WEBVTT - Snortin’ College Hoops with Nancy Armour

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Good Game with Sarah Spain, where Kim Maulky

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>accidentally added us to LSU's team slack and now we

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>know their war game plan for the Sweet sixteen. Prayer Hands,

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Prayer Hands, arm Flex American Flag Basketball. It's Thursday, March

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventh, and on today's show, we'll be talking to

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>USA Today's Sports columnist Nancy Armour about everything from being

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a quote unquote national disgrace and her March madness takes,

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>to Lindsay Vaughn's return to skiing and the philosophy that

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>drives Nancy as a journalist. Plus one sport makes an

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate return to the past, and another offers a glimpse

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of the future. It's all coming up right after this

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>welcome back slices. Here's what you need to know today.

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the NWSL where our coming soon FC

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>jerseys are already out of style. The Boston expansion team's

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>new and much anticipated name was finally unveiled on Wednesday,

0:00:56.240 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the Boston Legacy Football Club Boston Legacy FC. The change

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>comes five months after public outcry about the original name

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Boston Nation FC and the too many Balls marketing campaign

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that accompanied it. In a statement, the club's controlling owner,

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Epstein said of the new name, quote, we aim

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for our values to reflect a city that breathes competition, passion,

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and pride, and to pay tribute to those who paved

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>the way before us, including the game changers who helped

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>build previous women's professional teams in Boston. End quote. The

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>club plans to unveil its crest and full branding this summer.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>My opinion, Legacy's kind of underwhelming. It doesn't feel specific

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to Boston or the area really at all. But I

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of do like the idea of fans yelling let's

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>go Legs. I don't know, just has like a nice

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>rig to it. And I assume that the name has

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to do with creating a legacy for pro women's soccer

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in the town, or maybe a bit of a hat

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>tip to the legacy that began with the Boston Breakers.

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Legacy is a nice sentiment, and in

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the end, we know the name is usually the biggest

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>thing when it's announced, and then isn't all that important

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>once the games begin. So I guess I'll just say

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Legacy better than Boss Nation, not offensive at all, which

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is a great start, and I guess let's get to

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the soccer, because I can't imagine a team more ready

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to get on the field and have actual games to

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about than the Boston Folks to the PWHL. You

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>may recall that in yesterday's interview with hockey writer Hailey

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Salve and she said that pretty much every PWHL team

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>was still in the running for this year's Walter Cup, except,

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, for the sixth place New York Sirens. Well,

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the Sirens' ears must have been ringing because on Tuesday

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>night they were losing three nothing to the Ottawa Charge

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>midway through the second period, but scored six, yes, six

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>unanswered goals in the third to win it six to three.

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>What those six goals broke the PWHL record for most

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>goals in a single period by a full two goals.

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>The previous record was four. So I guess what they're

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>saying is, don't count us out just yet. To track

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and field. On Tuesday, World Athletics president seb Co announced

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that the organization is planning to reintroduce gender verification testing

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to maintain quote the integrity of the competition

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>end quote. If the new policy is implemented, competitors in

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the women's category will be required to do a chromosome

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>test using a dry blood spot sample or a cheek swab,

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and any athlete with a Y chromosome will be barred

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>from competing unless they can show that they are quote

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>completely insensitive to androgens end quote. Now it's worth noting

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that World Athletics already has a near blanket ban on

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>transgender women competing in the women's category, so this new

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>policy is especially targeted at cisgender women with differences of

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>sexual development AKADSDS. Gender verification tests aren't new in women's sports.

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, policies like the one World Athletics plans to

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>reintroduce were the norm until the nineteen nineties, when they

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>were abandoned after decades of athletes complaining about their invasiveness

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and scientific research showing their flaws and drawbacks. Now, if

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you haven't heard it already, listen to the podcast Tested.

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a six part series on the history of sex

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>testing in sports that will offer a lot of context

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and facts about this decision from World Athletics. We spoke

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>with the quarter of the Tested series, Rose Evelyth, last

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>summer on this show they wrote on Blue Sky of

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the return to this chromosome based policy. Quote, World Athletics

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is going back to mandatory sex testing for all women.

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>This is something that was done for years but abandoned

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen nineties because it was invasive, discriminatory, and

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>also useless. They continued, quote, some estimates suggest that one

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 1>in five hundred women would test positive for a Y

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.799
<v Speaker 1>chromosome end quote. We'll link to both the Tested series

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and our interview with Rose in the show notes. Tavibs

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in Love Pro Volleyball. The two top teams in the

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>league meet tonight, with number one Atlanta traveling to number

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>two Houston. We're in the final two weeks of the

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>regular season, and while all six teams will qualify for

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, Atlanta and Houston have been so good this

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>season that this could be an early preview of what

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to expect in the finals. That match tips at eight

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern tonight. Will link to the full Love schedule

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in the show notes. We got to take a quick break.

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>When we come back. It's Nancy Armor joining us now.

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>She's been a sports columnist for USA Today since twenty fourteen.

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Previously spent twenty years with the Associated Press and has

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>covered every Olympics since nineteen ninety six. She grew up

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a Packers fan and went to Marquette University in Milwaukee,

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>but smartly came south to the greatest city in the world, Chicago,

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and she's never left. Meghan Kelly called her a goddamn

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>national disgrace. It's Nancy Armor, Hi, Nancy.

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Sarah, how are you.

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty good, real quick on that. Megan Kelly thing

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>as someone who has myself faced the wrath of the

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>right wing news programs, and also very disappointing when you

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>learn about it, because someone's like, my dad saw you

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>on Fox News and you're like, oh, that's too bad

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>for you. How did you react or feel when Meghan

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and Greg Guttfeld and others sort of sicked their

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>viewers on you for the column that you wrote about

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Don Staley and her support of transparticipation in sport.

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I consider it a badge of honor. You know,

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 2>if I'm pissing them off, I must be doing something right.

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of how I look at it. But yeah,

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 2>it is always weird that when somebody tells me that

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>or oh, I was watching Fox News and I'm like,

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 2>oh god, no, please, right, yeah, I And I mean

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 2>you know this, you get it all the time. I'm

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 2>still caring. You know, there are days that it depends

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 2>upon how much coffee I've had or whatever, but I

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 2>mostly just don't care because I and this is going

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to sound arrogant, and I don't mean it too, but

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 2>I know that I am on the right side of

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 2>history and issues like that, and it shocks me and

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 2>enrages me that we haven't caught up to the rights

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 2>of that right side of history yet, but I know

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 2>we eventually will. So I am perfectly okay with taking

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 2>up my positions on that. And if you know, the

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Megan Kelly's of the world don't like it, I don't

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 2>much care.

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I actually completely agree, And when I ended up in

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that sort of like washing machine of garbage, I felt

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>very strongly about my opinion in my perspective. But also

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it still sucks when you have like thousands or hundreds

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of people in your men cheese being terrible. So I'm

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>sorry for that and also agree with you. You're on

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the right side of things, and it is a bit

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of a badge of honor. I want to talk about

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>this women's NCAA basketball tournament. But first you just got

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>back or you still are there covering downhill skiing. Yes,

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>very big weekend for a big name. You got to

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>see forty year old Lindsay Vaughn take silver in the

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Super G at the World Cup Finals in Sun Valley,

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>just four months after coming out of retirement. There were

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of emotions from her, can you take us there?

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And what you saw on herd?

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so she was and all the skiers were a

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit disappointed because the downhill on Saturday was canceled.

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 2>They had gotten roughly six inches of snow here in

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 2>sun Valley overnight and then winds kicked up, and you

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 2>know anything about downhill skiing, you don't want to be

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 2>having people going sixty seventy eighty miles an hour and

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 2>going over jumps when there's like a gust of wind blowing.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 2>That would not be safe for anybody. So Lindsay's last

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 2>race was the Super G on Sunday and she started

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 2>low in the order, which if it's better to be

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 2>starting the higher up, those are tending to be the

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 2>you know where the track is the best, you know

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 2>before it gets broken down, And she just crushed it.

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 2>She she had that fine line of being super aggressive

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>but just being on the very edge of being out

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 2>of control, but she wasn't out of control. And when

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 2>she crossed the finish line, like when people, you know,

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 2>because the stands are the fans are watching on the

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 2>big screens, and the roar that went up when she

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 2>crossed the finish line was just like, I'm getting goosebumps

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 2>now thinking about it. Yeah, and she was so thrilled.

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, it's a she's forty years old,

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 2>oldest woman by a long time to win a World

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Cup medal, World Cup Finals well yeah, Wold Cup medal

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 2>and World Cup Finals medal. It was her first podium

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 2>appearance since in a World Cup since twenty eighteen World

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Championships twenty nineteen. And she's also been dealing with you know,

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 2>she was retired for five years, and she's been dealing

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 2>with some people who when she came back, were saying,

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 2>why are you doing this, you know, questioning hermotives, saying, oh,

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 2>there's no way you can do this. So there was,

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 2>as she said, there was relief. It wasn't that she

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 2>ever doubted herself, but it was really satisfactory. To be

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 2>able to shot the people who did doubt her up.

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You wrote a great column about it's not just about Lindsay,

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>but every other female athlete that we don't even know

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>what they can do and how long they can do

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it for. And the science is behind and the resources

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are behind. But as we are helping fuel and serve

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and heal female athletes later in life, they are getting

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>more opportunities to prove that our limitations were probably artificial

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for a while. And she's just the latest example. It's

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a great story. Everyone to check it out. Also, you

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote about an up and comer that we should keep

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 1>an eye on Lauren Masuga, someone we should know ahead

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of next year's Olympics.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Probably, yes, very much so. She and her sisters. Lauren

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 2>is she's hilarious personally, but she is a really good skier.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 2>She's just twenty two. She won the Super G in

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Saint Anton earlier this year. She made a downhill podium

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 2>in the World Cup. She made the Super G podium

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 2>at the World Championships. She's really become a factor And

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 2>as of right now, there's there's one more race on Thursday,

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 2>but as of right now, she is the top American

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 2>woman in the down in the overall standings, which is

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, we haven't seen that the last couple of years.

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>It's always, you know, it was either Mikayla Shiffern or

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 2>it was Lindsay Vaughn. And now we've got somebody new.

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>And because of missing a bunch of events because of

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the injury and whatnot. But still, yeah, all that being said, yeah,

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>something to keep an eye on for sure.

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And she's got a great story.

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 3>She is.

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 2>She's got two sisters. One sister is a mogul skier,

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 2>one sister is a ski jumper, and each one of

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 2>them is on their national team. So you could have

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 2>three sisters at the Olympics next year. It's it's crazy. Yeah,

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 2>it's a wonderful story.

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk coops because you're joining us. About

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a year after Caitlin Clark and the Clark angel Reese

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>rivalry helped women's basketball break countless viewing records and breakthrough

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>onto the big debate shows, which sort of changed where

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it sits in the sports landscape, you wrote about how

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the enthusiasm hasn't left the college game just because Caitlin

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>has What are we seeing? One year later in terms

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of some of the numbers and also excitement.

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well we've seen you know, big ratings. Again, it

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 2>used to be like I remember last year, in the

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>year before, when a women's basketball game would get a

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 2>million viewers, it was like, oh my god, that's you know,

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>that's just huge. You know, this year there were a

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 2>ton of them.

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>At least half a dozen, you said, by yeah, just

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in the regular season.

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know, we've seen it more in conference championships.

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 2>In the tournaments. Clark might have been the gateway for

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 2>some people to come in, but once they got here,

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>they realized like, oh, there are great other players, you know,

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 2>whether it's ju Ju, whether it's Paige, whether it's malaysa

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 2>full Wiley, Like, you know, people realize that this that

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>the game is actually really darn good. And so I

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 2>think we've seen that carry over in the regular season,

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 2>and corporate sponsors and people with money have realized that, oh,

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's I don't want to say that there's

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 2>necessarily that men's sports has hit a ceiling, but there's

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot less room for growth than there is in

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 2>the women's game. And people who know a lot about

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 2>sponsorships and advertising half recognize that that, hey, if we

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 2>want to make some money, this is a real growth

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for us, And so they're putting money into women's sports,

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 2>which is terrific to see.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want to get to some of the spots

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing and what we can expect during the

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>rest of this tournament. But you've now introduced yet another

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>term for Kaitlin Clark. You said she might be a doorway,

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>a gateway, So I'm going to go gateway drug, gateway

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>drug to start, just like snorting all of women's college

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>basketball and other sports. I usually call her the match

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for the bonfire. It was already built, but then you

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>needed that little match to really set it a blaze.

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'm going I like gateway drug. Like gateway drug.

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>That's good. Let's talk about that. You mentioned the average

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>price for a thirty second spot in the story that

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you wrote for this year's women's NCAA Championship game has

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>more than doubled from last spring, going for about four

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty thousand dollars, according to Sports Business Journal.

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So how important is it for the business and the

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>sponsorship side to sort of lead the way so that

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 1>they can convince late adopters in front offices, media outlets,

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise that women's sports is a massive economic opportunity.

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 2>It's huge, and I think when we have the sponsors,

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 2>or when you have the people with the money at stake,

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 2>when they've invested, when they have gotten involved, there is

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 2>no going back. Because we saw in the late nineties

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 2>early two thousands, we saw big numbers, whether it was

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the WNBA or whether it was a college game, and

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 2>then there was a backslide. And we can discuss all

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons why, but when you have these people

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 2>who are investing, they're not going to let this backslide

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 2>because they have too much money invested. Now there's too

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 2>much riding on this. So I think it's huge that

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, the game itself has gotten better, We've seen

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 2>that in the tournament itself, especially at the upper levels,

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>but the fact that there's you know, we're seeing commercials

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 2>with page and juju. This is mainstream. And so now

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 2>that there is a foothold in mainstream conversations or that

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 2>that women's sports are part of the mainstream sports culture,

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>it's really hard to say, Okay, we're going to go

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 2>back to where we were five and seven years ago.

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 2>It's you know that that ship thankfully has sailed, and

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 2>it's just you know, are we going to see the

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 2>rocket fuel growth that we have the last couple of years.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Probably not, But are we going to see steady and

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 2>sustain growth. Absolutely?

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. We do need to not expect every year to

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to say and we broke another record, and

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we broke it down the record because eventually I need

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to just be sustained in positive growth. But it can

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>go backwards, and if it does, it's usually because of intention.

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>What we often do is act like it's a natural

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>response to the product, but usually someone with a big

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>amount of power is the one impacting that backslide. And

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I know I talked to you for an article you

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>wrote a couple months ago, and as we were talking,

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you were getting ready to talk to Mark Shapiro, who

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>was in programming, uh in charge of programming for ESPN.

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>When they buried the WNBA and ESPN two, it was

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>averaging over a million and a half plus households on

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, each of its first three seasons before that move.

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>What did you tell you about that? Because I think

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that's worth talking about too, is are we is there

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>potential for that to happen again, if someone in charge

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>decides that they want to bury it.

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 2>I'll take the second part first. I don't think so,

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 2>because I think we have seen enough. I think there

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 2>is there are enough data points, there's enough demand now

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 2>from viewers and from from from people to realize that, hey,

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 2>this is worthwhile programming. This is going to get ratings

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 2>as long as we've promoted, as long as we give it,

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, put it in the right spots. It is,

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 2>it is worthy.

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Shapiro, I think has I don't necessarily want to say

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 2>he's come to see the error of his ways, but

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 2>he says that he was brought in to fix ESPN's

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 2>ratings and he didn't want to air anything that was

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>going to be a potential drag on the ratings, which

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 2>that's chicken or the egg. You know, where were you

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 2>putting women's basketball. You were putting it on ESPN two.

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 2>You were putting it at weird times, like you know,

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 2>of course you weren't going to draw as well when

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 2>you're doing that. If you had given it the time slots,

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 2>if you had given it the promotion that NBC had

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 2>those first few seasons, I think it would have been

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 2>a different story. Now, does he not like women's basketball?

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 2>He says, no, that you know that he's a big fan. Yeah,

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 2>he's actually an iowagrad. So he's a huge Caitlin Clark fan.

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>He you know.

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 2>He says it was all about ratings. I am am

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 2>not wanting to have a drag on ESPN ratings.

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And quality of play, he said, I remember, Yeah, the

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>quality of play wasn't ready for ESPN, which is interesting

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>for a network that will air Little League World Series

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and other things. And also I think when you go

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>back and watch, yes, absolutely, the talent has improved. When

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you go back and watch like Tisha Pennicero and Cheryl

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Swoops and these players from the early years, there was

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a ton of talent. There's just not that well produced

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as far as like game production and and game entertainment opportunities,

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and it just didn't look as high value when you

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>were watching it. But the play wasn't the problem.

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 2>No, I agree with that. And if the play had

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 2>been the problem, then you could say, well, then why

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 2>was NBC getting the ratings that they were. So it's

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, any excuse, and I'll use the word excuse,

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 2>any excuse that you can give for doing it. There

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 2>is a very easy rebuttal for it.

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So this is the first time ever that women's

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>teams that advance in the tournament will earn their schools

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and conference money quote unquote units. We've talked about these

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on the show before, but can you talk about how

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that change, even with a much smaller pool of money

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>than the men's side, will affect the future of women's

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>programs and investments across the space.

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. First of all, can we just talk about the

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 2>fact it is twenty freaking twenty five and women are

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 2>finally getting paid for me in the tournament?

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I agreed, But also at this point, when I say

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.479
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty twenty five, it's actually like all bets are off, like,

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>well that it used to be like this is the

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>year whatever, so we should be No, at this point,

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like what the is going on pretty much all

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>the time in twenty twenty five. But agreed that it

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>should not have taken this long.

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that's true. You know, this is this is monumental.

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 2>The basic explanation or why units are important. Schools that

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 2>make the tournament, they earn money for their conferences. The

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>money goes to the conference. The conference then doles it

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 2>out to the schools. It's very similar to what what

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 2>they do with the with football and the bol you

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 2>know the Bowls series that there's a there's a pot

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 2>and then it goes out to the different conferences and

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 2>trickles down to the schools. That money is significant because

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 2>that's what you put back into your program. That is

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 2>what you can use to improve facilities. That is what

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 2>you you can use to go to the tournament in

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 2>the Bahamas or a tournament why where you are going

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 2>to get better competition in the non conference season. That

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 2>is money that you can spend to upgrade your coaching staff,

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 2>or add a dedicated nutritionist, or expand your coach at

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 2>your pool of assistance, all of these things which are

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 2>these are building blocks. So you know, you do that,

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 2>your team gets better. You know, that means that you

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 2>win more games, which means you get more money, which

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 2>means you can do this. It's it's the it's the

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 2>foundation that men's teams have always had and that is

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 2>part of the reason that they've had the growth that

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 2>they've had. You know, it's the same thing as we've

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 2>seen with any other women's sports, like with soccer, if

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 2>you don't put money into your product, you can't expect

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to get the best product, as you know,

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 2>the best result, right, So this is to me, this

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 2>is huge. Again, it's not the same pool of money

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 2>as the men are getting. It's it's not any We're close,

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 2>but it's a start, and it's I think we are

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 2>going to see the dividends fairly quickly.

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's to be an impact from Juju

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Watkins's injury on interest in this year's Sweet Sixteen and

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>going forward? I know it's heartbreaking.

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm so. I mean, I'm sad for her because she's

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 2>such an amazing player, but yeah, I'm sad for the

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 2>tournament and I'm sad for women's basketball because Juju is

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 2>she might not be quite at Caitlin Clark's level, but

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 2>she is darn close. I mean, I can't tell you

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the number of guys, especially teenage boys that I talked

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 2>to who loved Juju. They just think that they love

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the way she they love her game. They just they

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:24.959
<v Speaker 2>they're mesmerized by her. So yeah, it is a bummer.

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 2>It's I don't know how much the tournament is going

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 2>to take a hit because the committee was stupid and

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 2>put USC in Yukon in the Elite eight. So it's

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 2>not like we're you know, and I don't know that.

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know a whole lot of people can be

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Ukon at this point, So I don't know that USC

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 2>would have gotten to the final four anyway with Juju.

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>But we do lose out on that matchup, which was

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a ratings bonanza and so much fun.

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, you know, the and this is I hate to

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 2>say this, but we will be talking about Juju the

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 2>rest of the tournament with the what ifs, you know,

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 2>if USC loses two K state, which I don't see

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 2>that happening either, but you know, what would it what

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 2>would have happened if Judu had been here. So she'll

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 2>still be in the conversations, but it's not going to

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 2>be nearly the rock would have been.

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I might actually cry if she's sitting

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on the bench with a gentleman god knee brace watching

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>her team, I think I might actually cry.

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm going to be in Spokane, so like

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 2>if you see somebody leaping at court side, that would

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 2>be me.

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, we'll be sort of take a screen grab

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and then circle you and post it everywhere. Nancy, you've

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>been writing about sports for decades. I wonder how you've

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>seen the folks in charge of the places at which

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>you've worked changed their approach to women's sports coverage.

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think we're covering it now, first of all,

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 2>And I have been very fortunate in that I have

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 2>almost always had a female sports etter, like my boss

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 2>is almost Yeah, that's unusual. It's super unusual, and I

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 2>didn't realize like how good I had it. I started

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 2>with the AP and the sports editor for a long

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>time was Terry Taylor, and so there was never any

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, any kind of oh, you can't do this,

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 2>because the person running our entire department was a woman.

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>So there was never any kind of that, you know,

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 2>some of the crap that my colleagues got at their places.

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 2>And then when I moved to USA Today, Mary Byrne

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 2>was my first editor, and Roxanna Scott is our editor now. Actually,

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 2>our entire leadership team is female in USA Today Sports,

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 2>which is tremendous. So you know, from that perspective, that

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 2>hasn't changed for me. But I think the emphasis and

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the recognition that we need to cover women's sports, not

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 2>just not because we should, but because they are sports

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and we need to cover them and use that word,

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 2>that connective tissue. We need to write about the transactions,

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 2>We need to write about the fact that, you know,

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Cody McMahon went into the transfer portal today as opposed

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 2>to just doing you know, great features, which there's a

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 2>place for those, but we need to treat on the sport. Yeah, exactly.

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's where I've seen the biggest change.

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, you mentioned earlier, Caitlin being this gateway and

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>changing the way that people see the larger sports world

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>as women's sports and particularly women's basketball as a part

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of sports. And I feel like I've been during my

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>time at ESPN, I had this view of radio, podcasts, television, writing,

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 1>even producing, and at each turn I would see how

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>different decision makers and gatekeepers scanned the news for what

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>would go in that show, What do we want to

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:34.239
<v Speaker 1>talk about on Around the Horn, what do we want

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to talk about on my nightly national radio show, my podcast,

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>everything else? And I feel like Caitlin was the gateway

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>drug where they had to start scanning for Caitlin news,

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>which meant NCAA Basketball News, which then meant WNBA News,

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>which now has sort of opened the door ajar for

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe NWSL and other things too, because instead of just

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>saying what's happening in the four major men's pro sports,

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>they now think what's happening in this larger group of things.

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>People are interested in it and demanding. I think we

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>silo sports on this show, women's sports for a reason

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and for a purpose. But I hope eventually everyone will

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>just talk about sports. What do you think is still

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>getting in the way of us being able to just

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>say sports and everyone knows that that could be women's,

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>men's whatever's the news of the day.

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's just time. I hope that it's

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 2>just time that, you know, we're seeing people when they

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 2>talk about the NCAA tournament, we're talking about the whole thing.

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, we could be talking about pagebackers, we could

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 2>be talking about Cooper Flag.

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just and just Cooper Flag because that

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>is the only name of a men's college basketball player I.

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Know, Okay, good one, same, the only one.

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know a single other name.

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 2>And you know what, there were plenty of people who

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 2>before the tournament started felt that exact same or thought

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 2>that exact same thing, like Cooper Flag, Yes, got that one.

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 2>The rest of them, man, I don't know. So yeah,

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just you know, stars help, big names help.

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 2>And so the fact that we have had this gift

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 2>with going from Caitlin Clark then to Pagebackers, to Juju,

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 2>to Hannah Hidalgo and Olivia Miles. You know, we've we've

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 2>had this line of stars and then you know in

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 2>the w n b A You've got Fee, You've got Stewie,

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 2>You've got you know, Angel, you have all of the people.

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think that as you know, as that pool

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 2>of stars, as they get more recognized in the in

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 2>like the public domain, whether that's through commercials or appearances places,

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's going to tear down whatever boundaries

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 2>continue to exist, at least I hope.

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah, I agree. The last decade has seen a

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty drastic shift in standards and expectations when it comes

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to the behavior of the leader of our country and

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>other politicians of the media. And I wonder, you know,

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you write a lot about the intersection of sports and

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>social issues. Have you seen or felt a difference in

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>how you're writing has been assigned, edited, or received, depending

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>on who's at the helm.

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 2>No, And that is one thing that I have been

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 2>very fortunate. I've never been told to write something, and

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 2>just as importantly, I've never been told not to write something. Now,

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 2>if I am writing, especially these days, something about the

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 2>president and you know, him turning his little interview during

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 2>the National Football Championship game into a campaign spot, do

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 2>my editors take a closer look at it? Does it

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 2>get maybe a second or third read? Of course, But

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm okay with that. But no one is saying, oh,

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 2>you can't write that, or we just had somebody write that,

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 2>so you can't write that. I mean, there's there is

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.719
<v Speaker 2>none of that. There is a you know, yeah, if

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 2>you want to take on tough issues, if you want

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 2>to take on tough topics, go for it. Just we'll

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 2>just make sure that you know every I is dotted

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 2>in there, every T is crossed.

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>We recently have this hockey writer from the Athletic Kaylee Salviannon.

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>She's one of the few like major women Talkeey writers,

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about how she has to be thoughtful

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>about her coverage because her impact is outsized as one

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of the few go to voices in the space, And

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how you think your role has a columnist

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>on women's sports has changed as the women's sports space

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>has changed. How much do you have to be aware

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of how what you say, or your reporting or your

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>journalism is impacted by the space in which it lives.

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how much I think about that because

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I never really want to think about the potential impact,

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 2>because I don't want to make myself pull back or

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, think twice about saying something for fear of

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 2>either pissing somebody off or you know it. Obviously, if

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be causing harm, that's a completely different story.

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 2>But I don't want to. I'm not going to. I'm

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 2>not going to not take a tough stance because I

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 2>worry that it might damage the women's game or you know,

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 2>a women's sport or a female athlete. And to me,

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 2>that's hopefully aside of the growth of the game that

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I write the same way about women's athletes, women's teams,

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 2>women's leagues as I do and have written about men,

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 2>and I think we should. I think that's the way

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 2>that we should be handling it. So I tend not

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 2>to think about those types of things. Again, like if

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 2>it's the potential to do harm, that is a completely

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 2>different conversation.

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 1>But just right, I think that's where we're kind of

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.239
<v Speaker 1>in a sticky spot right now, because agreed, yes, we

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>need to get past the cheerleader phase and be able

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:36.919
<v Speaker 1>to be honest and critical because that's a space that

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>sports needs. And also, to your point, if there is

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>harm caused because of an misunderstanding about the space or

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the nuance that's required to work in it, it is

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>different than men's sports, where, for instance, the safety of

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>women athletes, they have less money for security, or there's

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>more intersectional issues around race, gender identity, sexuality in the

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>way in space, So if you're not aware of those

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>when you're asking questions or setting up interviews, you might

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially cause harm to your point, So yeah, it's like this,

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>just the more people have been in the space and

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.719
<v Speaker 1>know it, the better usually because usually they're coming to

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it with an understanding. Versus if you parachute in for

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.479
<v Speaker 1>your one story and you don't know how it works,

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it can be sometimes insulting to the athletes. I know.

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Sue Bird has talked about how our interviews are sometimes

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>just the same four pop points off our Wikipedia, and

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>she can just tell immediately, oh good, thank you for reading.

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>And here comes the question about something wacky in there

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that everybody thinks they're the only one to ask me about. Yeah,

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated. I mean, you know, we've had other journalists

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in here that I think their approach of everything should

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>be the same as the men's game can be harmful,

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and so it's it's how do I make sure I'm

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>being fair and critical without making a space that's already

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>subject to so much toxicity even more poisoned.

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I I do this. I've done this

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 2>since the beginning of my career in sports. Is I

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of go into it assuming that I don't know

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>much because like, for example, I never played football, and

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 2>so when I started covering Notre Dame, which was my

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 2>first like full time beat, there were a lot of

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 2>things obviously that I didn't know. So I asked a

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of questions and things that never made it into print.

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 2>If they weren't questions from an interview perspective, they were

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 2>a hey, help me understand this, or what am I

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 2>not seeing? Or how should I be looking at that?

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 2>And I've kind of you. I've kind of carried that

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 2>forward with the rest throughout the rest of my career.

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 2>So especially because I do cover a lot of different things,

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 2>so I might not be necessarily parachuting in, but I'm

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 2>not in that space day to day, so I make

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 2>sure to ask people like, Hey, what do you know

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 2>about this person? Or what should I know when I'm

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 2>covering this or about this? Or I didn't know about that?

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Can you explain that to me? So I'm in addition

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 2>to being a sports junkie, I'm just like an information jockie.

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I want to know all of the things. So I've

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 2>always kind of operated that way, and I think that's

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 2>a really I think that's an important thing with covering

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 2>women's sports, because you're right, you can do there is

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 2>the potential for harm unintentionally, right, but you need to

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 2>be aware of that.

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So of course, part of that is just being willing

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to learn and evolve. And I when I was starting

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in the business, I would hear someone say that they

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>had twenty years experience, and I would be jealous. I'd

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.479
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh my gosh, they're insight, They're acclaim all

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the things they've done and now that I have about

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty years experience, I realize that immediately signals to people

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that I'm of a certain age. Right, oh, twenty years Okay,

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Well you have reached thirty years experience, and I wonder

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>if you check in with yourself to be sure you're

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>evolving with the times, applying the knowledge you've gained, while

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:50.959
<v Speaker 1>still staying open to what it is you don't know.

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, you have to, because it's you know, avolve

0:31:55.800 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 2>or by basically whether it is using technology or keeping

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 2>up with what is currents in popular culture, all of

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 2>those things. It part of it is you don't want

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 2>to look like a dinosaur. But also you need to

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 2>meet the people that you're covering where they live. And

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 2>in sports, we're mostly covering people who are in their

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 2>teams or twenties or thirties, some forties, but most people

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 2>who are much younger, and you need to have an

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 2>understanding of who they are, the challenges that they're facing,

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 2>what is important to them, what things they might you know,

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 2>think are important that maybe my generation doesn't. You have

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 2>to at least have an awareness of all that I think,

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 2>and not to say that you know it makes you

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 2>buddies with them or anything like that, because that's not

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 2>a thing anyway, or that's not what you should be

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.239
<v Speaker 2>going for anyway, but to have an understanding so that

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 2>you can you can go in with a base knowledge

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 2>and someone have a respect for where these these people

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 2>might be coming from at this age or where they

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 2>are in their life.

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree that connection that comes from at least

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to get on their level. In some way. I

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>do struggle because I don't want to spend even more

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>time on social media. I don't want to be on

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>TikTok all day so that I can know what trend

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, but I do. I'm like, I want to

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>know why they're doing that, so I don't say something

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>dumb around these younger athletes, but also like I have

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>shit to do. I don't have time to pay attention

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to that. You know, your bio at USA Today reads

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in part I definitely know I don't have all the answers,

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but I'm always looking for more of them, And that

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>seems to me at the heart of most great journalists,

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>both curiosity and a desire to learn more, but a

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>desire to learn, evolve and get answers, even if you

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>know they might change. So I wonder about questions and answers.

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>If you can think of a question you've changed your

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>answer to as a result of research or time or experience.

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 2>A question that I answered differently now because you can

0:33:54.920 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 2>see the impact is why why does it matter that,

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 2>particularly in women's sports, that so many of the coaches

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 2>are male? What is what's the reasoning for that? And

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I think originally I would have I looked at it

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 2>as you want to have a coach who can relate

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 2>to their athletes. And obviously, and you know, not to

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 2>say that that's goingted to be the case for everybody,

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 2>but a female coach is probably going to be able

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 2>to relate to female athletes a little bit better because

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 2>they have experienced some of the same things. But I

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 2>think now I look at it more of you know,

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 2>like when Muffatt MacGraw went off on her you know

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 2>thing about not hiring male coaches at the Final Four

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 2>a few years ago. It really made me made me

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 2>think about it and look at if we are not

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 2>in we meaning like the coaching people, If if the

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 2>younger generation, if the next generation is not being trained,

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 2>is not being you know, put in place to succeed

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 2>that that has a detrimental effect in a number of

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 2>different areas. You know, Mikayla Schiffrin two years ago said specifically,

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 2>I am hiring a woman coach, a female coach, because

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 2>we need to have more women coaches in skiing, and

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:22.439
<v Speaker 2>hopefully this will, you know, inspire other people to hire

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 2>women coaches or inspire other women to get into coaching.

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 2>And so I think the way that I look at

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 2>the importance of having women coaches in women's sports has

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 2>has changed or has expanded from what I would have

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:36.879
<v Speaker 2>initially thought.

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. I think also I used to push

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>back on statements like muffets about over corrections sometimes because

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I would think it was about fairness, and fairness would

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>be whoever the best person for the job is, and

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't even decide in advance by gender, because then

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not the way we want them. To look at

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it in reverse, when you're looking at women for predominantly

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>male jobs, or even something like you know Ruth bay

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Ginsburg saying like how many women on the Supreme Court

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is enough? And she's like all of them?

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>There were there were these things that felt extreme to me,

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a joke that you know, everybody

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 1>gets more conservative as they get older, except for progressive

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>women who just become more and more radicalized. And I'm

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely like living that because now I'm at the

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>point where, like all of this overcorrect until we die,

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>because at this point it's not working to be fair

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and equal when we know that one half of not

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>one half of the population, not all men hashtag, but

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that there is a massive part of the population that

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 1>would push back on anything that changes the status quo.

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 1>And it is as much an agenda to want things

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>to say the same as it is an agenda to

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 1>want them to change. But we get demonized for desiring

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>change way more than people get demonized for wanting them

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to stay the same. And so at this point we

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>do kind of have to just start over correcting like

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>mad in order to try to get to a space

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>not only where there's a better equality of representation, but

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to your point where young people growing up see it,

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.879
<v Speaker 1>and then it becomes the norm without needing to overcorrect,

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's established as something that is more all Right,

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I just went on a rant. Sorry, I've been thinking

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 1>about that lately.

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 2>No, I totally agree with you, and I think there's

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 2>so much power. Like I went to Kansas City last

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 2>year for the first game in the current stadium, which

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 2>again twenty twenty four, and it's the first time we

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 2>have a purpose built stadium for women's sports, Like that's

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.800
<v Speaker 2>just absurd. But the current had a player who I

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 2>think she was sixteen at the time or had maybe

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 2>just turned seventeen. It was her first NWSL game and

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 2>she will never know a time in her career where

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 2>there was not at least one stadium built specifically for

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 2>a women's team, and that that might not sound like

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 2>a huge deal, but it is. Like and when we

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 2>were talking before about not being able to backslide, things

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.399
<v Speaker 2>like that matter. There are stakes in the ground. There

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 2>is concrete that has been over that you cannot you know,

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 2>you can't just knock that down, or you can, but

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be freaking expensive, right, And that's how you

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 2>get changed when you have things like that. And I

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 2>think it's yeah, so if we don't over correct it,

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.760
<v Speaker 2>if we don't make this an emphasis, we're never ever

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 2>going to get permanent change, or we might get it

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 2>for a year or two and then it could backside.

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I'm right there with.

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You all right, we write it. Don We write it.

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Don Nancy, Thank you so much for the time, Thank

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you for joining, for you're inside, thanks for continuing to

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>write great stuff. We'll keep reading it. We got to

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>take another break when we return. A moment that didn't

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:40.359
<v Speaker 1>take long to earn a spot in the Good Game

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame. Welcome back, now slices. When it comes

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to sports, every hall of fame has different rules. Almost

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 1>all of them required that an athlete be retired in

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>order to be eligible for induction, while some require a

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 1>waiting period of ye three years or more. But here

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:04.959
<v Speaker 1>a Good Game we make our own rules, which means

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 1>we're allowed to induct a player whose Hall of Fame

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>worthy moment happened just a few days ago. That brings

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>us to the latest edition of the Good Game Hall

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 1>of Fame. Yes, the Good Game Hall of Fame, where

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we celebrate women's sports lore, the kind of legendary stories

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we should all know by heart, just like we know

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:26.240
<v Speaker 1>about Babe Ruth's called Shot, Bill Buckner's Air, and Merkles

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Boner Google it your pervs. We've got some catching up

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to do in women's sports, though, so grab another plaque

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and find a good place on the wall. Today we've

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>got another inductdee. Last weekend's NCAA Hockey Championship featured the

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin Badgers and Ohio State Buckeyes, and it came down

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to the wire, featuring one of the most chaotic endings

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in a long time. Trailing three to two

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 1>with under two minutes left, the Badger's got two lucky breaks,

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>first when Ohio State got hit with the penalty for

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>too many players on the ice, and then with just

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>eighteen seconds left, when an Ohio State defender covered the

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 1>puck in the crease and Wisconsin was given a choice

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to assess Ohio State with another minor penalty or take

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a penalty shot. That choice was easy. Legendary Wisconsin coach

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Mark Johnson told the ref they'd take the penalty shot,

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and then he turned to his players, asking who wants

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>it now. It's worth noting here that Johnson knows a

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 1>little something about pressure himself. He was a member of

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen to eighty US Olympic men's team that won

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>gold and defeated the Soviet Union. He scored two goals

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in that game that earned the title of Miracle on

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Ice a performance that helped him earn induction into just

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>about every hockey Hall of Fame. But let's get back

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to the present. So Johnson posed the question and down

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>on the ice in front of him, Kirsten Simms hand

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>shot up. That was that. The twenty year old from Plymouth, Michigan,

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>skated confidently to the center of the ice, and her

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:48.760
<v Speaker 1>penalty shot was a butte the definition of a dangle.

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>With the game tied three to three and headed to overtime,

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and he guesses who scored the game winner just two

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>forty nine into sudden death overtime, yep Sims again asked

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>about the hand raised. In the postgame presser, Sims, like

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a true hockey player, credited her teammates with the decision

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>take a listen. I mean, I can't really say it

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>was like initially my choice. I had everyone on the

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 1>bench screaming sim Simms, you do it, you do it.

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So I was like, you know what, whatever, I was like,

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 1>coach is gonna need to see my hand go up

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.959
<v Speaker 1>for me to actually go so and what about our coach?

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Would Mark Johnson of Miracle on ice Fame have raised

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>his hand in that moment?

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.399
<v Speaker 3>I was asking several people after. I don't know if

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I wanted, if I was playing, I would take the shot,

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 3>just because again, it's like nothing. You got to be

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 3>as free as you can be right in that moment.

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 3>You can't be thinking about anything other than I'm going

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 3>to score.

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Talk about pressure. Welcome to the Good Game Hall of Fame,

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Kirsten Simms. We'll find a nice spot for that plaque.

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we love that you're listening. But you

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 1>know we want you to get in the game every

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>day too. And this one's easy. If you bought some merch,

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>send us a photo. We've already gotten a handful of

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 1>people sending us pictures wearing their T shirts and sweatshirts

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>from Breaking Tea, but if you got one, we want

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to see it. It makes us so happy every time

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we get sent one. And if you haven't yet, obviously

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>go to Breakingtea dot com slash Spain and get you

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a good gay merch rocket, take a photo, set it

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to us, and don't forget to subscribe, rate and review.

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It's easy. Watch Boss Nation. Sorry. Boston Legacy FC once

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>again using men's sports to hype their new women's team,

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:27.760
<v Speaker 1>rating five out of five. Eye rolls review. Now listen,

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the Boston folks have taken more than enough of a

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>beating for their slip ups during this ramp up to

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 1>an active team. Need a reminder the name, the too

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>many Balls campaign, the long delay before this rebrand, the

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 1>ongoing issues with their stadium plans, not mentioning the Boston

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Fleet or any other women's sports teams past or present

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in that infamous intro video that featured every men's pro

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 1>team in Beantown, and also, weirdly, Tom Brady reacting to

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a goat balls reference. So I hate to pile on,

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>but after one post on Instagram announcing the new name,

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the next post, a shared post with the team's supporters group,

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 1>read can't wait to support the home team. Everyone loves

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a good comeback story, right with a screenshot of the

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:13.759
<v Speaker 1>old name Boss Nation aligned next to the Super Bowl

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 1>score from twenty seventeen from the third quarter when the

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:18.839
<v Speaker 1>New England Patriots were down against the Atlanta Falcons twenty

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>eight to three. Below that, the new name Boston Legacy,

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 1>next to an aligned with the final score of that

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, the Patriots winning thirty four to twenty eight,

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:31.319
<v Speaker 1>a legendary comeback win. I get it. Sports law in

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>any town is just sort of a universal language that

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody speaks, and that comeback win was one of the

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 1>most legendary games in sports history. And they're poking fun

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:43.479
<v Speaker 1>at their own terrible start, which I like. But when

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 1>so many of the complaints about your initial rollout involved

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:49.880
<v Speaker 1>centering men's teams in the video, centering the idea of

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 1>men with the too many balls garbage, and not including

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 1>women's teams, then what brainiac thought rolling out Yet another

0:43:56.440 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 1>reference to men's sports was the move here. Yes, it

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 1>was a post that originated from the supporters group, but

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the comments make it clear that many supporters still don't

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like the constant references to men's teams. Now listen it.

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 1>They want to post this in a month or two. Absolutely,

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it's funny, but for the official admin account to make

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this their second post after the name change announcement, it

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>just holds too much weight in my opinion. Also, is

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the comeback really complete if you're already fumbling the rollout

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 1>of the new name with the same mistakes that you

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 1>made the first time and clearly heard from a bunch

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of fans that they didn't like. Side note, the team

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:33.879
<v Speaker 1>also posted a quote from a Wall Street Journal story

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:36.319
<v Speaker 1>about the rebrand and the new name, titled she hit

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Button and all Hell Broke loose. How the sports

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 1>team everyone hated came back but then almost immediately deleted

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that from their Instagram. Curious. Anyway, We're rooting for you, Boston.

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Just maybe hold back on the whole team everyone hated

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:54.280
<v Speaker 1>coming back until you actually come back. Let's just finish

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:56.320
<v Speaker 1>this rollout of the new name and try not to

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 1>step in anything else, and then I'll celebrate. Now it's

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:02.280
<v Speaker 1>your jurn y'all right, thanks for listening, See you tomorrow.

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Good game, Nancy, Good Game, Kirsten Simms h World Athletics.

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Good Game with Sarah Spain is an iHeart women's sports

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 1>production in partnership with Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment. You

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:17.759
<v Speaker 1>can find us on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. Production by Wonder Media Network,

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>our producers are Alex Azzie and Misha Jones. Our executive

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>producers are Christina Everett, Jesse Katz, Jenny Kaplan, and Emily Rudder.

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Our editors are Emily Rutterer, Britney Martinez, and Grace Lynch.

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Our associate producer is Lucy Jones and I'm Your Host

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Spain.