WEBVTT - What are the Weirdest Things the Government Invests In?

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Guess what, mango, what's that will? I know you're a

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>big fan of couzies, so I've got a great story

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>for you. Just just go with it. It's a good setup.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>So you know how we've had so many good business

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>ideas since starting this show. We had amish dust, we

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.279
<v Speaker 1>had remote control condoms. Well, I think we need to

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>try and apply for some government money to get these

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>things off the ground. So you really think we'd have

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a shot. Well that's where the coozies come in. Just

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, to students at the University

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of Washington, we're doing some pretty cool research on how

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>foam couzies helped keep a can cold in the summer heat.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>And you know how much they got from the National

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Science Foundation to explore this one point three million dollars

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you're making up? I'm not. And it turns out that

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a little more to the story than just that headline,

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and that the study was part of an effort to

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>learn more about climate change. But it's more fun to

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.639
<v Speaker 1>ignore the important science e stuff and just say one

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>point three million to study cazies. And I'm sure we

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>could come up with a bigger, more noble cause behind

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>our ideas, but it does make you wonder what are

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the weirdest things our government has invested in? And that's

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about today, Mr Hei their podcast listeners,

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Part Time Genius. I'm Will Pearson and as

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>always I'm joined by my good friend Mangueshot Ticketer and

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>today we're breaking out our calculators and taking a hard

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>look at questions on government spending. What exactly does the

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>US budget pay for? And more importantly, what's the weirdest

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff our country has ever invested in? And to talk

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>about that, We've got a few fun guests today. Who's

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be joining us today, Mango. Today we'll be joined

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>by James Ledbetter, author and editor of inc Magazine, and

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>he's got this great new book, One Nation Under Gold,

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>where he digs into Operation Goldfinger, this bizarre secret federal

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>plan from the sixties that tried to sniff out golden

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>strange places. And we're also going to talk to a

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of coin collectors. You know a thing or two

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>about unusual investments. They're going to give us a low

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>down on some of their best finds and in return,

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll put them to the test. All right, Well, that

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a fair trade. So to kind of dip

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>our toes into this topic, I thought we should first

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>address what most people already know about government spending, which

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it turns out isn't a whole lot. Plenty of us

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>could probably point to healthcare and national defense as big

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>parts of the US budget, but beyond that, the specifics

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>actually get a little hazy for most people. Yeah, sad,

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>but true. The Pure Research Center to the study back

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand fourteen that really helped illustrate just how

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>little we know about where our money goes. PU pulled

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Americans on what they knew about carent events and issues

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.959
<v Speaker 1>in the news, and while the average respondent was fairly

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>knowledgeable about many of the topics, when it came to

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>how much the government spent on particular programs, most people

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>were pretty clueless. So when they were pulled out, what

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>were they asked about? Well, respondents were asked how much

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>money they thought the government spent on four programs. It

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>was foreign aid, transportations, social security, and paying down interest

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on the national debt. Or rather, they were asked to

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 1>put them in order from like largest the smallest, so

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>at thirty three the majority of people said we spend

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the most money on foreign aid, followed by interest on

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the national debt. That was at thought. Social Security received

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the most money and only four percent. Name transportation is

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the top expense, all right, so I'm guessing that's a

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>little off. So what's the actual breakdown, Well, social Security

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>nets the most money of the programs on the list

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>by far. It received ninety four billion dollars in the

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>fiscal year two thousand and sixteen, and that's roughly seventeen

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>times the annual spending on foreign aid. It's also nine

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>point five times the amount spent on transportation and almost

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>three and a half times the amount spent on interest

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>for the national debt. So people underestimated how much we

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>spend on Social Security and they also severely overestimated the

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>money we devote to foreign aid. Yeah, yeah, I'd say,

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>well that that's that's very interesting. How do you think

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>we should reconcile the fact that Social Security always ranks

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most popular government programs among Americans.

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'll barn aid consistently ranks as the least popular

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>spending category. I think it really points to how our

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>preconceived notions and political opinions can color the way we

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>view the world, including our nation's spending habits. Well, how

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is that? Well, we tend to assume the worst about

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>our government spending, and I think that's because we're aware

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in this really broad sense that the country burns through

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money and that the national debt is

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>this like sky high number that's unimaginable, but it's always

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>on the rise, even if we don't know the specifics. Yeah,

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems like we take the pessimistic approach,

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's easy to imagine our government that

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we must spend the least amount on programs we like

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and the most on ones we don't like. And I

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>guess that's kind of human nature too exactly. But a

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>closer look shows that the worst case mentality doesn't always

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>add up. For example, foreign aid, that's the program that

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>tops the chart in terms of unpopularity, but in reality

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 1>it only accounts for roughly one percent of the total

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>federal budget. Wow, I wouldn't have guessed that. All right,

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's set the record straight on this and once again,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's Pew Research to the rescue here. So they

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>broke down how the US government spent its three point

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>nine five trillion dollar budget last year, and according to

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>their senior writer, Drew to Silver, our country is basically

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a giant insurance company that also has a defense gig

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>on the side. So we spend most of our money

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>on healthcare in the national defense, oh definitely. About seventy

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>of the total budget went for different kinds of social insurance,

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>so that would include Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare, unemployment compensation,

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 1>veterans benefits, all of the things kind of like this. Now,

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>another fifteen percent of total spending went for national defense.

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Interest payments on national debt came in and looks like

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>six percent, and education and related services made up less

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>than three percent. So I'm just looking at the numbers

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>on your page here, So seventy fifteen six three that's

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>only whereas the other six well, that's the crazy thing.

0:05:55.800 --> 0:06:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Every other program, whether that's national parks, public broadcasting, foreign A, NASA,

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>you name it, all of those fit into the remaining

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>six percent of the federal budget, which is all the

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>stuff we squabble about. But it's all the fun stuff too.

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's a pretty sweet six percent, And it's

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>inside that six percent that we're going to be focused

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>on today. Yeah, but again, the worthiness of those programs

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is up for debate depending on who you ask, right,

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're not going to get into that debate. If

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you haven't noticed, we typically avoid big political statements here

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on the show, but we do love to dig up

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting fact. So that's what we're gonna stay

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>focused on. Right. Well, we definitely see federal spending running

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>into the same problems we face as individuals. You know,

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>what to buy at the grocery store, or how much

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of your incomes should go to entertainment versus savings. Most

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>people aren't going to agree on this stuff, and the

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>fact is not everyone wants to spend their money in

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the same way, and that causes pretty big headaches when

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you're spending from a pot to which every taxpayer contributes. Sure,

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's why you'll never reach a consensus on certain

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>line items, like, for example, whether or not it was

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a wise move for the government to invest nine dollars

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>to promote Vidalia nions as part of a promotional campaign

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>for the fourth Shrek movie. Ninety thousand dollars. I think

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.799
<v Speaker 1>we can all agree that sounds like a really bizarre

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>use of money. Don't tell me that actually happened. It did,

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not so sure the can was a waste.

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Like according to the Vidalia Onion Committee, which is a

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>real committee I was going to call, onion sales were

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>up thanks to the Shrek promotion, and that's a huge

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>deal here in Georgia, where agricultural makes up like a

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>good chunk of the economy. By the way, did you

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>know even more than that was spent in two thousand

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve to help Idahope promote their caviar. It's like three

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars Idaho. Again, it was to help the

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>local farmers in rural areas. Onions and caviar yummy. All right,

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, But but here's another one for you, unrelated

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to food. So in two thousand and ten, the government

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>gave six hundred and fifteen thousand dollars to the University

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of California at Santa Cruz so they could digitize Grateful

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Dead memorabilia. How crazy is this? That's over half a

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>million in federal funds that went a digitally preserving old

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Grateful Dead concert tickets, t shirts and posters of dancing

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bears. I mean, maybe it's just me, but that

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>seems a little tougher to defend. I feel like we're

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a ton of angry emails from deadheads now.

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I was on Wikipedia the other day

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and I found this incredible page of what fans are called,

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And so do you know what Barry Manilow's fans are called.

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>They're called fan alos and cris Pines fans they're called

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>pine nuts. I'm a huge pine. Maybe I didn't know that,

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.239
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, I see your point, right. Like expenses

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>like the Shrek Onion promotion and a federally funded Grateful

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Dead archive, they're tough to justify because they tend to

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 1>benefit a much smaller segment of the population than you know,

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>something like medicare Well, it's definitely an eye of the

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>beholder kind of thing, and some programs will seem like

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>good investments to you and others won't. And there's bound

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of disagreement among people as to

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>which or which. Absolutely so one of my favorite examples

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of that disparity and thinking comes from this weird research

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>study from two thousand five. Biologists at Yale University received

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a federal grant to study the reproductive anatomy of ducks

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and namely the mail ducks unique corkscrew shape privates. Right, So, like,

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>pundits and politicians were all over this, and they counted

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the study as like a particularly egregious case of wasteful

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>government spending, so much so that the lead researcher, and

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>her name was Patricia Brennan, she actually came forward to

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.359
<v Speaker 1>defend her work for the public. What did she say, Yeah,

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty great statement. Actually, so I'm just gonna

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and read it. Quote, this is basic science.

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The headlines reflect outrage that the study was about duck genitals,

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>as if there's something inherently wrong or perverse with this

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>line of research. Imagine if medical research through the line

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>at the belt Genitalia, Dear readers, are where the rubber

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>meets the road evolutionarily, that's a statement. What a great

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>quote there. But you know, that kind of dismissive attitude

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is it's actually pretty common when dealing with research projects

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 1>that can admittedly sound a little nutty when take and

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in isolation. In fact, there are a few senators who've

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>made it a yearly tradition to publish waste books, as

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>they call them. These detail hundreds of what they deemed

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to be the worst cases of wasteful spending for a

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>given year. I should note that the two thousand sixteen

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>waste book was titled Pokemon Go. It's pretty great. But

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>while these reports always make some fair points, they also

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>tend to ridicule grants for quirky research and present them

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>without mention of their connections to the broader fields of

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>legitimate study. Yeah, and I want to make sure we

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>don't fall prey to that same temptation. But that's a

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>They're definitely other parts of the federal budget that seemed

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>wasteful no matter the context. What do you say we

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the strangest cases of clear cut waste,

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>along with a few more examples that skirt the line

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>between impractical and outright crazy. All right, well, that sounds

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>good to me. Why don't we start with Operation gold Finger,

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>which seems like a prime candidate for the outright crazy category.

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we see if we can get our first

0:10:54.240 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>guest on the line to talk through it. Our guest

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>today is the editor of inc magazine and the author

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of a new book titled One Nation Under Gold, How

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 1>One Precious medal has dominated the American imagination for four centuries.

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a terrific book. And with today's episode being focused

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>on weird government investments, we're going to focus this conversation

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>on an incredibly bizarre effort known as Operation gold Finger.

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>James Ledbetter, Welcome to Part time Genius. Thank you so

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>much for having me. All Right, well, James, can you

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>help us set the stage for our listeners. So it's

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the early nineteen sixties. What is the state of gold

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>at this point? So, when World War Two was coming

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 1>to an end, the major powers of the world gathered

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in New Hampshire in Bretton Woods to hammer out a

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>new monetary system for the globe. Uh and that system

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.079
<v Speaker 1>had at its heart the convertibility of the dollar to

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>gold at the rate of thirty five announced so Bamian theory,

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone with thirty five dollars could go to the United

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>States Treasury and get a bounce of gold, and anybody

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>with announce of gold could go to the High States

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and get thirty five dollars. That every other currency

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in the world was then pegged to the dollar, and

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the dollar was fully convertible to gold. This system worked

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. It arguably worked too well in the sense

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that the growth of Western Europe and Japan starting in

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the late forties through the nineteen fifties was so rapid

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>and extensive that you now have all of these dollars

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 1>out in the world and dollar backed securities that if

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>they were to be redeemed at the same time at

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that treasury window, there would be no more gold. And

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that was considered to be an absolute disaster that had

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to be prevented because it would it would bring the

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>whole system crumbling down. And that's not because we didn't

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>have any gold. We had amassed the largest stockpile of

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>gold known to mankind, but it still wasn't enough to

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>deal with all of the dollars that were out there.

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>And so with this problem being very well known by

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the country's leaders and the Federal Reserve, there was a

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of desperation about what to do, and so on

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>top of that you have pressure coming from the United

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>States gold mining industry. The the keeping the value of

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>gold at thirty five an ounce was very depressing to

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the US gold industry. That it's a little analogous to

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>like oil companies when oil is at twenty barrel it's

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>really not worth their time to drill in certain places

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>or to go where you need to do fracking. At

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollars a barrel, it's it makes a lot

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>more sense. But with the price fixed at thirty most

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of the gold that was easily accessible in the United

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.599
<v Speaker 1>States had already been tapped out, and and so the

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>question is where what could be done to get more gold?

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And a strange combination of high placed Treasury officials, l

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>v j's science and technology advisor, and some sympathetic members

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>of Congress cooked up this scheme in the mid sixties

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that because it's the mid sixties, what else are they

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>going to call it? Operation Golder and the idea, the

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>idea was to use state of the art technology to

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>basically find gold where it had never been found before.

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So you had this is all completely top secret. There

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>was no congressional debate, There was no budget line item

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for it. You know, there wasn't like people said, oh yeah,

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>let's let's uh, let's sign off on the on the

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>on the alchemy quest. Um. It was completely hush hush

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>because they were afraid, uh they they they believed that

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>there was so much gold that they could find that

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it was essentially you know, double or triple the amount

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of gold already mind in the world. That's that's so

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I say is it's not like

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>discovering a new gold mine. This was like they thought

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>discovering a new planet, and that they felt that that

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>if that got out, it might be so disruptive to

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the world central banks that you could cause you know,

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>any number of economic problems. And so what were some

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of the weirdest places that they started looking for gold?

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>It feels like this insane exploratory mission. Yeah, so so

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>they were There were kind of three parts to Operation

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>gold Finger. The first part involved using state of the

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>art technology to see if there is in fact gold

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in places where it had traditionally not been looked for. So,

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, uh, is their gold in the ash that

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>comes out of cold plants? Is there gold in certain

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>types of um plants and flowers? Is their golden animal brains?

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Is their gold in deer antlers? Is their gold in seawater?

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Um Literally dozens and dozens of projects all across the

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>country and internationally to find out if there's some you know,

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of hidden source of gold. And this is almost comical.

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>This is an instant of when science kind of gets

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in the way of wisdom because the technology was really great.

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>The fact is there are traces of gold in lots

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of places, but at parts per million or parts per billion,

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to get the gold out of the deer antlers would

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>cost way more than thirty five dollars, So it really

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a solution, even though yeah, it was kind of there. UM.

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>The second component of Operation gold Finger again goes back

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to this idea that we know where the gold is,

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but all of the gold that can be easily and

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>profitably mined in location X has already been mined out.

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a very good chance that there's more gold underneath there,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's not really accessible um at thirty five dollars

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>announced if you use conventional explosives. But what if what

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>if we put nuclear explosives in the ground and blast

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>out the gold and then lead it out with a

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>with a with a chemical and this this was a

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>very enticing idea in the in the mid sixties, there

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of government scientists who really believed in

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what we're called the peaceful uses of atomic energy. UM.

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>It was a somewhat naive time in the sense that

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>people were not paying a lot of attention to radioactivity. Uh,

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's a bit of a problem. But there were

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a number of experiments that were conducted using nuclear weapons

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>to to move large amounts of earth, and it was

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of in the books to do this

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>for mining purposes. But by the time the words started

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to get out and some of the more um uh

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of conscious scientists, the program was eventually scrapped before

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it actually took the form of of using nuclear weapons

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>for for gold mining. Um. And then the third component,

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>which really didn't get too far beyond the conceptual stage. Um.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>But let's call it what it is, was to turn

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>base metals into gold. It was nothing short of a

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century alchemy proposal. And here again the science kind

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of outpaced people's understanding of things. You can do this,

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>It can be done. Glenn Seaborg, who was for many

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>years the chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, and there's

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>there's elements named after him. He's he discovered a number

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>of elements. Very distinguished scientists actually did this. In you

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>could you could take very very thin foil of bismuth

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and bombard it with proton beam and it displaces electrons,

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>so that some of this remaining is in fact an

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>isotope of goals. So you can create gold out of

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 1>base metals. But again here's the problem. When Seaboard did this,

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>he estimated that to produce gold by this method would

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>cost probably one quadrillion dollars per ounds as a way

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of replacing the gold that was propping up the dollar

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that was worth thirty five This was not really a

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>very good proposal. Um. But but you know, it's it's

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of easy to make fun of these ideas. Now,

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it has to be said that at the time these

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>these were considered viable ways of propping up the global economy,

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>which was it was a very serious, sober thing to do.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>But it shows you how twisted and um and kind

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of um uh, what's the word I'm looking for, how

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>unsustainable the monetary system had become, that that that that

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you would have someone seriously thinking of putting nuclear weapons

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in the ground, is you know, a better way of

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>propping up the world's monetary system as opposed to say

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>changing the rules. It just shows you how the logic

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>had had really become you know, kind of work. And

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's part of the theme of my

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>book One Nation Under Gold, that for whatever reason, sometimes

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we're good, sometimes we're not so good. This metal has

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of warped the American mind over time, and uh,

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and we we can't we can't stop. It's it's this utter,

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>utter fascination with this substance. Well, James, this has been terrific.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I hope everyone will check out One Nation Undergold. James,

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Thank you for having me.

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to part time Genius and we're talking about

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the weirdest things our government spends money on. To ango.

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Before the break, you mentioned that there were some clear

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>cut cases of wasteful government spending that are tough to dispute.

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So when you said that, what did you have mind?

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, where to begin? I'd say one of the

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>worst I came across was the staggering ninety million dollars

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that federal agencies spent on unnecessary printing charges each year.

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Like this includes about twenty eight million dollars just to

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>print the Congressional Record, and that's a daily transcription of

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>every word spoken in Congress. So there are over copies

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of this record printed every single day. And the worst

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>part is the whole thing is available online. Yeah, that's

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the definition of wasteful. And I've I've got

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>another one here. So, according to a two thousand thirteen

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>report by the Office of the Inspector General, the government

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>spent big on inside advertising to increase traffic to their

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Twitter pages. How exciting is that Facebook and

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter for government? All told, the State Department told out

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and thirty thousand dollars of the course of

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>two years, and this was basically to buy more likes

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>for their social media posts. Man, did they at least

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 1>get the traffic they wanted? Well, no, unfortunately. I mean

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>although the State Department's pages did see an uptick and

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>visit ters, I think it was less than two percent

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of them actually liked or favorite at any post. So

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>not only was it a big waste of money, but

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing it was kind of a blow to the

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>government's pride. You know, I almost feel bad for them.

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>But what about how much is spent on the annual

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>upkeep of vacant government buildings? Yeah, I remember you were

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>looking into this, so I'll buy it on this one.

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>So how many of our tax dollars go to empty buildings,

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>way way too many of them. So, according to the

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>l A. Times, the government spends as much as one

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>point seven billion dollars each year just to maintain the

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>more than seven hundred seventy thousand vacant buildings it owns.

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>And you want to talk about wasteful. Even though the

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>government already pays for all that unused space, some of

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the agencies continue to buy at least new spaces rather

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>than put the vacant ones. To use seven hundred and

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy thousand vacant buildings, that is insane. Well, it's it's

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>especially frustrating in cases like that where a little more

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>communication could cause multiple problems to cancel each other out.

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in addition to easy workspace for employees, these

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>buildings could be used as government storage. Take the I

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>R S. I mean, the I R S alone has

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>more than twenty thousand pieces of unused office furniture, and

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>rather than sell it or stored in government buildings, the

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>agency pays nearly one million dollars each year to rent

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>storage space. That's so crazy. But you know, as crazy

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>as these expenses are, if we want to find the

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>weirdest government investments, we've got to talk about DARPA. Very

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>good point, all right. So for those who haven't thought

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>about DARPA lately or or ever, the full name is

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Was created back in

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.239
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight to help with the US space race and

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>quickly switched focus to developing technical innovations for defense. This

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>was once NASA took over the space research. DARPA research

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>has led to all kinds of breakthroughs, from the first

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>stealth aircraft, communications, satellites, and drones to the less military

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>minded inventions like driverless cars and robotic vacuum cleaners. Right,

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and if rumas weren't weird enough, DARPA is also responsible

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>for about sixty years worth of really far robotics projects,

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>many of which were never put to active use. You know.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite examples of this was called EATER.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>That's e a t R, also known as the Energy

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Autonomous Tactical Robot. I don't know if you saw this, Mango,

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>but it was back in two thousand twelve. They were

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>all these online rumors that the government was developing some

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of monstrous flesh heating robot. It was to be

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 1>used in combat. What I mean, I feel like I

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely remember about that. Well. Thankfully, the rumors turned out

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to be exaggerated. Researchers clarified that Eater was strictly vegetarian,

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>which is comforting seeing as the robot was equipped with

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a chainsaw and a powerful gripper arm and this was

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>help but collect plant based biomass to use for energy,

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and the idea was that Eater could support troops in

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the battlefield without the need for conventional fuels. I mean,

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it's actually kind of cool. So instead it would simply

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>collect twigs, grass, paper, other plant materials to help power itself.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 1>And I like this statement from the CEO of the

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>company that was funded by DARPA to help develop the robot.

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>He said, completely understand the public's concern about futuristic robots

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>feeding on human population, but that is not our mission.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>That's super comforting still for my money. You know, the

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>scariest thing Dark has worked on has to be their

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Total Information Awareness project from way back in two thousand two.

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that does sound way scarier than managing robots.

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I know. It was basically this massive counter terrorism database

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that was supposed to collect, process, and even analyze mind

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>data to help prevent terrorist attacks. And as you'd imagine,

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of pushback against what was essentially

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>this electronic version of Big Brother. And if you thought

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the name was creepy, you've got to see the logo

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they came up with. They used the Eye of Providence

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 1>symbol that's on the back of the dollar bill, you know,

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.959
<v Speaker 1>the pyramid with all seeing eye on top. But then

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>they managed to make it even more creepy by showing

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it projecting a beam of light onto the surface of

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the entire planet o God. Yeah, okay, nothing unsettling about that. Now.

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Not all their research is terrifying, though. One of the weirdest, coolest,

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and most non threatening projects from dark Uh is this

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>robot that can play jazz music. And we already have

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence programs that can produce pseudo original classical music

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.719
<v Speaker 1>by analyzing the work of human composers, but DARPA has

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>its eyes set on robots that actually write and perform

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>their own jazz songs. All I think about when you

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>said this is like the creatures from Showbiz Pizza. That's

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty much what it is. They were so far ahead

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of their time that show Biz. But tell me why

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>jazz and how do musical robots like help with defense. Well,

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>jazz was chosen because it would require the robots to improvise.

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it kind of makes sense. So in order

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to jam along with human musicians, the robots need to

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to think and react to the situation in

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>real time. So the aim is to produce a form

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of AI that can make you know the spur of

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the moment decisions and response to constantly changing conditions, which

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>is definitely a skill that would come in handy on

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a battlefield just as much as in a jazz club.

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So I can't believe you just convinced me that jazz

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 1>playing robots are smart investment, or at least that they're

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 1>not the worst way to spend our talks about No,

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>not the worst. But it's, like we were saying earlier,

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>so many of these seemingly outlandish projects don't sound nearly

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>as crazy when they're given the proper context. So how

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>about we try and experiment, mango. Let's take a look

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>at a couple of the country's most recent strange investments

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and see if they're as silly as they sound, if

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they're actually worth the money. I'm up for it. But

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>why don't we take a break for a quiz, first

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a mango. Who do we have on the line today,

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>We've got Charles Morgan and Hubert Walker from the wonderful

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>publication Coin Week. Welcome to part time genius guys. Hi guys,

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>he has gone for having. When people are getting into

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>coin collecting, what are some of the mistakes they tend

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to make? So the first one is that people who

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>really get into a hobby really intensely in the beginning,

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a race that they need to

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>buy everything they see because somehow they're all going to

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.199
<v Speaker 1>disappear and they're gonna run out of time. And the

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>fact the matter is like nobody has ever are a

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>symbol of a a coin collection and that has everything. It's

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>just it's it's probably not even possible even if you,

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, even with Esos his money, I don't think

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you could do it because you would run out of time,

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and then there would also be coins that would be

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>so rare that maybe there's only one or two known

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and you have to convince the person who owns at

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the celt Sea. But the second thing is one of

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the most profoundly stupid stories that we had covered in

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the last few years involved a guy who was an

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>investor who bought a quarter million dollar gold coin from

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a one of those you know called the eight hundred

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>numbers listened to on radio kind of gold dealers, and

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>they sold him this this amazing coin, like any collector

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>who is a real collector would have been just thrilled

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to own it. But he found that it had a flaw,

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit dingy, so uh, he basically polished the

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>life out of it, and by the time we saw it,

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it looked like costume jewelry, like something that it didn't

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>even look real anymore. I mean it was it was gold,

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so it looked like gold, but it was so shiny,

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was a coin. It looked like something made

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to look like gold. And he still only got like

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.239
<v Speaker 1>five six thousand dollars for it on auction. So now

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you're used to dealing with much more valuable coins. But

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I was curious, what are your thoughts on getting rid

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of the penny. I'm personally in favor of a total

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>coinage reform, which would include getting rid of the penny

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>at least and maybe the nickel. And if you think

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>about it, there has never been a success They push

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to eliminate a piece of paper currency in favor of

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a coin. Uh. In the past, probably a hundred or

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>so years in this country, we used to actually make

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>currency notes called fractional currency, which were parts of a dollar.

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>That was done during the Civil War because they didn't

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>want to, you know, use silver precious and being hoarded.

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So they were making basically stance over money. But uh,

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, when they tried to introduce the Susan B.

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Anthony dollar, it didn't replace the one dollar bill and

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the presidential dollar in the second to we it all

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.719
<v Speaker 1>are also failed to do that. So from a minting

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>industry sent point, the elimination of any point from circulation,

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it is a slow death spiral for that as an industry.

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>The second part is the good part. So in the

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>United States we have essentially had the same coin structure

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>since seven The coins are different and there are some

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>different denominations that don't exist, more like a half cent,

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>half dime, two cent, or three cent piece. But in

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>eighteen fifty seven the United States meant in a major

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>pointage reform which eliminated the half cent and the cent

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>large cent size cent which was oh gosh, maybe in

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>between the size of a half dollar and a quarter. Essentially,

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that's how big the scent used to be, and they

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>eliminated it in favor of the small size scent that

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we used today. Well, the elimination of that meant that

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>there were scents that were made from three the eighteen

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven, which are like now obsolete, and they were

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>being redeemed it turned in and destroyed. Well, that's what

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>started coin collecting in America as sort of a popular hobby.

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And so my opinion is if they eliminated the scent

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and the nickel, it would actually help coin collecting because

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>people who grew up using those coins would realize they

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>were no longer going to be available and people would

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>start looking for the different dates and mint marks and

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>things like that. So for coin collectors eliminating stuff like

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's probably a good thing, But for the mincing

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>industry it's not. That makes a lot of sense. Well,

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys are used to dealing with rare coins and

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>much more valuable coins, but we're gonna put you guys

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to the test with something a little more simple. Mango,

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>what game are we playing today? We're playing the quarter quiz,

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and basically we're gonna tell you what's on the back

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of the U S quarter and you just have to

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>tell us the state where it's from. But we're gonna

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>have you guys face off against one another, and in

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>order to chime in, we're going to have you make

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>some animal noises. So Charles you will chime in with

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a cow's move, and Hubert you will have the lovely caca. Alright,

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>so let's get started. Question number one. This stake quarter

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>has a picture of a common loon on it, though

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the phrase Land of ten Thousand Lakes might be the

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>bigger giveaway. All right, so that's Hubert, what's the answer there?

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>All right? I think that would be Minnesota, Absolutely nicely done.

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Question number two. There are no slot machines or poker

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>tables on the back of this stake quarter, just a

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>pair of beautiful mustangs running free. Oh that sounded like

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a very realistic cow. Okay, Charles, what do you think

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I do? Mind us? Uh? That would be Na Bob, absolutely,

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and Nevada is actually home of the nation's wild horses.

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Question number three. This state quarter has the phrase Crossroads

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of America on it, right under a picture of a

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>race car. Okay, Hubert, Indiana al right, well done. Question

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>number four. Unlike North Carolina, which also features the Right

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Brothers plane, this state quarter paired. They're playing with a

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>picture of John Glenn in a space suit. Wow, Huber

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>just barely beats Charles with a coca alright, what's the answer?

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>It is Ohio? Alright? Question number five. This state quarter

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>has a ring necked pheasant in the foreground, though the

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>pick of Mount Rushmore in the back might be more recognizable.

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Um I, why don't we give it to Charles? Yeah?

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>That would that would be the South Dakota. You got it,

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>all right? Question number six, This state has a bucking

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>cowboy on it, and it's accompanied by the phrase the

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>equality state. It's better known as a home of Dick Cheney.

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>This is also probably the worst coin design and the

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:10.879
<v Speaker 1>entire STA series, and that would go to Wyoming. Wait,

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>why why do you think it's the worst state design. Well,

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not because of the iconic image of the bucking cowboys,

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>because there's no detail on it. It's just basically a silhouette.

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's kind of boring. Anything that is pretty boring. Okay, Well,

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken, we are tied at three. So

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this is the very last question, the tiebreaker number seven.

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.280
<v Speaker 1>This state quarter has a picture of a peregrine falcon

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and the phrase may it be forever in Latin. There

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>are zero potatoes on it, however, alright Hubert for the

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>wind Idaho, it is Idaho. Alright, Mango. How our contestants

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>done well? He just barely edged out Charles. But it

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.439
<v Speaker 1>was a great competition. And as always are, whinner gets

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a note to his mom or boss sing his praises.

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>And because we don't want Charles to go home h

0:34:57.719 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>empty handed, We're gonna send you home with the weirdest

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 1>poin press we could find online, a hedgehog coin purse.

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to use it. Well, congratulations guys, and

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us on part time genius.

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much, guys, great, thank you guys. Thanks, We

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>will thank you. Okay, Well, so it's time to live

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 1>out the ultimate taxpayer fantasy. We're basically gonna audit the U. S.

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Government and see if any of their two thousand and

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>sixteen investments past muster. Where do you want to start? Alright?

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>So here's what I want your opinion on. The researchers

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>and m I T developed a new program to view

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 1>six hundred hours of television shows and four hundred hours

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of online videos to see if they could learn about

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and anticipate human behavior. So with this, do you think

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the government was right to foot the bill for a

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>couch potato computer. I'm not falling for this. I feel

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like I need some more information, So tell me what

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it watch. Well, the program was trying to anticipate actions

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>like hugs, kisses, high fives, and handshakes, so the researchers

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>had to watch tons of YouTube videos and hours and

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>hours of Desperate Housewives, The Office, and Scrubs, to name

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a few, which isn't a bad plan, but like, what

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>was the end goal? I mean, is the government really

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>interested in like saving people from being left on high fives. Well,

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the real hope is that, with enough time and enough

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>binge watching, the program could be used in security cameras.

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Is a way to automatically call for help. It identifies

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that somebody is about to be injured, or that a

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>crime is about to be committed. It's it's it's actually

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.839
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting stuff. Yeah that's pretty neat. So, um, why

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>don't we try another one? Since it's beach season, let's

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>look at the three million dollars study the National Science

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Foundation did on how background music affects viewers perception of sharks.

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>But before I go into more detail, I'm going to

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>give you how the Internet frame the studies conclusion. So

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 1>here it is the theme music from Jaws caused people

0:36:55.320 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to view sharks in a negative manner. That did. I mean,

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna say we got ripped off, but it

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>does strike me as a fairly obvious conclusion. I mean,

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the Jaws theme was composed to feel ominous. It follows

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that the song would make viewers wary of whatever's played

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>alongside it, whether it's sharks or whatever, which is a

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>totally fair response. Now, let me fill in some of

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the gaffs and we'll see if it changes your opinion. So,

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>as part of the study, researchers determined that the public's

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>negative perception of sharks is actually hindering conservation efforts, and

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we tend to ignore cases where sharks are exploited or abused,

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and we donate less money to shark conservation programs than

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:35.359
<v Speaker 1>we do to similar programs for other creatures. I mean,

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a little sad, But again, is this surprising our culture?

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Has a bad habit of blowing shark on human violence

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>way out of proportion, especially when you look at all

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the Jaws and shark nadoes of the world. So what

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 1>what is the angle here? Well, according to the NSF

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm quoting here, participants rated sharks more negatively and

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>less positively after viewing a sixty second video of swimming

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.399
<v Speaker 1>sharks set to ominous background music, compared to participants who

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 1>watched the same video clips set to uplifting background music

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>or silence. And here's the thing, right, Like, researchers didn't

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>use footage from Jaws or other horror flicks. They used

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.479
<v Speaker 1>a clip from the BBC's Blue Planet Nature series, which

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>just showed sharks like swimming around and being sharks. So basically,

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the study is a warning about making educational content that

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>borrows too heavily from the Hollywood Shark Playbook. Yeah, pretty

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>much so, the studies actual non inflammatory conclusion was quote.

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Given that nature documentaries are often regarded as objective and

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>authoritative sources of information, it is critical that documentary filmmakers

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and viewers are aware of how the soundtrack can affect

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the interpretation of the educational content. All right, I think

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I see where you're going with this, and you know,

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>suddenly a laughable research study doesn't seem quite as ridiculous.

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, three million dollars, was it really worth

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>that much? Yeah? I mean, I guess that depends on

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 1>how the educational community responds to the findings, and of

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>course whether or not you like sharks. All right, Well,

0:38:57.680 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you know this might sound silly, but auditing the government

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:02.399
<v Speaker 1>is much harder than I thought it would be. There's

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>just so many angles from what you can analyze these expenses,

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>and they all make a certain amount of sense. I mean,

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>our country spent a hundred and twenty five thousand dollars

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.240
<v Speaker 1>on a three D printer that can create edible pizzas

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>for astronauts. On the one hand, that's exorbitant, But on

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the other, do we really want to be the kind

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of people who would deny astronauts pizza? I don't, I know.

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are real benefits to even the most

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous sounding investments, but balancing those potential benefits against the

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:32.760
<v Speaker 1>real world costs, I mean, that can all be dizzying.

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's so important to try and keep things

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in perspective when looking at these weird government investments. What

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>do you mean by that, Well, just like with the

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>thread of sharks or that one percent of funding goes

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 1>to foreign aid, we have a way of making these

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 1>weird expenses out to be way bigger problems than they

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 1>really are. Take those government waste books, for example, they

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>document billions spent on questionable grants and programs. But even

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>all nineteen billion dollars of that is only half of

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the three point nine trillion dollar federal budget.

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So while it's definitely not something we should ignore, it

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make as much of an impact on the government's

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:09.399
<v Speaker 1>bottom line as you think. That's actually pretty comforting. I mean,

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I want people to like sharks and I want astronauts

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to eat pizza. So if those things can happen at

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>no huge cost to the country, I consider that a

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>win in my boat. We'll hold onto that feeling well,

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's time for the fact not bring it on mango,

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>h All right, So I'll kick it off. Every wonder

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>where all those old Neon signs go when they burn out.

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand ten, one eight million dollars was given

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to construct a Neon sign graveyard near Las Vegas, and

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I clearly want to check this place out. Yeah,

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I kind of do too. Alright, well, Mago, you and

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I both have young sons who are very curious about

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>video games. Are doing the whole Minecraft thing now, but

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it won't be long before they're begging to play games

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 1>like World of Warcraft. And it turns out there could

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>be some good money in this. The creators of one

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>study received two point nine million dollars to look into

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>how online virtual worlds such as World of Warcraft and

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Second Life can help organizations collaborate and compete more effectively

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in the global marketplace. Have you ever been to Denali

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.359
<v Speaker 1>National Park? I haven't. Well, when you do, I'm sure

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the animals and mountains and stuff will be pretty cool

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to look at. But be sure to check out the

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>toilets because they've got some seriously fancy new ones, or

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 1>at least they'd better be fancy. At forty one dollars

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>perceed with thirty six toilets, that comes out to one

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>point five million dollars. Wow. All right, Well, I'll try

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to swing by right after I visit the home for

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the US Ambassador to NATO and Brussels to see the

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred and sixty violets, nine hundred and sixty tulips,

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred and sixty begonias, five four Iva geraniums, and

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of other plants, totaling seven hundred and four thousand

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 1>dollars for this one residence. I feel like he cut

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>the budget on the ivy geraniums. Yeah, everything was at

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred and sixty until the ivy geranium. So 'st year,

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the government allocated like close to a million dollars to

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>post poems and zoos throughout the country. The poems are

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>there to quote, increase environmental awareness. Thank goodness, Yeah, thank

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>goodness for that one. All right. I'm not sure if

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you remember this ad back in two thousand and ten,

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>but the government invested two point five million dollars on

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.359
<v Speaker 1>what would later become known as the worst Super Bowl

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>ad ever. So back in two thousand twelve, then Congressman

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Mark Newman noted that he wanted to save taxpayers a

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred seventy five thousand dollars by cutting the funding for

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a study on quote the connection between cocaine and the

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>risky sex habits of the Japanese quail for risky sex,

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I know. And while the study was really intended to

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 1>help researchers understand the connection between drug abuse and sex

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>habits and public health options. I want to see his

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>study on coked up quails. All right, I'm with you

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 1>on this one. That seems like the most necessary use

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of government money we've talked about all day. So I'm

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna get this one to you. Congrats, thank you, and

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>that's it for today's Part Time Genius. Thank you so

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>much for listening. Thanks again for listening. Part Time Genius

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is a production of how stuff works and wouldn't be

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>possible without several brilliant people who do the important things

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't even again to understand. CHRISTA McNeil does the

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.359
<v Speaker 1>editing thing. Noel Brown made the theme song and does

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the mixy mixy sound thing. Jerry Rowland does the exact

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>producer thing. Gay Bluesier is our lead researcher, with support

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>from the Research Army including Austin Thompson, Nolan Brown and

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Adams and Eves. Jeff Cook gets the show to

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>your ears. Good job, Eves. If you like what you heard,

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>we hope you'll subscribe. And if you really really like

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>what you've heard, maybe you could leave a good review

0:43:44.239 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 1>for US. Do we do we forget Jason? Jason who

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:00.800
<v Speaker 1>s