1 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:08,520 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. What a day, Haunty, 2 00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:09,600 Speaker 1: what a day? 3 00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 2: Another day, another crazy day. I don't know. I'm I'm 4 00:00:14,360 --> 00:00:17,200 Speaker 2: I'm getting a little tired. Is tired of the words? 5 00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:21,000 Speaker 1: I'm not, I'm exhilarated. I am not getting tired. I 6 00:00:21,040 --> 00:00:22,640 Speaker 1: think this is why we get up in the morning. 7 00:00:22,640 --> 00:00:26,400 Speaker 1: But as we are talking right now, which is April third, 8 00:00:26,880 --> 00:00:28,480 Speaker 1: nas X down four point eight percent. 9 00:00:29,040 --> 00:00:32,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, obviously this is all because of Liberation Day and 10 00:00:33,360 --> 00:00:37,400 Speaker 2: Donald Trump announcing his new reciprocal tariffs, which turned out 11 00:00:37,400 --> 00:00:39,880 Speaker 2: to be a lot worse than a lot of professional 12 00:00:39,920 --> 00:00:42,440 Speaker 2: analysts and economists had been expecting. 13 00:00:43,080 --> 00:00:46,440 Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm sure the market's just totally taken aback, Tom Orleck. 14 00:00:46,680 --> 00:00:48,440 Speaker 1: How surprised were you by yesterday? 15 00:00:49,320 --> 00:00:52,479 Speaker 3: We took him seriously, but not seriously. 16 00:00:56,800 --> 00:00:57,760 Speaker 1: I did a dead lest. 17 00:00:57,760 --> 00:01:02,160 Speaker 2: I'm both the most popular trader, most successful trader at Citadel. 18 00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:03,400 Speaker 3: That is going viral. 19 00:01:03,640 --> 00:01:04,480 Speaker 2: Uh barges. 20 00:01:04,600 --> 00:01:06,759 Speaker 1: This isn't after school special, except. 21 00:01:06,360 --> 00:01:08,920 Speaker 2: I've decided I'm going to base my entire personality going 22 00:01:08,920 --> 00:01:12,160 Speaker 2: forward on campaigning for a strategic pork reserve in the US. 23 00:01:12,400 --> 00:01:13,000 Speaker 3: Black goal. 24 00:01:13,240 --> 00:01:15,840 Speaker 2: These are the important question. Is it robots taking over 25 00:01:15,880 --> 00:01:16,440 Speaker 2: the world? No. 26 00:01:16,520 --> 00:01:19,399 Speaker 1: I think that like in a couple of years, the 27 00:01:19,480 --> 00:01:21,680 Speaker 1: AI will do a really good job of making the 28 00:01:21,720 --> 00:01:24,760 Speaker 1: Odd Lots podcast. One day that person will have the 29 00:01:24,800 --> 00:01:25,680 Speaker 1: mandate of heaven. 30 00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:28,160 Speaker 2: How do I get more popular and successful? 31 00:01:28,400 --> 00:01:29,600 Speaker 3: We do have the. 32 00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:33,959 Speaker 2: You're listening to lots More where we catch up with 33 00:01:34,000 --> 00:01:36,760 Speaker 2: friends about what's going on right now, because. 34 00:01:36,480 --> 00:01:39,400 Speaker 1: Even when the Odd Lots is over, there's always lots. 35 00:01:39,160 --> 00:01:41,959 Speaker 2: More And we really do have the perfect guest. 36 00:01:45,840 --> 00:01:49,279 Speaker 3: So on the campaign trail, Trump was talking about sixty 37 00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:53,160 Speaker 3: percent tariffs on China, twenty percent tariffs on everybody else, 38 00:01:53,480 --> 00:01:56,440 Speaker 3: and I think the reaction from wool Street and the 39 00:01:56,480 --> 00:02:01,120 Speaker 3: reaction from most in the economics profession will this is 40 00:02:01,240 --> 00:02:04,000 Speaker 3: red meat for the campaign trail. This is not a 41 00:02:04,120 --> 00:02:08,680 Speaker 3: serious proposal. The US economy, the global economy, the global 42 00:02:08,720 --> 00:02:12,240 Speaker 3: trade system wouldn't be able to survive tariffs at this level. 43 00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:15,919 Speaker 3: And now here we are on April third, one day 44 00:02:15,960 --> 00:02:19,480 Speaker 3: after Liberation Day, and we've got tariffs at that level 45 00:02:19,760 --> 00:02:22,839 Speaker 3: for China. If you add it up, tariffs may even 46 00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:25,520 Speaker 3: be a bit higher than sixty percent. So it's a 47 00:02:25,600 --> 00:02:28,080 Speaker 3: huge shock. And I think the question people are going 48 00:02:28,160 --> 00:02:31,680 Speaker 3: to be asking is what's being liberated from what is 49 00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:36,680 Speaker 3: the US being liberated from unfair trade practices from China 50 00:02:36,919 --> 00:02:40,400 Speaker 3: and Europe? Or are US workers about to be liberated 51 00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:44,280 Speaker 3: from their jobs and US investors liberated from their returns? 52 00:02:44,639 --> 00:02:48,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, kind of two different outcomes there, Tom, you were 53 00:02:48,800 --> 00:02:50,960 Speaker 2: at our Washington, DC event. 54 00:02:50,720 --> 00:02:52,320 Speaker 3: You think, by the way, thank you. 55 00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:55,760 Speaker 2: You gave this great presentation showing some of your favorite 56 00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:58,120 Speaker 2: charts at the moment, and you kind of made the 57 00:02:58,160 --> 00:03:02,040 Speaker 2: point that when it comes to trade, the US has 58 00:03:02,080 --> 00:03:06,600 Speaker 2: some legitimate grievances. Can you kind of walk us through that, 59 00:03:06,919 --> 00:03:10,000 Speaker 2: especially in relation to China? And then also if you 60 00:03:10,280 --> 00:03:14,600 Speaker 2: think these tariffs are actually going to start alleviating some 61 00:03:14,639 --> 00:03:15,560 Speaker 2: of those grievances. 62 00:03:17,200 --> 00:03:20,000 Speaker 3: So I think it's interesting, Tracy, if we go back 63 00:03:20,040 --> 00:03:24,480 Speaker 3: to the nineteen nineties, it was the kind of unipolar 64 00:03:24,520 --> 00:03:28,440 Speaker 3: moment for the United States. Right the Soviet Union had collapsed, 65 00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:32,880 Speaker 3: China was still an early stage of its development. Its 66 00:03:32,919 --> 00:03:35,880 Speaker 3: GDP was a kind of tiny fraction of that of 67 00:03:35,880 --> 00:03:40,680 Speaker 3: the United States, and so the argument for free markets 68 00:03:41,040 --> 00:03:44,600 Speaker 3: really made a lot of sense. Let's have low tariff barriers. 69 00:03:45,480 --> 00:03:48,440 Speaker 3: US firms are the most competitive firms in the world. 70 00:03:48,680 --> 00:03:52,000 Speaker 3: They're going to be the biggest winners from low trade barriers, 71 00:03:52,320 --> 00:03:55,800 Speaker 3: and guess what additional bonus if we trade with China. 72 00:03:56,200 --> 00:03:58,920 Speaker 3: That's going to be a force for market reform in China, 73 00:03:59,240 --> 00:04:03,000 Speaker 3: and maybe the whisper it quietly a force for democratic 74 00:04:03,080 --> 00:04:07,280 Speaker 3: reform in China. That's not how things played out. Over 75 00:04:07,320 --> 00:04:11,200 Speaker 3: the years that followed. China developed really quickly up to 76 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:14,600 Speaker 3: the point where it became a rival to the United 77 00:04:14,600 --> 00:04:18,360 Speaker 3: States for that biggest economy in the world, biggest geopolitical 78 00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:21,680 Speaker 3: power spot. And China didn't reform its economy, it didn't 79 00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:24,880 Speaker 3: become more market based, and it certainly didn't reform its 80 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:30,040 Speaker 3: political system. And the US had a huge trade deficit, 81 00:04:30,360 --> 00:04:33,360 Speaker 3: and a lot of that trade deficit was with China. 82 00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:36,919 Speaker 3: So jobs were being lost, opportunities teas were being lost, 83 00:04:36,960 --> 00:04:39,839 Speaker 3: and even worse, they were being lost to America's biggest 84 00:04:39,880 --> 00:04:42,599 Speaker 3: geopolitical rival. And that just doesn't make a huge amount 85 00:04:42,600 --> 00:04:45,080 Speaker 3: of sense. And I think the Trump team and Trump 86 00:04:45,120 --> 00:04:48,160 Speaker 3: himself deserve a bunch of credit for calling that out 87 00:04:48,560 --> 00:04:52,240 Speaker 3: back in twenty sixteen and saying, this isn't the deal 88 00:04:52,279 --> 00:04:54,839 Speaker 3: we signed up for in the nineteen nineties, This isn't 89 00:04:54,880 --> 00:04:56,800 Speaker 3: the deal we signed up for when we invited China 90 00:04:56,839 --> 00:05:01,400 Speaker 3: into the wto something has to change. Question is, well, 91 00:05:01,640 --> 00:05:05,200 Speaker 3: now we've got these sweeping tariffs, is this going to 92 00:05:05,360 --> 00:05:10,599 Speaker 3: deliver the realignment which Trump wants or could there be 93 00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:14,599 Speaker 3: a sort of significant adverse consequence for the United States. 94 00:05:14,880 --> 00:05:17,400 Speaker 3: Could the United States end up just cutting itself off 95 00:05:17,640 --> 00:05:21,000 Speaker 3: from the rest of the world and actually accelerating its 96 00:05:21,040 --> 00:05:24,719 Speaker 3: own decline, its own fading as a global power, rather 97 00:05:24,800 --> 00:05:28,240 Speaker 3: than restoring American greatness as President Trump intents. 98 00:05:28,560 --> 00:05:30,599 Speaker 1: Well, right now, if you look at the market, it's 99 00:05:30,640 --> 00:05:33,640 Speaker 1: clearly the latter and the tariffs are not just on China. 100 00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:37,760 Speaker 1: They're on countries that many people would say are friends 101 00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:42,000 Speaker 1: or allies, or countries that have not risen an industrial 102 00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:44,279 Speaker 1: might at the expense of the United States. 103 00:05:44,200 --> 00:05:47,719 Speaker 2: Narrow New Yeah Island in the South. 104 00:05:48,520 --> 00:05:51,720 Speaker 1: You know, you started your answer by saying, when this 105 00:05:51,880 --> 00:05:54,440 Speaker 1: was thrown out on the campaign trail, it was perceived 106 00:05:54,440 --> 00:05:57,200 Speaker 1: that the global trading system could never survive something like this. 107 00:05:57,760 --> 00:06:00,200 Speaker 1: We don't know. Maybe there will be renegotiations. So the 108 00:06:00,279 --> 00:06:02,839 Speaker 1: White House is not giving that indication as of the 109 00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:05,000 Speaker 1: time we're talking about this. They're not indicating that they're 110 00:06:05,040 --> 00:06:07,119 Speaker 1: going to back trackers of the market. They're not saying 111 00:06:07,160 --> 00:06:09,680 Speaker 1: this is the start of deal talks. Can the global 112 00:06:09,839 --> 00:06:14,120 Speaker 1: trading system survive the level of tariffs that we see, 113 00:06:14,320 --> 00:06:15,760 Speaker 1: assuming this is what's said. 114 00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:20,760 Speaker 3: So it's a difficult question to answer because we just 115 00:06:20,839 --> 00:06:26,080 Speaker 3: haven't seen such big tariffs introduced in recent history, so 116 00:06:26,600 --> 00:06:29,680 Speaker 3: we don't have much data we can use to estimate 117 00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:34,040 Speaker 3: the impact. That said, we're making best efforts. What we've 118 00:06:34,080 --> 00:06:37,320 Speaker 3: done is we've taken a computable general equilibrium model of 119 00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:40,160 Speaker 3: the global economy. Is the same model which some of 120 00:06:40,200 --> 00:06:43,760 Speaker 3: the economists that the World Trade Organization use, and we've 121 00:06:43,839 --> 00:06:47,080 Speaker 3: used it to estimate the impact of this tariff shock. 122 00:06:47,320 --> 00:06:49,559 Speaker 3: And if we focus for a moment on the China 123 00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:53,800 Speaker 3: piece of it, well, if you put sixty percent China 124 00:06:53,880 --> 00:06:57,480 Speaker 3: tariffs into the model, it tells you that that pretty 125 00:06:57,560 --> 00:07:02,160 Speaker 3: much wipes out US China trade. And that's pretty consequential, right, 126 00:07:02,480 --> 00:07:07,240 Speaker 3: the world's two biggest economies, a Chinese economy, which is 127 00:07:07,480 --> 00:07:11,880 Speaker 3: the home to major US supply chains for Apple and others. 128 00:07:12,080 --> 00:07:15,040 Speaker 3: If those two economies just stop trading with each other, 129 00:07:15,600 --> 00:07:18,800 Speaker 3: that's a huge, huge shock to the system. Thinking about 130 00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:21,680 Speaker 3: the rest of the world, well, most places haven't been 131 00:07:21,760 --> 00:07:26,360 Speaker 3: hit by such high tariffs, but still a pretty significant shock. Europe, 132 00:07:26,440 --> 00:07:30,200 Speaker 3: for example, now facing twenty percent tariffs when they sell 133 00:07:30,240 --> 00:07:33,080 Speaker 3: to the United States. If you plug that into the 134 00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:36,720 Speaker 3: big model, well that tells you europe exports to the 135 00:07:36,840 --> 00:07:40,680 Speaker 3: United States dropped by around fifty percent. So these are 136 00:07:40,920 --> 00:07:46,520 Speaker 3: huge consequential negative shocks to the global trade system. 137 00:07:46,640 --> 00:07:49,840 Speaker 2: When it comes to inflation, I mean, lots of economists 138 00:07:49,880 --> 00:07:53,280 Speaker 2: right now are ratcheting up their inflation forecasts and ratcheting 139 00:07:53,360 --> 00:07:57,880 Speaker 2: down their GDP forecast. To your point on inflation, how 140 00:07:57,960 --> 00:08:02,160 Speaker 2: much of the ultimate results the increase in prices of 141 00:08:02,600 --> 00:08:06,760 Speaker 2: imports into America. How much does that depend on companies 142 00:08:07,280 --> 00:08:10,640 Speaker 2: absorbing the costs? And how do you go about trying 143 00:08:10,680 --> 00:08:13,080 Speaker 2: to analyze that because it seems kind of, you know, 144 00:08:13,280 --> 00:08:14,360 Speaker 2: a bit of a wild card. 145 00:08:15,360 --> 00:08:17,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think it's a huge uncertainty. So if we 146 00:08:17,600 --> 00:08:21,080 Speaker 3: think about Trump one and the trade war with China, 147 00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:25,120 Speaker 3: back then, a couple of things happened. So firstly, we 148 00:08:25,360 --> 00:08:29,560 Speaker 3: had dollar appreciation and that offset some of the impact 149 00:08:29,720 --> 00:08:35,840 Speaker 3: of the tariffs. Secondly, we had transshipment, so China carried 150 00:08:35,880 --> 00:08:38,360 Speaker 3: on selling to the United States, but the goods went 151 00:08:38,400 --> 00:08:40,960 Speaker 3: through Vietnam or they went through Mexico, and that meant 152 00:08:40,960 --> 00:08:46,520 Speaker 3: they dodged the tariffs. And thirdly, we had retailers absorbing 153 00:08:46,920 --> 00:08:49,800 Speaker 3: some of the shock in lower margins rather than passing 154 00:08:49,800 --> 00:08:52,760 Speaker 3: them on to consumers. So all of these things meant 155 00:08:53,280 --> 00:08:56,480 Speaker 3: tariffs on China went up twenty five percent, but the 156 00:08:56,600 --> 00:08:59,840 Speaker 3: US consumer didn't really feel the shock, and I think 157 00:08:59,840 --> 00:09:02,520 Speaker 3: that maybe how the Trump administration are thinking about it 158 00:09:02,559 --> 00:09:05,480 Speaker 3: this time around. This time around, though, I think there's 159 00:09:05,520 --> 00:09:09,560 Speaker 3: going to be some pretty significant differences. So the first 160 00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:13,720 Speaker 3: difference is, well, the economic textbooks tell us when you 161 00:09:13,760 --> 00:09:17,520 Speaker 3: apply tariffs, the dollar should appreciate, but guess what, this 162 00:09:17,600 --> 00:09:21,120 Speaker 3: time round, it is depreciating. So that isn't gonna offset 163 00:09:21,240 --> 00:09:24,480 Speaker 3: tariffs shock on inflation. It's going to amplify the tariff 164 00:09:24,520 --> 00:09:28,840 Speaker 3: shock on inflation. Secondly, this time round is not just China, 165 00:09:29,240 --> 00:09:31,800 Speaker 3: it's everybody. Everybody's being hit with the shock at the 166 00:09:31,840 --> 00:09:36,679 Speaker 3: same time. And that means that that transhipment strategy, sending 167 00:09:36,720 --> 00:09:39,760 Speaker 3: goods via Mexico or Vietnam, that's not going to work. 168 00:09:39,800 --> 00:09:43,079 Speaker 3: You're still going to get hit with tariffs. And then thirdly, well, 169 00:09:43,080 --> 00:09:46,080 Speaker 3: if you're hitting everybody at the same time, can a 170 00:09:46,120 --> 00:09:50,280 Speaker 3: Walmart or a target really absorb all of that in 171 00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:52,480 Speaker 3: narrower margins or is it just going to have to 172 00:09:52,520 --> 00:09:55,280 Speaker 3: start passing it on to the consumer. So the experience 173 00:09:55,320 --> 00:09:59,600 Speaker 3: in the Trump term. Trump's first term was tariff shock, 174 00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:03,520 Speaker 3: no impact on consumer prices in the United States. This 175 00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:06,719 Speaker 3: time round, well, it's difficult to say. There's a lot 176 00:10:06,720 --> 00:10:08,960 Speaker 3: of variables at work, but I think this is going 177 00:10:09,040 --> 00:10:13,040 Speaker 3: to be a stagflationary shock, pretty significant hit to US growth, 178 00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:16,920 Speaker 3: pretty significant boost to US inflation. And that's why we're 179 00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:20,200 Speaker 3: seeing this fierce stock market sell off today and the 180 00:10:20,320 --> 00:10:23,000 Speaker 3: US coming out worse than pretty much anybody else. 181 00:10:23,600 --> 00:10:25,959 Speaker 1: So crazy, Yeah, especially when you look at US versus 182 00:10:25,960 --> 00:10:28,760 Speaker 1: every other stock market and how much everyone how much 183 00:10:28,760 --> 00:10:31,160 Speaker 1: more optimistic people are about the rest of the world. 184 00:10:31,360 --> 00:10:33,520 Speaker 1: You know, there's this vision right that on the other 185 00:10:33,640 --> 00:10:36,840 Speaker 1: side that there's pain now that we get to the 186 00:10:36,840 --> 00:10:39,720 Speaker 1: other side, that there's this reindustrialization, and Trump talked about 187 00:10:39,760 --> 00:10:42,600 Speaker 1: it yesterday. We're going to make great cars with us 188 00:10:42,640 --> 00:10:44,400 Speaker 1: this state of the art manufacturer, We're going to build 189 00:10:44,480 --> 00:10:45,240 Speaker 1: chips again, all this. 190 00:10:45,520 --> 00:10:48,160 Speaker 2: The sunlit uplands manufacturing. 191 00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:52,320 Speaker 1: What would have to happen for these tariffs to actually 192 00:10:52,400 --> 00:10:55,560 Speaker 1: translate into or because like I'm fine with taking some 193 00:10:55,600 --> 00:10:58,200 Speaker 1: short term pain to be like one of the most advanced, 194 00:10:58,200 --> 00:11:01,760 Speaker 1: technologically prosperous countries on the I see all those propaganda 195 00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:04,000 Speaker 1: videos out of China with the drones and the cars. 196 00:11:04,040 --> 00:11:06,680 Speaker 1: I'm like, yeah, I want that here. I'm susceptible to 197 00:11:06,760 --> 00:11:09,000 Speaker 1: that too. I want like all that stuff produced here. 198 00:11:09,400 --> 00:11:12,040 Speaker 1: What would have to happen to go from today to 199 00:11:12,440 --> 00:11:13,000 Speaker 1: that vision. 200 00:11:14,600 --> 00:11:17,120 Speaker 3: Well, it's a tough one, Joe. So I think Trump 201 00:11:17,160 --> 00:11:22,000 Speaker 3: will point to the pledges from Apple and TSMC and 202 00:11:22,240 --> 00:11:25,880 Speaker 3: Nvidia and Hyundai and others to make massive investments in 203 00:11:25,920 --> 00:11:29,120 Speaker 3: the United States and say, look, it's working. I made 204 00:11:29,160 --> 00:11:32,719 Speaker 3: the tariff threat. Everyone's bringing their jobs and their factories 205 00:11:32,720 --> 00:11:35,120 Speaker 3: back to the United States. I think it's probably a 206 00:11:35,160 --> 00:11:38,600 Speaker 3: bit more complicated than that. Wages in the US are 207 00:11:38,679 --> 00:11:43,120 Speaker 3: much higher than wages in China or Vietnam or Mexico. 208 00:11:43,800 --> 00:11:47,440 Speaker 3: Infrastructure in the United States, well, there's not been a 209 00:11:47,480 --> 00:11:52,120 Speaker 3: lot of investment in manufacturing infrastructure here over recent decades. 210 00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:56,520 Speaker 3: Supply chains stretch across borders. If you're going to impose 211 00:11:56,600 --> 00:12:00,080 Speaker 3: massive tariffs, actually makes it harder to manufacture in the 212 00:12:00,160 --> 00:12:02,720 Speaker 3: United States because factories are going to have to pay 213 00:12:02,760 --> 00:12:07,200 Speaker 3: that tariff to get crucial inputs and of course the 214 00:12:07,360 --> 00:12:11,480 Speaker 3: uncertainty which Trump has introduced into the system, and which 215 00:12:11,520 --> 00:12:14,520 Speaker 3: he sees is crucial to get deals done well. That 216 00:12:14,640 --> 00:12:18,320 Speaker 3: uncertainty makes it harder to plan, makes it harder to 217 00:12:18,400 --> 00:12:21,400 Speaker 3: make long term investment decisions, and that makes it harder 218 00:12:21,400 --> 00:12:24,880 Speaker 3: to reshore manufacturing as well. So it's striking to me 219 00:12:25,280 --> 00:12:28,320 Speaker 3: if you look at all of those companies which said 220 00:12:28,320 --> 00:12:32,320 Speaker 3: we're making massive investments in the United States, Apple five 221 00:12:32,400 --> 00:12:36,440 Speaker 3: hundred billion dollars, TSMC one hundred billion dollars. If you 222 00:12:36,440 --> 00:12:38,480 Speaker 3: look at what happened to the share price of those 223 00:12:38,480 --> 00:12:42,760 Speaker 3: companies on the day after the announcement, basically didn't move right, 224 00:12:42,840 --> 00:12:45,480 Speaker 3: basically didn't move. And I think what that tells us 225 00:12:45,800 --> 00:12:50,200 Speaker 3: is that markets investors are pretty skeptical. They see those announcements, 226 00:12:50,400 --> 00:12:53,960 Speaker 3: perhaps as good government relations by those companies currying favor 227 00:12:54,000 --> 00:12:57,120 Speaker 3: with the White House, rather than the big change in 228 00:12:57,200 --> 00:13:01,520 Speaker 3: corporate strategy that we'd have to see if manufacturing was 229 00:13:01,600 --> 00:13:03,280 Speaker 3: really going to come back to the US. 230 00:13:03,559 --> 00:13:06,160 Speaker 2: Yeah, and on the topic of investment, there's no physical 231 00:13:06,200 --> 00:13:11,080 Speaker 2: offset either. I mean, the administration is extending the tax cuts, 232 00:13:11,160 --> 00:13:14,360 Speaker 2: that's basically the existing status quo. So it's not like 233 00:13:14,440 --> 00:13:17,040 Speaker 2: the government is going to be funding a sudden roll 234 00:13:17,080 --> 00:13:20,800 Speaker 2: out of investment to try to boost these industries. You 235 00:13:20,920 --> 00:13:25,680 Speaker 2: mentioned stagflation earlier, Tom, what does the FED do in 236 00:13:25,800 --> 00:13:27,199 Speaker 2: response to stagflation? 237 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:30,880 Speaker 3: So it's a tough one. 238 00:13:30,920 --> 00:13:36,200 Speaker 1: Tracy keep saying that, how do we get it's going 239 00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:37,840 Speaker 1: to be tough to keep going? 240 00:13:38,520 --> 00:13:40,520 Speaker 3: A lot of tough ones in our future. You know, 241 00:13:40,840 --> 00:13:43,679 Speaker 3: this is the biggest tariff hike that we've seen in 242 00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:46,400 Speaker 3: the United States going back over the course of one 243 00:13:46,440 --> 00:13:51,280 Speaker 3: hundred years, and it takes tariff to their highest level 244 00:13:51,600 --> 00:13:54,760 Speaker 3: in one hundred years. So this is an absolutely enormous 245 00:13:54,760 --> 00:13:57,800 Speaker 3: shock to the system. So I feel like somewhat justified. 246 00:13:58,360 --> 00:14:03,160 Speaker 3: Are you are? So it's a tough one. And so 247 00:14:03,200 --> 00:14:06,120 Speaker 3: if you're the FED, you see growth coming down, you 248 00:14:06,120 --> 00:14:09,120 Speaker 3: see unemployment going up, you want to cut interest rates. 249 00:14:09,520 --> 00:14:13,960 Speaker 3: But you see inflation rising because import prices are going up, 250 00:14:14,520 --> 00:14:16,720 Speaker 3: and so you want to raise interest rates. So what's 251 00:14:16,760 --> 00:14:19,680 Speaker 3: the impulse? What's the kind of the major impulse? Which 252 00:14:19,680 --> 00:14:23,240 Speaker 3: one do you follow? Well, some of the messaging which 253 00:14:23,240 --> 00:14:26,760 Speaker 3: we've been hearing from Chair Powell is that the tariff 254 00:14:27,040 --> 00:14:30,760 Speaker 3: impact on inflation, well it could be transitory. If I 255 00:14:30,800 --> 00:14:32,840 Speaker 3: was Chair Powell personally, I wouldn't be using the terb 256 00:14:32,880 --> 00:14:35,480 Speaker 3: transitory anymore. I think you kind of use that one 257 00:14:35,520 --> 00:14:37,800 Speaker 3: up in the post COVID shock. But there we are. 258 00:14:37,960 --> 00:14:41,200 Speaker 3: There's the idea that the tariff impact on inflation is 259 00:14:41,240 --> 00:14:43,480 Speaker 3: going to be transitory, and so what you have to 260 00:14:43,520 --> 00:14:46,520 Speaker 3: respond to is the impact on growth, and so that 261 00:14:46,560 --> 00:14:49,840 Speaker 3: would suggest the impulse for the FED is going to 262 00:14:49,840 --> 00:14:53,480 Speaker 3: be more rate cuts. That said, there's a bunch of 263 00:14:53,560 --> 00:14:56,200 Speaker 3: uncertainty out there. We don't know how big the growth 264 00:14:56,280 --> 00:14:58,280 Speaker 3: shock's going to be, we don't know how big the 265 00:14:58,280 --> 00:15:01,560 Speaker 3: inflation shock's going to be, don't know if inflation expectations 266 00:15:01,560 --> 00:15:05,520 Speaker 3: are going to move. If we see inflation expectations staying high, 267 00:15:05,920 --> 00:15:08,960 Speaker 3: well that will be a sign that the tariffshock and 268 00:15:09,040 --> 00:15:11,760 Speaker 3: inflation isn't going to be transitory. And the FED is 269 00:15:11,800 --> 00:15:14,160 Speaker 3: going to be tracking all of these things and weighing 270 00:15:14,160 --> 00:15:14,880 Speaker 3: them in the balance. 271 00:15:28,640 --> 00:15:33,240 Speaker 2: So we've established that it's tough. At a minimum, what 272 00:15:33,320 --> 00:15:37,640 Speaker 2: are you looking out for in terms of economic indicators 273 00:15:37,960 --> 00:15:41,040 Speaker 2: or I don't know, even corporate anecdotes to see which 274 00:15:41,080 --> 00:15:42,360 Speaker 2: way things are going to go? 275 00:15:43,840 --> 00:15:45,280 Speaker 3: So I think there's a few things we're going to 276 00:15:45,280 --> 00:15:47,400 Speaker 3: be looking for in the days ahead. So the first 277 00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:52,520 Speaker 3: one is going to be the retaliate or kaw tao 278 00:15:52,760 --> 00:15:56,920 Speaker 3: choice for other countries. Right, do we see China and 279 00:15:57,040 --> 00:16:01,480 Speaker 3: Europe and Japan saying, Okay, we don't want these tariffs. 280 00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:03,080 Speaker 3: Tell us what you want and we'll give it to 281 00:16:03,120 --> 00:16:05,640 Speaker 3: you and you can take the tariffs away. Or do 282 00:16:05,720 --> 00:16:08,800 Speaker 3: we see them saying you give us tariffs, We're going 283 00:16:08,840 --> 00:16:11,160 Speaker 3: to give you tariffs right back. And if it's that 284 00:16:11,240 --> 00:16:15,840 Speaker 3: retaliation path, that's going to amplify the impact. Second thing 285 00:16:15,880 --> 00:16:18,480 Speaker 3: I think we'll be looking for is whether the Trump 286 00:16:18,560 --> 00:16:22,560 Speaker 3: administration just pivots because of the markets. Right, we've got 287 00:16:22,560 --> 00:16:26,480 Speaker 3: the Nasdaq down more than four percent today. If that 288 00:16:26,600 --> 00:16:29,720 Speaker 3: slide continues into the end of the week into next week, 289 00:16:29,880 --> 00:16:32,480 Speaker 3: if we see a very significant and sustained market fall, 290 00:16:33,000 --> 00:16:36,640 Speaker 3: it's possible, then we'll see that Trump put come into play. 291 00:16:37,160 --> 00:16:39,480 Speaker 3: And then in terms of indicators we're going to be 292 00:16:39,520 --> 00:16:41,720 Speaker 3: looking at well, of course, we're going to be tracking 293 00:16:41,920 --> 00:16:45,560 Speaker 3: the important export numbers. Another important one to look at 294 00:16:45,880 --> 00:16:48,560 Speaker 3: is going to be the import price data. That's going 295 00:16:48,600 --> 00:16:50,920 Speaker 3: to tell us how much of this cost is being 296 00:16:50,960 --> 00:16:54,440 Speaker 3: absorbed by foreign factories and how much of it is 297 00:16:54,480 --> 00:16:59,200 Speaker 3: being passed through to US retailers. And potentially the US consumer. 298 00:16:59,720 --> 00:17:04,080 Speaker 3: By the way, is also the US voter. And mid terms, 299 00:17:04,359 --> 00:17:08,840 Speaker 3: well twenty twenty six not that far away, Tracy. 300 00:17:08,840 --> 00:17:11,960 Speaker 1: Can I just say two things that yesterday. One is 301 00:17:12,240 --> 00:17:14,000 Speaker 1: they knew this was gonna slam the market. 302 00:17:14,080 --> 00:17:15,000 Speaker 2: Oh yeah, and they did it. 303 00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:17,280 Speaker 1: Anyway, this is a really big deal to me because 304 00:17:17,320 --> 00:17:20,280 Speaker 1: this is not usual on his American politics. Some might 305 00:17:20,320 --> 00:17:22,840 Speaker 1: even look at that say I'm impressed, right, because you're like, well, 306 00:17:22,880 --> 00:17:25,199 Speaker 1: for once we have a president who is not so 307 00:17:25,600 --> 00:17:27,800 Speaker 1: obsessed with the market. I don't know, I'm just saying. 308 00:17:28,680 --> 00:17:31,240 Speaker 2: In his speech he also talked about how much stock 309 00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:34,960 Speaker 2: price is in his first term, which is you can't 310 00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:35,840 Speaker 2: have it both ways. 311 00:17:36,200 --> 00:17:38,480 Speaker 1: I thought that too, and then I just think it's man, 312 00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:42,320 Speaker 1: we had this multiple years of really high inflation, and 313 00:17:42,400 --> 00:17:44,920 Speaker 1: the first thing that the new president does is push 314 00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:46,840 Speaker 1: up the price of anything. It's really funny. 315 00:17:47,240 --> 00:17:49,720 Speaker 2: Tom. I have one more question for you. This is 316 00:17:49,760 --> 00:17:52,600 Speaker 2: a very important one. It's a bit of a loaded question, 317 00:17:52,720 --> 00:17:55,719 Speaker 2: but here goes. How much fun did you have at 318 00:17:55,720 --> 00:17:57,119 Speaker 2: our Washington, DC event? 319 00:17:58,480 --> 00:18:02,320 Speaker 3: Just an absolutely enormous of fun, Tracy. And my message 320 00:18:02,320 --> 00:18:05,159 Speaker 3: to od Loots listeners is, if Joe and Tracy come 321 00:18:05,200 --> 00:18:08,080 Speaker 3: to your time, snap up a ticket immediately. We didn't 322 00:18:08,119 --> 00:18:08,840 Speaker 3: plan that. 323 00:18:08,840 --> 00:18:16,360 Speaker 1: That was amazing. That was a perfect answer. Lots More 324 00:18:16,440 --> 00:18:19,040 Speaker 1: is produced by Carmen Rodriguez and dash Ol Bennett, with 325 00:18:19,040 --> 00:18:21,080 Speaker 1: help from Moses Ondam and kil Brooks. 326 00:18:21,480 --> 00:18:24,639 Speaker 2: Our sound engineer is Blake Maples. Sage Bauman is the 327 00:18:24,640 --> 00:18:26,080 Speaker 2: head of Bloomberg Podcasts. 328 00:18:26,520 --> 00:18:29,840 Speaker 1: Please rate, review, and subscribe to Odd, Lots and lots 329 00:18:29,880 --> 00:18:32,760 Speaker 1: More on your favorite podcast platforms. 330 00:18:32,520 --> 00:18:35,280 Speaker 2: And remember that Bloomberg subscribers can listen to all our 331 00:18:35,320 --> 00:18:39,959 Speaker 2: podcasts ad free by connecting through Apple Podcasts. Thanks for listening.