WEBVTT - Zoltan Pozsar on His Next Big Move and the Coming Monetary Divorce

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe.

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't thal Joe? Do you remember what we were

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>doing this time last year?

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can barely remember two weeks ago. Yeah, but

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I actually I remember this one mostly because I looked

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it up right before we started doing this recording. But

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this time last year, we were preparing organizing our first

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>live All Thoughts debate between Zultan Posar and Perry Maryland.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>That was really fun.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>We got to do that again.

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So we were sort of frantically doing a lot

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>of the sort of travel arrangements and things like that

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>for that.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, waking up early in the morning, like of the

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 2>day of the debate, entering names into a database so

0:00:58.560 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>that people could get into the Bloomberg.

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yes too. It was fun, all right. But my

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>point is it's been a while since we've spoken to

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Sultan Posar.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>It has been a while, and it's unfortunate because he

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 2>is one of our most requested guests. People would listen

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 2>to him every month if we interviewed him.

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I agree, in fact, I think we should do monthly

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>or even quarterly interviews with Sultan. But I am very

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>happy to say without further ado that Sultan is he's back.

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>He's back and so right. So he was at Credit Sweeze,

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 2>he left Credit Sweeze. He's been kind of silent. There

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 2>has been this incredible mystery about what he's going to

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 2>do next, and uh, we don't know. But he's coming

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 2>out on the Odd Lots podcast, so let's find out.

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna tell us. Now, Sultan, welcome back to the show.

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>We're so glad to have you back on.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 2>This is like when Lebron James announced on ESPN all

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 2>those years ago what he was going to do next.

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So very nice, thanks for having all right, so what

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? Just jump right into it. Yeah, you

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>were strategistic credits us as everyone knows at this point,

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and now what are you up to?

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, the next steps is I have founded my own

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 3>macroeconomic consultancy. The name of the firm is Exlunoplurus, and

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I will be providing research to institutional investors and consult

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 3>institutional investors about plumbing as I always have.

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, meny questions, Well let's just start simple. What is

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 2>X you know?

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Plurist man exlunopluris is the opposite of a plural busulum,

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 3>which is this little motto that we can find on

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 3>a great seal of the United States and on the

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 3>dollar bill. It means in English, out of one many.

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 3>It's meant to capture two ideas. The first idea is,

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 3>you know that my retrospective on what I've been doing

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 3>for a strategies for a decade is basically anticipating moments

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 3>when prices fall apart in funding and rates markets. So

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the basic idea is that most of the time things

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 3>straight on top of each other, you know, the industry

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 3>structure is orderly, and then then something bad happens, whether

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 3>it's panic or a pandemic or a balance sheet constraint

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 3>or liquidity constraint, prices fall apart. So out of one price,

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 3>you are dealing with many prices. And so that's basically

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 3>the bread and butter of what a rate strategist and

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 3>a rate strater is doing, anticipating those moments and being

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 3>on the right.

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Side of those movements.

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 3>And then the other idea is that you know global

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 3>macro as such, I think it grew up as a

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 3>concept and an asset price, if you will in the

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 3>unicorn or moment where globalization was moving forward, the dollar

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 3>was the undisputed global hegemonic currency, and so we were

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 3>all kind of creating the global dollar cycle and going forward.

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 3>As we discussed this in the context of bread in

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 3>was three, that's no longer going to be the case.

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 3>So it's kind of capturing the site PST. You know,

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 3>China is trying to extract itself from the Western financial system,

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 3>much like the Western real economy is trying to extract

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>itself out of supply chains that.

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Are running through China.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 3>And so we are I think at the beginning of

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 3>this era the next five ten years.

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 4>At least, where we are going to go through this.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Monitory divorce and you know, the dollars hegemony is going

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 3>to be challenged by some geo financial moves that the

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:33.679
<v Speaker 3>chain is blooding, So out of one dominant reserve currency,

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 3>we will have the world where we will have.

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Met That's a great name.

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, you mentioned moments in macro and I

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>think last year when you released that Breton Woods three

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>thesis that you talked about on the show and wrote

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a number of research notes about it, definitely demarketed a

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that seemed to be, you know, floating out there

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in people's minds, this idea that maybe finally some things

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>were changing around dollar hegemony, as you just mentioned. Talk

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to us about that original thesis a little bit more

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and whether or not you think it's been born out

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the last I guess twelve to

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>fifteen months or so.

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 3>I think the concept is very healthy and it's alive.

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 3>I personally see more and more signs that some of

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 3>these teams that we have discussed on that first show

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 3>when we talked about Bretton Woodstree or computer fruition, and

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 3>also the conversation with bit Perry, I think we did

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 3>a quick temperature check on the idea and at the

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 3>conclusion I had there was that, you know, Bretton wood

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Tree is a healthy baby boy, so to speak. So

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 3>it's throwing and development rapidly. Look a couple of things.

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 3>The frame that my answer to that question is, I

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 3>think it's becoming very obvious that when you talk to

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 3>policy circles and investors in the West, I think the

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 3>primary focus is on how do we, so to speak,

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 3>de risk supply chains that are running through China. How

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 3>do we become more you know self sufficient in terms

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 3>of rare or the capital goods we need for energy,

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 3>transition ships and so.

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 4>On and support.

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.559
<v Speaker 3>And so the focus in the West is on making

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 3>sure that the real economy is decoupled from the East,

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 3>so to speak. And when you speak to market participants

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 3>and policy makers in the East, the primary focus.

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 4>There because they have all the supply chains and so

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 4>they are in control of that part of the equation.

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 3>There, the primary focus is on how do you expect

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 3>yourself from the Western financial system and how do you

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 3>de risk this relationship that you have financially with the

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 3>US dollar and Western national institutions and financial centers in general.

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 3>And I would say that since we last spoke about

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 3>this topic, there have been a number of news headlines

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, read out from state visits, what have you,

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 3>where you know things like the rendmen b invoicing of

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 3>commodities is moving ahead. We are reading about more and

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 3>more stories where natural gas deals and oil deals are

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 3>invoiced in.

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Redmond and not equest dollar.

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 3>I have not talked about this aspect of breaton Woodstree,

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 3>but I kind of uncovered the new aspect of it,

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 3>which is the whole Central Bank digital currency topic and

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 3>how all that fits into breadon wood tree. And you know,

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 3>when you start digging in that domain, I think you

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 3>uncover several things that are kind of eye opening. So

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 3>let me just offer one for example, the real economy

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 3>and real economy analog again is you know, in the US,

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 3>for example, they don't allow Huawei.

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 4>To build cell phone towers for obvious reasons.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's a risk of beevesdropping and spionage, and

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Central Bank digital currencies are basically the

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 3>same story. I have been kind of cursorially following CBDCs,

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 3>but I couldn't truly put into an overall macro picture

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 3>as to what are CBDCs about. You know, if you

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 3>think about it, China has been quite busy trying to

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 3>internationalize the rent, being it more for trade settlement purposes

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 3>since the middle of the last decades. Around twenty fifteen

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 3>is when they started, and then that process somehow stalled.

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think the reason why that process talled is

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 3>that they recognize that it's pointless to internationalize your currency

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 3>through a Western financial system, through London, through New York,

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 3>and through the balance sheets of Western finational institutions when

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 3>you basically do not control that network of institutions that

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 3>your currency is running through for you to do something

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 3>like that to basically knewed out a whole new correspondent

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 3>banking system, Okay. And so you know, this is also

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 3>the time when Russia annexed Ukraine, so the financial sanctions

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 3>became a much more dominant topic in the financial press.

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 3>So I think that was a wake up role for

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 3>China that if they want to indeed internationalized rent fee,

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 3>they need to start from scratch and they need to

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 3>build a the noblestial network that they control. And so

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 3>this is also the time when CBDC has become a

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 3>hot topic. You know, CBDCs started in China, you know

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 3>the ec and y. And the way I think about

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 3>CBDCs and developments in net space today is that you

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 3>basically need to imagine a world where five ten years

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 3>from now, we are going to have the renmnty that's

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 3>far more internationally used than today, but the settlement of

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 3>international R and B transactions are going to happen on

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 3>the balance sheets of central banks. So instead of having

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 3>a network of correspondent banks, we should be thinking about

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 3>a network of correspondent central banks and a world where

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 3>you have a number of different countries. In each of

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 3>those different countries have their banking systems using the local currency.

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 3>But when country A wants to trade the country B

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, Thailand with China, for example, the effects needs

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 3>of those two local banking systems are going to be

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 3>met by dealings between two central banks.

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 4>And so when you reimagine a.

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 3>System like this, it's basically a state the state, and

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 3>a central bank to central bank network that is completely

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 3>independent of Western financial centers and the dollar. So there's

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 3>a ton of development we can develop some time liter

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.599
<v Speaker 3>and show talk about this. So there's a ton of

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 3>development on NetFront. And also the context here is that

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 3>if you want to imagine an alternative to a dollar

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 3>based system, you know, the single most important thing that

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 3>makes the dollar so important is that ninety percent of

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 3>ethics transactions any given day in the world use the

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 3>US dollar as one leg of the transaction. Okay, So

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 3>basically that's because we inherited the system where if you

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 3>want to sell you know, if you want to settle

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 3>a transaction between someone in Hungary in Thailand, okay, the

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 3>way you will do that today is you would sell

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 3>your Hungarian for it buy.

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Euros, sell the euro and buy the dollar and sell

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 4>the US iBOT.

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 3>So that's basically three different currency pairers, three market makers,

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 3>three bid ask spreads. Incredibly inefficient. But again, if you

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 3>go back to this concept of correspondent central banks as

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 3>opposed to correspondent banks, this transaction just can settle between

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the local Bagarian banking system and the local tie banking system.

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 3>We have to do central banks as dealers of less

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 3>resorts in the FX markets.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 4>And so that that's the last piece I want to mention.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 3>In this part, which is that you know, in the

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 3>West we are talking about this dealer of less resort

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 3>thing a lot. And the context in which we talk

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 3>about dealer of less resort in the West and in

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 3>the US case specific, is that we need a dealer

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 3>of less resort for the treasury market because the treasuring

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 3>market is not liquid.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 4>That's where the focus is.

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 3>And of course we need a dealer of less resort

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 3>and the repo market and the FX pop market, but

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 3>I think it's also time to start thinking about dealers

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 3>of first resorts in terms of FX market making for

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the global East, and which is the Central Bank Salfurence,

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 3>the Central Bank correspondent system that I'm describing.

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 2>This is so interesting because I don't think i'd ever

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 2>heard anyone talk about cbdc's within the context of like

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 2>a new kind of plumbing, and you hear stuff about, Okay, well,

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's the twenty twenty first century and we

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 2>need to be able to pay our stuff on our phones,

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 2>which we already can do, or sometimes you hear about

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 2>it in the context of privacy. I've always had this

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 2>theory that CBDCs are just a way for central bankers

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to get invited to panels and yet and get really

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 2>plush jobs after they leave the central banking world, like

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 2>doing digital money for visa or something like that. So

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 2>but this is like actually sort of like an interesting

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.079
<v Speaker 2>theory before we go a little bit further down on

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 2>this road, because I want to talk more about it,

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 2>but I'm still curious about the business. You know, you're

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be going out to, you know, be independent.

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 2>What is your sort of vision for X you know pluris,

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 2>which is again I think is a really clever name,

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 2>the opposite of e plurbus union. What is your vision

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 2>for like what kind of business who it will be?

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to be who are your clients like,

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 2>talk to us a little bit about what your vision

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 2>for your your firmat.

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, thanks for coming back to that. I mean, look,

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 4>I figure you're.

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 2>Going to announce the decision, the big decision here on

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 2>odd lots happy, I like, I'm actually also just I'm

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>very curious about how this world works.

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So look, I have a lot for two streams

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 3>of publications in terms of research. The first one there

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 3>will be money, Banks and Bases. This would be the

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 3>publication that that most people kind of you know, identify

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 3>me with. So I'd be looking at the fifty largest

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 3>balan hips in the world with a lot of attention,

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 3>you know that what the big banks are up to,

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 3>what the gesips are up to, what are they doing

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 3>in their portfolios or the balanceships constraints. And it's going

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 3>to be based on a research piece about the day

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 3>to day working of the dollar system as we know

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 3>it today. And then the parallel publication will be Money

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 3>and World Order, which is going to keep track of

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 3>how Breton Bookstree is evolving because you know these topics

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 3>of the dollarization, the remodetization of gold, you know, using

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 3>central bank digital currencies to build out to knit out,

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, the novo financial system, you know, the petrol

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 3>you want, and the rending be invoicing of commodities and

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 3>created goods going forward.

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 4>I think these are basically.

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 3>The two lenses through which one should be following dollar

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 3>funding and dollar rates markets going forward, because you know,

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 3>the day to day we just have to live with,

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 3>but then we absolutely cannot lift our eyes off all

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 3>the geopolitical realities and challenges that that the dollar will

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 3>be facing. So these will be the two publications that

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 3>subscribers will get. As I said, you know, it's a

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 3>it's a price side, so you know, the target audiences

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 3>institutional investors exclusively and that and not retail investors, and

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 3>so I will be completely behind the paywall and subscribers

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 3>will be able to chat with me and the conference

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 3>calls and meetings, And that's basically the simple vision.

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I was actually going to circle back to that towards

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the ends, but since you guzumped me, let me ask

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a question that sort of squares these two thoughts, like

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the new business and the Breton Woods three vision. So

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the criticisms that we sometimes hear about, you know,

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>big bold predictions about changes in the overall financial system

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is that it's hard to actually invest money based on them.

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So I guess the question is, you know, if someone

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>hears Breton Wood's three new central bank digital currencies, four

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>x lenders of first resort, things like that, what's actionable

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>about those ideas? What is it actually mean for investors?

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it means a lot.

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 3>So Number one, I think if you are looking at

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 3>a whole new plumbing where you know, let's back up

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 3>for example, I mean we are used to thinking about

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 3>a world where there is either a dollar shortage in

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 3>some regions or dollar surplus in other regions, and then

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 3>these surfaces get recycled either in the FX swap market

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 3>or in the rate market. And you know, I think

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 3>if we end up in a world where countries are

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 3>now going to have several options, for example, as to

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 3>how they pay for commodities, and let's take oil for

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 3>an example. You know, people hold dollars many reasons. One

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 3>reason why people hold dollars is because oil it has

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 3>been historically priced in dollars. So if you are a

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 3>poor country that needs to import oil on the margin,

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 3>you need to have dollars to be able.

0:16:58.000 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 4>To do that.

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Now, if you are going to live a world where

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 3>you can pay dollars for oil, but you can also

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 3>pay rendmin b or oil. But if you are a

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 3>gold miner, you can also pay for oil to gold

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 3>like Gone for example. You know, that's basically three options

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 3>you're looking on at a screen, and so you will

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 3>just choose whichever one is cheaper. And that picture gets,

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, further complicated by the fact that there is

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 3>oil blowing west, which is one price, and oil blowing east, which.

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 4>Is another price.

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 3>So it's not just again out of one many it's

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 3>not just one price anymore, but it's a bunch of

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 3>prices and a bunch of currencies, and choose whichever works

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 3>best for you. So and also if you go into

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 3>a world where trade is not dominantly invoiced in dollars,

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 3>so people don't have to borrow dollars to import stuff

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 3>and the exporters don't earn dollars exclusively, then it's no

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 3>longer a machinery where you know the dollars are getting

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 3>created on the margin, that dollars are getting accumulated on

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the margin, and the question is how do you recycle

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the earned dollars back into funding and rates markets. So

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 3>if that world splits into you know, we are now

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 3>doing half of this in rendment B and the other

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 3>half we are doing it in dollars, then naturally, for

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 3>example the fxplop market, the landscape of the fx pop

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 3>market is going to get redrawn.

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 4>The following way.

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 3>There will be regions that used to be short dollars,

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 3>but now they are not because they can you know,

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 3>source rendmen be through the rentman b spoplanes from the PBOC,

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 3>So dollars shortages and certain regions are going to disappear.

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Then there will be regions that used to recycle dollar

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 3>surpluses into the fx splop market. You know, maybe the

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Reserve Bank of Australia putting in the fx pop market

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 3>and then you know, some Japanese investor picking those dollars

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 3>up in the fx pop market. You has their treasury portfolios,

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 3>but have you you know, if Australia ends up, you know,

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 3>earning only half as much dollars then as they used

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 3>to in the past, and the other half is now

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 3>in renomn B, then the dollar recycling is going.

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 4>To suffer as well.

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 3>So you know, the supply of dollars in fx pop

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 3>markets and the demand for dollars in the fx pop

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 3>market is going to get redrawn, and I think there

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 3>will be some regions that are going to turn that

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 3>are going to be turned on their head, you know.

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 3>So there will be positive trust currency bases that will

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 3>turn negative, and there will be negative trust currency bases

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 3>that will turn positives. So it's just one example for

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 3>example in terms of fxpops, and then in terms of

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, the rest of the world's demand for treasuries,

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 3>which is a big question again. Dollars you historically need

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 3>because you need to import a bunch of things which

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 3>have been exclusively invoiced in dollars. But if you have

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 3>a world where things are being invoiced half in dollars

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 3>and have rende, you know, that need to accumulate dollar.

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Reserves doesn't exist there.

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 3>China, I think is a very important example in this

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>regard because one reason why China has so many fex

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 3>reserves because that's kind of like your life insurance policy,

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 3>because all the commodities and foodstuffs that they need to import.

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think the big five commodities that the

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 3>import is natural gas, oil, soybeans, copper, gut knows what

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 3>else but you know, the annual bill for those imports

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 3>is running the five hundred billions, you know, so if

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 3>you don't have the dollars to pay for those, your toast.

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 4>So you have to have a lot of dollar reserves.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 3>But if you end up in a world where you

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 3>can now force commodity exporters to accept your currency for

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 3>those commodity imports and not the US dollar, you basically

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 3>have gained sovereignty from a monetary perspective, and so again

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 3>you will not have to run with as much effects reserves.

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 3>And so you know, this is going to have feedback

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 3>effect on you know, demand for treasuries in general and

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 3>on the margin. You know, things are always in the

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 3>margin devidance. So I think if these teams are going

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 3>to play out over the next five to ten years

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 3>on the margin, you know, demand for treasuries and the

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 3>recycling of dollars in the front end, then an affect

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 3>and the upgrades market, I think, is going to get

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 3>pushed around.

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Would you anticipate in you know, or do you have

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 2>some timing Like we talked about this on a recent

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 2>episode with Karthik centerund But they will see, you know,

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of countries around the world that

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 2>float dollar bonds for one reason or another. Do you

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 2>anticipate that we'll see if rinmand B internationalization continues, that

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>we will see various ems float more rinman B bonds

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 2>or would that be a crucial aspect towards a successful

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 2>internationalization of R and B.

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it can be a part of our MBA internationalization.

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, it's just the way of kind

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 3>of raising offshore R and B that's out there, and

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 3>you can either tap swaplights with the PBOC. You know,

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 3>that's a very important aspect of it. I mean, BBOC

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 3>has swap lined with way more countries than the USA

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 3>swop lines for example, So there is you know, when

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 3>you kind of look at the topography of that EBOC

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 3>spopline network and when you look at the topography of

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 3>the central banks that are actively planning to have a

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 3>CBDC or they actually have a CBDC pilot up and

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 3>running already, I mean, there's a perfect overlap.

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 3>So if you think about the swaps as the funding

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 3>angle to the RENVP that you don't have in the

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 3>system get and then if you look at the CBDC

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 3>as the kind of swapping and clearing of existing local

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 3>currencies in the system. I mean you basically have a

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 3>spot effects market and a funding market infrastructure around it.

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 3>So you know, you can internationalize the rendom be that way,

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 3>you can internet nationalize it by you know, em compries

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 3>raising r and bonds to raise term RMB liquidity. But again,

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 3>I think the most important thing here is that we

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 3>are starting to see evidence that more and more commodity

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 3>trades are being settled in rendmen b. And also over

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 3>the past year, the renminb's share of trade and ends

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 3>has increased tremendously. I think it has increased from barely

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 3>one percent to five percent in a twelve month period

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 3>and now it's at far with the euro's share of tradements.

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 3>And again, if that one twelve month period is any sign,

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, you project that five ten years out you

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 3>can have a lot of ground.

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 4>That's the rent if you can gain you know.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Sultan, you mentioned changes in structural demand for treasuries and

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you about this because this is

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>one of the I guess the last research notes that

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you wrote at Credit Swiss. I think it was in January,

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>so definitely not the final one. But you were talking

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>about at some point the Fed's going to need to

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>come in and support the treasury market once again because

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>you have all these natural buyers of bonds who are

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>starting to step away. And I think you talked about

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>potentially the FED having to restart asset purchases as soon

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>as the summer. Is that something that you still see.

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 3>On the table, Well, it's the summer. Yeah, So let's

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 3>put it this way. I mean, we have now the

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 3>offer on buyback program that's up and running. You can

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 3>find that mistake and correct yep, you're right, yeap, Okay,

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 3>so there is that, and then we had, you know,

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 3>the problems around SVP and some other banks.

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 4>So let's just put it this way.

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that when we think about these what is

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 3>the government going to have to do to step in

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 3>on the margin to calm things down? You know, I

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 3>always tell you that the answer is always the longest spectrum.

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 3>So I think we are in the ante room of something.

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 3>You know, we are dealing with illiquidity with the buybacks.

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 3>So far, so good. We have dealt with underwater bank portfolios.

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean the bank term funding program effectively your ability

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 3>to raise at you know, to value underwater bonds at

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 3>the FED at bar and raise liquidity that way if

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 3>you have to. I think that's a pretty that's a

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 3>pretty big support to market functioning.

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 4>So I think, you know, things are happening on the.

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 3>Margin, which kind of points to the FED and the

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Treasury building scaffolding around the treasury market to deal with

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 3>the illiquidity issues and this lack of marginal buyer issues

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 3>that we have been talking about.

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 3>The other point here is that you know, in the

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 3>front end there is a ton of liquidity, and so

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 3>all these issue and that the Treasury has been doing

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 3>and will be doing is going to be front and heavy,

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 3>you know. So that's another way of dealing with treasury

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 3>market functioning. I mean, you have two trillion dollars in

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 3>our fy viacility. You're just going to issue where you

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 3>can most likely soak up a lot of liquidity without

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 3>any glitches.

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 4>But again, I think this underlying issue that we are talking.

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 3>About that the world is probably going through a split

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 3>where demand for treasuries from the rest of the world

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 3>is probably not going to be what it wants was.

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be an issue and as these issues

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 3>pop up, we are going to be dealing with them

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 3>in a step by step passion. But again, I think

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 3>these illiquidity problems are present and we are dealing with

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 3>them as they pop up.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to get you know, your take further on

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 2>like some of the banks and particularly the aftermath of

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 2>SVB et cetera. But before we do, you know, going

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 2>with thinking back a year ago, this conversation or versions

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 2>of this conversation might have been much more commodity centric.

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>And obviously oil has fallen quite a little bit. There

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of stress a year ago about the

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 2>European electricity costs, which have come down significantly. Generally, there's

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 2>been a lot of easing there. But I'm curious, like,

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 2>was that just a sort of like a one time

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 2>reset in terms of maybe post pandemic shocks and of

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 2>course the invasion of Ukraine and that things are settled

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 2>or will sort of like commodity fragility, commodity volatility, anxiety

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 2>about sourcing energy be sort of a permanent or semi

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 2>permanent condition over the next several years as part of

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 2>this sort of Bretton Wood's three point zero vision.

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, you know, to be intellectually honest to ourselves

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 3>and to the listeners, yes, we did talk about you know,

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 3>commodities creating a bigger goal in you know, reserve management practices.

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 4>And whatnot, among many other teams. So I would say that.

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 3>For me, what survives that commodity aspect of the Breton

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 3>would three pieces is that I think gold is definitely

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 3>something that's coming back as a theme. I mean, just

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 3>to give you a very good example, when I saw

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 3>I think Barry Ikagreen was a co author on that paper.

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 3>The IM published a paper about gold and the title

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 3>I think was a barbarous relic no More and it

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 3>was co authored by Barry Ikongreen. So I'll hide behind

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 3>it a little bit, but I think it's noteworthy when

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 3>someone like Barry ikongreenews probably the official biographer of the dollar,

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 3>rites of paper like that, and I think we are

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 3>seeing the more and more in the data that especially

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 3>the countries that are not geopolitically aligned to the US

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 3>are shunning treasuries and shunning the dollar and they are

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 3>buying gold instead. I think there is also a number

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 3>of other headlines which I think are important to keep

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 3>an eye on because individually they might not sum up

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 3>too much. But I think in the fatality of these

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 3>things probably point a trend. You know, Ghana and Russia

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 3>basically had an oil for gold deal whereby Russia ships

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 3>oil to Ghana and Ghana pays gold for.

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 4>The oil that they receive.

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the basic idea was that a country that

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 3>has prepidy and offex reserves US dollars mostly that also

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 3>minds a lot of gold is going to pointless for

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 3>them to spend their precious dollars on oil when they

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 3>can just swap gold for oil and kind of get

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 3>their oil de band and they have you know, effects

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 3>reserves left for other stuff pharmaceuticals for example. Again, geopolitics

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 3>is at the angle here, but you know, Russia and

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Iran are establishing a special economic zone along the CASP

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 3>and c where the trade is going to be settled

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 3>in a gold act digital token. Forget which country it was,

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 3>but you know there's another gold rich African country which

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 3>is playing with this idea of a gold bag digital token. Again,

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I think these are interesting developments, but again some of

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 3>the last ones that I mentioned are probably on the fringes.

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 3>But again you know in the IMF data and in

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 3>the data Gold Council, we see this massive increase in

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 3>foreign central banks purchases of gold, so that gold aspect

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 3>definitely survives. And yes, you know, energy markets have gone

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 3>up and they have come down, but again I think

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 3>it's just hard to escape the reality that you know,

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Saudi Arabia is not exactly falling over backwards to increase

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 3>oil production, but in fact that there is this stug

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 3>of war where I think the Cran Prince has the

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 3>stic economic agenda. It needs oil prices to trade between

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred dollars a barrel for them to pull up

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 3>that quite ambitious domestic and regional and also geopolitical agenda.

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think there is a stug of war between

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 3>the oil consumers and the oil producers where you know,

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 3>things haven't really breaken out into either side, but I

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 3>think that pullback is basically given us a body language

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 3>where you know, if there's not enough demand for oil

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 3>and oil prices are falling, we need our revenue, so

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 3>we're just going to not supply such that prices don't

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 3>pull too much. So again I think the commodity shortage

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 3>and this, you know, I think the team that I

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 3>used was our commodity your problem. I think it's definitely

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 3>there in oil again, you know, Russian oil. Surprisingly, I

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 3>think it all found a way to alternative markets. So

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, tanker rates are up. You know, we talked

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 3>about this a year ago, that tanker rates being the

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 3>balance sheet for you know, the real economy balance sheet

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 3>equivalents in the oil market, and the tanker rates are

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 3>through the rule because these shadow fleets had to be

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 3>a sampled to find those pternative markets.

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 4>For Russian oil. And I think, you know, the supply

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 4>chains are probably.

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Getting more caught up in this team involving you know,

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 3>energy transition, you know, getting the lifting and all these

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 3>things that are.

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Needed for that. So I would say that the commodity

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 4>aspect is a mixed bag, except for goal.

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>That other African country I think it was Zimbabwe doing

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>all digital token So I guess make of that what

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you will.

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 5>But I wanted to go back, well, make makeup well,

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 5>I just wanted to say, you can make up that,

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 5>but you Bill and perhaps a lot of countries that

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 5>people mention on this conversation are going to be the

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 5>sanctioned countries.

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 4>Let's put it that way. But I think that's precisely

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know, these are not not.

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 3>The countries that you think about when you're talking on

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 3>the financial press about things. But I think the underlying

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 3>team here is very much one where if you look

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 3>look at this unicorn or world that we are, you know,

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 3>talking about whether it's supply chains or whether it's the

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 3>monster regimes, whether it's you know, foreign policy alignments between

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 3>East and West, you know, two great powers and a

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 3>bunch of on a life, non alive countries. I think

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 3>it's important to pull in these fringe countries because you know,

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 3>there is powering numbers and like, yeah, one country's GDP

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 3>is not much, but you know when you kind of

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 3>plump them all together and they kind of sign into

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 3>one system as opposed to another system, these things are

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 3>going to be meaningful on the market. So I think

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 3>that's why it's important to think about best case countries,

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 3>so to speak. But that's why that's why we mentioned Yeah.

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And I mean US dollar transactions I think are a

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty big thing in Zimbabwe, so you know the fact

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that they're experimenting with a new type of thing to

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>try to maybe get away from that is interesting. But

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to go back to what we saw in

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the banking system because everyone who knows your origin story,

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>probably knows that you know, started out working at the

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>New York FED. There was the famous shadow banking chart

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that you did before the financial crisis, sort of laying

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>out how this is entire system actually worked. What do

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you make of the most recent banking crisis? And I

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>know some people take issue with actually labeling a crisis.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>We can call it a banking drama or whatever. But

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is the drama over for now?

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, it feels like, let me tell you this, It

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 3>feels very different from two thousand and eight. Obviously, I

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 3>mean there it was an existential moment and you know,

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 3>the central nervous system of the global dollar system was

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 3>at risk, you know, the big banks, So the big

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 3>banks were a source of strength this time rapping. I

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 3>would say that we basically have three institutions that became

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 3>collateral damage either to crypto or the tech inclosion or

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, your inability to make to underpride you know

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 3>mortgages intelligently, so you know, signature bank is crypto related.

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 3>SPB I think is a very unique case because what

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 3>it kind of tells you is that it is important

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 3>for a bank to be diversified both in terms of

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 3>its lending portfolio and also.

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Its deposit mixed. You know, when I was following the

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 4>SVV the backle the.

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 3>Thing that came to mind for me was, I don't

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 3>know if you remember his tracy, but bear Sterns used

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 3>to have to hatch funds, which were the first hetch

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 3>funds to.

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Blow up in Yeah.

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 3>I forget what they were called, but they had I

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 3>think the bear Sterns Enhanced Leverage fund or whatever they

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.839
<v Speaker 3>were called. You know, those hedge funds were the first

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 3>ones to blow up because they had the worst assets

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 3>imaginable and they had the worst live of the structure imaginable.

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they were like really high yield structured credit

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>or something like that.

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, high yield structure credit, you know cdo so that

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 3>stuff on the asset side, you know, overnight funding, so

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 3>pickled funding.

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 3>SVB, I would say, is a case where on the

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 3>liability decide. I mean, we know who the big deposit

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the school, the clients were. They were reading about some

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 3>of them in the financial press. But basically, you know,

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.760
<v Speaker 3>if you think about the tech sector, venture capital sector,

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 3>where all the valuations have basically taken a big nose

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 3>dive after tech stocks corrected. You basically had a depositor

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 3>base that was liquidity constraints. So they basically pulled money

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 3>from one bank where a lot of tech entrepreneurs kept

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 3>their cash and so that's a liquidity drain and it

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 3>wasn't diversified on the asset side. SVB had a lot

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 3>of duration. I mean, you know, you guys know that

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 3>my bread and butter is you know, going through all

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 3>the cold reports of the biggest institutions and you know,

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, very few banks have as big a share

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 3>of their agebre a portfolio in strips stripped port respect

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 3>securities as they did. But you know, they had a

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of coupon explore, they had a lot of principal

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 3>exposure there. They had a lot of duration in these

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 3>portfolios and they didn't hedge them properly. They also had

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 3>a lending book where they were lending to the same

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 3>you know, customers that were pulling funds away from them.

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 3>But again, the collaboral on that landing book was tex related,

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 3>so you had valuation issues. So that was just kind

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 3>of a perfect storm. Systemic absolutely not, but it's hurt them.

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 3>And you know, first Republic, I mean, I have to

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 3>say I. I have a friend in New York who

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 3>once texted me when First Public was going under, saying,

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 3>I didn't realize I got such a great deal on

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 3>my mortgage that it's the end the first problem. And

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 3>I said, you know, I told him that, Well, next

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:29.399
<v Speaker 3>time you get a mortgage that's too good to be true,

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 3>you should also short the bank. Maybe the mortgage is

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.320
<v Speaker 3>going to pay it stuff up faster then you anticipate.

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 3>So so again, I think this is basically the story

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 3>of these three the three banks that got into difficulties.

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 3>The solution that the FAT crafted for some of these

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 3>licurity problems, I think they were extremely powerful. I was surprised,

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 3>even shocked when I saw the terms of the BDFP.

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 3>When I talked to my context. You know, there were

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 3>two types of responses to this BDFP program. Number one, yes,

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 3>that's the right move, because the letter and spirit of

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Basal Tree says that treasuries and Genie Maison reserves are

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:07.760
<v Speaker 3>level one assets, no haircut.

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 4>But again that assumes that you also have the brains

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 4>to hedge the interstraight exposure there.

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 3>And also, I mean, you know, you can put some

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 3>of these bonds that are underwater into a whole maturity

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.760
<v Speaker 3>portfolio where if you are sitting on huge market market losses,

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't hit your bank's activity and you don't have

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 3>to book those losses.

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 4>And it doesn't hit your capital.

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 3>But again, that assumes that your deposit base is sticky

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 3>and so you're not going to lose deposits in the

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 3>aggregate to the point where you actually have to liquidate

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 3>these underwater bonds. And you know, it was not the

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 3>case for SVV, its case for other banks like Bank

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 3>of America for example. You know, and the other response

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 3>to the BTFB is that you know this is this

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 3>should not have happened because it basically euthanizes the need

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 3>for interest rate risk management in bank portfolio. So it

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:58.439
<v Speaker 3>was a kind of a polar response. But again, what's

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 3>done is done. I think it's a part of the system.

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 3>I think the BTFB is going to be there as

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:07.240
<v Speaker 3>a standard feature of the system, much like standing people

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 3>facility and spoplanes are there. So you know, these facilities

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 3>tend to be born and slip around. But it's again

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 3>it's the part of the scaffoldings that we have. I mean, imagine,

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 3>imagine the treasury market coming under strain because some of

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 3>these banks have to meet, you know, bitterly short balls,

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 3>and then instead of pledging to the fat off market

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 3>to be at liquidity, you basically have to dump it

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 3>on the dealers. And imagine what that would have done

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 3>the treasury market. Nothing, So we just basically kept this

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 3>treasure is off the great so to speak.

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 2>When when SVB failed, there were sort of two conversations

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.800
<v Speaker 2>that sprung up right afterwards. One had to do with

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 2>like the sort of like, okay, all deposits in the

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 2>US are do we just accept that they're all implicitly

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 2>guaranteed regardless of what the formal FDI C cap is.

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 2>And then there's also a conversation about, you know, five

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 2>thousand banks in the US would which is like I think,

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 2>probably the most banked country in the world. Do we

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 2>just sort of, you know, does anything change with the

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 2>business model of banking or do we just sort of

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 2>accept that there are these contradictions and these tensions but

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 2>we sort of we don't talk about them, and we

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 2>just sort of let these issues go on and occasionally

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 2>we have to clean up a mess. But by and large,

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.760
<v Speaker 2>there's some of these structural questions about the banking system.

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 2>We just sort of kicked the can and let them persist.

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, I mean I don't think the blanket deposit

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 3>insurances in the cards, but I think again, you know,

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 3>other than the BTFB, we have this other tool, which

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 3>is the FDIC steps in between the PLAT and the

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 3>troubled institution.

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 4>And so there's a capital buffer.

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 3>So you know, it's some of the it's some of

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 3>the same playbooks in a different fashion that we have

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 3>seen in two thousand. You know that that always has

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 3>to be secure through its satisfaction that it's planting, you know,

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 3>but always wants to eliminate credit risk. And you know,

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:59.839
<v Speaker 3>the FDIC standing has it been plus a special loan

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 3>that the FAT extends. Trouble institutions serve exactly that purpose.

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:06.240
<v Speaker 3>So I think we will be dealing with whatever problems

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:08.760
<v Speaker 3>we will be dealing with on a case by case basis.

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 4>Again, I think SVB. You know, the conceptually, the problem.

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Of underwater security portfolios we kind of dealt with commercial

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:19.760
<v Speaker 3>real estate is going to be a slow burning problem.

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 3>Perry Merton likes to say a bank can be insolvent

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 3>but liquid, but it cannot be solvent, and in liquid

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, for as long as the pass don't run,

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 3>we will be able.

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 4>To deal with these issues.

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, interest on reserves is manna from heaven. You know,

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 3>it's providing banks to steady stream of interesting income. So

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 3>if you have capitalization issues, that's going to be a

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 3>back door way of kind of refilling your capital base.

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 3>You know, back during the early nineteen eighties when the

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 3>bulbul curve was in charge and we had Latin American

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 3>death crisis and Thanks for underwater and had their capital issues,

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:59.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, the FED had to generate the steep yield

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 3>curve in the system, which was a way to recapitalize

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 3>the banks, you know, with interest from deserves. You know,

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 3>that's no longer necessary, so it's actually easier. So I

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:11.839
<v Speaker 3>think the banking system is fine for now. I think

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 3>we had a scare and you know, we are definitely

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 3>going to be dealing with issues in credit portfolios. We

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 3>are going to be dealing with cr lending books. There

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 3>will be consolidation across the banking system. But there are

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 3>many levers that the that can who to help clean

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 3>things up.

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 3>JP Morgan, for example, was an institution that came in

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 3>as a healthy hand because I'd like to remind people

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 3>haven't written about as far agoing.

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 4>A long time.

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:44.399
<v Speaker 3>But you know, don't forget now, You can't thank now.

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 3>I can you know that bank is still under an

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 3>asset cap. You know, it has a ton of unused

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 3>balance sheet capacity, So you know, that's a lot of

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 3>balance sheet capacity to want chain if you need a

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 3>healthy private hand to clean up some stuff in I mean,

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 3>some of the banks that are already very big, and

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:07.879
<v Speaker 3>we're big beneficiaries of dislocations and banking crisis in recent times,

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 3>are probably not going to be able to add much

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 3>to their balance because they are already too big. But

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think Wells Fargo is another kind of

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:19.239
<v Speaker 3>case in the back pocket of the TAT that could

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 3>be pulled out if need be.

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:22.479
<v Speaker 4>So I think the system is fine.

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 3>I think we're just going to be dealing with these

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 3>microL dislocations here and there, you know, regional bank here,

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 3>regional bank there, treasury market. But again, people will be

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 3>dealing to these things. But you know the name of

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 3>the game is to anticipate this and the appropriate positions.

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, can I ask one more question, just going back

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to your sort of shadow banking origins, but the expectation

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>now seems to be that, you know, if banks maybe

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:54.919
<v Speaker 1>have to hold even more capital or maybe d lever

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in one way or another, that a lot of that

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:01.840
<v Speaker 1>activity is going to end up being pushed into shadow

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 1>banks essentially, so private equity perhaps or some sort of

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 1>non bank lender. And to some extent, this is what

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen since the two thousand and eight financial crisis

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>by design of the financial regulators. There is some concern

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that even more starts to get pushed out now and

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe if you have interest rates that remain substantially higher,

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a big hit for both corporate

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>credit and commercial real estate. Should we worry about exposure

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to those sectors in non banks.

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, because I think credit has yet to have its

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 3>threckoning and commercial real estate has yet to have its thckoning.

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 3>But again, it's better to suffer those losses in non

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 3>banks that banks, because you know, banking crises are very

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 3>nasty things. But if these losses get booked and absorbed

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 3>in balance sheets that are I don't want to say

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 3>not levered, because they all are. But you know that

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 3>leverage doesn't really have much to do with money markets.

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:10.320
<v Speaker 3>That's orders of magnitude better to deal with than dealing

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 3>with a lot of these concentrated exposures in the banking system.

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:18.240
<v Speaker 4>Regarding that shuttle banking question that you also asked, Tracy,

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 4>I think.

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Where we started this conversation that you know, world trade

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 3>trading of commodities is going to get invoiced in currencies

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:30.200
<v Speaker 3>other than just the dollar, you know, rent fee and

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 3>all these central bank digital currency market making and EFX markets,

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, migrating to the balance sheets of central banks

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 3>and instead of correspondent banks, you should be imaginating correspondent

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 3>central banks. If that pisis is true, I think over

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.600
<v Speaker 3>time that's going to provide balance sheet lead to all

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 3>the jesuves because e FX market making credit lines exclusively

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 3>provided into US dollars to oil and cover and other

0:44:57.080 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 3>commodities around. You know, that's the bread and butter to

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 3>main of JP, Morgan, Bank of American and City Bank.

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:05.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you kind of moved to this world

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 3>that I'm describing, you know, that's going to provide balangy

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:11.800
<v Speaker 3>really for the big US banks on the market. You

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 3>can use that for other things, you know, as the

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 3>shot banks are licking their wounds because they are suffering

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 3>their credit and real estate problems. You know, the banking

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 3>system is going to be potentially a source of strength

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 3>in a sense that not only do you have the

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:27.439
<v Speaker 3>capital to land, but you also have the balent sheet

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 3>to do so. I think so, I think things are

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 3>going to work themselves out. I think it's a good

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:34.720
<v Speaker 3>thing that things are happening in the shadow banking system.

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 3>The shadow banking system we are talking about today, it's

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 3>very different from the shadow banking system I have. I

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 3>didn't come up with the sexy definition of shadow banking.

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 3>That's very early who said that shadow banking is money

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 3>market funding of capital market landing. And I think the

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 3>general understanding about shadow banking these days is that anything

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 3>that happens outside of a bank that involves credit is

0:45:57.760 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 3>shadow banking.

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 4>That's not true too to me, at least, because you.

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Know, you have to have a very strong mind market component,

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:07.800
<v Speaker 3>which is what appifies things, and so that shuttle banking

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 3>is fine and if you will, you know, basically a

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of traditional bread and butter Western financial market making,

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 3>credit provisioning, financing functions migrating to the balance sheet of

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 3>central banks cbdc's different currencies. I think that's the new

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:30.400
<v Speaker 3>shuttle banking terrain that we need to be focusing that

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:32.840
<v Speaker 3>I will be focusing on, and I will be mapping

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 3>and thinking about because I think that's the frontier that's

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 3>going to drive rate some Tonic markets going forward.

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Sulton, I have one last, very tiny question,

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 2>and I'm only asking this really because I need to

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:48.320
<v Speaker 2>know it for the outro of the episode.

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to join Twitter?

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 4>I will not be doing Twitter, really, I will not

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 4>do social media. Really. Maybe we can say this at

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 4>the end. I will say the name of my website

0:46:58.719 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 4>where people can go and look.

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Wow, incredible. That's an incredible restraint. It's an incredible restraint.

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm very impressed by.

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:11.799
<v Speaker 4>Is that a good thing? I think it's a good thing.

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it would make you very scarce, but it's

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 2>an incredible restraint, So I'm impressed.

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 3>No, I will be strictly behind the payball, and probably

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:26.279
<v Speaker 3>this would be my last public appearance and then I

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 3>would just disappear.

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, this is a gift.

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 2>It was, thank you, it was it was a pleasure.

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much for having me.

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 1>All Right, well, thanks so much, Sultan, and the website,

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the new website is expluris dot h U. You should

0:47:45.600 --> 0:48:01.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely check that out, Joe. I love talking to Sultan

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>me too. That's such a treat. The quote about like

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we are in the ante room of something. I'm going

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:11.439
<v Speaker 1>to steal that, yeah, for coverage, but I thought, I mean, look,

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:13.359
<v Speaker 1>every time we talked to him, there are a number

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 1>of really interesting big picture points. The one thing I

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 1>would say is, I remember when the Breton Woods three

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 1>thesis came out last year. Yeah, there were a lot

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of people saying that this was never going to happen,

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and many of those people now have sort of tweaked

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that statement to oh, you know, it may happen, but

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>not for a long time.

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 4>You Know what I think is a.

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting point that I don't think gets discussed enough

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:41.440
<v Speaker 2>in this which I appreciated Sultan bringing up, was you know,

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 2>people look at this from a very sort of like

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 2>financial angle, or they talk about China specifically. But I

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:50.920
<v Speaker 2>liked that he brought up you know, all these other countries,

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the sort of non aligned countries, they matter to a

0:48:55.080 --> 0:48:57.800
<v Speaker 2>significant degree, particularly when added up and sort of the

0:48:58.000 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 2>politics of on theline countries who don't necessarily see the

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 2>world through the same lens as the US, or have

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the same perspective on many of these global trends. Obviously,

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 2>some of the bricks nations, et cetera, like I just

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the pure like you know, geopolitics sort of gets trotted

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:18.239
<v Speaker 2>out too much, but they're sort of like the sovereignty

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 2>and the impulses and desires of all these other countries.

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:22.359
<v Speaker 1>They really matter.

0:49:22.800 --> 0:49:25.799
<v Speaker 2>And as their wealth grows and there as their need

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 2>to grow, what they do economically and who they trade

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 2>with is going to sort of be determinative to some

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:34.839
<v Speaker 2>extent about who rises and fall.

0:49:35.120 --> 0:49:35.239
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:37.840
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I thought was really interesting was this

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:42.560
<v Speaker 1>idea of maybe outsourcing more dealer functions to the central bank. Yes,

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and if you were to do that, it could potentially

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 1>solve some of the concerns that you just outlined, but

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>also free up some balance sheet for big banks to

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:57.800
<v Speaker 1>do other types of activities, maybe more like non market

0:49:57.840 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 1>making activities, more loans like that. I hadn't really considered that.

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a really it's a really interesting point, and

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 2>no one else has really talked about that. But you know,

0:50:07.480 --> 0:50:10.040
<v Speaker 2>we do sort of live in this era in which

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of like state capitalism or state directed capitalism is

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 2>such a big thing, right, and so the extent to

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:21.399
<v Speaker 2>which central banks become bigger sort of active dealers rather

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 2>than just sort of behind the scenes supporters of private

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:27.600
<v Speaker 2>banks is something to takes seriously. And maybe there is

0:50:27.640 --> 0:50:31.400
<v Speaker 2>a context there in which the sort of the CBDC

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 2>or digital currencies could sort of have like a natural

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:35.720
<v Speaker 2>fit in that framework.

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we need a new map, Yeah we really do,

0:50:38.719 --> 0:50:41.680
<v Speaker 1>don't we. Well, maybe Sultan will publish at his new

0:50:41.760 --> 0:50:44.239
<v Speaker 1>research firm. Shall we leave it there? Let's leave it there?

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>All right? This has been another episode of the All

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Tracy Alloway.

0:50:51.520 --> 0:50:54.360
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me on Twitter

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 2>at the Stalwart. Our guest, Sultan Poster, is not on Twitter,

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:02.200
<v Speaker 2>but you should go check out his brand new website

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 2>xunopluris dot hu. I certainly will be follow our producers

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Arman and dash Ol Bennett at

0:51:11.800 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 2>dashbot and check out all of our podcasts under the

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:18.239
<v Speaker 2>handle at podcasts and for more odd Laws content, go

0:51:18.320 --> 0:51:21.759
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where we have transcripts,

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:24.800
<v Speaker 2>a blog, a new newsletter, and you can chat twenty

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:27.680
<v Speaker 2>four to seven with fellow listeners about all of these topics.

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure there's going to be a lot of discussion

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:32.840
<v Speaker 2>about this one in there on the odd Lots discord

0:51:33.000 --> 0:51:36.759
<v Speaker 2>at discord dot gg slash odd Lots. It's a lot

0:51:36.800 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 2>of fun.

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I go in there a lot and aud lots listeners.

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy these podcasts, if you like listening to

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the guests that we have on, like Sultan Posear, please

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:49.880
<v Speaker 1>go and leave us a review on any of the

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 1>big podcast platforms. If you like us, please let us know.

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much, thanks for listening

0:52:01.320 --> 0:52:01.360
<v Speaker 4>In