WEBVTT - Iran Is The Thing That Keeps Me Up At Night: Former CIA Officer

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa A. Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P and

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com,

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>National security, trade tweets, Trump and Iran. Here to help

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>us understand all of these different things is Jack Divine.

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>He is the former acting director of the Central Intelligence Agency,

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>and he is also the founding partner and the president

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>of the security firm The Arkin Group. He joins us

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>here in our eleven three oh studios. Jack, thank you

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>very much for being here. Do you have a security clearance?

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I do. What is your reaction to the news reports

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>about the potential for revoking the security clearances of several

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>former administration security officials. I can understand why the presidents upset.

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I can unders stand um why it's painful to listen

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to them. But free speech is a big part of

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>our critically important part of our system, and you can't.

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>You have to be in the political rena. You have

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to live with it. UM. I do think there's questions

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>about why we have so many people that have security clearance.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Last time I looked at was the three millions why

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>government officials carried into the private sector. I mean legitimate

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>reasons is but to go after because you don't like

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what's being said, I think is wrong foot it well,

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think it has legs. If you'll use

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>excuse the pun, I don't. I don't think there's gonna

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>be a long lasting story. I don't think you're going

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.559
<v Speaker 1>to do it, but you know, it rattles everybody's cage.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that's rattling everybody's cage right now is President

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump's rhetoric toward Iran UH, similar to the approach that

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 1>he took with North Korea, basically threatening them and UH

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 1>and and the idea of sanctions are definitely coming up.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>What's going on here? Well, I think there's the bigger

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>picture of where we headed in Iran. But let's start

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>with today's today's news, if you will, UH. I think

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Rohani, president in Iran, spoke out so

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>forcedly and said if you do try and sanction, as

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, be the mother of all wars. I mean

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the predictable reaction. You don't have to be a rocket

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>science to know that President Trump is going to come

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>back and loves a good fight, and they're just going

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to come back as strong as you can, and says

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>if you think that's the mother of all wars, what

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>do you see what I have for you? So I

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was reading an article day where quoting someone saying, you

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>know they're dealing with the for fish in this pond.

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Now you know what they might have gotten away with

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and passed with challenges. But if you know, if they

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>really think they're going to use force the Iranians, then

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>then I think they need to be prepared for a

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty harsh response. I mean, I don't think it's all bravado.

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:19.559
<v Speaker 1>So you think that we could have a military altercation

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>with Theyran I've been concerned about the prospects. It used

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to be my concern about Pakistan having nuclear weapons that

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>kept me awake. The thing that has troubled me, and

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I've written about this in my quarterlies for the past year.

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>The Place to Watch. I mean, I'm obviously fixated on

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the Russian Helsinki meeting, but I would say the longer

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>term issue where there's a real risk, is Iran an

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>arm relationship with them. Jack, You've had a thirty two

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>year career with the CIA. You're also the author of

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a book called Good Hunting, a spy Master's story based

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on what you know. Do you believe that the meeting

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that took place between Vladimir Huon and President Donald Trump

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was recorded? That's a good A good question. UM. I

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>would I wouldn't bet a lot of money, but I

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>think it was limited to the stenography. All right, now,

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>they'd have to have an agreement, and I would think

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>if I were either the participants, I would not want

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>to record it because you're not sure how that meeting

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to go. I think it's too risky to

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>have it recorded. I think they were prudent. Actually, if

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to have UM, you know, once in a while,

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you really do have to do one on one and Uh.

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I seriously doubt that it was recorded, but I wouldn't

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>bet a lot of money on it. Do you think

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump's lack of uh castigation of Prussia for

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>their involvement in the election, which is agreed by bipartisan groups,

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that there was meddling the Russian government in the US elections.

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that the president's tepid kind of approach

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to that puts US into greater danger? I think the UH.

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I think President Trump was on a roll, depending on

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>how you look at it, up until he landed in

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>the UK, and I thought something wheel fell off of

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the car in terms of the preparation and strategy of

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the meeting. And then I honestly must say Helsinki, I

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>thought it was a huge setback for the president in

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of the exerting what looked like a very strong president.

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you may not like the policies that may

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>not be popular. Eventually popular already cuts up with it.

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>But it was strong, whether you liked it or not.

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest and most troubling thing about that

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>meeting it was a sense of of weakness and not

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>coming out ahead, which is a very bad place for

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a president to be. I remember I was a kid,

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but I remember Khruschef meeting Kennedy on the first seven meeting,

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't want Kennedy to make the meeting, and

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>he did. He being Kennedy and Khrushchov belf. It was

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a disaster for Kennedy after that meeting, Putin went off

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and decided he was going to push, push hard and

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>put missiles in the Cuba. But he didn't realize that.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>Jack Kennedy at the same time realized he did poorly,

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and and and strengthen it. And then you had a

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>confrontation as close as we've gotten a nuclear war. And

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>fortunately for Kennedy, we had in his pocket inside intelligence

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>from the spy Pankovski and was able to push back

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on Krushev. So I think there's a dynamic here and

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>what is Alice Trump going to regain his strength? And

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>does that come from pushing back? And um, I think

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that would be my recommendation. I am a bit befuddled

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>by the call for a second summit in that context,

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought I had a pretty good grasp of what

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen next to now ambivalent Jack. One

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of you are various UH duties. You headed the CIA's

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Counter Narcotics Center. You also worked on the response to

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States to Russian incursions in Afghanistan. Do you

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>believe that there's a casual relationship between human behavior and logic?

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a really interesting question, but I'm not sure

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>where you're coming from, and I would say, yes, qualified,

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>quite qualified. Well, I think we all think we're very logic,

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, But I do think that we all come

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>out of the same place with a DNA and makeup

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that was somehow related to some uncle who was a

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>little flaky. So maybe we're not. We're trying to be logical,

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>but we do have personalities that are developed. Um so yeah,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to be optimistic that mankind woman kind as

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>well h are logical. Well, let's hope that logic prevails.

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Jack Divine, thank you so much for being with us.

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>We could spend another hour talking. Uh so many questions,

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so we'll leaf to have you back. Let's start our

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>focus to emerging markets, in particular Turkey assets are falling

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>out of bed there after the central Bank unexpectedly held

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rates where they were despite the fact that inflation

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 1>was spiraling out of concern and that many people were

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that they needed to support the currency. Of course, uh,

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the president's son in law is now helming the central bank.

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>So Damian Sassour joins us. Now fixed income started just

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. Damien, Wow, Turkey, are you surprised by

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this or is this just uh, you know, an ongoing

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>mess that just gets worse. Well, I'm not surprised than

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 1>it is an ongoing mess, and it's it's one of

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>his own making. It's one of it's one of one's

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>own making, right. I mean, we have a country that's

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>operating with a six point one percent current account deficit UM.

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It's debt is funded in external currencies and it's all

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>short term portfolio flows, right, So how are they going

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to fund their debt? How are they going to fund

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the country's operations? I mean, the only way to do

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that is to raise rates and appeal to offshore creditors

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to continue, you know, basically making its economy more investable.

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And it did not do that today. And so now

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the lira the worst performer pretty much um

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>outside of Argentina on the year down local currency, Turkish

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>debt down twenty nine percent year to date in dollar terms.

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah. Now you've got yields in the high teams

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>now seventeen point eight percent five year yields and local currency.

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's getting bad, it's getting ugly. You've got

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation there of around fifteen percent I believe percent inflation

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I mean that was that was in June.

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>It's average a eight and a half percent over the

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>last five years. Just to give you a sense of

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>just how far things have gone, I mean, think about

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>p M I. P m I felt to its lowest

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>level on record in May. That signals slower GDP growth.

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the only way that could possibly think they're gonna,

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, move their way out of this is to

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>accelerate growth, right, is to grow their way out of it.

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But clearly that's not happening either. And so where does

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>attention now shift. It shifts to the financial sector. And hey,

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>we're an earning season, right, So you've got all the

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>big Turkish banks reporting starting tomorrow and through next week,

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're also huge, huge issuers of US dollar debt

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna have trouble rolling it over. When I

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>talked to emerging markets investors, particularly the debt world, they say,

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, in general, we still find some things to

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>like in emerging markets. Credit that's sold off a lot,

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>but we're not touching Argentina or Turkey. Some people are

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>actually tiptoeing back to Argentina Turkey off limits. I'm just

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>wondering I mean, it's Turkey just a completely idiosyncratic story

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>unto itself, with a government that just is getting itself

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>deeper into mess. Or do you see signs of something

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>more pervasive happening across the board and development more? I mean,

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I mean I I every time I

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>think I've got emerging markets figured out, Lesta, they always

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>another Turkey pops up. And you know, it's just unbelievable,

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the stubbornness. And look, it's it's not unprecedented. Right, We've

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>seen in South in Brazil, we said Dilma, you know,

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, contesting the credibility of the of the Brazilian

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank a few years back. We've seen recently in

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>South Africa something somewhere. We're seeing here in the US

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump saying he does think rates should continue to go up, right,

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>So this is nothing new. But for a president to

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>basically just shrug off the markets, um to install his

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>son in law as the dual head of the Central

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Bank and the Finance Ministry and give him the control,

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>it's basically he's I mean, now the markets believe he's

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a puppet, right, And so you know, Idawin's on the

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>record is having said he does not think high rates

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>are good for the economy. He wants rates lower, and

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing evidence of that here today. And it's just

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>h yeah, No, I a a central bank that's um,

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of um, not independent, that's not targeting inflation,

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>that's not targeting full employment. You know, the markets have

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 1>a funny way of of showing them where the clearing rate,

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>where the clearing prices and um. And I think that's

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what Turkey's undergoing right now, and we don't know where

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the bottom is. They mean, if you're an emerging markets

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>investor for debt and you're looking for corporates, what sector

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking commodities, maybe extractive industries, mining companies, oil companies.

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>How are they doing? Yeah? No, I mean you're now

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>now we're going to shift out of Turkey and we're

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>getting to get into the fun stuff. So the fun

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff is this I happen to think that. I'm sorry,

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't think the data tells us that commodities are

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>over sold. Right We're starting to see for the first time,

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen copper short up, COMICX copper, we've seen a

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>net short, a speculative interest moved, you know, it's moved short.

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 1>It was, it was, it was long for as long

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>as we can remember. It's now gone short. We're seeing

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the same thing in oil and other commodities, and what

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that tells us is that these markets are vulnerable to

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a short squeeze to a near term rebound which could

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>be accentuated to the upside. So that's good for all

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of the commodity producers. Latin American specific, Peru, Colombia, and

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Chile are three that come to mind there um. But

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>then you know, you've got You've got you've got Russia,

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>who's a pretty big oil export over they have their

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>own problems, and you've got a handful of other there's

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East and so forth. So so so yeah, I

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:14.839
<v Speaker 1>happen to agree with you. I think you know you're

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:16.599
<v Speaker 1>going to see a pivot on the corporate side and

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets toward commodity exporters. And we're seeing a little

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>bit of evidence of that now, although you know, we'll

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. But I like your thoughts about copper

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 1>very interesting because copper has dropped more than seventeen percent

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in price, not this year, just since the beginning of June.

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely now it's oversold. I mean, the red metal is oversold.

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>If you would ask my colleague Mike mcglonany's actually on

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>vacation now, we should get him up here. But yeah, no,

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 1>he would agree with you completely. Vacation. I'm sorry, he's

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>not a vacation. He's actually working from home. But yeah, right,

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 1>But you know, broad commodity sell off, I mean, that's

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>where we are, and we need to see that kind

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of rebound in order for emerging markets to catch a bid,

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I think and uh, and we might very well be

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>on on the verge of that. Thanks very much, Damian Sassaur.

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 1>We love having you on Fixed Income Strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>telling us all about Turkey and commodity related emerging market debt.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the biggest question marks right now is around oil,

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly are we heading much higher than seventy dollars a barrel?

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>We're much lower? Uh, And a lot of this hinges

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>on Iran. Joining us now Will Ryan, founder and chief

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>executive officer of Granite Shares in New York. Well, I

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>want to start with Iran because we've gotten this battle

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of words between President Trump uh and the Iranian leaders

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering do you think that the market is

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>pricing in some kind of escalation here and the likelihood

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that Iranian oil fields would truly be taken out of

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>service for the rest of the world. In short, no,

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Um. Iran is a huge producer,

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the largest opaque producing countries, and so if

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>there was a disruption or an escalation that resulted in disruption,

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that would have a big effect on supply. And right

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>now what you have is a situation where we have

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>strong demand for oil and almost certainly you see the

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>price being pushed higher. How much higher? Uh is impossible

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to say, but I mean give us a range. I mean,

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>are we talking, you know, five dollars? Are we talking

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars? I think you could see ten to twenty. Yeah, alright, Well,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>before we get into some details about commodity related funds,

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk just a second about granite shares because, UM,

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>when I was young before I think almost just around

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the time they invented the telephone, UM, one of the

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>ways to be interested in the world was to read

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>annual reports, and it was quite exciting because you got

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to see how things operated, how companies created products are

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>versus all over the world was one of the few

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>ways to really access the excitement of what was happening

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Tell our listeners a little bit about

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>granite shares and how you're trying to bring some of

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that excitement back. Thank you, um So, grantite Shares is really,

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's my expression of what a modern day

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>E t F company should be about, or an asset

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>manager should be about. So we specialize in E t

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>F E t F so the new technology, if you will,

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in the asset management space. And really the reason why

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>they're driving so much popularity and investor flows is because

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on the whole, lower cost, more transparent and liquid. And

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of specifically why I started the business, I

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>felt that there was an opportunity, or actually a rare

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to really do two things. One was to reinvent

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the way people access commodity markets in investment form. And too,

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I felt like the timing was right for a new

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of ball market in commodities. And when I took

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>about reinvesting the commodity market, before investors had accessed or

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>had access to commodities in two ways, either to buy

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>partnerships that issued k ones, which can be pretty clunky

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>for investors around tax time. Or they could buy notes

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>from banks, and notes from banks have credit exposure to

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that particular issuing bank. So I thought, here's a way

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to actually change the way that investors get access improve

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the solution, so by offering it in a fund of

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.479
<v Speaker 1>forty act fund without k ones, but without the credit

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>risk of the the issuing banks of notes, and provide

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 1>that exposure to the broad commodity markets. Okay, thank you,

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a great definition. And now I want to turn

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to the actual way in which investors can speculate or invest,

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>let's say in crude in oil markets. Is that a

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>specific market and there are there specific challenges to doing that? Yes, So,

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so investors have a broad array of options when it

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to investing in either individual commodities or broad based commodities.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Um and you can invest in gold, for example, something

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>very specific. You can invest in other metals, you can

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>invest in crude, or you can invest in in broad

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Now I would say just to just to be clear

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that when we're talking about precious metals, we're talking about

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>owning exposure of fun. For example, we have the Granite

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Shares Gold Trust, the ticket code is bar and what

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that actually holds as physical bars of gold. So every

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>share is backed by a tenth of announce of gold.

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Now that's fine for precious metals because the natural state

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>is stored in a vault and we can do that,

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but when we go outside into other commodities that either

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>decay or die over time, you have to obtain that

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>exposure of your futures contracts. So when we're talking about oil,

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about physical barrels of oil. We're talking

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>about futures contracts are linked to the price of oil.

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>So since we started with oil, I'm wondering, what have

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you seen recently with respect to the investors that have

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>been using your e t f s in that space

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and do you find that they tend to be more

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>speculators or more true investors. Well, we um We offer

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>really two broad diversified commodity funds, so take us C O,

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>m B, and CMG, and that's really for the investor

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that wants to take broad market exposure. So those people

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>are really more longer term investors that are looking to

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to gain longer term exposure. So we don't offer some

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of the more racy individual commodities for example, Um, that

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>may be something we do over time, but at the

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>moment we have just the two broad based commodities, and

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>then we have gold and platinum, and so really that's

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>somebody that is looking to put five percent of the

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>portfolio typically into commodities, and the decision making process that

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going to go through is really to evaluate how

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>much energy exposure do I want within that particular fund,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and that leads you to to the decision of whether

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>you buy one or the other. Okay, the reason I

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>was focusing on oil and futurist contracts is there is

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a natural seasonality not only to oil and other commodities,

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>but there is a rollover effect because you have the

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>expiration of those contracts. How do you avoid that natural

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>decay of value when you're dealing with futurist contracts, great question.

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>So you can't avoid it. That's a market structure issue.

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So by definition, when you're investing in futures contracts, the

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>contract you own, depending on what expiry date it is,

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>is going to expire at that expiry date. That is

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>the whole point. And so by definition, to maintain that

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>exposure we call it rolling, you have to sell that

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>contract before it expires and buy the next contract, And

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 1>that has a friction associated with it because you're selling

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>one contract and buying another, and depending on whether that

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>contract that you're buying is trading more expensive or cheaper

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>in the money, you're out of the money. Exactly. That's

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>either a positive or negative effect. I've been looking at

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>comb as. You're one example, right, and this is it

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>was trading right about twenty seven back in May, now

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>trading at around twenty five s, a drop of about

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half percent. Do you believe that that's

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>an accurate reflection of the overall commodity market? Yes, So

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>what's happened actually, and this is this is a great

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>point because I think you know, it's important for investors.

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are three components that make up what

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>we call the total return of these kind of funds.

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>So the first one is the spot price of the

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>underlying futures naturally. The second one is what we're just

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about, which is the we call the roll yield,

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>which is either positive or negative. The third one is

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the return on the collateral. Because when we invest in

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>future as, we hold treasury bills as collateral and they

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>generate an interest rate orbit not not a huge amount,

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but still generates an interest rate, and so those three

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>make up the total return. What's actually happened is the

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>market structure for the majority of commodities is shifted into backwardation,

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>so people are being paid to be long that exposure

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and oil for example, Well done, Thanks very much, Will

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>ryand he is the founder and the chief executive of

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Granted Shares. Talking about investing in commodities through E T

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>F S Well, Verizon decided that it is going to

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>seek to partner with either Google or Apple to provide

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>television when it launches the first super fast five G

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>service to homes in l A and Sacramento later this year.

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>A big question, why didn't they go with Hollywood? Why

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't they go with the traditional television networks? And here

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that, John Butler, Senior Telecom Service as

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>an equipment analyst with Bloomberg intell Agents, John, what happened here? So,

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.719
<v Speaker 1>first of all, Verizon just held its earnings call and

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the question didn't even come up about content really, so

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the and that reflects the fact that the

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>company is focused on launching these new five G services. Uh,

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>tell people what five G is so five G is

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of a next generation wireless technology. It is ultra fast.

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It's probably ten to a hundred times faster than the

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>four G connection you get today. What's really important is

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you can as a carrier, you can begin to pars

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>off or create these little slices of dedicated network for

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 1>your business customers. And so Verizon is looking at that,

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>going wow, an ultrafast dedicated connection. What appeal that's going

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to have for the business community. And so they're structuring

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this whole sort of commercial plan down the road, but

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the initial launch is going to be to over build

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>your cable guy or in some cases, I guess your

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>teleco providing broadband internet services to the home. But that

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is a first step. Okay, I'm just sorry to stop

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you there. I'm trying to sort of figure out what

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we're who's doing television, who's doing the tech part, who's

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>doing what because it seems like there's ever merging of

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>all of these things, of the content and the providing

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of the services, and this just sort of increases the confusion.

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So Verizon wants to provide television, uh, and it's going

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>to use Google and Apple, which have their own maybe

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>which have their own sort of content providers in various ways.

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to struggle like who's doing what here. Well,

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of convergence going on. So a lot

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of cable companies now can provide your telecom services. They

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>provide internet, they provide videos. So does Verizon. I have

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Verizon FiOS at home. I don't get my telephone, I

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>get pardon me. I get my telephone, my video, and

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>my broadband internet all from Verizon. And I think the

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>appeal for residential customer is bundling. You get service discounts

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>across the board by going with one carrier. They sort

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of reward you for that in a lot of markets.

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>For Rising doesn't have the infrastructure to compete with cable

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 1>by bundling like that. They happen to in my neighborhood.

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>But they only have seventeen million homes across the US

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>wired to do that. So the plan is to use

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the ultra Fast five G to provide a last hundred

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>foot connection to the home using wireless, so they don't

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>have to dig trenches like they did in my front yard.

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't need to put five or in my basement

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they put an Antenta on my roof and provide service.

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So what would Google or Apple actually do and who's

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>the loser here? Well, the punchline is do you want

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>to I guess if you're Verizon, do you want to

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>provide just the dumb pipe as it's called, or do

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to begin to fill it with sort of

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>value added services? Uh in In this case, it would

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>be video services coming from Apple, which doesn't currently have

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a streaming service, or Google, which has I believe it's

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a sixty channel service on YouTube. So by partnering with them,

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Verizon doesn't really need to get in the content game

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 1>in a big way like a T and T is doing,

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>for example. They can sort of stay out of it.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>But what they're offering in terms of the five G

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 1>link over a cable operator or in competing with a

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>cable operator, I should say they'll be able to come

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to customers and say, well, not only give you the

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>pipe at a discount, but we have content that goes

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>along with it. Wow, when you say value added services,

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:13.239
<v Speaker 1>all I see is an extra bill to pay at

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of the month. You have Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Spotify, Hulu, Pandora.

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Now you're telling me what I didn't even add in

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the mobile services, so that may be T Mobile or

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Sprint or whatever. If you've got Plus. Now you're telling

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>me that a T T is going to offer something.

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Are they're really going to offer anything that you don't

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have to pay for? I think they'll have a very

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>ultra low cost add supported tier on direct TV now,

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>which is their streaming service. I will add with Verizon.

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the partnership with Google or Apple is

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>rumored at this point, not the five ge services of course,

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>but the content services to go along with it. So

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if it happens or not. Either way, I

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>would say what you you're speaking to that that convergence

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 1>between telecom and cable operators and now even Google and

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple is really happening and going to continue. By the way,

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want know why this convergence has to

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>cost so much money every month, And meanwhile you have

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Verizon with its own content provider of oath Man. My

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>head is spinning. Yeah, just keep writing the checks, all right.

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much, John Butler, He's our expert when it

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>comes to telecom services and equipment. He's our analyst for

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa Abramowits one before the podcast. You can

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio h