Speaker 1: The views and opinions expressing this podcast are solely those
Speaker 1: of the authors and participants and do not necessarily represent
Speaker 1: those of iHeart Media, Tenderfoot TV, or their employees. This
Speaker 1: series contains discussions of violence and sexual violence. Listener discretion
Speaker 1: is advised previously an algorithm. After graduating high school in
Speaker 1: in Lima, Ohio, Vaughan returned to Indiana, where he says
Speaker 1: he committed three murders in Hammond, killing a couple as
Speaker 1: part of a robbery and shooting a man after getting
Speaker 1: into a fight. You said that you shot him near
Speaker 1: the telephone call that was directly across right from there.
Speaker 1: How many times you think you shot at? By? After
Speaker 1: a stint in the Marines, some head trauma and a
Speaker 1: less than honorable discharge, Vaughn began dating a woman twenty
Speaker 1: nine years older than him. They moved to Texas and
Speaker 1: got married, but life kept drawing vond back to Gary
Speaker 1: and they moved back. Around the year two thousand, Von
Speaker 1: grew apart from his wife. He made a new girlfriend, Sharifa,
Speaker 1: but it was an abusive relationship. In two thousand four,
Speaker 1: he and Sharitha had a child together, but shortly after
Speaker 1: their child's birth. The child died. That n a dead
Speaker 1: moment for we allowed the child. We're going through the
Speaker 1: morning period. She was out, took the money to the nopeman.
Speaker 1: I was like, that's just too got me. What do
Speaker 1: you want to fuck up? Like if we're just gonna
Speaker 1: beat this ship over from my Heart radio and Tenderfoot TV,
Speaker 1: this is algorithm, I'm ben key break. After Von and
Speaker 1: Shretha's child died, Sharia escaped Vaughn and went into hiding.
Speaker 1: Von suspected Sharitha was staying with a friend of hers,
Speaker 1: a man named David Abraham, who Vaughan said was a
Speaker 1: drug dealer and a member of a rival gang, the
Speaker 1: Vice Lords. Dude, we woke through somebody. I'm too, According
Speaker 1: to a police report, near the beginning of April two
Speaker 1: thousand four, Vaughan showed up at Abram's house and asked
Speaker 1: if Shritha was there. Abram told him she wasn't, but
Speaker 1: Vaughan got angry. I know she's in there, he said,
Speaker 1: and kept demanding to see her, but eventually Von gave
Speaker 1: up and left. The Next day, Vaughan returned, this time
Speaker 1: with police officers. Vaughn told them that Abram had shot
Speaker 1: at his cousin Darryl. Abram talked to the police and
Speaker 1: explained the situation. When the police were satisfied with Abram's story,
Speaker 1: they left and Vaughan left as well. But Abram started
Speaker 1: hearing through the grape vine that Vaughn was hatching a
Speaker 1: plan to get back at him. Vaughn was telling people
Speaker 1: he had dynamite and he was going to blow up
Speaker 1: Abram's house. A few days later, Abram was driving through
Speaker 1: his neighborhood when he saw Van storming towards his house
Speaker 1: with a red can of gasoline. Abram called the police
Speaker 1: and pulled over beside Vaughan. Vaughan yelled at him that
Speaker 1: he'd blew up Abraham's home if he didn't get Sharita back,
Speaker 1: and said that Shreta owed him seven thousand dollars. Abraham
Speaker 1: tried to reason with Vaughan. He remembered saying, you're going
Speaker 1: to burn down my family, innocent people, over a woman.
Speaker 1: Vaughan responded, give me seven thousand dollars and you can
Speaker 1: have her. When the police showed up, they saw Vaughan
Speaker 1: was standing by Abram's car, yelling wildly and waving around
Speaker 1: a red gas canister. Police say that they tried to
Speaker 1: get Von to calm down, but things escalated. Instead, Vaughn
Speaker 1: poured gasoline on himself and got out of lighter, yelling
Speaker 1: to officers that he had dynamite and would blow himself up.
Speaker 1: The officers advised Abraham to get away from Vaughan, so
Speaker 1: Abraham drove back towards his home, but he could see
Speaker 1: Vaughan following in his rear view mirror. Abraham says he
Speaker 1: saw Sharita sitting on a porch a couple of doors
Speaker 1: down from his home, and he threw her a set
Speaker 1: of his keys and told her to lock herself inside.
Speaker 1: But before Sharitha had a chance to react, Vaughan was
Speaker 1: already approaching. He yelled, bitch, are you crazy, and then
Speaker 1: started running towards her. She sprinted to the back door
Speaker 1: of Abram's house. Von pursued her, gaining on her, but
Speaker 1: she managed to get inside and locked the door behind her.
Speaker 1: Vaughan began kicking at the door. Terrified, Shartha tried to
Speaker 1: find a place to hide and ended up crawling under
Speaker 1: a bed. She could hear the door bust open and
Speaker 1: then heard Von stepping inside Vaughan yelled that if she
Speaker 1: didn't come out of hiding, he'd burned the whole place down.
Speaker 1: He began pouring gasoline onto the floor. Sharitha was terrified
Speaker 1: and didn't know what to do, but as Vaughan kept
Speaker 1: pouring gas, fumes began filling apartment and soon became overpowering. Finally,
Speaker 1: Sharifa crawled out from under the bed. Immediately, Von put
Speaker 1: her in a headlock, and then he poured gasolene on
Speaker 1: top of her until the can was almost empty. The
Speaker 1: final bit of gasoline he poured onto his own head
Speaker 1: gabs just running off. Yeah, but the gas pipe and
Speaker 1: had the whole bud to feel with games. Police had
Speaker 1: now arrived at Abram's home, but Von told them to
Speaker 1: stay back. We'd light the building on fire. Police tried
Speaker 1: to talk him down and to clear others out of
Speaker 1: the area. Vaughn says he started clicking the lighter the
Speaker 1: girl fire, beat on fire and go to building up,
Speaker 1: always saying it's part but it didn't light. You said
Speaker 1: you got lucky fume with one hard. Officer Carrie Rice
Speaker 1: was working that day. He remembers it a bit differently.
Speaker 1: If he had tried to strike that cigarette line and
Speaker 1: it didn't strike the person, he wouldn't have got a
Speaker 1: second chance to try to strike it. He had a
Speaker 1: deadly weapon, a gas on the cigarette for the deadly weapons,
Speaker 1: deadly for it was authorized. You shouldn't and you don't
Speaker 1: want to, but sometimes you scenario had it went different
Speaker 1: in two thousand four, and maybe some people would still
Speaker 1: be alive today. I don't know, but it's just eerie
Speaker 1: sometimes because I don't think we still know I'm in
Speaker 1: the women he's actually killed. Rice says that he was
Speaker 1: nearby when Abram called. We don't have too many days
Speaker 1: where we have stuff like this. In fact, it probably
Speaker 1: my first time ever going to a hospital situation like
Speaker 1: this one was. It was a strange scene with Sharifa
Speaker 1: in a headlock. Vaughan had marched her out of Abram's
Speaker 1: apartment and was starting back towards his own place. He
Speaker 1: had a left hand around her neck, the gas can
Speaker 1: in his left hand and cigarette lighter in his right hand.
Speaker 1: The girl was, of course scared. She was screaming, please
Speaker 1: help me a lot. The officers tried to calm Vonda down.
Speaker 1: You trying to tell him you haven't heard anybody it's
Speaker 1: gonna be okay. You know, let's go ahead end this
Speaker 1: now and nobody hurts. You know, it's not that serious.
Speaker 1: But he really didn't want to be, for some reason
Speaker 1: separated from that female, and he wouldn't let any of
Speaker 1: us get too close to him. But like if you
Speaker 1: guys started getting close, he threatened to light him on fire.
Speaker 1: Or yes, he kept telling us to stay away every
Speaker 1: time you get the step twelve and be thrown the
Speaker 1: light both of him up. And how would you describe
Speaker 1: his general state of mind? Um, he was calm, but
Speaker 1: but he was yellout. I guess he was yellous so
Speaker 1: we could hear him. I really did believe that he
Speaker 1: was going to set both of them on fired, you know,
Speaker 1: just from this demeanor what he was saying. Sure, you
Speaker 1: kind of like running through in your head. What can
Speaker 1: you do if he does do that? The only thing
Speaker 1: we can do at that point is trying to at
Speaker 1: least grab the female fell up to the ground and
Speaker 1: try to put the fire up. As Vaughan March Wreatha
Speaker 1: back to his apartment, a growing procession of police, firefighters,
Speaker 1: and now a SWAT team followed. They crossed us twenty
Speaker 1: a three way highway that runs through Gary, and they
Speaker 1: went down an alleyway until they arrived at the back
Speaker 1: door of Vaughn's apartment because back was up against the
Speaker 1: door in the back of the apartment building. At that point,
Speaker 1: we had two or three of our swat team guys
Speaker 1: go through the front door apartment buildings. But after he
Speaker 1: backed up to the door and opened it, two of
Speaker 1: us watch teams actually grabbed him. He ran up, also
Speaker 1: grabbed the can. One of us grabbed the girl as
Speaker 1: snatched her out, and that's not we were able to
Speaker 1: prod him away from her. Vaughn was charged with felony
Speaker 1: breaking and entering and felony intimidation. He took a plea
Speaker 1: deal that knocked off the intimidation charge, and the judge
Speaker 1: used her discretion to bump the breaking and entry charge
Speaker 1: down to a misdemeanor. Vaughn was sentenced to a year
Speaker 1: in praison in in a year of probation. Obviously, Von
Speaker 1: was a deeply troubled person before this all happened. But
Speaker 1: in Von's own mind, or at least the story that
Speaker 1: he's told the police, this two thousand four incident, losing
Speaker 1: his child and his relationship with Sharifa and then going
Speaker 1: to prison. This was the incident that vond saw as
Speaker 1: the beginning of his downward spiral. And then it seemed
Speaker 1: like I never made it back from there. I was
Speaker 1: doing good thing, a quick crime like quick back. What
Speaker 1: are you now? Working at a house doing good? Just
Speaker 1: couldn't make it back. We're at least if it wasn't
Speaker 1: the beginning of his downward spiral, it may have been
Speaker 1: when he returned to killing, it all went back out
Speaker 1: of control again. I never made him back. Un Once
Speaker 1: you I don't know how to flame. If y'all y'all
Speaker 1: don't have the same or just once you start killing again,
Speaker 1: it becomes it's like any other day. It's like if
Speaker 1: I was I'm not an out the hallway, right, But
Speaker 1: if I were and I started to drink, you're off
Speaker 1: to the races, right. That's because you have the urge
Speaker 1: to hunt. In this part of the interview, Vaughan clearly
Speaker 1: implies they struggled with murder rages sometime before his arrest
Speaker 1: in two thousand four, and then he struggled with them
Speaker 1: again after his release in two thousand five. In two
Speaker 1: thousand and six, after Vaughan finished serving a year in
Speaker 1: jail and a year of probation. He borrowed some money
Speaker 1: from his stepsister, Regina, and moved back down to Texas.
Speaker 1: Vaughan got an apartment in the Rundberg area of North Austin,
Speaker 1: an area known for drugs and prostitution. That's that same
Speaker 1: area where Maria's son said that Vaughan would go for
Speaker 1: long walks at night. In Austin, Vaughn kept a low
Speaker 1: profile for about a year before he committed his next crime.
Speaker 1: In two thousand and six, after Vaughan had finished a
Speaker 1: year of prison and a year of probation for breaking
Speaker 1: and entering and threatening to kill Sharita, Vaughan moved back
Speaker 1: to Austin, and in December two thousand seven, he committed
Speaker 1: his next documented crime. This next section is going to
Speaker 1: get graphic. I'm not including it to be lurid, but
Speaker 1: because this is what von did, and maybe more importantly,
Speaker 1: this is what the justice system knew Vaughan was capable of.
Speaker 1: The following comes from police documents. On December two thousand seven,
Speaker 1: Vaughan booked a prostitute to come to his apartment. She
Speaker 1: says they met in the parking lot inside his building,
Speaker 1: and then went back to his place. It was dark,
Speaker 1: and she asked Vaughan if they could turn on a light.
Speaker 1: He did, and then asked her if she was a
Speaker 1: police officer. She told him she wasn't, and then he
Speaker 1: attacked her. He tripped her and knocked her down to
Speaker 1: the ground, gone on top of her, and began choking her.
Speaker 1: As she lost blood flow to her brain, she felt
Speaker 1: her body go limp and she urinated. She felt completely
Speaker 1: and utterly helpless. Vaughan yelled at her that he could
Speaker 1: kill her if he wanted. She thought that she was
Speaker 1: going to die. Vaughan then forced her to undress and
Speaker 1: to perform sex acts, beating her if she didn't comply. Eventually,
Speaker 1: he ejaculated inside her in a short while later, he
Speaker 1: allowed her to leave. The Next day, the woman went
Speaker 1: to the Austin Police to report the attack. A sexual
Speaker 1: assault nurse observed that she had broken blood vessels in
Speaker 1: her left eye and pinpoint bruises behind her ears. These
Speaker 1: are injuries that can occur if someone has been strangled,
Speaker 1: so they supported her story of a violent attack. The
Speaker 1: nurse performed a rape kit and collected DNA evidence. The
Speaker 1: woman told police what had happened and where Von lived.
Speaker 1: Police determined that Darren Vaughan was leasing the apartment at
Speaker 1: the address she had given them, but he wasn't at
Speaker 1: the apartment when they showed up. Eventually, they did locate him,
Speaker 1: and Vaughan told them that he was innocent. He claimed
Speaker 1: to have never met the victim and said that he
Speaker 1: had moved out of the apartment a month prior to
Speaker 1: the incident. Police asked him if he'd consent to a
Speaker 1: DNA test, and he agreed. Almost half a year passed
Speaker 1: before police received the DNA analysis His uncle year exactly
Speaker 1: what caused this delay. Like many places across the country,
Speaker 1: there was a rape kit backlog in Texas. It's worth noting, too, though,
Speaker 1: that there's currently a class action lawsuit against the Austin
Speaker 1: Police Department for allegedly mishandling thousands of sexual assault cases
Speaker 1: going back to the same time period. Whatever the reason, though,
Speaker 1: almost half a year passed between when the DNA was
Speaker 1: collected and when police received the analysis. The analysis showed
Speaker 1: a sample from the victims jacket matched Vaughn's DNA, but
Speaker 1: it still took another two months before police found and
Speaker 1: arrested Vaughan. Vaughn was charged with two counts of aggravated
Speaker 1: sexual assault, a first degree felony that can lead to
Speaker 1: a sentence of up to years in prison, but the
Speaker 1: Travis County District Attorney's office labeled Vaughan a low risk
Speaker 1: offender and gave him a plea deal where if he
Speaker 1: played guilty to a second degree sexual assault charge, he'd
Speaker 1: only see a five year sentence. Years later, a spokesperson
Speaker 1: for the District Attorney's office told the local paper that
Speaker 1: they were completely unaware of Vaughan's violent incident with Sharifa
Speaker 1: because Vaughan had only been convicted of a misdemeanor breaking
Speaker 1: and entering charge. It wasn't even on their radar when
Speaker 1: I learned about the crimes Vaughan had been convicted of
Speaker 1: ving Gary and Austin for incidents where he had almost
Speaker 1: killed two women. I was shocked by the short sentences
Speaker 1: he'd received, but I also just didn't have a good
Speaker 1: sense for what's normal. How do we and how should
Speaker 1: we make decisions about how we sentence someone for a crime.
Speaker 1: To try to find out how big of a threat
Speaker 1: someone like Vaughan poses, I contacted professor Carl Hansen. If
Speaker 1: you look at the police stories, the police stories are
Speaker 1: almost always told from the perspective of catching the wrong door.
Speaker 1: My story starts, Okay, you caught him, Now what you know,
Speaker 1: what's the rest of the story. Hanson is a clinical
Speaker 1: psychologist who spent most of his career working for the
Speaker 1: Canadian government trying to figure out how their justice system
Speaker 1: should deal with sex offenders. He's now a professor at
Speaker 1: Carlton University in Ottawa. Most of my research has focused
Speaker 1: on sexual recidivism. So these are people with a history
Speaker 1: of sexual crime, and the question is, given that somebody
Speaker 1: has a history of sexual crime, what is the likelihood
Speaker 1: that they're going to do it again? And how can
Speaker 1: we tell individuals are higher or lower risk? Hansen says
Speaker 1: there's a number of factors that predict whether an offender
Speaker 1: is high risk or low risk, like young age, past crimes,
Speaker 1: negative attitudes towards authority, substance use, and a general preoccupation
Speaker 1: with sex. All of these risk factors can then be
Speaker 1: tallied up and put into an algorithm that then predicts
Speaker 1: a sex offender's risk of committing future offenses. Studies know
Speaker 1: that these algorithms do a better job at predicting recidivism
Speaker 1: than pearl boards, who are decisions made by professionals based
Speaker 1: on their intuition. The data is getting better. We can
Speaker 1: stort people into higher and lower risks. The lowest risk
Speaker 1: people have expected rates of sexual recidivism that are quite low.
Speaker 1: It's like less than two percent after five years. The
Speaker 1: highest risk groups have rates um, you know, thirty two
Speaker 1: after five years, which I think most people would consider
Speaker 1: objectively high. Now that being said, people are not fully predictable.
Speaker 1: We're not billiard balls. Even somebody in the highest risk group.
Speaker 1: There's no group that will say this person is guaranteed
Speaker 1: to reoffend. It's a question of how much risk we're
Speaker 1: willing to tolerate. I wondered whether Texas had all the
Speaker 1: information it needed when it deemed von low risk. Should
Speaker 1: the gasoline incident with Sharifa have been factor it in?
Speaker 1: This guy at one point had kidnapped in an ex girlfriend,
Speaker 1: So after she left the relationship, he showed up and
Speaker 1: was threatening her with a can of gasoline, and you know,
Speaker 1: police showed up, and it was this whole thing. But
Speaker 1: I'm curious how you know, like the history of a
Speaker 1: crime like that might influence how you think of someone's risk.
Speaker 1: A history of of violence is a well established rispector
Speaker 1: for sexual crime. If you knew this guy had a
Speaker 1: history of threatening his ex girlfriends, um, it's not good. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And and it's kind of like domestic violence or violence
Speaker 1: against women. Is that particularly important or so? One of
Speaker 1: the well established predictors of sexual violence against women is
Speaker 1: his negative attitude towards women. You're putting women in a
Speaker 1: class who they're not trusted. You know, think about in
Speaker 1: cells individuals who think that women are or you out
Speaker 1: to get them. They're tricky. You can't be trusted if
Speaker 1: you have that belief. And if you also have problems
Speaker 1: with what you know they college would call attachment, so
Speaker 1: that you get particularly upset or irrational around the breakup
Speaker 1: of relationships. Those are established risk factors for sexual violence.
Speaker 1: When Hansen mentioned attachment problems, I thought of Vaughan's relationship
Speaker 1: with his mother, how he'd been put into foster care
Speaker 1: at age six and felt that his mother had abandoned him.
Speaker 1: You know, there probably are factors from someone's childhood or
Speaker 1: early experiences, are really things that they have little control over.
Speaker 1: Is it fair to use those factors to make these decisions, um,
Speaker 1: when in some ways they could help public safety, but
Speaker 1: in other ways almost feel discriminatory against a person. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it coming back to the moral question about you know,
Speaker 1: how blame worthy people are. We're all a product of something, right,
Speaker 1: you know, there's we all have causes and conditions that
Speaker 1: made us who we are. And if we're you know,
Speaker 1: committing serious sexual violence, I can bet that the conditions
Speaker 1: weren't very good, right, So what do we do about that? UM?
Speaker 1: I think that we have to make some determination to
Speaker 1: blame worthin us. But I think we also have to
Speaker 1: have a wide view about how we can make the
Speaker 1: world a better place, and some of it has to
Speaker 1: do with, um, making people's upbringings better. One of the
Speaker 1: researchers who I really like, Richard Tromblay, He was very
Speaker 1: interested in, you know, going back in the prevention, and
Speaker 1: so he started with you know, severe forensic hospitals, and
Speaker 1: he got a bit younger, and got two teens, and
Speaker 1: he got two young children. And last time I talked
Speaker 1: to him, or so him speak, UM, he was looking
Speaker 1: at pregnant women and he was able to identify prior
Speaker 1: to birth children who were going to be involved in
Speaker 1: the criminals as the system and had to do with
Speaker 1: the parents, um lifestyle, their substance abuse. There, you know,
Speaker 1: values and behavior. We're all products of something. I'm not
Speaker 1: sure what to do with all this information about the
Speaker 1: factors that might make someone high or blue risk of reoffending.
Speaker 1: Before I ended my conversation with Hansen, he wanted to
Speaker 1: make it very clear that Vaughan isn't a typical offender.
Speaker 1: He's an exception to the rule. Sounds the fellow that
Speaker 1: you're focusing on a specificate and serious problems in multiple areas,
Speaker 1: but that's not typical when you're talking about sex crime
Speaker 1: and sex crimes against women. We tend to make policy
Speaker 1: based on the worst cases. If you have a wider
Speaker 1: range of what these cases actually look like, I think
Speaker 1: we'll motivate towards better public policy overall. And I want
Speaker 1: to be clear, I don't think any advant's risk factors
Speaker 1: excuse his behavior in any way. But I do think
Speaker 1: as a society we should work to reduce risk factors
Speaker 1: like neglect and abuse that can make someone more likely
Speaker 1: to commit these sorts of violent crimes. And I think
Speaker 1: we need to do a better job at making sure
Speaker 1: courts and parole boards have the information they need to
Speaker 1: make informed, evidence based decisions about someone's risk of re offense.
Speaker 1: But Vaughan didn't feel like he'd gotten off easy. As
Speaker 1: he told Detective Forward in and from that offense where
Speaker 1: you choked the girl there and wound up with all
Speaker 1: this happening, you were never given probation or parole conditions
Speaker 1: or anything like that. Is you came to Indiana, you
Speaker 1: were completely released. So the only thing you had to
Speaker 1: do was signed up on the offender RESHI, according to
Speaker 1: Von's twisted logic, because the woman was a prostitute, it
Speaker 1: wasn't ranged locked up. Yeah, I'll beat her. I rape you, well,
Speaker 1: I rape got standard. Y'all call it rape, but we
Speaker 1: don't call it rape. And streets like you pay her.
Speaker 1: So what is she p plaining about? After Vaughn was
Speaker 1: released from prison in Austin, he needed somewhere to stay Texas, right,
Speaker 1: offer me housing. I don't want your money. I don't
Speaker 1: need you to give me anything. I could go get
Speaker 1: what I wanted. It might not be the way y'all
Speaker 1: want me to go get anything, but I could go
Speaker 1: get it. I think it's the way most people in
Speaker 1: society wasn't right. But that's why we got what a
Speaker 1: trillion dollars and did because everybody, like guys that lived
Speaker 1: in projects that we know your publics. This we call
Speaker 1: him bitches. You get no respect, We'll slap you, knock
Speaker 1: you out because you're mate. We'd rather you rob like
Speaker 1: because kids need more health than a delt. Once you've
Speaker 1: been going with a dolt, you shouldn't need any dolt.
Speaker 1: Vun ended up going straight back to Gary and moving
Speaker 1: in with his stepbrother, Reginald Beard. Here's Reginald talking to
Speaker 1: the police shortly after Bond's arrest. You know he was
Speaker 1: gonna do when he got out and mucket, I'm sensitive,
Speaker 1: you know what I'm saying that it's my brother. No,
Speaker 1: I said, brother, you know you need space, crash man,
Speaker 1: you can come here, okay. And he when he got home,
Speaker 1: he explads to me like the details of when he
Speaker 1: went to jail for down there in Texas. Uh, he
Speaker 1: had to register at my house. I get him light up.
Speaker 1: You know, okay, what do you do when you first
Speaker 1: came most here doing? When he first name well, he
Speaker 1: really didn't go him right on that mostly watching a
Speaker 1: lot of TV, eating a lot of food. Yeah, how
Speaker 1: does behavior mens? Just's been out of jail. I mean,
Speaker 1: what do you I was having when you first came
Speaker 1: from Do you have me? He started getting pressed, He
Speaker 1: flip flops. Man. Uh. Some days he had come in
Speaker 1: the house and he had spent on couch. On a
Speaker 1: day he watched cartoonls, like fucking cartoonls out back day,
Speaker 1: Schoopy said, and then true green one more for a while.
Speaker 1: See you you know what I'm saying. And I'm alte
Speaker 1: him for a couple of fucking days, sure, he said,
Speaker 1: two three morning open, go for a walk? Yeah? Is
Speaker 1: that all the time? He walks a lot. He had
Speaker 1: disappeared for a couple of days. But it's not always
Speaker 1: at the exact time. I really can't keep tabs something
Speaker 1: like that. But before olish, you know, his walks out
Speaker 1: and you just take a walk. Okay, working house now
Speaker 1: and now as alltist and like, well you've walked up.
Speaker 1: Help not I'm talking about the city to like see
Speaker 1: you know what I'm saying. It's unclear exactly when Bond
Speaker 1: started killing after he returned to Indiana, but Bonds confirmed
Speaker 1: murders the ones where he took police to the bodies.
Speaker 1: News appeared to have started in January with the disappearance
Speaker 1: of Tierra Beatty. Contact police base, but they will say
Speaker 1: enough that she probably wanted to be bombed with nobody,
Speaker 1: but we knew that wasn't the case. But you knew
Speaker 1: the look out with it. So I said, well, let
Speaker 1: me start in death. Gave myself next time on algorithm.
Speaker 1: I'm not normally a drug dealer because I'm not kind
Speaker 1: of got you go hold ten dollars to you know
Speaker 1: what I'm saying, I want my ten dollars. Presiban talking
Speaker 1: like keeping people that were like, I don't you got
Speaker 1: the twinings, but I've seen you had to sing her
Speaker 1: the other day, dn't pretty much one dollars. It was
Speaker 1: one girl. She was one of the very very first
Speaker 1: person that I ever ran into him, but she happened
Speaker 1: to get away from him. She talked to the detective
Speaker 1: because of her line of work, they didn't have time
Speaker 1: for her to me, it's more because this is him.
Speaker 1: You know what I'm saying, This is he's told me
Speaker 1: the person I've always tooke. China was going around telling
Speaker 1: people that she's in a band of building on the
Speaker 1: west side of town. It was like a singing from
Speaker 1: a horror movie. This episode was written and produced by
Speaker 1: me then Keith. Break Algorithm is executive produced by Alex
Speaker 1: will Umes, Donald Albright and Matt Frederick. Production assistance and
Speaker 1: mixing by Eric Quintana. The music is by Makeup and
Speaker 1: Vanity Set and Blue Dot Sessions. Thanks to Christina Dana,
Speaker 1: Miranda Hawkins, Jamie Albright, Rema l Kali, Trevor Young, and
Speaker 1: Josh Thane for their help and notes. And if you're
Speaker 1: looking for another true crime show to listen to, you
Speaker 1: can now binge camp Hell. It's a podcast investigating the
Speaker 1: rise of this weird wilderness therapy school based out of Georgia,
Speaker 1: which operated for over thirty years and ended in this
Speaker 1: huge scandal. Is a really good show and all twelve
Speaker 1: episodes are out now, so you can binge them. Search
Speaker 1: for Camp Hell on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,
Speaker 1: or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.