WEBVTT - How Police Interrogation Works

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to you Stuff you should know from house Stuff

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Josh Clark. There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, Uh and Noel.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>I guess producer nol is over there, which makes this

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know. Jerry's on the beach. Good for her. Yeah,

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Jelly. Yeah, it'd be nice to be on

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the beach right now. Surewood podcasting on the beach. Yeah,

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>Jerry's a beach person for sure. In uh, is she okay?

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>She was flip pops like in the dead of winter. Yeah,

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.639
<v Speaker 1>that's true, the beach person which got nice feet done.

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Can I say that I fired for saying that. I

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. If you said it, like alone in

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>a room or something she didn't feel like she could leave,

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you'd probably get fired for that. But yeah, saying it

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast to everybody's probably in the clear. Okay,

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out. I mean, she edits these so she'll

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>say thanks. Jucker's there you go, So, Chuck, have you

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>ever been interrogated by the police. No, that's good. No,

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a good way to be I was shaking down

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>on the street once, but they didn't ask us any

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>questions stopping frisk Yeah, in New York. In Athens, m

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>just walk into the car after being out, threw us

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>all against the wall. Fristus been left. I'm sure it

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was a real cop. Yeah, they were cops. Man. I

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>was like, what's going on? Huh, I don't even know.

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I still don't know what happened. Well, I guess they

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>were just stopping and frisking. A little known fact. Athens,

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>George is the real home of stopping frisk Well, five

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>minutes after it happened, we didn't care. You know, these

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>are college days. Yeah. Now, though you must be burning

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>with a sense of injustice over the whole thing. Well,

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I ask you if you've ever been interrogated by the police,

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>because we're about to talk about police interrogation, so it

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>seems appropriate. And before we get started, I have some

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>side reading that I think might interest some people. Um,

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>there is a New Yorker article called the Interview. Um,

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>there's one called Joe Arty was the Happiest Man on

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Death Row. It's in Westward. Uh, there's something called Brooklyn's Baddest,

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>which was in GQ. And then lastly, uh, looking left

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>or right doesn't indicate your lying in Smithsonian. So all

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>those articles are awesome, and they all have something to

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>do with this police interrogation, which is it turns out

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>becoming an increasingly controversial subject. Yeah, and I think this

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>probably brings our police suite to a close or close

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to it, don't you think. I think so every time.

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I know, and I didn't even know this existed, and

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>then I saw it and it turned out to be

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>one of the more interesting ones, I think. Yeah, and

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of falls into this um law enforcement category,

0:02:53.520 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>into the subcategory of are largely debunked armchair psychology jical

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:06.399
<v Speaker 1>or armchair psychology techniques like polygraph Yeah, we did that, fingerprints,

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>they did that, truth serum we did that. Yeah. Like

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>there's all these episodes that we've done out there about

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>just law enforcement techniques. We're doing them. We were like,

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>oh wow, this is this should not be the way

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it is. And apparently police interrogations similar. Yeah, it's a

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of a shakedown. So let's talk about this. Like

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in in the United States, there is um a long

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and storied history of rather intense interrogation. I think you

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>know this this comes before the United States too. We

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>did a medieval torture episode as well. There were plenty

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of interrogations going on. We did the Spanish inquisition that

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>was pre United States. Yeah, I would I would say

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that falls into the banner though, of our police and

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>crime interrogation. Yeah right, so, um, the United States, though,

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:02.839
<v Speaker 1>has well carried on the torch of basically beating suspects

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>up to get confessions. This is where the term the

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>third degree comes from. Actually, Like when somebody's like, hey,

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>why do you give me the third degree? They may

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>or may not know it, but they're they're speaking about

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>interrogation techniques that CAPS used to use. Yeah, those third

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>degree techniques, a lot of them were involved deprivation, like

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>or you know the one where they shine the bright

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>light in your face. That's old school. Yeah, that's an

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>old movie trope. But you know, no access to food

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and water, Um, long periods of isolation, we might beat

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit, we might threaten you. That's the

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>third degree, right and then uh, starting in about the thirties,

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the public started to say, I don't know if this

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is such a good idea because I might end up

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in a police interrogation one day, and I don't want

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to get beat up and then the I guess the

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>straw that started to break the camel's back came in

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty seven in the case Brown versus Mississippi, where

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Brown said, uh, your thug cops tied me up to

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a tree and with me more than once, not just

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>whip me more than once. Strung me up in a tree,

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to whip me more than once has happened repeatedly, and

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that the confession they got should stand.

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>The Supreme Court said, we agree with you. Yeah, it

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>was he and his two buddies were accused of murdering. Uh,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>they were tenant farmers murdering their boss basically, And of

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>course they were black guys and the boss was a

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>white guy, so they were pretty determined. Then well, we'll

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>see over and over. A lot of these cases of

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:36.799
<v Speaker 1>coerced false confessions h are mainly because someone really wants

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>to tab somebody as the criminal. Well, yeah, for a

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of different reasons. There can be a sense of injustice.

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>There can be a genuine conviction that this person is guilty, um,

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>and then there can be the you know, the case

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>clearance um percentage that a cop needs to keep up.

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of reasons why a cop might

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>say you need to confess. Yeah. I think a lot

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of them too that I've seen documentaries on, at least

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>because of the public, Like, hey man, we really need

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>to finger somebody for this, because people are scared, and

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>who better than this person who might not be too

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>smart or might but might be kind of poor and

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>can't afford and doesn't you know, representation doesn't know what's

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>going on. So let's just run them up, run them up,

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>ring them up. Sure, run them up a flagpole, right,

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and see if it sticks to the wall. Yeah. But

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that it is not easy to get

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>someone to confess, uh, they estimate between forty two of

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>suspects do confess and that's the one thing you don't

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>want to do, and up still do it. Yeah, so

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we should say supposedly up to um eight percent of

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>suspects in in the United States wave their right to

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>silence and counsel. Yeah that's just wait, that's just agreeing

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>to be interrogated, right, not necessarily confessing. Yeah. So, but

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>you can get around the whole idea of a false

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>confession or of being coerced into confessing or whatever, just

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>by remaining silent, not being like part demand your lawyer.

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're gonna give you some tips, um, not

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>how to get away with a crime, but some tips

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>on if you if you are rounded up and put

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in a room, there are some things you can do.

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a public service announcement with guitars. By the

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties, they confessions that were involuntary. Um, they consider

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it involuntary, not just if you were beaten and threatened,

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but if you were all the deprivation third degree techniques

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>were no longer allowed, like even if you couldn't use

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom, or if you've been promised something in return

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for confessing, or we'll go easy on you, buddy, or

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>if you'd even just been threatened, that counts as coercion too,

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>And so in about the fifties, UM, the United States said, Hey,

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>this kindler, kinder, gentler interrogation technique thing is is starting

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to work out. Let's put a bow on the whole

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>thing and say that for a confession to be admissible,

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the the confess or has to sign it yeah and

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>say yeah, I didn't, I didn't do anything under coercion.

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>This is my own, full free confession. And here's my

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>signature and UM, which helped but certainly didn't stop false confessions. Right.

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>So the thing is is UM law enforcement replaced the

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>physical coercion with what amounts to plainly is psychological manipulation.

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's predicated on the idea that you when you

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>are saying you didn't do something and you're guilty, you

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to become stressed out. And then the that

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>stress is derived from anxiety over knowing you're guilty and

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>having to lie, because when you're being interrogated, you're denying

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that you're guilty. The cops don't just say, oh, okay,

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>well thanks for coming by. If they think you're guilty,

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they or they want to think you're guilty, They're going

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to keep pressing you. Like interrogations aren't necessarily brief things, right,

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>So the more they press you, the more stressed you

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>should get. And the more stressed you get under this

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>idea of UM interrogation technique, the obviously the more obvious

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it is that you're guilty, which means the more they

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>press So this feedback loop starts, right, Yeah. I mean

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>they're basically relying on a few basic human things inherent

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to humans, tendencies, inherent to humans. Um. One is you're

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna probably open up more to someone who is like you, uh,

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to their If you start talking, it's gonna be hard

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to stop. And three if you're if you're telling the truth,

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be harder to lie. Right. So they kind

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of prey on that with some age old techniques like

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 1>the good Cop, Bad Cop. Right you you uh, If

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you're being persecuted, but then you're also

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>being rescued by somebody else, you're going to identify with

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>the rescuer, trust them. That's a classic move. And here's

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.559
<v Speaker 1>the thing like that, a lot of this stuff, like

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the good cop part um, is predicated on this complete

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and utter deception that that cop understands where you're coming

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>from and sympathizes with you. That cop does not sympathize

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>with you. That cop may understand where you come from,

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but he or she probably despises that and they are

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>not your friend. But the whole one of the whole

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>points of um of interrogation is for the cop to

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>pretend like they're they're right there with you, they understand

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>where you're coming from, they feel for you. This is

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>just you're jammed up and I want to help you

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>get out of it. Oh yeah, you see. I mean

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>if if all this sounds super familiar from every TV

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>show or movie you've ever seen, is because they it's

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>been written so much that it's almost like they don't

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>need to do their own Like writers don't even need

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>to do their own research into how this is the

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>right because it's just how it is in the movies.

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>When it is in the movies is how it is

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in real life. When I was reading this, I was like, oh, yeah,

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that before. I've seen that technique before. Like

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>it made me actually researching this article made me appreciate

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that there are some TV cop show writers out there

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>who like really do their homework, like The Wire, like

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>every it was a little more nuance like Law and Order. Um,

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>what is it? Uh? I don't watch those the one

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>vincent and offer you. I don't know. Oh, I can't

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>remember what it's called criminal minds something like that. It's

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>not it. Um like it's a little more overt, right,

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's all the all the factors are there. Yeah.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Another one of the tried and true techniques is maximization.

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>That's when they try to scare you. Um, if you've

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>ever heard like, oh you're you're pretty Josh, they're gonna

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>love you in prisoner. I hear that almost every day.

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>That is a classic maximization or just you know, they're

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>going to throw the book at you for what you've

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>done your unless you, you know, start playing along, you're

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the max exactly. Um. They may also go

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the exact opposite route, which is minimization, which is to

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>create the idea that society will will commiserate with you

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>because anybody in your position would have done the same thing,

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, like that that little lady was asking for

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>her person to be taken, you know, in this day

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and age, in this economy, that kind of thing. Um.

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Polygraph was used for a while, and they still used that,

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>but most times, um, if you listen to our show

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>on polygraphs, they're not admissible in court. So a man

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>named John Reid, he was a polygraph analyst, said, you

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>know what, there's a lot of things that happen during

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a polygraph exam that we can use without the machine

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 1>just to root out the truth or lies. Yeah. Basically,

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>John Reid said, Hey, I've noticed through all of my

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>experience all of these things that a person who is

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>guilty or who confesses at least goes through. And here

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 1>are some ways to like really make this more efficient,

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to make them react more strongly, to get them to

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>confess faster, more forcefully. And he came up with order

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>called the Read Technique. Nine steps of the Read Technique,

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>registered trademark of Johnny Reidon Associates. Yeah, really, because Johnny

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Reidon Associates is like this business that's still very much around. Yeah.

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I need to say that, but

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it is their technique. Yeah, and they trained the CIA,

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the FBI, the local law enforcement there, like the in

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the United States, the Red technique is the gold standard

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>for police interrogation. The problem is it is also being

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>increasingly proven to be based on basically armchair psychology and

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 1>not science. It's say, it's going through the same thing

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>right now that like a lot of the forensic sciences

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>are going through. There's like based on intuition that doesn't

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>really hold up to scrutiny. And I should say the

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Read technique has not been across the board debunked, and

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense in a lot of ways, but there

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>are studies out there that have said, like this doesn't

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>really this doesn't really hold up. Yeah, he defends it. Uh,

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>he says, it's very sound technique, but false confession comes

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>from improper use and bad police work. Yeah, and it's

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>not it's not necessarily like the read people are treated

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.239
<v Speaker 1>like they're you know, they're out to get anybody and everybody.

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>The red technique is criticized because the whole foundation that's

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>built on is the presumption of guilt, and it has

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>been shown to prove or produce false um confessions. And

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to the read technique in a minute, but

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>after this message, we're gonna talk a little bit about

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the earlier, h earlier parts of the process.

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, if you sit down in a in a

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>room to get interrogated by the cops, one thing that

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>they're probably gonna start doing is lying to you and

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>saying we have evidence that they may not have. We

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:23.359
<v Speaker 1>have witnesses that put you at the scene that don't exist. Basically,

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>with a few exceptions, cops can lie and say whatever

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>they want in there, and that is going to make

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>someone nervous. Even though you were you know, surgical gloves

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>when you broke into that house. If they say your

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>fingers are all over the place. You're gonna start second

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>guessing yourself and get nervous. Yeah, and even if like

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you weren't in that house ever, and you know that

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you weren't in that house, you're gonna start to wonder

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>if maybe you suffer from blackouts and do horrible things

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>like this cop is saying, Wow, you're blacked out. Um,

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, the courts of upheld the cops right to deceive. Uh.

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And I've read about a study that found that of

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>six dirty detectives in the U. S. And Canada that

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>were pulled, say they use false evidence ploys where they're

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>saying surprises, Yeah, you would guess. I mean maybe the

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>other eight percent were just like they didn't even look

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>at what they were saying, you know, but yeah, they

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you can and they do say we have your fingerprints,

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we have a witness, we have d n A. They

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>can completely lie about what they have and that they

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>have it on you to get you to confess. It

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. You can't say, well that cops said he

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>had evidence doesn't matter. And the whole legal basis for

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this idea for the cops being letting the cops deceive

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is this UH longstanding notion that no innocent person would

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>ever sign a confession even if they were lied to

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>about physical evidence of their guilt being at the scene

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of the crime, because there they know they're not guilty.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that long standing idea is coming under

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>more and more scrutinous is being found to be not

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the case. Like people, it's been shown people will when

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>lied to in situations like that, they will confess to

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>things that they did not do. I know it seems

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>crazy for people like you and me, UM, because I

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>know I would never do that, but you know, I'm

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>not mentally challenged or I'm not poor, and I haven't

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of reasons why someone might

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>falsely confess. Yeah, and I think though also it's not

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just necessarily like going how you are going into it. Like, Yes,

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the a lot of the like mentally ill people UM

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>make up a decent amount of UM false confessions. Same

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>with UM, mentally handicapped, cognitively impaired people, UM, people of

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>low socioeconomic status. There are a lot of a lot

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>of factors that set you up to be more likely

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to have a false or give a false confession. Knowing

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>your rights, but if you took if we took you

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>and ran you through a long enough um interrogation with

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>people who knew what they were doing. Yeah, they who

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>knows what you would sign? I'd be all right, we'll

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>see because I understand this all. I know my rights.

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I have a very strong mind. You would probably say

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I want a lawyer. Well, yeah, I just ended all.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And then I'd be like, m I don't know any lawyers.

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Do you know a lawyer? Have an entertainment attorney? Does

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that count? Um? They know lawyers? Yeah, exactly. This is

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole network. So um, once they bring you in

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the room, the room itself h and this is all

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>from Read's manual. He wrote a manual nineteen sixty two

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>with a Northwestern law professor named fred In Mao called

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Criminal Interrogation and Confessions. I imagine every writer in Hollywood

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>has a copy of that on their shelf. Um. But

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the room that you see on TV, that's what there.

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>They suggest you know. Nothing on the walls, a very

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>plain desk, a very un comfortable chair on one side,

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>two chairs on the other for the detectives. Um, that

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>one way mirror that's gonna serve a purpose of letting

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>people spy on you and just to make you nervous,

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>even if there's no one on the other side, and

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>put you out of reach from this one. I didn't

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>really uh, I had never really noticed. But out of

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>reachs from just light switches and maybe the the a

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>c uh what do you call those thermostat thermostatic just

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to make you feel powerless. It's all a mind game

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to make you feel helpless. So far seems pretty intuitive,

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty logical, Like if you can't flip the lights on

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>and off, it's not something I would think that I

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>would want to do right then, but maybe knowing seeing

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that it was that far away, Yeah, woid just give

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>me this reinforced the idea that like, I couldn't even

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>if I wanted to, because it's all the way over there.

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>That's probably a small detective in between me and that,

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like exactly, but it makes sense. But I point that

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>out because that's that's the read technique. Stuff like that,

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>keep the light switches away from the criminal because it'll

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>make him feel helpless. Does It sounds a little hinky,

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>but it it makes sense in a way. That is

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the red technique encapsulated. So let's continue, Chuck, So that

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>was that's just the room that they suggest there there

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>if you follow the re technique to a t, and

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the saving graces of it. Um,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to do what's an initial interview. And if

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you're the detective and you go into in an initial

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>interview of an interrogation, you are the red technique tasks

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you with going in without a presumption of guilt. Yet

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the point of the initial interview, is you're supposed

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to be sizing your guy up and determining for yourself

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>as a seasoned investigator, whether you think initially they're guilty

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>or innocent. I'm sure that happens some Yeah, there was

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>another study that found that it's often skipped as well. UM,

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's they just start like hammering right away. Well, yeah,

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you're throwing out the the the potential for this um,

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this person to be treated as possibly innocent. Right, you're

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>not sizing up. You're going in assuming they're guilty. So

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>but if you if you do go through that initial interview,

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the other point of it is that you're supposed to

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be creating a baseline yea, which I think is that

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>showed up in the polygraph one too, which isn't surprising

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>because John Reid was a polygraph expert for a while too. Yeah,

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and you've been gratiated yourself, you know, in the first

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>few minutes by this point, like, uh, if if you're

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're in Philadelphia and your suspect has on like

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a Phillies cap, you might talk about the game last night,

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, And that that throws back to, um, the

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>suspect being more likely can you trust someone that shares

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>their same views that they feel they can identify with,

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So the detective will do whatever they can to make

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>it seem like, oh, you're a Catholic, I'm a Catholic too,

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing, you know. Yeah, And so once

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got a little bit of rapport going on is

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>when you're gonna set your baseline. And I thought this

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>is pretty interesting. You don't and I'm gonna start looking

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>for this on cop shows to see if they don't

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>overtly talk about it, if they're just how good they

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>are with their you know, uh, with their acting, because

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>if they're looking at the eyes, um, then they're gonna

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>be accurate. Because that's one of the ways supposedly you

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>can create a baseline um, you're gonna ask some some

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>questions that require memory recall, and you're gonna ask other

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>questions that require more creativity, and you're gonna look at

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>where their eyes go. Supposedly, if your eyes moved to

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the right, that is just recall, because you're I guess,

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>looking in the direction of your memory center of your brain.

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>If it's more creative, you might look to the left.

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And then then you're gonna use these later on to

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>see if your suspect is creatively making up a lie,

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>they might look to the left, or if they're just

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>truthfully recalling something, they might look to the right. Is

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that bunk? Yes, all right. It's very dangerous too, because

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>they that is incredibly widespread. It's a popular misconception. If

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you ask anybody if you move your eyes a certain

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>way doesn't indicate your lying, most people are gonna say, yes, yeah,

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it totally does. I can't remember if it's right or left,

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but if you look a certain way, it means you're lying.

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's a longstanding thing that's based actually on a

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>self help philosophy from the seventies that's nothing to do

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>with science. And actually Richard Wiseman, who we um incorrectly

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>said did some research that proved that ghosts exist in

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>our ghost episode. That guy, he's done someones to debunk this.

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>He did a couple of studies and in one of

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:37.959
<v Speaker 1>the studies he found, um he he used footage of

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>people who were holding press conferences searching for lost relatives.

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But the person pleaing for their relatives return was later

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>convicted of like killing or kidnapping their their relatives, so

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>they were obviously lying. They were committing a huge lie

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in front of the public, and he found that they

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>were just as likely to look to the left or

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the right. There was no correlation whatsoever. Yeah, I'm sure

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>there are facial cues of pantomimes if you're Christopher walking,

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>but um, it all depends on the person to write.

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Like you could be really good at line or really

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>good at throwing people off with facial cues. Yeah, or

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 1>the idea that your eyes move in a certain direction

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>at all because you're coming up with a lie or

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>because you're remembering something might not It doesn't mean anything necessarily. Yeah,

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we also did one of micro expressions. This is a

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>culmination of a lot of shows, I'm realized. Yeah, it

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>really is. Yeah, So Um. That was another one. You

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got the baseline set. You're watching the eyes even

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>though you really shouldn't be. Um. But for the most part,

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you're you're seeing what your suspect appears like when they're

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>stressed or I'm sorry, when they're relaxed. And and the

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>reason you're creating this baseline of what they act like

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>when they're relaxed is because if you ask them questions

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and they answer them and appear relaxed, then supposedly they're

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>telling the truth. A in this is predicated on some

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>faulty ideas, because here's the problem. Anxiety is not necessarily

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>linked to lying. Like, yes, you may appear anxious if

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you're lying, but that doesn't mean that if you're anxious,

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you're lying, right. Do you know what I'm saying? Yeah,

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I would do that. I would do the Chuck Chuck technique.

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Would be the fast thing, like I would set him up.

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll calm and be like, Hey, do you watch the

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>game last night? Yeah? How cool? Why did you kill it?

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Old lady? Yeah? You like the Phillies? Yeah, it was

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good game. How do you think they're gonna

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>go far? Yeah? Did you kill your wife and boom.

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>That was pretty good. You almost said yes, yeah, really

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and you didn't kill your wife? No, I meanez, that

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>was thrilling. The chuck technique. I I like the Colombo.

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>What's that? Oh, well, you're just like that's that's great.

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you like the Phillies. I just want to

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you for coming by. That's it was good to

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>meet you. Write if we if we need anything, can

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we call you? And they're like yeah, they're so relieved

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that they get to eat, and then you, oh, I'm sorry.

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>One more thing, Why did you kill your wife? That

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Colombo did? Yeah, here's a little better at it than

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I was. He would say, there's there's just there's one

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things just not making sense to me. If

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you didn't kill your wife, why were you found standing

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>over with the knife? Yeah, so that's how Colombo would

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>catch him off guard, like really get them to let

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>their guard down. Yeah. I like that. So you said,

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>he I know what Colombo was. I was about to

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>say he went on and killed his wife. But that

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>was Robert Blake. Yeah, that was Barretta. What was his technique?

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I never watched Barretta check your gun

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>with the maitre D. And then isn't that what he did? Know?

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>What did you do? I think he left his gun

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>with the matred D. Supposed that's what he said he did,

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, I'm here table for two, here's my

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>coat and here's my gun. Yeah, well you hang onto

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that for me? Will you be my alibi? Um? I

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>think we're at the read technique now, right we are.

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So the the other stuff was from the book that's

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>based on the read technique criminal interrogation and confessions. But

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>now we are at the actual read technique, the nine

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>point technique that is designed to maximize um discomfort which

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>leads to more frequent confessions. Yeah, and it's actually it's

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>illegal and a lot of European countries for children, um,

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 1>which which it should because that's another risk factor going

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in that can produce false confessions is age, of course,

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:31.479
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get to some of those later. Those are

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of uh maddening when you read about like a

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>fourteen year old it's interrogated without their parents for like

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a full day, but it happens. So step number one

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and the read technique is the confrontation. Uh. And this

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is after the initial interview you have, you're going to

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>present the facts of the case. You're gonna tell them

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 1>about the evidence, um, what they're faced with, the all

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the evidence against them, even if you're making some of

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it up. You might want to invade their personals based

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>at this time if you're Matthew McConaughey, uh, and then

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you start looking for things like fidgety, uh, suspect they

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>look in their lips, are they like muscle with their hair, um,

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And then if you're an investigator, you might say, all right,

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I've got this guy just where I want him. That

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>guy ran his fingers through his hair, he's guilty, exactly.

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of part of the part of the

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>issue that a lot of critics of the re technique

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>bring up, um, is that basically, if you stripped non

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>verbal stuff out, then you've got some sound stuff there. Right.

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>The biggest problem is when you're trying to read nonverbal

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>cues because there's it's not rooted in science. Its rooted

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in armchair psychology and pop science totally. So the idea

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that somebody's fidgeting meanings they're guilty and they're lying. Not

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>necessarily they could be fidgeting because any human being would

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>be really uncomfortable when placed in that situation and interrogated

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>by cops who are experts at it. Right. Uh So,

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>step number two is theme development, and you're gonna be

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.719
<v Speaker 1>a little more soothing here with a softer voice. And

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>this is when you come up with some some theories

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and a story maybe of why they committed this crime,

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, you just couldn't go on any longer. Know,

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>when your best friend at sex with your wife. You

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>just couldn't live with that, could you. And if the

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>suspect latches onto that and some verbal or nonverbal ways

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and they'll continue they don't, then they'll just create another theme. Yeah,

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and the the detective will basically just kind of while

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>they're creating the story for the for the suspect to

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>latch onto, they're also actively listening to the suspect to

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>see if the suspect will latch onto it in any way,

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>shape or form, and if they don't, they try another one.

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>If they do, then they start to kind of beat

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that one up and that leads alternatives, which actually comes later.

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime, one of the main techniques of

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the read technique is stopping denials. But I didn't do it, Josh, listen,

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you I was. But imagine my finger on

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Chuck's lips right now. That's why you would never do that. Now,

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you stopped the Niles because it creates a sense of hopelessness,

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>like the like, don't you feel hopeless with my fingers

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>on your lips? So hopeless you have no idea? Uh,

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it makes you feel hopeless that you don't even have

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to to reason with this cop. You can't

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>defend yourself, not at all, so you have a sense

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of hopelessness. Plus, the other upside if you're an interrogator

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is that you're keeping the person from talking, meaning they

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>also can't ask for counsel. Then I don't see why

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>people don't just do that the first thing, over and

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>over say I need a lawyer, I need a lawyer,

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I need a lawyer. I read this article in I

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>think this stranger aren't the oddest Seattle. I don't know.

0:30:56.360 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a great article. It was kind of um.

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>It was just kind of misleading, like the author really

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted you to to sympathize with the guy who was

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.719
<v Speaker 1>guilty and really revealed that he really was pretty guilty

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>towards the end, but it had this this really great

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>explanation for why people don't ask for a lawyer in

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>this article. Yes, and I've seen it before, but this

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>article really got the point across that this guy was, like,

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he'd done some stuff before, like I think

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>like he um, he was, he dabbled in drugs and

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like ran an illegal like poker game and stuff like that,

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>like mouthfeasance. Yeah, and he so enough so that he

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>was like he knew he was technically guilty in the

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>eyes of the law, but not for this thing that

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they wanted him on. Um, so he was he had

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that guilt to begin with. And then these cops saying like,

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna really look guilty if you if you ask

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>for a lawyer. That's one. And then the other aspect

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>was if you lawyer up, we can't help you. Oh yeah,

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that one. If you talk to us, that's

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the only way we can help you get out of

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this jam. We want to get jam like we we

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>know we might we would have done the same thing

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you did. Yeah, but the cops never want to get

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you out of a jam. No, that's not what they're

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to do, and so what they were saying was

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like if you clam up this, like, who knows what's

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>going to happen to you. They were doing all sorts

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of really effective psychological manipulation. And the guy they were

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>talking to was a lawyer's son. And this guy who

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like forty years old, a lawyer's son, so he'd known

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>his whole life to ask for a lawyer. And even

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this guy didn't immediately ask for a lawyer because these

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>cops got him. You know, I probably wouldn't either. Actually,

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>if I was if I was arrested today after work

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and obviously completely innocent of anything, would that be mind blowing?

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>If that happened and I was completely innocent, I would.

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I would at first My first instinct would probably be

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>like I need a lawyer and I didn't do anything, Yeah,

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like why why curred that expense? Well, I think that's

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>another aspect of the initial um, initial consultation, that initial

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>discussion where it's like, oh, it's all friendly, we're talking

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>about the phillies. Why would you need a lawyer for that? Right,

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I retract my statement, I get it now, but you

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>should stick to your original statement no matter what, Like

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you have a right to counsel, and there's no reason

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you should not invoke it. Your your punishment is not

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be worse for asking for a lawyer. Yeah,

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you should open up. You sound like one of those

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>legal commercials called Josh Clark. That reminds me we should

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>do and we should mention the A c l U

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>episode that was a pretty good in too. Yeah. Man,

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>this thing is just so many tangential podcasts. So the

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>stopping denials, that's a big part of the read technique.

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And then, um, there's something that's similar that John Reid noticed,

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>but it is a little nuance. There's a difference, uh,

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's objections to to to read. Denials were different

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>than object actions, and objections were something to be treated

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>differently as a result. Yeah, an objection that example they

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 1>gave here was like I would never rape somebody because

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>my sister was raped and it destroyed our family. Of

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>course I wouldn't do something like that, right. So to

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a cop, that's not a denial. A denial is like

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do that. I didn't do that that that's

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 1>not me. You got the wrong guy. Those are denials,

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and the cop would try to stop you from completing

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>those sentences. That objection you just said is a denial,

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's encapsulated with um, a reason, yeah, a justification,

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>something to it. Do you remember when you used to

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>take multiple choice tests in high school they always said

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that if you don't know the answer, usually the one

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>with the most verbiage, the one with the most words,

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is the right one. I never heard that's true. That

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>works out. It's not good at taking tests either. Well, no, wonder,

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>we need to get in the way back machine. You

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>can go take some more multiple test tests. Knowing that now,

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But the the I think that's kind of the same

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>prem us for an objection. It's like, it's not just

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a denial, it's there's more to it. And the fact

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that somebody put that much more thought into it means

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that there's something to that. So a cop will take

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that and cultivate it and try to turn that around,

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and they would say, we, I know you love your sister,

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know you you stood by her while she

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was raped, so of course this wouldn't be like a

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 1>recurring thing. This is just a one time thing that

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you did and you were out of your head or whatever,

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>because you care about your sisters, so you would never

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>do this all the time or something. And so all

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, you're you're kind of like you're giving

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the suspect like a something to latch onto, something for

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>them to to basically re enter society to an extent,

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>because at this moment, especially if they're guilty, they are

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>totally on the ounce with society, and the sole representative

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of society and who's speaking with them right now is

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the cop that's interrogated them, and everybody wants to be included,

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't, then your associopath and they're gonna

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>get you anyway. They're well, yeah, but they're gonna have

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a hard time through interrogation. So number five is getting

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the suspects attention. Is I don't know these the real

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.280
<v Speaker 1>titles or is this just the liberties of the author

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of this article? I don't know what We'll call it

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>getting the suspects attention. And uh, this is when you

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:29.479
<v Speaker 1>pretend to be the ally of the suspect um because

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>at this point they're probably looking for a way out,

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's when you might go, hey, man, I get it.

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 1>If I call it my best friend having sex with

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.399
<v Speaker 1>my wife, I'd kill him too. I understand where you're

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>coming from, and uh, maybe a little pad on the shoulder,

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a little rub on, a little rub on the back,

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>or maybe a pad on the back and just some

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>reassurance like I get to where you're coming from. Man,

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it could have could happen to any of us, and

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:56.879
<v Speaker 1>you're in big trouble at that point. Yeah, and that's

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>probably going on like throughout. Yeah, and of themes run

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>These all overlap quite a bit. But if if there's

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 1>an objection that you've noticed that you're working, you've turned

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:10.280
<v Speaker 1>around and you're working that objection with an extra layer

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:14.879
<v Speaker 1>of compassion and commiseration. Uh, can I guess really kind

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of start to ensnare the suspect a lot more. It's

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>weird because I'm I'm repulsed by a lot of this,

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:25.919
<v Speaker 1>but I'm also very impressed by like what I've seen

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 1>on TV. What you can tell is someone who's really

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>good at it. Oh yeah, it's an effective it's like

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.879
<v Speaker 1>an art form. There's UM. I believe something like eight

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>percent or seventies six percent of UM suspects who are

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:40.839
<v Speaker 1>interrogated in this manner. When you take out people who

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>UM invoke their miranda rights, uh confess like it has

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 1>an enormous confession rate, and there's a lot of people

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>who the vast majority the study I saw or the

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 1>number I saw six of those confessions are from guilty people.

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>That something like point zero four percent are false confessions.

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 1>The problem is there's still such a thing as false confessions.

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 1>There's no safeguards. It's just it just so happens that,

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 1>like the false confessions are in that small of an amount. Yeah,

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and that percentage isn't high. But if you think about

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 1>how many people are interrogated, that's like several hundred per

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>year in the US, up to several hundred per year.

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of people. Yeah, And it's not like

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that that those people just it gets found out at

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>trial or somewhere down the road that they're innocent. Like,

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.360
<v Speaker 1>those people may spend the rest of their lives in jail.

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>At the worst case, they may be executed, which has

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 1>probably happened in the history of the US, although it

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been um irrefutably proven yet. Yeah, and you can

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to how the Innocence Project works. From June, we

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>interviewed Paula is On. Oh, yeah, that's right. I wish

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.439
<v Speaker 1>i'd known a lot more about the Innocence Project back

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>when we did that episode, Like I kind of got

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it and understood it. But just over the last few years, Um,

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of I understand it even more. Yeah, I

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>wish I would have known better than It's still a

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>good episode. We talked to Paul Paul is on Yeah

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>she's a real pro. Yeah no it's not, is it? Okay,

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 1>that's how rumors get made. Well, I just liked her

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>like more after you said that. Oh yeah, yeah, I

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>love Steve's on. Um, all right, and back to the

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 1>red technique. At this point number six, the suspect might

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>lose resolve, And uh, this seemed really obvious to me.

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 1>If the suspect is has his shoulders hunched, or is

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>got his head in his hands, or is crying, then

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you've got them just where you want them as an interrogator, right,

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you were going to get your confession, whether it's a

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>false confession or not. That's not guaranteed by these outward signs. Again,

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 1>if you strip away the non terrible stuff from the

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>re technique, it's it's pretty pretty good stuff. And apparently

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>this is where you really want to regain their attention.

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Like if they start crying, like forced them to look

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:11.399
<v Speaker 1>you in the eye. Uh, because I guess that works.

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>That increases the stress level. Um. So remember we talked

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:19.720
<v Speaker 1>about that theme development. It's like here, here's what happened,

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they object to that, and then you

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 1>take that objection, you turn it around and they start

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to latch onto that theme couched in that objection. You

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>take that next, and as you're developing it, it becomes

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>one of two or more alternatives. But basically you're taking

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the theme that the person latched onto and you're making

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:47.479
<v Speaker 1>that the minimal um example. It's almost like a good

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 1>cop bad cop version of reasons why you did it? Exactly,

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's, um, you you you shot that lady

0:40:56.239 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in the back because she was a horrible person. Nobody

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:04.879
<v Speaker 1>is going to think that you did it because you

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>just wanted the insurance money, exactly that anybody in your

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>position would have done this, And everyone's gonna understand this

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:16.800
<v Speaker 1>is why you did it, not this horrible reason. This reason,

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this reason society can live with. Maybe you'll go to

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 1>jail for a year, two, who knows, but when you

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>come out, everybody's gonna say, hey, that Bernie guy is okay,

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I would have shot that old lady in the back too. Yeah. Uh,

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not Hey, that Bernie guy needs to burn in

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>hell for the rest of his life because it killed

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 1>some poor old lady for her insurance money. You know.

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So with the cops sitting there saying, here's what we're saying,

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you're agreeing to. Here's this horrible interpretation that I can't control.

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But this I've created and sculpted with your help. So

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>let's throw this horrible, big thing away and this thing

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't seem nearly as bad is what the press

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>will hear. I will start to put it on paper. Yeah,

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:04.439
<v Speaker 1>but here's what you're not thinking about what you're doing,

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is it's the same in both cases. If you're confessing

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to a murderer and you are just at a point

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 1>to where you're you think, man, that sounds way better

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in a newspaper than this other thing. And also it's

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the mouth of this detective that is

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>um that is appearing to commiserate with you, that has

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>empathized with you, that maybe told you on the side

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>like hey, I hated that old lady too, and I'm

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 1>glad you did it the cop can totally say that

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>and and to win the trust of the suspect. So

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 1>all of these factors combine all of a sudden. You

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:39.319
<v Speaker 1>have a story, you have a narrative, you're working out

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>with the cops. You may not even realize that that's

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. And then the cops going to say,

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 1>I have a piece of paper and a pen here,

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and I want you to write down what we just

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about. I want you to write down your confession. Yeah, well,

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna bring someone else in there first, Well, there's

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>probably already someone else in there. They may bring a

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>third person, new person in there, uh, to try and

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>force them to retell their story, which they probably won't

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 1>want to do. Uh. And that's when you can introduce like, hey,

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to tell the story again to this

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>new detective. I know you're tired, just here to take

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the spend exactly, don't stab me with it. By this time,

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the person will likely want to do just about anything

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 1>to get out of that room and from writing and

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>signing this this confession their salvation. On the other end,

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a light at the end of the tunnel, even

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>if it's possibly jail Yeah, they can get out of

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>this room. They can get out of this horrible interrogation. Yeah.

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 1>They may promise like a hot meal, like something as

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>simple as that can can get someone to sign a

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 1>confession at the end of a long, long day. So

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:52.799
<v Speaker 1>you've got the written confession, you haven't signed. Uh. They

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:55.400
<v Speaker 1>probably have to sign an additional waiver that says I

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't write this under coercion or else. They'll include that

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in the confession, and you have basically what amounts to

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.319
<v Speaker 1>a slam dunk conviction in court. And that is the

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>red technique. Uh. And we're gonna talk about some real

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:18.719
<v Speaker 1>cases of interrogation right after this break, all right, Chuck.

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's the red technique that your purpose super effective. Um,

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and it has been used in plenty of cases. Like

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:29.919
<v Speaker 1>we said, the number that I saw was like point

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>zero per point zero four of confessions or false confessions, um,

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>which is extraordinarily small, which means that a lot of

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:44.319
<v Speaker 1>truly bad guys get caught through the red the red technique, right. Um.

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's this one in this article on how stuff works, um,

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 1>how police interrogation works, and it's with a woman named

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Michelle Frederick it's between her and a detective named

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Victor Lauria, and it takes place in Detroit in September

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three, and um Nicole Michelle Frederick was the

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 1>step mom to a two year old daughter, and the

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>two year old daughter had shown up in the hospital,

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:14.439
<v Speaker 1>I believe, unresponsive with bruises all over her body had

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>clearly been physically abused, and the step mom was saying,

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:21.800
<v Speaker 1>she falls down a lot, like I don't think anybody

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>heard her, Like, she just gets bruised like that, and uh,

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:27.839
<v Speaker 1>it certainly wasn't me. But not only was it not me,

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was anybody. The little girl just

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:32.839
<v Speaker 1>falls down, she does it to herself. And with that,

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Detective Lauria took her to be blaming the victim that

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 1>she was trying to go free. By blaming this little

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>girl for being clumsy, momsy and difficult, yes, which a

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 1>detective can then latch onto is reprehensible as that sounds, uh,

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 1>by trying to get some empathy going like, hey, I

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>get it, you know, like this is a tough baby, yes,

0:45:57.440 --> 0:46:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's I'm sure it's trying, and it's very off

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>cult so all of a sudden, uh, detective Lauria has

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 1>has this I guess this theme, this justification that was

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>set up by the suspect, and he starts to play

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it out. He's saying, like this, this girl, she was

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 1>a difficult baby. She's crying. You lose your head for

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a minute and you get a little rough, and you know,

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it could happen to anybody, and um uh ms. Frederick says, no,

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not right at all. Nobody hurt this kid. I

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>don't understand why you don't believe me. You seem to

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>be not listening to me, which is from what I understand.

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>That's you're in the danger zone right there, and your

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>a derogation. If somebody's saying, if they're pressing back their

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 1>own reality on the you, the detective, you're not in

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>control right then they are, so uh. Laurias started to

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>look for another theme, and it was along the same lines,

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 1>but rather than losing your head for a minute, it

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 1>was a split second. Something happened in the flash of

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>him minute or flash of a second, and she perked

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.879
<v Speaker 1>up a little. Yeah, she started to latch onto that one. Yeah.

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So then he knew he had her, you know, in

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:11.319
<v Speaker 1>a pretty tough spot and Um. She started nodding her head.

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 1>He sets up the alternative and said, you know what,

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 1>if you don't explain this thing, every he's gonna everyone's

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna just assume that you're this awful, abusive person. Um.

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I think people might understand more though, because everyone's been there.

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:31.839
<v Speaker 1>If we paint, you know, if if it was just

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.279
<v Speaker 1>a split second thing and he lost control, people are

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:36.840
<v Speaker 1>going to get that. So those are the alternatives. All

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, and then it came uh, it came

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:43.760
<v Speaker 1>out that the her daughter had had had brain damage,

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it was likely not gonna die. And then all of

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, the suspects started saying, oh I I they're

0:47:50.040 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get me for murder. Yeah. Well, he pointed out

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to her, He's like, by the way, you haven't even

0:47:54.920 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 1>asked about the condition of your daughter. And she was like, no,

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I haven't totally have and he's like, no, you really haven't,

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and she's like, well how is she He's like, she's

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:04.520
<v Speaker 1>not gonna make it, and that's when she goes, oh, no,

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be tried for murder. And she was and

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 1>found guilty. Um, she she confessed, I believe right, Yeah,

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:17.879
<v Speaker 1>she admitted to shaking, shaking a baby and then said

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:19.920
<v Speaker 1>out loud, I killed the little girl. I killed her

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 1>right So, Um, she was convicted of killing her two

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>year old stepdaughter. And last I saw, I found an

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 1>appeal in two thousand five that was denied. That was

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the last I saw of her after her conviction. So

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it does work, and Detective Lauria followed all of these steps,

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>um and got a bad guy in this case. Yeah,

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of times it goes down just

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>like it should. But it is super controversial, which we've

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 1>talked about some and you mentioned at the beginning. One

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest problems is it's guilt presumptive. Is they

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:57.959
<v Speaker 1>go in there thinking, all right, this person's the goal

0:48:58.080 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of the of the interrogation is to get a confession,

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:03.720
<v Speaker 1>not to find out whether or not someone did something.

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 1>In most in many cases, they go in there thinking

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>this person is guilty. And if you're going in there

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:14.319
<v Speaker 1>thinking you're guilty, even if you don't mean to, you're

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna start to filter out any reasons why they might

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:22.080
<v Speaker 1>be innocent, even if they're good reasons and valid reasons.

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>And that ain't no good, No, it's not that's um.

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>That's well it's pretty huge flaw really, even if it

0:49:29.520 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>does result on only point zero four percent of false confessions. Yeah,

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and you also mentioned that, Um, the whole purpose of

0:49:36.040 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the interrogation is to make someone stressed and uncomfortable. And

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:43.600
<v Speaker 1>then when you notice people behaving stressed and uncomfortable, that's

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 1>the presumption an indicator of guilt Supposedly, when it's like

0:49:47.800 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you said, would you call a feedback loop, So you know,

0:49:51.320 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to make you stressed and uncomfortable, you're being

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>stressed and uncomfortable, that means you're guilty. Yeah, it's an

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>odd you to approach things. It's coercion. Um. And then

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:05.200
<v Speaker 1>there's also been a lot of people to point out

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of these techniques are the same thing

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:11.759
<v Speaker 1>that are used in brainwashing, which we did a show

0:50:11.800 --> 0:50:15.440
<v Speaker 1>on July two thousand nine, did a brainwashing show invading

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 1>a personal space, not allowing the person to speak, um,

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 1>using contrasting alternatives to have them come to uh, make

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 1>them feel like they're making a decision or that they

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 1>have a choice or some sort of power. I think

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you brainwashed me in that episode two, right, Yeah, we

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 1>did a little role play. Yeah, it was awesome. Man,

0:50:34.800 --> 0:50:37.439
<v Speaker 1>I turned you into a prep that was five years ago. Yeah,

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and then um position and confession as a means of escape.

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that was like the last step I think

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:50.160
<v Speaker 1>before resolution was to say like just like denounce your

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:52.840
<v Speaker 1>family or whatever and you will be saved or something.

0:50:53.000 --> 0:50:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Right in this case, it signed this thing and man,

0:50:55.520 --> 0:50:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get that hot meal and that cigarette. I

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>promised you. The thing is is like we said, it's uh.

0:51:02.400 --> 0:51:05.759
<v Speaker 1>It does produce false confessions. And I saw somewhere that

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:11.959
<v Speaker 1>of people who have been exonerated with DNA evidence, UM

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:15.680
<v Speaker 1>gave a false confession. So people go to jail for

0:51:15.960 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 1>years for this kind of thing. Well, here's a few

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:21.359
<v Speaker 1>of the more famous cases. Peter Riley in nineteen seventy three.

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:26.839
<v Speaker 1>It's an eighteen year old who is whose mother was murdered. UM,

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I think no siblings and no father, so like the

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:32.400
<v Speaker 1>only parent he'd ever known, And after eight hours of

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>interrogation by Connecticut police, he confessed to brutally murdering her.

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Murdering her and UH was convicted on manslaughter based on

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the confessional loan was no evidence, no motive. Medical findings

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 1>suggested that there were at least two attackers and UH

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the town really got behind him, apparently, and like, so

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:53.399
<v Speaker 1>this kid didn't do this, He's not that kind of guy.

0:51:53.440 --> 0:51:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And let's have bake sales and raise money. And Arthur Miller,

0:51:57.239 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the famous playwright, lived in the town and he championed

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it because he did a lot of work with a

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>c l U. And Um. Eventually new evidence came out

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that exonerated him and he was set free after three

0:52:10.000 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>years in prison. Three years not too bad. It's better

0:52:12.640 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 1>than Earl Washington Jr. Who in nineteen eighty two he

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:19.879
<v Speaker 1>was described as in police everybody, I'm using scare quotes here.

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:23.920
<v Speaker 1>He was described by psychologists as mildly retarded. He had

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>an i Q of sixty nine, which is a whole

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:30.360
<v Speaker 1>other kettle of fish that mean anything anyway, But um,

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:33.359
<v Speaker 1>he confessed to raping and murdering a nineteen year old

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:37.480
<v Speaker 1>woman under interrogation. He was convicted on the confessional loan

0:52:38.080 --> 0:52:41.320
<v Speaker 1>right just on the confession. A lot of these are,

0:52:41.600 --> 0:52:44.239
<v Speaker 1>and spent eighteen years in prison, some of them on

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>death row, and was apparently rescued from the um executioner

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>with like nine days to go. Yeah, But at the

0:52:51.880 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 1>same time, like, as a jury, what are you to

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:58.160
<v Speaker 1>do when someone says I did this, you know, I

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>mean hopefully you don't know, maybe maybe add some other evidence.

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I agree. The thing is is Earl Washington's UM thing.

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:11.360
<v Speaker 1>He he was somebody else was caught doing it using DNA.

0:53:11.680 --> 0:53:14.640
<v Speaker 1>That's that's been a huge change to this kind of thing.

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:18.879
<v Speaker 1>It's at least exonerated people like free and clear. But

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:21.719
<v Speaker 1>that's that brings up another problem with false confessions. Not

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 1>only do innocent people go to jail, guilty people stay free,

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and they accumulate more victims over time, you know, like, um,

0:53:30.719 --> 0:53:33.840
<v Speaker 1>how how how many more children would that that lady

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:36.839
<v Speaker 1>in Detroit have abused if like she gotten off or something,

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean like the and the guy who

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:45.360
<v Speaker 1>created UM the read technique actually had a false confession

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and wrongful conviction under his belt, a guy. If you

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:53.200
<v Speaker 1>read the article um the uh the interview in the

0:53:53.239 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>New Yorker, the first thing he talks about is this

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:58.160
<v Speaker 1>guy in the fifties who was in jail for twenty

0:53:58.239 --> 0:54:00.560
<v Speaker 1>years for murdering his wife even though he didn't do it,

0:54:00.760 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 1>who was um interrogated by John Reid himself. Wow. Yeah,

0:54:04.800 --> 0:54:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So the guy who actually did do it went on

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to rape pregnant women and UM commit all these other

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:15.840
<v Speaker 1>horrible crimes that he wouldn't have he wouldn't have done

0:54:16.120 --> 0:54:19.000
<v Speaker 1>had he been caught the first time, or had the

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 1>cups still been looking for him. Wow. So yeah, it's

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge point. I mean, like, it's not just innocent

0:54:25.640 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 1>people in prison, it's guilty people out still. Yeah, if

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you really want to see uh this all firsthand, I

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:36.400
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend the documentary from Ken burn Sarah Burns and

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:40.319
<v Speaker 1>David McMahon, The Central Park Five. And this is the

0:54:40.320 --> 0:54:44.799
<v Speaker 1>famous story in of five young African American men who

0:54:44.800 --> 0:54:48.280
<v Speaker 1>were set up the river for a rape in Central

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Park and they did not do it. And uh, it's

0:54:50.880 --> 0:54:54.799
<v Speaker 1>a great documentary and it's it just summarizes how you

0:54:54.800 --> 0:54:57.719
<v Speaker 1>can get a false confession very nicely and it all

0:54:57.719 --> 0:55:00.200
<v Speaker 1>plays out and you see these interviews and get really

0:55:00.239 --> 0:55:04.800
<v Speaker 1>angry and uh, but that was definitely a case of UM,

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:07.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of like with the Atlanta child murders. Like people

0:55:07.640 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 1>are scared to go into Central Park now and we've

0:55:10.520 --> 0:55:14.480
<v Speaker 1>got these five use who aren't so smart and they're poor,

0:55:15.200 --> 0:55:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and we can we think they did it and I

0:55:18.080 --> 0:55:20.440
<v Speaker 1>don't care what the evidence says. We need to finger

0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:21.920
<v Speaker 1>them for the crime and put them all over the

0:55:21.920 --> 0:55:25.080
<v Speaker 1>news so people will feel safe again. But they were

0:55:25.120 --> 0:55:30.359
<v Speaker 1>eventually exonerated thanks to DNA again. Um. And they spent

0:55:30.600 --> 0:55:34.680
<v Speaker 1>depending on which guy, between six years and twelve years

0:55:34.680 --> 0:55:37.719
<v Speaker 1>in prison. And really great documentary and I think it's

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:42.319
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix. It is it is. Have you seen it? Yeah? Yeah,

0:55:42.360 --> 0:55:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a good one. Um. So chuck this. We've basically

0:55:45.840 --> 0:55:49.000
<v Speaker 1>been talking mostly about the Red technique, that there are alternatives.

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>There's some law enforcement agencies have lost faith in, um,

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the red technique. Uh. And in Britain, apparently in there's

0:55:58.719 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of false confess since that came to light

0:56:01.600 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and the British government said, we need to figure something

0:56:04.640 --> 0:56:07.560
<v Speaker 1>else out. So they created a Blue Ribbon task force

0:56:08.200 --> 0:56:11.959
<v Speaker 1>and said, come up with an alternative to the re technique,

0:56:12.160 --> 0:56:15.920
<v Speaker 1>which ironically is a technique in the re technique. But

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:21.000
<v Speaker 1>what they came up with was called peace, which this

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is the worst acronym of all time, but preparation and planning,

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:32.160
<v Speaker 1>engage and explain, account closure evaluate clearly spells peace. Yes, Um.

0:56:32.360 --> 0:56:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So they came up with it after a couple of years,

0:56:35.480 --> 0:56:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and by two thousand and one it was pretty widespread

0:56:38.040 --> 0:56:41.680
<v Speaker 1>but the peace technique is predicated on the idea that

0:56:41.760 --> 0:56:45.319
<v Speaker 1>you're not going after a confession. This technique, like you

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:50.640
<v Speaker 1>as a an investigator an interrogator, you're going in to

0:56:50.960 --> 0:56:54.320
<v Speaker 1>just get the whole story out and as much detail

0:56:54.400 --> 0:56:57.799
<v Speaker 1>as possible, and you're not going after a confession. You're

0:56:57.800 --> 0:57:01.319
<v Speaker 1>not accusing the person of the crime, being polite and

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you're here's another thing, and a lot of people think

0:57:03.600 --> 0:57:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that this will cure false confessions almost in and of itself,

0:57:08.360 --> 0:57:12.719
<v Speaker 1>videotaping the confession from beginning to end. And so what

0:57:12.760 --> 0:57:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the cops do is they interview the the suspect. They say, well,

0:57:16.480 --> 0:57:19.120
<v Speaker 1>what about this, here's a discrepancy, what about this? And

0:57:19.160 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 1>they're not being accusatory, they're just putting everything out there

0:57:22.080 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and letting this person explain it in front of the

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 1>video tape or in front of the video camera. And

0:57:26.840 --> 0:57:29.120
<v Speaker 1>then the tape is shown to a jury and the

0:57:29.240 --> 0:57:32.680
<v Speaker 1>jury apparently decides whether the person is lying or not. Yeah,

0:57:32.680 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is all built on the what I think

0:57:36.800 --> 0:57:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty rock solid theory that it is really

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:43.600
<v Speaker 1>hard to lie and lie and lie and keep it

0:57:43.640 --> 0:57:47.920
<v Speaker 1>all straight and keep it all and that that congruous

0:57:48.000 --> 0:57:51.840
<v Speaker 1>line that's believable. At some point, if you keep talking

0:57:52.320 --> 0:57:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're lying a bunch, you're gonna mess up. And

0:57:54.880 --> 0:57:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what they prey on, especially if you've just spent

0:57:58.360 --> 0:58:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the last eight hours like drinking cruddy coffee and eating

0:58:02.360 --> 0:58:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a few ho hoes and being asked questions by interrogators,

0:58:06.200 --> 0:58:09.600
<v Speaker 1>even if they're being polite like yeah, you're you're gonna

0:58:09.640 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have a really hard time keeping up with what you've

0:58:11.680 --> 0:58:14.680
<v Speaker 1>already said. Yeah, Like you've got to be a real

0:58:14.960 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 1>skilled sociopath to lie for hours and hours and hours. Uh,

0:58:19.040 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll bring him again and again. A week later,

0:58:21.680 --> 0:58:23.280
<v Speaker 1>let's say, you know, let's have some more tea and

0:58:23.360 --> 0:58:25.960
<v Speaker 1>let's sit down and talk and uh, a week later,

0:58:26.000 --> 0:58:28.919
<v Speaker 1>you might forget some of the things you said. And um,

0:58:28.960 --> 0:58:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and the cops have the video and they're writing down

0:58:31.000 --> 0:58:33.400
<v Speaker 1>all the details. Seems pretty solid to me. Yeah, so

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:35.360
<v Speaker 1>good on you, Brittain. And um, there are some people

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 1>here in the US trying to teach it the cops here,

0:58:37.520 --> 0:58:40.280
<v Speaker 1>but apparently it's just like word of mouth and the

0:58:40.640 --> 0:58:44.680
<v Speaker 1>particular jurisdiction has to be down with it and support it,

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's just not super widespread here. Yeah. Well, I mean,

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the read technique isn't the force of law. It's just

0:58:50.440 --> 0:58:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the gold standard. It's the one that everybody uses and there, like,

0:58:53.320 --> 0:58:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to be like the cops on the shows. Well, yeah, exactly,

0:58:56.320 --> 0:58:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to do the piece technique. Um, the in

0:58:59.680 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>can it? I found a completely different technique too. It's

0:59:02.440 --> 0:59:04.440
<v Speaker 1>called the Mr. Big technique. Have you heard of it?

0:59:05.240 --> 0:59:12.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's extremely involved. Basically, you the suspect, will meet

0:59:12.960 --> 0:59:16.000
<v Speaker 1>an undercover cop who's posing as a criminal while you're

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:18.520
<v Speaker 1>out and about and free and easy or whatever, maybe

0:59:18.520 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 1>while you're being booked whatever, and you guys are gonna

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>become friends and over the course of the next several months,

0:59:24.200 --> 0:59:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this undercover cop is going to gain your trust and

0:59:28.680 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 1>get you to ultimately confess. That's just how little crime

0:59:31.560 --> 0:59:33.160
<v Speaker 1>there is. They're like, so would you cut down your

0:59:33.160 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 1>neighbors street? Right exactly? Like they can spend like three

0:59:36.680 --> 0:59:40.000
<v Speaker 1>months on a single confession, you know. Yeah. But it's

0:59:40.040 --> 0:59:41.959
<v Speaker 1>called the Mr. Big technique, and it actually the reason

0:59:41.960 --> 0:59:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it's called Mr biggess Uh. In its ideal form, you, um,

0:59:47.360 --> 0:59:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the suspect are become like kind of criminal compatriots with

0:59:51.600 --> 0:59:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this this undercover cop who then introduces you to Mr Big,

0:59:55.360 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 1>this crime boss who wants you to step up to

0:59:57.920 --> 1:00:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the next crime level. But it's gonna you to talk

1:00:00.600 --> 1:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>about this murder that you did or whatever, and then

1:00:03.200 --> 1:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you confess it and you're being secretly taped and you

1:00:05.400 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know it, and you've just entrapped yourself. Man, I

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>love Canada, Mr I might have to move there, man,

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>yea A you're gonna stick around after a Toronto or

1:00:15.480 --> 1:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Vancouver one country. So we said earlier we were gonna

1:00:20.480 --> 1:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>give some tips. I think we'd be remiss if we didn't. Um.

1:00:23.400 --> 1:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>They seem a little silly, but they recommend you just

1:00:26.480 --> 1:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>don't talk. You don't talk, they said. Imagine the words

1:00:30.040 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I invoke my rights to remain silent painted on the

1:00:32.240 --> 1:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>wall and stare at them. Uh, ask for counsel, ask

1:00:37.240 --> 1:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>for a lawyer. And then the number five thing they

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>say to do is cultivate hatred for your interrogator. Who

1:00:43.400 --> 1:00:46.480
<v Speaker 1>who's that from Peace Help Beagle or something weird like that.

1:00:46.600 --> 1:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, it's for recommendations for animal rights activists who

1:00:50.320 --> 1:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>get arrested. So yeah, he seems kind of basic to me.

1:00:56.480 --> 1:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>It is, but I think it's one of those things

1:00:58.160 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>where they can't easily go out the window when you're

1:01:01.120 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in that situation, you know. Yeah, and again, if you're

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and you invoke your right to council,

1:01:07.520 --> 1:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that like the cops are they have to stop,

1:01:09.920 --> 1:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and if they don't, that's a that's a big problem.

1:01:12.480 --> 1:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I kind of perversely want to know how I would

1:01:14.720 --> 1:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>hold up. I know it's no laughing matter and I

1:01:17.200 --> 1:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't joke around about it, but I would like to

1:01:19.080 --> 1:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be interrogated just to see. Uh so, Uh, I guess

1:01:27.000 --> 1:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that's If you want to learn some more about UM

1:01:29.680 --> 1:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>police interrogation, check out this article police interrogation on how

1:01:33.200 --> 1:01:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot Com. It's a good one UM and

1:01:36.080 --> 1:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you can find that by using the search bar, of course.

1:01:38.440 --> 1:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And since I said that, it's time for listener mail,

1:01:42.280 --> 1:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this Jittery Joe's Oh yeah coffee. Hey guys,

1:01:47.480 --> 1:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So Paul as well my wife Catsy now are big

1:01:49.440 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>fancy y'alls, and uh we've been listening for years. This

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>summer we took a two month honeymoon to Southeast Asia.

1:01:54.840 --> 1:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>It was a blast. Your podcasts kept the sane. Thanks

1:01:57.840 --> 1:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for that. You've sent you a postcard from uh Angkor

1:02:01.080 --> 1:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Watt and Cambodia. Uh. It was bought there, written in Borneo,

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and mailed from Malaysia, so it was well traveled. Um. Anyway,

1:02:09.200 --> 1:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>we live in Athens and love to hear your stories

1:02:11.240 --> 1:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>about Athens. We actually live in five Points on the

1:02:13.960 --> 1:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Shortcut road where Chuck told about his mystery creepy old

1:02:17.640 --> 1:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Lady ghost story. I drive by there every day and

1:02:19.960 --> 1:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I always keep an eye out for her. But my

1:02:23.200 --> 1:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>day jobs with Jittery Joe's Coffee Roasters, a local Athens institution,

1:02:27.320 --> 1:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And um, he brought a huge box of coffee and

1:02:33.240 --> 1:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>shirts and hats and hand delivered it to the office.

1:02:36.880 --> 1:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I think he was surprised to know that

1:02:39.360 --> 1:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember when Jittery Joe's first opened, because he was like, oh, well,

1:02:42.960 --> 1:02:46.439
<v Speaker 1>that was before my time. I think he I didn't

1:02:46.440 --> 1:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>think I was as old as I was. But I

1:02:49.320 --> 1:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>remember Jittery Joe's opening up. It was a big deals,

1:02:51.560 --> 1:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>like the first kind of good indie coffee house in Athens.

1:02:54.560 --> 1:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know they were the first, but I'm not

1:02:56.280 --> 1:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>surprised the first one I remember at least. But he

1:02:59.440 --> 1:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>suggests the Sumatra Wahana. He said it's unlike any coffee

1:03:02.640 --> 1:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I've ever had, people either love it or hate it.

1:03:06.120 --> 1:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So um, that is from Mike Lord and you can

1:03:09.520 --> 1:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>just look up Jittery Joe's online. I'm sure you can

1:03:11.760 --> 1:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>order this stuff. Yeah, you definitely can. Thanks for the coffee, Mike,

1:03:14.360 --> 1:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it's good. Yes, and thank you to your wife Cassidy

1:03:17.200 --> 1:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for all the support. Uh. If you want to give

1:03:20.560 --> 1:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Chuck and Eye free stuff, we are happy to accept it.

1:03:23.560 --> 1:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>You can get in touch with us to ask for

1:03:25.280 --> 1:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>our physical mailing address and we'll give it to you. Okay. Yeah,

1:03:29.400 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I have to say showing up at the office and

1:03:30.800 --> 1:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>announced was a little weird, but since you had a

1:03:34.520 --> 1:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>huge box of coffee, h it was all forgetting. Oh yeah,

1:03:37.080 --> 1:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>so your comparing gifts, it's like yeah, yeah, it's social lubricant. Yeah, gifts, sorry,

1:03:43.480 --> 1:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>especially good one. It's like Jittery Joe's coffee. You can

1:03:46.520 --> 1:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with us via Twitter at s Y

1:03:48.720 --> 1:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>s K podcast. You can join us on Facebook dot com.

1:03:51.200 --> 1:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So I Stuff you should Know. You can send us

1:03:53.120 --> 1:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>an email at stuff podcast at how Stuff Works dot

1:03:56.160 --> 1:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>com and as always joined us at home on the

1:03:58.600 --> 1:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>web Stuff you Should Know dot com for more on

1:04:06.720 --> 1:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics. Is it how stuff works?

1:04:09.480 --> 1:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Dot com h