WEBVTT - Oh Goat, You Devil - Part 3

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>we are back with part three of our series on

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the Goat and the Devil, where we are exploring reasons

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for the some would say unfair association in especially Christian cultures,

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>between the ordinary domestic goat, a wonderful animal, and the

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>demonic realm of sin and flames. Now, in previous episodes,

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about the basic biology of the goat is

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a browsing bovid that was once adapted to harsher environments

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>like mountains and forests, but sometime many thousands of years ago,

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was domesticated by the humans who used to hunt it.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>We talked about mythical inspirations for later goatman devil's paly,

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>lying in the figure of the Greek god Pan and

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in the satyrs and fawns that bore his image. We

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about goat reproduction and goat voices. How it's possible

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that goats could be interpreted as sinful by judgmental human

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>eyes because because of the he goat's reputation for being

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>very enthusiastic about mating and the idea that it's possible

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>people have seen goats as uncanny because sometimes some goats,

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>when they kind of moan and scream, they sound freakishly human. Uh.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>In the second episode, we talked about the role of

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>goats in the Hebrew Bible, where they could be associated

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>with demonic forces because of the ritual of the Day

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of Atonement, where it is said that one goat is

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>sent off into the wilderness to carry the sins of

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the people off for as a zel, and that that

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>name is sometimes interpreted as some kind of demonic power.

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>We also talked about goats in the Christian New Testament,

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>where Jesus is said to have given apocalyptic preaching that

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>when the Son of Man comes to bring the of

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the age, he will separate the righteous from the unrighteous.

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>And what's the image use there. It's as the shepherd

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>separates the sheep from the goats. The goats are the

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>bad ones. And finally, we also talked about goat lore

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>from around the world to point out that the association

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>between goats and evil is by no means universal. There

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>are some very interesting counter examples in Chinese mythology in

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Basque mythology with this figure of the black billy goat

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>deity who protects livestock and so forth. So it's been

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a wild ride so far, a wild goat ride. But

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to kick things off today, I wanted to come back

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>to our discussion about the particular uh features of goat

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>biology that people of centuries past might possibly have interpreted

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>as devilish or sinful in one way uh in someone

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in one way or another. And the example I wanted

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to look at here is goat eyes. One might argue

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that you haven't really been stared at until you've been

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>stared at by a goat, And part of the reason

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for that is when you're being stared at by a goat,

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you're not quite sure if you're being stared at by

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 1>a goat. That's right. It comes down to the the

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the inhuman shape of the goat pupils. Yeah yeah uh.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And before I get there, I want to say that

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the goats stare does not have to be imbued with

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>any kind of menace. I came across a a very sweet,

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>whimsical little poem. I wanted to read a bit from

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>this is by the British Canadian poet Robert Service, who

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>wrote a poem called the Goat and I and uh

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it goes each sunny day upon my way a goat

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I pass. He has a beard of silver gray and

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a bell of brass, And all the while I am

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in sight, he seems to muse and stares at me

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>with all his might, and choose, and choose upon the hill,

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>so timy, sweet with joy of spring, he hails me

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>with a tiny bleat of welcoming. Though half the globe

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is drenched with blood and cities flare contentedly, he choose

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the cud and does not care. Oh gentle friend, I

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>know not what your age maybe, but of my years

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd give the lot yet left to me to chew

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a thistle and not choke, but bright of eye gaze

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>at the old world, weary bloke who hobbles by. This

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>is great. I love how this drives some like an

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>overall interpretation of goat physiology that that I think we

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>can often fall into, and that is of the goat

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>as the old goat, Like there's even if a goat.

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>You do see some goats that look, you know, very

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>virile and young, and in a goatish fashion, but oftentimes

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you'll encounter goats who do kind of hobble about there.

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>They have all these likenesses that we attribute to elderly

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:46.239
<v Speaker 1>human individuals. You know, you'll have the beard and so forth.

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, this is a neat little poem summing

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>up the uh, the independent and relatable spirit of the goat. Oh.

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I also I left off a final stanza where essentially

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the last stance is just like, why am I writing

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>a poem about a goat? It's not great? Um so,

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, anyway, the gaze of the goat has often

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>been observed to have a strange character in one way

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>or another. Sometimes it's it's more like what services saying here,

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>almost narcotically placid and unmoved. And yet other times people

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>notice that the gaze of the goat is kind of

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>thrillingly alien, because, unlike with a dog or a cat,

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>it can be hard to tell if a goat is

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>actually looking at you, or at least for me, it can.

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Despite the efforts of Robert's service, the the eye of

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>the goat has often been characterized as creepy, and I

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>think there could be a couple of reasons for that.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It might be because it's a bit harder to tell

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>where the goat is focusing than it is with some

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>other kind of animals, like our predatory companion animals um

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe it's just because the eye of a goat

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of looks weird. It looks unusual if you're not

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>used to it, because laws instead of around pupil as

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you alluded to earlier, Rob, the goat has a horizontal

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>pupil sometimes described as rectangular in shape I think sometimes

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of described as like elongated capsule shape, so it's

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>like a rectangle with kind of rounded edges. I've also

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>found some photos where it looks like a horizontal capital

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I with a hint of those cross beams or slight

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>bulges at the ends of the rectangle. And the question

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>is why do goat pupils look that way? Well, funny enough,

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we actually did an episode just a while back which

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>contained a segment about the evolutionary reasoning behind different pupil

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.239
<v Speaker 1>shapes in the Animal Kingdom. The episode was The Three

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Pupil Die, and I think the study we talked about

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in that show is still a good one to inform

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>us on the question I've just raised. So to to

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>bring up the same paper again. This was by Martins

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Banks at All published in the journal Science Advances in

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's called why do Animal eyes have pupils of

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>different shapes? Basic conclusion is that an animal's pupil shape

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is usually determined by what its ecological niches, what its

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>role in the food chain is. So animals like humans, tigers,

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and wolves have round pupils. Round pupils appear to be

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>common a common shape for active hunters who chase down

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>their prey. Meanwhile, predators that are lower to the ground

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>or hunt by way of ambush, so a predator that

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>might lie in wait and then pound suddenly on a

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>prey animal, these tend to have vertical pupils vertically oriented

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>slit pupils, and the vertical slits seem to be adaptive

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.679
<v Speaker 1>for low down ambush predators because they're helpful in using

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>tricks called stereopsis and defocus blur to very precisely judge

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the distance needed for a single uh exact medium range pounds.

0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But herbivores prey animals are more likely to have horizontal

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>pupils like the goat UH. To quote from the study,

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>horizontally elongated pupils creates sharp images of horizontal contours ahead

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and behind, creating a horizontally panoramic view that facilitates detection

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of predators from various directions and forward locomotion across uneven terrain.

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>So these horizontal pupils are good for scanning the whole

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>panorama of the environment, seeing at all angles of all

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the time to watch out for any approaching predators, which

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>might be one of the reasons you can get that

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>creepy feeling where you can't tell if the goat is

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>actually looking at you. The goat is sort of designed

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>by nature to be looking everywhere rather than to be

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at you. But I also thought it's an interesting

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>note about the forward locomotion across uneven terrain given the

0:08:55.280 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the evolutionary history of goats occupying mountains and craggy landscape.

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Though again, less craggy creatures like horses also have horizontal pupils.

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So that made me wonder about the question why do

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>we tend to notice the horizontal orientation of goat pupils

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>more than we notice it in horses and other herbivores.

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I think this must be a common thing. It's at

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>least true for me, and so I was looking into this.

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh And I want to make two non expert observations

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>just by looking at a lot of photos on Google.

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>One is that the horse pupil seems less noticeably elongated

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in the horizontal dimension than the goat pupil. So they're

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>both horizontal, but the horse pupil seems a little bit

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>shorter usually or the goat went off and looks visibly

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>stretched out. Second, and I think this might be even

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>more important, there seems to be, on average, a stronger

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>color contrast within the goat's eye. If you just look

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>at a bunch of pictures of the eyes of horses

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and the eyes of goats, it seems goats on average

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>have lighter colored irises, which really makes the pupil pop.

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>That makes the people stand out, which makes it look

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>more noticeably alien, at least to me. Interesting. I remember

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in that episode on The Three People that I we

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about pupil changes in the shape of the pupil

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with predators tended to vary as well depending on height. Yeah, yeah,

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right, But I don't remember any such distinction being

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>made in the materials we were looking at then regarding herbivores,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 1>like if goat versus cow versus horse, etcetera. Yeah, I

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>don't recall any distinction like that either, but definitely there

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was a change in height, uh in in predators, because again,

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the taller predators have round pupils and the shorter predators

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>have vertical slip pupils. Uh. And so part of that

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>has to do with a difference in hunting strategy, like

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>chasing versus ambushing, But part of it has to do

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>also with just I think, managing the angles at which

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you would be observing your prey. Now, this instantly makes

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>me think of something that I guess we got into

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in the three people that Eyes. What

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of eyes do we expect? Knowing all of this

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of divine beings and divine emissaries, Uh, certainly in the

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>like the Irish and uh in some Chinese traditions that

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>we discussed in that episode, we talked about the idea

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of someone with three pupils or three irises being uh

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>in some way enlightened and having superior vision and perhaps

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>wisdom as well. UH. But but taking all that we've

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>discussed here into the scenario, it's like, Okay, if we

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of god or godlike being or anti

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>god taking on the head and eyes of a goat. Well,

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in a way, it's it seems more fitting. It's like,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>uh that this is a being that can look in

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>many directions at once and doesn't need to focus its

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>attention and maybe doesn't focus its attention all that much.

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And hey, being a god, maybe you don't want its

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>attention focused too heavily. Well. Also, the thinking about the

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>predator prey distinction, I mean, shouldn't the horizontal pupils make

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it less dangerous, Like wouldn't round pupils or really be

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the most dangerous. Yeah, But then I get it comes

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>down to the human scenario, right. We want to we

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>want to connect with the human in the superhuman, and

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>therefore we want them to have pupils. Though I guess

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we see, especially in modern depictions, you know, we love

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>to like black out the eyes of inhuman beings, uh,

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, often with those really cool contact lenses. So

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll have various there's so many treatments of this where

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>various fallen angels and so forth, we'll have all black

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>eyes or maybe all white eyes, and that tends to

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>note some sort of strangeness of vision as well. Yeah,

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right about that. Like, sometimes otherworldly beings

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>are just depicted as having eyes like that, sometimes their

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>eyes change into all white or all black or something

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>when they are exercising a type of second sight. Wait,

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>it sometimes works quite well, though sometimes you're kind of

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you're kind of inconveniencing your actors by taking

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>away their eyes, are taking away one of their tools. Well,

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should look at a little bit more goat

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>mythology and goat symbolism in history. I think if we're

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out why, especially a lot of say

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Continental European Christian cultures made an association between the devil

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and goats, I think we must talk about the figure

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>known as Baha Met. Yeah, and this is this is

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating but also kind of convoluted UH situation because

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it involves multiple different cultures either appropriating or interpreting or

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>misinterpreting or outlight rights slandering something that other culture, the

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>previous cultures or or or different cultures believed in or

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>believe in UH. And the end result is this um,

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this strange satanic goat creature that you're more likely to

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>encounter now in a TV show or on a heavy

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>metal T shirt, that sort of thing. So I covered

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>some of this in a Monster Fact episode about the

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Goat of Mendis that came about UH shortly after we

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>recorded a weird House cinema episode on the film The

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Devil Rides Out, which prominently features Uh the Satanic goatman

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>appearing at a black mass. And so this this entity

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Bapha May or the Goat of Mendi's is essentially a

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Western occultists distortion of a Greek interpretation of the God

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of Egypt, the Egyptian god known as but neb Jadette

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh that was worshiped in Mendis, which is the Greek

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>name for an ancient Egyptian city named Jadette, also known

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>today as tell L Ruba. Fifth century Greek historian Herodotus

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote of this god and his practices and made veiled

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>references to sexual aspects of the worship, and also compared

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the entity to Pan, of course, from from Western traditions.

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>So all already, I know this. This sounds like some

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of You can imagine like the different pins on

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a board with the different bits of string colored string

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>showing you where all this is going across a map

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of of Europe. And North Africa. So here's a quote

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>from from Herodotus via S. Birch's translation. Quote. Now, the

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>reason why those of the Egyptians whom I have mentioned

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>do not sacrifice goats, female or male, is this The

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Mendians count Pan to be one of the eight gods. Now,

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>these eight gods, they say, came into being before the

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve gods, and the painters and image makers represent in

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>painting and in sculpture the figure of Pan, just as

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the Helenes do with goat's face and legs, not supposing

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>him to be really like this, but to resemble the

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>other gods. The cause, however, why they represent him in

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>this form, I prefer not to say. The Mendesian's then

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>reverence all goats, and the males more than the females,

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and the goatherds too have greater honor than other herdsman.

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>But the goats one especially is reverenced, and when he

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>dies there is great mourning in all the Mendisian district,

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and both the goat and Pan are called in the

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Egyptian tongue Mendies. Okay, So, not knowing exactly what's going

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>on here, I would wonder if Herodotus is seriously misinterpreting

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>reports he has heard about Egyptian worship in light of

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Greek religion. Yeah, yeah, there's a there's there's clearly a

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>lot going on, like using Greek religion to try and

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>understand what uh individuals in this region are worshiping going

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's so many ways that the information here

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>can become skewed. We have this veiled um reference to

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>uh I believe other critics have pointed out that he's

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>he's referencing supposed beast reality uh in worship and so forth.

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So already we're engaging in uh In in various levels

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of misinterpretation and perhaps slander. Now, as Geraldine Pinch explains

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in her excellent book Egyptian Mythology, the word for ram

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>bah and the word for soul or manifestation sound much

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the same in Egyptian uh to the ancient Egyptians, so

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they were often regarded as manifestations of other deities such

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>as Osiris and Pinch rights quote. The sexual aspect of

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the culted Mendis made it particularly disliked by early Christians,

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>but Nebjudet's form as a ram or goat headed man

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>was reinterpreted as a devil figure who entered Western tradition

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>as the Horned King of the Witches. A classic example

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of literal demonization, taking a god in in another mythology,

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>in this case one having the head of a of

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a sheep or a goat, and saying that, well, actually,

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this is just a demon in our mythology, right right,

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>But of course they gets more complicated than that. They are.

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>All these are additional threads going on here, because as

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>for the the actual name Goat of Mendis, this is

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>the name given by French right or Elfeus Levi in

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century, most likely referencing the writings of Herodotus.

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>The most well known image of this particular monstrous humanoid

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is in the eighteen fifties sixth edition of Levi's book

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Dogma and Ritual of High Magic. And as with any

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>many examples of divine and occult imagery, the image of

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Baha may here Is or the Goat of Mendes is

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>highly symbolic, and it's been incorporated into various occult traditions, subcultures,

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>new religious movements, and so forth. I think everyone's probably

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>seen this. This is the like a a goat being

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>with the the upper body of sometimes a female, but

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes like half the chest is female half as male.

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>They're like black angelic wings, the goat head, the pentagram

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:54.479
<v Speaker 1>on the forehead, a middle horn that is like a torch,

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>various other symbols going on in the image as load

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it with stuff to look at. Yeah, yeah, so, I

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>mean as far as images of the divine or the demonic,

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty great one. There's lots to focus on,

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>lots to try and figure out. And at the very least,

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we've discussed many times before, the basic

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>symbolism involved here of combining beast with man or beast

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>with woman, et cetera. Like, it instantly starts forming patterns

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in the mind. You can't look at it and not

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of reaction. Oh. I don't know if

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed this before, but at least in Levi's depiction,

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it incorporates a symbol that is like the caduceus or

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like the rod of Asclepius. It has the rod and

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the snakes intertwined around it. Yeah. Yeah. Now, as for

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>the name Baha may here this gets us into something

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that we've we've touched on a few times in the

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>on the show before never devoted like full episode to it,

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>but it it involves the Templars, the poor Knights of

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Christ and the Temple of Solomon's. Just to to get

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the basics out here again. This was a religious military

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>order of the Catholic Church during the Crusades, which ran

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 1>about roughly ten through twelve UH. They were This organization

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>was intended to serve as a as a as a

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>way to protect pilgrims on their way to the Holy Lands,

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>but a sort of power creep occurred. They were given

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>free rein to move across borders, They were made exempt

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>from taxes and ended up playing key military roles in

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>various battles of the Crusades, and even the non warriors

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>became important, managing the movement of funds across vast distances

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>UH that were involved in the Crusades and setting up

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a kind of proto banking system. They became powerful, and

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so they made powerful enemies, and as the Crusades failed,

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the Templars were blamed and finally Fillip the Fourth of France,

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>with the aid of Pope Clement the Fifth, who was

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>then based in France UM, they pressed the order and

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>falsely accused them or generally everyone. I think most sources

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and historians agree that these are false or trumped up

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>charges of blasphemy and heresy, saying that, among other things,

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>they worshiped a severed head called Baha may Uh. There's

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole litany of charges against them. Some of them

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>were burned at the stake, I think fifty six in total,

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and that included Grandmaster Jacques Delay and others. Other members

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of the order were absorbed into different militaries and so forth. Now,

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the name Bappa may here is generally understood to be

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a French corruption of the name Muhammad, the most of

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the monstrous templar god. Bapha may is therefore a product

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of trumped up charges that the templars had converted to

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the Islamic faith of their enemies, and the French and

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Papal accusers invoked this fanciful and grotesque degradation of Islam

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>to make their case, because, to be clear, nowhere in

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Islamic traditions do you find a creature like this. So

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially the monster at the heart of a xenophobic

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theory Uh created to slander ones political enemies. In

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the Middle Ages. Yes, pretty much this, And there's a

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>lot more to the to all of this as well,

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.199
<v Speaker 1>And certainly when you get into writings about the templars,

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>there's they're added theories, some perhaps worth talking about, some

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>worth skipping over unless you're engaging in just like pure entertainment,

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I suppose. But but yeah, this seems to be the

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>most straightforward explanation. And it is kind of interesting how

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in this you have something that is put together as

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a corruption, as a slander, uh, and over time it

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of takes on life of its own. It becomes

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>used as a symbol of liberation, becomes used as a

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 1>symbol of rebellion against organized religion, it becomes used as

0:22:56.400 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a a part of new religious movements. Even so, it's

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>always fascinating the life of symbols and the life of

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas like this. Well, speaking of rebellion, there is one

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>more biological feature of goats that I wanted to talk about.

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're ready, Robert, or are you ready to get

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>into goat intelligence, let's do it. I think this one

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is interesting because while I don't think this is a

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>primary reason that the goats would be identified with devils

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>or with the legions of Hell, I do I do

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 1>think there is some interesting resonances here, and we can

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>come back to that, But basically I was just thinking

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>what is more readily identified with evil than intelligence? Right,

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>because intelligence is often associated with a tendency toward rebellion,

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>or a tendency maybe to think a little too critically

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>about what somebody is telling you to do. And while

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>goats are not generally a species known for how smart

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they are, there's some evidence that at least in some ways,

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they might be more clever than we give them credit for,

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>but that it's also a kind of intelligence that is

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of alien to human primate intelligence. So I want

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to look at a paper by L. D. F. Briefer

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>at All published in Frontiers in Zoology called Goats excel

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>at Learning and Remembering, a highly novel cognitive task, published

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in ten to explain the context of what the authors

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>were trying to figure out here, They begin by highlighting

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>a couple of competing frameworks for explaining the evolution of

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>higher intelligence. One you might call the social intelligence hypothesis,

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and the other you might call the ecological competence hypothesis.

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:44.479
<v Speaker 1>The social hypothesis argues that the evolution of intelligence and

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>higher cognition is primarily for managing relationships between individuals within

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a social species. So there are obvious huge survival benefits

0:24:56.240 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to being social and working together, and I think there's

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>a very good case to be made that that is

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 1>what primarily explains the success of humans as a species

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of animal. But there are also a lot of unique

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>problems that arise when animals congregate in social groups and

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>perform or try to perform any cooperative behaviors. The social

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis would say that animals need intelligence in order to

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>get as many benefits as possible from social cooperation and

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to negate the possible downsides of social cooperation, so to

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 1>do things like maintain group cohesion and reduce conflict between

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>group members. Meanwhile, the competing ecological competence hypothesis would say

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that the evolution of intelligence is mainly for uh increasing

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>survival advantage when faced with the problems posed by the environment.

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And in a sense, the world is a puzzle, and

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the better you are at solving that puzzle, the more

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>likely you are to survive. So examples would be fine

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>ending ways to extract difficult access nutrition during foraging, remembering

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the locations of important resources and threats and things like that.

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And these views would tend to also have implications for

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the type of learning that we see in different animals,

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because creatures with social intelligence tend to be capable of

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:23.479
<v Speaker 1>social learning. This is a very important concept. Social learning

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is the ability to learn not only by doing, but

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to learn by watching others. So when you learn how

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to do a task by observing someone else doing it,

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that's social learning, and it's a very important ability. That

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is arguably what makes it possible for human beings to

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>have technology, civilization, and culture. Animals with the largest brains

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and the most advanced cognition tend to usually be social animals,

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>and the authors right that quote. The prevalent view today

0:26:56.040 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>is that intelligent species should excel at social learning. But

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the authors argue that a lot of this research is

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>focused on primates, which we already know are very smart,

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>they have relatively large brains, and we already know they're

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>very social. But what would happen if we studied this

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>on this question on relatively smaller brained mammals. What if

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we test this theory on the goat? Goats have a

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>few interesting characteristics. They not only have relatively smaller brains,

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>than primates. Also, the domestication process itself tends to lead

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to a decrease in brain size when compared to wild ancestors.

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, domestic animals have fewer puzzles to solve. Let's say, uh,

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and this could also affect cognition and the author's right quote.

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Goats possess several features commonly associated with advanced cognition, such

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>as successful colonization of new environments and complex fission fusion societies.

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 1>To briefly explain both of those, I guess colonization of

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>new environments is fairly self explanatory. You know, goats um

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they have a pretty adventurous relationship of the natural world,

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and they can they can spread into areas where it's

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>harder for other animals to survive, but they thrive there,

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>so that they're they're getting something out of the environment

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that some other animals can't quite get. But the other

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 1>thing that's interesting is the complex fission fusion societies. This

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>means animals that live together in groups, but they are

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>able to uh, sort of alter those groups in a

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.959
<v Speaker 1>fluid way and then and then come back together. So

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>an example would be humans live in fission fusion societies

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>We live in groups, but those groups separate off into subgroups.

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>They separate, and they come back together. The groups change sizes,

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>People separate on their own and do different tasks and

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>then rejoin. That's fission fusion. So the authors here tested

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>out goat intelligence and memory on what they call a

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>food box cognitive challenge, a much a puzzle box with

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a special lever that a goat had to learn how

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to operate in order to access food, and there were

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>different conditions in this experiment. Wouldn't make a difference to

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a goat's ability to learn how to use this box

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>if the goat were able to watch another goat opening

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the box successfully a k a. Social learning and the

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>authors in in the results section right quote, the majority

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of trained goats nine out of twelve, successfully learned the

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>task quickly, on average within twelve trials at intervals of

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>up to ten months. They solved the task within two minutes,

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>indicating excellent long term memory. The goats did not learn

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the task faster after observing a demonstrator than if they

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>did not have that opportunity. This indicates that they learned

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>through individual rather than social learning, so goats pretty smart.

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>They learned the task pretty well. They can solve the

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>puzzle most of the time, and they're able to remember

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that lution pretty well in the long term. Ten months later,

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you give them another puzzle box, they get into it

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty fast. But the goats did not seem to benefit

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>from watching the struggles of other goats at all, So

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they did not display signs of social learning. And I

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:17.719
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of interesting because goats are to some

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>degree social they live in herds, but biologically they're not

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>oriented to learn in a cooperative way. They can't learn,

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>at least according to this finding, by watching other goats

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>do the way we can. And the authors say that

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>this would provide some evidence that the evolution of goat

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>cognition is driven more by ecological competence pressure than by

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>social intelligence pressure. So they think, you know, what's pushing

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>goats to uh, to be able to think more efficiently

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>is probably more the stuff about trying to extract solve

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>puzzles in the environment. How do you extract the maximum

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:57.479
<v Speaker 1>amount of foraging resources from this area? How do you

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>remember where cashes of food are? How do you remember

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>where threats are? And things like that. Rather than using

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that intelligence to try to maintain relationships within the group

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>like you might see in chimpanzees. Yeah, now that makes sense.

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Based on my limited experience with with goat mischief. It

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>tends to be things like you're at a petting zoo

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and you have a you have a map of the

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>zoo sticking out of your pocket. Somebody decides to sneak

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that out of your pocket and start eating it. Um,

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, or I've I've spoken this problem solving problem.

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>It's curiosity is pure curiosity? Is it food? I shall investigate? Um?

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I know. Other situations that have come up of the

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>from some goat farmers that i've I've spoken to in

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the past have been like the goat wants to find

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>out how to get on top of something and doing

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that and may find well find its way out of

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>an enclosure. So that sort of thing, right, So clever

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>problem solving within the physical space, but less so within

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the social arena. So one might be tempted to say

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that crap, the antisocial goats cast long and sinister shadows. However,

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to put another weight on the scale, sort

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of on the other side of the scale, And this

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was a study I was looking at by Christian now

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>roth at all published in Biology letters in called goats

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>display audience dependent human directed gazing behavior in a problem

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>solving task. In the background of this one is the

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>observation that, okay, domestication, when you domesticate a wild animal,

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>this clearly affects the animal's brain and its cognition. A

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:41.239
<v Speaker 1>domestic dog simply does not think and solve problems the

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>same way its nearest wild relative would. Uh. You know,

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>dog dog thinking is way different than wolf thinking. But

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.479
<v Speaker 1>how much of this difference is a result of straight

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>domestication and how much is the result of the fact

0:32:55.960 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that dogs are domesticated specifically as companions. Yeah? And this, yeah,

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly we get into the whole scenario where we often

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about dogs and cats and other close domesticated animals

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as we talk about how they look at humans, what

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>do they think humans are? And I know they're they're

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>different interpretations, but I know that it's often said, well,

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>like a cat thinks you may think that you are

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>another cat. I've I've heard, you know, they think you're

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>another kitten, or they think you're its mom, that sort

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Dogs, I believe, tend to look at at

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>their humans kind of like their dogs, right, Well, to

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>some extent, I mean you can tell that there is

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a there's a very natural, inclusive kind of social relationship

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>with dogs to humans, so they acclimatize easily to humans.

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>On on the other hand, there seems to be a

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of special thing with humans, right where like you

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>have these studies where you give a dog a puzzle

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that it cannot solve, like it can't get the treat

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the puzzle box, And is it going to

0:33:57.360 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the other dog in the room for help

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>or look at the human for help? It's going to

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the human right, right, And and I don't

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>have any studies to back this up, but I mean

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this seems to be the case with cats as well,

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Like the cats will come to the human, they will

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>use their special meal that that is a way of

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>communicating with the humans, as if they are like the

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>mama cat that will fix things. Yeah, but with the goat, Yeah,

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 1>where do we go with that? Because as we've we've

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:25.919
<v Speaker 1>already established like there's a different underlying social dynamic. Right,

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 1>But what the authors here found, just to read from

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>their abstract, they say, quote, we investigated human directed behavior

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in an unsolvable problem task in a domestic but non

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 1>companion species goats. Okay, so they're giving goats sort of

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>like a puzzle box that they can't solve. There, there's

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>clearly an outcome they want, but they can't achieve it

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on their own. It's not like they, you know, the

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:49.800
<v Speaker 1>lever that they could figure out with a few tries

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in the other experiment. They can't win this game, so

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the author's right quote. During the test, goats experienced stay

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>forward facing or an away face in person. They gazed

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>toward the forward facing person earlier and for longer, and

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 1>showed more gaze alterations and a lower latency until the

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.919
<v Speaker 1>first gaze alteration when the person was forward facing. Our

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>results provide strong evidence for audience dependent, human directed visual

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 1>orienting behavior in a species that was domesticated primarily for production.

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And they also say the results quote show similarities with

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the referential and intentional communicative behavior exhibited by domestic companion

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>animals such as dogs and horses. This indicates the domestication

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>has a much broader impact on hetero specific communication than

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>previously believed. So the study is finding that even though

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>goats were domesticated for production for agriculture, meat, milk, hide,

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 1>and fur things like that, as opposed to dogs, which

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 1>were domesticated as companions and helpers. Nevertheless, goats do this

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>dog like thing when they have this unsolvable problem task.

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>They are more likely to look up, for presumably for help,

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>at a human who is looking at them, as opposed

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to the control of a human that is looking away

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>from them. So this is that this is kind of

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the impact of the goatherd over over the goat. Now,

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know exactly what all this adds up to about,

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, how this would affect humans over the years

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at the goats they're familiar with, and whether they

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>would imagine that this goat is having crafty, devilish designs

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on them or is thinking impure thoughts. But but I

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 1>did find it interesting. Yeah, like maybe there is a

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>long underlying realization that the goat thinks and behaves differently

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>when we're looking at it as opposed to when we're

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>not looking at it, which reminds me of that ridiculous

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>idea that we folk with Tale that we've brought up

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in the last episode about how you can't keep tracking

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>the goats not even there all the time. Sometimes it's there,

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>but the rest of the time it's going to hell

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>so that Satan can clean its beard for it. You

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>know what you call that, It's a fission fusion society. Yeah, yeah,

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like, all right, what's your day look like, Carl. Well,

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna eat a bunch of a bunch of grass,

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna climb some rocks and then oh, I've got

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I've got I've got a one PM with Satan. Gotta

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>get this be taken care of, thank thank now. As

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>previously mentioned, goats, of course, are really good at figuring

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 1>out how to make use of new environments. And as

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 1>a result, as a result of that reality and a

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>result of human domestication of the animals, goats are a

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>common sight all over the world. They're one of our

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>oldest domesticated animals. As we discussed in the first episode,

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>They've traveled a long and far with us. And yeah,

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the goat is especially good at sustaining itself even in

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:00.760
<v Speaker 1>places where nothing like the goat has ever lived. And

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to go to a particular place, and and

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>part of this is because I I just physically returned

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 1>from this place, and so it's it's on my mind

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but I want to go to the Galapagos Archipelago.

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a cluster of volcanic islands located five d

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty three miles or n kilometers off the coast of Ecuador.

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a place famous for its biodiversity and for the

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>examples of evolution found there uh as in various species

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 1>many found nowhere else in the world that have evolved

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to thrive in isolated environments. And while there is some

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>dispute over whether the Inca ever reached the island, we

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>can be certain that Europeans uh discovered the islands in

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thirty five, and outside of Charles Darwin's visit to

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the island three hundred years later, the history of human

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>contact with the island is has frequently been a bloody one,

0:38:55.239 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in tailing at times penal colonies, utopian communities, whalers and pirates.

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Sailors infamously made off with many of the smaller female

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>galapacost tortoises, which they used to restock their food supplies

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>at these islands, and later these sailors that were visiting

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the Galapacos Islands would see the islands with food species

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like goats and pigs, so drop off some goats and pigs,

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>knowing that these are hardy creatures that will find out

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 1>how to survive, that will breed. And then when you

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>drop back by, we just send some some of some

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>sailors ashore and say, hey, go get me some goat meat.

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Go get me some pig meat. Can you bring back

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty to fifty feral hogs? Uh? And And given how

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>good these creatures were at at thriving in new environments,

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and given that these islands had never seen goats or

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>pigs before, yeah, they did quite well. And as you

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>can imagine, this sort of willful introduction of invasive species

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:02.320
<v Speaker 1>had a huge negative packed on the environment. In addition

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to feral goats and pigs, also feral cats feral cattle

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>have along been an issue along with of course rats uh.

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Cats are of course terrific killers of birds. Pigs will

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>consume hidden eggs including a glob of coast tortoise eggs,

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I guana eggs, etcetera. Uh, and our problems and other

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world as well. But you might well

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>wonder why feral donkeys and especially feral goats would be

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>an issue, Like what ultimately is so destructive about the goat. Well,

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 1>think back to the browsing dietary habits of the goat

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that we discussed in the first episode. Again, the goat

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>excels at consuming vegetation and ultimately actually outperforms the giant

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:49.399
<v Speaker 1>galapagost tortoise, munching down parts of the plant they would

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.839
<v Speaker 1>ultimately be inaccessible to the tortoise, and in doing so

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>they also end up loosening the underlying soil. They also,

0:40:56.480 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>along with donkeys and cattle, can trample eggs uh you know,

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for the for the eggs as well as just young tortoises,

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 1>feral pigs, dogs, cats, and black rats can serve as

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>deadly predators and so for these reasons along with with

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:15.280
<v Speaker 1>human hunting, we saw the extinction of the Floridana Island

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>subspecies of the Glava Coast tourtise during the mid nineteenth century,

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course all of the glab of coost tortoises

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>have have kind of had an uphill battle uh to

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to regain successful numbers. Another important thing to keep in

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>mind here and this this reminds me of our discussions

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of the moa uh, the giant flightless bird in the past.

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>We have to remember that Okay, glab of Coast tortoises

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>are notoriously slow, but they do move around quite a bit,

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and aided by a slow digestion, they're able to spread

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.919
<v Speaker 1>seeds across the vast distances. So the glap of cost

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>tortoise isn't just this amazing curiosity to be found on

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the Glap Coast islands. They're a crucial part of island ecology.

0:41:56.920 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>They've evolved to thrive within these isolated ecosystems, and those

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.880
<v Speaker 1>ecosystems have evolved to depend upon them and to uh

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and to live alongside them. Uh. There are other examples

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of this as well, like one in particular, you see

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>these very tall to cactus varieties that have evolved to

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to climb high enough to where they're above the tortoises reach.

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>And then you'll see, you know, all the fruiting parts

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>of the cactus up there, and they'll beat it more

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 1>like this hard bark on the lower portions of it,

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>very tall cacti. So anyway, we end up with this

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>situation where on we have we have we have islands

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>here that have lots of goats, and the goats are destructive.

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:42.839
<v Speaker 1>The goats are in competition with the animals that we

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 1>want to help, that we want to see survive and

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have no other place in the world where they can survive,

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>where they can call home. And so this lad to

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 1>goat removal efforts, a war on goats. And there had

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>been prior goat removal efforts on in other islands, but

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this was the but this was the largest at this

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 1>point in history. We're getting into the nineteen nineties here.

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So according to the Galapa Coos Conservancy quote, prior to

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:15.839
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seven, the largest island with a successful goat eradication

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>was Auckland Island in New Zealand, where only one five

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>goats occupied a near four thousand hectares. The next two

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:27.839
<v Speaker 1>of the largest islands with successful go to eradications were

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Lanai in Hawaii and San Clemente Island in California. And

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 1>uh this in in San Clemente Island they have removed

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>apparently twenty nine thousand goats. So yeah. By the late

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, some real mover movements were being made to

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 1>eradicate feral populations from the Galapagos Islands. This included the

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>N seven Project Isabella Plan, which aimed to eradicate goats

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and donkeys from northern Isabella Island, also pigs, goats and

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 1>donkeys from Santiago Island and goats from Penta Island, And

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>with international funding, they waged a war against the goats

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and their feral kin and the results are pretty staggering.

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:11.280
<v Speaker 1>By two thousand and four, eighteen thousand pigs were removed

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 1>from Santiago Island. The same year, roughly fifty five thousand

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 1>goats were eliminated on Isabella. And it's it's interesting when

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you start, when you start getting into this sort of problem,

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:26.320
<v Speaker 1>when you have thousands, tens of thousands of of goats,

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you get rid of them? How do you

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 1>round them all up? You? Uh? I'm to understand that

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>some of this was done via aerial hunting and some

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of the pig removal. I think it still goes on today.

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm to understand with with with hunting efforts, but with

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the goats. They use judas goats to help carry this out,

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 1>some seven hundred and seventy of them. Now what is

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a judas goat, you might ask, Well, these are trained

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>goats and in these efforts they are also sterilized goats.

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Because you don't you're not going to solve your goat

0:44:57.760 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>problem by releasing seven hundred seven and debreedable goats into

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the population. But these are trained goats that in they

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 1>were traditionally used in uh in previous times to lead

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>sheep to slaughter, but they can also be used to

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 1>lead feral goats to their destruction. So in the case

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:19.799
<v Speaker 1>of the galapagost efforts, sterilized goats were used, and uh, yeah, yeah,

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:21.839
<v Speaker 1>they were used to help round up many of these

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>goats so that they could be um eliminated. But I

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>think this whole scenario is it's it's kind of a

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>testament to so many of the properties of the goat

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that we've discussed, their tenacity, their uh, their great ability

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to thrive in an environment, and in this case, they're

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>too good at it. Again, they just out outperform everything

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.879
<v Speaker 1>that's already there. Then you have to get rid of them.

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:48.319
<v Speaker 1>And how do you how do you wrangle them up? Uh, Well,

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:50.919
<v Speaker 1>you've got to use goat against goat. You've you've got

0:45:50.920 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to you've got to enlist trader goats or judas goats

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to go out there and help you lead them in

0:45:56.800 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 1>to the kill. I had heard the phrase judas goat

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:01.320
<v Speaker 1>before but I don't think I ever knew what that meant.

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it's a goat that it takes advantage

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of the the social hurting behaviors of goats by being

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>trained by humans to lead goats where you want them

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to go, often too, a place that's not in the

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>interest of the goats themselves, right right, so that they

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 1>can be rounded up and in this case eliminated and uh.

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And I believe that they still keep Judas goats around

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>on some of these islands for for monitoring purposes. I wonder,

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>how do you train a goat that other goats really

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:32.479
<v Speaker 1>want to follow? Like what is the most followable type

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of goat? Yeah, I don't know. I didn't go in

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>deep into like the making of a Judas goat, Like

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>how does it come together? I think it since you're

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you're training an animal to betray it's its own species

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 1>one instantly, you can't help an anthropomorphize the scenario when

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you start thinking of various episodes of the outer Limits

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and imagining like aliens brainwashing human captives so that they'll

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 1>betray their uh, the human species or something. But I

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's quite that complicated. But thank goodness, we

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 1>can do it. I mean, you think of other problems

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:06.600
<v Speaker 1>species like the like the rat. To my knowledge, there's

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 1>no such thing as a Judas rat. The rats are

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 1>too clever for that. I suppose You've We've got to

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 1>resort to, in some cases more basic methods, but also

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 1>methods that are perhaps just incapable of of solving a

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>large scale rat problem. Al Right, Well, as we reached

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of these three episodes, how do we how

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 1>has this change the way we feel about goats? It

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>changes nothing for me my allegiances to the goat and

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to the goat alone as it has always been. Well, obviously,

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 1>we'd love to hear from everyone out there about all

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of this. H Yeah, did did Did these episodes change

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the way you think about goats? Yet? Perhaps? Perhaps not? Uh?

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:48.359
<v Speaker 1>And of course we I feel like we we do

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 1>have listeners who raise goats, or have raised goats, who

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 1>have been around goats. Um. I'm almost certain of it,

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>if I'm thinking I'm remembering correctly. So if you out there,

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:00.879
<v Speaker 1>if you are a goatherd, we would love to hear

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>from you. Let us know what your thoughts are about

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the way of the goat. Um. So if you've ever

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:07.760
<v Speaker 1>worked at a petting zoo, if you have any experience

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>with with goats, uh that that lines up with anything

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed here right in, and we'll discuss them on

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>future episodes of Listener Mail. It's also not impossible there'll

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>be another episode concerning goats in the not too distant future,

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 1>because we were just wrapping up our our work on

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>this and I got a press release from somebody who

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 1>had like a new study regarding the behavior of goats

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and rams, and I was like, yeah, I'm like, oh man,

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:34.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll have to Maybe we'll have to have them

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on the show and chat with them. So this may

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:39.359
<v Speaker 1>not be the end of the goats in the long run,

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 1>but it is the end of this three part series, Okay.

0:48:42.000 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Do As a reminder, you can find all the episodes

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of Stuff to Blow Your Mind and the Stuff to

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind podcast feed. We are primarily a science

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:53.400
<v Speaker 1>podcast with core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays, with Listener

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Mail episodes on Mondays. On Wednesday's we do a short

0:48:56.400 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 1>form monster fact or artifact episode, and on Friday's we

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>do a little something called Weird House Cinema. That's our

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:05.399
<v Speaker 1>time to set aside most serious concerns and just talk

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:08.359
<v Speaker 1>about a strange film. Huge thanks as always to our

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 1>excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:13.839
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with us with feedback on this

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 1>episode or any other, to suggest a topic for the future,

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 1>or just to say hello, you can email us at

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:29.200
<v Speaker 1>contact at stuff to Blow Your Mind dot com. Stuff

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Minds, production of I Heart Radio. For

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the i heart

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listening to your

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:46.279
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.