WEBVTT - Growth is Not Quite as Stable, Morse Says Description:

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Ye, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jaily.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>investment and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg This

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>is what Bloomberg Surveillance is all about. Edward Morris with

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a subsidy group, with his work on international relations, geopolitics,

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and of course commodities for the bank. Ed Morris expect

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the unexpected, or maybe the shocks come away from the

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>certitude of looking at Syria or that I'm looking at

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a dollar Turkish lira of four seventeen, which screams to

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>me instabilities. What's the instability in the region you're focused on? Uh?

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Is you use all of the research capabilities of your bank.

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where to start on this. Uh there's uh,

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, putting aside what's happening with the Turkish lyra.

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>These are all economies in the Gulf that are pegged

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>to the US dollar. They've benefited remarkably by uh what's

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>happened with the price of oil? Um the pressure on

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>them too. Deepegg has gone away. Um uh and um.

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>What's next is really know how these economies going to

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>adjust to this new world of getting out of oil.

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>It screams shuttle diplomacy, except we don't have a Secretary

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of State to get on the shuttle right not yet,

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and it remains to be seen whether he's going to

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>be confirmed by the Senate. What do you make of

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the price section that we've seen over the last couple

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, said, because I'm looking at this risk off

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>move and I'm saying risk off with inverted commas on

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>either side, because treasuries a bit, yes, but yields it

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>down like three bay Sis points and Dolly ends off

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>by about a third of one percent. And I think

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the equity market alone, you would

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>think something very vicious has been happening in the market

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of weeks. But everything house seems

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to be holding up Cross asset, and I think, Tom,

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>what's been really interesting over the last couple of weeks

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is that this risk on risk off regime of the

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.399
<v Speaker 1>last few years has changed. It used to be sal

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>equities by treasuries in a proportional amount and do the

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>same thing with the Japanese yen, and I don't see

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that in the same way anymore. What's changed, dead Well,

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:33.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that's changed we haven't talked about

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it is a commodity is actually outperformed both equities and

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>bonds in the first quarter. Uh. That's something to keep

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>your eye on, and we can talk a lot about that.

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that's changed is the I think there's been

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>an acceleration of risk on risk off. One of the

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>things to worry about is with this risk on risk

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>off have been massive inflows of debt issuance and equity

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>investments into emerging markets and out of emerging markets. And

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's also flirted with the notion that growth is

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>not quite as stable as it might be. So when

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you look at the situation worldwide, do you actually see

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a firm macro backdrop, because there are some people starting

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to question that. I imagine I'll speak to many investors

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>today and I'll talk to them about this geopolitical risk

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>store and they will say shore in the short term,

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's going to be a sentiment driven story. What

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this means for markets expects the more volatility, but the

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals will re assert them sounds earning season is going

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to start and a macro backdrop is still firm. Is

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the macro backdrop still as firm as people say it is, Well,

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it looks like that's it's fraying at the edges. There

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of data points that are coming in

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that show weakness, that show that the growth may in

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>fact be impacted. And that's that's the problem of the

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>brinksmanship that we're seeing on the trade front. Where brinksmanship

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>when you when you draw lines in the sand and

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody says they're not going to budge, what do you do?

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>What would you say to General Matters Right now? I

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you say to the State Department. I'm

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>sure I don't know what you say to the sixty

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>under Pennsylvania Avenue. But with all of your years of experience,

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you say to the Secretary Defense into our military? Well, yeah,

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they're they're the last bastions of consensus politics, and and

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got to assume that the military, given their organization,

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>are going to tow the line. So that's the encouragement

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that they need, and that's the voice of reason that's

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that's required. I mean, within that is the surgical strikes

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 1>certitude that we've all seen within modern warfare, you know,

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>whether it was the advent of air the air force,

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. We can be surgical and your experience of

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East, surgical really doesn't work, doesn't now the

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>danger in the Middle East, and and maybe you know,

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's something that will will will unmask, uh what's happening.

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>But uh, Now, Russia's an economy that's slightly bigger than

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the state of Florida, slightly smaller than the state of

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>New York, and they've been managing to do something on

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the global front, partly because of what's happened with their

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Saudi Arabia on the oil side, that that

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>has made them seem a lot more powerful than they

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>actually are. So maybe we're gonna see something resulting from that.

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Edward Morris, thank you so much, greatly appreciate your effort

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to come in today for an extended period with Bloomberg surveillance.

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Dr Morris, of course, with City Group running all of

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>their commodity or with us right now Gary Shilling on inflation. Gary,

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the big deal right now and with the data here

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in forty minutes is the base effect the base effect

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is where and the fourteenth and the fifteen month drifts away.

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>How do you respond to people saying, well, inflation is

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be higher because is the base effect? Well, there,

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>there certainly isn't effect. I mean, if you go back

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to all months, of course it was a reverse that

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was reversed. And that's what you're that's what you're talking about.

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's more important to concentrate on the future.

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>And one are the basic forces there. And you know,

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>we're in a globalized world. There's a lot of deflationary

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>forces there. You're seeing lower inflation and medical medical care

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and education. You're seeing Amazon what they're doing to bricks

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>and mortar stores and prices. Uh, And you know, I

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they're just there are a lot of downwards pressure.

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's rip up the script here, folks. That's what we

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 1>do on Bloomberg surveillance. Hn Farrell demands I do it

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>once a day. Gary, you went there. It is stunning.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>The second derivative of empty stores in this nation. Everyone,

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:54.239
<v Speaker 1>even his his arch angry opposites, agree with President Trump.

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of empty stores. How does that market clear?

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>A wise one, one would hope, And and and a

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of areas they tear down the buildings and make

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>parking lots. But but you know, but rental price can

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>come down. And that's a very heavily leveraged business time

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>as you know, and so there's no reason that those

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>rental rates can't come down. But you know that the

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>reality is it isn't going to get any any easier.

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you pull out your your spark, your smartphone,

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you got an app there, you push a couple of

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of buttons and you can find the absolute

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>lowest price. You know, there is no ability to compete

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>on everything is coming in years decades of experience at

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Mary Lynch and inventing market economics. I'm gonna say with that,

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Hyman is well, maybe you're denial throw in there is well,

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Gary Shilling, how do you clear and absolutely unique tobaccle

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in real estate? Which is what we all observe. Everybody

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>listening to this program coast to coast is observing it. Well,

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>what happens is that at at a long enough price, uh,

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>those buildings are worth something you have to convert into

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>alternative spaces. Now that's what's happening to malls today. Of course,

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>because you're seeing they put in fitness centers, they put

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in restaurants, UH, they put in they put in movie

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>theaters and so on. But that still means that they

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>don't replace them at the same rental rates. Because anchor

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>stores UH generate a lot more traffic and they support

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the small jewelry stores and sestionary stores,

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and the severe she have to mark the price down,

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>in other words, the market in price, and the text

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is that the landlord pays have to clear it will

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>lower rate. Well, that's that's right. And of course this

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is what this does is it puts a lot of

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>pressure on everything. It puts pressure on the municipalities and

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>point out because of the taxes, it pulls pressure on

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the area. You look at a lot of of areas

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in this country and tremendous amount of of suburban housing

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>real estate is around malls. You know where where I am,

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Short Hills, New Jersey. They built a Short Hills mall

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>basically to UH to Prudential did this because they were

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>developing a huge amount of land around there for residential

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>right after World War Two, and that mall was really

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>there to in effect attract people into this residential area,

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's obviously far from unique. So you do have

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than just the retail stores, particularly in

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the case of the malls. To switch your back to

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>showing one oh one, do you stay in your newsletter

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>with lower rates? And how low is the Is there

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a new low? I should say for Gary showing is

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it a higher low? I don't. I don't think so.

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've been of the opinion that we would

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>get to two percent on the thirty year bond and

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>one percent on the ten uere and I don't see

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>any reason to change that. I just think there's an

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>awful lot of We're in an excess supply world, and

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's going to change. You labor markets

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>are tightening up in this country. But unless we're gonna

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>unless Trump is gonna build not only a wall in

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the Mexican border, but a terrible wall completely around the country,

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you're really you're really faced with a whole globalization effect.

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge coal Gary. What's the what's the time

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.839
<v Speaker 1>arising for that? Cool? Because I think many people would say,

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's the next recession. Then I think a lot

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of people might say that could make sense because we

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>hit around mark on a ten year and we weren't

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>in a recession. So is it the next recession you're

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking about, or is it in this cycle? What's the

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>time arising for the cool? Well? Uh, one of the

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>great forecasters of history say you should forecast what will

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>happen or when it will happen, but not both. Yes,

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not dumb enough to put a put an exact

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>timeline on that, John, But but I do think that

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>is in the cars. And you say, I mean, you

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>look at this, you look at the situation today, and

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that everybody is screaming about tight labor

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>markets and and that's where inflation only starts to his eyes,

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and where are you? You know, you're below three percent

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>on the third ear The characteristics of the treasury market

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>has adapted somewhat in the last couple of months, though

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>on a morning like today, with features down quite hard,

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you've only got a bid that comes into treasuries that

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>generates a move of negative three basis points. Were down

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>three basis points on the US tenure now in in

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>risk off of previous years, we might have been bound

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>down ten perhaps even fifteen. We aren't seeing these big

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>haven flows rush into treasuries in periods of risk aversion.

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Something's changed, Gary, can you put your finger on it? No,

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you're right. As a matter of fact our April newsletter.

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I look at that because it is it is. It

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is strange because when when you saw the starting in

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>early February, when you saw the collapse of the of

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the of the volatility trade, the vixed trade, uh, you

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>did not get the normal rush into treasuries and gold.

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think there are offsetting things. I mean, one is,

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>people are worried about inflation, they're worried about big government deposition.

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you've got to you've got to at least

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>one trillion over ten years for the tax cuts, and

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>another three billion for the two year uh two year

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>spending bill. And then behind that you've got the retiring

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>post for our baby, social Security, medicare funding those things.

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And then and we talked about this on TV earlier time,

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>about about about down the road, military spending and infrastructure.

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>You've got a lot of things. And now I don't

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>think those are going to be that I don't. I

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>think the the treasures will, they'll they'll find homes in

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>race will be lower. But there's a lot of concern

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>about that right now. And I think this is this

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 1>is holding off what normally would be a greater rush.

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Finally dr showing the zite guys just three to four

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>rate increases this year. It's April, we're dashing to May.

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's the schedule right now. Does that crack?

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Do we do? We do we reset with all the

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>discourse and the finale seeing a message? Do we? Yeah?

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>That what you see like June, July, August. Yeah, I

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>really suspect there will be a dialing back. I mean again,

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the Fed does one higher race. They'd like to have

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>some higher race to cut when the next recession comes

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>along the ground. As John was pointing out, Uh, you

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>also have their tremendous concern about the speculation to take

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a look at bitcoin and everything in between that hedge

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 1>funds of private equity people have so zealous for yielded.

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>FED worries about that. Uh. But at the same time

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 1>they've they've got this lack of inflation and that that

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>really is bothering him now. They basically have said this

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is a one off deal. Uh, you know, Yelling kept

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>saying it was it was a matter of the of

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the cell phone race coming down, and then medical care UH, Medicaid, etcetera.

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Powell has adopted some of the same policy. But when

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you get a series of one offs after a while,

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 1>you say, that's a trend showing thank you so much.

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>This great all the time on Bloomberg television and radio

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg surveillance. Before we had president's tweeting, we had

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>people writing thoughtful books about people and changing things. You

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>should be David Kirkpatrick, and of course many of you

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that know me know my rave review of The Facebook Effect.

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>It is not a dated book. It is a wonderful

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>window into a young Zuckerberg. Your book, The Facebook Effect.

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>We've moved on from that, haven't we, David. It was

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a different moment, So we're having a Facebook Effect. I

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>think that could be absolutely agreed upon. But certainly my

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>book was, you know, an introduction to a company that

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the book came out originally in so people

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>really didn't even realize it was important at that time.

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>But what really brought their ten to do it was

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the I P O. Of course, and it it you know,

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>did it well then? And then it dropped because they

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't get mobile and he came back, and Zuckerberg showed

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>great leadership in that period. But I think what we've

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>really learned, and what I think even he's learned even

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this week, is that he hasn't shown enough leadership when

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it came to certain key things around privacy and security.

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's it's shocking to me that they

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>made so many oversights when it came to that area.

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But I will say, listening to the hearings yesterday and

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>spending too much of my time thinking about this company,

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I am relatively cautiously optimistic that they are moving in

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a direction that will be extremely productive for them and

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for society, because that's where we've gotten to that. It's

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the relationship with society is the thing that matters of Facebook.

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>They are that globe spanning, that influential in our daily lives.

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>David Kirkpatrick, I'm just curious if you are covering any

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>other company, and there had been a situation in which

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>years prior to an event, there was a mess up

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of this magnitude that caused the CEO to have to

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>appear before Congress, and there was an actual paper slash

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>email trail that connected various executives Okay, well, um, I

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know about you, but in most companies someone gets

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>shown the door. Yes, who's accountable here other than someone

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>saying I'm sorry, I don't think that lets you keep

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>your job in most companies. Here's the one of the

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>many oddities about Facebook, which is one of the reasons

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I chose to write a book about it because I

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>really felt that it was a unique company from the beginning,

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is that there really is only one person who's accountable

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for everything, and that really does change the calculation in

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a situation like what you're describing. So it really is,

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in some central sense Zuckerberg's fault that all this happened.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>He didn't put the priorities where he should, and ultimately

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>he unilaterally and solely that's the priorities at Facebook, which

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>let's acknowledge, for a company that is worth half a

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars, it's a very weird thing. You know, everybody

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>showing I think I saw an MSNBC or CNE and David.

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Everybody shows this guy in intense conversation with the one

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 1>guy he can talk to, who's David Kirkpatrick. Chapter six,

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Chapter six of your book, David Becoming a Company every

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 1>single business person listening to this program is going, you

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>gotta be kidding me. You got this kid running the show.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a billionaire. Great congratulations, Miss Samberg is messaging who's

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the adult that could come in and shift this company

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to proper business practices? You mean then or now you're

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>talking about now? No, he needs some I will agree

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>with you. He needs somebody. You know. I was actually

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you know who I suggested the other day, Jerry Brown,

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's not really a business leader that he needs that.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Brown has got a job, we know that. But

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the point is he needs somebody of that degree of

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>gravitas that he can't ignore. Who you know, he would

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>still be somebody who had no real power because Zuckerbert

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>controls literally everything. But he needs he needs gray hairs

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>in there who really understand the way the world works

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and share some of his idealism about how the world

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>ought to be. But that who are capable of saying

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to him, Mark, listen to me, this is wrong. I mean,

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>David just described David Kirkpatrick, Well, okay, if Jerry Brown

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>won't take the job, maybe David Kirkpatrick, Well, well, you

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>know it's funny because I I sometimes this is arrogant preps.

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes I think that I am in a role.

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Since I'm sixty five, I've been around journalist, business journalists

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty four years or whatever. But sometimes I think I'm

0:18:57.840 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to give them a message. And when I interviewed

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>him on stage at the Techonomy conference in two days

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>after the election, in which is when he said his

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>faithful fake news comment, that got a lot of this inquiry,

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, and in this controversy started. I asked him

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>four times did Facebook have a unique responsibility for given

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>its scale, given its impact an election, given the power

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of the news feed in media. And I used that

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>word four times. He never used the word in response.

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>When you read his stuff now, he all he says

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>his responsibility. He doesn't want to listen until he's ready.

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing about David Kirkpatrick, the author of the

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook Effect. Right now, Kevin's surreally with us, our chief

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Washington correspondent, Kevin, have you ever seen the cot, the

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>proverbial cot that speaker Ryan's sleeps on at the house.

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I have not, the completely honest I have not taught,

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>but I can tell you that yesterday I spoke with

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a Republican lobbyists who told me, hey, have you heard

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>about the Speaker Ryan's timing? Reverse uh, that we could

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>get this announcement, you know, because he has to declare

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 1>by next Friday whether or not he's gonna seek reelection.

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>So this has been whispered about all of the Congress

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time. But it's the timing of the

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>announcement this day in particular, I find, you know, I mean,

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just such a crazy day already with period the

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:40.719
<v Speaker 1>news flows overwhelming, and we have to change it here

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in the next eight minutes thirty two seconds. But Kevin's

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>really when when we look at this and we compare

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and contrast to other House speakers, and of course Mr

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Bainer of Ohio, was he run out of this job?

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he was run out of his

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>job in the way the Speaker run or Speaker Bayner was,

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>but I do think said it's worth noting that back

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on the campaign trail, when I covered candidate Donald Trump

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and we went to Speaker Paul ryan district, they were

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>booing Paul Ryan. Donald Trump was on stage and had

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>them booing Paul Ryan at the mention of his name.

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So the relationship between Speaker Ryan and President Trump has

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>been tent putting it mildly for quite some time. They

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>were never really big fans of each other. And even

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you this, like the Aids that I

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>talked with on to President Trump still don't like Speaker

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul Ryan, Kevin Sirelli. I don't know where where where

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to go? Do you want to talk about

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the Wisconsin first and who takes who takes the seat,

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>or what happens to all those committee ships and the

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>actual running of the legislative branch. Now that the Speaker

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Ryan has already said that he's not going to be

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>returning to the halls of Congress, well, so this is

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>very It's interesting because we talk about the different political

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>factions within the Republican Party all the time, but a

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of these new factions and political alliances in the

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>halls of Congress have really been dramatically redrawn, and the

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>steers of influence, particularly within the last twenty four months,

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>have really been shifting and and and look no further

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>than then Speaker Ryan's political alliance with Ryank's previous and

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>UH and UH as well as that former apparatus Sean Spyser, Well,

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about having a Wednesday moment. I couldn't remember Shanna

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Shawn Spyser. Paul Ryank's previous and Paul Ryan were really

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>a trio about town when I was coming up as

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a Cup reporter. To see them essentially be irrelevant right now,

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not irrelevant, but to see them really equipped is remarkable. Um.

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And the Freedom Caucus is going to be pouncing on those.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna say, I'll offer up the tweet

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>that presidents Wednesday for the President. And you know, when

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you were a Cup reporter, I don't know, maybe they

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't even have Twitter, you didn't have to follow us

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>on a regular basis, but we've always had Twitter, all

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>right in short pants? Um uh, just a minute ago,

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the President tweeting the speaker. Paul Ryan is a truly

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>good man, and while he will not be seeking re election,

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>he will leave a legacy of achievement that nobody can question.

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>We are with you, Paul, exclamation point. So who takes

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>over from Paul Ryan from the Wisconsin First Well, he

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>would like to see Kevin McCarthy or Steve Scalise replace

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has developed personal relationship with Congress Mr. Scalise.

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>So remember, of course the tragic baseball shooting several months ago.

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh, they've had a close relationship on the

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>foot side of that. I spoke with an aid to

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the Kim Caucus just within the last hour who said

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're carefully watching this any developments out of the

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Freedom Caucuses, and that I point four hours. But but

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be attention. I would just also note, and

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>you guys know this the Trump's world. They're preparing and

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>folks are preparing for a blue wave in the fall.

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>But there's going to be some new voices from ultra

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>conservative districts throughout the country who are fully aligned with

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>President Trump and everything he stands for their Republicans when

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>they're watching this and they view this as an example

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of being drained the swamp and right. But Kevin, Kevin,

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>one of your great charms is you're in Capitol Hill

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot. It's damaged you. We understand that, but you

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>get the zeit. Guys to the hill. Is Kevin McCarthy

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna be anointed and assumed to be Speaker of the

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>House or is there just a Republican a GOP tone

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that he's running to be the Minority head. That's a

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>great point. Well, here's what I can tell you. Mark Short,

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the President's top Legislative affairs director and lieutenant on titol Hill,

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. Uh, was wanting to be seen outside

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the Marge Zuckerberg hearing yesterday and he walked while he

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>was on the cell phone, past a lot of cameras

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>that was engulfing that part Senate hearing room, and he

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>went into a private meeting with Senator John Cornyn, Republican

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>from Texas. And that I think shows the level of

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>saviness that this White House is trying to exert and

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the pressure behind the teams of Republican leadership who will

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>be meeting with President Trump at the White House Lader

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>this evening. They're definitely making a play for the but

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't know where they stand. But there's no question

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has had frustrated with Speaker Ryan and Republican

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>leadership in the past and started leader Mr McConnell for

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that matter. Uh. But you know, and I would also

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>know that, Uh Bernardo the Sentiment Arty leader Truck Shumer

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>just David saying, Hey, Speaker Ryan's on cha. Now, let's

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>hope that he breaks ties from the altar conservatives can

0:25:56.400 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>also puts pressure on President Trump. Outline, Pimfox, that's gonna

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>just offer this. Do you talk about the Twitter and

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the Senator Ran Paul saying, quote promising war by tweet

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>insults not only the Constitution but every soldier who puts

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>their life on the line. Uh. We seem to have

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a you know, government by tweet, and uh, Kevin surreally

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>does the President's position on Syria and possible military action

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>make it that much more difficult to have any real,

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of political consistency when it comes to any

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>anything happen to do with legislative achievements. No, right before

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I came on, Eric, before Riley Dabs called our producer here,

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>as I spoke in the hallway with Senator Linday Graham,

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Republican from Carolina, he called a quote unquote defining moment

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>for this presidency. Uh, and he's hoping that not just

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>at one time military strike, but part of a broader,

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>more articulated plan. Obviously, you can't articulate a military plan

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a full on Twitter with regards to Steria. But I

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>can tell you that every Democrats spoken with Senators Warner Bloomenthal,

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrats from Virginia and Connecticut respectively, as well as every

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Republican but the exception of the likes that people like

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Senator Rand Paul fully support some type of military response

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in response to the chemical attack. On the side, I

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>just spoke with Representative Diane Black Republicans Senna Stee, who

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is also saying that this steria issue has to be

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>dealt with military forces. Is something that is military strike

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>roud is something that is fully on the table and

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>many people are anticipating with the Kevin, thank you for

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the good work this morning. Is our chief Washington correspondent

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>was just sir, really where us on television and radio?

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Winter at Tom Keane before

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.