WEBVTT - The Radiohead Guide to Good ETF Investing

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trillions. I'm Joel Webber, I'm Eric Belchionis. This

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>episode is going to be a fun one. We're big

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.119
<v Speaker 1>on metaphors. If you've listen to Trillions at all, you

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>know that we bring them into basically every single episode,

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and this episode is no exception. It's going to be

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>one big metaphor. Metaphors are good as an analyst, especially

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>dealing with all kinds of investors. Metaphors helped to make

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>something complicated and boring in some cases much more interesting

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and simple. And so we've used many metaphors, the food store,

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the car. This one's a little closer to home for

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>me personally, and it's so good that we had to

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>consult our legal department first and we got their blessing.

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And if that doesn't wet your appetite, this will, which

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is this episode is going to be all about Radiohead

0:00:53.920 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and the ETF. So why Radiohead. There's a couple band

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that I hear and sometimes get ideas from for some reason,

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>both Billy Joel and Radiohead. Their their song titles speak

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to good financial advice, but Radiohead even more. And you know,

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at back in the day when people found

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>hidden messages and led Zeppelin in the Beatles. I think

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it was more like satanic messages. I swear to you

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I find hidden financial advice messages in Radiohead lyrics. It

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is I probably just listened to too much Radiohead and

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like, it's too much. Do you think about

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>two things basically Radiohead and ETF so, but when it

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>start troubling it out, there's something there. Well, joining us

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>this episode will also be Rachel Evans, reporter with Bloomberg

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>News who covers et F s and Rachel is a

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of an ETF head and Radiohead as well. So

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this one's gonna get. We're gonna get. This is gonna

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just be awesome. This could be too much, It could

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>be too much, but bug of your seat belts. This

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>episode Radiohead teaches you how to be a good et

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>F investor. Hi, Rachel, Hey Joel, how's again? Good? Thanks

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>for coming on the shol delighted. So we know that

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>aracle of the radiohead and we're going to get there,

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>but I want to hear from you. What was your

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>first Radiohead experience? So Radiohead for me began in my

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>teen years growing up just outside Oxford, which is obviously

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>where Radiohead is from, so you're like literally, you're like

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>from there on the doorstep, on the doorstep. So my

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>first experience with Radiohead live was going to see them

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>when I was fifteen years old. They did a homecoming

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>gig in south Park, just outside Oxford, UM, and they

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>had bands all afternoon and Radiohead was that the headliner.

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the night. Was one of the

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>most amazing experiences of my life. It started to rain

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>as they sort of started playing their final set. Everybody

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>was kind of dancing around in the mud. It was fantastic,

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and their last song of the night was Creep, which

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>they said they'd never play again. It was incredible. And

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>then your dad picked you up into exactly that. My

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>dad came pick me up, picked me up with my

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>my three other friends who were all a bit underage,

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>drinking around then busted, busted, just drinking. Eric, your first

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Radiohead experience mine, and this is gonna age me. I'm

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not gonna say how old I was. Well, I guess

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm it was in college. We're going to find out,

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you get it, figure it out. But I was in

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>college and Radiohead played at the Rutgrouds when it went

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to Rutgers. They played at the Student Center. This is

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>off of their first album, Pablo Honey, and they opened

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>for Belly. I don't know if you remember Belly. They

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>were pretty good band, but they're you know, long forgotten,

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>but they opened that that show, and uh, you know,

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I went for both really But then I saw them

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>again on the Bench tour in San Francisco when I

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>went out there on a bit of an excursion in life,

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and I saw them in a really small bar about

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>three four inndred people and that was the Bens And

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that that's when I got really hooked in. And I

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>saw him a couple of times since then on different tours,

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and I saw them around the time Rachel saw them.

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>That was the sort of post okay computer just pre

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>kid A. That was their project. That was the best

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Radiohead I think. And so for both of you, what

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>makes Radiohead so special to me? It was the fact

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that they kind of spoke to my inner ANX at

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a time. You know, when you're you're struggling with all

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>these feelings and you can't really express them because you

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>know you don't have the emotional language to do so

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a Radiohead kind of came in there at that point,

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and they had this kind of viscerality with their lyrics.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>They were able to sort of describe feeling sort of

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>blue and this world that you didn't really understand, and

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like almost post apocalyptic imagery at times.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Yet at the same time I found them very uplifting.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>There was something so cathartic about actually sticking on the

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>bends or ok computer even kid a turning it up,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether you're in your car or in your

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in your bedroom, and then sort of listening to this

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>music kind of take you to a place where actually

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>things were better. Yeah, it actually speaks to me because

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I first listen to Radiohead in nineteen seven. I guess

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody passed me headphones, which is a saying something. They

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>were like literally over your ear headphones in a study

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>hall and played the bins and big plastic cres came on,

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, I've never heard anything like this before,

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and it just really took me away. Also, they slip

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in weird chords. His falsetto voice, which I think he

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>got from Jeff Buckley, but to apply that to the

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>sort of uh sound of the times with some a

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of minor chords I just worked well, and I

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>agree it's it makes you feel a little less alone

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in the world, but at the same time it's uplifting,

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's also very artistic. The the stuff he describes

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and the way it's the sound you get it's like

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>a movie in your head. It's very very visual, and

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>I just all aspects of it are great. So let's

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>bring it back to the E. T. F. Rachel. When

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we came to you and said we're going to do

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.679
<v Speaker 1>this episode and kind of told you about the idea

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of the hidden financial meetings within the lyrics, had you

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>ever thought about that before? I wouldn't say that I

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>had necessarily so, so for me, the thing with radio

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Head that that has always been an interest is the

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>very anti capitalist in nature. Like when you've listened to

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>their lyrics and when you think about kind of your

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>the imagery that they use along with their albums, a

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is quite anti business. It's questioning the

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>power that corporations have over us. It's looking at impact

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>on climate chain your average investor, right, well, yeah, so

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>so I was like, oh, interesting, But then like I

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>started listening to the lyrics and that's what kind of

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>really got me because actually, one of the great things

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>about Radiohead that I've always loved about them is that

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>whilst their imagery is very dense and you can interpret it,

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it in many different ways. And one of those ways

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>is indeed to think about it from the perspective of

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>advice for investing. And I think this speaks to why

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>it works is because they you know, they went to

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>art school in Oxford. They were going to be painters,

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>but they were like, we can't make a living there,

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>so we'll get together and do music. And so their

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>stuff is abstract and just like looking at a painting

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that is not crystal clear what it is, people can

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>draw different things, and I think that speaks to not

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're writing about investing, but that you could interpret

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>many things from their lyrics. Hey droll here, Now that

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm the editor of Bloomberg Business Week, I pulled a

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>few strings for our loyal podcast listeners. Go to business

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>Week mag dot com slash trillions right now for a

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty day free trial. If you like what we're doing

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>here on trillions, you're gonna love the stories that we

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>published in Bloomberg Business Week. Here's that special offer one

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>more time. Go to business Week mag dot com slash

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>trillions for your free thirty day trial. Thanks. Okay, so

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>let's just go straight into it because we get to

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>listen to some Radiohead Okay, Rachel, what song are we

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna listen to? First? We've got anyone can play guitar

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>from Radioheads, Pablo Honey. Okay, so why did you pick

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that song? So, I mean, this song really shows you

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of like anyone can play guitar. You can pick

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>up you know, your acts, and off you go. You're

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>off to the races. You can be in a band. Right,

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what Radiohead was kind of saying with us. But

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the same really applies for for ETFs. You can, you know,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>go on your your brokerage account, you can go to

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>your advisor. Anyone can buy an ECF. They are very

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>very accessible products there at fees that anybody can really

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>afford um and you can kind of trade in and

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>out of them when you want to. Anyone can do it,

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and there are several combinations. Just like chords, there's different

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>ways to do it. And it's like you said, the

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>guitar is interesting. It is a really accessible tool for

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that has really allowed a lot of people who wouldn't

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>otherwise be in music to do music. The thing that

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I understands out to me is that it's really not

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that complicated, right, and that's sort of like the simplicity

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 1>of this is sort of ultimately an interesting place to

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>start with. Okay, so so what's next? So next up,

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>we have everything in its right place from the semin

0:08:41.360 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed kidd ap, I can actually see Tom York singing

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>into a microphone right there. How about the leap from

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone who can play guitar to that. Yeah, that's it's

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>only ten years a right, A little bit jarring perhaps,

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's like and so, Eric, what do you like

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>about that song? Well, first of all, the sound is

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>just you know, you're just it stops you. But the

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>reason I thought this was a good one to pick

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>was this is ascid allocation in a nutshell, and that

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>also is part of the accessibility. You know, you have stocks,

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>you have bonds, it's not that difficult and it's like

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>a pie, right, So what percentages do you want of

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>each as a class? You plug in the E T

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>F and that's ultimately everything in its right place. So

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it speaks to acid allocation, and they've done

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>studies that your decision on what percentages to put in

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:56.199
<v Speaker 1>those asset classes, it has much more determinant on your

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>returns than the securities you select within the class. So

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it's huge, right, Good advice from Tom York. Excellent advice

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>from Tom York. Next one up, we've got air bag

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:20.959
<v Speaker 1>from Okay computer. What are the lyrics that are that

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>resonate with you? So, so Tom talks about Tom York

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>obviously to his friend's Rady heads Ley singer Tom Tommy boy, Yeah,

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Tommy why as we call him in my household. So

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>he talked about how last night and air bag saved

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>my life. And he's talking about this jack knife juggernaut

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to where which you know, assumably some kind of vehicle

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>who's which is sort of turned over on the road,

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and how he's kind of born again and saved where

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>his air back. Now this applies to e t S

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>because to Eric's point about asset allocation, you need to

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about your portfolio in terms of risk and reward. Right,

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be all in in risky e

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>t f s. You want to have some kind of

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>air bag there that's a protective element. So that might

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:01.839
<v Speaker 1>be looking at kind of a treasury z t F

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, a way to kind of like put your

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>money to work while still having something that's that's pretty safe.

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I like about this is that we're

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>jumping around in time right, Like we're covering so many

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>different albums here. Yeah, we're not going in chronic That's

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what makes it cool. This is not chronological order.

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>It's financial advice order. It's been like high fideality, right,

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you see the financial were arranging his CDs by like

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>order of his life. So this grouping though was loosely

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>this is not that complicated, right, pretty much what's our

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>next group? And going to be good behavior? So good behavior?

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Why is that relevant topic in this conversation? That was

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>half of our episode with betterment behavior? If you behave badly,

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter that you save all this money on

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>lower costs or you get less capital gains. You can

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>really destroy a lot of gains if you make bad

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>decisions and market time and so behavior is really a

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>huge deal, which is nique aspect of the E t

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>F because there's part of it that also sort of

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 1>can encourage bad behavior because it's so easy to use

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly this is more applicable to ets than any other

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>type of structure because they are so convenient you can

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>get in and out whenever you want. So behavior is

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 1>even more important with E t S. Okay, So, first

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>song in our good behavior section optimistic from kid As

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>did you pick this one or didn't Rachel pick this one?

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I did because I'm on Twitter a lot. And there's

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>these people called perma bears, and they get a lot

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of airtime on television because calling the next sort of crisis. Remember,

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Michael has made all the people who called the financial

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>crisis into like superheroes. So everybody's trying to call the

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>next downturn. And ultimately, if you listen to them, especially

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in the last eight years, you would have definitely done

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>worse than just doing nothing. And so optimism is huge,

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and I find that the best investors are the most optimistic,

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the ones who stick to their plan, believe in it,

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and get rid of the noise. Next up next, Little

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>by a Little from the King of Limb. It's one

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of them more recent albums, What did So This is

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of a parable in like how to think about

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>your E T F returns? Now you don't want to

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>think about you know, sort of getting necessarily in a

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>year in terms of your returns. You need to be

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:08.079
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this slowly compounding um amounts of money kind

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of coming into your ETFs, gradually going up and gradually

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 1>returning you the big but whatever the index gives you, right,

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what That's what ETF does. Well, that's what traditional

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 1>passive index tracking ETF does. So you don't want to

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about like that. This is not about, you know,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>getting rich quick. This is about investing for the long

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>term and little by little that should pay off, basically

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of bitcoin investors, right, Okay, uh what I

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>What I also liked about that one was like, that's

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the most recent Radiohead song I think on our list, right, Yeah,

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>this was from King of Limbs, which was I wouldn't

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>put this in there like top Echelon. I put them

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in the middle level in terms of how good they were,

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>But there's some gems on their lotus. Flower in particular

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is as good as anything they've done. Which also leaves

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>me a question that I haven't asked either of you yet.

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>How many times do you think you've seen radio Head live?

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Probably eight over or under under. Sadly, I'm at three. Though,

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I do have with me today my T shirt from

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>my first ever gig, which I'm going to actually, and

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm a bit hot already. This is great. I love

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I love, Actually I have the same. I'm like, whatever, Yes,

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>this is this is It's play on that monkey one

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>where the the where they have the no eyes, no mouth, right,

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>except it's like modern day gen X. You don't have

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to cover your mouth. I got it. You have to

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>stalk talking to the microphone. Well, I know I had

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to explain things to you, so I was given the

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>visuals to help help it go fastest. So how many

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>concert t shirts do you still have? I probably have.

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I probably have two. Over the years, I probably bought four.

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But I have a framed poster in my office area

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that I really kept. But a lot of a lot

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff I bought is kind of come and go.

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>You've liked pretty ahead for such a long time. I

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>have to ask, do you still have a cassette? No?

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But I have CDs. Yeah, I have a couple of CDs.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, yeah, I have some cassettes. Used to

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>make mix tapes for the car, and then inflicted on

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>my family so that we would all get in there

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, i'd have like a little remix from

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bend. How did you How did your parents feel

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>about your radiohead? So, my dad's pretty cool. My dad

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>was all right. He was obviously came picked me up

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>from the concert, so he was. He was with it.

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>My mom not such a big fan. My brother, yeah,

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't into it. I think he was more kind

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of getting into sort of the pop things at the time.

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Those those cassette mixes were not so highly prized on

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>on those family road trips and prized by me but

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>no one else. Okay, last song in the good behavior section,

0:16:41.000 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>We've got I might be wrong from Amnesiac? What album

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>was that? From Amnesiac? So they recorded two albums at

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the same time back in two thousand, two thousand one

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of a first part became kid a second with Amnesiac.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I still remember going down to the shops the day

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that Amnesiac was released, got a left from school with

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>my friend's mom. Brilliant. If you were in the US,

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have seen you with the record. Amnesiac was

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>my Bloomberg terminal password for the first five years I

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>was here. Ye amazing. Yeah, that was an amasiac one

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>amn easiac too. Then I started using my kid's names

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>because that's like there's numbers. Now they make you do

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>capitals and yeah, I will tell you those Amasa. I

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like that. Um okay, and why do we pick? I

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>might be wrong? So this one I think speaks to

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>behavior because if you have your plain vanilla core and

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>we talked about just hanging in there a little by

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a little, but let's face it, people like to speculate.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>That's okay. You know, it's okay to take some money

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:58.239
<v Speaker 1>and put that on something you think might go up.

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 1>So take something like Russia small caps or Palladium, you know,

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>something that's a little out there high flyer. Sometimes these

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>do not work out you think they should work. Uranium

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is a good example that one has a great story,

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>but it always goes down. It just goes down and

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>down and down. You can cut your losses, okay, it's

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>okay to met you're wrong because a lot of people

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>lose extra money by thinking that it's going to turn

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>around and and it never does. And one uh metric

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>people use a lot for this is the two hundred

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>moving day average. So if the price of the e

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>t F falls below it's two moving day average. That's

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>known as the death cross, and a lot of times

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>people will look at that as the time to get out,

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>like it's just gonna get worse from there. So it's okay,

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to like marry every idea you have

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>for like a good trade. The death cross almost sounds

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 1>like a Radiohead song. They're probably working out something with

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that right now or an album. Okay, So that grouping

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>was good behavior. The opposite of good behavior is bad behavior.

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And we also have some songs that we picked for that,

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the first one being Just from the Bad, one of

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>my favorite songs. They're teaching some personal responsibility here they are. Yeah,

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>so the song itself a sort of deals with a

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>rather unfortunate relationship going bad. But in terms of personal

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>investing advice, I think that's some really interesting takeaways, right.

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at the financial crisis, one

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of the things that the people lamented after everything soured was, oh,

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know. Now, there is a lot of responsibility

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that advisers and sellers of products have to make sure

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that you have the information. You should be able. You

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't being missouled something, you should know what it is.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to e t F, there's so

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>much information in the public domain, you as an investor

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>have to take responsibility for what you own and to

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>go and read the prospectives of what you're buying. To

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>take one example, you could look at kind of emerging

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>market equity e t F for example, Um, some of

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>these are hedged, some of them aren't. You need to

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>know that some of them hedge all of the currencies

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>within them. Some of them hedge some of the currencies

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and optimize that hedge. Now, unless you actually read the

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>small print, you don't know that. And if you don't

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>know that, you could get burnt when something bad happens

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in the markets. I'd riff off of this with our

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>next one, which is which is fake Plastic Tree, the

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>same concept here, which is the same album, same album. Yeah,

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the vents and look, there's a lot of things that

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>look pretty good. I mean that either the name is

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>very nice to kind of the cereal awl, the cartoon

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>character on front. But there's a lot of things that

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't need. There's a lot of noise out there,

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>and I think that sort of speaks to that. The

0:20:36.320 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>green plastical, the affection is fake Blood, good from God.

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>That's soothing. Eric, put your later Away, Rachel, what do

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you like about that song? I mean that song to

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>me has always been one of the finest radio Head songs.

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I think lyrically it's fantastic. It's musically beautiful and haunting.

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Um and yeah, it builds to a really kind of

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>great finale where you can kind of like pretty much

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>scream it loud and yeah, it's it's great. Does the business, Yeah,

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>that one was just top of my list. Although The

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Bins is funny, it's all about bad behavior and yet

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's like the best album ads. Eric will probably

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>back me up on. I think, you know, they wrote

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>it when they were twenty seven. Let's face it, we

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>were all doing bad things at age seven, and you're

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of fighting yourself at that age, and so I

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>think they they kind of settled down, had kids in

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>their music became more about judge, you're looking at the

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>outside world. But The Bends I think was very much

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about stuff going on in like their life and trying

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to get your act together. Yeah, I agree, Like the

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:03.959
<v Speaker 1>first couple of albums are kind of very personal. They

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like they're they're dealing with their own personal demons,

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and then as they kind of move out, they start

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 1>looking at consumerism, commercialism, all that kind of stuff, and

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking about climate change and like next track, next track.

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Also sticking with the bends, we have high and dry.

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So okay, lyrics in there. Two jumps in a week.

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I bet you think that's pretty clever, don't you, boy

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>So to me, obviously, thinking with an investor hat on,

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>this is about the perils of trading too frequency frequently.

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>So basically what you want to be thinking about when

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you're trading is not really trading, Like you only want

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to be moving in and out of an ETF if

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you're changing strategy, if there's a really profound reason for moving.

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>If you're jumping in and out twice in a week,

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>like the song talks about, then all you're doing is

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>racking up costs. It costs money to trade, um, so

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be doing that too frequently. And

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I think trading isn't the worst thing in the world,

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>but say that for the institutions and the professionals. But

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>even then there's been some evidence that it's it's tough

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>for them because the more costs again, you know, the

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>more you trade. It's sort of like the you know,

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the casino. If you go and the more you gamble,

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the more likely the house will win. So I think

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely speaks to that as well. I'll throw one

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>other quickie in here on this whole behavior is where

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I end, then you begin, which is kind of a

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>creepy song. It's it's good though. I think it's about

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>his father, but I don't know. I can't confirm that

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to abstract, but I think it is. There's some products

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>out there that retail vestlers probably should just have like

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a hard stop, don't touch, and I would put VIX

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>products in there. I'd put anything that holds futures, oil futures,

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>anything that uses derivatives and leverage ETFs. And I think

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that's good, just to have a hard rule on that.

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>They're like power tools. You love your effects. Why why

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't they You should have been a police academy. Okay, yeah,

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>i'd agree with that. I mean, like when you think

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>about leveraged e t f s, I mean, these are

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>very much intended for traders, right, They're not intended for

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>for retail. And sure, I mean you can be well

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>educated about how they work, but you've really got to

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of understand, and I think for the vast majority

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>of people that that own them, they don't and they

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>get hammered by the roll costs. The same could be

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>said for some of these kind of more sort of

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>faddish thematic e t f s. Not to name names

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>or anything, per se, but I think there's a few

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>out there that perhaps are trying to to jump on

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>the bandwagon of something that's been been in the news

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>or seems to be popular, um, and that perhaps there's

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>not really a compelling investing argument to be in them. Okay,

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>so let's listen to that. Okay, So this is a

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty epic back of T shirt set list that we've

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>just kind of rolled through. They put the cities on

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the back, not the songs, but I'm putting the songs

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>on this one. This is your shirt, Yeah, my shirt,

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>my rules. What is somebody going to get out of

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>all of this advice about how to use et f

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>s more effectively? It comes back to the whole thing

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>we talked about about writing Capitalism's cotails. Why are you

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.959
<v Speaker 1>doing this? Why are we here? I'm still pondering it

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>ever since you asked it the first time. Don't go

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that deep with that. Let's go second level. Second, the

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>reason is because you want to retire, you want to

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>send your kids to college, just basic stuff, right, So

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>all of this is so you can do that and

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>if you get you know, a little wealthy along the way,

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a bonus. Rachel. There's a song that I

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>know you want to include to kind of help about

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>sign off on this idea, which one is that how

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I made my millions? There you go there, Okay, so

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>how I made my millions? Okay, now, Joel, you're crying

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>balling over here? Why do I Why do I listen

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to that? No, I'm joking, it's really it's beautiful. But

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we're not done because you can't end on that note. Yeah,

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 1>that's a little even from my radio head standards, that's

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a little so chin up here, because two plus two

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>equals five should as shuch a dream to putter? Ah?

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>So what ah, it's makes a fun Two plus two

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 1>equals five gets to the power of compounding interests. There

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you go, I mean it is you know that there's

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>always that people that people talking about if you bought

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>such and such at you know, ten and dollars, it

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 1>really is true if you can just get in and

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>just hang in there. I mean that stuff compounds and

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>just get an just get a get a get a

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>hook in there, just do something. That's why UM and

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>this song it's it's interesting. This is a Orwellian phrase

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>from the book and it was really about brainwashing, and

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>we're turning it into a positive about compounding interest with

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>E T S. So that's a bit of a stretch,

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>but I think it works. It's power of radiohead. You

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>can apply it to betterything. Okay. Closing question, Rachel, you

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>probably know this by now. We like to ask people

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>what their favorite E T F taker is. However, I'm

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>going to change the rules slightly and ask you a hypothetical,

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you think tom Yorke's favorite EF. So I

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>had a good long think about this UM and the

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>conclusion that I came up with for for what Tom's

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite at F was given that this is Tommy why

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a good friend? Given that this is twenty years since

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>okay computer came out, I thought he m quite like robo.

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah there you go, and everybody paranoid android that is robotics. Yeah, yeah,

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you're right, that's a good one. That's more creative than

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>mind minds, probably a little too. What do you think

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Tom's would be? I would go with the Climate Leadership

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>et F though, which is all about Yeah, but that

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that's Tom. You're in a nutshell climate change and like

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>computer robots. Rachel Evans, Bloomberg News, Thank you so much,

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Okay, So we reached out to the radiohead

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>because we just we had just done this episode and

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>we were just like, we have to hear what they

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>have to say about this. So it was like almost

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Eric's dream. He got to email the band and here's

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>what they had to say. I did, but you're not

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>giving me credit for finding the email of the manager.

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I had to go to some serious chat rooms in

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>blogs that only fans like me would know. But anyway,

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I got it. So I emailed the band's manager, Chris Hufford.

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>He here's what he says back to me. Thanks for

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the l Eric, but I'm afraid none of the band

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>are available best Chris, so at least it got back

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to me and respect, respect, proser rating. Thanks thanks for

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>listening to trillions Until next time. You can find us

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal Bloomberg dot com. Apple podcasts, and

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>probably a bunch of other places I haven't heard of yet.

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. We're on Twitter, I'm

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>at Joel Webber Show, He's at Eric call Tunis, and

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>our guest Rachel Evans is that Rachel Evans Underscore and

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Why Trillions is produced by Jordan Bell with help from

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Magnus Henrickson. Francesca Levie is the head of Bloomberg Podcast.

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Bye