WEBVTT - Faux Meat's Next Chapter

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube search Bloomberg clovel News. I just want to

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>bring you one COVID headline, White House Chief Medical Advisor

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Andthony Fauci saying it a briefing earlier that the dynamics

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of the COVID nineteen outbreak in the US are pointing

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>sharply downward. That's a trend line we'd like to see. Yeah,

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing it just here in New York City,

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but throughout the United States as well. Let's get into

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it with Michael Dowling, President and CEO at north Well Health.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from Long Island. Uh. Michael,

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it's great to have you back with us. Uh. You

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>run New York's largest health system. Give us an idea

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of how things are looking inside north Well Health right now. Oh,

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>things are looking very very well. Indeed, we are definitely

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>on the exit ramp of of COVID and consistent we went.

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Dr Fauci indicated we only have about five hundred COVID

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>patients in our facilities today and it is dropping each day,

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>So we're in a good place. Um, we're moving back

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to a normality. Um, and which is I think we've

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>all got to stop beginning to do now, even though

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>COVID will always be hanging around for quite a while,

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>but the devise civility is much much less, and things

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that things are looking very very positive. Indeed, you know, Michael,

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we know it wasn't easy, and I'm sure I can't

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 1>even imagine the stresses as you guys went through it. Um,

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And we're just kind of looking in and hearing what

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>was going on in healthcare systems like your own. My

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>understanding is you kind of threw the budget out the window.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that? Because you do have to

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>ultimately think about the top and bottom line, and there

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>was government assistance in some cases, but how do you

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>do that or do you have it's it's it's a

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>standard thing with us because we've had this situation with

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Hurricane and Sandy, Hurricane Irene, and ever so often bad

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>things happened to you and you've got to be able

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to react, and especially when the community is in danger,

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>either from a hurricane and or bad or or things

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>like COVID. You can't be going around each and every

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 1>day warning about the budget because you will you will

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>not be innovative, you will not be creative, and you

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>will not respond to what is needed to be responded to.

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So my message was do what is right, do everything

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we possibly can to help people, save people, protect people's lives,

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and we'll figure out the budget and the mechanics that

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it later, because otherwise you're you're going to be constraining

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>your your activities. So during the height of COVID that

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>the beginning in twenty our revenue dropped oh well over

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the billion and a half and it was scary moments,

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>but we know that you're going to We wouldn't we

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>knew that we had the attitude we're going to win

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>against this virus. The virus is not going to beat this.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna win. And then we had to come back

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 1>and rebuild. Um, this is what you're doing the crisis.

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Where are you, Michael in terms of rebuilding? Now? How

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>do you? How do you get back that lost time?

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>And I believe we will come out this year. We

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>will come out positive from a financial point of view.

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Are the end of the feral help? Just mentioned the

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>subtle assistants help, but we stopped it too, uh to

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of pivot for bringing back regular business. You know,

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months after the height of the COVID

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>crisis and in the spring of quinty. You know, one thing,

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious and we were all talking our planning call

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>this morning about the business of running a healthcare system.

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And I was having a conversation with a doctor earlier

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in the week about just how slim the margins can

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>be in terms of a hospital running efficiently and as

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to all of a sudden the system being

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>maxed and strained. How tight is it? It's very, very tight.

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>But we had a fifteen in the fifteen points were

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Billy in dollar entity and we're not just hospitalizis you

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>know very well, we have huge ambulatory occations and heart care,

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>all of that, plus academics and research, but we run

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom one to one and a half cent Martin.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>It's tight. So you've got to be very efficient. You've

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>got to be quite productive. You've got to be very

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>very careful of how you operated. But you've got to

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>move forward each and every day with a great sense

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>of optimism. Um uh. And and still they do everything

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you possibly can to make sure we serve the community

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the best of all ability. It's not hard to make

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a margin. If you decide, for example, sit back and

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>eliminate those services that you lose money on, those things

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that you do you get no money at all for,

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>then you can come back and say, oh, we don't

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>create we have a huge margin. But that's not in

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>my view, that's not why we're here. We're here to

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>do well, and we're here to do good. And um uh,

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we were if we have a margin strong enough to

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be a to you know, feedo balance sheet, commit to

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the investments we need to make in technology, in people,

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and in infrastructure, and then show a one to one

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half maybe up to two percent at the end,

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we're we're we're doing well. Um now not as well.

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>We're in New York is a much more expensive place

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to be. We have unionized staff, which is more expensive.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>So you will see places around the country that are

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>much higher margins. I'm not worried about them. I worried

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>about what we do, and I think we focused on

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>mission and as well as making sure we try to

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we make a margin to sustain an ongoing business. Well, Michael,

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that's why we're That's why we're here. What are the

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>permanent shifts that you see in your business on the

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>other side of COVID, we are the permanent changes you

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>have made at north Well Health Well, um, let me.

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>It accelerates a lot of what we were doing. Okay,

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>not not a complete shift, but an acceleration. So, for example,

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>COVID demonstrated the unbelievable benefit of having large, large ambulatory

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>outpatient entities because they actually treated an awful lot of COVID.

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>If you didn't have those should be in trouble. Trouble, um.

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It accelerated the use of harm care. It dramatically accelerated

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the use of technology. So we will never again be

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same and call me to me was a

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal learning experience. Capitalists of Change. It's one of them

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>many ways, I would say it's one of the best

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>things that has ever happened. Now, it's difficult to say

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>because of all of the you know, well, Michael just

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>just got about twenty seconds. If there's one thing that

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>has changed dramatically and for the better, Uh, what is it?

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Because of what we learned during the panic and just

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>quickly if you could they it proved to us that

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we can be a remarkably agile and and flexible And

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>if we can continue to maintain that culture of innovation,

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>creativity and be able to change quickly and build it

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>into our culture, then there is nothing that we can Well.

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Good luck in the future and thanks for finding time

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>once again. Michael Daly, President and CEO at Northwhile Health,

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>author of the book Leading Through a Pandemic. He was

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>named to Modern Healthcare's magazines a hundred most Influential People

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in Healthcare, ranked number three overall. This is Bloomberg. You're

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Among our most

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>read on the Bloomberg Today. It's a Bloomberger exclusive and

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it's about Morgan Stanley's role in reinvigorating a federal probe

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>examining regularities in a very look at a market for

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. We're talking about block trades. Yeah, raj on

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>his finance reporter for Bloomberg News. He's with us in

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Let's get some definitions, Sree,

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>just out of the way here first. What is a

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>block trade? Large junks of stock that you need to

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>sell and it has to be privately negotiated. You can

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>just dribble them out, because if you do that over

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a long time, it will take a while and you

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>will have advance price action. You might as well figure

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>out the right price at which you can sell off,

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>usually at a discount to where the stock is trading.

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Say you want a big jung of apple and it's

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>trading at you negotiate a deal and it's usually at

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a discount, so you probably sell it to the best,

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>better nine and then they hope to parcel it off

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to other people. So I remember years ago where we

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>would Las Laborini was really into block trades and money

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>flow and we would track the big moves by institutional

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>investors when they sell the block and watch the money flows,

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>because it was usual an indication of where stock was going.

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>We've gotten away from that big time, like through the

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>tech the tech crisis and run up if you will.

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>What is it that's at stake or what is it

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that investigators have been looking at when it comes to

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>block trades? Effectively, if some people have been blurring the

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>lines and going from the grid of the black what

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 1>they're really trying to figure out is when banks get

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>mandates for some of these block trades, are they tipping

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>their friends in the hedge fund world? Are they front

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.479
<v Speaker 1>running some of that information so that they can preposition themselves,

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>possibly by shorting the stock, because you know, when a

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 1>block trade hits the tape, the stock is going to

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>trade down because a large amount of stock is coming

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>down the bike and that will drive the price down.

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you're short to stock, you're bound to make money.

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So is there some willing and dealing going on where

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>some of their clients are short in the stock so

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that when the block actually comes through, the bank can

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>tap on their shoulders and get them to buy that.

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 1>So both sides are happy, clients are in a way

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>behold into the bank, and the clients are making some

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>money that is obviously not good. Remember that a lot

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>of this operates in the gray area. It is murky

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>when you're bringing your block trade. What is the hypothetical

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>conversation you're having. Is it really illegal confidence conversation or

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>even a confidential conversation if you don't have the mandate yet.

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 1>These are some of the things we imagine that regulators

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors will have to wrestle with and it won't be

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>easy to solve. And that might be one reason that

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>might be giving faith and belief to a lot of

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the defendants that and when I say defendants, I'm just

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about the people who have sought information from right

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>now because they haven't even charged anyone. But that's the

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that they would have to solve for

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and figure out if they have a real case. Here,

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll take us back about a year ago to Arks

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and the blow up there and how this current version

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of an inquiry into block trades was really set off

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>by that. I'll take you further back then, because this

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>investigation into block trades really started off around twenty eighteen.

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>As early as twenty eighteen is our understanding. But since

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>then it waxed and wained a little bit and never

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>really seemed to gather a steam. Then what happened last

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>year Archagos, Bill Huong's famed family office that had the surprise,

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>spectacular run up and even even more shocking collapse. The

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>unwind happened because a lot of the banks, worried about

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the positions that Archagos held, moved quickly to dump their holdings,

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 1>and that meant large blocks and across a variety of

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>names hit the market. So when investigators a few months

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>down the line started investigating what happened with Archas you know,

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we know that there are inquiries looking into whether there

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>was market manipulation, whether banks are concluding in the sale process.

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Along the way, they also started looking at some of

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>these blocked trades, and that seems to have breathed new

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>life into this probe that has looked at this lucrative

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>block trade activity and from there it seems to have

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>expanded to other traits. That Morgan Stanley, the bank we're

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>looking at that seems to be the center of all

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>this uh is they're looking at the trades that they

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 1>bought to market and whether there is more wrongdoing, and

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>some executives at the film are under the gun right now,

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:29.559
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's what caught our attention. It's like, okay,

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>so where's Morgan Stanley and all of this, So they're

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>being investigated to or there's no charge, Like where what

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>is it? How do we need to look at this firm?

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>They certainly seems central to whatever process is going on

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. There seems to be a lot of information

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>gathering from the SDN, Y, the SEC and other people.

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the threads, based on our reporting so far,

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>tie back to Morgan Stanley. Back in November, we had

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>reported that there had a syndicated recent to get desk

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>power and Pussy was put on leave. It wasn't quite

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>clear why. But now it's become much more apparent than

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it was tied to this entire block trading probe. And

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>now they're looking at some of his clients, some of

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the conversations he's had, some of his colleagues. So it's

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be interesting few weeks and months ahead as

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>they try and figure out whether they can build a

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>real case. I mean, ultimately we could get regulators to

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>rule right on this. But you said it's murky regulators, prosecutors,

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 1>if if if if we if they have what we

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>think they have in terms of evidence, in terms of

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>being tracking them for a while. It's really it's really

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>hard for anyone on the outside to be able to

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>definitively tell you which way this goes, because I can

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>guarantee you there's someone at the SD and why sitting

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in an evidence room looking at a pile of stuff.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Very well, good know all the answers well, and just

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>got about twenty seconds or fift I mean black trades.

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a part of how Wall Street works, right, It's

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a part of how Wall Street works. It was made

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>famous by the legendary Ghostly we fifty years ago and

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>still a very lucrative part of the market. Well, incredible reporting,

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and we set a Bloomberg exclusive animals right tree not

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a Raja, And thank you so much, finance reporter at Bloomberg.

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg is do this week with Carol Messer

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. After

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>surging we're sales plant based meats in the meat departments

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of grocery stores increased only just a smidge in one

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>percent last year. Tim, It's remarkable to read that in

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Dina Shanker's latest article in the upcoming double issue of

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business Week magazine. She's consumer reporter for Bloomberg Knew.

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>She joined us now on the phone from New York City.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Also with us as Joel Webber, editor at Bloomberg business Week.

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>He's with us in the Bloomberg INTERACTI Broker studio. Joel,

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 1>I think back to where we were about two years ago.

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I was going to the grocery store every two or

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, okay, because that's where I wasn't in pandemic mode,

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>using two shopping carts, okay. And I was at the

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>grocery store. I think it was a Wegman's, and there

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>was like this whole section of beyond me that was

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>on sale there and beyond meat stock. It actually at

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the time was doing pretty well. Yeah, And you know,

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, uh, you haven't gone to the grocery

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>store since I'm guessing no, I have gone to the

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>grocery first. You know what taken up with the team

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. We do a lot of delivery these days, right, Well,

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>grocery delivery. So the enthusiasm among investors and certain consumers

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.599
<v Speaker 1>was incredibly high. Um. For uh, you know this the

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>foe meat fake meat stuff when it came to market,

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen it um reflected in I'm looking at

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>beyond share price, which has come down pretty substantially since

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that moment that you were at Wigman's all those months

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>ago and then before times. Um. But as Dina writes

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in this latest issue, which I found this to be

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>really interesting, the companies are starting to attack and think

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of themselves maybe not as always being the main event,

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>into something more like an ingredient. So so Dina walk

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>us through the strategy and how it's playing out. Hi. Thanks.

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So basically what you have is these companies are no

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>longer getting all the attention from consumer from people like

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>me in the media, although I do give them a

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention. Um. People are are getting a little

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>bored with the novelty of a burger made from something

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>other than meat, or sausage made from something other than pork.

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>They're also getting maybe you guys can relate, getting a

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>little tired of cooking all the time. So, uh, the

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>sales have dropped precipitously. Um. Oh, and then there's also

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they can get meat a lot more

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>easily than they did during that time when you're taking

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>those two supermarket uh cards through the aisles. So all

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of these things are making is that uh people just

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't feeling as compelled to try these uh not so

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>new products anymore. So what are these companies doing? They're saying,

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>but wait, there's more. Okay, we can put our fake

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>beef into ravioli, we can put sausage on a pizza,

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we can put it in a dumpling. So many ways

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to eat this stuff, and a lot of it doesn't

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>even involve cooking, or at least, you know, real cooking.

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>You can throw this into a microwave. You can just

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>put it in the oven for ten minutes and it'll

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>be ready before your next zoom meeting. So it's really simple.

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And hopefully, you know, with all of this melted cheese

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on top, or pasta around it, or what other whatever

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>else is dressing it up, you might not even notice

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's not the real thing. So I have a theory, Tina,

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm interested if you're reporting bear this our just

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a observation from the Weber household, which is when I've

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>cooked with uh, fake meat, it doesn't smell good when

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just by itself. Did that come up? You know,

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it did not come up with any of the wrong Definitely,

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it has no note. I was gonna say it's come

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>up real human beings, but I talked to um all

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the time. I've noticed it in my house. Other when

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I say real human being, I'm using that term really

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>loosely because I'm realizing I'm mostly talking about other reporters.

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>But people people have definitely mentioned it to me that

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>there's a funny smell, and I noticed it too, Um,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>but it made me wonder actually, like, you know, this

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is actually maybe a brilliant technique because there's so many

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>things that meat gets added to, and you know, maybe

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't need to be meat. It could be fake muting.

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Like this solves the other problem of maybe not having that,

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the smell of jewel cooking in your house.

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm coming over. I don't know that I am sodina.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>My problem with this plant based food is that I

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 1>don't know that it's definitely healthier. And I guess that's

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>what I'm thinking about, that that's where food is ultimately

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>moving in terms of direction, does that hold it back

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>from growth as well? Definitely? I mean it is you know,

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:02.360
<v Speaker 1>as a as a category. Um, there's nothing nobody's gonna

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>say this category is a health food category. You can

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>go a product by product and some will have, you know,

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>better nutritional value than others. But um and and that's

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>also becoming some A way that the newer companies are

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to differentiate themselves is by saying, look, we're only

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>using um, a handful of ingredients or um, we have

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>fewer calories or whatever it is. But compared to uh,

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the real stuff, I mean kind of

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a wash, you can you can definitely make arguments that, um, listen,

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have a cholesterol, but it has a ton

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of sodium. Um and uh, the amount of you know,

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the beef burger can have literally just a single ingredient

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in it, so um, the beef industry will say that's

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>really great. But then of course you can make the

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>argument that, um, well, sure, hidden in all that beef

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>are a whole lot of you know, antibiotics that are

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>fed to the animals, said to the animals, um, bring

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it back, you know, I'm wondering if I'm wondering about

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>product pipelines here, because for the last couple of years,

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the news from these companies has really been, Hey, we're

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>working on this chicken version of chicken. What is the

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>product pipeline telling you about their new strategy. Well, when

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to Dennis Woodside, who's the president at Impossible,

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, listen, we're still working on mimicking

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that hole muscle kind of format, which is like a

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>chicken breast or steaks. Um. And then he didn't put

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it this way exactly, but essentially what he was saying was,

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>but this is so much easier, Like I can just

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>take the ground beef we are have and put it

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in a ravioli. All I have to do is, you know,

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.719
<v Speaker 1>make that business deal. And that's not that's a lot

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>easier than making a fake chicken breath. All right, Well,

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I want real stuff in my only I'm just gonna

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>put it out there. Um. This story in the new

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. You can find it

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>everywhere tomorrow. Bloomberg Business Week getter Joe Weber, who's kind

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of takes maybe some cooking lessons and of course, Tina

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Shankar of Bloomberg News. Yeah, I'll bet you let me drive. No, no, no,

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, I want to drive. It's a good question.

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Drive is the drive to the clothes on Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, just about twelve minutes left in today's trading session.

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>We've definitely seen our reversal and we are hovering neuro

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>best levels of the session. So we've gone from red

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to green when it comes to the equity trade, and

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>that is following the latest FED minutes from the Federal Reserve.

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>It was at January meeting. I really think the takeaway

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and our our markets live blog has been just great

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>on this said. Basically, there was nothing there that made

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.479
<v Speaker 1>investors think that the Fed is going to be more

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>hawkish than it was already anticipate. Keep in mind the

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>markets already pretty aggressive about what the Fed made more

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>hawk issues. I think the key of the Carol right,

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>not much new in there in terms of new hawkish

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>signs in the Fed minutes. Let's shut all about it.

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>That and more with Jimmy Lee, the founder and CEO

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Wealth Consulting Group two point seven billion dollars

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in assets under management. Jimmy joins us once again on

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Las Vegas. Jimmy, how are you great?

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Is here from you guys? Yeah, it's good to have

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you back with us. Help us make sense of this

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>market right now? Um, we not just have you know,

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>investors trying to figure out the Fed's next move. We

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>have investors concerned about the hottest inflation print in forty years,

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and then we have geopolitical tensions on the border of

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Russia Ukraine. Help us make sense of it? Well, I

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>think until we get past the FED meeting in March,

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see some days where we get some wild

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>swings in the market UH and volatility, and so you know,

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>until they Russia, Ukraine, tod Asian UH settles itself out

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and we'll know that pretty soon. I think. Um, that's

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the one thing besides the FED meeting that's coming up

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>where people are speculating whether the FED will raise rates

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>by fifty basis points or less. I'm in the thinking

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that it's not going to be fifty, but the speculation

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>about that, and you're gonna have people on your show

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and commentators are they think both ways. So I think

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the market economy can absolutely stand fifty. So if that

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>were to happen and we get some short term volatility

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>from either of that or invasion into your crane, I

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>still think I'm constructive on equities for this year and

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy, and I would use that as a buying

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>opportunity if you're a stalk investor. Yeah, it's interesting on

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>the equity side of things. Right to me is that

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>right now a lot of investors are a lot more

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>aggressive in their thoughts about how aggressive the Fed will

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>be in raising rates UM. You know, we're talking without

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen Hayes in terms of the balance sheet is a

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>very big difference, and that's still in question how the

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Fed approaches this. And there's a difference between letting a

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>run off for actually actively selling UM assets off the

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. There are still a lot of unknowns. We

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>know the Feed's going to raise rates at this point,

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it's aggressive. If the FETE is a little bit more devish,

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>what would that mean potentially for the equity markets, I

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>could put it in a really good place. I agree,

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's actually what I think is gonna happen. Carol.

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, the hawkish signaling that the

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>fet IS has made absolutely gives them some room to

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>back off of that statement or those statements, and the

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>people that are predicting seven rak hikes I think are

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be wrong. And so I think the supply situation

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>gets better first. And then as they said, they're gonna

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>be very data dependent and very flexible every single meeting.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I don't see them raising rates is as

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>high as some people think. And I think the long

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the bottom market agrees with that. So you

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>don't see the long end of the market really going

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>up that much. And um, I think that the bond

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>investors on that side are disagreeing with people that I

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:00.479
<v Speaker 1>think that FET is going to be very hot. Well,

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>so the bottom market just come in just a little

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>bit un yelled at me, hair, just you know. And

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is in that FOMC minutes um that again

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we heard from those members that price pressures would moderate.

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh and the default setting of that the issue will

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>work at south out tim that is still there by

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>members of the f O m C. Yeah, Hey, Jimmy,

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to dig into what you were saying about

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this being a buying opportunity between now and the next

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>meeting of the Federal Reserve. What type of what to

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you is sort of a bottom for the current cycle

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're in. Well, I think we've seen a lot

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of support around temper cent on this and P during

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the days that we saw across intraday, and Uh, I

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 1>would see that. I would see Let's let's say, for example,

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>if we get an invasion into ukrane Um, maybe it

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>could go down a little further. Um. If the FED

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>raises fifty basis points, maybe we could see hitting that

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>temperacent number again. But I would see it. I would

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I would think that we would get aggressive buying at

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>around that tempera sent number again. And so you know,

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm bullish um, as long as earnings continue to look good,

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think earnings can look better in a lotter

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>part of this year if costs come down a little

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>bit and so if the shortage on the supply situation

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>improves a bit and um, and we're already seeing some

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>signs of that. By the way, one of the indexes

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we follow is the shipping index little London, and costs

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>have come down by like two thirds and over the

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>last month or two and so so certainly supplies the

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>supply situation. You hear lots of different stories, But I

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>think the the supply side and the expense of that

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>companies have to deal with will get better. And so

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>if earnings can hold up parts you do to that,

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and also the strong consumer. I think that the equities

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>from here on out, if we end up with high

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>single digits for the year, would be very good. So, Jimmy,

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.959
<v Speaker 1>you you think inflation has peaked? You know, I think

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a good chance it has. And um, I think that, yes,

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I do, And I know it's a little bit of

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a contrarian view, but I believe that the Fed ultimately

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>would be right that that it was transitory. It will

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>be transitory. You're like the only one it might be,

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, relatively lonely in that corner. But people have

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about peak inflation. They have, but you know we're

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>still seeing Yeah they have, but you know it hasn't

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>really turned out that way. Well, yeah, that's the problem.

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>This is it's a tricky time. So I know, you

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>don't talk stocks sectors. Where should we be there at

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this point? To be um, we're using a Barbell strategy

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and we still believe that it's better to be in

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>some of the more economy opening cyclical sectors, and so

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>we're overweight energy, financials, industrial materials. But I think people

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>will go back into growth stocks and but quality growth stocks,

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>so companies that have good earnings. Obviously the companies have

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>been hit the most with the highest valuations that don't

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>really have great earnings. I don't know if investor money

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>will flow back into those as aggressively as they make

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the megacap stocks that investors have been, you know,

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>invested in for a long time. Also for listeners, you know,

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>in the past FED tightening cycles, stocks have done very well,

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>so equities of very good asked the class during tightening

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>cycles and actually growth as beat value in those past

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>time periods. Although this time around, I think it's dangerous

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>to say, but I think it is a little bit

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>different in the sense that I think the value sectors

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>will will be doing very well. And also it's important

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>for investors not to be too underweight overseas, and so

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think international markets will do better as well. Yeah,

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we've heard that too, although you know what's interesting, and

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll have to watch the economic data points um.

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>The FED in their minutes also talked a lot about

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>O Macron and it's potential to weigh on output and

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>also talked about future variants, and we know are reporting

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to our I think of our Michelle Cortez story over

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the weekend that we're not out of the pandemic, and

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>we're not out of the pandemic until everybody's out of

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. So that continues to be something to me

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that certainly can impact the trade and where the opportunities are. Yeah,

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and I've got one, you know, I was listening to

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 1>on the commercial break there um Dr Fauci's interview. Regardless

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of where we're at with the with the case count,

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's pretty evident now that we're opening up the

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>economy and they're getting rid of things like the mass

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>mandates in a lot of states. And so I don't

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>see a reversal on that. I really dont so. And

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and also investors have not really understood that there's probably

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to be any tax hikes this year. So

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll understand that once we get closer to April and

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>people are talking their accountants, but without tax hikes in

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a mid term election year, where as they think, whether

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't really care what side somebody's on

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>on the political side, but there's a little momentum for

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the GOP, I think, and I think from an investors standpoint,

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, not any more new regulations and things like

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that will seem bullish and uh, I think you'll it'll

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, promote risk taking. All right, We're gonna run. Hey, listen, Um,

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>thanks for stopping by. Jimmy Lee, founder and chief executive

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>officer of the Wealth Consulting Group out there in Vegas.

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Two point seven billion in assa. It's under management, and uh,

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about his thoughts in terms of the environment, We're

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna find opportunities. Yeah, his COVID thoughts are really interesting.

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Carol reminds me of what Michael Dowling, CEO at North

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Will Health told us earlier in the show. We are

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.239
<v Speaker 1>on the exit ramp of COVID. We're in a good

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>place right now. Yeah, I mean it is interesting and

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we are also increasingly learning at you know, how to

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>deal with this and move forward on it. Thanks for

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube, search Bloomberg Global News,