WEBVTT - First Five Fever | Mon MLB Best Bets

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Fall, no crying, and this game is underway.

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 2>In the line up, it is Springs offering Josh the

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 2>bit outside.

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Here's a drive in a deep bliftfield by Casianos who

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 3>will be a home run.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And look to time you're talking about a roll at

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the dice.

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>This is it.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's the Payoff Pitch.

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Payoff Pitch, Action Networks Major League Baseball Betting Podcast.

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 3>It is Monday, August tenth. I'm Colin Richard, joined as

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 3>usual by Action Network senior MLB analyst Sean Zarrillo to

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 3>break down this Monday MLB slate, not a full slate

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 3>as it usually is on Monday. We've got what three, six, nine,

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 3>ten games all under the light tonight, some decent pitching matchup,

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 3>some decent favorites and underdogs. Uh, it's going to be

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 3>a short one today, a small card for you today, Sean.

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 3>We're not going to go with the eighty sixty forty.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 3>We're just going to give out your four or five

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 3>favorite bets on the show and uh call it a day.

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 3>So let's jump right into it with our best bets.

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 3>In your first one, we're going to go to Brewers

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Padres in San Diego Tonight, Casey Mai is making his

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 3>second start for the Padres since coming over. In the

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 3>trade deadline, Logan Henderson making a case for Milwaukee's playoff rotation.

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Where are you going with this one today?

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Brewers first five money line. I like it up

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to you about minus one thirty five. I make it

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>closer to minus one forty five. Project Henderson substantially better

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>than Casey mis I have myes pushing closer to a

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>leg gabage starter now Henderson ranking closer to the number ones. There's,

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>i'd say, of all the pitchers right now, the big

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>different or the biggest disagreement between like their projections right

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the public projections Oopsie vat ATC Steamer. The biggest disagreement

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>between a starting pitcher's public projections and their underlying indicators

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>might be Logan Henderson. If it's not Henderson, it's probably Miserowski.

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Because Miserowski's expected FIP and SIERRA have gone under two.

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Henderson's are sitting in the low twos. He's at or

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>mid twos. He's at two point six for his expected

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>era on the year, expected FIP around two seven, but

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>all of his projections are still a run higher. His

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>average projection is four point one. I think he's much

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 1>better than that. I think he's proven that he's much

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>better than that. And if you look at his trend

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>line as compart to Casey Mis's trend line, they're moving

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in opposite directions. Henderson came back from injury strike at

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>minus walk over thirty percent walk or his rate of

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>balls going down, his rate of cald strikes and whiffs

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>going up. It's the exact opposite for Casey myis and

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I think the Tigers might have traded him at the

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>right time. There's some red flag injury concerns in the

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 1>Casey Mies profile. Strike up minus walk is dipped below

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>major league average just nine percent in his past five starts.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Granted to get shelt in his last start, and you

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>can write that one off a little bit. But if

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the ball percentage wasn't going up, if his fastball spin

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>was it also dropping, I would be willing to write

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it off. It just seems like Casey Mayes is losing

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.839
<v Speaker 1>effectiveness as the season goes along. Here a guy's dealt

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>with injury, and Jo's injury issues in the past never

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>really managed to get through full seasons. Might be fatiguing

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>here in the second half. So not only do I

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>project a starting pitching edge for the Brewers, also prefer

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>their lineup. They project better about three points better in

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of WRC plus against righty's, but also they have

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>more power. The Podres have more contact, which could be

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>an issue for Henderson because Henderson throws a lot of

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>balls in the middle of the zone and gets dudes

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to swing through them. We'll see if the Padres could

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>follow those pitches off. But the Brewers have the better

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>power and the better plate discipline of the pair, and

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>also they're the better defensive and running team. So throughout

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the first five innings, I give you Brewers the advantage

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>everywhere bullpen tilts towards the Podreys later in the game,

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>especially because it looks like the Brewers may be down

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>several key arms today. Avenuer Uribe I believe is tired.

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Ashby is tired, so that's why I stayed away from

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the full game line. I still show a slight edge

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Brewers over the full game, but it definitely

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a much bigger edge of the first five. So Brewers

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>first five up to minus one thirty five. The alternative

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>angle here it's correlated, but it's the alternative angle. Podrais

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>team total under three and a half. It was minus

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>one ten last night, it's minus one eighteen. Now I

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>probably only like it up to about minus one twenty,

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>but that would be the alternative vet if you can't

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>get the first five numbers, just the first five numbers

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the same Brice essentially on. I think it's you know

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>again with the bolt been stuff for the Brewers. It's

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>a bigger edge anyway. So the first the team total,

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and the money line sort of correlate to one another,

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>but the first five is the biggest edge of the three.

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>That would be the alternative approach. PO was taking one.

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Padres hanging around this playoff race, I know they've been

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 3>a fade candidate, I believe early in the season in

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 3>terms of playoff markets, it seems.

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Like it's never the Diamondbacks for that final spot there. Yeah,

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>they had a pretty competitive series last week, so I

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>would expect it to come down to one of those

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>two teams.

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Diamondbacks Phillies currently tied for wild card spots two

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 3>and three. Marlin's Cardinals also lurking there, but probably probably

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be Padres or Diamondbacks parting slip back a

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 3>little bit?

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>What's that?

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>The Pirates are starting to slip back a little bit?

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're I mean they've they're on a really five

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 3>and a half. They're behind Washington and the Cardinals.

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, the Reds completely collapsed there.

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, bummer about the Pirates. I want to see them.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 3>You know they got those bullpen reinforcements. We'll see. Still

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 3>a long way to go. Goodn't important to remember it

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 3>is August tenth, and what was it like August twenty

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 3>eighth last year or something like that, the Guardians worth

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 3>thirteen and a half back of the Tigers.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Yep, So a lot.

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Can happen still, even as as it gets late here.

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, every year we see one surprising team make run late,

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>one team who's in a good spot collapses late. So

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>something's gonna happen. We just don't know where it does. Yep, yep.

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 3>All right, next bet, we are going to the Mets

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 3>and Braves in Atlanta tonight, Christian Scott against Bryce Elder

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 3>and you're looking at another first five here.

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a bunch of first five bets today. I actually

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>added one late as well, so we have five bets

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>today for them or in the first five innings, and

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.679
<v Speaker 1>then we have one full game total. Christian Scott projects

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>as a top forty starting pitcher for me. I have

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Bryce elder at one fifty two, so more than a

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>full run in not more than a full run, about

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a full run in terms of projected fit between these

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>two starting pitchers, again, very similar stories. I just kind

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of discussed with Casey miz. You know, Christian Scott maintaining

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a strikeout minus walk about twenty four percent. Elders has

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>fallen below le gaverage. He's sitting around eight percent in

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>his recent sample. His velocity is dipped, fastball spin is

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about the same, but the ball rate is going up,

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>so he's just not being nearly as efficient in terms

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of his pitch. Mis ball rate's been over forty percent

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>twice in his past three starts. It's very concerning. Christian

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Scott since he came back for the Mets, has looked

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>hyper efficient, arguably been their best starter aside from Nolan McLain.

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Old McClain's been taking off in the second half. But

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with those two guys going forward, it seems like they

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty nice core atop their rotation. And then again,

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, not just the projections, or I should say,

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, projections push these guys closer together. The underlying

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>indicators say that they're further apart. So another place where

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I sort of disagree with the projections. The deeper we

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>get into a season, you know, as we have more

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>underlying data for these guys, I'm more willing to trust it.

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>The Braves have the better offense here, they have the

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>better bullpen. Again why I'm staying away from the full

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>game edge, But in terms of the first five I

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>actually make the Mets a slight favorite. I have them

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>at about minus one oh seven. Was able to get

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>plus one seventeen this morning. I would take that down

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to even money, and then again, like the last game

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I discussed, the alternative here would be a team total approach.

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>These are the only two team totals that currently show

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>an edge right now. Actually there's a third, but I'd

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>rather avoid that one. But the Padres, as I said,

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>under three and a half minus one eighteen, the Mets

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>over three and a half minus one eighteen, same number,

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>bigger edge. I like that up to about minus one

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, and the Mets, as I said, the first

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>five money line is plus one seventeen down to even money.

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>That's where i'd take that number. But I actually like

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the the team total. Here is why I may end

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>up adding that, because the Braves may have some guys

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>who are down today as well, and Olds pitched well.

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess you would say based on the game logs

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>lately two runs, one run, one run past three starts,

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>but you look at the strikeouts and walks like pretty

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>much even, it's just he's not as efficient and he's

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get hit at some point, hopefully that is today.

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>But we'll take some first five money line and consider

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>adding the team total once the Mets lineup drops. Mets.

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Mets have been hitting, you know, Semion finally hitting over

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of weeks, Jorge Polanco, who at one

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>point had a lower slash line than lou gerrig suffering

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>from als that was pretty devastating for Horey Polanco's now

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>this season, he's now finally hitting. Francisco Alvarez has been

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>on a tear of late my dude, so it seems

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like this is the best the Mets offense has performed

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this year without Juan Soto in the lineup, so hopefully

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>they can keep it going tonight and get Christian Scott's

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>some early runs.

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Polanco and Semion specifically getting hot after the Mets fall

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 3>out of contention would be just it's just like a

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 3>knife in the back. Basically, it's like, yeah, I.

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Think Lou Bob Homer yesterday as well, like they're all

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 1>they're all going now.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, interesting little playoff subplot these last two months too,

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 3>is the Braves are actually ahead of the Dodgers right

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 3>now for that second National League payoff seed, and of

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 3>course that's the the other by uh in the first round.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 3>So that's a that's a big deal and something to

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 3>keep an eye on.

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Dodgers didn't get the buy last year and then

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we got a last year card round to win the

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>World Ares.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of the Dodgers, they are at home against the

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Royals tonight. Trek Skubele making his second Dodger start against

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Noah Cameron. He's looking at this right before we recorded

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 3>biggest favorites of the year Dodgers. As of this recording consensus,

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Odge they're minus three to twenty five on the money line.

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 3>That would be if it closes there, the seventh biggest

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 3>favorite of this season. Of the other six, four of

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 3>those are also Dodgers games. Not surprisingly, we have a

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Dodgers Rockies, a Dodgers Giants, a Dodger's Angels, and another

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Dodger's Rockies on there, and then we have a Brewer's

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Rockies in a Phillies Nationals. The only favorite that lost

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 3>of those other six were the Dodgers against the Giants

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 3>back in early May. They lost six to two. As

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 3>minus three forty four favorites. Today again Scooble against Cameron.

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 3>The Dodgers are minus three twenty five Royals plus two

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 3>sixty on the underdogs, and you do have a You're

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 3>not it doesn't look like you're going full game Royals here,

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 3>but you do have an angle where you like the

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 3>underdogs just based on the price.

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing yeah, I show an edge for the full

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>game as well, but a bigger edge for the first

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>five innings. So attacking Scoobols specifically in the first five

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>seems like an awkward approach. Not getting the bullpens involved.

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I hate this Royals bullpen. I would much rather have

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>just no camera involved over the first five innings and

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, guaranteed having a lefty in there for at

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>least the first four or four and a half innings

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>against the Dodgers offense, which, as I pointed out, number

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>one a baseball against right end and pitching one thirteen

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 1>worc plus even with their recent funk. But they are

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>six against lefties and they drop to a one oh

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>six and again shut down by Edward or Rodriguez yesterday.

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>They just struggle a little bit more with lefties. Once

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you're able to neutralize Otani and Freeman and Munsey at

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the top of that lineup, everything else kind of falls

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>into play, gets a little bit easier. Mookie Betts has

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>had a significant down year. Still know Will Smith in

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the middle of that lineup, which you know against the

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>left handed starter is a big difference. So having a

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>catcher in your nine to hole that can't really hit

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is a big difference for this daughter's lineup. They don't

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>go nine deep like they normally do, even having against

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the left thee having Miguel Rojas in the eight spot

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>like it is a little bit of a sigh of relief,

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you get to the bottom of that

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>daughter's lineup compared to what it normally looks like. And

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>right now Noah Cameron has been going well. He's been

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 1>a very streaky pitcher in his brief major league sample

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 1>year and a half major league sample that we've had

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of him, But his past three starts seven innings, eight innings,

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>eight innings, strikeouts and walks on the increase. For Tark Schooble,

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we haven't discussed it a lot this year, but his

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>fastball spin rate has been dipping continuously. I think this

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>guy is just hoping he can get to the off

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>season healthy and get his contract that if he's going

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to break again, hopefully it happens next year, because there's

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely not only did he have the il stint, but

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 1>there's signs of injury in his profile in the fastball,

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the declining called strike close wolf rate at points throughout

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the year. I haven't downgraded him whatsoever. I still project

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>him as my SP two. I still have him at

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a two point seven weighted fit projection, which is right

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>around his era in the year two point eight. But

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>over the first five innings, I make the Royals about

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>plus two hundred. I would take their first five money

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>line two plus two thirty. But what I really like here,

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>which you don't get often, is the first five spread

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>at plus one and a half, not plus the half

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>plus one and a half. You could still lose the

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>first five innings money line and cash this ticket. I

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>would take that up to about minus one forty. I

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>make it closer to minus one fifty. For the plus

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>one and a half, I make it about plus one

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>plus blanking on it. My price target for the plus

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>half is plus one forty. If you want to play

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the first five money line, take it to plus two thirty.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But I really like that plus one and a half

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>for the first five innings. Hopefully Royle's just keep it

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>within a run. Hopefully they're able to get a run

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>off of Schooble and eliminate some of the sweat. But

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>taking a shot year yes, as you said, against the

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>second biggest favorite on the year, but in the first

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 1>five innings specifically on the spread. You can mess around

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>with the money line or the half a run, but

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I really like getting that plus one and a half.

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>It just does not pop up often and you only

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>really get it when you have a favorite north of

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>minus three hundred. So Royals plus one and a half

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to minus one forty my bet in that game. There

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>is value on the full game money line. There's value

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on the first five money line if you want to

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>mess around with it, and with the way the Dodters

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>are playing right now, maybe it's worth a shot. I

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>believe they've lost eight of nine or nine of ten

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>at this point. But yeah, that's a number that you

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>just don't see often and how to grab it.

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, we've been doing this together for a

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 3>long time, and I, off the top of my head,

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 3>can't recall an instance of you betting a run line.

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure you'd have done it from time to times

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 3>over the years, but it's rare enough that I can't

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 3>recall it an instance off the top of my head.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 3>So that's just a good example of how how much

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 3>of this value's popping in terms of Royal's money line.

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, I pulled up the Bartolo tool when I

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 3>woke up this morning and I saw the edges, and

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 3>this is if you're betting Royal's money line, it is

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 3>prime candidate for your bonus bets.

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>If you've got bonus, you know it's going to be uh,

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you know it's going to be a fade the public

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>type of spot today.

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I went in there and I had a bonus

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 3>bet at one of the books, and I went in

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 3>there and just threw it on Royal's money line. I'm like,

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 3>why not? This is it's a great those like plus

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 3>two hundred to plus three hundred range bets are a

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 3>great spot for it. So we will root against Trek

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Scubel once again today. You talk about I mean his

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 3>injury history. Everyone knows, I mean his his big injury

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 3>this year that people thought was going to end up

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 3>being a lot serious than it was. The short memories

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 3>that folks have, you know, back to back Cy Young's

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 3>before twenty twenty four, Scooble was known as a talented

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 3>pitcher who couldn't stay healthy. Like, yeah, he had Tommy

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Johns in his past. His career high in innings before

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four was one hundred and forty nine innings.

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 3>He had thrown only eighty innings the year before his

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 3>first Cy Young like that dude had arm trouble. So

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, he seems unhittable at times. But like, it's

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 3>a very volatile profession starting pitching in Major League Baseball,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 3>and it could go south in a hurry. Obviously, we

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 3>don't root for that at all.

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>He's added a lot of weight to his frame as well.

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Over time. I think it's helped, you know, make him

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>more durable. But the same time, he's throwing as hard

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>as ever. He is like very bulky in his upper half.

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder about his durability long term. You know,

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>c C. Sabathia had a lot of weight on him,

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>was able to pitch forever through a ton of innings.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it's not a big deal. But Cec also

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>never had that prior injury history. Cee Cee was a

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>horse throughout his career, school's had the injury history. Now

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>he has that added weight on his frame. I do

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>worry about him breaking down. And I think if the

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers signed him and he breaks down, and then they

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have that contract and Kyle Tucker's contract on books together,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not like they really care from their perspective, but

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>that Kyle Tucker contract is already looking pretty bad, and

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many more of those they can

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>afford to take on.

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, it doesn't last forever. A whole other

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.479
<v Speaker 3>side conversation we don't need to get into, but like,

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't last forever, Like these guys get old, Otani

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 3>will get old, you know, bets, we're already seeing Freeman's

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 3>getting old. Like it seems just people who are old

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 3>enough to remember the late nineties, early two thousands Yankees.

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 3>You just felt like they were going to win the

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 3>World Series or be right there every single year forever.

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 3>It seemed like it was never going to end. But

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 3>guess what it ended. People have very short memories with

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:46.239
<v Speaker 3>these things. The Dodgers are World Series favorites this year.

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 3>They're probably going to be World Series favorites next year.

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Will they win it? Who knows, But all good things

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 3>come to an end.

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>It worth noting too. You know, I don't know if

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you saw the data. You know, Sayah's put out, but

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers have seen the biggest increase in four seat

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>fastball rate against them. It's almost like the league decided, Hey,

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a team full of old dudes. Why are

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we throwing them spin when we could just throw it

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>hard and see if they could catch up with it.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's been a change in pitching approach against the

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Daughters of late, which coincides with this cold streak. So

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if they adjust back now that the league

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>is adjusted to them. But yeah, I think it's it's

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>an interesting strategy of this team's. You know, average age

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of this lineup is like thirty three years old. Why

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>not throw the ball harder and see if they get

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>hit it.

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 3>It is the oldest roster in the majors by average age,

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 3>no surprises there. The only young guy who gets regular

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 3>run in their lineup iss Andy pat Has, who's great obviously.

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Great work if you can get it too, like to

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>be a Tyler Glass now or like a Blake Snow

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>where like they're signing you for twenty million dollars a

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>year just for October. Like their expectation is like, hey,

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 1>pitch fifty innings and be healthy for the playoffs, you

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>know if you need to, Like you're just kind of

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>on vacation there to take making twenty five million dollars

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a year rehaving constantly living in LA and then when

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs roll around, you're just guaranteed a playoff spot

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're one of the four best pictures. So it's

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>quite the organization they've built there where they have these

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty million dollars pittures if they don't even need until

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs start.

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 3>Yep, all right, we will move from the Dodgers naturally

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 3>to the other team you think about when you think

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 3>of world class organizations, the Colorado Rockies. They are in

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Arizona tonight, divisional matchup Diamondbacks in a playoff spot right now,

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 3>tied for that wild card two to three in the

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 3>National League with the Phillies. I think that's probably the

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 3>most surprising. I mean not based on not based on

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 3>preseason priors, because I would obviously be like the White Sox,

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 3>but like just based on the trajectory of this team,

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 3>Like the Diamondbacks just keep hanging on. They didn't do

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 3>much at the deadline. They added Lars Nootbar and nothing else.

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 3>They're surviving with a rotation of it. Eduardo Rodriguez getting

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 3>by with smoking mirrors, throwing a thirty eight eight year

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 3>old Merril, Kelly, Brandon Fott, Mitch Bratt like, I don't

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 3>know how they're doing it, but they will get some

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:12.479
<v Speaker 3>reinforcements tonight. Returning Mike Soroka hasn't pitched since mid June.

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 3>He is back. Gabriel Hughes on the mound on the

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 3>other side for the Rockies. Are you buying Soroka in

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 3>his return or are you fading the Snakes.

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>No fading the Snakes to night, and fading Soroka's return.

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>He only got through fifty five pitches or so in

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>his final rehab outing. It seemed like they were gonna

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>send him down or keep him down for one more

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>rehab start. They're bringing him up. Velocity was also down

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in that start as well. Now he had a glut injury.

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>He didn't have an arm injury, so there is less

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>concern coming back from that, but seeing the velocity down,

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing that he's probably not gonna throw more than eighty

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>or so pitches tonight, knowing if he has one long inning,

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like a thirty pitch inning, they're gonna have a pretty

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>quick cookop with him. So I like Gabriel Hughes. He's

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.719
<v Speaker 1>pitched really well thus far for the Rockies. Doesn't have

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.239
<v Speaker 1>great stuff, just an eighty eight stuff plus rating, but

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>what he has had is the ability to miss bats

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>even with that bad stuff, and he's had excellent control.

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he has a one oh four location plus

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>rating and he's had great underlying indicators thus far. Hopefully

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>he can keep it going tonight. I don't think he's

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>anything better than a league average pitcher. Going forward. And

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I also have not downgraded Michael Soroka again, even coming

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>off of that il stint. I bet on Soroka, maybe

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>as much as I bet on any pitcher, especially through

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the first three months or so of the year when

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>he was pitching. It seemed like I was betting on

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Soroka every single start, either first five or full game.

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>But we're against him today. Slide's just too high. I

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>make the Rockies about plus one thirty five for the

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>first five innings. I was able to get them in

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a believe plus one sixty seven, and I would take

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>them down to about plus one forty five. This number

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>jumped up. It was plus one fifty this morning at

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the best book. Most of the market was around plus

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>one forty. Jumped down to plus one forty. I looked again,

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it got as high as plus one sixty, and I said,

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 1>that's my purchase point. So no exposure to the Rockies bullpen,

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>which ranks as the number thirty bullpen in my rankings.

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Also have a couple of guys down today, but we

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>will take Colorado for the first five here down two

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>plus one forty five, and that is my final of

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>four first five place today as I said, we have

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>one total left, but targeting first five innings. We're gonna

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>target a little bit more first five, a little bit

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>more team totals I have had. If you've tailed my

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>bets this year, you know how it's gone. We've had

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine blown saves with unders or money lines in

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the eighth or ninth inning. Fifty nine blown saves. We've

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten twenty eight back, so we've got twice as many

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>blown saves against this four, which has cost us I believe,

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty units in game in terms of the late in variance.

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>We've also underrun CoV by fourteen units, so I'm down

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe twelve and a half units on the year.

0:22:56.000 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>We're underrunning our CoV expectation relative to historical closed by

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>about that much, and then another minus twenty of in

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>game very and sick of losing on these bullpens. So

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to target a little bit more first five

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>here down the stretch, and then team totals as well.

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Now that I'm dividing out team totals on the bar

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>total tool, you can see there's a tab so you

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.360
<v Speaker 1>can check out my edges on team totals. That way,

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a game like last night. For instance, I

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was really torn on the Dodters over Daughters over nine

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>yesterday had popped up as an edge, but the side

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of it that I really liked was the d Backs

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>over three and a half, and if you had looked

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>at the tool. I didn't end up putting it in

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the app, it was too late to get to the

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>price before it moved, but if you had looked at

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>the bar Totle tool you would have seen an edge

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>highlightd on Dbacks over three and a half. I believe

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 1>it was about minus one twenty when it opened yesterday,

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>close closer to minus one forty. So another alternative option

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of betting these games full game money line,

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>first five obviously money lines and totals, but I added

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>a team total feature to the tool as well that

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is calibrated to historical performance the game totals, my projections, etc.

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>So the edges on those should be pretty tight, and

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you'll see a couple pop up each day, but just

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>worth looking at those if there's a side of a

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>game that you like. Oftentimes there will be a correlation

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>with the team total, as I mentioned with fading the

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>padres or betting on the Mets today, so just take

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a look at those as well, because as the market

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>gets sharper. Right, we're all the way into August now,

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and market's pretty sharp. There's not that many edges popping

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 1>up on a day to day basis, so you just

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>have to look for more alternative ways to bet on

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>these games, and I think team totals are a good

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 1>route to do.

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 2>So.

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 3>It does kind of feel like an old school Shanzrilla

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 3>day today betting on the twenty six games under five

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred Rockies and the twenty one games under five hundred

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Rails as big underdogs. So looking forward to it. It's

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 3>a fun day. Gabriel Hughes, I know, has been a

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 3>popular target of our colleague Derek Cardi in the prop market,

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 3>usually the outs market with him talented arm, doesn't have

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of length, usually throws seventy some mid seventies

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 3>in this pitch count at least right now. But we

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.959
<v Speaker 3>like the Rockies. And then you mentioned one total on

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 3>your card. This is a very this is a very

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 3>mean matchup right here. These are like my two. These

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 3>guys are my two starting pitchers. I love the the

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 3>lefties with really good stuff and shaky command where I'm like,

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 3>you're good, but why aren't you better? You should be

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 3>a cy young contender Rangers, Angels. Two of my guys,

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 3>two trade candidates who stayed put at the deadline. Mackenzie

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Gore read debt meers, I hope because these are my

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 3>guys that you're betting on pitching today with this total

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 3>and going with an under and not an over.

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, under eight and a half down to eight at

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>minus one oh five. I believe this has moved directionally

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>from eight and a half to eight again in terms

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>of COLV this year. As I said, like, we are

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>consistently beating lines, consistently generating value, which is for whatever reason,

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>has not come together this year. I do think the

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>changing baseballs, the ever changing baseballs, are a big part

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of it. I posted on Twitter last week, I think

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>MLB changed the ball again after the All Star break.

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>The ball is being hit or it's coming off the

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>bat about two miles an hour slower than it was

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in April, as temperatures have increased into August. If anything,

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball should be coming off of the bat hotter

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and carrying further. It is carrying less and coming off

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of the bat softer. That is a difference in core

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a difference in drag. What we talked

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>about earlier this year was a difference in a decrease

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in drag, meaning when the ball was hit at the

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>same exit velocity, it would just fly further just because

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the ball physics were different. Now we've seen since the

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>All Star break balls are leaving the bat softer, which

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>means that it's likely that they changed the baseball almost

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>extremely likely. It's very hard for that to happen. Otherwise, unless,

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like the offensive quality around the league took a complete

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>nose dive, you know, in the recent weeks. It seems

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>very unlikely. But concerning this game, and concerning totals in general,

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>do you like to see the directional move? It has

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>not guaranteed anything unfortunately this year. Typically on a year

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to year basis, when you get a half run move

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 1>in your direction, it's worth about a three percent expectation

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of rois. So going to keep generating these

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>half moves hopefully they start working out a little bit

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>better for us. But as you said, you know, these

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>are two volatile pitchers, two guys who could keep this game,

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, one nothing or one of them could blow up,

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>or both of them could blow up. I'm not really

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be surprised. But in terms of the average

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>projection where I put these guys, I have them as

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>both top fifty starters. I have them right around one another.

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I do rate Detmers slightly better than Gore. Detmers is

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>also at home tonight, Gores on the road or has

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>slightly lesser road numbers than he does home numbers. You

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about changes in the ball and changes

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in parks. You know, I've theorized that Global Life Park

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>may have turned off their humidor at some point this year.

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>There is data to suggest that, because it went from

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the best pitchers park in baseball to now a league

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>average park once again, if not hit or favoring. So

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>detecting what to do with guys who are on the

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>rangers offensively and their pitchers, you know, their home road

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff is going to be all over the place this

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>year because they've basically pitched in two different parks at

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>home this year and played in two different parks home

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. But ultimately, in terms of this game projection,

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>even though I don't love these bullpens, I still make

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>this total about seven point six the under eight down

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>two minus one oh five would be the bet here.

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And hopefully these guys can whip it around tonight. These

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>lefties detmer slider, the main pitch, gore, the change up

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the main pitch. Those are the two weapons to watch

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>out for. If those are working, we should have success.

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we'll probably get some dueling perfect games

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 3>into the ninth inning because these are my guys.

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>And we got four runs for each game in extra

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>innings and it goes.

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 3>Over christ Oh all right.

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Even though even that Red Sox under yesterday, you know,

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>because I bet the Red Sox under four straight days.

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>The Red Sox offense has been unbelievable of late. On Saturday,

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I had under nine and a half, I believe, and

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>there was like a garbage run scored, maybe under ten

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half. There was a garbage run score with

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>two outs and two strikes at the ninth inning. It's

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>been that over and over and over again, which has

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>been really frustrating. Fired on the under again yesterday. It

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>moved a whole run down in my direction, a full

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>run down, and then it got to four to three

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in the ninth inning and the Red Sox were about

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:04.959
<v Speaker 1>to score to tie it and send it to extras,

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, here we go. You know, it's a

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>three to two game in the eighth, Yeah, three, and

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the ninth you get to four to four and then

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you go on to extras. And the chance to get

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to five five when you have an under ten and

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a half is like a nightmare. Fuel. So it has

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>not been easy. Even the wins have been pulling teeth.

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>But I do continue to see positive movement in terms

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of our directional correctness, and that is all I can

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>do in terms of handicapping these games from a pregame perspective.

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>If I had given you, you know, then my closing number,

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>if I'd offered you the number I bet it at

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>right before game time starts, of course you would take it.

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you have to understand that getting on the

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>best number is the best that I can do in

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of finding value on these games. And historically that

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>directional correctness does prove out in terms of RORI but

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>just for whatever reason, has been a struggle this year.

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, long time listeners of the show, followers of the

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 3>action app know that that variance will come back in

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 3>your direction eventually, and if you're not a long time

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 3>follower you will find now because I have no doubt

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 3>we've been doing this long enough.

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's all hopefully it'll all come in September and

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>then the playoffs, and we just end a year in

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>an extreme high note. But even you know, it's even

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners right the way the Mariners have face planted

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>this year. The Tigers have face planted this year, like

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>teams we liked from a futures perspective are just wildly

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>underperforming expectations. It's it's been a frustrating year all around,

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult year to handicap. Your White Sox overachieving

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure has brought you a lot of joy, but

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>also like there's nothing in the projections to say that

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox should have done this. They've just seen

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>like a player development bump across the board, which is

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a big credit to the organization. But a lot of

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>times it is difficult to handicap these things. The Birds

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>overachieved projections every year. You know, I projected that to

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>happen this year, but not even to this degree. So

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>baseball is a tough sport. Man. Vladd has a ninety

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>debre arc plus this year. The entire Blue Jays roster

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>went from saying the average hitters and making the World Series.

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they're the first team in the stat tracking era,

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the first offense in quite a long time to not

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>have it qualified that is above league average, Like this

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>is It's a wild sport and the differences in production

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and swing mechanics are so minischool. Right, cal Rally went

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>from being Babe Ruth for a year to now hitting

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>one fifty. It's just it's a tough sport and the

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>variance is so high and the differences are so mini

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>school and success versus failures. So yeah, we we just

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to see baseball reflect life in terms of being unpredictable.

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Vladimir Gero Junior and Fernando Tetis Junior have combined for

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 3>the same amount of home runs as brooks Lee has

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 3>hit this year.

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>He's finally it though. Tatis changes stance. He's up to eleven,

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>so Mike Petriello, he had like closed the stance and

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>now he opened it back up or vice versa. So

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Tatis is finally hitting. I don't know what is wrong

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>with Flad.

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 3>I know that he sunk my fantasy team this year.

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 3>That's all I know, all right, Well, those are five

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 3>bets for this ten game Monday slate. Four first five

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 3>bets and then a total Rangers Angels. It's gonna do it.

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 3>For today's episode of Payoff Pitch. Thanks so much for

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 3>tuning in. If you'd like to tail some of those

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 3>bets from today's episode, look for the quick slip links

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 3>in the episode description. Don't forget to download the free

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 3>award winning Action Network app, and if you sign up

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 3>for pro you will be getting those instant alerts every

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 3>time Sean Zerillo logs a bet in the app. Also,

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 3>please leave us a five star rating and review wherever

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 3>you listen to the podcast. If you're watching on YouTube,

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 3>throw us alike give us a comment. All that jazz

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 3>very very much appreciated. We will be back tomorrow with

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 3>another episode of Payoff Pitch. Grant never will be here

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 3>giving out some bets for Dinger Tuesday. For Shan Zarello.

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm Colin Richard. Thanks so much for listening to Payoff

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Pitch Action Networks Major League Baseball Betting podcast.

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Good luck with all your bets.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Look at his crowd on his free what trigg it No,

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>what wants to leave h