WEBVTT - Revenge: Bitter, Not Sweet

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, get this. We have a mind bending announcement

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to make the Stuff you Should Know episode on Vinyl

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is now on vinyl. You can learn about records by

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>listening to a record. It's possibly the first time a

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast episode has ever been put to wax, and we

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>did it along with our friends at bourn Loosers Records.

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>It comes in three awesome colors, black, white, and a

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>super cool splattercore and you can order it for pre

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>sale now at syskvinyl dot com. Records will ship on

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>October twentieth, just in time for Halloween, whatever that means.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>So go to sysk vinyl dot com right now to

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>get this super duper limited edition, super cool stuff you

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 1>should know thing a record on records.

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know. A production of iHeartRadio.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's Chuck and

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Jerry's here too, and this is Stuff you Should Know,

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the podcast about Revenge. Revenge. We've done an episode on

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it was like a top ten on cases Legendary Cases

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of Revenge. Oh yeah, I remember that, but we didn't

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>talk much about Revenge itself, and I felt it was

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>high time. We've been dancing around it for decades now.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 2>And here we are I thought, this is a great idea,

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 2>So kudos to you because it. Dave helped us out

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 2>with this one. And it's a lot of like science

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 2>and studies have sort of and I'm not going to

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 2>spoil anything, but have sort of produced results that fly

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 2>in the face of what one might typically think about

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 2>revenge and what it means for the person getting the revenge.

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think most people how we feel about revenge,

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it's from watching movies and it's like deeply satisfying to

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>watch the bad guy who deserves revenge get their come upance, right,

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>sure is, or even be killed just like, yes, that

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>guy deserved that kind of thing. But in reality carrying

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>out acts of revenge or they just it's not like

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the movies, I guess, is what I'm trying to say.

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And yet there's a lot of evidence of revenge in

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.959
<v Speaker 1>real life, so much so that the New York Police

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Department came out with a study in twenty twelve and

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>found out that forty two percent of the homicides in

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>New York were motivated by revenge. Man So, and that

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of underscores like a problem with revenge is

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that when you enact vengeance on somebody and you leave

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>them alive, almost invariably that person feels like you overdid

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in response to what they did. It was disproportionate, So

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>now they have to strike back again, and it can

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>go back and fourth until somebody dies or else somebody

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>can die right away is the first act of revenge.

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>But the point of the whole thing is is that

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>once you do carry out revenge, no matter if it's

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>petty exciting somebody up for spam or killing somebody in

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>response to whatever slight like road rage, they cut you

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>off in traffic, you don't feel good afterward. You actually

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>feel worse. And that's the underlying point of this entire episode.

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, my favorite Petty I don't do it,

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 2>but my favorite petty revenge to witnesses is when and

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>it's so dumb, everyone just settled down, is on a highway,

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 2>when someone is on an expressway and they clean their

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 2>windows and it gets all over the car behind them.

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I see people all the time race in front of

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 2>that person and do the same thing back then.

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>God, really, yeah, that is petty.

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 2>That is Tom Petty. That's not Tom Petty. Could Thom

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Petty was great. That's just and I also wanted to

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 2>say too, you talked about revenge, coming back harder or whatever.

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Emily has her own personal saying, like when we're messing

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 2>around and I like I will do something to her,

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>or I'll say something kind of mean as a joke,

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>she'll eviscerate me, and she calls it coming back double.

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 3>She goes, I come back double. Oh boy.

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 2>He's one of those people that think she gets pushed

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>into corner and man, she comes out hard. So it's

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 2>a good trait, I think, and one to be wary of.

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, Yes, I'm suddenly way more wary

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.799
<v Speaker 1>of Emily than I was before. Luckily, I've always stayed

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on her good side.

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you wouldn't come at it Emily anyway, You're smart.

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of questions revolving around revenge. If

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>if we know for a fact it feels good to

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.799
<v Speaker 1>think about, but then it feels bad to do despite

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we're thinking about it, where like this

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to feel good, it's not the act of

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it that feels good. It's fantasizing about how

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>good it's going to feel to get that person back

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to set the universe right again, to do all sorts

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of things that revenge allegedly does. And it turns out,

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>when you carry out an act of revenge, you are

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>playing the chump to evolution on behalf of society as

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>a whole, and that's kind of like the whole basis

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of revenge. There's an evolutionary instinct that's very very old.

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>It's found extensively in the animal kingdom, and it really

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>collides with the modern evolved humans that live in these

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>complex societies we've formed today. When you put those two

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>things together, an interesting podcast comes out.

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:46.679
<v Speaker 2>What you're talking about in the animal kingdom is also

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 2>called retaliatory aggression, and that is the idea that so,

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 2>let's say a lion mama goes out and kills an

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>animal to leave for her little cubs to eat. Another

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 2>animal is like, ooh, you know, let me see if

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 2>I can sneak in there and eat some of that too.

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 2>The mama lion doesn't just scare this thing off to

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 2>preserve that meat for the kids. The mama lion goes

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and hunts down and kills that animal. Yes, that's they

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>come back double Emily style right.

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like the problem solved, the hyena has been

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>chased away, But to leave your kids and go find

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it and kill it, that is seems retaliatorially aggressive.

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this next one too, I'm gonna mention these

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 2>are interesting because it made me sort of question the

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 2>idea of revenge versus punishment, right, because I think those

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 2>are different things. But the Teresis monkey, We've talked a

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 2>lot about their vocalizations, like they're all about the group,

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 2>or they should be at least, And like when they

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 2>find food, let's say they will tell everyone, hey, I

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 2>found food. But if a Riesei's monkey is ever like,

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm gonna have a little bit of this

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 2>first before I call out. And if they find that out,

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 2>there's a punishment for that Reese's monkey. I don't think

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 2>they kill it, but there is a punishment. And this

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 2>is the idea that these retaliatory aggressions are deterrence. It's

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 2>like a punishment for everyone to see to prevent future

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 2>trans aggressions like hey, did you hyena see that? Did

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 2>you other Reesis monkeys see that? So that, you know,

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 2>would be an advantageous thing evolutionarily speaking, So that gene

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 2>gets passed on.

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because the more the more you're prone to do that,

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the likelier you are to not have food stolen from

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you for your kids, the likelier it is for your

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>kids to survive and your lineage to survive. So it

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>makes sense evolutionarily speaking, this retaliatory aggression does at least right.

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which I would still argue is punishment more than revenge.

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I think there's an emotional component that's missing, but we're getting.

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>To that absolutely. I think you're absolutely right. And there's

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a story, a couple of stories of tigers actually engaging

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in can only be described as revenge, and it's very

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>much up in the air whether what we're witnessing is

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>actual revenge. But like, like, there was a very famous

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>story out of Russia where like a poacher not only

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>shot a tiger but also took some of their kill,

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and that the tiger tracked the guy down, found his

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>little lodging, destroyed everything he could find in the lodging,

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and then waited outside for the hunter to come back

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and then kill them. And that the tiger managed to

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>hold this idea in his head. I think it was

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>her her head for up to maybe twenty four hours

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 1>after the hunter shot her. There's a couple of stories

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>out there that seem to pertain to tigers specifically that

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like it does contain an emotional component to it.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, yes, it's it's solving a

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 1>problem and then maybe preventing future problems among the animals.

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, one of my favorite sayings is revenge is

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 2>a meal best serve cold. I don't know why, because

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a revenge guy really, but I just I

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>think that is just such a great saying.

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 3>I just like it.

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's something about like, oh no, no, no,

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 2>the real revenge is like when he waited around.

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 3>For a while.

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, and then when you would might not be suspected,

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 2>you come back and take that revenge.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because if you just immediately do it in response,

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you're a hot head and a dummy. Anybody can do that.

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>But to sit there and really stew on it and

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>figure out the best way to really get back at

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the person that takes intellect Yeah, I agree, and a

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>little bit of craziness. I just have to say.

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, so now we can get to the humans.

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 2>As far as evolution is concerned, we have that same

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 2>sort of instinct ingrained in our DNA for that retaliatory aggression.

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Our ancestors when they were living in hunter gatherer groups,

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of relying on one another, obviously a

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 2>lot of communication and cooperation, and thus a lot of

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 2>punishing to be done if people either were outsider people

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 2>inside the group didn't cooperate and do the right thing.

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and so this is again the same thing what

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about. You're punishing the person who transgressed.

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>You're also deterring future behavior. And the more we became social,

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.599
<v Speaker 1>the more important this kind of stuff became, because we

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>started depending on other people, and so as a result,

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>we started monitoring one another, and that in and of

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>itself can act as a deterrent in the future, because

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that there's a vengeance instinct, and there's a

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>set amount or set structure of norms and rules, and

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>then other people are watching you to see what you're doing,

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're watching them, and that kind of creates an

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere of conformity. And you say what you want about conformity,

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>but if you have a large group of people following

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the same rules, you're taking care of a really basic

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>problem and issue and you can then kind of evolve

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>more into more and more complex societies. Yeah, that's I

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>saw one person say that revenge is ultimately what provided

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the basis for human civilization and allowed it to grow

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>knowing that there was such a thing as revenge that

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>humans were capable.

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 3>A bit totally.

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>So kind of put a pin in that for a second,

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 2>because we should talk about this idea of like sweet revenge.

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 2>That's a that's a word that's often associated with revenge.

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 2>And you talked about the fantasy of revenge, and it's

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, it's a fantasy because for very good reasons,

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>if you are physically hurt, obviously or emotionally or psychologically

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 2>wounded by somebody you, it's a natural instinct to think

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 2>about getting back at that person, right, and the feelings

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 2>that come with that take place. And a part of

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the brain called the dorsal striatum, and it's the same

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 2>aim part of the brain that controls the reward system

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 2>of like, hey, that pecan pie tastes great, that sexual

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 2>orgasm feels amazing, or the drug that really want.

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 3>To take feels good.

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 2>It's that same lizard brain pathway that revenge lights up,

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 2>that lights up whenever you do anything that feels rewarding

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 2>or satisfying for somebody.

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's extraordinarily powerful and hard to deny and overcome

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's just such a basic response.

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:31.199
<v Speaker 3>Right, totally.

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>But again, the problem, and this is where the tension arises.

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>We have evolved to a way where we've created these

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>societies with rules and expectations that in part say like,

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't carry out revenge. It's not okay. And you

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>know that that's not okay as a modern human living

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in modern human society. And yet we have that part

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of our brain, that really powerful, basic part of our brain,

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>telling us to do it, and we know we're not

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>supposed to. And that's kind of like the point in

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>human evolution that we live in right now.

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 3>That's right, Should we take a break? Sure?

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 2>All right, that sounds like a good stopping point. So

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 2>we'll take a break and we'll come back and we'll

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 2>hit on the thing that you brought up earlier about

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 2>the fact that actually getting that revenge may not be

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 2>so sweet. Stop.

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So, Chuck, one of the things about revenge that makes

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it different from the drug that you were talking about,

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>or the orgasm or whatever, is that when you think

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>of it, it's more fulfilling than when you actually do it.

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So like if you think about a drug, might it

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>might be pleasurable, but it's probably nothing compared to what

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the drugs doing in your brain when you actually take it, right,

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not true with revenge. Not only is the thought

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy of revenge more fulfilling and will hit that

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>limbic system harder when you actually do carry out an

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>active revenge, it actually creates negative feelings in you as well.

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is interesting because like, how can an idea

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>of something? How can a fantasy of something trigger the

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 2>same cascades of the other pleasurable things in their life

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 2>that you're actually doing, And when you think about it,

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 2>it actually does make sense because revenge, actually taking revenge

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 2>is risky. Thinking about revenge fantasies, Sizing about revenge is

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 2>not risky per se. I mean it could be dangerous

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>for you know, negative for a person perhaps eventually if

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 2>you like you've become obsessed with it, but initially it's

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 2>a feel good feeling, but carrying through on it can

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 2>be risky. If you go to if you're the hunter

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 2>gatherer group and someone invade your group and steals your meat.

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 2>You could go you could just sit there and think

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 2>about how great it would be to get them back,

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 2>and that's probably the safest move. Or you could actually

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>go to that other camp and try and kill that person.

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 2>But you're taking a big risk at that point.

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>You individually are that's right, but you're doing it on

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>behalf of the group or the group benefits whether you're

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>doing it on their behalf or not.

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>If you didn't do anything, though, that group, not just you,

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but the group you're a member of, would seem weak

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to other groups. Yeah, and it's it sounds really like

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of chromagnet or something like that, But that's it.

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It's important. You can't have like I was saying before,

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't have society without the knowledge that if you

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>transgress there will be consequences for it. I saw, I

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>saw it put. There's a neurologist and psychologist named Jeff

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>viktor Off. He said that reciprocal altruism, which is how

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>people cooperate between groups and within groups, that it rewards

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and requires a costly signal demonstrating risk taking on behalf

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of the in group. So for people to be able

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to trade with one another. For people to be able

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to get along in a society and not kill each

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>other or whatever, you have to know that there's a

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>threat to you if you transgress. It has to be

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>there or else people will inevitably invariably cheat or kill

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you or do whatever. And it's a really basic, paranoid

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>way of looking at the world. But if you start

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to study revenge, it seems like it's a lynchpin of society,

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>as it states that there's just you can't have a

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>society animal or human without that that threat hanging over

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you of revenge.

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, totally. Yeah.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I got another quote, and this is the idea kind

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 2>of supports the idea that the revenge itself isn't you know,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 2>it's risky and it could be bad for you. It's

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 2>really the idea of it that's that's better or at

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 2>least better for the individual. This from Francis Bacon. A

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 2>man that studieth revenge keeps his own wounds green, which

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 2>otherwise would heal and do well. And that's sort of

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 2>the thing that you know, has come up over and

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 2>over again and studies that we're going to be talking about,

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 2>is that the you know, the path of the Buddha.

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 2>The getting over things and not seeking revenge is really

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the path that ultimately will bring someone what satisfaction? Tranquility, yeah, tranquility,

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe not satisfaction, actually yeah.

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's getting past the need for satisfaction that

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>will lead you to the point that you really want

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>to get to, which is feeling good again, but like

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you felt before you were wronged. Right. The thing is

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>is with no wronged. The thing is is with with

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>revenge what again? What you have is an innate, automatic

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>impulse to smash the other person in the face to

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>get back at them for them insulting you or your

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>family or your favorite football team or whatever. It's a

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>really basic instinct that if you can learn to overcome,

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.959
<v Speaker 1>not just you as an individual can evolve, we as

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a society can evolve. The thing is is you still

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>need that for just to keep society going and functioning.

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>What we've figured out as further evolved humans that we

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>can externalize that revenge instinct and imbue our institutions with that,

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>where we've created court systems and justice systems. They're responsible

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for carrying out acts of vengeance or retribution or righting

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>wrongs in serving justice on behalf of the individuals of

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>society and as society for society as a whole, so

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have to care acts of revenge on

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>one another. And in fact, we have rules now that

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>if you do carry out an act of revenge, you

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>can be punished by those same institutions that are there

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to enact vengeance on your behalf.

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because what happened is, you know, we went from

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 2>the hunter gatherers, where you literally had to do this

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 2>for your group to survive, to eventually settling down. Once

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 2>we became farmers and settlers and eventually urbanites, and those

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 2>became Those same instincts were there, but they became moral codes,

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and all of a sudden, you know, we had these

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 2>moral codes like you don't cheat on your friend's wife

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 2>and stuff like that, and you know that's not punishable

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 2>by death, but that revenge instinct is still there to

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 2>overcome these moral codes. There was a psychologist named Herbert

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Herbert Gentis that talked about revenge seeking his moral behavior.

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Individual secrivenge not when they've been hurt, but when they've

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 2>been morally wronged. I would also argue, you know, some

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 2>people's secrevenge when they literally they have been physically hurt

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 2>as well, right, But it's also a morally wronging that

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 2>happens if someone you know, jumps you and beats you

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 2>up at a football game or something.

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's actually that's attention that philosophers been trying to

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.239
<v Speaker 1>figure out for a while. John Stuart Mill was a

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 1>fan of the deterrent explanation of revenge or punishment or

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call it, and he was saying, like,

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like with the animal Kingdom, when you you punish the transgressor,

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you're you're deterring future behavior by making an example of them.

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Kant said, no revenge exists because when somebody transgresses,

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you're against a person, you're being morally wronged, and just

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>remove everything else. Morally speaking, that person deserves to be punished.

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And he put it in a really kind of alarming way.

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>But philosophers always operate on the fringes anyway to make

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>their points.

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:20:55.040 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>He was saying that a genuinely I guess, a legitimate society,

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>even if it was disbanding, it was in the act

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>of disbanding that they were they they were required to

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>go in and kill all of the remaining prisoners, all

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the all the murderers, like, go execute the rest of

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the murderers. Just because your society's disbanding makes no excuse

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever for the people that you've imprisoned that transgressed against

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 1>the society, because they committed a moral wrong that is

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>larger and more important than any any individual or even

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>any society, and that they deserve to be punished in that.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the function of revenge, according to Khan. Oh interesting, Yeah,

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a kind of vengeance.

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 2>kN was he was serious, man, Yeah, he came back

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:48.199
<v Speaker 2>double you mentioned earlier. You know, we have systems set up,

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, court systems, police forces, things like that these days.

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 2>But it's interesting that they found that historically these places

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 2>in the world where the culture were what you would

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 2>call like a culture of honor, were more prone to,

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, commit acts of violence as revenge. Like the

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 2>American South was historically known as a culture of honor,

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 2>where you would go out and defend the honor or

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 2>fight somebody or have a shootout with somebody.

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I saw specifically, that's white Southern culture. That patterns of

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>African American retribution or crimes like that don't really vary geographically.

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>That's the white American South is the one that does that.

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that makes sense.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think that's what they're talking about as

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 2>sort of you know, pre Antebellum and stuff like that.

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Culture.

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Middle Eastern cultures historically can kind of be the same

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 2>way as far as revenge goes restoring honor, and they

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 2>found and this is what gets really interesting is that

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 2>cultures and areas that have a history of weak law

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 2>enforcement maybe engage in revenge more often. When you hear

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 2>about like street justice, you might think of a low

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 2>income community that maybe mistrust the system, they don't think

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 2>the courts or the police are on their side to

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 2>begin with or would take care of them. So that's

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 2>where you're going to see more sort of street justice

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 2>revenge carried out right.

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And then same with workplace environments and schools. Apparently three

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.959
<v Speaker 1>and five school shootings from nineteen seventy four to twenty

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty were acts of vengeance revenge. I'm surprised it was

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>actually that low of a ratio. And then if you

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>work in a place where your complaints to management or

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever seem to be falling on deaf ears, that can

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>also lead to vengeance in the workplace like workplace shootings.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Like remember in our going postal episode, what like the

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>common factor was that management was not only like dismissing

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>complaints about bullying, they were often engaged in bullying themselves. Yeah,

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and like it doesn't justify or excuse it, but that

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is an example of some buddy tarrying out an act

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of revenge, at least in their mind.

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure, you were talking about philosophers earlier. Now

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 2>we get to finally talk about our old friend Sigmund

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 2>Freud and Joseph Preuer his mentor because they had what

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 2>was known as the catharsis theory of aggression or the

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 2>hydraulic model. And this is the idea is that a

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of psychosis or most of them were repression and

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 2>it was negative emotion that was building up. And if

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 2>you repress these emotions, if you have these negative emotions,

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 2>if you have anger towards someone or frustration, and it

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 2>builds up like a hydraulic pomp, eventually you're going to

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 2>pop or you're going to have what's called a catharsis

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 2>or Greek meaning cleansing or purging, and you will release

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 2>that in an unhealthy way, which is probably going to

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 2>be revenge, Freud said, it could manifest as hysteria. And

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 2>here's the thing, though, is that's stuff falls apart when

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 2>you actually apply science to it. They have found that,

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, you know, punching a punching bag can maybe

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 2>give you an immediate relief, but a lot of times

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 2>that stuff only serves to work you up more when

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:16.479
<v Speaker 2>you apply science to it.

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because the basis of the Catharsis theory was that

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>rather than going and killing the person who wronged you,

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you could go hit that punching bag and pretend the

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>punching bag was them, and you would get out that

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>repressed anger and feel better and could move on. But yes,

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>starting I think the fifties, they were like this, wait

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>a minute, this is this is not right at all.

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that when you do that, it just

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>extends that the sour feelings that cause you to want

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>revenge in the first place. And like we said, if

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you can find a way to forgive or forget or

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>move on or whatever, you will ultimately be happier in

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the long run, and even immediately compare to somebody who

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>actually carries out an act of revenge or even goes

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and punches a punching bag, pretending like it's the person

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>they want to carry out an active revenge against.

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's that psychologist you're talking about, a Ri Hornberger.

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the studies they did, he would have an

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 2>actor come in and like insult someone in a study.

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Can you just see Ted Dats been doing this early

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in his career.

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you half witch, look at that nose. So somebody

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 2>would get really mad, apparently and be instructed to go

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 2>bang nails, hit nails into a board for ten minutes. See,

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, apparently let out that frustration as their fists.

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 2>The other half of the people just had to sit

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 2>there and think about it for ten minutes, and then

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 2>they were given a chance to criticize the person who

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 2>insulted them. And if you subscribe to Freud and the

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Catharsis theory, then the nail pounders would have been you know, relieved,

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 2>and their aggression would have been let out and they

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 2>would have been less hostile. But the exact opposite happened.

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 2>They were even more hostile after they pounded those nails

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 2>towards the actor than the people who did nothing.

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was Hornberger in the fifties. It's still being

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>proven today. There's a psychologist named Brad Bushman who made

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a slightly more robust study of the whole thing, but

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it followed essentially the same methodology, where you were thinking

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>about whoever you wanted to get revenge on while you're

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>hitting a punching bag, or another group was hitting a

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>punching bag, but they were told to think about the

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>health benefits of boxing, and then the other one didn't

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>punch anything, the third group, and they found that the

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>rumination group was the one who displayed the most anger,

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and then the distraction group, who were also punching the

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>bag but thinking about how great boxing is, they were second.

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And then the last group, the people who didn't punch anything,

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>They were the happiest, They were the least hostile as

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a result afterward. Yeah, and you know, again we're getting

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>into social psychology territory here. But these people are working

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>with the best they can while staying within ethical boundaries,

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>like you can't actually harm somebody, but they do have

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>ways of making you feel insulted or cheated. That's another

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>big one too. And when you're in one of these experiments,

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't know that they're researching revenge. You think they're

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>researching how well you can play like a game with

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 1>others or something. You have no idea that that's what

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 1>they're researching. So there are some pretty good models for

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>testing revenge without actually putting anyone in harm's way.

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure.

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Should we take a break, Yeah, let's all right, let's

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 2>take a break, and we'll talk a little bit about

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>sometimes revenge can feel good and explain those studies as well.

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, before we broke, we talked about the fact

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 2>that revenge basically actually undertaking the revenge, or in these

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 2>studies at least it's not revenge, but you know, letting

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 2>out that aggression, thinking about the person who did you wrong,

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 2>we punched a heavy bag.

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Really just makes you feel worse.

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Revenge, under the right circumstances can make you feel better, apparently,

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 2>according to the studies of German psychologists Mario I'm sorry,

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 2>he's a psychological scientist, Mario Goldwitz, and this gets a

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 2>little interesting. I think he talked about comparative suffering and

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the notion that when you see the person who wronged

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 2>you suffer might restore a balance, an emotional balance, getting

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 2>yourself into the universe at large. Even that and his

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 2>other theory of the what's called the understanding hypothesis, which

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 2>is that if the under the person who did you wrong,

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 2>if they suffer, that's fine, but that's really not enough.

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 2>They have to know that they're suffering because of what

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 2>they did to you. Yeah, and that that can actually

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 2>bring some I don't know about positive emotions, but make

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 2>someone feel good as opposed to feeling worse.

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And he came up with a pretty clever experiment

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to test which one was correct comparative suffering or understanding hypothesis.

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And essentially what happened was the research participants thought that

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to compete for raffle tickets with another

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>person who was in another room. They were paired up

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>with a partner team member, yeah, partner, and after they

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>won all the raffle tickets, they were told that they

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and the partner could divvy them up between them and

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>basically all of the participants, you know, cut them in half,

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>distribute them evenly. But they found that the other people

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>had really shorted them on their tickets. Their partner had

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>really kept a bunch of tickets rather than distributing them evenly,

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:05.959
<v Speaker 1>so they had been wronged in some way, they were

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>given a chance to write that wrong by carrying out revenge.

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>They were allowed to redistribute the tickets like a second chance.

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>And in that case they almost invariably screwed the other

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>person over who would you know, So they enacted revenge.

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And then this is where Goalwitzer really kind of shown

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>for me. He figured out a way to test how

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>satisfied those people were with that act of revenge.

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there were I think sixty percent of the people

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 2>ended up shorting them in return, sometimes even more than

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 2>they were shorted to begin with, Like they came back

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 2>double Emily styles. So he went that one extra step,

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 2>like you were saying, and he said, all right, here's

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 2>what you do. Now you can write a note to

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 2>the person and say whatever you want. You can reference

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the justice. So one person wrote sorry

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 2>for taking the tickets away. And remember now it gets

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 2>a little convoluted, but this is someone who initially was

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 2>shorted and then they took revenge by shorting the other person,

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe even more right, And so they sent them a

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 2>note they said, sorry for taking tickets away, but unfortunately

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:21.239
<v Speaker 2>you only cared about yourself. That's so childish, so they

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 2>would write a note of many many of them would

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 2>write notes like saying, I really want you to understand

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 2>this is why you're getting shorted. Right.

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>So then what Gallwitzer figured out was that he could

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>test understanding hypothesis and comparative suffering by getting two different

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>kinds of notes to the people. That group of participants

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that had carried out revenge and then sent a note

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>saying I wronged you because you wronged me. And the

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.239
<v Speaker 1>first note was kind of it was like contrician. They

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>were saying, yeah, I understand you really gave it to

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>me because I had wronged you initially. And then the

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>other note was like, hey, you way over did it.

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do it that bad to you. I'm a

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>little indignant. And so if the comparative suffering was correct,

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>just knowing that those people had been put out by

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the revenge of retaliation should have been satisfying enough. But

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>what Gallwitzer found was that that's not the case at all.

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>That the group that got the note back that said, man,

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you really stuck it to me and I feel like

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a schmo because of what I did to you, they

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>were far more satisfied than the people who had just

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>gotten the note back, saying like, I'm a little indignant

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you overdid it. So just knowing that they suffered was

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>not enough. They had to know why they were suffering.

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's really interesting. Like I guess it's

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 2>the idea of like, if somebody and if you're trust me,

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 2>no one should ever do anything like this. It means

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 2>you're a truly bad person if you do. But if

0:33:57.920 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 2>you engage in road rage and someone cuts you off

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 2>and you follow them to the gas station and like

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 2>cut their tire when they're in the store and leave,

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 2>that wouldn't be as satisfying scientifically as if you do

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 2>that and leave a note that says like, you know,

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 2>this is what you get for cutting me off.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Right exactly. So you said something in there that I

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>think is really important too, that that group who retaliated

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the participants, when they retaliated, they often distributed things even

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>more unfairly than their partner had initially right right, right, right,

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's something that's a big problem with the cycle

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>of revenge that a researcher named Arlene Stillwell from State

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>University of New York at Potsdam pointed out. The problem

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 1>is is that when you are on the side of

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>avenging yourself for a wrong, you think that after you've

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>done that, things are right again. You've created equilibrium in

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the moral universe again. But when you're the recipient of vengeance,

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you feel like that person was disproportionate to the wrong

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that you inflicted, and so, like I was saying earlier,

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>now you feel like you might need to get them

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 1>back again. And it just goes tit for tat and

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>tit for tat, And that's why the safest, smartest, most

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>highly evolved, most Buddhist thing you can do is to

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>just short circuit the whole thing and let it go

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and just move on and know, yes, you've been morally wronged,

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and you have the power within you to not do

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a thing about it and like live a happier life

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>than you would if you did something about it.

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think that kind of holds with They

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 2>found some pretty good research on what's called impact bias,

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 2>and that's the idea that people tend to overestimate how

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 2>much like one kind of even sometimes small, single thing

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 2>will affect their future.

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 3>They overestimate it.

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 2>And the example he used is like a kid, a

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 2>high school kid, saying, well, if I don't get an

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 2>A in this class, it'll ruin my chances to get

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>into a good college. And that's probably overestimating things, because

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 2>getting into a college is more about this one class maybe,

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 2>or this one test. But people underestimate, apparently, like anger

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 2>goes to opposite, they will underestimate how hard it is

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 2>to shake angry thoughts. So you might think that you

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 2>can get over something by committing the act revenge, but

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 2>you're really underestimating it, and those those feelings are going

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 2>to stick with you even past that revenge act.

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. With anger in particular, it's its own thing. It

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't follow the rules of other emotions, right yeah, And

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that is of course part and parcel with revenge. You

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 1>are angry, maybe even hateful, and you have to carry

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>out some sort of act of vengeance, right yeah.

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 2>And I think there's also something to the idea that

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 2>even though you think committing that actor of revenge will

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 2>fulfill you, what it does in the end is it

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 2>you've heard about, like you know, you brought me down

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 2>to your level, Like if you go and slash that

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 2>guy's tire for cutting you off, you know I got you.

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 2>But those negative thoughts about yourself are going to creep

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 2>in because you have now stooped and done something even

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.320
<v Speaker 2>worse than cutting someone off. You you know, cost someone

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 2>money and ruin their property and potentially created a danger

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 2>for them.

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, well, even if you were cut off by

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the person, I've seen people do this too, and you

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 1>rev your engine and catch up to them and cut

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>them off. Right, So it's literally tip for tad, right,

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no nothing was done beyond it's completely even You're

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>still gonna feel bad about having should that, And it's

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:38.359
<v Speaker 1>insane how it happens, Like you are just driven by

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>this rage, is just feeling like this is what you're

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be doing, This is what the universe is

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>demanding you do to set things right again. And then

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the moment you do it, you feel terrible about yourself

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:51.959
<v Speaker 1>in one way or another. And it is just such

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>a just such a BS evolutionary relic that like you're

0:37:56.800 --> 0:38:00.919
<v Speaker 1>being manipulated by genetics at that point. Yeah, at that moment,

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you're being manipulated. You are a puppet. And so the

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>best thing you can do to control your own destiny

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 1>again is to say, man, that guy cut me off.

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.439
<v Speaker 1>He's a putt or even better, that guy cut me off.

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's a his lake is bleeding and he's he's

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>got to get to the hospital. You know, there are

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things you can do, but when you

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>do that, you're overcoming your genetic destiny and taking it

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in an even better direction.

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's tough stuff, man, to follow that pass

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 2>for me, for a lot of people, I have tried

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.720
<v Speaker 2>and tried, the more of the older I've gotten to

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 2>try try, right, It's hard, but try to think, like

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 2>what happened to that person? Why are they like that?

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Like when you see someone who's you can tell as

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 2>a bad person, not someone who cuts you off in traffic, but.

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Like if you's someone hit learn in traffic.

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 2>No, but when you know someone is doing the wrong thing,

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 2>and someone is just a bad human doing doing bad things,

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I try to find some empathy of like what happened

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 2>to them that made them that way and what happened

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 2>to them today to make them that angry, And I

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:12.839
<v Speaker 2>try to seek those moments out.

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 3>It's stuff though.

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying too, But to be real, there's a crew

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:25.399
<v Speaker 1>of appliance delivery dudes who scratched my wood floor two

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and the company refusing, has refused to pay,

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>refuse to pay over a year ago. Yeah, and I

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>still am like, should I get those guys back? And

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 1>if so, how like I, well, you break into their

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 1>house and scratch your floor? Man? Yeah, tip for tat?

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but then also dovetails with that, that idea, that

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>tip for tat, or even better, an eye for an

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>eye leads the whole world blind as part of that

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:53.879
<v Speaker 1>escalation and encycle of retaliation. Which is such a great

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>quote and everybody attributes it to Gandhi, but apparently it

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>was not word for a word, but the sentiment was

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 1>by Canadian named George Perry Graham. He was a journalist

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and a politician and a huge fan of the Raptors.

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>No Gordon Lightfoot, oh, of course, even though it comes

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 1>back to g L. I think he was probably dead

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 1>long before Gordon Lightfoot was alive. I just wanted to

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>give a little shout out for Canada's sake.

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, why don't we wrap it all up with this

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:30.800
<v Speaker 2>idea of mutually assured destruction because it dovetails nicely, right.

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>It does, chuck, And here's why to think it away. So,

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>just as a refresher. We've talked about it before. The

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>doctrine of mutually assured destruction was that if you are

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear superpower, say the Soviet Union during the Cold

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>War or the United States during the Cold War, if

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>you launched an initial first strike, the other side, even

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 1>though they were doomed because your nuclear warheads were in

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the air and going to come and kill everybody there

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, they were going to launch a retaliatory strike.

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>It would do nothing to save anybody's life on their side.

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't do anything to stop those missiles from coming.

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It was strictly revenge and the human awareness of the

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 1>concept of revenge and that that was a very real

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that the other side really would do. That is

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 1>what kept people from carrying out an initial strike during

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War, according to mutually assured destruction doctrine.

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, did I take up the whole thing? I'm sorry,

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't be.

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think it's it's a great way to

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 2>end it. It's for all this talk of revenge. It's like,

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 2>is that the thing that has kept humanity on the earth?

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, that's that's what some people say. And

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Yeah, the doctrine of mutually assured destruction keeps

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>getting questioned, like was that really what what was keeping

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>things in check? Or was there really like behind the

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 1>scenes stuff we didn't know about. And it seems like

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>more and more it really was keeping things and check.

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And it seems to be because there was a total

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>awareness that the other side would kill you just because

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>you killed them first. Yeah, so that's revenge, everybody. I

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:13.359
<v Speaker 1>think if there was one point to this episode, it's

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:16.479
<v Speaker 1>get past it as best you can, and if you can't,

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 1>don't be too hard on yourself. Just try again next time.

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, try that narrow path is narrow, and do your best.

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 2>It's hard, we all struggle with it. But see if

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:30.799
<v Speaker 2>at the next time you want to get revenge on

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 2>somebody in traffic or wherever, See if you can take

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 2>that narrow path and calm yourself down, and you know,

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 2>there's a really good chance you're gonna feel better about

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 2>yourself and the world's going to be a better.

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:42.359
<v Speaker 3>Place because of it.

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>To squeeze your steering wheel until you bleed from your

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>palms and your butt cheeks. Since Chuck said butt cheeks,

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows that's time for listener mail.

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 2>This is a great follow up quite a while ago,

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 2>not that long ago, but like last year. Sometime we

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 2>or it may have been this year, I don't know.

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 2>We read an email about a guy who's had the

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 2>cussing dentist.

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh that was just a few months ago.

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, I have no concept of time anymore. Understood

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the guy who's dentist cussed, and we liked it because

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 2>my doctor cusses, and I just think it's funny, you know,

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 2>it's a funny story about the dentist dropping and f bomb.

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 2>We got to pull these f and teeth or whatever.

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:26.359
<v Speaker 2>And then we get this emial. Hey guys, my name

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 2>is Ginger and I'm a dental assistant in Blueville, Main.

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:31.279
<v Speaker 2>The patient came into our office this week and said

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 2>my boss was famous. She then proceeded to tell us

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 2>that she listened to your show and at the end

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:37.839
<v Speaker 2>you read letters from viewers, and went on to say

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 2>that the patient wrote in about the dentist that swears.

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I went back found the episode August. Oh yeah, here

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 2>its right here, August twenty three, August third Really.

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:51.919
<v Speaker 3>Wow, oh boy, that was this month. Well, we read

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 3>it to be fair five weeks before that.

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:57.359
<v Speaker 2>The episode was the last meal ritual and it has

0:43:57.440 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 2>to be my boss, doctor Travis Castle.

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I said it was okay to read this.

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 2>By any chance that the patients say the dentist was

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 2>because my ball thinks it could totally be another dentist,

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 2>but I don't believe it. If you could, could you

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:11.839
<v Speaker 2>send me an email back so I could know if

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 2>I was right? He he, So I did.

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:15.439
<v Speaker 3>Look this up.

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 2>The original gentleman did not give the name of the dentist,

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 2>but he was a dentist in Maine. And what are

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the chances that there are two cursing dentists in Maine.

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:29.240
<v Speaker 1>They're essentially zero, probably zero.

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 2>So Ginger goes on to say he does like to cuss,

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:35.360
<v Speaker 2>obviously not in front of kids, and he's not everyone's

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:36.840
<v Speaker 2>cup of tea, but he surely has a lot of

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 2>fun to work with.

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:39.280
<v Speaker 3>He's a genuine dentist.

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:41.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know what that means, but it takes

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 2>no bs from root patients. I've worked with him for

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 2>two years and I still love to come to work

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 2>every day. Thank you for taking the time to read

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 2>my email. Thanks to our patient, you have a new listener,

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:53.319
<v Speaker 2>and I look forward to hearing from you. That is

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 2>from Ginger, the dental assistant of doctor Castleberry. So I

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 2>almost want to save up a cleaning and go see

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Ginger and doctor Castleberry sometime.

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Why not just book a plane ride up to Maine and.

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 2>To your tea clean and then come on have a

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 2>swim in their cold, cold ocean.

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:16.440
<v Speaker 1>That email, by the way, was ginger v itis. Sorry Ginger,

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:22.319
<v Speaker 1>sorry to everybody who hates puns, including me. Well, if

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in touch of this, like Ginger did,

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you can send us an email. Send it off to

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff podcast at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 2>For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.