WEBVTT - ADP Duels and Player Draft Positions 0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.680 Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you 0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160 want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, 0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.080 download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy 0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.760 Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also, 0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.400 if you want to watch the video of this podcast, 0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000 check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope 0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.880 and type in you guess dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll 0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200 find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. 0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:35.720 Did let me just become best friends? Fantasy best Friends Forever? 0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:59.080 Whoo whoo hoo, whoo whoo hoo. Yo. This as the 0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:04.480 Fantas best Friends Forever Fantasy's Points Already Network alongside Frankie Stanfell, 0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.440 I am Gregg Sauceman. Thank you so much for joining us. Greggy, 0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:14.319 what's going on? How much? Greggy Friday? Yeah, it's uh, 0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.399 it was pretty good. It's lackluster. Yeah, you weren't there 0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:22.840 for the first one. I was practice and didn't feel it. 0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.000 We'll figure it out. Like it didn't have it was 0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.200 probably not listen. We said, we're gona let the people decide, 0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:31.119 and we'll do that. We're gonna put a pull up 0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.160 after the show, we said, because people weren't voting during 0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.520 the show. Um, we're gonna put a full up after 0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.120 the show. I feel like that intro or other instros 0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:41.520 we used around in the world most of the week 0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.399 by a t C. If you like that, can vote 0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.520 for that. You can ask us to keep trying, which 0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.880 we were more than happy to do. Um. And of 0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:50.480 course we'll put third eye line back on there because 0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.880 let people ever questioned that oddly enough, Frank, Yeah, you 0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:58.000 don't realize what you have until it's gone. Because while 0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.800 we had it, you know people would it passes. Now 0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.080 the comments we get where to go? Where to go? 0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:05.640 You guys need to do do what happened to do? 0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.280 Do do? I don't know what. We didn't actually tut you. 0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.399 By the way, it's gonna be an issue. You haven't 0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.679 figured it out. I had an idea. It doesn't. It 0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:18.359 doesn't even be gonna happen now. Sorry. Yeah, my last 0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:22.000 who rob before football season? Who rack? There? You go? 0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.000 Do you know that joke that was? Was that a 0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:32.000 wrestler who did that? Yes? Was that? Ah? I can't 0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.799 think of it. Oh, I'm going to be very disappointed. 0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:44.120 Rah Rah, I don't know. I've got nothing. Is the 0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:49.360 most musty do do you having a history mss There 0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.880 was a MS. Al right, I got I heard you 0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.200 the first time. Greg on the show today, Super fun 0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.560 show for you. We got the Fact of the Day 0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.560 coming out. We had the Hall of Fame game last night. 0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.919 What you know he was super excited about. Um there, 0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.560 we watched it together, right, we watched baseball together. What 0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.600 are you talking about? We watch baseball together? I thought 0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.520 we watched the Hall of Fame game together to Nope, 0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:17.720 I tried failed. Yes, we got that. We have some 0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:19.639 some guys know what's talking about? We want to throw 0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.920 out there and then and the week we will have 0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:27.280 the first edition of the a DP duel between for 0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:31.680 example and myself, the first edition ever the A d 0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:38.760 P Duel. We're doling. It's just not are you purposely 0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:40.400 trying to break this? No, I'm trying to win the 0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.120 duel though it's gonna break very easily. You're not a bet, 0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.000 you're not a good dueler. Well, if I go as 0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:49.080 hard as you are, these things are bounded for people 0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.800 just listening. We're just clanking, little baby pirate sort of thing. 0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:57.560 Baby swords. They are shined by the greatest swordsman or 0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.640 craftsman in all of West Gros. Is that true? Yeah, 0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.440 they made from Valerian steel. Damn right. There are Valiian 0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:10.000 blast a DP duels coming out later on in the program. 0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:11.960 But first we started the stat of the day. Frankie, 0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.039 I don't have a tape. I'm sorry you didn't see 0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.720 me downstairs. I was very busy today. All right, we're 0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:25.039 both very busy today, very busy day. Okay, Meg, I 0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.919 looked through. I have a whole bunch of notes on players, 0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:32.600 all right of the day. Uh, well, how about this one? 0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.200 All right? It was fun when we spoke about Alvin 0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.960 Kamar since two thousand two, Kamars twenty carries was the 0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.719 lowest total by top three running back in half PPR, 0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.120 and it wasn't close. The next closest was two hundred 0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:49.320 and thirty carriers. You can't mess that out like multiple 0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.159 times now. But maybe people were listening back that I 0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:58.880 need another stat. Uh looking, I don't have anything right now. Nothing. 0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:03.600 You have a whole list of Okay. Last year, six 0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:07.760 of the twelve top running backs, the RB ones, six 0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.760 of them average four points year yards per carry or less, 0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.520 just proving that volume Trump's efficiency for RB one's Gregg 0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.160 is that good one? Like a Matt Modique stet. Matt 0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.960 Modique was big on volume over efficiency? But which is 0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.080 true for you? RB one? Which does that cause you 0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.920 to push Alvin Kamara down the draft board a little bit? Well? 0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:33.240 You here's that? Like that? Should we do with Barkley? 0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.640 Should we do? Well? Which? Where where are you? I 0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.279 don't know if we're on the same not of the duel? 0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:47.440 Ah take that, young smen? What's not a duel? Are 0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:53.000 you on? I have Alvin Kamara. We speak about that 0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.800 trio a lot. It's Kamara Barkley Hunt. Should Gordon me 0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.520 in in that dream making a quartet? I have just 0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.000 recently a non PPR put Alvin Gordon ahead of Alvin Kamar. 0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:07.320 Really a navivrn prcause touchdowns count for you know a 0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.200 large majority of your fantasy production. Non PPR. We're doing. 0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.000 We're doing half point Austill take Kamara? Will you take 0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:18.360 Kamara Barley? I've already said I have Barkley ranked ahead 0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.040 of him, all right, because I think you can touch 0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:21.800 up all three fifty times, So you're not a DV 0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.640 dueling there? Because I agree with you, no duel? What 0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.080 would you have in half point between Kareem Hunt and 0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:34.680 Alvin Kamara. Greg Kareem Hunt, guy, man, you really you 0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.400 really calmed down a lot, don't Kamara? And then because 0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:41.320 you were not you were absolutely not on that. I 0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:43.760 just think, you know, with guys like Kareem Hunt at 0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.000 Sae Kwon Barkley, guys who can consistently touch the ball 0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:47.920 twenty times, which, don't get me wrong, in the first 0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.720 four weeks of the season, Alvin Kamara can probably help 0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:52.200 you get off to like a four and no start 0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.280 in those first four weeks. I know they're gonna work 0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.080 someone else in as well. He's not gonna get like 0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.800 twenty five to thirty touches in that span. But you 0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:00.880 gotta remember last year, this guy was getting what ten 0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.600 eleven carries per game and he was getting seven or 0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.800 eight catches. I think he's gonna get around twenty touches 0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.360 in those first four games. So he's gonna help you then. 0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.720 But don't forget once mark Ingram comes back, it's gonna 0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:14.520 go back to a lot of what we saw last year. 0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:16.840 And if he doesn't match the efficiency that he had 0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:20.400 last season, then we're not getting the same fantasy production. 0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.800 Like there's no way he's gonna mass the efficiency from 0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.200 last year six point one yards per carry. There was 0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.760 like ten yards per reception. Avan Kamara is a phenomenal player, 0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.680 don't get me wrong, but he had twelve or thirteen 0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.400 total touch on He's just not going to be able 0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.040 to match that production. In my opinion, this year where 0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.560 you're drafting him is based on what he did last year, 0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.480 and I'm not sure he gets back to that level 0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.120 of efficiency. But we did say, like repeatedly over and 0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.200 over last year, he'll have more volume, which will trump 0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.920 the loss inefficiency. But I just don't know how much 0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.080 more volume he gets once Ingram is back. But we 0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:58.240 said this all year last year, right that he's not sustainable. 0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.560 Now we can't trust as we a week out and 0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.280 he before he did it, he did it last year. 0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.040 So I'm almost wondering because you were the one for 0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.040 a while, Frank, that was like you, um, you know 0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:12.200 Kamara man. I was the Kareem Hunk guy. You were 0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.640 the Camara guy, and that was it. And now you're 0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:16.360 always like walking it back for the same reason that 0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.680 I was giving you a month ago. And and I 0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.720 don't know why, like why did you stop believing in 0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.240 your guy? It because comes down to volume again, like 0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.240 what I mentioned, I think there's a chance that Kareem 0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.840 Hunt is going to touch the ball around twenty times 0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.080 for names in half point, would you take me over 0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.880 him over Kamara? Yes, that's where that's where the line 0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:40.160 is drawn DA non PPR, I would because look back 0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.000 to back years twelve total touchdowns for Gordon. I think 0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.240 he's going to score at least ten. Would it surprise 0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.839 me if Alvin Kamar is more than the seven eight 0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.760 touchdown ranges here? No, wouldn't. I still think he'd catch 0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.640 the ball eighty times, which is going to make him 0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.560 more valuable than Melvin Gordon in my opinion, and a 0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.280 half point PPR definitely in a full point. When it 0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.880 comes to non PPR, where touchdowns matter so much more, 0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:03.440 I will I have moved Melvin Gordon ahead of its 0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.800 amazing how badly I want one of Melvin Gordon Kareemhunt. 0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.000 I love them so much. I think that's like you're 0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.880 doing the Whiteboard series a lot. I figured out that's 0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:14.480 the section I want to be in. It's like the 0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:19.679 eight nine pick I want to be DeAndre Hopkins was beforehand. 0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.160 That's the question. So I have the six pick in 0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.520 non PPR flex right now, and I'm trying to trade 0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:27.760 out of it because I'm stressing what be stressing that? 0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:29.800 So first of all, I don't I don't know who 0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.120 to take between Sakoon Barkley and Antonio Brown in a 0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.480 non PPR setting because but you may backs touched the 0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.720 ball so much, but you may not have the choice. 0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.800 I might not. I might not be thrilled. There's a 0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.440 chance that Alvin Camargo's five, I mean he might Antonio 0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.400 Brown was five, It's true. But then so basically the 0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.160 cut off for me is like if I take se 0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.760 Kwon Barkley, I pick six, and I guaranteed to get 0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:54.800 one of A J. Green or Davante Adams in the 0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.480 middle of the second I don't know that that happens. 0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.360 And then if if it doesn't, then I'm pulling up 0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.280 one of these other receivers of the board, Mike Evans 0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.000 or t Y Hilton in the middle of the second round. 0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:04.560 Do I want to do that? Can you just drive 0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.040 on the running back? I could theoretically and then take 0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.160 running back round three and fourth what I did last year, 0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.120 and I won. I took I started running back running 0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.319 back from I think pick eight or nine, right, But 0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.440 I'm trying to trade out of this pick to pick 0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.040 eight or nine because I'm guaranteed one of Kareem Hunter, 0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.720 Melvin Gordon, and in the in the early second round, 0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.520 I'm going to get one of Keenan Allen or Davante Adams. 0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.120 Why I like that. I think pick nine is awesome. Yeah. 0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.719 I've already hit up a few guys. Pat Thorman of 0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.160 Pro Football Focus, he shot me down. I think he 0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.240 had picked nine. I hit up a few other guys 0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.480 who have I think one has picked eight and the 0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.559 other has picked ten. So I'm going to see if 0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.400 one of those work out. Okay, I'll keep you updated. Well. 0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.160 Appreciate that, right, appreciate that. Um. Let me see all 0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.000 the Fame game. And you didn't actually watch an am, um, 0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.000 but you read about it to say goodbye or good 0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:57.600 friends yet but r I p who oh nobody really? Um, 0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.200 but you read about it, you look into it. What 0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:05.160 are you take aways? Yeah? I mean, look, no starters 0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.240 pretty much played in this game. It was all backup. 0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:08.760 So you got some of r G three, You got 0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.120 some of Lamar Jackson. I mentioned to see you Jackson 0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.720 average three point three yards per attempt, so really nothing 0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:15.840 down the field. From what I saw the highlights, he 0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.480 was throwing a lot of checkdown passes. Did throw a 0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.120 touchdown to Hayden Hurst, who people are hyping up a 0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.679 little bit today getting excited about. And I think he 0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.559 should have been on our radar even before this happened, 0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.280 and it's gonna continue to happen. Great. Anytime someone scores 0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.599 a touchdown in the preseason, you're gonna see their a 0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.000 DP move up. Hayden Hurst should have been on your 0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.600 radar regardless. Anyway, as a I'll say a solid tight 0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.320 end two inside your top twenty maybe top twenty four, 0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.599 because we know the Ravens like to throw the to 0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.719 the tighten a ton. They also drafted Mark Andrews, but 0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.280 Hayden Hurst they used a first round pick on. Remember 0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.720 they drafted hayden Hurst over Lamar Jackson with that first 0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.280 pick in the first round, and then they took Lamar 0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.079 Jackson with their later pick in the first round. So 0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.520 I think Lamar Jackson still he needs to work on 0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:03.280 something is obviously through the interception as well. He's not ready. 0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.760 He's not ready to start at the NFL level. Maybe 0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.200 at some point in this year, if Joe Flacco gets hurt, 0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.280 we could see him. But I'm not sure that Lamar 0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.920 Jackson is necessarily pushing for Joe Flacco's job. Unless this 0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.920 team starts owen whatever, or they have a losing record 0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:19.880 by like mid season, then you throw him out there 0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:21.400 and see what you have Lamar Jackson. One thing he 0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.760 didn't mention that Lamar Jackson's that he did take off 0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.840 eight times, not only years rushing, did take off those 0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.480 those eight times very interesting. Yeah, I watched a little bit, 0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.160 and it's just seem whenever the park the pockets started 0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.240 to problem, he just wanted to bail and he just 0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.640 wanted to run. So that's part of you know why 0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:38.800 I say I don't think he's ready yet. Obviously he's 0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:40.880 just a rookie coming in. He's going to learn those things, 0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:42.880 but he needs to learn to be a little more 0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.560 comfortable in the pocket. And you know, not just once 0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.320 things breakdown, you just want to take off and run 0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.440 right away. Maybe you break outside the pocket and you 0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.360 continue to look downfield. That's what makes guys like Russell 0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.080 Wilson so great at what they do. Once he gets 0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.240 out of the pocket. Defenders coming up. They have to 0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.120 decide whether to come attack Russell Wilson so that he 0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.680 doesn't run forward, or to stay back and guard the defenders. 0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:05.839 So that's what makes guys like Russell Wilson's so hard 0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.160 to defend Lamar Jackson. That's gonna be part of his 0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.400 progression as a quarterback at the NFL level. For Sean P. 0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.160 Harriman didn't get hurt, So I think that's a plus. 0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:13.839 There you go, there's a plus. Yeah, So that's that's 0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.440 that's that's obviously a positive for for Baltimore, UM over 0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.280 to Chicago. Anything you're taken away from that side of 0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.840 the ball. Any Cunningham look great man six for thirty seven. 0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.199 His long was thirty yards. That means there was five 0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.080 other carries for a total of seven yards. There's not 0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:31.440 much going on in the bear side of the ball, 0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.040 all right. All of Fame game remembers the extra preseason games, 0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.000 not even like the first. It's the first preseason game, 0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.320 but it's not like one of four. It's like no 0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.280 starters played. And I did look into the preseason schedule 0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.920 for next week when things actually kick off Thursday, there's 0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.160 like twelve games and so that's when a lot is 0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:48.679 going to be going on going in New York Giants 0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.640 Barkley's that's play on Fridays they do. Yeah, Giants debut 0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.559 on Thursday for St Kwon Barkley. I have phili Odell 0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.400 Beckham Jr. Won't play, uh, but you'll get set Kawan 0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.280 Barkley some actions first time in a pro game in 0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.040 a Giants uniforms. That'll be fun. That'll obviously be fun 0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.600 to watch. And I did promise promise Frank by the 0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.200 way off air that my rankings will be done by 0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:15.000 the time he gets back. You have about Yeah, I 0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.319 have faith in It's it's annoying because I used to 0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.920 be able to after the bfs you know what, maybe 0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.080 working at that today because I was like normally I 0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.000 would do it after the BFFs. I'd sit and my 0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:28.480 headphones in and focus. You see me now like running 0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.080 around all the time like a chicken without a head. 0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.360 That's what it feels like. But maybe today things the 0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.720 afternoon might be common enough to do that. But I 0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.280 think might be ready to do it. I'm just about 0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.640 finishing my ranking. Is gonna post those on Rotal Experts 0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.440 dot com Florida. If you're watching you seven years. Thanks. 0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:45.960 I was gonna say, you know, maybe you won't mind, 0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:47.760 but I guess I'm not good enough. I just like 0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:49.200 to you do it the same before, and he does 0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.360 it because you do it, honestly, don't know. I just 0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.120 copy and paste. It's very easy. Does he do it 0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.360 on an Excel sheet? Yeah? You know what, I just do. 0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:58.600 I do it on fantasy pros like right there on that. 0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.480 Can I export it? Maybe I'll look into it. I'll 0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.280 see you might be able to export as an Excel. 0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.160 That's fine because otherwise I just have to start over. 0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.640 I also do tears to like you know what I mean. 0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.520 I'm all about all about some people don't even mistake 0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:14.880 great big on tears. We should probably do like a 0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.080 tear strategy discussion at some point. Well, I'll say this. 0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.280 We can get doing today if you want, because I 0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.360 do like having a strategy discussion. We do have a 0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:26.600 bunch of dueling to do. But um an auction, the 0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.360 tears are more massive than anything else, even more than 0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.720 a snake. To me, you the auction. When you are 0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.240 in an auction, the tears, You live and die by 0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.560 the tears, especially if other people have similar tears. Tears 0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.440 as well. So you know that when that group, when 0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.520 that group of running backs is going that Alvin Kamar 0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.080 Kareem Hunt. If Melvin Gordon's last one on the board 0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.560 in an auction, he's gonna get jacked up. He's gonna 0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.240 end up going for more than all those other guys 0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.880 because people see him as the last workhorse running back 0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.120 in the first round. That's not necessarily the case, but 0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.040 if that's the perception that someone has, you're gonna see 0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.240 Melvin Gordon's pricing and all seen starts the skyrocket and 0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.400 just have a great name of our tears show where 0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:08.200 to do. It's called Tears for Fears, Fears for Fears 0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.200 or I come up with lots of bands, very famous band? 0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.840 Is it really? Do I not know that? Then tears? 0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.120 Is it like a Dave Matthews bands? No, no, no, no, no. 0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.280 Bones would kill you for not knowing this. Fears for Fears. 0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.560 It's like a throwback banders, Yes, yes it is. You 0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.560 know what I wrote Tears for Fears, but I spelt 0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:31.160 out tears like positional tears, like t I will play 0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.400 this when we come back to the brain. The song 0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.360 Everybody wants to Rule the World Mad World. I didn't 0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.080 know that Mad World is a very famous song. Yeah, 0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:46.040 Mad World, Yes, originally there's a lot of people from 0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.080 this era who make great music, but you don't know 0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.280 who made it. I was gonna call the original name 0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.600 of the show was Tears for Tears. I thought that 0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.520 was very creative as well, Tears for Tears. But I 0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.040 have to figure out, like what we would do to 0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.360 make it special, Like what do we put especial into 0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.680 we're tearing out up while we're doing this, Like if 0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.000 you miss out on a tear when you start sing. Well, 0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:06.359 that was the idea, but I would want to make 0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.200 sure we had tears coming out, and then I would 0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.000 fill the and then I would make you full fill 0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.280 the board for the show with the crying emojor. All right, 0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:18.720 we'll figure it out. Look forward to that sometime we're 0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:25.800 going back. We're doing the rest of the show. Did 0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:27.520 you know that You can listen to this show live 0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.639 on the award winning Fancy Sports Radio Network. Listen on 0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.320 the I Heart Radio app to tune in radio app, 0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.720 or download the Fancy Sports Radio Network app. The Fancy 0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.640 Sports Radio Network is the only totally free seven three 0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.000 sixty five Fancy sports network of its kind without a subscription. 0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.879 Check out YouTube live want the Fancy Sports Network YouTube 0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.480 page and participate in the programing there where you can 0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.200 ask questions discuss the topics with other fantasy enthusiasts. I'll 0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.000 tell anyone that you disagree. Call into your favorite show 0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.560 and ask your question. The number is A four four 0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.880 eight four fancy s y. That's eight four four eight 0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:06.560 four three six eight seven nine. Defenci Sports Radio Network, 0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:11.560 your free fancy source, twenty four hours a day. Did 0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:36.959 back with your fantasy best friends forever? Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Um, 0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.320 all right, doesn't one yes, because we can get a chance. 0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.359 Talking about yesterday, brend LaFell was cut by the Bengals 0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:43.840 and he was like, listen, I wanted my release. I've 0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:45.680 been asked you for for months. I realized that they're 0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.040 going in a different direction. I wanted out. I wanted 0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:49.760 to move on. We joked about him going back the 0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.080 Patriots and the whole physical thing um with Eric Decker, 0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.600 but we didn't really get into is it replaces Brandon Fell? 0:18:57.560 --> 0:18:59.600 John Ross played like one game and then they tried 0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.400 to turn and even do a quarterback for a little while. 0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.120 Then he got hurt and then he backs the wide 0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.320 receiver and then trying to turn into a quarterback again. 0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.040 And this dude was top ten pick, and there's like, 0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:12.680 what is going on? Well, Brendain felt gone, Tyler Boyd 0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.560 has already proven not to be all that good and 0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.800 he's fine, He's like whatever. Tyler Efforts never healthy, which 0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:23.760 means theoretically this would open up a spot for John 0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:28.040 Ross to have a little value here. I know there's 0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.679 a lot of people, Jake Selley in particular, who are 0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.680 very high on Mike Williams. Should more people be high 0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:37.320 on John Ross rank? I think he fits his role 0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:39.800 on the team within the offense. Look a J Green 0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:41.800 is always going to be the top target getter in 0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.720 this offense. And no believe it or not, Greg, you 0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.280 killed me for Jordan read the other day, Tyler Efforts 0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.600 picking up some scene rock in the fantasy just because 0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.800 of his price. Because of his price, Greg, you're getting 0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:54.600 this guy as one of your last picks. If you 0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:56.760 play in a sixteen round draft, you're getting him in 0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.800 the fourteen fifteenth round. That's why Tyler Effort is picking 0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:03.320 up some steam right now. But regardless if it's Tyler Eiffort, 0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.720 if it's Tyler Croft, Andy Dalton has always leaned on 0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.160 the tight end a little bit in the red zone. Um, 0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.600 So I don't know that there's much to go around here. 0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.400 Even if John Ross is healthy, like I think he'll 0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.000 fit his role on the team. Maybe he'll see like three, 0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.560 four or five deep shots down the field. He can 0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.720 catch one two of those. Maybe he has some big games, 0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:22.240 some blow up games. You want to take a shot 0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.439 in him in best ball, There's no chance I'm drafting 0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.960 him in redraft. And if you ask me, I actually 0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.520 think Tyler Boyd has been a little bit underappreciated by 0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.440 the Cincinnati Bengals. I think he should have an opportunity 0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.880 to have a bigger role in this offense. You start 0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.240