WEBVTT - P&L: Trump Can't Micromanage a Manufacturing Revival

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Fox along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether at the grocery store

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. I want

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to bring in my colleague Brook Sutherland, a Bloomberg Gadfly

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>columnist who wrote a piece that was really terrific yesterday

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>about President elect Donald trumps celebration of a decision that

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>he says he reached with Carrier UH to keep with

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Carriers Heating and air Conditioning unit to save about one

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand Indiana jobs. Brooke, thank you so much for being

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with us. So can you just talk first a little

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>bit about what this agreement was and what this really

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>does with respect to saving jobs in the US. Sure,

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we're still waiting for all of

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the details. But United Technologies announced the decision earlier this

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>year to shut down to Indiana plants actually and move

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the jobs to Mexico. So the agreement that Trump is

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about has to do with the facility in Indianapolis,

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>um and they are planning on saving about a thousand

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.199
<v Speaker 1>jobs there. We don't know yet what's going to happen

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>to the other Indiana factory, which was in Huntington's uh So,

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, at best, this is sort of a stop gap,

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>half measure that maybe save some jobs, but not all

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of them. And it's just not really clear if it

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>does much more beyond that. Um So, just real quick,

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>what what exactly what kinds of jobs are we talking

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>about that? Uh? United Technology was going to move to

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Mexico and you know, how long will they actually stay here?

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Why were they thinking of moving to Mexico? Sure? You know,

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>so these are manufacturing jobs that typically play pay pretty all.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're talking about about twenty five dollars an hour,

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>which is a lot more than somebody can make working

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in the service industry. But you can have those same

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>jobs done in Mexico for a lot less, and so

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the appeal. The other part is that,

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, there have been significant regulations in the air

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>conditioning and h VAC industry in terms of making the

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>products more efficient, living up to sort of environmental standards,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and those have a cost, and so to be competitive.

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>What United Technologies has said is they need to lower

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>labor costs, and a lot of its competitors have already

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.399
<v Speaker 1>made these moves to Mexico. And so that's really where

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it's coming from, not you know, we don't want to

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.119
<v Speaker 1>support America. Is it also the case that while these

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>jobs may be saved, other factory jobs in Indiana in

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the geographical location where this United Technologies carrier plant is located,

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>those layoffs and those moves to Mexico they're continuing exactly.

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not even that all of the United

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Technologies jobs are going to be saved, they're only saving

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>some of them. So but there are you know, other

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers who have had to make these same decisions. And

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that manufacturers like making these decisions, but

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times it's just sort of the reality

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of the economic situation they find themselves in. And to

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>your point, Rex Nerd, which is another industrial manufacturer, is

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>also in Indiana, not too far from where the United

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Technologies plant is actually, and they are looking at shutting

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>down that facility and moving those jobs to Mexico. And

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we haven't really heard as much about rex Nerd, and

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to wonder if that's because there's no viral

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>video about the rex nerd layoffs the way that there

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>was with Carrier. It hasn't gotten as much public attention,

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't drawn as much pushback, it hasn't really been

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about about by President Trump. Um So I just

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of wonder if we're going to see anything there,

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>if he's just sort of picking and choosing the ones

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that might bring good publicity. I love the lead Donald

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump can't micromanage his way to a man manufacturing revival

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in America. Perhaps he can't micromanage his way to a

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing revival. But is there something on a policy level

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that he could do to keep manufacturing jobs in the

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>US or these jobs just going away because of automation. Well,

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's sort of a tough question. You know,

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>he's talked about leveling hefty tariffs at these companies that

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>manufacture products in Mexico and then bring them back to

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the US. He's talked about doing this on an individual basis,

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>which I think would be very hard to implement without

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>looking like you're picking and choosing who wins in this country.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know which businesses do well and if they

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>don't do exactly what you tell them to do, you're

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>going to punish them. That's a very dangerous precedent to set.

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you want to have a mass

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>tariff because that could spark trade war. So I don't

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>really know what you do on a national scale to

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>stop this from happening. And even if you put those

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.119
<v Speaker 1>types of policies in place, you're not going to change

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of the broader trends that are driving this momentum.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>A lot of it is technology. You know, these jobs

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>are being replaced by machines because they don't need people

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to do them, or there's excess manufacturing capacity because these

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>companies have merged, or their products just aren't into and anymore.

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>If you're Caterpillar or Joy Global. People just aren't buying

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>mining equipment right now because commodity prices have eroded so much.

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I just want to note that another new store. You

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>mentioned technology, but something called the Internet Archive. They preserve

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the digital records of billions of web pages, indeed, even

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>cash pages of websites that no longer exist. They are

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>moving their backup data to Canada because they fear potential

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>changes in legislation due to a Trump administration could maybe

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>put the archives at at risk. All different a lot

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>of moving pieces there is, and you know, I think

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what makes it hard to tackle these sort of

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>job decisions on a national level. And that's one of

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the points I was trying to make is that typically

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>this is a conversation that happens on the state level,

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.679
<v Speaker 1>where you have state governors or legislators talking to companies

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>about specific facilities within their state and what they can

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>do to preserve jobs. But it's hard to translate that

0:05:50.480 --> 0:06:04.799
<v Speaker 1>on the national level. I want to bring in Eric Marshall,

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager with Hodges Funds, to talk a little bit

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>about what to look for in small cap stocks. And

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we've just seen an amazing run in the Russell two

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand and other small small cap indexes, the Russell two

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand gaining almost eleven percent since the US election. Thank

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you for being with us, Eric. Do you think that

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>this can continue? We think that there's a good case

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that we'll see the bull market and small caps continue,

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and there's a couple of things that make us encouraged

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in this space. You know, it's been a very bifurcated

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>market within small caps. This year where a lot of

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the things having to do with reads and utilities and

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the defensive areas have really carried very

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>high multiples, while a lot of areas within consumer discretionary

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>industrials have not. And you know, as we look at

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the prospects for higher interest rates, lower taxes, US regulation

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and it continued pick up in merger and acquisition activity,

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we think you could still see room to run in

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>this bull market for small cap stocks. All right, can

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.239
<v Speaker 1>you give us some specific industry groups or even names?

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I know, for example, we're looking at a potential infrastructure

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>spending plan coming from President elect Donald Trump administration. Is

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that going to help small cap stocks? Yeah, And that's

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the areas in the Hodges Small Cap Fund

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that we've really been focused on is companies that can

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>benefit from that infrastructure spend and it leads us to

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>own a lot of the materials, uh, including concrete and

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>cement companies. One that we like is a relatively new

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I p o Ra and this is a company that

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>makes large diameter concrete pipes and so forth that are

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.239
<v Speaker 1>used for water infrastructure, which is UH, there's a huge

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>upgrade cycle going on. The stock trades at a very

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>reasonable valuation and very much still underneath the radar. They

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>went public a couple of months ago, and uh, not

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly a great time for small cap I p o s,

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>but we like things like that. We're seeing opportunities in

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the steel companies and a lot of these

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>material companies that will benefit from a multi year spending

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>cycle for infrastructure. Just tell us the name of the company. Again,

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>people may not have heard, uh, Fonterra Fontera indeed. And

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>did you buy it at the IP or did you

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>wait for it to come out? We bought some of

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the I p O and it broke that I p

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>O price and actually traded off and we've added to

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it since. Um, you have a fund, the Pure Contrarian Fund.

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>What's your most contrarian bet within that fund? Um Our

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>founder of our firm, Craig Hodges, manages that fund, and

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>I would say one of the pure contrarian funds. UH

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>biggest moves was in some of the steel and iron

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>ore companies which were kind of left for dead, probably

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>doably a year or two ago, and we found some

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>very deep value opportunities and several companies there that have

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>done very well so you know, when US Steel got

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>down to eight dollars of share, that fund took a

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>large position in that stock, as well as things like

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Cliffs and some of the those more commodity type

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>companies that people had really just kind of thrown away

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>with the bathwater. Do you think that, given the rally

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen recently, that there's still more room to

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>run with the steel and metals companies. I think that

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>there is. When you look at overall consumption of steel

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in in the United States, Uh, it's relicatively good. The

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>capacity utilization of a lot of domestic steel companies has

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>been running in the sixty six percent area now for

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years because of so much cheap

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>imports of steel coming out of Southeast Asia and Turkey,

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>places like this. And I think as you see some

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of the trade regulations tighten up a little bit, if

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you mean tariffs, I mean, because that's what's not the

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>steel industry, right. I mean, they put sanctions on imported steel,

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>making it more expensive and or more competitive with US

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>produced products. And you've seen US steel new core all

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>move higher, absolutely and PIM A lot of people don't

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>realize we don't have enough steel capacity in our country.

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>We need to import of our steel just to meet

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>our needs. The problem is we've been importing thirty percent

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>or thirty five percent of that steel and that's really

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>caused pricing not to recover while demand has recovered for

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>things like auto and infrastructure and construction. Let me just

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>turn your attention Hodges small cap fund. Right, you're up

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>more than thirteen and a half percent so far this year.

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Good on't you? U? J C. Penny is in the

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>portfolio small cap? How does that end up being? What's

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>your definition of small cap? It seems to change no

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>matter you know who portfolio manager. Well, believe it or not.

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>J C. Penny's is down to about a three billion

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar market cap, and when we bought the stock, I

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>think it was about two and a half billion dollar

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.319
<v Speaker 1>market cap, so well within the definition of the Russell

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand market cap range. But it's really a turnaround

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>situation where we see, uh, some good underlying assets in

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the former real estate and so forth, and we think

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that the management's new plan to kind of reinvent the

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>business through the house wares and Sephora brand, some of

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>these new things that they're doing and kind of cater

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to a younger generation as well as gain back some

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of those core customers. We think that there's a very

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 1>good risk award there. What's your concern about the rise

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in benchmark borrowing costs and how that could affect some

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of these smaller companies which are going to need to

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>borrow and might not be able to borrow at higher rates. Well,

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at um, you know, corporate

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:02.599
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets in general roll uh, they're in really relatively

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 1>good good shape right now. And I do think that

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you definitely need to be more aware in a higher

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>interest rate environment about the uh, you know, interest burden

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that smaller companies have with their balance sheets as the

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>cost of capital goes up. But I think, you know,

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody's had a very long period of time of low

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>interest rates to refinance get their balance sheets in order.

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the in general, um, you know,

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of the concerns there could be offset

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>by you know, a lower lower tax corporate tax rate. Transports,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I noticed you got a Jet Blue holding in there.

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean Warren Buffett recently going in and buying shares

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of airline companies Delta United, you know, and that that's

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>another one. You missed our Kntrian fund earlier. That's one

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>of the big bets we made a couple of years ago,

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and no one liked airlines. We were buying airlines, and

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 1>we what we see going on in the airline industry

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is not that much different than what happened in the

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>railroad industry ten years ago, where they had kind of

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>come out of a decade's worth of consolidation and you

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>started to see an environment where now I think the

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>top four airlines control about seventy of the domestic capacity,

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>so you're getting a more rational pricing environment. People are

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>being more careful about how they add capacity, how they

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>manage that, and we think that we're in an environment

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>now where airlines, for the first time in about thirty years,

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>will actually generate respectable shareholder returns. So I want to

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you there. Eric Marshall, portfolio manager Hodges Funds. Two

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>asset classes want to focus on right now our private

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>equity and venture capital, and joining us is Greg Stento.

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>He is managing director at Harbor Vest Are based in Boston,

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>home to Bloomberg. Greg, thanks very much for being here much.

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Let me just give you a headline

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>though that Brent crude is rising to the highest this

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>year after the agreement in Vienna by OPEC to hold

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>production levels flat. And one if you could speak a

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit about increases in the price of almost everything,

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>including money, and what would that do to private equity

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and venture capital markets. Sure well. Harbor Vest is a

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>global private equity asset manager focused on providing solutions to

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>investors around the globe seeking to access the private markets.

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Solutions being money like a lot of mezzanine financing, solutions

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>being uh, ways in which investors can access the asset class,

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>whether that be through a co mingle fund, through a

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>dedicated account, or through some type of a specialized vehicle. Uh.

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And so that those are ways in which investors are

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>coming into the asset class. You know, with regards to

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the pricing environment that you speak about, uh, you know,

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>we're focused on long term investing and so uh, no question,

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the valuations over the past year have been pretty full

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>around the board, but you know, in all parts of

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the business, uh, And so investors have got to work

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to find those special opportunities where there's growth, where

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>there's very strong secular long term trends to be able

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to overcome the full prices that that folks have had

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to pay here in the short term. But again, this

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is all about long term investing, uh, And that's what

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, brings it back to our firms that we've

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>been doing this for thirty five years and have the

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>access to those types of opportunities where we can see

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>long term value and long term creation of growth. You know, Greg,

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of discussion about how pensions and

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies have moved away from hedge funds um just

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>because of how high the fees are. I'm one ring

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>whether that holds in the private equity world as well.

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I saw a story in the Boston Globe last night

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>about the Massachusetts State pension fund paying one point five

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars to more than one hundred private equity firms

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of the past five years, and that that's sort of

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the headline, even though the returns were, uh, we're

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>remarkable eighteen percent annualized from two thousand elements. So no question,

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a focus on fees within the private markets that

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>are being paid. But what we think is that the

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>real focus needs to be on the net returns. As

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you just talked about. I mean that has been the

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>best performing part of the Massachusetts State portfolio. Um, the

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>returns that you can earn in the private markets have

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>consistently exceeded what you can earn in the private the

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>public equity markets, or other other asset classes over a

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>long period of time. Why can you demystify that for us? Sure?

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's a number of reasons. UM. First of all,

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>when you operate in the private markets, you haven't you

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>operate out of the glare of the public investors, and

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you have an opportunity to really think long term about

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>building a business and growing a business. You know, in

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the venture capital space, for instance, UH, there's the creation

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of new business ideas, you know, something like an uber

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.719
<v Speaker 1>that never existed ten years ago, that when you have

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the right entrepreneur um, the right product market fit, in

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the right risk capital, you can bring that together to

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>create solutions to to meet unmet needs and create very

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>scale businesses. As a company that's been you know, UH

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>quoted in the press is being worth more than sixty

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars today, UH and UH I land up. So

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>there are those opportunities to develop um UH solutions for

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>unmet needs, whether they be in technology or in healthcare

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>or other markets. Uh, and finding those right globally diversified

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>ideas or what we what we're focused on at Harper Ust.

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>You've got a lot of investments in Canada. I understand

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>also it's global, right. I wonder if you could just

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>speak a little bit about how the change in the

0:17:55.440 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>price of energy affects the decision making process for places

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is like Canada, Because if you've got an overall economy

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that is driven by commodity prices, what is that? How

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>does that sort of inform your view? Sure? So we

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>have a specialized fund that we put in place in

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Canada in conjunction with a Kittian government, and I think

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>it was very much to diversify away from what you're discussing.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>So the idea was to generate new business formation in

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Canada's focused on the venture capital market. So it's trying

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to find those Canadian venture capital firms and other other

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>global investment firms investing in Canada that can help drive

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>new business creation and new industries in Canada to to

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>somewhat diversify away from an economy that has written its

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>natural resource base. How has fundraising been so far this

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>year and what do you expect it to be like

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>next year? Well, for Harvarvest, it's been a it's been

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a record year. For us, We've had a phenomenal year

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the reception that we've had from investors

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>seeking UM commingle funds, UH, specialized funds like our Canadian

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>fund or are messing income fund or also looking at

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, dedicated separate accounts that want a very specific

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and bespoke solution. So for US has been a record year.

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 1>It's been, it's been, it's been quite good at invest

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>in the history UM Broadly across the industry, fundraising is

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>up mildly over last year. Uh, it's something that we watch,

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, because those imbalances of capital in the market

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>are are of concern in any market, but also in

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the private markets. Importantly, the reassuring thing has been that

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't been a proliferation of the number of new

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>funds and the new managers coming into the business. So

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>while the capital is up slightly year over year, the

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.959
<v Speaker 1>number of market participants is relatively steady h and so

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that keeps the competitive dynamic and the competitive balance in place.

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.479
<v Speaker 1>And again those are the types of things that are

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>investors seek from us to try to make sure that

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.719
<v Speaker 1>we're finding those opportunities that despite the market environment, we're

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have good, good potential for long term success.

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>We're speaking with Greg Stento, he is managing director at

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Harbor Vest the topic of an equity and venture capital.

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe it early in November, right, you just closed

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>on a on a fund. I believe this was, what

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>about a four point seven seven billion dollar fund? Tell

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about this. This is a secondaries fund,

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it is, and that's correct. Secondaries is something that we've

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>been doing since so we celebrated over thirty years of

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>having been active in the market. Just to be clear,

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>secondaries means people who want to sell their stake in

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a private equity fund can sell it to somebody else

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>through this type of fund. Correct. That's right. It's an

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>ill liquid market and it's it's done through private transactions,

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it be a fund position or a position in companies. UH.

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>And again we've been one of the pioneers in that space,

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>having done it now for more than thirty years, and

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>we closed a close to fund in early November that

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is focused on that market, dedicated to that market. UH.

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>In particular, I think where we've carved out a niche

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in the secondary market and is what we call the

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>complex transactions. So um these are doing things that UM

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>again we that are a little bit off the beaten

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>half of the typical commodity like lp UM purchase. So

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>these could be an end of fund life solution where

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a private equity fund has reached near the end of

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>its life. The general partner still feels as though they've

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>got assets that they like to manage and continue to

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>grow for the next three to five years. But at

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the same point, their investors are tired and maybe want

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>to some of them want to get out. So we

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>can provide a special vehicle to bridge that solution. Greg Stento,

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>managing director at Harbor Fest, speaking to us about the

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>outlook for private equity and venture capital. This is Bloomberg

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Americans just loving their trucks. General Motors, Ford and other

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>major automakers beat analysts estimates for US sales y because

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Americans just can't get enough pickups and SUVs. I want

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to bringing Kevin Tynan, senior auto analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about, uh, just how good these

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>sales numbers really were, and whether they can last. So, Kevin,

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us, Hi Lisa. UM. Yeah,

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>so very good numbers in the sense that UM, you know,

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>consumer buying frenzy, end of the year, Black Friday through

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, clearance sales UM incentives obviously

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>higher and and very aggressive. UM. But I think the

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>concern there is if incentives don't work, which obviously they

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>are UM, and then what happens come January February you

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit of a hangover? UM. You know,

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the automakers are not as aggressive on on the incentive

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and lease deals because there's no real demand left. UM.

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So very good here and now today. The question is

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>what happens in If you care about what happens in

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>at this point for now, you'll take this. There's there's

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>talk of an eighteen point three seasonally adjusted rate, which

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>would be the best since UM employee pricing programs of

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five h So all all things are coming

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>along here, Hey, Kevin, what about all things coming along

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in the auto loan business? Yeah, I think there would be. Uh.

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Delinquencies are rising, yeah, right, supprise right, I mean? And

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>third quarter of subprime auto loan balances became at least

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>ninety days delinquent. That's up from one point six percent

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>in the third quarter of four. And this is this

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a significant concern? Yeah, these are these are concerns. The

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>length of the the average term getting longer, and the

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>amount uh financed, you know, the loan to asset ratio,

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>all those things are trending probably where where they would

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>cause concern. Um. The other issue is that as long

0:23:55.720 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>as money is cheap and easy, what you get is

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that negative equity of those longer loans flowing into new

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>loans and people get more and more upside down, and

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that's really what crashed in you know that two periods.

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So what happens is you get consumers are drivers basically

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>having to hold onto those vehicles till the term until

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>there's at least close to some equity because they can't

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>roll that that negative equity anymore. And aren't they longer

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>term loans? Yeah, absolutely right, if not more so, the

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 1>average is probably a little bit higher. But if you

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>get people taken seventy two months loans, you don't have

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>equity in that vehicle. Um, which is okay if there

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>if if the finance company is gonna let you roll

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>that negative equity into the next loan. Once they stop that,

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>then that's where the real trouble starts. You know. I

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>do have to think that one thing that a number

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of analysts have told us is that, UM, the auto

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>companies have captive finance companies, so they can afford to

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 1>take a little bit of a bigger risk keep extending

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>loans to even sub prime borrowers because they're earning so

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 1>much from selling the cars. How much does it put

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the captive financing companies of these auto companies at risk

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of making too many loans that are too speculative. Well,

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly a big risk lease to the Other thing

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to remember is um the leasing part of it,

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>where the automakers rather than if you think about a

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>cash or a finance deal with with cash incentive across

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the table, you're getting these sort of subsidized residual values

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that are being propped up. You know. And now those

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>vehicles come back, which we've been leasing at record rates,

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>starting to come down a little bit. UM. But as

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>those off lease vehicles come back in the market, there's

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna be downward pressure on new price uh, new vehicle

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>prices because you're gonna have this flood of low mileage

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>off lease vehicles coming back to the market. It's not

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>an industry that really looks too far into the future

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to worry about these things. But it's out there and

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it's coming all right. Just gonna give you ten seconds.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>The environmental protection age, see leaving in place those CEO

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>two standards. Is that going to hurt the industry? You

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>know what's going to happen PIM in ten seconds, is

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that they will produce the fuel efficient vehicles. Those will

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>go into fleets, things like Lift Duber. There'll be really

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>aggressive lease deals for those companies. They'll hit their marks

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll go ahead and turn around and sell

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>what they want. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg pen

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>out there on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.