WEBVTT - Tesla Regret Doesn't Move Markets, Banks Try to Offload Twitter Debt

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, Elon Musk is now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 3>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 3>controlled by one man.

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, he's a legitimate super genius.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 4>I mean legitimate.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 5>He says he's always voted for Democrats, but this year

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 5>it will be different.

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>He'll vote Republican.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 6>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 6>on him.

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 7>Alon Musk is a scam artist and he's done nothing.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 3>Anything he does, he's fascinating people. Welcome to Eylan Ink,

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk. It's Tuesday, January twenty eighth.

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm your host, David Papadopolis. It's Tesla Earnings Week, people,

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:02.639
<v Speaker 3>which means, of course, earnings bingo. You know that, get

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 3>out your popcorn. But it'll also give us a fresh

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 3>window into the financials of a company that is absolutely

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 3>taken off in the stock market since Trump's selection. So

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 3>the question is are the fundamentals catching up to these

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 3>growing expectations of what Tesla can be in the Trump

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 3>era or are they falling further behind. We'll dive into

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 3>those numbers with our regulars here, Max Chafkin and Dana Hull.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 3>Hello to you both.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 2>Happy almost earnings day, David, and.

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.639
<v Speaker 3>Happy earnings day to you Max. Dana, Hello, Hello, Hello,

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 3>and we have our global autos are beaming in from London.

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Craig Trudell. Craig, Hello, sir.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 7>Thanks for having me.

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 3>Then we're going to talk about Muskin is Wall Street

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 3>bankers who suddenly and finally see an opportunity to unload

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 3>the thirteen billion dollars of loans they doled out the

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 3>finance's purchase of Twitter. After two years, the stars seem

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 3>a ligne to make a sale happen, unless that is

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 3>the out of the blue emergence of deep seek scuttles

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the whole thing. We'll talk about all that with one

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 3>of our top Wall Street reporters, Shredar Naderjan Okay, Dan,

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 3>I start with you, though tomorrow is Tesla earnings Day.

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Remind us what we know so far in terms of

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 3>how the fourth quarter went for Tesla and what you're

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 3>going to be looking for the most in the numbers

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 3>that come out and in the conference call that follows

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 3>the release.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>So Tesla earnings, we know how many cars the company

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>delivered in the fourth quarter. We know that for the year,

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>sales were down roughly one percent, and so the big

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>thing for earnings is the growth outlook, And you know,

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is going to do whatever he can to

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of take control of the narrative and promise Wall

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Street that everything is great, that they are making progress

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.399
<v Speaker 1>with FSD, that the Model Y Refresh is happening, And

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be the first call since Donald

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump was elected, and so I expect there's going to

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of questions about Doge, about tariffs, about

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, is Tesla ever going to build a Mexico

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>plan or not, And so it's really more about the

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>call than the numbers itself.

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Right by the way, just for the record, my bet

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 3>on the Mexico plant is we never see that, at

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 3>least not over the next four years. Craig Danna mentions

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 3>the Model Why Refresh, which reminds me, I don't know

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 3>that we've talked about it on this show. Tell us

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 3>a bit about it and how high expectations are for

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 3>it in terms of driving sales of Tesla's top model.

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 7>So I guess the first thing to start with is

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 7>the look of it on the exterior. It's got a

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 7>sort of cyber truck like face. It's got a light

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 7>bar running across the front, very similar to the cyber truck. Otherwise,

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 7>there's honestly not that much to say about it. I mean,

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 7>there's in the rear seat you now have a screen,

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 7>you know, along with the screen that you know, folks

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 7>are used to up in the front row. There's some

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.839
<v Speaker 7>interior changes in terms of, you know, number of speakers.

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 7>They kept a turn signal stock which they took out

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 7>of the Model three when they refresh that, and Tesla

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 7>owners didn't particularly care for that, you know that. I mean,

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 7>that's the sort of level of of you know, lack

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 7>of newness that actually.

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's pretty it's pretty minor stuff. So you

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 3>don't seem to expect necessarily that that refresh is going

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 3>to make an enormous difference. But tell us what you're

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 3>most looking for tomorrow in these numbers and in the

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 3>call that follows.

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, I think I agree with Dana that

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 7>the outlook is going to be what's most important. But

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 7>I also think that it will be interesting to see,

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, just how much of a of a you know,

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 7>hit they potentially took in the fourth quarter, they did

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 7>deliver more evs than in any quarter than they ever have,

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 7>but they really pulled out all the stops to get there.

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 7>So you know, they did you know, big discounts, they

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 7>had you know cut rate loan and lease offers, they

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 7>had you know, free charging deals, and so you know

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 7>how much did they sort of need to give away

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 7>in terms of you know, profitability to get a result

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 7>that honestly was a bit disappointing even for for Tesla.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 7>Think they you know, guided to this idea that they

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 7>would be able to grow for the year, and as

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 7>Dana mentioned, they actually ended up even despite all of

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 7>those you know, promotions and efforts, actually having a down

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 7>year for the first time in more than a decade.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Craig, not to belabor the point, but just give us,

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 3>give our listeners a cent. So, when margins were at

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 3>their highest and just spectacular for Tesla, a standout in

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 3>the auto industry, what exactly were they and where are

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 3>they now? What do folks expect for the fourth quarter?

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean during the pandemic, I think we saw,

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 7>you know, across the industry this huge run up in margins,

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 7>and so you know, we saw for everybody you know,

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 7>a big you know bump in terms of you know,

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 7>they had plenty of demand but not enough supply. And

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 7>so for for Tesla, we were seeing you know, more

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 7>than twenty percent margins on a quarterly basis of you

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 7>know for some time, and that was as sort of

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 7>as good as it gets aside from you know, a

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 7>brand like a Ferrari, right, and so we've seen now

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 7>that come back down into you know, into the double

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 7>digits still, but in terms of having profit margins more

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 7>in line with what you would expect to see from

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 7>other carmakers you know, in the past, at that margin

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 7>used to be much better than their Detroit competitors.

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, Max. This company is and I'm not saying

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 3>this just because we're doing this podcast, you know, but

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 3>it really is one of the most fascinating stocks out

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 3>there right now, and fascinating companies right now, because the

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 3>stock is still even after a recent selloff, up like crazy.

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 3>It's up more than fifty percent since Trump was elected.

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 3>But the sales numbers, as these guys are saying, are

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 3>just margins are shrinking. And there's this growing sense out

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 3>there that the more Elon gets involved in politics, the

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 3>more he's alienating a big chunk of his potential customers. So,

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, unless this dream and this vision of the

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 3>robotaxi and the AI future comes to pass, I don't

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 3>know that the math gets tricky.

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 2>So like with Tesla, and I think this is true

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 2>about basically all of Musk's companies. You have kind of

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 2>like the business and the story and at times they've

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 2>been kind of pointing in the same direction, and at

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 2>times they've kind of diverged over the course of the

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 2>company's life. And you know, since we've been doing this

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 2>podcast for like two years, almost the business of Tesla

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 2>has been kind of the same.

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 3>You have an.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.119
<v Speaker 2>Aging product line that people are not that excited about.

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Craig mentioned the refresh of the Model three, which I

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know if we've actually ever mentioned that on this podcast.

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we have and I've just forgotten it. But like,

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 2>they went and refreshed the Model three, and it doesn't

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 2>seem to have made a huge difference, or if it

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 2>did make a difference, it was you know, helping from

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>a place of weakness. The growth story that you're hitting

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>on the AI robotaxi. Somehow Trump's gonna do something amazing.

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 2>He's going to bring the good vibes back or whatever.

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 2>He has a lot of ways to go on the

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Ernie's call to do that, and I think he will try. Right,

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>He's going to try to talk about robotaxis and the

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 2>potential for the regulatory environment to change. The problem is,

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 2>of course, you need an actual working robotaxi to be

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 2>able to take advantage of a favorable regulatory environment, which

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>is not clear they have. And then the other problem

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 2>is there are sort of headwinds or whatever you want

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 2>to call it, you know, sort of blowing in the

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>face of this story. One of them is that we've

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 2>seen a sudden kind of correction in AI, so like

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 2>we have investors reacting to the release of this Chinese

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>large language model Deep Seek and suddenly devaluing a bunch

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>of AI stocks. That potentially hurts, you know, the AI

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 2>story that Elon Musk is going to try to tell.

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing is these regulatory credits, which has

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 2>been a big source of Tesla's profit, as well as

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 2>the tax subsidies. Trump in an executive order has basically

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 2>said he's gonna get He's gonna get rid of these

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 2>or at least begin considering getting rid of these which

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 2>arguably would hurt other EV companies more than it would

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 2>hurt Tesla, but it will also hurt Tesla.

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 3>I noticed that, I mean Tesla when the deep Seek

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 3>news came out yesterday and much of the tech complex

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 3>absolutely collapse. I mean in Nvidia, you know fell I

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 3>don't know fifteen percent or something like that. Tesla didn't

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 3>move that much. But it does strike me that if

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Deep Seek was something of China spot Nick moment in

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 3>terms of AI, there could be a potential warning sign

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 3>there for Tesla and its plans going forward.

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think that's right, and I do think that

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 7>Tesla did sort of take it on the chin. It

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 7>was certainly no Navidia in terms of how much of

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 7>a hit they took yesterday, But they too, you know,

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 7>did have a rough day in the market, along with

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 7>a lot of other companies. I do think that, you know,

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 7>to Max's point, you know, we've also just generally seen

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 7>challenges that companies that have gotten much further in actually

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 7>commercializing robotaxis. We've seen a major player in that field

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 7>already fall by the wayside, right and GM's you know, Cruse,

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 7>and today they're out with their earnings and sort of

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 7>beating their chests about the fact that they're going to

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 7>lose a whole heck of a lot less money on

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 7>that business that they've decided to just fold in into

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 7>the car company. They're happy about that. So I think

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 7>we've also seen, you know, companies that didn't get so

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 7>far as Cruise fold I'm thinking rg AI, which Volkswagen

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 7>and Ford acquired. We've seen some people start to commercialize

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 7>the robotaxi business, but nobody's making any money, so it

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 7>remains to be seen how anybody's going to actually earn

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 7>anything here.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think one of the big questions that investors

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>are hopefully going to ask is, you know, the Trump

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>administration has alluded to this idea that they're going to

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>have a federal framework for AVE, so rather than this

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>patchwork of state regulations, there could be sort of a

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>federal framework that would make it easier for Elon to

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>get his robotaxi approved. So if anyone asks Elon about that,

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean he could say, oh, yeah, like I was

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>just talking to Emil Michael and blah blah blah. I mean,

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>he is part of the govern now, and there's a

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>reason why he donated so many millions of dollars to Trump.

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>There are things on his ask list, and so av

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>regulation or lack thereof is one of them, and so

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to be a big part of

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the call tomorrow as well.

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 2>One thing, aren't they supposed to have an affordable car

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 2>like now, Craig, weren't we promised to twenty five thousand

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 2>dollars car? Like shouldn't this whole podcast just be like,

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>when's the twenty five thousand dollars car coming?

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 7>My best guess to that is is it's never coming.

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 7>And the only way I could see, you know, some

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 7>potential for them actually making good on that is actually

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 7>sticking a steering wheel in that cyber cap that they

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 7>showed a few months back and selling it as a

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 7>human driven car for some time. Maybe they could make

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 7>that sort of you know, smaller sized car at least,

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, closer to that price point. But I think

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 7>from what we've sort of gathered over the last year,

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 7>it looks like that's been abandoned for self driving purposes.

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Craig. I wanted to go back, though, for a second,

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:10.119
<v Speaker 3>to the topic of how Musk's politics are alienating potentially

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 3>a chunk of his customers. We have seen signs of

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 3>late of resistance of sorts or to the company and

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 3>people lashing out at the company and its products. And

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 3>you guys also had an interview with a Tesla rival

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 3>where he spoke to this topic. Tell us a little

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 3>bit about that.

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we met with the CEO of Polestar, which you know,

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 7>of course, any company that is trying to compete with

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 7>Tesla is you know, of course incentivized to talk about,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 7>you know, ways in which they could potentially benefit from

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 7>any setbacks at their rival. But I did find this

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 7>conversation with Michael Loschler, that the relatively new CEO of Polestar,

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 7>really interesting because he's German and as we know, you know,

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 7>Elon has been inserting himself in German politics to this

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 7>really significant degree and throwing his weight beyond the a

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 7>f D, which is, you know, a far right party

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 7>in Germany with a lot of skeletons in its closet.

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 7>And he said in no uncertain terms that you know,

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 7>the way that Musk has inserted himself into the sort

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 7>of political conversation in Germany is unacceptable and is not

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 7>going to fly. And you know, I think that we've

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 7>seen some indications that you know, he's he's right to

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 7>say that. We've seen protesters project the emotion that Musk

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 7>made at last week's Trump event that you know, people

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 7>saw as a sort of Roman salute, you know, that

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 7>projected onto Tesla's factory outside Berlin with the words kile Tesla.

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 7>We've seen in Poland, which you know, this week is

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 7>commemorating eighty years since Auschwitz. You know, a minister call

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 7>for a boycott against the company. We've seen you know,

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 7>vandalized cyber trucks in the Bay Area, and just this

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 7>morning I saw something about, you know, a store in

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 7>Seattle that was tagged with you know, references to Hitler

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 7>and so.

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know that vandalized storn Seattle really jumped out.

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean it was the language that was sprayed on

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 3>the window was aggressive, Nazi scum golf. Well, and that's

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 3>what it says.

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, we can get to this, maybe we

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 2>talk about X, but like we're seeing a lot the

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 2>backlash has been much much more pronounced since the quote

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 2>unquote awkward gesture. You know, we've seen Reddit, lots of

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 2>boards on Reddit spanning X links like and you're just

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 2>seeing like it's more than just like a bumper sticker

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 2>or two. You're seeing more people pushing against it. On

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, of course, like America's polarized country. You

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 2>know a lot of Tesla sales.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Or something, but it's not just America, it's the world,

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes is pointing out.

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 2>It definitely seems like this is going to be bad

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 2>for business in Europe. It does seem like Tesla sales

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 2>have suffered from Elon Musk's political turn. I don't think

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>we know yet just how much.

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, and Dan, I know I've already got

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 3>you in my year saying, oh, you know that that's

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 3>anecdotal evidence. You know, I won't show it to me

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 3>in the macro numbers. Given that there are some people

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 3>who feel so strongly about it that they're willing to

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 3>go out and vandalize private property in multiple countries, is

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 3>that not a window into a broader sentiment among a

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 3>much larger percentage of potential Tesla customers who you are

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 3>driving away.

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen, there's no question that Elon's politics are hurting sales.

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's irrefutable, But there's no hard data that

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>ties the two together. Because people don't buy Tesla's for

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>any number of reasons. And like you know the person

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>who went out and spray painted a Nazi scum on

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a store, Like do they own a Tesla? Were they

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>about to buy a Tesla and then they weren't. Like

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this is like performative outrage, and I

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>mean I get it, Like the outrage is real, but

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>like it's the same thing of like everyone's saying they're

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>going to move to Canada if Trump is reelected. These

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>are not people who necessarily owned a car or were

0:15:56.360 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in the market for a car like so and like

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I see the same thing. Like all there's lots of

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>people that are like, oh my god, I know I'm

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>embarrassed to drive my Tesla and it's like, well you're

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>still but you're still driving it. And like the biggest

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>thing is the stock. Like if you're so upset about

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Elon and his and his behavior, then sell the stock.

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Like like the biggest example is California's pension fund is

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge shareholder of Tesla. They have sold off their

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>position a bit, but they are still like a top holder.

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not like a big fan of like this

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>performative outrage. Like if people were really upset the stock

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>valuation would not be as high as it is, and

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the stock has remained so high despite

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>all of his shenanigans over the past six months is

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>really telling. So I think you know, you will continue

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to see Tesla lose market share in states like California,

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you will continue to see brand erosion, and like you know,

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>surveys about the value of the brand erode. But Elon

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is a financial engineer, and as long as that stock

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>price stays hi, he is going to be fine. And

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like no analyst on Wall Street is calling out this.

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 3>No, no, Dana. That's a good point. But I will

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 3>I will note that in speaking with Esha Day, our

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Tesla stock reporter this morning, she did say to me

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>that she and her conversations with analysts that they at

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 3>least they are bringing it up more with her than

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 3>they ever have before in the past. Perhaps not to

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 3>the point indeed of penning it into notes, but there

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 3>at least it's something that can.

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Because they're afraid. So if you, if you really care,

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 1>then put it in a.

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Note, put it in Wall Street, put it in a note.

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Otherwise we don't want to hear about it.

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Max tell Us Bingo about being I mean, you know,

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 2>the best time of the year. We have huge news

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 2>here in elin Klan tell us Bloomberg Terminal subscribers. I'm

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 2>sure that most of our listeners already subscribe to the

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal can now play Bingo on their terminal and

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 2>it's interactive.

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 6>You have there's a leaderboard. The card will change. We

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 6>are very Dana and I are very excited about there.

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 3>There's a leaderboard wayman, so everyone's not getting the same

0:17:59.240 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 3>card anymore.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 6>You got a different car gives its shuffled.

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>We have we have, we have, we have iterated our

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>product and it is soft launch.

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 6>This is all human labor as far as I know.

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 6>But but we are very excited.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 3>About it and to you by deep seek.

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I do think that like this is really just from

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 2>a pure Bingo perspective, leaving out politics or money. Just

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 2>like the question of how trumpy does this earnings call

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 2>get to me is like it will be interesting. We've

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 2>got a few trumpy categories on the Bingo cards. Some

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 2>i'd say some reaches. First Buddy Greenland are both potential squares.

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, So you like First Buddy as a Bingo

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 3>as a Bingo square. You also like Greenland Fun Dana,

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 3>what are your favorite squares out there?

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Deep Seek, Come on, this is gonna be all about

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm waiting for you Deep China questions, Deep Seek,

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>cybercab Tariffs. Let's go Geo, I want, I want full

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on geopolitical Elon.

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 3>You all can still download the card, and this is

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 3>for those who are not Bloomberg terminal subscribers. That's small

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 3>universe out there. You can download it at Bloomberg dot

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 3>com backslash Elon Inc. And play with everyone here.

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 6>The terminal handle b NNGO.

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Go.

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 3>By the way, no I b n g O. Isn't

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 3>that what I said? I'm just just for emphasis, right,

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Craig Trudell Dan out. We say goodbye to you, but

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 3>enjoy Bingo, enjoy the earnings, and we'll talk next week.

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 6>Thank you, Thanks much.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Max and I are now joined by shred Ar Nadaijan,

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 3>one of our crack Wall Street reporters. Here, Shri, Hello,

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 3>welcome to the show. Hello. Now listen, Max. Shre's got

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 3>this story that he likes to periodically through out there

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 3>that I just want to just debunk from the get go.

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 3>He alleges that at some point in early on his career,

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 3>I tried to fire him. That's not true, because had

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 3>I tried to fire him, he wouldn't be here today.

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 3>But Shre is a non mitigated superstar. And that's why

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 3>we have used.

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 6>To believe this story because it's funny.

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 3>True, it is not, it's bold, all right, So Shre,

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 3>We're going to talk about Musk and his bankers and

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 3>his acquisition of Twitter for our listeners out there who've

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 3>forgotten a bit about this, which may be a number

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 3>of them. Not they haven't certainly haven't forgotten about Twitter

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 3>or X, but they've forgotten about, perhaps about the way

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 3>the deal went down. Let's go back to the beginning

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 3>and remind them the way, remind him about how this

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 3>deal was financed.

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 4>So we're in twenty twenty five. You want to go

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 4>back to twenty twenty two, I'll take you further back.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 4>I'll take you back to twenty ten. That's the first

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 4>time Elon Musk ever tweeted on Twitter. Twenty twenty two.

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 4>Elon picks up this crusade of Twitter is not doing

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 4>enough for free speech and what starts off or at

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 4>least looks like and sounds like a joke. Idea of

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 4>him wanting to buy Twitter, wanting to pull his user

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 4>and wanting to see if he could take over the

0:20:55.520 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 4>platform actually becomes something serious. Management is rattled by it.

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 4>They even offer him a board seat. But soon things

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 4>are scalid and he just straight up says I want

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 4>to buy Twitter. Comes in with a pretty premium on

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 4>what was then a public company, so forces Twitter management

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 4>and the board to consider his offer pretty seriously. All

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 4>in that was about forty four billion dollars and after

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of push and pull, I think at

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 4>the end of the day, Twitter, advised by Goldman Sachs,

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 4>JP Morgan, two of the premier investment banks, who have

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 4>to do their duty and do tell the management that

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 4>this is a pretty good deal, like the man or not.

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 4>You can't say no to this because your shareholders will

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 4>be upset, and they approve the deal. That sounds simple enough.

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Now we should move on to the chapter where Elon

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 4>owns Twitter. But with everything Elon thinks are not quite

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 4>that's simple. Two months later, he tries to find a

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 4>creative way to get out of the deal. However, the

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 4>courts force him to go ahead with that deal. And

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 4>so he does front up the money.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 3>That forty four billion, which comes from both a group

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 3>of equity investors who put up money to buy a

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 3>stake beside him, and also these Wall Street bangs.

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 4>Correct cash from Elon margin loans extended next to Tesla

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 4>stock collateral, a group of equity investors that includes people

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 4>like everyone from Larry Ellison's to Prince Alwalids. So you

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 4>have an eclectic mix there backing this deal, Mark and

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 4>recent sequoia. So all of these players who put in

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 4>some of the equity city.

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 3>I believe right that. I'm not sure that's right.

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 6>He was in there.

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 3>It was a.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 6>Colectic It wasn't czy.

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 3>A part of the mix is.

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Cz Yeah, you know, yes, right, So that was right,

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 4>eclectic mix of investors. So you have a situation where

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 4>when you still need about thirteen billion dollars of debt.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 3>Thirteen right, So he's picked up with so it's a

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 3>forty four billion dollar purchase. They've come up with thirty

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 3>some odd in cash money they need financing of about

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 3>thirteen billion.

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 4>And thirteen billion on a company like Twitter, which if

0:22:58.200 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 4>you go back to twenty twenty one, look at the

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 4>finale Fullier twenty twenty one. I think they were projecting

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 4>EBITDAF something like a billion in Jeta.

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 3>You got to help us out here.

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 4>IBITDA fancy earnings metric, but it's a metric that dead

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 4>investors live by. It's it's a measurement of profit, not

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 4>necessarily pure profit, but it is a key metric for

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Wall Street investors. And by that metric, keeping on thirteen

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars of debt on that company is a risky,

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 4>risky maneuver. And if you go back to the environment

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 4>at that time, in the years leading up to that deal,

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 4>and you know this very well because we've worked in

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 4>so many stories about this over the years, that it's

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 4>the kind of risk that banks were not in a

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 4>position to take, or at least didn't want to dig

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 4>because regulators were not happy with it. They didn't want

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 4>to have to run around with that kind of risk.

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 4>Except the X factor here, the literal X factor here

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 4>is you're dealing with someone like Elon Musk. Help him

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 4>out on one deal and it could pay off brilliantly

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 4>on so many other transactions and financings that brings to

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 4>the market.

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 3>You help him come up with this money, even if

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 3>you're not crazy doing the deal. You can help them

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 3>come up with the money the thirteen billion dollars which

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 3>you lend to him and then he's going to cut

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 3>you in and other deals in the future, maybe an

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 3>IPO of SpaceX SO and so forth. So the group

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 3>of the banks are names like Morgan, Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays,

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 3>among others. Their normal mo shre is they make a

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 3>loan like this, it's a risky loan, it's called a

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 3>leverage loan, and they want to get out of it.

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 3>They want to sell these godforsaken loans, or at least

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 3>the vast bulk of them. Two clients are theirs. They

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 3>don't want to get stuck with it on their books.

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 3>The financiers who are just for a second, who are

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 3>typically those kind of buyers who would buy those loans

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 3>from banks.

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.239
<v Speaker 4>Think of large institutional investors, Think of people who are

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 4>big in credit markets. You can go from a Blackstone

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 4>to Apolo, to Pimco to Hatch Funds. A lot of

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 4>these institutions who themselves have come up with the money

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 4>because pension funds and retirement funds and sovereign wealth funds

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 4>have invested in them. They have this treasure trove. They

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 4>can use the cash from that to buy into these

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 4>deals and the deals that the banks bring into the market.

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 4>So these are the kinds of people that they will

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 4>approach and should have been a cell They recognized from

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 4>the outset was going to be a hard sell back

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 4>in twenty back in twenty twenty two, because everything constant

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 4>of Twitter's earnings was going on the same path that

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 4>it was at. This was a difficult deal. But if

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 4>you remember the noise at the time and all the

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 4>changes that Elon made, all the massive staff cuts, that

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 4>was chaos, and that chaos meant was advertisers were the

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 4>first ones to flee. That was the lifeblood of revenue

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 4>of Twitter. That's how they made a lot of their money.

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 4>And when that happened, the earnings profile, the forward earnings profile,

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 4>suddenly looked very shaky, and revenue did slump, earnings did slump,

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 4>and that suddenly became a very very difficult ask when

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 4>you go to investors and say, can you please take

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:46.959
<v Speaker 4>this dead off us.

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Not only that, but you had Elon Musk in the

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 2>months before the deal was closed trying to get out

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 2>of it and going around telling everyone that forty four

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars was way too much money.

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 6>This thing was actually mad.

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like basically doing the worst sales job ever when

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to unload some corporate debt, right, And so yeah,

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's like as soon as the deal closed,

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 2>even if he hadn't told the advertisers to go f

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 2>themselves as he did eventually, I think it would have

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 2>been a difficult You just don't want to climb like

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 2>that actually going out that making life so difficult for you.

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 2>They wouldn't say that because they also know he's the

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 2>man behind SpaceX and Tesla and Lincoln.

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 6>You get to be the client from hell though if

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 6>you are.

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 2>A whale, Right, It's like it's like the guy in

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.239
<v Speaker 2>the casino kind of abusing all of the you know,

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 2>the dealers and the person bringing the drinks or whatever,

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 2>and is still being treated super well because everybody there

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 2>knows that he cow.

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 3>They'll put up with a lot of a lot of

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 3>your bs. If you're not, they won't. And even the

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 3>other thing tre that went against these bankers after this

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 3>deal was cut to finance the purchase is the interest

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 3>rate environment changed quite a bit. You went from a

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 3>world in which interest rates across the globe and the

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 3>US and other places benchmark rates were close to zero,

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 3>they surge up to over five percent. So all that

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 3>goes against them. They've been sitting on these things forever,

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 3>nursing losses. I think some of them have booked, have

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 3>written off losses on it. But again, all of a sudden,

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 3>they're in action, They're in play, they're trying to sell

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 3>these things. What is given them this wind at their back?

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, the noises died down around Twitter, the.

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Platform we like to never for do it as X.

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 4>And now we have to call it X, so that

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 4>not only has the noise died down around Twitter, Twitter

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 4>itself has died down, and we talk only about X.

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 4>It does seem to have maintained a core group of users.

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 4>And we have gone through this very very busy cycle

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 4>which otherwise is known as a US election cycle, which

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 4>has meant that that platform has been more active and

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 4>more busy than usual. That is a good time for

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 4>a social media platform, and especially good time for a

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 4>social media platform that's sort of news focused, right, And

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 4>also a lot of the advertisers who initially fled Twitter

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 4>are back on X. They are advertising on that platform.

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Are they there are certain Twitter has said that this is.

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 3>What the bankers are telling shre.

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 6>We don't really know what that means. Does it Does

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 6>it mean.

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 2>That like the advertisers who were there before are spending

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 2>at their previous levels?

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 6>I would I would guess.

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 2>The answer is now, does it mean that advertisers who

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 2>were like completely staying out of x because they were

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 2>offended by Elon Musk or actually just didn't think Twitter

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 2>was good enough business have decided, Hey, you know this

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 2>guy is at the arm of Trump. Maybe it makes

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 2>sense to like throw them a couple bucks and avoid

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 2>getting into a Twitter war with one of the most

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 2>powerful people, if not the most powerful people on the planet.

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 6>Like, it's it's more the latter.

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 3>If you bail, that is an improvement. Arguably, Yeah, bankers

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 3>are telling you that advertisers are bad. No.

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 4>But but more importantly you also have to slice and

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 4>dicee that a bit. You don't have to worry about

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 4>the absolute math here. I don't need a company that

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 4>is worth forty four billion dollars to make this debt

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 4>feeling to invest us. I just need to make sure

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 4>that this company is strong in enough that your money

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 4>good on the thirteen billion dollars. So from that perspective,

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 4>that has been a bit of a rebound. It's the

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 4>revenue of this company is certainly not what it was

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 4>for fullier twenty twenty one. We're still way of that mark,

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 4>is my understanding, based on our conversations with bankers and investments.

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 3>It's going back up.

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 4>It is improved from say, twelve months ago, from eighteen

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 4>months ago. So that's a helpful sign. Add to that

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 4>two very distinct factors. Not the kind of things you

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 4>keep in mind when you're thinking about leverage, finance, when

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 4>you're thinking about risky corporate debt, but here it matters.

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Elon played a key role in cheer leading Trump's return

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 4>to the white.

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 3>And access kind of, as Max calls it, the media

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 3>arm to a certain degree of the Republican Party.

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the risk here, right, if you hold their

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 2>debt is that Musk says, f this, I'm done. I'm

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 2>worth three hundred billion dollars. I don't want to run

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 2>this thing. I've been threatening bankruptcy for a long time.

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 6>Forget it where bankrupt's not happen.

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 5>There was a world where that year ago we were

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 5>talking about world right, now is unfreaking thinkable total because

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 5>for all the things that Sria is saying, for the

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 5>things you're saying, this thing is maybe it's on the rebound,

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 5>maybe it's not.

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>But it's certainly useful to Elon Musk now and will

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 2>be useful to Elon Musk in the foreseeable future. There's

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 2>no universe where he's gonna walk away from it. And

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 2>you have the fact that like every anything that's even

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 2>like kind of tangentially connected to Trump or Trump vibes

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 2>has seen like a fifty percent increase in its valuation

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 2>or more, and so like, clearly this thing is is

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 2>on the come up in terms of its value, in

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 2>terms of its lasting power and so on, even if

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 2>like the revenue is not there, and I don't think

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 2>the revenue looks great with.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 4>The business rebounding, What is important is you don't need

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 4>to sell to investors an equity investor leg dream. You

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 4>don't need to say that something that's well one hundred

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 4>dollars today will be one hundred back then. You just

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 4>need a principle that's all that that investors care about.

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 4>So from that perspective, things that are improving. From that perspective,

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 4>the Trump linkage, the Trump halo is helpful. And then

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 4>there's this complete wild factor here of what we now

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 4>know as Xai Corp. Two years ago, that is Elon

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Musk's artificial intelligence startup. We have been caught in this

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 4>cycle of craze in the AI world that has drawn

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 4>all sorts of investors to it. Now, what has happened

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 4>is Xai and x have a lot of interconnections. It

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 4>has trained its models off of the data set on

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 4>x use the chips and service and instead of paying

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 4>money like you.

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 6>Would do another intercompany border.

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 4>So the barter almost in this case is x has

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 4>gotten an equity stake in Xai, and like all things Ai,

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 4>in a span of two years that stake that x

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 4>has an Xai has become quite valuable.

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Reports say that Xai is that awesome man. Look.

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Last valuation for Xai is roughly fifty billion dollars. Now

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 4>we've reported this, which gives x is excess take in

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 4>Xai is about six billion dollars.

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 3>So if you're a banker trying to get rid of

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 3>these loans that have been stuck on your book for

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 3>two years, that is something that you are saying to

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 3>possible buyers of these loans. Hey, by the way, you

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 3>buy this loan from me, you in park get a

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 3>claim or a lean on X, which gets you a

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 3>lean on the great XI.

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 4>So David the optimistic banker is going around to all

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 4>the investors and saying, not just improving fundamentals in the

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 4>business doesn't have to go to the peak levels of

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 4>where Twitter was, but X has seen its business rebound.

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 4>But on top of that, what you will have a

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 4>lean on that is, if you're a secure investor, if

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 4>you're someone who has collateral against the money that you're

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 4>lending to this company, you will have a claim on

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 4>X is stick in XAI, which is worth six billion.

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 4>So take whatever earnings X has, apply an eight times,

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 4>nine times, ten times multiple, whatever's the going right in

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.959
<v Speaker 4>the market. On top of that, add the value of

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 4>this stick and then see that the loan that you're

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 4>putting up, what is the loan to value? Is that

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 4>about fifty percent sixty percent? At that rate, it will

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 4>draw in a lot of people. Again, we don't know

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 4>if it's a done deal. We know there's a lot of.

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Have they sold any of it? Have they sold any

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 3>of these loans? Yet?

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 4>They sold a small piece. They went out there and

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 4>sold about a billion dollars of day.

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Do they is their plan among these different banks to

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 3>sell all thirteen billion or they I think the.

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Goal will be, of course, to get that. I don't

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 4>think all thirteen billion gets off their balance sheet anytime soon,

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 4>but you know, you start one is off, another three

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 4>three and a half in the coming few weeks. It

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 4>at least sets the stage for a lot more to

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 4>be done.

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Which, by the way, mact, if that's right, that would

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 3>be more or less in line with your everything in

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 3>the must complexes up fifty percent now since the election.

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 2>People shouldn't listen to this podcast, you know, we would

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 2>we call this like months ago of the podcast.

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, I am an ardent listener of everything you said

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 4>podcast or not.

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 2>The other thing I'll say is like I don't think

0:33:56.360 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the valuation fifty billion or whatever for Xi Xai crazy

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 2>given open AIS valuation, which is something you know, it

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 2>was like one hundred and fifty two hundred billion dollars

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 2>somewhere in that in that range. But like we are

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of an extremely frothy period here, we're

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 2>also living through a sudden kind of re evaluation of

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 2>just how much those things are worth. I mean, if

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:23.280
<v Speaker 2>deep Seek does everything that all the people are excited

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 2>about it believe it's gonna do, that's gonna really hurt

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 2>open AI's business. Open A is not gonna be worth

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 2>as much, and frankly, x Ai probably be worth the whole.

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Complex has gotta has gotta be devalued quite a bit,

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 3>which is what we saw in the stock market yesterday.

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you could argue obviously ultimately really good for

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 3>the broader economy and really good if you can suddenly

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 3>access this technology deep That.

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Said, like in certain ways, Xai is a little bit

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 2>like deep Seek in the sense that this is something

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 2>that Elon kind of slapped together.

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 6>Remember like when this was launching, he had like, you know,

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 6>it seemed like a handle of engineers.

0:34:57.840 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Audio clips of uh, you know react.

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 2>In a matter of months, he he did manage to

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 2>build something that like, is I don't know, is it

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 2>as good as chatch ebt?

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 3>Probably not?

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Is it? Does it get pretty close to how most

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 2>people use that chatbot?

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, probably does.

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 2>And so so in that sense, like this is maybe

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 2>arguably another sort of lower cost chappot that is also

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 2>eating away at open Ais. You know, potential, you know,

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 2>market share.

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 3>Before we let you go, just to ask you, because

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 3>you're a star banking reporter for US here, are you

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 3>ready to bank on X? Are you gonna do your

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Are you gonna?

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 2>Because just made a face. I almost don't even know

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 2>how to It.

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Seems like.

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm not even gonna deign to respond to that question.

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Max tell us, tell us about the news today.

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 2>The news is that X has a banking partner X,

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the Everything app, which you know again from the jump,

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 2>basically with the take over, Musk has said he wants

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 2>this to be basically like a we chat, so there

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 2>would be banking on this, there be all sorts of things.

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 2>X has some sort of partnership with Visa that is

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 2>going to allow you to at least maybe send money

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 2>on X. Finally, after two years, everyone's been collamoring for this.

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I actually don't think anyone has, but of

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:24.839
<v Speaker 2>course except for Elon Musk, because he sees this as

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 2>a potential way to expand the utility of this app.

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:31.280
<v Speaker 4>And all I would say is, don't dismiss it offhand,

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 4>because for a while, the chatter and the talk in

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.720
<v Speaker 4>the banking sector, in the banking world, the Jamie Diamonds

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 4>of the world have talked about this idea, the specter

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 4>of tech companies with hundreds of millions of customers and

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 4>whilst amount of resources at their disposal, having the ability

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 4>to create a competitive mode where they can actually compete

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 4>against banks. They have the technology, they have the platform,

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 4>they have the users, and find a banking partner and

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 4>suddenly you can have an Apple credit card, you can

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 4>have a fintech that sits inside Walmart, and you can

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.399
<v Speaker 4>have X Money where you are, you know, zipping money

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 4>back and forth between users on that social media platform.

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 4>So it certainly has value and potential. Now can Elon

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 4>drive up the hype and the hoopla around it to

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:16.959
<v Speaker 4>convince people to actually partake And the answer is knowing

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Elon and knowing his legions followers. It's quite possible that happens,

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 4>and if that takes off, that will be another crucial

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.879
<v Speaker 4>leg to the X story that will make it more

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 4>appealing to invest These loans.

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Aren't worth ninety ninety five. You're saying these loans are

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 3>worth one hundred and ten cents onund the hour. That's

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 3>what you're telling me.

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Can I just say, first of all, by now I'm

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 2>saying this just purely as a long time Twitter user,

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 2>someone who's been on this thing forever. No One, no

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 2>one wants to trust this thing with their money, Like

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I barely trust it with my like bad jokes and

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 2>and and that has been true before and after Elon

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Musk bought a bought it. I mean, there's some universe, right,

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the Elon Musk is a great market or whatever. Maybe

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 2>he somehow convinces people, but you're starting from a very

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 2>poor base, which is this is not an app that

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 2>is like broadly trusted with anything other than to entertain.

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, And that is a good point, and we

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 3>will end on that. The only thing I'll say, though,

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 3>because I don't want to. I don't want Tree to

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 3>leave here totally dispirited. Is his point on not dismissing

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 3>something that Musk has come up with. I think it's fair.

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 3>We've learned the hard way not to out of hand

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 3>dismiss anything he dials up.

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 6>That's true.

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I feel like we actually have all along

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 2>been been articulating on this podcast saying that you know,

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 2>this X thing, there are ways that it can make.

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 3>The money back.

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 6>We've been talking about this AI thing for like a year.

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm glad we all end an agreement.

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know about that tree. Thanks for joining us.

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Max Greator is always pleasure to be here.

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:00.800
<v Speaker 3>This episode was produced by Stacy Wang and Masa Rakas

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 3>is our editor, and Rayhan Harmansi, our senior editor. The

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 3>idea for this very show also came from Rayhan. Blake

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Maples handles engineering, and Dave Purcell factchecks. Our supervising producer

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 3>is Magnus Henrickson. The elon In theme is written and

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:19.720
<v Speaker 3>performed by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Sugiura. Brendan Francis Newnham

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 3>is our executive producer, and Sage Bauman is the head

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 3>of Bloomberg Podcasts. A big thanks to our supporters Joe

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Weber and Bradstone. I'm David Papadopolis. If you have a minute,

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 3>rate and review our show, it'll help other listeners find us.

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 3>See you next week.