate, and have given up the second fewest rushing

1:05:26.000 --> 1:05:28.920
<v Speaker 4>yards per game. But there are injuries on the defensive

1:05:28.960 --> 1:05:32.080
<v Speaker 4>side for San Francisco, They're gonna be without both starting

1:05:32.120 --> 1:05:36.200
<v Speaker 4>defensive tackles Eric Armstead and Javon Hargrave. They'll also be

1:05:36.240 --> 1:05:39.320
<v Speaker 4>missing strong side linebacker or In Berks. He has been

1:05:39.400 --> 1:05:42.520
<v Speaker 4>ruled out, So Connor is still startable with the C

1:05:43.200 --> 1:05:45.000
<v Speaker 4>and Trey McBride, of course is startable.

1:05:45.040 --> 1:05:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Getna give him a bee.

1:05:46.440 --> 1:05:48.400
<v Speaker 4>He only had one catch in the first meeting, but

1:05:48.440 --> 1:05:52.760
<v Speaker 4>that's because zach Ert saw ten targets, so that volume

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:55.560
<v Speaker 4>should go McBride's way. But a tough matchup on paper.

1:05:56.200 --> 1:05:58.960
<v Speaker 4>But again, the forty nine ers defense is dinged up

1:05:58.960 --> 1:06:02.360
<v Speaker 4>pretty good. But Saffan Cisco allowing less than five catches

1:06:02.360 --> 1:06:04.880
<v Speaker 4>and forty yards per game to opposing tight ends. But

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:07.760
<v Speaker 4>no way you're gonna sit Trey McBride. There is a

1:06:07.800 --> 1:06:10.560
<v Speaker 4>way you're gonna sit Markis Brown if you have better options.

1:06:10.560 --> 1:06:12.640
<v Speaker 4>I will give him a C grade. Though he had

1:06:12.720 --> 1:06:15.520
<v Speaker 4>seven catches for ninety six yards in the first meeting,

1:06:15.840 --> 1:06:18.919
<v Speaker 4>he should see similar volume in a likely positive game.

1:06:18.960 --> 1:06:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Script for the Carolina passing game, I'm sorry the Cardinals

1:06:21.840 --> 1:06:24.480
<v Speaker 4>passing game. The forty nine Ers have allowed these second

1:06:24.480 --> 1:06:28.440
<v Speaker 4>most receptions to wide receivers and San Francisco starting cornerback

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:31.640
<v Speaker 4>Tarvarius Ward could miss this game.

1:06:31.680 --> 1:06:32.480
<v Speaker 3>With a groin injury.

1:06:32.480 --> 1:06:35.600
<v Speaker 4>They're saying he's expected to play, still listed as questionable,

1:06:35.600 --> 1:06:37.840
<v Speaker 4>but likely won't be one hundred percent if you play,

1:06:37.920 --> 1:06:40.280
<v Speaker 4>So I will give Brown the starting grade with the Sea,

1:06:40.760 --> 1:06:43.360
<v Speaker 4>and just to see for quarterback Kyler Murray, who has

1:06:43.400 --> 1:06:46.840
<v Speaker 4>been pretty spotty as a passer in his four games

1:06:46.880 --> 1:06:50.880
<v Speaker 4>since returning, as he hasn't thrown for multiple scores yet,

1:06:51.040 --> 1:06:53.760
<v Speaker 4>but his legs have kept him relevant, with a rushing

1:06:53.760 --> 1:06:57.560
<v Speaker 4>touchdown in three of those four games played this year. Again,

1:06:57.640 --> 1:06:59.400
<v Speaker 4>this is a tough matchup, but a lot of injuries

1:06:59.400 --> 1:07:02.120
<v Speaker 4>on the San Francis go side. But one long run

1:07:02.120 --> 1:07:04.120
<v Speaker 4>could save Maury's day. So you're still gonna start him

1:07:04.120 --> 1:07:04.640
<v Speaker 4>with the Sea.

1:07:04.760 --> 1:07:09.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, Washington taking on the Rams store this figures

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:11.960
<v Speaker 3>will be a one sided affair. Washington's without Brian Robinson,

1:07:11.960 --> 1:07:13.920
<v Speaker 3>who's been ruled out of this game. I don't think

1:07:13.920 --> 1:07:16.120
<v Speaker 3>you are touching any part of the running game because

1:07:16.160 --> 1:07:18.000
<v Speaker 3>the game script's going to be all passes for a

1:07:18.000 --> 1:07:20.240
<v Speaker 3>team that only passes anyway, sure.

1:07:20.160 --> 1:07:23.080
<v Speaker 6>Is, I'm giving your boys Sam Howell a B grade

1:07:23.120 --> 1:07:26.680
<v Speaker 6>in this one, QB seven and fantasy this year, and man, yeah,

1:07:26.880 --> 1:07:28.880
<v Speaker 6>Chargers blowing the horn for him in the offseason, So

1:07:28.920 --> 1:07:31.960
<v Speaker 6>got to give you a credit on that one. Sam

1:07:32.000 --> 1:07:35.560
<v Speaker 6>Howell number one in passing attempts, he is number three

1:07:35.600 --> 1:07:38.800
<v Speaker 6>in airy yards, and the Rams have an average pass defense.

1:07:38.960 --> 1:07:42.160
<v Speaker 6>Howell's guaranteed to have the volume to attack that average defense.

1:07:42.560 --> 1:07:43.360
<v Speaker 5>But give him a bee.

1:07:44.800 --> 1:07:46.880
<v Speaker 6>I will say, if you're in a desperate situation, you

1:07:46.920 --> 1:07:49.360
<v Speaker 6>get started. Antonio Gibson, who stepping into the limelight with

1:07:49.360 --> 1:07:52.360
<v Speaker 6>Brian Robinson out with that hamstring injury. Last week when

1:07:52.440 --> 1:07:55.640
<v Speaker 6>Robinson got injured, Gibson out touched Chris Rodriguez fourteen to

1:07:55.680 --> 1:07:58.120
<v Speaker 6>three before the rookie Rodriguez got the last four.

1:07:57.960 --> 1:07:59.280
<v Speaker 5>Touches in a blowout loss.

1:07:59.400 --> 1:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:08:00.040 --> 1:08:02.720
<v Speaker 6>I also think Gibson's going to get ample receiving targets

1:08:02.720 --> 1:08:07.200
<v Speaker 6>in this game. Recall at Memphis, Antonio Gibson reever.

1:08:07.680 --> 1:08:08.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:08:08.640 --> 1:08:11.919
<v Speaker 6>Terry McLaurin, I'm gonna give him a C Fantasy's wide

1:08:11.960 --> 1:08:15.400
<v Speaker 6>receiver thirty eight, but he's been trending down. McLaurin is

1:08:15.440 --> 1:08:18.360
<v Speaker 6>not finished as a top thirty six Fantasy receiver in

1:08:18.400 --> 1:08:22.160
<v Speaker 6>any week since Week nine and no touchdowns since Week eve.

1:08:22.080 --> 1:08:25.439
<v Speaker 3>Despite the best quarterbacking of his career, the most prolific

1:08:25.520 --> 1:08:27.839
<v Speaker 3>court and all of them though, though so Howell.

1:08:28.040 --> 1:08:30.760
<v Speaker 4>Sorry didn't like Howell's going off and charged one of

1:08:30.800 --> 1:08:33.680
<v Speaker 4>the greatest calls since I've been on the show by you.

1:08:33.760 --> 1:08:37.160
<v Speaker 4>But how is Howell having such a good year. But McLaurin,

1:08:37.520 --> 1:08:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Jan Dotson, Curtis Samuel, they're all outside like the top thirty.

1:08:41.360 --> 1:08:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, wide receivers. It's because of the ball distribution, right,

1:08:44.240 --> 1:08:47.559
<v Speaker 3>It's crazy, so many different receivers that no one of

1:08:47.600 --> 1:08:50.559
<v Speaker 3>them is piling up decent stats. Curtis Samuel's been the

1:08:50.560 --> 1:08:52.360
<v Speaker 3>most fantasy relevant of the bunch.

1:08:52.560 --> 1:08:54.840
<v Speaker 5>Especially recently. That's why I'm giving him a bee.

1:08:55.200 --> 1:08:58.559
<v Speaker 6>The work his workload has been increasing as mclaurin's has

1:08:58.560 --> 1:09:00.719
<v Speaker 6>been going down in terms of the target gets. Since

1:09:00.760 --> 1:09:03.479
<v Speaker 6>week twelve, Samuel has a twenty five percent target share

1:09:03.520 --> 1:09:06.360
<v Speaker 6>and a twenty four percent first read share, and he's

1:09:06.400 --> 1:09:09.639
<v Speaker 6>averaging eighty three receiving yards per game during that span.

1:09:10.479 --> 1:09:12.840
<v Speaker 6>John Dodson, sorry to say, you gotta stay on the bench.

1:09:12.880 --> 1:09:16.480
<v Speaker 6>Clear wide receiver three in Washington, widersoft fifty six in fantasy.

1:09:16.680 --> 1:09:19.120
<v Speaker 6>But yeah, he's got to stay on the bench. Logan Thomas,

1:09:19.120 --> 1:09:21.320
<v Speaker 6>though I'm gonna give him a b there's a chance

1:09:21.360 --> 1:09:23.280
<v Speaker 6>for a big bounce back game for him after he

1:09:23.320 --> 1:09:26.000
<v Speaker 6>had only two catches in the last two games combined

1:09:26.040 --> 1:09:29.360
<v Speaker 6>before the bye. But Logan Thomas had five tight end

1:09:29.439 --> 1:09:32.280
<v Speaker 6>one weeks earlier this season, and the Rams are number

1:09:32.280 --> 1:09:35.600
<v Speaker 6>three and fantasy points allowed to tight ends. Moving to

1:09:35.640 --> 1:09:38.120
<v Speaker 6>the Rams, Matthew Stafford, which was charged to take a

1:09:38.200 --> 1:09:40.840
<v Speaker 6>chance on the guy, which I totally agree with. I

1:09:41.200 --> 1:09:43.800
<v Speaker 6>was gonna give him an a in this gad on him. Yeah,

1:09:43.840 --> 1:09:46.360
<v Speaker 6>twenty three plus Fantasy points and three straight. I think

1:09:46.360 --> 1:09:48.240
<v Speaker 6>he gets to four in this one against that horrid

1:09:48.360 --> 1:09:51.880
<v Speaker 6>Washington pass defense. Pooka Nakoa, My boy, I gotta give

1:09:51.920 --> 1:09:55.000
<v Speaker 6>myself the peacock on that one. Great a of course,

1:09:55.560 --> 1:09:58.280
<v Speaker 6>Fantasy's wide receiver eleven Key's.

1:09:58.120 --> 1:10:01.519
<v Speaker 5>Your your Fantasy MVP. Good Nakua and of.

1:10:01.400 --> 1:10:03.439
<v Speaker 6>Course the rookie of the year seven plus targets in

1:10:03.479 --> 1:10:05.720
<v Speaker 6>every single game this year, by the way, needs to

1:10:05.760 --> 1:10:08.320
<v Speaker 6>average eighty six receiving yards per game in the last

1:10:08.320 --> 1:10:10.599
<v Speaker 6>four games to break Jamar Chase's rookie record.

1:10:10.920 --> 1:10:12.479
<v Speaker 5>I think he's top in one hundred in this one.

1:10:12.920 --> 1:10:16.719
<v Speaker 6>Commander's rank dead last in defensive drop back EPA truly

1:10:16.800 --> 1:10:19.640
<v Speaker 6>truly ran to pass defense. Cooper cup I'm also going

1:10:19.680 --> 1:10:21.320
<v Speaker 6>to give him an A in this one because it's

1:10:21.320 --> 1:10:24.040
<v Speaker 6>just such a great matchup. Wide receiver twenty seven in

1:10:24.120 --> 1:10:27.960
<v Speaker 6>Fantasy points per game last two games, averaging seven catches

1:10:27.960 --> 1:10:31.719
<v Speaker 6>for seventy seven yards and a touchdown. Again, awesome matchup

1:10:31.880 --> 1:10:34.599
<v Speaker 6>Wash and particularly for guys coming out of the slot

1:10:34.720 --> 1:10:37.840
<v Speaker 6>like cup Is, Washington is dead last in defending slot

1:10:37.920 --> 1:10:40.880
<v Speaker 6>since the halfway point of the season. Tyler Higby, I'm

1:10:40.880 --> 1:10:43.000
<v Speaker 6>gonna give him a grade seat if he plays. He

1:10:43.040 --> 1:10:45.880
<v Speaker 6>missed last week with the neck injury, has returned to

1:10:45.920 --> 1:10:49.160
<v Speaker 6>practice as a full participant as of Thursday, so I

1:10:49.240 --> 1:10:51.760
<v Speaker 6>expect him to play. But you have to monitor that

1:10:52.160 --> 1:10:54.400
<v Speaker 6>Boomer bust tight end two this week, so I'll give

1:10:54.439 --> 1:10:56.200
<v Speaker 6>him a grade of CE there.

1:10:56.560 --> 1:10:57.840
<v Speaker 5>And then Kyron Williams.

1:10:58.200 --> 1:11:01.080
<v Speaker 6>I've given everyone on the panel credit until Brian at

1:11:01.080 --> 1:11:04.000
<v Speaker 6>this point, Brian, shout out to you for the Kyra

1:11:04.040 --> 1:11:04.880
<v Speaker 6>and Williams one.

1:11:05.000 --> 1:11:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

1:11:06.000 --> 1:11:09.240
<v Speaker 6>Great another great a matchup for Kyron in this one.

1:11:09.320 --> 1:11:12.479
<v Speaker 6>He's RB two in Fantasy points per game, averaging one

1:11:12.520 --> 1:11:15.960
<v Speaker 6>hundred and forty three total yards per game. Since his return,

1:11:16.560 --> 1:11:19.760
<v Speaker 6>Washington's run defense has been circling the toilet ever since

1:11:19.800 --> 1:11:22.360
<v Speaker 6>the trades per in particular, if Chase Young and Montes

1:11:22.439 --> 1:11:25.800
<v Speaker 6>sweat anyone can run on them, Kyrin gets dang near

1:11:25.840 --> 1:11:26.719
<v Speaker 6>one hundred percent.

1:11:26.479 --> 1:11:27.960
<v Speaker 5>Of the snaps. He's gonna go off again.

1:11:28.479 --> 1:11:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs sake on the Patriots. This one take long, although well,

1:11:32.479 --> 1:11:34.400
<v Speaker 3>let me ask you this. Okay, So the Chiefs have

1:11:34.880 --> 1:11:38.240
<v Speaker 3>this weird emotional thing at the end of last week's game.

1:11:38.680 --> 1:11:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that's going to spark a resurgence? Is

1:11:45.040 --> 1:11:47.160
<v Speaker 3>this like the emotional spark that they needed?

1:11:47.520 --> 1:11:48.160
<v Speaker 5>I don't think so.

1:11:48.880 --> 1:11:51.760
<v Speaker 6>Something seems off with them, and then Mahomes complaining about it.

1:11:51.760 --> 1:11:54.240
<v Speaker 5>It's like, bro, he was clearly offside. What are you

1:11:54.280 --> 1:11:54.840
<v Speaker 5>talking about.

1:11:55.760 --> 1:11:57.160
<v Speaker 3>I didn't like it. I don't think this is going

1:11:57.200 --> 1:11:58.000
<v Speaker 3>to be the spark.

1:11:57.760 --> 1:11:59.960
<v Speaker 5>But some do. They've been winding about it all week too.

1:12:00.680 --> 1:12:01.320
<v Speaker 5>I think move on.

1:12:01.439 --> 1:12:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Travis Kelsey's more, you know, motivated because he couldn't attend

1:12:06.160 --> 1:12:07.519
<v Speaker 4>Taylor Swift's birthday party.

1:12:07.640 --> 1:12:09.200
<v Speaker 3>So now he's really got to make up for that.

1:12:09.280 --> 1:12:11.759
<v Speaker 3>He's like promised for like four touchdowns. I've moved Kelsey

1:12:11.800 --> 1:12:13.760
<v Speaker 3>down to a B grade first time this year. I

1:12:13.760 --> 1:12:16.679
<v Speaker 3>had already moved Mahomes down a couple of times. This

1:12:16.880 --> 1:12:20.400
<v Speaker 3>is the first B grade for Kelsey. Here's why, only

1:12:20.400 --> 1:12:23.880
<v Speaker 3>getting twenty percent of Patrick Mahomes' red zone targets. What

1:12:24.000 --> 1:12:26.479
<v Speaker 3>the hell? Come on? Eighty percents going somewhere other than

1:12:26.520 --> 1:12:29.439
<v Speaker 3>Travis Kelsey. That's absurd. New England's been any lead tight

1:12:29.520 --> 1:12:32.800
<v Speaker 3>end defense this year, allowing the fourth fewest fantasy points

1:12:32.840 --> 1:12:35.360
<v Speaker 3>and tight ends in an average of just twenty nine

1:12:35.479 --> 1:12:38.519
<v Speaker 3>yards to tight ends in the last six games. What's more,

1:12:39.320 --> 1:12:42.920
<v Speaker 3>one tight end has scored against the Patriots all year.

1:12:43.360 --> 1:12:48.160
<v Speaker 3>B grade, Travis Kelcey B grade, Patrick Mahomes. Belichick rallying

1:12:48.200 --> 1:12:51.720
<v Speaker 3>his secondary back to excellent status. They had suffered that

1:12:51.800 --> 1:12:54.200
<v Speaker 3>loss of christ Gonzalez earlier in the year and Matthew

1:12:54.240 --> 1:12:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Judon in the same game, and they struggled for about

1:12:56.400 --> 1:12:58.880
<v Speaker 3>a month. Then this past month or so they've been

1:12:58.960 --> 1:13:01.720
<v Speaker 3>much better. Over the last five weeks. They've given up

1:13:01.720 --> 1:13:04.719
<v Speaker 3>the six fewest passing yards, just one hundred and ninety

1:13:04.840 --> 1:13:08.400
<v Speaker 3>seven per game, and just two passing touchdowns in five weeks.

1:13:08.800 --> 1:13:11.320
<v Speaker 3>That's all Fredyk. It's gone wrong with the Patriots. It's

1:13:11.360 --> 1:13:14.000
<v Speaker 3>not the defense. So just the B grade. I'm Patrick

1:13:14.000 --> 1:13:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes orshe Rice comes in with a B grade. He's

1:13:16.360 --> 1:13:18.880
<v Speaker 3>hauled in at least seven catches in three straight games.

1:13:18.920 --> 1:13:21.400
<v Speaker 3>He's establishing himself as the go to wide out. He's

1:13:21.439 --> 1:13:24.799
<v Speaker 3>averaging eighty one yards and two scores in those three games.

1:13:25.360 --> 1:13:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Rice's top ten in the league in red zone looks

1:13:28.400 --> 1:13:31.559
<v Speaker 3>with seventeen this year, and he's got a massive seventy

1:13:31.680 --> 1:13:36.439
<v Speaker 3>seven percent completion rate on those red zone passes. But

1:13:37.040 --> 1:13:39.840
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots only give up one passing touchdown per game

1:13:40.120 --> 1:13:43.720
<v Speaker 3>to all positions, Rice runs from the slot the most often,

1:13:43.760 --> 1:13:46.040
<v Speaker 3>where he's going to face off against cornerback Miles Bryant

1:13:46.200 --> 1:13:48.400
<v Speaker 3>in a slightly plus matchup. Bryant gives up an eighty

1:13:48.479 --> 1:13:51.240
<v Speaker 3>two percent catch rate, which is promising B grade Rashee

1:13:51.320 --> 1:13:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Rice and the running games on the bench here in

1:13:54.000 --> 1:13:58.000
<v Speaker 3>part because Clyde Edwards layer and Jerk McKinnon split split carries,

1:13:58.280 --> 1:14:01.680
<v Speaker 3>but also because this just's been a great Patriots run

1:14:01.720 --> 1:14:04.479
<v Speaker 3>defense all year. They ranked third by Pro Football Focus

1:14:04.520 --> 1:14:07.439
<v Speaker 3>fifth and run stuff win rate. Don't start those guys

1:14:08.479 --> 1:14:10.679
<v Speaker 3>on the New England side. There's only one startable player.

1:14:10.720 --> 1:14:13.320
<v Speaker 3>That's Ezekiel Elliott, who got ninety one percent of the

1:14:13.320 --> 1:14:16.120
<v Speaker 3>snaps last week, and with no other running back logging

1:14:16.160 --> 1:14:21.040
<v Speaker 3>or rushing attempt seven straight opponent opposing runners have underperformed

1:14:21.160 --> 1:14:26.760
<v Speaker 3>their season averages against Kansas City, Frankly has not looked good.

1:14:26.760 --> 1:14:29.400
<v Speaker 3>He's averaging just three point seven yards per carry and

1:14:29.720 --> 1:14:34.000
<v Speaker 3>negative rushing yards over expectation. He's eighth worst in yards

1:14:34.040 --> 1:14:37.479
<v Speaker 3>over expectation. The Chiefs allow four point eight yards per carry,

1:14:37.479 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 3>so there's an opportunity, But I don't love Zeke here,

1:14:39.920 --> 1:14:41.519
<v Speaker 3>and I can only get you to a C grade

1:14:41.600 --> 1:14:44.839
<v Speaker 3>the entire passing games on the bench for the Patriots. Obviously,

1:14:44.920 --> 1:14:47.679
<v Speaker 3>Bailey Zappy looked much improved last week, but Kansas City's

1:14:47.680 --> 1:14:50.120
<v Speaker 3>pass defense is very good, and I see a big

1:14:50.200 --> 1:14:53.880
<v Speaker 3>regression coming. Even if de Mario Douglas returns six of

1:14:53.920 --> 1:14:58.160
<v Speaker 3>the last eight quarterbacks to face Kansas City zero or

1:14:58.200 --> 1:15:02.040
<v Speaker 3>one passing touchdown to leave all those guys nobody's playoff

1:15:02.080 --> 1:15:04.040
<v Speaker 3>worthy from the Patriots passing game.

1:15:04.120 --> 1:15:06.640
<v Speaker 4>The first Monday night football game in history to be

1:15:06.680 --> 1:15:09.439
<v Speaker 4>flexed out of Monday Night, I believe was this game?

1:15:09.720 --> 1:15:13.559
<v Speaker 4>Wasn't I think show how excited should be about this game?

1:15:13.800 --> 1:15:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? And that's they moved the Chiefs on Monday Night.

1:15:16.840 --> 1:15:19.480
<v Speaker 3>That takes it says a lot. We come back Dallas

1:15:19.520 --> 1:15:23.439
<v Speaker 3>and Buffalo a signature game for this week. Points Galore

1:15:23.560 --> 1:15:25.679
<v Speaker 3>is how it feels. Will find out if Brian agrees

1:15:25.720 --> 1:15:42.479
<v Speaker 3>when we come back. Final segment of the first week

1:15:42.479 --> 1:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs. Fantasy Football Weekly Back to the matchups,

1:15:46.120 --> 1:15:49.960
<v Speaker 3>including a Biggie Dallas Cowboys at Buffalo Bills. Brian, what

1:15:50.000 --> 1:15:52.040
<v Speaker 3>do you think on this game? Let's start with Tony

1:15:52.080 --> 1:15:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Pollard if you don't mind, no, yeah, let's start going

1:15:54.360 --> 1:15:56.800
<v Speaker 3>in game here. I'm less enthused about him than I

1:15:56.840 --> 1:15:58.479
<v Speaker 3>have in the past few weeks. What do you think? Yeah?

1:15:58.560 --> 1:16:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Not the best matchup for Hollard, but Pollard has salvaged

1:16:01.600 --> 1:16:03.920
<v Speaker 4>his season over the last month. Should have had a

1:16:03.920 --> 1:16:06.479
<v Speaker 4>touchdown for the fourth straight game last week, but was

1:16:06.520 --> 1:16:09.879
<v Speaker 4>vultured by Rico Dowdell yet again. But a tough matchup

1:16:09.880 --> 1:16:12.479
<v Speaker 4>for Pollard here against the Bills, who have only allowed

1:16:12.800 --> 1:16:15.679
<v Speaker 4>two running backs to reach seventy rushing yards over their

1:16:16.040 --> 1:16:19.639
<v Speaker 4>last seven games. But Buffalo has allowed the fourth most

1:16:19.680 --> 1:16:22.240
<v Speaker 4>receptions and receiving yards to running backs.

1:16:22.560 --> 1:16:24.360
<v Speaker 3>So I like that for Pollard. So he gets to

1:16:24.360 --> 1:16:26.160
<v Speaker 3>be obviously.

1:16:25.800 --> 1:16:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Like CD lamb nay love cd A not getting into

1:16:30.080 --> 1:16:30.679
<v Speaker 4>that anymore.

1:16:30.760 --> 1:16:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Don't have to. He's going to flame Tarron Johnson in

1:16:33.400 --> 1:16:36.000
<v Speaker 3>the slots. It's my number one ranked wide receiver this week.

1:16:36.240 --> 1:16:39.160
<v Speaker 4>As for the other wide receivers, Brandon Cooks and Michael Gallup,

1:16:39.200 --> 1:16:41.240
<v Speaker 4>I have them both on the bench, Gallup the more

1:16:41.280 --> 1:16:45.040
<v Speaker 4>obvious bench. Some might consider starting Cooks, but Cooks has

1:16:45.080 --> 1:16:49.040
<v Speaker 4>cooled considerably as of late, and since week nine, Buffalo

1:16:49.040 --> 1:16:51.639
<v Speaker 4>has the fourth highest rate of too high, and since

1:16:51.680 --> 1:16:54.880
<v Speaker 4>week eight against two high, Cooks has disappeared with only

1:16:54.920 --> 1:16:58.280
<v Speaker 4>a seven point four percent target share and zero point

1:16:58.280 --> 1:17:00.880
<v Speaker 4>seventy five yards per route run is not a lot,

1:17:01.120 --> 1:17:03.719
<v Speaker 4>and that's statu is courtesy of Derek Brown the Fantasy

1:17:03.720 --> 1:17:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Pro is a great stat there, So I'm benching Cooks,

1:17:06.160 --> 1:17:09.280
<v Speaker 4>not benching Jake Ferguson, though he gets a be Fergie

1:17:09.280 --> 1:17:12.000
<v Speaker 4>now leads all tight ends in red zone targets, and

1:17:12.040 --> 1:17:15.080
<v Speaker 4>the Bills have yielded the third most red zone targets

1:17:15.439 --> 1:17:18.559
<v Speaker 4>in goal to go scenarios. And the Bills haven't faced

1:17:18.600 --> 1:17:21.040
<v Speaker 4>any tight ends of note recently, so their numbers aren't

1:17:21.080 --> 1:17:25.200
<v Speaker 4>scary except for a guy named Travis Kelsey who they

1:17:25.200 --> 1:17:27.960
<v Speaker 4>saw last week. He saw ten targets for six catches

1:17:28.360 --> 1:17:31.600
<v Speaker 4>eighty three yards. That's hopefully a safe floor for Ferguson

1:17:31.640 --> 1:17:34.960
<v Speaker 4>here and Dak Prescott an A for him. Safety Michael

1:17:35.040 --> 1:17:37.559
<v Speaker 4>Hyde week to week with a neck injury for Buffalo,

1:17:37.640 --> 1:17:41.040
<v Speaker 4>he's unlikely to play. Bodes even better for Dak, so

1:17:41.120 --> 1:17:44.160
<v Speaker 4>an easy A for him. Over to the Buffalo side,

1:17:44.200 --> 1:17:46.880
<v Speaker 4>starting with James Cook, he gets a C. With Joe

1:17:46.920 --> 1:17:50.599
<v Speaker 4>Brady as the new offensive coordinator, Cook has averaged nineteen

1:17:50.640 --> 1:17:53.120
<v Speaker 4>touches for one hundred and fourteen combo yards love it

1:17:53.240 --> 1:17:55.760
<v Speaker 4>per game. He has been on a major upswing, but

1:17:55.800 --> 1:17:58.760
<v Speaker 4>this is a tough matchup the Cowboys allowing only one

1:17:58.880 --> 1:18:01.880
<v Speaker 4>hundred combo yards per game to opposing running backs. That's

1:18:01.920 --> 1:18:04.640
<v Speaker 4>the third fewest. So just a C for Cook and

1:18:04.720 --> 1:18:08.520
<v Speaker 4>just a B for Stefan Diggs. Here's diggs fantasy finishes

1:18:08.600 --> 1:18:09.960
<v Speaker 4>over his last four games.

1:18:10.200 --> 1:18:10.920
<v Speaker 3>This is not good.

1:18:11.040 --> 1:18:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Wide receiver fifty three wide receiver sixteen wide receiver, fifty three,

1:18:15.160 --> 1:18:18.879
<v Speaker 4>wide receiver fifty five. Those are not the fifty burgers

1:18:18.880 --> 1:18:21.680
<v Speaker 4>we are looking for for Stefan Diggs, and unfortunately this

1:18:21.720 --> 1:18:25.599
<v Speaker 4>isn't a bounce back spot necessarily, but saving grace here

1:18:25.680 --> 1:18:28.599
<v Speaker 4>is number one. Wide receivers have had good games against

1:18:28.600 --> 1:18:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Cowboys over the last two weeks. Aj Brown had nine

1:18:31.200 --> 1:18:34.000
<v Speaker 4>catches for ninety four yards, and DK metcalf well, he

1:18:34.040 --> 1:18:36.240
<v Speaker 4>had a great game. He had six catches for one

1:18:36.280 --> 1:18:39.400
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty four yards and three touchdowns. Hopefully Digs

1:18:39.400 --> 1:18:42.280
<v Speaker 4>can settle somewhere in the middle of those two stat lines.

1:18:42.320 --> 1:18:45.439
<v Speaker 4>But either way, you're not gonna bench him. Gabe Davis

1:18:45.720 --> 1:18:48.320
<v Speaker 4>gonna give him a C as and see you in

1:18:48.400 --> 1:18:49.519
<v Speaker 4>hell if you start him.

1:18:50.560 --> 1:18:52.680
<v Speaker 3>So that's not a letter grade. That's see.

1:18:52.760 --> 1:18:56.000
<v Speaker 4>You cannot trust Gabe Davis in the playoffs here, so

1:18:56.080 --> 1:18:59.000
<v Speaker 4>he is on the bench. Dalton Kincaid is not though

1:18:59.200 --> 1:18:59.800
<v Speaker 4>to give him a c.

1:19:00.200 --> 1:19:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Ah. I'm worried about him with knocks back. He did nothing.

1:19:03.000 --> 1:19:03.439
<v Speaker 3>Last week.

1:19:03.520 --> 1:19:06.559
<v Speaker 4>He did nothing, but he still ran roughly seventy percent

1:19:06.600 --> 1:19:07.200
<v Speaker 4>of the routes.

1:19:08.120 --> 1:19:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Over the last five games.

1:19:09.880 --> 1:19:13.000
<v Speaker 4>The Cowboys have allowed just thirty seven yards per game

1:19:13.080 --> 1:19:14.240
<v Speaker 4>to opposing tight ends.

1:19:14.280 --> 1:19:16.040
<v Speaker 3>That is not good either.

1:19:16.160 --> 1:19:19.280
<v Speaker 4>But I'm more concerned about the Cowboys than I am

1:19:19.360 --> 1:19:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Dawson Knox. But if you have a better option than Kincaid,

1:19:24.360 --> 1:19:26.800
<v Speaker 4>certainly starred him, but most do not, so I'm still

1:19:26.840 --> 1:19:29.040
<v Speaker 4>gonna give him a C in this shootout. And lastly,

1:19:29.120 --> 1:19:31.639
<v Speaker 4>Josh Allen gets a bee outside of the Gino Smith

1:19:31.640 --> 1:19:34.240
<v Speaker 4>experience in Week thirteen. The Cowboys have surrendered just one,

1:19:34.760 --> 1:19:37.720
<v Speaker 4>just one passing touchdown across their last three games. But

1:19:37.800 --> 1:19:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Allen is going to get it done with his arms

1:19:40.000 --> 1:19:40.800
<v Speaker 4>and legs here.

1:19:41.040 --> 1:19:42.040
<v Speaker 3>But there's hope for that.

1:19:42.320 --> 1:19:44.640
<v Speaker 4>Five of the last six quarterbacks to face Dallas have

1:19:44.720 --> 1:19:47.200
<v Speaker 4>rushed for at least thirty yards and door a touchdown.

1:19:48.640 --> 1:19:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Thor It's always tricky with Lamar Jackson because sometimes the

1:19:51.320 --> 1:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Ravens play a great game and then he passes for

1:19:53.600 --> 1:19:55.240
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and eighty yards and he runs for forty

1:19:55.240 --> 1:19:57.280
<v Speaker 3>and he doesn't score any touchdowns and your team sunk.

1:19:57.680 --> 1:20:00.640
<v Speaker 3>But man, Jacksonville's a juicy opponent, and I've got him

1:20:00.680 --> 1:20:03.599
<v Speaker 3>ranked inside my top five at the quarterback position this week.

1:20:03.640 --> 1:20:06.519
<v Speaker 6>I think it's game on, absolutely a big, big, big

1:20:06.560 --> 1:20:08.719
<v Speaker 6>games coming for him. That Jake's allowed the third most

1:20:08.720 --> 1:20:12.479
<v Speaker 6>Fantasy points per game to opposing quarterbacks, and Jackson's obviously

1:20:12.479 --> 1:20:15.960
<v Speaker 6>been great. QB one last week in Fantasy also given

1:20:16.000 --> 1:20:19.519
<v Speaker 6>an A to his top receiver, Zave Flowers. Get that

1:20:19.680 --> 1:20:23.240
<v Speaker 6>since Mark Andrews went down, Flowers has run every single

1:20:23.320 --> 1:20:25.799
<v Speaker 6>route that the Ravens have had with an eye opening

1:20:25.840 --> 1:20:29.960
<v Speaker 6>twenty six percent target share. Gotta keep starting him. Is

1:20:30.120 --> 1:20:33.120
<v Speaker 6>jaa likely? I give him a bee. The last two

1:20:33.120 --> 1:20:35.479
<v Speaker 6>weeks he's been tight end eighteen and tight end three

1:20:35.520 --> 1:20:38.440
<v Speaker 6>in Fantasy and this is a great matchup. That jaguarres

1:20:38.439 --> 1:20:40.559
<v Speaker 6>allowed the eighth most Fantasy points per game and the

1:20:40.560 --> 1:20:44.719
<v Speaker 6>second highest yards per reception to opposing tight ends. Keton Mitchell,

1:20:45.040 --> 1:20:48.559
<v Speaker 6>My boy, give him a bee. So it is tough

1:20:48.600 --> 1:20:51.280
<v Speaker 6>to predict to his workload. Last week he only played

1:20:51.320 --> 1:20:53.760
<v Speaker 6>thirty three percent of the snaps, but because he's a

1:20:53.760 --> 1:20:56.960
<v Speaker 6>home run hitter, he accrued the yards anyways. Last week

1:20:57.000 --> 1:21:00.200
<v Speaker 6>he had sixty two total yards and just ridiculou less

1:21:00.280 --> 1:21:05.200
<v Speaker 6>lee efficient six yards after contact per attempt in the

1:21:05.280 --> 1:21:07.800
<v Speaker 6>NFL as a rookie, Wow, he's gonna light up the

1:21:07.880 --> 1:21:10.720
<v Speaker 6>Jaguars because they're they're really bad at what he is

1:21:10.800 --> 1:21:14.000
<v Speaker 6>best at. Jaguars are dead last and explosive run rate

1:21:14.040 --> 1:21:16.680
<v Speaker 6>allowed since week nine, and that's what Keith Don is.

1:21:16.720 --> 1:21:19.559
<v Speaker 6>A home run hitter. Moving over to the Jaggs, Trevor Lawrence.

1:21:19.560 --> 1:21:22.280
<v Speaker 6>I got a see grade on him. Ankle injury very

1:21:22.320 --> 1:21:25.920
<v Speaker 6>clearly still hampering him. Can't scramble, can't throw on run.

1:21:26.000 --> 1:21:29.479
<v Speaker 6>You pen him in really can't drive into his throws.

1:21:29.800 --> 1:21:32.880
<v Speaker 6>Lawrence had a brutal forty seven point eight PFF passing

1:21:32.920 --> 1:21:36.400
<v Speaker 6>grade last week, five point one yards per attemp, three interceptions,

1:21:37.000 --> 1:21:39.000
<v Speaker 6>and the matchup is quite bad.

1:21:39.120 --> 1:21:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:21:39.479 --> 1:21:42.360
<v Speaker 6>The Ravens allow an NFL low five point six yards

1:21:42.360 --> 1:21:45.559
<v Speaker 6>per attempt and they leave the NFL with forty nine sacks.

1:21:45.920 --> 1:21:49.160
<v Speaker 6>Pretty good combination of that, yeah, exactly. I'm also going

1:21:49.240 --> 1:21:51.320
<v Speaker 6>to give Calvin Ridley a great to see. Only four

1:21:51.360 --> 1:21:54.840
<v Speaker 6>catches for fifty three yards last week. Obviously Lawrence was compromised.

1:21:55.080 --> 1:21:57.519
<v Speaker 6>Gonna be another down game with the Ravens elite pass

1:21:57.560 --> 1:22:01.280
<v Speaker 6>defense coming in here. Ridley will be opposed by Marlin Humphrey,

1:22:01.320 --> 1:22:04.679
<v Speaker 6>the stud. Humphrey is number six in yards allowed per

1:22:04.800 --> 1:22:08.320
<v Speaker 6>coverage snap. So now looking good there. You could start

1:22:08.680 --> 1:22:11.320
<v Speaker 6>Jay Jones if you're desperate. Twenty five percent targets here

1:22:11.400 --> 1:22:14.280
<v Speaker 6>last two games with Christian Kirk out. He also averages

1:22:14.320 --> 1:22:16.519
<v Speaker 6>more than one deep target and one red zone target

1:22:16.560 --> 1:22:19.400
<v Speaker 6>per game, but of course, the Ravens pass defense tempers

1:22:19.439 --> 1:22:22.439
<v Speaker 6>the expectations, as they do for Evan Ingram. I also

1:22:22.479 --> 1:22:25.040
<v Speaker 6>give him a C Fantasy tight end six, and coming

1:22:25.040 --> 1:22:27.920
<v Speaker 6>off a really big week, he's number two in receptions

1:22:27.920 --> 1:22:30.080
<v Speaker 6>at number five in receiving yards among tight ends over

1:22:30.120 --> 1:22:33.519
<v Speaker 6>the entire season, but again bad matchup. Ravens allowed the

1:22:33.560 --> 1:22:36.799
<v Speaker 6>fifth fewest fantasy points per game to opposing tight ends. Lastly,

1:22:36.920 --> 1:22:39.600
<v Speaker 6>Travis Etn I give him a b RB six in

1:22:39.680 --> 1:22:40.799
<v Speaker 6>Fantasy for the season.

1:22:40.960 --> 1:22:42.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but lately it's not as good.

1:22:42.600 --> 1:22:43.400
<v Speaker 5>Lately, not as good.

1:22:43.520 --> 1:22:46.080
<v Speaker 6>He's only averaging sixty eight total yards per game since

1:22:46.120 --> 1:22:48.839
<v Speaker 6>Week ten. This is, though, I think, in my opinion,

1:22:48.880 --> 1:22:52.240
<v Speaker 6>a sneaky solid matchup for Etn in this one, just

1:22:52.240 --> 1:22:54.400
<v Speaker 6>because the Jaguars, I think are gonna run funnel to

1:22:54.439 --> 1:22:56.080
<v Speaker 6>avoid that awesome Ravens secondary.

1:22:56.200 --> 1:22:58.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, volume will be there for you ten for sure. Yeah,

1:22:58.840 --> 1:23:00.599
<v Speaker 3>just the explosive plays have been the same.

1:23:00.760 --> 1:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>No.

1:23:01.040 --> 1:23:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it's I don't know if he's just wearing

1:23:03.320 --> 1:23:05.320
<v Speaker 3>down over the course of a long season or whatever

1:23:05.360 --> 1:23:07.800
<v Speaker 3>the case is, but it's that part's been disappointing. The

1:23:07.800 --> 1:23:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Monday night or is Philadelphia at Seahawks rain expected, but

1:23:10.960 --> 1:23:12.160
<v Speaker 3>not much you're gona be able to do about it

1:23:12.160 --> 1:23:12.760
<v Speaker 3>by Monday night.

1:23:13.400 --> 1:23:13.640
<v Speaker 2>A J.

1:23:13.760 --> 1:23:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Brown is an obvious A DeVonta Smith Zoe's a much

1:23:17.200 --> 1:23:19.800
<v Speaker 3>more tricky play over the last five weeks, Seattle's allowed

1:23:19.840 --> 1:23:22.519
<v Speaker 3>the fifth most touchdowns per game to opposing receivers, which

1:23:22.560 --> 1:23:26.960
<v Speaker 3>is good. And Seattle's cornerbacks Trey Brown, Devin Witherspoon already

1:23:26.960 --> 1:23:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Burns all questionable for this game. If they're gonna miss

1:23:29.560 --> 1:23:32.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, it could be game on for DeVonta Smith

1:23:32.080 --> 1:23:35.080
<v Speaker 3>with a really nice game here. What worries me a

1:23:35.080 --> 1:23:37.800
<v Speaker 3>little bit is Dallas Goddard coming back. When Goddard was

1:23:37.880 --> 1:23:40.800
<v Speaker 3>in earlier in the season, Smith wasn't doing much and

1:23:40.840 --> 1:23:43.559
<v Speaker 3>when God it went out Smith's productivity and fantasy points,

1:23:43.600 --> 1:23:46.639
<v Speaker 3>we went way up Goddard's back. That worries me a bit.

1:23:46.640 --> 1:23:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I've got to be grade on Smith. If those cornerbacks

1:23:49.000 --> 1:23:50.519
<v Speaker 3>don't go we d up him to an A. Again,

1:23:50.560 --> 1:23:52.479
<v Speaker 3>it's Monday night. Can't do anything about it at that point,

1:23:52.520 --> 1:23:54.520
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, we duped him to an A in that scenario.

1:23:55.080 --> 1:23:58.599
<v Speaker 3>Dallas Goddard for himself right back to the huge workload.

1:23:58.640 --> 1:24:00.439
<v Speaker 3>He got eighty four percent of the tight end snaps

1:24:00.520 --> 1:24:03.759
<v Speaker 3>last week, but it only materialized into four catches. Second

1:24:03.800 --> 1:24:07.720
<v Speaker 3>game off injury should be better for Dallas Goddard. Seahawks

1:24:07.760 --> 1:24:11.040
<v Speaker 3>are a bottom ten team against tight end receptions and

1:24:11.080 --> 1:24:14.040
<v Speaker 3>tight end yards allowed. Including big games from George Kittle

1:24:14.280 --> 1:24:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Jake Fergus in the past two weeks, Goddard averaging just

1:24:17.400 --> 1:24:20.679
<v Speaker 3>one red zone target per game, and that really caps

1:24:20.720 --> 1:24:23.040
<v Speaker 3>his upside. They just don't throw them anywhere near the stripes.

1:24:23.120 --> 1:24:25.080
<v Speaker 3>So I can only get you to a C grade

1:24:25.120 --> 1:24:27.640
<v Speaker 3>on Dallas Goddard in this one. So where does that

1:24:27.760 --> 1:24:30.639
<v Speaker 3>leave Jalen Hurts. We've talked about everybody else so far

1:24:30.680 --> 1:24:38.080
<v Speaker 3>in the passing game that matters body, he looks increasingly hurt, battered, tired.

1:24:38.560 --> 1:24:41.600
<v Speaker 3>He's thrown zero or one passing touchdown in three of

1:24:41.640 --> 1:24:45.600
<v Speaker 3>the last four games. Fortunately this is I love the

1:24:45.640 --> 1:24:48.280
<v Speaker 3>matchups for aj Brown, I like it for DeVonta Smith.

1:24:48.320 --> 1:24:51.080
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned the injuries to the secondary and three mobile

1:24:51.120 --> 1:24:54.160
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks to face Seattle, Daniel Jones early in the season,

1:24:54.240 --> 1:24:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Josh Dobbs and then Lamar Jackson all top forty three

1:24:57.120 --> 1:24:59.400
<v Speaker 3>rushing yards. So I've still got a B grade on

1:24:59.479 --> 1:25:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Hurt. There's a lot of big range of outcomes here,

1:25:03.080 --> 1:25:05.840
<v Speaker 3>and there is some danger with Hurts. This week, let's

1:25:05.840 --> 1:25:10.240
<v Speaker 3>go to DeAndre Swift, quietly murdering fantasy owners the past

1:25:10.520 --> 1:25:13.760
<v Speaker 3>basically two months. He's gone two straight games so without

1:25:13.760 --> 1:25:17.400
<v Speaker 3>a broken tackle. He has not top passed eighty rushing

1:25:17.479 --> 1:25:21.439
<v Speaker 3>yards since Week three. He has one touchdown in his

1:25:21.520 --> 1:25:24.559
<v Speaker 3>last seven games. That's all DeAndre Swift is getting you.

1:25:24.880 --> 1:25:26.519
<v Speaker 3>And I think people have just been thrown him in

1:25:26.520 --> 1:25:28.719
<v Speaker 3>the lineup and just forgetting about it because he's DeAndre

1:25:28.760 --> 1:25:30.759
<v Speaker 3>Swift and he's the starting running back for the Eagles.

1:25:31.080 --> 1:25:33.519
<v Speaker 3>It has not really been working out for him at all. Fortunately,

1:25:33.560 --> 1:25:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Seattle is allowing the six most fantasy points per game

1:25:36.400 --> 1:25:39.719
<v Speaker 3>to opposing backfields. They ranked twenty first in run defense

1:25:39.760 --> 1:25:42.920
<v Speaker 3>by Pro Football Focus. They've allowed twenty eight receptions to

1:25:43.000 --> 1:25:45.680
<v Speaker 3>running backs in their last five games. But they're not

1:25:45.720 --> 1:25:48.559
<v Speaker 3>even thrown to Swift that much anymore. Gainwol's getting more

1:25:48.600 --> 1:25:51.080
<v Speaker 3>catches and they're just not And now with Goddard back,

1:25:51.360 --> 1:25:53.640
<v Speaker 3>that's that many fewer catches to go to Swift. And

1:25:53.760 --> 1:25:55.600
<v Speaker 3>I can only get you to a C grade on

1:25:55.720 --> 1:25:59.519
<v Speaker 3>DeAndre Swift. Let's go over to Seattle, A grade for

1:26:00.080 --> 1:26:03.360
<v Speaker 3>dk Metcalf because of his scoring prowess, and at B

1:26:03.520 --> 1:26:06.120
<v Speaker 3>grade for Tyler Lockett, and I'll talk about both of

1:26:06.160 --> 1:26:11.000
<v Speaker 3>them here. Both excellent matchups against the Eagles formerly formidable

1:26:11.120 --> 1:26:15.360
<v Speaker 3>cornerbacks Darius Slay and James Bradberry Man for two guys

1:26:15.360 --> 1:26:19.400
<v Speaker 3>who were just shut down cornerbacks last year. They've regressed

1:26:19.479 --> 1:26:23.920
<v Speaker 3>all the way down to PFF grades of forty eighth

1:26:23.960 --> 1:26:29.080
<v Speaker 3>and one hundred and second in coverage by Pro Football Focus.

1:26:29.320 --> 1:26:32.040
<v Speaker 3>The Eagles allow the second most yards to wide receivers

1:26:32.080 --> 1:26:35.559
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and ninety three per game. They've allowed multiple

1:26:35.560 --> 1:26:38.680
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver touchdowns and five of the last six, so

1:26:38.840 --> 1:26:42.280
<v Speaker 3>both guys could score. I like both Metcalf and Lockett.

1:26:42.320 --> 1:26:44.559
<v Speaker 3>Lockett's only got the two touchdowns on the season, I think,

1:26:44.600 --> 1:26:45.920
<v Speaker 3>and that's why I can't get him to an A.

1:26:46.360 --> 1:26:48.760
<v Speaker 3>But both you know, Metcalf's a lock a, and I

1:26:48.920 --> 1:26:51.879
<v Speaker 3>like Lockett here too, you know Wels. I like Jackson

1:26:51.920 --> 1:26:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Smith and Jigbo running out of the slot a very

1:26:54.120 --> 1:26:58.000
<v Speaker 3>positive matchup against Bradley Roby. He ranks his Pro Football

1:26:58.040 --> 1:27:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Focuses eighty sixth quarterback cornerback. Although I'll know he is

1:27:03.640 --> 1:27:05.720
<v Speaker 3>not allowed a touchdown in his coverage, so which is good.

1:27:05.760 --> 1:27:10.120
<v Speaker 3>He's played six games no touchdowns allowed. Philadelphia allows the

1:27:10.160 --> 1:27:16.120
<v Speaker 3>most fantasy points to slot receivers. That's why Jackson Smith

1:27:16.160 --> 1:27:20.000
<v Speaker 3>and Jigba b grade on this one. So if I've

1:27:20.040 --> 1:27:22.639
<v Speaker 3>got a's and b's on all the receivers. I gotta

1:27:22.720 --> 1:27:25.920
<v Speaker 3>like Drew Lock and Gino Smith. I've got B grades

1:27:25.920 --> 1:27:28.479
<v Speaker 3>on whoever ends up starting in this game. Six straight

1:27:28.560 --> 1:27:31.640
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks have thrown multiple touchdowns. Granted most of them the

1:27:31.800 --> 1:27:33.799
<v Speaker 3>really good quarterbacks because he wass have played to Murderer's

1:27:33.840 --> 1:27:36.760
<v Speaker 3>row of teams. Lock through two touchdowns on last week's start,

1:27:36.800 --> 1:27:38.599
<v Speaker 3>and Lock always throws some bad passes. I mean, that's

1:27:38.640 --> 1:27:40.320
<v Speaker 3>part of his deal. He looked pretty good, though, but

1:27:40.360 --> 1:27:43.439
<v Speaker 3>I thought overall he did look pretty good. Game plan

1:27:43.560 --> 1:27:45.400
<v Speaker 3>is going to tilt heavily towards the pass here, so

1:27:45.800 --> 1:27:47.160
<v Speaker 3>if you're in a pinch, and by the way, the

1:27:47.200 --> 1:27:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Eagles see the most pass attempts forty per game. Even

1:27:50.400 --> 1:27:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Drew Lock, you give him forty tries, he's going to

1:27:52.760 --> 1:27:54.360
<v Speaker 3>get you to a couple of touchdowns in this one.

1:27:54.400 --> 1:27:57.240
<v Speaker 3>I like him here. The running backs Zach Sharbonay Kenneth

1:27:57.280 --> 1:28:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Walker splitting touches evenly every week. That's going to continue,

1:28:02.040 --> 1:28:04.320
<v Speaker 3>and it makes it a really risky play against a

1:28:04.479 --> 1:28:08.360
<v Speaker 3>very good Eagles run defense. Since mid October, the only

1:28:08.520 --> 1:28:10.879
<v Speaker 3>running the only running back to score on the Eagles

1:28:11.640 --> 1:28:15.679
<v Speaker 3>is Christian McCaffrey. And that's not Zach Sharbonay and Kenneth

1:28:15.720 --> 1:28:18.679
<v Speaker 3>Walker here. Philly gives up just three point nine yards

1:28:18.680 --> 1:28:22.439
<v Speaker 3>per carry. They haven't allowed a receiving touchdown all year

1:28:22.520 --> 1:28:24.840
<v Speaker 3>to a running back. There's nothing to like from those

1:28:24.880 --> 1:28:26.960
<v Speaker 3>guys here. So you've got them on the bench. Got

1:28:27.000 --> 1:28:29.200
<v Speaker 3>them on the bench. Bends for both guys. If it

1:28:29.240 --> 1:28:30.760
<v Speaker 3>was just one of them, I could see moving one

1:28:30.800 --> 1:28:33.320
<v Speaker 3>to agreed, But splitting it up, I can only get

1:28:33.360 --> 1:28:35.120
<v Speaker 3>you to a seat. Hey, Best of luck in the

1:28:35.240 --> 1:28:38.639
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy Playoffs everybody. Obviously, if you're the kind of listener

1:28:38.680 --> 1:28:40.320
<v Speaker 3>to the show, we want you to win more than

1:28:40.320 --> 1:28:43.360
<v Speaker 3>your opponent, unless that guy's also a listener, And then

1:28:43.400 --> 1:28:45.040
<v Speaker 3>we want you to tie, and then we want you

1:28:45.080 --> 1:28:46.840
<v Speaker 3>to go to the tiebreaker that I gave you and

1:28:46.920 --> 1:28:48.840
<v Speaker 3>three tough questions and the only one I gave you.

1:28:49.240 --> 1:28:51.639
<v Speaker 3>We'll be back next week for Round two of the playoffs. Everybody,

1:28:52.000 --> 1:28:54.639
<v Speaker 3>Best of luck in the first round this week. Talk

1:28:54.640 --> 1:28:55.360
<v Speaker 3>to you soon. Bye bye,